WO2003075135A1

WO2003075135A1 - User login delegation

Info

Publication number: WO2003075135A1
Application number: PCT/US2002/006536
Authority: WO
Inventors: Dwayne Mercredi; Rod Frey; Gregory C. Jensen
Original assignee: Saflink Corporation
Priority date: 2002-03-01
Filing date: 2002-03-01
Publication date: 2003-09-12
Also published as: AU2002254100A1; EP1481304A1

Abstract

An apparatus (10), method and program product (42) logs a delegate user into an account of a principal user on behalf of the principal in response to authentication code, such as biometric data, correlated to the delegate user. Actions taken by the delegate while within the account of the principal may be recorded for evaluation and accountability considerations. Delegate user(s) privileged to access the account of the principal are added and deleted to a profile (44) as necessary to facilitate controlled sharing of resources.

Description

User Login Delegation

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to identity authentication

technologies, and more particularly, to using authentication technologies and

techniques to control access to electronic data.

Background of the Invention

Considerations regarding the safeguarding of computer resources have become ubiquitous throughout industry, government and private channels.

Typical security measures require a user to sign on (i.e., log in) to a computer or

network by providing a user ID and an authentication code, such as a password, identification card, smart card, token device, or biometric data (fingerprint,

retinal scan, voice, or the like). If the authentication code given at the time of log-on is verified to that which was previously stored for that user ID, then the person seeking to sign on is given access to the computer or network, or portion thereof, as is customary. An area of concern arises, however, where a user (referred to herein as a "principal user") wishes to allow someone else to

sign on as the delegate of the principal user. For example, a busy executive

may want one or more assistants to actually sign on to the system as the executive. This type of delegated access presents some unique concerns.

For example, in the password environment, a principal user may simply tell the delegate the principal user's password which thus allows

the delegate to sign on as the principal user. Such password sharing is fraught

with problems, not the least of which is the security risk created by giving out passwords. Similarly, in the identification card or token environment, a

principal user may simply loan the principal user's identification card to the

delegate which thus allows the delegate to sign on as the principal user. Such

identification card sharing is fraught with problems, not the least o fwhich is

the security risk created by loaning identification cards. On the other hand,

biometric systems generally preclude the ability for a principal user to allow a

delegate to access the system on behalf of the principal user. The unique

nature of biometric data simply does not lend itself to "sharing". Moreover, when a delegate accesses the system as if he were the principal user by using a shared password, identification card, or other authentication code, there is no audit trail to show who was actually accessing the system.

Summary of the Invention

The present invention provides an authentication mechanism

which can allow a delegate to access a networked system on behalf of a

principal user without the above-mentioned drawbacks. To this end, and in

accordance with the principles of the present invention, both a principal user's authentication code and an authorized delegate's authentication code are associated with the principal user's ID. When a user attempts to log on to the network with a given user ID, the authentication code given by that user may

be compared with the principal's stored authentication code for that ID, and if

a match is determined, then it is determined that the principal is logging on

and access is given accordingly.

If there is no match, then the delegate's stored authentication

code for that principal's ID is evaluated for a match. If there is such a match,

then the delegate is given access as if the delegate were the principal user, or

may be given partial access to those aspects of the computer or network to which the principal would otherwise have broader access. Alternatively, all stored authorization codes associated with a principal user may be examined, and access given either as the principal or the delegate if a match is found. As a consequence, when the delegate seeks access on behalf of the principal, in a password-based system, there is no need for the principal to share a password; in an identification card or token-based system, there is no

need for the principal to loan a token; and in a biometric-based system, the

delegate's own biometric data may be used. Thus, the security problems

created by password sharing and identification card and token loaning are reduced or eliminated. Similarly, the inability to allow delegated access in a

biometric system is overcome.

In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the

delegate to a principal may also be a separate principal on the system

associated with that delegate's ID for conventional access by the delegate to the delegate's own account.

With the foregoing, it is also possible, if desired, to create a log

of delegate access. To this end, if this feature is employed, when a delegate is

given access on behalf of a principal user, a log may be created to record that

fact. The log may also record data or program access events, lock/unlock events, logout events, and otherwise track the usage by the delegate on behalf of the principal.

By virtue of the foregoing there is thus provided an improved

mechanism which can allow a delegate to access a networked system on behalf of a principal user in a mamier that addresses above-identified shortcomings of known authentication systems. These and other objects and advantages of the

present invention shall be made apparent from the accompanying drawings and the description thereof.

Brief Description of the Drawing

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention

and, together with the general description of the invention given above and the

detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.

Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a networked computer system

consistent with the invention;

Fig. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary hardware and

software environment for a computer from the networked computer system of

Fig. 1;

Fig. 3 is a flowchart outlining method steps suited for execution

within the enviromnents of Figs. 1 and 2;

Fig. 4 is a dialog box having application within the process

steps of Fig. 3; and

Fig. 5 is a flowchart illustrate process steps associated with the

login delegation steps of Fig. 3. Detailed Description of Drawings

With reference generally to Fig. 1, there is shown a system 10

configured to allow a delegate user to access an account of a principal user in the name of that principal user. More particularly, the exemplary system 10

enables access by the delegate to the principal's account using the capture

authentication code of the delegate user. Capture authentication code refers

generally to a password, token or biometric signature received at a computer. Preferably, such capture authentication code comprises a biometric identification record (BIR) of the delegate user. However, it should be noted at the onset of this disclosure that the principles of the present invention apply

equally to other authentication techniques, to include passwords and

authentication tokens.

