USPP32952P3 - Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’ - Google Patents

Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP32952P3
USPP32952P3 US16/501,374 US201916501374V USPP32952P3 US PP32952 P3 USPP32952 P3 US PP32952P3 US 201916501374 V US201916501374 V US 201916501374V US PP32952 P3 USPP32952 P3 US PP32952P3
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
ucd
royal
royce
fruit
cabrillo
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US16/501,374
Other versions
US20200187402P9 (en
US20190380245P1 (en
Inventor
Steven J. Knapp
Glenn S. Cole
Douglas V. Shaw
Kirk D. Larson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of California San Diego UCSD
Original Assignee
University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of California San Diego UCSD filed Critical University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority to US16/501,374 priority Critical patent/USPP32952P3/en
Publication of US20190380245P1 publication Critical patent/US20190380245P1/en
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Shaw, Douglas V.
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Knapp, Steven J.
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LARSON, KIRK D.
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COLE, GLENN S.
Publication of US20200187402P9 publication Critical patent/US20200187402P9/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP32952P3 publication Critical patent/USPP32952P3/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H6/74Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
    • A01H6/7409Fragaria, i.e. strawberries
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/08Fruits

Definitions

  • Genus and species The strawberry cultivar of this invention is botanically identified as Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne.
  • This invention relates to a new and distinct day-neutral strawberry cultivar designated as ‘UCD Royal Royce’, which originated from a cross performed in the winter of 2008 between proprietary germplasm parents 03C114P003 (unpatented) and 04C009P005 (unpatented). Seeds of the cross were harvested from greenhouse-grown plants in the spring of 2008 and germinated in June 2008. Seedlings were transplanted to a greenhouse in July 2008 and transplanted to the field in October 2008. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected and clones were first harvested in 2009. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ has been asexually propagated since 2009.
  • the plant of this selection was originally designated ‘08C123P001’ (also represented as 8.123-1) and later called ‘16DN009’ or ‘UC9’ for evaluation in field trials.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is a day-neutral (ever-bearing) strawberry cultivar selected for increased marketable fruit yield, extended shelf-life and decreased runner (stolon) production. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ consistently produces more marketable fruit per hectare, particularly during the first six to seventh months of an eight or nine-month harvest season, compared to San Andreas (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 19,975), ‘Monterey’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 19,767) or ‘Cabrillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,830); and has fewer stolons (runners) than ‘Monterey’ or ‘Cabrillo’.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ also delivers yield earlier than cultivar ‘UCD Moxie’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 16/501,376), whereas the cumulative marketable fruit yield of ‘UCD Moxie’ surpasses that of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ late in the season.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is day neutral compared to short day parent 4C009P005, and exhibits earlier flowering and increased numbers of stolons compared to parent 03114P003.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was genotyped with a 35,000-SNP array (Hardigan et. al., Plant Genome 11:180049, 2018). The variety has a unique DNA profile compared to ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’, ‘UCD Moxie’, and ‘UCD Valiant’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 16/501,375). The pairwise genetic distances between ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and ‘UCD Valiant’, ‘UCD Moxie’, ‘Cabrillo’, and ‘Monterey’ are estimated to be 0.270, 0.167, 0.259, and 0.302, respectively based on the 35,000-SNP genotype analysis. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ also has a unique DNA profile compared to each of its parents, proprietary germplasm varieties 03C114P003 and 04C009P005.
  • FIG. 1 shows fruit of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ in cross-section.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates color of the fruit.
  • FIG. 3 depicts general flowering and fruiting characteristics of ‘UCD Royal Royce’.
  • FIG. 4 shows representative fruit trusses of the plant.
  • FIG. 5 shows representative flowers of the plant.
  • FIG. 6 shows representative leaves of the plant.
  • FIG. 7 depicts plant habit.
  • Cultivar testing in small-plot yield trials was performed as follows. Test day-neutral cultivars and comparison cultivars were field tested in Oso Flaco (Santa Maria, Calif.) and Prunedale, Calif. in 2015-2016. Fruit was harvested once or twice per week over the spring and summer growing season: March 16 to Aug. 18, 2016 in Santa Maria (31 harvests) and April 2 to Aug. 27, 2016 in Prunedale (30 harvests). ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected on the basis of fruit appearance, size, shelf-life, and cumulative marketable fruit yield for a second year (2016-17) of replicated testing in Santa Maria and Prunedale (Tables 1-2). Fruit was harvested once or twice per week over the growing season: March 13 to Aug.
  • Table 1 shows marketable yield (g/plant) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ compared to that for ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’ tested in small-plot yield trials in Santa Maria, Calif. and Prunedale, Calif. in 2015-16 and 2016-17.
  • Table 2 shows the range in increase in yield compared to ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’ for the small-plot yield trials.
