WO1998032265A1 - Determination of service situation in packet radio network - Google Patents

Determination of service situation in packet radio network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998032265A1
WO1998032265A1 PCT/FI1998/000034 FI9800034W WO9832265A1 WO 1998032265 A1 WO1998032265 A1 WO 1998032265A1 FI 9800034 W FI9800034 W FI 9800034W WO 9832265 A1 WO9832265 A1 WO 9832265A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
parameter
service
determined
terminal equipment
quality
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI1998/000034
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Hannu Kari
Antti Hannula
Original Assignee
Nokia Telecommunications Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Telecommunications Oy filed Critical Nokia Telecommunications Oy
Priority to EP98900866A priority Critical patent/EP1021892A1/en
Priority to AU56653/98A priority patent/AU5665398A/en
Publication of WO1998032265A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998032265A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/18Negotiating wireless communication parameters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/08Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery
    • H04W48/10Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery using broadcasted information
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/08Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery
    • H04W48/12Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery using downlink control channel

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for transmitting the prevailing service situation of the telecommunication connection to the subscriber.
  • the invention will be explained primarily in connection with packet radio systems, such as GPRS, but it can also be applied to other kinds of telecommunication systems.
  • Figure 1 shows the parts of the packet network essential for understanding the invention.
  • Mobile stations MS communicate with base stations BTSn (Base Transceiver Station) over an air interface Um.
  • Base stations are controlled by base station controllers BSC which are connected to mobile switching centres MSC.
  • the subsystem managed by the base station controller BSC, including the base stations controlled by it, is generally referred to as a base station subsystem BSS.
  • the interface between the centre MSC and the base station subsystem BSS is called an A-interface.
  • the part of the mobile communication system on the side of the MSC at the A- interface is known as a network subsystem NSS.
  • NSS network subsystem
  • the mobile switching centre MSC attends to the switching of incoming and outgoing calls. It carries out similar tasks as the exchange of the public switched telephone network PSTN. In addition, it carries out functions characteristic of mobile telephone traffic only, such as subscriber location management, in co-operation with network subscriber registers which are not shown separately in Figure 1.
  • a conventional radio connection used in digital mobile communi- cation systems is circuit-switched, which means that the radio resources reserved for a subscriber are kept reserved for this connection for the duration of the call.
  • Packet radio service GPRS General Packet Radio Service
  • the packet radio system is described in ETSI recommendations TC- TR-GSM 02.60 and 03.60.
  • a packet radio service By means of a packet radio service, a user of the mobile station MS can be provided with a radio connection which efficiently utilizes radio resources.
  • radio resources are reserved only when speech or data is to be sent. Speech or data is assembled into packets of a specific length. When such a packet has been sent over the air interface Um and the sending party does not immediately have the next packet to send, the radio resource can be released to the use of other subscribers.
  • the system of Figure 1 includes a separate Serving GPRS Support Node, that is, an SGSN 15 which controls the operation of the packet data service on the network side.
  • This control includes, for example, registrations of the mobile station to the system and from the system (Logon and Logoff, respectively), updating mobile stations location and routing data packets to the correct destination.
  • data broadly interpreted refers to any information transmitted in a digital mobile communication system, including, but not limited to speech encoded into a digital form, data transmission between computers or telefax data.
  • the SGSN may be located in connection with the base station BTS, the base station controller BSC or the mobile switching centre MSC or it may be located separately from them.
  • the interface between the SGSN and the base station controller BSC is known as a Gb-interface.
  • a situation is conceivable in which the subscriber using a computer PC is in contact with another computer 14 via a packet network 10, a data network 11 , a router 13 and a local area network LAN.
  • a packet network 10 There is an ongoing long data transmission or several successive short data transmissions between the computers PC and 14 in accordance with Internet FTP protocol, for example.
  • a user of the computer PC or some other user starts an interactive session in accordance with Internet Telnet protocol, for example. If a packet of each interactive session had to wait at nodes along the connection until the long data transmission had been terminated, the response times of the interactive session would grow so long that the use of the service would no longer be sensible.
  • Table 1 a typical correspondence of classes for the quality of service and propagation delays:
  • the users or the application programs may estimate and determine independently the prevailing service situation in the quality of service which has been negotiated at each time, the users or the application programs cannot receive information independently about other classes for the quality of service and thus cannot make any objective conclusions on whether the quality of service should be re- negotiated to be higher or lower.
  • the object of the invention is to develop a method for solving the problems mentioned above.
  • the objects of the invention are achieved by a method that is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • the dependent claims relate to the preferred embodiments of the invention.
  • the invention is at its simplest implemented by establishing a method for indicating the service situation in a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined.
  • a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined.
  • at least one parameter describing the service situation of the packet radio network is determined and this parameter is made available to the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
  • the terminal equipment the person using it and/or the application program to be executed therein
  • the user and/or application program may conclude, for example, that information is received slowly regardless of the good service situation in the network.
  • the application program or its user can conclude that the delay is caused by the loading of the server in which case the negotiation of the quality of service into a better one will not improve the situation.
  • This conclusion cannot be made objectively if the service situation is determined subjectively in the terminal equipment (by estimating or measuring the effective data transmission rate) as the terminal equipment or its user cannot distinguish the delays caused by the network from the delays caused by the server.
