USH308H - Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys - Google Patents

Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USH308H
USH308H US06/856,567 US85656786A USH308H US H308 H USH308 H US H308H US 85656786 A US85656786 A US 85656786A US H308 H USH308 H US H308H
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
tubing
decoy
fabric
frame
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US06/856,567
Inventor
Michael B. Tutin
Steven A. Pitman
Gregory R. Bothe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
United States Department of the Air Force
Original Assignee
United States Department of the Air Force
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by United States Department of the Air Force filed Critical United States Department of the Air Force
Priority to US06/856,567 priority Critical patent/USH308H/en
Assigned to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE reassignment UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: BOTHE, GREGORY R., PITMAN, STEVEN A.
Assigned to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE reassignment UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: TUTIN, MICHAEL B.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USH308H publication Critical patent/USH308H/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H3/00Camouflage, i.e. means or methods for concealment or disguise
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/495Counter-measures or counter-counter-measures using electronic or electro-optical means
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q17/00Devices for absorbing waves radiated from an antenna; Combinations of such devices with active antenna elements or systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/38Jamming means, e.g. producing false echoes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/41Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section
    • G01S7/411Identification of targets based on measurements of radar reflectivity

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the field of aircraft decoys, and more specifically to realistic decoy coverings and easily assembled. disassembled and transportable decoy frames.
  • Aircraft decoys simulate full size aircraft to mislead enemy reconnaissance.
  • Full size aircraft decoys have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,334,539 to Buchtel, U.S. Pat. No. 2,351,891 to Weisbaum, U.K. Specification No. 767,257 to Wyllie, and others.
  • Those, and other patents have also disclosed various frames to allow for convenient assembly, disassembly and transport before reassembIy elsewhere.
  • the prior art also teaches as in Buchtel and Wyllie, and in U.S. Pat. No. 2,395,914 to Scott, painting the decoy coverings to visually resemble actual aircraft and markings.
  • the prior art teaches nothing concerning simulating the radar or infrared signatures of actual aircraft.
  • the new construction method is particularly adaptable to kit construction and, when disassembled, provides an very lightweight and low volume package for shipping.
  • a novel aircraft decoy which includes a covering over its frame to provide desired visual, radar and infrared signatures to aerial reconnaissance.
  • the covering may comprise a fabric and coating.
  • the invention also includes an open weave fabric to minimize air resistance.
  • the invention further includes an aircraft decoy frame and a method of assembling aircraft decoy frames by the use of tubing and tubing fittings.
  • the tubing may be marked with location identification markings.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified perspective drawing showing the basic frame concept of a decoy aircraft fuselage.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective drawing of a portion of a decoy aircraft showing the assembly of tubing connected by fittings, over which various frame coverings may be applied.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective schematic drawing of the frame covering showing a fabric and a coating.
  • FIG. 4 shows the use of location identification markings on tubing sections to aid assembly.
  • FIG. 1 of the drawings there is shown a simplified perspective drawing of the basic frame concept of a frame 10 of a fuselage of an aircraft decoy.
  • the frame comprises a number of metal or plastic pipes or tubing 12 of various lengths, connected by fittings 14 to form the approximate shape of an aircraft fuselage.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective drawing of a portion of a decoy aircraft showing a more detailed embodiment of an assembly of tubing 16 and tubing fittings 18 over which various frame coverings may be applied.
  • the fittings shown use set screws to retain tubing sections 16, but other fittings, such as those utilizing male and female threads for use with threaded tubing, may be used as well. Shear and cotter pins may be added to the fittings to increase strength, and weldment used to provide permanence and strength for appropriate sections. In most cases, standard fittings may be used, and special fittings can be easily fabricated where needed.
  • the use of metal tubing and fittings allows the aircraft decoy to be disassembled in sections, making possible different degrees of disassembly to balance ease of reassembly with varying storage and transport requirements.
  • the aircraft decoy frame allows extremely compact storage.
  • This embodiment shows the use of additional tubing and fittings to not only add strength, but also to subdivide existing sections along the centerline of the fuselage to allow the decoy to be bullt in right and left halves.
  • the tubing and connectors are additionally arranged to provide structural strength to support a towing bar attached at the front of the decoy.
  • FIG. 3 there is shown a schematic representation of a frame covering material comprising a high strength fabric 20 and a coating 22.
  • the covering is stretched and secured over the frame.
  • the fabric is of an relatively open weave to minimize resistance to air passing through the fabric, yet will still display an acceptable shadow. This helps prevent high winds and storms from moving the decoy.
  • Coatings 22 to be used must adhere to the individual threads of the fabric 20, preserving the open weave and must be flexible. Additionally, the coatings should protect the fabric 20 and prevent deterioration.
  • Chemically bonded photo resistive dyes have been successfully used. Such photo resistive dyes, including their application to the fabric at the factory, are also available from Gehring Textiles. A gray dye was used, leaving the native white color of the nylon fabric 20 uncoated for the canopY and exhaust port areas.
  • the various coatings to be applied to the fabric are selected to duplicate as closely as possible the actual visual, infrared and radar signatures of the actual aircraft which the decoy is intended to mimic.
  • the visual duplication is simply a straightforward application of paints to match the color and markings of the actual aircraft.
  • the infrared and radar mimicry are both accomplished by adding metal to the decoy. In tests with decoys made with metal tubing, the metal in the tubing was sufficient to create the desired infrared and radar signatures.
  • a metallized paint may be used. Either a commercial metallized paint may be used, or powdered metal may be mixed with the paint already selected. For maximum effectiveness, silver bearing dust or paint can be used.
  • Pre-metallized fabrics may be used, in some case eliminating the need for a separate coating.
  • the metallized fabric may incorporate metal in various forms, such as flakes, strips, or strands and wire woven as part of the weave.
  • Another alternative is metal screening underneath the fabric covering frame sections, such as wing tips, that contain less metal.
  • the structure of the invention permits a wide variety of additional features.
  • containers of kerosene may be placed within the structure, mimicking the burning of an actual aircraft when attacked by enemy aircraft deceived by the decoy.
  • FIG. 4 shows the use of location identification markings on tubing sections to aid assembly.
  • Horizontal tubing section 24 and vertical tubing section 26 are shown with an index to an eight digit identification code.
  • Areas and sections of the aircraft decoy are indicated on plan views in an assembly instruction manual. Use of the markings greatly facilitates assembly by providing logical and intuitive guidance to the proper assembly location of each tubing section while minimizing the time required for assemblers to continually refer to the manual.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

An aircraft decoy is made by assembling metal or plastic pipe or tubing into tubing fittings to form the shape of an actual aircraft. The tubing is marked with location identification markings. The decoy thus constructed is easily disassembled, stored, transported, or reassembled. The aircraft decoy is covered with an open weave fabric to minimize air resistance so that high winds will not move the decoy on the ground. The fabric is coated with paint to mimic not only the optical characteristics or signature of the actual aircraft, but also the infrared and radar signature of the actual aircraft. Metal particles can be added to paint to increase the infrared and radar signatures.

Description

RIGHTS OF THE GOVERNMENT
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States for all governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of aircraft decoys, and more specifically to realistic decoy coverings and easily assembled. disassembled and transportable decoy frames.
Aircraft decoys simulate full size aircraft to mislead enemy reconnaissance. Full size aircraft decoys have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,334,539 to Buchtel, U.S. Pat. No. 2,351,891 to Weisbaum, U.K. Specification No. 767,257 to Wyllie, and others. Those, and other patents, have also disclosed various frames to allow for convenient assembly, disassembly and transport before reassembIy elsewhere. The prior art also teaches as in Buchtel and Wyllie, and in U.S. Pat. No. 2,395,914 to Scott, painting the decoy coverings to visually resemble actual aircraft and markings. Other than the use of ordinary paint to mimic the visual aspects of real aircraft, the prior art teaches nothing concerning simulating the radar or infrared signatures of actual aircraft.
The use of special coverings to conceal objects from radar has been disclosed in previous patents. U.S. Pat. No. 3,187,331 to Beller and U.S. Pat. No. 3,349,397 to Rosenthal disclosed a radar absorbing covering. And, U.S. Pat. No. 3,396,400 to Kelly, et al. discloses a radar transparent covering. The use of special coverings to make an object more visible to radar has also been disclosed. U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,757 to Ebneth, for example, discloses a metallized sheet form textile for making small objects at sea, such as small boats, more visible to radar to facilitate rescue attempts in high seas.
To deceive modern aerial reconnaissance requires more than the visual factors shown in the prior art decoy patents, and more than the use of an enhanced radar reflecting fabric such as described by Ebneth. Objects which are the subject of aerial reconnaissance produce distinctive visual, radar and infrared signatures, all three of which must be simulated in order to create an effective decoy. Previous aircraft decoys have attempted to simulate only the visual characteristics of actual aircraft, and have not taught the need to simulate all three characteristic signatures in order to create a decoy convincing to modern aerial reconnaissance.
Another common problem with prior art aircraft decoys is their light weight which, while making them convenient to set up, also makes them susceptible to being moved or damaged by storms and high winds.
With the foregoing in mind, it is, therefore, a principal object of the present invention to provide an improved aircraft decoy that is capable of simulating the visual, radar and infrared signatures of actual aircraft.
It is an additional object to provide an improved covering that casts a solid shadow and minimizes the effect of high winds on the aircraft decoy.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel aircraft decoy construction method that provides convenient assembly, disassembly and reassembly.
It is a feature of the present invention that the new construction method is particularly adaptable to kit construction and, when disassembled, provides an very lightweight and low volume package for shipping.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent as the detailed description of a representative embodiment proceeds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the foregoing principles and objects of the present invention, a novel aircraft decoy is described which includes a covering over its frame to provide desired visual, radar and infrared signatures to aerial reconnaissance. The covering may comprise a fabric and coating.
The invention also includes an open weave fabric to minimize air resistance.
The invention further includes an aircraft decoy frame and a method of assembling aircraft decoy frames by the use of tubing and tubing fittings. The tubing may be marked with location identification markings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be more clearly understood from a reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a simplified perspective drawing showing the basic frame concept of a decoy aircraft fuselage.
FIG. 2 is a perspective drawing of a portion of a decoy aircraft showing the assembly of tubing connected by fittings, over which various frame coverings may be applied.
FIG. 3 is a perspective schematic drawing of the frame covering showing a fabric and a coating.
FIG. 4 shows the use of location identification markings on tubing sections to aid assembly.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Referring to FIG. 1 of the drawings, there is shown a simplified perspective drawing of the basic frame concept of a frame 10 of a fuselage of an aircraft decoy. The frame comprises a number of metal or plastic pipes or tubing 12 of various lengths, connected by fittings 14 to form the approximate shape of an aircraft fuselage.
As indicated by the drawing sophisticated shapes can be quickly and easily made by this method of using tubing and fittings. The profile from the air of the actual aircraft to be mimicked determines the final configuration. The triangular sections create strength, and additional tubing and fittings can be added to triangulate square sections to add further strength as needed.
FIG. 2 is a perspective drawing of a portion of a decoy aircraft showing a more detailed embodiment of an assembly of tubing 16 and tubing fittings 18 over which various frame coverings may be applied. The fittings shown use set screws to retain tubing sections 16, but other fittings, such as those utilizing male and female threads for use with threaded tubing, may be used as well. Shear and cotter pins may be added to the fittings to increase strength, and weldment used to provide permanence and strength for appropriate sections. In most cases, standard fittings may be used, and special fittings can be easily fabricated where needed.
The use of metal tubing and fittings allows the aircraft decoy to be disassembled in sections, making possible different degrees of disassembly to balance ease of reassembly with varying storage and transport requirements. When fully broken down, the aircraft decoy frame allows extremely compact storage.
This embodiment shows the use of additional tubing and fittings to not only add strength, but also to subdivide existing sections along the centerline of the fuselage to allow the decoy to be bullt in right and left halves. The tubing and connectors are additionally arranged to provide structural strength to support a towing bar attached at the front of the decoy.
Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown a schematic representation of a frame covering material comprising a high strength fabric 20 and a coating 22. The covering is stretched and secured over the frame. The fabric is of an relatively open weave to minimize resistance to air passing through the fabric, yet will still display an acceptable shadow. This helps prevent high winds and storms from moving the decoy. A knitted 100% nylon fabric, available from Gehring Textiles, lnc., 200 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016, has worked successfully in tests.
Coatings 22 to be used must adhere to the individual threads of the fabric 20, preserving the open weave and must be flexible. Additionally, the coatings should protect the fabric 20 and prevent deterioration. Chemically bonded photo resistive dyes have been successfully used. Such photo resistive dyes, including their application to the fabric at the factory, are also available from Gehring Textiles. A gray dye was used, leaving the native white color of the nylon fabric 20 uncoated for the canopY and exhaust port areas. A tar base type spray paint for automobile use, such as undercoating or trunk spatter paint, was used for shading and enhancing the appearance of the decoy. These types of paints were found to have the best adhering qualities for application to the nylon fabric.
The various coatings to be applied to the fabric are selected to duplicate as closely as possible the actual visual, infrared and radar signatures of the actual aircraft which the decoy is intended to mimic. The visual duplication is simply a straightforward application of paints to match the color and markings of the actual aircraft. The infrared and radar mimicry are both accomplished by adding metal to the decoy. In tests with decoys made with metal tubing, the metal in the tubing was sufficient to create the desired infrared and radar signatures. When plastic tubing is used, or to increase the reflection, a metallized paint may be used. Either a commercial metallized paint may be used, or powdered metal may be mixed with the paint already selected. For maximum effectiveness, silver bearing dust or paint can be used. Pre-metallized fabrics may be used, in some case eliminating the need for a separate coating. The metallized fabric may incorporate metal in various forms, such as flakes, strips, or strands and wire woven as part of the weave. Another alternative is metal screening underneath the fabric covering frame sections, such as wing tips, that contain less metal.
It will be seen by those with skill in the art that the structure of the invention permits a wide variety of additional features. For example, containers of kerosene may be placed within the structure, mimicking the burning of an actual aircraft when attacked by enemy aircraft deceived by the decoy.
FIG. 4 shows the use of location identification markings on tubing sections to aid assembly. Horizontal tubing section 24 and vertical tubing section 26 are shown with an index to an eight digit identification code. Areas and sections of the aircraft decoy are indicated on plan views in an assembly instruction manual. Use of the markings greatly facilitates assembly by providing logical and intuitive guidance to the proper assembly location of each tubing section while minimizing the time required for assemblers to continually refer to the manual.
It is understood that certain modifications to the invention as described may be made, as might occur to one with skill in the field of this invention, within the scope of the claims. Therefore, all embodiments contemplated have not been shown in complete detail. Other embodiments may be developed without departing from the spirit of this invention or from the scope of the claims.

