USRE38229E1  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration  Google Patents
Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration Download PDFInfo
 Publication number
 USRE38229E1 USRE38229E1 US09918420 US91842001A USRE38229E US RE38229 E1 USRE38229 E1 US RE38229E1 US 09918420 US09918420 US 09918420 US 91842001 A US91842001 A US 91842001A US RE38229 E USRE38229 E US RE38229E
 Authority
 US
 Grant status
 Grant
 Patent type
 Prior art keywords
 seismic
 semblance
 method
 cell
 traces
 Prior art date
 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 Expired  Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications

 G—PHYSICS
 G01—MEASURING; TESTING
 G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
 G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
 G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
 G01V1/288—Event detection in seismic signals, e.g. microseismics

 G—PHYSICS
 G01—MEASURING; TESTING
 G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
 G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
 G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
 G01V1/30—Analysis
 G01V1/301—Analysis for determining seismic crosssections or geostructures

 G—PHYSICS
 G01—MEASURING; TESTING
 G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
 G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
 G01V2210/60—Analysis
 G01V2210/65—Source localisation, e.g. faults, hypocenters or reservoirs
Abstract
Description
This patent application is a continuation in part of a provisional patent application filed Oct. 6, 1995, and having a Ser. No. 60/005,032 and a U.S. patent application to Bahorich and Farmer, having a Ser. No. 08/353,934 and a filing date of Dec. 12, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,949.
This invention relates to the general subject of seismic exploration and, in particular, to methods and devices for identifying structural and stratigraphic features in three dimensions.
In seismic exploration, seismic data is acquired along lines (see lines 10 and 11 of FIG. 1) that consist of geophone arrays onshore or hydrophone streamer traverses offshore. Geophones and hydrophones act as sensors to receive energy that is transmitted into the ground and reflected back to the surface from subsurface rock interfaces. Energy is often provided onshore by Vibroseis® vehicles which transmit pulses by shaking the ground at predetermined intervals and frequencies on the surface. Offshore, airgun sources are usually often used. Subtle changes in the energy returned to surface often reflect variations in the stratigraphic, structural and fluid contents of the reservoirs.
In performing threedimensional (3D) seismic exploration, the principle is similar; however, lines and arrays are more closely spaced to provide more detailed subsurface coverage. With this high density coverage, extremely large volumes of digital data need to be recorded, stored and processed before final interpretation can be made. Processing requires extensive computer resources and complex software to enhance the signal received from the subsurface and to mute accompanying noise which masks the signal.
After the data is processed, geophysical personnel assemble and interpret the 3D seismic information in the form of a 3D data cube (See FIG. 2) which effectively represents a display of subsurface features. Using this data cube, information can be displayed in various forms. Horizontal time slice maps can be made at selected depths (See FIG. 3). Using a computer workstation, an interpreter can also slice through the field to investigate reservoir issues at different seismic horizons. Vertical slices or crosssections can also be made in any direction using seismic or well data. Seismic picks of reflectors can be contoured, thereby generating a time horizon map. Time horizon maps can be converted to depth to provide a true scale structural interpretation at a specific level.
Seismic data has been traditionally acquired and processed for the purpose of imaging seismic reflections for structural and stratigraphic interpretation. However, changes in stratigraphy are often difficult to detect on traditional seismic displays due to the limited amount of information that stratigraphic features present in a crosssection view. While working with both time slices and crosssections provides an opportunity to see a much larger portion of faults, it is difficult to identify fault surfaces within a 3D volume where no fault reflections have been recorded.
Coherence is one measure of seismic trace similarity or dissimilarity. The more two seismic traces increase in coherence, the more they are alike. Assigning a coherence measure on a scale from zero to one, “0” indicates the greatest lack of similarity, while a value of “1” indicates total or complete similarity (i.e., two identical, perhaps timeshifted, traces). Coherence for more than two traces may be defined in a similar way.
One method for computing coherence was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,949 to Bahorich and Farmer (assigned to Amoco Corporation) having a Ser. No. 353,934 and a filing date of Dec. 12, 1994. Unlike the shaded relief methods that allow 3D visualization of faults, channels, slumps, and other sedimentary features from picked horizons, the coherency process devised by Bahorich and Farmer operates on the seismic data itself. When there is a sufficient change in acoustic impedance, the 3D seismic coherency cube developed by Bahorich and Farmer can be extremely effective in delineating seismic faults. It is also quite effective in highlighting subtle changes in stratigraphy (e.g., 3D images of meandering distributary channels, point bars, canyons, slumps and tidal drainage patterns).
Although the process invented by Bahorich and Farmer has been very successful, it has some limitations. An inherent assumption of the Bahorich invention is the assumption of zero mean seismic signals. This is approximately true when the correlation window exceeds the length of a seismic wavelet. For seismic data containing a 10 Hz component of energy, this requires a rather long 100 ms window which can mix stratigraphy associated with both deeper and shallower time horizons. Shortening the window (e.g., to 32 ms results in higher vertical resolution, but often at the expense of increased artifacts due to the seismic wavelet. Unfortunately, a more rigorous, nonzero mean running window cross correlation process is an order of magnitude more computationally expensive. Moreover, if seismic data is contaminated by coherent noise, estimates of apparent dip using only two traces will be relatively noisy.
Thus, there is a need for methods and apparatus that would overcome the shortcomings of the prior art. In particular, improved resolution and computational speed are desirable. In addition, it would be highly desirable to improve estimates of dip in the presence of coherent noise.
In accordance with the present invention, a method and an article of manufacture is disclosed for locating subterranean features, faults, and contours. In one embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the steps of: accessing 3D seismic data covering a predetermined volume of the earth; dividing the volume into an array of relatively small threedimensional cells, wherein each of said cells is characterized by at least five laterally separated and generally vertical seismic traces located therein; determining in each cell the semblance/similarity of the traces relative to two predetermined directions; and displaying the semblance/similarity of each cell in the form a twodimensional map. In one embodiment, semblance/similarity is a function of time, the number of seismic traces within the cell, and the apparent dip and apparent dip azimuth of the traces within the cell; the semblance/similarity of a cell is determined by making a plurality of measurements of the semblance/similarity of the traces within the cell and selecting the largest of the measurements. In addition, the apparent dip and apparent dip azimuth, corresponding to the largest measurement of semblance/similarity in the cell, are deemed to be estimates of the true dip and true dip azimuth of the traces therein. Finally, a color map, characterized by hue, saturation and lightness, is used to depict semblance/similarity, true dip azimuth and true dip of each cell; in particular, true dip azimuth is mapped onto the hue scale, true dip is mapped onto the saturation scale, and the largest measurement of semblance/similarity is mapped onto the lightness scale of the color map.
In another embodiment of the invention, an article of manufacture is disclosed that comprises a medium that is readable by a computer and that carries instructions for the computer to perform a seismic exploration process. In one embodiment, the computer accesses 3D seismic data covering a predetermined volume of the earth and the medium instructs the computer to: divide the volume into an array of relatively small threedimensional cells, wherein each cell is characterized by at least five laterally separated and generally vertical seismic traces located therein; determine in each cell the semblance/similarity of the traces relative to two predetermined directions; and store the semblance/similarity of each cell for display in the form a twodimensional map. In one embodiment, the instructions on the medium define semblance/similarity as a function of time, the number of seismic traces within the cell, and the apparent dip and apparent dip azimuth of the traces within the cell; the semblance/similarity of a cell is determined by making a plurality of measurements of the semblance/similarity of the traces within the cell and by selecting the largest of the measurements. In addition, the apparent dip and apparent dip azimuth, corresponding to the largest measurement of semblance/similarity in the cell, are deemed to be estimates of the true dip and true dip azimuth of the traces therein. The computer comprises means for producing a color display that is characterized by hue, saturation and lightness; and the medium has instructions to map true dip azimuth onto a hue scale, true dip onto a saturation scale, and the largest measurement of semblance/similarity onto a lightness scale.
The process of the invention is particularly well suited for interpreting fault planes within a 3D seismic volume and for detecting subtle stratigraphic features in 3D. This is because seismic traces cut by a fault line generally have a different seismic character than traces on either side of the fault. Measuring multichannel coherence or trace similarity along a time slice reveals lineaments of low coherence along these fault lines. Such measures can reveal critical subsurface details that are not readily apparent on traditional seismic sections. Also by calculating trace similarity along a series of time slices, these fault lineaments identify fault planes or surfaces.
The process of the invention presents a multitrace semblance method that is generally more robust in noisy environments than a three trace cross correlation method for estimating seismic coherency. In addition, the semblance process presented in this patent application provides:
higher vertical resolution for good quality data than that of a three trace cross correlation measurement of seismic coherency;
the ability to map the 3D solid angle (dip/azimuth) of coherent events;
the ability to generalize the concept of complex “trace” attributes to one of complex “reflector” attributes; and
by combining these enhanced complex trace attributes with coherency and solid angle, the basis of quantitative 3D seismic stratigraphy data attributes that are amenable to geostatistical analysis methods.
Moreover, seismic coherency versus dip maps of picked horizons allow analysis of:
the structural and stratigraphic framework before detailed picking starts;
structural and stratigraphic features of the entire data volume, including zones that are shallower, deeper, and adjacent to the primary zone of interest;
subtle features that are not respresentable by picks on peaks and troughs; and
features internal to the top and bottom of formation or sequence boundary picks.
Coupled with coherency, data cubes of the solid angle dip of coherent seismic reflection events allow one to quickly see structural as well as stratigraphic relationships (such as onlap and offlap) between the seismic data and interpreted sequence boundaries.
Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention, the embodiments described therein, from the claims, and from the accompanying drawings.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawings (s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an arrangement of geophones to obtain 3D seismic data from the earth's subsurface for processing in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a pictorial representation of the information obtained from the data acquired using the arrangement of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a pictorial representation of a horizontal time slice (t=1200 ms) of 3D seismic data processed in accordance with the prior art;
FIGS. 4A through 4H illustrate various analysis windows (computational stars) that may be used in running window analysis of seismic coherence, dip and dip azimuth;
FIG. 5 is a pictorial representation of the process of the invention using an elliptical window centered about an analysis point;
FIGS. 6A and 6B are examples of a rectangular dip/azimuth tessellation useful when analyzing a survey having strikes and dips parallel to the acquisition axes, and when illuminating faults cutting perpendicular to a dominant reflector strike and dip (p_{O}, q_{O});
FIGS. 7A through 7C are pictorial representations of three tesselations of solid angle dip/azimuth space;
FIGS. 8A through 8D depict the mapping of 3D seismic attributes (φ,c,d) to 3D color space (H,L,S);
FIG. 9 shows four surfaces through the color hemisphere of FIG. 8A for four values of coherence;
FIGS. 10A through 10C depict ordinary vertical slices of the seismic data of FIG. 3;
FIGS. 11A through 11C depict the seismic attributes, dip, dip azimuth and coherency obtained by applying the process of the invention, to data corresponding to that of FIGS. 10A through 10C;
FIGS. 12A and 12B are time slices (t=1200 ms and t=1600 ms) through the dip azimuth cube giving rise to FIGS. 11A and 11B;
FIGS. 13A and 13B are gray scale displays of coherency;
FIGS. 14A through 14C depict coherency slices corresponding to the data of FIGS. 10A through 10C;
FIGS. 15A and 15B depict the results of applying a semblance algorithm and applying dip/azimuth algorithm in accordance with the present invention; and
FIGS. 16A and 16B are schematic diagrams depicting the processing flow of the steps performed in one embodiment of the invention.
