USRE35576E - Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys - Google Patents

Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE35576E
USRE35576E US08/534,929 US53492995A USRE35576E US RE35576 E USRE35576 E US RE35576E US 53492995 A US53492995 A US 53492995A US RE35576 E USRE35576 E US RE35576E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aluminum
iaddend
iadd
recited
lithium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/534,929
Inventor
Rudolph G. Buchheit, Jr.
Glenn E. Stoner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Center for Innovative Technology
Original Assignee
Center for Innovative Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Center for Innovative Technology filed Critical Center for Innovative Technology
Priority to US08/534,929 priority Critical patent/USRE35576E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE35576E publication Critical patent/USRE35576E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/60Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using alkaline aqueous solutions with pH greater than 8
    • C23C22/66Treatment of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/73Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals characterised by the process
    • C23C22/74Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals characterised by the process for obtaining burned-in conversion coatings

Definitions

  • the present invention is generally related to forming protective coatings on aluminum and aluminum alloys which will increase corrosion resistance by using chemicals that pose a relatively small environmental hazard and have a small toxic effect.
  • a first category of barrier coatings are anodic oxides, and these types of coatings are usually formed by an electrochemical means known as "anodizing" during immersion in an inorganic acid like H 2 SO 4 or H 3 PO 4 .
  • Anodic oxides have a wide range of thicknesses and porosities. Porous coatings can be "sealed” in steam, boiling water or various salt solutions.
  • a second category of barrier coatings are ceramic coatings, and these type of coatings are usually special cements applied to a metal to prevent corrosion.
  • a common example of a ceramic coating is porcelain enamel.
  • a third category of coatings are molecular barrier coatings, and these types of coatings are formed by the addition of organic molecules to solution.
  • a fourth category of barrier coatings are organic coatings, and these types of coatings are generally intended to simply prevent interaction of an aggressive environment with the metal surface.
  • Organic coatings are the most widely used barrier coatings for metals and paint is a typical example of an organic coating.
  • a fifth category of barrier coatings are conversion coatings, and these types of coatings are made by a process which "converts" some of the base metal into the protective oxide coating. Chromate and phosphate conversion coatings are the two most common types of conversion coatings currently used.
  • Chromate and phosphate conversion coatings can be formed by chemical and electrochemical treatment of a metallic component during immersion in a solution containing hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 ), phosphorus as a phosphate anion, and usually other components.
  • hexavalent chromium Cr +6
  • phosphorus as a phosphate anion
  • usually other components hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 ), phosphorus as a phosphate anion, and usually other components.
  • chromate conversion coating formulas exist for aluminum and aluminum alloys.
  • the primary active ingredient in the bath is usually a chromate, dichromate (CrO 4 2- or Cr 2 O 7 2- ), or phosphate (PO 4 3- ).
  • the pH of the solutions is usually in the range of 1.3 to 2.5, but a few alkaline bath formulas are known.
  • the process results in the formation of a protective, amorphous coating comprised of oxides of the substrate, complex chromium or phosphorus compounds, and other components of the processing solution.
  • a protective, amorphous coating comprised of oxides of the substrate, complex chromium or phosphorus compounds, and other components of the processing solution.
  • substrate oxides and hydroxides such as Al 2 O 3 and Al(OH) 3
  • chromium oxides and hydroxides such as Cr 2 O 3 , CrOOH, Cr(OH) 3 , and Cr 2 O 3 ⁇ xH 2 O
  • phosphates such as AlPO 4 .
  • Chromate conversion coatings are applied by contacting the processed surfaces with a sequence of solutions.
  • the basic processing sequence typically consists of the following six steps: cleaning the metal surface, rinsing, creating the conversion coating on the metal surface, rinsing, post treatment rinsing, and drying.
  • the cleaning, rinsing, and drying steps are fairly standard procedures throughout the industry.
  • the chief variant among the processes used is the composition of the chromate conversion solution.
  • the compositions of these solutions depends on the metal to be treated and the specific requirements of the final product.
  • the chief disadvantage of chromate conversion coating processes is that they involve the use of environmentally hazardous and toxic substances. It is expected that the use of substances like chromates will soon be regulated under stringent guidelines.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,004,951 to Dorsey discloses applying a hydrophobic coating on an aluminum surface by treatment with a long chain carboxylic acid and an equivalent alkali metal salt of the carboxylic acid
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,054,466 to King et al. discloses a process for the treatment aluminum in which vegetable tannin is applied to the surface of the aluminum
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,063,969 to Howell et al. discloses treating aluminum with a combination of tannin and lithium hydroxide.
  • the primary protective ingredient is the complex organic compound
  • the treatment solution is applied at slightly elevated temperatures (90°-125° F.), and the treatment solution is kept at a mid-level pH (4-8 in King and Howell, and 8-10 in Dorsey).
  • Csanady et al. in Corrosion Science, 24, 3, 237-48 (1984) showed that alkali and alkali earth metals stimulated Al(OH) 3 growth on aluminum alloys.
  • Csanady et al. report that the incorporation of Li + or Mg + into a growing oxide film degrades corrosion resistance.
  • alkali metal salts such as Li 2 CO 3 , Li 2 SO 4 , LiCl, LiOH, and LiBr
  • alkaline earth metal salts such as MgCl 2 , MgBr 2 , and MgCO 3
  • aluminum alloys have been found to exhibit increased corrosion resistance after exposure to aqueous alkaline (pH ranging from 8-13) solutions of lithium salts. Because lithium salts are similar in character to magnesium salts, similar results are likely to be achieved for solutions containing a magnesium cation.
  • a specific chemical composition containing aluminum, lithium (or magnesium) and the salt anion is formed as a protective film on the aluminum surface. Formation of the protective film readily occurs at room temperature. Heating the aluminum substrate after film formation may liberate water and volatile anions bound in the chemical structure of the film.
  • Aluminum alloys which contain lithium or magnesium and magnesium based alloys only need to be treated with an alkaline salt solution to form the protective aluminum-lithium-anion film or aluminum-magnesium-anion film.
  • Lithium and magnesium salts are ubiquitous, low cost compounds which are not hazardous to the environment and, therefore, the inventive process has significant advantages over the use of chromate conversion coatings.
  • Corrosion resistant films can be formed on aluminum and aluminum alloy components using a multi-step process involving immersion in an alkaline lithium salt bath. Corrosion resistance my be enhanced by a subsequent heat treatment and room temperature aging process.
  • Components to be coated are first degreased using hexane or some other suitable degreasing agent. Then, the components are cleaned in an alkaline bath. The residue from the cleaning process is removed in a deoxidizing acid bath. The components are then immediately immersed in an alkaline lithium salt solution.
  • the solution may be 0.01 to 0.6 M Li 2 CO 3 (the upper solubility limit). The best results have been achieved with alkaline lithium salt solutions with concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 M.
  • the pH of the solution must be greater than 8 and is most preferably between 11 and 12.
  • the components remain in the alkaline lithium salt bath for approximately 5 to 60 minutes (or longer for thicker coatings).
  • the salt bath may be maintained at room temperature (e.g., 25°-30° C.) during immersion.
  • the components are then removed and dried.
  • the components may then be heat treated and aged. For example, heating in air at 150° C. and aging for seven days at room temperature yields desirable results. Coatings formed by this process are thin and translucent The appearance of these coatings is similar to that produced by some traditional conversion coating and the corrosion resistance is comparable to some chromate conversion coatings in accelerated testing.
  • the compounds formed on the aluminum surface during immersion in the salt solution have a structure comprised of layers of hydroxide ions separated by alternating layers of metal (Al and Li (or Mg)) cations and anions of the salt.
  • the compounds belong to a class of clays known as hydrotalcites.
  • the hydrotalcite compounds in the surface film can, without further processing, impart corrosion resistance to the aluminum.
  • the protective properties of the film may degrade in acid and neutral solutions. Therefore, a post film formation heat treatment has been found to be beneficial in improving corrosion resistance. Heat treatment is believed to liberate water and volatile anions bound in the hydrotalcite structure to create more corrosion resistant film which is less susceptible to degradation. Titanium salts, hydrofluoric acid, phosphoric acid, and sodium hydroxide may be added to the alkaline lithium salt solution to improve the characteristics of the resulting corrosion resistant film; however, such additions are not required.
  • Hydrotalcite compounds are detectable on aluminum and aluminum alloys after immersion in solutions with a pH as low as 8. However, increasing amounts of the hydrotalcite compounds result when the solution has a higher pH. Increased corrosion resistance has been observed in the presence of several lithium salt solutions including LiCl, LiOH, LiBr, Li 2 CO 3 , and Li 2 SO 4 . Other lithium salts should also be suitable for hydrotalcite compound formation. Hydrotalcite films are formed in solution at room temperature. Increasing the lithium salt solution temperature causes volatile species like carbonates and sulfates to escape solution as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, thereby inhibiting hydrotalcite formation.
  • Aluminum alloys which contain lithium at a level ranging from 0.5 to 10 weight percent would only need to be exposed to aqueous alkaline salts having anions such as CO 3 2- , SO 4 2- , Cl - , Br - , and OH - , or the like, since the lithium in the alloy surface could react with the immersion solution.
  • the immersion time required to form the hydrotalcite compounds in the protective film depends on the alloy type, salt concentration, salt type, and bath pH.
  • Corrosion performance of the coatings made by the inventive process have been compared to conventional coatings. Accelerated tests were performed using electrochemical imperdanice spectroscopy (EIS) in aerated 0.5 M NaCl solution. In these tests, the polarization resistance, Rp, is determined and provides a measure of the corrosion resistance. In general, larger values of Rp indicate better corrosion resistance. Corrosion performance coatings is tracked as a function of time to determine how long a coating will offer the necessary level of protection. Moreover, the time at which a coating no longer often a threshold level of corrosion protection is a useful way of the ranking the effectiveness of different coating processes. A drawback to evaluating coating corrosion performance in actual service environments is that testing times can be exceedingly long.
  • An ideal test environment is one that is severe enough to keep testing times down, but maintains enough sensitivity to distinguish among different levels of coating performance and induces damage by the same mechanisms that are expected to operate under service conditions.
  • EIS testing in 0.5 M NaCl solution satisfies these criteria (e.g., film breakdown can be detected in reasonable periods of time, the performance of various coatings can be distinguished, the performance of coatings on various alloys can be distinguished, and the damage mechanisms are followed since chloride ion instigates film failure in service environments).
  • the sheet stock used was alloy 1100, which has a composition of 99.5% Al with the remainder being iron, silicon and copper and is commercially available from Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation.
  • the test panels were cut from the sheet stock and mechanically polished with successively finer SiC paper ending with a 600 grit final polish.
  • the panels were then decreased by immersing them in 1,1,1 tricloroethane at 70° C. and deoxidized in an ammonium bifluoride (75 g/l)/concentrated nitric acid bath for ten minutes.
  • the panels were then rinsed in a 10 mega-Ohm distilled water cascade for five minutes.
  • the panels were then subjected to immediate immersion procedures for film formation.
  • the first panel had a film formed by immersion in 0.6M Li 2 CO 3 at pH 11.2 for one hour at room temperature. After removing the panel from the immersion bath, it was cascade rinsed in distilled water and allowed to dry in ambient air. The panel was aged seven days in a desiccator at room temperature prior to ElS testing.
  • the second panel had a film formed by the same process as the first panel, but, it was additionally subjected to a heat treatment step of 150° C. for four hours.
  • the third panel had a film formed by the Parker-Amchem Alodine 1200 process. The film is a mixture of hydrated aluminum oxide Cr 6+ and various chromium oxides, the relative proportions of which can vary widely.
  • the fourth panel was given a chromate conversion coating treatment of fifteen minutes in 1.0M Na 2 CrO 4 at pH 8.5.
  • the fifth panel acted as a control and did not have a protective film formed thereon.
  • Table 1 shows the polarization resistance measurements for the five panels after three hours exposure to 0.5M NaCl.
  • Table 2 presents the measured polarization resistance of lithium carbonate coated and heat treated aluminum alloy 1100 vebus time in aerated 0.5M NaCl solution at pH 5.5.
  • the increase with time in the immersion bath indicates that barrier properties may be maintained for extended exposure periods under less severe service conditions.
  • the anticipated service conditions are atmospheric exposure 0-100% relative humidity and/or under organic and polymeric paints and coatings.
  • Anodic potentiodynamic polarization testing Another electrochemical method for evaluating corrosion performance is known as anodic potentiodynamic polarization testing.
  • Typical parameters obtained from such testing that are commonly used to characterize corrosion behavior are the corrosion potential (E corr ), the breakaway potential (E br ), and the passive current density (i pass ).
  • Lower corrosion potentials usually correspond with lower corrosion resistance.
  • the breakaway potential is the potential at which the surface film no longer offers significant protection from corrosion; therefore, higher breakaway potentials correspond with more corrosion resistance.
  • the passive current density is a direct measure of the corrosion rate in the potential range where the surface firm is stable. Lower passive current densities correspond with better corrosion resistance.
  • Tables 3 and 4 show the anodic polarization data summary for 99.999% aluminum in deaerated 0.6M salt solutions at a pH ranging from 6 to 7 and at a pH ranging from 10 to 10.5, respectively.
  • Table 5 summarizes anodic polarization data obtained for 99.999% aluminum in various other lithium salt solutions.
  • the measured E br and/or i pass parameters indicate a beneficial passivating effect.
  • a wide variety of lithium salts can be used in immersion solutions to create a corrosion resistant film on aluminum and aluminum alloys.
  • Al-lithium alloys could be passivated by exposure to an alkaline solution (e.g., non-lithium containing since lithium is present in the alloy)
  • 99.999% Al and an Al-3 weight percent Li alloy (Al-3Li) were immersed in 0.6M NaCl at pH 5.5 and pH 10 prior to anodic potentiodynamic polarization testing.
  • Tables 6 and 7 present the anodic polarization data summaries for 99.999% Al in deaerated 0.6M NaCl solution and for a solution heat treated and quenched Al-3Li in deaerated 0.6M NaCl solution, respectively.
  • the first element in a group in the Periodic Table exhibits properties which deviate from the trends of its group. Commonly the physical and chemical behavior of the first element in the group is more like the elements in the next group (see Bodie et at., Concepts and Models of Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd, John Wiley & sons, Inc. New York, 1983). Physical chemists have described this phenomena as "diagonal relationships", referring to the fact that the element is similar in behavior to an element diagonally positioned to it on the Periodic Table. Lithium, being the first element in Group IA behaves more like Group IIA magnesium than other Group IA elements, like sodium and potassium. Diagonal relationships are evident when comparing physical properties like solubility. For example, fluorides, carbonates and phosphates of Mg and Li are only moderately soluble, while the same Na and K compounds are highly soluble.
  • lithium and magnesium compounds have unusually high lattice energies resulting in relatively good chemical stability.
  • the hydrolysis behavior of lithium and magnesium are also similar (see Baes et al., Hydrolysis of Cations, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, FL, 1986).
  • Lithium is the only Group IA ion to hydrolyze appreciably, but does so only in extremely alkaline solutions. Magnesium also hydrolyzes, but does not do so appreciably before the precipitation of brucite (Mg(OH) 2 ).
  • lithium exists mainly as Li + and is believed to be imbibed into Al(OH) 3 to form a hydrotalcite-like structure.
  • magnesium in the bath solution would exist primarily as Mg 2+ and would also be easily imbibed.
  • the radii of the two ions is nearly identical (e.g,, 0.086 nm for Li + and 0.090 nm for Mg 2+ ) so these cations could occupy the same sites in the cation layer of the hydrotalcite structure without significantly altering the structure.
  • the naturally occurring variant of hydrotalcite, Mg[Al 2 (OH) 6 ] 2 ⁇ CO 3 nH 2 O) contains magnesium (see Miyata, Clay Minerals, 23, 369-375, 1975).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

Aluminum and aluminum alloys are protected from corrosion by immersion in an alkaline lithium or alkaline magnesium salt solution. Immersion in the salt solution causes the formation of a protective film on the surface of the aluminum or aluminum alloy which includes hydrotalcite compounds. A post film formation heat treatment significantly improves the corrosion resistance of the protective film.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is generally related to forming protective coatings on aluminum and aluminum alloys which will increase corrosion resistance by using chemicals that pose a relatively small environmental hazard and have a small toxic effect.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Metal surfaces are often protected from corrosion by the application of a barrier coating. A first category of barrier coatings are anodic oxides, and these types of coatings are usually formed by an electrochemical means known as "anodizing" during immersion in an inorganic acid like H2 SO4 or H3 PO4. Anodic oxides have a wide range of thicknesses and porosities. Porous coatings can be "sealed" in steam, boiling water or various salt solutions. A second category of barrier coatings are ceramic coatings, and these type of coatings are usually special cements applied to a metal to prevent corrosion. A common example of a ceramic coating is porcelain enamel. A third category of coatings are molecular barrier coatings, and these types of coatings are formed by the addition of organic molecules to solution. Effective inhibitors are transported to the metal-solution interface and have a reactive group attached to a hydrocarbon. The reactive group interacts with the metal surface while the hydrocarbon group is exposed to the environment. As the molecules form the molecular barrier coating, corrosion reactions are slowed. A fourth category of barrier coatings are organic coatings, and these types of coatings are generally intended to simply prevent interaction of an aggressive environment with the metal surface. Organic coatings are the most widely used barrier coatings for metals and paint is a typical example of an organic coating. A fifth category of barrier coatings are conversion coatings, and these types of coatings are made by a process which "converts" some of the base metal into the protective oxide coating. Chromate and phosphate conversion coatings are the two most common types of conversion coatings currently used.
Chromate and phosphate conversion coatings can be formed by chemical and electrochemical treatment of a metallic component during immersion in a solution containing hexavalent chromium (Cr+6), phosphorus as a phosphate anion, and usually other components. Literally hundreds of subtly different, proprietary chromate conversion coating formulas exist. For aluminum and aluminum alloys, the primary active ingredient in the bath is usually a chromate, dichromate (CrO4 2- or Cr2 O7 2-), or phosphate (PO4 3-). The pH of the solutions is usually in the range of 1.3 to 2.5, but a few alkaline bath formulas are known. The process results in the formation of a protective, amorphous coating comprised of oxides of the substrate, complex chromium or phosphorus compounds, and other components of the processing solution. Only a small number of coatings and chromating processes have been characterized by surface analysis techniques. But in coating systems that have been studied, the following compounds have been reported: substrate oxides and hydroxides such as Al2 O3 and Al(OH)3, chromium oxides and hydroxides such as Cr2 O3, CrOOH, Cr(OH)3, and Cr2 O3 ·xH2 O, and phosphates such as AlPO4. These coatings enhance corrosion resistance of bare and painted surfaces, improve adhesion of paint, or other organic finishes, or provide the surface with a decorative finish.
Chromate conversion coatings are applied by contacting the processed surfaces with a sequence of solutions. The basic processing sequence typically consists of the following six steps: cleaning the metal surface, rinsing, creating the conversion coating on the metal surface, rinsing, post treatment rinsing, and drying. The cleaning, rinsing, and drying steps are fairly standard procedures throughout the industry. The chief variant among the processes used is the composition of the chromate conversion solution. The compositions of these solutions depends on the metal to be treated and the specific requirements of the final product. The chief disadvantage of chromate conversion coating processes is that they involve the use of environmentally hazardous and toxic substances. It is expected that the use of substances like chromates will soon be regulated under stringent guidelines.
Because of the environmental problems with chromates, much work has been done to develop protective coatings which do not employ such compounds. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,004,951 to Dorsey discloses applying a hydrophobic coating on an aluminum surface by treatment with a long chain carboxylic acid and an equivalent alkali metal salt of the carboxylic acid, U.S. Pat. No. 4,054,466 to King et al. discloses a process for the treatment aluminum in which vegetable tannin is applied to the surface of the aluminum, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,063,969 to Howell et al. discloses treating aluminum with a combination of tannin and lithium hydroxide. In each of the above patents, the primary protective ingredient is the complex organic compound, the treatment solution is applied at slightly elevated temperatures (90°-125° F.), and the treatment solution is kept at a mid-level pH (4-8 in King and Howell, and 8-10 in Dorsey). Csanady et al., in Corrosion Science, 24, 3, 237-48 (1984) showed that alkali and alkali earth metals stimulated Al(OH)3 growth on aluminum alloys. However, Csanady et al. report that the incorporation of Li+ or Mg+ into a growing oxide film degrades corrosion resistance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved process for forming a protective coating on aluminum and aluminum alloys which is environmentally sound, utilizes low-cost chemical ingredients, and is procedurally similar to existing coating processes.
It is another object of the present invention to use alkali metal salts, such as Li2 CO3, Li2 SO4, LiCl, LiOH, and LiBr, and alkaline earth metal salts, such as MgCl2, MgBr2, and MgCO3, in a treatment solution having an elevated pH to provide a protective coating on aluminum.
It is yet another object of the present invention to use aqueous alkaline salts to treat aluminum alloys containing lithium to produce a protective coating on the aluminum alloy.
According to the invention, aluminum alloys have been found to exhibit increased corrosion resistance after exposure to aqueous alkaline (pH ranging from 8-13) solutions of lithium salts. Because lithium salts are similar in character to magnesium salts, similar results are likely to be achieved for solutions containing a magnesium cation. Upon immersion in the alkaline bath, a specific chemical composition containing aluminum, lithium (or magnesium) and the salt anion is formed as a protective film on the aluminum surface. Formation of the protective film readily occurs at room temperature. Heating the aluminum substrate after film formation may liberate water and volatile anions bound in the chemical structure of the film. Aluminum alloys which contain lithium or magnesium and magnesium based alloys only need to be treated with an alkaline salt solution to form the protective aluminum-lithium-anion film or aluminum-magnesium-anion film. Lithium and magnesium salts are ubiquitous, low cost compounds which are not hazardous to the environment and, therefore, the inventive process has significant advantages over the use of chromate conversion coatings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