Generally, the delegate user may use a keypad, mouse, microphone, electronic notepad and/or some other input device to designate a principal user in response to a computer prompt or other interface. The

biometric device or other authenticating teclinique used to verify the identity

or otherwise login the delegate may be programmatically determined as product of prior use and network/user preference. Additional considerations may include system and/or hardware mandates and stipulations. The account of the principal user contains data, programs, or other resources to be accessed by the delegate user on behalf of the principal user. Morever, the delegate may have been approved or granted a privilege to access the account as the principal. To this end, an administrator or the principal may add login

information pertaining to the delegate to a profile of the principal. Such

mformation preferably includes stored BIR data, but may alternatively

comprise a password or authentication token.

The stored BIR or other authentication code may be recalled in response to the delegate presenting capture BIR data. The capture BIR data

prompts the program code to initiate retrieval of the stored BIR data and other

information associated with the user from the network or hard drive of the

local computer. This provision facilitates login processes by enabling a direct comparison between the stored and capture BIR data. In one embodiment,

stored BIR data for each delegate user assigned to the profile of the principal

can be recalled in sequential order. Alternatively or in addition, the stored BIR

data can be recalled according to its frequency of use or some related

chronological scheme. As such, the capture BIR data may be sequentially evaluated against the stored authentication codes, which are recalled for the purpose of finding a match.

If no match can be established after all stored authentication

codes have been evaluated against the capture BIR data, then the delegate is

denied access to the account of the principal. However, if the capture authentication code correlates to a set of stored BIR data, then the delegate is permitted to enter the account of the principal as the principal user. A log or other record of actions taken by the delegate during the session is maintained

for purposes of accountability and system analysis. In this manner, the principal may share data and other resources with the delegate in a secure

environment with minimum risk of compromise to password and

authentication systems.

These and other exemplary embodiments in accordance with

the principles of the present invention are described below in detail. Of note,

although a network is shown in Fig. 2 for the purpose of illustrating the

functionality of an exemplary application of the invention, other embodiments consistent with the principals of the present invention may suitably include

machines isolated from any network connection.

Hardware and Software Environment ,

Fig. 1 shows an exemplary computer system 10 suitable for

controlling access of privileged delegates to an account of a principal via a computer 20 adapted to communicate with a network 18. As such, computer

system 10 is illustrated as a networked system that includes one or more client computers 12, 14 and 20 (e.g., lap top, desktop or PC-based computers, workstations, etc.) coupled to server 16 (e.g., a PC-based server, a

minicomputer, a midrange computer, a mainframe computer, etc.) through a

network 18. Network 18 represents a networked interconnection, including, but not limited to local-area, wide-area, wireless, and public networks (e.g., the Internet). Moreover, any number of computers and other devices may be

networked through network 18, e.g., multiple servers. Significantly, the present invention may have particular application when a computer 12, 14, 20

becomes disconnected from the network 18.

User computer 20, which maybe similar to computers 12, 14,

may include: a central processing unit (CPU) 21, a number of peripheral components such as a computer display 22, a storage device 23, a printer 24,

and various input devices (e.g., a mouse 26, keyboard 27) to include biometric

login devices. Those skilled in the art will recognize that biometric devices

compatible with the present invention are not limited to the exemplary devices shown in Fig. 1, which include a fingerprint scanner 17 and microphone 19. Consequently, suitable input devices may comprise any mechanism configured

to receive BIR data. For that matter, the principles of the present invention are

applicable to all other forms of authenticating data or verifying identities.

Accordingly, suitable input devices to user computer 20 may

additionally or alternatively embody one or mores devices configured to receive a password or authenticating token, such as a microchip embedded card or key. Server computer 16 may be similarly configured, albeit typically

with greater processing performance and storage capacity as is well known in

the art. Fig. 2 illustrates a hardware and software environment for an

apparatus 30 suited to delegate access to electronic data by using an account of a principal in a manner consistent with the principles of the invention. For

exemplary purposes and within the context of this disclosure, apparatus 30

may represent a computer, computer system or other programmable electronic device, including: a client computer (e.g., similar to computers 12, 14 and 20

of Fig. 1), a server computer (e.g., similar to server 16 of Fig. 1), a portable

computer, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), an embedded controller, etc.

Apparatus 30 will hereinafter also be referred to as a "computer," although it

should be appreciated the term "apparatus" may also include other suitable

programmable electronic devices consistent with the invention.

Computer 30 typically includes at least one processor 31

coupled to a memory 32. Processor 31 may represent one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), and memory 32 may represent the random access

memory (RAM) devices comprising the main storage of computer 30, as well

as any supplemental levels of memory, e.g., cache memories, non-volatile or

backup memories (e.g., programmable or flash memories), read-only

memories, etc. In addition, memory 32 may be considered to include memory storage physically located elsewhere in computer 30, e.g., any cache memory in a processor 31, as well as any storage capacity used as a virtual memory, e.g., as stored within a database 37 or on another computer coupled to

computer 30 via network 38.

