USPP21358P3 - Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’ - Google Patents

Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP21358P3
USPP21358P3 US12/009,065 US906508V USPP21358P3 US PP21358 P3 USPP21358 P3 US PP21358P3 US 906508 V US906508 V US 906508V US PP21358 P3 USPP21358 P3 US PP21358P3
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
nematode
selections
root
rootstock
nematodes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/009,065
Other versions
US20090183288P1 (en
Inventor
Andrew Walker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of California San Diego UCSD
Original Assignee
University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of California San Diego UCSD filed Critical University of California San Diego UCSD
Priority to US12/009,065 priority Critical patent/USPP21358P3/en
Assigned to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA reassignment THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WALKER, ANDREW
Publication of US20090183288P1 publication Critical patent/US20090183288P1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP21358P3 publication Critical patent/USPP21358P3/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H6/88—Vitaceae, e.g. Vitus [grape]

Definitions

  • Botanical/commercial classification ‘L514-10’ ( Vitis rufotomentosa ⁇ ( V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ⁇ V. riparia ‘Riparia Gloire’)) ⁇ V. champinii ‘c9038’.
  • Nematodes are important pests in vineyards around the world, and these soil-borne pests can be particularly problematic in California vineyards. Two factors intensify the impact of nematodes—the high value of grapes and of vineyard land. These factors force growers to ignore the steps of leaving land fallow and rotating crops, both of which reduce nematode build up and delay the selection of adapted strains. Nematicides and fumigants help control nematodes, but the use of these pesticides has been greatly restricted and their future use in doubt because they must be persistent and penetrate deeply through the soil profile to be highly effective. In addition, grape rootstocks were bred to resist grape phylloxera (a devastating root-feeding aphid), and were not selected for nematode resistance.
  • the grape rootstocks ‘Freedom’ and ‘Harmony’ were released to provide resistance to nematodes, but they are not resistant to grape phylloxera. More recently two rootstocks, ‘RS3’ and ‘RS9’ (siblings of a ‘Schwarzmann’ ⁇ ‘Ramsey’ cross), were released, which were designed to resist multiple nematode species and provide growers with nematode resistant rootstock alternatives. However, they have nematode resistance from a relatively narrow genetic base, which may promote the evolution of strains capable of feeding on them. Therefore, there is a need to develop nematode resistant grape rootstock.
  • This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of grapevine rootstock plant (grape rootstock) with resistance to a broad array of soil-borne nematodes including root-knot, dagger, lesion and citrus nematodes. It is moderately susceptible to ring nematode, but has strong resistance to grape phylloxera. It is a cross of ‘L514-10’ ( Vitis rufotomentosa ⁇ ( V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ⁇ V. riparia ‘Riparia Gloire’)) ⁇ V. champinii ‘c9038’. It is recommended for vineyard sites with severe nematode infestations.
  • FIG. 1 number of ring nematodes recovered off rootstock selections growing in 1 gal pots with three soils, known to have severe and chronic nematode pressure. Results per soils are means of three replicate pots.
  • FIG. 2 a photograph showing rootstock ‘9365-85’.
  • a breeding program was initiated in 1990 at Davis, Calif., to provide a group of rootstocks with broad and durable resistance to the nematodes found in California vineyards. This program commenced with an evaluation of selections that remained from breeding efforts in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These selections from the late 1960s and early 1970s were previously screened against two root knot nematode species ( Meloidogyne incognita acrita and M. arenaria thamsei ), the lesion nematode ( Pratylenchus vulnus ), and the dagger nematode ( Xiphinema index ).
  • the first phase of the selection process examined the progeny for their general vigor and horticultural characters such as internode length and the degree of lateral shoot formation.
  • ten 2-node dormant cuttings of the best 1,000 were tested for their ability to form roots.
  • Rootstocks that root well generally graft well, thus this evaluation was a key indicator of their future success as rootstocks.
  • One hundred of the progeny were selected, again with an effort to get a broad representation from the large number of families.
  • the second phase of the selection process involved testing these 100 selections for resistance to M. incognita I3.
  • This root-knot nematode isolate is capable of feeding on many rootstocks, but does not feed on rootstocks that derive their resistance from V. champinii (‘Freedom’, ‘Harmony’, ‘Dog Ridge’ and ‘Ramsey’). All of the nematode testing in this breeding program utilized potted plants under greenhouse conditions with optimized soils and irrigation techniques to promote nematode feeding. Resistance to this isolate of root-knot nematode was evaluated by assaying the number of galls on the roots after inoculation with 1,000 J2 larvae (the free-living infectious stage of this nematode).
  • the third phase of the selection process tested the 33 root-knot nematode resistant selections against two aggressive strains of root-knot nematode and against the dagger nematode, X. index .
  • the two aggressive strains were selected from soils from a declining vineyard of ‘Harmony’ rootstock. Root-knot nematodes were extracted from this soil and the larvae were placed onto tomato plants with high susceptibility to root-knot nematodes. Two egg masses were collected from these infested plants and J2 larvae from each mass were put on a separate uninfested tomato plant to create new strains from a single egg mass (root-knot nematodes are parthenogenic).
  • HarmA and HarmC were multiplied on tomato and were then used to inoculate potted plants of ‘Harmony’ rootstock to verify their ability to feed aggressively on this resistant rootstock. These two strains were named HarmA and HarmC. Later investigations determined that HarmA was a strain of M. arenaria while HarmC was a strain of M. incognita . The dagger nematodes were collected from several vineyards in the Napa Valley of California, which were known to have fanleaf degeneration.
  • the 33 selections were then inoculated with each of the three nematode strains independently.
  • the root-knot nematode screens used 1,000 J2 larvae to inoculate plants growing in 1,000 cm 3 plastic pots with a coarse sand/clay loam soil mix.
  • the dagger nematode screens were done in the same pots and soils, but used 200 adult X. index as the inoculum.
  • Fourteen selections did not produce egg masses when inoculated with the three root-knot nematode strains nor did they produce root tip galls after inoculation with X. index (Table 2).
  • the 14 selections were subjected to a series of tests.
  • the first was a combined inoculum of all four nematodes at once to determine the impact of simultaneous nematode feeding on resistance (Table 3). They were also tested against the four nematodes over a range of temperatures, 24, 27, 30 and 32° C. There was some erosion of resistance to HarmA (the most aggressive strain of root-knot nematode) at this temperature, but 6 of the selections performed very well (Table 4). Root-knot nematode resistance is known to fail at about 28° C. in a wide range of species including tomato, pepper and plum.
  • Grape phylloxera are capable of feeding and producing galls (nodosities) on the young roots of virtually all grape rootstocks and species. In order to gauge the phylloxera hosting ability of the final six selections, they were tested for the ability to support phylloxera on nodosities and compared to a set of commercial rootstocks. Three sets of young root pieces from each selection were inoculated with 10 phylloxera eggs collected from ‘101-14 Mgt’ rootstock roots. Over a 21-day period, the number of eggs and juveniles that were produced were summed and divided by 10 (the original inoculum) to produce the average rate of increase. Table 5 presents these results for the six selections.
  • Nodosity galling on young roots does not appear to damage grapevines, only feeding and galling on mature roots (tuberosities) leads to vine death.
  • the high rate of phylloxera feeding, galling and reproduction on ‘101-14 Mgt’ (7.98 average rate of increase) has been observed in past tests. Most of the values were very low, although this ‘101-14 Mgt’ strains is well adapted to ‘9407-14’. Three of the selections were very resistant: ‘8909-05’, ‘9363-16’, and ‘9449-27’.
  • the low values for AXR#1 demonstrate that the results of this test do not reflect field level or tuberosity level feeding and damage, and that phylloxera adapt independently to rootstock hosts.
  • the six rootstock selections in large pots using soils with nematode pressure from root-knot, lesion, ring and Xiphinema americanum is known to be severe and chronic. This test was conducted to evaluate these selections under “field conditions” using infested soil without added inoculations. All of the selections performed very well against root-knot nematodes (Table 6) and two, ‘9407-14’, and ‘8909-05’, also performed very well against ring nematode ( FIG. 1 ).
  • Rootstock ‘9365-85’ is a staminate flowered vine with leaves that appear more like V. riparia with longer teeth, more prominent lobing, and thinner more puckered texture. Its resistance to root-knot and dagger nematodes in the combined testing was very good, and it resists citrus and lesion nematode, but is susceptible to ring nematode (Table 3). The resistance of ‘9365-85’ to M. arenaria HarmA was the most severely impacted by higher temperatures compared with the other five selections, although it is not statistically different from ‘9365-43’ and ‘9363-16’ (Table 4). ‘9365-85’ is an excellent mother vine with long canes, good internode lengths and few lateral shoots. Preliminary propagation results indicate it has moderately deep rooting angles.
  • rootstock ‘9365-85’ The following is a further description of rootstock ‘9365-85’:
  • Plant tips The variety has shoot tips which are e enclosed in expanding leaves, typical and observed color - green (5GY 5 ⁇ 6), and sparsely covered with arachnose tomentum.
  • Young leaves The variety has young leaves with typical and observed color green (5GY 5 ⁇ 6), and typical and observed shape - three lobed glabrous leaves with fine arachnose tomentum and relatively long sharply pointed teeth.
  • Mature leaves The variety has a typical and observed size—medium sized (8.7 ⁇ 11 cm), typical and observed upper surface color - dark green upper (5GY 4/4) and typical and observed lower surface color - dark green (5GY 5/4), slightly 3-lobed, broad cuneiform-shaped leaves with medium-sized angular to convex teeth, and medium-sized petioles.
  • the upper surface is glabrous, broadly rugose with some indented puckering near the petiole.
  • the lower surface has scattered arachnose tomentum, fine bristles along the main vines and small tufted bristles (domatia) at the intersection of the main veins.
  • the petiolar sinus is a narrow U to lyre shape.
  • V. champinii c9038 (probably V. candicans ⁇ V. monticola ) 9407-14 ( V. champinii ‘Ramsey’ ⁇ Riparia Gloire ) ⁇ V. champinii c9021 (probably V. candicans ⁇ V. berlandieri )

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

Rootstock ‘9365-85’ is a cross of ‘L514-10’ (Vitis rufotomentosa×V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ×V. riparia ‘Riparia Gloire’))×V. champinii ‘c9038’. This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of grapevine rootstock plant with resistance to a broad array of soil-borne nematodes including root-knot, dagger, lesion and citrus nematodes. The variety is moderately susceptible to ring nematode, but has strong resistance to grape phylloxera.

Description

Botanical/commercial classification: ‘L514-10’ (Vitis rufotomentosa×(V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’×V. riparia ‘Riparia Gloire’))×V. champinii ‘c9038’.
Variety Denomination: ‘9365-85’.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Nematodes are important pests in vineyards around the world, and these soil-borne pests can be particularly problematic in California vineyards. Two factors intensify the impact of nematodes—the high value of grapes and of vineyard land. These factors force growers to ignore the steps of leaving land fallow and rotating crops, both of which reduce nematode build up and delay the selection of adapted strains. Nematicides and fumigants help control nematodes, but the use of these pesticides has been greatly restricted and their future use in doubt because they must be persistent and penetrate deeply through the soil profile to be highly effective. In addition, grape rootstocks were bred to resist grape phylloxera (a devastating root-feeding aphid), and were not selected for nematode resistance. The grape rootstocks ‘Freedom’ and ‘Harmony’ were released to provide resistance to nematodes, but they are not resistant to grape phylloxera. More recently two rootstocks, ‘RS3’ and ‘RS9’ (siblings of a ‘Schwarzmann’ בRamsey’ cross), were released, which were designed to resist multiple nematode species and provide growers with nematode resistant rootstock alternatives. However, they have nematode resistance from a relatively narrow genetic base, which may promote the evolution of strains capable of feeding on them. Therefore, there is a need to develop nematode resistant grape rootstock.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of grapevine rootstock plant (grape rootstock) with resistance to a broad array of soil-borne nematodes including root-knot, dagger, lesion and citrus nematodes. It is moderately susceptible to ring nematode, but has strong resistance to grape phylloxera. It is a cross of ‘L514-10’ (Vitis rufotomentosa×(V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’×V. riparia ‘Riparia Gloire’))×V. champinii ‘c9038’. It is recommended for vineyard sites with severe nematode infestations.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1: number of ring nematodes recovered off rootstock selections growing in 1 gal pots with three soils, known to have severe and chronic nematode pressure. Results per soils are means of three replicate pots.
FIG. 2: a photograph showing rootstock ‘9365-85’.
 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A breeding program was initiated in 1990 at Davis, Calif., to provide a group of rootstocks with broad and durable resistance to the nematodes found in California vineyards. This program commenced with an evaluation of selections that remained from breeding efforts in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These selections from the late 1960s and early 1970s were previously screened against two root knot nematode species (Meloidogyne incognita acrita and M. arenaria thamsei), the lesion nematode (Pratylenchus vulnus), and the dagger nematode (Xiphinema index). In 1990, these selections were evaluated for their ability to root and for growth habits such as brushy growth, internode length and the degree of lateral shoot production. In 1993 and 1994, the best of these selections were crossed to species chosen for their ability to reduce scion vigor or improve the rooting of the progeny. The parentage and species composition of the ‘8905-05’ and other crosses are listed in Table 1. About 5,000 progeny were planted in the vineyard and their evaluation for nematode resistance was initiated in 1996.
The first phase of the selection process examined the progeny for their general vigor and horticultural characters such as internode length and the degree of lateral shoot formation. The best 1,000 progeny, selected from as many families as possible, were advanced to a rooting assay. In December of 1996, ten 2-node dormant cuttings of the best 1,000 were tested for their ability to form roots. Rootstocks that root well generally graft well, thus this evaluation was a key indicator of their future success as rootstocks. One hundred of the progeny were selected, again with an effort to get a broad representation from the large number of families.
The second phase of the selection process involved testing these 100 selections for resistance to M. incognita I3. This root-knot nematode isolate is capable of feeding on many rootstocks, but does not feed on rootstocks that derive their resistance from V. champinii (‘Freedom’, ‘Harmony’, ‘Dog Ridge’ and ‘Ramsey’). All of the nematode testing in this breeding program utilized potted plants under greenhouse conditions with optimized soils and irrigation techniques to promote nematode feeding. Resistance to this isolate of root-knot nematode was evaluated by assaying the number of galls on the roots after inoculation with 1,000 J2 larvae (the free-living infectious stage of this nematode). Resistance was also evaluated by extracting the J2 nematodes in the pots after the root galls were counted. Later phases of the root-knot nematode screening evaluated resistance by counting the number of egg masses formed using a technique developed by Cousins and Walker (Cousins and Walker 2001 Plant Disease 85:1052-1054). There were no root galls on 33 of the 100 selections and the 33 selections were advanced to the next phase of screening.
The third phase of the selection process tested the 33 root-knot nematode resistant selections against two aggressive strains of root-knot nematode and against the dagger nematode, X. index. The two aggressive strains were selected from soils from a declining vineyard of ‘Harmony’ rootstock. Root-knot nematodes were extracted from this soil and the larvae were placed onto tomato plants with high susceptibility to root-knot nematodes. Two egg masses were collected from these infested plants and J2 larvae from each mass were put on a separate uninfested tomato plant to create new strains from a single egg mass (root-knot nematodes are parthenogenic). These new strains were multiplied on tomato and were then used to inoculate potted plants of ‘Harmony’ rootstock to verify their ability to feed aggressively on this resistant rootstock. These two strains were named HarmA and HarmC. Later investigations determined that HarmA was a strain of M. arenaria while HarmC was a strain of M. incognita. The dagger nematodes were collected from several vineyards in the Napa Valley of California, which were known to have fanleaf degeneration.
The 33 selections were then inoculated with each of the three nematode strains independently. The root-knot nematode screens used 1,000 J2 larvae to inoculate plants growing in 1,000 cm3 plastic pots with a coarse sand/clay loam soil mix. The dagger nematode screens were done in the same pots and soils, but used 200 adult X. index as the inoculum. Fourteen selections did not produce egg masses when inoculated with the three root-knot nematode strains nor did they produce root tip galls after inoculation with X. index (Table 2).
In the fourth phase, the 14 selections were subjected to a series of tests. The first was a combined inoculum of all four nematodes at once to determine the impact of simultaneous nematode feeding on resistance (Table 3). They were also tested against the four nematodes over a range of temperatures, 24, 27, 30 and 32° C. There was some erosion of resistance to HarmA (the most aggressive strain of root-knot nematode) at this temperature, but 6 of the selections performed very well (Table 4). Root-knot nematode resistance is known to fail at about 28° C. in a wide range of species including tomato, pepper and plum. The 14 selections were also evaluated for resistance to lesion (Pratylenchus vulnus), citrus (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) and ring (Mesocriconema xenoplax) nematodes (Table 3). From this series of tests a number of six rootstock selections were made, including ‘9365-85’. A summary of the ‘9365-85’ characteristics is presented below.
Grape phylloxera are capable of feeding and producing galls (nodosities) on the young roots of virtually all grape rootstocks and species. In order to gauge the phylloxera hosting ability of the final six selections, they were tested for the ability to support phylloxera on nodosities and compared to a set of commercial rootstocks. Three sets of young root pieces from each selection were inoculated with 10 phylloxera eggs collected from ‘101-14 Mgt’ rootstock roots. Over a 21-day period, the number of eggs and juveniles that were produced were summed and divided by 10 (the original inoculum) to produce the average rate of increase. Table 5 presents these results for the six selections. Nodosity galling on young roots does not appear to damage grapevines, only feeding and galling on mature roots (tuberosities) leads to vine death. The high rate of phylloxera feeding, galling and reproduction on ‘101-14 Mgt’ (7.98 average rate of increase) has been observed in past tests. Most of the values were very low, although this ‘101-14 Mgt’ strains is well adapted to ‘9407-14’. Three of the selections were very resistant: ‘8909-05’, ‘9363-16’, and ‘9449-27’. The low values for AXR#1 demonstrate that the results of this test do not reflect field level or tuberosity level feeding and damage, and that phylloxera adapt independently to rootstock hosts.
It will take years to determine which sites each of these rootstock selections are best suited to, but they have unparalleled levels of resistance to nematodes and should excel in sites with single and mixed nematode species infestations. Four of the selections (‘9365-43’, ‘9365-85’, ‘9407-14’ and ‘9449-27’) were grafted to ‘Fiesta Seedless’ and planted in a ‘Fresno’ rootstock trial in 2004. That year two of these selections (‘9365-43’ and ‘9365-85’) were also included in a ‘Chardonnay’ rootstock trial in Santa Maria, Calif. The six rootstock selections in large pots using soils with nematode pressure from root-knot, lesion, ring and Xiphinema americanum, is known to be severe and chronic. This test was conducted to evaluate these selections under “field conditions” using infested soil without added inoculations. All of the selections performed very well against root-knot nematodes (Table 6) and two, ‘9407-14’, and ‘8909-05’, also performed very well against ring nematode (FIG. 1).
Each of the selections was repeatedly asexually reproduced to provide testing materials for nematode resistance evaluations. The cuttings were taken from the original seedling vine planted in Davis, Calif. On Jun. 7, 2002 the original seedlings were asexually reproduced to provide more cuttings for greenhouse and eventual field testing. The variety ‘9365-85’ was first asexually reproduced for distribution in Davis, Calif. from woody and herbaceous cuttings.
Detailed Botanical Description
Rootstock ‘9365-85’ is a staminate flowered vine with leaves that appear more like V. riparia with longer teeth, more prominent lobing, and thinner more puckered texture. Its resistance to root-knot and dagger nematodes in the combined testing was very good, and it resists citrus and lesion nematode, but is susceptible to ring nematode (Table 3). The resistance of ‘9365-85’ to M. arenaria HarmA was the most severely impacted by higher temperatures compared with the other five selections, although it is not statistically different from ‘9365-43’ and ‘9363-16’ (Table 4). ‘9365-85’ is an excellent mother vine with long canes, good internode lengths and few lateral shoots. Preliminary propagation results indicate it has moderately deep rooting angles.
The following is a further description of rootstock ‘9365-85’:
Shoot tips.—The variety has shoot tips which are e enclosed in expanding leaves, typical and observed color - green (5GY ⅚), and sparsely covered with arachnose tomentum.
Young leaves.—The variety has young leaves with typical and observed color green (5GY ⅚), and typical and observed shape - three lobed glabrous leaves with fine arachnose tomentum and relatively long sharply pointed teeth.
Mature leaves.—The variety has a typical and observed size—medium sized (8.7 ×11 cm), typical and observed upper surface color - dark green upper (5GY 4/4) and typical and observed lower surface color - dark green (5GY 5/4), slightly 3-lobed, broad cuneiform-shaped leaves with medium-sized angular to convex teeth, and medium-sized petioles. The upper surface is glabrous, broadly rugose with some indented puckering near the petiole. The lower surface has scattered arachnose tomentum, fine bristles along the main vines and small tufted bristles (domatia) at the intersection of the main veins. The petiolar sinus is a narrow U to lyre shape.
      • Petioles.—typical and observed length 4 to 5 cm, typical and observed diameter—3 to 4 mm, and color is similar to the upper leaf surface (5GY 4/4).
      • Canes.—typical and observed color.—dark brown (5YR ⅝), typical and observed internodes length—15 to 20 cm, and relatively limited lateral development, nodes have short pointed buds. Canes are oval in cross-section, have thin diaphragms and medium sized pith.
      • Flowers.—typical and observed flowers are staminate and do not produce berries.
TABLE 1
Parentage of the five nematode resistant grape rootstock selections.
Selection Parentage
8909-05 V. rupestris × M. rotundifolia
9363-16 (V. rufotomentosa × (V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ×
Riparia Gloire)) × Riparia Gloire
9365-43 (V. rufotomentosa × (V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ×
Riparia Gloire)) × V. champinii c9038
(probably V. candicans × V. monticola)
9365-85 (V. rufotomentosa × (V. champinii ‘Dog Ridge’ ×
Riparia Gloire)) × V. champinii c9038
(probably V. candicans × V. monticola)
9407-14 (V. champinii ‘Ramsey’ × Riparia Gloire) ×
V. champinii c9021 (probably V. candicans ×
V. berlandieri)
TABLE 2
Selections with broad resistance to four
nematodes when inoculated individually.
M. M. M.
incognita arenaria- incognita-
Selection X. index I3 HarmA HarmC
8909-05 R R R R
9317-06 R R R R
9332-43 R R R R
9344-03 R R R R
9363-16 R R R R
9365-43 R R R R−
9365-62 R R R R
9365-85 R− R R R
9403-35 R R R− R−
9403-107 R R R R
9407-14 R R R R
9449-23 R R R R
9449-25 R R R R
9449-27 R R R R
Control Group:
1616C S R R− R−
Harmony S R S S
Colombard S S S S
R = Resistant, no gall symptoms or egg masses observed
R− = Trace infection
S = Susceptible, symptoms present, nematode reproduction supported
TABLE 3
Summary results for 14 nematode resistant selections when tested
against combined inoculum with three
root-knot nematode (RKN) strains and dagger nematode (Xi).
Results of testing against citrus, lesion and ring are also reported.
Xi Galls in Combined RKN Egg Masses in
Genotypes Testing Combined Testing
8909-05 R   0 R   0
9317-06 MS <1 S <5
9332-43 S <5 S <5
9344-03 S <5 MS <1
9363-16 R   0 R   0
9365-43 R   0 R− <1
9365-62 MS <1 S <5
9365-85 MS <1 R− <1
9403-107 R 0 S <5
9403-35 S <5 S <5
9407-14 R   0 R   0
9449-23 MS <1 R   0
9449-25 MS <1 R   0
9449-27 MS <1 R− <1
1616C S >50  S <5
Freedom S >10  S <10 
Colombard S >100  S >100 
Harmony S >10  S <50 
St. George S >100  S <50 
Genotypes Citrus Lesion Ring
8909-05 R <100 R <10 R  <1,000
9317-06 R <100 R <50 HS <20,000
9332-43 R <100 R <50 S <10,000
9344-03 S >400 S <200  S <10,000
9363-16 S >400 R <50 S <10,000
9365-43 R <100 R <50 MS  <5,000
9365-62 R <100 R <50 MS  <5,000
9365-85 R <100 R <50 S <10,000
9403-107 R <100 R <50 MS  <5,000
9403-35 R <50 MS  <5,000
9407-14 R <100 R <50 LS  <3,000
9449-23 R <100 R <50 S <10,000
9449-25 R <100 R <50 S <10,000
9449-27 R <100 R <50 S <10,000
1616C S >400 S <200  HS <20,000
Freedom R <100 R <50 HS <20,000
Colombard S <1000  S <300  HS <30,000
Harmony S <1000  S <200  HS <30,000
St. George S >400 R <50 S <10,000
TABLE 4
Number of egg masses per potted plant and per
gram of root after inoculation with 1,000
M. arenaria HarmA nematodes and testing at 32° C.
Egg Egg Mass/g
Genotype Mass/Plant Root
Colombard 442.50 a 155.86 a
Harmony 156.00 b 123.28 b
9365-85 32.25 c 16.49 c
9365-43 7.25 c 6.04 cd
9363-16 6.75 c 5.74 cd
9449-27 0.25 c 0.22 d
9317-06 0.00 c 0 d
8909-05 0.00 c 0 d
TABLE 5
The average rate of population increase of phylloxera on nodosities
formed on young root tips of advanced rootstock selections and a set
of standard rootstocks. The phylloxera were selected from a vineyard
planted on ‘101-14’ Mgt rootstock.
8909-05 0.59
9363-16 0.89
9365-43 1.86
9365-85 1.99
9407-14 9.83
9449-27 0.30
1103P 2.10
101-14 Mgt 7.98
Teleki 5C 1.38
AxR#1 2.15
O39-16 0.43
TABLE 6
Number of root-knot nematode egg masses recovered from rootstock
selections growing in 1 gal pots with soils collected from a vineyard
site. This vineyard is known to have severe and chronic nematode
pressure. Results per soils are means of three replicate pots.
Selection Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3
Colombard 69.02 89.8 74.6
Harmony 31.2 0 2.8
St. George 9.8 26.2 16.0
9365-85 1 0 1.4
9407-14 0 0 0
9363-16 0 0 1.4
9365-43 0 0 0.2
9449-27 0 0 0.8
8909-05 0 0 0

Claims (1)

1. A novel and distinct variety of grapevine rootstock plant designated ‘9365-85’ having the characteristics described and illustrated herein.
US12/009,065 2008-01-15 2008-01-15 Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’ Active 2028-11-15 USPP21358P3 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/009,065 USPP21358P3 (en) 2008-01-15 2008-01-15 Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/009,065 USPP21358P3 (en) 2008-01-15 2008-01-15 Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090183288P1 US20090183288P1 (en) 2009-07-16
USPP21358P3 true USPP21358P3 (en) 2010-10-05

Family

ID=40851892

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/009,065 Active 2028-11-15 USPP21358P3 (en) 2008-01-15 2008-01-15 Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP21358P3 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090217422P1 (en) * 2008-01-15 2009-08-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Nematode resistant grape rootstock '9407-14'

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090217422P1 (en) * 2008-01-15 2009-08-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Nematode resistant grape rootstock '9407-14'
USPP23532P3 (en) * 2008-01-15 2013-04-16 The Regents Of The University Of California Nematode resistant grape plant rootstock ‘9407-14’

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090183288P1 (en) 2009-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Das et al. Prunus diversity-early and present development: A review
Jiajun et al. A natural pentaploid strawberry genotype from the Changbai Mountains in Northeast China
Esmenjaud et al. Selection and application of resistant germplasm for grapevine nematodes management
Eliwa et al. Approach to New peach rootstocks resistant to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species) selected from local Mit-Ghamer peach cultivar
Nico et al. Host suitability of the olive cultivars Arbequina and Picual for plant-parasitic nematodes
USPP21358P3 (en) Nematode resistant grapevine rootstock plant ‘9365-85’
Seemüller et al. Plant resistance.
USPP20051P2 (en) Nematode resistant grape rootstock ‘9365-43’
Milan Breeding of Psidium species for root knot nematode resistance in Malaysia
USPP19981P2 (en) Nematode resistant grape rootstock ‘8909-05’
USPP23532P3 (en) Nematode resistant grape plant rootstock ‘9407-14’
USPP19993P2 (en) Nematode resistant grape rootstock ‘9363-16’
McGranahan et al. Advances in genetic improvement of walnut at the University of California, Davis
Grauke et al. Phenotypic screening of pecan seedling rootstocks in search of nematode resistance
Khan et al. Occurrence of rice root-knot nematode and yield loss assessment in Aligarh and Hathras districts of Uttar Pradesh, India
Di Vito et al. Response of wild and cultivated potato clones to Italian populations of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp.
Sümbül et al. Identification of dwarf rootstock candidates in fig: wild fig (Ficus carica var. rupestris (Hausskn.) browicz) population and morphological characterization
USPP27602P2 (en) Mint plant ‘Ochoco Mint’
USPP35357P2 (en) Bermudagrass named ‘UCR 17-8’
USPP22208P3 (en) Peach rootstock named ‘HBOK 50’
Jacobs Characterizing the Response of Diverse Hazelnut Germplasm to Eastern Filbert Blight in New Jersey
USPP22505P3 (en) Peach tree rootstock named ‘HBOK 10’
USPP32999P2 (en) Grapevine plant named ‘Errante Noir’
Jose et al. Phenotyping diversity population of black pepper for Phytophthora resistance
US20210227770A1 (en) Cannabis plant named &#39;frb005&#39;

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WALKER, ANDREW;REEL/FRAME:021035/0606

Effective date: 20080508