US9678048B2 - Method of evaluating final equilibrium pH of contaminated soil on site by using paste pH - Google Patents
Method of evaluating final equilibrium pH of contaminated soil on site by using paste pH Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9678048B2 US9678048B2 US14/181,312 US201414181312A US9678048B2 US 9678048 B2 US9678048 B2 US 9678048B2 US 201414181312 A US201414181312 A US 201414181312A US 9678048 B2 US9678048 B2 US 9678048B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- paste
- equilibrium
- mine
- final
- final equilibrium
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N31/00—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N31/00—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods
- G01N31/22—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods using chemical indicators
- G01N31/221—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods using chemical indicators for investigating pH value
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/24—Earth materials
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH.
- the present invention a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH, capable of estimating the final equilibrium pH on site in real time by evaluating the pH of the contaminated soil around a wasted mine and an area to produce heavy metal.
- Another object of the present invention is to exactly specify an artificial contamination source of a Pb isotope resulting from the industrial activity of a human being.
- a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH includes measuring the paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil, and evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH by applying the paste pH to Equation 1,
- the initial pH is a predetermined integer in a range of 1 to 10.
- the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time by using the pH of the contaminated soil, so that the contaminated soil can be analyzed in real time and the contamination degree can be estimated.
- the time and the experimental cost can be reduced. Accordingly, the soil analysis can be effectively performed on site.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the final equilibrium pH of the first to nineteenth embodiments measured in the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH and the result of the final equilibrium pH measured in a laboratory according to each embodiment.
- the present invention provides a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH including measuring a paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil, and evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH by applying the measured paste pH to following Equation 1.
- Equation 1 the initial pH is a predetermined integer in the range of 1 to 10.
- the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time by using the pH of the contaminated soil, so that the contaminated soil can be analyzed in real time and the contamination degree can be estimated.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 1 .
- the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention includes measuring a paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil (step S 10 ).
- the contaminated soil may include mineral tailings, or waste rocks, or both of the mineral tailings and the waste rocks.
- distilled water or water is added to the contaminated soil to make the contaminated soil in a paste state, the paste pH is measured.
- the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention includes evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH in the range of 1 to 10 by applying the measured paste pH to following Equation 1 (step S 20 ).
- the initial pH is a predetermined integer in the range of 1 to 10.
- the initial pH may be the pH of raindrop, underground water, or ore industry sewage.
- the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH of the present invention after measuring the paste pH of the contaminated soil around the waste mine and the area to produce heavy metal, the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time without analyzing the final equilibrium pH in a laboratory according to the pH of surrounding raindrop, underground water, or ore industry sewage, so that time and cost can be saved.
- Korean representative mines such as Sangdong mine, Yeonhwa mine, Janggun mine, Samkwang mine, Deokchon mine, Sannae mine, Yeosu mine, Dokseong mine, Yaro mine, Taechang mine, Backwol mine, Gumgae mine, Munmyeong mine, Shinlim mine, Gakhee mine, Daeyang mine, Ilwall mine, and Jangja mine
- Samkwang mine which is one of representative mines, will be described as an example in detail.
- Samkwang mine is located in Sindaeri, Ungokmyeon, Cheongyanggun, Chungcheongnamdo, Korea.
- Samkwang mine is the biggest mine among domestic metal mines.
- gold and silver have been developed from Japanese occupation, and abandoned in 2001. Since 11 million tons of mineral tailings and several thousand tons of waste rocks are deposited, contamination is spread downward of the mine along a water system.
- the high content of arsenic (As) is contained in the mineral tailings and the soil around the mine.
- Arsenic (As), which exceeds 15 to 25 times higher than a standard value thereof, lead (Pb), which exceeds two times higher than a standard value thereof, and cadmium (Cd) exceeding a standard value thereof, are detected in a soil around a yard of the mineral tailings.
- Arsenic (As), which exceeds 20 times higher than the standard value thereof, is detected in a rice paddy or a dry field in the contact with the yard of the mineral tailings.
- the main cause of the high concentration of Arsenic (As) is determined as mineral tailings, and Arsenic (As) is significantly spread into a surrounding area.
- 50 ml of distilled water was put into the paper cup and neglected. If necessity, a slight amount of distilled water was additionally added into the paper cup to make the soil in a paste state and the pH of the soil in the paste state was measured. In this case, the paste pH was 8.9.
- the initial pH was set to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and the final equilibrium pH was evaluated by applying the initial pH to Equation 1.
- the final equilibrium pH according to each initial pH in the range of 1 to 10 was shown in following table 1.
- the second embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yeonhwa mine located in Samcheok-si, Kangwon-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 7.8.
- the third embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Janggun mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeonsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 7.1.
- the fourth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Janggum mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeonsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 7.8.
- the fifth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Sankwang mine located in Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 9.1.
- the sixth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Deokchon mine located in Hapcheon-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 7.8.
- the seventh embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Sannae mine located in Milyang-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 7.8.
- the eighth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yeosu mine located in Yeoju-gun, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 6.1.
- the ninth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Dokseong mine located in Yongin-si, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 5.9.
- the tenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yaro mine located in Hapcheon-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 5.7.
- the eleventh embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Teachang mine located in Chungju-si, Chungcheonbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 4.7.
- the twelfth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Backwol mine located in Changwon-si, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 4.3.
- the thirteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Gumgae mine located in Yanpyeong-gun, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 3.9.
- the fourteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Munmyeong mine located in Yeongduk-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 3.4.
- the fifteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Shinlim mine located in Wonju-si, Kangwon-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 3.3.
- the sixteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Gakhee mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 3.2.
- the seventeenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Daeyang mine located in Jecheon-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 3.0.
- the eighteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Ilwall mine located in Yeongyang-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 2.6.
- the nineteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Jangja mine located in Cheongsong-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH.
- the paste pH was 2.1.
- Equation 1 shows the final equilibrium pH calculated through Equation 1 with respect to mines according to the first to nineteenth embodiments, from which a soil is collected, the paste pH, and each initial pH.
- Table 2 shows the analysis of the metal component and the specific gravity of a contaminated soil collected from mines to be investigated according to the first to nineteenth embodiments.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Abstract
Disclosed is a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH. The method includes measuring the paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil, and evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH by applying the paste pH to
in which the initial pH is a predetermined integer in a range of 1 to 10.
Description
This application claims priority to Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-0031318 filed on Mar. 25, 2013, and all the benefits accruing therefrom under 35 U.S.C. §119, the contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH.
2) Background of Related Art
In Korea, thousands of abandoned metal mines are scattered and mineral tailings and waste rocks discharged from the abandoned metal mines are neglected in many areas of the abandoned metal mines. Acid drainage and dissolved metal are discharged from the mineral tailings and the waste rocks to surroundings, thereby cause severe damage to the surrounding ecosystem of the abandoned mines and the health of a human being. Accordingly, the priority for rapid and effective contamination evaluation processes of the mineral tailings or the waste rocks discharged from the abandoned mines must be immediately determined.
In order to evaluate the contamination degree of a soil contaminated with mineral tailings or the waste rocks, the collection of the representative sample of the mineral tailings or the waste rocks piled up in the abandoned metal mine is important. In other words, standards must be established with respect to a scheme of reasonably and systematically collecting samples according to the characteristics (deposits type, mineral type, ground, or the like) of the mineral tailings or the waste rocks and to the number of samples.
Most domestic abandoned mines are distributed in mountainous territories difficult to access thereto, so that samples may not be easily investigated, collected, and moved. Accordingly, much time is spent to collect samples of the mineral tailings discharged from many abandoned metal mines distributed all over the country. In addition, as the number of collected mineral tailings is increased, the information of representative heavy metal of the mineral tailings exerting an influence on contamination may be more acquired. However, when an excess amount of samples are analyzed, much time and cost are required. Accordingly, a method of economically and rapidly evaluating a soil contaminated by the abandoned metal mine is required.
As a related art of the present invention, there is Korea Patent Registration No. 10-0571601 titled “BIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR CUT OFFING AND PURIFYING CONTAMINATED SOIL” (issued on Apr. 1, 2006).
The present invention a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH, capable of estimating the final equilibrium pH on site in real time by evaluating the pH of the contaminated soil around a wasted mine and an area to produce heavy metal.
Another object of the present invention is to exactly specify an artificial contamination source of a Pb isotope resulting from the industrial activity of a human being.
In order to accomplish the above object, there is provided a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH. The method includes measuring the paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil, and evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH by applying the paste pH to Equation 1,
in which the initial pH is a predetermined integer in a range of 1 to 10.
As described above, according to the present invention, the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time by using the pH of the contaminated soil, so that the contaminated soil can be analyzed in real time and the contamination degree can be estimated. In addition, since the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil can be found in real time, the time and the experimental cost can be reduced. Accordingly, the soil analysis can be effectively performed on site.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to accompanying drawings.
The advantages, the features, and schemes of achieving the advantages and features of the present invention will be apparently comprehended by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments, which are detailed later in detail, together with accompanying drawings.
The present invention is not limited to the following embodiments but includes various applications and modifications. The embodiments will make the disclosure of the present invention complete, and allow those skilled in the art to completely comprehend the scope of the present invention. The present invention is only defined within the scope of accompanying claims
In addition, the detailed descriptions of well-known techniques incorporated herein may be omitted when they make the subject matter rather unclear.
The present invention provides a method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH including measuring a paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil, and evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH by applying the measured paste pH to following Equation 1.
In Equation 1, the initial pH is a predetermined integer in the range of 1 to 10.
According to the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH of the present invention, the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time by using the pH of the contaminated soil, so that the contaminated soil can be analyzed in real time and the contamination degree can be estimated.
In addition, since the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil can be found in real time, the time and the experimental cost can be reduced. Accordingly, the soil analysis can be effectively performed on site.
The method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention includes measuring a paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil (step S10).
The contaminated soil may include mineral tailings, or waste rocks, or both of the mineral tailings and the waste rocks. After the solution, in detail, distilled water or water is added to the contaminated soil to make the contaminated soil in a paste state, the paste pH is measured.
The method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention includes evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH in the range of 1 to 10 by applying the measured paste pH to following Equation 1 (step S20).
In Equation 1, the initial pH is a predetermined integer in the range of 1 to 10. In detail, the initial pH may be the pH of raindrop, underground water, or ore industry sewage.
Therefore, according to the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH of the present invention, after measuring the paste pH of the contaminated soil around the waste mine and the area to produce heavy metal, the final equilibrium pH can be evaluated on site in real time without analyzing the final equilibrium pH in a laboratory according to the pH of surrounding raindrop, underground water, or ore industry sewage, so that time and cost can be saved.
In order to ensure the reliability of the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention, following embodiments are provided regarding Korean representative mines such as Sangdong mine, Yeonhwa mine, Janggun mine, Samkwang mine, Deokchon mine, Sannae mine, Yeosu mine, Dokseong mine, Yaro mine, Taechang mine, Backwol mine, Gumgae mine, Munmyeong mine, Shinlim mine, Gakhee mine, Daeyang mine, Ilwall mine, and Jangja mine
Hereinafter, Samkwang mine, which is one of representative mines, will be described as an example in detail. Samkwang mine is located in Sindaeri, Ungokmyeon, Cheongyanggun, Chungcheongnamdo, Korea. Samkwang mine is the biggest mine among domestic metal mines. In Samwang mine, gold and silver have been developed from Japanese occupation, and abandoned in 2001. Since 11 million tons of mineral tailings and several thousand tons of waste rocks are deposited, contamination is spread downward of the mine along a water system. Particularly, in Samkwang mine, the high content of arsenic (As) is contained in the mineral tailings and the soil around the mine. Arsenic (As), which exceeds 15 to 25 times higher than a standard value thereof, lead (Pb), which exceeds two times higher than a standard value thereof, and cadmium (Cd) exceeding a standard value thereof, are detected in a soil around a yard of the mineral tailings. Arsenic (As), which exceeds 20 times higher than the standard value thereof, is detected in a rice paddy or a dry field in the contact with the yard of the mineral tailings. In Samkwang mine, the main cause of the high concentration of Arsenic (As) is determined as mineral tailings, and Arsenic (As) is significantly spread into a surrounding area.
A soil collected from Sangdong mine located in Yeongwol-gun, Kangwan-do, Korea was sieved in 60 meshes, and 10 g of the sieved soil was put into a paper cup. In addition, 50 ml of distilled water was put into the paper cup and neglected. If necessity, a slight amount of distilled water was additionally added into the paper cup to make the soil in a paste state and the pH of the soil in the paste state was measured. In this case, the paste pH was 8.9. The initial pH was set to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and the final equilibrium pH was evaluated by applying the initial pH to Equation 1. The final equilibrium pH according to each initial pH in the range of 1 to 10 was shown in following table 1.
The second embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yeonhwa mine located in Samcheok-si, Kangwon-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 7.8.
The third embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Janggun mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeonsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 7.1.
The fourth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Janggum mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeonsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 7.8.
The fifth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Sankwang mine located in Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 9.1.
The sixth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Deokchon mine located in Hapcheon-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 7.8.
The seventh embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Sannae mine located in Milyang-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 7.8.
The eighth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yeosu mine located in Yeoju-gun, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 6.1.
The ninth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Dokseong mine located in Yongin-si, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 5.9.
The tenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Yaro mine located in Hapcheon-gun, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 5.7.
The eleventh embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Teachang mine located in Chungju-si, Chungcheonbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 4.7.
The twelfth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Backwol mine located in Changwon-si, Kyeongsangnam-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 4.3.
The thirteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Gumgae mine located in Yanpyeong-gun, Kyeonggi-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 3.9.
The fourteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Munmyeong mine located in Yeongduk-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 3.4.
The fifteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Shinlim mine located in Wonju-si, Kangwon-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 3.3.
The sixteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Gakhee mine located in Bonghwa-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 3.2.
The seventeenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Daeyang mine located in Jecheon-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 3.0.
The eighteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Ilwall mine located in Yeongyang-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 2.6.
The nineteenth embodiment is applied to Equation 1 in the same manner as that of the first embodiment except for a soil collected from Jangja mine located in Cheongsong-gun, Kyeongsangbuk-do, Korea to evaluate the final equilibrium pH. In this case, the paste pH was 2.1.
Following table 1 shows the final equilibrium pH calculated through Equation 1 with respect to mines according to the first to nineteenth embodiments, from which a soil is collected, the paste pH, and each initial pH.
TABLE 1 | |||
Paste | Initial pH |
Example | Mine name | pH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Embodiment 1 | Sangdong | 8.9 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 |
Embodiment 2 | Yeonhwa | 7.8 | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Embodiment 3 | Janggun | 7.1 | 3.0 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.9 |
Embodiment 4 | Janggun | 7.8 | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Embodiment 5 | Samkwang | 9.1 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.8 |
Embodiment 6 | Deokchon | 7.8 | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Embodiment 7 | Sannae | 7.8 | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Embodiment 8 | Yeosu | 6.1 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Embodiment 9 | Dokseong | 5.9 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Embodiment 10 | Yaro | 5.7 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
Embodiment 11 | Taechang | 4.7 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Embodiment 12 | Backwol | 4.3 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Embodiment 13 | Gumgae | 3.9 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
Embodiment 14 | Munmyeong | 3.4 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Embodiment 15 | Shinlim | 3.3 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Embodiment 16 | Gakhee | 3.2 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Embodiment 17 | Daeyang | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
Embodiment 18 | Ilwall | 2.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Embodiment 19 | Jangja | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Table 2 shows the analysis of the metal component and the specific gravity of a contaminated soil collected from mines to be investigated according to the first to nineteenth embodiments.
TABLE 2 | ||||
Specific | ||||
Embodiment | Metal component | gravity | ||
Embodiment 1 | W | 2.91 | ||
Embodiment 2 | Pb, Zn | 3.42 | ||
Embodiment 3 | Cu, Pb, Zn, Mn | 3.42 | ||
|
Cu, Pb, Zn, Mn | 3.59 | ||
Embodiment 5 | Au, Ag, Pb, Zn | 2.69 | ||
|
Au, Ag | 2.85 | ||
Embodiment 7 | W, Mo | 2.81 | ||
|
Au, Ag | 2.65 | ||
|
Au | 2.67 | ||
|
Au, Ag, Pb, Zn | 3.00 | ||
|
Au, Ag | 2.68 | ||
Embodiment 12 | Zn | 2.78 | ||
Embodiment 13 | Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn | 2.67 | ||
|
Au, Ag | 2.76 | ||
Embodiment 15 | Ag | 2.85 | ||
|
Au, Ag, Pb | 2.61 | ||
Embodiment 17 | W | 3.65 | ||
Embodiment 18 | Au, Ag, Cu | 3.33 | ||
Embodiment 19 | Ag, Zn, Cu, Pb | 2.85 | ||
The results of the final equilibrium pH evaluated through Equation 1 according to the first to nineteenth embodiments in the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention, and the results of the final equilibrium pH measured in a laboratory according to each embodiment are shown in table 3 and FIG. 2 .
TABLE 3 | ||
Initial pH |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
Calculated | 3.6 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 1 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 3.8 | — | 8.0 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 7.9 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 2 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.1 | 2.3 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 7.7 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.0 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.9 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 3 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.9 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 6.3 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 4 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 3.8 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.8 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.7 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.8 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 5 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 5.3 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 9.5 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.6 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 6 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.0 | 5.9 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.9 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 3.2 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 7 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.3 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 8.0 | 8.1 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 2.6 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 8 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.1 | — | 4.5 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.4 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 2.5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 9 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.1 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.8 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 10 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.2 | 5.4 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.9 | 6.9 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 2.1 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 11 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.3 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.6 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 12 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.0 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.3 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 13 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.2 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.7 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 14 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.0 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.7 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 15 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.4 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 16 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.5 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 17 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 18 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
Calculated | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
value of | ||||||||||
Embodiment 19 | ||||||||||
Measured final | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
equilibrium pH | ||||||||||
It can be recognized from table 3 that the final equilibrium pH calculated in the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the present invention is significantly approximate to the final equilibrium pH measured in the laboratory. Accordingly, the final equilibrium pH value can be simply obtained in real time on site.
Until now, the method of evaluating the final equilibrium pH of the contaminated soil on site by using the paste pH according to the embodiment of the present invention has been described in detail, it is obvious that various modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention.
As described above, although various examples have been illustrated and described, the present disclosure is not limited to the above-mentioned examples and various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In addition, these modified examples should not be appreciated separately from technical spirits or prospects.
Therefore, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above. The scope of the present invention will be limited by the appended claims. In addition, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that variations or modifications from the appended claims and the equivalent concept of the claims are included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (3)
1. A method of evaluating a final equilibrium pH of a contaminated soil on site by using a paste pH, the method comprising:
measuring the paste pH by adding a solution to the contaminated soil to make it in a paste state; and
evaluating the final equilibrium pH according to an initial pH comprising a pH of a raindrop, underground water, or ore industry sewage by applying the paste pH to Equation 1,
in which the initial pH is a predetermined integer in a range of 4 to 10.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the contaminated soil comprises at least one of a mineral tailing and a waste rock.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the solution comprises distilled water, or water.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR10-2013-0031318 | 2013-03-25 | ||
KR1020130031318A KR101416192B1 (en) | 2013-03-25 | 2013-03-25 | On-site evaluation technique of final equilibrium ph of contaminated soil using paste ph |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140288833A1 US20140288833A1 (en) | 2014-09-25 |
US9678048B2 true US9678048B2 (en) | 2017-06-13 |
Family
ID=51569742
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/181,312 Active 2035-11-12 US9678048B2 (en) | 2013-03-25 | 2014-02-14 | Method of evaluating final equilibrium pH of contaminated soil on site by using paste pH |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9678048B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101416192B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11666956B2 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2023-06-06 | Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. | Method for mitigating acid rock drainage potential through the smoldering combustion of organic materials |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2178550A (en) * | 1929-05-02 | 1939-11-07 | Solomon F Acree | Method of determining ph and buffers and indicators therefor |
US5172332A (en) * | 1989-12-22 | 1992-12-15 | American Sigma, Inc. | Automatic fluid sampling and monitoring apparatus and method |
JP2000055909A (en) | 1998-08-07 | 2000-02-25 | Horiba Ltd | Soil constituent automatic analysis device |
US6356830B1 (en) | 1998-08-11 | 2002-03-12 | Purdue Research Foundation | System and method for automated measurement of soil pH |
KR100571601B1 (en) | 2003-07-10 | 2006-04-24 | 한남대학교 산학협력단 | Biological method for cutoffing and purifying contaminated soil |
US20060185411A1 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2006-08-24 | Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. | Calcium polysulfide, potassium polysulfide, calcium thiosulfate, and magnesium thiosulfate as urease inhibitors |
US20070092407A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | General Electric Company | Optical sensor array system and method for parallel processing of chemical and biochemical information |
US20080137069A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2008-06-12 | Kissel David E | Systems and Methods for Predicting the Lime Requirement in Soils |
US20080179253A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2008-07-31 | Malcolm William Clark | Porous Particulate Material For Fluid Treatment, Cementitious Composition and Method of Manufacture Thereof |
JP2009061420A (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2009-03-26 | Air Liquide Japan Ltd | Manufacturing method of gas component and condensable component, and manufacturing system thereof |
US20090311048A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-17 | Horst John F | Mineral hardpan formation for stabilization of acid- and sulfate-generating tailings |
US20100176061A1 (en) * | 2007-02-14 | 2010-07-15 | Monzyk Bruce F | Water purification |
US20110139695A1 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2011-06-16 | Solutions-Ies, Inc. | In situ ph adjustment for solid and groundwater remediation |
US20120053427A1 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2012-03-01 | Glumetrics, Inc. | Optical sensor configuration and methods for monitoring glucose activity in interstitial fluid |
KR20120080274A (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2012-07-17 | 한국지질자원연구원 | Method for selecting contaminated soil treating process |
US20120228229A1 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2012-09-13 | Grant Brian Douglas | Treatment or remediation of natural or waste water |
US8834725B2 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2014-09-16 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Method for treating acid mine drainage |
US20150196708A1 (en) * | 2012-08-17 | 2015-07-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Systems, methods and compositions for improved treatment of acidosis |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0961420A (en) * | 1995-08-30 | 1997-03-07 | Hitachi Ltd | Soil diagnosing pretreatment apparatus |
-
2013
- 2013-03-25 KR KR1020130031318A patent/KR101416192B1/en active IP Right Grant
-
2014
- 2014-02-14 US US14/181,312 patent/US9678048B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2178550A (en) * | 1929-05-02 | 1939-11-07 | Solomon F Acree | Method of determining ph and buffers and indicators therefor |
US5172332A (en) * | 1989-12-22 | 1992-12-15 | American Sigma, Inc. | Automatic fluid sampling and monitoring apparatus and method |
JP2000055909A (en) | 1998-08-07 | 2000-02-25 | Horiba Ltd | Soil constituent automatic analysis device |
US6356830B1 (en) | 1998-08-11 | 2002-03-12 | Purdue Research Foundation | System and method for automated measurement of soil pH |
KR100571601B1 (en) | 2003-07-10 | 2006-04-24 | 한남대학교 산학협력단 | Biological method for cutoffing and purifying contaminated soil |
US20080179253A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2008-07-31 | Malcolm William Clark | Porous Particulate Material For Fluid Treatment, Cementitious Composition and Method of Manufacture Thereof |
US20080137069A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2008-06-12 | Kissel David E | Systems and Methods for Predicting the Lime Requirement in Soils |
US7679058B2 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2010-03-16 | The University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. | Systems and method for predicting the lime requirement in soils |
US20060185411A1 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2006-08-24 | Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. | Calcium polysulfide, potassium polysulfide, calcium thiosulfate, and magnesium thiosulfate as urease inhibitors |
US20070092407A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | General Electric Company | Optical sensor array system and method for parallel processing of chemical and biochemical information |
US20100176061A1 (en) * | 2007-02-14 | 2010-07-15 | Monzyk Bruce F | Water purification |
US20110139695A1 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2011-06-16 | Solutions-Ies, Inc. | In situ ph adjustment for solid and groundwater remediation |
JP2009061420A (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2009-03-26 | Air Liquide Japan Ltd | Manufacturing method of gas component and condensable component, and manufacturing system thereof |
US20090311048A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-17 | Horst John F | Mineral hardpan formation for stabilization of acid- and sulfate-generating tailings |
US20120228229A1 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2012-09-13 | Grant Brian Douglas | Treatment or remediation of natural or waste water |
US20120053427A1 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2012-03-01 | Glumetrics, Inc. | Optical sensor configuration and methods for monitoring glucose activity in interstitial fluid |
KR20120080274A (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2012-07-17 | 한국지질자원연구원 | Method for selecting contaminated soil treating process |
US8834725B2 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2014-09-16 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Method for treating acid mine drainage |
US20150196708A1 (en) * | 2012-08-17 | 2015-07-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Systems, methods and compositions for improved treatment of acidosis |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101416192B1 (en) | 2014-07-09 |
US20140288833A1 (en) | 2014-09-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sungur et al. | Characterization of heavy metal fractions in agricultural soils by sequential extraction procedure: the relationship between soil properties and heavy metal fractions | |
Farag et al. | Concentrations of metals in water, sediment, biofilm, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Boulder River watershed, Montana, and the role of colloids in metal uptake | |
Abouian Jahromi et al. | Heavy metal pollution and human health risk assessment for exposure to surface soil of mining area: a comprehensive study | |
Zornoza et al. | The effect of former mining activities on contamination dynamics in sediments, surface water and vegetation in El Avenque stream, SE Spain | |
Obeng-Gyasi et al. | Lead distribution in urban soil in a medium-sized city: household-scale analysis | |
Torfstein et al. | Chemical characterization of atmospheric dust from a weekly time series in the north Red Sea between 2006 and 2010 | |
Peralta et al. | Heavy metal availability assessment using portable X-ray fluorescence and single extraction procedures on former vineyard polluted soils | |
Conesa et al. | Metal extractability in acidic and neutral mine tailings from the Cartagena-La Unión Mining District (SE Spain) | |
Solà et al. | Monitoring metal and metalloid bioaccumulation in Hydropsyche (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae) to evaluate metal pollution in a mining river. Whole body versus tissue content | |
Thapalia et al. | Zinc isotopic signatures in eight lake sediment cores from across the United States | |
Donner et al. | Selenium in surface waters of the lower Athabasca River watershed: chemical speciation and implications for aquatic life | |
Manga et al. | Environmental geochemistry of mine tailings soils in the artisanal gold mining district of Bétaré-Oya, Cameroon | |
Antunes et al. | Potential risk assessment in stream sediments, soils and waters after remediation in an abandoned W> Sn mine (NE Portugal) | |
Udiba et al. | Soil lead concentrations in Dareta village, Zamfara, Nigeria | |
Baldeck et al. | A taxonomic comparison of local habitat niches of tropical trees | |
Mendes et al. | Quantification of methylmercury and geochemistry of mercury in sediments from a contaminated area of Descoberto (MG), Brazil | |
González-Corrochano et al. | Environmental geochemistry of a highly polluted area: the La Union Pb–Zn mine (Castilla-La Mancha region, Spain) | |
Festa et al. | The comet assay for the detection of DNA damage in Mus spretus from Donana National Park | |
Souissi et al. | Mobility of Pb, Zn and Cd in a soil developed on a carbonated bedrock in a semi-arid climate and contaminated by Pb–Zn tailing, Jebel Ressas (NE Tunisia) | |
Nascimento et al. | Pollen storage by stingless bees as an environmental marker for metal contamination: spatial and temporal distribution of metal elements | |
Gębka et al. | Watershed characteristics and climate factors effect on the temporal variability of mercury in the southern Baltic Sea rivers | |
Beriot et al. | Intensive vegetable production under plastic mulch: A field study on soil plastic and pesticide residues and their effects on the soil microbiome | |
Couillard et al. | Sources and chronology of fifteen elements in the sediments of lakes affected by metal deposition in a mining area | |
US9678048B2 (en) | Method of evaluating final equilibrium pH of contaminated soil on site by using paste pH | |
Reutova et al. | Long-term impact of the Tyrnyauz tungsten–molybdenum mining and processing factory waste on environmental pollution and children's population |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KOREA INSTITUTE OF GEOSCIENCE AND MINERAL RESOURCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEE, PYEONG-KOO;CHOI, JUNG-HAE;REEL/FRAME:032639/0516 Effective date: 20140110 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |