USPP12631P2 - Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ - Google Patents
Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP12631P2 USPP12631P2 US09/500,141 US50014100V USPP12631P2 US PP12631 P2 USPP12631 P2 US PP12631P2 US 50014100 V US50014100 V US 50014100V US PP12631 P2 USPP12631 P2 US PP12631P2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fruit
- tree
- anjou
- banjo
- pear
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 235000014443 Pyrus communis Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 240000001987 Pyrus communis Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 241000538562 Banjos Species 0.000 title claims description 26
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 241000220324 Pyrus Species 0.000 abstract description 2
- 240000007817 Olea europaea Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241001164374 Calyx Species 0.000 description 3
- 206010053615 Thermal burn Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004320 controlled atmosphere Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000005070 ripening Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- RLLPVAHGXHCWKJ-IEBWSBKVSA-N (3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl (1s,3s)-3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylate Chemical compound CC1(C)[C@H](C=C(Cl)Cl)[C@@H]1C(=O)OCC1=CC=CC(OC=2C=CC=CC=2)=C1 RLLPVAHGXHCWKJ-IEBWSBKVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000032544 Cicatrix Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000001543 Corylus americana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000007582 Corylus avellana Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007466 Corylus avellana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004258 Ethoxyquin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000001140 Mimosa pudica Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000028344 Primula vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000016311 Primula vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021185 dessert Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- DECIPOUIJURFOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethoxyquin Chemical compound N1C(C)(C)C=C(C)C2=CC(OCC)=CC=C21 DECIPOUIJURFOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940093500 ethoxyquin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000019285 ethoxyquin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003898 horticulture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002420 orchard Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000021017 pears Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012794 pre-harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000241 scar Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000037387 scars Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/74—Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
- A01H6/7481—Pyrus, i.e. pears
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/08—Fruits
Definitions
- the ‘Banjo’ pear Pyrus communis L. ) is a new, smooth skinned, very attractive cultivar with very little or no russet. This pear, unlike most pears, ripens on the tree, stores into late December and early January and has a unique shape.
- This new invention which is a whole tree mutation, also has different leaf characteristics, time of bloom, time of leaf emergence and color of the one year old wood.
- the ‘Banjo’ pear was discovered in 1987 as a whole tree mutation in a mixed orchard of ‘Beurre d'Anjou’ ( Pyrus communis L. ), not patented, ‘Bartlett’ ( Pyrus communis L. ), not patented, and ‘Buerre Bosc’ ( Pyrus communis L. ) not patented.
- the new cultivar grows and looks much like a ‘d'Anjou’ tree with an upright, spreading growth habit.
- the original tree lacked typical vigor for some reason but the young trees are growing well with excellent new growth and a healthy appearance.
- the leaf size is larger on the ‘Banjo’ tree than on a ‘d'Anjou’ tree and the leaf stem is shorter when 100 leaves were measured. Measurements of the leaf are shown in the detailed description.
- the color of the one year old wood is olive brown (4E5) on the ‘Banjo’ tree, olive green (2F6) on the ‘d'Anjou’ tree and hazel (6E8) on the ‘Bartlett’ tree. (See detailed description for color references).
- Bloom data indicates that the date of bloom of the ‘Banjo’ tree is one to two days later than the ‘Bartlett’ tree and 5 to 6 days later than that of the ‘d'Anjou’ tree.
- Full bloom date for 2001 for the ‘d'Anjou’ tree was April 19, for the ‘Bartlett’ tree it was April 23 and for ‘Banjo’ and ‘Bosc’ was April 25.
- Temperatures in the Hood RIver Valley were cool until Apr. 23, 2001, when the weather turned quite warm.
- the ‘Banjo’ fruit is more similar to the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit than it is to a ‘Bartlett’ or ‘Bosc’ fruit.
- the ripening characteristics and color change are more similar to the ‘Bartlett’.
