WO2002079986A1 - Legacy system interface - Google Patents
Legacy system interface Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2002079986A1 WO2002079986A1 PCT/GB2002/001406 GB0201406W WO02079986A1 WO 2002079986 A1 WO2002079986 A1 WO 2002079986A1 GB 0201406 W GB0201406 W GB 0201406W WO 02079986 A1 WO02079986 A1 WO 02079986A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- host system
- transaction
- data
- information
- database
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/50—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
- G06F9/5005—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request
- G06F9/5027—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2209/00—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/00
- G06F2209/50—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/50
- G06F2209/5021—Priority
Definitions
- This invention relates to the field of legacy systems, particularly but not exclusively to the transfer of information to and/or from legacy or host systems.
- screen scraper systems are intrinsically hostile to host systems, since they seek to work around the constraints imposed by the host system. Therefore, errors in the screen scraper program can easily crash the host system. Additionally, screen scraper applications can cause performance problems for a host computer as the speed at which they work and the sheer volume of work they generate far exceed that which would be expected from a human. As a result, the code for establishing each virtual session has to be extensively tested to ensure that it will not create any such problems. Furthermore, the aim of creating a virtual session is to enable the simultaneous running of a number of such sessions, each requesting a variety of information from the host system. Such uncontrolled interaction with the host system can again lead to system failure.
- apparatus for providing an interface between a client application and a host computer system comprising a plurality of servers for communicating with the host system, a control hub for controlling communications between the client application and the host system and a database connected to the control hub, wherein the control hub is arranged to control said communications in accordance with data held in the database.
- the sessions to be established by each server can be controlled, so allowing control of the number of sessions which can seek to access particular aspects of the host system and the amount and speed of work undertaken.
- apparatus for controlling an interface to a host computer system comprising means for receiving requests for information from a plurality of clients, means for associating each of said requests for information with data stored in a database, said data representing instructions for the host system and means for instructing a server to retrieve information from the host system in accordance with the data.
- the invention also provides a transaction server for use in an interface between a client application and a host computer system, the interface including a plurality of servers for communicating with the host system, a control hub for controlling communications between the client application and the host system and a first database connected to the control hub, the control hub being arranged to control said communications in accordance with data held in the first database, the transaction server comprising means for receiving the data from the control hub and a second database connected to the server, further comprising means arranged to interrogate the host system in accordance with the received data and the data stored in the second database.
- a method of interfacing to a host computer system comprising the steps of requesting information from a control hub, the hub being arranged to control communications between a client and the host system via a plurality of servers, retrieving instructions to be input to the host system from a database connected to a selected server and inputting the instructions to the host system via the selected server.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an information retrieval system according to the invention
- Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a conventional server computer
- Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of the information retrieval system of Figure 1.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an information transfer interface 1 between a legacy or host system 2 and a plurality of clients 3 that requires information from the host system 2.
- the interface 1 comprises a group of server computers 4 - 7, referred to herein as transaction servers (TS), connected to the host system 2 and controlled via a hub computer 8.
- the transaction servers 4 - 7 are essentially data driven interfaces into the host system 2. Although 4 transaction servers are shown, the interface can have fewer or more servers, for example 15 servers.
- the hub computer 8 is connected to a database 9, for example an Oracle database, which is used as a communication mechanism for the clients 3 to be able to talk through the transaction servers 4 - 7 to the host system 2, as will be described in detail below.
- Each of the transaction servers 4 - 7 is associated with a local copy 10 of a database which defines the host actions to be taken on behalf of the client applications 3.
- Each of the transaction servers 4 - 7 is capable of establishing 30 virtual sessions. On the assumption that there are 15 transaction servers in total, this makes a possible 450 sessions.
- Each computer comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 11 for executing computer programs and managing and controlling the operation of the computer.
- the CPU 11 is connected to a number of devices via a bus 12, the devices including a first storage device 13, for example a hard disk drive for storing system and application software, a second storage device 14 such as a floppy disk drive or CD/DND drive for reading data from and/or writing data to a removable storage medium and memory devices including ROM 15 and RAM 16.
- the computer further includes a network card 17 for interfacing to a network.
- the network connection enables, for example, the control hub 8 to connect to each of the transaction servers 4 - 7, and the transaction servers 4 - 7 to connect to the host 2.
- the computer can also include user input/output devices such as a mouse 18 and keyboard 19 connected to the bus 12 via an input/output port 20, as well as a display 21. It will be understood by the skilled person that the above described architecture is not limiting, but is merely an example of a typical computer architecture. It will be further understood that the described computer has all the necessary operating system and application software to enable it to fulfil its purpose.
- the TRA ⁇ S_TYPES table holds a list of transactions and their priority, on a scale of 1 - 10.
- Each transaction identified by a transaction identifier TI, comprises a series of instructions which will form the basis of an interrogation session between a transaction server 4 - 7 and the host 2.
- Each transaction is associated with a priority level to enable the hub 8 to prioritise the jobs it receives in accordance with the importance of the job.
- the CLIENTS table holds a list of all client applications 3 together with the parameters MIN JOBS, which represents the number of sessions which are dedicated to those clients and MAXJOBS, which represents the maximum number of jobs that a client is permitted to run on the hub 8 at one time.
- the HUB_IN table holds new jobs, with a parameter PRI_INDEX representing the order in which they are to be processed.
- the HUB_OUT table holds all the responses, i.e. the result of job requests placed in HUB_IN. The Hub 8 actively manages this table and deletes any responses that have been read by client applications 3.
- the Priority Index Modifier is a registry setting that is a multiplier for the priority to allow priority tuning. Its default value is 1.
- the parameter Max Sessions is a registry setting specifying the number of mainframe sessions available to the hub
- a client application 3 requiring information from the host 2 first makes a request for the information from the hub 8 (step si).
- the request relates to a transaction which has previously been set up in the local databases 10.
- a transaction is defined by a series of database tables specifying the screen actions needed to access the host system 2.
- the screen actions specify each screen of the host system 2 and how information is organised on the screen.
- the request is in the general form TI/input_message, where TI is the transaction identifier and input_message represents parameters which are used in conjunction with the screen actions, such as the data to be displayed when the transaction is running.
- a client application 3 calls a transaction and supplies any required arguments.
- the transaction server 4 - 7 to which the transaction is allocated looks up the transaction in the Transactions table, which defines the start point for each transaction.
- the transaction also defines the returned values and their order.
- the hub 8 receives such requests, referred to herein as jobs, from a plurality of clients (step s2) and every processing cycle, loads the jobs into the HUB_IN database table (step s3). It then performs certain access and load control checks (step s4). These checks are part of the functionality of the hub 8.
- One of the functions of the hub is access control, to ensure that only requests from approved IP (Internet Protocol) addresses are accepted.
- Another function is load limitation, to ensure that the host is not overloaded and to allocate host time between various users fairly.
- the load limitations are expressed, for example, as maximum requests per hour/ day per client and maximum concurrent jobs per client.
- the client IP addresses are arranged, for example, into projects and all of the relevant parameters set at the project level.
- the hub 8 sets the parameter PRI_INDEX for each job to determine the order in which the jobs will be executed (step s6).
- PRI_INDEX is set in accordance with the priority for the requested transaction specified in the TRANS_TYPES table, for example, as the system time + (Transaction priority*Priority index modifier) in minutes.
- the hub determines if the client is running fewer jobs than MINJOBS (step s7). If this is the case, then the client is not making use of all the sessions dedicated to it and the hub 8 is loaded with the amount of jobs for this client which bring the running jobs up to MINJOBS, assuming sufficient jobs exist (step s8). Jobs are loaded in accordance with the PRI_INDEX parameter, starting with the lowest first.
- the free session pool is calculated (step s9), as follows:
- FREE POOL Max Sessions - MINJOBS for all clients - No. of jobs over
- the hub 8 then loads the remaining jobs from the database 9 up to the limit specified by FREE POOL (step slO).
- the jobs are loaded in the order determined by PRI NDEX, irrespective of the client. Once the jobs loaded for a client reach the MAXJOBS limit for the client, no further jobs are loaded for the client.
- the hub 8 then sends the jobs to the transaction servers 4 - 7 which have capacity (step sll).
- the transaction server 4 - 7 which receives a job supplies the host with the data for the transaction as extracted from the local database (step sl2).
- Value 1 and iLength are parameters passed in the input_message from the client application and the return string, for example, ⁇ Value 2 >, is set in the Transactions table.
- the associated set of screen actions is:
- the requested data is transferred from the host 2 to the transaction server 4 - 7 (step sl4) and the transaction server 4 - 7 in turn returns the result to the hub 8 (step si 5), which stores it in the HUB_OUT table (step si 6).
- Each of the transaction servers 4 - 7 periodically sends a status message (step sl7) which is received at the hub (step si 8) and informs the hub of, for example, the status of the transaction server and how much work it can take, for example, the number of available sessions.
- a cache memory can be provided to cache information at the hub, so that information which has previously been retrieved from the host 2 can be quickly provided in response to a transaction request, thereby reducing the work the host system has to do.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP02716919A EP1374050A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-03-27 | Legacy system interface |
US10/471,425 US20040078428A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-03-27 | Legacy system interface |
CA002440805A CA2440805A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-03-27 | Legacy system interface |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP01302945 | 2001-03-29 | ||
EP01302945.9 | 2001-03-29 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2002079986A1 true WO2002079986A1 (en) | 2002-10-10 |
Family
ID=8181847
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2002/001406 WO2002079986A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-03-27 | Legacy system interface |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20040078428A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1374050A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2440805A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002079986A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8122147B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2012-02-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method for acknowledgement of messages in a star network |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2338093A (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 1999-12-08 | Mosaix Inc | Prioritized transaction server allocation |
WO2000002365A1 (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2000-01-13 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for utilizing a communications network for providing mobile users access to legacy systems |
US6023684A (en) * | 1997-10-01 | 2000-02-08 | Security First Technologies, Inc. | Three tier financial transaction system with cache memory |
US6205415B1 (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 2001-03-20 | Openconnect Systems Incorporated | Server and terminal emulator for persistent connection to a legacy host system with file transfer |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6125196A (en) * | 1992-10-02 | 2000-09-26 | Unisys Corporation | Method for identifying suspect items in an out-of-balance transaction |
-
2002
- 2002-03-27 US US10/471,425 patent/US20040078428A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-03-27 CA CA002440805A patent/CA2440805A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-03-27 WO PCT/GB2002/001406 patent/WO2002079986A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-03-27 EP EP02716919A patent/EP1374050A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6205415B1 (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 2001-03-20 | Openconnect Systems Incorporated | Server and terminal emulator for persistent connection to a legacy host system with file transfer |
US6023684A (en) * | 1997-10-01 | 2000-02-08 | Security First Technologies, Inc. | Three tier financial transaction system with cache memory |
GB2338093A (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 1999-12-08 | Mosaix Inc | Prioritized transaction server allocation |
WO2000002365A1 (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2000-01-13 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for utilizing a communications network for providing mobile users access to legacy systems |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
DUXBURY P: "LEGACY SYSTEMS IN CLIENT-SERVER NETWORKS: A GATEWAY EMPLOYING SCRITPED TERMINAL EMULATION", INGENUITY, INTERNATIONAL COMPUTERS LIMITED, GB, vol. 9, no. 1, 1 May 1994 (1994-05-01), pages 102 - 121, XP000460303, ISSN: 1354-9952 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1374050A1 (en) | 2004-01-02 |
CA2440805A1 (en) | 2002-10-10 |
US20040078428A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5838969A (en) | System and method for collecting and dispatching selected events in a computer application program | |
US6237005B1 (en) | Web server mechanism for processing multiple transactions in an interpreted language execution environment | |
EP0413074B1 (en) | Managing host to workstation file transfer | |
US5859969A (en) | Remote installation system and method | |
US5671414A (en) | Method and apparatus for providing simple secure management of remote servers | |
JP2003303052A (en) | Method and system for operation and management of storage | |
US7673112B2 (en) | Volume management system and method | |
US8001327B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing placement of data in a tiered storage system | |
WO1996018948A9 (en) | Method and apparatus for providing simple, secure management of remote servers | |
US6823513B1 (en) | Workflow distribution process granting to operators with assigned activities access to needed computer resources and withdrawing such access upon the completion of the assigned activity | |
US6973447B1 (en) | System apparatus and method for supporting multiple partitions including multiple systems in boot code | |
WO2006014735A1 (en) | Heterogeneous job dashboard | |
CN103294765A (en) | Policy-based approach and system for provisioning and transforming virtual appliances | |
US20020188672A1 (en) | Server-based computing environment | |
JP2005228278A (en) | Management method, management device and management program of storage area | |
JP2004303190A (en) | Program, information processor, method for controlling information processor, and recording medium | |
JP2022504860A (en) | Controlling storage access for merge operations | |
CN109684270A (en) | Database filing method, apparatus, system, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing | |
US20040078428A1 (en) | Legacy system interface | |
US7202961B2 (en) | Method for dynamically creating a printer driver | |
CA2491385A1 (en) | Printing system and method | |
KR20100058567A (en) | System and method for processing data | |
CN108536782A (en) | Information processing unit and information processing method | |
JP6244496B2 (en) | Server storage system management system and management method | |
US8015207B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for unstructured data mining and distributed processing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2440805 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10471425 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1527/CHENP/2003 Country of ref document: IN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002716919 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002716919 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: JP |