WO1996031626A1 - In situ hybridization solution and process - Google Patents

In situ hybridization solution and process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996031626A1
WO1996031626A1 PCT/US1996/004720 US9604720W WO9631626A1 WO 1996031626 A1 WO1996031626 A1 WO 1996031626A1 US 9604720 W US9604720 W US 9604720W WO 9631626 A1 WO9631626 A1 WO 9631626A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
hybridization
solution
denaturation
approximately
minutes
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1996/004720
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
In C. Kim
Donald M. Thompson
Gloria E. Sarto
Original Assignee
University Of New Mexico
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University Of New Mexico filed Critical University Of New Mexico
Priority to AU57120/96A priority Critical patent/AU5712096A/en
Priority to EP96915311A priority patent/EP0820525A1/en
Priority to JP8530511A priority patent/JPH11503026A/en
Publication of WO1996031626A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996031626A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B21/00—Microscopes
    • G02B21/34—Microscope slides, e.g. mounting specimens on microscope slides
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6841—In situ hybridisation

Definitions

  • This invention relates to fluorescence in situ hybridization.
  • ISH In situ hybridization
  • DNA and RNA nucleic acids
  • ISH is widely used for research and potentially for diagnosis in the areas of prenatal genetic disorders, and molecular cytogenetics.
  • ISH is used to detect gene expression and, over-expression, to map genes, to identify sites of gene expression, to localize target genes, and to identify and to localize various viral and microbial infections.
  • ISH technology research is being expanded into tumor diagnosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis for in vitro fertilization, evaluation of bone marrow transplantation, and analysis of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase and metaphase nuclei.
  • ISH labeled nucleic acids
  • DNA or anti-sense RNA are hybridized to chromosomes or mRNAs in cells which are immobilized on microscope glass slides
  • In situ Hybridization In Veurobiology; Advances n Methodology (eds. J.H. Eberwme, K.L. Valentino, and J.D. Barchas), Oxford University Press Inc., England (1994); In Si tu Hybridization : A Practical Approach (ed. D.G. Wilkinson), Oxford University Press Inc., England (1992)).
  • Non-isotop c systems have been developed to visualize labeled DNA probes including; a) fluorescence-based direct detection methods, b) the use of digoxigenm and biotin labeled DNA probes coupled with fluorescence detection methods, and c) the use of digoxigenm and biotin labeled DNA probes coupled with antibody- enzyme detection methods.
  • fluorescence-labeled nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) probes are hybridized to cellular DNA or RNA
  • the hybridized probes can be viewed directly using a fluorescence microscope.
  • simultaneous multicolored analysis i.e., for multiple genes or RNAs
  • simultaneous multicolored analysis can be performed in a single step on a single target cell.
  • Fluorochrome-directly labeled nucleic ac d probes eliminate the need for multi-layer detection procedures (e.g., antibody-based system), which allows fast processing and also reduces non-specific background signals. Therefore, fluorescence m s tu hybridization (FISH) has become an increasingly popular and valuable tool in both basic and clinical sciences.
  • FISH fluorescence m s tu hybridization
  • FISH technology for DNA (or RNA) or chromosomes is dependent on four major factors: (a) optimal temperature for effective denaturation of double strand DNAs (separation of two DNA strands), (b) optimal temperature for annealing or hybridization between target DNA (or RNA) and labeled DNA or RNA probes (i.e., DNA or anti-sense RNA fragments with which enzymes, fluorochromes, chromophores, chemiluminescers, bioluminescers, radioisotopes, biotin or avidin are conjugated), (c) selection of suitable solutions to enhance both the denaturation and the hybridization processes, and (d) effective post-hybridization washing conditions.
  • FISH Fluorescence In situ hybridization
  • FISH procedures performed by many laboratories around the world are generally very similar to those of Kuo, et al . , ("Detection of Aneuploidy Involving Chromosomes 13, 18 or 21, by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization to Interphase and Metaphase Amniocytes," Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 112-119 (1991);
  • Scoring fluorescence signals using the FISH procedures described above generally requires a 100X oil-immersion objective with triple bandpass filter due to lower signal sensitivity.
  • the use of a high concentration of formamide during FISH process appears to incur morphological destruction of cellular, nuclear or chromosomal structure.
  • all of these processes involve the use of formamide during hybridization or post-hybridization process.
  • Formamide is an expensive, toxic solvent and also a teratogen. Therefore, a formamide-free FISH process is environmentally and hygienically desirable.
  • FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • Labeled nucleic acid (DNA or anti-sense RNA) probes were dissolved in one of these two denaturation- hybridization solutions.
  • the solution containing the labeled probes was applied to nuclei or appropriately treated cells and tissue sections which were immobilized on microscopic glass slides and then glass coverslips were gently placed to allow uniform spreading of the probe solution.
  • Labeled nucleic acid probes and nucleic acids in chromosomes and appropriately treated cells and tissue sections on the glass slides were simultaneously denatured for approximately 1.5 ⁇ 0.5 minutes in an oven of approximately 100° C + 5° C with or without a sealant between coverslip and glass slide, and then immediately hybridized in an oven at a temperature of approximately 55° C + 5° C for 5 minutes.
  • the hybridized slides were washed in 50% formamide in 0.45% NaCl or 3 minutes at 38° C, and then for 5 minutes in 0.9% NaCl at 38° C.
  • the hybridized slides were washed in formamide-free 0.1-0.2% NaCl at 60 C for 5 minutes and then for another 3 minutes in new 0.1-0.2% NaCl at 60° C.
  • the present invention includes several areas of improvements of current FISH technology: (a) development of simple denaturation- hybridization solutions which facilitate the FISH process in approximately 15 minutes with very high sensitivity and high retention of morphology; and (b) development of an entirely formamide-free FISH technique.
  • the present invention permits the detection of one copy of target genes or RNA in cultured cells, tissue sections, tumors, and on nitrocellulose or nylon paper for use in association with blotting technology.
  • the present invention permits the detection of signal in interphase nuclei, using more dilute solutions of probe than suggested in prior art (Oncor, Inc.; Imagenetics/Vysis Inc.; BDS, Inc.), thus decreasing the cost of the procedure and increasing the likelihood that screening large populations would be cost effective.
  • the present invention allows the entire procedure to be accomplished at varying temperatures and times, without negatively affecting the signal detection, and makes the whole process more forgiving of minor deviations and thus applicable to processing large numbers of samples.
  • the quickness (15 minutes) and reliability with which FISH can be accomplished with the present invention makes it applicable to those instances where speed is of the essence, e . g . , preimplantation genetics.
  • the most widely used commercial kits include or suggest hybridization buffers containing formamide and SSC (saline sodium citrate) with or without dextran sulfate.
  • SSC saline sodium citrate
  • hybridization signals were barely detectable with 40X objective.
  • enumeration of signals in prior art normally requires 100X oil immersion objective. Therefore, it appears that use of formamide and SSC with and without dextran sulfate according to the provided protocols is less effective in hybridization and requires longer hybridization time (preferably overnight).
  • the present invention provides a highly effective medium for hybridization.
  • Prior art FISH technologies available from commercial sources, take at least two hours to more than 12 hours.
  • those procedures involve various laborious steps, separate denaturation of target nucleic acids and labeled probes, separate denaturation and hybridization procedures, and repeated dehydration of target nucleic acids with graded alcohols, etc.
  • the present invention in contrast, involves only three steps and results in a high detection sensitivity: denaturation (approximately 1.5 ⁇ 0.5 minutes), hybridization (approximately 5 minutes or less), and post-hybridization wash (approximately 8 minutes). Therefore, it takes only a total of approximately 15 minutes to perform the FISH process of the present invention (see Example 1).
  • Conventional FISH procedures require precise timing and temperature for the denaturing and hybridization processes.
  • the present invention allows variation in the time and temperature with little effect on the high degree of sensitivity.
  • SSC saline sodium citrate
  • SSC saline sodium citrate
  • the pH must be adjusted to around 7.0. Preparation of SSC is a time consuming process.
  • SSC may be used instead of the saline with the present invention, in the present invention, SSC may be entirely replaced with saline. There is no need for adjusting the pH of saline for post-hybridization washings, thus shortening and simplifying the FISH process.
  • the preferred solution of the present invention comprises a formamide-free mixture of 10% ⁇ 2% by weight dextran sulfate and 15%-25% (preferably 20%) glycerol and 0.9% by weight NaCl, KCl or other salt.
  • a 10%-20% dextran sulfate solution or 20-50% glycerol solution alone, mixed with labeled nucleic acid probes, will not result in effective hybridization.
  • the present invention's combination of glycerol and dextran sulfate enhances the hybridization remarkably.
  • the efficiency of the hybridization depends mainly on the concentration of glycerol. As glycerol concentration increases above 30%, hybridization signals decrease, probably due to the increased viscosity of the solution.
  • glycerol in the probe solution prevents drying throughout the hybridization process (e.g. up to 15 hours at 38° C) without the need for sealing with rubber cement.
  • glycerol and dextran sulfate are relatively inert chemicals. Therefore, solution G is a more desirable solution.
  • solution F comprises 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 10-30% (preferably 20%) by volume formamide and 0.9% by weight NaCl, KCl or other salt.
  • the formamide is only effective for hybridization in conjunction with the dextran sulfate.
  • Formamide concentrations lower than 15% or higher than 25% can be used for fluorescence in situ hybridization, but the use of these formamide concentrations requires different denaturation temperature settings, different denaturation times, different hybridization temperature settings, and different hybridization times. For example, these conditions require 38 C in a humidified incubator for a much longer time (preferably overnight) to complete the FISH process.
  • the longer incubation time requires sealing the coverslips and glass slides with tight rubber cement in order to avoid uptake of moisture or evaporation of FISH solution. Therefore, the preferred formamide concentration is 20% ⁇ 5% by volume. In addition, a higher concentration of formamide (above 35%) promoted structural destruction of cellular and nuclear morphology.
  • the present invention does not require sealing coverslips with rubber cement during any step of the FISH assay although the use of rubber cement or other sealants may be utilized.
  • hybridization signals become weak if the seal with rubber cement is broken by an unintended mistake. Therefore, applying rubber cement must be done carefully, is tedious, and requires 30-60 minutes before denaturation. The rubber cement seals must be removed before initiation of post-hybridization washings.
  • the present invention eliminates these laborious and tedious procedures (e.g., sealing and removing of rubber cement) without interfering with the hybridization process. Therefore, the present invention is very easy and convenient to perform.
  • hybridized slides are preferably washed with formamide-free 0.1 to 0.2% NaCl solution. Non-specifically bound or excess unbound probes are effectively removed under these conditions. Therefore, by using solution G, entirely formamide-free FISH can be accomplished. Since formamide is toxic and expensive, a formamide-free FISH assay is environmentally and economically desirable.
  • the above description of the present invention defines the optimal conditions for DNA under which the whole FISH process can be completed in 15 minutes and allows enumeration of signals in interphase nuclei with a 20X or 40X dry objective under a triple bandpass filter.
  • Other conditions may be used, for example, any temperature for denaturation and hybridization can be used, as long as the temperature does not exceed approximately 110° C. Under these "other conditions" enumeration of signals require 60X dry objective lens in conjunction with 10X eyepieces, but still does not require 100X oil immersion lens.
  • Hybridization conditions range from 45° C to 38° C for 30 minutes to overnight (with or without rubber cement).
  • Denaturation temperature can range from 75° C to 90° C for over 2 minutes to 1 minute respectively.
  • Hybridization conditions range from 45° C to 38° C for 30 minutes to overnight. The overnight incubation requires sealing of the coverslips with rubber cement.
  • solution F-DEPC The solutions contained approximately 8 and 12% by weight Dextran sulfate dissolved in 0.1% Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) water, between approximately 10 and 30% by volume formamide and a salt. There was no need to denature RNA.
  • the hybridization time was from 1 hour to 24 hours at 75°C. Sealing the cover glass with rubber cement was needed for hybridization times greater than 2 hours.
  • Example 1 FISH performed with F and G solutions on various cell and tissue samples with simultaneous denaturation of sample and probes, hybridization and formamide and formamide free washings.
  • Rhodamine-labeled specific DNA for X chromosome and FITC fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled specific DNA for Y chromosome probes (or Rhodamine-labeled Y chromosome and FITC labeled X-chromosome DNA probes) were obtained from a commercial source (Oncor, Inc., Imagenetics/Vysis, Inc., BDS, Inc.). The probes were diluted with various denaturation- hybridization solutions (see below).
  • Leukocytes were obtained from peripheral blood as follows: Freshly collected blood from donors were subjected to routine Histopaque centrif gation. Mononuclear and granulocyte cells were combined and washed once with PBS (phosphate buffered saline). The washed cell pellets were treated with cold ethanol/acetic (3:1), and kept at -20° C until use for FISH.
  • PBS phosphate buffered saline
  • Metaphase spreads or interphase cells of cultured and uncultured peripheral lymphocytes were immobilized on the glass slides according to standard cytogenetic procedures; methanol/acetic acid treated cells were placed on glass slides. Slides were air dried.
  • c) 5% parformaldehyde-treated cells were treated with cold methanol/acetic (3:1), and kept at -20° C for at least 30 minutes. Then, the methanol/acetic treated cells were applied on glass slides. When the slides were dried, proteinase K (50 ⁇ g/ml) was applied to the cell smear and incubated for 10 minutes at 38° C. Then the slides were washed with 0.05M Tris buffer, pH 7.4, and then air dried.
  • Paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized according to the standard procedures (with xylene and graded alcohols). The deparaffinized sections were treated with proteinase K as described above. The slides were air dried.
  • Solution F Formamide-containing denaturation hybridization solution.
  • Solution F contained 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 20% ⁇
  • Solution G contained 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 20% + 5% (preferably 20%) by weight glycerol, and 0.9% by weight saline (e.g. NaCl or KCl) as follows: (Preferred) 1 gram of dextran sulfate and 0.09 gram of NaCl or KCl were dissolved in 8 ml of deionized water and then 2 ml of glycerol was added. The solution was thoroughly mixed, and stored at -20° C until use.
  • saline e.g. NaCl or KCl
  • labeled probes represent DNA or anti-sense RNA to which relatively heat-stable enzymes and ligands, fluorochromes, (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, Texas Red) chromophores, chemiluminescers, bioluminescers, or radioisotopes were covalently conjugated.
  • the labeled probes were diluted with solution F or G to an appropriate concentration.
  • the "probe solution” represents labeled probes (Oncor, Inc.; Imagenetics/Vysis, Inc.,
  • the slides were transferred into another oven of 55° C ⁇ 5 C, and hybridized for approximately 5 minutes.
  • the hot aluminum shelf with the slides on it was removed from the oven and placed in a drawer of the laboratory bench and kept at ambient temperature for approximately 5 minutes to cool the temperature spontaneously.
  • single stranded target DNA and probes were hybridized with a maximum efficiency in the presence of the unique F or G solution.
  • Hybridization for up to 20-30 minutes increased the hybridization signals slightly more, but it was determined that the 5 minute incubation was adequate for microscopic detection of hybridization signals with 20X or 40X objective. (See Example 2, Table II).
  • the coverslips were removed from glass slides.
  • the slides were then subjected to one of the following post-hybridization washings to remove non-specifically bound probes: a) Formamide-containing washings: The hybridized slides were immersed in 50% formamide solution containing 0.45% NaCl for 3 minutes at 38' C, and subsequently in 0.9% NaCl for 5 minutes. b) Formamide-free washings: The hybridized slides were immersed in 0.1%-0.2% NaCl for 5 minutes and then for another 3 minutes in new 0.1%-0.2% NaCl solution.
  • PI 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
  • DAPI 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
  • Hybridization signals in the nuclei were viewed using an Olympus inverted fluorescence microscope (Model IMT-2) which was equipped with triple bandpass filter and a 100 watt mercury lamp and 10X,
  • Example 2 Identification of denaturation/hybridization solutions, denaturation/hybridization time and temperatures, resulting in enumeration of fluorescence signals in interphase nuclei with 20x, 40x dry lens.
  • a mixed probe was used containing rhodamine-conjugated X and FITC-conjugated Y chromosome probes (or rhodamine-conjugated Y and FITC-conjugated X chromosome probes) was used on cultured and uncultured, male, peripheral blood leukocytes.
  • Specific red or orange X (or Y) and green Y (or X) signals were examined under fluorescence microscope equipped with triple bandpass filter with 10X, 20X, and 40X objectives.
  • the purpose was, using the present invention, to develop FISH procedures in which fluorescence signals in interphase nuclei could be enumerated unequivocally under the 40X, non-oil objective. In some cases, enumeration of interphase nuclei was accomplished with 20X objective.
  • Hybridization with labeled probes containing formamide alone, glycerol alone or dextran sulfate alone did not promote hybridization.
  • FISH was performed with the solution G (containing glycerol and dextran sulfate) or solution F (containing formamide and dextran sulfate) , hybridization signals were noticeably enhanced. From studies with various combinations of conceivable mixture of chemicals, it was found that the above solutions (solutions F and G) were found to be the most effective denaturation-hybridization media for FISH.
  • the concentration of dextran sulfate should be at least 10%, or between 8%-12%.
  • the effectiveness of hybridization was considerably decreased with concentrations under 5%.
  • concentrations under 5% Alternatively, as dextran sulfate concentration was increased above 15%, the viscosity of the denaturation-hybridization solution was increased, resulting in decreased effectiveness of hybridization between target nucleic acid and labeled DNA probes.
  • formamide played a significant role in the effectiveness of the hybridization in the absence of salts.
  • formamide concentration was increased in the presence of 10% dextran sulfate, the increased viscosity of the solution possibly reduced effective hybridization.
  • high formamide concentrations induces irreversible structural damage on nuclear or chromosomal DNA during FISH process.
  • the optimal formamide concentration was determined to be at 20% ⁇ 5%. With concentration of formamide below 10%, the slides had a tendency to dry around the edge of the coverslip during hybridization in the absence of sealing with rubber cement. These dried slides did not exhibit fluorescence signal. With formamide concentration above 30%, the slides showed extensive destruction of cellular or nuclear morphology under the denaturation-hybridization conditions of the present invention.
  • solution F normally cannot be used for probes labeled with proteins or enzymes (e.g., horseradish peroxidase, C ⁇ -galactosidase, or alkaline phosphatase) .
  • proteins or enzymes e.g., horseradish peroxidase, C ⁇ -galactosidase, or alkaline phosphatase
  • formamide can be used at limited concentrations (i.e., 20 ⁇ 5%) for effective hybridization with DNA/RNA specific probes.
  • Samples treated with solution F have a tendency to dry faster due to evaporation of formamide during hybridization in a dry oven (or dry incubator) for an extended period of time without sealing with rubber cement.
  • the samples had a tendency to absorb excessive moisture. Therefore, sealing with rubber cement is necessary to keep the slide from drying or from absorbing moisture during long hybridization periods.
  • Solution G was a highly versatile denaturation-hybridization medium. Although the exact roles played by glycerol and dextran sulfate during fluorescence in situ hybridization has not yet been determined, it appears that glycerol concentration plays an important role in the effectiveness of hybridization in the presence of dextran sulfate. In addition, in general glycerol has a tendency to stabilize and protect enzymes and proteins. The optimal glycerol concentration for effective in situ hybridization was in the 20% - 30% range. The fluorescence signal was diminished considerably as the glycerol concentration was increased above 35% or decreased under 10% concentration.
  • hybridization temperature and hybridization time can be varied without losing the effectiveness of hybridization or the ability to detect signals.
  • Glycerol concentrations of 20%-50% required a longer hybridization time to achieve hybridization signals. Sealing with rubber cement was not needed.
  • a 5-m ⁇ nute hybridization period was adequate under the above experimental conditions for enumeration of signals in interphase nuclei with a 40X dry objective. Although, incubation for a total of 20 - 30 minutes enhanced the hybridization signals, allowing enumeration of fluorescence signals with 20X objective. Under 20X objective, the size of nuclei was too small to enumerate.
  • formamide-free washing was achieved by immersing the hybridized slides into 0.1%-0,2% NaCl for 5 minutes at 60° C, and repeated again for another 3 minutes in fresh 0.1%-0.2% NaCl at 60° C.
  • Example 3 FISH with solution F and G using digoxygenin-labeled X and biotin-labeled Y (or biotin-labeled X and dioxygenin-labeled Y) .
  • a mixed probe of digoxygenin-labeled X and biotin-labeled Y probes were obtained from commercial sources.
  • the probes were diluted with denaturation-hybridization F or G solution.
  • In situ hybridization process e.g., denaturation and hybridization and post-hybridization washings
  • An appropriate amount of a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated anti-digoxygenin available from various commercial sources
  • FITC-conjugated-avidin available from various commercial sources
  • a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated and FITC- conjugated-anti-digoxigenin can be applied to the slides.
  • the slides were then incubated at 38 C for 5 minutes in a humidified incubator.
  • the slides were washed in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) 2 minutes each for three times.
  • the slides were then air- dried.
  • a small amount of counterstain (DAPI or PI) was spotted on the slides to counterstain before visualization under microscope, as described under Example 1. Under these experimental conditions, no oil immersion lens was necessary for analysis. Interphase nuclei signal enumeration by fluorescence was adequately performed with 40x or 60x dry objective.
  • Example 4 mRNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled RNA probes.
  • paraffin embedded placental tissue was deparaff ized, hydrated, and prehybridized and hybridized in a mixture of solution F and 0.1% Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) using labeled RNA probes to detect mRNA in the nuclei or cytoplasm of placental tissue sections.
  • DEPC Diethylpyrocarbonate
  • the purpose was to determine if using the present invention facilitated mRNA FISH and produced clear signals.
  • the present invention under conditions as described below allowed the mRNA FISH procedure to be completed in 24 hours or less. Prior art using radioisotope detection requires up to 15 days.
  • tissue sample was cut to an appropriate size, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (overnight minimum) at 5° C; then placed in 5% sucrose (overnight minimum) until processed, embedded in paraffin, and cut into tissue sections (TS).
  • the TS were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated through graded EtOH as defined in prior art.
  • the TS were placed in Proteinase K, 2.5ug/ml to lOug/ml, digested for 30 minutes to 1 1/2 hours at 37" C and washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
  • PBS phosphate-buffered saline
  • the TS then were prehybridized in a mixture of solution F and DEPC (without probe), for 1 hour at 37° C; washed 3 times with PBS; excess PBS was removed by shaking.
  • the probe was diluted in solution F-DEPC at 20ng/ml to 200ng/ml, was added to the sample (approx. 12.5 ul/sample or enough to cover the sample) and a cover glass placed over the sample.
  • the cover glass was sealed with rubber cement for overnight hybridization; rubber cement was not necessary for hybridization of 5 hours or less.
  • the TS were placed in an oven at a temperature of 55' C to 90° C for 3 hours to 24 hours dependent upon the probe concentration.
  • the cover glasses were removed and the samples washed for 7 minutes in 0.15% NaCl at 60" C. 15 ul of antifade (Vector Laboratories) was placed on each sample and cover glassed.
  • the slide was viewed with a Texas red triple bandpass filter on a fluorescence microscope using 60x dry lens. Signal was seen in the cytoplasm.
  • Example 5 DNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
  • paraffin embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, denatured, and hybridized in solutions F and G.
  • the purpose was to determine the effectiveness of the present invention for DNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
  • the tissue and tissue sections were prepared as set forth in Example 4.
  • the probe (Imagenetics/Vyses, Inc., Oncor Inc., BDS, Inc.) diluted to 1 ul to 99 ul, approximately 12.5 ul/sample or enough to cover sample was added, and a cover glass placed over sample.
  • the cover glass was sealed with rubber cement denatured at 100°C to 110'C for 1.5 minutes, then subjected to overnight hybridization; rubber cement was not used for hybridization times of 5 hour or less.
  • the TS were placed in a hybridization oven at a temp, of 55 C to 90 J C form 3 hours to 24 hours.
  • the cover glasses were removed and the samples are washed for 7 minutes in 0.15% NaCl at 60 " C.
  • Example 6 DNA FISH in Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) using different fixatives and direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
  • PBMC Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • PMN polymorphonuclear cells
  • fixatives were used with the direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
  • the purpose was to demonstrate the versatility of the present invention with various fixatives.
  • Peripheral blood was collected in an anticoagulant tube and the PBMN and PNM separated as described in prior art and fixed in several fixatives: 1) 3:1 Methanol:Glacial acidic acid (MeOH:Hac) fixative for a minimum of 30 minutes at -20° C, 2) 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes to 3 hours and then applied to slides for and air dried for processing, 3) Methanol for 30 minutes minimum at -20° c.
  • MeOH:Hac Methanol:Glacial acidic acid
  • Example 7 FISH in Fetal cells from the maternal peripheral blood circulation fixed in 3:1 MeOH/Hac using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
  • Maternal peripheral blood was collected in an anticoagulant tube and the fetal cells separated as described in prior art and fixed in 3: 1 MeOH:Hac fixative for a minimum of 30 minutes at - 20" C.
  • the samples were centrifuged at 1000 g's for 10 minutes, and 10 ul of sample applied to each slide (12 mm fluorescent antibody circle) until a density of cells was reached sufficient for analysis.
  • Example 8 FISH insperm and noncultured Amniocytes fixed in 3:1 MeOH/Hac using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
  • the preparation of sperm and noncultured amniocytes for FISH was identical. Aliquots of sperm or amniocytes were placed into 15 ml centrifuge tubes. PBS containing 2mM Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to sperm or amniocytes at a concentration of 10 to 2 ⁇ xl ⁇ 6 per ml for 45 min. at room temperature to decondense the chromatin, then centrifuged at 160gs for 5 minutes. Supernatant was discarded and 8 ml -20" C 3:1 MeOH/Hac was added and the sample vortexed. The samples were fixed at -20° C 3:1 MeOH:Hac for a minimum of 30 minutes.
  • DTT Dithiothreitol
  • Preferable fixation time is overnight at -20° C.
  • the sperm or amniocyte samples were centrifuged at lOOOg for 10 minutes. The supernatant was removed and samples were resuspended in an appropriate volume of 3:1 MeOH:Hac. 10 ul of samples suspended in fixatives were placed on the slide (12 mm circle) assuring an even distribution. The slides were air dried for a minimum of 5 minutes. 7 ul of DNA probe (Imagenetics/Vysi ⁇ , Inc.; Oncor, Inc.; BDS, Inc.) diluted (1 ul to 99 ul) in Solution F or G was added to each 12 mm circle and covered with a 12 mm round cover glass. The samples were processed by previously described optimal methods in this patent (Example 1). The samples were viewed and counted using a fluorscence microscope with a Texas red triple band pass filter 60x dry lens.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) procedure and solutions. The entire FISH procedure is fast (15 minutes or less), with the hybridization step occurring in 5 minutes or less. The entire FISH procedure with digoxygenin- or biotin-labeled probes takes approximately 30 minutes. A formamide-free solution (dextran sulfate and glycerol) is provided. An additional solution (10 % dextran sulfate and 20 % formamide) is also provided. Additional solutions are provided for nRNA in situ hybridization whereby the process takes less than 24 hours.