- the differences in the appearance of the two fruits, ‘Banjo’ and ‘d'Anjou,’ include the following six points.
- the ‘Banjo’ fruit is cleaner, smoother and free of russet when compared with the finish of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear.
- the skin has a waxy finish that, unlike the ‘d'Anjou,’ turns yellow (2A6) as the fruit ripens.
- the shape of the two fruits appears to be different.
- the ‘Banjo’ fruit is longer, the width is narrower, and the stem length is longer than the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit. See detailed description.
- FIG. 1 shows a fruit bearing branch of the subject variety.
- FIG. 2 shows another fruit bearing branch of the subject variety.
- FIG. 3 shows the fruit of the subject variety.
- FIG. 4 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
- FIG. 5 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
- FIG. 6 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
- FIG. 7 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
- Size Slightly smaller than ‘d'Anjou,’ similar to ‘Bartlett’; diameter of the ‘Banjo’ tree — 11 to 12 feet; height — 14 feet.
- Sepals Number: 5. Color: fruit side — Greyish red (9B5). calyx side — Greyish green (1C6). Skin: glabrous, medium thick. Texture: tender, smooth, waxy. Color: changes as fruit matures from yellowish green (29A6) to primrose yellow (2A6). Dots: as fruit matures the small inconspicuous dots disappear.
- Resistance to insects or mildew. Does not appear to be more or less tolerant or susceptible to pests. No winter damage observed on old or young trees.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
Abstract
A new variety of pear tree discovered as a whole tree mutation. The new variety appears similar to the ‘d'Anjou’ pear tree but has larger leaves, shorter stems, and a different color of one-year-old wood. The date of full bloom of the new variety is 5 to 6 days later than the ‘d'Anjou’ tree. The fruit of the new variety has a finish that is cleaner, smoother and free of russet when compared with the finish of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear. The fruit of the new variety is quite edible right off to the tree, while that of the ‘d'Anjou’ is not.
Description
The ‘Banjo’ pear (Pyrus communis L.) is a new, smooth skinned, very attractive cultivar with very little or no russet. This pear, unlike most pears, ripens on the tree, stores into late December and early January and has a unique shape. This new invention, which is a whole tree mutation, also has different leaf characteristics, time of bloom, time of leaf emergence and color of the one year old wood.
The ‘Banjo’ pear was discovered in 1987 as a whole tree mutation in a mixed orchard of ‘Beurre d'Anjou’ (Pyrus communis L.), not patented, ‘Bartlett’ (Pyrus communis L.), not patented, and ‘Buerre Bosc’ (Pyrus communis L.) not patented. The original tree, located on the Eastside Road near Hood River, Oreg., was found in between old trees that had been inter-planted in 1975 and 1976 with some of the above mentioned cultivars.
Wood from the original tree was top worked (grafted) into a young ‘Columbia Red d'Anjou’ (Pyrus communis L.) (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 6,194) tree in 1994 and is now bearing fruit. Trees propagated at the direction of the inventors are now bearing some fruit.
The new cultivar grows and looks much like a ‘d'Anjou’ tree with an upright, spreading growth habit. The original tree lacked typical vigor for some reason but the young trees are growing well with excellent new growth and a healthy appearance. As mentioned above there are three distinguishing characteristics in the appearance of the plant.
1. The leaf size is larger on the ‘Banjo’ tree than on a ‘d'Anjou’ tree and the leaf stem is shorter when 100 leaves were measured. Measurements of the leaf are shown in the detailed description.
2. The color of the one year old wood is olive brown (4E5) on the ‘Banjo’ tree, olive green (2F6) on the ‘d'Anjou’ tree and hazel (6E8) on the ‘Bartlett’ tree. (See detailed description for color references).
