WO2003059391A2 - Viscoelastics for ocular surgery - Google Patents
Viscoelastics for ocular surgery Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003059391A2 WO2003059391A2 PCT/US2002/041247 US0241247W WO03059391A2 WO 2003059391 A2 WO2003059391 A2 WO 2003059391A2 US 0241247 W US0241247 W US 0241247W WO 03059391 A2 WO03059391 A2 WO 03059391A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- viscoelastic
- molecular weight
- polymer
- irrigating solution
- daltons
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
- A61L31/04—Macromolecular materials
- A61L31/041—Mixtures of macromolecular compounds
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/30—Macromolecular organic or inorganic compounds, e.g. inorganic polyphosphates
- A61K47/36—Polysaccharides; Derivatives thereof, e.g. gums, starch, alginate, dextrin, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, inulin, agar or pectin
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/30—Macromolecular organic or inorganic compounds, e.g. inorganic polyphosphates
- A61K47/36—Polysaccharides; Derivatives thereof, e.g. gums, starch, alginate, dextrin, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, inulin, agar or pectin
- A61K47/38—Cellulose; Derivatives thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
- A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
- A61K9/0048—Eye, e.g. artificial tears
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
- A61L31/04—Macromolecular materials
- A61L31/042—Polysaccharides
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P27/00—Drugs for disorders of the senses
- A61P27/02—Ophthalmic agents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P27/00—Drugs for disorders of the senses
- A61P27/02—Ophthalmic agents
- A61P27/04—Artificial tears; Irrigation solutions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L2430/00—Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration
- A61L2430/16—Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration for reconstruction of eye parts, e.g. intraocular lens, cornea
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of surgery utilizing viscous and/or viscoelastic materials, also known as viscosurgery.
- the invention involves inclusion of polymeric materials in irrigating solutions to enhance the performance of the viscosurgical materials by altering the rheologies thereof.
- the invention also relates to methods of using such modified irrigating solutions in conjunction with such viscous or viscoelastic materials in surgical procedures, especially ophthalmic surgical procedures.
- Viscous or viscoelastic agents used in surgery may perform a number of different functions, including without limitation maintenance and support of soft tissue, tissue manipulation, lubrication, tissue protection, and adhesion prevention. It is recognized that the differing rheological properties of these agents will necessarily impact their ability to perform these functions, and, as a result, their suitability for certain surgical procedures. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,273,056, the contents of which are by this reference incorporated herein.
- Cataracts are opacities of the natural ocular lens which generally arise in the elderly.
- the cataractous lens is surgically removed from the eye and an artificial intraocular lens is inserted in its place.
- viscoelastic materials are typically injected into the anterior chamber of the eye to prevent collapse of the anterior chamber and to protect the delicate eye tissues from damage resulting from physical manipulation.
- agents viscous or viscoelastic agents
- Viscoat ® Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
- Provisc ® Alcon
- Healon ® Healon ® GV
- Healon ® 5 Pharmacia Corporation
- Amvisc ® and Amvisc ® Plus Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
- Vitrax ® Allergan Inc. all of which contain sodium hyaluronate (hyaluronic acid and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, such as sodium hyaluronate, are some times hereinafter referred to as HA)
- HA hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
- HPMC hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
- viscoelastics may be used in cataract surgery. They are used by the skilled ophthalmic surgeon for several purposes, including maintenance of the 'anterior chamber of the eye and protection of ophthalmic tissues during surgery, particularly corneal endothelial cells, and as an aid in manipulating ophthalmic tissues.
- Viscoelastics that are dispersive tend to offer better coating and protection of delicate tissues, such as the endothelial lining of the cornea.
- Cohesive viscoelastics tend to be "stiffer” offering an advantage in soft tissue manipulation, e.g., capsulorhexis, but do not coat as well and are prone to accidental or premature aspiration. See, Miyauchi et al., "The Optimal Molecular Weight of Dispersive Type Sodium Hyaluronate for the Reduction of Corneal Endothelial Damage Induced by Sonication, Irrigation, and Aspiration," Jpn J.
- IOP intraocular pressure
- IOP spikes depending on their magnitude and duration, can cause significant and/or irreversible damage to susceptible ocular tissues, including, without limitation, the optic nerve.
- viscoelastics are typically removed from the eye just prior to the close of surgery.
- the ease with which an agent can be removed from the surgical site, typically by aspiration, has traditionally been considered an important characteristic in the overall assessment of the agent's usefulness in cataract surgery. By removing the agent before the close of surgery, the surgeon hopes to minimize or avoid any significant IOP spike.
- removal of agents which are relatively dispersive (as opposed to cohesive) or which adhere to the ocular tissue is often difficult and may cause additional trauma to the eye.
- the present invention involves supplementing the irrigating solution used in such surgeries with relatively low molecular weight polymers that, when mixed with a cohesive hyaluronate- based viscoelastic, have the effect of modifying the rheological properties, and particularly the cohesiveness, of such viscoelastic to improve its performance in surgery.
- Irrigating solutions for use in surgery and particularly ophthalmic surgery are well known. See, e.g. commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 4,443,432. It has also been suggested that viscous or viscoelastomeric substances may be added to irrigating solutions to reduce cell loss. See commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,409,904, the contents of which are by this reference incorporated herein. None in such prior art, however, discloses or suggests surface modified viscoelastics or a method of using a modified irrigating solution to effect a reduction in the cohesiveness of a hyaluronate- based viscoelastic in the manner of the present invention.
- the present invention is directed to surface modified viscoelastics and to improved methods of performing surgery, especially ophthalmic surgery, using viscous or viscoelastic agents and an irrigating solution comprising a relatively low molecular weight polymer. More specifically, the inventive methods of the present invention comprise transitioning the rheological properties (specifically viscosity and cohesiveness) of hyaluronate-based viscoelastic agents by exposing such viscoelastic agents to irrigating solutions containing low levels of relatively low molecular weight, biocompatible polymers, such as chondroitin sulfate (CS) and cellulosic polymers, especially hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC).
- CS chondroitin sulfate
- HPMC hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
- the hyaluronate-based viscoelastic at its interface with the polymer-containing irrigating solution, becomes less cohesive and, at the same time, more viscous.
- the decreased cohesiveness and increased viscosity of the surface hyaluronate interfacing the irrigating solution in situ renders it less susceptible to unintentional aspiration during the surgical procedure.
- the hyaluronate material that is more distant from such surface i.e. deeper within the bolus of material retains its original lower viscosity and higher cohesiveness, and may therefore be readily aspirated at the conclusion of the surgery.
- the skilled surgeon will be able to enjoy the positive aspects of different rheological profiles using the same hyaluronate-based material by modifying its properties at the aforementioned interface with the polymer-containing irrigating solution to suit the particular phase of the surgery, i.e., capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification or aspiration of the viscoelastic.
- compositions and methods of the present invention may be utilized in any viscosurgical procedure, and especially those in which there is concern over unintentional or premature removal of the viscoelastic material from the surgical site.
- cataract surgery the anterior chamber of the eye, i.e. the space between the iris and the corneal endothelium, is filled with viscoelastic.
- the viscoelastic serves two principal purposes: (1) maintaining the corneal dome to give the surgeon an unobstructed view of the interior surgical site, and (2) protecting the delicate endothelial cells of the cornea by coating them.
- hyaluronate-based viscoelastic as used herein means any aqueous solution of hyaluronic acid or physiologically acceptable salts thereof, which is free of any significant amount of any low molecular weight polymer. With the exception of Viscoat ® , all of the commercial HA products described above are considered hyaluronate-based viscoelastics.
- Lens removal surgery such as cataract surgery or the less common clear lensectomy, involves several different steps or phases. As previously discussed, differing rheological profiles may be preferred for the viscoelastic that is going to be used in each of those steps or phases. For example, during capsulorhexis (opening of the capsular bag to expose the clear or cataractous lens), it is desirable to have a cohesive viscoelastic for space maintenance; during phacoemulsification (ultrasonic fragmentation of the lens) it is desirable to have a dispersive viscoelastic for better coating and maneuverability; finally, during artificial lens insertion and completion of the surgery, it is desirable to have a cohesive viscoelastic both for space maintenance and ease of removal.
- Preferred methods of the present invention comprise the following steps.
- a cohesive viscoelastic like PROVISC ® Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas
- HEALON ® or HEALON GV ®
- AMVISC ® PLUS Bousch & Lomb Surgical, Claremont, California
- a small amount of polymer-containing irrigating solution is permitted to flow, without aspiration into the space separating the viscoelastic from the anterior surface of the exposed, typically cataractous lens.
- the phaco emulsification device is then engaged, without irrigation/aspiration, and the tip of the phaco emulsification handpiece is introduced into the surgical site and placed in the irrigating solution above the exposed lens. It is believed that the ultrasonic waves from the tip of the phaco emulsification handpiece will promote the mixture of the irrigating solution and the viscoelastic agent at the interface of those two substances. This will change the cohesive property of the hyaluronate-based viscoelastic in the immediate vicinity of the lens rendering the viscoelastic more dispersive. After up to twenty seconds of mixing, the phacoemulsification of the lens, with irrigation/aspiration, is completed in the ordinary manner.
- the irrigation aspiration tip may be inserted into the bolus of viscoelastic material in the anterior chamber, i.e., beyond the more dispersive surface material at the interface and into the material not affected, or less affected, by admixture with the polymer-containing irrigating solution.
- the viscoelastic material in this region remains more cohesive and is therefore easily aspirated out with minimal effort and minimal trauma to the delicate endothelial cells.
- the cohesive, hyaluronate viscoelastics suitable for use in the methods of the present invention include those commercial products identified above, and may generally be characterized as aqueous solutions containing sodium hyaluronate (of course other physiologically acceptable hyaluronate salts could also be used) having average molecular weights greater than 750,000 Daltons, preferably from about 1,000,000 to about 5,000,000 Daltons, and concentrations from about 0.5 to about 3.0% by weight.
- Irrigating solutions that may be used in the methods of the present invention include any sterile, aqueous irrigating solution suitable for surgery.
- Preferred are balanced salt solutions such as BSS ® or BSS ® Plus (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas).
- BSS ® or BSS ® Plus Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas.
- the addition of polymers to the irrigating solution may be effected in the manner described in U.S. Patent No. 5,409,904, previously incorporated by reference. Virtually any biocompatible, lower molecular weight (i.e. below about 500,000 Daltons) polymer may be used.
- Examples would include lower molecular weight fractions of the following polymers or combinations thereof: HA, CS, polyacrylamide, HPMC, proteoglycans, collagen, methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, keratin, carrageenans, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, especially sodium salts.
- Preferred polymeric components for the irrigating solution include CS and HPMC.
- the preferred, relatively low molecular weight CS suitable for purposes of the present methods would include material having an average molecular weight of less than about 100,000 Daltons, preferably from about 20,000 to about 80,000 Daltons, and most preferably from about 30,000 to about 50,000.
- Lower molecular weight HPMC used as the polymeric component of the irrigating solution in the present methods will generally have an average molecular weight below about 400,000 Daltons and, preferably from about 50,000 to about 200,000 Daltons, and most preferably from about 70,000 to about 100,000 Daltons. Concentration ranges for the polymeric components will vary depending upon the molecular weight of the polymeric component chosen, but should be maintained at levels low enough to retain the flow properties desired for an irrigating solution.
- the concentration in the irrigating solution may be from 0.1 to 10% by weight, preferably from 0.5 to about 7%, and most preferably from about 2% to about 5% by weight.
- the concentration in the irrigating solution may be from 0.05 to 5% by weight, preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.5%, and most preferably from about 0.2 to about 0.3%. Combinations of different low molecular weight polymers, as exemplified below, may also be used. In a preferred combination, the irrigating solution may contain from about 1.0 to about 3.0% by weight of CS, and from about 0.1 to about 0.3% by weight of HPMC.
- the irrigating solution in contact with the viscoelastic was then agitated to promote partial mixing by engaging the ultrasound on the ⁇ phacoemulsification handpiece tip, and placing such tip in the irrigating solution, (expression of additional irrigating solution should be avoided by lowering the irrigating solution bottle attached to the phacoemulsification unit to a height below the level of the reaction vial).
- the ultrasound mixing was continued for 20 seconds, while moving the phaco tip, to mix the solution with the viscoelastic, along with the dye.
- the irrigating solution bottle was raised and irrigation/aspiration of the colored viscoelastic mixture was commenced with ultrasound on, working as efficiently as possible. The time taken to fully aspirate the viscoelastic mixture was recorded.
- the irrigating solution was mixed here with the help of ultrasound for 20 seconds, which was likely excessive.
- the mixing is only required at the interface of the irrigating solution and the viscoelastic, so the actual time needed may be 1 second or less, as the viscosity and cohesiveness of the viscoelastic at the interface changes almost instantly upon mixing.
- a 0.85 mL syringe containing a 1.0% solution of sodium hyaluronate (marketed as PROVISO ® by Alcon) are expressed into a sterile, 5 mL syringe with a tip cap.
- 0.85 mL of the appropriate irrigating solution (containing low molecular weight polymer) is added to yield a 1 :1 ratio.
- 1.7 mL of the irrigating solution is added, and for a 1:3 ratio, 2.55 mL of the irrigating solution is added.
- the plunger is then carefully inserted into the barrel of the syringe, and the cap on the tip of the syringe is removed.
- a leur lock connector is affixed on the tip on the syringe, and another (empty) 5 mL syringe is similarly attached on other end of the leur connector.
- the contents are thoroughly mixed, by alternately pushing plungers of the two conjoined syringes. After repeating this motion a few times, the mixed material is then sonicated for 5 minutes. Finally, the material is centrifuged on a very low setting for 1 min to remove the air bubbles.
- the contents are then transferred to the plate of a Bohlin Rheometer, through a 27 gauge needle, and the low shear viscosity of the sample is determined in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
- the plunger was removed from a 10 mL sterile plastic syringe, and the cannula end was closed with a tip cap.
- the syringe was placed upright on a balance with the open end facing up by resting the syringe in a beaker.
- An appropriate amount of a 1.0% sodium hyaluronate solution (PROVISO ) was transferred into the open syringe and weighed.
- an appropriate amount of the irrigating solution of interest was similarly transferred into the open syringe and weighed.
- the irrigating solutions were BSS PLUS; BSS PLUS with 0.21% or 0.27% HPMC; and BSS PLUS containing 2% CS.
- the weight of PROVISO was adjusted such that it was in a 1:1 ratio by weight with the irrigating solution.
- the plunger was placed back into the syringe and the tip cap removed.
- a leur connector was placed on the syringe, where the tip cap had been.
- Another 10 mL empty sterile syringe was then connected to the other end of the leur connector. The contents of the syringe were thoroughly mixed by alternately pushing plungers of the conjoined syringes for 2 minutes.
- the contents were sonicated for 30 seconds. After sonication, the contents were further mixed by pushing the plungers a couple of times and the contents were then transferred into a centrifuge tube. The tube was labeled and centrifuged for 2 minutes at low speeds (e.g. 2500 rpm) to remove the air bubbles. The sample was then allowed to sit in a refrigerator overnight. The rheological profile of the product was determined the next day. Preliminary viscosity determination was made without overnight storage of the sample.
- the rheological profile was determined by using Bohlin CS Rheometer with a 4° cone and a 40 mm diameter plate (CP 4/40) at a gap width of 0.15 mm.
- the viscosity was determined at 25°C. Shear stresses between 0.06 and 139 Pa were applied.
- the corresponding shear rate and viscosity were calculated by the Bohlin software after 200 seconds of integration or whenever the system approved steady state was reached. The results are summarized as follows:
- the above-described formulation may be prepared as follows: First, the water for Injection is brought close to boiling or at boiling. The HPMC is then slowly added to the water under continuous stirring to thoroughly disperse it in the water. Then the mixture is slowly allowed to cool, stirring continuously. Once at room temperature, the mixture should start clearing up. Then the mixture is stored overnight at 4° to 8°C in an appropriate container to fully hydrate the HPMC. The following day, the remaining ingredients are added to the HPMC solution, pH of the solution is adjusted and additional water for injection is added if needed to bring the solution to final volume. The final solution is then filtered, packaged in bottles and autoclaved.
- a stock solution of HPMC (1 to 2%) may be prepared first, by an approach similar to that described above.
- HPMC is first dispersed in hot water that is close to boiling. Then the mixture is brought to room temperature and chilled to fully hydrate the HPMC. The next day, the stock solution is used as one of the components of the composition.
- An appropriate amount of stock solution is first added to cooled water for injection. This is followed by the addition of salts, and by pH and volume adjustment.
- the above-described formulation may be prepared as follows. First, the water for injection is allowed to cool to room temperature. The appropriate quantity of CS is slowly added to the water under continuous stirring to thoroughly disperse it in the water. Stirring continues until all CS is in solution. The remaining ingredients are then added sequentially to the CS solution, making sure that each such ingredient is dissolved before adding the next one. The pH and volume of the solution are then adjusted. The final solution is then sterile filtered and packaged in bottles. The solution may even be terminally sterilized by autoclaving.
Abstract
Disclosed are surface modified viscoelastics and methods of performing viscosurgery using polymer-containing irrigating solution to reduce cohesiveness of the viscoelastic agent at the interface, thereby improving its performance by reducing the occurrence of unintentional aspiration, especially in ocular surgery.
Description
VISCOE ASTICS FOR OCULAR SURGERY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of surgery utilizing viscous and/or viscoelastic materials, also known as viscosurgery. In particular, the invention involves inclusion of polymeric materials in irrigating solutions to enhance the performance of the viscosurgical materials by altering the rheologies thereof. The invention also relates to methods of using such modified irrigating solutions in conjunction with such viscous or viscoelastic materials in surgical procedures, especially ophthalmic surgical procedures.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Viscous or viscoelastic agents used in surgery may perform a number of different functions, including without limitation maintenance and support of soft tissue, tissue manipulation, lubrication, tissue protection, and adhesion prevention. It is recognized that the differing rheological properties of these agents will necessarily impact their ability to perform these functions, and, as a result, their suitability for certain surgical procedures. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,273,056, the contents of which are by this reference incorporated herein.
Cataracts are opacities of the natural ocular lens which generally arise in the elderly. In order to improve eyesight, the cataractous lens is surgically removed from the eye and an artificial intraocular lens is inserted in its place. During these surgical procedures, viscoelastic materials are typically injected into the anterior chamber of the eye to prevent collapse of the anterior chamber and to protect the delicate eye tissues from damage resulting from physical manipulation.
A number of viscous or viscoelastic agents (hereinafter "agents" or "viscoelastics") are known for ophthalmic surgical use: Viscoat® (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) which contains sodium hyaluronate and chondroitin sulfate; Provisc® (Alcon),
Healon®, Healon® GV, and Healon®5 (Pharmacia Corporation), Amvisc® and Amvisc® Plus (Bausch & Lomb, Inc.), and Vitrax® (Allergan Inc.) all of which contain sodium hyaluronate (hyaluronic acid and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, such as sodium hyaluronate, are some times hereinafter referred to as HA); and Cellugel® (Alcon) which contains hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). All of the foregoing examples of viscoelastics may be used in cataract surgery. They are used by the skilled ophthalmic surgeon for several purposes, including maintenance of the 'anterior chamber of the eye and protection of ophthalmic tissues during surgery, particularly corneal endothelial cells, and as an aid in manipulating ophthalmic tissues.
While all of the agents described above may be used during cataract surgery, each has certain recognized advantages and disadvantages. Viscoelastics that are dispersive tend to offer better coating and protection of delicate tissues, such as the endothelial lining of the cornea. Cohesive viscoelastics, on the other hand, tend to be "stiffer" offering an advantage in soft tissue manipulation, e.g., capsulorhexis, but do not coat as well and are prone to accidental or premature aspiration. See, Miyauchi et al., "The Optimal Molecular Weight of Dispersive Type Sodium Hyaluronate for the Reduction of Corneal Endothelial Damage Induced by Sonication, Irrigation, and Aspiration," Jpn J. Ophthalmol., 45:339-347 (2001). Thus, during phacoemulsification, a less cohesive, i.e. more dispersive, viscoelastic is desired to avoid total evacuation of the anterior chamber and collapse of the corneal dome. See also U.S. Patent No. 5,273,056, which teaches sequential administration of viscoelastics possessing different rheological properties.
Generally, however, all such agents having sufficient viscosity and pseudoplasticity to be useful in ophthalmic surgery will, if left in the eye at the close of surgery, result in a transient increase in intraocular pressure ("IOP") known as an "IOP spike." (See, Obstbaum, Postoperative pressure elevation. A rational approach to its prevention and management, J. Cataract Refractive Surgery 18:1 (1992).) The pressure increase has been attributed to the agent's interference with the normal outflow of aqueous humor through the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal. (See, Berson et al., Obstruction of Aqueous Outflow by Sodium Hyaluronate in Enucleated Human Eyes, Am. J. Ophthalmology, 95:668 (1983); Olivius et al., Intraocular pressure after cataract
surgery with Healon®, Am. Intraocular Implant Soc. J. 11 :480 (1985); Fry, Postoperative intraocular pressure rises: A comparison of Healon, Amvis, and Viscoat, J. Cataract Refractive Surgery 15:415 (1989).) IOP spikes, depending on their magnitude and duration, can cause significant and/or irreversible damage to susceptible ocular tissues, including, without limitation, the optic nerve.
Consequently, viscoelastics are typically removed from the eye just prior to the close of surgery. The ease with which an agent can be removed from the surgical site, typically by aspiration, has traditionally been considered an important characteristic in the overall assessment of the agent's usefulness in cataract surgery. By removing the agent before the close of surgery, the surgeon hopes to minimize or avoid any significant IOP spike. Unfortunately, however, removal of agents which are relatively dispersive (as opposed to cohesive) or which adhere to the ocular tissue is often difficult and may cause additional trauma to the eye.
Alternatives to removing the viscoelastic have been suggested. For example, exogenous dilution of the viscoelastic has been suggested to alleviate IOP spikes. See U.S. Patent No. 4,328,803. Depending, however, on the particular viscoelastic and the surgical technique employed, IOP spike may still be a problem. More recently, it has been suggested that the administration of degradative agents to break down conventional viscoelastics in the eye can reduce or avoid the occurrence of IOP spikes. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 5,792,103. Such an approach requires not only the administration of an enzymatic agent into the eye, the biocompatability of which must be assured; but also means for adequately mixing the two agents via a special apparatus. Such approaches, which could leave residual material in the eye and thereby result in an IOP spike, have not been adopted by the ophthalmic community, which prefers to aspirate the viscoelastic from the eye at the close of surgery.
There is, therefore, a need for an improved means for reducing or avoiding IOP spikes associated with the use of conventional viscous or viscoelastic agents in ophthalmic surgery, especially cataract surgery. More specifically, the need for an improved methodology that will lend to traditional, hyaluronate-based viscoelastics
variable rheological properties that will improve their performance during surgery and facilitate their removal at the end of surgery was recognized. The compositions and methods of the present invention serve this need. More specifically, the present invention involves supplementing the irrigating solution used in such surgeries with relatively low molecular weight polymers that, when mixed with a cohesive hyaluronate- based viscoelastic, have the effect of modifying the rheological properties, and particularly the cohesiveness, of such viscoelastic to improve its performance in surgery.
Irrigating solutions for use in surgery and particularly ophthalmic surgery are well known. See, e.g. commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 4,443,432. It has also been suggested that viscous or viscoelastomeric substances may be added to irrigating solutions to reduce cell loss. See commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,409,904, the contents of which are by this reference incorporated herein. Nothing in such prior art, however, discloses or suggests surface modified viscoelastics or a method of using a modified irrigating solution to effect a reduction in the cohesiveness of a hyaluronate- based viscoelastic in the manner of the present invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to surface modified viscoelastics and to improved methods of performing surgery, especially ophthalmic surgery, using viscous or viscoelastic agents and an irrigating solution comprising a relatively low molecular weight polymer. More specifically, the inventive methods of the present invention comprise transitioning the rheological properties (specifically viscosity and cohesiveness) of hyaluronate-based viscoelastic agents by exposing such viscoelastic agents to irrigating solutions containing low levels of relatively low molecular weight, biocompatible polymers, such as chondroitin sulfate (CS) and cellulosic polymers, especially hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). The hyaluronate-based viscoelastic, at its interface with the polymer-containing irrigating solution, becomes less cohesive and, at the same time, more viscous. The decreased cohesiveness and increased viscosity of the surface hyaluronate interfacing the irrigating solution in situ renders it less
susceptible to unintentional aspiration during the surgical procedure. The hyaluronate material that is more distant from such surface (i.e. deeper within the bolus of material) retains its original lower viscosity and higher cohesiveness, and may therefore be readily aspirated at the conclusion of the surgery. In this manner, the skilled surgeon will be able to enjoy the positive aspects of different rheological profiles using the same hyaluronate-based material by modifying its properties at the aforementioned interface with the polymer-containing irrigating solution to suit the particular phase of the surgery, i.e., capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification or aspiration of the viscoelastic.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
While particularly important in ophthalmic surgery, and especially cataract surgery, the compositions and methods of the present invention may be utilized in any viscosurgical procedure, and especially those in which there is concern over unintentional or premature removal of the viscoelastic material from the surgical site. In cataract surgery, the anterior chamber of the eye, i.e. the space between the iris and the corneal endothelium, is filled with viscoelastic. The viscoelastic serves two principal purposes: (1) maintaining the corneal dome to give the surgeon an unobstructed view of the interior surgical site, and (2) protecting the delicate endothelial cells of the cornea by coating them. As discussed above, unsuccessful attempts have been made to find a viscoelastic material with a single, optimized rheology that achieves both of the foregoing objectives. Another approach has been to utilize separate cohesive and dispersive viscoelastic agents in the same surgical procedure. The DuoVisc product marketed by Alcon Laboratories, Inc. utilizes this latter approach, and has enjoyed commercial success. Nevertheless, it would be preferable if the dual functions of the viscoelastic could be served by a single viscoelastic material. That objective is met using the compositions and methods of the present invention.
We have found that by using an irrigating solution which contains relatively low concentrations of lower molecular weight polymers such as HPMC and CS, the rheology of a cohesive, hyaluronate-based viscoelastic material at the interface of the viscoelastic
and the irrigating solution is significantly altered. The viscoelastic at such interface becomes less cohesive and more viscous thereby minimizing inadvertent or premature aspiration and removal of the protective viscoelastic material from the eye. The term "hyaluronate-based viscoelastic" as used herein means any aqueous solution of hyaluronic acid or physiologically acceptable salts thereof, which is free of any significant amount of any low molecular weight polymer. With the exception of Viscoat®, all of the commercial HA products described above are considered hyaluronate-based viscoelastics.
Lens removal surgery, such as cataract surgery or the less common clear lensectomy, involves several different steps or phases. As previously discussed, differing rheological profiles may be preferred for the viscoelastic that is going to be used in each of those steps or phases. For example, during capsulorhexis (opening of the capsular bag to expose the clear or cataractous lens), it is desirable to have a cohesive viscoelastic for space maintenance; during phacoemulsification (ultrasonic fragmentation of the lens) it is desirable to have a dispersive viscoelastic for better coating and maneuverability; finally, during artificial lens insertion and completion of the surgery, it is desirable to have a cohesive viscoelastic both for space maintenance and ease of removal. By using a polymer-containing irrigating solution, as described more fully below, with any of the conventional hyaluronate-based viscoelastic agents, one can, using the methods of the present invention, secure the preferred rheological profile at each step of the procedure.
Preferred methods of the present invention comprise the following steps. A cohesive viscoelastic like PROVISC® (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas), HEALON®, or HEALON GV® (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack, New Jersey), or AMVISC® PLUS (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Claremont, California) is used before and during the capsulorhexis step. Then, immediately prior to commencing phacoemulsification, a small amount of polymer-containing irrigating solution is permitted to flow, without aspiration into the space separating the viscoelastic from the anterior surface of the exposed, typically cataractous lens. The phaco emulsification device is then engaged, without irrigation/aspiration, and the tip of the phaco
emulsification handpiece is introduced into the surgical site and placed in the irrigating solution above the exposed lens. It is believed that the ultrasonic waves from the tip of the phaco emulsification handpiece will promote the mixture of the irrigating solution and the viscoelastic agent at the interface of those two substances. This will change the cohesive property of the hyaluronate-based viscoelastic in the immediate vicinity of the lens rendering the viscoelastic more dispersive. After up to twenty seconds of mixing, the phacoemulsification of the lens, with irrigation/aspiration, is completed in the ordinary manner. At the end of surgery, the irrigation aspiration tip may be inserted into the bolus of viscoelastic material in the anterior chamber, i.e., beyond the more dispersive surface material at the interface and into the material not affected, or less affected, by admixture with the polymer-containing irrigating solution. The viscoelastic material in this region remains more cohesive and is therefore easily aspirated out with minimal effort and minimal trauma to the delicate endothelial cells.
The cohesive, hyaluronate viscoelastics suitable for use in the methods of the present invention include those commercial products identified above, and may generally be characterized as aqueous solutions containing sodium hyaluronate (of course other physiologically acceptable hyaluronate salts could also be used) having average molecular weights greater than 750,000 Daltons, preferably from about 1,000,000 to about 5,000,000 Daltons, and concentrations from about 0.5 to about 3.0% by weight.
Irrigating solutions that may be used in the methods of the present invention include any sterile, aqueous irrigating solution suitable for surgery. Preferred are balanced salt solutions such as BSS® or BSS® Plus (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas). The addition of polymers to the irrigating solution may be effected in the manner described in U.S. Patent No. 5,409,904, previously incorporated by reference. Virtually any biocompatible, lower molecular weight (i.e. below about 500,000 Daltons) polymer may be used. Examples would include lower molecular weight fractions of the following polymers or combinations thereof: HA, CS, polyacrylamide, HPMC, proteoglycans, collagen, methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, keratin, carrageenans, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, especially sodium salts. Preferred polymeric
components for the irrigating solution include CS and HPMC. The preferred, relatively low molecular weight CS suitable for purposes of the present methods would include material having an average molecular weight of less than about 100,000 Daltons, preferably from about 20,000 to about 80,000 Daltons, and most preferably from about 30,000 to about 50,000. Lower molecular weight HPMC used as the polymeric component of the irrigating solution in the present methods will generally have an average molecular weight below about 400,000 Daltons and, preferably from about 50,000 to about 200,000 Daltons, and most preferably from about 70,000 to about 100,000 Daltons. Concentration ranges for the polymeric components will vary depending upon the molecular weight of the polymeric component chosen, but should be maintained at levels low enough to retain the flow properties desired for an irrigating solution. For CS, the concentration in the irrigating solution may be from 0.1 to 10% by weight, preferably from 0.5 to about 7%, and most preferably from about 2% to about 5% by weight. For HPMC, the concentration in the irrigating solution may be from 0.05 to 5% by weight, preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.5%, and most preferably from about 0.2 to about 0.3%. Combinations of different low molecular weight polymers, as exemplified below, may also be used. In a preferred combination, the irrigating solution may contain from about 1.0 to about 3.0% by weight of CS, and from about 0.1 to about 0.3% by weight of HPMC.
The following examples are provided to further illustrate various features of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 1
A 0.4 mL aliquost of PROVISO or VISCOAT, as the case may be, was placed in a 5 mL reaction vial (conical interior, covered with a flat bottom). To the viscoelastic, 5 microliters of Na fluorescein solution (25%w/v) were added for visualization of the viscoelastic. 0.6 mL of appropriate irrigating solution were then added to the above vial, using a micropipette. The irrigating solution in contact with the viscoelastic was then agitated to promote partial mixing by engaging the ultrasound on the β
phacoemulsification handpiece tip, and placing such tip in the irrigating solution, (expression of additional irrigating solution should be avoided by lowering the irrigating solution bottle attached to the phacoemulsification unit to a height below the level of the reaction vial). The ultrasound mixing was continued for 20 seconds, while moving the phaco tip, to mix the solution with the viscoelastic, along with the dye. After mixing, the irrigating solution bottle was raised and irrigation/aspiration of the colored viscoelastic mixture was commenced with ultrasound on, working as efficiently as possible. The time taken to fully aspirate the viscoelastic mixture was recorded.
The above steps were repeated twice for each irrigating solution (i.e. a total of 3 runs tested). The results for the various irrigating solutions are as follows:
Aspiration Time (in seconds) for Various Irrigating Solutions/Viscoelastic combinations
Discussion:
The above results demonstrate that PROVISO®, a cohesive viscoelastic, is aspirated very quickly, when regular BSS is used in the irrigating solution. On the other hand, VISCOAT®, a well known dispersive viscoelastic, takes longer to aspirate. However, when CS or HPMC is in the irrigating solution, aspiration time of PROVISO® is closer to that of VISCOAT®, which indicates in situ changes in the physical properties of the hyaluronate-based viscoelastic.
It should be noted that the irrigating solution was mixed here with the help of ultrasound for 20 seconds, which was likely excessive. In actual surgery the mixing is only required at the interface of the irrigating solution and the viscoelastic, so the actual time needed may be 1 second or less, as the viscosity and cohesiveness of the
viscoelastic at the interface changes almost instantly upon mixing.
EXAMPLE 2
The entire contents of a 0.85 mL syringe containing a 1.0% solution of sodium hyaluronate (marketed as PROVISO® by Alcon) are expressed into a sterile, 5 mL syringe with a tip cap. To the same 5mL syringe, 0.85 mL of the appropriate irrigating solution (containing low molecular weight polymer) is added to yield a 1 :1 ratio. For a 1:2 ratio, 1.7 mL of the irrigating solution is added, and for a 1:3 ratio, 2.55 mL of the irrigating solution is added. The plunger is then carefully inserted into the barrel of the syringe, and the cap on the tip of the syringe is removed. A leur lock connector is affixed on the tip on the syringe, and another (empty) 5 mL syringe is similarly attached on other end of the leur connector. The contents are thoroughly mixed, by alternately pushing plungers of the two conjoined syringes. After repeating this motion a few times, the mixed material is then sonicated for 5 minutes. Finally, the material is centrifuged on a very low setting for 1 min to remove the air bubbles. The contents are then transferred to the plate of a Bohlin Rheometer, through a 27 gauge needle, and the low shear viscosity of the sample is determined in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Using the foregoing procedure, it was confirmed that the low shear viscosity of the viscoelastic (1% sodium hyaluronate) mixed with the polymer-containing irrigating solutions was 3 to 5 times that of the control solution that did not contain the low molecular weight polymeric component.
EXAMPLE 2A
Generally following the approach described in Example 2, the plunger was removed from a 10 mL sterile plastic syringe, and the cannula end was closed with a tip cap. The syringe was placed upright on a balance with the open end facing up by resting the syringe in a beaker. An appropriate amount of a 1.0% sodium hyaluronate solution
(PROVISO ) was transferred into the open syringe and weighed. Then an appropriate amount of the irrigating solution of interest was similarly transferred into the open syringe and weighed. The irrigating solutions were BSS PLUS; BSS PLUS with 0.21% or 0.27% HPMC; and BSS PLUS containing 2% CS. The weight of PROVISO was adjusted such that it was in a 1:1 ratio by weight with the irrigating solution.
After adding the 1.0% sodium hyaluronate material and the irrigating solution to the syringe, the plunger was placed back into the syringe and the tip cap removed. A leur connector was placed on the syringe, where the tip cap had been. Another 10 mL empty sterile syringe was then connected to the other end of the leur connector. The contents of the syringe were thoroughly mixed by alternately pushing plungers of the conjoined syringes for 2 minutes.
After mixing, the contents were sonicated for 30 seconds. After sonication, the contents were further mixed by pushing the plungers a couple of times and the contents were then transferred into a centrifuge tube. The tube was labeled and centrifuged for 2 minutes at low speeds (e.g. 2500 rpm) to remove the air bubbles. The sample was then allowed to sit in a refrigerator overnight. The rheological profile of the product was determined the next day. Preliminary viscosity determination was made without overnight storage of the sample.
The rheological profile was determined by using Bohlin CS Rheometer with a 4° cone and a 40 mm diameter plate (CP 4/40) at a gap width of 0.15 mm. The viscosity was determined at 25°C. Shear stresses between 0.06 and 139 Pa were applied. The corresponding shear rate and viscosity were calculated by the Bohlin software after 200 seconds of integration or whenever the system approved steady state was reached. The
results are summarized as follows:
Results: Zero Shear Viscosity of Different Mixtures with 1.0% NaHA (PROVISO
*Zero Shear Viscosity for solutions, was determined by taking average of the viscosities at shear rate of 1 xlO"3 to 9.9 x 10"3 seconds if a clear plateau was not available. For the solutions having a clear plateau, no averaging was necessary.
As seen from the above table, upon dilution of 1.0% NaHA solution with BSS PLUS in a 1 : 1 ratio, the viscosity drops exponentially. When CS is present in the solution, the viscosity drop is reduced. In fact, when 2% CS is present in the irrigating solution, viscosity is almost twice that of when CS is not in solution, i.e., two times, that of the control. When HPMC is present in the solution, the reduction of the viscosity drop upon 1 :1 dilution is even more dramatic. In fact, viscosity of the resultant solution is almost 10 times that of the control.
Additional Note:
Preliminary viscosity determinations (carried out immediately after the sample preparation rather than the next day) yielded similar results. However, the differences in viscosity enhancement by HPMC was about 3 to 5 times higher, instead of it being 10 times higher when HPMC was present in the irrigating solution. Allowing the samples to sit in a refrigerator overnight seems to help, as the sample settles down and more reproducible viscosity numbers are obtained.
EXAMPLE 3
The above-described formulation may be prepared as follows: First, the water for Injection is brought close to boiling or at boiling. The HPMC is then slowly added to the water under continuous stirring to thoroughly disperse it in the water. Then the mixture is slowly allowed to cool, stirring continuously. Once at room temperature, the mixture should start clearing up. Then the mixture is stored overnight at 4° to 8°C in an appropriate container to fully hydrate the HPMC. The following day, the remaining ingredients are added to the HPMC solution, pH of the solution is adjusted and additional water for injection is added if needed to bring the solution to final volume. The final solution is then filtered, packaged in bottles and autoclaved.
Alternatively, a stock solution of HPMC (1 to 2%) may be prepared first, by an approach similar to that described above. To prepare the stock solution, HPMC is first dispersed in hot water that is close to boiling. Then the mixture is brought to room temperature and chilled to fully hydrate the HPMC. The next day, the stock solution is used as one of the components of the composition. An appropriate amount of stock solution is first added to cooled water for injection. This is followed by the addition of salts, and by pH and volume adjustment.
EXAMPLE 4
The above-described formulation may be prepared as follows. First, the water for injection is allowed to cool to room temperature. The appropriate quantity of CS is slowly added to the water under continuous stirring to thoroughly disperse it in the water. Stirring continues until all CS is in solution. The remaining ingredients are then added sequentially to the CS solution, making sure that each such ingredient is dissolved before adding the next one. The pH and volume of the solution are then adjusted. The final solution is then sterile filtered and packaged in bottles. The solution may even be terminally sterilized by autoclaving.
The invention has been described by reference to certain preferred embodiments; however, it should be understood that it may be embodied in other specific forms or variations thereof without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The embodiments described above are therefore considered to be illustrative in all respects and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description.
Claims
1. A method of performing surgery comprising: instilling a hyaluronate-based viscoelastic agent into the site of the surgery; introducing a low viscosity, polymer-containing irrigating solution into the site of the surgery so that it makes contact with the viscoelastic agent along an interface; and permitting the irrigating solution to mix with the viscoelastic agent at the interface thereby reducing the cohesiveness of the viscoelastic agent along the interface.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hyaluronate-based viscoelastic is an aqueous solution of sodium hyaluronate having an average molecular weight greater than 750,000 Daltons and a concentration of from about 0.5% to 3% by weight.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the polymer-containing irrigating solution contains a polymer having an average molecular weight of less than 500,000 Daltons, which polymer is selected from the group consisting of : HA, CS, polyacrylamide, HPMC, proteoglycans, collagen, methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, keratin, carrageenans, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the polymer-containing irrigating solution contains chondroitin sulfate at a concentration of from about 0.5% to about 7% by weight.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of the chondroitin sulfate in the irrigating solution is from about 2% to about 5% by weight and the chondroitin sulfate has an average molecular weight of from about 20,000 to about 80,000 Daltons.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the polymer-containing irrigating solution contains hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose at a concentration of from about 0.05% to about 5.0% by weight.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of the hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose in the irrigating solution is from about 0.1 % to about 0.5% by weight and has an average molecular weight of from about 50,000 to about 200,000 Daltons.
8. A hyaluronate-based viscoelastic having a modified surface rheology, comprising an aqueous solution of hyaluronic acid or a physiologically acceptable salt thereof (HA) having an average molecular weight of at least 750,000 Daltons, and having an interior volume and a surface area, wherein the surface area has a reduced cohesivity and/or an increased viscosity relative to the interior volume effected by the exposure of said surface area to a low molecular weight polymer characterized by an average molecular weight of less than 500,000 Daltons.
9. The surface modified viscoelastic of claim 8 wherein the hyaluronic acid or physiologically acceptable salt thereof has a molecular weight of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 Daltons, and an interior volume concentration of from about 0.5% to about 3.0% by weight, and wherein the low molecular weight polymer is selected from the group consisting of: HA, CS, polyacrylamide, HPMC, proteoglycans, collagen, methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, keratin, carrageenans, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
10. The surface modified viscoelastic of claim 9 wherein the exposure to the low molecular weight polymer is effected by contacting the surface area with an irrigating solution containing said low molecular weight polymer and permitting mixing of the polymer-containing irrigating solution with the HA surface area.
11. The surface modified viscoelastic of claim 10, wherein the low molecular weight polymer in the irrigating solution is hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose at a concentration from about 0.05% to about 5% by weight.
12. The surface modified viscoelastic of claim 11, wherein the hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose is present at a concentration of from about 0.1% to about 0.5% by weight, and has an average molecular weight of from about 70,000 to about 100,000 Daltons.
13. The surface modified viscoelastic of claim 10, wherein the mixing of the polymer-containing irrigating solution with the HA surface area is enhanced by ultrasonic agitation without concurrent aspiration of the irrigating solution.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/380,135 US20040118414A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2002-12-20 | Surface modified viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
AU2002360752A AU2002360752A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-12-20 | Viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
US10/882,923 US7363928B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2004-06-30 | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions |
US11/294,247 US7578809B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2005-12-05 | Surface modified viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US34291601P | 2001-12-21 | 2001-12-21 | |
US60/342,916 | 2001-12-21 |
Related Child Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10380135 A-371-Of-International | 2002-12-20 | ||
US10/380,135 A-371-Of-International US20040118414A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-12-20 | Surface modified viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
US10/882,923 Continuation-In-Part US7363928B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2004-06-30 | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions |
US11/294,247 Division US7578809B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2005-12-05 | Surface modified viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003059391A2 true WO2003059391A2 (en) | 2003-07-24 |
WO2003059391A3 WO2003059391A3 (en) | 2004-02-19 |
Family
ID=23343837
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2002/041247 WO2003059391A2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-12-20 | Viscoelastics for ocular surgery |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2002360752A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003059391A2 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005097225A1 (en) * | 2004-03-29 | 2005-10-20 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | New viscoelastic composition, method of use and package |
FR2878444A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-02 | Corneal Ind Soc Par Actions Si | Biocompatible visco elastic aqueous solution, useful in auxiliaries and/or temporary surgery implants and hydration implants, comprises mixture of sodium hyaluronate and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose |
WO2007008206A1 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2007-01-18 | Alcon, Inc. | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions |
WO2007030623A2 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-15 | Amo Regional Holdings | Bi-modal hyaluronate solution |
US7244440B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2007-07-17 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US7709012B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2010-05-04 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
US7914803B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2011-03-29 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US7947295B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2011-05-24 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
US10143530B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2018-12-04 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Membrane for protecting intraocular tissues and the protection methods used thereof |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0136782A2 (en) * | 1983-08-09 | 1985-04-10 | Nestle S.A. | Chondroitin sulfate/sodium hyaluronate compositions |
US5409904A (en) * | 1984-11-13 | 1995-04-25 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Hyaluronic acid compositions and methods |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3455852B2 (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2003-10-14 | 株式会社オフテクス | Eyewash composition |
-
2002
- 2002-12-20 AU AU2002360752A patent/AU2002360752A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-12-20 WO PCT/US2002/041247 patent/WO2003059391A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0136782A2 (en) * | 1983-08-09 | 1985-04-10 | Nestle S.A. | Chondroitin sulfate/sodium hyaluronate compositions |
US5409904A (en) * | 1984-11-13 | 1995-04-25 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Hyaluronic acid compositions and methods |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
ARSHINOFF S A: "The ultimate soft-shell technique" OPHTHALMIC PRACTICE 2000 CANADA, vol. 18, no. 6, 2000, pages 289-290, XP009009472 ISSN: 0832-9869 * |
ARSHINOFF S: "Using the dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft-shell technique with different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices" OPHTHALMIC PRACTICE 2000 CANADA, vol. 18, no. 5, 2000, pages 224-226, XP009009473 ISSN: 0832-9869 * |
DATABASE WPI Section PQ, Week 200273 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class P33, AN 2002-679066 XP002238665 & JP 2002 255829 A (OPHTECS CORP), 11 September 2002 (2002-09-11) * |
HOLZER M P ET AL: "Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery." JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY. UNITED STATES FEB 2001, vol. 27, no. 2, February 2001 (2001-02), pages 213-218, XP002238664 ISSN: 0886-3350 * |
RAINER G ET AL: "Intraocular pressure rise after small incision cataract surgery: a randomised intraindividual comparison of two dispersive viscoelastic agents." THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. ENGLAND FEB 2001, vol. 85, no. 2, February 2001 (2001-02), pages 139-142, XP002238663 ISSN: 0007-1161 * |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7914803B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2011-03-29 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US7709012B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2010-05-04 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
US7329411B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2008-02-12 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US7618620B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2009-11-17 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US7306802B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2007-12-11 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
EP2526929B1 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2016-04-06 | Novartis AG | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
US7244440B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2007-07-17 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of three polymers |
US8313754B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2012-11-20 | Novartis Ag | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
US7947295B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2011-05-24 | Alcon, Inc. | Ophthalmic compositions containing a synergistic combination of two polymers |
WO2005097225A1 (en) * | 2004-03-29 | 2005-10-20 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | New viscoelastic composition, method of use and package |
WO2006059029A2 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-08 | Corneal Industrie | Solutions viscoelastiques renfermant du hyaluronate de sodium et de l ' hydroxypropylmethylcellulose |
WO2006059029A3 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-08-31 | Corneal Ind | Solutions viscoelastiques renfermant du hyaluronate de sodium et de l ' hydroxypropylmethylcellulose |
FR2878444A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-02 | Corneal Ind Soc Par Actions Si | Biocompatible visco elastic aqueous solution, useful in auxiliaries and/or temporary surgery implants and hydration implants, comprises mixture of sodium hyaluronate and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose |
WO2007008206A1 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2007-01-18 | Alcon, Inc. | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions |
AU2006287485B2 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2012-07-12 | Amo Regional Holdings | Bi-modal hyaluronate solution |
WO2007030623A3 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2007-07-26 | Amo Regional Holdings | Bi-modal hyaluronate solution |
WO2007030623A2 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-15 | Amo Regional Holdings | Bi-modal hyaluronate solution |
US10143530B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2018-12-04 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Membrane for protecting intraocular tissues and the protection methods used thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2003059391A3 (en) | 2004-02-19 |
AU2002360752A1 (en) | 2003-07-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5792103A (en) | Viscosurgical method and apparatus | |
US7578809B2 (en) | Surface modified viscoelastics for ocular surgery | |
US8529938B2 (en) | Combinations of viscoelastics for use during surgery | |
WO2005097225A1 (en) | New viscoelastic composition, method of use and package | |
US7060297B2 (en) | Carrageenan viscoelastics for ocular surgery | |
AU2005231687B2 (en) | New free-radical scavenger containing viscoelastic composition, methods of use and package | |
JP2008308503A (en) | Intraocular irrigating solution having improved flow characteristics | |
US7084130B2 (en) | Intraocular irrigating solution having improved flow characteristics | |
AU2005216946B2 (en) | Alginate viscoelastic composition, method of use and package | |
WO2003059391A2 (en) | Viscoelastics for ocular surgery | |
US7363928B2 (en) | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions | |
CA2470466C (en) | Combinations of viscoelastics for use during surgery | |
US20060003964A1 (en) | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions | |
US20060002982A1 (en) | Xanthan gum viscoelastic composition, method of use and package | |
JP2004530452A (en) | Non-attractable transition viscoelastic materials for use in surgery | |
WO2007008206A1 (en) | Dilution resistant viscoelastic compositions | |
Mahar | Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices (OVDs) Past, Present and Future |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10380135 Country of ref document: US |
|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AU BR CA JP KR MX US ZA |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: JP |