US9270498B2 - System and method for amplifying a signal - Google Patents
System and method for amplifying a signal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9270498B2 US9270498B2 US14/516,358 US201414516358A US9270498B2 US 9270498 B2 US9270498 B2 US 9270498B2 US 201414516358 A US201414516358 A US 201414516358A US 9270498 B2 US9270498 B2 US 9270498B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- gain
- amplification
- amplified
- determination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 18
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 31
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 22
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 101100445834 Drosophila melanogaster E(z) gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005314 correlation function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017105 transposition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0264—Arrangements for coupling to transmission lines
- H04L25/028—Arrangements specific to the transmitter end
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/32—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
- H03F1/3241—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits
- H03F1/3247—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits using feedback acting on predistortion circuits
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F3/00—Amplifiers with only discharge tubes or only semiconductor devices as amplifying elements
- H03F3/20—Power amplifiers, e.g. Class B amplifiers, Class C amplifiers
- H03F3/24—Power amplifiers, e.g. Class B amplifiers, Class C amplifiers of transmitter output stages
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03G—CONTROL OF AMPLIFICATION
- H03G3/00—Gain control in amplifiers or frequency changers
- H03G3/20—Automatic control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03G—CONTROL OF AMPLIFICATION
- H03G3/00—Gain control in amplifiers or frequency changers
- H03G3/20—Automatic control
- H03G3/30—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices
- H03G3/3036—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices in high-frequency amplifiers or in frequency-changers
- H03G3/3042—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices in high-frequency amplifiers or in frequency-changers in modulators, frequency-changers, transmitters or power amplifiers
- H03G3/3047—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices in high-frequency amplifiers or in frequency-changers in modulators, frequency-changers, transmitters or power amplifiers for intermittent signals, e.g. burst signals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/0002—Modulated-carrier systems analog front ends; means for connecting modulators, demodulators or transceivers to a transmission line
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements covered by H03F1/00
- H03F2201/32—Indexing scheme relating to modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
- H03F2201/3233—Adaptive predistortion using lookup table, e.g. memory, RAM, ROM, LUT, to generate the predistortion
Definitions
- the present invention concerns an amplification system having a servo-control device for the transmission power.
- These systems can be used in civil or military radio communications equipment, for example, using waveforms that have a non-constant envelope and that can be single-carrier or multi-carrier.
- this allowance is likewise known by the expression Output Back-Off.
- the aim of this allowance is to remain within a region of linear operation of the power amplifier.
- the presence of this allowance is inconsistent with the quest for the best possible yield.
- the reason is that in order to improve the yield of the power transistors used in radio communications equipment, they are often focussed into class AB.
- One of the special features of the AB class is that its yield increases when the transmitted power increases.
- Another special feature of this class of operation is that its optimum operating point in terms of linearity is dependent on a certain number of operating variables such as the transmission frequency used or the temperature.
- FIG. 1 Systems operating in closed-looped mode are also known from the prior art. These systems are shown in FIG. 1 , are connected to a modem 101 and have an amplification device 102 exhibiting a variable amplification gain. They also have a device 103 for determining a difference between the amplified signal and a copy of the signal to be amplified. Finally, these systems have a device 104 for determining the amplification gain on the basis of the difference.
- the device 103 for determining a difference is known to carry out filtering of the amplified signal or of the signal representing the difference so as to remove the contribution of the variations in the modulation envelope on the gain control signal.
- the automatic gain control is then severely slowed down in relation to the spread band for the frequencies of the modulation used.
- the loop band must be one hundred times lower than the bandwidth of the modulation in order to completely eliminate envelope variations.
- the device 103 for determining a difference is known to make direct use of the samples of the signal to be amplified as a setpoint. It this case, the gain control loop can be rapid and it is possible to eliminate the envelope variations of the gain control signal.
- U.S. Pat. No. 7,353,006 B2 Analog Devices, 2004
- U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691 B2 RF Micro devices, 2005
- the device 104 for determining the amplification gain can take account of the perturbations of the signal that are generated by the amplification device 102 .
- this taking-account of the perturbations is static, that is to say that it does not use an estimator to update the model of the perturbations of the amplification device.
- these systems can cause instability if the gain and the delay of the radio channel differ from the expected values.
- the present invention therefore aims to overcome these problems by proposing an amplification system that is connected to a modem delivering a signal to be amplified.
- This system has at least one amplification device in which an amplification gain is variable. It also has at least one first determination device for determination of a first difference between an amplified signal and the signal to be amplified. Moreover, this system has at least one second determination device for determination of the variable gain. Moreover, the second determination device is capable of the determination of said variable gain on the basis of said signal to be amplified, said amplified signal and said first difference.
- This second device has at least one third determination device for determination of a model of the perturbation of the first difference by said amplification device on the basis of said signal to be amplified and said amplified signal.
- This second device also has at least one fourth determination device for determination of perturbations of the first difference, which are caused by said amplification device, on the basis of said model and said signal to be amplified.
- the second device also has at least one fifth determination device for determination of a second difference between said first difference and said perturbations and a controller that is capable of determining said variable gain on the basis of said second difference.
- the amplification system has at least one extraction device, for extraction of the amplified signal to the first determination device.
- This extraction device comprises a directional coupler that is used to recover the signal transmitted on a wire connecting the amplification device and an antenna. It also has at least one device for regulating the gain of the recovered signal. It then has a mixer for mixing the signal that has had its gain regulated with a sinusoidal signal.
- This coupler also has a plurality of filters for filtering the mixed signal, these filters comprising at least one fixed-bandwidth analogue filter that is used for anti-aliasing and/or anti-jamming and at least one switchable digital filter for the bandwidth that varies as a function of a bandwidth of said signal to be amplified and/or of a disparity between a frequency of said signal to be amplified and a frequency of said perturbations.
- the first determination device is connected directly to the modem.
- the model of the perturbations comprises a delay and a gain and the third determination device for determination of a model is capable of the determination of said model by means of a correlation between said signal to be amplified and said amplified signal.
- the controller is a PID controller.
- the second determination device has a conversion table relating a power of said signal to be transmitted to the amplification gain.
- the present invention also proposes a method for using the amplification system having the following successive steps:
- the method has a step of regulation of the amplification gain of the amplification device. This step of regulation of the amplification gain is carried out after the step of increase of the amplification gain. Moreover, this step of regulation is carried out on the basis of a setpoint.
- the step of configuration is suited to configuring the amplification device so as to be able to transmit a maximum output power of Pout_max.
- Pout_max by means of this calculation allows configuration of the gain to be applied to the setpoint signal (setpoint gain) so as to compare it with the signal received on the measurement path.
- calibration tables for the measurement path and for the transmission path contain the values of the setpoint gain and the configuration on the variable-gain elements of the measurement path and of the transmission path corresponding a priori to the power Pout_max.
- the step of increase of the amplification gain is implemented by means of a conversion table relating a power of said signal to be transmitted to said amplification gain when the power of said signal to be amplified is lower than a threshold; and by means of the controller when the power of said signal to be amplified is higher than said threshold.
- the delay in the main loop which is caused by the filters of the amplification system that are necessary for co-site operation, is eliminated from the gain error (first difference) by virtue of the estimator of the model of perturbation of the signal by the amplification system.
- Co-site operation is implemented when various radio systems are situated in a close geographical region.
- This geographical region is defined by a circle having a radius in the order of ten or so meters.
- the modelling of the signal as perturbed by the amplification system and the use of the modulated samples as a reference for the calculation of the first difference make it possible to significantly increase the bandwidth of the main loop and to make it independent of the bandwidth of the signal to be amplified.
- the bandwidth of the loop can then be chosen solely in order to comply with the rise time required by the waveform (in the case of waveform regularly changing transmission frequency, also known by the expression FH waveform).
- the loop bandwidth characterizes the behaviour of the system in closed-looped mode. It is calculated on the basis of the closed-looped transfer function of the system.
- This transfer function in the case of this invention includes the contribution of all the filters of the transmission path and of the measurement path (when likened to their transfer function) and the transfer function of the controller.
- A(p) is the transfer function of the transmission chain associated with the controller and B(p) is the function of the chain of the measurement path.
- the closed loop transfer function (also known by the acronym CLTF) has the following value:
- the estimator of the perturbation of the signal caused by the amplification device allows optimum and stable gain control to be obtained, which makes it possible to control gain continuously, including during phases containing useful data and for waveforms with a non-constant envelope.
- the precision of the transmitted power depends on the precision of calibration of the transmission path.
- the transmission path has a large number of non-linear elements (amplifiers, tuneable filters, etc.). Its gain is therefore greatly dependent on transmission power, temperature and frequency. It is therefore necessary to perform calibration over the entire range of operation that the radio station can cover.
- the precision of the system of the invention is solely dependent on the precision of the calibration of the measurement path. Since the measurement path does not have any non-linear elements, it is easier and faster to calibrate than the transmission path.
- the first determination device 103 connected directly to said modem 101 allows direct use of the samples from the modem to perform gain control.
- the amplification system allows a precise power for the amplified signal, even in a harsh environment.
- the harsh environment translates into two phenomena:
- the use of a mixer associated with the anti-jamming device makes power servo control possible in a co-site situation (This situation is realized when various radio systems are situated in a close geographical region. This geographical region is defined by a circle having a radius in the order of ten or so meters).
- a mixer which has a linear voltage response
- a logarithmic detector facilitates servo control because it is no longer necessary to use conversion tables. These conversion tables allow an item of information of logarithmic type to be converted into an item of information of linear type.
- FIG. 1 shows a system according to the prior art.
- FIG. 2 shows the system using the method of the invention.
- FIG. 3 shows the voltage-controlled variable attenuator.
- FIGS. 4 . a to 4 . c show the model of perturbation of the signal by the amplification device.
- FIG. 4 d shows the voltage-controlled variable attenuator.
- FIG. 5 shows the system using a conversion table.
- FIG. 6 shows the method for using the system.
- FIG. 7 shows the various phases of use of an FH signal.
- FIG. 8 shows a mode of implementation of the system.
- FIG. 2 describes the system according to a first aspect of the invention.
- the modem 101 is connected to the amplification system.
- the amplification system has:
- the second device 104 for determining the variable gain effects this determination on the basis of:
- This second device has:
- the system has an extraction device 301 for extraction of the amplified signal to the first device for determining a difference.
- This extraction device 301 comprises:
- the model of perturbations of the signal to be amplified which are caused by the amplification device and the extraction device 301 , has a pure delay and a gain.
- the third device 201 uses a correlator of difference amplitude type that works in non-real time during the start of use of the automatic gain controller. In order to determine the value of this delay and of this gain, the third device uses the correlation function R(m) between the signal to be amplified X(n) and the amplified signal z(n). This correlation is expressed using the following relationship:
- the value of mean_g is corrected by the value of the variable gain (the gain of the voltage-controlled variable attenuator denoted by the acronym GWA) to give an estimate of the static gain G_stat.
- GWA the gain of the voltage-controlled variable attenuator
- the determination device 202 for determination of the perturbation of the first difference adapts the operation of a Smith predictor to the case of a modulated signal which, in association with a pure delay of the radio channel, causes a perturbation of the error signal.
- FIG. 4 . a shows a classic example of a looped system having a delay.
- the transfer function C(p) corresponds to a controller.
- the transfer function H(p)e ⁇ Tp corresponds to the rest of the loop.
- it is likened to the set made up of the transmission path and the measurement path.
- OLTF′ c ( p )* H ( p )
- CLTF closed-looped transfer function
- CLTF ′ OLTF ′ 1 + OLTF ′
- CLTF ′ C ⁇ ( p ) * H ⁇ ( p ) 1 + C ⁇ ( p ) * H ⁇ ( p )
- OLTF open-looped transfer function
- CLTF closed-looped transfer function
- FIG. 4 . b illustrates the new loop thus formed.
- FIG. 4 . c shows this loop in the digital domain.
- the secondary loop implements the transfer function: H ( z )(1 ⁇ z ⁇ k )
- the main error signal E(z) is subtracted from the output signal of the Smith predictor S corr (z) to produce a corrected error E_corr(z).
- E _cor( n ) Error( n ) ⁇ S corr( n )
- the signal E_cor(z) is sent to the transfer function controller C(z).
- the variable attenuator is modelled as a voltage-controlled variable gain or a system having two inputs and one output.
- FIG. 4 . d shows the model of this attenuator.
- the gain response GVVA of the voltage-controlled attenuator is modelled by a 2nd-order transfer function associated with a pure delay and with an offset. This transfer function is set up on the basis of measurements from a component targeted to implement the automatic gain control function.
- the transfer function HVVA(p) is identified on the basis of measurement and takes the following form:
- HVVA ⁇ ( p ) GVVA 0 ⁇ ( p )
- V_cmd ⁇ ( p ) Katt * e - Tatt * p ( 1 + ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ a ⁇ ⁇ tt * p 2 ) + off_att
- V_cmd(p) represents the control voltage of the attenuator.
- GVVA 0 (p) represents the modelled gain of the attenuator.
- Katt represents the gain of the attenuator.
- e ⁇ Tatt*p represents the pure delay of the attenuator vis-à-vis its control voltage.
- 1+ratt*p 2 represents the denominator of a 2nd-order low-pass function.
- off_att represents the gain offset, thus when the control voltage is zero the gain is not zero. This offset allows the attenuation dynamics of the component to be modelled, which are limited.
- the infinite impulse response filter representing HVVAt(z), thus obtained is, in a non-limiting embodiment, of 6th-order (convolution of a 2nd-order filter and of a 3rd-order filter for the delay).
- the samples GVVA 0 (n) from the filter HVVA(z) are multiplied by a polynomial function.
- the polynomial function is applied directly to the samples GVVA 0 (n) in order to obtain the gain GVVA(n) by virtue of the following formula:
- FIG. 5 describes the system in which the second determination device 104 has a conversion table 501 that allows a power of said signal to be transmitted to be related to the amplification gain.
- FIG. 6 describes a first embodiment of the method for implementing the system described in this invention. This method has the following steps:
- step 603 of regulation of the gain is not realized explicitly.
- the amplification system must therefore be capable of regulating the gain without degrading the useful data.
- the operation of the amplification system is identical to FH operation with, moreover, transitions from step 604 of deactivation of the regulation to step 603 of regulation of the gain.
- the time interval during which step 603 of regulation of the gain is carried out needs to be signalled to the gain control device so that it is able to adapt the model of perturbations. This interval must be compatible with the determination carried out by the determination device 201 for determination of the model.
- the modem and the amplification system exchange a certain number of parameters that are representative of the waveform that needs to be amplified. These parameters can be exchanged at the moment at which the waveform is loaded or during the use of the waveform and include:
- the bandwidth information allows addressing of the tables containing the parameters of the regulation loop, notably the coefficients of the P controller (integration constant, gain) and of the digital filters of the measurement path.
- FIG. 8 shows a mode of implementation of the system of the invention.
- the system comprises the following elements:
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Nonlinear Science (AREA)
- Transmitters (AREA)
- Control Of Amplification And Gain Control (AREA)
Abstract
Description
-
- a step of configuration of the gain of said amplification device, said step of configuration being carried out when said signal to be amplified has zero power,
- a step of increase of the amplification gain of the amplification device, in an initialization phase, during which said signal to be amplified does not have any useful data, and
- a step of deactivation of the regulation of the gain, said step of deactivation being carried out when the signal to be amplified has useful data.
Pout_max=Pout_mean_MODEM_setpoint+Modulation_crest_factor
where;
-
- Pout_max represents the maximum output power in dBm,
- Pout_mean_MODEM_setpoint represents the mean power in dBm of the signal that said modem (101) will transmit, and
- Modulation_crest_factor represents the modulation crest factor in dB of the signal that will be transmitted by said modem (101).
-
- The mobility of the radio station, causing load variations for the amplifier. Moreover, this load variation added to the mismatch between the antenna and the amplifier brings about large variations in the gain of the amplifier and in the incidental power.
- Operation with a co-site jammer, that is to say with a transmitter close by.
-
- a
device 102 for amplifying the signal transmitted by the modem. Thisamplification device 102 exhibits a variable gain, - a
first device 103 for determining a first difference between the signal amplified by thedevice 102 and the signal to be amplified that is delivered by themodem 101, - a
second device 104 for determining the variable gain of theamplification device 102.
- a
-
- the difference calculated by the
first determination device 103, - the signal to be amplified that is transmitted by the
modem 102 and - the signal amplified by the
amplification device 102.
- the difference calculated by the
-
- a
third determination device 201 for determination of a model of the perturbation of the first difference by the amplification device and possibly the extraction device 301 (this determination of the model is implemented on the basis of the signal to be amplified and the amplified signal), - a
fourth determination device 202 for determination of the perturbation of the first difference using the signal to be amplified and the model obtained by thethird device 201, - a
fifth determination device 203 for determination of a second difference between the first difference, obtained by the first device, and the perturbation determined by the fourth device, and - a
controller 204 that is capable of determining the variable gain on the basis of the second difference.
- a
-
- a
directional coupler 302 that allows recovery of the signal transmitted on a wire connecting theamplification device 102 and the transmission antenna, - at least one
device 303 for regulating the gain of the recovered signal, - an
analogue mixer 304, which allows mixing of the signal that has had its gain regulated by the device for regulating the gain with a sinusoidal signal, the sinusoidal signal being the local oscillator that is shared between the transmission mixer and the mixer of the measurement path in order to ensure coherence between the phase of the transmitted signal and the phase of the received signal, - and a plurality of
filters 305 that are suited to filtering the mixed signal. These filters can be used to implement an anti-jamming function, and they are then suited to the signal to be amplified and to the frequency disparity between the signal to be amplified and the jamming signal. The invention may include several types of filters:- a fixed-bandwidth analogue filter used for anti-aliasing and anti-jamming, and
- several variable-bandwidth switchable digital filters. The configuration of the digital filters is implemented as a function of the bandwidth of the signal to be transmitted and of the anticipated frequency disparity of the jamming signal.
- a
The determination of the perturbation model produces an estimate mean_g of the total mean gain and Tg of the total pure delay of the loop (these values are dependent on the number of samples).
Tg is given by the index m of the maximum value of the function R(m)
mean_g is the mean value of the instantaneous gain between the signal received on the measurement path sig_out and the transmitted and delayed signal of Tg sig_in_del.
The value of mean_g is corrected by the value of the variable gain (the gain of the voltage-controlled variable attenuator denoted by the acronym GWA) to give an estimate of the static gain G_stat.
The
The
S corr(n)=GVVA(n)*G_stat*(abs(sig — in — del(n)2))
where:
-
- sig_in represents the modulated input signal,
- sig_in_del represents the modulated input signal delayed by Tg,
- GVVA(n) is the modelled gain of the variable attenuator,
- G_stat is a static gain determined on the basis of mean_g, the setpoint gain and the mean value of GVVA over the duration necessary for correlation:
G stat=mean— g/mean(GVVA) - GVVA(n)*G_stat*(abs(sig_in(n))2 is an undelayed term
- GVVA(n)*G_stat*(abs(sigin_del(n))2 is a term delayed by Tg
The signal Scorr(n) is subtracted from the main error signal Error(n) that come from thedevice 103 for determining the first difference. This new device is thedevice 203 for determining the corrected error signal E_corr(n), therefore:
E_corr(n)=Error(n)−S corr(n)
-
- The Smith predictor technique allows elimination of the contribution of the group time in the servo control by modifying the closed-looped transfer function.
- A second loop is added to the main looped system. This loop uses a model of the transfer function downstream of the PID controller and allows the main error signal to be corrected:
OLTF′=c(p)*H(p)
The closed-looped transfer function (CLTF) of a looped system without a pure delay is expressed by:
The open-looped transfer function (OLTF) of a looped system with a pure delay is expressed by:
OLTF=c(p)*H(p)e −Tp
The closed-looped transfer function (CLTF) of a looped system with a pure delay is expressed by:
It is noticeable that the pure delay appears in the denominator, which does not allow an unconditional stability to be obtained whatever the value of the pure delay.
The following is then obtained:
H(z)(1−z −k)
The main error signal E(z) is subtracted from the output signal of the Smith predictor Scorr(z) to produce a corrected error E_corr(z).
E_cor(n)=Error(n)−Scorr(n)
The signal E_cor(z) is sent to the transfer function controller C(z).
The signal S_corr generated by the
S corr(n)=GVVA(n)*G_stat*(abs(sig — in(n))2 −abs(sig — in — del(n)2))
is a generalization of the Smith predictor technique in the case of a downstream transfer function H(z) including the contribution of the modulated samples.
-
- Undelayed downstream transfer function: H(z)
- Delayed downstream transfer function H(z)z−k
It is possible to identify the delayed and undelayed terms of the following formula:
S corr(n)=GVVA(n)*G_stat*(abs(sig — in(n))2 −abs(sig — in — del(n)2))
using the delayed and undelayed terms of the formula from the Smith predictor: - H(z) corresponds to GVVA(n)*G_stat*abs(sig_in(n))2
- H(z)−k corresponds to GVVA(n)*G_stat*abs(sig_in_del(n))2
The term GVVA(n)*G_stat*abs(sig_in_del(n))2 models the variable attenuator, the amplifier and the measurement path. These elements are considered to be linear and are “contained” in the delay and the static gain (Tg and G_stat). In order to obtain the gain GVVA, it is necessary to model the voltage-controlled variable attenuator.
This relationship allows the gain of the attenuator to be modelled by a second-order low-pass transfer function associated with a pure delay.
V_cmd(p) represents the control voltage of the attenuator.
GVVA0(p) represents the modelled gain of the attenuator.
Katt represents the gain of the attenuator.
e−Tatt*p represents the pure delay of the attenuator vis-à-vis its control voltage.
1+ratt*p2 represents the denominator of a 2nd-order low-pass function.
off_att represents the gain offset, thus when the control voltage is zero the gain is not zero. This offset allows the attenuation dynamics of the component to be modelled, which are limited.
-
- Transposition of the polynomial portion of the transfer function HVVA(p) to the digital domain by bilinear transformation.
- Modelling of the pure delay e−Tatt*p by an all-pass filter of Thiran filter type. The Thiran filter T(z) is a known approximation allowing synthesization of a delay that is fractional in relation to the sampling period. The transfer function of the Thiran filter is given by the following equation:
T(z)=z −N D(z −)/D(z)
D(z)=1+a 1 z −1 + . . . +a N z −N
N=ceil(D),
where D=Tg*Fs
Fs represents the sampling frequency,
d=D−N.
-
- Finally, the final transfer function in the digital domain HVVA(z) is obtained by performing convolution of the primary transfer functions. The final transfer function HVVAt(z) is the product of the bilinear transform (in the domain z) of the transfer function HVVA(p) and the transfer function of the Thiran filter T(z).
HVVAt(z)=HVVA(z)*T(z) - If the discrete samples for the two filters are considered, this amounts to obtaining the product of convolution between the samples from the two filters HVVA(n) and T(n).
- Finally, the final transfer function in the digital domain HVVA(z) is obtained by performing convolution of the primary transfer functions. The final transfer function HVVAt(z) is the product of the bilinear transform (in the domain z) of the transfer function HVVA(p) and the transfer function of the Thiran filter T(z).
-
- a
step 601 of configuration of the gain of the amplification device, this step of configuration being carried out when the amplified signal has zero power, - a
step 602 of increase of the amplification gain of the amplification device, - a
step 603 of regulation of the amplification gain of the amplification device. The regulation scheme is obtained at the end of the time required by the estimator to update the gain and delay parameters (mean_g and Tg) of the device for correcting the error. - a
step 604 of deactivation of the regulation of the gain, this step of deactivation being carried out when the signal to be amplified has useful data.
- a
-
- A first phase, called “blanking” phase. During this phase, the power of the signal is zeroed. Thus, no signal is transmitted by the antenna. This phase is also called “bearing hole” and it is used to implement the configuration of the various devices of a radio (frequency positioning and routing of the switches, notably). This time is used to implement
step 601 of configuration of the gain of the amplification device. This is realized, in one embodiment, by using the following relationship:
Pout_max=Pout_mean_MODEM_setpoint+Modulation_crest_factor - in this relationship;
- Pout_max represents the maximum output power,
- Pout_mean_Modem_setpoint represents the average power of the signal that the modem will transmit, and
- Modulation_crest_factor represents the crest factor of the modulation of the signal that will be transmitted by the MODEM.
- Moreover, during the step of
configuration 601, theamplification device 102 is configured to allow the transmission of a signal of maximum power Pout_max. - The determination of Pout_max by means of this calculation allows configuration of the gain to be applied to the setpoint signal (setpoint gain) so as to compare it with the signal received on the measurement path. On the basis of the value of Pout_max, calibration tables for the measurement path are addressed. These contain the values of the setpoint gain and the configuration of the variable-gain elements of the measurement path corresponding to the power Pout_max.
- A second phase called “shaping” phase, this phase allowing the rise in power of the transmitted signal. The quality of the rise in power is very high because it influences the width of the spectrum of the signal transmitted by the antenna. This phase is implemented via
step 602 of increase of the amplification gain of the amplification device. In an illustrative embodiment, this step can be carried out by the configuration of thesecond determination device 104 so that they use the conversion table 401 when the power of said signal to be amplified is lower than a threshold, and via the configuration of thesecond determination device 104 so as to use thecontroller 204 when the power of the signal to be amplified is higher than this threshold. This threshold is variable and is fixed by configuration. It is dependent on the power of the jamming signal expected on the measurement path. In one embodiment, this threshold has a typical value of between −20 dB and −5 dB with a preferential value of −15 dB. - Let S/J be the ratio between the power of the useful signal and the maximum power expected from the jamming signal on the measurement path after the anti-jamming filters. The trigger threshold then has the following value:
Threshold=S/J(dB)−10 dB. - A third phase called “ALC dedicated” phase, the phase during which all of the processing operations necessary for regulating the gain of the amplification device need to be carried out. The duration of this phase may be variable. During this phase, step 603 of regulation is used. During this step of
regulation 603, the setpoint gain used is that determined duringstep 601 of configuration using the relationship
Pout_max=Pout_mean_MODEM_setpoint+Modulation_crest_factor - and the calibration tables.
- Finally, the fourth phase corresponds to the phase of sending the useful data. In one embodiment, the gain of the amplification device must be stabilized at the beginning of this phase and cannot then evolve again. This phase corresponds to step 604 of deactivation of the regulation of the gain.
- A first phase, called “blanking” phase. During this phase, the power of the signal is zeroed. Thus, no signal is transmitted by the antenna. This phase is also called “bearing hole” and it is used to implement the configuration of the various devices of a radio (frequency positioning and routing of the switches, notably). This time is used to implement
-
- The RMS output power (dBm) desired at the output of the amplifier
- The crest factor for the modulation (dB) of the signal to be amplified
- The modulation bandwidth (Hz) of the amplified signal
- The transmission frequency.
-
- DUC (Digital Up Converter) filters that allow conversion of the signal from a base frequency to an intermediate frequency. In
FIG. 8 , these filters are referenced 801.a and 801.b. - A DDC (Digital Down Converter) filter that allows conversion of the signal from an intermediate frequency to a base frequency. In
FIG. 8 this filter is referenced 802. - Two digital-to-analogue converters (known also by the expression DAC) that are referenced 803.a and 803.b in
FIG. 8 . - A digital processing portion of the invention that is referenced 804 in
FIG. 8 . This digital processing portion of the invention (made up of the main loop and the predictive control loop) needs to be implemented between the chain of digital processing for the modulated samples transmitted and the digital-to-analogue converter of the transmission path. This portion corresponds toelements FIG. 1 or 3. - A frequency-selective detection portion that is referenced 805 in
FIG. 8 . This frequency-selective detection portion needs to be realized by a directional coupler arranged between the output of the power amplifier and the antenna, a gain regulation device, a mixer, an analogue-to-digital converter and a set of analogue and digital filters distributed along the detection chain. A gain pre-positioning system is likewise used in the detection path so as to make the gain of the loop almost constant for a large range of operating power (in the order of 25 dB), thus facilitating the stability of the main loop. This portion corresponds toelements FIG. 3 . - The invention implements two open-loop gain controls referenced 806.a and 806.b, intended for the bearing shaping (during the “shaping” phase) by means of a plurality of conversion tables using static coefficients (LUT), a digital gain arranged in the chain of digital processing for the transmitted signal and a voltage-controlled analogue attenuator with a digital-to-analogue converter. These controls are integrated in the
second determination device 104. - The invention implements closed-loop gain control using the two digital processing loops claimed in the invention and a voltage-controlled analogue attenuator with a digital-to-analogue converter. This control is integrated in the
second determination device 104. - The algorithm for the method of the invention is suited more particularly to waveforms of FH type but can easily be suited to waveforms of continuous type because it has a regulation mode allowing it to be activated during the useful phase of the modulation.
- The system also has a
device 807 for repositioning the static gains 807.a and the gain of thegain regulation device 303 that uses a calibration table.
- DUC (Digital Up Converter) filters that allow conversion of the signal from a base frequency to an intermediate frequency. In
Claims (9)
Pout_max=Pout_mean_MODEM_setpoint+Modulation_crest_factor
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1302416A FR3012272B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2013-10-18 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AMPLIFYING A SIGNAL |
FR1302416 | 2013-10-18 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150110222A1 US20150110222A1 (en) | 2015-04-23 |
US9270498B2 true US9270498B2 (en) | 2016-02-23 |
Family
ID=50478433
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/516,358 Active US9270498B2 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2014-10-16 | System and method for amplifying a signal |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9270498B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2863541B1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2683423T3 (en) |
FR (1) | FR3012272B1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL235114A (en) |
MY (1) | MY167984A (en) |
PL (1) | PL2863541T3 (en) |
SG (1) | SG10201406747PA (en) |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6133789A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-17 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and system for robustly linearizing a radio frequency power amplifier using vector feedback |
US20020171484A1 (en) | 2001-04-23 | 2002-11-21 | Lars Sundstorm | Automatic optimization of linearity for envelope feedback RF amplifier linearization |
GB2394374A (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2004-04-21 | Roke Manor Research | An IQ feedback predistortion loop comprising a power amplifier (PA) and a PA model |
US6735420B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2004-05-11 | Globespanvirata, Inc. | Transmit power control for multiple rate wireless communications |
US7023278B1 (en) | 2004-09-21 | 2006-04-04 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Digital power amplifier level control |
US7058369B1 (en) | 2001-11-21 | 2006-06-06 | Pmc-Sierra Inc. | Constant gain digital predistortion controller for linearization of non-linear amplifiers |
US7353006B2 (en) | 2003-03-12 | 2008-04-01 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Closed loop power control of non-constant envelope waveforms using sample/hold |
US7773691B2 (en) | 2005-04-25 | 2010-08-10 | Rf Micro Devices, Inc. | Power control system for a continuous time mobile transmitter |
US20100248658A1 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2010-09-30 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Method and system of adaptive predistortion of a wireless transmitter |
US20120034887A1 (en) * | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-09 | Crestcom, Inc. | Transmitter Linearized Using Cartesian-Processed Look-Up Table and Method Therefor |
US20130034188A1 (en) * | 2006-04-04 | 2013-02-07 | Apple Inc. | Signal Transmitter Linearization |
US8706062B1 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2014-04-22 | Scintera Networks, Inc. | Self-adaptive power amplification |
-
2013
- 2013-10-18 FR FR1302416A patent/FR3012272B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-10-15 ES ES14189077.2T patent/ES2683423T3/en active Active
- 2014-10-15 PL PL14189077T patent/PL2863541T3/en unknown
- 2014-10-15 EP EP14189077.2A patent/EP2863541B1/en active Active
- 2014-10-16 US US14/516,358 patent/US9270498B2/en active Active
- 2014-10-16 MY MYPI2014703061A patent/MY167984A/en unknown
- 2014-10-19 IL IL235114A patent/IL235114A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2014-10-20 SG SG10201406747PA patent/SG10201406747PA/en unknown
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6133789A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-17 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and system for robustly linearizing a radio frequency power amplifier using vector feedback |
US20020171484A1 (en) | 2001-04-23 | 2002-11-21 | Lars Sundstorm | Automatic optimization of linearity for envelope feedback RF amplifier linearization |
US7058369B1 (en) | 2001-11-21 | 2006-06-06 | Pmc-Sierra Inc. | Constant gain digital predistortion controller for linearization of non-linear amplifiers |
US6735420B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2004-05-11 | Globespanvirata, Inc. | Transmit power control for multiple rate wireless communications |
GB2394374A (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2004-04-21 | Roke Manor Research | An IQ feedback predistortion loop comprising a power amplifier (PA) and a PA model |
US7353006B2 (en) | 2003-03-12 | 2008-04-01 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Closed loop power control of non-constant envelope waveforms using sample/hold |
US7023278B1 (en) | 2004-09-21 | 2006-04-04 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Digital power amplifier level control |
US7773691B2 (en) | 2005-04-25 | 2010-08-10 | Rf Micro Devices, Inc. | Power control system for a continuous time mobile transmitter |
US20130034188A1 (en) * | 2006-04-04 | 2013-02-07 | Apple Inc. | Signal Transmitter Linearization |
US20100248658A1 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2010-09-30 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Method and system of adaptive predistortion of a wireless transmitter |
US8706062B1 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2014-04-22 | Scintera Networks, Inc. | Self-adaptive power amplification |
US20120034887A1 (en) * | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-09 | Crestcom, Inc. | Transmitter Linearized Using Cartesian-Processed Look-Up Table and Method Therefor |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
M. Brandon, M.Ariaudo, S.Traverso, J.Bouvier, I.Fijalkow, J.L. Gautier, "Linearity improvement thanks to the association of Active Constellation Extension and digital predistortion for OFDM", Universite Cergy-Pontoise-CNRS and Thales Communications, France, Jun. 26-29, 2011. * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2683423T3 (en) | 2018-09-26 |
EP2863541B1 (en) | 2018-05-16 |
FR3012272A1 (en) | 2015-04-24 |
SG10201406747PA (en) | 2015-05-28 |
MY167984A (en) | 2018-10-09 |
PL2863541T3 (en) | 2018-11-30 |
IL235114A (en) | 2017-09-28 |
FR3012272B1 (en) | 2017-05-26 |
US20150110222A1 (en) | 2015-04-23 |
IL235114A0 (en) | 2015-01-29 |
EP2863541A1 (en) | 2015-04-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8879665B2 (en) | Controlling a power amplifier based on transmitter output emissions | |
EP1935089B1 (en) | Systems, methods and devices for dual closed loop modulation controller for nonlinear rf amplifier | |
EP2027649B1 (en) | System and method for providing a transmitter for polar modulation and power amplifier linearization | |
TWI540829B (en) | Envelope tracking system with internal power amplifier characterization | |
US6445249B1 (en) | Modification of phase component of error signal to reduce variation of phase component of output signal of power amplifier | |
US8184739B2 (en) | Power series digital predistorter and control method therefor | |
US20160373072A1 (en) | Devices and Methods for Adaptive Crest Factor Reduction in Dynamic Predistortion | |
US8619905B2 (en) | Predistorter and distortion compensation method | |
US7899416B2 (en) | RF transmitter with heat compensation and method therefor | |
US7027785B2 (en) | Transmitter RF power control | |
US8314656B2 (en) | Power series digital predistorter and distortion compensation control method thereof | |
US6519293B1 (en) | Radio transmitter and radio communication method | |
CN103297366A (en) | Digital wideband closed loop phase modulator with modulation gain calibration | |
JPH0394522A (en) | Output waveform control circuit | |
US9363130B2 (en) | Dynamic digital predistortion for a microwave radio system | |
JP5049562B2 (en) | Power amplifier | |
US9793871B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for controlling wireless transmission | |
US9166859B2 (en) | Wireless communication apparatus and transmission power control method | |
WO2013134025A1 (en) | Noise optimized envelope tracking system for power amplifiers | |
WO2014160841A1 (en) | Power amplifier signal compensation | |
Wood | Digital pre-distortion of RF power amplifiers: progress to date and future challenges | |
US7400690B2 (en) | Adaptive phase controller, method of controlling a phase and transmitter employing the same | |
US6999737B2 (en) | Wireless transmitter and device for mobile station | |
US9853608B2 (en) | Temperature compensation technique for envelope tracking system | |
US9270498B2 (en) | System and method for amplifying a signal |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THALES, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BOUVIER, JESSICA;COSTA, BRUNO;GUERN, PIERRE;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150210 TO 20150225;REEL/FRAME:035663/0064 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |