LUBRICATING OIL HAVING IMPROVED RUST INHIBITION AND DEMULSIBILITY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention concerns the use of a synergistic combination of a rust inhibitor containing at least one COOH group and particular derivatives of pyridine.
2. Description of Related Art
Many lubricating oils require the presence of rust inhibi¬ tors to inhibit or prevent rust formation, which often occurs due to water contacting a metal surface. However, we have found that the oil/water interfacial tension decreases with increasing concentration of the rust inhibitor. Therefore, although rust inhibition is im¬ proved, the demulsibility of the lubricating oil is degraded. Accord¬ ingly, it would be desirable to have a simple yet convenient means to obtain effective rust inhibition while reducing any adverse effect on the demulsibility of the oil.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one embodiment, this invention concerns a lubricating oil capable of inhibiting rust formation which comprises a major amount of a lubricating oil basestock and a synergistic additive combination comprising
(a) a rust inhibiting amount of a rust inhibitor having at least one COOH acid group, and
(b) a pyridine derivative having the formula
where Ri, R2, and R3 are independently hydrogen or an alkyl group containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms,
wherein the weight ratio of (b) to (a) is greater than zero and less than about 0.06:1.
In another embodiment, this invention concerns a method for inhibiting rust formation in an internal combustion engine by lubricating the engine with the oil described above.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention requires a major amount of a lubricating oil basestock and a minor amount of a synergistic combination of an oil soluble rust inhibitor containing at least one COOH group and a particular pyridine derivative.
The lubricating oil basestock can be derived from natural lubricating oils, synthetic lubricating oils, or mixtures thereof. Suitable lubricating oil basestocks also include basestocks obtained by isomerization of synthetic wax and slack wax, as well as hydro- crackate basestocks produced by hydrocracki-ng (rather than solvent extracting) the aromatic and polar components of the crude. In general, the lubricating oil basestock will have a kinematic viscosity ranging from about 5 to about 10,000 cSt at 40'C, although typical applications will require an oil having a viscosity ranging from about 10 to about 1,000 cSt at 40°C.
Natural lubricating oils include animal oils, vegetable oils (e.g.., castor oil and lard oil), petroleum oils, mineral oils, and oils derived from coal or shale.
Synthetic oils include hydrocarbon oils and halo-substituted hydrocarbon oils such as polymerized and interpolymerized olefins (e.g.. polybutylenes, polypropylenes, propylene-isobutylene copolymers, chlorinated polybutylenes, poly(l-hexenes), poly(l-octenes), poly(l- decenes), etc., and mixtures thereof); alkylbenzenes (e.g.. dodecyl- benzenes, tetradecylbenzenes, dinonylbenzenes, di(2-ethylhexyl)ben¬ zene, etc.); polyphenyls (e.g. biphenyls, terphenyls, alkylated polyphenyls, etc.); alkylated diphenyl ethers, alkylated diphenyl sulfides, as well as their derivatives, analogs, and ho ologs thereof; and the like.
Synthetic lubricating oils also include alkylene oxide polymers, interpolymers, copolymers and derivatives thereof wherein the terminal hydroxyl groups have been modified by esterification, etherification, etc. This class of synthetic oils is exemplified by polyoxyalkylene polymers prepared by polymerization of ethylene oxide or propylene oxide; the alkyl and aryl ethers of these polyoxya ylene polymers (e.g., methyl-polyisopropylene glycol ether having an average molecular weight of 1000, diphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol having a molecular weight of 500-1000, diethyl ether of polypropylene glycol having a molecular weight of 1000-1500); and mono- and poly- car- boxylic esters thereof (e_.g., the acetic acid esters, mixed C3-C8 fatty acid esters, and C13 oxo acid diester of tetraethylene glycol).
Another suitable class of synthetic lubricating oils com¬ prises the esters of dicarboxylic acids (e.g., phthalic acid, succinic acid, alkyl succinic acids and alkenyl succinic acids, aleic acid, azelaic acid, suberic acid, sebasic acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid, linoleic acid dimer, alonic acid, alkyl alonic acids, alkenyl malonic acids, etc.) with a variety of alcohols (e.g., butyl alcohol, hexyl alcohol, dodecyl alcohol, 2-ethylhexyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol onoether, propylene glycol, etc.). Specific examples of these esters include dibutyl adipate, di(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate, di-n-hexyl fumarate, dioctyl sebacate, diisooctyl azelate, diisodecyl azelate, dioctyl phthalate, didecyl phthalate, dieicosyl sebacate, the 2-ethylhexyl diester of linoleic acid dimer, and the complex ester formed reacting one mole of sebacic acid with two moles
- A - of tetraethylene glycol and two moles of 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and the like.
Esters useful as synthetic oils also include those made from C5 to C12 monocarboxyl c acids and polyols and polyol ethers such as neopentyl glycol, trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, dipentaeryl- thritol, tripentaerythritol, and the like.
Silicon-based oils (such as the polyalkyl-, polyaryl-, polyalkoxy-, or polyaryloxy-siloxane oils and silicate oils) comprise another useful class of synthetic lubricating oils. These oils include tetra-ethyl silicate, tetraisopropyl silicate, tetra-(2- ethylhexyl) silicate, tetra-(4-methyl-2-ethylhexyl) silicate, tetra(p- tert-butyphenyl) silicate, hexa-(4-methyl-2-pentoxy)-disiloxane, poly(methyl)-siloxanes and poly(methylphenyl) siloxanes, and the like. Other synthetic lubricating oils include liquid esters of phosphorus- containing acids (e.g., tricresyl phosphate, trioctyl phosphate, diethyl ester of decylphosphonic acid), polymeric tetrahydrofurans, polyalphaolef ns, and the like.
The lubricating oil may be derived from unrefined, refined, rerefined oils, or mixtures thereof. Unrefined oils are obtained directly from a natural source or synthetic source (e.g., coal, shale, or tar sands bitumen) without further purification or treatment. Examples of unrefined oils include a shale oil obtained directly from a retorting operation, a petroleum oil obtained directly from distil¬ lation, or an ester oil obtained directly from an esterification process, each of which is then used without further treatment. Refined oils are similar to the unrefined oils except that refined oils have been treated in one or more purification steps to improve one or more properties. Suitable purification techniques include distillation, hydrotreating, dewaxing, solvent extraction, acid or base extraction, filtration, and percolation, all of which are known to those skilled in the art. Rerefined oils are obtained by treating used oils in processes similar to those used to obtain the refined oils. These rerefined oils are also known as reclaimed or reprocessed
oils and often are additionally processed by techniques for removal of spent additives and oil breakdown products.
The oil soluble rust inhibitor must be acidic -- that is, must contain at least one COOH acid group -- and can contain essen¬ tially any acid group, including carboxylic, succinic, sulfonic acid groups, and the like. A particularly preferred rust inhibitor is one containing a major amount (preferably at least 70 wt.%) of a succinic acid derivative of the formula
(R )2 C-COOH (R5)2 C-COOH
and a minor amount (preferably less than 30 wt.%) of a partially esterified alkyl succinic acid of the formula
where R4, R5, and Rζ are each an alkyl group. The alkyl group may be linear or branched, with linear being preferred. If there are too few carbon atoms in each of R4, R5, and R5, the inhibitor will be very soluble but cannot absorb on the metal surface to prevent rust. In contrast, if there are too many carbon atoms in each of R4, R5, and Rδ, the inhibitor will not be sufficiently oil soluble. Accordingly, to ensure that R4, R5, and R6 can be oil soluble and impart rust inhibition to the lubricating oil, R4, R5, and Rs should each contain from about 2 to about 10, preferably from about 3 to about 6, and most preferably from about 3 to about 4, carbon atoms. R4, R5, and R6 may be the same or different and saturated or unsaturated. Most prefer¬ ably, R4 and R5 will each be CH3 - CH = CH, and R6 will be (CH2)3-
The particular pyridine derivative used in this invention has the formula
where R » R2, and R3 are independently hydrogen or an al yl group containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms. If alkyl, each may be saturated or unsaturated, with saturated being preferred. Most preferably, R1-R3 will each be a methyl group (i.e., collidine).
The amount of rust inhibitor used in the additive combina¬ tion added need only be an amount that is necessary to impart rust inhibition performance to the oil; i.e. a rust inhibiting amount. Broadly speaking, this corresponds to using at least about 0.03 wt.% of the inhibitor. However, the minimum amount required will vary with the particular feedstock. For example, high viscosity basestocks such as 1400 Neutral or higher base oils will require at least 0.1 wt.% or more, while most other lower viscosity basestocks (such as 150 to 600 Neutral) require at least 0.03-0.04 wt.%. Although not necessary, an amount of the inhibitor in excess of the minimum amount required could be used if desired.
•The relative amount of the rust inhibitor and pyridine derivative is important. To pass the ASTM D665B rust test, the weight ratio of pyridine derivative to rust inhibitor should be greater than zero and less than about 0.06:1, preferabl less than about 0.04:1, and most preferably 0.02:1 or less.
As shown in the following examples, the rust inhibitors and pyridine derivatives suitable for use in this invention are commer¬ cially available. As such, so are their methods of preparation.
If desired, other additives known in the art may be added to the lubricating base oil. Such additives include dispersants, anti- wear agents, antioxidants, corrosion inhibitors, detergents, pour
point depressants, extreme pressure additives, viscosity index im¬ provers, friction modifiers, and the like. These additives are typically disclosed, for example, in "Lubricant Additives" by C. V. Smalhear and R. Kennedy Smith, 1967, pp. 1-11 and in U.S. Patent 4,105,571, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by refer¬ ence.
A lubricating oil containing the synergistic additive combination described above can be used in essentially any application where rust inhibition is required. Thus, as used herein, "lubricating oil" (or "lubricating oil composition") is meant to include automotive crankcase lubricating oils, industrial oils, gear oils, transmission oils, and the like. In addition, the lubricating oil composition of this invention can be used in the lubrication system of essentially any internal combustion engine, including automobile and truck en¬ gines, two-cycle engines, aviation piston engines, marine and railroad engines, and the like. Also contemplated are lubricating oils for gas-fired engines, alcohol (e.g. methanol) powered engines, stationary powered engines, turbines, and the like.
This invention may be further understood by reference to the following examples, which include a preferred embodiment of the invention. In the examples, the rust protection and oil/water inter- facial tension were measured using ASTM Test Methods D665B and D971-82, respectively, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. The oil/water demulsibility was measured by ASTM Test D 1401-84, the disclosure of which is also incorporated herein by reference.
Example 1 - Properties of Base Oils Tested
The properties of the base oils tested in the following examples are shown in Table 1 below.
aro at cs an remove essent a y any su ur an n trogen rom conventional base oils. (6) A polyalphaolefin synthetic base oil obtained by polymerizing a Cχo monomer to form a mixture of three components: Cχo trimer (C3θ)
> c10 tetra er (C40), and Cχo penta er (C50).
Example 2 - Minimum Amount of Rust Inhibitor Required Varies
Rust performance tests were performed on base oils A-E from Example 1 to determine the minimum concentration of Lz 859 (a commer¬ cial rust inhibitor available from The Lubrizol Corporation) required to pass ASTM Test D665B. This inhibitor is a mixture of about 74.5 wt.% unreacted tetrapropenyl succinic acid of the formula
(CH3 - CH = CH) 2 C - COOH
I (2)
(CH3 - CH = CH) 2 C - COOH
and about 25.5 wt.% of a partially esterified alkyl succinic acid of the formula
(CH3 - CH = CH)2 C - COOH
I (3)
(CH3 - CH = CH)2 C - C00(CH2)3 - OH
which is obtained by reacting (2) with HO-(CH2)3-OH. The results of these tests are shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Base Oil Minimum wt.% Lz 859 to Pass ASTM D665B
A <0.03
B 0.04
C <0.03
D 0.05
E 0.10
The data in Table 2 show that the minimum amount of Lz 859 required to pass ASTM Test D665B varies with the base oil tested. In particular, the data show that higher nitrogen content base oils (NMP extracted base oils A and C) require less Lz 859 than equivalent viscosity grade phenol extracted base oils.
Example 3 - Rust Performance of Lz 859 in White Oil
The rust performance, oil/water interfacial tension, and demulsibility of oil E from Example 1 was tested at various concentra¬ tions of Lz 859. The results of these tests are shown in Table 3 below:
Lz 859 IT wt.% mN/m Demulsibility (2)
0 45.1 24/39/17
0.05 13.5 15/23/42
0.09 10.9 0.10 9.3
3/7/70
(1) Numbers after pass/fail indicate rust performance - 0 indicates no rust while 8 indicates that whole metal surface is covered.
(2) Oil/water/emul ion in milliliters after 1 minute.
The data in Table 3 show that oil/water interfacial tension and demulsibilty degrade with increasing concentrations of Lz 859. Thus, although effective rust performance can be obtained using 0.1 wt.% Lz 859, the oil/water interfacial tension and demulsibility are poor.
Example 4 - Rust Performance of Collidine in White Oil
The rust performance of oil E containing vari.ous amounts of 2,4,6-trimethyl pyridine (i.e. collidine -- formula (1) above in which Rl = R2 = R3 = CH3) was determined. The results of these tests are shown in Table 4 below.
Table 4
Collidine ppm Nitrogen Rust Performance
0 Fail
5 Fail
11 Fail 47 Fail 93 Fail
The data in Table 4 show that collidine alone does not inhibit rust.
Example 5 - Rust Performance Using Lz 859 and Two Pyridine Derivatives in White Oil
Rust performance tests were performed on two samples of oil E containing Lz 859 with 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine and 2,4,6-trimethyl pyridine (collidine). The results of these tests are shown in Table 5 below.
Table 5
Pyridine Derivative
2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine Collidine
The data in Table 5 show 2,6-di-tert-butyl pyridine did not improve the effectiveness of Lz 859 as a rust inhibitor. In contrast, the presence of collidine did.
Example 6 - Rust Performance and Interfacial Tension of 150N and 600N Basestocks Using Combination of Lz 859 and Collidine
The rust performance and interfacial tension (IT) for oils B and D were determined using various concentrations of collidine and Lz 859. The results of these tests are shown in Table 6 below.
Rust Base Oil Performance
Fail Fail Pass Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass
Fail
(1) Total nitrogen present is 30 ppm.
(2) Total nitrogen present is 35 ppm.
(3) Total nitrogen present is 80 ppm.
(4) Not tested.
The data in Table 6 show that the 150N base oil (oil B) requires 0.04 wt.% Lz 859 to pass the rust test, and that the inter¬ facial tension of this blend is 15.8 mN/m. After increasing the nitrogen content from 8 (see Table 1) to 30 ppm due to the addition of collidine, the amount of Lz 859 required to pass the rust test de¬ creases from 0.04 to 0.03 wt.%, and oil B passes the rust test at a higher interfacial tension (20.7 mN/m). The higher viscosity 600N base oil (oil D) required only an increase in total nitrogen content from 30 (see Table 1) to 35 ppm to decrease the amount of rust inhi¬ bitor required from 0.05 to 0.04 wt.%, and passed the rust test at a higher interfacial tension (20.9 mN/m). The- data also show that the pyridine derivative/rust inhibitor combination was not effective at a weight ratio of 0.08:1.
Example 7 - Pyridine Derivative/Rust Inhibitor Weight Ratio Important
A series of tests were performed using oil F containing 0.05 wt.% Lz 859 to which various amounts of collidine were added. The results of these tests are shown in Table 7 below.
Rust Performance (1)
Fail - 8 Pass - 0 Fail - 7
Fail - 8
(1) See footnote (1) in Table 3.
The data in Table 7 show that the additive combination of this invention is an effective rust inhibitor when the weight ratio of the pyridine derivative to the rust inhibitor is greater than zero and less than about 0.06:1, most preferably about 0.02:1 or less.