  • the cumulative marketable fruit yields of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ were significantly greater than ‘Cabrillo’ (p ⁇ 0.0078), ‘Monterey’ (p ⁇ 0.0001), and ‘San Andreas’ (p ⁇ 0.0001) across years and locations (Table 1).
  • the per plant yields of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ were 12 to 112% greater than ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘San Andreas’ (Table 2).
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected, with other test varieties, for advanced testing in large-plot yield trials (150 plants/plot) with five commercial growers in 2017-18.
  • the selection criteria were: high cumulative marketable yields, high marketable fruit percentages, resistance to bruising and deterioration with harvest, handling, and storage, fruit appearance, and reduced runner production in coastal production environments.
  • the production systems for large-plot yield trials were diverse and included: low-input organic (Santa Maria, Calif.), low-input fumigated (Salinas, Calif.), and high-input fumigated (Oso Flaco, Calif., Prunedale, Calif. and Moss Landing, Calif.).
  • LSMs Least-square means for firmness, soluble solids concentration (SS), and titratable acid concentration (TA) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’ grown in five locations in 2017-18.
  • LSMs were estimated from three harvest dates per location, one biological replication per harvest date, 10 sub-samples per harvest date for firmness, and three sub-samples per harvest for SS and TA.
  • LSMs Least-square means
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ maintained adequate marketability and visual appeal over 14 days of post-harvest storage, the industry standard (Table 8), as did ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘Monterey’.
  • the marketability of fruit stored for 21 days post-harvest was inadequate for all three cultivars.
  • Fruit weight and brightness significantly decreased as post-harvest storage time increased (Table 8).
  • the fruit weight decreases were not significantly different among cultivars. Cultivar ⁇ post-harvest storage time interactions were only statistically significant for liquid leakage and mold formation, with ‘Cabrillo’ deteriorating more than ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and ‘Monterey’ (Table 8).
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and additional cultivars were screened for resistance to Fusarium wilt, Verticillium wilt, Macrophomina , and Phytophthora crown rot in Davis, Calif. field experiments between 2015 and 2018. These included 2015-16 and 2016-17 Fusarium wilt screening experiments with 480 to 960 entries, a 2015-&b 16 Macrophomina experiment with 960 entries, 2016-17 and 2017-18 Verticillium wilt experiments with 480 to 960 entries, and a 2017-18 Phytophthora crown rot experiment with 480 entries. Entries were arranged in randomized complete blocks experiment designs with four single-plant replications per entry. The 2015-16 experiments were planted in virgin soil in Davis, Calif.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was susceptible to Fusarium wilt (4.5 on scale), moderately susceptible to Verticillium wilt (3.1 on scale), moderately susceptible to Phytophthora crown rot (3.3 on scale), and susceptible to Macrophomina (5.0 on scale).
  • Fruiting plants of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are similar in height to ‘Monterey’, but slightly taller than ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’. The spread is more compact than ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’ and more similar to ‘San Andreas’.
  • Leaves (including petioles) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are longer than for all three comparative cultivars. Color for the upper and lower levels of the leaves of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are darker green than all 3 comparative cultivars. Serrations at midseason are more pointed than Monterey and more similar in shape and number to ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’. The stipule length of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is shorter than all three comparative cultivars. Stolon production of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is similar to ‘San Andreas’, but less than for ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘Monterey’.
  • ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is similar to other California day-neutral cultivars (e.g. ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’ and ‘San Andreas’) in that it will flower independently of day length, given appropriate temperature and horticultural conditions.
  • the primary flowers for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are similar in size to the comparative cultivars with a calyx that is distinctly larger relative to the corolla on the primary fruit.
  • the sepals for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are slightly longer and wider than all 3 comparative cultivars.
  • the calyx of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is variable (reflex to flat) more similar to ‘Monterey’ and ‘San Andreas’, less reflexive than ‘Cabrillo’.
  • the fruit shape of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ can vary through the season, but is generally a conic fruit as compared to the long conic fruit of ‘San Andreas’, the short and rounded conic fruit of ‘Cabrillo’ and the short and slightly flattened conic fruit of ‘Monterey’.
  • External fruit color of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is darker red than for ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’.
  • the internal fruit color of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is lighter than both ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’.
  • Achenes of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are slightly indented in the fruit, comparatively similar to the fruit of ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’, whereas ‘Monterey’ has more flat to the surface position.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Compression Or Coding Systems Of Tv Signals (AREA)
  • Bakery Products And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

‘UCD Royal Royce’ is a day-neutral cultivar of a strawberry plant that provides high yields and produces fewer runners that many high-yielding day-neutral cultivars.

Description

Genus and species: The strawberry cultivar of this invention is botanically identified as Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne.
Variety denomination: The variety denomination is ‘UCD Royal Royce’.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a new and distinct day-neutral strawberry cultivar designated as ‘UCD Royal Royce’, which originated from a cross performed in the winter of 2008 between proprietary germplasm parents 03C114P003 (unpatented) and 04C009P005 (unpatented). Seeds of the cross were harvested from greenhouse-grown plants in the spring of 2008 and germinated in June 2008. Seedlings were transplanted to a greenhouse in July 2008 and transplanted to the field in October 2008. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected and clones were first harvested in 2009. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ has been asexually propagated since 2009.
The plant of this selection was originally designated ‘08C123P001’ (also represented as 8.123-1) and later called ‘16DN009’ or ‘UC9’ for evaluation in field trials.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
‘UCD Royal Royce’ is a day-neutral (ever-bearing) strawberry cultivar selected for increased marketable fruit yield, extended shelf-life and decreased runner (stolon) production. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ consistently produces more marketable fruit per hectare, particularly during the first six to seventh months of an eight or nine-month harvest season, compared to San Andreas (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 19,975), ‘Monterey’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 19,767) or ‘Cabrillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,830); and has fewer stolons (runners) than ‘Monterey’ or ‘Cabrillo’. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ also delivers yield earlier than cultivar ‘UCD Moxie’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 16/501,376), whereas the cumulative marketable fruit yield of ‘UCD Moxie’ surpasses that of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ late in the season. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is day neutral compared to short day parent 4C009P005, and exhibits earlier flowering and increased numbers of stolons compared to parent 03114P003.
‘UCD Royal Royce’ was genotyped with a 35,000-SNP array (Hardigan et. al., Plant Genome 11:180049, 2018). The variety has a unique DNA profile compared to ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’, ‘UCD Moxie’, and ‘UCD Valiant’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 16/501,375). The pairwise genetic distances between ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and ‘UCD Valiant’, ‘UCD Moxie’, ‘Cabrillo’, and ‘Monterey’ are estimated to be 0.270, 0.167, 0.259, and 0.302, respectively based on the 35,000-SNP genotype analysis. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ also has a unique DNA profile compared to each of its parents, proprietary germplasm varieties 03C114P003 and 04C009P005.
‘UCD Royal Royce’ is maintained by annual asexual propagation by stolons in Winters, Calif.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The colors in the photograph are depicted as nearly true as is reasonably possible to obtain in color reproductions of this type.
FIG. 1 shows fruit of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ in cross-section.
FIG. 2 illustrates color of the fruit.
FIG. 3 depicts general flowering and fruiting characteristics of ‘UCD Royal Royce’.
FIG. 4 shows representative fruit trusses of the plant.
FIG. 5 shows representative flowers of the plant.
FIG. 6 shows representative leaves of the plant.
FIG. 7 depicts plant habit.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Fruit Production
‘UCD Royal Royce’ and comparison cultivars were asexually propagated in high-elevation nurseries in Dorris and Mcdoel, Calif. for field testing in 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018. Clones were harvested according to commercial planting schedules, which were calibrated by the number of chill hours required for optimum production in Santa Maria and Prunedale, Calif.
Cultivar testing in small-plot yield trials was performed as follows. Test day-neutral cultivars and comparison cultivars were field tested in Oso Flaco (Santa Maria, Calif.) and Prunedale, Calif. in 2015-2016. Fruit was harvested once or twice per week over the spring and summer growing season: March 16 to Aug. 18, 2016 in Santa Maria (31 harvests) and April 2 to Aug. 27, 2016 in Prunedale (30 harvests). ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected on the basis of fruit appearance, size, shelf-life, and cumulative marketable fruit yield for a second year (2016-17) of replicated testing in Santa Maria and Prunedale (Tables 1-2). Fruit was harvested once or twice per week over the growing season: March 13 to Aug. 21, 2017 in Santa Maria (25 harvests) and April 3 to Sep. 1, 2017 in Prunedale (44 harvests in Prunedale). To highlight differences among cultivars, the yield data were displayed in three ways: (a) per plant yields for individual harvests for each location×year combination for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’; (b) per plant cumulative marketable yields for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’; and (c) per plant cumulative marketable yields tested in both years and locations. Entry ranks were highly consistent and the best and worst performing cultivars were virtually identical over locations and years.
Table 1 shows marketable yield (g/plant) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ compared to that for ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’ tested in small-plot yield trials in Santa Maria, Calif. and Prunedale, Calif. in 2015-16 and 2016-17.
Table 2 shows the range in increase in yield compared to ‘Monterey’, ‘San Andreas’, and ‘Cabrillo’ for the small-plot yield trials.
TABLE 1
Least-square means for cumulative marketable yield tested in
small-plot yield trials in Santa Maria, CA and Prunedale, CA
in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017
Yield across
Locations and
Santa Maria Prunedale Years
Cultivar 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 (g/plant)
UCD Royal 2,016 2,329 1,750 2,632 2,183
Royce
Cabrillo 1,617 2,073 1,362 2,299 1,838
Monterey 1,115 1,324 1,077 1,722 1,310
San Andreas 1,229 1,096 1,048 1,569 1,236
TABLE 2
Least-square means for cumulative marketable yield (g/plant)
across years and locations tested in the small-plot yield trials in Santa
Maria and Prunedale. The ranges for yield increases over
comparison cultivars were estimated from least square means
for individual environments (see, Table 1). (Percent Marketable Fruit =
(Cumulative Marketable Fruit Yield)/(Cumulative Total Fruit Yield)
Yield
Percent Increase Yield Yield
Market- Range Increase Increase
Yield able Over San Range Over Range Over
Cultivar (g/plant) Fruit Andreas Monterey Cabrillo
UCD Royal 2,183 87-88 64-112% 53-81% 12-28%
Royce
Cabrillo 1,838 86-87
Monterey 1,310 79-82
San Andreas 1,236 76-84
The cumulative marketable fruit yields of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ were significantly greater than ‘Cabrillo’ (p<0.0078), ‘Monterey’ (p<0.0001), and ‘San Andreas’ (p<0.0001) across years and locations (Table 1). The per plant yields of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ were 12 to 112% greater than ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘San Andreas’ (Table 2). The mean fruit size for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ (29.7 g/fruit) was not significantly different from ‘Cabrillo’ (30.0 g/fruit; p=0.78) or Monterey (28.4 g/fruit p=0.23), but was significantly greater than ‘San Andreas’ (26.7 g/fruit; p=0.007).
The marketable fruit percentages for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and ‘Cabrillo’ were comparable (86-88%) and superior to ‘Monterey’ and ‘San Andreas’ (76 to 84%) (Table 2).
Significantly less runner production was observed in ‘UCD Royal Royce’ compared to the other high yielding cultivars tested in small-plot yield trials. Runner production differences among cultivars could not be absolutely quantified because growers trimmed runners to prevent the diversion of energy away from fruit production; however, it is estimated based on observation that runner production was reduced by at least 50% for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ compared to runner production by ‘San Andreas’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’. This was confirmed in large-plot yield trials described below.
‘UCD Royal Royce’ was selected, with other test varieties, for advanced testing in large-plot yield trials (150 plants/plot) with five commercial growers in 2017-18. The selection criteria were: high cumulative marketable yields, high marketable fruit percentages, resistance to bruising and deterioration with harvest, handling, and storage, fruit appearance, and reduced runner production in coastal production environments. The production systems for large-plot yield trials were diverse and included: low-input organic (Santa Maria, Calif.), low-input fumigated (Salinas, Calif.), and high-input fumigated (Oso Flaco, Calif., Prunedale, Calif. and Moss Landing, Calif.). Fruit was harvested from February 2 to October 5 in Oso Flaco (52 harvests), April 3 to October 4 in Santa Maria (53 harvests), April 12 to October 6 in Prunedale (48 harvests), May 7 to October 8 in Moss Landing (45 harvests), and March 9 to October 12 in Salinas (36 harvests). The residual for statistical analyses was the entry×location interaction mean square.
TABLE 3
Least square means for cumulative marketable fruit yield
(cartons/acre) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’
grown in unreplicated large-plot (150 plant) yield trials in five
locations in 2017-18, where a carton = eight clamshells and eight
clamshells/carton × one pound/clamshell = eight pounds/carton.
Santa Oso Prune- Mossing Across
Cultivar Salinas Maria Flaco dale Landing Locations
UCD Royal 8,729 11,042 16,837 15,069 10,603 12,456
Royce
Cabrillo 5,201  6,892 17,569 14,057  9,465 10,637
Monterey NA  7,891 14,731 11,940 10,257 10,274
TABLE 4
Least square means for fruit weight (g/fruit) for ‘UCD Royal
Royce’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’ grown in unreplicated large-plot
(150 plant) yield trials in in five locations in 2017-18, where fruit
weight = (weight of fruit per clamshell)/(number of fruit per clamshell).
Santa Oso Prune- Mossing Across
Cultivar Salinas Maria Flaco dale Landing Locations
UCD Royal 25.0 21.8 28.5 28.6 34.1 27.6
Royce
Cabrillo 26.1 21.9 28.0 27.5 34.0 27.5
Monterey NA 21.6 29.4 27.9 33.8 27.8
TABLE 5
Statistical significance (Pr > F) of differences between least
square means for cumulative fruit yield (cartons/acres) and fruit
weight (g/fruit) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, and
‘Cabrillo’ tested in unreplicated large-plot (150 plant)
yield trials in five locations in 2017-18.
Yield Fruit Weight (g/fruit)
Difference Difference
Comparison (carton/acre) Pr > F (g/fruit) Pr > F
UCD Royal Royce- 2,182 0.0392 −0.22 0.6631
Monterey
OCD Royal Royce- 1,820 0.0610  0.11 0.8133
Cabrillo
The mean cumulative marketable yields ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was 12,456 cartons/acre=99,648 pounds/acre across production systems and locations (Table 3). Reduced runner production was observed for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ across trials. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was the highest yielding cultivar through August, 2018 compared to ‘Monterey’, ‘Cabrillo’, and two other test cultivars (data not shown), and second highest yielding cultivar through October, 2018 compared to ‘Monterey’, ‘Cabrillo’ (Table 3) and two other test cultivars (data not shown). The cumulative marketable fruit yields of (Table 3) were significantly greater than ‘Monterey’ (p=0.039) and ‘Cabrillo’ (p=0.061) (Table 5). ‘UCD Royal Royce’ produced 1,820 cartons/acre (11,144 pounds/acre) more than ‘Cabrillo’ and 2,182 cartons/acre (17,464 pounds/acre) more than ‘Monterey’ (Tables 3 & 5). ‘UCD Royal Royce’ fruit weights were not significantly different from ‘Monterey’ (p=0.49) or ‘Cabrillo’ (p=0.46) (Tables 4 & 5).
To assess the quality of freshly harvested fruit, firmness (grams force), total soluble solids (SS) concentration, and titratable acid (TA) concentrations were measured from samples of fruit harvested on three dates from each location in 2017-18 (Tables 6-7). Harvest dates were one month apart with one replication per harvest date, 10 sub-samples per replication for firmness, and three subsamples per replication for SS and TA. Firmness was quantified with a hand-held penetrometer measuring the grams of force needed to puncture the fruit. SS and TA concentrations were quantified with benchtop instruments. The SS to TA ratio provides a relative measure of sweetness. To assess shelf-life, fruit weight (g/clamshell), SS, brightness (ordinal scale with 1=excellent to 5=unmarketable), liquid leakage (g/clamshell), and mold incidence (%) were quantified from samples of fruit harvested on two dates from each location with fruit stored under standard 4° C. conditions for 0, 7, 14, and 21 days (Table 8). Harvest dates were one month apart with one replication per harvest date.
TABLE 6
Least-square means (LSMs) for firmness, soluble solids concentration
(SS), and titratable acid concentration (TA) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’,
‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’ grown in five locations in 2017-18.
LSMs were estimated from three harvest dates per location, one
biological replication per harvest date, 10 sub-samples per harvest
date for firmness, and three sub-samples per harvest for SS and TA.
Titrable
Firmness Acids
Cultivar (g force) SS (%) (g/100 ml) SS/TA
UCD Royal Royce 430.94 7.94 0.84  9.48
Cabrillo 359.61 8.05 0.77 10.50
Monterey 294.55 8.71 0.77 11.48
TABLE 7
Statistical significance (Pr > F) of differences between least square
means for SS, TA, and SS/TA for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’,
and ‘Cabrillo’ tested in unreplicated large-plot yield trials in
five locations in 2017-18.
Soluble Solids Titratable Acids
Concentration (SS) Concentration (TA) SS/TA
Least Least Least
Square Square Square
Mean Mean Mean
Difference Difference Differ-
Comparison (%) Pr > F (g/100 ml) Pr > F ence Pr > F
UCD Royal −0.77 0.0405 0.07 0.0090 −2.00 <0.0001
Royce-
Monterey
UCD Royal −0.11 0.7808 0.06 0.0231 −1.02  0.0185
Royce-
Cabrillo
TABLE 8
Least-square means (LSMs) for fruit weight (g/clamshell), soluble solids
concentration (SS), fruit brightness, liquid leakage, and mold
formation for ‘UCD Royal Royce’, ‘Monterey’, and ‘Cabrillo’ grown
in four locations 2017-18 and stored for zero to 21 days postharvest.
LSMs were estimated from two harvest dates per location
Days
Post- Soluble Liquid
Harvest Weight Solids Bright- Leakage Mold
Cultivar Storage (g/clamshell) (%) ness (g) (%)
UCD Royal 0 555.7 7.3 1.0 0.0 0.0
Royce
Cabrillo 0 555.4 7.5 1.3 0.0 0.0
Monterey 0 572.0 9.2 1.2 0.0 0.0
UCD Royal 7 538.0 7.6 2.1 0.2 0.0
Royce
Cabrillo 7 538.7 7.4 2.0 0.2 0.0
Monterey 7 556.3 9.1 1.8 0.0 0.0
UCD Royal 14 523.0 7.5 3.4 0.0 1.0
Royce
Cabrillo
14 522.9 7.3 3.3 0.8 1.2
Monterey 14 542.3 9.5 3.0 0.0 0.5
UCD Royal 21 508.6 7.0 4.1 0.8 12.7
Royce
Cabrillo 21 504.4 7.3 4.3 35.8 36.7
Monterey 21 526.4 8.7 3.8 0.2 11.8
‘UCD Royal Royce’ produced fruit meeting or exceeding industry standards for mass-production cultivars (Tables 6-8). The fruit was firm, withstood the rigors of harvest, packing, and storage, and maintained acceptable fruit quality and appearance for over two weeks of storage. ‘UCD Royal Royce’ produced significantly firmer fruit than either ‘Cabrillo’ (p<0.0001) or ‘Monterey’ (p<0.0001). ‘UCD Royal Royce’ additionally had significantly lower SS concentration than ‘Monterey’ (p<0.0001), but was not significantly different compared to ‘Cabrillo’ (p=0.78). The SS/TA ration for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ was significantly lower than ‘Monterey’ (p<0.0001) and ‘Cabrillo’ (p<0.019).
‘UCD Royal Royce’ maintained adequate marketability and visual appeal over 14 days of post-harvest storage, the industry standard (Table 8), as did ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘Monterey’. The marketability of fruit stored for 21 days post-harvest was inadequate for all three cultivars. Fruit weight and brightness significantly decreased as post-harvest storage time increased (Table 8). The fruit weight decreases were not significantly different among cultivars. Cultivar×post-harvest storage time interactions were only statistically significant for liquid leakage and mold formation, with ‘Cabrillo’ deteriorating more than ‘UCD Royal Royce’ and ‘Monterey’ (Table 8).
Disease Resistance Evaluation
‘UCD Royal Royce’ and additional cultivars were screened for resistance to Fusarium wilt, Verticillium wilt, Macrophomina, and Phytophthora crown rot in Davis, Calif. field experiments between 2015 and 2018. These included 2015-16 and 2016-17 Fusarium wilt screening experiments with 480 to 960 entries, a 2015-&b 16 Macrophomina experiment with 960 entries, 2016-17 and 2017-18 Verticillium wilt experiments with 480 to 960 entries, and a 2017-18 Phytophthora crown rot experiment with 480 entries. Entries were arranged in randomized complete blocks experiment designs with four single-plant replications per entry. The 2015-16 experiments were planted in virgin soil in Davis, Calif. The 2016-17 and 2017-18 experiments were planted in fumigated soils in Davis, Calif. For each experiment, plants were artificially inoculated with the respective pathogen and phenotyped for disease symptoms on an ordinal scale, where 1=highly resistant (symptomless), 2=resistant, 3=intermediate, 4=susceptible, and 5=highly susceptible (dead). Within each experiment, plants were phenotyped at six different time points to study changes in the phenotypic distributions and quantify the progression of disease symptoms over time.
‘UCD Royal Royce’ was susceptible to Fusarium wilt (4.5 on scale), moderately susceptible to Verticillium wilt (3.1 on scale), moderately susceptible to Phytophthora crown rot (3.3 on scale), and susceptible to Macrophomina (5.0 on scale).
BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION
The following botanical descriptors are characteristic of ‘UCD Royal Royce’. The descriptors were collected from two different sites in May 2017 in Santa Maria, Calif. Colors are designated with reference to The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart, Sixth Edition, 2015. The characteristics of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ may vary in detail, depending upon environmental factors and culture conditions.
  • Growth habitat: Semi-upright Plant height average of 29 cm.
  • Plant spread average of 37 cm.
  • Density of foliage: Medium.
  • Vigor: Medium.
  • Position of inflorescence in relation to foliage: Same level.
  • Number of stolons: Average of 6.
  • Stolon, anthocyanin coloration: 60B.
  • Stolon, density of pubescence: Sparse.
  • Leaf size: Medium.
  • Leaf color: Adaxial 137A, Abaxial 147B.
  • Leaf blistering: Absent.
  • Leaf glossiness: Medium glossy.
  • Leaf variegation: Absent.
  • Terminal leaflet, length in relation to width: Average of 89 mm long and 77 mm wide.
  • Terminal leaflet, shape of base: Obtuse.
  • Terminal leaflet, margin: Serrate to crenate.
  • Terminal leaflet, shape in cross section: Concave.
  • Petiole, length: Average of 19 cm.
  • Petiole, attitude of hairs: Horizontal.
  • Stipule, anthocyanin coloration: Core color 144D, Margin color 144A (absent or very weak).
  • Inflorescence, number of flowers: Many.
  • Pedicel, attitude of hairs: Slightly outwards.
  • Pedicel, anthocyanin coloration: 60B.
  • Flower diameter: Average of 24 mm.
  • Flower, arrangement of petals: Touching.
  • Flower, size of calyx: Calyx diameter average of 33 mm.
  • Color of calyx: 137B.
  • Flower stamen: Present.
  • Number of stamens per flower: Average of 24.
  • Number of sepals per flower: Averages of 12.
  • Petal, length in relation to width: Equal, Average of 10 mm long and 9.5 mm wide.
  • Petal, color of upper side: NN155B.
  • Petal color of lower side: NN155B.
  • Number of petals per flower: Average of 6.
  • Fruit, length in relation to width: Average of 45 mm long and 39 mm wide.
  • Fruit size: Average of 30 grams through the season for both primary and secondary fruit.
  • Fruit shape: Conical.
  • Fruit, difference in shape of terminal and other fruits: None or very slight.
  • Fruit color: N45B.
  • Fruit, evenness of color: Even or very slightly uneven.
  • Fruit glossiness: Medium.
  • Fruit, evenness of surface: Even or very slightly uneven.
  • Fruit, width of band without achenes: Absent or very narrow.
  • Fruit, positions of achenes: Below surface.
  • Achene color: 4A.
  • Fruit, position of calyx attachment: Inserted.
  • Fruit, attitude of sepals: Upwards.
  • Fruit, diameter of calyx in relation to fruit diameter: Slightly larger.
  • Fruit, adherence of calyx: Strong.
  • Fruit firmness: Very firm.
  • Fruit, color of flesh (excluding core): 40C.
  • Fruit, color of core: 37A.
  • Fruit cavity: Average of 6 mm.
  • Time of beginning of flowering: Medium, starts in February to November.
  • Time of beginning of fruit ripening: Medium, starts in March to December.
  • Type of bearing: Day neutral.
PLANT AND FOLIAGE COMPARISONS
Fruiting plants of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are similar in height to ‘Monterey’, but slightly taller than ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’. The spread is more compact than ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’ and more similar to ‘San Andreas’. Leaves (including petioles) for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are longer than for all three comparative cultivars. Color for the upper and lower levels of the leaves of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are darker green than all 3 comparative cultivars. Serrations at midseason are more pointed than Monterey and more similar in shape and number to ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’. The stipule length of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is shorter than all three comparative cultivars. Stolon production of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is similar to ‘San Andreas’, but less than for ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘Monterey’.
FLOWERING AND FRUITING COMPARISONS
‘UCD Royal Royce’ is similar to other California day-neutral cultivars (e.g. ‘Cabrillo’, ‘Monterey’ and ‘San Andreas’) in that it will flower independently of day length, given appropriate temperature and horticultural conditions. The primary flowers for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are similar in size to the comparative cultivars with a calyx that is distinctly larger relative to the corolla on the primary fruit. The sepals for ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are slightly longer and wider than all 3 comparative cultivars. The calyx of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is variable (reflex to flat) more similar to ‘Monterey’ and ‘San Andreas’, less reflexive than ‘Cabrillo’. The fruit shape of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ can vary through the season, but is generally a conic fruit as compared to the long conic fruit of ‘San Andreas’, the short and rounded conic fruit of ‘Cabrillo’ and the short and slightly flattened conic fruit of ‘Monterey’. External fruit color of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is darker red than for ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’. The internal fruit color of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ is lighter than both ‘Monterey’ and ‘Cabrillo’.
Achenes of ‘UCD Royal Royce’ are slightly indented in the fruit, comparatively similar to the fruit of ‘Cabrillo’ and ‘San Andreas’, whereas ‘Monterey’ has more flat to the surface position.

Claims (1)

What is claimed is:
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant having the characteristics substantially as described and illustrated herein.
US16/501,374 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’ Active USPP32952P3 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/501,374 USPP32952P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461997548P 2014-06-04 2014-06-04
US201461999632P 2014-07-30 2014-07-30
US14/545,653 US20150359150P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2015-06-03 Strawberry cultivars
US15/530,135 US20170142881P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2016-12-06 Strawberry cultivars
US15/932,994 US20180295762P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2018-06-07 Strawberry cultivars
US16/501,374 USPP32952P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190380245P1 US20190380245P1 (en) 2019-12-12
US20200187402P9 US20200187402P9 (en) 2020-06-11
USPP32952P3 true USPP32952P3 (en) 2021-04-06

Family

ID=54770734

Family Applications (10)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/545,653 Abandoned US20150359150P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2015-06-03 Strawberry cultivars
US15/530,135 Abandoned US20170142881P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2016-12-06 Strawberry cultivars
US15/932,994 Abandoned US20180295762P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2018-06-07 Strawberry cultivars
US16/501,374 Active USPP32952P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’
US16/501,375 Active USPP32984P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Valiant’
US16/501,373 Active USPP32950P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Warrior’
US16/501,376 Active USPP32953P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Moxie’
US16/501,372 Active USPP32966P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Victor’
US16/602,365 Abandoned US20200037484P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-09-23 Strawberry cultivars
US17/008,048 Abandoned US20210076549P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2020-08-31 Strawberry cultivars

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/545,653 Abandoned US20150359150P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2015-06-03 Strawberry cultivars
US15/530,135 Abandoned US20170142881P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2016-12-06 Strawberry cultivars
US15/932,994 Abandoned US20180295762P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2018-06-07 Strawberry cultivars

Family Applications After (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/501,375 Active USPP32984P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Valiant’
US16/501,373 Active USPP32950P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Warrior’
US16/501,376 Active USPP32953P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Moxie’
US16/501,372 Active USPP32966P3 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-04-01 Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Victor’
US16/602,365 Abandoned US20200037484P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2019-09-23 Strawberry cultivars
US17/008,048 Abandoned US20210076549P1 (en) 2014-06-04 2020-08-31 Strawberry cultivars

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (10) US20150359150P1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016138018A2 (en) 2015-02-24 2016-09-01 410 Medical Innovation, LLC Apparatus and kits for fluid infusion
US11387254B2 (en) * 2020-10-30 2022-07-12 Ferroelectric Memory Gmbh Memory cell and methods thereof
USPP35905P2 (en) * 2023-04-17 2024-07-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Strawberry plant named ‘UC Monarch’

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20200187402P9 (en) 2020-06-11
US20200037484P1 (en) 2020-01-30
USPP32966P3 (en) 2021-04-13
US20150359150P1 (en) 2015-12-10
US20210076549P1 (en) 2021-03-11
USPP32953P3 (en) 2021-04-06
US20170142881P1 (en) 2017-05-18
USPP32984P3 (en) 2021-04-20
US20180295762P1 (en) 2018-10-11
US20190380243P1 (en) 2019-12-12
US20190380244P1 (en) 2019-12-12
USPP32950P3 (en) 2021-04-06
US20190380246P1 (en) 2019-12-12
US20190380245P1 (en) 2019-12-12
US20200187401P9 (en) 2020-06-11
US20190380247P1 (en) 2019-12-12
US20200178444P9 (en) 2020-06-04
US20200178446P9 (en) 2020-06-04
US20200178445P9 (en) 2020-06-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USPP20363P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Florida Radiance’
USPP32952P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Royal Royce’
USPP23042P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘FL 05-107’
US20170006747P1 (en) Strawberry plant named &#39;PE-7.2059&#39;
USPP34242P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Finn’
USPP25865P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-4.367’
USPP34265P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘UCD Mojo’
USPP21415P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Reliance’
USPP31148P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-9.3128’
USPP35905P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘UC Monarch’
USPP23256P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-3.324’
USPP26209P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘PE-6.2036’
USPP23257P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-4315’
USPP23255P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-4316’
USPP32221P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘CIVRH612’
USPP33285P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘A13-07’
USPP23291P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘PS-3.108’
US20230140847P1 (en) Strawberry plant named &#39;civh413&#39;
USPP33450P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-12.3266’
USPP31913P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘PE-7.2054’
USPP16859P3 (en) Strawberry variety named ‘Brunswick’
USPP21558P3 (en) ‘Winter Dawn’ strawberry plant
USPP28755P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘BG-6.3016’
USPP23290P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘PS-1.125’
USPP24613P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Herriot’

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SHAW, DOUGLAS V.;REEL/FRAME:051927/0265

Effective date: 20200114

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LARSON, KIRK D.;REEL/FRAME:051941/0750

Effective date: 20200122

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KNAPP, STEVEN J.;REEL/FRAME:051942/0162

Effective date: 20200131

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COLE, GLENN S.;REEL/FRAME:051951/0171

Effective date: 20200130

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PTGR); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY