WO2001034877A1 - Alkaline etching solution and process for etching semiconductor wafers - Google Patents
Alkaline etching solution and process for etching semiconductor wafers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001034877A1 WO2001034877A1 PCT/US2000/028238 US0028238W WO0134877A1 WO 2001034877 A1 WO2001034877 A1 WO 2001034877A1 US 0028238 W US0028238 W US 0028238W WO 0134877 A1 WO0134877 A1 WO 0134877A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- wafer
- etching solution
- set forth
- alkaline
- wafers
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 101
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 235000012431 wafers Nutrition 0.000 title claims description 159
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 title claims description 19
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen peroxide Chemical compound OO MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229910000000 metal hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 150000004692 metal hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ozone Chemical compound [O-][O+]=O CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 abstract description 56
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 abstract description 21
- 239000012670 alkaline solution Substances 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 23
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 6
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008119 colloidal silica Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 229910021421 monocrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000007517 polishing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004441 surface measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000032484 Accidental exposure to product Diseases 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitric acid Chemical compound O[N+]([O-])=O GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrous Oxide Chemical class [O-][N+]#N GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000818 accidental exposure Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003486 chemical etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004679 hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009616 inductively coupled plasma Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910017604 nitric acid Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000012487 rinsing solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02002—Preparing wafers
- H01L21/02005—Preparing bulk and homogeneous wafers
- H01L21/02008—Multistep processes
- H01L21/0201—Specific process step
- H01L21/02019—Chemical etching
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/04—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
- H01L21/18—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic Table or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
- H01L21/30—Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
- H01L21/302—Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
- H01L21/306—Chemical or electrical treatment, e.g. electrolytic etching
- H01L21/30604—Chemical etching
- H01L21/30608—Anisotropic liquid etching
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an alkaline etching solution and a process for etching a silicon semiconductor wafer with the alkaline etching solution to produce wafers with highly flat surfaces with a reduced roughness compared to conventional alkaline etching solutions.
- Silicon semiconductor wafers are typically obtained by slicing a single crystal silicon ingot in a direction normal to the axis of the ingot to produce thin wafers, profiling the edges of the wafers, grinding or lapping the wafers to remove surface damage induced by the slicing process, chemically etching the wafers to remove mechanical damage produced by the prior shaping steps, and finally, chemically/mechanically polishing the edge, and at least one surface of each wafer with, for example, a colloidal silica slurry and a chemical etchant, to ensure that the wafers have highly flat, reflective and damage- free surfaces.
- the wafers are then typically cleaned and quality inspected prior to being packaged.
- silicon semiconductor wafers Prior to chemical etching, silicon semiconductor wafers typically exhibit surface and/or subsurface defects such as embedded particles and physical damage such as micro-cracks, fractures or stress imparted to the wafer by upstream processes such as lapping, grinding and edge profiling. These defects generally occur in the region extending from the surface of the wafer to at least about 2.5 ⁇ m or greater below the surface of the wafer. To remove these defects, therefore at least 2.5 ⁇ m of stock are removed from the surface of the wafer using an acidic or alkaline etchant thus removing the embedded particles, contaminants, and physical damage contained in the layer of stock that was removed .
- surface defects such as embedded particles and physical damage such as micro-cracks, fractures or stress imparted to the wafer by upstream processes such as lapping, grinding and edge profiling. These defects generally occur in the region extending from the surface of the wafer to at least about 2.5 ⁇ m or greater below the surface of the wafer. To remove these defects, therefore at least 2.5 ⁇ m of stock are removed
- alkaline etching solutions offer several benefits over acid etching solutions. For example, alkaline etching tends to produce wafers having more uniform and flat surfaces than wafers etched with acid etching solutions, using relatively simple etching equipment. Additionally, alkaline etching solutions provide excellent protection for silicon against deposition of metals (other than iron) , because the metals convert either to insoluble precipitates or soluble salts resulting in a surface with fewer contaminants .
- alkaline etching processes are inherently more safe with lower cost than the acid processes.
- Gaseous byproducts from the alkaline etching process are non-toxic, whereas acid etchants, which typically include nitric acid, produce nitrous oxides (NO x ) as a gaseous byproduct of the acid etching process.
- the NO x are toxic to the human body and tend to be very difficult and costly to remove from the effluent gas to avoid polluting the environment and to comply with environmental regulatory requirements.
- alkaline etching solutions tend to react with skin tissue less quickly than acid etching solutions, making accidental exposure to alkaline etching solutions less dangerous to operating personnel than acid etching solutions .
- Alkaline etching solutions are not superior to acid etching solutions in every respect, however. Wafers subjected to alkaline etching processes often exhibit irregularities on the wafer surface and edge, such as a faceted surface which is revealed as an increased surface roughness compared to wafers etched by acid etching processes. Surface roughness can be reduced in the subsequent polishing step; the polishing time required to produce acceptable surfaces, however, greatly increases with increasing surface roughness. Additionally, some device manufacturers require the backside surface of the wafer to remain "as etched.” Wafers etched with alkaline etching solutions produce wafers with "as etched" backside surfaces with unacceptable surface roughness characteristics. Accordingly, semiconductor manufacturers typically consider the surface roughness problems associated with alkaline etching solutions to outweigh the benefits of alkaline etching and thus use acid etching solutions .
- U.S. Patent No. 5,494,862 discloses a process in which a concentrated solution of sodium or potassium hydroxide, such as a 45 % by weight solution of sodium hydroxide, is used to etch the wafer. The etched wafer subsequently exhibits the increased surface roughness caused by the alkaline etching as discussed above.
- U.S. Patent No. 5,494,862 requires a light backside polishing in addition to the standard practice of polishing the front side of the wafer, thus increasing both the complexity and cost of the overall process.
- the increased surfaces roughness caused by the conventional alkaline etchant generally results in increases in the polishing time for polishing the front surface and edge surface of the wafer thus reducing the throughput and increasing the cost of the overall process.
- an alkaline etching solution a process for using said solution for producing uniformly etched wafers; the provisions of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching in which the etched wafers have a reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched with conventional alkaline etching solutions; the provisions of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching with enhanced safety characteristics over acid etching; the provision of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching which improves the throughput of subsequent polishing steps; and the provision of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching which reduces the amount of toxic emissions and/or the cost of environmental controls.
- the present invention is directed to a process for etching silicon semiconductor wafers wherein the wafers are subjected to an alkaline etching solution comprising about 25 to about 65 percent by weight base and about 0.5 to about 10 percent by weight oxidizing agent wherein said base comprises a metal hydroxide and said oxidizing agent comprises hydrogen peroxide or ozone.
- Fig. 1 is a bar chart showing the surface roughness of p " wafers as a function of etchant composition, as described in Example 1.
- Fig. 2 is a bar chart showing the surface roughness of p + wafers as a function of etchant composition, as described in Example 2.
- Table 1 shows the effect of the present invention upon edge roughness and polishing time, as described in Example 3.
- the process of the present invention is designed to utilize an alkaline etching solution comprising a base and an oxidizing agent to remove at least about 2.5 ⁇ m of stock from the surface of the wafer thereby removing the surface and subsurface defects such as embedded particles and mechanical damage such as those imparted to the wafer during slicing, grinding and/or lapping process steps, such that the resulting wafer has a reduced degree of roughness over wafers etched with typical alkaline etching solutions.
- Wafers produced with the etching solution of the present invention have a greater uniform flatness and reduced roughness after etching such that the subsequent polishing time is significantly reduced.
- Alkaline solutions comprising a base and an oxidizing agent have been previously used as cleaning solutions, wherein dilute alkaline hydroxides are used in combination with oxidizing agents to repeatedly oxidize the surface of the wafer producing a thin silicon dioxide layer which is then immediately etched from the surface by the alkaline component thus removing contaminants from the surface of the wafer.
- cleaning methods are only designed to clean the surface of the wafer, and generally remove less than 1 ⁇ m and more typically remove less than about 100 nm of stock from the surface of the wafer.
- the rate at which cleaning solutions remove stock from the surface of the wafer decreases rapidly such that cleaning solutions will not remove sufficient quantities of stock to eliminate the defects described above, even when left in contact with the cleaning solutions for extended periods of time.
- the amount of stock removed is several orders of magnitude less than that required to remove the embedded particles, contaminants, and physical damage as discussed above.
- the concentrations of the base and oxidizing agent in the alkaline etching solution of the present invention are such that the etching effects of the base are greater than the oxidation effects of the oxidizing agent with the net effect being the removal of stock from the surface of the wafer.
- the process of the present invention employs as a starting material a silicon semiconductor wafer which has been sliced from a single crystal silicon ingot and further processed using conventional grinding apparatus to profile the peripheral edge of the wafer and to roughly improve the general flatness and parallelism of the front and back surfaces.
- the wafer may be sliced from the ingot using any means known to persons skilled in the art, such as, for example, an internal diameter slicing apparatus or a wiresaw slicing apparatus.
- the peripheral edge of the wafer is preferably rounded to reduce the risk of wafer damage during further processing.
- the wafer is then subjected to a conventional grinding process to reduce the non-uniform damage caused by the slicing process and to improve the parallelism and flatness of the wafer.
- a conventional grinding process to reduce the non-uniform damage caused by the slicing process and to improve the parallelism and flatness of the wafer.
- Such grinding processes are well known to persons skilled in the art. Typical grinding processes generally remove about 20 ⁇ m to about 30 ⁇ m of stock from each surface to roughly improve flatness using, for example, a resin bond, 1200 to 6000 mesh wheel operating at about 2000 RPM to about 4000 RPM.
- the silicon semiconductor wafer may have any conductivity type and resistivity which is appropriate for a semiconductor application. Additionally, the wafer may have any diameter and target thickness which is appropriate for a semiconductor application. For example, the diameter is generally at least about 100 mm and typically is 150 mm, 200 mm, 300 mm or greater and the thickness may be from about 475 to about 900 ⁇ m or greater, with the thickness typically increasing with increasing diameter.
- the wafer may also have any crystal orientation. In general, however, the wafers have a ⁇ 100> or ⁇ 111> crystal orientation.
- the wafer Having been sliced from the ingot and subjected to the mechanical shaping processes described above, the wafer typically exhibits surface and/or subsurface defects such as embedded particles and physical damage such as micro- cracks, fractures or stress imparted to the wafer by upstream processes such as lapping, grinding and edge profiling. These defects generally occur in the region extending from the surface of the wafer to at least about 2.5 ⁇ m or greater below the surface of the wafer.
- the surface of the wafer generally has a surface 5 roughness of at least about 50 nm to about 100 nm or greater.
- the surface roughness may be measured using any metrology device capable of measuring the surface roughness. Such devices are well known in the art. For example, the surface roughness may be measured using an MP
- the present invention uses an alkaline etching solution to remove sufficient amounts of stock, at least about 2.5 ⁇ m or greater, from the surface of the wafer such that the region containing the defects described above is
- the present invention may be used to eliminate any other surface or subsurface defects which can be eliminated by removing stock from the surface of the wafer, or simply to remove a desired amount of stock from the surface of the wafer.
- the surface of the wafer is brought into contact with an etching solution for a sufficient time period to remove a desired quantity of stock from the surface of the wafer.
- the wafer is immersed in an etching solution
- etching solution either individually, or concurrently with multiple wafers to remove a sufficient quantity of stock from the surface of the wafer such that the defects located in the region removed are eliminated.
- the precise number of wafers etched in a single bath is not critically narrow, typically 25 wafers are etched at a time, wherein said wafers are held in a support and rotated during the etching process.
- the rate of rotation is not critically important, however it typically varies from about 5 to about 100 revolutions per minute.
- the surface of the wafer may be contacted with the etching solution by spin etching, wherein one surface of the wafer is placed on a rotatable chuck, and the etching solution is sprayed on the surface apposing the surface attached to the chuck, while the wafer is rotated at high speed. While not critically narrow, the rotation speed of the chucked wafer ranges from about 10 to about 1000 rotations per minute.