  • the network determines the prevailing service situation in each class for the quality of service and this information is transmitted to the terminal equipment.
  • the terminal equipment or its user
  • the terminal equipment has available objective information on the service situation prevailing in the other classes for the quality of service.
  • the application to be executed in the terminal equipment or its user may then decide to negotiate a higher or a lower class for the quality of service, as required.
  • the service situation in the neighbouring base stations is used as a criterion in connection with handover, in which case the mobile stations can be handed over to a base station whose audibility is poorer but the service situation better (loading smaller) than in the base station which serves the mobile station.
  • the advantage of the method and system of the invention is a more efficient use of packet radio network resources as the users and/or applications making decisions (change of the service quality or handover) have available objective information on the prevailing service situation.
  • Figure 1 shows the parts of the packet network essential for understanding the invention.
  • the invention is at its simplest implemented by establishing a method for indicating the service situation in a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined.
  • a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined.
  • at least one parameter representing the service situation of the packet radio network is determined and this parameter is made available to the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
  • the parameter representing the service situation is determined in some fixed network element of the network, such as the base station system BSS or the support node SGSN.
  • said parameter can be determined in the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
  • the prevailing service situation in the service quality used by the mobile station MS can be determined in several different ways.
  • One possible technique is based on that the parameter is determined on the basis of the utilization ratio of the capacity of the base station system BSS, for example by determining the ratio of free channels to reserved channels.
  • the parameter can also be determined by following on which probability and/or delay the mobile stations are able to reserve resources, such as traffic channels. It is also possible to calculate the number of packets sent to the mobile station MS per a time unit and maintain the moving time average of this number. Alternatively, it is also possible to use the fact that in most packet networks packets are time stamped when they arrive at the network, in which case the parameter representing the service situation may be determined on the basis of the time stamps of the downlink packets, for example.
  • this parameter can be sent to the terminal equipment (MS, PC) on a broadcast control channel. Suitable channels in the GPRS system are BCCH or PBCCH, for instance. Alternatively, this parameter can be sent to terminal equipment (MS, PC) as a multicast transmission, such as a Point-To-Multipoint transmission.
  • the parameter can be sent to one terminal equipment (MS, PC) at a time, as a Point-To-Point transmission or as a short message in the GPRS system.
  • a multicast transmission and an individual transmission may be combined so that the parameter is sent to the terminal equipment generally as a multicast transmission but to a terminal equipment that has just registered to the network individually as a Point-to-Point transmission or as a short message, for example.
  • said parameter is determined in more than one class for the quality of service. If the parameters are sent to all terminal equipments at the same time (e.g. broadcast or multicast), it is most advantageous to send simultaneously the parameters representing the situation of all the classes for the quality of service. If the parameters are instead sent individually to the terminal equipments, capacity may be saved by sending primarily only the parameters representing the situation of the upper and lower classes for the quality of service in addition to the quality of service used at each time.
  • a specific hysteresis for example, in such a manner that a higher (faster) class for the quality of service is negotiated if the parameter falls below the threshold value by 10 per cents and a lower (less expensive) class for the quality of service is negotiated if the parameter exceeds the threshold value by 10 per cents.
  • time delay can be determined for example so that the quality of service is re-negotiated only if the parameter has been below or above the threshold value for a certain time, such as one minute.
  • the new class for the quality of service can be negotiated immediately if there is a great deviance from the threshold value towards a poorer value (e.g. if the average propagation delay exceeds two times the normal value).
  • the terminal equipment and the application program executed therein can make decisions independently, without disturbing the user, by means of which decisions the ratio of the service level to costs is maintained at the optimal level.
  • the service situation can be transmitted to the user for example so that there is in a corner of the screen of the mobile station MS and/or the computer PC an element (e.g. a number, a dot or a bar) indicating the prevailing service situation, some feature (such as a numerical value, the size, the colour or the blinking speed) of the element being dependent on the service situation.
  • an element e.g. a number, a dot or a bar
  • some feature such as a numerical value, the size, the colour or the blinking speed
  • the user can start a dialogue where more exact information is shown and through which the user can renegotiate the quality of service.
  • the quality of service is changed automatically by a negotiation between the application program and the network, it may be advantageous to produce some audio signal so that the user would have a chance to accept or discard the change of service quality suggested by the application program.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method for indicating the prevailing service situation in a packet radio network (1, 2) which includes at least one base station (BTS) and at least one terminal equipment (MS, PC), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined. In accordance with the invention, at least one parameter representing the service situation of the packet radio network is determined and this parameter is made available to the terminal equipment (MS, PC). The parameter can be determined in some fixed network element of the network, such as a base station system (BSS) or a support node (SGSN). Alternatively, the parameter can be determined in the terminal equipment (MS, PC). The parameter can be sent simultaneously to several terminal equipments (MS, PC) on a broadcast channel, preferably on BCCH or PBCCH or as a multicast transmission (e.g. Point-To-Multipoint) or it can be sent to one terminal equipment at a time as a Point-To-Point transmission or a short message, for example. If the parameters are sent to all terminal equipments at the same time, it is most advantageously to send simultaneously the parameters representing the situation of all the classes for the quality of service.

Description

DETERMINATION OF SERVICE SITUATION IN PACKET RADIO NETWORK
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a method for transmitting the prevailing service situation of the telecommunication connection to the subscriber. The invention will be explained primarily in connection with packet radio systems, such as GPRS, but it can also be applied to other kinds of telecommunication systems. Figure 1 shows the parts of the packet network essential for understanding the invention. Mobile stations MS communicate with base stations BTSn (Base Transceiver Station) over an air interface Um. Base stations are controlled by base station controllers BSC which are connected to mobile switching centres MSC. The subsystem managed by the base station controller BSC, including the base stations controlled by it, is generally referred to as a base station subsystem BSS. The interface between the centre MSC and the base station subsystem BSS is called an A-interface. The part of the mobile communication system on the side of the MSC at the A- interface is known as a network subsystem NSS.- Correspondingly, the interface between the base station controller BSC and the base station BTS is called an Abis-interface. The mobile switching centre MSC attends to the switching of incoming and outgoing calls. It carries out similar tasks as the exchange of the public switched telephone network PSTN. In addition, it carries out functions characteristic of mobile telephone traffic only, such as subscriber location management, in co-operation with network subscriber registers which are not shown separately in Figure 1.
A conventional radio connection used in digital mobile communi- cation systems is circuit-switched, which means that the radio resources reserved for a subscriber are kept reserved for this connection for the duration of the call. Packet radio service GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) is a new service designed for digital mobile communication systems, such as GSM systems. The packet radio system is described in ETSI recommendations TC- TR-GSM 02.60 and 03.60. By means of a packet radio service, a user of the mobile station MS can be provided with a radio connection which efficiently utilizes radio resources. In a packet-switched connection radio resources are reserved only when speech or data is to be sent. Speech or data is assembled into packets of a specific length. When such a packet has been sent over the air interface Um and the sending party does not immediately have the next packet to send, the radio resource can be released to the use of other subscribers.
The system of Figure 1 includes a separate Serving GPRS Support Node, that is, an SGSN 15 which controls the operation of the packet data service on the network side. This control includes, for example, registrations of the mobile station to the system and from the system (Logon and Logoff, respectively), updating mobile stations location and routing data packets to the correct destination. In the context of the present application, "data" broadly interpreted refers to any information transmitted in a digital mobile communication system, including, but not limited to speech encoded into a digital form, data transmission between computers or telefax data. The SGSN may be located in connection with the base station BTS, the base station controller BSC or the mobile switching centre MSC or it may be located separately from them. The interface between the SGSN and the base station controller BSC is known as a Gb-interface.
In a packet radio network a situation is conceivable in which the subscriber using a computer PC is in contact with another computer 14 via a packet network 10, a data network 11 , a router 13 and a local area network LAN. There is an ongoing long data transmission or several successive short data transmissions between the computers PC and 14 in accordance with Internet FTP protocol, for example. At the same time, a user of the computer PC or some other user starts an interactive session in accordance with Internet Telnet protocol, for example. If a packet of each interactive session had to wait at nodes along the connection until the long data transmission had been terminated, the response times of the interactive session would grow so long that the use of the service would no longer be sensible.
Network operators typically determine several classes for the quality of service (QoS) so that in a higher class for the quality of service the propagation delay (and possibly also the probability of losing the packet) is smaller than in a lower class for the quality of service. In this invention, propagation delay is the most significant parameter connected with the quality of service. The operator may determine three classes for the quality of service, for example, for which two propagation delays TAVE and T95 have been determined, the first (TAVE) of which determines the average propagation delay of the packet in the network of the operator and the second (T95) determines such a delay that 95 per cent of the packets are transmitted on a smaller delay than T95. The correspondence of classes for the quality of service and propagation delays could be as follows:
Table 1 , a typical correspondence of classes for the quality of service and propagation delays:
Quality of service TAVE (ms) T95 (ms)
1 400 1000
2 800 2000
3 1600 4000
(It is obvious that these values are only examples. There may be more than three classes for the quality of service, a median can be employed instead of the arithmetic average and other percentages can be used instead of 95 per cent.) There are several problems in the arrangement described above.
For example, there are no pre-determined protocols for transmitting the prevailing service situation to the user and/or the application programs and no specified procedures with which the application programs could automatically adapt to changes in the service situation. Although the users or the application programs may estimate and determine independently the prevailing service situation in the quality of service which has been negotiated at each time, the users or the application programs cannot receive information independently about other classes for the quality of service and thus cannot make any objective conclusions on whether the quality of service should be re- negotiated to be higher or lower.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The object of the invention is to develop a method for solving the problems mentioned above. The objects of the invention are achieved by a method that is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 1. The dependent claims relate to the preferred embodiments of the invention.
