WO2003043267A1

WO2003043267A1 - System and method for providing quality of service in ieee 802.11 systems

Info

Publication number: WO2003043267A1
Application number: PCT/SE2002/002070
Authority: WO
Inventors: Jan Lindskog; Stefan Rommer; Gunnar Rydnell; Ulf Hansson; Jan Kullander; Karl Fredrik Johansson
Original assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority date: 2001-11-12
Filing date: 2002-11-12
Publication date: 2003-05-22
Also published as: EP1446920B1; US20050068924A1; CN100518108C; ES2321699T3; EP1446920A1; ATE422760T1; DE60231138D1; CN1853371A

Abstract

A method for providing quality of services of at least one mobile terminal in a wireless network, such as a 802.11 wireless network, wherein a service proxy functionality within an access point of the network or another entity provide quality of service operations to the at least one mobile terminal.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING QUALITY OF SERVICE IN IEEE 802.11 SYSTEMS

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to wireless LAN networks, and more particularly, to methods and systems for providing quality of service within IEEE 802.11 systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network protocol enables wireless communications between access points and mobile terminals within a cell. IEEE 802.11 provides two methods for accessing the access points by the mobile terminal. The distributed coordination function (DCF) enables a number of units to simultaneously contend for access to the network. The point coordination function (PCF) allows an access point to control access to the network. While existing access points can distribute bandwidth between mobile terminals within a cell using the point coordination function, currently most 802.11 products do not support the polling mechanism that is used in the point coordination function. This leaves a system that may only be used to control downlink traffic and has very restricted possibilities with respect to QoS.

The IEEE 802.11 standard presently provides no explicit support for quality of service (QoS). A new standard is currently being worked on that would provide QoS support. However, this update is far from being implemented and support for QoS will not exist for a long time. Thus, there is a need for a system that will support systems having no QoS abilities and for systems that may partially support QoS and for providing some type of differentiated quality of service support within the existing 802.11 infrastructure for devices that do not support the polling mechanism of the point coordination function.

Apart from the IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN protocol used by the end user of the wireless terminal, the IP, the UDP, the RTP (Real-Time Transport Protocol) and the TCP protocol are well known protocols.

SUMMARY

The present invention overcomes the foregoing and other problems with a method for providing quality of service in an 802.11 wireless network wherein data received from at least one mobile terminal is processed at an access point or intermediate note using a quality of service proxy functionality within the access point or note. The at least one mobile terminal is then provided with a quality of service operation from the access point.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention that together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings: Fig. 1 illustrates an 802.11 wireless local area network; Fig. 2 illustrates the operation of the point coordination function; Fig. 3 illustrates a first embodiment for providing quality of service within an 802.11 WLAN; Fig. 4 illustrates a further embodiment for providing quality of service within an 802.11 WLAN;

Fig. 5 illustrates yet a further embodiment for providing quality of service in an 802.11 WLAN;

Fig. 6 illustrates yet another embodiment for providing quality of service in an 802.11 WLAN;

Fig. 7 illustrates a duration/ID field within a frame transmitted from an access point to various mobile terminals;

Fig. 8 illustrates a NAV transmission to multiple STAs; Fig. 9 illustrates a use of an extended network allocation vector to achieve quality of service within an 802.11 WLAN;

-7- Fig. 10 illustrates one protocol stack of a mobile terminal, AP and peer end user;

Fig. 11 illustrates the IP version 4 protocol format; Fig. 12 illustrates the IP version 6 protocol format; and Fig. 13 illustrates the TCP protocol foπnat.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to Fig. 1, there is illustrated an example of a network environment that uses the IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network standard. A wireless LAN system 10 typically consists of a number of cells 15 each having at least one access point (AP) 20 within each cell 15. Mobile terminals (MT) 25 can associate with a particular access point 20 and obtain access to the services provided by the access point 20 connecting to a wired network (not shown). The access points 20 and mobile terminals 25 are sometimes referred to as stations (STAs). In the following, the term "station" or "ST A" is used when referring to both access points and mobile terminals rather than when each of these are referred to individually.

As mentioned previously, the IEEE 802.11 standard provides two methods for accessing the wireless medium, namely, the distributed coordination function (DCF) and the point coordination function (PCF). The distributed coordination function is a carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance scheme were all STAs simultaneously contend for access to the wireless medium. The STAs listen to the wireless medium for a specified amount of time and when it is not busy, an STA begins transmitting. When collisions occur, a back off mechanism is used to reduce the risk of further collisions. There is in principle no way to predict when a transmission of a certain frame will occur or how much bandwidth a certain STA will obtain since access to the wireless medium is dependent on the amount of contention from other STAs in a cell. It is also not possible to differentiate between STAs since all STAs contend using the same rules irrespective of the type or amount of data for transmission. The point coordination function enables an access point 20 to issue a contention free period (CFP) providing the access point 20 control over the wireless medium. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 wherein a beacon 30 transmitted by the access point 20, establishes the contention free period 35 within a particular cell. The contention free period 35 ends upon expiration of a CFP maximum duration period or upon transmission of a CF-end frame 40 by the access point 20. The contention period 45 is then in effect wherein the distributed coordination function is used for communications until a next beacon 50 is transmitted by an access point 20. During the contention free period 35 the access point 20 can transmit downlink (AP to MT) but the mobile terminals 25 are not allowed to transmit uplink (MT to AP) traffic unless they are polled by the access point 20. Thus, using the point coordination function, the access point 20 has control over both the uplink and downlink scheduling.

Since there is no support in IEEE 802.11 for explicit distribution of bandwidth between mobile terminals 25 in a cell, there is a need to use some type quality of service proxy 26 (Fig. 1) to act as an intermediate between peers that act in quality of service functions. The quality of service proxy 26 may be situated in the access point 20, in an intermediate note such as a router. This solution may cause the mobile teπninals 25 to experience different bandwidth, delay, packet error rate etc, but the 802.11 layers within the mobile teπninal will not be aware of any quality of service differentiation.

Several possible implementations of a proxy are available. With respect to the following discussions, references will be made between preferred users and regular users with respect to corresponding mobile tenninals 25. A preferred user, for example, has a more expensive subscription with a WLAN provider than a regular user and will thus receive preferred treatment within a cell 15. A distinction may also be made between different types of categories of data, e.g., high priority and low priority, but for purposes of the following discussion, reference will only be made to the user. The access point 20 can use the MAC address of the mobile terminals 25 to distinguish between users and/or IEEE 802.1Q-tags to distinguish between traffic categories.

Referring now to Fig. 3, there is illustrated a first embodiment when a proxy 26 is implemented within the access point 20. Upon reception of a frame 60 from a regular mobile terminal 25 during a contention period, the access point 20 discards the frame at 65 without transmitting an acknowledgment message to the regular mobile terminal 25 user. When the mobile teπninal 25 does not receive an acknowledgment for transmission of the frame, the mobile teπninal 25 will increase its contention window at 70 and retransmit the frame from the mobile teπninal 25 to the access point 20 at 75. The larger contention window implies a longer back off time. The back off time deteπnines the time during which the wireless medium has to be idle before an STA is allowed to transmit. Within a cell 15 having a lot of contention, this will cause the total contention to decrease, and mobile terminals 25 that have not increased their contention window, including all preferred mobile terminals, will have an advantage in accessing the wireless medium.

Referring now to Fig. 4, there is illustrated an alternative embodiment of an implementation of a proxy 26 wherein upon receipt of a frame 80 at the access point 20 from a regular mobile terminal 25 during the contention period, the access point 20 acknowledges at 85 the received frame as nonnal to the mobile tenninal 25 but discards the frame at 90 and does not forward the frame to a wired network connected to the access point. This acts to decrease the pace at which higher layers of the protocol transmit the data. This decreases the pace at which data is transmitted by a TCP sender. This also reduces the amount of data transmitted onto the wireless medium by the regular mobile teπninal and because of that the other mobile terminals, including the preferred mobile tenninals, will experience less contention.

Referring now to Fig. 5, there is illustrated yet a further embodiment for implementation of a proxy, wherein upon reception of a frame 95 from a regular mobile terminal 25 during a contention period, the access point 20 forwards the received frame at 100 to a wired local area network 105 but prevents transmission of an acknowledgment back to the regular mobile teπninal sender 25. The response will be essentially the same as that described with respect to Fig. 3, wherein the mobile terminal 25 will increase its contention window at 110 and retransmit the frame to the access point 20 at 115. The difference between this and the example of Fig. 3 will be noticeable on the higher layers, for example, on the RTT estimates of the TCP layers.

Each time an access point 20 begins a contention free period 35 as described above with respect to Fig. 2, all mobile terminals 25 within a cell set their network allocation vector (NAV) to protect the wireless medium during the contention free period. As described above, the contention free period ends when the CFP maximum duration expires or when the access point 20 transmits a CF- End frame to the broadcast address. The mobile terminals 25 will, upon reception of a CF-End frame, reset their network allocation vector and open the wireless medium to DCF contention. Referring now to Fig. 6, in order to provide quality of service, the access point 20 may transmit unicast CF frames addressed to preferred mobile terminals 25. This will cause the mobile terminals that receive the CF End frames to reset their network allocation vector and start using distributed coordination function. If only selected mobile teπninals receive unicast CF-End frames, while all other mobile terminals still have their network allocation vector set and are prevented from transmitting, the selected mobile terminals will have privileged access to the wireless medium.

The beacon is sent periodically at times denoted by the Target Beacon Transmit Time (TBTT). At each TBTT, an access point 20 must wait for the wireless medium to become idle prior to transmitting the beacon 180. Thus, as illustrated in Fig. 6, at the occurrence of TBTT 120, the network allocation vectors are set for all mobile teπninals associated with a particular access point 20. Absent any further actions, the NAN will be set for each of the mobile teπninals 25 for the entire period of time indicated at 125. If the access point 20 transmits a unicast CF- End frame to mobile terminal 1 at 130. Mobile terminal 1 resets its NAN and then uses the distributed coordination function for time period 135. When access point 20 transmits a unicast CF-End frame to mobile teπninal 2 at 140, both mobile teπninal 1 and mobile terminal 2 use the distributed coordination function at 145. Prior to transmission of the broadcast CF-End frame at 150, only mobile tenninal 1 and mobile terminal 2 are using the distributed coordination function and hence have easier access to the wireless medium. All other mobile tenninals 25 are only able to communicate with the access point 20 when polled. After the broadcast, the end frame is transmitted at 150 and all mobile tenninals may begin using the distributed coordination function for time period 155 until a next beacon 160 is received.

Referring now to Figs. 7-9, a further embodiment of a proxy is illustrated wherein during a contention period, the network allocation vector is used to protect the wireless medium for the duration of a frame exchange sequence. An STA that receives a frame that is not addressed to the STA is required to update its NAN value using the value in the duration /ID field 165 as shown in Fig. 7 of the received frame.

An access point 20 may give prioritized access to a given mobile terminal 25 by transmitting a frame to the mobile tenninal with a value in the duration/ID field 165 indicates a time period that is larger than required. Thus, as shown in Fig. 8, when an access point 20 transmits a frame to the first mobile terminal 25 a, the one or more STAs also receiving the frame set their network allocation value in accordance with the received value. Since the intended recipient mobile terminal 25a of the frame does not update its NAN, and the extended ΝAV will not affect the mobile teπninal 25a to which the frame has been addressed. The address mobile terminal 25a will have priority access for the duration of the NAN

This mobile terminal 25 a will have sole access to the wireless medium for as long as the extended NAN lasts, as illustrated in Fig. 9. The time T denotes the time during which all other mobile tenninals have set their NAN and mobile teπninal 25a has exclusive access to the wireless medium. The regular NAN denotes the NAN that would have been set by standard usage of the duration field. Extended NAV denotes the NAV as set by the above proposed proxy. The time T in Figure 9 should be longer than DIFS + CW*slot_time to guarantee that the DCF mechanism in mobile teπninal 25a can start a transmission during time period T. CW is the contention window, DIFS is the DCF interframe spacing and slot_time is the 802.11 SlotTime. This described system would provide an implicit polling of the mobile teπninal 25a.

In the following embodiments focus upon the QoS proxy implementations will be made at the protocol layers above the IEEE 802.11 WLAN protocol. Fig. 10 shows one protocol stack 200 of a mobile teπninal and the conesponding protocol stack 210 at the AP, and a protocol stack of a peer end user 200 located at the wired LAN 220. As it can be seen the AP 210 utilizes one type of MAC and physical layer for the wired side 250 and the 802.11 MAC and physical layer 260 for the wireless side. It can also be seen that the IP layer as well as the TCP layer are transparent through the AP 210. In the following embodiment the QoS Proxy modifies the ToS (Type of

Service) field in the IP version 4 header, as seen in Fig. 11. Prior to transmitting, or relaying, a received IP datagram the QoS Proxy modifies the ToS field. For a prefened user the QoS Proxy will modify the ToS field to indicate a high QoS class, whilst for a regular user the QoS Proxy will modify the ToS field to indicate a low QoS class. The ToS field is currently used for negotiating bandwidth properties such as delay and throughput according to DiffServ mechanism, RFC (Infonnational) no. 2475, which is implemented in many routers. By adjusting the ToS field the packets from the tenninal 200 will be subject to a lower service level towards peer 220. It is also possible to enhance the service for given terminal 200 by adjusting the ToS field conespondingly. It should be noted that the QoS proxy will recalculate the checksum of IP datagrams in order to reflect the manipulated ToS field and still allow checksum operations to be carried out.

Similar to the implementation above, where IP version 6 is used, the QoS Proxy modifies the Traffic Class field in the IP version 6 header, see Fig. 12. For a prefened user the QoS Proxy will modify the Traffic Class field to indicate a high QoS class, whilst for a regular user the QoS Proxy will modify the Traffic Class field to indicate a low QoS class.

In another embodiment the QoS Proxy will deliberately delay IP datagram or drop IP datagram for regular users, i.e. users of a low QoS allocation. The deliberate delaying of IP datagrams will have the effect that the pace by which the higher layers of the sending end which delivers IP datagrams to the IP protocol, e.g. TCP, will decrease the transmitting pace. The increasing round trip time for regular, i.e. low QoS, users will result in a shorter round trip time for prefened users, i.e. high QoS users. The effect of dropping IP datagrams may result in a retransmission from the higher layer of the sending end user and in a decreased pace by which the higher layer of the sending end user delivers IP datagrams to the IP protocol. This will also cause benefits for the prefened users.

By combining the mechanisms of modifying the ToS field, Traffic Class field, deliberately delaying IP datagram and deliberately dropping IP datagrams, a powerful toolbox is given to the QoS Proxy. The behavior of the QoS Proxy may be detennined by the higher layer protocol above the IP layer. E.g. regular users using TCP may be given precedence over regular users using RTP, or UDP, or any combination thereof. It can also be noted that the behavior of the QoS Proxy may be determined according to the lower layer statistics. For instance the IEEE 802.11 Busy/Idle threshold may determine the delay of IP datagram such that if the Busy/Idle threshold is high more IP datagram are delayed compared to when the Busy/Idle threshold is lower. In another embodiment the QoS Proxy will split the TCP connection that spans from the wireless mobile tenninal via the AP to e.g. a peer entity in the wired LAN into 2 TCP connections. The split will occur in the QoS Proxy and result in 2 TCP connections. The QoS Proxy will then relay TCP segment floating back and forth from the wireless mobile terminal, and as seen from both end users act as any other peer TCP sender or receiver. Similar to the case where the QoS Proxy modifies the ToS field in the IP version 4 header, the QoS Proxy can modify the window field in the TCP header, see Fig. 13.

The window field detennines an upper limit to the amount of outstanding data for the sender and consequently an upper limit to its' packet transmission rate. By increasing the window field for prefened users and/or decreasing the window field for regular users, the prefened users may perceive a higher throughput of the TCP layer and thus an increased QoS.

It can be noted that apart from actually changing the window field when relaying a TCP segment, the QoS Proxy could also influence the communicating end users to change the window field. This could for example be done by explicitly controlling links towards the end users.

It is believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description and, while the invention shown and described herein has been characterized as particular embodiments, changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method for providing quality of service in a wireless local area network, comprising the steps of: processing received data from at least one mobile terminal using a quality of service proxy; and providing a quality of service operation to the at least one mobile tenninal.

2. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of processing further comprises the steps of: receiving a frame via the quality of service proxy from a mobile terminal; discarding the received frame; and preventing transmission of an acknowledgment of receipt of the frame back to the mobile tenninal.

3. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of processing further comprises the steps of: receiving a frame via the quality of service proxy from a mobile terminal; and discarding the received frame.

4. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of processing further comprises the steps of: receiving a frame via the quality of service proxy from a mobile terminal; preventing transmission of an acknowledgment of receipt of the frame back to the mobile teπninal; and forwarding the frame to a wired network.

5. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of processing further comprises the steps of: setting a network allocation vector for each mobile terminal of a plurality of mobile tenninals associated with an access point; transmitting a unicast CF-End frame to at least one mobile teπninal of the plurality of mobile tenninals; and resetting a network allocation vector for the at least one mobile tenninal responsive the unicast CF-End frame to enable DCF access to the wireless network.

6. The method of Claim 5, further comprising the steps of: broadcasting a CF-End frame to the plurality of mobile terminals; and resetting the network allocation vector for any remaining mobile tenninals.

7. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of processing further comprises the steps of. transmitting a frame from an access point that can be received by each of a plurality of mobile terminals, said frame addressed to a particular mobile station and including a value in a duration/ID field that is larger than required; setting a NAV addressed for each mobile teπninal to which the frame was not addressed according to the indicated value; providing priority access to the access point by the particular mobile station for a time period responsive to the larger than required value.

8. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the wireless is an 802.1 1 wireless local area network.

9. Method according to claim 1 characterised in that the proxy modifies the ToS field in the IPv4 header.

10. Method according to claim 1 characterised in that the proxy modifies the Traffic Class field in the IPv6.

11. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the proxy deliberately delays one or more IP packets.

12. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that the proxy deliberately drops one or more IP packets.

13. Method according to claim 1 characterised in that the communicating peers use TCP in their communication.

14. Method according to claim 1 characterised in that the communicating peers use UDP in their communication.

15. Method according to claim 1 characterised in that the communicating peers use RTP in their communication.

16. Method according to claim 13 characterised in that a proxy splits TCP connections, that is, intercepts and acknowledges segments on behalf of the communicating peers.

17. Method according to claim 16 characterised in that a proxy modifies the window field in the TCP header.

18. Method according to claim 17 characterised in that a proxy influence the value a communicating peer sets in the window field.

19. Method according to any preceding claim wherein, the proxy resides in an AP.