Computer 30 also may receive a number of inputs and outputs

for communicating information externally. For interface with a user, computer 30 typically includes one or more input devices 33 (e.g., a keyboard, a mouse,

a trackball, a joystick, a touchpad, smartcard slot, retinal/fingerprint scanner,

token detector and/or a microphone, among others) and a display 34 (e.g., a

CRT monitor, an LCD display panel, and/or a speaker, among others). It should be appreciated, however, that with some implementations of computer

30, e.g., some server implementations, direct user input and output may not be

supported by the computer or system protocol, and interface with the computer

may be implemented through a client computer or workstation networked with computer 30.

For additional storage, computer 30 may also include one oi^¬ more mass storage devices 36 configured to store a biometric database 37.

Exemplary devices 36 can include: a floppy or other removable disk drive, a

hard disk drive, a direct access storage device (DASD), an optical drive (e.g., a CD drive, a DVD drive, etc.), and/or a tape drive, among others. Furthermore, computer 30 may include an interface with one or more networks 38 (e.g., a

LAN, a WAN, a wireless network, and/or the Internet, among others) to permit

the communication of information with other computers coupled to the network. It should be appreciated that computer 30 typically includes suitable analog and/or digital interfaces between processor 31 and each of components

32, 33, 34, 36 and 38.

Computer 30 operates under the control of an operating system

40, and executes various computer software applications, components,

programs, objects, modules, etc. (e.g., delegate program 42, biometric authentication program 43, delegate profile program 44, Human

Authentication Application Programming Interface (HA- API) 51 and

authenticating device determination software 50, among others). Of note, HA-

API 51 regards an exemplary programming interface supplied by biometric

service providers that provides enrollment and verification services for installed biometric devices. Moreover, various applications, components,

programs, objects, modules, etc. may also execute on one or more processors

in another computer coupled to computer 30 via a network 38, e.g., in a

distributed or client-server computing environment, whereby the processing required to implement the functions of a computer program may be allocated to multiple computers over a network.

h general, the routines executed to implement the

embodiments of the invention, whether implemented as part of an operating

system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions will be referred to herein as "computer programs," or simply "programs." The computer programs typically comprise one or more

instructions that are resident at various times in various computer memory and

storage devices. When a program is read and executed by a processor, the program causes the computer to execute steps or elements embodying the

various aspects of the invention.

Moreover, while the invention has and hereinafter will be

described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems,

those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments of the

invention are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of

fonns, and that the invention applies equally regardless of the particular type

of signal bearing media used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples

of signal bearing media include, but are not limited to recordable type media

such as volatile and non- volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., CD-ROM's, DVD's, etc.), among

others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication

links.

hi addition, various programs described hereinafter may be identified based upon the application for which they are implemented in a specific embodiment of the invention. However, it should be appreciated that

any particular program nomenclature that follows is used merely for convenience, and thus the invention should not be limited to use solely in any

specific application identified and/or implied by such nomenclature.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that the exemplary environments illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2 are not intended to limit the present

invention. Indeed, those skilled in the art will recognize that other alternative

hardware and/or software environments may be used without departing from

the scope of the invention.

User Delegation

The flowchart of Fig. 3 illustrates an exemplary embodiment

for biometrically controlling access of a user with regard to the hardware and

software environments of Figs. 1 and 2. Generally, BIR delegation calls for

allowing a delegate user access to electronic data associated with an account of

a principal user. More specifically, the delegate accesses the account and

associated data as the principal user. Prior to such access, a delegate profile is established for the principal user. A suitable profile may contain a listing of preapproved delegates, or users privileged to enter the account of the principal.

Morever, an authentication code correlated to each of the delegates may be stored in a manner accessible to the local computer or networked server

running the delegate program 42 of Fig. 2. As discussed below in detail,

program code may initiate a comparison of this stored authentication code against the capture authentication code of a user attempting to login as a delegate. The result of the comparison may determine whether or not the user

will access the account of the principal.

Turning more particularly to the flowchart of Fig. 3, a user

activates or otherwise initiates normal startup processes at a computer terminal at block 52. For instance, the user may boot or turnon the computer while initiating proprietary software resident on the machine. For example, system

protocol may require all users to depress a sequence of keyboard symbols to

stimulate program execution. In response, the computer may activate

programming associated with an applicable operating system and user

delegation 43 at block 54. In one embodiment, the program may initially query a server, operating system, or user input to determine if user delegation

is available. If so, the program may initiate a display or display option

configured to prompt a user to fiirther initiate delegation processes at block 54. At block 54, a user desiring to login to the account of a

principal indicates a wish to do so by initiating programmed instructions configured to guide the user through a delegation login session. For instance, the delegate user may click on a button or check a dialog box labeled "User

Delegate Login." Alternatively or in addition, a system administrator may

have previously configured the computer and/or network such that the computer software automatically determines that the user delegation feature is enabled at block 52. In either case, the computer accessed by the user recognizes at block 54 of the illustrated embodiment that user delegation has

been enabled. Regarding block 54, some computers and networks may not require such initialization processes, and may rather allow the user to proceed

directly to block 56. Of note, should user delegation be disabled for the computer at block 54, the conventional login sequence for the computer may

be invoked at block 88.

The program code initiates a display of program options at

block 56 in response to an action by the user at block 54 indicating a desire to

login as a delegate. One such option may include a listing of principal users. That is, a drop-down list of principal users having profiles allowing for

delegate users to log into their account on their behalf may be displayed. To this end, the program at block 56 may retrieve at the top of the list of

principals, those who have most recently had a delegate access their account in their name. Such a configuration may accommodate those delegates who

login with the greatest frequency for an ongoing project. That is, such a setup

could save the delegate from having to scroll down a long list of principals. Of note, statistics compiled for this purpose can be measured locally on the machine at which the delegate user attempts to access the account, or they may

alternatively reflect overall network use. As such, the computer may display

the list of principals in the fonn of a drop-down screen box. An administrator may set the number of user ID's displayed according to application and performance considerations.

As such, a delegate user may scroll down the drop-down box to

select the name of an applicable principal user at block 58. If the name of a

principal user sought by the delegate is not displayed by the computer at block

56, the embodiment may present the user with the option of typing the principal's name into a text field. Although not shown in Fig. 3, another

embodiment may require the delegate user to provide their own ID subsequent

or even prior to selecting the ID of the principal.

Fig. 4 shows a suitable dialog box having such a text field 77

and drop-down box 75. As shown in Fig. 4, the user may submit the name of the principal 85 by depressing the "OK" button 83. The user may alternatively

end a login session by selecting the "Cancel" button 87. In one embodiment,

the dialog box may further include a password login option 79. As such, a delegate user may access the account of the principal using the conventional

password option so long as allowed by the system administrator. Another embodiment may require users to access the account of a principal using their

own conventional password.

One embodiment may programmatically deteπnine which, if

any, available devices can be utilized by the user to gain access^' to the account of the principal. At blocks 60-72, program code determines a set of allowable biometric login devices based on settings relating to the computer, principal

user and overarching system mandates. Other considerations can include

hardware availability, user preference and prior usage of the authenticating equipment. Thus, steps 60-72 represent one exemplary sequence for

triangulating or weighting a biometric login selection process toward system

and user preferences. Of note, one embodiment will apply these factors

equally to all users attempting to access an account, whether as a delegate or a principal user.

More particularly, the program code may initially access a local

BIR policy for the machine at which the user desires to login at block 60.

Such a policy may be stored on the local hard drive or may be accessible via

the network. Program code at block 60 may evaluate the accessed infonnation to determine if a policy has been established for the accessed computer. A

policy may include a preprogrammed preference or mandate for a biometric testing device established by an administrator or a prior user for that machine.

Should a connection to the network be established, the computer may similarly

query the server for a biometric testing device setting(s).

Of note, should no setting be available at block 60 via the server, the program may substitute a default preference. The default setting, as discussed herein, may track a compilation of available biometric devices on

the machine. The policy may further be specific to user delegation applications. Alternatively at block 60, the absence of a setting may cause the program to force the user to provide a conventional password or other non- biometric instrument of authentication.

Similarly at block 62, the BIR policy for the principal user may

be evaluated. A user BIR policy may be preset in a database field associated

with a relevant account of the principal user. The field or other indicator may mandate one or more devices that are suitable for login with regard to the

principal user. Such a setting can act as a default, or statistical preference for a

particular user, directing the computer to select a single or ordered group of biometric devices from among the available devices.

Global settings for a network, subsystem and/or group of user

accounts can then be queried by the program code at block 64. An administrator, security or account manager can designate groupings of machines or users having particular security requirements. Tags relating to

these requirements or settings may be programmatically attached to a database field associated with the designated grouping. Program code at block 64 can

then access these fields to obtain security settings applicable to a grouping of

machines, users or a system implicated in a delegate login scenario.

At block 66, an accounting is made of which biometric or other

authentication devices are currently installed on the computer from which the

user seeks to access the account of the principal. For instance, program code may evaluate which biometric devices are installed and available on the local machine at block 66 of Fig. 3. For instance, the local computer of the user

may be equipped with both fingerprint and retinal biometric testing devices.

Proprietary programs associated with conventional biometric testing devices

place a marker within a registry of the computer upon installation and de-

installation. This registry provides a mechanism for the embodiment to assess available devices at block 66. In an instance where the computer is in

communication with the network, the computer may alternatively check the

server to obtain status information pertinent to available biometric devices.

Should no acceptable or preferred biometric testing device be located on the

computer at block 66, an embodiment of the software may, as above, relegate the user to login using a conventional password if the option is available at

block 82.

Another factor that can determine which, if any, biometric device will be made available to capture BIR data of the user concerns whether

a principal user has previously enrolled using the equipment determined to be

available at block 66. Consequently, program code may initiate such a

determination at block 68. That is, the computer may determine whether

biometric login on an available device has ever taken place on the computer

with regard to the principal user desiring access using the collection of devices available at the terminal. If not, then the user may again be relegated to the password entry of block 82.

