WO1982002624A1 - Emission-electron microscope - Google Patents

Emission-electron microscope Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1982002624A1
WO1982002624A1 PCT/GB1982/000008 GB8200008W WO8202624A1 WO 1982002624 A1 WO1982002624 A1 WO 1982002624A1 GB 8200008 W GB8200008 W GB 8200008W WO 8202624 A1 WO8202624 A1 WO 8202624A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
electrons
region
emission
specimen
field
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1982/000008
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Cryogenics Ltd Thor
Original Assignee
Turner David Warren
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Turner David Warren filed Critical Turner David Warren
Priority to AT82900282T priority Critical patent/ATE26768T1/en
Priority to DE8282900282T priority patent/DE3276143D1/en
Publication of WO1982002624A1 publication Critical patent/WO1982002624A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/26Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes
    • H01J37/285Emission microscopes, e.g. field-emission microscopes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S505/00Superconductor technology: apparatus, material, process
    • Y10S505/825Apparatus per se, device per se, or process of making or operating same
    • Y10S505/879Magnet or electromagnet

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)

Abstract

An emission-electron microscope comprises an evacuated chamber (70) with a superconducting magnet (73) at one end generating a region of very high field strength. In this region a specimen is mounted and the surface of the specimen is irradiated with photons, typically x-ray or hard ultra-violet, from a source (75). As a result the specimen emits photo-electrons. The magnetic field is axially symmetrical along the length of the chamber (70) and emitted electrons spiral about the lines of force travelling down the chamber into a region of lower magnetic field controlled by electro-magnet coils (81). Transverse kinetic energy of the electrons is converted into energy along the lines of force of the magnetic field and the divergence of the magnetic field lines causes electrons to produce on a detector (79) an expanded electron image indicative of the distribution of electron flux across the surface region of the specimen. The emission-electrons may be produced by other stimulation methods, for example neutral atoms or heat (thermal electrons) and arrangements may be provided to permit only electrons of predetermined energy reaching the detector.

Description

EMISSION-ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
The present invention relates to an emission-electron microscope. There are various ways in which a specimen material can be stimulated so as to emit electrons. For example photo-electrons may be emitted from the surface of a specimen irradiated with photons of sufficient energy. Another method of stimulation is to irradiate the specimen with neutral atoms to produce emitted electrons. Also thermal electrons may be emitted when a specimen material is heated.
Throughout the description and claims of this specification, electrons which are emitted fron the specimen itself, usually, though not always, as a result of being suitably stimulated, are referred to as "emission electrons".
The present invention is concerned with apparatus, referred to as a microscope, for imaging the surface of an electron emitting specimen using these emission electrons. The image produced is indicative of the distribution over the imaged surface of the flux of emission electrons.
Considering particularly photo-electrons, the technique of photo-electron spectroscopy is well known and has been used for determining properties of specimens dependant on the ienizatiσn energy of atoms in the surface region of the specimen. Well known text books on the technique are "Principles of Ultra Violet Photo-electron Spectroscopy", by J.W. Rabalais, published by Wiley, and "Electron Spectroscopy, Theory Techniques and Applications" Vols. 1-3 Eds. C.R. Brundle and A.D. Baker, Academic Press 1977.
In photo-electron spectroscopy it is known to irradiate a specimen with ultra violet radiation, usually vacuum ultra violet, or alternatively with soft x-rays, to stimulate the specimen to emit photo-electrons. Various techniques are then employed to determine the energy spectrum of the emitted photo-electrons. One problem with photo-electron spectroscopy is that photo-electrons are normally emitted over a solid angle of a full 4", or 2" for the plain surface of a solid specimen, so only relatively few enter the aperture of the energy analyser.
One way of improving the flux of photo-electrons entering the electron analyser of the spectrometer involv carrying out the photo-electron experiment in a strong magnetic field. This is described in the journal, Phys. Scr.16 185, in an article by Beamson, Pearce and Turner entitled "Photo-electron spectroscopy in a strong magnetic field". That article describes a technique of collimating the photo-electron flux using an axially symmetric homogeneous magnetic field. In such an arrangement, electrons emitted from the surface of the specimen at an angle to the direction of the magnetic field are constrained by the field to orbit about the lines of flux of the field and therefore travel with a helical path along the magnetic field direction. It has also been proposed to carry out photo- electron spectroscopy in an axially symmetric inhomogeneous magnetic field, that is a field in which the flux lines converge or diverge along the axis of the field. It can then be shown that, if the specimen is located in a region of relatively high magnetic field so that photo-electrons emitted thereby travel along the axis of the field into a region of lower field strength, any kinetic energy of the electrons transverse to the direction of the magnetic field is progressively transferred to energy along the field direction as the electron moves into the region of weaker magnetic field. A discussion of this phenomenon is given in the article entitled "The collimating and magnifying properties of a superconducting, field photoeiectron spectrometer", by Beamson, Porter and Turner, published in the Journal of Physics, J. Phys. E:Sci. Instrum., Vol.13, 1980, page 64. In that article it is explained that if the ratio between the magnetic field at the specimen and the field at the energy analyser is sufficiently large nearly all the transverse kinetic energy of the emitted electrons has been transferred to longitudinal energy by the time the electrons arrive at the analyser. This greatly facilitates the measurement of electron energy spectra since substantially all electrons emitted from the surface of the specimen can be used in determining the energies. The above article also suggests that the technique may be employed to provide a magnified image of the electron energy or flux distribution over the surface of the irradiated specimen. Electrons emitted from the surface of the specimen are effectively contrained in their general motion to travel parallel with the lines of flux of the magnetic field so that the spatial distribution of electrons emitted from the specimen surface is reproduced at the analyser with a linear magnification proportional to the square root of the ratio of the magnetic field strength at the specimen to that at the analyser. The above referred article however gives no indication of how a practical device can be built. According to the present invention, an emission-electron microscope comprises means for generating a mag netic field having a first region at which the field is relatively strong and a second region at which the field is relatively weak and which is inter-connected by lines of flux with the first region, means for locating a specimen to be examined in said first region, the specimen being selected or arranged in use such that electrons are emitted by at least a portion of a surface of said specimen extending in said first region at an angle to said field, said magnetic field generating means being arranged so that the field in said first region is sufficiently strong that electrons emitted by the specimen at angles to the magnetic field are constrained by the field to spiral around the lines of flux of the field, electron detector means including a detector located in said second region, said detector means being arranged to provide an indication of the spatial distribution transversely of the field in said second region of electrons emitted by the specimen and travelling to said second region, thereby to provide a magnified emission-electron image of at least part of said surface portion of the specimen and means for controlling and adjusting the relative strengths of the magnetic fields in the first and second regions to effect adjustment of said image magnification.
In a preferred example, the microscope includes means for stimulating at least said surface portion of the specimen to cause electrons to be emitted by said surface. This means for stimulating may comprise means for irradiating at least said portion of said surface with radiant energy. Where the radiant energy comprises a beam of photons, the emission-electrons are photo-electrons.
Normally, to produce photo-electrons, the specimen surface is irradiated with photons from a selected direction or directions. The resolution of the magnified image at the second region can be seen to be a function of the primary energy of the emission-electrons emitted at the sample and the angular distribution of these emitted electrons. The radius of the helical orbits of the electrons so emitted sets the limit of resolution. The worst case for the resolution is to consider all electrons emitted perpendicular to the magnetic field at the sample. For a specimen in a magnetic field at 7.7 Tesla, this maximum helical radius is typically one micron for photo-electrons of 5 electron Volts (eV) . If an isotropic distribution of emitted electrons is considered, the results would be more favourable leading to an effective resolvable object size (diameter at half intensity) of 1.7 microns.
The ability to produce a magnified electron image of the specimen can be used to provide spatial information of the distribution of electron yields across the surface of the specimen. For photo-electrons, spatial information would be associated with regions of different photo-electron yield on the specimen surface. For example the microscope may be used to map heavy atom rich structures in biological specimens. Concentration of iodine containing species for example be observable.
In addition employing electron energy analysis as used for electron spectrometry can enable the magnified image to be formed only from electrons having pre-determined energy ranges. Using this energy analysis capability more information about the object may be obtained. The image described may be formed with electrons of a selected energy so, for example, mapping the surface in terms of the electron energy distribution characteristic of particular atoms or molecules. For example in the case cited, iodine containing constituents would be revealed by the groups of photo-electrons whose energy is characteristic of this atom (in the case of He 1 photo-ionisation this would be the iodine 5p electrons).
Furthermore, it is anticipated that the energy resolution will be sufficient to detect, from shifts of the peak energies, small changes in the binding or chemical state and to produce a map of such changes. By providing in the microscope of the present invention, means for controlling and adjusting the relative strength of the magnetic fields in the first and second regions, the magnification provided by the microscope can readily be adjusted. Most conveniently, the magnetic field is axially symmetric but inhomogeneous along the axis, said first and second regions being at spaced positions along the axis.
Then said controlling and adjusting means may include means for moving the detector along the axis to locations of different relative field strength.
Said controlling and adjusting means may include means for adjusting the overall rate of variation of magnetic field strength along the axis between said first and second regions. In one example, said generating means comprises electromagnet means having separately energisable portions for producing magnetic field at said first and second regions and said controlling and adjusting means includes means for adjusting the energising current in one portion of the electromagnet means relative to that in the other.
In one arrangement, at least said portion of the electro-magnet means for producing the field at said first region is a superconducting solenoid.
In another arrangement, said generating means include means for supplying pulses of current to the electro-magnet means to generate magnetic field pulses synchronously at said first and second regions and said electron detector means is arranged to operate in synchronism with said field pulses. In this way large pulsed fields can be generated by ordinary (non-superconducting) electro magnets, whilst avoiding the problem of joule heating in the magnet coil. It is important that the pulsed fields at all parts of the apparatus are maintained in predetermined proportions by supplying scaled and synchronised current pulses to the various coils.
Said controlling and adjusting means may include one or more members of a material having a high relative permeability located symmetrically about the axis and moveable relative to said second region. It will be appreciated that such a member or members can distort the magnetic field in the free space adjacent the member or members so as effectively to focus or diffuse the field as desired. In one example, there are a plurality of said members formed as axially aligned elongate rods. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the magnetic field has a third region, on the flux lines interconnecting said first and second regions, at which the field is sufficiently weak relative to the field at said first region that any kinetic energy of the electrons, when emitted, transverse to the field at the sample has been converted to kinetic energy along the flux lines when the electrons reach the third region, and means for analysing the energy along the flux lines of the electrons in the third region.
Conveniently said energy analysing means comprises means for preventing continued passage towards said second region of electrons passing through said third region having less than a predetermined energy along the flux lines. Then said means for preventing may comprise a retarding electrode in said third region.
It would be appreciated that such a retarding electrode analysing means allows all electrons above a certain energy to pass through to reach the detector. Alternative analysing means may permit only electrons having an energy within a relatively narrow band to pass through. Examples of such analysing means employ so called trochoidal deflection with crossed magnetic and electrostatic fields, or use pulsed retarding grids spaced apart along the field in the third region to permit passage through both grids only of electrons traversing between the grids with a predetermined time of flight. With such forms of analysing means, the detector can be made responsive only to electrons emitted in the predetermined energy band. In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided, positioned in said first region in front of said specimen locating means, means for preventing continued passage towards said second region of electrons emitted by said sample having less than a predetermined kinetic energy along the flux lines, whereby only electrons emitted having a relatively high proportion of their energy along the field can be transmitted. This technique can be used to improve the spatial resolution of the microscope by eliminating emitted electrons having a relatively high proportion of their energy transverse to the magnetic field. It will be appreciated that electrons with high transverse energies have the greatest orbits around the field lines thereby reducing image' resolution at the detector. The use of this technique for improving resolution does of course reduce the flux of electrons flowing to the second region.
Said means for preventing in said first region may be a retarding electrode.
Said means for preventing in said first region preferably includes a further electrode in said first region at a potential relative to said retarding electrode such as to restore the forward energy along the flux lost by electrons transmitted by said retarding electrode . The microscope may be arranged such that the field strength in said first region reduces on each side, in the field direction, of a point of maximum field strength, and then said means for locating the specimen may be arranged for locating the specimen at a selected distance, in the field direction, from said point of maximum field strength remote from said second region, whereby said point of maximum field strength acts as a magnetic mirror to reflect back electrons having a velocity at greater than a corresponding angle to the field direction.
In one embodiment, said electron detector means includes electro-magnetic deflection means arranged for selectively deflecting the electrons travelling to the detector so as to present for imaging at the detector electrons from a selected part of said stimulated surface portion of the specimen. Then, the detector may comprise a single point detector and said electro-magnetic deflection means may be arranged to provide a raster scanning of the desired electron image over said detector so that the detector provides a serial T.V.-like output video signal of said image.
Conveniently, said means for irradiating may comprise a source of vacuum ultra-violet or soft x-ray radiation and means for controlling the polarisation and/or the angle of incidence of photons from the source on the surface of the specimen.
In another arrangement the radiant energy may be a beam of neutral atoms.
In yet another arrangement, said means for stimulating may comprise means for heating the specimen to emit thermal electrons.
Examples of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: Figure 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an emission-electron microscope embodying the present invention;
Figure 2 illustrates diagrammatically the use of a retarding grid at the irradiated specimen to improve resolution;
Figure 3 is a graphical representation of the effect of the retarding grid of Figure 2;
Figure 4 illustrates a time of flight measuring arrangement for electron energy analysis; Figure 5 illustrates a trochoidal deflection arrangement for energy analysis;
Figure 6 illustrates a windowless ultra-violet source with adjustable polariser and direction selector; and Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of a prototype form of microscope employing photo-electrons.
Referring to Figure 1, a specimen 10 for analysis and inspection is mounted on a support 11 in a region of high magnetic field produced by a solenoid 12 which may be super-conducting. The solenoid 12 is arranged to produce an axially symmetric field having an axis 13 and the specimen 10 is located by the support 11 so that a surface 14 of the specimen intersects the axis 13 transversely. In one arrangement, a source 15 typically of vacuum ultra-violet light or of soft x-rays, is arranged to direct a beam 16 of photons towards the surface 14 of the specimen 10. The photons in the beam 16 have an energy sufficient to ionize atoms at the surface 14 of the specimen 10 so that photo-electrons are emitted from the surface.
The region surrounding the specimen 10 is maintained at a hard vacuum, by means not shown in the diagram, so photo-electrons emitted from the surface 14 can travel substantially without collisions with other particles or atoms.
As explained previously, the presence of the magnetic field from the solenoid 12. constrains electrons emitted with components of energy transverse to the magnetic field at the sample 10 to travel in spirals along the lines of flux of the field. Thus all electrons emitted from the surface 14 travel substantially parallel to the axis 13 of the magnetic field so long as the field is homogeneous within the solenoid 12.
The solenoid 12 is preferably formed to produce a magnetic field at the specimen of at least one tesla, and preferably between 5 and 20 tes la . The maximum limit to the magnetic field which can be produced is dependent on developments in the production of superconducting solenoids for use as the solenoid 12. It will be appreciated that the higher the field produced by the solenoid 12 , the smaller the diameter of the spiral orbits of electrons emitted from the surface 14.
The source of ultra-violet 15 , typically a helium discharge lamp , may be arranged to produce photons with energies in the range 3 to 50 electron Volts , typically 21 electron Volts . It will be understood that the greater the energy of photons in the beam 16 , the greater the kinetic energy of the emitted photo-electrons , which also has the effect of increasing the diameter of the electron spiral orbits . It is desirable to keep the spiral orbits as small as possible to enhance the resolution of the microscope.
Spaced along the axis 13 of the super-conducting solenoid 12 there are further solenoids 17 and 18 one or both of which may also be superconducting. Solenoids 17 and 18 are co-axial with the solenoid 12 and arranged to control the strength of the magnetic field over respective regions along the axis 13. The solenoid 17 is arranged to provide a substantially homogeneous magnetic field over an axial region containing an energy analyser comprising a retarding electrode 19. The retarding electrode 19 is maintained by an energy select unit 20 at a selected electric potential so that only electrons travelling along parallel to the axis 13 from the specimen 10 with an axial energy greater than the potential difference between the electrode 19 and the specimen 10 can pass the electrode 19. Thus, the flux of electrons to the right hand side of the electrode 19 in Figure 1, comprises only those electrons having an energy along the axis 13 greater than a predetermined amount dependent on the setting of the energy select unit 20.
The magnetic field between the solenoids 12 and 17 is inhoraogeneous along the axis 13 so that the field within the solenoid 17 is very much weaker than the field in solenoid 12. As a result, as explained previously, nearly all the energy transverse to the magnetic field of the electrons emitted at the surface 14 of the specimen 10 is transferred to energy along the field by the time the electrons reach the region within the solenoid 17. The proportion of electrons passing the retarding electrode 19 is therefore representative of the proportion of electrons emitted from a predetermined region of the surface 14 with total kinetic energies above the preset energy determined by the unit 20.
Because the lines of magnetic flux between the solenoids 12 and 17 diverge in an axially symmetric manner, it will be appreciated that the spatial distribution of the electrons passing the electrode 19 is representative of a magnified electron image of a small axial portion of the surface 14 of the specimen 10.
The solenoid 18 provides a further region of substantially homogeneous magnetic field containing an electron detector arrangement. This may comprise a micro- channelled plate 21 in front of a fluorescent phosphor screen 22. The operation of micro-channel plates is well known and they serve in effect as electron multipliers whilst preserving the spatial distribution transverse to the electron flux. The duly multiplied electron flux from the micro-channel plate 21 then impinges upon the phosphor screen 22 to produce a light image of the electron flux distribution. It can be seen that, this image on the phosphor screen 22 comprises a magnified photo-electron image of a portion of the surface 14 of the specimen 10. Alternatively the electron image may be recorded using an integrated solid state device with or without amplification by a channel plate. Since electrons emitted from the surface 14 are constrained in the magnetic field initially to orbit around a fixed bundle of flux lines, and in due course to travel substantially parallel to the flux lines, it can be seen that the linear magnification of the image on the phosphor screen 22 is proportional to the square root of the ratio of the magnetic field at the specimen 10 produced by the solenoid 12 to the field at the detector comprising the micro-channel plate 21 and phosphor screen 22 , produced by the solenoid 18.
With a super-conducting solenoid for the solenoid 12 producing a magnetic field up to say 9 Tesla , and the field at the detector, as controlled by the solenoid 18, as small as 10 microtesla, it can be seen that magnifications in the order of a thousand times or greater can be achieved.
As also explained previous ly , the resolution of the
electron image is dependent on the diameter of the electron orbits on emission from the surface 14 , which is in turn dependent on the size of the magnetic field at the specimen 10 and the energy of the electrons emitted from the surface 14.
A magnification control unit 23 enables the magnetic field produced by the solenoid 18 to be adjusted so as to control the magnification at the phos-ohor screen 22. The light image produced on the phosphor screen 22 is detected by a TV camera 24 in the usual way and the vide data resulting from this or other detector may be supplied for direct viewing of the image on a TV screen 25 or via a digitiser 26 for feeding to a computer 27 with a data store 28. The digitised, data can then be analysed by the computer as desired.
In the described example, each of the solenoids 12, 17 and 18 are preferably super-conducting solenoids and they may be formed as a single unit provided with means to enable discrete control of the magnetic field at one region containing the specimen 10 and at least one other region containing the detector 21, 22. Separate control may also be provided over a third region containing the energy analyser 19.
The entire flight path of photo-electrons between the specimen 10 and the phosphor plate 22 must be maintained at a hard vacuum to minimise the risk of collision of electrons during the passage along the instrument.
The above described example operates with steady state magnetic fields preferably generated using a superconducting solenoid at least for the solenoid 12. However useful results may be obtained using a permanent magnet even for generating the high field strength at the specimen 14. The field strength attainable with presently available permanent magnets is lower than with superconducting magnets, but is yet sufficient to provide an operable microscope though with lower resolution. However, the low cost of a permanent magnet may make its use desirable in some applications. The permanent magnet should produce a field with axial symmetry and the specimen may be mounted against one pole-piece.
Instead of steady state fields, pulsed fields may be produced using ordinary (non-superconducting) solenoids for each of solenoids 12, 17 and 18. Then, a current pulse generator and synchronising unit 29 may be arranged to provide synchronous pulses of energising current to each of the solenoids 12, 17 and 18. Very high pulsed fields can be generated in this way without excessive joule heating in the solenoids. Synchronising pulses are also supplied from unit 29 on line 35 to the T.V. camera 24 to ensure the image generated on the phosphor screen 22 only during the pulses is recorded by the camera. it can be shown that with normal substantially isotrcpic emission of photo-electrons at the surface 14 of the specimen 10, spatial resolution of the surface 14 at the phosphor plate 22 may be in the order of one micron with a typical maximum field strength at the specimen 10 of 9 Tesla and an electron energy on emission of 5 electron Volts. However, the resolution can be improved by arranging to discriminate at the specimen 10 against those electrons emit with relatively high proportions of their energy transverse to the magnetic field. Referring to Figure 2, a portion of the surface 14 of the specimen is illustrated at 30. Close in front of the surface 30 still in the region where the magnetic field at the specimen is substantially homogeneous axially, there is provided a retarding electrode 31. Means are also provided (not shown) to set the retarding eleccrode 31 at a predetermined negative potential relative to the specimen 10. Thus, if the specimen 10 is considered at
O Volts,the retarding electrode 30 may be at minus-V Volts. As a result, only electrons emitted from the surface 30 having an energy in the direction of the arrow 32, i.e along the magnetic field, greater than V electron Volts can penetrate through the electrode 31. Considering two electrons A and B emitted from the surface 30 with the same total kinetic energy, these maybe represented by the vectors A and B in the graphical representation of Figure 3 in which the X axis represents the energy of the electron along the magnetic field and the Y axis the energy perpendicularly across the magnetic field. Electron A has a higher proportion of its energy transverse to the magnetic field and has insufficient forward energy to pass the electrode 31 represented by the vertical line MIN in Figure 3. Electron B on the other hand has sufficient energy to pass the electrode. Since electron A has more energy transverse to the magnetic field, it travels from the surface 30 with a helical orbit greater than that of electron B , as shown in Figure 2. The electrode 31 therefore acts to cut out those electrons , such as electron A having relatively larger helical orbits, and therefore providing better resolution in the electron image produced.
It will be appreciated that electrons , such as electron B , which do pass the electrode 31, have, at least initially, reduced forward velocity along the magnetic field and it may be desirable to ensure that these electrons are speeded up again, to their original forward energy by providing a further-electrode 33 beyond the first electrode 31 and at the same potential as the specimen 10.
In Figure 1, a technique of energy analysis within the region controlled by the solenoid 17 was described employing a retarding electrode 19. This technique is capable of providing only integral photo-electron spectra since all electrons having greater than the predetermined energy pass through the grid 19. Figures 4 and 5 illustrate two alternative techniques of producing in effect a first derivative spectral analysis whereby only electrons having energies within a narrow band are permitted to pass through the detector.
Figure 4 illustrates a time of. flight technique. In Figure 4, the two soienoids 17 and 18 of Figure 1 are in effect combined in a solenoid 40 providing an extended region along the axis 13 of substantially homogeneous magnetic field. The magnetic field within the solenoid 40 is arranged to be sufficiently weak relative to that at the specimen 10 to provide the desired magnification and also to ensure substantially all electron energy has been converted to forward energy.
Spaced apart by a distance a in front of the detector there are two retarding electrodes 41 and 42. In one arrangement, electrodes 41 and 42 are normally maintained at a sufficient negative voltage relative to the specimen 10 to prevent any photo-electrons penetrating. A pulse control unit 43 then provides positive going voltage pulses to the electrodes 41 and 42 with the pulse supplied to the electrode 42 following that supplied to the electrode by a predetermined time delay t. If the voltage pulses are such as to permit electrons travelling along the axis 13 to pass through either of the electrodes only during the duration of the pulse supplied to the electrode it can be seen that only those electrons having a predetermined flight time for the distance d between the grids equal to the time delay t will pass both electrodes 41 and 42 and arrive at the detector. Since the flight time is dependent on the speed of the electrons which is in turn dependent on their energy, varying the time delay t can effectively tune the analyser to pass only electrons having a predetermined energy. The alternative arrangement illustrated in Figure 5, employs trochoidal deflection of the electrons. A similar extended solenoid 40 is employed to encompass both the detector and the analyser regions. In the analyser region means are provided to produce an electric field transverse to the magnetic field, for example out of the paper as illustrated at 44 in Figure 5. It is well known that electrons travelling in perpendicular magnetic and electric fields describe a complex motion, resulting in an average displacement at righ t angles to the electric field , upwards in Figure 5.
By providing a grid of chevron plates 45 , only having a predetermined angle to the axis 13 are passed to the detector. Clearly, with a given electric field (over a predetermined distance ) and magnetic field, the angle of the electron path, is dependent on the electron energy so that the chevron plates 45 operate to pass only those electrons having a predetermined energy. The energy may be selected by adjusting either the electric field 44 or the magnetic field produced by the solenoid 40 or alternatively by adjusting the angle or position in the region of electric field of the plates 45.
Figure 6 illustrates diagrammatically a preferred arrangement for directing photons from the source 15 to the radiated specimen. The source may comprise a helium discharge tube providing ultra-violet radiation. Ultra-violet radiation is absorbed by the glass or other material used to contain the gas of the gas discharge. Thus, in order to maximise the photon flux or intensity from the gas discharge it is desirable to use a windowless arrangement. A capillary tube 50 may be provided having one closed end 51 and the opposite end open, via a small pin hole 52 to the interior of a chamber 53 forming the vacuum chamber of the photo-electron microscope. As mentioned before the specimen 10 and all regions of the microscope in which the photo-electrons are intended to travel, and thus the chamber 53, should be at a hard vacuum. On the other hand a certain density of gas atoms is required to provide the gas discharge generating ultra-violet radiation. An anode 54 and cathode 55 are provided at opposite ends of the capillary 50 and supplied from a voltage source 56, to produce the desired discharge. It will be appreciated that gas atoms in the capillary 50 will tend to escape through the pin hole aperture 52 into the chamber 53. accordingly, pumping means (not shown) are provided to pump continuously from the enamber 53 via an aperture 57 to remove atoms leaking into the chamber. Since atoms in the capillary 50 are continually being lost through the opening 52, these atoms must be replenished, to maintain the discharge, through an inlet 58. With this arrangement, ultra-violet radiation generated by the discharge can pass directly into the chamber 53 through the opening 52 without being transmitted through a window.
In the chamber 53, a mirror arrangement is provided to direct the beam of ultra-violet radiation as desired at the surface 14 of the specimen 10. The mirror arrangement may comprise two mirrors 59 and 60 set so that the radiation from the discharge is reflected in the two mirrors before being directed at the specimen 10. The mirror 59 may be set at ah angle to the radiation emitted from the pin hole opening 52 such that the reflected radiation from the mirror 59 is substantially polarised. Means may be provided also to rotate the mirror 60 about an axis in the plane of the mirror and perpendicular to the paper in Figure 6 so as to direct the radiation from the mirror 60 as desired. Furthermore, both mirrors 59 and 60 may be rotatable together about an axis 61 to enable the angle of polarisation of the emerging radiation relative to the specimen to be set as required. With this arrangement both the polarisation angle and the angle of incidence of the radiation in the beam 16 directed at the surface 14 of the specimen 10 can be adjusted. It can be seen, that the photo-electron microscope described above can be used to provide a magnified image of a portion of the surface 14 of the specimen 10. This image can be representative of the spatial distribution of the total electron flux from the various surface regions and it is also possible and advantageous to produce an image representative of the flux of electrons within a predetermined energy band. Substantially all electrons emitted from the part of the surface forming the image can arrive at the detector. Only a very low energy quantum is used to excite the surface 14 of the specimen 10 so that minimal damage is done even to biological specimens. Further, the images can be employed to determine the distribution of materials of different bonding energies or chemical states across the surface. For example the microscope may be used to map heavy atom rich structures in biological specimens. Concentration of iodine containing species, for example, can readily be observed.
Further, since there are no lenses or focusing optics in the microscope, there is no depth of field field limitation. The thickness of the surface layer of the specimen which contributes to the image depends on the incident photon wavelength and on the electron escape depth and lies approximately in the range 2 × 10-10 metres to 2 × 10-8 metres. In the above description of examples of microscope embodying the present invention, consideration has been given primarily to an arrangement employing a beam of photons to irradiate the surface of the specimen so as to emit photo-electrons, which are subsequently imaged. This particular embodiment has been referred to as a "photo-electron microscope".
More generally, the invention is applicable to other forms of emission-electrons. For example, the surface of the specimen may be excited or stimulated to emit electrons by a neutral atom beam. Such neutral atom beams are used for various purposes in the technology of surface devices. When a specimen is irradiated with neutral atoms, the surface of the specimen emits electrons and these emitted electrons could be imaged in the same way as photo-electrons using the above described techniques. The above described imaging process could be carried out on electrons given off by a specimen which is being irradiated with a neutral atom beam for some other investigative purpose. Commercial devices for producing neutral atom beams are readily available.
The specimen may be stimulated to emit electrons by other means. For example, the specimen may be heated to emit thermal electrons. Many materials, when heated to a suitably high temperature, emit electrons spontaneously and these thermal electrons can be used in the above described apparatus to form an image in the same way as for photo-electrons. For example, the specimen may comprise the cathode of an electron tube and the image produced by the microscope could then provide a means of assessing the quality of the cathode.
When the apparatus illustrated in Figure 1 is used to image thermal electrons emitted, for example, by a heated cathode, a heater supply and control unit 36 may be provided supplying heater current to a heating element associated with the specimen to be heated, e.g. the cathode.
The apparatus described may also be used to image Auger electrons. It is well known that atoms which are highly excited by x-ray photons, or an electron beam, or by other methods can suffer internal transitions which result in the emission of an electron whose energy is characteristic of the atom itself and is independent of the means of excitation. Such electrons are commonly called. Auger electrons and the process is described in, for example, "Photo-electron and Auger Spectroscopy", by T.A. Carlson, published by Plenum Press 1975. One use of such Auger electrons would be to form an image using the above described apparatus of the distribution of a selected element in the specimen surface. Figure 7 illustrates in diagrammatic form a prototype microscope apparatus embodying the invention. In Figure 7, electrons to be imaged are emitted into an evacuated chamber 70 by a specimen mounted at the end of a mounting rod 71 located at one end of the chamber 70. The mounting rod 71 may permit the specimen to be inserted into the chamber 70 through a gate valve 72 so that the specimen can be located in the region of a strong magnetic field generated by a superconducting solenoid 73 cooled in a liquid helium cryostat 74. The specimen is irradiated by hard ultra-violet photons generated in a helium lamp 75. The photons enter the chamber 70 via a port 76. The chamber 70 is formed with a further spare port 77. The chamber 70 is evacuated via an exhaust port 78 by a vacuum pump (not shown). Electrons emitted by the specimen and travelling along the chamber 70 impinge upon a detector arrangement 79 comprising a channel plate in front of a phosphor screen. The electron image formed on the phosphor screen can be viewed through a view port 80 in the end of the chamber 70. The magnetic field at the detector is controlled at a desired relativel low field strength by coils 81. The apparatus shown in Figure 7 operates essentially in the same manner as the apparatus of Figure 1 and no further description is considered to be necessary. However, the apparatus of Figure 7 has additionally image shift coils 82. These image shift coils are arranged, when energised, to produce a component of magnetic field transverse to the magnetic field direction along the chamber 70. Thus, the effect of the magnetic field component generated by the shift coils 82 is to shift the magnetic flux lines transversely across the length of the chamber 70 and thereby to produce a corresponding shift in the electron image at the detector arrangement 79. A shift control unit 83 is arranged to control the current supplied to the shift coils 82 to effect a desired amount of transverse shift of the electron image. Conveniently, two sets of shift coils are provided enabling the image to be shifted as desired in both X and Y directions. In one arrangement, the shift control unit 83 is arranged to provide saw tooth energising current wave forms to the orthogonal shift coils such as to produce a raster scanning of the image. Then, the detector 79 may be replaced by a single point electron detector providing an electrical signal output on a single line. It can be seen then that the output of the single point detector can comprise a serial T.V.-like video signal making up a T.V. raster scan picture of the electron image. This arrangement obviates the need for a separate television camera for recording the electron image. In the above described examples of the invention, it has been said to be desirable to locate the specimen in a region of high field strengths. In order to obtain maximum spatial resolution in the electron image produced by the apparatus, the field strength at the specimen should be maximised. However, in certain application, it may be desirable to arrange for the field strengths in the region of the specimen to fall away on opposite sides, in the axial direction, of a point of maximum field strength. In such an arrangement, the specimen may desirably be located slightly behind the point of maximum field strength, i.e. on the opposite side of the maximum point from the detector.
It is well known that electrons can be reflected from a region of increasing magnetic field. This is known as the magnetic mirror effect. This occurs because, within the adiabatic approximation, the quantity Cl/B) sin2θ is conserved, where B is the magnetic field strength and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the electron velocity. As B increases so θ is required to increase, but the value sinø cannot exceed 1, so the electron simply turns back, i.e. is reflected. In the above described example of the present invention, it is apparent that an electron emitted from a soecimen in a field Bs, which has to pass a region of greater field Bmax before reaching a detector, will only reach the detector if it is emitted at an angle θ (to the field Bs) which is smaller than a critical value 8 given by
(l/B S) sin2θ C = (1/Bmax)
Thus, by mounting the specimen slightly behind a point of maximum field strength, there is provided an arrangement which reflects electrons not emitted into a forward looking cone of a predetermined angle. Only electrons emitted within the defined solid angle can pass the magnetic mirror. This can be useful in certain investigations of solid surfaces. It will be understood, however, that displacement of the specimen behind the point of maximum magnetic field reduces the spatial resolution of the electron image.

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. An emission-electron microscope comprising means for generating a magnetic field having a first region at which the field is relatively strong and a second region at which the field is relatively weak and which is inter-connected by lines of flux with the first region, means for locating a specimen to be examined in said first region, the specimen being selected or arranged in use such that electrons are emitted by at least a portion of a surface of said specimen extending in said first region at an angle to said field, said magnetic field generating means being arranged so that the field in said first region is sufficiently strong that electrons emitted by the specimen at angles to the magnetic field are constrained by the field to spiral around the lines of flux of the field, electron detector means including a detector located in said second region, said detector means being arranged to provide an indication of the spatial distribution transversely of the field in said second region of electrons emitted by the specimen and travelling to said second region, thereby to provide a magnified emission-electron image of at least part of said surface portion of the specimen and means for controlling and adjusting the relative strengths of the magnetic fields in the first and second regions to effect adjustment of said image magnification.
2. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the magnetic field is axially symmetric but inhomogeneous along the axis, said first and second regions being at spaced positions along the axis.
3. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 2 wherein said controlling and adjusting means includes means for moving the detector along the axis to locations of different relative field strength.
4. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein said controlling and adjusting means includes means for adjusting the overall rate of variation of magnetic field strength along the axis between said first and second regions.
5. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 4 wherein said generating means comprises electromagnet means having separately energisable portions for producing magnetic field at said first and second regions and said controlling and adjusting means includes means for adjusting the energising current in one portion of the electro-magnet means relative to that in the other.
6. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 5 wherein at least said portion of the electro-magnet means for producing the field at said first region is a superconducting solenoid.
7. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 5 wherein said generating means includes means for supplying pulses of current to the electro-magnet means to generate magnetic field pulses synchronously at said first and second regions and said electron detector means is arranged to operate in synchronism with said field pulses.
8. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in any of Claims 4 to 7 wherein said controlling and adjusting means includes one or more members of a material having a high relative permeability located symmetrically about the axis and moveable relative to said second region.
9. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 8 wherein there are a plurality of said members formed as axially aligned elongate rods.
10. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the magnetic field has a third region, on the flux lines interconnecting said first and second regions, at which the field is sufficiently weak relative to the field at said first region that any kinetic energy of the electrons, when emitted, transverse to the field at the sample has been substantially converted to kinetic energy along the flux lines when the electrons reach the third region, and means for analysing the energy along the flux lines of the electrons in the third region.
11. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 10 wherein said energy analysing means comprises means for preventing continued passage towards said second region of electrons passing through said third region having less than a predetermined energy along the flux lines.
12. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 11 wherein said means for preventing comprises a retarding electrode in said third region.
13. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in any preceding claim and including, positioned in said first region in front of said specimen locating means, means for preventing continued passage toward said second region of electrons emitted by said sample having less than a predetermined kinetic energy along the flux lines.
14. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 13 wherein the field in said first region is homogeneous in the field direction and said means for preventing in said first region is a retarding electrode.
15. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 14 wherein said means for preventing in said first region includes a further electrode in said first region at a potential relative to said retarding electrode such as to restore the forward energy along the flux lost by the electrons transmitted by said retarding electrode.
16. An emission-electrons microscope as claimed in any of Claims 1 to 12 wherein the field strength in said first region reduces on each side, in the field direction, of a point of maximum field strength, and said means for locating the specimen is arranged for locating the specimen at a selected distance, in the field direction, from said point of maximum field strength remote from said second region, whereby said point of maximum field strength acts as a magnetic mirror to reflect back electrons having a velocity at greater than a corresponding angle to the field direction.
17. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said electron detector means includes electro-magnetic deflection means arranged for selectively deflecting the electrons travelling to the detector so as to present for imaging at the detector electrons from a selected part of said stimulated surface portion of the specimen.
18. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 17 wherein the detector comprises a single point detector and said electro-magnetic deflection means is arranged to provide a raster scanning of the. desired electron image over said detector so that the detector provides a serial T.V.-like output video signal of said image.
19. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in any preceding claim and including means for stimulating at least said surface portion of the specimen to cause electrons to be emitted by said surface.
20. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 19 wherein said means for stimulating comprises means for irradiating at least said portion of said surface with radiant energy.
21. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 20 wherein the radiant energy comprises a beam of photons of sufficient energy to cause photo-electrons to be emitted as the emission electrons.
22. A photo-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 21 wherein said means for irradiating comprises a source of vacuum ultra-violet or soft x-ray radiation and means for controlling the polarisation and/or the angle of incidence of photons from the source on the surface of the specimen.
23. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 20 wherein the radiant energy is a beam of. neutral atoms.
24. An emission-electron microscope as claimed in Claim 19 wherein said means for stimulating comprises means for heating the specimen to emit thermal electrons.
25. An emission-electron microscope substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
PCT/GB1982/000008 1981-01-16 1982-01-15 Emission-electron microscope WO1982002624A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT82900282T ATE26768T1 (en) 1981-01-16 1982-01-15 EMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE.
DE8282900282T DE3276143D1 (en) 1981-01-16 1982-01-15 Emission-electron microscope

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8101364810116 1981-01-16
GB8101364 1981-01-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1982002624A1 true WO1982002624A1 (en) 1982-08-05

Family

ID=10519026

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1982/000008 WO1982002624A1 (en) 1981-01-16 1982-01-15 Emission-electron microscope

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4486659A (en)
EP (1) EP0069750B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS58500186A (en)
DE (1) DE3276143D1 (en)
WO (1) WO1982002624A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0112345B1 (en) * 1982-06-17 1986-12-10 Kevex Corporation X-ray source apparatus
EP0389952A2 (en) * 1989-03-31 1990-10-03 Shimadzu Corporation A photoelectron microscope

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2534688A1 (en) * 1982-10-19 1984-04-20 Commissariat Energie Atomique DEVICE FOR EXAMINING SAMPLES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
US4554457A (en) * 1983-07-08 1985-11-19 Surface Science Laboratories, Inc. Magnetic lens to rotate transverse particle momenta
US5128543A (en) * 1989-10-23 1992-07-07 Charles Evans & Associates Particle analyzer apparatus and method
JP2590417B2 (en) * 1992-06-19 1997-03-12 工業技術院長 Auger electron spectrometer
US5569916A (en) * 1992-07-09 1996-10-29 Agency Of Industrial Science & Technology, Ministry Of International Trade & Industry Electron spectroscopy apparatus
US6326617B1 (en) * 1997-09-04 2001-12-04 Synaptic Pharmaceutical Corporation Photoelectron spectroscopy apparatus
US6744268B2 (en) 1998-08-27 2004-06-01 The Micromanipulator Company, Inc. High resolution analytical probe station
US6198299B1 (en) 1998-08-27 2001-03-06 The Micromanipulator Company, Inc. High Resolution analytical probe station
JP2005257538A (en) * 2004-03-12 2005-09-22 Riken Keiki Co Ltd Photoelectron measuring device
US7399963B2 (en) * 2005-09-27 2008-07-15 Revera Incorporated Photoelectron spectroscopy apparatus and method of use
US7608838B1 (en) 2007-01-15 2009-10-27 Raymond Browning Electron optical component
US7569816B1 (en) 2007-01-15 2009-08-04 Raymond Browning Electron spectrometer
US7718961B1 (en) 2007-01-15 2010-05-18 Raymond Browning Photoelectron microscope
US20110006205A1 (en) * 2009-07-12 2011-01-13 Raymond Browning Ambient pressure photoelectron microscope
US20110017909A1 (en) * 2009-07-21 2011-01-27 Raymond Browning Electron imaging apparatus with image processing
US8295443B2 (en) 2010-07-07 2012-10-23 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals X-ray system with superconducting anode
US20120298861A1 (en) * 2011-05-23 2012-11-29 Raymond Browning Vector Potential Photoelectron Microscope
DE102013006535A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2014-10-30 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Scanning particle beam microscope with energy filtering detector system

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3822382A (en) * 1971-08-17 1974-07-02 Jeol Ltd Apparatus for analyzing electron energy
US4096386A (en) * 1977-04-04 1978-06-20 Taylor-Kincaid Company Light reflecting electrostatic electron lens

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3822382A (en) * 1971-08-17 1974-07-02 Jeol Ltd Apparatus for analyzing electron energy
US4096386A (en) * 1977-04-04 1978-06-20 Taylor-Kincaid Company Light reflecting electrostatic electron lens

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Instruments and Experimental Techniques, Volume 21, No. 4, part 2, July/August 1978 (New York, US), A.V. GOSTEV et al.: "Universal Instrument for the Investigation of Local and Integral Electron Emission", pages 1053-1055, see the whole document *
Journal of Physics, E, Scientific Instruments, Volume 13, 1980 (London, GB), G. BEAMSON et al.: "The Collimating and Magnifying Properties of a Superconducting Field Photoelectron Spectrometer", pages 64-66, see page 64, left-hand column, last paragraph, page 65, left-hand column, last paragraph to page 66, left-hand column, end of the first paragraph, figure 1, page 66, paragraph 3 cited in the application *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0112345B1 (en) * 1982-06-17 1986-12-10 Kevex Corporation X-ray source apparatus
US4713833A (en) * 1982-06-17 1987-12-15 Kevex Corporation X-ray source apparatus
EP0389952A2 (en) * 1989-03-31 1990-10-03 Shimadzu Corporation A photoelectron microscope
EP0389952A3 (en) * 1989-03-31 1991-03-27 Shimadzu Corporation A photoelectron microscope

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0069750A1 (en) 1983-01-19
DE3276143D1 (en) 1987-05-27
JPH0367301B2 (en) 1991-10-22
US4486659A (en) 1984-12-04
EP0069750B1 (en) 1987-04-22
JPS58500186A (en) 1983-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4486659A (en) Emisson-electron microscope
KR101988189B1 (en) Charged particle beam device and scanning electron microscope
Liebl Ion microprobe mass analyzer
Loretto Electron beam analysis of materials
Metherell Energy analyzing and energy selecting electron microscopes
US7428298B2 (en) Magnetic head for X-ray source
Pikuz et al. High-luminosity monochromatic x-ray backlighting using an incoherent plasma source to study extremely dense plasmas
US10049850B2 (en) X-ray apparatus with deflectable electron beam
EP0389952B1 (en) A photoelectron microscope
Egedal et al. Plasma generation and confinement in a toroidal magnetic cusp
US3819941A (en) Mass dependent ion microscope having an array of small mass filters
Arndt et al. A microfocus X-ray tube used with focusing collimators
Queller et al. High-current long-duration uniform electron beam generation in a diode with multicapillary carbon-epoxy cathode
Reimer et al. Elements of a transmission electron microscope
Aoki et al. Development of novel projection-type imaging mass spectrometer
US20040004773A1 (en) Reducing chromatic aberration in images formed by emmission electrons
Tou et al. Magnetic field mapping using an image‐intensifying fluorescent probe
Neff et al. A plasma focus as radiation source for a laboratory x-ray microscope
Pikuz et al. Studies of X-pinch plasma fine structure using high resolution optical and imaging spectroscopy methods
JPH0718960B2 (en) X-ray microscope
Denham et al. High energy electron diffraction instrument with tunable camera length
Kumakhov X-ray and neutron polycapillary optics: status and perspectives
JPH1050250A (en) Photoelectron spectrometry device
Dietz Transmission Optics of Focused Ion Beams Used in Mass Spectrometry
Markovits et al. Diagnostic methods for investigation of collective ion acceleration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Designated state(s): GB JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LU NL SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1982900282

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1982900282

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1982900282

Country of ref document: EP