USRE33920E - Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity - Google Patents

Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE33920E
USRE33920E US07/390,713 US39071389A USRE33920E US RE33920 E USRE33920 E US RE33920E US 39071389 A US39071389 A US 39071389A US RE33920 E USRE33920 E US RE33920E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
smoke
level
smoke detector
sensitivity
predetermined
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US07/390,713
Inventor
William P. Tanguay
James McCrink
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bank of America Illinois
Maple Chase Co
Original Assignee
Seatt Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26695510&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=USRE33920(E) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from US07/022,099 external-priority patent/US4792797A/en
Application filed by Seatt Corp filed Critical Seatt Corp
Priority to US07/390,713 priority Critical patent/USRE33920E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE33920E publication Critical patent/USRE33920E/en
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS reassignment BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEATT CORPORATION
Assigned to SEATT CORPORATION reassignment SEATT CORPORATION TERMINATION AND RELEASE Assignors: BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS
Assigned to SEATT CORPORATION reassignment SEATT CORPORATION RERECORD TO CORRECT ERROR IN RECORDATION DATE ON REEL 7613 FRAME 0353. Assignors: BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS
Assigned to SEATT CORPORATION reassignment SEATT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEATT CORPORATION
Assigned to COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. reassignment COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEATT CORPORATION
Assigned to MAPLE CHASE COMPANY reassignment MAPLE CHASE COMPANY CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC.
Assigned to MAPLE CHASE COMPANY (FORMERLY KNOWN AS COLEMAN SECURITY INC; SEATT CORPORATION; COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS INC.) reassignment MAPLE CHASE COMPANY (FORMERLY KNOWN AS COLEMAN SECURITY INC; SEATT CORPORATION; COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS INC.) CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COLEMAN SAFETY AND SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC.
Assigned to COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. reassignment COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEATT CORPORATION
Assigned to DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON reassignment DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAPLE CHASE COMPANY
Assigned to DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH reassignment DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: MAPLE CHASE COMPANY
Assigned to MAPLE CHASE COMPANY reassignment MAPLE CHASE COMPANY RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SECURITY INTEREST Assignors: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/12Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems
    • G08B29/14Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems checking the detection circuits
    • G08B29/145Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems checking the detection circuits of fire detection circuits
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B17/00Fire alarms; Alarms responsive to explosion
    • G08B17/10Actuation by presence of smoke or gases, e.g. automatic alarm devices for analysing flowing fluid materials by the use of optical means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to a smoke detector having the ability to temporarily change its sensitivity to smoke levels. More particularly, the invention is concerned with a smoke detector .[.have.]. .Iadd.having .Iaddend.a single button to test the smoke detector and also to activate a temporary period of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. The change from diminished sensitivity to normal sensitivity operation is also characterized by a rapid switching from one smoke sensitivity level to the other.
  • Various smoke detectors include the ability to operate for a short time in a silent mode during which the smoke detector is rendered inoperative in order to avoid false alarms associated with smoke from cooking or from persons smoking.
  • Other units are not rendered totally inoperative but have a rapidly changing level of smoke sensitivity over a temporary period of diminished smoke level sensitivity.
  • current smoke detectors having these features do not allow testing of the operability of the smoke detector during the silent period, and currently available smoke detectors generate an unpleasant beeping sound during the silent operational mode.
  • such smoke detectors have different buttons to test the unit and to actuate the silent mode of operation.
  • Such units have substantial disadvantages to the user including, (a) the user can mistakenly push the test button generating an alarm signal (b) the user can inadvertently push the test button of a failed smoke detector causing the user to falsely believe the silent mode has been activated, (c) the user can even be confused as to the function of each of the two buttons, or (d) the user can inadvertantly push the silence button of a smoke detector, not get a response, and then push the test button and additionally not get a response since the unit been previously silenced, which can substantially confuse the user and make him think the detector has failed.
  • One of the primary objects of the invention is to provide an improved smoke detector having a single button for both testing .[.operabiilty.]. .Iadd.operability .Iaddend.of the smoke detector and also for actuating an operational mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels.
  • a feature of the smoke detector in accordance with the invention lies in the provision of a single user button or switch for controlling both testing of the smoke detector and for actuating a mode of temporarily diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. Testing of the smoke detector can be performed at all times, overriding if necessary the mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. During this mode of diminished sensitivity the smoke detector still acts to sense and provide an alarm for the presence of smoke levels exceeding a predetermined smoke level which is increased over the normal mode alarm smoke level.
  • the precise amount of smoke level sensitivity is maintained constant over at least a majority of the temporary time period during which the diminished sensitivity mode is operative. At the end of the temporary time period the smoke detector switches rapidly back to the normal sensitivity mode of operation.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a smoke detector constructed in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is an electrical circuit diagram of one form of the invention
  • FIG. 3 shows a control signal plotted as a function of time illustrating the signal level of the sensitivity control element during the normal smoke detector mode and during the temporary period of diminished sensitivity smoke level;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates voltage on the collector plate versus smoke obscuration percentage
  • FIG. 5 shows sensitivity level of a transistor during both normal and diminished sensitivity modes of operation.
  • the smoke detector 10 includes a single element, such as a switch 12, which can be used to interact with the smoke detector 10 by user actuation of the switch 12.
  • the switch 12 is moved along the direction of arrow 13 into contact with a container 14 defining an ionization chamber 16.
  • the ionization chamber 16 is one .[.exampe.]. .Iadd.example .Iaddend.of means for sensing smoke levels and is a conventional unit having an Americium isotope source 17 (Am 241 ) supplied by Nuclear Radiation Development, Buffalo, N.Y.
  • the isotope source 17 emits alpha particles designated as 18, and the ionization chamber 16 is vented to admit smoke.
  • the alpha particles 18 ionize the atmosphere in the ionization chamber 16 in a known manner, providing a conductive path between the container 14 and the isotope source 17.
  • the voltage at collector plate 20 is potentiometrically divided between the voltage at the container 14 and the isotope source 17. It is a design convenience that the isotope source 17 also functions as one conductive terminal of the ionization chamber 16.
  • the introduction of smoke into the ionization chamber 16 causes the voltage at the collector plate 20 to change in a known manner (see FIG. 4) such that the voltage is a function of the smoke .[.levels.].
  • the photocell used for measuring the smoke obscuration level (as required by Underwriters Laboratory Standard 217) is manufactured by Weston Instruments, Model No. 594R.R.
  • Another example of conventional sensing means is a photoelectric sensor system.
  • the user moves the switch 12 into contact with the container 14; and approximately 90 microamps current flows from a battery 22 having input terminal 24.
  • This current flows through resistor 25 in parallel with .[.a resistor 26 and.]. the base-emitter (B-E) junction of a transistor 27 .Iadd.and into resistor 26. .Iaddend.About seventy-two micro amps of current flows into the base-emitter (B-E) junction of the transistor 27 which induces a current in the collector (C) of the transistor 27.
  • the resistors 25 and 26 and the transistor 27 shown in FIG. 2 form a test switch sensor 28 illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • the current source generated at the transistor 27 is approximately twenty to forty milliamps, this current being dependent on the transistor 27 DC beta, or current gain.
  • the transistor 27 charges a capacitor 30 through a diode 32 and substantially simultaneously turns on a second transistor 34 through a resistor 36.
  • the capacitor 30, a resistor 38 and a resistor 40 in FIG. 2 form a time constant circuit 42 in FIG. 1, and this circuit 42 will be discussed in more detail hereinafter as part of our explanation of the diminished sensitivity operational mode.
  • an inhibiting means such as an inhibit control circuit 44 shown in FIG. 1, is used for inhibiting actuation of the mode of .[.dimished.]. .Iadd.diminished .Iaddend.sensitivity to smoke levels.
  • Components of the inhibit control circuit 44 include the resistor 36, a resistor 46 and the transistor 34 shown in FIG. 2.
  • the inhibit control circuit 44 prevents the time constant circuit 42 from activating and controlling operation of the diminished sensitivity mode.
  • a Darlington transistor 48 (such as, for example, a MPSA12, NPN transistor) acts as a control switch 50 (see FIG. 1) for activation of the diminished sensitivity mode.
  • the control switch 50 functions to determine the current flow to a transistor 56, and along with coupled resistors, acts as a sensitivity control 58 during the .[.diminishd.]. .Iadd.diminished .Iaddend.sensitivity operational mode (to be discussed in detail hereinafter).
  • the transistor 34 saturates via the current flow through the resistor 36 and pulls the base B of the transistor 48 to about 100 millivolts. This prevents the transistor 48 from turning on and the emitter E of the transistor 56 floats at a voltage relative to the circuitry.
  • Pin numbered P13 of a smoke detector chip 60 with a voltage comparator portion (such as, a Motorola MC14467-P1) settles to fifty percent of the battery voltage (9 VDC in the illustrated embodiment), or 4.5 VDC at the pin P13.
  • the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 compares the 4.5 VC at the pin P13 with the voltage at pin P15, which is the input from the ionization chamber collector plate 20.
  • a circuit to ground 62 is completed both through a resistor 64 and to a ground 66 through the container 14.
  • These complete circuits therfore form a voltage divider network with a voltage on the container 14 of about 6.08 VDC, and thus a voltage of approximately four VDC at the collector plate 20. This voltage is dependent on the manufacturer's calibration of the ionization chamber 16. Consequently, in the test mode the 4.0 VDC input from the collector plate 20 to the pin P15 is less than the voltage of 4.5 VDC at the pin P13.
  • the horn 68 includes a pieozoelectric ceramic disk (not shown), such as a Kyocera No. KBS-350A-3FCS-2 , manufactured by Kyocera, Ltd., Japan.
  • the ceramic disk is mounted in a transducer socket, such as an ATM 7373, manufactured by Molex, Inc., Lisle, Ill.
  • the transducer socket (not shown) provides an audio output in coordination with the .[.piezolectric.]. .Iadd.piezoelectric .Iaddend.disk.
  • this push-to-test operational mode always overrides any other mode of operation, including the normal operating mode and the mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels.
  • the inhibit control circuit 44 is operative, thereby preventing the time constant circuit 42 from controlling the diminished sensitivity mode.
  • the time constant circuit 42 now turns on the transistor 48, and the mode of diminished .[.snesitivity.]. .Iadd.sensitivity .Iaddend.to smoke levels becomes operative.
  • the diminished sensitivity mode can be actuated independently of the testing mode while still using only one button or switch.
  • the time constant circuit 42 sets a time period of about thirteen minutes for operation of the diminished sensitivity mode.
  • the time constant circuit 42 supplies a current to the base B of the transistor 48.
  • the capacitor 30 of the time constant circuit 42 is a high quality, .[.low-leakge.]. .Iadd.low-leakage .Iaddend.electrolytic capacitor which assures an accurate time period when using high resistance values for the resistors 38 and 40 of the time constant circuit 42.
  • the diode 32 blocks the discharge to ground of the capacitor 30 back through the resistors 36 and 46 and through the transistors 34.
  • the time constant circuit 42 is actuated, approximately 0.9 microamps initially flows into the base--emitter (B-E) junction of the transistor 48,causing .[.its saturation with.]. .Iadd.it to saturate with current supplied by .Iaddend.the components connected to the collector C, such as resistors 70 and 72 and the transistor 56.
  • the transistor 48 is also the control switch 50 (see FIG. 1) which outputs a control signal via its saturation to control current flow to the transistor 56 (also the sensitivity control 58).
  • the transistor 56 acts as an emitter--follower based on the voltage divider ratio established by the resistors 70 and 72. In the .[.emobodiment.].
  • the voltage divider ratio is such that the transistor 48 saturates at about 0.5 VDC, causing a potential of about 2.5 VDC to be placed at the base B of the transistor 56. This locks the emitter E of the transistor 56 at 3.0 VDC when the internal voltage setting resistance ladder and voltage comparator of the chip 60 is strobed on.
  • This resistance ladder has a large impedance (about 1 megaohm) which appears as a current source to the transistor 56, and thus the .[.resistance ladder.].
  • .Iadd.transistor 56 .Iaddend.easily clamps the input pin P13 of the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 to about 3.0 VDC (roughly 1/3 the voltage of the battery 22).
  • the control switch 48 When the control switch 48 is not on, the emitter E of the transistor 56 floats; and the voltage at pin P13 returns to about half of the voltage of the battery 22 when the chip 60 strobes on.
  • This voltage level of 3.0 VDC for the pin P13 corresponds to about a three percent smoke obscuration level in the ionization chamber 16 for the following conditions; the buffered .[.collection plate.]. .Iadd.collector plate 20 .Iaddend.voltage is plotted against smoke obscuration level in a smoke box (see FIG.
  • a predetermined smoke level for alarm signal generation is about one and a half percent smoke obscuration (also known as optical smoke density) .Iadd.which is conventionally defined in % obscuration per foot.Iaddend..
  • an alarm signal will be generated if the smoke level in the ionization chamber 16 exceeds the increased predetermined smoke level of three percent obscuration, corresponding to changing the voltage on the collector plate 20 to less than 3.0 VDC.
  • This smoke signal is input to pin P15 of the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 and compared with the voltage pin P13.
  • This setting is for light to moderate smoke levels and suppresses alarms associated with various user generated conditions, such as, for example, at least one of cooking smoke, fireplace smoke, excessive water vapor from bath facilities and from persons smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes.
  • the user can select different sensitivity levels through the sensitivity control 58 which can include selectable different ones of the transistors 56 or resistors, such as the resistors 70 and 72.
  • the capacitor 30 has discharged sufficiently to cause the transistor 48 to turn off.
  • the base junction B of the transistor 56 is then pulled positive to the supply.
  • the changeover from the diminished sensitivity to the normal sensitivity smoke detector mode occurs rapidly as illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • the voltage at the collector C of the transistor 48 is the control signal.
  • the voltage behavior in FIG. 3 does give a relative measure of the behavior of the sensitivity and is plotted over a small part of the normal mode and over the temporary time period of the diminished sensitivity mode.
  • the voltage for the transistor, 48 shows a rapid decay, or a change from saturation to cut-off. This rapid decay arises from the use of an .[.appropirate.].
  • .Iadd.appropriate .Iaddend.diminishing means which in the illustrated embodiment is amplifying means, such as the transistor 48, and comprises the operating feature of having a small current input, a large gain and a .[.small gain.]. .Iadd.small current .Iaddend.output.
  • the resulting control signal level has a substantially constant magnitude over at least a majority of the temporary time period of operation in the diminished sensitivity mode; and this in .[.turns.]. .Iadd.turn .Iaddend.provides a substantially constant level of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels over the temporary time period. This aspect is illustrated in more quantitative and absolute terms in FIG.
  • a smoke detector which includes a number of features having important commercial advantages.
  • a user actuated switch controls both testing of the smoke detector and engagement of an operational mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. The user can override any other operational mode and perform testing of the smoke detector.
  • the sensitivity to smoke levels is substantially constant over the temporary time period of diminished mode operation, providing a highly reliable smoke detection sensitivity while tolerating user generated conditions, such as cooking smoke or cigarette smoke.
  • At the end of the temporary time period there is a rapid switching back to the normal sensitivity mode of sensing smoke levels.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Fire-Detection Mechanisms (AREA)

Abstract

A smoke detector having variable sensitivity to smoke levels and using one button both to test the smoke detector and actuate a mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. The smoke detector is operable in a normal sensitivity mode and a diminished sensitivity mode with rapid switching between the modes. The sensitivity to smoke levels is substantially constant when in either the normal or diminished sensitivity mode.

Description

The present invention relates generally to a smoke detector having the ability to temporarily change its sensitivity to smoke levels. More particularly, the invention is concerned with a smoke detector .[.have.]. .Iadd.having .Iaddend.a single button to test the smoke detector and also to activate a temporary period of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. The change from diminished sensitivity to normal sensitivity operation is also characterized by a rapid switching from one smoke sensitivity level to the other.
Various smoke detectors include the ability to operate for a short time in a silent mode during which the smoke detector is rendered inoperative in order to avoid false alarms associated with smoke from cooking or from persons smoking. Other units are not rendered totally inoperative but have a rapidly changing level of smoke sensitivity over a temporary period of diminished smoke level sensitivity. Furthermore, current smoke detectors having these features do not allow testing of the operability of the smoke detector during the silent period, and currently available smoke detectors generate an unpleasant beeping sound during the silent operational mode. Also, such smoke detectors have different buttons to test the unit and to actuate the silent mode of operation. Such units have substantial disadvantages to the user including, (a) the user can mistakenly push the test button generating an alarm signal (b) the user can inadvertently push the test button of a failed smoke detector causing the user to falsely believe the silent mode has been activated, (c) the user can even be confused as to the function of each of the two buttons, or (d) the user can inadvertantly push the silence button of a smoke detector, not get a response, and then push the test button and additionally not get a response since the unit been previously silenced, which can substantially confuse the user and make him think the detector has failed.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One of the primary objects of the invention is to provide an improved smoke detector having a single button for both testing .[.operabiilty.]. .Iadd.operability .Iaddend.of the smoke detector and also for actuating an operational mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels.
It is another object of the invention to provide a novel smoke detector having a single button for both actuating a mode of diminished smoke level sensitivity and for testing the smoke detector while overriding the diminished sensitivity mode during the testing mode.
It is further object of the invention to provide a novel smoke detector operable in a mode of normal sensitivity to smoke levels and in a mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels, the sensitivity remaining substantially constant throughout at least a majority of the time period in the diminished sensitivity mode.
It is an additional object of the invention to provide a novel smoke detector operable for a temporary time period in a mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels and at the end of the temporary time period the detector switches rapidly to the normal mode of operation.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved smoke detector operable for a temporary time period in a mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels with the smoke alarm remaining quiet unless the smoke level exceeds an increased predetermined smoke level.
A feature of the smoke detector in accordance with the invention lies in the provision of a single user button or switch for controlling both testing of the smoke detector and for actuating a mode of temporarily diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. Testing of the smoke detector can be performed at all times, overriding if necessary the mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. During this mode of diminished sensitivity the smoke detector still acts to sense and provide an alarm for the presence of smoke levels exceeding a predetermined smoke level which is increased over the normal mode alarm smoke level.
During the mode of diminshed sensitivity to smoke levels, the precise amount of smoke level sensitivity is maintained constant over at least a majority of the temporary time period during which the diminished sensitivity mode is operative. At the end of the temporary time period the smoke detector switches rapidly back to the normal sensitivity mode of operation.
Further objects and advantages of the present invention, together with the organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention which taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the several views.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a smoke detector constructed in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is an electrical circuit diagram of one form of the invention;
FIG. 3 shows a control signal plotted as a function of time illustrating the signal level of the sensitivity control element during the normal smoke detector mode and during the temporary period of diminished sensitivity smoke level;
FIG. 4 illustrates voltage on the collector plate versus smoke obscuration percentage; and
FIG. 5 shows sensitivity level of a transistor during both normal and diminished sensitivity modes of operation.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to FIGS. 1 and 2, a smoke detector constructed in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention is indicated generally at 10. The smoke detector 10 includes a single element, such as a switch 12, which can be used to interact with the smoke detector 10 by user actuation of the switch 12. The switch 12 is moved along the direction of arrow 13 into contact with a container 14 defining an ionization chamber 16. The ionization chamber 16 is one .[.exampe.]. .Iadd.example .Iaddend.of means for sensing smoke levels and is a conventional unit having an Americium isotope source 17 (Am241) supplied by Nuclear Radiation Development, Buffalo, N.Y. The isotope source 17 emits alpha particles designated as 18, and the ionization chamber 16 is vented to admit smoke. The alpha particles 18 ionize the atmosphere in the ionization chamber 16 in a known manner, providing a conductive path between the container 14 and the isotope source 17. The voltage at collector plate 20 is potentiometrically divided between the voltage at the container 14 and the isotope source 17. It is a design convenience that the isotope source 17 also functions as one conductive terminal of the ionization chamber 16. The introduction of smoke into the ionization chamber 16 causes the voltage at the collector plate 20 to change in a known manner (see FIG. 4) such that the voltage is a function of the smoke .[.levels.]. .Iadd.level .Iaddend.in the ionization chamber 16. In FIG. 4 the photocell used for measuring the smoke obscuration level (as required by Underwriters Laboratory Standard 217) is manufactured by Weston Instruments, Model No. 594R.R. Another example of conventional sensing means is a photoelectric sensor system.
When the user wishes to test the operability of the smoke detector 10, the user moves the switch 12 into contact with the container 14; and approximately 90 microamps current flows from a battery 22 having input terminal 24. This current flows through resistor 25 in parallel with .[.a resistor 26 and.]. the base-emitter (B-E) junction of a transistor 27 .Iadd.and into resistor 26. .Iaddend.About seventy-two micro amps of current flows into the base-emitter (B-E) junction of the transistor 27 which induces a current in the collector (C) of the transistor 27. The resistors 25 and 26 and the transistor 27 shown in FIG. 2 form a test switch sensor 28 illustrated in FIG. 1. Once the transistor 27 is turned on, the current source generated at the transistor 27 is approximately twenty to forty milliamps, this current being dependent on the transistor 27 DC beta, or current gain. Acting as a current source, the transistor 27 charges a capacitor 30 through a diode 32 and substantially simultaneously turns on a second transistor 34 through a resistor 36. The capacitor 30, a resistor 38 and a resistor 40 in FIG. 2 form a time constant circuit 42 in FIG. 1, and this circuit 42 will be discussed in more detail hereinafter as part of our explanation of the diminished sensitivity operational mode.
During the mode of testing the operability of the smoke detector 10, an inhibiting means, such as an inhibit control circuit 44 shown in FIG. 1, is used for inhibiting actuation of the mode of .[.dimished.]. .Iadd.diminished .Iaddend.sensitivity to smoke levels. Components of the inhibit control circuit 44 include the resistor 36, a resistor 46 and the transistor 34 shown in FIG. 2. The inhibit control circuit 44 prevents the time constant circuit 42 from activating and controlling operation of the diminished sensitivity mode. In the illustrated embodiment a Darlington transistor 48 (such as, for example, a MPSA12, NPN transistor) acts as a control switch 50 (see FIG. 1) for activation of the diminished sensitivity mode. The control switch 50 functions to determine the current flow to a transistor 56, and along with coupled resistors, acts as a sensitivity control 58 during the .[.diminishd.]. .Iadd.diminished .Iaddend.sensitivity operational mode (to be discussed in detail hereinafter).
During operation of the inhibit control circuit 44, the transistor 34 saturates via the current flow through the resistor 36 and pulls the base B of the transistor 48 to about 100 millivolts. This prevents the transistor 48 from turning on and the emitter E of the transistor 56 floats at a voltage relative to the circuitry. Pin numbered P13 of a smoke detector chip 60 with a voltage comparator portion (such as, a Motorola MC14467-P1) settles to fifty percent of the battery voltage (9 VDC in the illustrated embodiment), or 4.5 VDC at the pin P13. The voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 compares the 4.5 VC at the pin P13 with the voltage at pin P15, which is the input from the ionization chamber collector plate 20. During the testing mode when the switch 12 contacts the container 14, a circuit to ground 62 is completed both through a resistor 64 and to a ground 66 through the container 14. These complete circuits therfore form a voltage divider network with a voltage on the container 14 of about 6.08 VDC, and thus a voltage of approximately four VDC at the collector plate 20. This voltage is dependent on the manufacturer's calibration of the ionization chamber 16. Consequently, in the test mode the 4.0 VDC input from the collector plate 20 to the pin P15 is less than the voltage of 4.5 VDC at the pin P13. This difference in voltage results in the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 outputting an alarm signal on pin P10 and P11, in conjunction with P8, and also with P5 (LED) to alarm generating means, such as a conventional light emitting diode 61 and a .[.pieozoelectric.]. .Iadd.piezoelectric .Iaddend.horn 68. The horn 68 includes a pieozoelectric ceramic disk (not shown), such as a Kyocera No. KBS-350A-3FCS-2 , manufactured by Kyocera, Ltd., Japan. The ceramic disk is mounted in a transducer socket, such as an ATM 7373, manufactured by Molex, Inc., Lisle, Ill. The transducer socket (not shown) provides an audio output in coordination with the .[.piezolectric.]. .Iadd.piezoelectric .Iaddend.disk. In the preferred embodiment this push-to-test operational mode always overrides any other mode of operation, including the normal operating mode and the mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels.
In the illustrated embodiment as long as the user maintains the switch 12 in a depressed position in contact with the container 14, the inhibit control circuit 44 is operative, thereby preventing the time constant circuit 42 from controlling the diminished sensitivity mode. Once the user releases the switch 12, current is no longer supplied through the collector C of the transistor 27 to the inhibit control circuit 44. The transistor 34 is also shut off, the time constant circuit 42 now turns on the transistor 48, and the mode of diminished .[.snesitivity.]. .Iadd.sensitivity .Iaddend.to smoke levels becomes operative. In other forms of the invention the diminished sensitivity mode can be actuated independently of the testing mode while still using only one button or switch. This could be accomplished, for example, by a simple timing circuit such that a momentary depression of the switch 12 actuates the diminished sensitivity mode but requires a substantially longer contact time to enter the test mode. In the illustrated embodiment the time constant circuit 42 sets a time period of about thirteen minutes for operation of the diminished sensitivity mode. The time constant circuit 42 supplies a current to the base B of the transistor 48. Preferably, the capacitor 30 of the time constant circuit 42 is a high quality, .[.low-leakge.]. .Iadd.low-leakage .Iaddend.electrolytic capacitor which assures an accurate time period when using high resistance values for the resistors 38 and 40 of the time constant circuit 42. During operation of the time constant circuit 42, the diode 32 blocks the discharge to ground of the capacitor 30 back through the resistors 36 and 46 and through the transistors 34.
Once the time constant circuit 42 is actuated, approximately 0.9 microamps initially flows into the base--emitter (B-E) junction of the transistor 48,causing .[.its saturation with.]. .Iadd.it to saturate with current supplied by .Iaddend.the components connected to the collector C, such as resistors 70 and 72 and the transistor 56. As indicated hereinbefore, the transistor 48 is also the control switch 50 (see FIG. 1) which outputs a control signal via its saturation to control current flow to the transistor 56 (also the sensitivity control 58). When the transistor 48 is conducting, the transistor 56 acts as an emitter--follower based on the voltage divider ratio established by the resistors 70 and 72. In the .[.emobodiment.]. .Iadd.embodiment .Iaddend.of FIG. 2, the voltage divider ratio is such that the transistor 48 saturates at about 0.5 VDC, causing a potential of about 2.5 VDC to be placed at the base B of the transistor 56. This locks the emitter E of the transistor 56 at 3.0 VDC when the internal voltage setting resistance ladder and voltage comparator of the chip 60 is strobed on. This resistance ladder has a large impedance (about 1 megaohm) which appears as a current source to the transistor 56, and thus the .[.resistance ladder.]. .Iadd.transistor 56 .Iaddend.easily clamps the input pin P13 of the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 to about 3.0 VDC (roughly 1/3 the voltage of the battery 22). When the control switch 48 is not on, the emitter E of the transistor 56 floats; and the voltage at pin P13 returns to about half of the voltage of the battery 22 when the chip 60 strobes on. This voltage level of 3.0 VDC for the pin P13 corresponds to about a three percent smoke obscuration level in the ionization chamber 16 for the following conditions; the buffered .[.collection plate.]. .Iadd.collector plate 20 .Iaddend.voltage is plotted against smoke obscuration level in a smoke box (see FIG. 4) with approximately thirty-four feet per minute air flow, and the initial voltage of the collector plate 20 is set to about 5.74 VDC. During normal sensitivity operation a predetermined smoke level for alarm signal generation is about one and a half percent smoke obscuration (also known as optical smoke density) .Iadd.which is conventionally defined in % obscuration per foot.Iaddend.. During the mode of diminshed sensitivity to smoke levels, an alarm signal will be generated if the smoke level in the ionization chamber 16 exceeds the increased predetermined smoke level of three percent obscuration, corresponding to changing the voltage on the collector plate 20 to less than 3.0 VDC. This smoke signal is input to pin P15 of the voltage comparator portion of the chip 60 and compared with the voltage pin P13. This setting is for light to moderate smoke levels and suppresses alarms associated with various user generated conditions, such as, for example, at least one of cooking smoke, fireplace smoke, excessive water vapor from bath facilities and from persons smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes. In another form of the invention the user can select different sensitivity levels through the sensitivity control 58 which can include selectable different ones of the transistors 56 or resistors, such as the resistors 70 and 72.
At the end of the thirteen minute time period, dictated by the time constant circuit 42, the capacitor 30 has discharged sufficiently to cause the transistor 48 to turn off. The base junction B of the transistor 56 is then pulled positive to the supply. The changeover from the diminished sensitivity to the normal sensitivity smoke detector mode occurs rapidly as illustrated in FIG. 3. In this figure the voltage at the collector C of the transistor 48 is the control signal. The voltage behavior in FIG. 3 does give a relative measure of the behavior of the sensitivity and is plotted over a small part of the normal mode and over the temporary time period of the diminished sensitivity mode. At the end of this temporary time period the voltage for the transistor, 48 shows a rapid decay, or a change from saturation to cut-off. This rapid decay arises from the use of an .[.appropirate.]. .Iadd.appropriate .Iaddend.diminishing means, which in the illustrated embodiment is amplifying means, such as the transistor 48, and comprises the operating feature of having a small current input, a large gain and a .[.small gain.]. .Iadd.small current .Iaddend.output. As noted in a relative manner in FIG. 3 the resulting control signal level has a substantially constant magnitude over at least a majority of the temporary time period of operation in the diminished sensitivity mode; and this in .[.turns.]. .Iadd.turn .Iaddend.provides a substantially constant level of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels over the temporary time period. This aspect is illustrated in more quantitative and absolute terms in FIG. 5 which plots the emitter (E) voltage of the transistor 56 over the temporary time period. The change of sensitivity levels is clearly shown as one proceeds from the normal mode at 4.5 VDC to about three volts during the diminished sensitivity mode. This feature of the invention yields a highly reliable smoke sensitivity in the .[.dminished.]. .Iadd.diminished .Iaddend.sensitivity mode and also exhibits a rapid changeover to normal smoke sensitivity levels. At any time the temporary period of diminished sensitivity can be reinstituted by the user again depressing and releasing the switch 12 to start the thirteen minute temporary time period.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention a smoke detector is provided which includes a number of features having important commercial advantages. A user actuated switch controls both testing of the smoke detector and engagement of an operational mode of diminished sensitivity to smoke levels. The user can override any other operational mode and perform testing of the smoke detector. Once the smoke detector is in the diminished sensitivity mode, the sensitivity to smoke levels is substantially constant over the temporary time period of diminished mode operation, providing a highly reliable smoke detection sensitivity while tolerating user generated conditions, such as cooking smoke or cigarette smoke. At the end of the temporary time period there is a rapid switching back to the normal sensitivity mode of sensing smoke levels.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention in its broader aspects. For example, the invention has been illustrated in terms of a collection of discrete components, but it is contemplated that the circuitry can be readily embodied within an integrated circuit chip. Various features of the invention are defined in the following claims.

Claims (26)

What is claimed is:
1. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal .[.charcteristic.]. .Iadd.characteristic .Iaddend.of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means comprising a single user .[.actuaed.]. .Iadd.actuated .Iaddend.element adapted to cause generation of said alarm signal; and
means for temporarily diminishing the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means the magnitude of said predetermined smoke level causing generation of said alarm signal, said single user element further adapted to actuate said diminishing means.
2. The smoke detector as defined in claim 1 wherein said sensing means comprises at least one of an ionization chamber/radioactive source and a photoelectric sensor system.
3. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means comprising a user actuated element adapted to cause generation of said alarm signal; and
means for temporarily diminishing the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means said predetermined smoke level causing generation of said alarm signal, said user actuated element further adapted to actuate said diminishing means and said user testing means overriding the operation of said diminishing means during the operation of said testing means.
4. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal .[.charcteristic.]. .Iadd.characteristic .Iaddend.of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means operable by the user for generating an alarm signal output to said alarm signal means; and
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means the magnitude of said predetermined smoke level causing generation of said alarm signal, said diminishing means generating a control signal for establishing the increased magnitude of said predetermined smoke level, and said control signal having a substantially constant magnitude during said temporary time period.
5. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal .[.charcteristic.]. .Iadd.characteristic .Iaddend.of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means operably by the user for generating an alarm signal output to said alarm signal means; and
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means the magnitude of said predetermined smoke level causing generation of said alarm signal, said diminishing means generating a control signal over said temporary time period and said control signal having a slowly changing level until the end of said temporary time period whereupon said control signal decays rapidly causing deactivation of said diminishing means.
6. The smoke detector as defined in claim 5 wherein said diminishing means comprises at least means for amplifying a small current input and having a large gain and small current output.
7. The smoke detector as defined in claim 5 wherein said increased predetermined smoke sensitivity level comprises a moderate smoke level associated with user generated conditions.
8. The smoke detector as defined in claim 7 wherein said user generated conditions comprise at least one of cooking smoke, fireplace smoke, excessive water vapor and persons smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes.
9. A smoke detector comprising: means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal .[.charcteristic.]. .Iadd.characteristic .Iaddend.of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means comprising a user actuated element adapted to cause generation of said alarm signal;
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means said predetermined smoke sensitivity level causing generation of said alarm signal, said user element being a single element and adapted to both actuate said diminishing means and operate said testing means; and
sensitivity control means for user selection of said increased predetermined smoke level.
10. The smoke detector as defined in claim 9 wherein said alarm signal means comprises a voltage comparator.
11. The smoke detector as defined in claim 10 further including alarm generating means.
12. The smoke detector as defined in claim 11 wherein said alarm generating means comprises a horn and light emitting diode.
13. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein said alarm signal means remains quiet unless user tested or said smoke levels exceed said increased predetermined smoke level during operation of said diminishing means or said smoke levels exceed said predetermined smoke level during the normal operation of said smoke detector.
14. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 further including means for inhibiting operation of said diminishing means for a user selected time period.
15. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means comprising a user actuated element adapted to cause generation of said alarm signal; and
means for temporarily diminishing the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means said predetermined smoke level causing generation of said alarm signal, said user testing means overriding the operation of said diminishing means during the operation of said testing means.
16. A smoke detector having a normal sensitivity level and a moderate sensitivity level, comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means operably by the user for generating an alarm signal output to said alarm signal means; and
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector to said moderate sensitivity level for activating said alarm signal, and said .[.dminishing.]. .Iadd.diminishing .Iaddend.means generating a control signal having a slowly changing magnitude during said temporary time period and a rapidly changing magnitude at the end of said temporary time period, whereupon the sensitivity of said smoke detector returns to said normal level.
17. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level;
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said testing means comprising a user actuated element adapted to cause generation of said alarm signal;
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means said predetermined smoke sensitivity level causing generation of said alarm signal, said user element being a single element and adapted to both actuate said diminishing means and operate said testing means; and
sensitivity control means for user selection of said increased predetermined smoke level.
18. .Iadd.A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a predetermined smoke level; and
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means the magnitude of said predetermined smoke level required for generation of said alarm signal, said smoke detector remaining reliably operative throughout substantially the entire duration of said temporary time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.
19. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said predetermined smoke level is about 1.5% smoke obscuration. .Iaddend. .Iadd.20. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said increased smoke level is about 3.0% smoke obscuration. .Iaddend. .Iadd.21. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said increased smoke level is about twice said predetermined smoke level. .Iaddend. .Iadd.22. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said increased smoke level is higher than that typically resulting from cooking, fireplace use, excessive water vapor from bath facilities or use of
tobacco products. .Iaddend. .Iadd.23. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said diminishing means generates a control signal to establish said increased smoke level, said control signal being substantially constant throughout generally the entire duration of said temporary diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.24. The smoke detector of claim 18 wherein said diminishing means generates a control signal to establish said increased smoke level, said control signal being substantially constant throughout an initial portion of said temporary
diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.25. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a first predetermined smoke level; and
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing in said sensing means the magnitude of said smoke level required for generation of said alarm signal to a second predetermined smoke level, said second predetermined smoke level being a moderate smoke level which is higher than said first predetermined smoke level whereby said smoke detector remains reliably operative throughout substantially the entire duration of said temporary diminished sensitivity
time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.26. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said first predetermined smoke level is about 1.5% smoke obscuration. .Iaddend. .Iadd.27. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said second predetermined smoke level is about 3.0% smoke obscuration. .Iaddend. .Iadd.28. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said first predetermined smoke level is about one-half said second predetermined smoke level. .Iaddend. .Iadd.29. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said first predetermined smoke level is about 1.5% smoke obscuration and said second predetermined smoke level is about 3.0% smoke obscuration. .Iaddend. .Iadd.30. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said moderate smoke level is a higher smoke level than that typically resulting from cooking, fireplace use, excessive water vapor from bath facilities or use of tobacco products. .Iaddend. .Iadd.31. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said diminishing means generates a control signal to establish said second predetermined smoke level, said control signal being substantially constant throughout generally the entire duration of said
temporary diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.32. The smoke detector of claim 25 wherein said diminishing means generates a control signal to establish said second predetermined smoke level, said control signal being substantially constant throughout an initial portion of said temporary diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.33. The smoke detector of claim 32 further including means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, both said user testing means and said diminishing means being operable by a single user actuated element.
.Iaddend. .Iadd.34. A smoke detector comprising:
means for sensing smoke levels and generating a signal characteristic of said smoke levels;
means for generating an alarm signal responsive to said sensing means detecting a first predetermined smoke level;
means for diminishing for a temporary time period the sensitivity of said smoke detector by increasing the magnitude of said smoke level required for generation of said alarm signal from said first predetermined smoke level to a second predetermined smoke level that is higher than said first predetermined smoke level; and
means for user testing the operability of said smoke detector, said user testing means being operative throughout substantially the entire duration of said time period while said diminishing means is operative. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.35. The smoke detector of claim 34 wherein said second predetermined smoke level is a moderate smoke level higher than that typically resulting from cooking, fireplace use, excessive water vapor from bath facilities or use of tobacco products. .Iaddend. .Iadd.36. The smoke detector of claim 34 wherein both said diminishing means and said user testing means are operable by a single user actuated element.
.Iaddend. .Iadd.37. The smoke detector of claim 34 wherein the sensitivity of said smoke detector remains reliable throughout substantially the entire duration of said diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend. .Iadd.38. The smoke detector of claim 34 wherein said diminishing means generates a control signal, said control signal having a substantially constant magnitude throughout the entire duration of said diminished sensitivity time period, whereby, responsive to said control signal, the sensitivity of said smoke detector remains substantially constant during said diminished sensitivity time period. .Iaddend.
US07/390,713 1987-03-05 1989-07-11 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity Expired - Lifetime USRE33920E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/390,713 USRE33920E (en) 1987-03-05 1989-07-11 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/022,099 US4792797A (en) 1987-03-05 1987-03-05 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity
US07/390,713 USRE33920E (en) 1987-03-05 1989-07-11 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/022,099 Reissue US4792797A (en) 1987-03-05 1987-03-05 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE33920E true USRE33920E (en) 1992-05-12

Family

ID=26695510

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/390,713 Expired - Lifetime USRE33920E (en) 1987-03-05 1989-07-11 Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USRE33920E (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5886638A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-03-23 Ranco Inc. Of Delaware Method and apparatus for testing a carbon monoxide sensor
US5912626A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-06-15 Soderlund; Ernest E. Dangerous condition warning device incorporating provision for permanently retaining printed protocol instructions
US5966078A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-12 Ranco Inc. Battery saving circuit for a dangerous condition warning device
US5966079A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-12 Ranco Inc. Of Delaware Visual indicator for identifying which of a plurality of dangerous condition warning devices has issued an audible low battery warning signal
US5969600A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-19 Ranco Inc. Of Delware Dangerous condition warning device incorporating a time-limited hush mode of operation to defeat an audible low battery warning signal
US6346880B1 (en) 1999-12-20 2002-02-12 Motorola, Inc. Circuit and method for controlling an alarm
US20040095253A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2004-05-20 Tanguay William P. Enhanced visual signaling for an adverse condition detector
US20040100375A1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2004-05-27 Tanguay William P. Temporary alarm locate with intermittent warning
US6753786B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2004-06-22 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Microprocessor-based combination smoke and carbon monoxide detector having intelligent hush feature
US6836210B2 (en) 2002-11-12 2004-12-28 Maple Chase Company Adverse condition detector having modulated test signal
US20050007248A1 (en) * 2000-08-11 2005-01-13 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Communication protocol for interconnected hazardous condition detectors, and system employing same
US20060082464A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Low battery warning silencing in life safety devices
US20060082461A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Gateway device to interconnect system including life safety devices
US20060082455A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Radio frequency communications scheme in life safety devices
US20100271220A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Pattok Greg R Detection Device System and Device Thereof
US20110057806A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-10 Universal Security Instruments, Inc Hazardous Condition Detector with Hardware Hush
US8836532B2 (en) 2009-07-16 2014-09-16 Gentex Corporation Notification appliance and method thereof

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4097850A (en) * 1976-11-01 1978-06-27 Pittway Corporation Means for adjusting and for testing a detecting device
US4101046A (en) * 1977-03-31 1978-07-18 Puntillo Theodore F Paint brush holder
US4151522A (en) * 1976-06-17 1979-04-24 Hochiki Corporation Count discriminating fire detection system
US4222046A (en) * 1978-07-31 1980-09-09 Honeywell Inc. Abnormal condition responsive means with periodic high sensitivity
US4300133A (en) * 1977-03-28 1981-11-10 Solomon Elias E Smoke detector
US4313110A (en) * 1980-02-19 1982-01-26 Thomas Subulak Smoke alarm having temporary disabling features
US4335378A (en) * 1978-12-20 1982-06-15 Emerson Electric Company Timed dual comparator alarm
US4383251A (en) * 1981-10-01 1983-05-10 Perelli David E Timed smoke detection
US4401979A (en) * 1981-02-11 1983-08-30 General Signal Corporation Electrical controls for ionization smoke detector
US4477798A (en) * 1982-04-26 1984-10-16 Sur-Gard Security Systems Ltd. Fire Alarm control system
US4543815A (en) * 1983-07-15 1985-10-01 Cerberus Ag Device for the detection of foreign components in a gas and an application of the device
US4567477A (en) * 1983-06-15 1986-01-28 Cormier Laurent L Smoke detector switch indicator
US4568924A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-02-04 Cerberus Ag Method of and apparatus for signalling an alarm
US4600314A (en) * 1984-10-26 1986-07-15 Theriault George E Smoke detector cutoff timer

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4151522A (en) * 1976-06-17 1979-04-24 Hochiki Corporation Count discriminating fire detection system
US4097850A (en) * 1976-11-01 1978-06-27 Pittway Corporation Means for adjusting and for testing a detecting device
US4300133A (en) * 1977-03-28 1981-11-10 Solomon Elias E Smoke detector
US4101046A (en) * 1977-03-31 1978-07-18 Puntillo Theodore F Paint brush holder
US4222046A (en) * 1978-07-31 1980-09-09 Honeywell Inc. Abnormal condition responsive means with periodic high sensitivity
US4335378A (en) * 1978-12-20 1982-06-15 Emerson Electric Company Timed dual comparator alarm
US4313110A (en) * 1980-02-19 1982-01-26 Thomas Subulak Smoke alarm having temporary disabling features
US4401979A (en) * 1981-02-11 1983-08-30 General Signal Corporation Electrical controls for ionization smoke detector
US4383251A (en) * 1981-10-01 1983-05-10 Perelli David E Timed smoke detection
US4477798A (en) * 1982-04-26 1984-10-16 Sur-Gard Security Systems Ltd. Fire Alarm control system
US4567477A (en) * 1983-06-15 1986-01-28 Cormier Laurent L Smoke detector switch indicator
US4543815A (en) * 1983-07-15 1985-10-01 Cerberus Ag Device for the detection of foreign components in a gas and an application of the device
US4568924A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-02-04 Cerberus Ag Method of and apparatus for signalling an alarm
US4600314A (en) * 1984-10-26 1986-07-15 Theriault George E Smoke detector cutoff timer

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Liefsaver Smoke Alarm" Owners Manual Sep. 1986; Fyrnetics Inc.; Elgin Ill. 60120.
"Lifesave Smoke Alarm" Owners Manual Jun. 1988; Fyrnetics Inc.
Liefsaver Smoke Alarm Owners Manual Sep. 1986; Fyrnetics Inc.; Elgin Ill. 60120. *
Lifesave Smoke Alarm Owners Manual Jun. 1988; Fyrnetics Inc. *

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5886638A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-03-23 Ranco Inc. Of Delaware Method and apparatus for testing a carbon monoxide sensor
US5912626A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-06-15 Soderlund; Ernest E. Dangerous condition warning device incorporating provision for permanently retaining printed protocol instructions
US5966078A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-12 Ranco Inc. Battery saving circuit for a dangerous condition warning device
US5966079A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-12 Ranco Inc. Of Delaware Visual indicator for identifying which of a plurality of dangerous condition warning devices has issued an audible low battery warning signal
US5969600A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-10-19 Ranco Inc. Of Delware Dangerous condition warning device incorporating a time-limited hush mode of operation to defeat an audible low battery warning signal
US6346880B1 (en) 1999-12-20 2002-02-12 Motorola, Inc. Circuit and method for controlling an alarm
US6753786B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2004-06-22 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Microprocessor-based combination smoke and carbon monoxide detector having intelligent hush feature
US20050007248A1 (en) * 2000-08-11 2005-01-13 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Communication protocol for interconnected hazardous condition detectors, and system employing same
US7449990B2 (en) 2000-08-11 2008-11-11 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Communication protocol for interconnected hazardous condition detectors, and system employing same
EP1988519A2 (en) 2000-08-11 2008-11-05 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Microprocessor-based combination smoke and carbon monoxide detector having intelligent hush feature
US6836210B2 (en) 2002-11-12 2004-12-28 Maple Chase Company Adverse condition detector having modulated test signal
US7075444B2 (en) 2002-11-15 2006-07-11 Maple Chase Company Temporary alarm locate with intermittent warning
US20040100375A1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2004-05-27 Tanguay William P. Temporary alarm locate with intermittent warning
US20040095253A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2004-05-20 Tanguay William P. Enhanced visual signaling for an adverse condition detector
US7030748B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2006-04-18 Maple Chase Company Enhanced visual signaling for an adverse condition detector
US20060082455A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Radio frequency communications scheme in life safety devices
US20060082461A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Gateway device to interconnect system including life safety devices
US7339468B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2008-03-04 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Radio frequency communications scheme in life safety devices
US7385517B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2008-06-10 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Gateway device to interconnect system including life safety devices
US20060082464A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Low battery warning silencing in life safety devices
US7508314B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2009-03-24 Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. Low battery warning silencing in life safety devices
US20100271220A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Pattok Greg R Detection Device System and Device Thereof
US8232884B2 (en) 2009-04-24 2012-07-31 Gentex Corporation Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors having distinct alarm indications and a test button that indicates improper operation
US8836532B2 (en) 2009-07-16 2014-09-16 Gentex Corporation Notification appliance and method thereof
US20110057806A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-10 Universal Security Instruments, Inc Hazardous Condition Detector with Hardware Hush

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4792797A (en) Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity
USRE33920E (en) Smoke detector having variable level sensitivity
FI100836B (en) Starting device with a continuous or pulse-shaped input for testing
US4225860A (en) Sensitivity controlled dual input fire detector
US4053785A (en) Optical smoke detector with smoke effect simulating means
US4901056A (en) Test initiation apparatus with continuous or pulse input
US4030086A (en) Battery voltage detection and warning means
US4401978A (en) Combination detector
US4306230A (en) Self-checking photoelectric smoke detector
EP1579398A2 (en) Microprocessor-based combination smoke and carbon monoxide detector having intelligent hush feature
EP1226567B1 (en) Adverse condition detection and notification apparatus
US4185278A (en) Obscuration type smoke detector
KR890000998A (en) Coin Detection Device and Method
CA2298744C (en) Multi-station dangerous condition alarm system incorporating alarm and chirp origination feature
US4680576A (en) Photoelectric smoke detector and alarm system
EP0733894A2 (en) Sensor for detecting fine particles such as smoke
US5093651A (en) Intelligent smoke detector
IES20000884A2 (en) A smoke alarm device
US4097850A (en) Means for adjusting and for testing a detecting device
US4290126A (en) Ultrasonic intrusion alarm system
US3585621A (en) Smoke detector
US3946374A (en) Rate-of-change combustion and contamination detection device
US3678511A (en) Alarm circuit
US4336455A (en) Smoke detectors
US4555634A (en) Optical smoke detector with contamination detection circuitry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS, ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SEATT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:007489/0097

Effective date: 19950412

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HLDR NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENT STAT AS SMALL BUSINESS (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LSM2); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: SEATT CORPORATION, ILLINOIS

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS;REEL/FRAME:007613/0353

Effective date: 19960102

AS Assignment

Owner name: SEATT CORPORATION, ILLINOIS

Free format text: RERECORD TO CORRECT ERROR IN RECORDATION DATE ON REEL 7613 FRAME 0353.;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS;REEL/FRAME:007613/0773

Effective date: 19960102

AS Assignment

Owner name: SEATT CORPORATION, ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SEATT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:008085/0040

Effective date: 19960327

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC., ILLINOIS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SEATT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:008104/0910

Effective date: 19960327

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES FILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFP); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFG); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: MAPLE CHASE COMPANY, ILLINOIS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013089/0281

Effective date: 19980401

SULP Surcharge for late payment
AS Assignment

Owner name: COLEMAN SAFETY & SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC., ILLINOIS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SEATT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015201/0619

Effective date: 19960414

Owner name: MAPLE CHASE COMPANY (FORMERLY KNOWN AS COLEMAN SEC

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:COLEMAN SAFETY AND SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015232/0429

Effective date: 19980401

AS Assignment

Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAPLE CHASE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:015177/0215

Effective date: 20040401

RR Request for reexamination filed

Effective date: 20040816

AS Assignment

Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH,UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MAPLE CHASE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:017921/0822

Effective date: 20060713

Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MAPLE CHASE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:017921/0822

Effective date: 20060713

AS Assignment

Owner name: MAPLE CHASE COMPANY, ILLINOIS

Free format text: RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:018047/0462

Effective date: 20060713

B1 Reexamination certificate first reexamination

Free format text: THE PATENTABILITY OF CLAIMS 1-17, 23, 24 AND 31-38 IS CONFIRMED. CLAIMS 18-22 AND 25-30 ARE CANCELLED.

CC Certificate of correction