WO1991006056A1 - Computer-assisted documentation system regarding dictating and transcribing - Google Patents

Computer-assisted documentation system regarding dictating and transcribing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1991006056A1
WO1991006056A1 PCT/US1990/005655 US9005655W WO9106056A1 WO 1991006056 A1 WO1991006056 A1 WO 1991006056A1 US 9005655 W US9005655 W US 9005655W WO 9106056 A1 WO9106056 A1 WO 9106056A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
option
user
document
text
definable
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1990/005655
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ken Buchanan
John A. Dowdle
Original Assignee
Medical Documenting Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23673559&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO1991006056(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Medical Documenting Systems, Inc. filed Critical Medical Documenting Systems, Inc.
Publication of WO1991006056A1 publication Critical patent/WO1991006056A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/166Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
    • G06F40/174Form filling; Merging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/20Natural language analysis
    • G06F40/274Converting codes to words; Guess-ahead of partial word inputs
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99939Privileged access

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to document generation systems and, more particularly to a system incorporating user-modifiable document structures or "boiler-plates", a database including information to be placed into a particular document structure, and a computing device which combines the particular document structure with relevant information stored in the database to form a document.
  • a physician typically dictates a report on each patient encounter which, subsequently, must be typed by a transcriptionist. The process is time consuming and repetitive. For this reason, shortcuts are often taken causing reports to be incomplete. As a result, potential legal and insurance problems as well as reduced quality of patient care can occur.
  • patient data is not readily available for fast and easy review. A patient's medical record cannot be easily combined with other reports or other patient data for analysis and reporting.
  • the present invention automates the documentation process by providing a computer-based documentation system incorporating a relational database with a multi-document word processor preferably comprising a graphics engine within a menu- driven, graphic window environment.
  • the documentation system utilizes previously defined document structures or "boiler-plates" to manage patient reporting.
  • a document structure offers a framework within which certain items will vary.
  • an initial exam conducted by an orthopedic surgeon will contain many basic elements common to all patients, but response to the exam will vary for each patient.
  • a report to be input can contain any number of variable responses, and each variable within the input report can offer any number of different options from which to choose.
  • a physician can personalize the report, modifying or creating new documents to suit a particular situation. Further, while generating a particular document, a physician can customize the document by inserting words into the generated document through the use of the integrated word processor.
  • the physician can avoid directly using the documenting system by utilizing printed checklists. After a checklist has been filled out by a physician, another individual can generate the desired documents from items checked off on the checklist.
  • the data input into the documenting system is electronically stored for possible future use in reporting and/or analysis. The future uses may include graphical analysis, cost accounting, time reporting and other desired document generation.
  • a document generation system for enhancing or replacing the dictation and transcription process. More particularly, a computer-based documentation system utilizing a document structure manipulated by a user interface is provided.
  • the document structure or "boiler plate" includes phrase fields containing user-definable phrases and option-text fields.
  • the option-text fields include a plurality of option-text segments.
  • the user interface further enables selecting of at least one option-text segment from within an option-text field. Subsequently, the system generates a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selected option-text segment.
  • Fig. 1 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment of the document generation system.
  • Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the contents of the preferred embodiment relational database.
  • Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an alternative embodiment of the document generation system in which the relational database shares stored information with more than one user.
  • Fig. 4 is a drawing depicting a preferred embodiment menu driven, graphical window environment.
  • Fig. 5 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment linked user-modifiable document structure.
  • Fig. 6 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment user-modifiable option-text field.
  • Fig. 7 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of information which can be stored in a patient database and subsequently may be utilized by a plurality of users through the selection of particular option-text segments within an option-text field.
  • Fig. 8 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example data structure which may be utilized to enter specific patient information.
  • Fig. 9 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a user-definable text-note and subsequently the automatic activation of a single line editing mode so that a single line of customized text can be entered into the database.
  • Fig. 10 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a user-definable text-note and subsequently the automatic activation of a multiple line editing mode so that multiple lines of customized text can be entered into the database.
  • Fig. 11 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting several previously defined document structures to form a new document structure.
  • Fig. 12 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment procedure for generating a document.
  • the preferred embodiment document generation system 1 comprises a computing device 10, relational database 2, and multi- document word processor 6.
  • the document generation system 1 further includes an output device such as a printer device 8.
  • the computing device 10 preferably comprises an electronic display 15, a data processing device 16, and a keyboard 18.
  • the computing device 10 further includes an electronic storage device 20 for storing information from the relational database 2.
  • Electronic storage device 20 can be any device capable of storing data for long periods of time.
  • electronic storage device 20 could be a floppy disk drive, Bernoulli hard drive, Winchester hard disk, analog tape drive, digital tape drive, optical disk drive.
  • the computing device 10 further includes a pointing device 12.
  • the pointing device can be utilized by the document generation system 1 as an alternative input device.
  • the pointing device may comprise a mouse, trackball, light pen, bar-code scanner or digitizing pad.
  • relational database 2 comprises a user-definable electronic document structure 22 shown in Fig. 2.
  • the user- definable document structure 22 comprises a plurality of phrase fields 40 which electronically store user- definable phrases and further comprises an option-text field for electronically storing a plurality of user definable option-text segments.
  • the option-text segments further comprises a plurality of data pointers which point to previously stored text which is electronically stored in an option list 24.
  • the relational database 2 further comprises patient data 32 which includes specific information about a particular patient which may be needed to produce a plurality of different documents derived from a plurality of different document structures 22.
  • the preferred option- text field further comprises a plurality of data pointers which point to particular data segments within stored patient data 32.
  • the relational database 2 preferably further comprises selection data 38.
  • Preferred selection data 38 includes information concerning selections of different option-text segments within a particular document structure 32 in combination with a particular set of patient data 32 and a date stamp 28.
  • the relational database 2 in combination with the data processor 16 further preferably includes a date stamp 28 function.
  • the date stamp 28 function allows the relational database 2 to determine the data and time that each document structure 22, option list 24, patient data 32, or selection data 38 was created or modified. It will be appreciated that relational database 2 may be configured in a variety of different structures and the description above is merely one example of one such structure.
  • the computing device 10 in combination with the multi-document word processor 6 and relational database 2 provide a user interface for utilizing the document structure 22 to generate a document.
  • the multi-document word processor 6 provides an editing environment for making user modifications to the user-definable phrases and user-definable option-text segments within the option-text fields 42.
  • Interaction of the electronic display 14, data processing device 16 and keyboard 18 provide a selecting function for selecting at least one user-definable option-text segment within an option-text field. This selecting may be accomplished by depressing key actuators on keyboard 18 which indicate the selection of a particular user definable option-text segment.
  • movement of a pointing device 12 in combination with activating pointing activator accomplish the selecting function.
  • document structure 22 preferably includes a user-modifiable electronic link between a phrase field and an option- text field.
  • the document structure 22 preferably includes a user-modifiable electronic link between a first and second phrase field.
  • the multi-document word processor 6 typically provides an editing environment for making user modifications to the links between a phrase field and an option-text field as well as between a first and second phrase field.
  • the elements of the user interface typically further combine to provide a document generation function which generates a document comprising a phrase field linked to an option-text field.
  • the document generation function may generate a document from the linked first and second phrase fields.
  • a multi-user system partitions relational database 2 into a plurality of parts.
  • the multi-user system includes user specific document structures 22, option lists 24 and selection data 38.
  • particular information may be stored such that more than one user can access the particular information.
  • Such information may include date stamp 28 and patient data 32.
  • each user may have access to the shared information for use in generating a document and may define specific document structures incorporating available data in a manner which seems appropriate for the particular document desired. For instance, such a multi-user system might be used in a hospital or clinic wherein a variety of different types of physicians are using document generation system 1.
  • relational database 2 preferably is partitioned into user specific data and sharable data. Such a configuration can be utilized across a local area network comprising a plurality of computing devices 10 connected to a relational database 2 which has user specific and sharable portions of data.
  • Security access to stored data preferably is provided by the document generation system 1.
  • Security access may be provided by distinguishing between each user's data and reports through the use of a user name.
  • the user name is comprised of the first and last name of a user followed by an optional security password.
  • the first and last name are combined to form a pointer to a storage location within relational database 2 which can typically be accessed by a user only after entering his or her first and last name as well as a security password.
  • Computing device 10 further includes an automatic configuration function in which the data processor 16 automatically senses the presence of an output device and automatically configures to operate with that output device.
  • Such an output device may include electronic display 14 and printing device 8.
  • computing device 10 preferably includes an operating function in which a user-definable output driver for operating the output device can be defined.
  • a user-definable output driver definition function can be particularly important for use in preferred embodiment document generation systems 1 which include a printer device 8 which is not automatically supported and configured to by data processor 16.
  • the preferred embodiment document generation system 1 further includes a contextual help function in which operating instructions for use of the document generation system 1 can be displayed on electronic display 14 or printed to printer device 8.
  • Fig. 4 is a drawing depicting a preferred embodiment menu-driven, graphical windowing environment.
  • This windowing environment of document generation system 1 supports both text and graphics operation modes. A user can choose between the two different modes of operation. In either mode of operation, the appearance and functionality of the document generation system remains substantially consistent.
  • the only limitation is that the use of an alternative embodiment graphics engine typically is not available in text mode operation.
  • the preferred graphics window environment 50 is divided into three areas. The areas include a top window section 52 which preferably displays the date, time, product name and main menu selections.
  • window environment 50 includes a middle section window 54 where documents, graphics and dialogue windows can be displayed and manipulated.
  • the graphics window environment 50 includes a bottom section 56 which displays status information for such things as the word processor 6, a generated report, particular selections of report and patients, and keyboard choices.
  • One of the first steps in using the document generation system 1 is to create a document structure 22.
  • An example of a preferred embodiment user- modifiable document structure 22' is shown in Fig. 5.
  • the example user-modifiable document structure 22' comprises a series of phrase fields linked to option- text fields.
  • phrase 58 is linked to option-text field pointer 60 within example document structure 22' .
  • a plurality of different reports can be generated for different needs. For example, a physician will probably create a separate report for initial visits and for follow-up visits by a particular patient as well as a separate report for writing a prescription.
  • a user After creating a document structure 22, a user typically defines the contents of an option-text field.
  • Shown in Fig. 6 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment user-modifiable option-text field 60.
  • the example option-text field 60 includes a plurality of user-definable option-text segments 64 and 66.
  • a user can modify the contents of option-text field 60 through the use of word processor 6.
  • Option-text segments 62, 64 or 66 may be inserted into document structure 22 to form a document.
  • a user can customize a particular report for a particular patient corresponding to a particular office visit.
  • document structure 22' can be combined with the selection of option-text segment 62 to form a document stating "patient came in complaining of fatigue, ".
  • the user interface provides the ability to select more than one option-text segment within an option-text field. For example, if the user selects option-text segment 66, the user interface will prompt the user to select two other option-text segments which will subsequently be combined with the document structure 22 when a document is generated.
  • FIG. 7 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of information which can be stored in a patient database 32 within relational database 2.
  • the patient information can be utilized by a plurality of users through the selection of particular option-text segments within the option-text field 68 for insertion into example document structure 22'.
  • the patient specific information could be input into a user- defined document structure 70 shown in Fig. 8.
  • the user interface typically will prompt the user for various patient specific information such as last name, first name, middle initial, home phone and health insurance company ID number.
  • example patient data structure 70 After a user enters this information into example patient data structure 70, the information can be stored in relational database 2 in patient data portion 32. Subsequently, such information can be retrieved for use in generating a document comprising option-text segments pointing to information stored within patient data storage portion 32.
  • a user can generate a set of selection data 38 which can be stored in relational database 2.
  • a user will first select a particular patient for which a report is to be generated. Shown in Fig. 4 is a preferred embodiment menu from which to choose the option of specifying a particular patient. A user may select the "choose patient from list" option 51 from the menu. As a result of such a selection, preferred computer device 10 will display another menu from which to choose a particular patient for generating a report.
  • a "single report” option 53 from the menu to designate a particular report document which is to be generated for this particular patient.
  • a window including a menu of possible document structures 22 which can be used to generate a document considering this patient preferably will be shown.
  • a user then typically will select the particular document structure 22 which is to be used in conjunction with the selected patient.
  • a document structure may be shown on electronic display 14 for review by user.
  • Data processor 16 preferably will prompt the user to select particular option-text segments within option-text fields in a particular document structure 22.
  • An example of such a document structure 22' is shown in Fig. 5, and an associated example option-text field 60 is shown in Fig. 6.
  • Data processor 16 typically will prompt the user to select one of the option-text segments within the option-text field 60 before allowing the user to generate a report.
  • Fig. 9 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a pointer 71 to a user-definable text note 73 and subsequently the automatic activation of a single line editing mode so that a single line of customized text can be entered into the selection data 38 for subsequent use in generating a document derived from the selection data 38.
  • a user may select a pointer 71 linked to an option-text note 73 to customize a report for a particular situation when, for example, the option-text segments within an option-text field are not appropriate for a particular situation or when a user desires to add additional information into the report at that particular point.
  • a user could select a pointer linked to an option-text note 73' shown in Fig. 10, which provides multiple line editing capabilities so that multiple lines of text can be entered into the selection data 38.
  • the user can electronically store this selection data in electronic storage device 20.
  • a time/date stamp 28 typically is added to the selection data 38 so that the particular set of selection data can be identified at a later time.
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment procedure for generating a document.
  • a typical generated document 36 is derived from a data structure 22 in combination with option list 24, selection data 38 and patient data 32.
  • Data preferably is inserted into data structure 22 at the points in which option-text field pointers point to particular data.
  • option-text field pointers which point to patient data may become the actual patient data in a generated document.
  • selections of particular option-text segments within option fields 24 may be used to determine which option- text segments are to be inserted into data structure 22 to form generated document 36.
  • selection data 38 comprising text notes typically are inserted into data structure 22 at the appropriate points to form a generated document 36.
  • document generation system 1 can display a generated document on the electronic display 14 of computing device 10 and/or output the generated document to printer 8.
  • Fig. 11 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting several previously defined document structures 22 to form a new document structure 72. It may be desirable to generate a complete patient report including several separate reports. For instance, a complete patient report document might include a report document structure 22 for "an initial visit,” “lab results,” and “follow-up” for ease of data entry and subsequent document generation these separate document structures 22 may be combined into a single document structure 72. As a result, a plurality of different multiple document structure definitions 72 may be generated for specific needs. Shown in Fig. 11, multiple document structure definitions 72 normally will include several document structure definitions 22. A user can define the order in which each document structure 22 will appear in multiple document structure definition 72.
  • a multiple document structure definition 72 preferably can be stored on electronic storage device 20. Subsequently, multiple document storage definition 72 is typically selected by a user for use with a particular patient in a similar manner as was used to select a document structure 22.
  • document generation system 1 can generate a checklist document including indicia of option-text segments to be chosen within an option-text field for a particular document structure 22. A printed copy of the checklist document can be utilized by a user to indicate preferred option- text segments to be included in a generated document for a particular patient at a particular time. For example, a user might use a medical check-up checklist document to select or indicate particular information on an office visit by a patient.
  • the document generation system 1, shown in Fig. 1, further includes a graphics engine 4.
  • the graphics engine 4 is an option preferably provided within the document generation system 1 which allows visual analysis of data stored within the relational database 2 including selection data 38 and patient data 32. Data is displayed on electronic display 14 in various forms within windows on the screen.
  • the forms may include the following graph types: 3-D Bar Line - Area Fill
  • the graphics engine 4 allows a user to manipulate a graph in a wide variety of ways.
  • Each data item has its own graphics definition, thereby allowing a mixture of graph types to be displayed simultaneously on the same graph.
  • a graph could contain a line of data overlaying a series of 3-D bars.
  • Preferred computer device 10 further includes a graphics editing mode of operation in which almost every aspect of a graph can be modified by user, including graph type, color, style, hatching, exploded pie pieces, x-axis and y-axis value ranges as well as number of points.
  • the definition of the graph typically is stored by the electronic storage device 20 as an option-graphic image definition.
  • Preferred document structure 22 further comprises an option-graphic field for electronically storing a plurality of user-definable option-graphic image definitions.
  • Such a computer device 10 typically further includes a selection function for selecting an option-graphic image definition within an option-graphic field. Subsequently, a document may be generated comprising the selected option-graphic image definition.
  • the document generation system 1 further preferably includes an analysis mode of operation in which data processor 16 can analyze electronically stored indicia of documents to produce graphs, tables or patient billing reports.
  • the patient billing reports may be based upon selections made within option-text fields within one or more document structures 22 related to a particular patient. For example, a bill could be generated for an office visit by analyzing the time spent with the patient indicated by a selection within an option-text field as well as the diagnosis made and the treatment prescribed.
  • a brief description of the services provided could be incorporated into the billing document by deriving particular information from the electronic analysis of the selection data corresponding to a particular patient.

Abstract

A document generation system is provided for enhancing or replacing the dictation and transcription process. More particularly, a computer-based documentation system utilizing a document structure manipulated by a user interface is provided. The document structure or 'boiler plate' includes phrase fields containing user-definable phrases and option-text fields. The option-text fields include a plurality of option-text segments. Through the use of the user interface, desired modifications to the user-modifiable phrases and option-text segments can be accomplished. The user interface further enables selecting of at least one option-text segment from within an option-text field. Subsequently, the system generates a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selected option-text segment.

Description

COMPUTER-ASSISTED DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM REGARDING DICTATING AND TRANSCRIBING
Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to document generation systems and, more particularly to a system incorporating user-modifiable document structures or "boiler-plates", a database including information to be placed into a particular document structure, and a computing device which combines the particular document structure with relevant information stored in the database to form a document.
Traditionally, the practice of dictating and transcribing has been used to record information related to interviews, personal reminders, thoughts on a subject, and drafts or letters of other documents. In the service industries, such as consulting, legal and medical fields, professionals have been increasingly burdened by the need to document every encounter with clients or patients. This is particularly true in the medical field where physicians must record information about each patient office visit, diagnosis, suggested treatment and prescription given. In addition to recording patient information, physicians must fill out forms for submission to insurance companies and provide information to regulatory agencies. To gather and produce all of this information, physicians must spend a significant portion of their work day dictating the needed information for each record or form. Further, a physician must maintain a staff to transcribe the information into reports and to fill out required forms.
A physician typically dictates a report on each patient encounter which, subsequently, must be typed by a transcriptionist. The process is time consuming and repetitive. For this reason, shortcuts are often taken causing reports to be incomplete. As a result, potential legal and insurance problems as well as reduced quality of patient care can occur. Using traditional manual methods of record keeping, patient data is not readily available for fast and easy review. A patient's medical record cannot be easily combined with other reports or other patient data for analysis and reporting.
In response to the above-mentioned needs and problems encountered in the medical field, the present invention was developed. The present invention automates the documentation process by providing a computer-based documentation system incorporating a relational database with a multi-document word processor preferably comprising a graphics engine within a menu- driven, graphic window environment. The documentation system utilizes previously defined document structures or "boiler-plates" to manage patient reporting. A document structure offers a framework within which certain items will vary.
For instance, an initial exam conducted by an orthopedic surgeon will contain many basic elements common to all patients, but response to the exam will vary for each patient. A report to be input can contain any number of variable responses, and each variable within the input report can offer any number of different options from which to choose. In addition, a physician can personalize the report, modifying or creating new documents to suit a particular situation. Further, while generating a particular document, a physician can customize the document by inserting words into the generated document through the use of the integrated word processor.
In an alternative embodiment, the physician can avoid directly using the documenting system by utilizing printed checklists. After a checklist has been filled out by a physician, another individual can generate the desired documents from items checked off on the checklist. The data input into the documenting system is electronically stored for possible future use in reporting and/or analysis. The future uses may include graphical analysis, cost accounting, time reporting and other desired document generation.
It will be appreciated by those familiar with the art that such a document generation system can be utilized in a plurality of environments including medical, legal, government, insurance and other service or document generating environments. In the legal field, simple contracts, licenses or agreements could be drafted in this manner. In the government, routine status reports, procurement requests or inspection reports could be produced by such a system. In the insurance field, insurance applications could be processed, policies maintained, or claim reports prepared. These and other possible areas of use of the present invention will become apparent after reading the following detailed description.
Summary of the Invention
A document generation system is provided for enhancing or replacing the dictation and transcription process. More particularly, a computer-based documentation system utilizing a document structure manipulated by a user interface is provided. The document structure or "boiler plate" includes phrase fields containing user-definable phrases and option-text fields. The option-text fields include a plurality of option-text segments. Through the use of the user interface, desired modifications to the user-modifiable phrases and option-text segments can be accomplished. The user interface further enables selecting of at least one option-text segment from within an option-text field. Subsequently, the system generates a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selected option-text segment.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment of the document generation system.
Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the contents of the preferred embodiment relational database. Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an alternative embodiment of the document generation system in which the relational database shares stored information with more than one user.
Fig. 4 is a drawing depicting a preferred embodiment menu driven, graphical window environment. Fig. 5 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment linked user-modifiable document structure.
Fig. 6 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment user-modifiable option-text field. Fig. 7 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of information which can be stored in a patient database and subsequently may be utilized by a plurality of users through the selection of particular option-text segments within an option-text field. Fig. 8 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example data structure which may be utilized to enter specific patient information.
Fig. 9 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a user-definable text-note and subsequently the automatic activation of a single line editing mode so that a single line of customized text can be entered into the database. Fig. 10 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a user-definable text-note and subsequently the automatic activation of a multiple line editing mode so that multiple lines of customized text can be entered into the database.
Fig. 11 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting several previously defined document structures to form a new document structure.
Fig. 12 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment procedure for generating a document.
Detailed Description
Shown in Fig. 1, is a diagram of a preferred embodiment document generation system. The preferred embodiment document generation system 1 comprises a computing device 10, relational database 2, and multi- document word processor 6. In an alternative embodiment, the document generation system 1 further includes an output device such as a printer device 8. The computing device 10 preferably comprises an electronic display 15, a data processing device 16, and a keyboard 18. The computing device 10 further includes an electronic storage device 20 for storing information from the relational database 2. Electronic storage device 20 can be any device capable of storing data for long periods of time. For example, electronic storage device 20 could be a floppy disk drive, Bernoulli hard drive, Winchester hard disk, analog tape drive, digital tape drive, optical disk drive. It will be appreciated by those in the art that new or improved electronic storage devices can be utilized by the present invention as they become available for use. In an alternative embodiment, the computing device 10 further includes a pointing device 12. The pointing device can be utilized by the document generation system 1 as an alternative input device. The pointing device may comprise a mouse, trackball, light pen, bar-code scanner or digitizing pad.
In the preferred embodiment, relational database 2 comprises a user-definable electronic document structure 22 shown in Fig. 2. The user- definable document structure 22 comprises a plurality of phrase fields 40 which electronically store user- definable phrases and further comprises an option-text field for electronically storing a plurality of user definable option-text segments.
In an alternative embodiment, the option-text segments further comprises a plurality of data pointers which point to previously stored text which is electronically stored in an option list 24. The relational database 2 further comprises patient data 32 which includes specific information about a particular patient which may be needed to produce a plurality of different documents derived from a plurality of different document structures 22. The preferred option- text field further comprises a plurality of data pointers which point to particular data segments within stored patient data 32.
The relational database 2 preferably further comprises selection data 38. Preferred selection data 38 includes information concerning selections of different option-text segments within a particular document structure 32 in combination with a particular set of patient data 32 and a date stamp 28. The relational database 2 in combination with the data processor 16 further preferably includes a date stamp 28 function. The date stamp 28 function allows the relational database 2 to determine the data and time that each document structure 22, option list 24, patient data 32, or selection data 38 was created or modified. It will be appreciated that relational database 2 may be configured in a variety of different structures and the description above is merely one example of one such structure.
The computing device 10 in combination with the multi-document word processor 6 and relational database 2 provide a user interface for utilizing the document structure 22 to generate a document. The multi-document word processor 6 provides an editing environment for making user modifications to the user-definable phrases and user-definable option-text segments within the option-text fields 42. Interaction of the electronic display 14, data processing device 16 and keyboard 18 provide a selecting function for selecting at least one user-definable option-text segment within an option-text field. This selecting may be accomplished by depressing key actuators on keyboard 18 which indicate the selection of a particular user definable option-text segment. In an alternative embodiment, movement of a pointing device 12 in combination with activating pointing activator accomplish the selecting function. The elements of the user interface further combine to provide a document generation function which generates a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selection option-text segment of an option-text field. In an alternative embodiment, document structure 22 preferably includes a user-modifiable electronic link between a phrase field and an option- text field. In addition, the document structure 22 preferably includes a user-modifiable electronic link between a first and second phrase field. Those skilled in the art will recognize that such links may be formed in various manners including, for example, the use of data pointers which point to the following element which is to be linked, the use of lookup tables, or B-tree data structures. Further, the multi-document word processor 6 typically provides an editing environment for making user modifications to the links between a phrase field and an option-text field as well as between a first and second phrase field. The elements of the user interface typically further combine to provide a document generation function which generates a document comprising a phrase field linked to an option-text field. Similarly, the document generation function may generate a document from the linked first and second phrase fields.
In an alternative embodiment, a multi-user system partitions relational database 2 into a plurality of parts. The multi-user system includes user specific document structures 22, option lists 24 and selection data 38. In addition, particular information may be stored such that more than one user can access the particular information. Such information may include date stamp 28 and patient data 32. In this alternative embodiment, each user may have access to the shared information for use in generating a document and may define specific document structures incorporating available data in a manner which seems appropriate for the particular document desired. For instance, such a multi-user system might be used in a hospital or clinic wherein a variety of different types of physicians are using document generation system 1. An orthopedic surgeon and a gynecologist probably would not want to have the same document structure 22 for describing an office visit; however, both physicians may need to incorporate specific patient data including name, age, address, date of birth and insurance provider into a particular report document. Significant cost savings and efficiency can be achieved by sharing this information between various individuals utilizing document generation system 1. At the same time, it is typically necessary to provide flexibility within the document generation system 1 to allow custom documents or reports to be generated for a particular situation. As a result, relational database 2 preferably is partitioned into user specific data and sharable data. Such a configuration can be utilized across a local area network comprising a plurality of computing devices 10 connected to a relational database 2 which has user specific and sharable portions of data.
Security access to stored data preferably is provided by the document generation system 1. Security access may be provided by distinguishing between each user's data and reports through the use of a user name. In the preferred embodiment, the user name is comprised of the first and last name of a user followed by an optional security password. The first and last name are combined to form a pointer to a storage location within relational database 2 which can typically be accessed by a user only after entering his or her first and last name as well as a security password.
Computing device 10 further includes an automatic configuration function in which the data processor 16 automatically senses the presence of an output device and automatically configures to operate with that output device. Such an output device may include electronic display 14 and printing device 8. In addition, computing device 10 preferably includes an operating function in which a user-definable output driver for operating the output device can be defined. Such a user-definable output driver definition function can be particularly important for use in preferred embodiment document generation systems 1 which include a printer device 8 which is not automatically supported and configured to by data processor 16.
The preferred embodiment document generation system 1 further includes a contextual help function in which operating instructions for use of the document generation system 1 can be displayed on electronic display 14 or printed to printer device 8.
Fig. 4 is a drawing depicting a preferred embodiment menu-driven, graphical windowing environment. This windowing environment of document generation system 1 supports both text and graphics operation modes. A user can choose between the two different modes of operation. In either mode of operation, the appearance and functionality of the document generation system remains substantially consistent. The only limitation is that the use of an alternative embodiment graphics engine typically is not available in text mode operation. The preferred graphics window environment 50 is divided into three areas. The areas include a top window section 52 which preferably displays the date, time, product name and main menu selections. In addition, window environment 50 includes a middle section window 54 where documents, graphics and dialogue windows can be displayed and manipulated. Further, the graphics window environment 50 includes a bottom section 56 which displays status information for such things as the word processor 6, a generated report, particular selections of report and patients, and keyboard choices. One of the first steps in using the document generation system 1 is to create a document structure 22. An example of a preferred embodiment user- modifiable document structure 22' is shown in Fig. 5. The example user-modifiable document structure 22' comprises a series of phrase fields linked to option- text fields. For example, phrase 58 is linked to option-text field pointer 60 within example document structure 22' . In the preferred embodiment document generation system 1, a plurality of different reports can be generated for different needs. For example, a physician will probably create a separate report for initial visits and for follow-up visits by a particular patient as well as a separate report for writing a prescription.
After creating a document structure 22, a user typically defines the contents of an option-text field. Shown in Fig. 6 is a drawing showing an example of a preferred embodiment user-modifiable option-text field 60. The example option-text field 60 includes a plurality of user-definable option-text segments 64 and 66. A user can modify the contents of option-text field 60 through the use of word processor 6. Option-text segments 62, 64 or 66 may be inserted into document structure 22 to form a document. By selecting different option-text segments within an option-text field, a user can customize a particular report for a particular patient corresponding to a particular office visit. For example, document structure 22' can be combined with the selection of option-text segment 62 to form a document stating "patient came in complaining of fatigue, ...". In the preferred embodiment, the user interface provides the ability to select more than one option-text segment within an option-text field. For example, if the user selects option-text segment 66, the user interface will prompt the user to select two other option-text segments which will subsequently be combined with the document structure 22 when a document is generated.
Another typical step in utilizing the document generation system 1 is the entering of patient data into patient data storage portion 32 of the relational database 2. Fig. 7 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of information which can be stored in a patient database 32 within relational database 2. Subsequently, the patient information can be utilized by a plurality of users through the selection of particular option-text segments within the option-text field 68 for insertion into example document structure 22'. The patient specific information could be input into a user- defined document structure 70 shown in Fig. 8. By using patient data document structure 70, the user interface typically will prompt the user for various patient specific information such as last name, first name, middle initial, home phone and health insurance company ID number. After a user enters this information into example patient data structure 70, the information can be stored in relational database 2 in patient data portion 32. Subsequently, such information can be retrieved for use in generating a document comprising option-text segments pointing to information stored within patient data storage portion 32.
After creating suitable document structures 22 and entering patient information into patient data storage portion 32 of relational database 2, a user can generate a set of selection data 38 which can be stored in relational database 2. To create a particular selection data set, a user will first select a particular patient for which a report is to be generated. Shown in Fig. 4 is a preferred embodiment menu from which to choose the option of specifying a particular patient. A user may select the "choose patient from list" option 51 from the menu. As a result of such a selection, preferred computer device 10 will display another menu from which to choose a particular patient for generating a report. After the user selects a particular patient from the menu, the user typically will select a "single report" option 53 from the menu to designate a particular report document which is to be generated for this particular patient. Upon selection of "single report" option 53, a window including a menu of possible document structures 22 which can be used to generate a document considering this patient preferably will be shown. A user then typically will select the particular document structure 22 which is to be used in conjunction with the selected patient. Subsequently, a document structure may be shown on electronic display 14 for review by user. Data processor 16 preferably will prompt the user to select particular option-text segments within option-text fields in a particular document structure 22. An example of such a document structure 22' is shown in Fig. 5, and an associated example option-text field 60 is shown in Fig. 6. Data processor 16 typically will prompt the user to select one of the option-text segments within the option-text field 60 before allowing the user to generate a report.
Fig. 9 is a drawing showing a preferred embodiment example of selecting an option-text segment comprising a pointer 71 to a user-definable text note 73 and subsequently the automatic activation of a single line editing mode so that a single line of customized text can be entered into the selection data 38 for subsequent use in generating a document derived from the selection data 38. A user may select a pointer 71 linked to an option-text note 73 to customize a report for a particular situation when, for example, the option-text segments within an option-text field are not appropriate for a particular situation or when a user desires to add additional information into the report at that particular point. Alternatively, a user could select a pointer linked to an option-text note 73' shown in Fig. 10, which provides multiple line editing capabilities so that multiple lines of text can be entered into the selection data 38.
After a user has selected option-text segments within all of the option-text fields pointed at by option-text pointers within a document structure 22, the user can electronically store this selection data in electronic storage device 20. Upon storing the selection data in electronic storage device 20, a time/date stamp 28 typically is added to the selection data 38 so that the particular set of selection data can be identified at a later time.
In addition, a user may choose to generate a document. Shown in Fig. 12 is a diagram showing a preferred embodiment procedure for generating a document. A typical generated document 36 is derived from a data structure 22 in combination with option list 24, selection data 38 and patient data 32. Data preferably is inserted into data structure 22 at the points in which option-text field pointers point to particular data. In particular, option-text field pointers which point to patient data may become the actual patient data in a generated document. Further, selections of particular option-text segments within option fields 24 may be used to determine which option- text segments are to be inserted into data structure 22 to form generated document 36. Furthermore, selection data 38 comprising text notes typically are inserted into data structure 22 at the appropriate points to form a generated document 36. After generating a document 36, document generation system 1 can display a generated document on the electronic display 14 of computing device 10 and/or output the generated document to printer 8.
Fig. 11 is a drawing showing an alternative preferred embodiment example of selecting several previously defined document structures 22 to form a new document structure 72. It may be desirable to generate a complete patient report including several separate reports. For instance, a complete patient report document might include a report document structure 22 for "an initial visit," "lab results," and "follow-up" for ease of data entry and subsequent document generation these separate document structures 22 may be combined into a single document structure 72. As a result, a plurality of different multiple document structure definitions 72 may be generated for specific needs. Shown in Fig. 11, multiple document structure definitions 72 normally will include several document structure definitions 22. A user can define the order in which each document structure 22 will appear in multiple document structure definition 72. After a user has selected each of these desired document structures 22 in a particular order, a multiple document structure definition 72 preferably can be stored on electronic storage device 20. Subsequently, multiple document storage definition 72 is typically selected by a user for use with a particular patient in a similar manner as was used to select a document structure 22. In an alternative embodiment, document generation system 1 can generate a checklist document including indicia of option-text segments to be chosen within an option-text field for a particular document structure 22. A printed copy of the checklist document can be utilized by a user to indicate preferred option- text segments to be included in a generated document for a particular patient at a particular time. For example, a user might use a medical check-up checklist document to select or indicate particular information on an office visit by a patient. Such information might include measured weight of the patient during the office visit, new height or weight, symptoms of illness shown by the patient, diagnosis of an illness, and prescribed treatment of the illness. Subsequently, the same or a different user of the documentation generation system may enter the information indicated on the check sheet document to generate a report on the office visit by the patient. In a further alternative embodiment, the document generation system 1, shown in Fig. 1, further includes a graphics engine 4. The graphics engine 4 is an option preferably provided within the document generation system 1 which allows visual analysis of data stored within the relational database 2 including selection data 38 and patient data 32. Data is displayed on electronic display 14 in various forms within windows on the screen. The forms may include the following graph types: 3-D Bar Line - Area Fill
Pie
Histogram The graphics engine 4 allows a user to manipulate a graph in a wide variety of ways. Each data item has its own graphics definition, thereby allowing a mixture of graph types to be displayed simultaneously on the same graph. For example, a graph could contain a line of data overlaying a series of 3-D bars.
Preferred computer device 10 further includes a graphics editing mode of operation in which almost every aspect of a graph can be modified by user, including graph type, color, style, hatching, exploded pie pieces, x-axis and y-axis value ranges as well as number of points. In such an embodiment, the definition of the graph typically is stored by the electronic storage device 20 as an option-graphic image definition. Preferred document structure 22 further comprises an option-graphic field for electronically storing a plurality of user-definable option-graphic image definitions. Such a computer device 10 typically further includes a selection function for selecting an option-graphic image definition within an option-graphic field. Subsequently, a document may be generated comprising the selected option-graphic image definition. The document generation system 1 further preferably includes an analysis mode of operation in which data processor 16 can analyze electronically stored indicia of documents to produce graphs, tables or patient billing reports. The patient billing reports may be based upon selections made within option-text fields within one or more document structures 22 related to a particular patient. For example, a bill could be generated for an office visit by analyzing the time spent with the patient indicated by a selection within an option-text field as well as the diagnosis made and the treatment prescribed. In addition, a brief description of the services provided could be incorporated into the billing document by deriving particular information from the electronic analysis of the selection data corresponding to a particular patient. Although the present invention has been described and illustrated with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of embodiments has been made by way of example only and that numerous changes in the arrangement and combination of parts as well as steps may be resorted to by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as claimed. For example, the document generation system could be utilized by other professionals such as attorney's, accountants, psychologists, dentists and consultants. Each of these professionals may find significant cost savings and increased efficiency by utilizing a document generation system similar to the previously described preferred embodiments.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A computer-assisted documentation system for enhancing or replacing the process of dictating and transcribing, comprising:
(a) document structure means for electronically storing an user-definable electronic document structure, the user-definable electronic document structure comprising:
(i) a plurality of phrase fields for electronically storing user-definable phrases; and
(ii) option-text field means for electronically storing a plurality of user-definable option-text segments; and
(b) user interface means for utilizing the document structure means, the user interface means comprising:
(i) editing means for making user modifications to the user-definable phrases and the user-definable option-text segments;
(ii) selecting means for selecting at least one user-definable option-text segment within the option-text field means; and
(iii) document generation means for generating a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selected option-text segment.
2. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein:
(a) the option-text field means comprises means for storing two types of user-definable option-text segments comprising a user- definable character and a user-definable text-note; and (b) the selecting means comprises means for automatically activating the editing means in response to selecting an option-text segment comprising a user-definable text-note so that the content of the option-text segment including a text-note can be customized for the particular generated document.
3. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein:
(a) the option-text field means comprises means for storing two types of user-definable option-text segments comprising a user- definable character and a user-definable text-pointer, the user-definable text-pointer comprising a pointer to previously electronically stored text; and
(b) the document generation means further comprises means for generating a document comprising at least one option-text segment derived from a user-definable text-pointer.
4. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein:
(a) the document structure means further comprises linking means for electronically storing a user-definable electronic link between a phrase field and the option-text field means; and
(b) the document generation means comprises means for generating a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase linked to at least one selected option-text segment.
5. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 4 wherein:
(a) the linking means further comprises means for providing a user-definable link between first and second phrase fields; and
(b) the document generation means further comprises means for generating a document comprising the first phrase field linked to the second phrase field.
6. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim
4 wherein the editing means further comprises means for modifying the user-definable link between a phrase field and the option-text field means.
7. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim
5 wherein the editing means further comprises means for modifying the user-definable link between the first and second phrase fields.
8. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the selecting means comprises means for simultaneously selecting a plurality of option-text segments within the option-text field means.
9. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means further comprises storage means for electronically storing indicia of the document.
10. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 9 wherein the document generation means further comprises means for generating a document derived from both the document structure means and the storage means.
11. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the document generation means comprises means for electronically storing the generated document.
12. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the document structure means further comprises means for electronically storing a user- definable electronic document structure derived from a plurality of previously defined electronic document structures.
13. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means further comprises output means for displaying a menu of option-text segments.
14. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 13 wherein:
(a) the output means comprises a printing device which produces a document including indicia of option-text segments; and
(b) the selecting means comprises means for indicating a preferred option-text segment on the printed document.
15. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 13 wherein:
(a) the output means comprises an electronic display device which shows the menu of option-text segments; and
(b) the selecting means comprises input means for selecting a preferred option-text segment from the menu.
16. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 15 wherein the input means comprises pointing device means including at least one actuator for use in selecting the preferred option-text segment.
17. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the selecting means comprises keyboard means including a plurality of actuators for use in selecting an option-text segment.
18. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the selecting means comprises bar-code reader means for use in selecting an option-text segment.
19. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means further comprises electronic display means operating in either of two modes of operation including text and graphic modes.
20. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 19 wherein a visual image produced by the electronic display means in the text mode or in the graphic mode visually appear to be substantially similar.
21. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means automatically senses the presence of an output device and automatically configures to operate with that output device.
22. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 21 wherein the user interface means further comprises means for generating an user-definable output driver for operating the output device.
23. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means comprises contextual help means for providing instructions on the use of the user interface means.
24. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the user interface means further comprises data security means for allowing access to electronically stored data only to authorized users.
25. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 1 wherein the document structure means further comprises means for electronically storing and accessing data on a computer network.
26. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 9 wherein:
(a) the document structure means further comprises option-graphic field means for electronically storing a plurality of user- definable option-graphic image definitions derived from the electronically stored indicia of the document;
(b) the editing means further comprises means for making user modifications to the user- definable option-graphic image definitions;
(c) the selecting means further comprises means for selecting at least one user-definable option-graphic image definition within the option-graphic field means; and
(d) the document generation means further comprises means for generating a document comprising a graphic image derived from at least one selected user-definable option- graphic image definition.
27. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 9 wherein the document generation means further comprises analyzing means for generating an analysis of electronically stored indicia of a plurality of documents and for generating an analysis document comprising information related to the analysis.
28. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 26 wherein the analyzing means further comprises means for generating a graphic image derived from the analysis.
29. The computer-assisted documentation system of claim 9 wherein the document generation system further comprises billing means for generating a billing document for services rendered based upon an analysis of electronically stored indicia of the document.
30. A computer-assisted process for enhancing or replacing the process of dictating and transcribing, comprising:
(a) electronically providing an user-definable electronic document structure, the process of providing the user-definable electronic document structure comprising:
(i) electronically providing a plurality of phrase fields for electronically storing user-definable phrases; and
(ii) electronically providing an option- text field for electronically storing a plurality of user-definable option- text segments; and
(b) electronically providing a user interface for use in:
(i) making user modifications to the user-definable phrases and the user- definable option-text segments;
(ii) selecting at least one user-definable option-text segment within the option-text field means; and
(iii) generating a document comprising at least one user-definable phrase and at least one selected option-text segment.
31. The process of claim 30 further comprising:
(a) providing a printing device which produces a document including indicia of option-text segments; and
(b) indicating a preferred option-text segment on the printed document.
PCT/US1990/005655 1989-10-16 1990-10-04 Computer-assisted documentation system regarding dictating and transcribing WO1991006056A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/422,139 US5148366A (en) 1989-10-16 1989-10-16 Computer-assisted documentation system for enhancing or replacing the process of dictating and transcribing
US422,139 1989-10-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1991006056A1 true WO1991006056A1 (en) 1991-05-02

Family

ID=23673559

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1990/005655 WO1991006056A1 (en) 1989-10-16 1990-10-04 Computer-assisted documentation system regarding dictating and transcribing

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US5148366A (en)
EP (1) EP0496747A1 (en)
AU (1) AU637552B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2067780A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1991006056A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2711029A1 (en) * 1993-10-06 1995-04-14 Imbert Guy Information transmission system and method
GB2355817A (en) * 1999-07-12 2001-05-02 St John S Registration Ltd Generating customised documents
US7472343B2 (en) 2002-05-10 2008-12-30 Business Integrity Limited Systems, methods and computer programs for analysis, clarification, reporting on and generation of master documents for use in automated document generation

Families Citing this family (261)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04127370A (en) * 1990-09-19 1992-04-28 Toshiba Corp Information collecting system
US5552982A (en) * 1990-10-31 1996-09-03 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for processing fields in a document processor
US5581460A (en) * 1990-11-06 1996-12-03 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Medical diagnostic report forming apparatus capable of attaching image data on report
CA2056865C (en) * 1990-12-11 1999-01-05 Barbara Clapp Interactive computerized document assembly system
US5392428A (en) * 1991-06-28 1995-02-21 Robins; Stanford K. Text analysis system
US5457792A (en) * 1991-11-07 1995-10-10 Hughes Aircraft Company System for using task tables and technical data from a relational database to produce a parsed file of format instruction and a standardized document
US6678864B1 (en) * 1992-02-25 2004-01-13 Irving Tsai Method and apparatus for linking designated portions of a received document image with an electronic address
JP3174168B2 (en) * 1992-10-01 2001-06-11 富士通株式会社 Variable replacement processor
US5774887A (en) * 1992-11-18 1998-06-30 U S West Advanced Technologies, Inc. Customer service electronic form generating system
US5561470A (en) * 1992-11-30 1996-10-01 U.S. Philips Corporation Method and system for entering a plurality of data into an apparatus
US5649192A (en) * 1993-01-15 1997-07-15 General Electric Company Self-organized information storage system
US5369704A (en) * 1993-03-24 1994-11-29 Engate Incorporated Down-line transcription system for manipulating real-time testimony
US7631343B1 (en) 1993-03-24 2009-12-08 Endgate LLC Down-line transcription system using automatic tracking and revenue collection
US7249026B1 (en) * 1993-03-24 2007-07-24 Engate Llc Attorney terminal having outline preparation capabilities for managing trial proceedings
US5444615A (en) * 1993-03-24 1995-08-22 Engate Incorporated Attorney terminal having outline preparation capabilities for managing trial proceeding
US5446653A (en) * 1993-05-10 1995-08-29 Aetna Casualty And Surety Company Rule based document generation system
US7765157B2 (en) * 1993-05-20 2010-07-27 Bennett James D Context sensitive searching front end
US5361202A (en) * 1993-06-18 1994-11-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Computer display system and method for facilitating access to patient data records in a medical information system
US6014630A (en) * 1993-08-26 2000-01-11 Patient Education Services, Inc. Customized system for providing procedure-specific patient education
US5517405A (en) * 1993-10-14 1996-05-14 Aetna Life And Casualty Company Expert system for providing interactive assistance in solving problems such as health care management
US5822720A (en) 1994-02-16 1998-10-13 Sentius Corporation System amd method for linking streams of multimedia data for reference material for display
US6810382B1 (en) 1994-04-04 2004-10-26 Vaughn A. Wamsley Personal injury claim management system
US5715449A (en) * 1994-06-20 1998-02-03 Oceania, Inc. Method for generating structured medical text through user selection of displayed text and rules
JPH0877155A (en) * 1994-07-07 1996-03-22 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Information processor and information processing method
US5782762A (en) * 1994-10-27 1998-07-21 Wake Forest University Method and system for producing interactive, three-dimensional renderings of selected body organs having hollow lumens to enable simulated movement through the lumen
WO1996015522A1 (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-05-23 Norris Communications Corp. Method for editing in hand held recorder
US5692206A (en) * 1994-11-30 1997-11-25 Taco Bell Corporation Method and apparatus for automating the generation of a legal document
US6243172B1 (en) 1995-01-18 2001-06-05 Varis Corporation Method and system for merging variable text and images into bitmaps defined by a page description language
US5729665A (en) 1995-01-18 1998-03-17 Varis Corporation Method of utilizing variable data fields with a page description language
US5734883A (en) 1995-04-27 1998-03-31 Michael Umen & Co., Inc. Drug document production system
GB2300991B (en) * 1995-05-15 1997-11-05 Andrew Macgregor Ritchie Serving signals to browsing clients
AU6252496A (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-12-30 E-Systems Incorporated Apparatus and method for centralized storage of heterogeneou s medical records in managed health care organization
US6332149B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2001-12-18 R. R. Donnelley & Sons Imposition process and apparatus for variable imaging system
US5664109A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-09-02 E-Systems, Inc. Method for extracting pre-defined data items from medical service records generated by health care providers
US6327599B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2001-12-04 R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Apparatus for controlling an electronic press to print fixed and variable information
US6209004B1 (en) * 1995-09-01 2001-03-27 Taylor Microtechnology Inc. Method and system for generating and distributing document sets using a relational database
WO1997012311A2 (en) * 1995-09-15 1997-04-03 Cable & Wireless, Inc. System and method for quality management
US6177940B1 (en) * 1995-09-20 2001-01-23 Cedaron Medical, Inc. Outcomes profile management system for evaluating treatment effectiveness
US6684188B1 (en) * 1996-02-02 2004-01-27 Geoffrey C Mitchell Method for production of medical records and other technical documents
US5974389A (en) * 1996-03-01 1999-10-26 Clark; Melanie Ann Medical record management system and process with improved workflow features
US5704371A (en) * 1996-03-06 1998-01-06 Shepard; Franziska Medical history documentation system and method
US6003007A (en) * 1996-03-28 1999-12-14 Dirienzo; Andrew L. Attachment integrated claims system and operating method therefor
US9619841B2 (en) 1996-03-28 2017-04-11 Integrated Claims Systems, Llc Systems to assist in the creation, transmission, and processing of health insurance claims
US5870737A (en) * 1996-04-15 1999-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic prioritized replacement of language
GB2313933B (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-06-28 Edward Henry Mathews A method of assisting the conducting of a research project
US5987480A (en) * 1996-07-25 1999-11-16 Donohue; Michael Method and system for delivering documents customized for a particular user over the internet using imbedded dynamic content
US5772585A (en) * 1996-08-30 1998-06-30 Emc, Inc System and method for managing patient medical records
US5890175A (en) * 1996-09-25 1999-03-30 Wong; Garland Dynamic generation and display of catalogs
US6029182A (en) * 1996-10-04 2000-02-22 Canon Information Systems, Inc. System for generating a custom formatted hypertext document by using a personal profile to retrieve hierarchical documents
US5899978A (en) * 1996-10-07 1999-05-04 Title America Titling system and method therefor
US5754755A (en) * 1996-10-10 1998-05-19 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for generating test scripts
US5950168A (en) * 1996-12-18 1999-09-07 Knowmed Systems Collapsible flowsheet for displaying patient information in an electronic medical record
US6209005B1 (en) * 1996-12-23 2001-03-27 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating and linking documents to contacts in an organizer
NL1004918C2 (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-07-01 Hadewe Bv Method for producing a document.
US8682045B2 (en) * 1997-02-25 2014-03-25 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Virtual endoscopy with improved image segmentation and lesion detection
US5924109A (en) * 1997-03-03 1999-07-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and apparatus for automatic generation of external interface specifications
AUPO863697A0 (en) * 1997-08-15 1997-09-11 OLIVER, Brian Keith A computerised method of compiling reports
US5956687A (en) * 1997-04-04 1999-09-21 Wamsley; Vaughn A. Personal injury claim management system
JP3553762B2 (en) * 1997-04-25 2004-08-11 三洋電機株式会社 Document processing device
US6185587B1 (en) * 1997-06-19 2001-02-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for building a web site with automated help
US6684369B1 (en) 1997-06-19 2004-01-27 International Business Machines, Corporation Web site creator using templates
US7302438B1 (en) 1997-07-18 2007-11-27 Tesseron Ltd. Method and system for flowing data to an arbitrary path defined by a page description language
US6192381B1 (en) 1997-10-06 2001-02-20 Megg Associates, Inc. Single-document active user interface, method and system for implementing same
US6205452B1 (en) 1997-10-29 2001-03-20 R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Method of reproducing variable graphics in a variable imaging system
US6088710A (en) * 1997-10-29 2000-07-11 R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company Apparatus and method for producing fulfillment pieces on demand in a variable imaging system
US6246993B1 (en) 1997-10-29 2001-06-12 R. R. Donnelly & Sons Company Reorder system for use with an electronic printing press
US6792574B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2004-09-14 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Computer-based patient recording system
US6182095B1 (en) * 1998-04-30 2001-01-30 General Electric Capital Corporation Document generator
US7353238B1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2008-04-01 Outcome Sciences, Inc. Apparatus and methods for determining and processing medical outcomes
US6135958A (en) * 1998-08-06 2000-10-24 Acuson Corporation Ultrasound imaging system with touch-pad pointing device
DE99943514T1 (en) 1998-09-03 2005-01-13 Arendi Holding Ltd., Grand Cayman Function key for handling computer data
NO984066L (en) 1998-09-03 2000-03-06 Arendi As Computer function button
US7496854B2 (en) 1998-11-10 2009-02-24 Arendi Holding Limited Method, system and computer readable medium for addressing handling from a computer program
US7272604B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2007-09-18 Atle Hedloy Method, system and computer readable medium for addressing handling from an operating system
US6272508B1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2001-08-07 Avaya Technology Corp. Guide builder for documentation management in computer applications
US7315979B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2008-01-01 Tesseron Ltd. Method and system for dynamic flowing data to an arbitrary path defined by a page description language
EP2302595A3 (en) 1998-11-25 2011-04-06 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Virtual endoscopy with improved image segmentation and lesion detection
US6366683B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2002-04-02 Curtis P. Langlotz Apparatus and method for recording image analysis information
US6658151B2 (en) * 1999-04-08 2003-12-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Extracting information from symbolically compressed document images
US7797730B2 (en) * 1999-06-24 2010-09-14 Engate Llc Downline transcription system using automatic tracking and revenue collection
US7069226B1 (en) 1999-07-07 2006-06-27 Synetic, Incorporated Prescription data processing system for determining new therapy starts
BR0013268A (en) * 1999-08-09 2002-07-02 Univ Wake Forest Process implemented by computer to create a database that belongs to the analysis of an image and system to create a database that belongs to the analysis of an image
US6785410B2 (en) 1999-08-09 2004-08-31 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Image reporting method and system
US7278094B1 (en) 2000-05-03 2007-10-02 R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Variable text processing for an electronic press
US6637649B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2003-10-28 Christopher S. Walsh Record and verification method, apparatus and system
US6789060B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2004-09-07 Gene J. Wolfe Network based speech transcription that maintains dynamic templates
US6876991B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2005-04-05 Collaborative Decision Platforms, Llc. System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US6600482B1 (en) * 2000-01-11 2003-07-29 Workonce Wireless Corporation Method and system for form recognition and digitized image processing
US6513003B1 (en) 2000-02-03 2003-01-28 Fair Disclosure Financial Network, Inc. System and method for integrated delivery of media and synchronized transcription
US7131057B1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2006-10-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for loose coupling of document and domain knowledge in interactive document configuration
US7240067B2 (en) * 2000-02-08 2007-07-03 Sybase, Inc. System and methodology for extraction and aggregation of data from dynamic content
US7403901B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2008-07-22 Accenture Llp Error and load summary reporting in a health care solution environment
JP2004509383A (en) * 2000-05-31 2004-03-25 ファーストトラック システムズ インコーポレイテッド Clinical trial management system and method
US7770102B1 (en) 2000-06-06 2010-08-03 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings
US7421645B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2008-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for providing electronic commerce actions based on semantically labeled strings
US7788602B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2010-08-31 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for providing restricted actions for recognized semantic categories
US7716163B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2010-05-11 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for defining semantic categories and actions
US7712024B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation Application program interfaces for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings
US7451389B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2008-11-11 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for semantically labeling data and providing actions based on semantically labeled data
CA2413845A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2001-12-27 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Electronic patient healthcare system and method
AU2001278575A1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-02-13 Glaxo Group Limited Document management and publication using reusable packages and components
US20040220815A1 (en) * 2000-08-18 2004-11-04 Johanne Belanger Apparatus and method for the compilation, assembly, and distribution of product documentation and associated information
US7093193B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2006-08-15 Microsoft Corporation String template pages for generating HTML document
US20020095378A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-07-18 Cauchon Mark P. Service provider network for legal services with direct browser delivery of rich text format documents
US7047491B2 (en) * 2000-12-05 2006-05-16 Schubert Daniel M Electronic information management system for abstracting and reporting document information
US20060129933A1 (en) * 2000-12-19 2006-06-15 Sparkpoint Software, Inc. System and method for multimedia authoring and playback
US20040039934A1 (en) * 2000-12-19 2004-02-26 Land Michael Z. System and method for multimedia authoring and playback
WO2002050657A1 (en) * 2000-12-19 2002-06-27 Coolernet, Inc. System and method for multimedia authoring and playback
US6654767B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2003-11-25 General Electric Company Methods and systems for managing invention disclosures
US20020133470A1 (en) * 2001-01-10 2002-09-19 Gruber Robert M. Material ordering and reporting expediter (MORE)
JP2002207768A (en) * 2001-01-10 2002-07-26 Shinseiki Technology:Kk Information processing system, its method and recording medium recorded with information processing program operating on computer
US6987998B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2006-01-17 Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. Cardiac rhythm management patient report
US20020133062A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2002-09-19 Arling Robert Stanley Embedded measurement values in medical reports
US7032174B2 (en) * 2001-03-27 2006-04-18 Microsoft Corporation Automatically adding proper names to a database
US6834264B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2004-12-21 Provox Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for voice dictation and document production
US6999193B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-02-14 International Business Machines Corporation Computer generated report printing method and system
US7778816B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for applying input mode bias
US7555720B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2009-06-30 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation System and user interface for processing and navigating patient record information
US7225408B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2007-05-29 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation System and user interface for communicating and processing patient record information
US7350145B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2008-03-25 Multiworks, Inc. Methods and systems for providing technology-assisted content development
US7802183B1 (en) * 2001-05-17 2010-09-21 Essin Daniel J Electronic record management system
US7130861B2 (en) 2001-08-16 2006-10-31 Sentius International Corporation Automated creation and delivery of database content
GB2380278A (en) 2001-10-01 2003-04-02 Sun Microsystems Inc Generating documents
WO2003042975A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Device to edit a text in predefined windows
US20030110036A1 (en) * 2001-12-10 2003-06-12 Sayling Wen Chinese input method for providing auxiliary writing model
US7818219B2 (en) 2001-12-27 2010-10-19 American Hungarian Technologies Inc. Electronic realty and transaction system and method therein
US20030144886A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-07-31 Taira Rick K. Method and system for generating textual medical reports
US7689899B2 (en) 2002-03-06 2010-03-30 Ge Corporate Financial Services, Inc. Methods and systems for generating documents
US7024620B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2006-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Point-of-need document production system and method
US8179555B2 (en) 2002-03-08 2012-05-15 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Printing and finishing capability for customized document production system and method
US7343565B2 (en) 2002-03-20 2008-03-11 Mercurymd, Inc. Handheld device graphical user interfaces for displaying patient medical records
US7716072B1 (en) 2002-04-19 2010-05-11 Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc. Integrated medical software system
US8606593B1 (en) 2009-02-25 2013-12-10 Greenway Medical Technologies. Inc. System and method for analyzing, collecting and tracking patient data across a vast patient population
US8738396B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2014-05-27 Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc. Integrated medical software system with embedded transcription functionality
US8050938B1 (en) 2002-04-19 2011-11-01 Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc. Integrated medical software system with enhanced portability
US7325194B2 (en) 2002-05-07 2008-01-29 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for converting numbers between measurement systems based upon semantically labeled strings
US7707496B1 (en) 2002-05-09 2010-04-27 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for converting dates between calendars and languages based upon semantically labeled strings
US20030220819A1 (en) * 2002-05-21 2003-11-27 Bruce Burstein Medical management intranet software
US7707024B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2010-04-27 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for converting currency values based upon semantically labeled strings
US7742048B1 (en) 2002-05-23 2010-06-22 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for converting numbers based upon semantically labeled strings
US7827546B1 (en) 2002-06-05 2010-11-02 Microsoft Corporation Mechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a local software application
US7281245B2 (en) 2002-06-05 2007-10-09 Microsoft Corporation Mechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a local software application
US7356537B2 (en) 2002-06-06 2008-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Providing contextually sensitive tools and help content in computer-generated documents
US20110178817A1 (en) * 2002-06-14 2011-07-21 Mckesson Technologies Inc. Targeted and patient-friendly billiing system method
US7003522B1 (en) 2002-06-24 2006-02-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for incorporating smart tags in online content
US7716676B2 (en) 2002-06-25 2010-05-11 Microsoft Corporation System and method for issuing a message to a program
US7392479B2 (en) 2002-06-27 2008-06-24 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing namespace related information
US7209915B1 (en) 2002-06-28 2007-04-24 Microsoft Corporation Method, system and apparatus for routing a query to one or more providers
US20040031017A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 Shankar Vaidyanathan System and method for context-sensitive help in a design environment
US9842188B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2017-12-12 Practice Velocity, LLC Method and system for automated medical records processing with cloud computing
US11361853B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2022-06-14 Practice Velocity, LLC Method and system for automated medical records processing with telemedicine
US8606594B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2013-12-10 Practice Velocity, LLC Method and system for automated medical records processing
US10714213B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2020-07-14 Practice Velocity, LLC Method and system for automated medical records processing with patient tracking
US7624027B1 (en) 2002-10-29 2009-11-24 Practice Velocity, LLC Method and system for automated medical records processing
US20040088215A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-06 Rochelle Sallie Jean Methods and systems for award document generation and approval
US7356768B1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2008-04-08 Adobe Systems Incorporated Using document templates to assemble a collection of documents
US7783614B2 (en) 2003-02-13 2010-08-24 Microsoft Corporation Linking elements of a document to corresponding fields, queries and/or procedures in a database
US7711550B1 (en) 2003-04-29 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation Methods and system for recognizing names in a computer-generated document and for providing helpful actions associated with recognized names
US7558841B2 (en) 2003-05-14 2009-07-07 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and computer-readable medium for communicating results to a data query in a computer network
US7346892B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2008-03-18 Microsoft Corporation Prediction and pre-selection of an element in syntax completion
US20040239638A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2004-12-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for displaying, completing and executing keyboard key combinations
US8504380B2 (en) * 2003-06-05 2013-08-06 Medidata Solutions, Inc. Assistance for clinical trial protocols
US7739588B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation Leveraging markup language data for semantically labeling text strings and data and for providing actions based on semantically labeled text strings and data
US20050027569A1 (en) * 2003-07-31 2005-02-03 Sohrab Gollogly Systems and methods for documentation of encounters and communications regarding same
US8327255B2 (en) * 2003-08-07 2012-12-04 West Services, Inc. Computer program product containing electronic transcript and exhibit files and method for making the same
US20050050021A1 (en) * 2003-08-25 2005-03-03 Sybase, Inc. Information Messaging and Collaboration System
US7404195B1 (en) 2003-12-09 2008-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Programmable object model for extensible markup language markup in an application
US7487515B1 (en) 2003-12-09 2009-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Programmable object model for extensible markup language schema validation
US7178102B1 (en) 2003-12-09 2007-02-13 Microsoft Corporation Representing latent data in an extensible markup language document
US7617447B1 (en) 2003-12-09 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Context free document portions
US7434157B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2008-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Programmable object model for namespace or schema library support in a software application
US7464330B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2008-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Context-free document portions with alternate formats
US7764771B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2010-07-27 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Method of recording invention disclosures
US20050154613A1 (en) * 2004-01-13 2005-07-14 Kade Christopher S. System and method for creation of operative notes for use in surgical facilities
US7610258B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2009-10-27 Microsoft Corporation System and method for exposing a child list
US7490314B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2009-02-10 Microsoft Corporation System and method for exposing tasks in a development environment
US7509573B1 (en) 2004-02-17 2009-03-24 Microsoft Corporation Anti-virus security information in an extensible markup language document
US20050204900A1 (en) * 2004-03-17 2005-09-22 Easynotes, Llc Note collection utility
US7277905B2 (en) * 2004-03-31 2007-10-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for a consistency check of a database backup
US7487448B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2009-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Document mark up methods and systems
US7383500B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2008-06-03 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for building packages that contain pre-paginated documents
US7418652B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2008-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for interleaving parts of a document
US7512878B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2009-03-31 Microsoft Corporation Modular document format
US8661332B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2014-02-25 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for document processing
US7549118B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2009-06-16 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for defining documents with selectable and/or sequenceable parts
US8335694B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2012-12-18 Bruce Reiner Gesture-based communication and reporting system
US7421647B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2008-09-02 Bruce Reiner Gesture-based reporting method and system
US20060059012A1 (en) * 2004-09-10 2006-03-16 Thompson Christopher T Automated medical record creation system
US7617450B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and computer-readable medium for creating, inserting, and reusing document parts in an electronic document
US20060078867A1 (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-04-13 Mark Penny System supporting acquisition and processing of user entered information
US7617229B2 (en) 2004-12-20 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Management and use of data in a computer-generated document
US7617451B2 (en) * 2004-12-20 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Structuring data for word processing documents
US7620889B2 (en) 2004-12-20 2009-11-17 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for linking data ranges of a computer-generated document with associated extensible markup language elements
US7617444B2 (en) 2004-12-20 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation File formats, methods, and computer program products for representing workbooks
US7614000B2 (en) 2004-12-20 2009-11-03 Microsoft Corporation File formats, methods, and computer program products for representing presentations
US7770180B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2010-08-03 Microsoft Corporation Exposing embedded data in a computer-generated document
US7752632B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2010-07-06 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for exposing nested data in a computer-generated document in a transparent manner
US8375293B2 (en) * 2005-01-09 2013-02-12 Apple Inc. Method and apparatus for defining documents
US8078963B1 (en) 2005-01-09 2011-12-13 Apple Inc. Efficient creation of documents
US7443303B2 (en) 2005-01-10 2008-10-28 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. System and method for managing workflow
US8296162B1 (en) 2005-02-01 2012-10-23 Webmd Llc. Systems, devices, and methods for providing healthcare information
US20060212452A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-21 Cornacchia Louis G Iii System and method for remotely inputting and retrieving records and generating reports
US20070255634A1 (en) * 2005-05-05 2007-11-01 Automotive Titling Of Colorado, Inc. Vehicle fee-tax management system
US20080091700A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2008-04-17 Brotherson Bradley R Network-based document generation and processing
US20060282473A1 (en) * 2005-06-08 2006-12-14 Horrocks Adam S Rules-based data evaluation and process trigger system and method
US7607079B2 (en) * 2005-07-08 2009-10-20 Bruce Reiner Multi-input reporting and editing tool
US7492949B1 (en) 2005-09-20 2009-02-17 Patrick William Jamieson Process and system for the semantic selection of document templates
US7992085B2 (en) 2005-09-26 2011-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Lightweight reference user interface
US7788590B2 (en) 2005-09-26 2010-08-31 Microsoft Corporation Lightweight reference user interface
US20070078806A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2007-04-05 Hinickle Judith A Method and apparatus for evaluating the accuracy of transcribed documents and other documents
US20070169021A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-07-19 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation Report Generation System
US7640158B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2009-12-29 Multimodal Technologies, Inc. Automatic detection and application of editing patterns in draft documents
US20070112854A1 (en) * 2005-11-12 2007-05-17 Franca Paulo B Apparatus and method for automatic generation and distribution of documents
US20070132767A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-06-14 William Wright System and method for generating stories in time and space and for analysis of story patterns in an integrated visual representation on a user interface
US20070136090A1 (en) * 2005-12-12 2007-06-14 General Electric Company System and method for macro-enhanced clinical workflow
US20080000145A1 (en) * 2006-06-18 2008-01-03 Marc Weinberger Animal trap remover
US8286071B1 (en) * 2006-06-29 2012-10-09 Escription, Inc. Insertion of standard text in transcriptions
US20080071577A1 (en) * 2006-09-14 2008-03-20 Highley Robert D Dual-access security system for medical records
GB2443438A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-07 Hewlett Packard Development Co Method of constructing and storing a document
GB2443447A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-07 Hewlett Packard Development Co A method of constructing an output document by adding data from a variable data document to a template document
US20080109739A1 (en) * 2006-11-02 2008-05-08 Mohammad Humayoun Khan Automated documentation system and method
JP4853292B2 (en) * 2007-01-10 2012-01-11 国産電機株式会社 Engine fuel injection / ignition control method and fuel injection / ignition control device
JP5141560B2 (en) * 2007-01-24 2013-02-13 富士通株式会社 Information search program, recording medium storing the program, information search device, and information search method
US11113451B2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2021-09-07 Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre Gmbh Representation of mark-up of master documents
US8380530B2 (en) 2007-02-02 2013-02-19 Webmd Llc. Personalized health records with associative relationships
NZ553484A (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-09-26 Optical Systems Corp Ltd Text management software
US20080250070A1 (en) * 2007-03-29 2008-10-09 Abdulla Abdulla M Creating a report having computer generated narrative text
US20080243549A1 (en) * 2007-03-31 2008-10-02 Woronka Michael T Patient care report management system
US20080250394A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Microsoft Corporation Synchronizing external documentation with code development
US7720814B2 (en) * 2007-04-04 2010-05-18 Microsoft Corporation Repopulating a database with document content
US7720885B2 (en) * 2007-04-04 2010-05-18 Microsoft Corporation Generating a word-processing document from database content
US20080288239A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2008-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Localization and internationalization of document resources
US20080300922A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 The Children's Mercy Hospital Electronic medical documentation
US20090049375A1 (en) * 2007-08-18 2009-02-19 Talario, Llc Selective processing of information from a digital copy of a document for data entry
US8060818B2 (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-11-15 Sap Ag Method and apparatus for form adaptation
GB2458692A (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-09-30 Careworks Technology Holding L A process for generating database-backed, web-based documents
US20090287487A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 General Electric Company Systems and Methods for a Visual Indicator to Track Medical Report Dictation Progress
US8243334B2 (en) * 2008-06-06 2012-08-14 Virginia Venture Industries, Llc Methods and apparatuses for printing three dimensional images
US20100070930A1 (en) * 2008-09-04 2010-03-18 Gilles Thibault Business document system
US20100100806A1 (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-04-22 Aboje Ameh Methods and apparatus for the immediate production of web sites and print collaterals
US20100125450A1 (en) * 2008-10-27 2010-05-20 Spheris Inc. Synchronized transcription rules handling
US20100169092A1 (en) * 2008-11-26 2010-07-01 Backes Steven J Voice interface ocx
US8700984B2 (en) * 2009-04-15 2014-04-15 Gary Siegel Computerized method and computer program for displaying and printing markup
US8176412B2 (en) * 2009-08-25 2012-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Generating formatted documents
US11152118B2 (en) 2010-07-20 2021-10-19 Interfaced Solutions, Inc. Electronic medical record interactive interface system
US20120022892A1 (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-01-26 Interfaceed Solutions, Llc Electronic medical record interactive interface system
CA2839266C (en) * 2011-06-19 2022-05-03 Mmodal Ip Llc Document extension in dictation-based document generation workflow
US9679077B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2017-06-13 Mmodal Ip Llc Automated clinical evidence sheet workflow
US10156956B2 (en) 2012-08-13 2018-12-18 Mmodal Ip Llc Maintaining a discrete data representation that corresponds to information contained in free-form text
EP2698753A1 (en) * 2012-08-16 2014-02-19 Corporación Medichem, S.L. Data management system for generating a report document by linking technical data to intellectual property rights data
US20140172740A1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-06-19 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for unified customer communications
US9779063B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-10-03 Not Invented Here LLC Document processor program having document-type dependent interface
US20140359509A1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2014-12-04 Alp Sinan Baran Templates
US10956997B2 (en) 2013-10-10 2021-03-23 E-Legal, Inc. System, method, and process for the automatic generation of documents
US10950329B2 (en) 2015-03-13 2021-03-16 Mmodal Ip Llc Hybrid human and computer-assisted coding workflow
WO2018136417A1 (en) 2017-01-17 2018-07-26 Mmodal Ip Llc Methods and systems for manifestation and transmission of follow-up notifications
US11282596B2 (en) 2017-11-22 2022-03-22 3M Innovative Properties Company Automated code feedback system
US11315667B2 (en) 2018-08-13 2022-04-26 Zoll Medical Corporation Patient healthcare record templates
US20210312919A1 (en) * 2018-09-13 2021-10-07 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Conversation device
US11755661B2 (en) * 2020-03-31 2023-09-12 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Text entry assistance and conversion to structured medical data
US20210390249A1 (en) * 2020-06-12 2021-12-16 Augmedix Operating Corporation Natural-language medicial record generation platform

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0216063A2 (en) * 1985-09-24 1987-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Document composition from parts inventory

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3872462A (en) * 1955-06-14 1975-03-18 Jerome H Lemelson Form filling system and method
US3934226A (en) * 1971-11-17 1976-01-20 International Health Systems, Inc. Automated audio health history acquisition system
US4348744A (en) * 1978-04-04 1982-09-07 White Edward A Method and portable apparatus for comparison of stored sets of data
US4491725A (en) * 1982-09-29 1985-01-01 Pritchard Lawrence E Medical insurance verification and processing system
US4959769A (en) * 1983-10-03 1990-09-25 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Structures and methods for representing and processing documents
US4591974A (en) * 1984-01-31 1986-05-27 Technology Venture Management, Inc. Information recording and retrieval system
US4962475A (en) * 1984-12-26 1990-10-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method for generating a document utilizing a plurality of windows associated with different data objects
US4835690A (en) * 1985-11-19 1989-05-30 Picker International, Inc. Integrated expert system for medical imaging scan, set-up, and scheduling
US4794386A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-12-27 Profit Technology, Inc. Data integrator for video display including windows
US4839822A (en) * 1987-08-13 1989-06-13 501 Synthes (U.S.A.) Computer system and method for suggesting treatments for physical trauma

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0216063A2 (en) * 1985-09-24 1987-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Document composition from parts inventory

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 1984 National Computer Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 9-12 July 1984, AFIPS Press, (Reston, Virginia, US), J. Sprowl et al.: "An expert system for drafting legal documents", pages 667-673 *
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, volume 21, no. 11, April 1979, (Armonk, New York, US), R.J. Gerlach et al.: "System for simplified form fill-in using CRT display", pages 4323-4329 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2711029A1 (en) * 1993-10-06 1995-04-14 Imbert Guy Information transmission system and method
GB2355817A (en) * 1999-07-12 2001-05-02 St John S Registration Ltd Generating customised documents
US7472343B2 (en) 2002-05-10 2008-12-30 Business Integrity Limited Systems, methods and computer programs for analysis, clarification, reporting on and generation of master documents for use in automated document generation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2067780A1 (en) 1991-04-17
EP0496747A1 (en) 1992-08-05
AU6509690A (en) 1991-05-16
US5148366A (en) 1992-09-15
AU637552B2 (en) 1993-05-27
US5267155A (en) 1993-11-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5148366A (en) Computer-assisted documentation system for enhancing or replacing the process of dictating and transcribing
North et al. A taxonomy of multiple window coordination
US6182047B1 (en) Medical information log system
Kasunic Designing an effective survey
Landau et al. A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS
US6684188B1 (en) Method for production of medical records and other technical documents
US20080243548A1 (en) System for Integrated Teleconference and Improved Electronic Medical Record with Iconic Dashboard
US20060036471A1 (en) Computerized automation of physician-patient interaction for streamlined physician workflow
US20060020886A1 (en) System and method for the structured capture of information and the generation of semantically rich reports
US20020019749A1 (en) Method and apparatus for facilitating delivery of medical services
US20110054944A1 (en) Systems and methods for providing and maintaining electronic medical records
US20010042080A1 (en) Augmentation system for documentation
US20020065854A1 (en) Automated medical diagnosis reporting system
Carpenter The electronic medical record: perspective from Mayo Clinic
WO2010114605A1 (en) Software system for aiding medical practitioners
Reiner et al. The cutting edge: strategies to enhance radiologist workflow in a filmless/paperless imaging department
Wiederhold et al. System design and engineering
Alves et al. CDRGen: A Clinical Data Registry Generator (Formal and/or Technical Paper)
Gutgarts Influence of algorithmization and interface for the preparation of management decisions
GÜRCAN Identification of Expertise Roles and Skill Sets Required for Careers in Health Information Management
Domańska Rethinking interfaces to medical records
CA2335200A1 (en) Comparison table generation and display from instantiations of knowledge model
Chitrapu Design and implementation of a patient medical record system using the IEF
Kiel et al. Clinical software for strengthening the physician-patient relationship
Carty Information features of clinical nursing information systems: A Delphi survey

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LU NL SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2067780

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1990914837

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1990914837

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1990914837

Country of ref document: EP