US8591848B2 - Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system - Google Patents

Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8591848B2
US8591848B2 US12/266,373 US26637308A US8591848B2 US 8591848 B2 US8591848 B2 US 8591848B2 US 26637308 A US26637308 A US 26637308A US 8591848 B2 US8591848 B2 US 8591848B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
urea
gasified
demand
ammonia
turbine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/266,373
Other versions
US20100061907A1 (en
Inventor
William H. Sun
Paul G. Carmignani
John M. Boyle
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fuel Tech Inc
Original Assignee
Fuel Tech Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fuel Tech Inc filed Critical Fuel Tech Inc
Priority to US12/266,373 priority Critical patent/US8591848B2/en
Assigned to FUEL TECH, INC. reassignment FUEL TECH, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BOYLE, JOHN M., CARMIGNANI, PAUL G., SUN, WILLIAM H.
Publication of US20100061907A1 publication Critical patent/US20100061907A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8591848B2 publication Critical patent/US8591848B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8621Removing nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/8625Nitrogen oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/54Nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/56Nitrogen oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8696Controlling the catalytic process
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/90Injecting reactants
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J15/00Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
    • F23J15/003Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes for supplying chemicals to fumes, e.g. using injection devices
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/20Reductants
    • B01D2251/206Ammonium compounds
    • B01D2251/2067Urea
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2219/00Treatment devices
    • F23J2219/10Catalytic reduction devices

