US8410228B2 - Emulsion polymerisation process - Google Patents

Emulsion polymerisation process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8410228B2
US8410228B2 US12/374,236 US37423607A US8410228B2 US 8410228 B2 US8410228 B2 US 8410228B2 US 37423607 A US37423607 A US 37423607A US 8410228 B2 US8410228 B2 US 8410228B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
emulsion
reductant
reactor
added
process according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US12/374,236
Other versions
US20090306288A1 (en
Inventor
David Charles Adams
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Celanese International Corp
Original Assignee
Celanese International Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Celanese International Corp filed Critical Celanese International Corp
Priority to US12/374,236 priority Critical patent/US8410228B2/en
Assigned to CROWN BRANDS LIMITED reassignment CROWN BRANDS LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ADAMS, DAVID CHARLES
Publication of US20090306288A1 publication Critical patent/US20090306288A1/en
Assigned to CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION reassignment CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CROWN BRANDS LIMITED
Assigned to CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION reassignment CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION CHANGE OF ADDRESS Assignors: CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8410228B2 publication Critical patent/US8410228B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2/00—Processes of polymerisation
    • C08F2/12—Polymerisation in non-solvents
    • C08F2/16—Aqueous medium
    • C08F2/22—Emulsion polymerisation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F4/00—Polymerisation catalysts
    • C08F4/40—Redox systems

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an emulsion polymerisation process in a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops with one or more inlets for raw material, one or more outlets, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop.
  • the polymerisation reaction is initiated by radicals to give a dispersion of high-molecular weight polymer particles suspended in a medium in which the polymer is insoluble, usually water.
  • the obtained emulsion polymers are particularly useful as binders in emulsion paints, such as wall paints, or dispersion adhesives.
  • Several types of initiators are used to initiate radical formation. Typical initiators are so-called redox initiators, comprising a reductant and an oxidant.
  • EP 0 417 893 A1 discloses an emulsion polymerisation process in a loop reactor. Water, monomers, and stabilisers are continuously fed to the loop and circulated and emulsion polymer is continuously drawn off.
  • the monomers may be added neat or in a pre-emulsion.
  • An oxidant is added to the flow containing monomer.
  • a reductant is carried by a separate aqueous flow and fed into the reactor at a different point.
  • grit formation is the formation of unwanted lumps of polymer during the manufacturing stage. These lumps most often are present as tiny beads of polymer of about 0.5 to 2 mm in diameter and must be filtered out of the product. High grit contents, e.g. above 0.4%, cause manufacturing difficulties because they slow the filter time and generate waste for disposal. Grit formation can be reduced by using high amounts of stabiliser. However, a high stabiliser content has the disadvantage of additional cost and most often is detrimental to application properties. Therefore, there is the general desire to use the lowest level of stabiliser consistent with achieving manufacturing and processing stability, acceptable levels of grit formation and application properties.
  • the object of the invention is to balance reduced grit formation with acceptably low stabiliser contents.
  • the object of the invention is achieved by an emulsion polymerisation process using a redox initiator comprising a reductant and an oxidant, wherein monomers are mixed into a carrier liquid to make a pre-emulsion, which is then supplied via a first feed line to a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops, an outlet, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop, characterised in that the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion separately from the oxidant and the oxidant is metered into the reactor charge via a second feed line.
  • the monomer pre-emulsions will generally have a monomer content of at least 10% by weight of the pre-emulsion, e.g. above 15 wt. % or above 20 wt. %
  • the oxidant can for example be added downstream or upstream of the inlet of the pre-emulsion, optionally pre-mixed with the aqueous carrier.
  • the reductant is added to the monomer pre-emulsion as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilisers.
  • the reductant can be dissolved in a small amount of water and fed into to the pre-emulsion feed line close to the point where it enters the loop reactor.
  • the risk of premature polymerisation can be further reduced by preparing the monomer pre-emulsion at ambient temperatures.
  • commercially available monomers generally comprise traces of inhibitors, such as hydroquinone or 4-methoxyphenol. Inhibitor in the monomers is consumed before polymerisation will commence.
  • the pre-emulsion is made on-line, i.e. continuously and at the same rate as the feeding rate of monomer pre-emulsion into the reactor charge.
  • Some typical monomers suitable for use in the present polymerisation process include, e.g., ethylene, propylene, butylenes, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylate, methacrylate; alkyl acrylates, such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate; alkyl methacrylates, such as methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, and butyl methacrylate; styrene, vinyl formate, vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher homologues of vinyl esters, vinyl chloride, and diallyl phthalate.
  • alkyl acrylates such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate
  • alkyl methacrylates such as methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, and butyl
  • oxidants are the salts of peroxodisulphuric acid, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, di-tert-amyl peroxide, tert-butyl peroxybenzoate, t-amyl hydroperoxide, and hydrogen peroxide itself.
  • Suitable reductants are sodium sulphite, sodium metabisulphite, sodium formaldehyde sulphoxylate, ascorbic acid, and sodium dithionite.
  • Transition metal salts e.g. ferrous sulphate, can be used advantageously in trace quantities.
  • the monomer pre-emulsion can also comprise stabilisers.
  • Suitable stabilisers are anionic and non-ionic surfactants, polymerisable stabilisers and surfactants, hydroxyethyl and hydroxymethyl cellulose and derivatives thereof, polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl pyrolidones, and surface-active water-soluble polyurethanes.
  • Agitation in the reactor can be provided by virtue of an in-line circulation pump.
  • the temperature can be stabilised by cooling means, usually by controlled circulation of a cooling fluid (e.g. water) through a cooling jacket.
  • a cooling fluid e.g. water
  • Discharged emulsion polymer flows to the cooling tank, where residual monomer converts to polymer.
  • the emulsion polymer is filtered to remove any oversize particles or gritty material in the strainer and transferred to the product storage tank.
  • the polymerisation process may be carried out under pressure, for instance under a pressure of 10 to 150 bar.
  • the polymerisation may be carried out at ambient pressure.
  • An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide metered directly into the loop.
  • the water phase contained a mixture of two partially hydrolysed polyvinyl alcohols totalling 2.0% on product, 0.2% of an anionic surfactant, pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, and water.
  • the formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 47%.
  • the reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 80° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 162 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 105, mean residence time 8 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.7 m/s, mean shear rate 350 reciprocal seconds.
  • the product made in this manner was found to be 47.7% in solids content and had a grit content of 2.3 g per kilogram of product.
  • a formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 1A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion comprising the monomers, stabilisers, pH modifier, and sodium metabisulphite was made. The pre-emulsion was fed into the reactor charge. A second feed consisted only of tert-butyl hydro-peroxide and 19% of the available water. The resultant reaction gave a solids content of 47.2% and a grit content of 0.07 g per kilogram of product.
  • An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide metered directly into the loop.
  • the water phase contained 0.3% of an allyl modified hydroxyethyl cellulose, 1.5% of an anionic surfactant, and 0.2% of a polymerisable stabiliser.
  • a pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, and water were present.
  • the formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 55%.
  • the reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 60° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 175 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 76, mean residence time 7.4 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.56 m/s, mean shear rate 275 reciprocal seconds.
  • the product made in this manner was found to be 54.5% in solids content and had a grit content of 13.4 g per kilogram of product.
  • a formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 2A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion comprising the monomers, stabilisers, pH modifier, and sodium metabisulphite was prepared.
  • the second feed consisted only of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, the polymerisable stabiliser, and 36% of the available water.
  • the resultant reaction gave a solids content of 55.3% and a grit content of 0.5 g per kilogram of product.
  • An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide and t-butyl peroxy-benzoate metered directly into the loop.
  • the water phase contained 0.5% of a hydroxyethyl cellulose, 1.0% of a non-ionic surfactant, 0.5% of an anionic surfactant.
  • a pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, sodium formaldehyde sulphoxylate, and water were present.
  • the formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 55%.
  • the reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 60° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 117 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 114, mean residence time 9.0 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.56 m/s, mean shear rate 275 reciprocal seconds.
  • the product made in this manner was found to be 56.3% in solids content and had a grit content of 0.6 g per kilogram of product.
  • a formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 3A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion was prepared comprising all the stabilisers except 0.1% anionic surfactant, pH modifier, and oxidants.
  • the second feed consisted of the reductants and 0.1% anionic surfactant and 25% of the available water.
  • the resultant reaction gave a solids content of 54.6% and a grit content of 1.9 g per kilogram of product
  • a formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 3B was prepared, except that the pre-emulsion was prepared comprising the monomers and stabilisers except 0.1% anionic surfactant, pH modifier, and reductants.
  • the second feed consisted of the oxidants, 0.1% anionic surfactant, and 25% of the available water.
  • the resultant reaction gave a solids content of 53.1 % and a grit content of 0.3 g per kilogram of product.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)

Abstract

An emulsion polymerization process using a redox initiator comprising a reductant and an oxidant, wherein monomers are mixed into a carrier liquid, e.g. water, to make a pre-emulsion, which is then supplied to a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops, an outlet, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop, characterized in that the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before it is mixed into the reactor charge and the oxidant is mixed into the reactor charge, e.g., via the water-phase feed.

Description

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPPICATION(S)
This application is the U.S. National Phase of PCT/EP2007/057294 filed on Jun. 7,2007 and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/837,292 filed on Aug. 14, 2006.
The present invention relates to an emulsion polymerisation process in a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops with one or more inlets for raw material, one or more outlets, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop. The polymerisation reaction is initiated by radicals to give a dispersion of high-molecular weight polymer particles suspended in a medium in which the polymer is insoluble, usually water. The obtained emulsion polymers are particularly useful as binders in emulsion paints, such as wall paints, or dispersion adhesives. Several types of initiators are used to initiate radical formation. Typical initiators are so-called redox initiators, comprising a reductant and an oxidant.
EP 0 417 893 A1 discloses an emulsion polymerisation process in a loop reactor. Water, monomers, and stabilisers are continuously fed to the loop and circulated and emulsion polymer is continuously drawn off. The monomers may be added neat or in a pre-emulsion. An oxidant is added to the flow containing monomer. In order to prevent premature polymerisation, a reductant is carried by a separate aqueous flow and fed into the reactor at a different point.
An undesirable feature encountered in these prior art polymerisation processes is grit formation, which is the formation of unwanted lumps of polymer during the manufacturing stage. These lumps most often are present as tiny beads of polymer of about 0.5 to 2 mm in diameter and must be filtered out of the product. High grit contents, e.g. above 0.4%, cause manufacturing difficulties because they slow the filter time and generate waste for disposal. Grit formation can be reduced by using high amounts of stabiliser. However, a high stabiliser content has the disadvantage of additional cost and most often is detrimental to application properties. Therefore, there is the general desire to use the lowest level of stabiliser consistent with achieving manufacturing and processing stability, acceptable levels of grit formation and application properties.
The object of the invention is to balance reduced grit formation with acceptably low stabiliser contents.
The object of the invention is achieved by an emulsion polymerisation process using a redox initiator comprising a reductant and an oxidant, wherein monomers are mixed into a carrier liquid to make a pre-emulsion, which is then supplied via a first feed line to a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops, an outlet, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop, characterised in that the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion separately from the oxidant and the oxidant is metered into the reactor charge via a second feed line.
Surprisingly, it was found that adding the reductant to the pre-emulsion instead of the oxidant resulted in much lower grit formation. Although premature polymerisation could have been expected, it did not take place.
The monomer pre-emulsions will generally have a monomer content of at least 10% by weight of the pre-emulsion, e.g. above 15 wt. % or above 20 wt. %
The oxidant can for example be added downstream or upstream of the inlet of the pre-emulsion, optionally pre-mixed with the aqueous carrier.
Optionally, the reductant is added to the monomer pre-emulsion as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilisers. The reductant can be dissolved in a small amount of water and fed into to the pre-emulsion feed line close to the point where it enters the loop reactor.
The risk of premature polymerisation can be further reduced by preparing the monomer pre-emulsion at ambient temperatures. Moreover, commercially available monomers generally comprise traces of inhibitors, such as hydroquinone or 4-methoxyphenol. Inhibitor in the monomers is consumed before polymerisation will commence.
Preferably, the pre-emulsion is made on-line, i.e. continuously and at the same rate as the feeding rate of monomer pre-emulsion into the reactor charge.
Some typical monomers suitable for use in the present polymerisation process include, e.g., ethylene, propylene, butylenes, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylate, methacrylate; alkyl acrylates, such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate; alkyl methacrylates, such as methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, and butyl methacrylate; styrene, vinyl formate, vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher homologues of vinyl esters, vinyl chloride, and diallyl phthalate.
Commonly used oxidants are the salts of peroxodisulphuric acid, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, di-tert-amyl peroxide, tert-butyl peroxybenzoate, t-amyl hydroperoxide, and hydrogen peroxide itself. Suitable reductants are sodium sulphite, sodium metabisulphite, sodium formaldehyde sulphoxylate, ascorbic acid, and sodium dithionite. Transition metal salts, e.g. ferrous sulphate, can be used advantageously in trace quantities.
The monomer pre-emulsion can also comprise stabilisers. Suitable stabilisers are anionic and non-ionic surfactants, polymerisable stabilisers and surfactants, hydroxyethyl and hydroxymethyl cellulose and derivatives thereof, polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl pyrolidones, and surface-active water-soluble polyurethanes.
Agitation in the reactor can be provided by virtue of an in-line circulation pump. During the polymerisation reaction heat is generated. The temperature can be stabilised by cooling means, usually by controlled circulation of a cooling fluid (e.g. water) through a cooling jacket. Discharged emulsion polymer flows to the cooling tank, where residual monomer converts to polymer. After cooling, the emulsion polymer is filtered to remove any oversize particles or gritty material in the strainer and transferred to the product storage tank.
Optionally, the polymerisation process may be carried out under pressure, for instance under a pressure of 10 to 150 bar. Alternatively, the polymerisation may be carried out at ambient pressure.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples. In the examples, amounts are given in percentages by weight of the complete formulation, unless indicated otherwise. Grit formation was evaluated by the following test method: emulsion polymer is poured onto a stainless steel sieve having a mesh size of 150 microns. By action of gravity the product slowly drains through the sieve but retains particulate matter generally larger than the sieve aperture size. The final trace of product is washed through with cold water and the retained particulates are washed with cold water, thereby concentrating the particulate matter. Excess water is removed from the grit before it is weighed. The weight of the grit is then expressed as g per kilo of emulsion filtered.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1A
An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide metered directly into the loop. The water phase contained a mixture of two partially hydrolysed polyvinyl alcohols totalling 2.0% on product, 0.2% of an anionic surfactant, pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, and water.
The formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 47%. The reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 80° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 162 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 105, mean residence time 8 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.7 m/s, mean shear rate 350 reciprocal seconds.
The product made in this manner was found to be 47.7% in solids content and had a grit content of 2.3 g per kilogram of product.
EXAMPLE 1B
A formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 1A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion comprising the monomers, stabilisers, pH modifier, and sodium metabisulphite was made. The pre-emulsion was fed into the reactor charge. A second feed consisted only of tert-butyl hydro-peroxide and 19% of the available water. The resultant reaction gave a solids content of 47.2% and a grit content of 0.07 g per kilogram of product.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2A
An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide metered directly into the loop. The water phase contained 0.3% of an allyl modified hydroxyethyl cellulose, 1.5% of an anionic surfactant, and 0.2% of a polymerisable stabiliser. In addition, a pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, and water were present.
The formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 55%. The reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 60° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 175 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 76, mean residence time 7.4 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.56 m/s, mean shear rate 275 reciprocal seconds.
The product made in this manner was found to be 54.5% in solids content and had a grit content of 13.4 g per kilogram of product.
EXAMPLE 2B
A formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 2A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion comprising the monomers, stabilisers, pH modifier, and sodium metabisulphite was prepared. The second feed consisted only of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, the polymerisable stabiliser, and 36% of the available water. The resultant reaction gave a solids content of 55.3% and a grit content of 0.5 g per kilogram of product.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3A
An emulsion polymer was made using the conventional format for monomer delivery, i.e. neat monomer containing t-butyl hydroperoxide and t-butyl peroxy-benzoate metered directly into the loop. The water phase contained 0.5% of a hydroxyethyl cellulose, 1.0% of a non-ionic surfactant, 0.5% of an anionic surfactant. In addition, a pH modifier, sodium metabisulphite, sodium formaldehyde sulphoxylate, and water were present.
The formulation was set to a nominal solids content of 55%. The reaction conditions were as follows, temperature 60° C., pressure 2 bar, production rate 117 ml/minute, recycle to feed ratio 114, mean residence time 9.0 minutes, mean flow path velocity 0.56 m/s, mean shear rate 275 reciprocal seconds. The product made in this manner was found to be 56.3% in solids content and had a grit content of 0.6 g per kilogram of product.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3B
A formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 3A was prepared, except that first a pre-emulsion was prepared comprising all the stabilisers except 0.1% anionic surfactant, pH modifier, and oxidants. The second feed consisted of the reductants and 0.1% anionic surfactant and 25% of the available water. The resultant reaction gave a solids content of 54.6% and a grit content of 1.9 g per kilogram of product
EXAMPLE 3C
A formulation identical to the formulation used in Comparative Example 3B was prepared, except that the pre-emulsion was prepared comprising the monomers and stabilisers except 0.1% anionic surfactant, pH modifier, and reductants. The second feed consisted of the oxidants, 0.1% anionic surfactant, and 25% of the available water. The resultant reaction gave a solids content of 53.1 % and a grit content of 0.3 g per kilogram of product.

Claims (16)

The invention claimed is:
1. An emulsion polymerization process using a redox initiator comprising a reductant and an oxidant, the process comprising:
mixing monomers into a carrier liquid to make a pre-emulsion having a monomer content of at least 10% by weight of the pre-emulsion;
supplying the pre-emulsion via a first feed line to a reactor comprising one or more circulation loops, an outlet, and a circulation pump for circulating a reactor charge within the circulation loop;
adding the reductant to the pre-emulsion instead of the oxidant via the first feed line to the reactor; and
separately metering the oxidant into the reactor charge via a second feed line entering the circulation loop.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the pre-emulsion has a monomer content of at least 15% by total weight of the pre-emulsion.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the oxidant is added downstream of said first feed line.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the reductant is added as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilizers.
5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
6. The process according to claim 2, wherein the oxidant is added downstream of said first feed line.
7. The process according to claim 2, wherein the reductant is added as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilizers.
8. The process according to claim 3, wherein the reductant is added as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilizers.
9. The process according to claim 6, wherein the reductant is added as an aqueous solution comprising one or more stabilizers.
10. The process according to claim 2, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
11. The process according to claim 3, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
12. The process according to claim 4, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
13. The process according to claim 6, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
14. The process according to claim 7, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
15. The process according to claim 8, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
16. The process according to claim 9, wherein the reductant is added to the pre-emulsion before the pre-emulsion enters the reactor.
US12/374,236 2006-07-18 2007-07-16 Emulsion polymerisation process Expired - Fee Related US8410228B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/374,236 US8410228B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2007-07-16 Emulsion polymerisation process

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP0611733.0 2006-07-18
EP06117433 2006-07-18
EP06117433 2006-07-18
US83729206P 2006-08-14 2006-08-14
PCT/EP2007/057294 WO2008009649A1 (en) 2006-07-18 2007-07-16 Emulsion polymerisation process
US12/374,236 US8410228B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2007-07-16 Emulsion polymerisation process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090306288A1 US20090306288A1 (en) 2009-12-10
US8410228B2 true US8410228B2 (en) 2013-04-02

Family

ID=38556381

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/374,236 Expired - Fee Related US8410228B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2007-07-16 Emulsion polymerisation process

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US8410228B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2125903B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008009649A1 (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2555874A1 (en) * 1974-12-12 1976-06-16 Boc International Ltd Aq dispersions of acrylic polymers prepn - by step-wise emulsion polymn using pre-emulsion of surfactant and monomers
EP0417893A1 (en) 1989-08-08 1991-03-20 Crown Berger Limited Polymerisation processes and reactors
US5969065A (en) * 1995-12-07 1999-10-19 Clariant Gmbh Redox catalyst system for the initiation of emulsion polymerization
WO2001034293A1 (en) 1999-11-11 2001-05-17 Akzo Nobel N.V. Emulsion polymerization process and reactor for such a process
US20010022951A1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2001-09-20 Adams David Charles Closed loop continuous polymerisation reactor and polymerisation process
US20080221282A1 (en) * 2005-09-07 2008-09-11 Basf Se Polymerization Process
US7858715B2 (en) * 2005-09-12 2010-12-28 Crown Brands Limited Loop reactor for emulsion polymerisation
US7897115B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-03-01 Crown Brands Limited Loop reactor for emulsion polymerisation

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB730071A (en) 1953-02-27 1955-05-18 Greenwood & Co Todmorden Ltd Improvements in tongues of the shuttles of weaving looms
GB1259459A (en) 1968-07-30 1972-01-05
GB1257940A (en) 1969-07-18 1971-12-22
NL7018307A (en) 1970-12-16 1972-06-20

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2555874A1 (en) * 1974-12-12 1976-06-16 Boc International Ltd Aq dispersions of acrylic polymers prepn - by step-wise emulsion polymn using pre-emulsion of surfactant and monomers
EP0417893A1 (en) 1989-08-08 1991-03-20 Crown Berger Limited Polymerisation processes and reactors
US5969065A (en) * 1995-12-07 1999-10-19 Clariant Gmbh Redox catalyst system for the initiation of emulsion polymerization
US20010022951A1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2001-09-20 Adams David Charles Closed loop continuous polymerisation reactor and polymerisation process
US7261863B2 (en) * 1998-08-07 2007-08-28 Akzo Nobel Nv Closed loop continuous polymerization reactor and polymerization process
WO2001034293A1 (en) 1999-11-11 2001-05-17 Akzo Nobel N.V. Emulsion polymerization process and reactor for such a process
US6569961B1 (en) * 1999-11-11 2003-05-27 Akzo Nobel Nv Emulsion polymerization process and reactor for such a process
US7897115B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-03-01 Crown Brands Limited Loop reactor for emulsion polymerisation
US20080221282A1 (en) * 2005-09-07 2008-09-11 Basf Se Polymerization Process
US7858715B2 (en) * 2005-09-12 2010-12-28 Crown Brands Limited Loop reactor for emulsion polymerisation

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Lauryl mercaptan" data sheet. Obtained from chemicaland21.com. No Author, No date. *
English machine translation of DE 2555874 to Dargan. Translation obtained from EPO website on Mar. 17, 2011. *
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2007/057294, dated Oct. 24, 2008.
International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2007/057294, dated Oct. 18, 2007.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090306288A1 (en) 2009-12-10
EP2125903A1 (en) 2009-12-02
EP2125903B1 (en) 2014-01-15
WO2008009649A1 (en) 2008-01-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
ITMI952024A1 (en) LOW VOC EMULSION
JP2010535891A (en) Styrenated phenol ethoxylates in emulsion polymerization.
JPH0597907A (en) Production of finely particulate water-soluble polymer
KR100345911B1 (en) Method of Making Acrylic Polymers
US6569961B1 (en) Emulsion polymerization process and reactor for such a process
JP2008539291A (en) Production of polymer in a conical reactor
EP1772470A1 (en) Method for producing carboxyl group-containing water-soluble polymer
US20030055150A1 (en) Latex with high non-volatile matter content, low viscosity and having a bimodal distribution
US8410228B2 (en) Emulsion polymerisation process
EP1266909B1 (en) Semi-continous bimodal emulsion polymerization
CN103443130B (en) Emulsion polymerisation process
EP0727442B1 (en) Process for synthesizing latex polymers from solid monomer particles
EP1924352B1 (en) Loop reactor for emulsion polymerisation
NO832673L (en) PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING A Aqueous POLYMER DISPERSION.
US20160032023A1 (en) Continuous emulsion polymerization process and initiation system
DE10253043A1 (en) Process for the recovery of residual ethylene in the production of vinyl ester-ethylene copolymers
JPH09188706A (en) Method for polymerizing acrylic monomers in aqueous suspension
JPH031321B2 (en)
CA2814789A1 (en) Anionic dispersion polymerization process
JP4592161B2 (en) Production method of vinyl acetate polymer
CN121843972A (en) Sulfated ethoxylated C8-11Use of branched alkanols in emulsion polymerization and process for preparing polymer latices
JPS5847010A (en) Continuous copolymerization of ethylene with vinyl acetate
JPH05262807A (en) Suspension polymerization method of vinyl chloride monomer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CROWN BRANDS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ADAMS, DAVID CHARLES;REEL/FRAME:023087/0020

Effective date: 20090417

AS Assignment

Owner name: CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CROWN BRANDS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:025886/0478

Effective date: 20110203

AS Assignment

Owner name: CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, TEXAS

Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:027212/0550

Effective date: 20110203

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20210402