Should the computer alternatively detennine that the user has previously logged in using a biometric device detected at block 66, then the

user delegation program may next determine whether more than one biometric

login device is available on the machine at block 70. Of note, should only one

biometric device be available and previously accessed, the program may initiate authentication processes directly at block 88. If none of the available

equipment has been previously used at block 68, then the user may be

relegated to logging in using their password at block 82. Should no such

password login procedure be enabled by the an administrator at block 82, then the login session may be ended at block 86. As such, a display may appear on the screen viewed by the user informing them that the login session was

unsuccessful and suggesting that they contact a system administrator.

If only one biometric login device candidate remains after the

screening processes of blocks 60-68, then biometric processes associated with that device are initiated at block 88. As such, the user may be presented with a

biometric interface configured to guide the user through a process of submitting a capture BIR. Should the program code alternatively determine

that more than one biometric login device is available at block 70, then

another database field may be checked to see if a preference for one of the available devices has been designated at block 72. For example, a database

field associated with an account of the principal may indicate a mathematical preference for a retinal scanner. As such, a retinal seamier will be a default

choice of the programming code in the absence of other input. As discussed

below, such a preference may be set during a prior computer session.

If such a preference is indicated at block 72, then the biometric

login interface applicable to the preferred login device may be presented directly to the user at block 88. That is, should the program detect a preferred

setting at block 72 that corresponds to a conforming BIR capture device, then it may initiate testing sequences associated with the preferred biometric device at block 88.

Should no single, biometric testing preference be recorded for

the user at block 72, then one embodiment may prompt the user to select a biometric testing sequence at block 76 from a listing displayed at the terminal at block 74. More specifically, program code may initiate the display at block

74 of a listing of those previously-used biometric devices available on the

local machine that conform to the user, machine and global settings prescribed

in blocks 60-68. As such, the user may select one or more biometric verification processes by typing in or clicking on a device displayed at block

74. In addition to selecting a login device, the user may also set a

preference for later sessions at block 78. For instance, a user may stipulate a

preference for logging in using a fingerprint scanner. Should such a preference be designated at block 78, then that fingerprint scanner preference

will be recorded at block 80. As such, the program code can recall the preference at block 72 of a subsequent session. Alternatively, the user may not

wish to set a preference at block 78, or an administrator may disable such an

option, altogether. In either case, a software interface particular to the

biometric login device selected at block 76 presents itself to the user at block 88.

Program code may retrieve software associated with the

designated biometric in preparation of the biometric challenge at block 88.

The program then launches the designated/preferred biometric test according

to the preset parameters of the biometric verification sequence. That is, should the preferred biometric testing device be thus available and approved, the user

may be prompted to provide appropriate capture BIR data at block 88. More

particularly, the program may initiate and display a user interface screen

configured to cause the user to provide the preferred and appropriate biometric

testing data. For instance, a fingerprint authentication application may prompt the user, "Please place finger on pad." At block 90, the user may provide the appropriate capture BIR data. The computer, in turn, collects the capture BIR data according to the

known biometric login sequence appropriate to the preferred testing device.

That is, the user submits a capture BIR according to the applicable BIR

mechanism and software at block 90. As discussed herein, devices suited to receive such data can include a fingerprint or retinal scanner, DNA sampler,

camera, radiation detector, microphone and any other known biometric

collection device. Morever, while the embodiment discussed in conjunction

with Fig. 3 basically concerns biometric logins, another embodiment may

utilize a non-biometric authenticating procedure such as tokens or passwords.

In response to collecting the capture BIR data at block 90, the

software may recall at block 92 a set of stored BIR data correlated to the principal user. Because in the present scenario the user is attempting to login

as a delegate, the stored BIR data will not match the capture BIR data at block

94. However, program code consistent with the principles of the present invention may nonetheless allow for such a comparison to accommodate

instances where the principal desires to conventionally log into their own account. Thus, the embodiment is consistent with and accommodates known

login authenticating systems, techniques and practices. As such, the principal

can access their own account at block 84 in accordance with conventional

login sequences. In response to an unsuccessful match at block 94, program code will check a database field associated with the principal to see if the profile of

the principal is configured for delegated login at block 96. Such a designation

may have been accomplished back at block 54. If not, then the user may be

directed to attempt a login sequence at block 82 using their conventional

password. Should such an access mechanism be unavailable to the user at block 82, then the session may be ended in a manner analogous to that

described above in connection with block 86.

If the account profile of the principal user has been set up for

delegated login, then the program code may retrieve stored BIR data correlated to a first delegate at block 98. As discussed below in greater detail, the delegate is a user privileged by the principal or a system administrator to

access the account of the principal as the principal user. The delegate can in

this manner perfonn duties and review data in the name of and with the full or

partial pennissions the principal.

For efficiency purposes, the first delegate evaluated by the

program code may be the delegate who most frequently accesses the account

of the principal. As such, the program code may attempt to verify the capture BIR data using a retrieved history of recent logins. That is, the program may

begin evaluating the stored authentication code in chronological order beginning with the most recent delegated user to access the account of the principal. As such, the program may sequentially evaluate stored BIR data

until a numerical match is detected. Another embodiment in accordance with the invention may select stored BIR data of the delegate user to login based on

the explicit delegate user ID entered in block 54, or of one who is

programmatically designated to be retrieved first for efficiency or protocol

purposes.