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to the efficient utilization of urea for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO x , and more particularly to feeding a gasified product of the urea to feed multiple turbine power units from a single unit, which converts urea to ammonia-containing SCR reagent yet maintains the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness.
  • SCR selective catalytic reduction
  • turbines to generate power is economical in many situations where more conventional powerplants cannot be contemplated. To their great credit, they generally operate with minimal generation of NO x and can utilize fuels, such as digester and landfill gases. However, they do generate regulatory significant amounts of NO x , and efforts are made to reduce emissions to even lower levels.
  • Digester and landfill gases are gaseous by-products, principally comprised of methane and carbon dioxide, of anaerobic decomposition of organic materials from sewage treatment or landfills. These are not clean fuels according to criteria that utilities normally consider. Trace quantities of offensive compounds are typically found in the gases and often include hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and acid gas forming compounds. In addition, some compounds present in the gas and are known to clog NO x reduction catalysts and shorten the life of the turbines. The net effect for operators is that utilization of this low-cost fuel can present additional costs in terms of shortened turbine life, corroded ductwork and fouled catalysts.
  • SCR has been proven to be highly effective at NO x reduction, and SCR units can generally be scaled to the size required for turbines.
  • SCR units typically require the use of ammonia as a reducing reagent, and it is a common problem that ammonia is difficult and dangerous to store, especially in populated areas.
  • ammonia generators such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,810 to Sun, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,491 to Cooper, et al., are often required, but their control for multiple turbine units has not been addressed and can be more costly or difficult than economics may permit in some installations, such as turbines for use with digester and landfill gases.
  • SCR units typically employ ammonia injection grids (AIGs), which are essentially arrays of distribution pipes with holes arranged through which the ammonia is preferably ejected with a carrier gas to provide sufficient momentum for the gas at each location and thereby achieve uniform distribution of ammonia.
  • AIGs ammonia injection grids
  • storage tanks which is to avoided for ammonia safety reasons, there is currently no good way to accommodate the fluctuations. Distribution will be adversely affected or excess ammonia will be supplied and result in ammonia slip.
  • the present invention provides a process for reducing the concentration of nitrogen oxides in combustion gases from a plurality of turbines or other combustors, each of which has an associated selective catalytic NO x reduction catalyst effective for utilizing gasified urea, the process comprising: heating aqueous urea at conditions of temperature and pressure for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with a heated gas stream in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined mass and concentration of ammonia; monitoring the demand for urea at each of the plurality of turbines; feeding the first gasified reductant stream to each turbine at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NO x reduction catalyst associated with each turbine; determining an amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each turbine; based on this determination, admixing a determined amount of carrier gas with
  • the invention also comprises the system and apparatus described and illustrated for accomplishing the process as described and reasonable variations of it.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the process and system of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a single turbine with an SCR unit supplied with gasified reductant in accord with the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram on one form of ammonia injection grid the operation of which in an SCR system that can be improved according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 a preferred embodiment shown schematically in FIG. 1 .
  • the drawing and the process it represents will be described briefly below, without undue recitation of sensors, pumps, indicators, transmitters, valves, pumps, and the like which are so well known to those skilled in engineering systems of this type.
  • a feed line 12 leads to urea tank 14 to maintain a sufficient supply of an aqueous solution of urea or like chemical as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,810, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the process is effective with urea, but can utilize other NO x -reducing reagents capable of generating a reactant gas containing ammonia upon heating.
  • the reactant gas will also contain HNCO which reacts with water to convert to ammonia and carbon dioxide.
  • urea is meant to include the reagents that are equivalent to urea in the sense that they form ammonia and HNCO when heated, whether or not they contain large amounts of the pure chemical urea in the form introduced into the combustion gases; however, the reagents that are equivalent to urea typically contain measurable quantities of urea in their commercial forms and thus comprise urea.
  • NO x -reducing reagents that can be gasified are those that comprise a member selected from the group consisting of: ammelide; ammeline; ammonium carbonate; ammonium bicarbonate; ammonium carbamate; ammonium cyanate; ammonium salts of inorganic acids, including sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid; ammonium salts of organic acids, including formic and acetic acid; biuret; triuret, cyanuric acid; isocyanic acid; urea formaldehyde; melamine; tricyanourea and mixtures of any number of these.
  • NO x -reducing reagents are available that do not form HNCO, but decompose to a mixture of gases including hydrocarbons.
  • urea is thus meant to encompass urea in all of its commercial and equivalent forms.
  • commercial forms of urea will consist essentially of urea, containing 95% or more urea by weight. This relatively pure form of urea is preferred and has several advantages in the process of the invention. It is preferably supplied to tank 14 at a concentration of from about 10 to about 50%, with about 30 to about 35%.
  • a level sensor and feed pump arrangement assure that sufficient urea solution will always be present in the tank 14 to meet programmed demand.
  • the urea solution flows via line 16 assisted by metering pump 18 and flow monitor 20 to line 22 for introduction through injector nozzle 24 , which with the aid of air from line 26 , atomizes the aqueous urea solution for its gasification in gasification chamber 28 .
  • the gasification of the urea is facilitated with heated air from line 34 which passes it to heater 36 and line 38 and auxiliary heater 39 for supply to chamber 28 .
  • the aqueous urea solution is heated at conditions of temperature (e.g., from about 175° to about 650° C.) and pressure (e.g., at near atmospheric, say from about 0.5 to about 1.5 atm) for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with the heated gas stream from line 38 in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined concentration of ammonia.
  • a typical gas stream will contain from about 0.5% to about 5% by weight ammonia.
  • an air line 30 can be employed to aspirate the nozzle 24 during cleaning.
  • the gasified urea solution, also called gasified reductant is withdrawn from chamber 28 via line 40 for distribution as a first gasified reductant stream to supply lines 42 serving the SCR units associated with each of the turbines as will be describe more below.
  • the demand for urea is monitored by sensors at each of the plurality of turbines by sensing at least one control parameter of the combustion gases from a turbine which is indicative of the NO x in the combustion gases and determining the demand by control programmable logic controller 43 or other like device.
  • the controller can be feed forward with or without feedback.
  • the first gasified reductant stream is fed to each turbine via individual lines 42 , utilizing control valves and flow monitors shown generally as 44 and 44 ′, respectively, at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NO x reduction catalyst associated with each turbine.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a single turbine with an SCR unit supplied with gasified reductant in accord with the invention.
  • the turbine 70 is fed fuel from line 72 and air from line 74 and generates combustion gases 76 which pass into SCR unit 78 where they are treated according to the invention and then exhausted to stack 80 .
  • FIG. 3 shows one form of AIG, ammonia injection grid 62 , the operation of which in an SCR system that can be improved according to the invention.
  • Such grids will generally have an array of pipes 63 with an array of holes 64 through which the gasified reagent is distributed to the combustion gases from the associated turbine.
  • the SCR unit includes an AIG, ammonia injection grid, 62 fed gasified reagent via line 60 .
  • An in-line mixing device 65 is typically provided for assuring good mixing of the gasified reagent with the combustion gases. Then, the gases are passed through a series of catalysts effective for selective catalytic reduction of NO x at the designed temperatures of the system at this point.
  • the gasified reagent is passed via line 40 to individual lines 42 to be mixed with a sufficient amount of carrier gas so that the correct dosing of gasified reagents can be utilized and mixed with sufficient carrier gas to achieve the correct mass flow rate and velocity profile for the reducing gas when introduced into the SCR unit 78 by means of an injection grid 62 .
  • FIG. 1 shows air introduced via line 45 and blower 46 to heater 48 and line 50 .
  • the rates of supply and degrees of heating can be controlled by appropriate sensors via controller 43 using instrument air 43 ′ or equivalent. Because the load of one or more turbines may not be high enough to require sufficient ammonia that the flow through a feed line 42 maintains it at the proper temperature, it is important that heater 48 be employed to maintain the temperature of the gasified reagent in line 60 .
  • the controller 43 or other logic device will determine the amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each turbine. Then, based on this determination, a determined amount of carrier gas from supply line 50 and individual lines 52 is admixed with the first gasified reductant stream from lines 40 , 42 to provide a catalyst feed stream associated with each turbine and which can be fed to the turbine via a line 60 . Then, at each turbine 70 , an associated catalyst feed stream 60 is introduced by means of an ammonia injection grid 62 to the combustion gases upstream of the catalyst 66 under conditions effective to reduce the concentration of NOx in the effluent from each turbine. Similarly as with supply of the first gasified reductant stream via individual lines 42 , lines 52 can utilize control valves and flow monitors shown generally as 54 and 54 ′, respectively to control the rate sufficient to supply a catalyst feed stream with the necessary mass and flow rate to each turbine.
  • a gasified product of urea can be fed with the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness.
  • the controller 43 can determine the amount of reagent required for each turbine to control NO x emissions and then direct mixing the gasified urea with the correct amount of carrier gas for efficient operation of each separate SCR unit despite the demand variation between the turbines. In this manner the gasification unit can be properly controlled to provide urea on demand without the need for storing large inventories of ammonia-containing gasses to correct for fluctuations in demand.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Engine Equipment That Uses Special Cycles (AREA)

Abstract

Disclosed is a system which enables the efficient utilization of urea for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx by gasifying it and feeding it to a plurality of selective catalytic reduction units associated with a plurality of gas turbines. The invention enables feeding a gasified product of the urea with the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness. Controllers determine the amount of reagent required for each turbine to control NOx emissions and then mixes the gasified urea with the correct amount of carrier gas for efficient operation of each separate SCR unit despite the demand variation between the turbines. In this manner the gasification unit can be properly controlled to provide urea on demand without the need for storing large inventories of ammonia-containing gasses to correct for fluctuations in demand.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60,986,917, filed Nov. 9, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to the efficient utilization of urea for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx, and more particularly to feeding a gasified product of the urea to feed multiple turbine power units from a single unit, which converts urea to ammonia-containing SCR reagent yet maintains the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The use of turbines to generate power is economical in many situations where more conventional powerplants cannot be contemplated. To their great credit, they generally operate with minimal generation of NOx and can utilize fuels, such as digester and landfill gases. However, they do generate regulatory significant amounts of NOx, and efforts are made to reduce emissions to even lower levels.
Digester and landfill gases are gaseous by-products, principally comprised of methane and carbon dioxide, of anaerobic decomposition of organic materials from sewage treatment or landfills. These are not clean fuels according to criteria that utilities normally consider. Trace quantities of offensive compounds are typically found in the gases and often include hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and acid gas forming compounds. In addition, some compounds present in the gas and are known to clog NOx reduction catalysts and shorten the life of the turbines. The net effect for operators is that utilization of this low-cost fuel can present additional costs in terms of shortened turbine life, corroded ductwork and fouled catalysts.
Unless these costs can be recovered by taking good advantage of the energy value of these fuels, the environment will suffer and their energy value will likely be replaced with imported petroleum. It is, therefore, advantageous that all costs be recovered by the facility operators, burned in combustion devices such as turbines to either generate electricity or directly power equipment, and treated by suitable NOx reduction technology, the best of which is SCR if it can be done effectively without storing dangerous ammonia in a system which is as flexible as the power grid is to energy demand.
SCR has been proven to be highly effective at NOx reduction, and SCR units can generally be scaled to the size required for turbines. However, SCR units typically require the use of ammonia as a reducing reagent, and it is a common problem that ammonia is difficult and dangerous to store, especially in populated areas. Thus, the use of ammonia generators such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,810 to Sun, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,491 to Cooper, et al., are often required, but their control for multiple turbine units has not been addressed and can be more costly or difficult than economics may permit in some installations, such as turbines for use with digester and landfill gases.
The digester and landfill gases, which have more traditionally been burned by a flare because of the low quality of the gases, can create costs that are difficult to recover. For these gases, the problem of economics is especially great. Installations requiring more than one turbine cannot presently benefit from a single urea-based ammonia SCR plant. Unfortunately, it has been seen that utilization of a single urea conversion unit for each turbine is the most practical approach.
However, because the demand on the turbines for power fluctuates over time—with daily and seasonal fluctuations—single ammonia generators have not been practical. SCR units typically employ ammonia injection grids (AIGs), which are essentially arrays of distribution pipes with holes arranged through which the ammonia is preferably ejected with a carrier gas to provide sufficient momentum for the gas at each location and thereby achieve uniform distribution of ammonia. When demand is low, immediate decrease of ammonia to one SCR unit for one turbine, will create a temporary excess of ammonia for the others. Without employing storage tanks, which is to avoided for ammonia safety reasons, there is currently no good way to accommodate the fluctuations. Distribution will be adversely affected or excess ammonia will be supplied and result in ammonia slip.
There is a present need for a process, apparatus and system for efficient utilization of urea for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx, and more particularly for feeding a gasified product of the urea to multiple turbine power units from a single urea gasification unit.
There is a particular need for such a system which converts urea to ammonia, yet maintains the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a process for reducing the concentration of nitrogen oxides in combustion gases from a plurality of turbines or other combustors, each of which has an associated selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst effective for utilizing gasified urea, the process comprising: heating aqueous urea at conditions of temperature and pressure for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with a heated gas stream in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined mass and concentration of ammonia; monitoring the demand for urea at each of the plurality of turbines; feeding the first gasified reductant stream to each turbine at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst associated with each turbine; determining an amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each turbine; based on this determination, admixing a determined amount of carrier gas with the first gasified reductant stream to provide a catalyst feed stream associated with each turbine; and at each turbine, introducing an associated catalyst feed stream by means of an ammonia injection grid to the combustion gases upstream of the catalyst under conditions effective to reduce the concentration of NOx in the effluent from each turbine.
The invention also comprises the system and apparatus described and illustrated for accomplishing the process as described and reasonable variations of it.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the process and system of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a single turbine with an SCR unit supplied with gasified reductant in accord with the invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram on one form of ammonia injection grid the operation of which in an SCR system that can be improved according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In describing the present invention, reference is made to the drawings, wherein there is seen a preferred embodiment shown schematically in FIG. 1. The drawing and the process it represents will be described briefly below, without undue recitation of sensors, pumps, indicators, transmitters, valves, pumps, and the like which are so well known to those skilled in engineering systems of this type. Various labels are used in the drawings to have the meanings as follows: TE=temperature element/sensor, LT=level transmitter/sensor, VFD=variable frequency drive, SC=speed control, PI=pressure indicator/sensor, TI=temperature indicator/sensor, FT=flow transmitter, I/P=current to pressure transducer, FIT=flow indicating transmitter, M=flowmeter, PLC=programmable logic controller.
With reference to FIG. 1, a feed line 12 leads to urea tank 14 to maintain a sufficient supply of an aqueous solution of urea or like chemical as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,810, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The process is effective with urea, but can utilize other NOx-reducing reagents capable of generating a reactant gas containing ammonia upon heating. As will be clear from the following, when certain of these reagents are gasified, the reactant gas will also contain HNCO which reacts with water to convert to ammonia and carbon dioxide. It is an advantage of the invention that this can be easily achieved without prehydrolysis of the NOx-reducing reagent which has the attendant risk of plugging nozzles and other equipment. By the term “gasification” we mean that substantially all of the urea is converted into a gas, leaving no significant dissolved or free solids or liquid to contact with and foul SCR catalysts.
The term “urea” is meant to include the reagents that are equivalent to urea in the sense that they form ammonia and HNCO when heated, whether or not they contain large amounts of the pure chemical urea in the form introduced into the combustion gases; however, the reagents that are equivalent to urea typically contain measurable quantities of urea in their commercial forms and thus comprise urea. Among the NOx-reducing reagents that can be gasified are those that comprise a member selected from the group consisting of: ammelide; ammeline; ammonium carbonate; ammonium bicarbonate; ammonium carbamate; ammonium cyanate; ammonium salts of inorganic acids, including sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid; ammonium salts of organic acids, including formic and acetic acid; biuret; triuret, cyanuric acid; isocyanic acid; urea formaldehyde; melamine; tricyanourea and mixtures of any number of these. Yet other NOx-reducing reagents are available that do not form HNCO, but decompose to a mixture of gases including hydrocarbons. Among this group are various amines and their salts (especially their carbonates), including guanidine, guanidine carbonate, methyl amine carbonate, ethyl amine carbonate, dimethyl amine carbonate, hexamethylamine; hexamethylamine carbonate; and byproduct wastes containing urea from a chemical process. Amines with higher alkyls can be employed to the extent that the hydrocarbon components released do not interfere with the NOx-reduction reaction. The term “urea” is thus meant to encompass urea in all of its commercial and equivalent forms. Typically, commercial forms of urea will consist essentially of urea, containing 95% or more urea by weight. This relatively pure form of urea is preferred and has several advantages in the process of the invention. It is preferably supplied to tank 14 at a concentration of from about 10 to about 50%, with about 30 to about 35%.
A level sensor and feed pump arrangement assure that sufficient urea solution will always be present in the tank 14 to meet programmed demand. From the tank 14, which can be heated to facilitate low temperature operation, the urea solution flows via line 16 assisted by metering pump 18 and flow monitor 20 to line 22 for introduction through injector nozzle 24, which with the aid of air from line 26, atomizes the aqueous urea solution for its gasification in gasification chamber 28. The gasification of the urea is facilitated with heated air from line 34 which passes it to heater 36 and line 38 and auxiliary heater 39 for supply to chamber 28. In chamber 28, the aqueous urea solution is heated at conditions of temperature (e.g., from about 175° to about 650° C.) and pressure (e.g., at near atmospheric, say from about 0.5 to about 1.5 atm) for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with the heated gas stream from line 38 in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined concentration of ammonia. A typical gas stream will contain from about 0.5% to about 5% by weight ammonia. In some embodiments, an air line 30 can be employed to aspirate the nozzle 24 during cleaning. The gasified urea solution, also called gasified reductant, is withdrawn from chamber 28 via line 40 for distribution as a first gasified reductant stream to supply lines 42 serving the SCR units associated with each of the turbines as will be describe more below.
The demand for urea is monitored by sensors at each of the plurality of turbines by sensing at least one control parameter of the combustion gases from a turbine which is indicative of the NOx in the combustion gases and determining the demand by control programmable logic controller 43 or other like device. The controller can be feed forward with or without feedback. The first gasified reductant stream is fed to each turbine via individual lines 42, utilizing control valves and flow monitors shown generally as 44 and 44′, respectively, at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst associated with each turbine. Because the turbines will have different requirements for NOx reduction due to their loads, fuels supplied or other factors, and because the gasified reductant must be uniformly dispersed within the combustion gases, normal ammonia injection grids, AIGs, will not provide the desired distribution with effective reagent utilization.
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a single turbine with an SCR unit supplied with gasified reductant in accord with the invention. The turbine 70 is fed fuel from line 72 and air from line 74 and generates combustion gases 76 which pass into SCR unit 78 where they are treated according to the invention and then exhausted to stack 80.
FIG. 3 shows one form of AIG, ammonia injection grid 62, the operation of which in an SCR system that can be improved according to the invention. Such grids will generally have an array of pipes 63 with an array of holes 64 through which the gasified reagent is distributed to the combustion gases from the associated turbine. The SCR unit includes an AIG, ammonia injection grid, 62 fed gasified reagent via line 60.
An in-line mixing device 65 is typically provided for assuring good mixing of the gasified reagent with the combustion gases. Then, the gases are passed through a series of catalysts effective for selective catalytic reduction of NOx at the designed temperatures of the system at this point.
Referring again to FIG. 1, it can be seen that the gasified reagent is passed via line 40 to individual lines 42 to be mixed with a sufficient amount of carrier gas so that the correct dosing of gasified reagents can be utilized and mixed with sufficient carrier gas to achieve the correct mass flow rate and velocity profile for the reducing gas when introduced into the SCR unit 78 by means of an injection grid 62.
A separate supply system is provided for providing carrier gas to each individual turbine. FIG. 1 shows air introduced via line 45 and blower 46 to heater 48 and line 50. The rates of supply and degrees of heating can be controlled by appropriate sensors via controller 43 using instrument air 43′ or equivalent. Because the load of one or more turbines may not be high enough to require sufficient ammonia that the flow through a feed line 42 maintains it at the proper temperature, it is important that heater 48 be employed to maintain the temperature of the gasified reagent in line 60.
To achieve the advantages of the invention, the controller 43 or other logic device will determine the amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each turbine. Then, based on this determination, a determined amount of carrier gas from supply line 50 and individual lines 52 is admixed with the first gasified reductant stream from lines 40, 42 to provide a catalyst feed stream associated with each turbine and which can be fed to the turbine via a line 60. Then, at each turbine 70, an associated catalyst feed stream 60 is introduced by means of an ammonia injection grid 62 to the combustion gases upstream of the catalyst 66 under conditions effective to reduce the concentration of NOx in the effluent from each turbine. Similarly as with supply of the first gasified reductant stream via individual lines 42, lines 52 can utilize control valves and flow monitors shown generally as 54 and 54′, respectively to control the rate sufficient to supply a catalyst feed stream with the necessary mass and flow rate to each turbine.
It is an advantage of the invention that a gasified product of urea can be fed with the ability to fully control separate SCR units without excessive reagent usage or loss of pollution control effectiveness. The controller 43 can determine the amount of reagent required for each turbine to control NOx emissions and then direct mixing the gasified urea with the correct amount of carrier gas for efficient operation of each separate SCR unit despite the demand variation between the turbines. In this manner the gasification unit can be properly controlled to provide urea on demand without the need for storing large inventories of ammonia-containing gasses to correct for fluctuations in demand. While the description exemplifies turbines due to the special effectiveness and importance of the invention in that context, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that its advantages can be extended to other types of combustors, including furnaces, boilers, engines, incinerators and the like. It is another advantage of the invention that the temperature of the gasified reagent in line 60 can be maintained at a sufficient temperature to prevent condensation or chemical reactions even when the load of one or more turbines may not be high enough for sufficient mass flow through a feed line 42.
The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the invention. It is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations, which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed components and steps in any sequence which is effective to meet the objectives there intended, unless the context specifically indicates the contrary.

Claims (4)

What is claimed is:
1. A process for reducing the concentration of nitrogen oxides in combustion gases from a plurality of combustors, each of which has an associated selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst effective for utilizing gasified urea while enabling control to provide urea on demand without the need for storing large inventories of ammonia-containing gases to accommodate fluctuations of demand seasonally and daily and between individual combustors, the process comprising:
a. heating aqueous urea at conditions of temperature and pressure for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with a heated gas stream in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined mass and concentration of ammonia;
b. monitoring the demand for urea at each of the plurality of combustors;
c. feeding the first gasified reductant stream to each turbine at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst associated with each combustor;
d. determining an amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each combustor;
e. based on this determination, admixing a determined amount of carrier gas with the first gasified reductant stream to provide a catalyst feed stream associated with each combustor; and
f. at each combustor, introducing an associated catalyst feed stream by means of an ammonia injection grid to the effluent upstream of the catalyst under conditions effective to reduce the concentration of NOx in the combustion gases from each combustor, whereby fluctuations of demand seasonally and daily and between individual combustors are accommodated without large inventories of ammonia-containing gases.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the urea is mixed with heated air in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising from about 0.5% to about 5% by weight ammonia.
3. A process for reducing the concentration of nitrogen oxides in combustion gases from a plurality of turbines, each of which has an associated selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst effective for utilizing gasified urea while enabling control to provide urea on demand without the need for storing large inventories of ammonia-containing gases to accommodate fluctuations of demand seasonally and daily and between individual turbines, the process comprising:
a. heating aqueous urea at conditions of temperature and pressure for a time effective to gasify the urea and water by mixing the aqueous urea with a heated gas stream in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising a predetermined mass and concentration of ammonia;
b. monitoring the demand for urea at each of the plurality of turbines;
c. feeding the first gasified reductant stream to each turbine at a rate sufficient to supply gasified reductant to supply the monitored demand to the selective catalytic NOx reduction catalyst associated with each turbine;
d. determining an amount of carrier gas needed to achieve a predetermined degree of mixing of the gasified reagent with combustion gases generated at each turbine;
e. based on this determination, admixing a determined amount of carrier gas with the first gasified reductant stream to provide a catalyst feed stream associated with each turbine; and
f. at each turbine, introducing an associated catalyst feed stream by means of an ammonia injection grid to the effluent upstream of the catalyst under conditions effective to reduce the concentration of NOx in the combustion gases from each turbine, whereby fluctuations of demand seasonally and daily and between individual turbines are accommodated without large inventories of ammonia-containing gases.
4. A process according to claim 3, wherein the urea is mixed with heated air in amounts relative to the amounts of urea and water to produce a first gasified reductant stream comprising from about 0.5% to about 5% by weight ammonia.
US12/266,373 2007-11-09 2008-11-06 Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system Active 2030-01-11 US8591848B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/266,373 US8591848B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2008-11-06 Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US98691707P 2007-11-09 2007-11-09
US12/266,373 US8591848B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2008-11-06 Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100061907A1 US20100061907A1 (en) 2010-03-11
US8591848B2 true US8591848B2 (en) 2013-11-26

Family

ID=40626217

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/266,373 Active 2030-01-11 US8591848B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2008-11-06 Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (1) US8591848B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2227313B1 (en)
KR (2) KR20100097140A (en)
CN (1) CN101909725B (en)
AU (1) AU2008323705B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0819111A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2705104C (en)
HK (1) HK1151492A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2010005152A (en)
NZ (1) NZ585550A (en)
RU (1) RU2445149C2 (en)
TW (1) TWI473645B (en)
WO (1) WO2009062129A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11339056B2 (en) 2017-01-05 2022-05-24 Fuel Tech, Inc. Controlled, compact, on-demand ammonia gas generation process and apparatus

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7824636B1 (en) * 2009-07-24 2010-11-02 General Electric Company Model-based tuning of ammonia distribution and control for reduced operating cost of selective catalytic reduction
JP5630025B2 (en) * 2010-01-25 2014-11-26 いすゞ自動車株式会社 Diesel engine exhaust purification device and exhaust purification method
US20120051993A1 (en) * 2010-08-25 2012-03-01 L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Mitigation System In A Steam Methane Reformer Plant
US9074530B2 (en) * 2011-01-13 2015-07-07 General Electric Company Stoichiometric exhaust gas recirculation and related combustion control
US8875499B2 (en) * 2011-03-18 2014-11-04 Hino Motors Ltd. Urea solution reformer and exhaust gas purifier using same
EP2541011A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-01-02 Ford Global Technologies, LLC A method for minimizing ammonia slip from SCR catalysts
RU2481890C1 (en) * 2011-10-18 2013-05-20 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Министерство промышленности и торговли Российской Федерации (Минпромторг России) Method of selective catalytic cleaning of exhaust and flue gas of nitrogen oxide
CN102619601B (en) * 2012-04-18 2013-10-02 潍柴动力扬州柴油机有限责任公司 SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) system of electrical control diesel engine and control method of SCR system
US9649604B2 (en) * 2012-05-10 2017-05-16 General Electric Technology Gmbh Injector grid with two stage mixer
FR2992726B1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2015-05-29 Inergy Automotive Systems Res METHOD OF DIAGNOSING A SYSTEM FOR STORING STORED GAS BY SORPTION ON A COMPOUND
DE102015208016A1 (en) * 2015-04-30 2016-11-03 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Exhaust after-treatment system for an internal combustion engine, internal combustion engine with an exhaust aftertreatment system and use of a Luftstromdüse
US20170058742A1 (en) * 2015-08-28 2017-03-02 General Electric Company Methods and systems related to selective catalytic reduction
US10137421B2 (en) 2015-11-12 2018-11-27 Doosan Heavy Industries Construction Co., Ltd. Static mixer
JP6772868B2 (en) * 2017-01-31 2020-10-21 株式会社Ihi Combustion equipment and gas turbine
KR102089126B1 (en) * 2017-05-24 2020-03-13 주식회사 엘지화학 Selected Catalytic Reduction System
CN107703262B (en) * 2017-10-24 2020-06-26 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 Method for online determination of average value of nitrogen oxides at outlet of SCR denitration device
US10690079B2 (en) * 2017-12-12 2020-06-23 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for diagnosing and controlling ammonia oxidation in selective catalytic reduction devices
CA3092342C (en) * 2018-02-27 2022-11-01 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. System and process for delivering controlled quantities of ammonia to ammonia-consuming devices
JP7211834B2 (en) * 2019-02-01 2023-01-24 三菱重工業株式会社 REDUCING AGENT SUPPLY DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATION OF REDUCING AGENT SUPPLY DEVICE
CN109821416A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-05-31 东北大学 A kind of method and system of low-temperature flue gas removing nitrogen oxides

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5047220A (en) * 1989-03-27 1991-09-10 Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Catalytic denitrification control process and system for combustion flue gases
US5681158A (en) * 1995-03-14 1997-10-28 Gfk Consulting Limited Single-stage process for disposal of chemically bound nitrogen in industrial waste streams
US20040057889A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2004-03-25 Mitsubishi Power Systems, Inc. Real-time control for zero ammonia slip selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system
US20040128982A1 (en) * 2000-10-16 2004-07-08 Engelhard Corporation Control system for mobile NOx SCR applications
US20060101811A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-05-18 Jan-Roger Linna Reducing agent metering system for reducing NOx in lean burn internal combustion engines
US20060204417A1 (en) * 2002-11-26 2006-09-14 Rini Michael J Method for treating emissions
US20060213197A1 (en) * 2005-03-28 2006-09-28 Sal Caro Air pollution control system for ocean-going vessels
US20070101703A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2007-05-10 Nissan Diesel Motor Co., Ltd. Exhaust emission purifying apparatus for engine
US20070142975A1 (en) * 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 Pegasus Technologies, Inc. Model based optimization of a single or multiple power generating units
US20080066453A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Christopher Oberski Management of a Plurality of Reductants for Selective Catalytic Reduction
US20080116054A1 (en) * 2004-08-16 2008-05-22 Leach James T Controlled Spectrum Ultraviolet Radiation Pollution Control Process
US20090019835A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-22 Dingle Philip J G Fluid delivery system
US7622093B2 (en) * 2003-05-22 2009-11-24 Doosan Babcock Energy America Llc Method for zonal injection of chemicals into a furnace convective pass to reduce pollutants from flue gases

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2132112B (en) * 1982-12-27 1986-08-20 Gen Electric Catalytic pollution control system for gas turbine exhaust
JPS6219229A (en) * 1985-07-16 1987-01-28 Babcock Hitachi Kk Control device for amount of ammonia to be injected
JPH08281074A (en) * 1995-04-19 1996-10-29 Babcock Hitachi Kk Denitrification equipment using urea
US6361754B1 (en) * 1997-03-27 2002-03-26 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Reducing no emissions from an engine by on-demand generation of ammonia for selective catalytic reduction
US6063350A (en) * 1997-04-02 2000-05-16 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Reducing nox emissions from an engine by temperature-controlled urea injection for selective catalytic reduction
EP1063000A4 (en) * 1998-03-11 2003-01-02 Hitachi Shipbuilding Eng Co METHOD FOR REMOVING NOx
EP1222016B1 (en) * 1999-10-15 2007-01-03 ABB Lummus Global Inc. Conversion of nitrogen oxides in the presence of a catalyst supported of a mesh-like structure
DE60127164T2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2008-01-10 Fuel Tech, Inc., Batavia POSSIBLE SELECTIVE CATALYTIC NO X REDUCTION THROUGH LOW-CURRENT-UREA REMOVAL
US7829033B2 (en) * 2003-07-03 2010-11-09 Fuel Tech, Inc. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx enabled by sidestream urea decomposition
DE102005045029A1 (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-03-29 Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag Internal combustion engine charged by exhaust gas turbocharger with an exhaust gas line with SCR catalyst (s)

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5047220A (en) * 1989-03-27 1991-09-10 Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Catalytic denitrification control process and system for combustion flue gases
US5681158A (en) * 1995-03-14 1997-10-28 Gfk Consulting Limited Single-stage process for disposal of chemically bound nitrogen in industrial waste streams
US20040128982A1 (en) * 2000-10-16 2004-07-08 Engelhard Corporation Control system for mobile NOx SCR applications
US20040057889A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2004-03-25 Mitsubishi Power Systems, Inc. Real-time control for zero ammonia slip selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system
US20060204417A1 (en) * 2002-11-26 2006-09-14 Rini Michael J Method for treating emissions
US7622093B2 (en) * 2003-05-22 2009-11-24 Doosan Babcock Energy America Llc Method for zonal injection of chemicals into a furnace convective pass to reduce pollutants from flue gases
US20070101703A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2007-05-10 Nissan Diesel Motor Co., Ltd. Exhaust emission purifying apparatus for engine
US20080116054A1 (en) * 2004-08-16 2008-05-22 Leach James T Controlled Spectrum Ultraviolet Radiation Pollution Control Process
US20060101811A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-05-18 Jan-Roger Linna Reducing agent metering system for reducing NOx in lean burn internal combustion engines
US20060213197A1 (en) * 2005-03-28 2006-09-28 Sal Caro Air pollution control system for ocean-going vessels
US20070142975A1 (en) * 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 Pegasus Technologies, Inc. Model based optimization of a single or multiple power generating units
US20080066453A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Christopher Oberski Management of a Plurality of Reductants for Selective Catalytic Reduction
US20090019835A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-22 Dingle Philip J G Fluid delivery system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11339056B2 (en) 2017-01-05 2022-05-24 Fuel Tech, Inc. Controlled, compact, on-demand ammonia gas generation process and apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HK1151492A1 (en) 2012-02-03
CA2705104C (en) 2013-04-23
EP2227313A1 (en) 2010-09-15
CA2705104A1 (en) 2009-05-14
EP2227313A4 (en) 2012-08-08
KR101654091B1 (en) 2016-09-05
TW200942319A (en) 2009-10-16
NZ585550A (en) 2012-07-27
CN101909725A (en) 2010-12-08
US20100061907A1 (en) 2010-03-11
AU2008323705A1 (en) 2009-05-14
RU2445149C2 (en) 2012-03-20
CN101909725B (en) 2014-11-05
EP2227313B1 (en) 2015-03-11
MX2010005152A (en) 2010-07-29
AU2008323705B2 (en) 2011-08-18
BRPI0819111A2 (en) 2017-05-02
KR20100097140A (en) 2010-09-02
TWI473645B (en) 2015-02-21
RU2010120163A (en) 2011-12-20
WO2009062129A1 (en) 2009-05-14
KR20130108677A (en) 2013-10-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8591848B2 (en) Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system
US7682586B2 (en) Thermal decomposition of urea in a side stream of combustion flue gas using a regenerative heat exchanger
CN101066520B (en) Selective catalytic reduction of NOx enabled by sidestream urea decomposition
JP4195383B2 (en) Continuous-variable adjustment method of pollution reducing agent for combustion source
US5809775A (en) Reducing NOx emissions from an engine by selective catalytic reduction utilizing solid reagents
US8470277B2 (en) Selective catalytic NOx reduction process and control system
EP2514522A1 (en) Conversion of urea to reactants for nox reduction
AU2012378238B2 (en) Ammonia gas generation from urea for low temperature process requirements
JPH0857261A (en) Denitrification apparatus using aqueous solution of reducing agent
US9586178B2 (en) System and method for reducing nitrogen oxide in exhaust
KR100876161B1 (en) Total nox control process
RU158364U1 (en) INSTALLATION OF NEUTRALIZATION OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN EMISSIONS OF GAS TURBINES
KR100739124B1 (en) Nox reduction system based on selective catalytic reduction
JP2007229544A (en) Denitrification process and denitrification facility
KR20210079919A (en) Spray Nozzle for Ammonia Injection Grid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FUEL TECH, INC.,ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SUN, WILLIAM H.;CARMIGNANI, PAUL G.;BOYLE, JOHN M.;REEL/FRAME:022101/0869

Effective date: 20081222

Owner name: FUEL TECH, INC., ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SUN, WILLIAM H.;CARMIGNANI, PAUL G.;BOYLE, JOHN M.;REEL/FRAME:022101/0869

Effective date: 20081222

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8