WO2001047842A1 - Process for the production of olefins - Google Patents

Process for the production of olefins Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001047842A1
WO2001047842A1 PCT/GB2000/004794 GB0004794W WO0147842A1 WO 2001047842 A1 WO2001047842 A1 WO 2001047842A1 GB 0004794 W GB0004794 W GB 0004794W WO 0147842 A1 WO0147842 A1 WO 0147842A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
metal
catalyst
platinum
group
hydrocarbon
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2000/004794
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
John William Couves
David Charles Griffiths
Brian Edward Messenger
Ian Allan Beattie Reid
Original Assignee
Bp Chemicals Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GBGB9930598.9A external-priority patent/GB9930598D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0006386A external-priority patent/GB0006386D0/en
Priority to BR0016603-0A priority Critical patent/BR0016603A/en
Priority to AT00985554T priority patent/ATE297367T1/en
Priority to DE60020733T priority patent/DE60020733T2/en
Priority to CA002395376A priority patent/CA2395376A1/en
Application filed by Bp Chemicals Limited filed Critical Bp Chemicals Limited
Priority to EP00985554A priority patent/EP1240120B8/en
Priority to AU21965/01A priority patent/AU777050B2/en
Priority to JP2001549318A priority patent/JP2003519105A/en
Publication of WO2001047842A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001047842A1/en
Priority to NO20023045A priority patent/NO20023045L/en
Priority to AU2004242502A priority patent/AU2004242502A1/en
Priority to US11/253,817 priority patent/US20060069297A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07CACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C5/00Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing the same number of carbon atoms
    • C07C5/42Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing the same number of carbon atoms by dehydrogenation with a hydrogen acceptor
    • C07C5/48Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing the same number of carbon atoms by dehydrogenation with a hydrogen acceptor with oxygen as an acceptor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07CACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C2523/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group C07C2521/00
    • C07C2523/38Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group C07C2521/00 of noble metals
    • C07C2523/54Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group C07C2521/00 of noble metals combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups C07C2523/02 - C07C2523/36
    • C07C2523/56Platinum group metals
    • C07C2523/62Platinum group metals with gallium, indium, thallium, germanium, tin or lead
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/50Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals
    • Y02P20/52Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals using catalysts, e.g. selective catalysts