The invention is at its simplest implemented by establishing a method for indicating the service situation in a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined. According to the invention, at least one parameter describing the service situation of the packet radio network is determined and this parameter is made available to the terminal equipment (MS, PC). In this case the terminal equipment (the person using it and/or the application program to be executed therein) has available exact and objective information on the service situation of the network. The user and/or application program may conclude, for example, that information is received slowly regardless of the good service situation in the network. In this case the application program or its user can conclude that the delay is caused by the loading of the server in which case the negotiation of the quality of service into a better one will not improve the situation. This conclusion cannot be made objectively if the service situation is determined subjectively in the terminal equipment (by estimating or measuring the effective data transmission rate) as the terminal equipment or its user cannot distinguish the delays caused by the network from the delays caused by the server.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the network determines the prevailing service situation in each class for the quality of service and this information is transmitted to the terminal equipment. In this case the terminal equipment (or its user) has available objective information on the service situation prevailing in the other classes for the quality of service. The application to be executed in the terminal equipment or its user may then decide to negotiate a higher or a lower class for the quality of service, as required.
According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, the service situation in the neighbouring base stations is used as a criterion in connection with handover, in which case the mobile stations can be handed over to a base station whose audibility is poorer but the service situation better (loading smaller) than in the base station which serves the mobile station.
The advantage of the method and system of the invention is a more efficient use of packet radio network resources as the users and/or applications making decisions (change of the service quality or handover) have available objective information on the prevailing service situation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
The invention will now be explained in more detail in connection with preferred embodiments, with reference to the appended drawing, wherein: Figure 1 shows the parts of the packet network essential for understanding the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As was stated above, the invention is at its simplest implemented by establishing a method for indicating the service situation in a packet radio network which includes at least one base station BTS and at least one terminal equipment (a mobile station MS and a computer PC possibly connected or integrated thereto), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined. According to the invention, at least one parameter representing the service situation of the packet radio network is determined and this parameter is made available to the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
According to one preferred embodiment, the parameter representing the service situation is determined in some fixed network element of the network, such as the base station system BSS or the support node SGSN. Alternatively, said parameter can be determined in the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
The prevailing service situation in the service quality used by the mobile station MS can be determined in several different ways. One possible technique is based on that the parameter is determined on the basis of the utilization ratio of the capacity of the base station system BSS, for example by determining the ratio of free channels to reserved channels. The parameter can also be determined by following on which probability and/or delay the mobile stations are able to reserve resources, such as traffic channels. It is also possible to calculate the number of packets sent to the mobile station MS per a time unit and maintain the moving time average of this number. Alternatively, it is also possible to use the fact that in most packet networks packets are time stamped when they arrive at the network, in which case the parameter representing the service situation may be determined on the basis of the time stamps of the downlink packets, for example. On the basis of this time stamp, it is possible to determine the two propagation delays TAVE and T95 (or one of them) described in connection with Table 1. This calculation may be carried out in the support node SGSN, the base station controller BSC or the base station BTS, for example. If the parameter representing the service situation is determined in some fixed network element, such as the base station system BSS or the support node SGSN, this parameter can be sent to the terminal equipment (MS, PC) on a broadcast control channel. Suitable channels in the GPRS system are BCCH or PBCCH, for instance. Alternatively, this parameter can be sent to terminal equipment (MS, PC) as a multicast transmission, such as a Point-To-Multipoint transmission. Instead of the multicast transmission, the parameter can be sent to one terminal equipment (MS, PC) at a time, as a Point-To-Point transmission or as a short message in the GPRS system. A multicast transmission and an individual transmission may be combined so that the parameter is sent to the terminal equipment generally as a multicast transmission but to a terminal equipment that has just registered to the network individually as a Point-to-Point transmission or as a short message, for example.
In order that the user of the terminal equipment or the application program executed therein could make objective decisions concerning the change of the service quality, it is advantageous that said parameter is determined in more than one class for the quality of service. If the parameters are sent to all terminal equipments at the same time (e.g. broadcast or multicast), it is most advantageous to send simultaneously the parameters representing the situation of all the classes for the quality of service. If the parameters are instead sent individually to the terminal equipments, capacity may be saved by sending primarily only the parameters representing the situation of the upper and lower classes for the quality of service in addition to the quality of service used at each time.
Conventional cell and handover algorithms are usually based only on signal quality. There may also be situations where the neighbouring base station of the base station that serves the mobile station would have more capacity and it could provide a faster connection than the base station that serves the mobile station at that moment. Then it is advantageous if the parameter representing the service situation is determined at least for two base stations (the base station that serves the mobile station and the neighbouring base station with the best audibility), and the parameter is employed as a crossover criterion. One possibility to employ the capacity of the base station as a crossover criterion is to weigh signal strength measurements so that the base station which has a great deal of unused capacity is notified of signal strength higher than the actual value, and vice versa. In this way changes to known crossover algorithms are minimal. When information on the service situation of the classes for the quality of service has been made available to the terminal equipment (either by calculating some parameter representing service in the terminal equipment or by calculating the information in the network and by sending it to the mobile station), this information has to be made available to application program and/or its user. The information on the service situation of the classes for the quality of service can be employed in the application program for example so that the criteria have been determined in advance, on the basis of which criteria the application negotiates the class for the quality of service higher or lower if the parameter representing the service situation is smaller or greater, respectively, than some predetermined threshold value. Then it is also advantageous to determine a specific hysteresis, for example, in such a manner that a higher (faster) class for the quality of service is negotiated if the parameter falls below the threshold value by 10 per cents and a lower (less expensive) class for the quality of service is negotiated if the parameter exceeds the threshold value by 10 per cents. Instead of the hysteresis or in addition to it, time delay can be determined for example so that the quality of service is re-negotiated only if the parameter has been below or above the threshold value for a certain time, such as one minute. In that case, however, the new class for the quality of service can be negotiated immediately if there is a great deviance from the threshold value towards a poorer value (e.g. if the average propagation delay exceeds two times the normal value). In this way the terminal equipment and the application program executed therein can make decisions independently, without disturbing the user, by means of which decisions the ratio of the service level to costs is maintained at the optimal level.
In some cases it should be possible to change the quality of service in a manner that is almost impossible to program in advance. For example, a situation is conceivable in which the user uses the mobile station (and a computer connected or integrated thereto) for taking care of bank transactions when waiting for the departure of the aeroplane. When the departure of the aeroplane is announced, the user is probably willing to pay considerably for the improvement of the service quality to finish the bank transaction. A reverse example may be a user who wishes to start a data transmission by using a high class for the quality of service (in order than the interactive phase would take place as fast as possible) but the actual data transmission can take place slower in a less expensive class for the quality of service. In order that the user of the terminal equipment could individually decide to change the quality of service, the user has to be informed of the parameter representing the service situation. The service situation can be transmitted to the user for example so that there is in a corner of the screen of the mobile station MS and/or the computer PC an element (e.g. a number, a dot or a bar) indicating the prevailing service situation, some feature (such as a numerical value, the size, the colour or the blinking speed) of the element being dependent on the service situation. By pointing to this element with the transfer mechanism of the cursor (such as keyboard, mouse, etc.), the user can start a dialogue where more exact information is shown and through which the user can renegotiate the quality of service. When the quality of service is changed automatically by a negotiation between the application program and the network, it may be advantageous to produce some audio signal so that the user would have a chance to accept or discard the change of service quality suggested by the application program.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the basic idea of the invention may be realized in various ways. The invention and its embodiments are therefore not restricted to the examples described above but they may vary within the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for indicating the prevailing service situation in a packet radio network which includes at least one base station (BTS) and at least one terminal equipment (MS, PC), and where several classes for the quality of service have been determined; characterized by
- determining at least one parameter representing the service situation of the packet radio network; and
- supplying this parameter to the use of the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
2. A method according to claim ^ characterized in that the parameter is determined in some fixed network element of the network, such as a base station system (BSS) or a support node (SGSN).
3. A method according to claim ^ characterized in that the parameter is determined in the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
4. A method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the parameter is determined on the basis of the utilization ratio of the capacity of the base station system (BSS).
5. A method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the parameter is determined on the basis of time stamps of the downlink packets.
6. A method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the parameter is determined by the success probability of resource reservation attempts or on the basis of the waiting times of resource reservations.
7. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that the parameter is sent to the terminal equipment (MS, PC) on a broadcast channel, preferably on BCCH or PBCCH.
8. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that the parameter is sent to the terminal equipment (MS, PC) as a Point-To-Multipoint transmission.
9. A method according to claim 2 or 8, characterized in that the parameter is sent at least to some terminal equipments (MS, PC), preferably to a terminal equipment that has just registered to the network, individually, such as a Point-To-Point transmission or a short message.
10. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that the parameter is determined in more than one class for the quality of service.
11. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that the parameter is determined in all classes for the quality of service in the packet radio network.
12. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the parameter is determined relating to at least two base station systems (BSS) and the parameter is employed as a crossover criterion.
13. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the parameter is transmitted to the user of the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
14. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the parameter is made available to the application program being executed in the terminal equipment (MS, PC).
15. A method according to claim 14, characterized in that at least one nominal value is defined for said application program and the appli- cation program independently negotiates a new class for the quality of service if said parameter deviates essentially from said nominal value.
PCT/FI1998/000034 1997-01-20 1998-01-16 Determination of service situation in packet radio network WO1998032265A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98900866A EP1021892A1 (en) 1997-01-20 1998-01-16 Determination of service situation in packet radio network
AU56653/98A AU5665398A (en) 1997-01-20 1998-01-16 Determination of service situation in packet radio network

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI970237A FI104606B (en) 1997-01-20 1997-01-20 Defining a Service Status in a Packet Radio Network
FI970237 1997-01-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998032265A1 true WO1998032265A1 (en) 1998-07-23

Family

ID=8547705

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI1998/000034 WO1998032265A1 (en) 1997-01-20 1998-01-16 Determination of service situation in packet radio network

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1021892A1 (en)
AU (1) AU5665398A (en)
FI (1) FI104606B (en)
TW (1) TW416186B (en)
WO (1) WO1998032265A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA98162B (en)

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19820845A1 (en) * 1998-05-05 1999-11-11 Mannesmann Ag Service quality evaluation method for telecommunications services in telecommunications network
EP0982955A2 (en) * 1998-08-26 2000-03-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for assigning telecommunication services
WO2000022865A2 (en) * 1998-10-12 2000-04-20 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Link and radio cell adaptation in tdma/tdd systems
WO2001020946A1 (en) * 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Ericsson Inc. Method and system for specifying a quality of service for communication between a mobile station and a packet wireless communications network
EP1089500A2 (en) * 1999-09-30 2001-04-04 Nortel Networks Limited Fair packet scheduler and scheduling method for packet data radio
WO2001026397A1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2001-04-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method of broadcasting a quality over-the-air multicast
WO2001058192A1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-09 Vodafone Ag Sim toolkit application service detection
GB2359700A (en) * 2000-02-25 2001-08-29 Motorola Inc Communication system, packet scheduler and operating method therefor
EP1241910A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2002-09-18 Evolium S.A.S. Process for the control of multi-media call sessions in a cellular system of mobile radiocommunications
WO2002098072A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmitting connection set-up parameters in packet data network
WO2002098073A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmission of connection setup parameters in packet data network
WO2002098071A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmission of connection set-up parameters in packet data network
EP1705940A1 (en) * 2005-03-24 2006-09-27 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Handover between mobile networks
CN100340125C (en) * 2002-09-23 2007-09-26 Lg电子株式会社 Radio communication scheme for providing multimedia broadcast and multicast services (MBMS)
US7551202B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2009-06-23 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Digital camera with integrated inkjet printer
US7551927B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2009-06-23 Qualcomm, Incorporated Communique wireless subscriber device for a cellular communication network
US7693162B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2010-04-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Communique system with dynamic bandwidth allocation in cellular communication networks
US7720475B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2010-05-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Communique system with active feedback for cellular communication networks
DE19861108C5 (en) * 1998-05-05 2011-02-03 Vodafone Ag Determining the Quality of Service of Telecommunications Services
DE102005012854B4 (en) * 2005-03-17 2014-06-05 Vodafone Holding Gmbh Device and mobile terminal for detecting quality of service

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0565229A2 (en) * 1992-03-30 1993-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for modem command processing during data transfer
US5467341A (en) * 1994-04-14 1995-11-14 Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for alerting computer users in a wireless LAN of a service area transition
WO1997019525A1 (en) * 1995-06-28 1997-05-29 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for communication system access

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0565229A2 (en) * 1992-03-30 1993-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for modem command processing during data transfer
US5467341A (en) * 1994-04-14 1995-11-14 Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for alerting computer users in a wireless LAN of a service area transition
WO1997019525A1 (en) * 1995-06-28 1997-05-29 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for communication system access

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR AND MOBILE ..., Sept. 1994, (Hague), ARIE VERSCHOOR, "Quality of Speech Services in GSM - Definition of a Universal Quality Parameter for Quality Comparison and Evaluation", pages 1348-1352. *
SCHULER CHRISTIAN, "A Quality of Service Concept for Wireless ATM'97", In: IEEE ATM'97 WORKSHOP, Edited by A. CASACA et al., LISBOA PORTUGAL: IEEE, 25-28 May 1997, p. 381-390. *

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7551202B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2009-06-23 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Digital camera with integrated inkjet printer
DE19820845A1 (en) * 1998-05-05 1999-11-11 Mannesmann Ag Service quality evaluation method for telecommunications services in telecommunications network
DE19861108C5 (en) * 1998-05-05 2011-02-03 Vodafone Ag Determining the Quality of Service of Telecommunications Services
EP1076989B2 (en) 1998-05-05 2011-11-30 Vodafone Holding GmbH Determining the quality of telecommunication services
DE19820845C2 (en) * 1998-05-05 2001-11-22 Mannesmann Ag Determination of the quality of service of telecommunication services
EP0982955A2 (en) * 1998-08-26 2000-03-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for assigning telecommunication services
EP0982955A3 (en) * 1998-08-26 2000-12-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for assigning telecommunication services
JP2002528015A (en) * 1998-10-12 2002-08-27 テレフォンアクチーボラゲット エル エム エリクソン(パブル) Application of link and radio cell for TDMA / TDD system
WO2000022865A3 (en) * 1998-10-12 2000-07-20 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Link and radio cell adaptation in tdma/tdd systems
WO2000022865A2 (en) * 1998-10-12 2000-04-20 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Link and radio cell adaptation in tdma/tdd systems
US6807154B1 (en) 1998-10-12 2004-10-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Link and radio cell adaptation in TDD systems
WO2001020946A1 (en) * 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Ericsson Inc. Method and system for specifying a quality of service for communication between a mobile station and a packet wireless communications network
EP1089500A2 (en) * 1999-09-30 2001-04-04 Nortel Networks Limited Fair packet scheduler and scheduling method for packet data radio
EP1089500A3 (en) * 1999-09-30 2002-01-02 Nortel Networks Limited Fair packet scheduler and scheduling method for packet data radio
WO2001026397A1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2001-04-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method of broadcasting a quality over-the-air multicast
AU775963B2 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-08-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method of broadcasting a quality over-the-air multicast
WO2001058192A1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-09 Vodafone Ag Sim toolkit application service detection
GB2359700A (en) * 2000-02-25 2001-08-29 Motorola Inc Communication system, packet scheduler and operating method therefor
US7551927B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2009-06-23 Qualcomm, Incorporated Communique wireless subscriber device for a cellular communication network
EP1310117B1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2016-04-06 QUALCOMM Incorporated Communique system with active feedback for cellular communication networks
US7720475B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2010-05-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Communique system with active feedback for cellular communication networks
US7693162B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2010-04-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Communique system with dynamic bandwidth allocation in cellular communication networks
EP1241910A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2002-09-18 Evolium S.A.S. Process for the control of multi-media call sessions in a cellular system of mobile radiocommunications
FR2822320A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2002-09-20 Evolium Sas METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MULTIMEDIA CALL SESSION IN A CELLULAR MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
CN1388717B (en) * 2001-03-16 2010-05-26 伊沃柳姆两合公司 Method for controlling multi-media call dialogue in mobile wireless communication cellular system
US7440744B2 (en) 2001-03-16 2008-10-21 Evolium S.A.S. Method of controlling multimedia call sessions in a cellular mobile radio system
US7139254B2 (en) 2001-05-28 2006-11-21 Nokia Corporation Transmission of connection set-up parameters in packet data network
WO2002098072A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmitting connection set-up parameters in packet data network
WO2002098071A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmission of connection set-up parameters in packet data network
US7020481B2 (en) 2001-05-28 2006-03-28 Nokia Corporation Transmitting connection set-up parameters in packet data network
WO2002098073A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-05 Nokia Corporation Transmission of connection setup parameters in packet data network
US7623483B2 (en) 2002-09-23 2009-11-24 Lg Electronics, Inc. Radio communication scheme for providing multimedia broadcast and multicast services (MBMS)
CN100340125C (en) * 2002-09-23 2007-09-26 Lg电子株式会社 Radio communication scheme for providing multimedia broadcast and multicast services (MBMS)
US7764645B2 (en) 2002-09-23 2010-07-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Radio communication scheme for providing broadcast or multicast services
DE102005012854B4 (en) * 2005-03-17 2014-06-05 Vodafone Holding Gmbh Device and mobile terminal for detecting quality of service
WO2006100438A1 (en) * 2005-03-24 2006-09-28 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Handover between mobile networks
EP1705940A1 (en) * 2005-03-24 2006-09-27 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Handover between mobile networks
US8934901B2 (en) 2005-03-24 2015-01-13 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Handover between mobile networks

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI970237A0 (en) 1997-01-20
FI970237A (en) 1998-07-21
EP1021892A1 (en) 2000-07-26
TW416186B (en) 2000-12-21
ZA98162B (en) 1998-07-09
FI104606B (en) 2000-02-29
AU5665398A (en) 1998-08-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO1998032265A1 (en) Determination of service situation in packet radio network
US6668175B1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing radio access bearer services
US6407999B1 (en) Method and router in a packet network with priority classes
CN100382647C (en) Method for converting types from public channel to dedicated channel in CDMA system
US7333441B2 (en) Method to control the packet switching traffic in digital cellular communication systems
US6597682B1 (en) Channel allocation method for a packet network
EP1787436B1 (en) Method and system for managing radio resources in mobile communication networks, related network and computer program product therefor
US7564784B2 (en) Method and arrangement for transferring information in a packet radio service
EP1322132B1 (en) Resource control system, resource control method, and base station and suitable for use with the same
EP1318689B1 (en) Communication control system, communication control method and base station
US20080291872A1 (en) Selective Rab Assignment
US6647265B1 (en) Admission control of multiple adaptive and elastic applications
US7130639B2 (en) Service switching method based on QoS in a mobile communication system
EP1179246B1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing radio access bearer services
CN1744766B (en) Communiacation system and method, exchange center and base-station control table
KR100605941B1 (en) Data transmission method and apparatus for guaranteeing quality of service in data communication system
US20010053126A1 (en) Resource reservation in 3G or future generation telecommunication network II
Wang et al. A QoS based bandwidth management scheme in heterogeneous wireless networks
US7006476B1 (en) Communication apparatus and communication rate selecting method thereof
JP3844673B2 (en) Communication system and communication method
KR100446501B1 (en) Method and apparatus for call admission control according to quality of service in mobile telecommunication base transceiver system
KR100436139B1 (en) System and Method for Packet Service in the IMT-2000 SGSN

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM GW HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

WR Later publication of a revised version of an international search report
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09341549

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998900866

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998533305

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998900866

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1998900866

Country of ref document: EP