US981281A

US981281A - Continuous rolling-mill.

Info

Publication number: US981281A
Application number: US52713409A
Authority: US
Inventors: Julius Kalle
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1909-11-10
Filing date: 1909-11-10
Publication date: 1911-01-10
Anticipated expiration: 1928-01-10

Description

.T. KALLB. CONTINUOUS ROLLING MILL.

APPLICATION FILED NOV.10, 1909.

l QSLQSI o Patented .Ian IO, 1911.

2 SHEETS-SHEET l.

/WMW Julie/s Kalle 543m I I,

J. KALLE.

CONTINUOUS ROLLING MILL.

APPLICATION FILED Nov. 1o, 1909.

Patented Jan. 10, 1911.

2 SHEETS-SHEET 2.

JULIUS KALLE, F DINSLAKEN, GERMANY.

CONTINUOUS ROLLING-MILL.

Specification of Letters Patent.

ratenteaaan. 1o, 1911.

Application filed November 10, 1909. Serial No. 52ifi34.

To all whom it may concern:

Be it known that I, JULIUS KALLE, a sub- ]ect of the King of Prussia, and resident of Dinslaken, in the Province of the Rhine, German Empire, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Continuons Rolling-Mills, o'fwhich the following is a specification.

This invention relates to improveinents'in the art of rolling tubes in continuous rolling mills of the type .in which the succeeding pairs of rollers in' the rolling mill are arranged with their axesl at right angles and in which the mandrel is moved forward with the material to be rolled. In rolling out hollow bodies in a continuous` rolling mill of this type there always occur differences in velocit-y between the mandrel and the tube or hollow body. The mandrel can only move with a single velocity, while the blank during the rolling` out processincreases in velocity corresponding to 1ts dnnlnutlon 1n thlckness. The disadvantages of these differences in velocity vincrease with their amount and are most are of course diminished but on the other hand a very large length of mandrel is necessary, as opposed to the first two cases where the mandrel may be shorter than theA finished tube. It is therefore advisable to communicate yto the mandrel a medi-um velocity so as to obtain the advantages of a short mandrel and to diminish as far as possible the relative velocity between the mandrel and the blank.

It has been usual hitherto when it was desired to give the mandrel the velocity of a certain pair of. rollers, to make the groove l of the required pair of rbllers circular, so

that a .greater frictional surface between the` mandrel and the blank was provided. All

the other pairs of rollers in the mill having oval grooves.

According to the present invention the pair of rollers which are to determine the velocity of the mandrel have also an oval groove and the rolling ont action of the said rollers is greater than any other pair of rollers in the mill. In this way thc greatest pressure on the blank will be exercised by this pair of rollers and the necessary friction between the rollers and the mandrel is obtained, in spite of the fact .that the blank does not completely close all the way around on the mandrel as is the case when using a. circular groove.

`With the present invention the heating action on the mandrel at the point where it is being fed forward is reduced owing lto the fact that the contacting surface between the blank. and the mandrel is decreased.

vrIhen again when the rollers which deter,-

mine the velocity of the mandrel are given a circular groove, the rolling out action of these rollers is inconsiderable, 'owing to the fact that it is absolutely necessary to provide a clearance for the ilow of the ma terial during pressing. The circular grooved rollers therefore were practically an idle' pair in the mill whereas the oval grooved rollers according' to the present invention are an exceedingly active pair and thereby not only effect the feeding of thc mandrel but also materially advance'the rolling action of the mill. The pairs of rollers arranged on each side of the intermediate pair which determine the velocity of the mandrel, are preferably so arranged that their rolling out action gradually decreases so that the ressure ofthe blank on the mandrel may iminish as the relative velocity of the mandrel and the blank increases. It is also preferable to effect only a comparatively small diminution of cross section in the individual pair of rollers arranged to receive the blank after it has passed to the pair of rollers which determines its velocity. According to the present invention therefore a greater number of roller pairs are arran ed to re ceive the blank after it passes rom that roller pair which determines its velocity, than `are arrangedy in front of this roller pair. In this way as the blank becomes thinner, the amount of rolling out action exercised on it by the rollers decreases.

los

It will -be understood that the amount of rolling out action effected by any pair of rollers, may be represented by the increase of velocity through the `said rollers.

In order to make the invention entirely clear. reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which:

Figure 1 represents a rolling mill embodying in desirable form the present improvements, and Fig. 2 illustrates a velocity diagram of a blank passing through said mill.

In the drawings m represents the mandrel and b the blank.

Assuming that seven pairs of rollers l, 2, 3, 4;, 5, 6, 7, are provided as illustrated then the lengths a a', I) b', c c', to g'g" represent the length over which the different roller pairs are acting. Therefore wg represents the entire manipulating length of the rolling mill. The velocity of feeding of the blank is represented by the linea A,

the velocity of eXit'from the first pair of rollers is represented by the line a-. The velocity of the finished tube is represented by the line g-G. The lengths b B and b 'B represent the velocity of the blankbefore and after passing through the second pair of rollers, and sb on the various dotted lines representing successively the entrance and exit-velocity of the blank. y In the third pair of rollers the' entrance velocity of the blank is c C and the exitI velocity o C. This is the pair which eiiects the greatest rolling out action, as can be clearly seen from the drawings, since this pair effects the greatest increase in the velocity of the blank. The average velocity HOC-l-GC] will represent approximately the velocity of the mandrel; this approxi-l mate velocity is shown by the line m of the yblank after passing- It will be seen that the amount of reduction effected in the pairs of'rollers 4, 5, 6, 7 and therefore the increase in speed of the blank gradually diminishes as also does the amount of reduction effected by the

pairs

2 and 1 in the order given. pairs of rollers are arranged to take the blank after it passes throughthe pair 3 whereas only two pairs are arranged in front of the pair 3.

I claim A,

1. The improvement inthe art of rolling tubes in a continuous mill, which consists in reducing the tube on a mandrel at each of a succession of passes, the reduction at each pass being on small portions only at diametrically opposite sides. of the tube while permitting the metal of lthe tube to flow laterally, and the greatest reduction being at one of -the intermediate passes whereby the velocity of the mandrel will be controlled by said intermediate pass.

2. The improvement in the art of rolling tubes in a continuous mill, which consists in reducing the tube on a mandrel at each of a succession of passes, the reduction at each pass being on 'small portions only at diametrically opposite sides of the tube while permitting t e metal of the tube to flowlaterally and the reduction in each pass gradually increasing toa maximum at anv intermediate pass and then gradually diminishing, whereby the velocity Vof the mandrel will be controlled by -said intermediate pass in which the greatest reduction is effected.

In witness whereof l have hereunto set my hand in the presence of two witnesses.

JULUS KALLE. [L s] Witnesses:

@rre KNIG,

CEAS. el. WRIGHT.

Further four soi