3. Bloom data indicates that the date of bloom of the ‘Banjo’ tree is one to two days later than the ‘Bartlett’ tree and 5 to 6 days later than that of the ‘d'Anjou’ tree. Full bloom date for 2001 for the ‘d'Anjou’ tree was April 19, for the ‘Bartlett’ tree it was April 23 and for ‘Banjo’ and ‘Bosc’ was April 25. Temperatures in the Hood RIver Valley were cool until Apr. 23, 2001, when the weather turned quite warm.
The ‘Banjo’ fruit is more similar to the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit than it is to a ‘Bartlett’ or ‘Bosc’ fruit. The ripening characteristics and color change, however, are more similar to the ‘Bartlett’. The differences in the appearance of the two fruits, ‘Banjo’ and ‘d'Anjou,’ include the following six points.
1. The ‘Banjo’ fruit ripens ten to fifteen days before ‘d'Anjou.’ From the chart below and from our experience in 1999 to 2000, it appears that the fruit could have been picked earlier than was done in 1997. From the 1997 data, the pressures were consistently higher on the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit than on the ‘Banjo’ fruit. Sugars were similar but starches were higher on the ‘Banjo’ fruit than on the ‘D'Anjou,’ as it should be on riper fruit.
| Press. lbs. | Sugar % | Starch | ||||
| Pick | Date | ‘Banjo’ | ‘Banjo’ | ‘Banjo’ | ||
| 1st | 8/26/97 | 12.4 | — | — | ||
| 2nd | 9/2/97 | 11.2 | — | 3.0 | ||
| 3rd | 9/5/97 | 10.4 | 11 | — | ||
Picking dates and pressures for ‘Banjo’ in 2000 were 1st picked fruit, Aug. 21, 2000 and 12.1 pounds, 2nd picked, Aug. 30, 2000 and 10.77 pounds, 3rd picked fruit, Sep. 5, 2000 and 9.26 pounds.
3. The ‘Banjo’ fruit is cleaner, smoother and free of russet when compared with the finish of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear. The skin has a waxy finish that, unlike the ‘d'Anjou,’ turns yellow (2A6) as the fruit ripens.
4. It appears that the ‘Banjo’ fruit is quite edible off the tree. This is not true with the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit which requires preripening in order to have acceptable eating quality.
5. While the interior quality of the ‘Banjo’ fruit is good after ripening, the smooth buttery texture of the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit is superior.
6. The shape of the two fruits appears to be different. The ‘Banjo’ fruit is longer, the width is narrower, and the stem length is longer than the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit. See detailed description.
7. The old ‘Banjo’ tree, because of its lack of vigor, has smaller fruit size than the ‘d'Anjou’ but the younger ‘Banjo’ trees have larger fruit more similar in size to the fruit of the ‘d'Anjou.’ For more information on fruit size see detailed description.
8. The fruit storage life has not been fully determined, but it appears that the fruit can be stored until January, while the ‘d'Anjou’ fruit can be stored well into June, in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage. Data collected by technicians at the Oregon State University Mid-Columbia Agriculture Research and Extension Center (MCAREC) in Hood River, from first year of storage showed the following information.
Sampled on Nov. 12, 1997, and evaluated according to maturity chart used at MCAREC.
| Pick | Date | Pressure | Scald | Browning | Flavor |
| 1st | 8/26/97 | 10.1 lbs | None | None | Very Good |
| 2nd | 9/2/97 | 12.5 lbs | None | None | Good |
| Sampled on January 12, 1998 |
| 1st | 8/26/97 | 8.9 lbs | Slight | 1 of 5 | Acceptable |
| 2nd | 9/2/97 | 7.1 lbs | Some | 1 of 5 | Acceptable |
| Sampled on March 10, 1998 |
| 1st | 8/26/97 | 7.3 lbs | Severe | 3 of 5 | Acceptable |
| 2nd | 9/2/97 | 6.3 lbs | Severe | Severe | Overripe |
The overall appearance of the fruit observed at the November 12 and January 12 evaluations was very good. From this data it appears that ‘Banjo’ fruit, under regular of common storage, keeps well into January. None of the fruit was treated with Ethoxyquin for scald control or a fungicide for rot control.
9. The 2000 evaluation showed that fruit picket on 8/3/00 (2nd pick) and evaluated on 11/4/00 were of excellent quality. Pressures averaged 2.46 pounds, extractable juices averaged 56.33 (100 g/FW), soluble solids averaged 13.5% and titratable acids averaged 2.82 meq/100 ml juice. No fruit exhibited scald, russet or internal browning. The fruit was juicy, smooth, had good flavor and the overall evaluation was very good.
FIG. 1 shows a fruit bearing branch of the subject variety.
FIG. 2 shows another fruit bearing branch of the subject variety.
FIG. 3 shows the fruit of the subject variety.
FIG. 4 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
FIG. 5 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
FIG. 6 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
FIG. 7 shows the fruit and foliage of the subject variety on the left and the fruit and foliage of the ‘d'Anjou’ pear on the right.
Technology is in accordance with “Modern Systemic Pomology” by Dr. Quentin Zielinski, Professor of Horticulture at Oregon State University, and “How to Identify Plants”, by H. D. Harrington, Professor of Botany and Curator of the Herbarium at Colorado State University. Color references are to the Methuen Handbook of Color by A. Kornerup and J. H. Wanscher.
Tree:
Size.—Slightly smaller than ‘d'Anjou,’ similar to ‘Bartlett’; diameter of the ‘Banjo’ tree — 11 to 12 feet; height — 14 feet.
Vigor.—Moderately vigorous.
Form.—Somewhat spreading, upright.
Growth.—Moderate.
Hardiness.—Hardy.
Production.—Productive.
Bearing.—One year out of seven, the parent tree had a light crop.
Trunk.—Form: upright. Size: old tree, diameter at 30 cm from ground — 16.3 cm; young trees — 7.9 cm. Texture: medium, smooth.
Branches.—Color: yellowish brown (5E4). Size: old tree: main: 1st 5 leaders, average diameter — 3.91 cm. young tree: main: 1st 5 leaders, average diameter — 3.01 cm. Lateral: spreading in zigzag pattern. Branchlets: long with internodes. Color of one year old wood: olive brown (4E5). Lenticels Color: dark brown (7F8). Number per square inch: approximately 20-30. Texture: Raised, conspicuous. Size: varied.
Leaves.—Size: length — 7.99 cm. Width — 4.29 cm. Petiole: Length: 2.76 cm. Diameter: 1 mm. Color of petiole: greyish — green (28C6). Form: ovate, symmetrical. Apex: medium acute. Base: broadly rounded. Thickness: thin to medium. Pubescence: some hairs early, glabrate, then glabrous. Texture: smooth and leathery. Margin: finely serrated. Color: topside — deep green (27E8); underside — greyish green (28D7). Leaf buds: form — obtuse, pointed. Leaf scars: prominent.
Flowers.—Blooming period: first, Apr. 16, 1997— full, Apr. 20, 1997; first, Apr. 19, 2000— full, Apr. 24, 2000; first, Apr. 19, 2001— full, Apr. 25, 2001. Size: width of opened flower — 41 mm. Pistil length: 13 mm. Style length: 9 mm. Filament: 8 mm. Pedicel: Length: 27 mm. Diameter: 1-2 mm. Petals: Length: 19.6 mm. Width: 10.5 mm. Color: grayish violet (7E). Number of petals: 5. Apex: mostly obtuse, some slightly acute. Base: cunate. Margin: entire. Texture: no hairs, glabrous. FLower bud: mixed. Size: diameter — 4.3 mm. Color: olive brown (4E5). Shape: conical, plump, free.
Fruit.—Date of first picking: in Hood River, Oreg. about 8/21/00. Date of last picking: in Hood River, Oreg. about 9/5/00. Retention: no pre-harvest drop observed. Size: slightly smaller than ‘d'Anjou,’ average width, 2.81 inches in diameter and average weight, 0.49 lbs.; ‘Banjo’ average width, 2.7 inches diameter and average weight, 0.44 lbs. Form: ovate, pyriform. Stem, small fruit stage; Color: greyish-green (28C7). Diameter: 2.2 mm. cavity: wide, shallow, slight russett. Calyx: small, partly closed, recurved. Lobes: persistent, united at base. Basin: narrow, shallow, smooth, rounded. Sepals: Number: 5. Color: fruit side — Greyish red (9B5). calyx side — Greyish green (1C6). Skin: glabrous, medium thick. Texture: tender, smooth, waxy. Color: changes as fruit matures from yellowish green (29A6) to primrose yellow (2A6). Dots: as fruit matures the small inconspicuous dots disappear.
Flesh.—Color: white. Texture: tender, juicy, fine-grained. Flavor: sweet, sub-acid, flat. Eating quality: very good. Core: distant, closed. Core lines: meeting. Calyx tube: urn-shaped.
Seed.—Size: small, 10 in number. Shape: acuminate. Color: dark brown (8F5).
Fruit use.—Fresh market, dessert.
Keeping quality.—Excellent to late December, early January.
Shipping quality.—Undetermined as no fruit has been shipped commercially.
Resistance to insects or mildew.—Does not appear to be more or less tolerant or susceptible to pests. No winter damage observed on old or young trees.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct variety of pear tree, referred to as the Banjo cultivar, substantially as shown and described herein, characterized by its fruit finish
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/500,141 USPP12631P2 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2000-02-08 | Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/500,141 USPP12631P2 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2000-02-08 | Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP12631P2 true USPP12631P2 (en) | 2002-05-21 |
Family
ID=23988217
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/500,141 Expired - Lifetime USPP12631P2 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2000-02-08 | Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP12631P2 (en) |
-
2000
- 2000-02-08 US US09/500,141 patent/USPP12631P2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP34636P2 (en) | Apple tree named ‘Canopy’ | |
| USPP12631P2 (en) | Pear tree named ‘Banjo’ | |
| USPP11012P (en) | Grape cultivar `Marquis` | |
| USPP9881P (en) | Apple tree `Co-op 32` | |
| USPP36342P2 (en) | Pear tree named ‘Rosebutter’ | |
| USPP9392P (en) | Apple tree `Co-op 38` | |
| USPP13352P2 (en) | Peach tree named ‘UFO’ | |
| USPP34771P2 (en) | Peach tree named ‘UFSol’ | |
| USPP9835P (en) | Asian pear tree named `Asio 1` | |
| USPP33495P2 (en) | Apple tree named ‘Eastman’ | |
| USPP35296P2 (en) | Actinidia plant named ‘Y19’ | |
| USPP34978P2 (en) | Pear tree named ‘PremP099’ | |
| USPP34006P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Prosperity Seedless’ | |
| US20230320242P1 (en) | Apple Tree Named 'R205' | |
| USPP33508P2 (en) | Apple tree named ‘R202’ | |
| USPP31444P2 (en) | Pear tree named ‘Olsen Bosc’ | |
| USPP20038P3 (en) | Fig Tree Named ‘Sequoia’ | |
| USPP32743P3 (en) | Kiwi plant named ‘AC 497 076’ | |
| USPP6245P (en) | Reimer cultivar pear tree | |
| USPP6829P (en) | Grapevine, "American Rose" | |
| USPP8463P (en) | Grapevine cv. Bianco One | |
| USPP9060P (en) | Columnar apple tree -- Obelisk variety | |
| USPP14177P3 (en) | Apple tree named ‘Civni’ | |
| USPP9822P (en) | Asian pear tree named `Asio 4` | |
| USPP8519P (en) | Hampshire apple tree cultivar |