The stored BIR data of the first delegate is compared against

the capture BIR data at block 102. Should the match be unsuccessful, then the program code may retrieve stored BIR data correlated to another delegate user

included within the profile of the principal user at block 98. As contemplated

in this disclosure, this second set of stored BIR data could relate to a delegate

user who statistically accesses the account of the principal with the second most frequency. In consideration of memory and processing time, one

embodiment may limit the delegate users for which authentication code is

recalled to around five to ten. However, an administrator may increase or

decrease the volume of BIR data stored/retrieved according to application

requirements and CPU resource availability.

The processes of blocks 98-102 may repeat as necessary until it has either sequenced through the stored BIR data of all potential delegate users

or a match is realized at block 102. Should the verification process be unsuccessful at block 102, one embodiment of the program code may relegate the user to any available password login procedures back at block 82, or the

login session may end altogether at block 86. Another embodiment may send

the user back to block 76 to select from the same or other available biometric

login devices. Of note, the respective login protocol may allow for multiple authentication attempts at block 102 before ending a session.

Alternatively, should a match be realized at block 102, then the

delegate user is granted access to the account of the principal at block 84 as the

principal. That is, the delegate user gains access upon matching and

evaluation processes of block 102 numerically or otherwise establishing that the accessing user is the delegate user associated with the stored BIR data. In response to a match, an embodiment of the program code may transparently

recall and present any ID or password infonnation associated with the matched

BIR that is required by an operating system. This feature fulfills vendor and

system requirements while liberating an accessing user from password/ID

redundancies.

In any case, information pertaining to actions taken by the

successful delegate user can be recorded within a log or other memory for

analysis and accountability purposes. For instance, the times associated with the login and logout of the accessing delegate user may be recorded within the

log at block 112, along with information relating to locking and unlocking a computer screen, as well as launching protected application programs. The flowchart of Fig. 5 includes processes suited to establish

and/or update a profile of a principal utilized by the processes of the user

delegation embodiment stepped out in Fig. 3 to detennine delegate privileges.

As discussed above, such a profile may be stored in association with a

principal user within local or network memory and may include a listing of delegate users privileged to access their account as the principal user. The

profile can additionally contain links or memory structure configured to recall

stored BIR data correlated to the delegate users.

Generally, the sequenced steps outlined in Fig. 5 represent an exemplary session for adding or deleting delegates to a profile of a principal

user in a manner that is in accordance with the principles of the present

invention. At block 120, an administrator, a principal or other authorized

individual may initialize system processes. For instance, the individual may

activate or otherwise initiate normal startup sequences to include rebooting or

turning on the computer. Software resident on the machine or network

configured to update a profile of a principal may be initiated, accordingly. At block 122, the user may select a programmatic object or

other memory structure associated with the principal by designating a link-

field, or subroutine configured to call up properties and other infonnation concerning an account of the principal. For instance, the user may click on an

applicable button or text with a computer mouse. In response, program code may display properties of the account to the user at block 124. From among

these account properties, the user may select a tab or field labeled, "Delegate Window" at block 126. In response, program code may initiate a display of all

delegate users privileged to access the account of the principal at block 128.

The display may comprise a drop-down list of names or other descriptors

designating individual or groups of users. For instance, a grouping of delegates assigned to an account may comprise participants in a project

development team.

The principal, administrator, or other authorized user may add a

delegate user to the account of the principal at block 130. Assuming all

administrative permissions and any required background checks have been accomplished, program code may evaluate at block 131 whether the intended delegate is already registered on the operating system or network. If so, the

user may merely link to and/or download identifying infonnation that has

previously been stored onto the network and that pertains to the delegate.

Such identifying information retrieved at block 133 preferably includes a stored BIR in addition to other login data. This feature promotes efficient and

safe avenues of data and resource sharing by capitalizing on preexisting data and links inherent to the system.

Where permissible, the administrator or other authorized user can alternatively enroll the delegate in the system at block 134 and 135. For instance, the user may cause enrolhnent BIR data of the delegate to be

captured or downloaded at block 134. This enrollment can be stored at block

135 for later use in verifying the identity of the delegate as a user authorized to

access the account of the principal. Of note, it may not be desirable or

compatible with system security requirements for the delegate to be enrolled

within the context of Fig. 5. Consequently, another embodiment may supplant

the functionality of steps 134 and 135 with an enor message to the user that effectively ends the session and instructs them to consult system regulations or management/administrative personnel to first register as a user on the

operating system or network so the evaluation at block 131 will succeed.

Should the BIR data correlating to the delegate be available via

either of blocks 133 or 135, then the name, ID or other designator of the delegate can be added to the domain listing of delegates displayed in

conjunction with the profile of the principal. Accordingly, pennissions

associated with the applicable operating systems are transparently aligned at

block 138 to enable the added delegate access to the account of the principal.

Conversely, the user may remove a delegate from a principal's profile as required by persom el and project status developments at block 132. As such, an administrator may click or otherwise select a listed identifier correlated to the delegate user and displayed within the delegate window.

Thus selected, the administrator may click on button that deletes the name of the former delegate user from the profile listing at block 140. Links and other

information pertaining to the former delegate are accordingly removed from

the operating system, account, processor, memory and/or other resources of the principal user at block 142. As such, the fonner delegate user can no

longer access the account of the principal using delegation processes. In this

mamier, the profile of the principal user may be updated to remain current with project and system security requirements. As above, any action taken with

regard to the properties of the principal's account, including adding and deleting delegate users, is recorded at block 144 prior to the session ending at

block 146.

While the present invention has been illustrated by the

description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been

described in considerable detail, it is not intended to restrict or in any way

limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages

and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. For example,

a program of the invention may encrypt biometric data, conventional passwords and other infonnation at any step delineated in the flowcharts of

Figs. 3 and 5. Morever, the sequence of the steps in the flowcharts of Figs. 3 and 5 could be altered, to include omitting certain processes without

conflicting with the principles of the present invention. Morever, related or known processes can be incorporated to complement those discussed herein. For example, a delegate user could proffer their identity to the operating system prior to logging in as a delegate. As such, the user could select their

user ID from a drop-down list affiliated with the principal. Program code

could initiate the immediate retrieval of stored BIR data associated with the submitted user ID for comparison against the capture BIR data as above.

Should a match be determined, then the user would login to the account of the principal as a delegate. Such a configuration could save processing cycles

spent in cycling through stored BIR data of all eligible delegates assigned to a

principal. Furthermore, one skilled in the art should appreciate that any of

the embodiments and associated programs discussed above are compatible with all known authenticating processes and may further be optimized to

realize even greater efficiencies. For instance, a program that locally stores

BIR data in response to a successful login may be complimented by the present invention. Such a program may cause an accessing user to provide capture BIR data to a local computer when accessing a network server. One embodiment of the present invention may retrieve and locally store the

enrollment BLR data of a delegate user at the computer from the server

following a successful login as the principal by the delegate user. Such enrollment data may have application for facilitating remote and accelerated user access. The general process of locally storing biometric data in response to a successful login is disclosed in International Application No. PCT/USOl/30458, which was filed on September 28, 2001, is entitled

"Biometric Record Caching," and is hereby incorporated by reference in its

entirety. Another embodiment consistent with the principles of the

present invention allows a delegate user to biometrically access a computer on behalf of a principal user without first providing another source of

identification. As above, that general concept was first disclosed in

International Application No. PCT/USOl/30458, which was filed on

September 28, 2001, is entitled "Biometric Record Caching," and is hereby

incorporated by reference in its entirety. Within the context of the present invention, a delegate user's first interaction with a machine may comprise the

placement of an index finger onto a scanner in communication with the

computer. Similarly, a microphone coupled to the computer may recognize

the voice pattern of the accessing user without first requiring identification

infonnation. Program software ranning on the computer compares capture BIR data to stored enrollment BIR data and determines if a match is present.

In the event of such a match, the program may retrieve and configure an ID and password associated with the enrollment BIR data to verify privileged

access status to the account of the principal. Morever, while one embodiment described herein concerns a networked operation, one skilled in the art will appreciate the principles of the present invention apply equally to stand-alone computers as well. The

invention in its broader aspects is, therefore, not limited to the specific details,

representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and

described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept.

Having described the invention, what is claimed is:

Claims

1. A method of controlling access to electronic data,

comprising: receiving capture authentication code from a user desiring access to an account of a principal user;

determining if the capture authentication code received from

the user matches within predetermined parameters a set of stored

authentication code correlated to the principal user; if there is such a match of the capture authentication code, permitting the user access to the account of the principal user; and

if the match is not established, detennining if the capture

authentication code received from the user matches within predetermined

parameters a set of authentication code conelated to a delegate user privileged

to access the account of the principal user.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising denying the user

access to the account of the principal user in response to the capture

authentication code not matching within the predetennined parameters the set of authentication code conelated to the delegate user.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising granting the user access to at least a portion of the account of the principal user on behalf of the

principal user in response to the capture authentication code matching within

the predetermined parameters the set of authentication code correlated to the

delegate user.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein granting the user access to

the account further includes granting the user restricted access to the account.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising storing infonnation within a memory for later use, the infonnation pertaining to an

action made by the user while operating within the account of the principal

user.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the action is selected from among a group consisting of at least one of: logging in, logging out, locking a computer, unlocking the computer, launching protected application programs,

viewing data and inputting data.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein detennining if the capture authentication code received from the user matches the set of authentication code correlated to the delegate user privileged to access the account of the principal user as the principal user further includes retrieving the set of

authentication code from a remote network server.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising locally storing the set of authentication code correlated to the delegate for future use in response to the capture authentication code received from the user matching

within predetermined parameters the set of authentication code conelated to

the delegate user privileged to access the account of the principal user as the

principal user.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising encrypting the

set of authentication code conelated to the delegate.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising recalling a

profile associated with the principal user.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising assigning

identifying information associated with the user to the profile.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising deleting

identifying information associated with the user from the profile.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving authentication

code further includes selecting a biometric device used to enter the capture

authentication code based upon selection criteria, wherein the selection criteria relates to considerations selected from a group consisting of at least one of: a user preference, a user privilege, a default machine setting, a default network

setting, prior usage, an administrative command, system processing time, and

device and system availability.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein detennining if the capture authentication code received from the user matches within predetennined

parameters the set of authentication code conelated to the delegate user further

includes retrieving a recently used set of authentication code.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a first user ID associated with a first user selected from a group consisting of at least

one of: the principal user and the delegate user.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising receiving a

second user ID associated with a second user selected from a group consisting of at least one of: the principal user and the delegate user.

17. A method of selecting a BIR capture device to receive

capture BIR data from a user from among a plurality of BIR capture devices,

comprising: programmatically determining a first BLR capture device of the

plurality of BIR capture devices from a user setting established for the user,

wherein the user setting indicates a partiality to at least the first BIR capture

device;

programmaticafiy detennining a second BIR capture device of

the plurality of BIR capture devices from a machine setting particular to a

computer, wherein the machine setting indicates a partiality to at least the

second BIR capture device;

programmatically determining a third BIR capture device of the plurality of BIR capture devices from a global setting designating a preference

for at least the third BIR capture device; and if the first, second and third BIR capture devices conespond to

at least one BIR capture device that confonns to the user, machine and global

settings, receiving capture authentication code from the at least one BIR

capture device.

18. A method of controlling access to electronic data, comprising: receiving capture authentication code from a user desiring

access to an account of a principal user;

determining if the capture authentication code received from

the user matches a set of stored authentication code conelated to a group

consisting of at least one of: a principal user and a delegate user; if there is such a match of the capture authentication code,

pennitting the user access to at least a portion of the account of the principal

user on behalf of the principal user.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising denying the user access to the account of the principal user in response to the capture

authentication code not matching within the predetermined parameters a set of

stored authentication code conelated to a group consisting of at least one of:

the principal user and the delegate user.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein pennitting the user

access to the account of the principal user as the principal user further includes

recording an identifier communicative of an identity of the user.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein permitting the user access to the account of the principal user as the principal user further includes storing information within a memory for later use, the infonnation pertaining

to an action made by the user while operating within the account of the

principal user.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein detennining if the

capture authentication code received from the user matches a set of stored authentication code conelated to a group consisting of at least one of: a

principal user and a delegate user, further includes retrieving a recently used

set of authentication code.

23. An apparatus, comprising: a memory; a database resident within the memory, the database storing respective sets of authentication codes, a first set of authentication code

conelated to a principal user and a set conelated to a delegate user having

privileged access to an account of the principal user;

program code configured to receive capture authentication code from a user desiring access to the account of the principal user and to

detennine if the capture authentication code received from the user matches

within predetermined parameters the set of stored authentication code

conelated to the principal user; if there is such a match of the capture

authentication code, the program code further pennitting the user access to the account of the principal user; and if the match is not established,

the program code being configured to detennine if the capture authentication code received from the user matches within predetennined parameters the set

of authentication code conelated to the delegate user privileged to access the

account of the principal user as the principal user.

24. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates denying the user access to the account of the principal user in

response to the capture authentication code not matching within the predetermined parameters the set of authentication code conelated to the delegate user.

25. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program code initiates granting the user access to the account of the principal user as

the principal user in response to the capture authentication code matching

within the predetennined parameters the set of authentication code conelated

to the delegate user.

26. The apparatus according to claim 25, wherein the program code initiates granting the user access to the account further includes granting

the user restricted access to the account.

27. The apparatus according to claim 25, wherein the program

code initiates storing information within a memory for later use, the infonnation pertaining to an action made by the user while operating within

the account of the principal user.

28. The apparatus according to claim 27, wherein the action is selected from among a group consisting of at least one of: logging in, logging out, locking a computer, unlocking the computer, launching protected

application programs, viewing data and inputting data.

29. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates retrieving the set of authentication code conelated to the

delegate user privileged to access the account of the principal user from a

remote network server.

30. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates locally storing the set of authentication code conelated to the

delegate for future use in response to the capture authentication code received from the user matching within predetennined parameters the set of authentication code conelated to the delegate user privileged to access the

account of the principal user as the principal user.

31. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates encrypting the set of authentication code correlated to the delegate.

32. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates recalling a profile associated with the principal user.

33. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the program code initiates assigning identifying information associated with the user to the

profile.

34. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the program

code initiates deleting identifying information associated with the user from

the profile.

35. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the program

code initiates selecting a biometric device used to enter the capture

setting, prior usage, an administrative command, device and system

availability and system processing time.

36. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the delegate user has

independent access to a system supporting the account.

37. A program product, comprising:

a program configured to receive capture authentication code

from a user desiring access to the account of a principal user and to detennine if the capture authentication code received from the user matches within predetermined parameters a set of stored authentication code conelated to the

principal user; if there is such a match of the capture authentication code, the

program code further permitting the user access to the account of the principal

user; and if the match is not established, the program code being configured to detennine if the capture authentication code received from the user matches within predetermined parameters a set of authentication code coιτelated to a delegate user privileged to access the account of the principal user as the

principal user; and a signal bearing medium bearing the first program.

38. The program product of claim 36, wherein the signal

bearing medium includes at least one of a recordable medium and a

transmission-type medium.