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the production of olefins.
  • Olefins such as ethylene and propylene may be produced by a variety of processes, including the steam cracking of hydrocarbons or by the dehydrogenation of paraffinic feedstocks. More recently, olefins have been produced by a process known as auto-thermal cracking. In such a process, a hydrocarbon feed is mixed with an oxygen- containing gas and contacted with a catalyst. The hydrocarbon feed is partially combusted, and the heat produced is used to drive the dehydrogenation reaction.
  • Preferred catalysts are supported platinum catalysts such as platinum/gamma alumina spheres, and platinum/monoliths such as platinum/cordierite or mullite monoliths.
  • platinum catalysts are modified with tin, copper or antimony. Specifically, Pt/Sn, Pt/Cu, Pt/Sb and Pt/Sn/Sb catalysts are disclosed.
  • the present invention provides a process for the production of an olefin from a hydrocarbon, which process comprises: partially combusting the hydrocarbon and an oxygen-containing gas in the presence of a catalyst, characterised in that the catalyst comprises platinum and at least one further metal, said further metal being a Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA or a transition metal; wherein said catalyst is a) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sn, Cu or mixtures thereof, and b) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sb or a mixture of Sb and Sn
  • the term "further metal” covers all elements of Group IIIA, IVA, NA and the transition metal series of the Periodic Table
  • the platinum and at least one further metal may be present in the catalyst in any form, for example, in metallic form, or in the form of a metal compound, such as an oxide
  • the partial combustion reaction is carried out by contacting a feed comprising the hydrocarbon and a molecular oxygen containing gas with the catalyst Any suitable oxygen-containing gas may be employed, oxygen being preferred
  • the preferred stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen is 5 to 16, preferably, 5 to 13 5 times, more preferably, 6 to 10 times the stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen required for complete combustion of the hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and water
  • hydrogen is co-fed into the reaction It is believed that in the presence of the catalyst, hydrogen combusts preferentially relative to the hydrocarbon, thereby increasing the olefin selectivity of the overall process
  • Additional feed components such as nitrogen, carbon monoxide and steam may also be fed into the reaction.
  • Suitable Group IIIA metals include Al, Ga, In and Tl Of these, Ga and In are preferred Suitable Group IVA metals include Ge, and Pb Of these, Ge is preferred
  • Suitable Group VA metals include Bi
  • Suitable metals in the transition metal series are any metal from Group IB to VIIIB of the Periodic Table
  • transition metals selected from Groups IB, DOB, VTB, VIIB and VIIIB of the Periodic Table are preferred Examples of such metals include Cr, Mo, W, Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, ⁇ i, Pd, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd and Hg
  • Preferred transition metals are Mo, Rh, Ru, Ir, Pd, and Zn
  • the catalyst comprises only one metal selected from Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA and the transition metal series.
  • the catalyst may comprise Pt and one of Ga, In, Ge and Bi.
  • platinum may nominally form between 0.01 and 5.0 wt %, preferably, between 0.01 and 2.0 wt %, and more preferably, between 0.05 and 1.0 wt % of the total weight of the catalyst. It should be noted, however, that not all the metal employed during the preparation of the catalyst necessarily becomes incorporated in the catalyst composition. Thus, the actual loading of metal may differ from the nominal loading. To ensure that the desired actual metal concentrations are achieved, the nominal metal concentrations may have to be varied accordingly.
  • the actual loading of platinum may be between 10 and up to 100% of the nominal loading. Preferably, the actual loadings are above 40%, more preferably, above 70 % (eg 90 to 99%o) of the nominal values.
  • platinum may actually form between 0.01 and 5.0 wt %, preferably, between 0.01 and 2.0 wt %, and more preferably, between 0.05 and 1.0 wt %> of the total weight of the catalyst.
  • the atomic ratio of platinum to the Group IIIA, IVA or transition metal may be 1 : 0.1 - 50.
  • Pt:Ga Preferred atomic ratios of Pt:Ga are 1 :0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0, even more preferably, 1 : 1.0 - 8.0, most preferably, 1 :5.0 - 8.0, for example, 1 :7.5.
  • Preferred atomic ratios of Pt:In are 1 :0.1 - 10.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 7.0, and most preferably, 1 :0.8 - 3.0., for example, 1 : 1.3.
  • Preferred atomic ratios ofPt:Ge are 1 : 0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0 and most preferably, 1 :0.5 - 12, for example, 1 : 10.8.
  • Pt:Bi are 1 : 0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0 and most preferably, 1 :0.5 - 10.0.
  • the metal is preferably Mo, Rh, Ru, Ir or Zn.
  • the catalyst comprises at least two metals selected from Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA and the transition metal series.
  • the catalyst may comprise Pt, Pd and Sn or Pt, Pd and Cu. Platinum may nominally form between
  • the actual loading of metal may differ from the nominal loading
  • the actual loading of platinum may be between 10 and up to 100%> of the nominal value
  • the actual loadings are above 40%>, more preferably, above 70 % (eg 90 - 99%) of the nominal values
  • the actual loading of platinum is between 0 01 and 5 wt %, preferably, between 0 01 and 2 0 wt %, and more preferably, 0 05 - 1 0 wt % of the total weight of the catalyst
  • the catalyst comprises a) platinum, b) a further transition metal and c) a Group IIIA or IVA metal
  • the transition metal b) is preferably palladium
  • the metal c) is, preferably, a Group IVA metal, more preferably Sn or Ge
  • the atomic ratio of metal b) (eg palladium) to platinum may be 1 0 1 - 10 0, preferably, 1 0 5 - 8 0, and more preferably, 1 1 0 -5 0
  • the atomic ratio of metal b) (eg palladium) to metal c) (eg Sn or Cu) may be 1 0 1 - 60, preferably, 1 0 1 - 50, for example, 1 0 1 - 12 Where metal b) is Pd and metal c) is Sn, the Pd Sn atomic ratio is preferably 1 0 1 - 60, more preferably, 1 0 1 - 50, for example, 1 0 1 -12 0 Where metal b) is Pd, and
  • the catalyst employed may be unsupported
  • the catalyst may be in the form of a metal gauze
  • the catalyst employed in the present process is a supported catalyst
  • the catalyst may be supported on any suitable support Ceramic supports are generally preferred, although metal supports may also be employed Where ceramic supports are used, the composition of the ceramic support may be any oxide or combination of oxides that is stable at high temperatures of, for example, 600°C and 1200°C
  • the support material preferably has a low thermal expansion coefficient, and is resistant to phase separation at high temperatures Suitable ceramic supports include lithium aluminium silicate (LAS), alumina ( ⁇ -
  • the supports may be wash-coated, for example, with ⁇ - Al O 3
  • the structure of the support material is important, as this may affect flow patterns through the catalyst Such flow patterns may influence the transport of reactants and products to and from the catalyst surface, thereby affecting the catalyst's activity
  • the substrate is a continuous multi-channel ceramic structure, such as a foam, a regular channelled monolith or a fibrous pad
  • foam monolith structures tend to provide tortuous paths for reactants and products
  • Such supports may have 20 to 80, preferably, 30 to 50 pores per inch Channel monoliths generally have straighter, channel-like pores These pores are generally smaller, and there may be 80 or more pores per linear inch of catalyst
  • the support may be in the form of spheres or other granular shapes, or may be present as a thin layer or wash coat on another substrate
  • the catalyst employed in the present invention may comprise further elements, such as alkali metals Suitable alkali metals include lithium, sodium, potassium and caesium
  • the catalyst employed in the present invention may be prepared by any method known in the art For example, gel methods and wet-impregnation techniques may be employed Typically, the support is impregnated with one or more solutions comprising the metals, dried and then calcined in air The support may be impregnated in one or more steps Preferably, multiple impregnation steps are employed The support is preferably dried and calcined between each impregnation, and then subjected to a final calcination, preferably, in air The calcined support may then be reduced, for example, by heat treatment in a hydrogen atmosphere
  • the support material is preferably impregnated in a platinum palladium solution, and then in a solution comprising tin
  • the catalyst is dried at eg 50 to 200°C, and calcined at eg 100 to 700°C e g 300 to 700°C,between each impregnation
  • the support is then subjected to a final calcination step at eg 400 to 1500°C in air
  • the catalyst may then be reduced in, for example, a hydrogen atmosphere This reduction step may be carried out at temperatures of up to 1000°C, for example, 300 to 750 °C are employed
  • the catalyst may be in the form of a fluidised or fixed bed Preferably, a fixed bed catalyst is employed
  • the partial combustion reaction may be suitably carried out at a catalyst exit temperature of between 600°C and 1200°C, preferably between 850°C and 1050°C and most preferably, between 900°C and 1000°C
  • the reaction may be carried out at atmospheric or elevated pressure Suitable pressures range from 0 to 2 bara, preferably 1 5 to 2 bara, for example 1 8 bara Elevated pressures of for example, 2 to 50 bara, may also be suitable
  • the hydrocarbon may comprise any suitable hydrocarbon
  • gaseous hydrocarbons are employed Suitable gaseous hydrocarbons include ethane, propane, butane and mixtures thereof
  • the hydrocarbon is passed over the catalyst at a gas hourly space velocity of greater than 10,000 h "1 , preferably above 20,000 h "1 and most preferably, greater than 100,000 h _1 It will be understood, however, that the optimum gas hourly space time velocity will depend upon the pressure and nature of the feed composition
  • heat may also be supplied by pre-heating the hydrocarbon
  • the temperature to which the hydrocarbon, oxygen-containing gas and (optionally) hydrogen mixture may be preheated is limited by the autoignition properties (eg temperature) of the feed
  • reaction products may be quenched as they emerge from the reaction chamber to avoid further reactions taking place
  • Any coke produced in the process of the present invention may be removed by mechanical means, or using one of the decoking methods described in EP 0 709 446
  • Figure 1 depicts an apparatus 10 comprising a reactor 12 surrounded by a furnace 14
  • the reactor 12 may be formed of quartz or metal Where a metal reactor 12 is employed, the inside of the reactor is lined with quartz (not shown)
  • quartz not shown
  • metal reactors are more susceptible to heat loss than quartz reactors
  • the reactor 12 is coupled to an oxygen supply 16 and a hydrocarbon feed supply 18
  • the hydrocarbon feed comprises ethane, and hydrogen and nitrogen
  • a catalyst 20 is located within the reactor 12
  • the catalyst 20 is positioned between a pair of LAS heat shields 22, 24
  • the furnace is set to minimise heat losses, and the reactants 16, 18 are introduced into the reactor via line 26 As the reactants contact the catalyst 20, some of the ethane in the hydrocarbon feed 18 combusts to produce water and carbon oxides
  • the hydrogen co-feed also combusts to produce water Both these combustion reactions are exothermic, and the heat produced is used to drive the dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene Examples
  • the catalyst was prepared by multiple impregnation of a lithium aluminium silicate support having a high purity alumina (HP A) wash-coat.
  • the support was impregnated in 1) a platinum/palladium solution ((NH 3 ) 4 Pt ⁇ Cl 2 , (NH 3 ) 4 Pd ⁇ Cl 2 ), and 2) an
  • the catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.36 wt % Pt, 0.04 wt % Pd and
  • a catalyst having a nominal loading of 1 wt % Pt was prepared by impregnating a lithium aluminium silicate support having an HPA wash-coat in a solution of (NH 3 ) 4 Pt ⁇ Cl 2 .
  • the impregnated support was dried at 120°C, and calcined at 450°C .
  • the catalyst was then calcined in air at 1200°C for 6 hours.
  • the catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.86 wt % Pt.
  • a catalyst comprising Pt and Sn was prepared by impregnating a lithium aluminium silicate support having an HPA wash-coat in a solution of 1) (NH 3 )4Pt ⁇ Cl 2 , and 2) SnCl 2 /HCl.
  • the impregnated support was dried, calcined and reduced as described in connection with Example 1 above.
  • the catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.48 wt % Pt, and 2.80 wt % Sn.
  • Example 2 The catalysts of Example 1, Comparative Example A and Comparative Example
  • the catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam blocks (lithium aluminium silicate with alumina washcoat) with aqueous tetrammineplatinum(II) chloride and germanium tetrachloride in ethanol. Between impregnations the blocks were dried in air at 120-140°C for ca. 30 minutes then calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature and the impregnation procedure was repeated. Once all the impregnation solution had been absorbed onto the foam the blocks were calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours. Several of the calcined blocks were given a further air calcination at 1200°C for 6
  • the catalyst comprised 1.0 wt % Pt and 4.0 wt % Ge.
  • Example 3 The catalyst of Example 3 was tested as a catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using the apparatus of Figure 1.
  • the reactor employed was formed of quartz.
  • the performance of this catalyst was compared to that of Comparative Example A.
  • the dehydrogenation conditions employed are summarised in Table 3 below.
  • Table 4 shows the ethane conversion and selectivities achieved.
  • the catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam block (99.5%o alumina with alumina washcoat) with aqueous tetrammineplatinum(II) chloride and aqueous gallium nitrate.
  • the foam block employed was 28mm diameter and 30mm in depth. Between impregnations, the block was dried in air at 120-140°C for ca. 30 minutes, calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature. Once all the impregnation solution had been absorbed onto the foam block, the block was calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours.
  • the Pt and Ga solutions were prepared with sufficient salt to achieve final Pt/Ga loadings of 0.28 wt%> platinum and 0.75 wt% gallium.
  • the atomic platinum:gallium ratio was 1 :7.5.
  • Example 5 The catalysts of Example 5, and Comparative Example A were tested as catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Each catalyst was mounted in the apparatus of Figure 1, and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction was carried out under the conditions summarised in Table 5 below.
  • the catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam blocks
  • foam block used was 28mm in diameter and 30mm in depth Between impregnations, the block was dried in air at 120-140°C for ca 30 minutes, calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature
  • Example 7 a Pt/In catalyst was prepared in the manner of Example 7 above, except that the catalyst was calcined in air at 1200°C for 6 hours, rather than at 600°C
  • Example 7 The catalysts of Example 7, 8 and Comparative Example A were tested as catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane Each catalyst was mounted in the apparatus of Figure 1, and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction was carried out under the conditions summarised in Table 7 below