Description

IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION SOLUTION AND PROCESS
BACKGROUND OF THE IMVENTIQN Field of the Invention: This invention relates to fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Background Art;
In situ hybridization (ISH) is a powerful and versatile tool for the detection and localization of nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) within cell or tissue preparations. By the use of labeled DNA or anti-sense RNA probes, the technique provides a high degree of spatial information in locating specific DNA or RNA sequences within individual cells or chromosomes. ISH is widely used for research and potentially for diagnosis in the areas of prenatal genetic disorders, and molecular cytogenetics. In the general area of molecular biology, ISH is used to detect gene expression and, over-expression, to map genes, to identify sites of gene expression, to localize target genes, and to identify and to localize various viral and microbial infections. Currently, the application of the ISH technology research is being expanded into tumor diagnosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis for in vitro fertilization, evaluation of bone marrow transplantation, and analysis of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase and metaphase nuclei.
In ISH, labeled nucleic acids (DNA or anti-sense RNA) are hybridized to chromosomes or mRNAs in cells which are immobilized on microscope glass slides ( In Si tu Hybrid .za.t on : Medical Applications (eds. G.R. Coulton and J. de Belleroche), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1992); In Situ Hybridization : In Veurobiology; Advances n Methodology (eds. J.H. Eberwme, K.L. Valentino, and J.D. Barchas), Oxford University Press Inc., England (1994); In Si tu Hybridization : A Practical Approach (ed. D.G. Wilkinson), Oxford University Press Inc., England (1992)). Numerous non-isotop c systems have been developed to visualize labeled DNA probes including; a) fluorescence-based direct detection methods, b) the use of digoxigenm and biotin labeled DNA probes coupled with fluorescence detection methods, and c) the use of digoxigenm and biotin labeled DNA probes coupled with antibody- enzyme detection methods. When fluorescence-labeled nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) probes are hybridized to cellular DNA or RNA, the hybridized probes can be viewed directly using a fluorescence microscope. By using multiple nucleic acid probes with different fluorescence colors, simultaneous multicolored analysis (i.e., for multiple genes or RNAs) can be performed in a single step on a single target cell. Fluorochrome-directly labeled nucleic ac d probes eliminate the need for multi-layer detection procedures (e.g., antibody-based system), which allows fast processing and also reduces non-specific background signals. Therefore, fluorescence m s tu hybridization (FISH) has become an increasingly popular and valuable tool in both basic and clinical sciences.
Because of the importance of FISH technology in molecular biology and cytogenetics, optimizing current FISH technology to improve the sensitivity of hybridization (fluorescence) signals, to simplify and thus decrease the time for the proc , and to substitute toxic reagents with non-health hazard chemicals used in the FISH process is desirable. FISH technology for DNA (or RNA) or chromosomes is dependent on four major factors: (a) optimal temperature for effective denaturation of double strand DNAs (separation of two DNA strands), (b) optimal temperature for annealing or hybridization between target DNA (or RNA) and labeled DNA or RNA probes (i.e., DNA or anti-sense RNA fragments with which enzymes, fluorochromes, chromophores, chemiluminescers, bioluminescers, radioisotopes, biotin or avidin are conjugated), (c) selection of suitable solutions to enhance both the denaturation and the hybridization processes, and (d) effective post-hybridization washing conditions. It is essential that the structural integrity of nuclei, chromosomes, cells, tissue sections and spatial resolution of the fluorescence signals not be compromised during the FISH process. Therefore, optimization of FISH technology should include increased hybridization efficiency, increased detection sensitivity, and preservation of cellular, tissue, nuclear, and chromosomal morphology.
Currently, FISH procedures performed by many laboratories around the world are generally very similar to those of Kuo, et al . , ("Detection of Aneuploidy Involving Chromosomes 13, 18 or 21, by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization to Interphase and Metaphase Amniocytes," Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 112-119 (1991);
Klinger, et al . , "Rapid Detection of Chromosome Aneuploidies in Uncultured Amniocytes by Using Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH)," Am J . Hum . Genet . 51: 55-65 (1992); and Ward, B.E., et al . , "Rapid Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Aneuploidies 6/31626 PC17US96/04720
- 4 - by Fluorescence n S tu Hybridization; Clinical Experience with 4,500 Specimens," Am. J. Hum. Genet . 52: 854-865 (1993)). However, most laboratories rely, for convenience's sake, on kits available from two major commercial sources: Oncor, Inc. , "Rapid Chromosome In Situ Hybridization System: Edition 1, Oct., 1993; and
Imagenetics/Vysis, Inc., 31 New York Ave., Framingham, MA 01701. Biological Detection Systems provides only labeled DNA probes with a recommended FISH protocol: Biological Detection Systems, Inc., 955 William Pitt Way, Pittsburgh, PA 15238. All of these FISH procedures are time consuming, labor intensive, extremely tedious, and of very limited detection sensitivity. U.S. Patent No. 5,225,326, to Bresser, et al . teaches "one step in situ hybridization," wherein both fixation and FISH can purportedly be performed in 5 minutes to 4 hours. Haar, et al . , "A Rapid FISH Technique for Quantitative Microscopy," Bio Techniques , Vol. 17,
No. 2, pp. 346-353 (Aug. 1994), discloses a technique which can "in principle" reduce the time necessary for FISH to thirty minutes.
Scoring fluorescence signals using the FISH procedures described above, generally requires a 100X oil-immersion objective with triple bandpass filter due to lower signal sensitivity. The use of a high concentration of formamide during FISH process appears to incur morphological destruction of cellular, nuclear or chromosomal structure. Furthermore, all of these processes involve the use of formamide during hybridization or post-hybridization process. Formamide is an expensive, toxic solvent and also a teratogen. Therefore, a formamide-free FISH process is environmentally and hygienically desirable. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A rapid, simple, and highly sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) procedure was developed on the basis of two preferred denaturation-hybridization solutions: 1) with formamide: 10% dextran sulfate/20% formamide/O.9% NaCl or KCl solution, and 2) formamide-free: 10% dextran sulfate/20% glycerol/0.9% NaCl or KCl solution. For RNA-FISH, solutions 1 and 2 may be modified by dissolving the dextran sulfate in 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) water to produce solutions F-DEPC (solution 1 plus DEPC) and G-DEPC (solution 2 plus DEPC). Labeled nucleic acid (DNA or anti-sense RNA) probes were dissolved in one of these two denaturation- hybridization solutions. The solution containing the labeled probes was applied to nuclei or appropriately treated cells and tissue sections which were immobilized on microscopic glass slides and then glass coverslips were gently placed to allow uniform spreading of the probe solution.
Labeled nucleic acid probes and nucleic acids in chromosomes and appropriately treated cells and tissue sections on the glass slides were simultaneously denatured for approximately 1.5 ± 0.5 minutes in an oven of approximately 100° C + 5° C with or without a sealant between coverslip and glass slide, and then immediately hybridized in an oven at a temperature of approximately 55° C + 5° C for 5 minutes.
After removing the coverslips from the slides, the hybridized slides were washed in 50% formamide in 0.45% NaCl or 3 minutes at 38° C, and then for 5 minutes in 0.9% NaCl at 38° C. Alternatively, the hybridized slides were washed in formamide-free 0.1-0.2% NaCl at 60 C for 5 minutes and then for another 3 minutes in new 0.1-0.2% NaCl at 60° C.
After air-drying, slides were counterstained with 4,6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or propidium iodide (PI) solution. Fluorescence signals were visualized with a fluorescence microscope which was equipped with a triple band-pass filter and a 20X or 40X dry objective. The whole FISH process took from 5 minutes to 15 minutes. Advantages of these procedures which are based on these two denaturation-hybridization solutions are: 1) elimination of a sealing step of coverslip to slide with rubber cement during the entire FISH process; 2) simplification of FISH processing steps by codenaturation (an ability to vary the temperatures +/-10 degrees without negatively affecting the outcome); 3) a rapid FISH process in 15 minutes or less; 4) highly increased sensitivity of hybridization (fluorescence) signals; and 5) development of an entirely formamide-free fluorescence in situ hybridization process. In addition, this process can be used for other non-fluorescence in s tu hybridization processes.
It is a primary object of the present invention to provide several solutions which result in highly sensitive, fast (hybridation within 15 minutes, and all steps of prehybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization within 24 hours), technically easy, reliable FISH procedures. It is another object of the invention to provide a formamide-free FISH solution and procedure.
Advantages of the invention are the use of simple, efficient and environmentally safe solutions for FISH procedures. Other objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS fBEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION!
The present invention includes several areas of improvements of current FISH technology: (a) development of simple denaturation- hybridization solutions which facilitate the FISH process in approximately 15 minutes with very high sensitivity and high retention of morphology; and (b) development of an entirely formamide-free FISH technique. The present invention permits the detection of one copy of target genes or RNA in cultured cells, tissue sections, tumors, and on nitrocellulose or nylon paper for use in association with blotting technology. The present invention permits the detection of signal in interphase nuclei, using more dilute solutions of probe than suggested in prior art (Oncor, Inc.; Imagenetics/Vysis Inc.; BDS, Inc.), thus decreasing the cost of the procedure and increasing the likelihood that screening large populations would be cost effective. The present invention allows the entire procedure to be accomplished at varying temperatures and times, without negatively affecting the signal detection, and makes the whole process more forgiving of minor deviations and thus applicable to processing large numbers of samples. The quickness (15 minutes) and reliability with which FISH can be accomplished with the present invention makes it applicable to those instances where speed is of the essence, e . g . , preimplantation genetics. Currently, the most widely used commercial kits include or suggest hybridization buffers containing formamide and SSC (saline sodium citrate) with or without dextran sulfate. When various commercial kits were used for FISH according to the provided protocols, hybridization signals were barely detectable with 40X objective. Thus, enumeration of signals in prior art normally requires 100X oil immersion objective. Therefore, it appears that use of formamide and SSC with and without dextran sulfate according to the provided protocols is less effective in hybridization and requires longer hybridization time (preferably overnight).
Therefore, the present invention provides a highly effective medium for hybridization.
Prior art FISH technologies, available from commercial sources, take at least two hours to more than 12 hours. In addition, those procedures involve various laborious steps, separate denaturation of target nucleic acids and labeled probes, separate denaturation and hybridization procedures, and repeated dehydration of target nucleic acids with graded alcohols, etc.
The present invention, in contrast, involves only three steps and results in a high detection sensitivity: denaturation (approximately 1.5 ± 0.5 minutes), hybridization (approximately 5 minutes or less), and post-hybridization wash (approximately 8 minutes). Therefore, it takes only a total of approximately 15 minutes to perform the FISH process of the present invention (see Example 1). Conventional FISH procedures require precise timing and temperature for the denaturing and hybridization processes. The present invention allows variation in the time and temperature with little effect on the high degree of sensitivity.
Conventional FISH procedures require oil-immersion 100X objective for adequate enumeration of signals. Because of the optimal composition of the denaturation-hybridization solutions and optimal denaturation-hybridization conditions (temperature and timings), the fluorescence signals become very bright. Therefore, enumeration of signals can be performed with 20X or 40X dry objective with triple bandpass filter after the 15 minute-FISH with the present invention.
Commonly, SSC (saline sodium citrate) is used during the FISH process. With SSC, the pH must be adjusted to around 7.0. Preparation of SSC is a time consuming process. Although, SSC may be used instead of the saline with the present invention, in the present invention, SSC may be entirely replaced with saline. There is no need for adjusting the pH of saline for post-hybridization washings, thus shortening and simplifying the FISH process.
The preferred solution of the present invention, known as solution G, comprises a formamide-free mixture of 10% ± 2% by weight dextran sulfate and 15%-25% (preferably 20%) glycerol and 0.9% by weight NaCl, KCl or other salt. A 10%-20% dextran sulfate solution or 20-50% glycerol solution alone, mixed with labeled nucleic acid probes, will not result in effective hybridization. However, the present invention's combination of glycerol and dextran sulfate enhances the hybridization remarkably. The efficiency of the hybridization depends mainly on the concentration of glycerol. As glycerol concentration increases above 30%, hybridization signals decrease, probably due to the increased viscosity of the solution. However, inclusion of glycerol in the probe solution prevents drying throughout the hybridization process (e.g. up to 15 hours at 38° C) without the need for sealing with rubber cement. As viscosity increases, hybridization signals become weaker resulting in the need for increased denaturation- hybridization times and temperatures to obtain optimal fluorescence signals. Glycerol and dextran sulfate are relatively inert chemicals. Therefore, solution G is a more desirable solution.
An alternative solution of the invention, known as solution F, comprises 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 10-30% (preferably 20%) by volume formamide and 0.9% by weight NaCl, KCl or other salt. The formamide is only effective for hybridization in conjunction with the dextran sulfate. Formamide concentrations lower than 15% or higher than 25% can be used for fluorescence in situ hybridization, but the use of these formamide concentrations requires different denaturation temperature settings, different denaturation times, different hybridization temperature settings, and different hybridization times. For example, these conditions require 38 C in a humidified incubator for a much longer time (preferably overnight) to complete the FISH process. Furthermore, the longer incubation time requires sealing the coverslips and glass slides with tight rubber cement in order to avoid uptake of moisture or evaporation of FISH solution. Therefore, the preferred formamide concentration is 20% ± 5% by volume. In addition, a higher concentration of formamide (above 35%) promoted structural destruction of cellular and nuclear morphology. The present invention does not require sealing coverslips with rubber cement during any step of the FISH assay although the use of rubber cement or other sealants may be utilized. In prior art, hybridization signals become weak if the seal with rubber cement is broken by an unintended mistake. Therefore, applying rubber cement must be done carefully, is tedious, and requires 30-60 minutes before denaturation. The rubber cement seals must be removed before initiation of post-hybridization washings. Therefore, sealing with rubber cement and removing seals are inconvenient nuisances and, with a large number of samples, can be extremely time consuming. The present invention eliminates these laborious and tedious procedures (e.g., sealing and removing of rubber cement) without interfering with the hybridization process. Therefore, the present invention is very easy and convenient to perform.
After the denaturation-hybridization process, hybridized slides are preferably washed with formamide-free 0.1 to 0.2% NaCl solution. Non-specifically bound or excess unbound probes are effectively removed under these conditions. Therefore, by using solution G, entirely formamide-free FISH can be accomplished. Since formamide is toxic and expensive, a formamide-free FISH assay is environmentally and economically desirable.
The above description of the present invention defines the optimal conditions for DNA under which the whole FISH process can be completed in 15 minutes and allows enumeration of signals in interphase nuclei with a 20X or 40X dry objective under a triple bandpass filter. Other conditions may be used, for example, any temperature for denaturation and hybridization can be used, as long as the temperature does not exceed approximately 110° C. Under these "other conditions" enumeration of signals require 60X dry objective lens in conjunction with 10X eyepieces, but still does not require 100X oil immersion lens. These other conditions for FISH are defined below:
(a) With solution G: Glycerol concentration from 35 - 50% with 10% dextran sulfate, denaturation conditions can range from 75" C to 90° C for 5 minutes to 1 minute respectively.
Hybridization conditions range from 45° C to 38° C for 30 minutes to overnight (with or without rubber cement).
(b) With solution F: Denaturation temperature can range from 75° C to 90° C for over 2 minutes to 1 minute respectively.
Hybridization conditions range from 45° C to 38° C for 30 minutes to overnight. The overnight incubation requires sealing of the coverslips with rubber cement.
(c) With solution F-DEPC: The solutions contained approximately 8 and 12% by weight Dextran sulfate dissolved in 0.1% Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) water, between approximately 10 and 30% by volume formamide and a salt. There was no need to denature RNA. The hybridization time was from 1 hour to 24 hours at 75°C. Sealing the cover glass with rubber cement was needed for hybridization times greater than 2 hours.
(d) With solution G-DEPC: The solution contained between approximately 8 and 12% by weight Dextran sulfate dissolved in 0.1% DEPC water, between approximately 15 and 25% by weight glycerol and a salt. There was no need to denature RNA. The hybridization time was from 1 hour to 24 hours at 75nC. Sealing the cover glass with rubber cement was needed for hybridization times greater than 2 hours.
Industrial Applicability:
The invention is further illustrated by the following non- limiting examples.
Example 1 FISH performed with F and G solutions on various cell and tissue samples with simultaneous denaturation of sample and probes, hybridization and formamide and formamide free washings.
1) Materials
A mixed probe of Rhodamine-labeled specific DNA for X chromosome and FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-labeled specific DNA for Y chromosome probes (or Rhodamine-labeled Y chromosome and FITC labeled X-chromosome DNA probes) were obtained from a commercial source (Oncor, Inc., Imagenetics/Vysis, Inc., BDS, Inc.). The probes were diluted with various denaturation- hybridization solutions (see below).
2) Preparation of cell and tissue samples a) Leukocytes were obtained from peripheral blood as follows: Freshly collected blood from donors were subjected to routine Histopaque centrif gation. Mononuclear and granulocyte cells were combined and washed once with PBS (phosphate buffered saline). The washed cell pellets were treated with cold ethanol/acetic (3:1), and kept at -20° C until use for FISH. b) Metaphase spreads or interphase cells of cultured and uncultured peripheral lymphocytes were immobilized on the glass slides according to standard cytogenetic procedures; methanol/acetic acid treated cells were placed on glass slides. Slides were air dried. c) 5% parformaldehyde-treated cells were treated with cold methanol/acetic (3:1), and kept at -20° C for at least 30 minutes. Then, the methanol/acetic treated cells were applied on glass slides. When the slides were dried, proteinase K (50 μg/ml) was applied to the cell smear and incubated for 10 minutes at 38° C. Then the slides were washed with 0.05M Tris buffer, pH 7.4, and then air dried. d) Paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized according to the standard procedures (with xylene and graded alcohols). The deparaffinized sections were treated with proteinase K as described above. The slides were air dried.
3) Preparation of denaturation-hybridization solutions: solutions F and G a) Solution F: Formamide-containing denaturation hybridization solution. Solution F contained 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 20% ±
10% (preferably 20%) by volume formamide, and 0.9% saline (e.g. NaCl or KCl) as follows: (Preferred) 1 gram of dextran sulfate and 0.09 grams of NaCl or KCl were dissolved in 8 ml of deionized water and then 2 ml of formamide was added. The solution was thoroughly mixed, and stored at -20" C until use. b) Solution G: Formamide-free denaturation- hybridization solution
Solution G contained 10% + 2% by weight dextran sulfate, 20% + 5% (preferably 20%) by weight glycerol, and 0.9% by weight saline (e.g. NaCl or KCl) as follows: (Preferred) 1 gram of dextran sulfate and 0.09 gram of NaCl or KCl were dissolved in 8 ml of deionized water and then 2 ml of glycerol was added. The solution was thoroughly mixed, and stored at -20° C until use.
4) Simultaneous denaturation of samples and probes
In this invention, "labeled probes" represent DNA or anti-sense RNA to which relatively heat-stable enzymes and ligands, fluorochromes, (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, Texas Red) chromophores, chemiluminescers, bioluminescers, or radioisotopes were covalently conjugated. The labeled probes were diluted with solution F or G to an appropriate concentration. Thus, the "probe solution" represents labeled probes (Oncor, Inc.; Imagenetics/Vysis, Inc.,
BDS, Inc.) which were diluted in solutions F or G. (See Example 2, Table I) .
5 to 30 μl of the diluted probe solution was spotted on nuclei, or appropriately treated cells or tissue sections on the glass slides. A glass coverslip was gently applied to cover the probe solution and slight pressure applied to assure uniform spread of the probe solution over the sample area. Sealing between the coverslip and glass slide with rubber cement was not necessary. The slides were put into an oven of 95° C - 100° C (100° C ± 5° C) and denatured for 1.5 ± 0.5 minute. During this period, both target nucleic acids and labeled probes appeared to be simultaneously and effectively denatured in the presence of the unique F or G solution.
5) Hybridization
Following denaturation, the slides were transferred into another oven of 55° C ± 5 C, and hybridized for approximately 5 minutes. Alternatively, if only one oven was available, the hot aluminum shelf with the slides on it, was removed from the oven and placed in a drawer of the laboratory bench and kept at ambient temperature for approximately 5 minutes to cool the temperature spontaneously. In either case, during this 5 minute period, single stranded target DNA and probes were hybridized with a maximum efficiency in the presence of the unique F or G solution. Hybridization for up to 20-30 minutes increased the hybridization signals slightly more, but it was determined that the 5 minute incubation was adequate for microscopic detection of hybridization signals with 20X or 40X objective. (See Example 2, Table II).
6) Post-hybridization washings
After hybridization, the coverslips were removed from glass slides. The slides were then subjected to one of the following post-hybridization washings to remove non-specifically bound probes: a) Formamide-containing washings: The hybridized slides were immersed in 50% formamide solution containing 0.45% NaCl for 3 minutes at 38' C, and subsequently in 0.9% NaCl for 5 minutes. b) Formamide-free washings: The hybridized slides were immersed in 0.1%-0.2% NaCl for 5 minutes and then for another 3 minutes in new 0.1%-0.2% NaCl solution.
7) Visualization of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals
After post-hybridization washings, slides were air dried. Then, a small amount of counterstain (200 ng/ml of propidium iodide
(PI) or 20 ng/ml of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in antifade) were spotted on the slide to counterstain nuclei.
Hybridization signals in the nuclei were viewed using an Olympus inverted fluorescence microscope (Model IMT-2) which was equipped with triple bandpass filter and a 100 watt mercury lamp and 10X,
20X, 40X and 60X dry objectives, in conjunction with 10X eyepieces.
Under experimental conditions, no oil immersion lens was necessary.
Signal enumeration by fluorescence was adequately performed with
20X or 40X dry objective.
Example 2 Identification of denaturation/hybridization solutions, denaturation/hybridization time and temperatures, resulting in enumeration of fluorescence signals in interphase nuclei with 20x, 40x dry lens.
In this example, a mixed probe was used containing rhodamine-conjugated X and FITC-conjugated Y chromosome probes (or rhodamine-conjugated Y and FITC-conjugated X chromosome probes) was used on cultured and uncultured, male, peripheral blood leukocytes. Specific red or orange X (or Y) and green Y (or X) signals were examined under fluorescence microscope equipped with triple bandpass filter with 10X, 20X, and 40X objectives. The purpose was, using the present invention, to develop FISH procedures in which fluorescence signals in interphase nuclei could be enumerated unequivocally under the 40X, non-oil objective. In some cases, enumeration of interphase nuclei was accomplished with 20X objective.
1) Solutions F and G were prepared as set forth in
Example 1.
2) Denaturation-hybridization solutions:
Hybridization with labeled probes containing formamide alone, glycerol alone or dextran sulfate alone did not promote hybridization. When FISH was performed with the solution G (containing glycerol and dextran sulfate) or solution F (containing formamide and dextran sulfate) , hybridization signals were noticeably enhanced. From studies with various combinations of conceivable mixture of chemicals, it was found that the above solutions (solutions F and G) were found to be the most effective denaturation-hybridization media for FISH.
The concentration of dextran sulfate, should be at least 10%, or between 8%-12%. The effectiveness of hybridization was considerably decreased with concentrations under 5%. Alternatively, as dextran sulfate concentration was increased above 15%, the viscosity of the denaturation-hybridization solution was increased, resulting in decreased effectiveness of hybridization between target nucleic acid and labeled DNA probes.
In solution F, formamide played a significant role in the effectiveness of the hybridization in the absence of salts. As formamide concentration was increased in the presence of 10% dextran sulfate, the increased viscosity of the solution possibly reduced effective hybridization. In addition, high formamide concentrations induces irreversible structural damage on nuclear or chromosomal DNA during FISH process. The optimal formamide concentration was determined to be at 20% ± 5%. With concentration of formamide below 10%, the slides had a tendency to dry around the edge of the coverslip during hybridization in the absence of sealing with rubber cement. These dried slides did not exhibit fluorescence signal. With formamide concentration above 30%, the slides showed extensive destruction of cellular or nuclear morphology under the denaturation-hybridization conditions of the present invention. Since formamide denatures and inactivates enzymes, solution F normally cannot be used for probes labeled with proteins or enzymes (e.g., horseradish peroxidase, Cι-galactosidase, or alkaline phosphatase) . However, it appears that formamide can be used at limited concentrations (i.e., 20 ± 5%) for effective hybridization with DNA/RNA specific probes. Samples treated with solution F have a tendency to dry faster due to evaporation of formamide during hybridization in a dry oven (or dry incubator) for an extended period of time without sealing with rubber cement. On the other hand, when hybridization was performed in a humidified incubator for an extended period of time (without the rubber cement), the samples had a tendency to absorb excessive moisture. Therefore, sealing with rubber cement is necessary to keep the slide from drying or from absorbing moisture during long hybridization periods.
Solution G was a highly versatile denaturation-hybridization medium. Although the exact roles played by glycerol and dextran sulfate during fluorescence in situ hybridization has not yet been determined, it appears that glycerol concentration plays an important role in the effectiveness of hybridization in the presence of dextran sulfate. In addition, in general glycerol has a tendency to stabilize and protect enzymes and proteins. The optimal glycerol concentration for effective in situ hybridization was in the 20% - 30% range. The fluorescence signal was diminished considerably as the glycerol concentration was increased above 35% or decreased under 10% concentration. However, by adjusting the glycerol concentration between 20% to 50% in conjunction with 10% dextran sulfate, hybridization temperature and hybridization time can be varied without losing the effectiveness of hybridization or the ability to detect signals. Glycerol concentrations of 20%-50% required a longer hybridization time to achieve hybridization signals. Sealing with rubber cement was not needed.
3) Temperature and time for denaturation of probes and nucleic acids in cells: Studies of peripheral lymphocytes using denaturation temperatures ranging from 80° C to 115° C, determined that simultaneous denaturation of target nucleic acid and labeled probes (without sealing the coverslips with rubber cement) gave the brightest fluorescence signals when the denaturation process was perfor ed in either solution F or solution G. The fluorescence signals were considerably diminished by denaturation temperatures below 85 C or above 110" C. Therefore, it appeared that denaturation of the target nucleic acid was most effective at 95° C - 105' C (100' C + 5 C) in the presence of solution F or G.
It was determined that the optimal denaturation time at 95° C - 105° C was for 1.5 ± 0.5 minutes. Denaturation for less than 1 minute and longer than 2 minutes at 100° C + 5° C caused diminished hybridization signals. The intensity of hybridization signals was almost identical between solutions F and G under these conditions.
TABLE I: DENATURATION Time and Temperature varied Hybridization: constant at 5 minutes at 55°C
90°C 100°C 105°C 110βC
0.5 MIN o + 1+ 1.5+
1.0 MIN 1.5+' 1.5+ 3+ 2+
1.5 MIN 2+ 4.5+ 4.5+ 3+
2.0 MIN 2.5* 3+ 3.5+ 2.5+
2.5 MIN 3+ 2.5+ 2.5+ +
5.0 MIN 3+ 2+ 1.5+ o
Visualization with 20x dry lens: score: 1-5+ with 5+ brightest
4) Temperature and time for hybridization
After the simultaneous denaturation of target nucleic acid and probes for 1.5 + 0.5 minutes at 100 C + 5 C, different hybridization temperatures were tested, from 38 C to 90" C for 5 minutes without sealing the coverslips with rubber cement. It was determined that 50 C - 60 C (55 C + 5 C) was the optimal condition for effective hybridization. As the hybridization temperature was lowered below 45° C or raised above 60° C, the intensity of the fluorescence signals was markedly diminished. Therefore, it was determined that the optimal temperature for effective hybridization between target nucleic acids and labeled probes (in the presence of solution F or G) was 55° C + 5° C.
A 5-mιnute hybridization period was adequate under the above experimental conditions for enumeration of signals in interphase nuclei with a 40X dry objective. Although, incubation for a total of 20 - 30 minutes enhanced the hybridization signals, allowing enumeration of fluorescence signals with 20X objective. Under 20X objective, the size of nuclei was too small to enumerate.
TABLE II: HYBRID ZATION
Time & Temperature Varied
Denaturation Constant at 100°+.5° x 1.5 minute
38CC 45°C 555C 65°C 75°C
2 MIN 0 0 1+ 2+ 1+
5 MIN 0 0 3+ 3+ 2+
10 MIN 0 0 3+ 3+ 2+
15 MIN 0 0 4+ 4+ 2+
30 MIN + + 5+ 3+ 2+
60 MIN 1+' 2+ 5+ 2.5+ 2+
OVERNIGHT 5+ 5+ 5+ 3+ 1+
Visualization with 20x dry lens: score: 1-5+; 5+ brightest Alternatively, sample slides were placed on an aluminum shelf for denaturation for 1.5 + 0.5 minutes at 100 + 5° C. The slides and shelf were put into a drawer of laboratory bench for 5 minutes, and cooled spontaneously by ambient air temperature of the laboratory. This also resulted in effective hybridization. The fluorescence signals observed, under these conditions, were almost identical to those observed by hybridization at 55° C + 5° C for 5 minutes as described above.
Since both the above hybridization procedures were very effective in the detection of fluorescence hybridization signals in 15 minutes, there was no need for overnight hybridization with this invention.
The following three procedures, however, were performed to determine the effectiveness of overnight hybridization.
(a) The denatured slides were incubated overnight in a dry incubator or oven at approximately 38° C. No sealing between coverslip and glass slide with rubber cement was done. The following morning, the slides were subjected directly to the post- hybridization washings (see below). Bright hybridization signals were obtained, which enabled performance of signal enumeration with 40X dry lens.
(b) The denatured slides were put inside of a drawer of a laboratory bench at ambient temperature overnight. No sealing between coverslip and glass slide with rubber cement was performed. The following morning, the slides were directly subjected to the post-hybridization washings (see below). Some of the slides were incubated at 55° C ± 5 C for 5 minutes before the post- hybridization washings. In either case, bright hybridization signals were visualized so that the analysis was able to be performed with a 40X dry lens. Therefore, there was no need to re- hybridize at 55° c. (c) After denaturation at 95° C - 105° C for 1.5 minutes, the hot aluminum shelf containing denatured slides was put inside of a drawer of a laboratory bench overnight; the slides on the aluminum shelf cooled down spontaneously and was left overnight. No sealing between coverslip and glass slide with rubber cement was performed. The following morning, the slides were subjected to the post-hybridization washings (see below). Bright hybridization signals were visualized with a 40X dry lens.
From these studies, it was determined that the present invention does not require another hybridization step after leaving the denatured slides (on or off of the hot aluminum oven shelf) at room temperature overnight in the laboratory. It appears that standing overnight at ambient temperature, hybridization fully occurred spontaneously for solution G.
Since solution F dries faster, overnight hybridization at room temperature or in a dry incubator of 38° C, without sealing with rubber cement was not attempted for solution F. However, strong hybridization signals were observed when the overnight hybridization was performed with rubber cement. On the other hand, as noted above, effective hybridization signals were obtained with overnight hybridization in solution G, without resorting to rubber cementing. The presence of glycerol in solution G kept the samples from drying. 5) Post-hybridization washings and visualization of signals: The hybridized slides (after removing coverslips) were soaked in 50% formamide/O.45% NaCl at 38° C for 3 minutes to remove excessive probes or non-specifically bound probes, and subsequently placed in 0.9% NaCl for 5 minutes at 38° C to remove formamide.
Alternatively, formamide-free washing was achieved by immersing the hybridized slides into 0.1%-0,2% NaCl for 5 minutes at 60° C, and repeated again for another 3 minutes in fresh 0.1%-0.2% NaCl at 60° C.
After air drying slides, the slides were counterstained with DAPI (for Rhodamine signals) of PI (for FITC signals) for microscopic visualization. Under the above conditions, both formamide-containing and formamide-free washing procedures were very effective in removing non-specifically bound labeled probes. Since formamide is expensive and also a toxic chemical. The present invention allows the elimination of formamide from the entire FISH procedure and there is more desirable in preventing hazards to health.
Example 3 FISH with solution F and G using digoxygenin-labeled X and biotin-labeled Y (or biotin-labeled X and dioxygenin-labeled Y) . (Indirect FISH)
A mixed probe of digoxygenin-labeled X and biotin-labeled Y probes (or biotin-labeled X and digoxygenin-labeled Y probes) were obtained from commercial sources. The probes were diluted with denaturation-hybridization F or G solution. In situ hybridization process (e.g., denaturation and hybridization and post-hybridization washings) was performed as described under Example 1. After post-hybridization washings, the slides were air-dried. An appropriate amount of a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated anti-digoxygenin (available from various commercial sources) and FITC-conjugated-avidin (available from various commercial sources) was applied to the slides. Alternatively, a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated and FITC- conjugated-anti-digoxigenin can be applied to the slides. The slides were then incubated at 38 C for 5 minutes in a humidified incubator. The slides were washed in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) 2 minutes each for three times. The slides were then air- dried. A small amount of counterstain (DAPI or PI) was spotted on the slides to counterstain before visualization under microscope, as described under Example 1. Under these experimental conditions, no oil immersion lens was necessary for analysis. Interphase nuclei signal enumeration by fluorescence was adequately performed with 40x or 60x dry objective.
With this indirect FISH, the whole process took an additional 11 minutes due to an additional antibody reaction and subsequent washings. The entire indirect FISH protocol can be accomplished in about 30 minutes to 60 minutes.
Example 4 mRNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled RNA probes.
In this example paraffin embedded placental tissue was deparaff ized, hydrated, and prehybridized and hybridized in a mixture of solution F and 0.1% Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) using labeled RNA probes to detect mRNA in the nuclei or cytoplasm of placental tissue sections. The purpose was to determine if using the present invention facilitated mRNA FISH and produced clear signals. The present invention under conditions as described below allowed the mRNA FISH procedure to be completed in 24 hours or less. Prior art using radioisotope detection requires up to 15 days.
The tissue sample was cut to an appropriate size, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (overnight minimum) at 5° C; then placed in 5% sucrose (overnight minimum) until processed, embedded in paraffin, and cut into tissue sections (TS). The TS were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated through graded EtOH as defined in prior art.
The TS were placed in Proteinase K, 2.5ug/ml to lOug/ml, digested for 30 minutes to 1 1/2 hours at 37" C and washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The TS then were prehybridized in a mixture of solution F and DEPC (without probe), for 1 hour at 37° C; washed 3 times with PBS; excess PBS was removed by shaking.
The probe was diluted in solution F-DEPC at 20ng/ml to 200ng/ml, was added to the sample (approx. 12.5 ul/sample or enough to cover the sample) and a cover glass placed over the sample. The cover glass was sealed with rubber cement for overnight hybridization; rubber cement was not necessary for hybridization of 5 hours or less. The TS were placed in an oven at a temperature of 55' C to 90° C for 3 hours to 24 hours dependent upon the probe concentration. The cover glasses were removed and the samples washed for 7 minutes in 0.15% NaCl at 60" C. 15 ul of antifade (Vector Laboratories) was placed on each sample and cover glassed. The slide was viewed with a Texas red triple bandpass filter on a fluorescence microscope using 60x dry lens. Signal was seen in the cytoplasm.
Example 5 DNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
In this example paraffin embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, denatured, and hybridized in solutions F and G. The purpose was to determine the effectiveness of the present invention for DNA FISH in fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
The tissue and tissue sections (TS) were prepared as set forth in Example 4. The probe (Imagenetics/Vyses, Inc., Oncor Inc., BDS, Inc.) diluted to 1 ul to 99 ul, approximately 12.5 ul/sample or enough to cover sample was added, and a cover glass placed over sample. The cover glass was sealed with rubber cement denatured at 100°C to 110'C for 1.5 minutes, then subjected to overnight hybridization; rubber cement was not used for hybridization times of 5 hour or less. The TS were placed in a hybridization oven at a temp, of 55 C to 90J C form 3 hours to 24 hours. The cover glasses were removed and the samples are washed for 7 minutes in 0.15% NaCl at 60" C. 15ul of a mixture of antifade (Vector Laboratories) and counterstain (DAPI or PI) placed on each sample and cover glassed. The slide was viewed with a Texas red triple bandpass filter on and epifluorescence microscope; signals were visualized with 40x dry lens in the interphase nuclei.
Example 6 DNA FISH in Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) using different fixatives and direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
In this example, different fixatives were used with the direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes. The purpose was to demonstrate the versatility of the present invention with various fixatives. Peripheral blood was collected in an anticoagulant tube and the PBMN and PNM separated as described in prior art and fixed in several fixatives: 1) 3:1 Methanol:Glacial acidic acid (MeOH:Hac) fixative for a minimum of 30 minutes at -20° C, 2) 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes to 3 hours and then applied to slides for and air dried for processing, 3) Methanol for 30 minutes minimum at -20° c.
Fixatives (1) The 3:1 MeOH:Hac fixation method is previously described in Example 1.
(2) The paraformaldehyde fixed cells on air dried slides were treated with proteinase K at 2.5ug/ml to lOug/ml and digested for 30 minutes to 1 1/2 hours at 37" C and washed 3 times in PBS. (3) The cells were vortexed on high speed and -20° C methanol added a few drops at a time to a total of 8 ml, then placed in a -20" C freezer for a minimum of 30 minutes. Following each fixative method described above, the samples were processed by the previously described optimal methods in this patent (Example 1). The slides were viewed with a Texas red triple bandpass filter on a fluorescent microscope; signals were observed with a 40x dry objective in the interphase nuclei.
Example 7 FISH in Fetal cells from the maternal peripheral blood circulation fixed in 3:1 MeOH/Hac using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
Maternal peripheral blood was collected in an anticoagulant tube and the fetal cells separated as described in prior art and fixed in 3: 1 MeOH:Hac fixative for a minimum of 30 minutes at - 20" C. The samples were centrifuged at 1000 g's for 10 minutes, and 10 ul of sample applied to each slide (12 mm fluorescent antibody circle) until a density of cells was reached sufficient for analysis.
7 ul of the diluted probe was then added to sample and a cover glass was placed over sample. The samples were processed by previously described optimal methods in this patent (Example 1). The slide was viewed with a Texas red triple bandpass filter on an epifluorescent microscope.
Example 8 FISH in Sperm and noncultured Amniocytes fixed in 3:1 MeOH/Hac using direct labeled fluorescent and indirect labeled DNA probes.
The preparation of sperm and noncultured amniocytes for FISH was identical. Aliquots of sperm or amniocytes were placed into 15 ml centrifuge tubes. PBS containing 2mM Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to sperm or amniocytes at a concentration of 10 to 2θxlθ6 per ml for 45 min. at room temperature to decondense the chromatin, then centrifuged at 160gs for 5 minutes. Supernatant was discarded and 8 ml -20" C 3:1 MeOH/Hac was added and the sample vortexed. The samples were fixed at -20° C 3:1 MeOH:Hac for a minimum of 30 minutes. Preferable fixation time is overnight at -20° C. The sperm or amniocyte samples were centrifuged at lOOOg for 10 minutes. The supernatant was removed and samples were resuspended in an appropriate volume of 3:1 MeOH:Hac. 10 ul of samples suspended in fixatives were placed on the slide (12 mm circle) assuring an even distribution. The slides were air dried for a minimum of 5 minutes. 7 ul of DNA probe (Imagenetics/Vysiε, Inc.; Oncor, Inc.; BDS, Inc.) diluted (1 ul to 99 ul) in Solution F or G was added to each 12 mm circle and covered with a 12 mm round cover glass. The samples were processed by previously described optimal methods in this patent (Example 1). The samples were viewed and counted using a fluorscence microscope with a Texas red triple band pass filter 60x dry lens.
The preceding examples can be repeated with similar success by substituting the generically or specifically described reactants and/or operating conditions of this invention for those used in the preceding examples. Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above, are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A solution for performing in situ hybridization procedures comprising: between approximately 8 and 12 percent by weight dextran sulfate; between approximately 10 and 30 percent by volume formamide; and a salt.
2. The solution of claim 1 wherein said salt is selected from the group consisting of NaCl, KCl and saline sodium citrate.
3. The solution of claim 1 further comprising diethylpyrocarbonate.
4. A solution for performing in sit u hybridization procedures comprising glycerol.
5. The solution of claim 4 further comprising dextran sulfate.
6. The solution of claim 5 wherein said dextran sulfate is between approximately 8 and 12 percent by weight of said solution.
7. The solution of claim 4 wherein said glycerol is between approximately 15 and 25 percent by weight of said solution.
8. The solution of claim 4 further comprising a salt.
9. The solution of claim 8 wherein said salt is selected from the group consisting of NaCl, KCl and saline sodium citrate.
10. The solution of claim 8 wherein said salt is approximately 0.9% by weight of said solution.
11. The solution of claim 4 further comprising diethylpyrocarbonate.
12. A process for fluorescence m situ hybridization (FISH) comprising the steps of: denaturation; hybridization in 5 minutes or less; and post-hybridization.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of denaturation is conducted within approximately 1 to 2 minutes.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the step of denaturation is conducted at between approximately 95' C and 105° C.
15. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of post- hybridization is conducted within approximately 5 to 10 minutes.
16. The process of claim 13 wherein the step of post- hybridization is conducted at between approximately 55° C and 65° C.
17. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of hybridization occurs in a solution, the solution comprising: between approximately 8 and 12 percent by weight dextran sulfate; between approximately 10 and 30 percent by volume formamide; and a salt.
18. The process of claim 17 wherein the solution further comprises diethylpyrocarbonate.
19. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of hybridization occurs in a solution, the solution comprising dextran sulfate and glycerol.
20. The process of claim 19 wherein the solution further comprises diethylpyrocarbonate.
21. The process of claim 19 wherein the solution further comprises a salt.
22. The process of claim 12 wherein the steps of denaturation and hybridization occur in the absence of a fixer for a sample on a substrate.
23. The process of claim 12 wherein the steps of denaturation and hybridization occur in the absence of formamide.
24. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of post- hybridization comprises washing in the absence of formamide.
25. A process for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) comprising the steps of: denaturation at a temperature of between 95° C - 105° C; hybridization at a temperature of between 45° C - 60° C; and post hybridization.
26. The process of claim 25 wherein denaturization, hybridization and post hybridization are all completed within 15 minutes.
27. The process of claim 25 wherein the step of hybridization occurs in a solution, the solution comprising: between approximately 8 and 12 percent by weight dextran sulfate; and between approximately 10 and 30 percent by volume formamide; and a salt.
28. The process of claim 27 wherein the solution further comprises diethylpyrocarbonate.
29. The process of claim 25 wherein the step of hybridization occurs in a solution, the solution comprising dextran sulfate and glycerol .
30. The process of claim 29 wherein the solution further comprises diethylpyrocarbonate.
31. The process of claim 29 wherein the solution further comprises a salt.
32. The process of claim 25 wherein the steps of denaturation and hybridization occur in the absence of a fixer for a sample on a substrate.
33. The process of claim 25 wherein the steps of denaturation and hybridization occur in the absence of formamide.
34. The process of claim 25 wherein the step of post- hybridization comprises washing in the absence of formamide.
35. A process for m situ hybridization for mRNA comprising the steps of: a) prehybridization; b) hybridization in 5 minutes or less; and c) post-hybridization.
36. The process of claim 35 wherein the steps of prehybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization are completed within 24 hours.
37. The process of claim 35, wherein the mRNA is derived from the nuclei of fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
38. The process of claim 35, useful for DNA or mRNA in the nuclei of cultured or non-cultured cells.
39. A process for in situ hybridization for mRNA comprising the steps of: a) prehybridization at a temperature of between 37°C and 55°C; b) hybridization at a temperature of between 45°C and 85°C; and c) post-hybrization.
40. The process of claim 39 wherein the steps of prehybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization are completed within 24 hours.
41. The process of claim 39, wherein the mRNA or DNA is derived from the nuclei of fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
42. The process of claim 39, wherein the DNA or mRNA is derived from the nuclei of cultured or non-cultured cells.
43. The process of claim 25 wherein the step of hybridization is conducted under a controlled descent from the denaturation temperature to ambient room temperature.
44. The process of claim 25 wherein the step of hybridization is conducted under a non-controlled descent from the denaturation temperature to ambient room temperature.
45. The process of claim 35, useful for mRNA in nuclei or cytoplasm of at least one member selected from the group consisting of fixed paraffin embedded tissue, frozen tissue sections, cultured cells or uncultured cells.
46. The process of claim 35, useful on at least one medium selected from the group consisting of nitrocellulose paper, nylon paper and blotting technology mediums.
47. The process of claim 12 useful for detection of nucleic acids in nuclei or cytoplasm of fixed paraffin embedded tissue, frozen tissue sections, cultured or uncultured cells, and on nitrocellulose or nylon paper or other mediums used in association with blotting technology.
48. The process of claim 35, useful for mRNA in nuclei or cytoplasm of at least one member selected from the group consisting of fixed paraffin embedded tissue, frozen tissue sections, cultured cells or uncultured cells on at least one medium selected from the group consisting of nitrocellulose paper, nylon paper and blotting technology mediums.
49. The process of claim 12 wherein the step of hybridization is conducted at between approximately 45^C and 60°C.
PCT/US1996/004720 1995-04-07 1996-04-05 In situ hybridization solution and process WO1996031626A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU57120/96A AU5712096A (en) 1995-04-07 1996-04-05 In situ hybridization solution and process
EP96915311A EP0820525A1 (en) 1995-04-07 1996-04-05 In situ hybridization solution and process
JP8530511A JPH11503026A (en) 1995-04-07 1996-04-05 In-two hybridization solution and method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/418,704 1995-04-07
US08/418,704 US5750340A (en) 1995-04-07 1995-04-07 In situ hybridization solution and process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996031626A1 true WO1996031626A1 (en) 1996-10-10

Family

ID=23659240

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1996/004720 WO1996031626A1 (en) 1995-04-07 1996-04-05 In situ hybridization solution and process

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5750340A (en)
EP (1) EP0820525A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH11503026A (en)
AU (1) AU5712096A (en)
CA (1) CA2217509A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1996031626A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998056955A1 (en) * 1997-06-13 1998-12-17 Bioseparations, Inc. Method of in situ hybridization
WO1999019511A1 (en) * 1997-10-10 1999-04-22 Bioseparations, Inc. In situ and in vitro hybridization method and buffer
EP0935672A1 (en) * 1996-10-09 1999-08-18 University of New Mexico In situ hybridization slide processes
WO2002048398A2 (en) * 2000-12-11 2002-06-20 Vermicon Ag In situ hybridization system for specifically detecting microorganisms
US6573043B1 (en) 1998-10-07 2003-06-03 Genentech, Inc. Tissue analysis and kits therefor
WO2011133625A1 (en) * 2010-04-20 2011-10-27 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Two-color chromogenic in situ hybridization
WO2011134474A1 (en) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Exiqon A/S In situ hybridization method and buffer
EP2428582A1 (en) * 2010-09-14 2012-03-14 miacom Diagnostics GmbH Clearance buffer
EP3904530A1 (en) * 2020-04-27 2021-11-03 Universidade de Évora Method for collection, detection and/or identification of microorganisms from a natural stone and uses thereof

Families Citing this family (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU4087399A (en) * 1998-05-18 1999-12-06 Igenex, Inc. (in situ) hybridization method for detecting target nucleic acid
EP1105539A2 (en) 1998-08-21 2001-06-13 Naxcor Assays using crosslinkable immobilized nucleic acids
AU773559B2 (en) * 1999-05-07 2004-05-27 Vermicon Ag Method for detecting microorganisms in a sample
US6942970B2 (en) * 2000-09-14 2005-09-13 Zymed Laboratories, Inc. Identifying subjects suitable for topoisomerase II inhibitor treatment
US20030017491A1 (en) * 2000-09-14 2003-01-23 Zuo-Rong Shi Chromogenic in situ hybridization methods, kits, and compositions
US6656685B2 (en) * 2001-01-29 2003-12-02 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Hybridization buffers using low molecular weight dextran sulfate and methods for their use
AU2003267140A1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2004-04-08 Pharmacia Corporation Isolation of genetic molecules from a complex biological construct for use in genetic expression analysis
WO2004097050A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-11 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Methods for in situ hybridization without the need for competitor dna
US8062897B2 (en) 2003-07-21 2011-11-22 Aureon Laboratories, Inc. Diagnostic histopathology using multiplex gene expression FISH
WO2005012537A2 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-10 Genvec, Inc. Adenoviral vector-based vaccines
WO2005033333A2 (en) * 2003-10-07 2005-04-14 Dako Denmark A/S Methods and compositions for the diagnosis of cancer
AU2004284461A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2005-05-06 Georgetown University Method for two- and three-dimensional microassembly of patterns and structures
WO2005042786A2 (en) * 2003-11-03 2005-05-12 Exagen Diagnostics Compositions and methods for glioma classification
EP1737981A2 (en) * 2004-04-23 2007-01-03 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Breast cancer gene expression biomarkers
JP2007530075A (en) * 2004-04-23 2007-11-01 エグザジェン ダイアグノスティクス インコーポレイテッド Compositions and methods for prognosis of breast cancer
EP1745156A2 (en) * 2004-05-04 2007-01-24 Dako Denmark A/S Methods for detecting chromosome aberrations
US20050287578A1 (en) * 2004-06-28 2005-12-29 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Methods for RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization
WO2006039045A2 (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-04-13 The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health And Human Services Adenoviral vectors able to transduce apcs, potential use in immune response generation
US20060223075A1 (en) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-05 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Unique sequence hybridization probes (USP)
WO2006119494A2 (en) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-09 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Acute myelogenous leukemia biomarkers
US7638278B2 (en) * 2005-05-13 2009-12-29 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Markers of DNA copy number alteration for improved prognostication in prostate cancer
SG136000A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2007-10-29 Univ Singapore In situ hybridization method
US8530196B2 (en) * 2006-04-07 2013-09-10 The Trustees Of The Univeristy Of Pennsylvania In situ cloning from pathological tissue specimens
BRPI0810540A2 (en) * 2007-04-24 2017-01-31 Pioneer Hi Bred Int method and software for distinguishing seed containing a genetic element of interest from a bulk sample
US8452445B2 (en) * 2007-04-24 2013-05-28 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Method and computer program product for distinguishing and sorting seeds containing a genetic element of interest
US8459463B2 (en) 2007-04-24 2013-06-11 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Method for sorting resistant seed from a mixture with susceptible seed
KR101383476B1 (en) 2007-11-01 2014-04-11 아스테라스 세이야쿠 가부시키가이샤 Immunosuppressive polypeptides and nucleic acids
JP5733977B2 (en) 2008-05-19 2015-06-10 株式会社セリッシュエフディー RNAin situ hybridization
EP2285979B2 (en) * 2008-05-27 2020-02-19 Dako Denmark A/S Hybridization compositions and methods
EP2391209A4 (en) * 2009-01-27 2014-03-26 Teleflex Medical Inc Sputum dissolving suctioning solution for endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes
US9303287B2 (en) 2009-02-26 2016-04-05 Dako Denmark A/S Compositions and methods for RNA hybridization applications
CA2781907C (en) * 2009-12-02 2019-07-16 Dako Denmark A/S Compositions and methods for performing hybridizations with no denaturation
US20110301051A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2011-12-08 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. Biomarkers for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease
EP2761028A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2014-08-06 Dako Denmark A/S Hybridization compositions and methods using formamide
EP2768974B1 (en) 2011-10-21 2017-07-19 Dako Denmark A/S Hybridization compositions and methods
JP6053327B2 (en) * 2012-05-23 2016-12-27 オリンパス株式会社 Microscope system, specimen image generation method and program
JP6982392B2 (en) * 2014-02-21 2021-12-17 ヴェンタナ メディカル システムズ， インク． Single-stranded oligonucleotide probe for counting chromosomes or gene copies
WO2018078448A1 (en) * 2016-10-27 2018-05-03 Scopio Labs Ltd. Methods and systems for diagnostic platform
CN110257483B (en) * 2019-07-10 2022-08-05 厦门通灵生物医药科技有限公司 Hybridization solution for in situ hybridization, preparation method thereof and detection kit

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4302204A (en) * 1979-07-02 1981-11-24 The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Junior University Transfer and detection of nucleic acids
US4886741A (en) * 1987-12-09 1989-12-12 Microprobe Corporation Use of volume exclusion agents for the enhancement of in situ hybridization
US4888278A (en) * 1985-10-22 1989-12-19 University Of Massachusetts Medical Center In-situ hybridization to detect nucleic acid sequences in morphologically intact cells
US5225326A (en) * 1988-08-31 1993-07-06 Research Development Foundation One step in situ hybridization assay
US5506098A (en) * 1991-09-04 1996-04-09 Daikin Industries, Ltd. In situ hybridization method
US5512436A (en) * 1991-07-01 1996-04-30 Amersham International Plc Enhancement of polynucleotide hybridization
US5521061A (en) * 1992-07-17 1996-05-28 Aprogenex, Inc. Enhancement of probe signal in nucleic acid-mediated in-situ hybridization studies

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4358535A (en) * 1980-12-08 1982-11-09 Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington Specific DNA probes in diagnostic microbiology
US4647529A (en) * 1984-06-01 1987-03-03 Rodland Karin D Hybridization method of detecting nucleic acid sequences with probe containing thionucleotide
US5132207A (en) * 1984-07-05 1992-07-21 Gen-Probe Incorporated Accelerated nucleic acid reassociation method
US4689294A (en) * 1984-11-19 1987-08-25 Miles Laboratories, Inc. Enhancement of hybridization of nucleic acids by anionic polymers
US5447841A (en) * 1986-01-16 1995-09-05 The Regents Of The Univ. Of California Methods for chromosome-specific staining
EP0440749B1 (en) * 1988-08-31 1997-05-28 Aprogenex, Inc. Manual in situ hybridization assay
US5232831A (en) * 1991-06-28 1993-08-03 Gen-Probe Incorporated Nucleic acid probes to streptococcus pyogenes
US5316906A (en) * 1991-08-23 1994-05-31 Molecular Probes, Inc. Enzymatic analysis using substrates that yield fluorescent precipitates
AU7474394A (en) * 1993-07-19 1995-02-20 Aprogenex, Inc. Enriching and identifying fetal cells in maternal blood for in situ hybridization

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4302204A (en) * 1979-07-02 1981-11-24 The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Junior University Transfer and detection of nucleic acids
US4888278A (en) * 1985-10-22 1989-12-19 University Of Massachusetts Medical Center In-situ hybridization to detect nucleic acid sequences in morphologically intact cells
US4886741A (en) * 1987-12-09 1989-12-12 Microprobe Corporation Use of volume exclusion agents for the enhancement of in situ hybridization
US5225326A (en) * 1988-08-31 1993-07-06 Research Development Foundation One step in situ hybridization assay
US5512436A (en) * 1991-07-01 1996-04-30 Amersham International Plc Enhancement of polynucleotide hybridization
US5506098A (en) * 1991-09-04 1996-04-09 Daikin Industries, Ltd. In situ hybridization method
US5521061A (en) * 1992-07-17 1996-05-28 Aprogenex, Inc. Enhancement of probe signal in nucleic acid-mediated in-situ hybridization studies

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
AM. J. PATHOLOGY, September 1994, Vol. 145, No. 3, VISAKORPI et al., "Sensitive Detection of Chromosome Copy Number Aberrations in Prostate Cancer by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization", pages 624-630. *
BIOTECHNIQUES, 1994, Vol. 17, No. 2, HAAR et al., "A Rapid FISH Technique for Quantitative Microscopy", pages 346-348 and 350-353. *
CYTOMETRY, January 1994, Vol. 16, HYYTINEN et al., "Improved Technique for Analysis of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tumors by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization", pages 93-99. *
CYTOMETRY, January 1995, Vol. 19, FLORIJN et al., "Analysis of Antifading Reagents for Fluorescence Microscopy", pages 177-182. *
J. IMMUNOL. METHODS, 1994, Vol. 176, CHANG et al., "In Situ Transcription with Tth DNA Polymerase and Fluorescent Nucleotides", pages 235-243. *

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0935672A4 (en) * 1996-10-09 2004-03-17 Stc Unm In situ hybridization slide processes
EP0935672A1 (en) * 1996-10-09 1999-08-18 University of New Mexico In situ hybridization slide processes
US5948617A (en) * 1997-06-13 1999-09-07 Biospeparations, Inc. Methods of in situ hybridization
US6194146B1 (en) 1997-06-13 2001-02-27 Bioseparations, Inc. Situ and in vitro hybridization method and buffer
WO1998056955A1 (en) * 1997-06-13 1998-12-17 Bioseparations, Inc. Method of in situ hybridization
WO1999019511A1 (en) * 1997-10-10 1999-04-22 Bioseparations, Inc. In situ and in vitro hybridization method and buffer
US7919254B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2011-04-05 Genentech, Inc. Tissue analysis and kits therefor
US6573043B1 (en) 1998-10-07 2003-06-03 Genentech, Inc. Tissue analysis and kits therefor
US7674589B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2010-03-09 Genentech, Inc. Methods for tissue analysis
US6905830B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2005-06-14 Genentech, Inc. Tissue analysis and kits therefor
US7129051B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2006-10-31 Genentech Inc Tissue analysis and kits therefor
US7344840B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2008-03-18 Genentech, Inc. Tissue analysis and kits therefor
US7468252B2 (en) 1998-10-07 2008-12-23 Genentech, Inc. Methods for tissue analysis
WO2002048398A2 (en) * 2000-12-11 2002-06-20 Vermicon Ag In situ hybridization system for specifically detecting microorganisms
WO2002048398A3 (en) * 2000-12-11 2003-05-15 Vermicon Ag In situ hybridization system for specifically detecting microorganisms
WO2011133625A1 (en) * 2010-04-20 2011-10-27 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Two-color chromogenic in situ hybridization
WO2011134474A1 (en) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Exiqon A/S In situ hybridization method and buffer
US9212390B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2015-12-15 Exiqon A/S In situ hybridization method and buffer
US10023912B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2018-07-17 Exiqon A/S In situ hybridization method and buffer
EP2428582A1 (en) * 2010-09-14 2012-03-14 miacom Diagnostics GmbH Clearance buffer
WO2012035076A1 (en) * 2010-09-14 2012-03-22 Miacom Diagnostics Gmbh Clearance buffer
US9297037B2 (en) 2010-09-14 2016-03-29 Miacom Diagnostics Gmbh Clearance buffer
EP3904530A1 (en) * 2020-04-27 2021-11-03 Universidade de Évora Method for collection, detection and/or identification of microorganisms from a natural stone and uses thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2217509A1 (en) 1996-10-10
EP0820525A1 (en) 1998-01-28
JPH11503026A (en) 1999-03-23
US5750340A (en) 1998-05-12
AU5712096A (en) 1996-10-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5750340A (en) In situ hybridization solution and process
US6022689A (en) Situ hybridization slide processes
WO1998015656A9 (en) In situ hybridization slide processes
DeLong Single-cell identification using fluorescently labeled, ribosomal RNA-specific probes
WO2009144581A1 (en) Hybridization compositions and methods
EP2401395A1 (en) Compositions and methods for rna hybridization applications
JP2019502386A (en) Hybridization buffer containing guanidinium thiocyanate
ES2707970T3 (en) Multiple simultaneous detection of TP53 / CEN17 gene / protein / B lymphocyte and exceptionally specific probes for 19q12, INSR, ATM, DLEU2, TP53 and 13q12
US5948617A (en) Methods of in situ hybridization
US20200340047A1 (en) Hybridization compositions and methods for making and using compositions
WO2017041005A1 (en) Hybridization buffers comprising an alkyl diester
CN105296649B (en) A kind of plant chromosome fluorescence in-situ hybridization method that improvement is simplified
EP0862650B1 (en) In situ hybridization to detect specific nucleic acid sequences in eucaryotic samples
Martini et al. Andrology: Application of different in-situ hybridization detection methods for human sperm analysis
Lawce Chromosome stains
Kearney et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for cancer-related studies
US5789161A (en) Methods for genome identification using direct label probe composition
US20040241734A1 (en) Methods for in situ hybridization without the need for competitior DNA
WO1993006245A1 (en) Probe composition for genome identification and methods
Herrington Demystified... in situ hybridisation.
Speel et al. Multicolour preparations for in situ hybridization using precipitating enzyme cytochemistry in combination with reflection contrast microscopy
US6194146B1 (en) Situ and in vitro hybridization method and buffer
Williams et al. PNA fluorescent in situ hybridization for rapid microbiology and cytogenetic analysis
Fung et al. Spectral imaging analysis of metaphase and interphase cells
Knoll et al. In situ hybridization and detection using nonisotopic probes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2217509

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2217509

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1996 530511

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1996915311

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1996915311

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1996915311

Country of ref document: EP