- the etching solution comprises a base and an oxidizing agent wherein the base is comprised of a metal hydroxide such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, and the oxidizing agent is comprised of hydrogen peroxide and/or ozone. Furthermore, the etching solution is about 25 to about 65 percent by weight base, more preferably about 45 to about 50 percent by weight base and about 0.5 to about 10 percent by weight, preferably about 0.6 to about 6 percent by weight, and most preferably about 0.6 to about 3 percent by weight oxidizing agent. Furthermore, the purity of the base and oxidizing agent and subsequently the etching solution, while not critically narrow, should be at least sufficient for general semiconductor wafer processing.
- the base and oxidizing agent comply with the purity profiles as set forth in the Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International standards (hereinafter SEMI standards) .
- SEMI standards Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International standards
- electronics grade hydrogen peroxide and potassium hydroxide, that meet or exceed the SEMI base standards are commercially available under the trademark CleanRoom ® from the Electronic Chemicals Division of Ashland Chemical Co. (Columbus, OH) .
- the temperature of the etching solution affects the etch rate. For example, increases in temperature generally results in an increase in etch rate. However, the solubility of the oxidizing agent in the etching solution generally decreases with increasing temperature. Therefore, it is preferred that the temperature of the etching solution is maintained at about 35°C to about 95°C, more preferably about 65 °C to about 95 °C and most preferably about 90°C.
- the surface of the wafer remains in contact with the etching solution for about 1 to about 5 minutes or until the desired amount of stock is remove from the wafer.
- the wafer is then removed from the etching solution and immediately rinsed with deionized water.
- deionized water may be used in place of the deionized water.
- the etching solution may be reused to subsequently etch additional wafers. Accordingly, additional quantities of metal hydroxide, water and/or oxidizing agent may be added to replace solution that is used up during the etching of previous wafers .
- the amount of time the wafer remains in contact with the etching solution is generally determined based on the desired amount of silicon to be removed from the surface of the wafer.
- the amount of silicon to be removed is a function of the flatness of the incoming wafer, the amount of defects on the surface and subsurface of the wafer, the depth at which the defects occur beneath the surface of the wafer, and the desired characteristics of the finished wafer. In a preferred embodiment, greater than about 2.5 ⁇ m, more preferably about 3 to about 10 ⁇ m, and even more preferably, about 3 to about 6 ⁇ m of material is removed from each surface of the wafer.
- the amount of stock actually removed can be determined by measuring the total thickness of the wafer prior to and after etching. Once the amount of stock removed is determined, for a given wafer at a given immersion time and etchant concentration, the time a subsequent wafer remains immersed may be varied to increase or decrease the amount of stock removed. Alternatively, the concentration of the etchant may be monitored wherein the reduction in the concentration of the etchant is directly related to the amount of material removed from the surface. Accordingly, the reduction in the concentration of the etchant may be used to predict the amount of stock removed.
- the etchant concentration may be measured by any means known to persons skilled in the art, and may be determined by, for example, inductively coupled plasma magnetic spectroscopy . Persons skilled in the art may utilize any means known in the art for determining the amount of stock removed without varying from the scope of the present invention.
- the resulting wafer has reduced surface and subsurface defects wherein the embedded particles and physical defects located in the layer of silicon removed from the wafer have been eliminated, and the resulting wafer surfaces have a roughness ranging from about 1,000 to about 2800 A as measured using a model MP 300 surface measurement devise.
- the wafer is polished using conventional polishing techniques.
- the wafer having a reduced roughness compared to wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants requires less time for subsequent edge and notch polishing steps.
- the edge and notch of the wafer is polished using a Speedfam EP 300 edge polishing apparatus which is commercially available from Speedfam Co.
- abrasive pad such as a Suba4 abrasive pad which is commercially available from Rodel Co.
- the time required to polish the notch of the wafer etched by the present invention to a roughness of about 30 to about 500 A is approximately 15 to 30 seconds whereas the time required for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants is 30 to 60 seconds.
- the amount of material removed from wafers etched by the present invention to achieve the desired roughness is about 3 to about 6 microns compared to 5 to 8 microns for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants.
- the front and back surfaces of wafers etched by the present invention have a roughness of less than about 2800 A, more preferably less than about 2500 A, o more preferably less than about 2000 A and most preferably less than about 1500 A compared to the front and back surfaces of wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants which generally have a surface roughness of greater than 2800 A, more typically greater than 3000 A and o may have a surface roughness of at least 4500 A or greater. Consequently, the polishing time for the front and back surface is less for wafers etched by the present invention than for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants.
- the front surface and optionally the back surface of the wafer are polished using a conventional polishing apparatus such as a 6 DZ polishing apparatus which is commercially available from Strasbaugh Co. (San Luis Obispo, California) , wherein a polishing pad for example, a Suba polishing pad which is commercially available from Rodel Co.
- a conventional polishing apparatus such as a 6 DZ polishing apparatus which is commercially available from Strasbaugh Co. (San Luis Obispo, California) , wherein a polishing pad for example, a Suba polishing pad which is commercially available from Rodel Co.
- a polishing pressure of about 40 to about 65 psi to the surface of the wafer at a temperature of about 20 to about 35 °C, while the polishing table is rotated at a speed of about 80 to about 120 RPM during which time, an abrasive mixture comprising colloidal silica is added at a flow rate of about 40 to about 100 ml/min and an alkaline solution comprising, for example, about 1 to about 3 weight percent metal hydroxide wherein said metal hydroxide comprises potassium hydroxide and/or sodium hydroxide at a pH of approximately 9.5 to 12 is added at a flow rate of about 120 to about 300 ml/min.
- the front and/or back surface are o polished to a roughness of about 5 to about 20 A, with a global thickness variation of less than about 1 micron and a local thickness variation of less than about 0.2 micron.
- the time required to polish the front or back surface of the wafer etched by the present invention is approximately 200 seconds whereas the time required to polish the front or back surface of a wafer etched by conventional alkaline etchants is approximately 300 seconds.
- the throughput of the surface polishing process is improved.
- EXAMPLE 1 P " ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H 2 0 2 at approximately 90°C. Additional, P " ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C. The wafers etched in the etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H 2 0 2 exhibited a significantly reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant. Figure 1 shows the improvement in surface roughness when wafers are produced using the etchant of the present invention, as compared with a purely alkaline, 45 % by weight KOH etch, for an equivalent amount of stock removal .
- P + ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H 2 0 2 at approximately 90°C. Additional, P + ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C.
- the wafers etched in the etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H 2 0 2 exhibited a significantly reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant.
- Figure 2 shows the improvement in surface roughness when wafers are produced using the etchant of the present invention, as compared with a purely alkaline, 45 % by weight KOH etch, for an equivalent amount of stock removal.
- EXAMPLE 3 Silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 3 % by weight H 2 0 2 at approximately 90°C. Additional silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C. The edge of the etched wafers was then inspected visually under a bright light, and measured for roughness. The results shown in Table 1, show the edge of the wafers etched using the etchant of the present invention, were shinny in appearance and less rough, as compared with wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant.
- the wafers were edge polished to remove all damage on the edge of the wafers.
- the wafers etched, using the etchant of the present invention required less edge polishing time to remove the damage on the edge of the wafer, as compared with wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant as shown in Table 1.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Weting (AREA)
- Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)
Abstract
A process and an alkaline solution for etching a silicon wafer has been discovered wherein the wafer is subjected to an aqueous etching solution comprising a base and an oxidizing agent, wherein the base is comprised of a metal hydroxide such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide and the oxidizing agent is comprised of hydrogen peroxide or ozone, which enables the enhanced benefits of alkaline etching with reduced surface roughness.
Description
ALKALINE ETCHING SOLUTION AND PROCESS FOR ETCHING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS
Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to an alkaline etching solution and a process for etching a silicon semiconductor wafer with the alkaline etching solution to produce wafers with highly flat surfaces with a reduced roughness compared to conventional alkaline etching solutions.
Silicon semiconductor wafers are typically obtained by slicing a single crystal silicon ingot in a direction normal to the axis of the ingot to produce thin wafers, profiling the edges of the wafers, grinding or lapping the wafers to remove surface damage induced by the slicing process, chemically etching the wafers to remove mechanical damage produced by the prior shaping steps, and finally, chemically/mechanically polishing the edge, and at least one surface of each wafer with, for example, a colloidal silica slurry and a chemical etchant, to ensure that the wafers have highly flat, reflective and damage- free surfaces. The wafers are then typically cleaned and quality inspected prior to being packaged.
Prior to chemical etching, silicon semiconductor wafers typically exhibit surface and/or subsurface defects such as embedded particles and physical damage such as micro-cracks, fractures or stress imparted to the wafer by upstream processes such as lapping, grinding and edge profiling. These defects generally occur in the region extending from the surface of the wafer to at least about 2.5 μm or greater
below the surface of the wafer. To remove these defects, therefore at least 2.5 μm of stock are removed from the surface of the wafer using an acidic or alkaline etchant thus removing the embedded particles, contaminants, and physical damage contained in the layer of stock that was removed .
In general, alkaline etching solutions offer several benefits over acid etching solutions. For example, alkaline etching tends to produce wafers having more uniform and flat surfaces than wafers etched with acid etching solutions, using relatively simple etching equipment. Additionally, alkaline etching solutions provide excellent protection for silicon against deposition of metals (other than iron) , because the metals convert either to insoluble precipitates or soluble salts resulting in a surface with fewer contaminants .
In addition to improving the quality of the resulting wafer, alkaline etching processes are inherently more safe with lower cost than the acid processes. Gaseous byproducts from the alkaline etching process are non-toxic, whereas acid etchants, which typically include nitric acid, produce nitrous oxides (NOx) as a gaseous byproduct of the acid etching process. The NOx are toxic to the human body and tend to be very difficult and costly to remove from the effluent gas to avoid polluting the environment and to comply with environmental regulatory requirements. In addition, alkaline etching solutions tend to react with skin tissue less quickly than acid etching solutions, making accidental exposure to alkaline etching solutions less dangerous to operating personnel than acid etching solutions .
Alkaline etching solutions are not superior to acid etching solutions in every respect, however. Wafers
subjected to alkaline etching processes often exhibit irregularities on the wafer surface and edge, such as a faceted surface which is revealed as an increased surface roughness compared to wafers etched by acid etching processes. Surface roughness can be reduced in the subsequent polishing step; the polishing time required to produce acceptable surfaces, however, greatly increases with increasing surface roughness. Additionally, some device manufacturers require the backside surface of the wafer to remain "as etched." Wafers etched with alkaline etching solutions produce wafers with "as etched" backside surfaces with unacceptable surface roughness characteristics. Accordingly, semiconductor manufacturers typically consider the surface roughness problems associated with alkaline etching solutions to outweigh the benefits of alkaline etching and thus use acid etching solutions .
One attempt to provide a process for manufacturing semiconductor wafers using an alkaline etching solution, was proposed in United States Patent No. 5,494,862. U.S. Patent No. 5,494,862 discloses a process in which a concentrated solution of sodium or potassium hydroxide, such as a 45 % by weight solution of sodium hydroxide, is used to etch the wafer. The etched wafer subsequently exhibits the increased surface roughness caused by the alkaline etching as discussed above. To reduce the surface roughness caused by alkaline etching, U.S. Patent No. 5,494,862 requires a light backside polishing in addition to the standard practice of polishing the front side of the wafer, thus increasing both the complexity and cost of the overall process. Additionally, the increased surfaces roughness caused by the conventional alkaline etchant generally results in increases in the polishing time for
polishing the front surface and edge surface of the wafer thus reducing the throughput and increasing the cost of the overall process.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Among the objects of the invention therefore, may be noted the provision of an alkaline etching solution; a process for using said solution for producing uniformly etched wafers; the provisions of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching in which the etched wafers have a reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched with conventional alkaline etching solutions; the provisions of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching with enhanced safety characteristics over acid etching; the provision of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching which improves the throughput of subsequent polishing steps; and the provision of an alkaline etching solution and process for etching which reduces the amount of toxic emissions and/or the cost of environmental controls. Briefly therefore, the present invention is directed to a process for etching silicon semiconductor wafers wherein the wafers are subjected to an alkaline etching solution comprising about 25 to about 65 percent by weight base and about 0.5 to about 10 percent by weight oxidizing agent wherein said base comprises a metal hydroxide and said oxidizing agent comprises hydrogen peroxide or ozone.
Other objects and features of this invention will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a bar chart showing the surface roughness of p" wafers as a function of etchant composition, as described in Example 1.
Fig. 2 is a bar chart showing the surface roughness of p+ wafers as a function of etchant composition, as described in Example 2.
Table 1 shows the effect of the present invention upon edge roughness and polishing time, as described in Example 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Surprisingly, a process for etching a silicon semiconductor wafer has been discovered wherein the wafer is subjected to an alkaline etching solution comprising a base and an oxidizing agent, which enables the enhanced benefits of alkaline etching while producing wafers with reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched with conventional alkaline etching solutions.
The process of the present invention is designed to utilize an alkaline etching solution comprising a base and an oxidizing agent to remove at least about 2.5 μm of stock from the surface of the wafer thereby removing the surface and subsurface defects such as embedded particles and mechanical damage such as those imparted to the wafer during slicing, grinding and/or lapping process steps, such that the resulting wafer has a reduced degree of roughness over wafers etched with typical alkaline etching solutions. Wafers produced with the etching solution of the present invention have a greater uniform flatness and reduced roughness after etching such that the subsequent polishing time is significantly reduced.
Alkaline solutions comprising a base and an oxidizing agent have been previously used as cleaning solutions,
wherein dilute alkaline hydroxides are used in combination with oxidizing agents to repeatedly oxidize the surface of the wafer producing a thin silicon dioxide layer which is then immediately etched from the surface by the alkaline component thus removing contaminants from the surface of the wafer. See, e.g. U.S. Patent No. 5,489,557 and Japanese Patent Application No. Hei 06-245281. However, such cleaning methods are only designed to clean the surface of the wafer, and generally remove less than 1 μm and more typically remove less than about 100 nm of stock from the surface of the wafer. Moreover, the rate at which cleaning solutions remove stock from the surface of the wafer decreases rapidly such that cleaning solutions will not remove sufficient quantities of stock to eliminate the defects described above, even when left in contact with the cleaning solutions for extended periods of time. Thus, while cleaning solutions may result in some stock removal, the amount of stock removed is several orders of magnitude less than that required to remove the embedded particles, contaminants, and physical damage as discussed above. In contrast, the concentrations of the base and oxidizing agent in the alkaline etching solution of the present invention are such that the etching effects of the base are greater than the oxidation effects of the oxidizing agent with the net effect being the removal of stock from the surface of the wafer.
The process of the present invention employs as a starting material a silicon semiconductor wafer which has been sliced from a single crystal silicon ingot and further processed using conventional grinding apparatus to profile the peripheral edge of the wafer and to roughly improve the general flatness and parallelism of the front and back surfaces. Accordingly, the wafer may be sliced from the
ingot using any means known to persons skilled in the art, such as, for example, an internal diameter slicing apparatus or a wiresaw slicing apparatus. Additionally, once the wafer is sliced from the ingot, the peripheral edge of the wafer is preferably rounded to reduce the risk of wafer damage during further processing. The wafer is then subjected to a conventional grinding process to reduce the non-uniform damage caused by the slicing process and to improve the parallelism and flatness of the wafer. Such grinding processes are well known to persons skilled in the art. Typical grinding processes generally remove about 20 μm to about 30 μm of stock from each surface to roughly improve flatness using, for example, a resin bond, 1200 to 6000 mesh wheel operating at about 2000 RPM to about 4000 RPM.
The silicon semiconductor wafer may have any conductivity type and resistivity which is appropriate for a semiconductor application. Additionally, the wafer may have any diameter and target thickness which is appropriate for a semiconductor application. For example, the diameter is generally at least about 100 mm and typically is 150 mm, 200 mm, 300 mm or greater and the thickness may be from about 475 to about 900 μm or greater, with the thickness typically increasing with increasing diameter. The wafer may also have any crystal orientation. In general, however, the wafers have a <100> or <111> crystal orientation.
Having been sliced from the ingot and subjected to the mechanical shaping processes described above, the wafer typically exhibits surface and/or subsurface defects such as embedded particles and physical damage such as micro- cracks, fractures or stress imparted to the wafer by upstream processes such as lapping, grinding and edge
profiling. These defects generally occur in the region extending from the surface of the wafer to at least about 2.5 μm or greater below the surface of the wafer. In addition, the surface of the wafer generally has a surface 5 roughness of at least about 50 nm to about 100 nm or greater. The surface roughness may be measured using any metrology device capable of measuring the surface roughness. Such devices are well known in the art. For example, the surface roughness may be measured using an MP
10 300 surface measurement device which is commercially available from Chapman Instruments (Rochester, NY) or other metrology devices such as an AFM microscope, a Nomarski microscope at 50X magnification, a Wyko-2D microscope equipped with a 10X magnification, or an optical
15 interferometer.
The present invention uses an alkaline etching solution to remove sufficient amounts of stock, at least about 2.5 μm or greater, from the surface of the wafer such that the region containing the defects described above is
20 removed. Additionally, the present invention may be used to eliminate any other surface or subsurface defects which can be eliminated by removing stock from the surface of the wafer, or simply to remove a desired amount of stock from the surface of the wafer.
25 In accordance with the present invention, therefore, the surface of the wafer is brought into contact with an etching solution for a sufficient time period to remove a desired quantity of stock from the surface of the wafer. In a preferred embodiment, the wafer is immersed in an
30 etching solution either individually, or concurrently with multiple wafers to remove a sufficient quantity of stock from the surface of the wafer such that the defects located in the region removed are eliminated. Although the precise
number of wafers etched in a single bath is not critically narrow, typically 25 wafers are etched at a time, wherein said wafers are held in a support and rotated during the etching process. The rate of rotation is not critically important, however it typically varies from about 5 to about 100 revolutions per minute. Alternatively, the surface of the wafer may be contacted with the etching solution by spin etching, wherein one surface of the wafer is placed on a rotatable chuck, and the etching solution is sprayed on the surface apposing the surface attached to the chuck, while the wafer is rotated at high speed. While not critically narrow, the rotation speed of the chucked wafer ranges from about 10 to about 1000 rotations per minute.
The etching solution comprises a base and an oxidizing agent wherein the base is comprised of a metal hydroxide such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, and the oxidizing agent is comprised of hydrogen peroxide and/or ozone. Furthermore, the etching solution is about 25 to about 65 percent by weight base, more preferably about 45 to about 50 percent by weight base and about 0.5 to about 10 percent by weight, preferably about 0.6 to about 6 percent by weight, and most preferably about 0.6 to about 3 percent by weight oxidizing agent. Furthermore, the purity of the base and oxidizing agent and subsequently the etching solution, while not critically narrow, should be at least sufficient for general semiconductor wafer processing. Preferably, the base and oxidizing agent comply with the purity profiles as set forth in the Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International standards (hereinafter SEMI standards) . For example, electronics grade hydrogen peroxide and potassium hydroxide, that meet or exceed the SEMI base standards are commercially available under the trademark CleanRoom® from
the Electronic Chemicals Division of Ashland Chemical Co. (Columbus, OH) .
The temperature of the etching solution affects the etch rate. For example, increases in temperature generally results in an increase in etch rate. However, the solubility of the oxidizing agent in the etching solution generally decreases with increasing temperature. Therefore, it is preferred that the temperature of the etching solution is maintained at about 35°C to about 95°C, more preferably about 65 °C to about 95 °C and most preferably about 90°C.
The surface of the wafer remains in contact with the etching solution for about 1 to about 5 minutes or until the desired amount of stock is remove from the wafer. The wafer is then removed from the etching solution and immediately rinsed with deionized water. Alternatively, other rinsing solutions known in the art may be used in place of the deionized water. The etching solution may be reused to subsequently etch additional wafers. Accordingly, additional quantities of metal hydroxide, water and/or oxidizing agent may be added to replace solution that is used up during the etching of previous wafers .
The amount of time the wafer remains in contact with the etching solution is generally determined based on the desired amount of silicon to be removed from the surface of the wafer. The amount of silicon to be removed is a function of the flatness of the incoming wafer, the amount of defects on the surface and subsurface of the wafer, the depth at which the defects occur beneath the surface of the wafer, and the desired characteristics of the finished wafer. In a preferred embodiment, greater than about 2.5 μm, more preferably about 3 to about 10 μm, and even more
preferably, about 3 to about 6 μm of material is removed from each surface of the wafer.
The amount of stock actually removed can be determined by measuring the total thickness of the wafer prior to and after etching. Once the amount of stock removed is determined, for a given wafer at a given immersion time and etchant concentration, the time a subsequent wafer remains immersed may be varied to increase or decrease the amount of stock removed. Alternatively, the concentration of the etchant may be monitored wherein the reduction in the concentration of the etchant is directly related to the amount of material removed from the surface. Accordingly, the reduction in the concentration of the etchant may be used to predict the amount of stock removed. The etchant concentration may be measured by any means known to persons skilled in the art, and may be determined by, for example, inductively coupled plasma magnetic spectroscopy . Persons skilled in the art may utilize any means known in the art for determining the amount of stock removed without varying from the scope of the present invention.
The resulting wafer has reduced surface and subsurface defects wherein the embedded particles and physical defects located in the layer of silicon removed from the wafer have been eliminated, and the resulting wafer surfaces have a roughness ranging from about 1,000 to about 2800 A as measured using a model MP 300 surface measurement devise.
After etching, the wafer is polished using conventional polishing techniques. The wafer having a reduced roughness compared to wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants requires less time for subsequent edge and notch polishing steps. For example, in a preferred embodiment, after the wafer is etched by the
present invention, the edge and notch of the wafer is polished using a Speedfam EP 300 edge polishing apparatus which is commercially available from Speedfam Co.
(Kanagawa, Japan) , wherein an abrasive pad such as a Suba4 abrasive pad which is commercially available from Rodel Co.
(Newark, Delaware) is attached to the surface of a drum which then rotates at approximately 600 to 1,000 RPM and is applied to the edge of the wafer with a polishing pressure of about 1,600 to about 2,000 grams of force while applying a polishing slurry comprising a colloidal silica slurry and about 1 to about 3 % potassium hydroxide. The amount of time required to polish the edge of a standard 200 mm wafer etched by the present invention to a roughness of about 30 o to about 500 A is approximately 1.5 to 2 minutes whereas the time required to polish wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants is 3 to 4 minutes. The time required to polish the notch of the wafer etched by the present invention to a roughness of about 30 to about 500 A is approximately 15 to 30 seconds whereas the time required for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants is 30 to 60 seconds. In addition, the amount of material removed from wafers etched by the present invention to achieve the desired roughness is about 3 to about 6 microns compared to 5 to 8 microns for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants. Thus both the yield and throughput of the edge/notch polishing processes are improved.
Additionally, the front and back surfaces of wafers etched by the present invention have a roughness of less than about 2800 A, more preferably less than about 2500 A, o more preferably less than about 2000 A and most preferably less than about 1500 A compared to the front and back surfaces of wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants which generally have a surface roughness of
greater than 2800 A, more typically greater than 3000 A and o may have a surface roughness of at least 4500 A or greater. Consequently, the polishing time for the front and back surface is less for wafers etched by the present invention than for wafers etched with conventional alkaline etchants. For example, the front surface and optionally the back surface of the wafer are polished using a conventional polishing apparatus such as a 6 DZ polishing apparatus which is commercially available from Strasbaugh Co. (San Luis Obispo, California) , wherein a polishing pad for example, a Suba polishing pad which is commercially available from Rodel Co. (Newark, Delaware) is applied at a polishing pressure of about 40 to about 65 psi to the surface of the wafer at a temperature of about 20 to about 35 °C, while the polishing table is rotated at a speed of about 80 to about 120 RPM during which time, an abrasive mixture comprising colloidal silica is added at a flow rate of about 40 to about 100 ml/min and an alkaline solution comprising, for example, about 1 to about 3 weight percent metal hydroxide wherein said metal hydroxide comprises potassium hydroxide and/or sodium hydroxide at a pH of approximately 9.5 to 12 is added at a flow rate of about 120 to about 300 ml/min. The front and/or back surface are o polished to a roughness of about 5 to about 20 A, with a global thickness variation of less than about 1 micron and a local thickness variation of less than about 0.2 micron.
The time required to polish the front or back surface of the wafer etched by the present invention is approximately 200 seconds whereas the time required to polish the front or back surface of a wafer etched by conventional alkaline etchants is approximately 300
seconds. Thus the throughput of the surface polishing process is improved.
The following examples will illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLE 1. P" ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H202 at approximately 90°C. Additional, P" ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C. The wafers etched in the etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H202 exhibited a significantly reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant. Figure 1 shows the improvement in surface roughness when wafers are produced using the etchant of the present invention, as compared with a purely alkaline, 45 % by weight KOH etch, for an equivalent amount of stock removal .
EXAMPLE 2
P+ ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H202 at approximately 90°C. Additional, P+ ground silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C. The wafers etched in the etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 0.6 % by weight H202 exhibited a significantly reduced surface roughness compared to wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant. Figure 2 shows the improvement in surface roughness when wafers are produced using the etchant of the present invention, as compared with a purely alkaline, 45 % by weight KOH etch, for an equivalent amount of stock removal.
EXAMPLE 3
Silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing 45 % by weight KOH and 3 % by weight H202 at approximately 90°C. Additional silicon wafers were immersed in an etchant containing only 45 % by weight KOH at approximately 90°C. The edge of the etched wafers was then inspected visually under a bright light, and measured for roughness. The results shown in Table 1, show the edge of the wafers etched using the etchant of the present invention, were shinny in appearance and less rough, as compared with wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant.
After measuring the edge roughness, the wafers were edge polished to remove all damage on the edge of the wafers. The wafers etched, using the etchant of the present invention, required less edge polishing time to remove the damage on the edge of the wafer, as compared with wafers etched in a purely alkaline etchant as shown in Table 1.
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved. As various changes could be made in the above-described semiconductor substrate flattening process without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the above description be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. In addition, when introducing elements of the present invention or the preferred embodiment (s) thereof, the articles "a," "an," "the" and "said" are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms "comprising," "including" and "having" are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements .
Table 1
Claims
1. A process for etching a silicon semiconductor wafer having a front surface, a back surface, and an edge surface peripheral to and joining the front and back surfaces comprising; contacting the wafer with an aqueous etching solution, said etching solution comprising about 25% to about 65% by weight base and about 0.5% to about 10% by weight oxidizing agent, wherein said base comprises a metal hydroxide, to remove at least about 2.5 μm of stock from at least one surface of the wafer; removing the wafer from the etching solution after said stock has been removed from the wafer; and rinsing the wafer to remove residual etching solution from the surface of the wafer.
2. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wafer is contacted with the etching solution by immersing the wafer in said solution.
3. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein about 3 microns to about 10 microns of stock is removed from at least one surface of the wafer.
4. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein at least one of the resulting wafer surfaces has a roughness ranging from about 1,000 to about 2800 A.
5. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wafer is contacted with said solution by spraying said solution on at least one surface of the wafer.
6. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein said metal hydroxide is selected from a group consisting of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide.
7. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 45% to about 50% by weight base.
8. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein said oxidizing agent is selected from a group consisting of hydrogen peroxide and ozone.
9. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 0.5% to about 10% by weight oxidizing agent.
10. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 0.6% to about 3% by weight oxidizing agent.
11. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein the temperature of said etching solution is about 35°C to about 95°C.
12. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein the temperature of said etching solution is about 90 °C.
13. An alkaline etching solution for etching silicon semiconductor wafers comprising greater about 25% to about 65% by weight base and about 0.5% to about 10% by weight oxidizing agent, wherein said base comprises a metal hydroxide .
14. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein the purity of said solution is at least sufficient for general semiconductor wafer processing.
15. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein said metal hydroxide is selected from a group consisting of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide .
16. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 45% to about 50% by weight base.
17. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein said oxidizing agent is selected from a group consisting of hydrogen peroxide and ozone.
18. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 0.5% to about 10% by weight oxidizing agent.
19. An alkaline etching solution as set forth in claim 13 wherein said aqueous etching solution comprises about 0.6% to about 3% by weight oxidizing agent.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US43855199A | 1999-11-10 | 1999-11-10 | |
US09/438,551 | 1999-11-10 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001034877A1 true WO2001034877A1 (en) | 2001-05-17 |
Family
ID=23741065
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2000/028238 WO2001034877A1 (en) | 1999-11-10 | 2000-10-12 | Alkaline etching solution and process for etching semiconductor wafers |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TW478061B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001034877A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007017229A1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-06-26 | Abb Ag | Monitoring etching of semiconductor substrate, for use in semiconductor devices, by measuring time-dependent concentration pattern for representative etching chemical |
WO2018031876A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2018-02-15 | Yale University | Stacking fault-free semipolar and nonpolar gan grown on foreign substrates by eliminating the nitrogen polar facets during the growth |
CN108963031A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-12-07 | 东方日升新能源股份有限公司 | A kind of black undesirable method of silicon cell EL of solution diamond wire wet etching |
US10435812B2 (en) | 2012-02-17 | 2019-10-08 | Yale University | Heterogeneous material integration through guided lateral growth |
US10892159B2 (en) | 2017-11-20 | 2021-01-12 | Saphlux, Inc. | Semipolar or nonpolar group III-nitride substrates |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SU557434A1 (en) * | 1976-03-02 | 1977-05-05 | Предприятие П/Я Х-5476 | Anisotropic etcher |
US4276114A (en) * | 1978-02-20 | 1981-06-30 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor substrate and a manufacturing method thereof |
JPS56169346A (en) * | 1980-05-30 | 1981-12-26 | Hitachi Ltd | Manufacture of semiconductor device |
US4343662A (en) * | 1981-03-31 | 1982-08-10 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Manufacturing semiconductor wafer devices by simultaneous slicing and etching |
DE3114309A1 (en) * | 1981-04-09 | 1982-10-28 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt | Process for manufacturing infrared detector cells |
US4992135A (en) * | 1990-07-24 | 1991-02-12 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method of etching back of tungsten layers on semiconductor wafers, and solution therefore |
US5049200A (en) * | 1987-11-13 | 1991-09-17 | Wacker-Chemitronic Gesellschaft Fur Elektronik-Grundstoffe Mbh | Process for the hydrophilizing and/or cement-residue-removing surface treatment of silicon wafers |
US5147499A (en) * | 1991-07-24 | 1992-09-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process for removal of residues remaining after etching polysilicon layer in formation of integrated circuit structure |
WO1995004372A1 (en) * | 1993-07-30 | 1995-02-09 | Semitool, Inc. | Methods for processing semiconductors to reduce surface particles |
US5494862A (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 1996-02-27 | Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. | Method of making semiconductor wafers |
EP0588055B1 (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1999-06-16 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Method for manufacturing wafer |
-
2000
- 2000-10-12 WO PCT/US2000/028238 patent/WO2001034877A1/en active Application Filing
- 2000-10-30 TW TW89122808A patent/TW478061B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SU557434A1 (en) * | 1976-03-02 | 1977-05-05 | Предприятие П/Я Х-5476 | Anisotropic etcher |
US4276114A (en) * | 1978-02-20 | 1981-06-30 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor substrate and a manufacturing method thereof |
JPS56169346A (en) * | 1980-05-30 | 1981-12-26 | Hitachi Ltd | Manufacture of semiconductor device |
US4343662A (en) * | 1981-03-31 | 1982-08-10 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Manufacturing semiconductor wafer devices by simultaneous slicing and etching |
DE3114309A1 (en) * | 1981-04-09 | 1982-10-28 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt | Process for manufacturing infrared detector cells |
US5049200A (en) * | 1987-11-13 | 1991-09-17 | Wacker-Chemitronic Gesellschaft Fur Elektronik-Grundstoffe Mbh | Process for the hydrophilizing and/or cement-residue-removing surface treatment of silicon wafers |
US4992135A (en) * | 1990-07-24 | 1991-02-12 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method of etching back of tungsten layers on semiconductor wafers, and solution therefore |
US5147499A (en) * | 1991-07-24 | 1992-09-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process for removal of residues remaining after etching polysilicon layer in formation of integrated circuit structure |
EP0588055B1 (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1999-06-16 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Method for manufacturing wafer |
US5494862A (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 1996-02-27 | Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. | Method of making semiconductor wafers |
WO1995004372A1 (en) * | 1993-07-30 | 1995-02-09 | Semitool, Inc. | Methods for processing semiconductors to reduce surface particles |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Derwent World Patents Index; Class E34, AN 1972-01304T, XP002159916 * |
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 197818, Derwent World Patents Index; Class L03, AN 1978-33227A, XP002159914 * |
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 198206, Derwent World Patents Index; Class L03, AN 1982-10929E, XP002159915 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007017229A1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-06-26 | Abb Ag | Monitoring etching of semiconductor substrate, for use in semiconductor devices, by measuring time-dependent concentration pattern for representative etching chemical |
US10435812B2 (en) | 2012-02-17 | 2019-10-08 | Yale University | Heterogeneous material integration through guided lateral growth |
WO2018031876A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2018-02-15 | Yale University | Stacking fault-free semipolar and nonpolar gan grown on foreign substrates by eliminating the nitrogen polar facets during the growth |
CN109564850A (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2019-04-02 | 耶鲁大学 | In the semi-polarity and nonpolarity GAN without stacking fault of grown on foreign substrates and eliminating nitrogen polarity facet in growth period |
US10896818B2 (en) | 2016-08-12 | 2021-01-19 | Yale University | Stacking fault-free semipolar and nonpolar GaN grown on foreign substrates by eliminating the nitrogen polar facets during the growth |
US10892159B2 (en) | 2017-11-20 | 2021-01-12 | Saphlux, Inc. | Semipolar or nonpolar group III-nitride substrates |
CN108963031A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-12-07 | 东方日升新能源股份有限公司 | A kind of black undesirable method of silicon cell EL of solution diamond wire wet etching |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW478061B (en) | 2002-03-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6238592B1 (en) | Working liquids and methods for modifying structured wafers suited for semiconductor fabrication | |
US5937312A (en) | Single-etch stop process for the manufacture of silicon-on-insulator wafers | |
TWI292586B (en) | ||
US6482749B1 (en) | Method for etching a wafer edge using a potassium-based chemical oxidizer in the presence of hydrofluoric acid | |
US7829467B2 (en) | Method for producing a polished semiconductor | |
US20040108297A1 (en) | Process for etching silicon wafers | |
US6338805B1 (en) | Process for fabricating semiconductor wafers with external gettering | |
TW229324B (en) | Low cost method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices | |
KR20000017512A (en) | Method for reclaiming wafer substrate and polishing solution composition for reclaiming wafer substrate | |
KR20030031009A (en) | Method for processing semiconductor wafer and semiconductor wafer | |
EP0718873A2 (en) | Cleaning process for hydrophobic silicon wafers | |
US6361407B1 (en) | Method of polishing a semiconductor wafer | |
KR20070106922A (en) | Method of processing a surface of group iii nitride crystal and group iii nitride crystal substrate | |
US5899731A (en) | Method of fabricating a semiconductor wafer | |
JP2002517090A (en) | Alkali treatment after etching | |
JPH03256665A (en) | Polishing method for silicone wafer | |
WO2001034877A1 (en) | Alkaline etching solution and process for etching semiconductor wafers | |
WO2001049450A1 (en) | Chemical mechanical polishing process for manufacturing dopant-striation-free silicon wafers | |
JP3202305B2 (en) | Manufacturing method and inspection method of mirror surface wafer | |
US6060396A (en) | Polishing agent used for polishing semiconductor silicon wafers and polishing method using the same | |
JP3456466B2 (en) | Polishing agent for silicon wafer and polishing method therefor | |
Fusstetrer et al. | Impact of chemomechanical polishing on the chemical composition and morphology of the silicon surface | |
JP3906688B2 (en) | Polishing cloth for semiconductor wafer and polishing method | |
US20020175143A1 (en) | Processes for polishing wafers | |
WO2001054178A1 (en) | Semiconductor wafer manufacturing process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CN JP KR SG |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |