USPP28994P3 - Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’ - Google Patents

Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP28994P3
USPP28994P3 US14/999,156 US201614999156V USPP28994P3 US PP28994 P3 USPP28994 P3 US PP28994P3 US 201614999156 V US201614999156 V US 201614999156V US PP28994 P3 USPP28994 P3 US PP28994P3
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
famoso
year
pollen
peters
pistachio
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US14/999,156
Other versions
US20160309631P1 (en
Inventor
Craig E. Kallsen
Dan E. Parfitt
Joseph Maranto
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of California San Diego UCSD
Original Assignee
University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of California San Diego UCSD filed Critical University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority to US14/999,156 priority Critical patent/USPP28994P3/en
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KALLSEN, CRAIG E., MARANTO, JOSEPH, PARFITT, DAN E.
Publication of US20160309631P1 publication Critical patent/US20160309631P1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP28994P3 publication Critical patent/USPP28994P3/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/08—Fruits
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy

Definitions

  • Varietal denomination The varietal denomination of the claimed pistachio variety is ‘Famoso’.
  • An objective of pistachio breeding programs is to develop improved male pollinators of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ (not patented).
  • the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ is the main later-season pistachio cultivar grown in California and in other parts of the world.
  • the male pistachio variety ‘Peters’ (not patented) is a common male cultivar used as a pollen source to pollinate ‘Kerman’.
  • ‘Peters’ is viewed as the industry standard pollinator variety for ‘Kerman’, ‘Peters’ often flowers later than ‘Kerman’ and has a history of providing poor flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’. This poor flowering overlap is especially seen during years with insufficient chilling.
  • ‘Peters’ is not very precocious, meaning that ‘Peters’ is slow to produce flowers as a juvenile tree. This is particularly apparent when ‘Peters’ is compared to female ‘Kerman’ trees, which will have many flowers at 6 th or 7 th leaf, while ‘Peters’ trees will have either none or relatively few. Typically, the female variety ‘Kerman’ is approximately one year ahead of the male variety ‘Peters’ in terms of flower development, which results in a year of lost production. Further, in low chill years, ‘Peters’ has performed very poorly.
  • ‘Peters’ produced almost no flowers, the flowers that were produced had no pollen, and ‘Peters’ often bloomed 1-2 weeks later than ‘Kerman’. Over time, the use of ‘Peters’ has resulted in inadequate pollination of ‘Kerman’ and reduced yield potential.
  • Pistachio growers are in need of a male pistachio variety that is more precocious than ‘Peters’, performs better in low chill years, and has a better flowering overlap with the female variety ‘Kerman’.
  • improved pollinator varieties such as male varieties having improved flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’.
  • the present male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ described herein is a product of the breeding efforts to produce improved male pistachio varieties.
  • the present invention relates to a new and distinct pistachio cultivar ( Pistacia vera L.) that has been denominated as ‘Famoso’, and more particularly as a male pistachio variety that has a better overlap with the flowering period of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ than does the male pistachio variety ‘Peters’.
  • the male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ is more precocious than ‘Peters’; ‘Famoso’ produces flowers three to four years after budding as compared to ‘Peters’, which typically takes four to five years to produce flowers after budding.
  • the male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ also has a more consistent flowering period that is more coincident with the flowering period of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’.
  • the male pistachio variety ‘Peters’ has poor flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’ as well as poor blooms during some years. ‘Peters’ has especially poor blooms during years with low chilling, which are expected to become more frequent in future years in view of the warming climate.
  • ‘Famoso’ may improve ‘Kerman’ yield, especially in years when ‘Peters’ flowers significantly later than ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ flowering is more consistent than ‘Peters’, and ‘Famoso’ also produces a large amount of pollen over an extended period. ‘Famoso’ is potentially significant as an alternative to ‘Peters’ for the Californian, New Mexican, Arizonan, and world-wide pistachio industries. ‘Famoso’ may be used as the pollinizer for other mid- to late-season pistachio cultivars such as ‘Kerman’.
  • ‘Famoso’ may also be used as an additional pollinizer of mid- to late-season female pistachio varieties (e.g. ‘Kerman’) in orchards along with the male variety ‘Peters’ or other male pistachio varieties.
  • ‘Famoso’ was originally made during Year 1, and the original seedling of ‘Famoso’ was planted at a research plot near Bakersfield, Calif., USA during Year 2.
  • the cross was made between Pistacia vera L. female ‘2-35’ (not patented) and Pistacia vera L. male ‘ES#4’ (not patented).
  • ‘Famoso’ was originally designated as selection ‘B19-69’.
  • ‘B19-69’ was budded (asexually propagated via T-buds) onto rootstocks at two test locations called Tejon Collins and Little Creek in eastern Kern County, Calif., USA.
  • Buds from the original ‘B19-69’ tree were budded onto ‘UCB-1’ (not patented) rootstocks at both test locations in Year 13.
  • Selection ‘B19-69’ was chosen as a candidate for release under the variety name ‘Famoso’.
  • the variety ‘Famoso’ has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree in bloom during Year 25.
  • FIG. 2A illustrates flower clusters of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree just prior to dehiscence.
  • FIG. 2B illustrates flower clusters of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree at anther dehiscence.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates the trunk, branches, and canopy of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates the leaves of ‘Famoso’.
  • FIG. 3C illustrates the venation pattern on the leaves of a 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree.
  • FIG. 4B illustrates a fitted means plot of the germination data presented in FIG. 4A .
  • FIG. 5B illustrates boxplots of viable pollen ratios by variety.
  • FIG. 6A illustrates the mean pollen weight per inflorescence (grams) for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and other male pistachio varieties in Year 26. Shown is the analysis of means (MiniTab 17) with 5% SD.
  • FIG. 6B illustrates boxplots of pollen weight by variety.
  • FIG. 7A - FIG. 7B illustrates a comparison of inflorescence density for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees ( FIG. 7A ) and ‘Peters’ ( FIG. 7B ).
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a comparison of collected inflorescences from a 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree and a ‘Peters’ tree showing differences in the colors of the inflorescences.
  • ‘Famoso’ as is typical of Pistacia vera L., will tolerate temperatures greater than ⁇ 5° C. to ⁇ 10° C.
  • the ‘UCB-1’ rootstock on which it is grafted can sustain significant damage at ⁇ 5° C. after a few hours.
  • the ‘Famoso’ cultivar is typically grown in a hot dry environment, and has been grown in a location having typical summer temperatures greater than 40° C. to 42° C.
  • ‘Famoso’ is similar to ‘Kerman’ or ‘Peters’ in that it requires sufficient winter chill to flower (800+ hours below 8° C.).
  • Tree Size Tree height was about 3-4 meters on 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees in Year 28.
  • ‘PG1’ ‘Pioneer Gold 1’ rootstock was the particular rootstock used for these particular ‘Famoso’ trees. Trunk cross sectional areas were taken above and below the graft union and converted to cross sectional area to provide an estimate of tree size at 15 years of age (TABLE 1).
  • ‘Randy’ U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,262
  • Both cultivars were similar in size (not significantly different), with some overgrowth of the scion for ‘Famoso’. This has been observed in other cultivars and has not been a problem.
  • Leaves are highly variable in the details of their form, shape and size within the tree. In general, the leaves are deciduous simple compound imparipinnate with one or two pairs of oppositely arranged lateral leaflets. However, the leaves can also be trifoliate and on branches with an abundance of new vegetative growth, and only one or no lateral leaflets may be present. Leaflet margins are entire to slightly crenate. Leaflets are oval to ovate and 5-8 cm long. Terminal leaflets can be less than 8 cm to greater than 16 cm. Leaflets vary considerably in shape, in general being ovate and having cuspidate to rounded apex and a rounded base (FIG. 3B). Margins of leaf blades are entire.
  • Leaf surfaces are glabrous, smooth, and waxy.
  • Leaf venation is of the cladodromous type as described by Hickey (1973) Amer. J. Botany 60:17-33, and as shown in FIG. 3C .
  • the color of new leaves is 138B to 139C, and the lower surface is 139C.
  • the leaf midrib color for new leaves is 143C.
  • Midrib and petiole colors are the same. Images of the leaves of ‘Famoso’ are presented in FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C . Typical petiole/leaf values of 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and ‘Randy’ trees from Year 28 are shown in TABLE 3 (15 observations). Differences were non-significant at 5% for both petiole and terminal leaflet. The petiole diameter is approximately 1-2 mm, and therefore too small to be measured accurately.
  • ‘Famoso’ is at full bloom ⁇ 1.4 days before or after ‘Kerman’ and 7-9 days after ‘Golden Hills’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,158), but 2-7 days before ‘Peters’ and ⁇ 4 days after ‘Randy’ (depending on the season).
  • the male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ flowered at approximately the same time as the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ over a five year period (TABLE 4A).
  • ‘Famoso’ trees were 5 years old in Year 18.
  • TABLE 4A shows mean “full bloom” flowering dates for ‘Famoso’ and ‘Randy’ over a 5 year period, referenced to ‘Kerman’ (day 0).
  • FIG. 1 An image of ‘Famoso’ in bloom is presented in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3A An image of a ‘Famoso’ tree, including images of the trunk, branches, and canopy, is presented in FIG. 3A .
  • ‘Kerman’ female ‘Kerman’ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ‘Famoso’ 0 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 1 ⁇ 1 0 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 1 ‘Randy’ ⁇ 4 ⁇ 5 ⁇ 6 ⁇ 7 ⁇ 5 0 ⁇ 9 ⁇ 6 ⁇ 7 ⁇ 4 Mean Flowering Date vs.
  • TABLE 4B presents flowering time results for Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), which was a low chill year.
  • ‘Famoso’ was similar to ‘Randy’ in terms of flowering date, and ‘Famoso’ flowered long before ‘Peters’. Both ‘Randy’ and ‘Famoso’ overlapped with ‘Kerman’. Despite the overlap between ‘Randy’ and ‘Kerman’ in this low chill year, from TABLE 4A above, it is seen that, in a normal chill year, ‘Randy’ would flower too early for good pollenization of ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ is intermediate to ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’ for flowering date and thus can overlap with ‘Kerman’ in both higher and lower chilling seasons.
  • ‘Famoso’ inflorescences are borne laterally on branches, rarely as terminal buds. They are located on one year old wood. The flower buds form a branched compound inflorescence as a compact compressed panicle. The panicles are 2 to 5 cm long when fully expanded and shedding pollen with considerable variation in size. Flower development is from base to tip of the panicle and typically spans several weeks, depending on weather conditions during individual seasons.
  • ‘Famoso’ inflorescences have an orange-reddish (31B to 43A or 43B) appearance, especially on the outer surface, in contrast to ‘Peters’ inflorescences which are green to light green (136B-139B) with tinges of red (42C-43C) on some predehiscing inflorescences ( FIG. 8 ). Individual flowers are 1-2 mm in diameter. ‘Famoso’ is a male pistachio tree, which means that all flowers are male. Because there are no female flowers, no seed is produced.
  • Tips and outside of individual flowers are pinkish red (39B-C) changing to yellow (11C, 12D, 13D), and flowers near the base of the panicles are tinged red (42C-43A,B) prior to opening of individual flowers.
  • Flowers do not have petals and have 5-6 stamens each with 4 lobes. Pollen is shed from the terminal ends of the stamens.
  • ‘Famoso’ has good pollen viability, providing good quantities of viable pollen. ‘Famoso’ sheds a large amount of pollen over a reasonably extended period (19, 14 and 20 days at the Famoso trial in Year 20, Year 21, and Year 22, respectively), and has a highly coincident flowering period with ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ trees were 7 years old in Year 20. Pollen germination at pollen shed for ‘Famoso’ is high and similar to both ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’. ‘Famoso’ produces more abundant flowers and pollen as a juvenile tree compared to ‘Peters’. Views of ‘Famoso’ flower clusters both prior to and at dehiscence are presented in FIG. 2A and FIG.
  • Pollen Germination (Year 26): Pollen germination is somewhat a snapshot in time, as it can vary from early to late bloom. Different inflorescences and flowers on the same branch will shed pollen at different times during the bloom period.
  • Year 26 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees
  • pollen from a variety of male pistachio varieties was collected between March 21 and March 31. Pollen was germinated on 18% sucrose with some boron and calcium nitrate, and at low light in a humid chamber. The pollen of each cultivar was germinated using hanging drop slides. Each slide had two wells and three of these slides were prepared for each cultivar. Germination results are presented below.
  • ‘Randy’ is a proven pollinizer for the 30,000+ acres of ‘Golden Hills’ planted in the San Joaquin Valley, and ‘Famoso’ had higher pollen germination percentages than ‘Randy’ or ‘Peters’ in this study (TABLE 6A, TABLE 6B, FIG. 4A , and FIG. 4B ).
  • Aged Pollen Germination In Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), pollen was collected from ‘Famoso’ and several comparison male pistachio varieties, including ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’. The collected pollen was stored in a refrigerator for two days prior to conducting viable pollen counts (germination assay). This “aged pollen” count provides an estimate of pollen durability. Mean viable pollen counts for each variety are presented in FIG. 5A , and boxplots of these viable pollen ratios by variety are shown in FIG. 5B . Raw mean data and standard errors are presented in TABLE 7. Additional data and analysis are provided in TABLE 8A and TABLE 8B- . Aged pollen for ‘Famoso’ was more viable than that of ‘Peters’, but less than that of ‘Randy’.
  • FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B provide a visual comparison of ‘Famoso’ and ‘Peters’, taken at their respective bloom periods. ‘Peters’ had very scattered bloom in Year 26, with many buds never breaking dormancy.
  • ‘Famoso’ has not been specifically evaluated for resistance or susceptibility to pistachio diseases. This variety is grown in a location where typical pistachio diseases are minimal, and which is managed to minimize disease development. It is expected that susceptibility to Botryosphaeria dothidea, Botrytis cinerea, or Alternaria alternata would be similar to other commercial pistachio cultivars since Pistacia vera L. in California is generally susceptible to these diseases. Most pistachio insect pests are controlled with insecticides, which have been used where ‘Famoso’ is grown. Significant differences in unspecified insect damage were not found among the tested cultivars, including ‘Famoso’. The flowering date of ‘Famoso’ is similar to that of ‘Peters’, and therefore the incidence of Botryosphaeria dothidea and Botrytis cinerea would be expected to be similar as well.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A new male pistachio tree (Pistacia vera L.) designated as ‘Famoso’, particularly characterized by mid- to late-season flowering time, is provided. The male pistachio tree ‘Famoso’ is further characterized by consistent flowering from year to year, and production of a large amount of pollen over an extended period. In addition, ‘Famoso’ is characterized by precocious flowering three to four years after budding.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/147,540, filed Apr. 14, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Latin name: Botanical/commercial classification: Pistacia vera L.
Varietal denomination: The varietal denomination of the claimed pistachio variety is ‘Famoso’.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
An objective of pistachio breeding programs is to develop improved male pollinators of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ (not patented). The female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ is the main later-season pistachio cultivar grown in California and in other parts of the world. The male pistachio variety ‘Peters’ (not patented) is a common male cultivar used as a pollen source to pollinate ‘Kerman’. Although ‘Peters’ is viewed as the industry standard pollinator variety for ‘Kerman’, ‘Peters’ often flowers later than ‘Kerman’ and has a history of providing poor flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’. This poor flowering overlap is especially seen during years with insufficient chilling. Even in seasons of sufficient chilling, ‘Peters’ is not very precocious, meaning that ‘Peters’ is slow to produce flowers as a juvenile tree. This is particularly apparent when ‘Peters’ is compared to female ‘Kerman’ trees, which will have many flowers at 6th or 7th leaf, while ‘Peters’ trees will have either none or relatively few. Typically, the female variety ‘Kerman’ is approximately one year ahead of the male variety ‘Peters’ in terms of flower development, which results in a year of lost production. Further, in low chill years, ‘Peters’ has performed very poorly. In some young orchards, ‘Peters’ produced almost no flowers, the flowers that were produced had no pollen, and ‘Peters’ often bloomed 1-2 weeks later than ‘Kerman’. Over time, the use of ‘Peters’ has resulted in inadequate pollination of ‘Kerman’ and reduced yield potential.
Pistachio growers are in need of a male pistachio variety that is more precocious than ‘Peters’, performs better in low chill years, and has a better flowering overlap with the female variety ‘Kerman’. Thus, there exists a need for improved pollinator varieties, such as male varieties having improved flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’. The present male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ described herein is a product of the breeding efforts to produce improved male pistachio varieties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a new and distinct pistachio cultivar (Pistacia vera L.) that has been denominated as ‘Famoso’, and more particularly as a male pistachio variety that has a better overlap with the flowering period of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ than does the male pistachio variety ‘Peters’. In addition, the male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ is more precocious than ‘Peters’; ‘Famoso’ produces flowers three to four years after budding as compared to ‘Peters’, which typically takes four to five years to produce flowers after budding. The male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ also has a more consistent flowering period that is more coincident with the flowering period of the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’. In contrast, the male pistachio variety ‘Peters’ has poor flowering overlap with ‘Kerman’ as well as poor blooms during some years. ‘Peters’ has especially poor blooms during years with low chilling, which are expected to become more frequent in future years in view of the warming climate.
By providing a better overlap in flowering period with ‘Kerman’ than is provided by ‘Peters’, ‘Famoso’ may improve ‘Kerman’ yield, especially in years when ‘Peters’ flowers significantly later than ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ flowering is more consistent than ‘Peters’, and ‘Famoso’ also produces a large amount of pollen over an extended period. ‘Famoso’ is potentially significant as an alternative to ‘Peters’ for the Californian, New Mexican, Arizonan, and world-wide pistachio industries. ‘Famoso’ may be used as the pollinizer for other mid- to late-season pistachio cultivars such as ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ may also be used as an additional pollinizer of mid- to late-season female pistachio varieties (e.g. ‘Kerman’) in orchards along with the male variety ‘Peters’ or other male pistachio varieties.
The cross that produced ‘Famoso’ was originally made during Year 1, and the original seedling of ‘Famoso’ was planted at a research plot near Bakersfield, Calif., USA during Year 2. The cross was made between Pistacia vera L. female ‘2-35’ (not patented) and Pistacia vera L. male ‘ES#4’ (not patented). ‘Famoso’ was originally designated as selection ‘B19-69’. ‘B19-69’ was budded (asexually propagated via T-buds) onto rootstocks at two test locations called Tejon Ranch and Little Creek in eastern Kern County, Calif., USA. Buds from the original ‘B19-69’ tree were budded onto ‘UCB-1’ (not patented) rootstocks at both test locations in Year 13. Selection ‘B19-69’ was chosen as a candidate for release under the variety name ‘Famoso’. The variety ‘Famoso’ has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree in bloom during Year 25.
FIG. 2A illustrates flower clusters of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree just prior to dehiscence. FIG. 2B illustrates flower clusters of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree at anther dehiscence.
FIG. 3A illustrates the trunk, branches, and canopy of a 12-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree. FIG. 3B illustrates the leaves of ‘Famoso’. FIG. 3C illustrates the venation pattern on the leaves of a 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree.
FIG. 4A illustrates the mean germination ratio of freshly-collected pollen for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and other male pistachio varieties in Year 26. Shown is the analysis of means (MiniTab 17) with 5% SD, where a value of 1.0=100%. FIG. 4B illustrates a fitted means plot of the germination data presented in FIG. 4A.
FIG. 5A illustrates the mean germination ratio of stored pollen for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and other male pistachio varieties in Year 26. Shown is the analysis of means (MiniTab 17) with 5% SD, where a value of 1.0=100%. FIG. 5B illustrates boxplots of viable pollen ratios by variety.
FIG. 6A illustrates the mean pollen weight per inflorescence (grams) for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and other male pistachio varieties in Year 26. Shown is the analysis of means (MiniTab 17) with 5% SD. FIG. 6B illustrates boxplots of pollen weight by variety.
FIG. 7A-FIG. 7B illustrates a comparison of inflorescence density for 13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees (FIG. 7A) and ‘Peters’ (FIG. 7B).
FIG. 8. illustrates a comparison of collected inflorescences from a 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ tree and a ‘Peters’ tree showing differences in the colors of the inflorescences.
 BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT
The following is a detailed botanical description of the new male pistachio cultivar designated as ‘Famoso’, including the key differentiating characteristics of this variety and comparisons of certain characteristics of ‘Famoso’ to other pistachio varieties. Unless otherwise indicated, evaluation data was taken from 12- to 15-year-old trees. Color descriptions are based on the color standards presented in R.H.S. Colour Chart of The Royal Horticultural Society of London (R.H.S.) (1st edition, 1966).
Plant Winter Hardiness, Heat Tolerance, and Drought Tolerance: ‘Famoso’, as is typical of Pistacia vera L., will tolerate temperatures greater than −5° C. to −10° C. The ‘UCB-1’ rootstock on which it is grafted, however, can sustain significant damage at −5° C. after a few hours. The ‘Famoso’ cultivar is typically grown in a hot dry environment, and has been grown in a location having typical summer temperatures greater than 40° C. to 42° C. ‘Famoso’ is similar to ‘Kerman’ or ‘Peters’ in that it requires sufficient winter chill to flower (800+ hours below 8° C.). All California pistachio cultivars are grown as an irrigated crop and require about 1000 mm of water during the growing season. Pistachio cultivars will tolerate poor quality water and do not show significant yield loss or damage up to EC (electrical conductivity) 8-12.
Tree Size: Tree height was about 3-4 meters on 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees in Year 28. ‘PG1’ (‘Pioneer Gold 1’) rootstock was the particular rootstock used for these particular ‘Famoso’ trees. Trunk cross sectional areas were taken above and below the graft union and converted to cross sectional area to provide an estimate of tree size at 15 years of age (TABLE 1). ‘Randy’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,262) was the standard check cultivar in this plot. Both cultivars were similar in size (not significantly different), with some overgrowth of the scion for ‘Famoso’. This has been observed in other cultivars and has not been a problem.
TABLE 1
Trunk cross sectional areas
Variable Cultivar Mean SE Mean StDev p value
xc top Famoso 1.460 0.142 0.28 0.734
Randy 1.4016 0.084 0.168
xc bottom Famoso 0.8432 0.0480 0.096 0.051
Randy 1.0229 0.0560 0.112
Ratio Famoso 1.727 0.124 0.248 0.113
(Top/bottom) Randy 1.390 0.133 0.265
Bark: The bark of ‘Famoso’ trees is grey (202C-D). Photographs were taken of 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ and ‘Randy’ trunks of 2 trees for the purpose of evaluating differences in trunk lenticel density in Year 28. 5 cm and 10 cm templates were used for the photographs. Counts were normalized to counts/cm. 8 to 10 evaluations were done per cultivar with count values of about 50 to 250 counts per observation. ANOVAs were computed with MiniTab 17. No significant differences were found (p=0.329). However, ‘Famoso’ was observed to have exceptionally irregular and rough lenticels. In most pistachios, lenticels are arranged in horizontal rows, but ‘Famoso’ lenticels were more random in arrangement and appearance. TABLE 2 shows the mean values for both cultivars (unit is number of lenticels/cm2).
TABLE 2
Mean number of lenticels/cm2
Cultivar Mean SE Mean StDev p value
Famoso 18.54 1.35 4.27 0.329
Randy 16.18 2.01 5.67
Leaves: ‘Famoso’ leaves are highly variable in the details of their form, shape and size within the tree. In general, the leaves are deciduous simple compound imparipinnate with one or two pairs of oppositely arranged lateral leaflets. However, the leaves can also be trifoliate and on branches with an abundance of new vegetative growth, and only one or no lateral leaflets may be present. Leaflet margins are entire to slightly crenate. Leaflets are oval to ovate and 5-8 cm long. Terminal leaflets can be less than 8 cm to greater than 16 cm. Leaflets vary considerably in shape, in general being ovate and having cuspidate to rounded apex and a rounded base (FIG. 3B). Margins of leaf blades are entire. Leaf surfaces are glabrous, smooth, and waxy. Leaf venation is of the cladodromous type as described by Hickey (1973) Amer. J. Botany 60:17-33, and as shown in FIG. 3C. For leaves, color evaluations were done on at least 3 leaves, each new and mature, collected at random from a ‘Famoso’ tree during the summer of Year 25 (12-year-old trees). Leaves are shades of green, similar for both upper and lower surfaces. Mature leaves, top surface=137B, bottom surface=137B, 137C, new leaves, top surface=137A, 137B, bottom surface=139C, 138B, leaf midrib=145C. The color of new leaves is 138B to 139C, and the lower surface is 139C. The leaf midrib color for new leaves is 143C. Midrib and petiole colors are the same. Images of the leaves of ‘Famoso’ are presented in FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C. Typical petiole/leaf values of 15-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees and ‘Randy’ trees from Year 28 are shown in TABLE 3 (15 observations). Differences were non-significant at 5% for both petiole and terminal leaflet. The petiole diameter is approximately 1-2 mm, and therefore too small to be measured accurately.
TABLE 3
Typical petiole/leaf values from Year 28
Cultivar Variable Mean SD p-value
Famoso petiole length (cm) 4.99 1.32 0.322
Randy petiole length (cm) 4.57 0.88
Famoso terminal leaflet (cm) 11.32 1.88
Randy terminal leaflet (cm) 11.11 2.34
Flowering Time: ‘Famoso’ is at full bloom ˜1.4 days before or after ‘Kerman’ and 7-9 days after ‘Golden Hills’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,158), but 2-7 days before ‘Peters’ and ˜4 days after ‘Randy’ (depending on the season). The male pistachio variety ‘Famoso’ flowered at approximately the same time as the female pistachio variety ‘Kerman’ over a five year period (TABLE 4A). ‘Famoso’ trees were 5 years old in Year 18. TABLE 4A shows mean “full bloom” flowering dates for ‘Famoso’ and ‘Randy’ over a 5 year period, referenced to ‘Kerman’ (day 0). Overall, ‘Randy’ flowered about 4 days before ‘Famoso’, while ‘Famoso’ peak flowering was about 1.5 days ahead of ‘Kerman’. An image of ‘Famoso’ in bloom is presented in FIG. 1. An image of a ‘Famoso’ tree, including images of the trunk, branches, and canopy, is presented in FIG. 3A.
TABLE 4A
Flowering time of ‘Famoso’ and other varieties relative to ‘Kerman’
Tejon Ranch Little Creek (Famoso)
Datea 4/5, 4/13 4/21, 4/21, 4/20, 4/1, 4/13, 4/19, 4/16, 4/17,
Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Year 21 Year 22 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Year 21 Year 22
Flowering Date vs. ‘Kerman’ (female) Flowering Date vs. ‘Kerman’ (female)
‘Kerman’ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
‘Famoso’ 0 −2 −3 −3 −2 −1 −1 0 −2 −1
‘Randy’ −4 −5 −6 −7 −5 0 −9 −6 −7 −4
Mean Flowering Date vs. ‘Kerman’ (both locations)
‘Kerman’ 0
‘Famoso’ −1.5
‘Randy’ −5.3
Flower Density Scoreb Flower Density Scoreb
‘Famoso’ 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 4 3
‘Randy’ 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
Mean Flower Density Score (both locations)
‘Famoso’ 2.9
‘Randy’ 3.9
aThis is the date that the female variety ‘Kerman’ flowered in the year identified.
bFlower density presented from 1 = low to 4 = high.
Low Chill Flowering: TABLE 4B presents flowering time results for Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), which was a low chill year. In Year 26, ‘Famoso’ was similar to ‘Randy’ in terms of flowering date, and ‘Famoso’ flowered long before ‘Peters’. Both ‘Randy’ and ‘Famoso’ overlapped with ‘Kerman’. Despite the overlap between ‘Randy’ and ‘Kerman’ in this low chill year, from TABLE 4A above, it is seen that, in a normal chill year, ‘Randy’ would flower too early for good pollenization of ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ is intermediate to ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’ for flowering date and thus can overlap with ‘Kerman’ in both higher and lower chilling seasons.
TABLE 4B
Year 26 flowering evaluation of ‘Famoso’. Note mid-bloom (3)/full bloom (4) dates for overlap.
Cultivar Evaluation Date:
Year 26 March 16 March 19 March 23 March 26 March 30 April 2
Famoso Male 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.3 6
Randy Male 2 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.5 6
Peters Male 1 0.9 1 1.3 2.6 2.8
Kerman Female 2 2.5 2.9 4.5 6 6
Golden Hills Female 2.4 3.2 3.5 6 6 6
Lost Hills Female 2.4 3.2 4.2 6 6 6
Bloom ratings 0 to 6:
0 = dormant buds, 1 = green tip on flower bud, 2 => (greater than) 5 open buds on tree, 3 = mid bloom, 4 = full bloom, 5 = late bloom, 6 = bloom finished
Flowers and Inflorescences: ‘Famoso’ inflorescences are borne laterally on branches, rarely as terminal buds. They are located on one year old wood. The flower buds form a branched compound inflorescence as a compact compressed panicle. The panicles are 2 to 5 cm long when fully expanded and shedding pollen with considerable variation in size. Flower development is from base to tip of the panicle and typically spans several weeks, depending on weather conditions during individual seasons. ‘Famoso’ inflorescences have an orange-reddish (31B to 43A or 43B) appearance, especially on the outer surface, in contrast to ‘Peters’ inflorescences which are green to light green (136B-139B) with tinges of red (42C-43C) on some predehiscing inflorescences (FIG. 8). Individual flowers are 1-2 mm in diameter. ‘Famoso’ is a male pistachio tree, which means that all flowers are male. Because there are no female flowers, no seed is produced. Tips and outside of individual flowers are pinkish red (39B-C) changing to yellow (11C, 12D, 13D), and flowers near the base of the panicles are tinged red (42C-43A,B) prior to opening of individual flowers. Flowers do not have petals and have 5-6 stamens each with 4 lobes. Pollen is shed from the terminal ends of the stamens.
Flower Density: On a flower density scale (1=low, 4=high), ‘Famoso’ ranks at an average of ˜3. This is higher than the rating of ‘Peters’, which ranks at a maximum of 2 as a mature tree. ‘Randy’ ranks as a strong 4.
Pollen: ‘Famoso’ has good pollen viability, providing good quantities of viable pollen. ‘Famoso’ sheds a large amount of pollen over a reasonably extended period (19, 14 and 20 days at the Famoso trial in Year 20, Year 21, and Year 22, respectively), and has a highly coincident flowering period with ‘Kerman’. ‘Famoso’ trees were 7 years old in Year 20. Pollen germination at pollen shed for ‘Famoso’ is high and similar to both ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’. ‘Famoso’ produces more abundant flowers and pollen as a juvenile tree compared to ‘Peters’. Views of ‘Famoso’ flower clusters both prior to and at dehiscence are presented in FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B. Pollen counts (germination) for ‘Famoso’ taken directly after pollen collection in Year 25 (12-year-old trees) was similar to ‘Randy’ but less than ‘Peters’ (TABLE 5). ‘Famoso’ should be a superior pollinizer for ‘Kerman’ due to better overlap of pollen shed with the ‘Kerman’ bloom period, especially when the orchard first comes into bearing.
TABLE 5
Pollen counts taken directly after pollen collection in Year 25
Mean Std. dev.
Variety n % %
‘Farnoso’ 8 69.711 8.796
‘Peters’ 6 79.034 8.014
‘Randy’ 8 67.752 7.179
Pollen Germination (Year 26): Pollen germination is somewhat a snapshot in time, as it can vary from early to late bloom. Different inflorescences and flowers on the same branch will shed pollen at different times during the bloom period. To analyze fresh pollen counts (germination) in Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), pollen from a variety of male pistachio varieties was collected between March 21 and March 31. Pollen was germinated on 18% sucrose with some boron and calcium nitrate, and at low light in a humid chamber. The pollen of each cultivar was germinated using hanging drop slides. Each slide had two wells and three of these slides were prepared for each cultivar. Germination results are presented below. ‘Randy’ is a proven pollinizer for the 30,000+ acres of ‘Golden Hills’ planted in the San Joaquin Valley, and ‘Famoso’ had higher pollen germination percentages than ‘Randy’ or ‘Peters’ in this study (TABLE 6A, TABLE 6B, FIG. 4A, and FIG. 4B).
TABLE 6A
Least Squares Means for germination of fresh pollen in Year 26, counted
immediately after flowering.
Cultivar Mean % SE Mean %
N-48 85.09 2.334
Peters 66.67 3.301
Randy 58.09 2.557
B15-43 86.19 2.334
B16-58 90.40 2.334
Famoso 85.66 1.906
TABLE 6B
GLM ANOVA showing highly significant differences among cultivars.
GLM Analysis of Variance for Germination of Fresh Pollen
Source DF SS MS F P
Cultivar 5 0.84564 0.16913 25.87 0.000
Error 64 0.41841 0.00654
Total 69 1.26405
S = 0.0808560 R-Sq = 66.90% R-Sq(adj) = 64.31%
Aged Pollen Germination: In Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), pollen was collected from ‘Famoso’ and several comparison male pistachio varieties, including ‘Randy’ and ‘Peters’. The collected pollen was stored in a refrigerator for two days prior to conducting viable pollen counts (germination assay). This “aged pollen” count provides an estimate of pollen durability. Mean viable pollen counts for each variety are presented in FIG. 5A, and boxplots of these viable pollen ratios by variety are shown in FIG. 5B. Raw mean data and standard errors are presented in TABLE 7. Additional data and analysis are provided in TABLE 8A and TABLE 8B- . Aged pollen for ‘Famoso’ was more viable than that of ‘Peters’, but less than that of ‘Randy’.
TABLE 7
“Aged Pollen” Viability Ratios
Standard Error
Variety Mean Mean
‘15-43’ 0.38198 0.04487
‘Famoso’ 0.35480 0.04915
‘N-48’ 0.33600 0.04915
‘Peters’ 0.09402 0.04915
‘Randy’ 0.51728 0.04915
TABLE 8A
Least Squares Means for germination of pollen in Year 26, counted
after 4° C. storage.
Cultivar Mean % SE Mean %
N-48 33.60 4.915
Peters 9.40 4.915
Randy 51.73 4.915
B15-43 38.20 4.487
Famoso 35.48 4.915
TABLE 8B
GLM ANOVA showing highly significant differences among cultivars.
GLM Analysis of Variance for Germination of Stored Pollen
Source DF SS MS F P
ACC 4 0.47137 0.11784 9.76 0.000
Error 21 0.25368 0.01208
Total 25 0.72504
S = 0.109908
R-Sq = 65.01%
R-Sq(adj) = 58.35%
Pollen Quantities: During March of Year 26 (13-year-old ‘Famoso’ trees), branches with dehiscing inflorescences were collected and evaluated. Treatments involved taking four to five shoots that were 8-12 inches long with dehiscing inflorescences and placing them on craft paper overnight, followed by pollen collection the following morning. Pollen from three replicates of each treatment were collected and weighed. Treatments were normalized by counting the number of actively dehiscing inflorescences. ANOVA and ANOM were performed with MiniTab 17. Mean pollen weights for each variety are presented in FIG. 6A, and boxplots of these viable pollen ratios by variety are shown in FIG. 6B. Raw mean data and standard deviations are presented in TABLE 9. Additional data and analysis are provided in TABLE 10A and TABLE 10B. ‘Famoso’ provides good quantities of viable pollen. Note that variety ‘15-43’ is also referred to as variety ‘B15-43’.
TABLE 9
Pollen quantity (weight) in Year 26
Standard
Variety N Mean Deviation
‘15-43’ 3 0.01683 0.00655
‘Famoso’ 3 0.01487 0.00858
‘N-48’ 3 0.04833 0.01524
‘Peters’ 3 0.02863 0.01741
‘Randy’ 3 0.01627 0.00958
TABLE 10A
Least Squares Means for pollen quantities (grams/inflorescence).
Accession Mean SE Mean
N-48 0.04833 0.007042
Peters 0.02863 0.007042
Randy 0.01627 0.007042
15-43 0.01683 0.007042
Famoso 0.01487 0.007042
TABLE 10B
GLM ANOVA for pollen quantities per inflorescence.
GLM for pollen quantification
Source DF SS MS F P
Acc 4 0.002410 0.000602 4.05 0.033
Error 10 0.001488 0.000149
Total 14 0.003898
S = 0.01220
R-Sq = 61.83%
R-Sq(adj) = 46.56%
Inflorescence Density: The tree canopies of several male cultivars were photographed to provide an approximate evaluation of the number of inflorescences in the canopy. It is difficult to develop methods that accurately quantify this variable, which is highly dependent on tree size, pruning, and tree health. FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B provide a visual comparison of ‘Famoso’ and ‘Peters’, taken at their respective bloom periods. ‘Peters’ had very scattered bloom in Year 26, with many buds never breaking dormancy.
Response to Pests and/or Diseases: ‘Famoso’ has not been specifically evaluated for resistance or susceptibility to pistachio diseases. This variety is grown in a location where typical pistachio diseases are minimal, and which is managed to minimize disease development. It is expected that susceptibility to Botryosphaeria dothidea, Botrytis cinerea, or Alternaria alternata would be similar to other commercial pistachio cultivars since Pistacia vera L. in California is generally susceptible to these diseases. Most pistachio insect pests are controlled with insecticides, which have been used where ‘Famoso’ is grown. Significant differences in unspecified insect damage were not found among the tested cultivars, including ‘Famoso’. The flowering date of ‘Famoso’ is similar to that of ‘Peters’, and therefore the incidence of Botryosphaeria dothidea and Botrytis cinerea would be expected to be similar as well.

Claims (1)

What is claimed is:
1. A new and distinct variety of pistachio tree designated ‘Famoso’ as shown and described herein.
US14/999,156 2015-04-14 2016-04-04 Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’ Active USPP28994P3 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/999,156 USPP28994P3 (en) 2015-04-14 2016-04-04 Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562147540P 2015-04-14 2015-04-14
US14/999,156 USPP28994P3 (en) 2015-04-14 2016-04-04 Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160309631P1 US20160309631P1 (en) 2016-10-20
USPP28994P3 true USPP28994P3 (en) 2018-02-27

Family

ID=57127821

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/999,156 Active USPP28994P3 (en) 2015-04-14 2016-04-04 Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP28994P3 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USPP35677P2 (en) 2023-02-03 2024-03-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Male pistachio tree named ‘UC Westside’

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Hickey (1973). "Classification of the Architecture of Dicotyledonous Leaves," American Journal of Botany, 60(1): 17-33.
none cited by Examiner /sbme/ *
The Aug. 1, 2014 Test Agreement for Trees (No. 2014-5016) between Saeed, LLC and The Regents of The University of California, 7 pages.
The Jul. 1, 2002 Test Agreement for Trees (No. 2003-5006) between Tejon Ranch and The Regents of The University of California, 9 pages.
The Jul. 1, 2002 Test Agreement for Trees (No. 2003-5066) between Pioneer Nursery (Little Creek) and The Regents of The University of California, 9 pages.
The Jun. 1, 2014 Test Agreement for Trees (No. 2014-5013) between Mojave Pistachios, LLC and The Regents of The University of California, 7 pages.
The Jun. 1, 2014 Test Agreement for Trees and Rootstocks (No. 2014—5014) between Paramount Farming Company, LLC and The Regents of The University of California, 7 pages.

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USPP35677P2 (en) 2023-02-03 2024-03-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Male pistachio tree named ‘UC Westside’

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20160309631P1 (en) 2016-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USPP28994P3 (en) Male pistachio tree named ‘Famoso’
US20150106983P1 (en) Peach tree named 'Souvenirs'
USPP29469P3 (en) Blueberry plant named ‘Ridley 4609’
USPP27080P3 (en) Magnifera plant named ‘201230THOM’
USPP22140P2 (en) Kiwi plant named ‘Au Golden Tiger’
US20150106982P1 (en) Nectarine tree named 'Amoore Sweet'
USPP28931P3 (en) Male pistachio tree named ‘Tejon’
USPP35296P2 (en) Actinidia plant named ‘Y19’
USPP28597P3 (en) Peach tree named ‘Burpeachthirtyseven’
USPP33308P2 (en) Nectarine tree named ‘Wanectfour’
USPP23933P3 (en) Apple tree ‘DS 22’
USPP21737P2 (en) Peach tree named ‘Burpeachtwentyfour’
USPP32431P2 (en) Peach tree named ‘Wapeachone’
USPP32391P2 (en) Apple tree named ‘CIVM49’
USPP31405P2 (en) Nectarine tree named ‘Burnectthirtyfour’
USPP22458P3 (en) Almond tree named ‘Matan’
USPP22613P3 (en) Almond tree named ‘Zohar’
USPP30144P3 (en) Apple tree named ‘PE’
USPP29047P3 (en) Blueberry plant named ‘ZF08-070’
USPP26989P3 (en) Pear tree named ‘PE3UNIBO’
USPP27545P3 (en) Maple tree named ‘JFS-KW187’
USPP30446P3 (en) Pear tree named ‘NC4’
USPP31006P3 (en) Kiwifruit plant named ‘ZES007’
USPP27954P2 (en) Crabapple tree named ‘JFS-KW207’
US20210185868P1 (en) Plum Tree Named 'Waplumone'

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KALLSEN, CRAIG E.;PARFITT, DAN E.;MARANTO, JOSEPH;REEL/FRAME:039423/0709

Effective date: 20160524