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings, and will herein be described in detail, specific embodiments of the invention. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to any specific embodiment or algorithm described herein.
Before describing the invention in detail, an overview will be given so that the detailed description, which follows, may be better understood. One embodiment of the process of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 16A. Briefly, the method comprises the steps of: accessing 3D seismic data 10 covering a predetermined volume of the earth; dividing 12 the volume into an array of relatively small threedimensional cells, wherein each of said cells is characterized by at least five laterally separated and generally vertical seismic traces located therein; determining 14 in each cell the semblance/similarity of the traces relative to two predetermined directions; selecting 16 the largest of the measurements; and displaying 24 the semblance/similarity of each cell in the form a twodimensional map. The semblance/similarity measurements may be recorded 18 for future use, or sent 20 to an interactive workstation for further analysis; or printed or displayed as a color map 22, characterized by hue, saturation and lightness, may be used to depict semblance/similarity, true dip azimuth and true dip of each cell.
The first step of the process (See FIG. 16A) is to obtain a set of seismic data in the form of seismic signal traces distributed over a three dimensional volume of the earth. Methods by which such data is obtained and reduced to digital form for processing as 3D seismic data are known to those skilled in the art.
The Semblance Process
The next step is to generate a “coherence cube.” This is done by applying a multitrace semblance algorithm to the 3D seismic data. This algorithm may take many forms. Whatever its form, its function is to compare the similarity of nearby regions of seismic data within the 3D seismic volume. This value (or attribute) serves as a rather robust estimate of signal discontinuity within geologic formations, as well as signal discontinuities across faults and erosional unconformities.
We define an analysis grid (or computational star) to be either an elliptical or rectangular pattern of “J” traces centered about a given output trace (See FIGS. 4A through 4H).
In the drawings “X” denotes the center of the analysis window while “O” denotes additional traces used in the semblance calculation. Minimum size circular and rectangular windows used to analyze data with equal trace spacings (Δx=Δy) are shown in FIGS. 4A and 4D. Minimum circular and rectangular windows used to analyze data with trace spacing in the crossline/strike (y) direction twice that in the inline/dip (x) direction (Δy=2Δx) are shown in FIGS. 4B and 4E. Such nonequal spacings are commonly used to exploit the slower change of geology in the strike direction. Larger analysis windows used for greater resolution of reflector dip and azimuth, or to increase signal to noise ratio in poor data areas, are shown in FIGS. 4C and 4F.
Elliptical and rectangular analysis windows centered about an analysis point defined by a major axis, a minor axis, and the azimuth of major axis are shown in FIGS. 4G and 4H. The acquisition (x,y) axes are rotated by φ_{O }degrees from the NorthEast (x′, y′) axes. Such assymmetric windows are useful in fracture detection.
If we center the (x, y) axis about the center of an analysis window containing J seismic traces, u_{j}(t, x_{j}, y_{y}), we define the semblance σ(τ,p,q) to be:
where the triple (τ,p,q) defines a local planar event at time τ, and p and q are the apparent dips in the x and y directions measured in ms/m. Since, p=d sin φ and q=d cos φ, where d is the true dip and φ is the dip azimuth, it follows that:
Those skilled in the art will recognize that, in the denominator of equation (1), J serves as a normalization factor. The numerator represents the average energy and the summation term in the denominator represents the total energy of the traces. In effect, equation (1) is representative of a ratio of coherent and incoherent energy.
The objective is to perform a simultaneous 2D search (See FIG. 5) over apparent dips (p,q) in the inline and crossline directions. However, the semblance estimate given by equation (1) will be unstable for small but coherent values of seismic events, such as might occur if we were to sum along the zero crossings of a plane coherent wavelet. To avoid this, we estimate the coherence c (τ,p,q) at time τ and apparent dips (p,q) to be the average semblance over a time window (or vertical analysis window of height 2 w ms of half length K=w(Δt samples):
In general, we do not know but wish to estimate that value of (p,q) associated with the local dip and azimuth of a hypothetical 3D reflection event.
In one embodiment of the process of the invention, we estimate (p,q) through a brute force search over all possible apparent dips (See FIGS. 6A and 6B). We assume that the interpreter is able to estimate the maximum true dip, d_{max }(measured in ms/m) from conventional seismic displays of the data (e.g., vertical data slices), thereby limiting the dips to be:
If x_{max }and y_{max }are the half width and half length of a rectangular analysis window, and if f_{max }is the highest temporal frequency component contained in the seismic data, then the Nyquist criterion of sampling the data at two points per period restricts the apparent dip increments, Δp to Δq, to:
It should be noted that the Nyquist criterion is valid for linear operations on the seismic data; and that equation (2) is nonlinear. In practice, we have found it necessary to limit Δp and Δq to half that required by the Nyquist sampling criterion to obtain an accurate semblance for a coherent dipping event.
Thus, our search for an estimate of the apparent dip ({circumflex over (p)}, {circumflex over (q)}) of a seismic reflector is reduced to the calculation of semblance c(p_{l}, q_{m}) over n_{p }* n_{q }discrete apparent dip pairs (p_{l}, q_{m}) where:
The apparent dip pair (p_{l}, q_{m}) is deemed to be an estimate of the reflector apparent dips when:
for all −n_{p}<1≦+n_{p}, −n_{1}≦m≦+n_{1}.
The estimated apparent dips ({circumflex over (p)}, {circumflex over (q)}) are related to the estimated true dip d and dip azimuth {circumflex over (φ)} by the simple geometric relationships:
where {circumflex over (d)} is measured in ms/m and the angle {circumflex over (φ)} is measured clockwise from the positive x′ (or North) axis. A simple coordinate rotation by angle φ_{O }is necessary when the inline acquisition direction x is not aligned with the NS (x′) axis (See FIG. 4G).
Solid Angle Discretization and Display
Optimal angular discretization is important for two reasons: minimization of computational cost, and limitation on the number of colors that can be displayed using commercial interpretation workstation software (e.g., currently 64 with Landmark's “Seisworks” and 32 with Geoquest's “IESX” systems).
FIG. 7A shows the discretization of apparent dip using equal increments Δp and Δq in a rectangular grid of 69 angles. FIG. 7B shows the discretization using equal increments Δd and Δφ in a radial grid of 97 angles. Clearly, we do not wish to sample the dip d=0 ms/m for ten different azimuths. The “Chinese Checker” tessellation of FIG. 7C more closely represents an equal and therefore more economic sampling of the (d, φ) surface with a minimum number of points (i.e., 61 angles). Each tesselation of FIGS. 7A and 7C represents an approximately equal patch of solid angle ΔΩ. For the angular discretization shown in FIG. 7C and for a circular analysis radius, a, the incremental dip Δd is chosen to be:
Display
While it is possible to independently map semblance, dip, and azimuth, it is clear that the latter two attributes are coupled to each other. Furthermore, the confidence we have in these estimates is proportional to the coherency/semblance. Others (See U.S. Pat. No. 4,970,699 to Bucher et al. and assigned to Amoco Corporation. “Method for Color Mapping Geophysical Data”) have shown that the color HLS (hue, lightness, saturation) model can be quite effective in displaying multicomponent seismic attributes (Also see Foley, J. D. and Van Dam, A., 1891, Fundamentals of Interactive Graphics, AddisonWesley, Reading, Mass.).
Refering to FIGS. 8A through 8D, in this scheme, we directly map azimuth, φ, onto the hue axis H:
where both H (commonly known as the “color wheel”) and φ vary between −180 and +180 degrees (See FIG. 8B). Blue corresponds to North, salmon to East, yellow to South, and forest green to West azimuth. Azimuths corresponding to zero dip are arbitrarily assigned a value of 0 degrees (North) and are thus plotted as blue.
Next, we map (See FIG. 8C) average semblance/coherence c, onto the lightness axis L:
where
α is a scale constant less than 100, since changes in hue and saturation near L=0 (black) and L=100 (white) are difficult to distinguish. White, or L=100, corresponds to high semblance or c=1, while black, or L=100, corresponds to low semblance, c=0. Intermediate semblances correspond to intermediate shades of gray, (such as silver, gray and charcoal gray). Lightness (sometimes referred to as “brightness”) expresses the amount of illumination. It represents a gray scale ranging from black to white.
Finally, we map dip d onto the saturation axis S:
The saturation (S=0) and hue chosen are arbitrary; we could just as easily have displayed this attribute for a value of (H=0, S=100) giving us semblance displayed as white, pastel blue, pure blue, midnight blue and black. Saturation expresses the lack of dilution of a color by white light. A fully saturated color has no white added; adding white “washes out” the color without changing its hue. (See FIG. 8D).
FIG. 9 illustrates four constant surfaces through the 3D (H,L,S) color hemisphere of (φc, d) shown in FIG. 8A, corresponding to c=100, c=0.75, c=0.50 and c=0.00.
Appendix 1 describes the color scheme in greater detail. Some advantages of the HLS color model are: azimuth is cyclic and maps neatly to the cyclic color wheel (hue); the azimuths corresponding to d=0 are meaningless; all azimuths converge smoothly to gray for shallow dips; and lower confidence in estimating dip and azimuth in zones of weak, low semblance (such as across faults) is indicated by darker colors.
Implementation of Mathematical Process
Landmark and GeoQuest interpretive workstations (See FIG. 16B), for example, can be used to view and interpret faults and stratigraphic features by loading the processed data as a seismic volume. Visualization software (e.g., Landmark's SeisCube software) may be employed to rapidly slice through the seismic volume to aid in understanding complex fault relationships.
Computer Program
A FORTRAN 77 program was written to perform the calculations and provide the information for the displays previously described. Additional details are given in Appendix 2. Each trace U_{MN }is accessed by its inline and crossline indices, M and N. The user specifies a rectangular or an elliptical spatial analysis window or cell about each point/trace in the input data set (See FIG. 4G). The major and minor axis of this analysis window, a and b are given by a=aplength and b=apwidth. The orientation or azimuth of the major axis φ_{a }is given by φ_{a}=apazim. A rectangular analysis window (FIG. 4H) is indicated by specifying −R on the command line. The 2J indices relative to the center of this analysis window (and corresponding to the traces that fall within this window) are tabulated as a simple list, with m(j) and n(j) indicating the trace index (relative to the analysis trace U_{MN}) in the x and y directions, respectively. The program performs a simultaneous 2D search over apparent dips (p,q) in the inline and crossline directions, where (p^{2}+q^{2})^{1/2}<+smax. The increments dp and dq are chosen such that the data are sampled at four points per period<1/(fref) at the edge of the analysis window. For interpretation, it may be convenient to express each apparent dip pair (p,q) in spherical coordinates as a true (time or depth) dip d and dip azimuth φ.
The data in the analysis window are interpolated to the fractional time, τ−px−qy, for each trial dip and azimuth (See FIG. 5), in essence, “flattening” of data. The semblance for this trial dip at the analysis point is defined to be the semblance of these flattened traces in the analysis window.
For time domain data, we flatten the jth trace about the analysis point (M,N) by:
where x and y are distances measured from the center of the analysis window. This may be expressed
where Δx and Δy are the inline and crossline trace spacings.
For depth domain data we flatten the jth trace using:
The semblance is ;then calculated for all subsequent dips and azimuths using:
As in velocity analysis, the semblance for each dip, azimuth and analysis point are smoothed by forming a running window time integration over the partial sums from −K to +K where K=apheight/dt. We therefore define the coherence, c(τ,p,q) to be:
That dip and azimuth pair Ω=(d, φ) which has the maximum (running window integrated) coherency c is taken to be an estimate of the coherency, {overscore (c)}, dip and azimuth ({circumflex over (d)}, {circumflex over (φ)}) for the analysis point.
FIGS. 11A through 11C are displays of the 3D seismic attributes (φ, c, d) corresponding to FIGS. 10A through 10C using the semblance based coherency algorithm expressed by equation (6), and the color display technique depicted in FIGS. 8 and 9. The input data were temporarily sampled at 4 ms, have an inline trace spacing of Δx=12.5 m, and have a crossline trace spacing of Δy=25 m, with the inline acquisition oriented along a NS axis. For FIGS. 11A through 11C, a circular analysis window or cell of a=b=60 m was used (See FIG. 4A), so as to include a total of 11 traces in the calculation. The maximum search dip (See FIG. 7C) was d_{max}=0.25 ms/m, giving rise to 61 search angles. The temporal integration time used was w=16 ms, or K=4, thereby averaging the semblance calculation over 9 samples.
In FIGS. 10A and 10B lines AA′ and BB′ were chosen as S to N and W to E vertical slices through the center of a salt dome. Line CC″ is an offset S to N line and illustrates the appearance of radial faults on a vertical slice. In FIGS. 11A through 11C, the interior of the salt dome is represented by dark colors, corresponding to an area of generally low coherency. Low areas of coherency correspond to the radial faults seen on line CC″. Coherent, flat dips are represented as light gray and dominate the section away from the salt dome, in particular line CC″. The blue color on the north side of the salt dome (seen on NS line AA′) corresponds to sediments dipping steeply (D=D_{max}) to the North. These dips become progressively shallower away from the salt dome, and are thus displayed first as blue (saturation, S=100.0), cadet blue (S=0.75) and steel blue (S=0.50), before they flatten and are displayed as gray (S=0.0). The yellow color on the south side of the salt dome (seen on line AA′) corresponds to sediments dipping steeply to the South. The salmon color on the East flank of the salt dome (shown on the EW line BB′) corresponds to sediments dipping steeply to the East. These dips also become progressively shallow away from the salt dome, and are displayed first as salmon (S=100.00), through sienna (S=50.0), and finally to gray, corresponding to flat dip. Finally, the forest green color on the West flank of the salt dome (shown on line AA′) corresponds to sediments dipping steeply to the West. These dips also flatten away from the salt dome and are displayed using the colors shown on the West part of the legend shown in FIG. 9. NS line CC′ is not aligned radially with the salt dome. Thus, outoftheplane rotation of different fault blocks are depicted, with the green block corresponding to dips to the SW and the cyan block with dips to the NW.
Since these 3D attributes were calculated for every point on the input seismic volume, they can be displayed as horizontal attribute time slices (See FIGS. 12A and 12B); these correspond to a time slice of the unprocessed seismic data. The interior of the salt dome, as well as the radial faults are displayed as dark colors, corresponding to incoherent zones of the data. Because of the nearly radial symmetry of the salt diapir at t=1,200 ms (See FIG. 12A), the dipping sediments that flank the diapir also radiate outward in an azimuthally simple fashion such that their azimuths correspond quite closely to the color legend on the left side of FIG. 9. This pattern is somewhat less symmetric at t=1,600 ms (See FIG. 12B), where there are shallower dips to the South than to the North. In addition, internal blocks of coherent data can be seen within the salt dome.
The color legend displayed in FIG. 9 allows for only four “buckets” of coherency. In order to examine the coherency in greater detail, it can be plotted as a single attribute. This is shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B where all 184 colors are applied to the simple gray scale shown of FIG. 8C. In this display, maximum coherency (c=1.0) is rendered as white; minimum coherency (c=0.0) is rendered as black. While the interior of the salt diapir is shown as a highly incoherent zone, this display better shows subtle details in the radial faults patterns. In particular, faults emanating from the salt dome are shown, with some bifurcating as we move away. In addition to more continuous binning of the coherency attribute, part of this difference in perception is due to the fact that the human retina sees colors and black and white using different (cone vs. rod) receptors. There is also a physiological difference in the ability to differentiate between greens and blues between male and female populations. For this reason, male interpreters often prefer the simple single attribute coherency display shown in FIGS. 13A, 13B and FIG. 15A over the multiattribute (φ,c,d) display shown in FIGS. 11A through 12B and FIG. 15B. In actuality, these displays are quite complimentary: the 3D component display being useful in recognizing the appearance of conflicting dips azimuths between adjacent rotated fault blocks; and the single component display being used to enhance the edge, or incoherent fault discontinuity, separating them.
Process Considerations
Careful study of FIGS. 13A and 13B reveals a ringlike pattern of incoherent energy circumscribing the salt dome. To investigate the cause of these artifacts, vertical slices were taken through the single component coherency cube corresponding to the seismic data in FIGS. 10A through 10C. This is shown in FIGS. 14A through 14C. The interior of the salt dome is clearly incoherent. An incoherent submarine canyon feature (described by Nissen et al., “3D Seismic Coherency Techniques Applied to the Identification and Delineation of Slump Features”, 1995 SEG Expanded Abstracts, pages 15321534) is shown to the north of the salt dome. If the seismic data shown in FIGS. 10A through 10C were overlayed on the coherency section shown in FIGS. 14A through 14C, one would see a close correspondence between areas of low coherency of FIGS. 14A through 14C with zero crossings of the seismic reflection events in FIGS. 10A through 10C. This is easily understood if it is assumed that there is a fixed, but incoherent, level of seismic noise throughout the data. For analysis points where the apparent dips are aligned with the peaks or troughs of strong amplitude seismic reflectors (such that the estimate of signal energy is high with respect to the incoherent noise), one can expect the signaltonoise ratio to be high, giving rise to an estimate of high coherency. However, if, our analysis point is such that there are apparent dips aligned with the zero crossings of these same seismic reflectors, such that the signal is low with respect to our incoherent noise, one can expect the signaltonoise ratio to be low, giving rise to a low estimate of coherency.
We have found three methods for increasing the signaltonoise ratio: the first more appropriate for structural analysis; the second more appropriate for stratigraphic analysis, and the third appropriate for both.
For the case of steeply dipping (less than 45 degrees from the vertical) faults, the signaltonoise ratio can be increased by simply increasing the size of our vertical analysis window w given in equation (2). Two effects will be observed. First, the structural leakage corresponding to the zero crossing points of the reflectors diminishes as vertical integration window size increases. Second, since few of the faults are truly vertical, the lateral resolution of the faults appears to decrease as the vertical window size increases. An analysis window of w=16 ms (which would encompass a full cycle of the peak 30 Hz energy in the data) appears to be in good compromise.
The second method (equally appropriate for stratigraphic and structural analysis) of increasing the signaltonoise ratio, is to extract coherency along an interpreted stratigraphic horizon. If this stratigraphic horizon is associated with an extremum of the seismic data, such as a peak or trough, those data having only a relatively high signaltonoise ratio are selectively displayed. Clearly, extracting coherency data corresponding to a zero crossing would greatly exacerbate the coherency display. A more economic version of this approach is to first flatten the data along the horizon of interest and then calculate the seismic attributes only along the picked horizon. This approach is somewhat more sensitive to busts in automatic (and human!) pickers, since cycle skip glitches in the picking are somewhat random and therefore will almost always appear as incoherent.
Shallow features (e.g., shallow channels; shallow tidal channel features corresponding to reworked deltaic sands; and small en echelon faulting) do not exist for any distance above or below an interpreted stratigraphic horizon; therefore, the inclusion of any data from above or below the horizon in which they are located adds uncorrelated amplitude variations, thereby making these discontinuities look more coherent, and hence washed out. If the time samples above or below the interpreted horizon contain independent, perhaps strong amplitude discontinuities, these discontinuities will bleed into the analysis for large windows, giving a stratigraphic horizon containing features mixed from stratigraphic different horizons generated at different geologic times.
The third method is a generalization of the original collection of seismic traces u_{j }to that of an analytic trace v_{j }defined as:
where u_{j} ^{H}(t) is the quadrature, or Hilbert transform of u_{j}(t), and i denotes {square root over (−1)}. The calculation of σ(τ,p,q) and c(τ,p,q) is entirely analogous to equations (1) and (2), where we note that the definition of v_{j} ^{2 }is given by
The third method avoids numerical instabilities in the semblance estimate of equation (1) at the “zerocrossings” of an otherwise strong reflector.
The Effect of the Horizontal Analysis Window
By examining equation (2), it is clear that the computational cost of analysis increases linearly with the number of traces included in the analysis. However, by comparing a semblance based 11trace coherency time slice with those of a 3trace cross correlation coherency time slice, (where each has an identical vertical analysis window of w=32 ms) one is led to believe that adding more traces to the computation can increase the signaltonoise ratio. In general, the signal to noise ratio increases as we increase the size of the analysis window. However, the overall coherency decreases somewhat (one sees less white), since the approximation of a possibly curving reflector by a constant (p,q) planar event breaks down as we increase the window size. In general, the signaltonoise ratio of dip/azimuth estimates increases with the number of traces in the calculation, until a point is reached whereby the locally planar reflector approximation no longer holds.
Conclusions
The 3D semblance technique presented in this patent application provides an excellent measurement of seismic coherency. By using an arbitrary size analysis window, we are able to balance the conflicting requirements of maximizing lateral resolution and signaltonoise ratio that is not possible when using a fixed three trace cross correlation technique. Accurate measurements of coherency can be achieved by using a short temporal (vertical) integration window that is on the order of the shortest period in the data, whereas a zero mean cross correlation technique preferably is used with an integration window that is greater than the longest period in the data. Thus, the semblance process results in less vertical smearing of geology than a cross correlation process, even for large spatial analysis windows (See FIGS. 15A and 15B). Equally important to the coherence estimate, the semblance process provides a direct means of estimating the 3D solid angle (dip and azimuth) of each reflector event. These solid angle maps may or may not be related to conventional time structure maps defining formation boundaries. Like the basic coherency process of Bahorich and Farmer (e.g., cross correlation), estimation of the instantaneous dip/azimuth cube can be achieved prior to any interpretation of the data for use in a gross overview of the geologic setting. In this reconnaissance mode, the coherency and instantaneous dip/azimuth cubes allow the user to pick key dip and strike lines crossing important structural or sedimentologic features very early in the interpretation phase of a project. In an interpretation mode, these dips and azimuths may be related to formation and/or sequence boundaries, such that one can map progradation and transgression patterns of the internal structure in 3D. Finally, having estimated the instantaneous dip and azimuth at every point in the data cube, one can apply conventional seismic trace attributes to locally planar reflectors, thereby greatly increasing signaltonoise ratios.
From the foregoing description, it will be observed that numerous variations, alternatives and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the manner of carrying out the invention. Other algorithms may be used to measure the similarity of nearby regions of seismic data or to generate the “discontinuity cube.” Moreover, equivalent computations may be substituted for those illustrated and described. For example, instead of a search over apparant dips p and q, one could search over dip and azimuth (d, φ). The inverse of the computed semblance may be used so as to obtain a display analogous to the negative of a photograph. Also certain features of the invention may be used independently of other features of the invention. For example, after the solid angle (dip and azimuth) has been estimated, a smoother and more robust multitrace estimate of the conventional complex trace attributes (Taner, M. T., Koehler, F., and Sheriff, R. E.; 1979; “Complex Seismic Trace Analysis;” Geophysics, 44, 10411063) may be obtained. Instead of calculating these attributes on a single trace, one can calculate attributes of the angle stack of traces within the analysis window. That is, one can calculate:
and
where
(See the numerator of equation 1);
U^{H}(τ,p,q) is the Hilbert transform, or quadrature component of U(τ, p, q);
a_{i}(τ,p,q) is the envelope, or instantaneous amplitude;
Ψ_{i}(τ,p,q) is the instantaneous phase;
f_{i}(τ,p,q) is the instantaneous frequency; and
b_{i}(τ,p,q) is the instantaneous bandwidth (See Cohen, L.; 1993; “Instantaneous Anything;” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, 4, 105109).
In addition to these “instantaneous” attributes, other attributes are suggested to characterize the signal within a given lobe of the trace envelope to be that of the attribute at the peak of the envelope τ_{θ}. These include (See Bodine, J. H.; 1994; “Waveform Analysis with Seismic Attributes;” presented in the 54th Ann. Intl. Mtg. SEG. Atlanta, Ga., USA):
the wavelet envelope:
the wavelet phase:
the wavelet frequency:
the wavelet bandwidth:
the zero phase component:
the ninety degree phase component:
as well as skewness, rise time, and response length. Since mixing occurs along the true dip direction, slowly varying amplitude, phase, frequency, and bandwidth components of the event will be preserved. Moreover, the computation of coherency/semblance/similarity allows one to perform “texture analysis” of similar seismic regions. Texture analysis combined with “cluster analysis” leads to segmentation analysis. Among other things, this allows one to make geologic correlations and extrapolate the geological character of the subsurface. In addition, determination of the coherency may be used to impose a priori constraints for both poststack and prestack seismic inversion. Thus, it will be appreciated that various modifications, alternatives, variations, and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications involved within the scope of the claims.
APPENDIX 1  
MULTIATTRIBUTE HLS CALIBRATION  
direction  φ (hue)  Crayola Color  
The hues are pure, or 100% saturated colors, and correspond to the  
following 1994 nontoxic 96 crayon “Crayola” standard:  
N  0  blue  
NNE  30  plum  
ENE  60  magenta  
E  90  salmon  
ESE  120  red  
SSE  150  orangered  
S  180  yellow  
SSW  210  limegreen  
WSW  240  green  
W  270  forestgreen  
WNW  300  cyan  
NNW  330  cerulean  
N  360  blue  
Partial 50% saturation corresponds to “dirtier” or “muddier” colors:  
N  0  cadet blue  
NE  45  fuscia  
E  90  maroon  
SE  135  sepia  
S  180  gold  
SW  225  olive  
W  270  sea green  
NW  315  steel blue  
N  360  cadet blue  
0% saturation corresponds to no color pigment:  
N  0  gray  
E  90  gray  
S  180  gray  
W  270  gray  
N  360  gray  
Low values of lightness correspond to “dark” colors; intermediate values of lightness correspond to “deep” colors, and high values of lightness correspond to “pastel” colors. 
APPENDIX 2 
SYNOPSIS 
\semb3d [Nfile_in] [Ofile_out] [hisfile_his] [tstarttstart] [tendtend] 
[ildmdx] [cldmdy] [aplengthaplength] [apwidthapwidth] 
[apheightapheight] [apazimapazim] [llazlmxazim] [clazimyazim] 
[dzdz] [smaxsmax] [pminpmin] [pmaxpmax] [qminqmin] 
[qmaxqmax] [threshthresh] [freffref] [startlinestartline] 
[endlineendline] [exppower] [min] [int] [R] 
DESCRIPTION 
semb3d reads in 3D seismic post stack time or depth data and generates 
semblance, dip and azimuth outputs. 
COMMAND LINE ARGUMENTS 
semb3d gets all its parameters from command line arguments. These 
arguments specify the input, output, spatial analysis window, and dip 
discretization parameters. The following command line arguments have 
been used in one embodiment of the invention. 
Nfile_ in 
Enter the input data set name or file immediately after typing N. This 
input file should include the complete path name if the file resides in a 
different directory. Example: N/export/data2/san_ juan/time_ stack tells 
the program to look for file ‘time_ stack’ in directory 
‘/export/data2/san_ juan’. For this program, the data is stored 
as a rectangular grid of regularly binned data. The number of traces 
(denoted by lineheader word ‘NumTrc’) defines the number of traces 
in the ‘x’ direction. The number of records (seismic lines denoted 
by lineheader word ‘NumRec’) defines the number of traces in the ‘y’ 
direction. Missing data padded in with dead traces flagged by a dead 
trace header flag. 
Ofile_ out 
Enter the output multiattribute data set name or file immediately after 
typing O. Attributes will be output back to back, line by line. Without 
scaling the semblance c will range between 0.0 and 1.0. The values of dip 
will range between 0 and smax and will always be positive (pointing 
down). Units are in msec/m (msec/ft) for time data, or m/m (ft/ft) for 
depth data. The azimuth φ is perpendicular to strike and points in the 
direction of maximum positive dip (pointing down). The values of azimuth 
will range between 0 and 360 degrees. Properly defined, an output azimuth 
of 0. degrees corresponds to North, while an output azimuth of 90 degrees 
corresponds to East. The values of OMEGA = (d, φ) can be chosen 
such that (when converted to an 8 bit integer) the left most 6 bits 
correspond to a valid Seisworks color table. This color table corresponds 
to the HLS color model previously described and is generated using a 
program that maps the angles scanned into an HLS (hue, lightness, 
saturation) color map of OMEGA = (d, φ). 
hls file_ hls 
Enter hls followed by the hls table file name to output an ascii flat 
file containing the hue, lightness and saturation of each sample contained 
in the output. This file is input to a program to generate a RGB (red, 
green, blue) color lookup table needed for a proper display on certain 
workstations. 
tstarttstart 
Enter tstart followed by the beginning of the analysis window in msec. 
tendtend 
Enter tend followed by the end of the analysis window in msec. The 
output record will be (tend − tstart) msec long. 
ildmdx 
After ildm enter the inline distance measure (trace separation) in m 
(ft). 
cldmdy 
After cldm enter the crossline distance measure (line separation) in m 
(ft). 
dzdz 
After dz enter the vertical depth sample increment in m (ft). A value of 
dz >0 indicates the data are in depth. 
aplengthaplength 
After aplength enter the half aperture length (in meters or feet) along 
the azimuth of the elliptical analysis window to be used. Increasing the 
analysis window by increasing aplength, apwidth will result in: 
(1) increased angular resolution, 
(2) decreased spatial resolution, 
(3) increased computational cost; and 
(4) decreased overall coherency (since the plane wave approximation is 
less valid. 
apwidthapwidth 
After apwidth enter the half half aperture width (in meters or feet) 
perpendicular to the azimuth of the elliptical analysis window to be used. 
apheightapheight 
After apheight enter the half length in milliseconds (or meters or feet) of 
the running time (depth) integration window applied over the semblance. 
Example = ±2 samples. Increasing the temporal integration window 
apheight will result in: 
(1) a smoothed, less noisy response, 
(2) decreased vertical resolution, and 
(3) no change in computational cost. 
apazimapazim 
After apazim enter the azimuth of the elliptical analysis window (with 0 
being North and 90 being East). 
smaxsmax 
After smax enter the maximum dip to be tested in msec/m (msec/ft) for 
time data, or in m/m (ft/ft) for depth data. This is recommended when 
there is no preferential strike direction in the data. This value can be 
read directly from a section display of the data. smax will be on the 
order of .30 msec/m (10 msec/ft) for time data. Increasing the value of 
smax beyond any true dips results in significantly increased computational 
cost for an identical result. 
pminpmin 
After pmin enter the minimum inline (increasing trace number) dip to be 
tested in msec/m (msec/ft) for time data, or in m/m (ft/ft) for depth data. 
This is recommended when there is a predominant strike direction parallel 
or perpendicular to the data acquisition lines. This value can be read 
directly from a section display of the data. 
pmaxpmax 
After pmax enter the maximum inline (increasing trace number) dip to be 
tested in msec/m (msec/ft) for time data, or in m/m (ft/ft) for depth data. 
This is recommended when there is a predominant strike direction parallel 
or perpendicular to the data acquisition lines. This value can be read 
directly from a section display of the data. Enter this command line 
argument to define a rectangular (2*aplength by 2*apwidth) vs. elliptical 
analysis window oriented along the azimuth axis. 
qminqmin 
After qmin enter the minimum crossline (increasing line number) dip to 
be tested in msec/m (msec/ft) for time data, or in m/m (ft/ft) for depth 
data. This is recommended when there is a predominant strike direction 
parallel or perpendicular to the data acquisition lines. This value can 
be read directly from a section display of the data. 
qmaxqmax 
After qmax enter the maximum crossline (increasing line number) dip to 
be tested in msec/m (msec/ft) for time data, or in m/m (ft/ft) for depth 
data. This is recommended when there is a predominant strike direction 
parallel or perpendicular to the data acquisition lines. This value can 
be read directly from a section display of the data 
threshthresh 
After thresh enter the threshhold or cutoff semblance value, below which 
dip and azimuth are considered to be valid measures; below this value 
shades of gray will be displayed. Some display software limits the number 
of colors available for display. 
freffref 
After fref enter the reference frequency in cycles/sec (Hz) for time 
data, or in cycles/km (cycles/kft) used in determining the number of 
dips to be searched (e.g., fref = 60 Hz for time data, 30 cycles/km 
for depth data). 
ilazimilazim 
After ilazim enter the inline azimuth (0 degrees being North, 90 
degrees being East) that is the azimuth of increasing trace number. This 
value is used to calibrate a solid angle output file, if used. 
clazimclazim 
After clazim enter the crossline azimuth (0 degrees being North, 90 
degrees being East) that is the azimuth of increasing line numbers. This 
value is used to calibrate the solid angle output file, if used. 
exppower 
After exp enter the exponent to be applied for nonlinear scaling of the 
semblance. In general, most semblance/coherency values will be between 
0.8 and 1.0. Scaling with power = 2.0 would map these values between 
.64 and 1.0, scaling with power = 4.0 would map these values between 
.41 and 1.0, and so forth. This is useful for loading data to an 
interpretive workstation. 
startlinestartline 
After startline enter the first output line to be generated. 
endlineendline 
After endline enter the last output line to be generated. 
min 
After min enter this command line argument to extract the dip, azimuth, 
and semblance corresponding to the minimum semblance of the angles 
searched. (As a default, the program searches for the maximum semblance 
or coherency). 
int 
Enter this command line argument to scale output such that it can be 
represented by an 8 bit integer ranging between −128 and +127. Useful for 
loading data to an interpretive workstation. 
Claims (175)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US08353934 US5563949A (en)  19941212  19941212  Method of seismic signal processing and exploration 
US503295 true  19951006  19951006  
US08707674 US5930730A (en)  19941212  19960913  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration 
US09918420 USRE38229E1 (en)  19941212  20010727  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration 
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US09918420 USRE38229E1 (en)  19941212  20010727  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration 
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date  

US08707674 Reissue US5930730A (en)  19941212  19960913  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration 
Publications (1)
Publication Number  Publication Date 

USRE38229E1 true USRE38229E1 (en)  20030819 
Family
ID=27738958
Family Applications (1)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US09918420 Expired  Lifetime USRE38229E1 (en)  19941212  20010727  Method and apparatus for seismic signal processing and exploration 
Country Status (1)
Country  Link 

US (1)  USRE38229E1 (en) 
Cited By (31)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US20030055598A1 (en) *  20010629  20030320  Dominique Gillard  Method for analyzing dip in seismic data volumes 
US20030200030A1 (en) *  19980911  20031023  Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S.  Method of processing acquired seismic data 
US20030231548A1 (en) *  20020613  20031218  Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company  Method of calculating a throw volume for quantitative fault analysis 
US6754587B1 (en) *  19990719  20040622  Henning Trappe  Method for processing seismic data 
US20040148148A1 (en) *  20030128  20040729  Phillips Petroleum Company  Well planning using seismic coherence 
US6865521B1 (en) *  20030129  20050308  Michael John Padgett  Method for horizon binning for an area of interest 
US20050125203A1 (en) *  20031003  20050609  Hartman Robert P.A.  Method, device, computer program and data carrier for modeling a multidimensional heterogeneous structure, using a digital processing unit 
US20060279569A1 (en) *  20001030  20061214  Mark Acosta  System and method for analyzing and imaging threedimensional volume data sets 
WO2007023080A2 (en) *  20050824  20070301  Statoil Asa  Seismic data processing 
US20080015784A1 (en) *  20060621  20080117  Terraspark Geosciences, L.P.  Extraction of Depositional Systems 
US20080024512A1 (en) *  20030728  20080131  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for realtime corendering of multiple attributes 
US20080165186A1 (en) *  20070105  20080710  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for visualizing multiple volumetric data sets in real time 
US20080165185A1 (en) *  20070105  20080710  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for selectively imaging objects in a display of multiple threedimensional dataobjects 
US7436735B2 (en)  20011108  20081014  Compagnie Generale De Geophysique  Method for seismic processing, in particular for compensating birefringence on seismic traces 
WO2008154341A1 (en)  20070607  20081218  Paradigm Geophysical Ltd.  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
US20090303233A1 (en) *  20080606  20091210  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and Methods for Imaging a ThreeDimensional Volume of Geometrically Irregular Grid Data Representing a Grid Volume 
US7702463B2 (en)  20071212  20100420  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for enhancing a seismic data image 
WO2010076638A2 (en) *  20081230  20100708  Schlumberger Technology Bv  Paleoneighborhood hydrocarbon spatial system 
US7796468B2 (en) *  20040226  20100914  Saudi Arabian Oil Company  Prediction of shallow drilling hazards using seismic refraction data 
US20110063947A1 (en) *  20090327  20110317  Norris Michael W  Zero offset profile from nearfield hydrophones 
US20110091078A1 (en) *  20070831  20110421  Josselin Kherroubi  Identifying geological features in an image of an underground formation surrounding a borehole 
US20110115787A1 (en) *  20080411  20110519  Terraspark Geosciences, Llc  Visulation of geologic features using data representations thereof 
US8022947B2 (en)  20060901  20110920  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging waveform volumes 
US8120991B2 (en) *  20061103  20120221  Paradigm Geophysical (Luxembourg) S.A.R.L.  System and method for full azimuth angle domain imaging in reduced dimensional coordinate systems 
US20130262061A1 (en) *  20120328  20131003  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Seismic attribute color model transform 
US8780132B1 (en) *  20090321  20140715  Charles Saron Knobloch  Enhanced assimilation of orientationdependent data in a multidimensional data volume 
WO2015079322A2 (en)  20131126  20150604  Newuro, B.V.  Bladder tissue modification for overactive bladder disorders 
US9171391B2 (en)  20070727  20151027  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging a volumeofinterest 
WO2016071728A1 (en) *  20141103  20160512  Cgg Services Sa  Systems and methods for vortex calculation as attribute for geologic discontinuities 
US20170192118A1 (en) *  20160105  20170706  Schlumerger Technology Corporation  Amplitude Inversion on Partitioned Depth Image Gathers Using Point Spread Functions 
US9728003B1 (en)  20091023  20170808  Paradigm Sciences Ltd.  Systems and methods for coordinated editing of seismic data in dual model 
Citations (81)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

SU172065A1  
US3571787A (en)  19670613  19710323  Texas Instruments Inc  Method and system for automatic seismic reflection picking 
US3599175A (en)  19690912  19710810  Petty Geophysical Eng Co  System and methods of processing seismic data and the like 
US3614623A (en)  19690421  19711019  North American Rockwell  Adaptive system for correction of distortion of signals in transmission of digital data 
US3622967A (en)  19681107  19711123  Mobil Oil Corp  Optimum stack 
US3638178A (en)  19691201  19720125  Chevron Res  Method for processing threedimensional seismic data to select and plot said data on a twodimensional display surface 
US3714621A (en)  19701230  19730130  Continental Oil Co  Method and apparatus for seismic gain control through seismic signal coherence 
US3787855A (en)  19661230  19740122  Texas Instruments Inc  Coherent digital radar target signal enhancement 
US3931609A (en)  19730214  19760106  Seiscom Delta, Inc.  Threedimensional seismic display 
US3961306A (en)  19711028  19760601  Seiscom Delta Inc.  Method of forming color graphic displays from input data 
US4223399A (en)  19780712  19800916  Union Oil Company Of California  Seismic exploration method 
GB2066467A (en)  19791217  19810708  Geophysique Cie Gle  Process and an apparatus for seismic geophysics with processing by focuses 
US4279026A (en)  19780831  19810714  Cities Service Company  Seismographic data color display 
US4298968A (en)  19651227  19811103  Mobil Oil Corporation  Digital reflection searching and section plotting 
US4393488A (en)  19781008  19830712  Chevron Research Company  Exploration system and method of determining elastic parameters and subsurface shape of an earth formation so as to indicate likelihood of the formation being an ore, marker rock, economic mineral or the like 
US4403312A (en)  19801230  19830906  Mobil Oil Corporation  Threedimensional seismic data gathering method 
GB2132350A (en)  19821130  19840704  Seismograph Service  Data filter 
US4467461A (en)  19810105  19840821  Conoco Inc.  Interactive color analysis of geophysical data 
US4503527A (en)  19810330  19850305  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for enhancement of the signaltonoise ratio in seismic reflection signals 
EP0181216A2 (en)  19841108  19860514  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Method for automatically producing representations of threedimensional horizons from processed seismic data 
US4633401A (en)  19841108  19861230  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Method and apparatus for automatically determining pairs of turnings related to the same seismic event in adjacent seismic traces 
US4633400A (en)  19841221  19861230  Conoco Inc.  Method for waveform feature extraction from seismic signals 
US4661935A (en)  19840917  19870428  Phillips Petroleum Company  Seismic data processing 
US4683556A (en)  19850227  19870728  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for identifying arrival times of waveforms on acoustic borehole well logs 
US4695984A (en)  19841224  19870922  Exxon Production Research Company  Method for establishing a surface consistent correction for the effects of the low velocity layer in seismic data processing 
USH374H (en)  19870209  19871103  The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army  Optimum multiple target detection and resolution 
US4713775A (en)  19850821  19871215  Teknowledge, Incorporated  Intelligent assistant for using and operating computer system capabilities to solve problems 
US4729101A (en)  19850509  19880301  Standard Oil Company  Method for identifying and separating the effects of elastic and anelastic formation properties in seismic data 
US4736347A (en)  19840518  19880405  Bernard Goldberg  Multiple stacking and spatial mapping of seismic data 
US4745550A (en)  19850816  19880517  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Processing of oriented patterns 
US4779237A (en)  19840827  19881018  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration including processing and displaying seismic data to obtain a measure of subterranean formation rock properties 
US4799200A (en)  19851021  19890117  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Method of acoustically detecting fractures in a borehole 
US4799201A (en)  19831216  19890117  Hydroacoustics, Inc.  Methods and apparatus for reducing correlation sidelobe interference in seismic profiling systems 
US4800539A (en)  19851216  19890124  Conoco Inc.  Method and apparatus for seismic dip filtering 
US4809240A (en)  19870624  19890228  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for interpreting seismic data 
US4813026A (en)  19871127  19890314  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for logarithmic analysis of seismic reflection signals 
US4829487A (en)  19880506  19890509  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for restoring seismic data using crosscorrelation 
US4839869A (en)  19861006  19890613  Shell Oil Company  Methods for processing converted wave seismic data 
US4843599A (en)  19870928  19890627  Amoco Corporation  Method for continuous color mapping of seismic data 
US4849887A (en)  19870828  19890718  Amoco Corporation  Horizon velocity analysis 
US4866659A (en)  19840406  19890912  Pennzoil Company  Method for selection of mining and drilling sites using synthesized three dimensional seismic data 
US4878204A (en)  19881028  19891031  Geophysical Service, Inc.  Method for trueamplitude dip moveout correction 
US4881207A (en)  19870507  19891114  Insitut Francais Du Petrole  Seismic prospection method providing improved knowledge of the geological discontinuities of the subsoil 
US4884248A (en)  19880125  19891128  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method of restoring seismic data 
US4894807A (en)  19880616  19900116  Western Atlas International, Inc.  Simultaneous verticalseismic profiling and surface seismic acquisition method 
US4916615A (en)  19860714  19900410  Conoco Inc.  Method for stratigraphic correlation and reflection character analysis of setsmic signals 
US4951266A (en)  19890428  19900821  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Method of filtering sonic well logging data 
US4951264A (en)  19860516  19900821  University Of Miami  Method of measuring the shear modulus profile of a seabed 
US4964087A (en)  19861208  19901016  Western Atlas International  Seismic processing and imaging with a drillbit source 
US4964088A (en)  19891031  19901016  Conoco Inc.  Method for tomographically laterally varying seismic data velocity estimation 
US4970699A (en)  19890213  19901113  Amoco Corporation  Method for color mapping geophysical data 
US4984220A (en)  19890306  19910108  Amoco Corporation  Geophysical exploration using velocity spectra regional coherency peaks 
US5008861A (en)  19890306  19910416  Amoco Corporation  Geophysical exploration by automatically picking and associating stacked seismic sections with regional coherency peaks of velocity spectra 
US5031155A (en)  19890428  19910709  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Compression and reconstruction of sonic data 
US5047991A (en)  19890428  19910910  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Lithology identification using sonic data 
US5047933A (en)  19880226  19910910  Chevron Research Company  Full wave form restoration of optically digitized seismic traces 
US5051960A (en)  19900716  19910924  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method of removing records of multiple reflection events from seismic data 
US5056066A (en)  19900625  19911008  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method for attribute tracking in seismic data 
US5079703A (en)  19900220  19920107  Atlantic Richfield Company  3dimensional migration of irregular grids of 2dimensional seismic data 
US5105356A (en)  19890714  19920414  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for curve correlation 
US5130951A (en)  19900808  19920714  Atlantic Richfield Company  Method for reducing noise effects in acoustic signals transmitted along a pipe structure 
US5132938A (en)  19910731  19920721  Shell Oil Company  Adjusting seismic data to tie to other data 
US5136553A (en)  19901219  19920804  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration 
US5148494A (en)  19890428  19920915  Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine  Process for automatic plotting and assistance interpretation of seismic crosssections in particular using image analysis techniques 
US5150332A (en)  19900821  19920922  Geco A.S.  Method of assigning a seismic trace 
US5153858A (en)  19910709  19921006  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method for finding horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5179518A (en)  19890804  19930112  Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine (Production)  Method of processing seismic reflection data in order to obtain improved seismic sections 
US5181171A (en)  19900920  19930119  Atlantic Richfield Company  Adaptive network for automated first break picking of seismic refraction events and method of operating the same 
US5189643A (en)  19920305  19930223  Conoco Inc.  Method of accurate fault location using common reflection point gathers 
US5191526A (en)  19880718  19930302  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for removing coherent noise from seismic data 
US5226019A (en)  19920110  19930706  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration 
US5245587A (en)  19901214  19930914  Hutson William H  Multidimensional signal processing and display 
US5251184A (en)  19910709  19931005  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method and apparatus for finding horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5265192A (en)  19900920  19931123  Atlantic Richfield Company  Method for the automated editing of seismic traces using an adaptive network 
US5295086A (en)  19891207  19940315  Jeol Ltd.  Method of producing noise free frequency spectrum signals 
US5299576A (en)  19911129  19940405  Fujitsu Limited  Ultrasonic synthetic aperture diagnostic apparatus 
US5309360A (en)  19910523  19940503  Halliburton Geophysical Services, Inc.  Method for attenuating undesirable data, such as multiples, using constrained crossequalization 
US5537320A (en)  19941031  19960716  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method and apparatus for identifying fault curves in seismic data 
US5537365A (en)  19930330  19960716  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Apparatus and method for evaluation of picking horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5563949A (en)  19941212  19961008  Amoco Corporation  Method of seismic signal processing and exploration 
US5671344A (en)  19910327  19970923  Exxon Production Research Company  Process for displaying N dimensional data in an N1 dimensional format 
Patent Citations (82)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

SU172065A1  
US4298968A (en)  19651227  19811103  Mobil Oil Corporation  Digital reflection searching and section plotting 
US3787855A (en)  19661230  19740122  Texas Instruments Inc  Coherent digital radar target signal enhancement 
US3571787A (en)  19670613  19710323  Texas Instruments Inc  Method and system for automatic seismic reflection picking 
US3622967A (en)  19681107  19711123  Mobil Oil Corp  Optimum stack 
US3614623A (en)  19690421  19711019  North American Rockwell  Adaptive system for correction of distortion of signals in transmission of digital data 
US3599175A (en)  19690912  19710810  Petty Geophysical Eng Co  System and methods of processing seismic data and the like 
US3638178A (en)  19691201  19720125  Chevron Res  Method for processing threedimensional seismic data to select and plot said data on a twodimensional display surface 
US3714621A (en)  19701230  19730130  Continental Oil Co  Method and apparatus for seismic gain control through seismic signal coherence 
US3961306A (en)  19711028  19760601  Seiscom Delta Inc.  Method of forming color graphic displays from input data 
US3931609A (en)  19730214  19760106  Seiscom Delta, Inc.  Threedimensional seismic display 
US4223399A (en)  19780712  19800916  Union Oil Company Of California  Seismic exploration method 
US4279026A (en)  19780831  19810714  Cities Service Company  Seismographic data color display 
US4393488A (en)  19781008  19830712  Chevron Research Company  Exploration system and method of determining elastic parameters and subsurface shape of an earth formation so as to indicate likelihood of the formation being an ore, marker rock, economic mineral or the like 
GB2066467A (en)  19791217  19810708  Geophysique Cie Gle  Process and an apparatus for seismic geophysics with processing by focuses 
US4403312A (en)  19801230  19830906  Mobil Oil Corporation  Threedimensional seismic data gathering method 
US4467461A (en)  19810105  19840821  Conoco Inc.  Interactive color analysis of geophysical data 
US4503527A (en)  19810330  19850305  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for enhancement of the signaltonoise ratio in seismic reflection signals 
GB2132350A (en)  19821130  19840704  Seismograph Service  Data filter 
US4799201A (en)  19831216  19890117  Hydroacoustics, Inc.  Methods and apparatus for reducing correlation sidelobe interference in seismic profiling systems 
US4866659A (en)  19840406  19890912  Pennzoil Company  Method for selection of mining and drilling sites using synthesized three dimensional seismic data 
US4736347A (en)  19840518  19880405  Bernard Goldberg  Multiple stacking and spatial mapping of seismic data 
US4779237A (en)  19840827  19881018  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration including processing and displaying seismic data to obtain a measure of subterranean formation rock properties 
US4661935A (en)  19840917  19870428  Phillips Petroleum Company  Seismic data processing 
US4633401A (en)  19841108  19861230  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Method and apparatus for automatically determining pairs of turnings related to the same seismic event in adjacent seismic traces 
EP0181216A2 (en)  19841108  19860514  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Method for automatically producing representations of threedimensional horizons from processed seismic data 
US4633400A (en)  19841221  19861230  Conoco Inc.  Method for waveform feature extraction from seismic signals 
US4695984A (en)  19841224  19870922  Exxon Production Research Company  Method for establishing a surface consistent correction for the effects of the low velocity layer in seismic data processing 
US4683556A (en)  19850227  19870728  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for identifying arrival times of waveforms on acoustic borehole well logs 
US4729101A (en)  19850509  19880301  Standard Oil Company  Method for identifying and separating the effects of elastic and anelastic formation properties in seismic data 
US4745550A (en)  19850816  19880517  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Processing of oriented patterns 
US4713775A (en)  19850821  19871215  Teknowledge, Incorporated  Intelligent assistant for using and operating computer system capabilities to solve problems 
US4799200A (en)  19851021  19890117  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Method of acoustically detecting fractures in a borehole 
US4800539A (en)  19851216  19890124  Conoco Inc.  Method and apparatus for seismic dip filtering 
US4951264A (en)  19860516  19900821  University Of Miami  Method of measuring the shear modulus profile of a seabed 
US4916615A (en)  19860714  19900410  Conoco Inc.  Method for stratigraphic correlation and reflection character analysis of setsmic signals 
US4839869A (en)  19861006  19890613  Shell Oil Company  Methods for processing converted wave seismic data 
US4964087A (en)  19861208  19901016  Western Atlas International  Seismic processing and imaging with a drillbit source 
USH374H (en)  19870209  19871103  The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army  Optimum multiple target detection and resolution 
US4881207A (en)  19870507  19891114  Insitut Francais Du Petrole  Seismic prospection method providing improved knowledge of the geological discontinuities of the subsoil 
US4809240A (en)  19870624  19890228  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for interpreting seismic data 
US4849887A (en)  19870828  19890718  Amoco Corporation  Horizon velocity analysis 
US4843599A (en)  19870928  19890627  Amoco Corporation  Method for continuous color mapping of seismic data 
US4813026A (en)  19871127  19890314  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for logarithmic analysis of seismic reflection signals 
US4884248A (en)  19880125  19891128  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method of restoring seismic data 
US5047933A (en)  19880226  19910910  Chevron Research Company  Full wave form restoration of optically digitized seismic traces 
US4829487A (en)  19880506  19890509  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for restoring seismic data using crosscorrelation 
US4894807A (en)  19880616  19900116  Western Atlas International, Inc.  Simultaneous verticalseismic profiling and surface seismic acquisition method 
US5191526A (en)  19880718  19930302  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for removing coherent noise from seismic data 
US4878204A (en)  19881028  19891031  Geophysical Service, Inc.  Method for trueamplitude dip moveout correction 
US4970699A (en)  19890213  19901113  Amoco Corporation  Method for color mapping geophysical data 
US4984220A (en)  19890306  19910108  Amoco Corporation  Geophysical exploration using velocity spectra regional coherency peaks 
US5008861A (en)  19890306  19910416  Amoco Corporation  Geophysical exploration by automatically picking and associating stacked seismic sections with regional coherency peaks of velocity spectra 
US5031155A (en)  19890428  19910709  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Compression and reconstruction of sonic data 
US5047991A (en)  19890428  19910910  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Lithology identification using sonic data 
US4951266A (en)  19890428  19900821  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Method of filtering sonic well logging data 
US5148494A (en)  19890428  19920915  Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine  Process for automatic plotting and assistance interpretation of seismic crosssections in particular using image analysis techniques 
US5105356A (en)  19890714  19920414  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method for curve correlation 
US5179518A (en)  19890804  19930112  Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine (Production)  Method of processing seismic reflection data in order to obtain improved seismic sections 
US4964088A (en)  19891031  19901016  Conoco Inc.  Method for tomographically laterally varying seismic data velocity estimation 
US5295086A (en)  19891207  19940315  Jeol Ltd.  Method of producing noise free frequency spectrum signals 
US5079703A (en)  19900220  19920107  Atlantic Richfield Company  3dimensional migration of irregular grids of 2dimensional seismic data 
US5056066A (en)  19900625  19911008  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method for attribute tracking in seismic data 
US5051960A (en)  19900716  19910924  Mobil Oil Corporation  Method of removing records of multiple reflection events from seismic data 
US5130951A (en)  19900808  19920714  Atlantic Richfield Company  Method for reducing noise effects in acoustic signals transmitted along a pipe structure 
US5150332A (en)  19900821  19920922  Geco A.S.  Method of assigning a seismic trace 
US5181171A (en)  19900920  19930119  Atlantic Richfield Company  Adaptive network for automated first break picking of seismic refraction events and method of operating the same 
US5265192A (en)  19900920  19931123  Atlantic Richfield Company  Method for the automated editing of seismic traces using an adaptive network 
US5245587A (en)  19901214  19930914  Hutson William H  Multidimensional signal processing and display 
US5136553A (en)  19901219  19920804  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration 
US5671344A (en)  19910327  19970923  Exxon Production Research Company  Process for displaying N dimensional data in an N1 dimensional format 
US5309360A (en)  19910523  19940503  Halliburton Geophysical Services, Inc.  Method for attenuating undesirable data, such as multiples, using constrained crossequalization 
US5153858A (en)  19910709  19921006  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method for finding horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5251184A (en)  19910709  19931005  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method and apparatus for finding horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5132938A (en)  19910731  19920721  Shell Oil Company  Adjusting seismic data to tie to other data 
US5299576A (en)  19911129  19940405  Fujitsu Limited  Ultrasonic synthetic aperture diagnostic apparatus 
US5226019A (en)  19920110  19930706  Amoco Corporation  Method of geophysical exploration 
US5189643A (en)  19920305  19930223  Conoco Inc.  Method of accurate fault location using common reflection point gathers 
US5537365A (en)  19930330  19960716  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Apparatus and method for evaluation of picking horizons in 3D seismic data 
US5675551A (en)  19930330  19971007  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Apparatus and method for evaluation of score failures in picking of 3D seismic data 
US5537320A (en)  19941031  19960716  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Method and apparatus for identifying fault curves in seismic data 
US5563949A (en)  19941212  19961008  Amoco Corporation  Method of seismic signal processing and exploration 
NonPatent Citations (83)
Title 

"Attribute extraction: An Important Application in any Detailed 3D Interpretation Study", by EJH Rijks & ICEM Sauffred, Geophysics: The Leading Edge of Exploration, Sep. 1991. 
"Automatic Delineation of Lateral Facies Changes in Clasic Environments" by Donald Vossler, Extended Abstracts of Papers, European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, 59th Meeting and Technical Exhibition, Oct. 29Nov. 2, 1989, p 803804. 
"Automatic Whole Section Seismic Reflection Mapping" by D.A. Vossler, Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists FiftyEight Annual International Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 30Nov. 3, 1988, p. 689691. 
"Dip and Azimuth Displays for 3D Seismic Interpretation" by RM Dalley et al, First Break vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1989. 
"Estimation of Three Dimensional Dip and Curvature from Reflection Seismic Data", By Christopher J. Finn, Master's Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, May 1986. 
"Image Analysis Techniques for the Purpose of Structural Interpretation of 3D and 2D Seismic Data", by Keskes and CamyPeyret; Mem. Soc. Geol. France 1992 Ser. No. 161 P133140. 
"Image Processing as a Tool for Interpreting 3D and 2D Seismic Data", by Messrs Keskes and CamyPeyret Supplement to Nature vol. 350, pp. 67; Apr. 18, 1991. 
"Image Processing of Interpreted 3D Seismic Data to Enhance Subtle Structural Features/Lineations" by LA Tilbury and D. Bush, Exploration Geophysics (1991) pp. 22, 391396. 
"ImageProcessing display techniques applied to seismic instantaneous attributes over the Gorgan gas field", R. Burnett Oliveros and Barbara J. Radovich, Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and SixtySeventh Annual Meeting, pp. 20642067, no date. 
"Interpretive nomenclaturea plea for conformity" (Round Table Reply) by A. R. Brown, The Leading Edge, vol./ISS 9 Oct. 10, 1990, p. 47. 
"Interpretive nomenclature—a plea for conformity" (Round Table Reply) by A. R. Brown, The Leading Edge, vol./ISS 9 Oct. 10, 1990, p. 47. 
"New Spatial Visualizatin Techniques in Tectonic and Stratigraphic Interpretation Optimize Reservoir Delineation of th Roar Field, Danish North Sea", Abatzis Geological Survey of Denmark and J. D. Kerr, p. 81. 
"On the history and culture of geophysics, and science in general" by Christopher L. Liner, University of Tulsa, The Leading Edge, 16, No. 06, 939940. Jun. 1997. 
"Poststack Estimation of ThreeDimensional Crossline Statics" by Messrs Schultz and Lau, Geophysics, vol. 49, No. 3, Mar. 1984 pp. 227236. 
"Reflection Seismic: A Tool For Energy Resource Exploration", Kenneth Waters and John Wiley, 1981, pp. 259263. 
"Seismic Attributes Revisited" by M. T. Taner et al. Expanded Abstracts with Author's Biographies, Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and SixtyFourth Annual Meeting, Oct. 2328, 1994. 
"Seismic Character Mapping Using Multivariate Statistical Pattern Integration" by Partyka, Prasad and Bahorich, Extended Abstracts of Papers, European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, FiftyFifth Meeting and Technical Exhibition, Jun. 711, 1993. 
"Seismic Sequence Attribute Map (SSAM)", by Michael Bahorich and S. Rutt Bridges, Technical Program Expanded Abstracts with Authors Biographies, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SixtySix Annual International Meetin and Exposition, Oct. 2529, 1992, pp. 13. 
"Semblance and Other Coherency Measures for Multichannel Data", by N. S. Neidell and M. Turhan Taner, Geophysics, vol. 36, No. 3, Jun. 1972, pp. 482497. 
"Signal Coherence Measure in Seismic Data Processing" by Boiardi and Cardamone, Technical program and abstracts of papersEuropean Association of Exploration Geophysicists; vol. 51, p. 76. 
"Signal Coherence Measure in Seismic Data Processing" by Boiardi and Cardamone, Technical program and abstracts of papers—European Association of Exploration Geophysicists; vol. 51, p. 76. 
"Sismage: The Techniques of Image Analysis at the Service of the Structural Interpretation of Seismic Data", Naamen Keskes and Jacqueline CamyPeyret, Soc. Nat. Aquitaine, 1991, pp. 271278. 
"The Binary Consistancy Checking Scheme and Its Applications to Seismic Horizon Detection" by Cheng and Lu, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence vol. 11, No. 4, Apr. 1989. 
"The Coherence Cube", Mike Bahorich and Steve Farmer, The Leading Edge, Oct. 1995, pp. 10531059. 
"The Seismic Sequence Attribute Map (SSAM)" by Mr Bahorich, Extended Abstracts of Papers, European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, 56th Meeting and Technical Exhibition, Jun. 610, 1994, Abstract. 
"The Signal Coherence as a Versatile Diagnostic Tool to Improve Seismic Data Processing Effectiveness" by Boiardi and Cardamone, Technical program and abstracts of papersEuropean Association of Exploration Geophysicists; vol. 53, p. 1213, 1984. 
"The Signal Coherence as a Versatile Diagnostic Tool to Improve Seismic Data Processing Effectiveness" by Boiardi and Cardamone, Technical program and abstracts of papers—European Association of Exploration Geophysicists; vol. 53, p. 1213, 1984. 
"TimeSlice Versus Statistical Slice (statslice: A Comparison of their Use for 3D Seismic Interpretation", by John D. Kerr and Gary L. Jones, Technical Program Expanded Abstracts with Authors Biographies, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SixtyFifth Annual International Meetin and Exposition, Oct. 813,1995, pp. 319321. 
Alam, A., Matsumoto, S., Hurst, C. and Caragounis, P., 1995, Qualitative porosity prediction from seismic attributes: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 313315. 
Applied Geophysics by R. E. Sheriff et al. (Cambridge University Press), p. 393, p. 395, (date unavailable). 
Bahorich, M. and van Bemmel, P., 1994, Stratigraphic interpretation of seismic data on the workstation, 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 481484. 
Bahorich, M. S. and Farmer, S. L., 1995, 3D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 9396. 
Bahorich, M. S., Lopez, J., Haskell, N. L., Nissen, S. E. and Poole, A., 1995, Stratigraphic and structural interpretation with 3D coherence: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 97100. 
Bahorich, Michael S., Amoco Production Research and Bridges, S. Rutt, Advance Geophysical Case Histories 1: Seismic Stratigraphy/Seismic Sequence Attribute Map (SSAM) CH1.1, Oct. 26, 1992; SEG New Orleans The Society of Exploration Geophysicists SixtySecond Annual International Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 2529, 1992. 
Bahorich, Mike and Farmer, Steve; 3D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The Coherence Cube, The Leading Edge, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists ISN 1070485X Oct. 1995, p. 10531058. 
Barnes, A. E., 1991, Instantaneous frequency and amplitutde at the envelope peak of a constantphase wavelet (short note): Geophysics, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 56, 10581060. 
Barnes, A. E., 1994, Theory of twodimensional complex seismic trace analysis: 64th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 94, 15801583. 
Barnes, A. E., 1996, Theory of 2D complex seismic trace analysis: Geophysics, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 61, 264272. 
Bodine, J.H., 1984, Waveform analysis with seismic attributes: Presented at the 54th Annual International Meeting of the S.E.G. in Atlanta, Georgia. 
Cohen, 1993, "Instantaneous Anything," IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, 4, p. 105109. 
Darche, G., 1992, Seismic blind zone detection by image pr, 54th Mtg Eur Assoc Expl Geophys., p2223. 
Douze, E. J. and Laster, S. J., 1979, Statistic of semblance (short note): Geophysics, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 44, 19992003. 
From: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications by W. Feller, p. 236, 1968. 
From: Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics by Sheriff, p. 35 (clutter to comb), no date. Supplemented by Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics by Sheriff, 3rd Edition, 1991 pp. 42 and 264 (see coherence and semblance). 
From: Reflection Seismology: A Tool for Energy Resource Exploration, 2nd Edition, 1981, Kenneth H. Waters. pp. 260, 284, 285 and 196. 
Haskell, N. L., Nissen, S. E., Lopez, J. A. Bahorich, M. S., 1995, 3D seismic coherency and the imaging of sedimentological features: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 15321534. 
Heggland, R., 1995, Detection of ancient morphology and potential hydrocarbon traps using 3D seismic data and attribute analysis: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 316318. 
Houston, L. M. and Potter, J. R., 1993, Multiple suppression using a local coherence filter, 63rd Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 10901094. 
Johnston, D. H., 1993, Seismic attribute calibration using neural networks: 63rd Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 93, 250253. 
Kemp, L. F., Threet, J. R. and Veezhinathan, J., 1992, A neural net branch and bound seismic horizon tracker: 62nd Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 92, 1013. 
Keskes, N., Boulanouar, A., Lechevalier, Y. and Zaccagnino, P., 1982, Image analysis techniques for seismic data, 52nd Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Session:S16.7, p. 221222. 
Keskes, N., Zaccagnino, P., Rether, D. and Mermey, P., 1983, Automatic extraction of 3D seismic horizons, 53rd Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Session:S21.1, p. 557559. 
Kirlin, R. L., 1992, The relationship between semblance and eigenstructure velocity estimators: Geophysics, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 57, 10271033. 
Lefeuvre, F. and Chanet, A., 1993, Reservoir characterization: A seismic attributes approach: 63rd Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 93, 289293. 
Lefeuvre, F. E., Wrolstad, K. H., Zou, K. S., Smith, L. J., Maret, JP. and Nyein, U. K., 1995, Sandshale ratio and sandy reservoir properties estimation from seismic attributes: An integrated study: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 108110. 
Lefeuvre, F., 1994, Fracture related anisotropy detection and analysis: and if the Pwaves were enough?: 64th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 94, 942945. 
Leslie, R. B., 1994, Digital image processing of 3D seismic attributes benefits exploration and production interpreters: 64th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 94, 813. 
Lewis, C., 1995, Seismic attributes for reservoir monitoring: A feasibility study using forward modeling: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 95, 309312. 
Marfurt, K. J., Scheet, R. M., Sharp, J. A., Cain, G. J. and Harper, M. G., 1995, Suppression of the acquisition footprint for seismic sequence attribute mapping: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 949952. 
Mondt, J. C., 1990, The use of dip and azimuth horizon attributes in 3D seismic interpretation: SPE 20943, 7177. 
Neff, D. B., 1990, "Estimated Pay Mapping Using ThreeDimensional Seismic Data and Incremental Pay Thickness Modeling"; 55, 567575. 
Neff, D. B., 1990, "Incremental Pay Thickness Modeling of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs"; Geophysics, 55, 556566. 
Neidell, N.S. and Taner, M. Turhan; "Semblance and Other Coherency Measures for Multichannel Data", Geophysics, vol. 36, No. 3 (Jun. 1971), p. 482497, 6 FIGS. 
Nelson, H. R. Jr., Mastoris, S. and Huxohl, C., 1991, Visualization of map and seismic attributes: 53rd Mtg. Eur. Assoc. Expl Geophys., Abstracts, , 91, 8687. 
Nissen, S. E., Haskell, N. L., Lopez, J. A., Donlon, T. J. and Bahorich, M. S., 1995, 3D seismic coherency techniques applied to the identification and delineation of slump features: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts., 95, 15351536. 
Ortmann, K. A. and Wood, L. J., 1995, Successful application of 3D seismic coherency models to predict stratigraphy, offshore eastern Trinidad: 65th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 95, 101103. 
Possato, S., Saito, M., Curtis, M. P. and Martinez, R. D., 1983, Interpretation of threedimensional seismic attributes contributes to stratigraphic analysis of Pampo oil field: 53rd Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 83, Session:S16.2. 
Robertson, J.D., and Fisher, D.A., 1988, Complex seismic trace Attributes: The Leading Edge, 7, No. 6, 2226. 
Robertson, J.D., and Nogami, H.H., 1984, Complex seismic trace analysis of thin beds: Geophysics, 49, 344352. 
Ronen, S., Hattori, M., Hoskins, J. C. and Schultz, P., 1993, Seismic guided estimation of reservoir properties, 63rd Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 281284. 
Sibille, G., Keskes, N., Fontaine, L. and Lequeux, J. L., 1984, Enhancement of the perception of seismic facies and sequences by image analysis techniques, 54th Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Session:S7.2. 
Sonneland, L., Barkved, O. and Hagenes, O., 1990, Construction of reservoir maps from seismic classifier maps: 60th Annual Intenat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 90, 241244. 
Sonneland, L., Barkved, O., Olsen, M. and Snyder, G., 1989, Application of seismic wavefield attributes in reservoir characterization: 59th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, , 89, 813. 
Stark, T. J., 1996, "Surface Slice Generation and InterpretationA Review"; The Leading Edge, 15, 818819. 
Stark, T. J., 1996, "Surface Slice Generation and Interpretation—A Review"; The Leading Edge, 15, 818819. 
Taner, M. T., Matsuoka, T., Baysal, E., Lu, L. and Yilmaz, O., 1992, Imaging with refractive seismic waves, 62nd Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 11321135. 
Taner, M.T., Koehler, F. and Sheriff, R.E., Complex Seismic Trace Analysis,Geophysics, vol. 44, No. 6 (Jun. 1979), p. 10411063, 16 FIGS, 1 table. 
The Coefficient of Coherence: Its Estimation and Use in Geophysical Data Processing, By M.R. Foster and N.J. Guinzy, Geophysics, vol. 33, No. 4, Aug. 1967, pp. 602616. 
Versteeg, R., Ehinger, A. and Geoltrain, S., 1991, Sensitivity of migration coherency panels to the velocity model, 61st Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 12511254. 
Versteeg, R., Geoltrain, S. and Ehinger, A., 1991, Use of migration coherency panels for velocity model determination, 61st Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 12551258. 
Vossler, Donald A., Landmark Graphics Corp., Automatic Declination of Lateral Facies Changes in Clatic Environments; SEG Dallas The Society of Exploration Geophysicists FiftyNinth Annual International Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 29Nov. 2, 1989. 
Vossler, donald A., Landmark Graphics Corp., Automatic Whole Section Selsmic Reflection Mapping: The Society of Exploration Geophysicists SixtySecond Annual International Meeting & Exposition, 1988. 
Yanovskiy, A.K., and Bogolyubskiy A.D., "Sposob avtomaticheskoy approksimatsii vertikal'nogo godografa, osnovannyy na posledovaTel'nom vydelenii plastov" in Prikladnaya geofizika, No. 82, 1976; pp. 95100. (Translation from Russian). 
Cited By (62)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US20030200030A1 (en) *  19980911  20031023  Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S.  Method of processing acquired seismic data 
US6754587B1 (en) *  19990719  20040622  Henning Trappe  Method for processing seismic data 
US20070195087A1 (en) *  20001030  20070823  Mark Acosta  System and method for analyzing and imaging threedimensional volume data sets 
US7248258B2 (en)  20001030  20070724  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for analyzing and imaging threedimensional volume data sets 
US7502026B2 (en)  20001030  20090310  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for analyzing and imaging threedimensional volume data sets 
US20060279569A1 (en) *  20001030  20061214  Mark Acosta  System and method for analyzing and imaging threedimensional volume data sets 
US6850864B2 (en) *  20010629  20050201  Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company  Method for analyzing dip in seismic data volumes 
US20030055598A1 (en) *  20010629  20030320  Dominique Gillard  Method for analyzing dip in seismic data volumes 
US7436735B2 (en)  20011108  20081014  Compagnie Generale De Geophysique  Method for seismic processing, in particular for compensating birefringence on seismic traces 
US6791900B2 (en) *  20020613  20040914  Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company  Method of calculating a throw volume for quantitative fault analysis 
US20030231548A1 (en) *  20020613  20031218  Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company  Method of calculating a throw volume for quantitative fault analysis 
US20040148148A1 (en) *  20030128  20040729  Phillips Petroleum Company  Well planning using seismic coherence 
US7280952B2 (en) *  20030128  20071009  Conocophillips Company  Well planning using seismic coherence 
US6865521B1 (en) *  20030129  20050308  Michael John Padgett  Method for horizon binning for an area of interest 
US7995057B2 (en)  20030728  20110809  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for realtime corendering of multiple attributes 
US20100053161A1 (en) *  20030728  20100304  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and Method for RealTime CoRendering of Multiple Attributes 
US20080024512A1 (en) *  20030728  20080131  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for realtime corendering of multiple attributes 
US8259126B2 (en)  20030728  20120904  Landmark Graphics Corporation  System and method for realtime corendering of multiple attributes 
US7616213B2 (en)  20030728  20091110  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  System and method for realtime corendering of multiple attributes 
US8050892B2 (en) *  20031003  20111101  Joa Oil & Gas B.V.  Method, device, computer program and data carrier for modeling a multidimensional heterogeneous structure, using a digital processing unit 
US20050125203A1 (en) *  20031003  20050609  Hartman Robert P.A.  Method, device, computer program and data carrier for modeling a multidimensional heterogeneous structure, using a digital processing unit 
US7796468B2 (en) *  20040226  20100914  Saudi Arabian Oil Company  Prediction of shallow drilling hazards using seismic refraction data 
WO2007023080A3 (en) *  20050824  20070419  Statoil Asa  Seismic data processing 
WO2007023080A2 (en) *  20050824  20070301  Statoil Asa  Seismic data processing 
US8065088B2 (en)  20060621  20111122  Terraspark Geosciences, Llc  Extraction of depositional systems 
US8504300B2 (en)  20060621  20130806  Terraspark Geosciences, Llc  Extraction of depositional systems 
US8010294B2 (en)  20060621  20110830  Terraspark Geosciences, Llc  Extraction of depositional systems 
US20100250210A1 (en) *  20060621  20100930  Terraspark Geosciences, L.P.  Extraction of depositional systems 
US20100211363A1 (en) *  20060621  20100819  Terraspark Geosciences, L.P.  Extraction of depositional systems 
US20080015784A1 (en) *  20060621  20080117  Terraspark Geosciences, L.P.  Extraction of Depositional Systems 
US20100245347A1 (en) *  20060621  20100930  Terraspark Geosciences, L.P.  Extraction of depositional systems 
US8384712B2 (en)  20060901  20130226  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging waveform volumes 
US8022947B2 (en)  20060901  20110920  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging waveform volumes 
US8120991B2 (en) *  20061103  20120221  Paradigm Geophysical (Luxembourg) S.A.R.L.  System and method for full azimuth angle domain imaging in reduced dimensional coordinate systems 
US8638328B2 (en)  20070105  20140128  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for visualizing multiple volumetric data sets in real time 
US20080165186A1 (en) *  20070105  20080710  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for visualizing multiple volumetric data sets in real time 
US20080165185A1 (en) *  20070105  20080710  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for selectively imaging objects in a display of multiple threedimensional dataobjects 
US9449422B2 (en)  20070607  20160920  Paradigm Sciences Ltd.  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
US8582825B2 (en)  20070607  20131112  Paradigm Geophysical Ltd.  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
EP2160631A1 (en) *  20070607  20100310  Paradigm Geophysical Corporation  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
EP2160631A4 (en) *  20070607  20140827  Paradigm Geophysical Corp  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
WO2008154341A1 (en)  20070607  20081218  Paradigm Geophysical Ltd.  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
US20100220895A1 (en) *  20070607  20100902  Zvi Koren  Device and method for displaying full azimuth angle domain image data 
US9171391B2 (en)  20070727  20151027  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging a volumeofinterest 
US20110091078A1 (en) *  20070831  20110421  Josselin Kherroubi  Identifying geological features in an image of an underground formation surrounding a borehole 
US7702463B2 (en)  20071212  20100420  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and methods for enhancing a seismic data image 
US20110115787A1 (en) *  20080411  20110519  Terraspark Geosciences, Llc  Visulation of geologic features using data representations thereof 
US20090303233A1 (en) *  20080606  20091210  Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company  Systems and Methods for Imaging a ThreeDimensional Volume of Geometrically Irregular Grid Data Representing a Grid Volume 
US8736600B2 (en)  20080606  20140527  Landmark Graphics Corporation  Systems and methods for imaging a threedimensional volume of geometrically irregular grid data representing a grid volume 
WO2010076638A2 (en) *  20081230  20100708  Schlumberger Technology Bv  Paleoneighborhood hydrocarbon spatial system 
WO2010076638A3 (en) *  20081230  20101209  Schlumberger Technology Bv  Paleoneighborhood hydrocarbon spatial system 
US8229950B2 (en)  20081230  20120724  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Paleoneighborhood hydrocarbon spatial system 
US8780132B1 (en) *  20090321  20140715  Charles Saron Knobloch  Enhanced assimilation of orientationdependent data in a multidimensional data volume 
US8964502B2 (en) *  20090327  20150224  Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company  Zero offset profile from nearfield hydrophones 
US20110063947A1 (en) *  20090327  20110317  Norris Michael W  Zero offset profile from nearfield hydrophones 
US9728003B1 (en)  20091023  20170808  Paradigm Sciences Ltd.  Systems and methods for coordinated editing of seismic data in dual model 
US9964654B2 (en) *  20120328  20180508  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Seismic attribute color model transform 
US20130262061A1 (en) *  20120328  20131003  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Seismic attribute color model transform 
US9179963B2 (en)  20120422  20151110  Newuro, B.V.  Bladder tissue modification for overactive bladder disorders 
WO2015079322A2 (en)  20131126  20150604  Newuro, B.V.  Bladder tissue modification for overactive bladder disorders 
WO2016071728A1 (en) *  20141103  20160512  Cgg Services Sa  Systems and methods for vortex calculation as attribute for geologic discontinuities 
US20170192118A1 (en) *  20160105  20170706  Schlumerger Technology Corporation  Amplitude Inversion on Partitioned Depth Image Gathers Using Point Spread Functions 
Similar Documents
Publication  Publication Date  Title 

Marfurt et al.  Narrowband spectral analysis and thinbed tuning  
Chopra et al.  Seismic attributes for prospect identification and reservoir characterization  
Wood et al.  Seismic signal processing  
US5260911A (en)  Seismic surveying  
US5500832A (en)  Method of processing seismic data for migration  
Babuška et al.  The lithosphere in central Europe—seismological and petrological aspects  
Roest et al.  Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal  
US6516274B2 (en)  Method for imaging discontinuities in seismic data using dipsteering  
US6876928B2 (en)  Method of estimating elastic and compositional parameters from seismic and echoacoustic data  
US6574563B1 (en)  Method for processing time lapsed seismic data signals  
US6278949B1 (en)  Method for multiattribute identification of structure and stratigraphy in a volume of seismic data  
Gao  Volume texture extraction for 3D seismic visualization and interpretation  
Veeken  Seismic stratigraphy, basin analysis and reservoir characterisation  
US6859734B2 (en)  Method and system for limited frequency seismic imaging  
McClymont et al.  Visualization of active faults using geometric attributes of 3D GPR data: An example from the Alpine Fault Zone, New Zealand  
US6026057A (en)  Method and system for correcting for offsetdependent directivity effects in seismic survey signals  
US7577061B2 (en)  Process and program for characterising evolution of an oil reservoir over time  
Brown  Interpretation of threedimensional seismic data  
US6853922B2 (en)  System for information extraction from geologic time volumes  
US5940778A (en)  Method of seismic attribute generation and seismic exploration  
Zeng et al.  Highfrequency sequence stratigraphy from seismic sedimentology: Applied to Miocene, Vermilion Block 50, Tiger Shoal area, offshore Louisiana  
US6081482A (en)  Semirecursive imaging under complex velocity structures  
POSAMENTlER  Seismic geomorphologyan overview HW POSAMENTlER, 1 RJ DAVlES, 2 JA CARTWRlGHT3 & L. WOOD4  
Chopra et al.  Emerging and future trends in seismic attributes  
US5742560A (en)  Seismic imaging using wave equation extrapolation 
Legal Events
Date  Code  Title  Description 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 8 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 12 