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

A process for the production of an olefin from a hydrocarbon, which process comprises: partially combusting the hydrocarbon and an oxygen-containing gas in the presence of a catalyst, characterised in that the catalyst comprises platinum and at least one further metal, said further metal being a Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA or a transition metal; wherein said catalyst is: a) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sn, Cu or mixtures thereof, and b) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sb or a mixture of Sb and Sn.

Description

PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF OLEFINS
The present invention relates to a process for the production of olefins.
Olefins such as ethylene and propylene may be produced by a variety of processes, including the steam cracking of hydrocarbons or by the dehydrogenation of paraffinic feedstocks. More recently, olefins have been produced by a process known as auto-thermal cracking. In such a process, a hydrocarbon feed is mixed with an oxygen- containing gas and contacted with a catalyst. The hydrocarbon feed is partially combusted, and the heat produced is used to drive the dehydrogenation reaction.
An example of an auto-thermal cracking process is described in EP 0 332 289. The patent describes platinum group metals as being capable of supporting combustion beyond the fuel rich limit of flammability. Preferred catalysts are supported platinum catalysts such as platinum/gamma alumina spheres, and platinum/monoliths such as platinum/cordierite or mullite monoliths.
In WO 97/26987, such platinum catalysts are modified with Sn or Cu.
In WO 00/14035, platinum catalysts are modified with tin, copper or antimony. Specifically, Pt/Sn, Pt/Cu, Pt/Sb and Pt/Sn/Sb catalysts are disclosed.
We have now developed other catalysts for auto-thermal cracking.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the production of an olefin from a hydrocarbon, which process comprises: partially combusting the hydrocarbon and an oxygen-containing gas in the presence of a catalyst, characterised in that the catalyst comprises platinum and at least one further metal, said further metal being a Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA or a transition metal; wherein said catalyst is a) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sn, Cu or mixtures thereof, and b) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sb or a mixture of Sb and Sn It should be understood that unless otherwise specified, the term "further metal" covers all elements of Group IIIA, IVA, NA and the transition metal series of the Periodic Table
For the avoidance of doubt, the platinum and at least one further metal may be present in the catalyst in any form, for example, in metallic form, or in the form of a metal compound, such as an oxide
The partial combustion reaction is carried out by contacting a feed comprising the hydrocarbon and a molecular oxygen containing gas with the catalyst Any suitable oxygen-containing gas may be employed, oxygen being preferred
The preferred stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen is 5 to 16, preferably, 5 to 13 5 times, more preferably, 6 to 10 times the stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen required for complete combustion of the hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and water
Preferably, hydrogen is co-fed into the reaction It is believed that in the presence of the catalyst, hydrogen combusts preferentially relative to the hydrocarbon, thereby increasing the olefin selectivity of the overall process
Additional feed components such as nitrogen, carbon monoxide and steam may also be fed into the reaction
Suitable Group IIIA metals include Al, Ga, In and Tl Of these, Ga and In are preferred Suitable Group IVA metals include Ge, and Pb Of these, Ge is preferred
Suitable Group VA metals include Bi
Suitable metals in the transition metal series are any metal from Group IB to VIIIB of the Periodic Table In particular, transition metals selected from Groups IB, DOB, VTB, VIIB and VIIIB of the Periodic Table are preferred Examples of such metals include Cr, Mo, W, Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, Νi, Pd, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd and Hg Preferred transition metals are Mo, Rh, Ru, Ir, Pd, and Zn
In one embodiment of the present invention, the catalyst comprises only one metal selected from Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA and the transition metal series. For example, the catalyst may comprise Pt and one of Ga, In, Ge and Bi.
In such an embodiment, platinum may nominally form between 0.01 and 5.0 wt %, preferably, between 0.01 and 2.0 wt %, and more preferably, between 0.05 and 1.0 wt % of the total weight of the catalyst. It should be noted, however, that not all the metal employed during the preparation of the catalyst necessarily becomes incorporated in the catalyst composition. Thus, the actual loading of metal may differ from the nominal loading. To ensure that the desired actual metal concentrations are achieved, the nominal metal concentrations may have to be varied accordingly. The actual loading of platinum may be between 10 and up to 100% of the nominal loading. Preferably, the actual loadings are above 40%, more preferably, above 70 % (eg 90 to 99%o) of the nominal values. In a preferred embodiment, platinum may actually form between 0.01 and 5.0 wt %, preferably, between 0.01 and 2.0 wt %, and more preferably, between 0.05 and 1.0 wt %> of the total weight of the catalyst. The atomic ratio of platinum to the Group IIIA, IVA or transition metal may be 1 : 0.1 - 50.
Where a Group IIIA metal is employed, it is preferably gallium or indium. Preferred atomic ratios of Pt:Ga are 1 :0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0, even more preferably, 1 : 1.0 - 8.0, most preferably, 1 :5.0 - 8.0, for example, 1 :7.5. Preferred atomic ratios of Pt:In are 1 :0.1 - 10.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 7.0, and most preferably, 1 :0.8 - 3.0., for example, 1 : 1.3.
Where a Group IVA metal is employed, Ge is preferred. Preferred atomic ratios ofPt:Ge are 1 : 0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0 and most preferably, 1 :0.5 - 12, for example, 1 : 10.8.
Where a Group VA metal is employed, Bi is preferred. Preferred atomic ratios of Pt:Bi are 1 : 0.1 - 20.0, more preferably, 1 : 0.2 - 15.0 and most preferably, 1 :0.5 - 10.0.
Where a transition metal is employed, the metal is preferably Mo, Rh, Ru, Ir or Zn.
In another embodiment, the catalyst comprises at least two metals selected from Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA and the transition metal series. For example, the catalyst may comprise Pt, Pd and Sn or Pt, Pd and Cu. Platinum may nominally form between
0.01 and 5 wt %>, preferably, between 0.01 and 2.0 wt %>, and more preferably, 0.05 - 1.0 wt % of the total weight of the catalyst. As described above, the actual loading of metal may differ from the nominal loading Thus, the actual loading of platinum may be between 10 and up to 100%> of the nominal value Preferably, the actual loadings are above 40%>, more preferably, above 70 % (eg 90 - 99%) of the nominal values In a preferred embodiment, the actual loading of platinum is between 0 01 and 5 wt %, preferably, between 0 01 and 2 0 wt %, and more preferably, 0 05 - 1 0 wt % of the total weight of the catalyst
Preferably, the catalyst comprises a) platinum, b) a further transition metal and c) a Group IIIA or IVA metal The transition metal b) is preferably palladium The metal c) is, preferably, a Group IVA metal, more preferably Sn or Ge The atomic ratio of metal b) (eg palladium) to platinum may be 1 0 1 - 10 0, preferably, 1 0 5 - 8 0, and more preferably, 1 1 0 -5 0 The atomic ratio of metal b) (eg palladium) to metal c) (eg Sn or Cu) may be 1 0 1 - 60, preferably, 1 0 1 - 50, for example, 1 0 1 - 12 Where metal b) is Pd and metal c) is Sn, the Pd Sn atomic ratio is preferably 1 0 1 - 60, more preferably, 1 0 1 - 50, for example, 1 0 1 -12 0 Where metal b) is Pd, and metal c) Cu, the atomic Pd Cu ratio is preferably 1 0 1 - 3 0, more preferably, 1 0 2 - 2 0, and most preferably, 1 0 5 - 1 5
The catalyst employed may be unsupported For example, the catalyst may be in the form of a metal gauze Preferably, however, the catalyst employed in the present process is a supported catalyst The catalyst may be supported on any suitable support Ceramic supports are generally preferred, although metal supports may also be employed Where ceramic supports are used, the composition of the ceramic support may be any oxide or combination of oxides that is stable at high temperatures of, for example, 600°C and 1200°C The support material preferably has a low thermal expansion coefficient, and is resistant to phase separation at high temperatures Suitable ceramic supports include lithium aluminium silicate (LAS), alumina (α-
Al2O3), yttria stabilised zirconia, alumina titanate, niascon, and calcium zirconyl phosphate The supports may be wash-coated, for example, with γ- Al O3
The structure of the support material is important, as this may affect flow patterns through the catalyst Such flow patterns may influence the transport of reactants and products to and from the catalyst surface, thereby affecting the catalyst's activity
Preferably, the substrate is a continuous multi-channel ceramic structure, such as a foam, a regular channelled monolith or a fibrous pad The pores of foam monolith structures tend to provide tortuous paths for reactants and products Such supports may have 20 to 80, preferably, 30 to 50 pores per inch Channel monoliths generally have straighter, channel-like pores These pores are generally smaller, and there may be 80 or more pores per linear inch of catalyst The support may be in the form of spheres or other granular shapes, or may be present as a thin layer or wash coat on another substrate
The catalyst employed in the present invention may comprise further elements, such as alkali metals Suitable alkali metals include lithium, sodium, potassium and caesium
The catalyst employed in the present invention may be prepared by any method known in the art For example, gel methods and wet-impregnation techniques may be employed Typically, the support is impregnated with one or more solutions comprising the metals, dried and then calcined in air The support may be impregnated in one or more steps Preferably, multiple impregnation steps are employed The support is preferably dried and calcined between each impregnation, and then subjected to a final calcination, preferably, in air The calcined support may then be reduced, for example, by heat treatment in a hydrogen atmosphere
In the case of a catalyst comprising platinum, palladium and tin, the support material is preferably impregnated in a platinum palladium solution, and then in a solution comprising tin Once impregnated, the catalyst is dried at eg 50 to 200°C, and calcined at eg 100 to 700°C e g 300 to 700°C,between each impregnation The support is then subjected to a final calcination step at eg 400 to 1500°C in air The catalyst may then be reduced in, for example, a hydrogen atmosphere This reduction step may be carried out at temperatures of up to 1000°C, for example, 300 to 750 °C are employed
The catalyst may be in the form of a fluidised or fixed bed Preferably, a fixed bed catalyst is employed
The partial combustion reaction may be suitably carried out at a catalyst exit temperature of between 600°C and 1200°C, preferably between 850°C and 1050°C and most preferably, between 900°C and 1000°C
The reaction may be carried out at atmospheric or elevated pressure Suitable pressures range from 0 to 2 bara, preferably 1 5 to 2 bara, for example 1 8 bara Elevated pressures of for example, 2 to 50 bara, may also be suitable
The hydrocarbon may comprise any suitable hydrocarbon Preferably, gaseous hydrocarbons are employed Suitable gaseous hydrocarbons include ethane, propane, butane and mixtures thereof
The hydrocarbon is passed over the catalyst at a gas hourly space velocity of greater than 10,000 h"1, preferably above 20,000 h"1 and most preferably, greater than 100,000 h _1 It will be understood, however, that the optimum gas hourly space time velocity will depend upon the pressure and nature of the feed composition
Advantageously, heat may also be supplied by pre-heating the hydrocarbon The temperature to which the hydrocarbon, oxygen-containing gas and (optionally) hydrogen mixture may be preheated, however, is limited by the autoignition properties (eg temperature) of the feed
Where the cracking reaction is carried out at elevated pressure, the reaction products may be quenched as they emerge from the reaction chamber to avoid further reactions taking place
Any coke produced in the process of the present invention may be removed by mechanical means, or using one of the decoking methods described in EP 0 709 446
These and other aspects of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to Figure 1 of the drawings, which is a schematic view of an apparatus suitable for carrying out an embodiment of the present invention
Figure 1 depicts an apparatus 10 comprising a reactor 12 surrounded by a furnace 14 The reactor 12 may be formed of quartz or metal Where a metal reactor 12 is employed, the inside of the reactor is lined with quartz (not shown) Typically, metal reactors are more susceptible to heat loss than quartz reactors
The reactor 12 is coupled to an oxygen supply 16 and a hydrocarbon feed supply 18 The hydrocarbon feed comprises ethane, and hydrogen and nitrogen A catalyst 20 is located within the reactor 12 The catalyst 20 is positioned between a pair of LAS heat shields 22, 24
The furnace is set to minimise heat losses, and the reactants 16, 18 are introduced into the reactor via line 26 As the reactants contact the catalyst 20, some of the ethane in the hydrocarbon feed 18 combusts to produce water and carbon oxides The hydrogen co-feed also combusts to produce water Both these combustion reactions are exothermic, and the heat produced is used to drive the dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene Examples
Example 1 - Preparation of Pd/Pt/Sn Catalyst
The catalyst was prepared by multiple impregnation of a lithium aluminium silicate support having a high purity alumina (HP A) wash-coat. The support was impregnated in 1) a platinum/palladium solution ((NH3)4PtπCl2, (NH3)4PdπCl2), and 2) an
SnCl2/HCl solution. Between each impregnation, the support was dried at 120°C, and calcined at 450°C . The catalyst was then calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours, and then reduced in an atmosphere of hydrogen (l.Onl/min), and nitrogen (1.5 nl/min) for 1 hour
(at 700°C). The catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.36 wt % Pt, 0.04 wt % Pd and
1.85 wt % Sn.
Comparative Example A - 1 wt% Pt
A catalyst having a nominal loading of 1 wt % Pt was prepared by impregnating a lithium aluminium silicate support having an HPA wash-coat in a solution of (NH3)4PtπCl2. The impregnated support was dried at 120°C, and calcined at 450°C . The catalyst was then calcined in air at 1200°C for 6 hours. The catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.86 wt % Pt.
Comparative Example B - Pt/ Sn
A catalyst comprising Pt and Sn was prepared by impregnating a lithium aluminium silicate support having an HPA wash-coat in a solution of 1) (NH3)4PtπCl2, and 2) SnCl2/HCl. The impregnated support was dried, calcined and reduced as described in connection with Example 1 above. The catalyst was analysed and found to have 0.48 wt % Pt, and 2.80 wt % Sn.
Example 2 The catalysts of Example 1, Comparative Example A and Comparative Example
B above were each tested as catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Each catalyst was mounted in the apparatus of Figure 1, and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction was carried out under the conditions summarised in Table 1 below. For the tests, a metal reactor 12 was employed. Table 1
Figure imgf000009_0001
As shown in Table 2 below, the selectivity of the catalyst of Example 1 towards ethylene is greater than those of Comparative Examples A and B, respectively.
Table 2
Figure imgf000009_0002
Example 3 - Preparation of Pt/Ge catalyst
The catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam blocks (lithium aluminium silicate with alumina washcoat) with aqueous tetrammineplatinum(II) chloride and germanium tetrachloride in ethanol. Between impregnations the blocks were dried in air at 120-140°C for ca. 30 minutes then calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature and the impregnation procedure was repeated. Once all the impregnation solution had been absorbed onto the foam the blocks were calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours. Several of the calcined blocks were given a further air calcination at 1200°C for 6
> hours before testing. Subsequent to air calcination at 600-1200°C the blocks could be reduced in a hydrogen (1.0 nl/min) and nitrogen (1.5 nl/min) atmosphere at 750°C for 1 hour prior to testing. The catalyst comprised 1.0 wt % Pt and 4.0 wt % Ge. Example 4
The catalyst of Example 3 was tested as a catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using the apparatus of Figure 1. The reactor employed was formed of quartz. The performance of this catalyst was compared to that of Comparative Example A. The dehydrogenation conditions employed are summarised in Table 3 below. Table 4 shows the ethane conversion and selectivities achieved.
Table 3
Figure imgf000010_0001
Table 4
Figure imgf000010_0002
Example 5 - Preparation of a Pt/Ga catalyst
The catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam block (99.5%o alumina with alumina washcoat) with aqueous tetrammineplatinum(II) chloride and aqueous gallium nitrate. The foam block employed was 28mm diameter and 30mm in depth. Between impregnations, the block was dried in air at 120-140°C for ca. 30 minutes, calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature. Once all the impregnation solution had been absorbed onto the foam block, the block was calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours.
The Pt and Ga solutions were prepared with sufficient salt to achieve final Pt/Ga loadings of 0.28 wt%> platinum and 0.75 wt% gallium. The atomic platinum:gallium ratio was 1 :7.5.
Prior to testing the catalysts were given an in situ reduction at 750°C under flowing hydrogen (ca. 1.0 nl/min) and nitrogen (ca. 1.5 nl/min) for 1 hour . Example 6
The catalysts of Example 5, and Comparative Example A were tested as catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Each catalyst was mounted in the apparatus of Figure 1, and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction was carried out under the conditions summarised in Table 5 below.
Table 5
Figure imgf000011_0001
As shown in Table 6 below, the selectivity of the catalyst of Example 5 towards ethylene is greater than that of Comparative Example A.
Table 6
Figure imgf000011_0002
Figure imgf000012_0001
Example 7 - Preparation of a Pt/In catalyst
The catalyst was prepared by sequential impregnation of 30ppi ceramic foam blocks
(99 5% alumina with alumina washcoat) with aqueous tetrammineplatinum(II) chloride and aqueous indium nitrate The foam block used was 28mm in diameter and 30mm in depth Between impregnations, the block was dried in air at 120-140°C for ca 30 minutes, calcined in air at 450°C for 30 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature
Once all the impregnation solution had been absorbed onto the foam the blocks were calcined in air at 600°C for 6 hours The Pt and In solutions were prepared with sufficient salt to achieve final Pt/In loadings of 0 54 wt% platinum and 0 4 wt%> indium The catalyst had an atomic platinum indium ratio of 1 1 26
Prior to testing the catalysts were given an in situ reduction at 750°C under flowing hydrogen (ca 1 0 nl/min) and nitrogen (ca 1 5 nl/min) for 1 hour Example 8
In this Example, a Pt/In catalyst was prepared in the manner of Example 7 above, except that the catalyst was calcined in air at 1200°C for 6 hours, rather than at 600°C
Example 9
The catalysts of Example 7, 8 and Comparative Example A were tested as catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane Each catalyst was mounted in the apparatus of Figure 1, and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction was carried out under the conditions summarised in Table 7 below
Table 7
Figure imgf000012_0002
As shown in Table 8 below, the catalysts of Examples 7 and 8 show higher selectivities towards ethylene than the catalyst of Comparative Example A.
Table 8
Figure imgf000013_0001

Claims

Claims
1 A process for the production of an olefin from a hydrocarbon, which process comprises partially combusting the hydrocarbon and an oxygen-containing gas in the presence of a catalyst, characterised in that the catalyst comprises platinum and at least one further metal, said further metal being a Group IIIA, Group IN A, VA or a transition metal; wherein said catalyst is a) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sn, Cu or mixtures thereof, and b) not a platinum catalyst consisting essentially of platinum modified with Sb or a mixture of Sb and Sn.
2 A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen is 5 to 13.5 times, preferably, 6 to 10 times the stoichiometric ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygen required for complete combustion of the hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and water
3 A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said partial combustion of said hydrocarbon and oxygen-containing gas is carried out in the presence of hydrogen
4 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst comprises at least one further metal which is a Group IIIA metal 5 A process as claimed in claim 4, wherein said Group IIIA metal is either Ga or In
6 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst comprises at least one further metal which is a Group IVA metal 7 A process as claimed in claim 6, wherein said Group IVA metal is Ge or Pb
8 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst comprises at least one further metal which is a Group VA metal
9 A process as claimed in claim 8, wherein said Group VA metal is Bi 10 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst comprises at least one further metal which is a transition metal
11 A process as claimed in claim 10, wherein said transition metal is selected from the group consisting of Cr, Mo, W, Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd and
Hg 12 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst comprises only one said further metal
13 A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 1 1, wherein said catalyst comprises at least two further metals selected from Group IIIA, Group IVA, VA and the transition metal series 14 A process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the catalyst comprises one metal selected from Groups IIIA, IVA and VA, and one metal selected from the transition metal series
15 A process as claimed in claim 14, wherein said metal selected from the transition metal series is Pt 16 A process as claimed in claim 14 or 15, wherein said one metal selected from
Groups IIIA, IVA and VA is Sn
17 A process as claimed in claim 13, wherein said catalyst comprises two metals selected from the transition metal series
18 A process as claimed in claim 17, wherein said catalyst comprises Pd, Pt and Cu 19 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said catalyst further comprises alkali metal ions
20 A process as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said hydrocarbon comprises at least one hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of ethane, propane and butane
PCT/GB2000/004794 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for the production of olefins WO2001047842A1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001549318A JP2003519105A (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Olefin production method
AU21965/01A AU777050B2 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for the production of olefins
AT00985554T ATE297367T1 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 METHOD FOR PRODUCING OLEFINS
DE60020733T DE60020733T2 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF OLEFINES
CA002395376A CA2395376A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for the production of olefins
BR0016603-0A BR0016603A (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for olefin production
EP00985554A EP1240120B8 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for the production of olefins
NO20023045A NO20023045L (en) 1999-12-23 2002-06-21 Process for producing olefins
AU2004242502A AU2004242502A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2004-12-30 Process for the production of olefins
US11/253,817 US20060069297A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2005-10-20 Process for the production of olefins

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9930598.9A GB9930598D0 (en) 1999-12-23 1999-12-23 Process for production of olefins
GB9930598.9 1999-12-23
GB0006386A GB0006386D0 (en) 2000-03-16 2000-03-16 Process for production of olefins
GB0006386.7 2000-03-16

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/253,817 Continuation US20060069297A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2005-10-20 Process for the production of olefins

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001047842A1 true WO2001047842A1 (en) 2001-07-05

Family

ID=26243887

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2000/004794 WO2001047842A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2000-12-14 Process for the production of olefins

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (2) US20030055306A1 (en)
EP (2) EP1240120B8 (en)
JP (1) JP2003519105A (en)
CN (1) CN1250491C (en)
AT (1) ATE297367T1 (en)
AU (2) AU777050B2 (en)
BR (1) BR0016603A (en)
CA (1) CA2395376A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60020733T2 (en)
GC (1) GC0000162A (en)
MY (1) MY127818A (en)
NO (1) NO20023045L (en)
WO (1) WO2001047842A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7067455B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2006-06-27 Conocophillips Company Copper modified catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation
WO2006077368A1 (en) * 2005-01-21 2006-07-27 Ineos Europe Limited Process for the production of olefins by autothermal cracking
US7807860B2 (en) 2003-02-18 2010-10-05 Ineos Europe Limited Autothermal cracking process and reactor
US9782754B2 (en) 2012-07-26 2017-10-10 Saudi Basic Industries Corporation Alkane dehydrogenation catalyst and process for its preparation

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100404129C (en) * 2005-10-25 2008-07-23 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Catalyst for removing hydrocarbon impurities in carbon dioxide, preparation method and application
EP1820569A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2007-08-22 Ineos Europe Limited Process for contacting a hydrocarbon and an oxygen-containing gas with a catalyst bed
US9963407B2 (en) 2013-06-18 2018-05-08 Uop Llc Fluidized catalyst circulation reactor for paraffin oxydative dehydrogenation

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3437703A (en) * 1966-05-05 1969-04-08 Foster Grant Co Inc Catalytic dehydrogenation process and compositions
US4788371A (en) * 1987-12-30 1988-11-29 Uop Inc. Catalytic oxidative steam dehydrogenation process
WO1994004632A1 (en) * 1992-08-20 1994-03-03 Bp Chemicals Limited Process for the production of mono-olefins
WO2000014037A1 (en) * 1998-09-03 2000-03-16 The Dow Chemical Company On-line synthesis and regeneration of a catalyst used in autothermal oxidation

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3123574A (en) * 1964-03-03 Hydrogenation of cottonseed and soybean oils foe shortening stock
US3670044A (en) * 1969-07-18 1972-06-13 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic dehydrogenation process
US3856880A (en) * 1970-03-02 1974-12-24 Petro Tex Chem Corp Oxidative dehydrogenation catalyzed with promoted zinc ferrite
BE789153A (en) * 1971-09-23 1973-03-22 Aquitaine Petrole IMPROVEMENT IN THE MANUFACTURE OF STYRENE
US4435607A (en) * 1981-04-28 1984-03-06 Uop Inc. Dehydrogenation of dehydrogenatable hydrocarbons
CA1211131A (en) * 1981-04-28 1986-09-09 Tamotsu Imai Dehydrogenation of dehydrogenatable hydrocarbons
DE3210708A1 (en) * 1982-03-24 1983-10-06 Basf Ag CATALYST AND ITS USE FOR PRODUCING METHYL METHACRYLATE
JPH05194281A (en) * 1992-01-23 1993-08-03 Nippon Oil Co Ltd Method for dehydrating hydrocarbons

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3437703A (en) * 1966-05-05 1969-04-08 Foster Grant Co Inc Catalytic dehydrogenation process and compositions
US4788371A (en) * 1987-12-30 1988-11-29 Uop Inc. Catalytic oxidative steam dehydrogenation process
WO1994004632A1 (en) * 1992-08-20 1994-03-03 Bp Chemicals Limited Process for the production of mono-olefins
WO2000014037A1 (en) * 1998-09-03 2000-03-16 The Dow Chemical Company On-line synthesis and regeneration of a catalyst used in autothermal oxidation

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7807860B2 (en) 2003-02-18 2010-10-05 Ineos Europe Limited Autothermal cracking process and reactor
US7067455B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2006-06-27 Conocophillips Company Copper modified catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation
WO2006077368A1 (en) * 2005-01-21 2006-07-27 Ineos Europe Limited Process for the production of olefins by autothermal cracking
US9782754B2 (en) 2012-07-26 2017-10-10 Saudi Basic Industries Corporation Alkane dehydrogenation catalyst and process for its preparation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GC0000162A (en) 2005-06-29
CA2395376A1 (en) 2001-07-05
NO20023045L (en) 2002-08-16
JP2003519105A (en) 2003-06-17
US20030055306A1 (en) 2003-03-20
ATE297367T1 (en) 2005-06-15
DE60020733D1 (en) 2005-07-14
EP1240120B8 (en) 2005-08-10
EP1616847A1 (en) 2006-01-18
US20060069297A1 (en) 2006-03-30
EP1240120A1 (en) 2002-09-18
AU2004242502A1 (en) 2005-01-27
CN1434790A (en) 2003-08-06
CN1250491C (en) 2006-04-12
AU777050B2 (en) 2004-09-30
EP1240120B1 (en) 2005-06-08
AU2196501A (en) 2001-07-09
BR0016603A (en) 2003-06-10
NO20023045D0 (en) 2002-06-21
MY127818A (en) 2006-12-29
DE60020733T2 (en) 2006-05-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2004103936A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins
US20040015031A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins
AU2001274338A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins
US7223897B2 (en) Process for the production of olefins
US20060069297A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins
AU779630B2 (en) Process for the production of olefins
US7291760B2 (en) Process for the production of olefins
ZA200204925B (en) Process for the production of olefins.
AU2001267742A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins
WO2004106463A1 (en) Process for the production of olefins

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000985554

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002/04925

Country of ref document: ZA

Ref document number: 200204925

Country of ref document: ZA

Ref document number: 21965/01

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2395376

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2001 549318

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 008190844

Country of ref document: CN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10168482

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000985554

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 21965/01

Country of ref document: AU

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2000985554

Country of ref document: EP