Corrosion resistant films can be formed on aluminum and aluminum alloy components using a multi-step process involving immersion in an alkaline lithium salt bath. Corrosion resistance my be enhanced by a subsequent heat treatment and room temperature aging process. Components to be coated are first degreased using hexane or some other suitable degreasing agent. Then, the components are cleaned in an alkaline bath. The residue from the cleaning process is removed in a deoxidizing acid bath. The components are then immediately immersed in an alkaline lithium salt solution. For example, the solution may be 0.01 to 0.6 M Li2 CO3 (the upper solubility limit). The best results have been achieved with alkaline lithium salt solutions with concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 M. The pH of the solution must be greater than 8 and is most preferably between 11 and 12. The components remain in the alkaline lithium salt bath for approximately 5 to 60 minutes (or longer for thicker coatings). The salt bath may be maintained at room temperature (e.g., 25°-30° C.) during immersion. The components are then removed and dried. The components may then be heat treated and aged. For example, heating in air at 150° C. and aging for seven days at room temperature yields desirable results. Coatings formed by this process are thin and translucent The appearance of these coatings is similar to that produced by some traditional conversion coating and the corrosion resistance is comparable to some chromate conversion coatings in accelerated testing.
The compounds formed on the aluminum surface during immersion in the salt solution have a structure comprised of layers of hydroxide ions separated by alternating layers of metal (Al and Li (or Mg)) cations and anions of the salt. The compounds belong to a class of clays known as hydrotalcites. The hydrotalcite compounds in the surface film can, without further processing, impart corrosion resistance to the aluminum. However, the protective properties of the film may degrade in acid and neutral solutions. Therefore, a post film formation heat treatment has been found to be beneficial in improving corrosion resistance. Heat treatment is believed to liberate water and volatile anions bound in the hydrotalcite structure to create more corrosion resistant film which is less susceptible to degradation. Titanium salts, hydrofluoric acid, phosphoric acid, and sodium hydroxide may be added to the alkaline lithium salt solution to improve the characteristics of the resulting corrosion resistant film; however, such additions are not required.
Hydrotalcite compounds are detectable on aluminum and aluminum alloys after immersion in solutions with a pH as low as 8. However, increasing amounts of the hydrotalcite compounds result when the solution has a higher pH. Increased corrosion resistance has been observed in the presence of several lithium salt solutions including LiCl, LiOH, LiBr, Li2 CO3, and Li2 SO4. Other lithium salts should also be suitable for hydrotalcite compound formation. Hydrotalcite films are formed in solution at room temperature. Increasing the lithium salt solution temperature causes volatile species like carbonates and sulfates to escape solution as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, thereby inhibiting hydrotalcite formation. Aluminum alloys which contain lithium at a level ranging from 0.5 to 10 weight percent would only need to be exposed to aqueous alkaline salts having anions such as CO3 2-, SO4 2-, Cl-, Br-, and OH-, or the like, since the lithium in the alloy surface could react with the immersion solution. The immersion time required to form the hydrotalcite compounds in the protective film depends on the alloy type, salt concentration, salt type, and bath pH.
Corrosion performance of the coatings made by the inventive process have been compared to conventional coatings. Accelerated tests were performed using electrochemical imperdanice spectroscopy (EIS) in aerated 0.5 M NaCl solution. In these tests, the polarization resistance, Rp, is determined and provides a measure of the corrosion resistance. In general, larger values of Rp indicate better corrosion resistance. Corrosion performance coatings is tracked as a function of time to determine how long a coating will offer the necessary level of protection. Moreover, the time at which a coating no longer often a threshold level of corrosion protection is a useful way of the ranking the effectiveness of different coating processes. A drawback to evaluating coating corrosion performance in actual service environments is that testing times can be exceedingly long. An ideal test environment is one that is severe enough to keep testing times down, but maintains enough sensitivity to distinguish among different levels of coating performance and induces damage by the same mechanisms that are expected to operate under service conditions. EIS testing in 0.5 M NaCl solution satisfies these criteria (e.g., film breakdown can be detected in reasonable periods of time, the performance of various coatings can be distinguished, the performance of coatings on various alloys can be distinguished, and the damage mechanisms are followed since chloride ion instigates film failure in service environments).
In the EIS tests, five panels were prepared from commercial sheet stock, The sheet stock used was alloy 1100, which has a composition of 99.5% Al with the remainder being iron, silicon and copper and is commercially available from Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. The test panels were cut from the sheet stock and mechanically polished with successively finer SiC paper ending with a 600 grit final polish. The panels were then decreased by immersing them in 1,1,1 tricloroethane at 70° C. and deoxidized in an ammonium bifluoride (75 g/l)/concentrated nitric acid bath for ten minutes. The panels were then rinsed in a 10 mega-Ohm distilled water cascade for five minutes. The panels were then subjected to immediate immersion procedures for film formation. The first panel had a film formed by immersion in 0.6M Li2 CO3 at pH 11.2 for one hour at room temperature. After removing the panel from the immersion bath, it was cascade rinsed in distilled water and allowed to dry in ambient air. The panel was aged seven days in a desiccator at room temperature prior to ElS testing. The second panel had a film formed by the same process as the first panel, but, it was additionally subjected to a heat treatment step of 150° C. for four hours. The third panel had a film formed by the Parker-Amchem Alodine 1200 process. The film is a mixture of hydrated aluminum oxide Cr6+ and various chromium oxides, the relative proportions of which can vary widely. The fourth panel was given a chromate conversion coating treatment of fifteen minutes in 1.0M Na2 CrO4 at pH 8.5. The fifth panel acted as a control and did not have a protective film formed thereon.
Table 1 shows the polarization resistance measurements for the five panels after three hours exposure to 0.5M NaCl.
              TABLE 1
______________________________________
Alloy 1100
Type of Coating    RP (ohms-cm.sup.2)
______________________________________
(1) Lithium Carbonate
                   1.5*10.sup.4
(2) Lithium Carbonate + Heat
                   1.5*10.sup.5
(3) Alodine 1200   2.5*10.sup.4
(4) Chromate       1.5*10.sup.5
(5) No Coating     1.0*10.sup.3
______________________________________
As can be seen from Table 1, the polarization resistance (Rp) measurements were as good or better than that measured for the standard alodine coating and the chromate coating. Table 1 also shows that the post film formation heat treatment resulted in improving the corrosion resistance by an order of magnitude. Similar improved corrosion resistance results were obtained with other aluminum alloys.
It has also been determined that under constant immersion conditions in NaCl at the free corrosion potential, the coating polarization resistance increases. Table 2 presents the measured polarization resistance of lithium carbonate coated and heat treated aluminum alloy 1100 vebus time in aerated 0.5M NaCl solution at pH 5.5.
              TABLE 2
______________________________________
Immersion Time (hours)
                 Rp (ohms-cm.sup.2)
______________________________________
0                2.0*10.sup.5
20               1.5*10.sup.5
43               2.0*10.sup.5
67               6.0*10.sup.5
91               3.0*10.sup.3
115              7.0*10.sup.3
240              5.0*10.sup.5
______________________________________
The increase with time in the immersion bath indicates that barrier properties may be maintained for extended exposure periods under less severe service conditions. The anticipated service conditions are atmospheric exposure 0-100% relative humidity and/or under organic and polymeric paints and coatings.
Another electrochemical method for evaluating corrosion performance is known as anodic potentiodynamic polarization testing. Typical parameters obtained from such testing that are commonly used to characterize corrosion behavior are the corrosion potential (Ecorr), the breakaway potential (Ebr), and the passive current density (ipass). Lower corrosion potentials usually correspond with lower corrosion resistance. The breakaway potential is the potential at which the surface film no longer offers significant protection from corrosion; therefore, higher breakaway potentials correspond with more corrosion resistance. The passive current density is a direct measure of the corrosion rate in the potential range where the surface firm is stable. Lower passive current densities correspond with better corrosion resistance.
Tables 3 and 4 show the anodic polarization data summary for 99.999% aluminum in deaerated 0.6M salt solutions at a pH ranging from 6 to 7 and at a pH ranging from 10 to 10.5, respectively.
              TABLE 3
______________________________________
pH = 6-7
             LiCl       NaCl
______________________________________
E.sub.coff (V.sub.sce)
               -1.020       -0.940
E.sub.br (V.sub.sce)
               -0.640       -0.660
i.sub.pass (A/cm.sup.2)
               7.0*10.sup.-7
                            4.0*10.sup.-7
______________________________________
              TABLE 4
______________________________________
pH = 10-10.5
             LiCl       NaCl
______________________________________
E.sub.COFF (V.sub.sce)
               -1.500       -1.750
E.sub.br (V.sub.sce)
               -0.600       -0.650
i.sub.pass (A/cm.sup.2)
               1.5*10.sup.-6
                            7.0*10.sup.-5
______________________________________
In Table 3, the polarization curve parameters are similar for LiCl and NaCl which would indicate no special passivating effects due to the presence of lithium in a neutral solution. However, the results in Table 4 show that the more alkaline lithium containing solution increases the breakaway potential by 0.050 Volts and the passive current density is reduced by an order of magnitude compared to the similar sodium containing solution.
Table 5 summarizes anodic polarization data obtained for 99.999% aluminum in various other lithium salt solutions.
              TABLE 5
______________________________________
         0.1M Li.sub.2 SO.sub.4
                   0.1M LiBr 0.1M LiOH
         pH 11.0   pH 11.0   pH 10.5
______________________________________
E.sub.COFF (V.sub.sce)
           -1.850      -1.750    -1.800
E.sub.br (V.sub.sce)
           -0.420      -0.040    -0.420
i.sub.pass(A/cm.sup.2)
           2.5*10.sup.-5
                       9.0*10.sup.-6
                                 1.0*10.sup.-6
______________________________________
In each case, the measured Ebr and/or ipass parameters indicate a beneficial passivating effect. Hence, a wide variety of lithium salts can be used in immersion solutions to create a corrosion resistant film on aluminum and aluminum alloys.
To determine whether aluminum-lithium alloys could be passivated by exposure to an alkaline solution (e.g., non-lithium containing since lithium is present in the alloy), 99.999% Al and an Al-3 weight percent Li alloy (Al-3Li) were immersed in 0.6M NaCl at pH 5.5 and pH 10 prior to anodic potentiodynamic polarization testing. Tables 6 and 7 present the anodic polarization data summaries for 99.999% Al in deaerated 0.6M NaCl solution and for a solution heat treated and quenched Al-3Li in deaerated 0.6M NaCl solution, respectively.
              TABLE 6
______________________________________
99.999% Al in Deaerated 0.6M NaCl Solution
             pH 5.5     pH 10
______________________________________
E.sub.COFF (V.sub.sce)
               -0.985       -1.340
E.sub.br (V.sub.sce)
               -0.725       -0.725
i.sub.pass (A/cm.sup.2)
               1.0*10.sup.-7
                            3.0*10.sup.-7
______________________________________
              TABLE 7
______________________________________
Solution Heat Treated and Quenched Al-3Li in
Deaerated 0.6M NaCl Solution
             pH 5.5     pH 10
______________________________________
E.sub.COFF (V.sub.sce)
               -0.965       -1.080
E.sub.br (V.sub.sce)
               -0.640       -0.575
i.sub.pass (A/cm.sup.2)
               2.1*10.sup.-6
                            2.0*10.sup.-7
______________________________________
With reference to Table 6, the corrosion potential for 99.999% pure aluminum decreases by nearly 0.400V, and neither Ebr nor ipass are significantly changed. This indicates that no benefit was obtained by treating the pure aluminum with the alkaline solution. However, with reference to Table 7, the Ai-3Li treated with the alkaline NaCl solution had an Ebr which increased by 0.065 V and an ipass which was reduced by a factor of 10. These results indicate that corrosion resistance of the aluminum-lithium alloy was significantly increased by pretreatment with the alkaline salt.
In general, the first element in a group in the Periodic Table exhibits properties which deviate from the trends of its group. Commonly the physical and chemical behavior of the first element in the group is more like the elements in the next group (see Bodie et at., Concepts and Models of Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd, John Wiley & sons, Inc. New York, 1983). Physical chemists have described this phenomena as "diagonal relationships", referring to the fact that the element is similar in behavior to an element diagonally positioned to it on the Periodic Table. Lithium, being the first element in Group IA behaves more like Group IIA magnesium than other Group IA elements, like sodium and potassium. Diagonal relationships are evident when comparing physical properties like solubility. For example, fluorides, carbonates and phosphates of Mg and Li are only moderately soluble, while the same Na and K compounds are highly soluble.
There are several physical and chemical characteristics shared by lithium and magnesium which would suggest that magnesium salts could be used to protect aluminum and aluminum alloys in the same manner shown above for lithium salts. For instance, lithium and magnesium compounds have unusually high lattice energies resulting in relatively good chemical stability. The hydrolysis behavior of lithium and magnesium are also similar (see Baes et al., Hydrolysis of Cations, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, FL, 1986). Lithium is the only Group IA ion to hydrolyze appreciably, but does so only in extremely alkaline solutions. Magnesium also hydrolyzes, but does not do so appreciably before the precipitation of brucite (Mg(OH)2). In the bath solutions discussed above in conjunction with the present invention, lithium exists mainly as Li+ and is believed to be imbibed into Al(OH)3 to form a hydrotalcite-like structure. Similarly, magnesium in the bath solution would exist primarily as Mg2+ and would also be easily imbibed. The radii of the two ions is nearly identical (e.g,, 0.086 nm for Li+ and 0.090 nm for Mg2+) so these cations could occupy the same sites in the cation layer of the hydrotalcite structure without significantly altering the structure. In fact, the naturally occurring variant of hydrotalcite, Mg[Al2 (OH)6 ]2 ·CO3 nH2 O) contains magnesium (see Miyata, Clay Minerals, 23, 369-375, 1975).
While the invention has been described in terms of its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims (8)

Having thus described our invention, what we claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent is as follows:
1. A method for providing an aluminum alloy containing lithium with a surface coating that protects against corrosion, comprising the steps of immersing a substrate comprised of an aluminum alloy that contains 0.5 to 10 weight percent lithium in an alkaline salt solution having a pH of at least 8 and a concentration ranging from 0.01M to 1.0M wherein an anion of said salt in said alkaline salt solution is capable of forming a salt with said lithium in said aluminum alloy, and drying a film formed on said substrate after said step of immersing.
2. A method as recited in claim I wherein said anion of said salt in said alkaline salt solution is selected from the group consisting of CO3 2-, SO4 2-, Cl-, Br-, and OH-.
3. A method as recited in claim 2 wherein said step of immersing is performed when said alkaline salt solution has a temperature ranging from 25° C. to 30° C.
4. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of heating said film formed on said substrate.
5. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein said step of heating is performed at approximately 150° C. for approximately four hours.
6. A method of protecting aluminum and aluminum alloys against corrosion comprising the step of immersing an aluminum or aluminum alloy in an aqueous solution consisting .[.solely.]. .Iadd.essentially of .Iaddend.a lithium salt .Iadd.to form a corrosion resistant coating.Iaddend.. .Iadd.7. A method of protecting aluminum and aluminum alloys against corrosion comprising the step of immersing an aluminum or aluminum alloy in an aqueous solution which is free of a quantity of tannin sufficient to form a corrosion resistant coating, comprising a lithium salt to form a corrosion resistant coating. .Iaddend..Iadd.8. A method of protecting aluminum and aluminum alloys against corrosion comprising the step of immersing an aluminum or aluminum alloy in an alkaline aqueous solution consisting essentially of a lithium salt to form a corrosion resistant coating. .Iaddend..Iadd.9. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 wherein the pH is greater than 9..Iaddend..Iadd.10. A method as recited claims 6, 7 or 8 where the pH is 10 or greater. .Iaddend..Iadd.11. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 wherein the lithium salt is LiCl, LiOH, LiBr, Li2 CO3 or Li2 SO4. .Iaddend..Iadd.12. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 wherein the concentration of the lithium salt
ranges from 0.01 to 0.6 molar. .Iaddend..Iadd.13. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 wherein said concentration of the lithium salt ranges from 0.05 molar to 0.1 molar. .Iaddend..Iadd.14. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 wherein said immersing step is performed when the lithium salt solution has a temperature ranging from 25° C. to 30° C. .Iaddend..Iadd.15. A method as recited in claims 6, 7 or 8 further comprising the step of heating the coating formed on the aluminum or aluminum alloy to improve the corrosion resistance of the coating. .Iaddend..Iadd.16. A method as recited in claim 15 wherein said heating step is performed at approximately 150° C. for approximately 4 hours. .Iaddend..Iadd.17. A method of protecting aluminum and aluminum alloys against corrosion by forming a hydrotalcite coating on a surface of an aluminum or aluminum alloy substrate by immersing said substrate in a solution consisting essentially of a lithium salt solution having a pH which allows hydrotalcite formation, for a length of time sufficient to allow a degree of hydrotalcite formation which provides corrosion
resistance for the substrate. .Iaddend..Iadd.18. A method as recited in claim 17 wherein said pH is greater than 10. .Iaddend..Iadd.19. A method as recited in claim 17 wherein said length of time is on the order of minutes. .Iaddend..Iadd.20. A method as recited in claim 17 wherein said alkaline metal salt is a lithium salt selected from the group consisting of LiCl, LiOH, LiBr, Li2 CO3 or Li2 SO4. .Iaddend..Iadd.21. A method as recited in claim 17 wherein said step of immersing is performed at approximately room temperature..Iaddend..Iadd.22. A method as recited in claim 17 further comprising the step of heating the hydrotalcite coating subsequent to formation to improve the corrosion resistance of the coating. .Iaddend.
US08/534,929 1991-06-21 1995-09-28 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys Expired - Lifetime USRE35576E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/534,929 USRE35576E (en) 1991-06-21 1995-09-28 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/723,445 US5266356A (en) 1991-06-21 1991-06-21 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys
US08/534,929 USRE35576E (en) 1991-06-21 1995-09-28 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/723,445 Reissue US5266356A (en) 1991-06-21 1991-06-21 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE35576E true USRE35576E (en) 1997-07-29

Family

ID=24906301

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/723,445 Ceased US5266356A (en) 1991-06-21 1991-06-21 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys
US08/534,929 Expired - Lifetime USRE35576E (en) 1991-06-21 1995-09-28 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/723,445 Ceased US5266356A (en) 1991-06-21 1991-06-21 Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US5266356A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6069197A (en) 1998-05-08 2000-05-30 University Of New Orleans Foundation Adhesive for aluminum using aluminum-lithium corrosion inhibitors
US20050022693A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2005-02-03 Wayne Pigment Corp. Pigment grade corrosion inhibitor host-guest compositions and procedure
US20050235873A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 Tony Gichuhi Synergistic corrosion inhibitor
US20080050268A1 (en) * 2006-08-28 2008-02-28 Alfred Frank Daech Aluminum/lithium/x materials
WO2013021368A1 (en) 2011-08-11 2013-02-14 Universidade De Aveiro Conversion films based on lamellar double-hydroxides for active protection against corrosion
US8512872B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2013-08-20 Dupalectpa-CHN, LLC Sealed anodic coatings
US8609254B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2013-12-17 Sanford Process Corporation Microcrystalline anodic coatings and related methods therefor
CN104001659A (en) * 2014-06-16 2014-08-27 滁州市宏源喷涂有限公司 Spraying method of aluminum alloy sections
US20190177855A1 (en) * 2016-08-12 2019-06-13 Prc-Desoto International, Inc. Preparation of Treatment Composition and System and Method of Maintaining a Treatment Bath Formed Therefrom

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3598163B2 (en) * 1996-02-20 2004-12-08 ソニー株式会社 Metal surface treatment method
US5756218A (en) * 1997-01-09 1998-05-26 Sandia Corporation Corrosion protective coating for metallic materials
CN100427401C (en) * 2005-12-29 2008-10-22 北京化工大学 Preparation method of highly oriented transparent dihydroxy metal oxide film
WO2008068997A1 (en) * 2006-12-04 2008-06-12 Konica Minolta Opto, Inc. Process for producing glass substrate for recording medium, glass substrate for recording medium, recording medium, and holding jig
US8858910B2 (en) * 2007-02-08 2014-10-14 Altek Capital, Inc. Device for and method of storage and generation of hydrogen for autonomous current sources based on fuel cells
EP2151855B1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2014-03-12 Ulvac, Inc. Plasma-processing device and method of manufacturing adhesion-preventing member
US10876211B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2020-12-29 Prc-Desoto International, Inc. Compositions for application to a metal substrate
PT106256A (en) 2012-04-17 2013-10-17 Chemetall Gmbh METHOD SURFACES COATING PROCESS WITH COATINGS CONTAINING LAMELAR DUAL HYDROXIDE PARTICLES.
CN109563628A (en) 2016-08-12 2019-04-02 Prc-迪索托国际公司 Sealing compositions
CN106868483B (en) * 2017-02-28 2019-03-29 北京石油化工学院 A kind of preparation method of aluminium and aluminum alloy surface ternary houghite film
CN112359356B (en) * 2020-11-09 2022-04-29 中国石油大学(华东) Method for preparing super-hydrophobic zinc-aluminum hydrotalcite-like coating on surface of aluminum alloy
CN113026010A (en) * 2021-01-29 2021-06-25 昆明理工大学 Environment-friendly alkaline passivation solution for aluminum material
DE102021128545A1 (en) 2021-11-03 2023-05-04 Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe Ag Steel flat product with quick-heating coating

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3973998A (en) * 1975-05-05 1976-08-10 Celanese Coatings & Specialties Company Rinsing solutions for acid cleaned iron and steel surfaces
US4004951A (en) * 1975-07-03 1977-01-25 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Protective coating for aluminum products
US4054466A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-10-18 Oxy Metal Industries Corporation Tannin treatment of aluminum
US4063969A (en) * 1976-02-09 1977-12-20 Oxy Metal Industries Corporation Treating aluminum with tannin and lithium
JPS54148141A (en) * 1978-05-12 1979-11-20 Showa Keikinzoku Kk Formation of anodized layer on aluminum surface
US4319924A (en) * 1974-02-12 1982-03-16 Coatings For Industry, Inc. Low-temperature curing coating composition
JPH05335899A (en) * 1992-05-28 1993-12-17 Fujitsu Ltd Flip-flop circuit

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4319924A (en) * 1974-02-12 1982-03-16 Coatings For Industry, Inc. Low-temperature curing coating composition
US3973998A (en) * 1975-05-05 1976-08-10 Celanese Coatings & Specialties Company Rinsing solutions for acid cleaned iron and steel surfaces
US4004951A (en) * 1975-07-03 1977-01-25 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Protective coating for aluminum products
US4054466A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-10-18 Oxy Metal Industries Corporation Tannin treatment of aluminum
US4063969A (en) * 1976-02-09 1977-12-20 Oxy Metal Industries Corporation Treating aluminum with tannin and lithium
JPS54148141A (en) * 1978-05-12 1979-11-20 Showa Keikinzoku Kk Formation of anodized layer on aluminum surface
JPH05335899A (en) * 1992-05-28 1993-12-17 Fujitsu Ltd Flip-flop circuit

Non-Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Abstract from Dialog File 33: Aluminum Industry Abstract Patent No. Japanese J7 7026,211 (16 Feb. 1973) Journal Announcement: 7801. *
Isobe, y. et al., "Chemical Conversion Treatment of Aluminum Alloys with the Mixed Solution of MgSO4 and NaHCO3 ", Boshoku Gitutsu (Corrosion Engineering), 38, pp. 161-166 (1989) (including English Translation) (no month avail.).
Isobe, y. et al., Chemical Conversion Treatment of Aluminum Alloys with the Mixed Solution of MgSO 4 and NaHCO 3 , Boshoku Gitutsu (Corrosion Engineering), 38, pp. 161 166 (1989) (including English Translation) (no month avail.). *
Mushiro, M., et al., "Studies on Aluminum Oxide Film Formed in Alkaline Baths Containing Nitrates, Part 1", Metal Finishing Society of Japan, 23, pp. 370-374 (1972) (no month avail.).
Mushiro, M., et al., Studies on Aluminum Oxide Film Formed in Alkaline Baths Containing Nitrates, Part 1 , Metal Finishing Society of Japan, 23, pp. 370 374 (1972) (no month avail.). *
Tanaka, S., et al., "Chemical Treatment of Aluminum Alloys with the Mixed Solution of LiNO3 and NaHCO3 ", Boshoku Gijutsu (Corrosion Engineering) 39, pp. 425-431, Aug. 15, 1990 (and English Translation).
Tanaka, S., et al., Chemical Treatment of Aluminum Alloys with the Mixed Solution of LiNO 3 and NaHCO 3 , Boshoku Gijutsu (Corrosion Engineering) 39, pp. 425 431, Aug. 15, 1990 (and English Translation). *
Uchimaya, T., "A Study on Chemical Conversion Coatings Formed on Aluminum in Boiling Sea Water," Metal Finishing Society of Japan (Kinzoku Hyomen Gitjutsu), 37, pp. 178-183 (1986). (No month avail.).
Uchimaya, T., A Study on Chemical Conversion Coatings Formed on Aluminum in Boiling Sea Water, Metal Finishing Society of Japan (Kinzoku Hyomen Gitjutsu), 37, pp. 178 183 (1986). (No month avail.). *
Uchiyama, T., "Recent studies on chemical oxide coatings of aluminum," Japan Institute of Light Metals (Kei-Kimz oku), 32, pp. 202-210 (1982) (no month avail.).
Uchiyama, T., Recent studies on chemical oxide coatings of aluminum, Japan Institute of Light Metals (Kei Kimz oku), 32, pp. 202 210 (1982) (no month avail.). *

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6069197A (en) 1998-05-08 2000-05-30 University Of New Orleans Foundation Adhesive for aluminum using aluminum-lithium corrosion inhibitors
US7662312B2 (en) * 2001-05-04 2010-02-16 Wayne Pigment Corp. Pigment grade corrosion inhibitor host-guest compositions and procedure
US20050022693A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2005-02-03 Wayne Pigment Corp. Pigment grade corrosion inhibitor host-guest compositions and procedure
US20080258114A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2008-10-23 Wayne Pigment Corporation Pigment grade corrosion inhibitor host-guest compositions and procedure
US7578878B2 (en) * 2001-05-04 2009-08-25 Wayne Pigment Corp. Pigment grade corrosion inhibitor host-guest compositions and procedure
US20050235873A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 Tony Gichuhi Synergistic corrosion inhibitor
US7481877B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2009-01-27 Hammond Group, Inc. Synergistic corrosion inhibitor
US20080050268A1 (en) * 2006-08-28 2008-02-28 Alfred Frank Daech Aluminum/lithium/x materials
US8512872B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2013-08-20 Dupalectpa-CHN, LLC Sealed anodic coatings
US8609254B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2013-12-17 Sanford Process Corporation Microcrystalline anodic coatings and related methods therefor
WO2013021368A1 (en) 2011-08-11 2013-02-14 Universidade De Aveiro Conversion films based on lamellar double-hydroxides for active protection against corrosion
CN104001659A (en) * 2014-06-16 2014-08-27 滁州市宏源喷涂有限公司 Spraying method of aluminum alloy sections
CN104001659B (en) * 2014-06-16 2016-01-20 滁州市宏源喷涂有限公司 A kind of spraying method of aluminium alloy extrusions
US20190177855A1 (en) * 2016-08-12 2019-06-13 Prc-Desoto International, Inc. Preparation of Treatment Composition and System and Method of Maintaining a Treatment Bath Formed Therefrom

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5266356A (en) 1993-11-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE35576E (en) Method for increasing the corrosion resistance of aluminum and aluminum alloys
RU2107746C1 (en) Coatings for metal surfaces chemically interacting with base
US5374347A (en) Trivalent chromium solutions for sealing anodized aluminum
EP0492306B1 (en) Steel sheet with enhanced corrosion resistance having a silane treated silicate coating
US5304257A (en) Trivalent chromium conversion coatings for aluminum
US4168983A (en) Phosphate coating composition
US5200275A (en) Steel sheet with enhanced corrosion resistance having a silane treated silicate coating
US5294266A (en) Process for a passivating postrinsing of conversion layers
WO1995034693A1 (en) Conversion coating and process and solution for its formation
GB2070073A (en) Anticorrosive treatment of galvanized steel
US20080274363A1 (en) Passivating of tin, zinc and steel surfaces
US5756218A (en) Corrosion protective coating for metallic materials
KR20040058040A (en) Chemical conversion coating agent and surface-treated metal
US4963198A (en) Composition and process for treating metal surfaces
US3957543A (en) Method for rinsing a conversion coated metal surface
US1947122A (en) Surface treatment of magnesium and magnesium base alloys
US3104177A (en) Phosphating process
CA1112432A (en) Protective coating for metals
US4101339A (en) Treatment of zinc surfaces
US3620939A (en) Coating for magnesium and its alloys and method of applying
US3477882A (en) Method of and composition for preventing "white rust" formation
US20040115448A1 (en) Corrosion resistant magnesium and magnesium alloy and method of producing same
US3556868A (en) Chromate coating composition and method
US9228263B1 (en) Chemical conversion coating for protecting magnesium alloys from corrosion
WO1995031587A1 (en) A method for pre-treating aluminum materials prior to painting

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8