Claims (12)

We claim:
1. An aircraft decoy, comprising:
(a) a frame simulating in size and shape a full size airplane;
(b) means for covering the frame to produce specific desired optical, infrared and radar characteristics.
2. An aircraft decoy according to claim 1, wherein the frame comprises tubing connected by tubing fittings and assembled into a frame substantially defining the shape of an actual aircraft.
3. An aircraft decoy according to claim 1, wherein the covering means further comprise:
(a) a fabric; and,
(c) a coating on the fabric.
4. An aircraft decoy according to claim 3, wherein the fabric is a woven material with a sufficiently open weave chosen to present as little air resistance as possible while preserving sufficient optical opacity.
5. An aircraft decoy according to claim 3, wherein the coating is a photo resistive dye.
6. An aircraft decoy according to claim 3, wherein the fabric is knitted nylon.
7. An aircraft decoy according to claim 3, wherein the fabric is metallized.
8. An aircraft decoy according to claim 3, wherein the coating is a paint or dye into which has been mixed metal particles.
9. An aircraft decoy frame comprising tubing inserted into tubing fittings to form an assembly substantially defining the shape of an actual aircraft.
10. An aircraft decoy frame according to claim 9, wherein sections of tubing include location identification markings.
11. A method of constructing an aircraft decoy, comprising the steps of assembling tubing with tubing fittings to form a frame substantially defining the shape of an actual aircraft.
12. A method of constructing an aircraft decoy according to claim 11, further comprising the step of marking tubing sections with location identification markings.
US06/856,567 1986-04-28 1986-04-28 Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys Abandoned USH308H (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/856,567 USH308H (en) 1986-04-28 1986-04-28 Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/856,567 USH308H (en) 1986-04-28 1986-04-28 Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USH308H true USH308H (en) 1987-07-07

Family

ID=25323969

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/856,567 Abandoned USH308H (en) 1986-04-28 1986-04-28 Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USH308H (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4852326A (en) 1987-04-29 1989-08-01 Diab-Barracuda Ab Dummy aeroplane
USH679H (en) 1988-03-24 1989-09-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Foldable towable thermal and radar vehicular decoy
US5077556A (en) * 1988-11-02 1991-12-31 Synteen Gewebe Technik Gmbh Canopy for screening objects
US5238406A (en) * 1991-06-21 1993-08-24 Littell Iii Charles C Thermal contrast detailing for inflatable decoy targets
US5760327A (en) * 1994-10-04 1998-06-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Superconducting radar decoys and camouflage
US8125369B1 (en) * 2011-03-15 2012-02-28 Korea Maritime & Ocean Engineering Research Institute Modular RCS and IR signature generation device and deception method to enhance susceptibility of naval vessels
CN103512428A (en) * 2012-06-26 2014-01-15 北京元恒大通科技有限公司 Hard shell type false missile vehicle target

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2576255A (en) 1948-06-15 1951-11-27 Emmett L Hudspeth Reflecting fabric
US3010103A (en) 1956-01-16 1961-11-21 Del Mar Eng Lab Radar reflective tow target
US3010104A (en) 1958-10-14 1961-11-21 Del Mar Eng Lab Radar reflective tow target
US3135511A (en) 1961-02-27 1964-06-02 Hayes Corp Towed target
US3295793A (en) 1964-02-11 1967-01-03 Louis E A Renart Kite-type aircraft
US3311376A (en) 1965-01-29 1967-03-28 Wilmer C Woodward Off-set tow target
US4014481A (en) 1974-09-26 1977-03-29 Dornier Gmbh Towed craft for representing aerial targets
US4354419A (en) 1980-08-08 1982-10-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Survivable target acquisition and designation system

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2576255A (en) 1948-06-15 1951-11-27 Emmett L Hudspeth Reflecting fabric
US3010103A (en) 1956-01-16 1961-11-21 Del Mar Eng Lab Radar reflective tow target
US3010104A (en) 1958-10-14 1961-11-21 Del Mar Eng Lab Radar reflective tow target
US3135511A (en) 1961-02-27 1964-06-02 Hayes Corp Towed target
US3295793A (en) 1964-02-11 1967-01-03 Louis E A Renart Kite-type aircraft
US3311376A (en) 1965-01-29 1967-03-28 Wilmer C Woodward Off-set tow target
US4014481A (en) 1974-09-26 1977-03-29 Dornier Gmbh Towed craft for representing aerial targets
US4354419A (en) 1980-08-08 1982-10-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Survivable target acquisition and designation system

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4852326A (en) 1987-04-29 1989-08-01 Diab-Barracuda Ab Dummy aeroplane
USH679H (en) 1988-03-24 1989-09-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Foldable towable thermal and radar vehicular decoy
US5077556A (en) * 1988-11-02 1991-12-31 Synteen Gewebe Technik Gmbh Canopy for screening objects
US5238406A (en) * 1991-06-21 1993-08-24 Littell Iii Charles C Thermal contrast detailing for inflatable decoy targets
US5760327A (en) * 1994-10-04 1998-06-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Superconducting radar decoys and camouflage
US8125369B1 (en) * 2011-03-15 2012-02-28 Korea Maritime & Ocean Engineering Research Institute Modular RCS and IR signature generation device and deception method to enhance susceptibility of naval vessels
CN103512428A (en) * 2012-06-26 2014-01-15 北京元恒大通科技有限公司 Hard shell type false missile vehicle target

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wood et al. The Narrow Margin: The Battle of Britain & the Rise of Air Power, 1930–1940
US7568492B1 (en) Custom camouflage hunting blind
USH308H (en) Fabric visual/infrared/radar decoys
Elias Camouflage Australia: art, nature, science and war
WO2021001089A1 (en) Decoy target, system and method for protecting an object
Pettersson Visual camouflage
Behrens The theories of Abbott H. Thayer: Father of camouflage
US5002525A (en) Military decoy
Quagliati Playing Hide-and-Seek in the German Press: The Presence and Absence of Camouflage in wwi Narrations
Ali et al. Camouflage textile
Hall Camouflage Blinds the Enemy
Behrens On visual art and camouflage
US2395914A (en) Decoy airplane
Walsh Deception: manipulating perception in air warfare
RU2855242C1 (en) Individual kit of automated technical means of camouflage of large military equipment
US4595156A (en) Deception pattern for camouflage
Deriu Between veiling and unveiling: modern camouflage and the city as a theater of war
Barrett et al. UAV visual signature suppression via adaptive materials
GB1595615A (en) Camoflaged vehicle
Griset Luke Air Force Base
Isby The Decisive Duel: Spitfire Vs 109
James Gloster Aircraft Company
Skaarup Texas Warbird Survivors 2003: A Handbook on Where to Find Them
McCabe Camouflage: War's Handmaid
Jacobs " Look Homeward Angel" in World War II

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY T

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:TUTIN, MICHAEL B.;REEL/FRAME:004676/0436

Effective date: 19860321

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE