US8150762B1 - System and method for providing credit - Google Patents
System and method for providing credit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8150762B1 US8150762B1 US11/322,137 US32213705A US8150762B1 US 8150762 B1 US8150762 B1 US 8150762B1 US 32213705 A US32213705 A US 32213705A US 8150762 B1 US8150762 B1 US 8150762B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- credit
- general use
- computer
- provider
- member
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 239000000047 products Substances 0 claims description 41
- 239000002609 media Substances 0 claims description 26
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0 claims description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0 description 16
- 239000000463 materials Substances 0 description 10
- 238000000034 methods Methods 0 description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0 description 5
- 238000004883 computer application Methods 0 description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0 description 3
- 230000000875 corresponding Effects 0 description 2
- 230000001747 exhibited Effects 0 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substances Substances 0 description 1
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0 description 1
- 238000006011 modification Methods 0 description 1
- 238000007639 printing Methods 0 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation, credit approval, mortgages, home banking or on-line banking
- G06Q40/025—Credit processing or loan processing, e.g. risk analysis for mortgages
Abstract
Description
This application is related to 1) U.S. application Ser. No. 11/321,859 filed on Dec. 29, 2005, and 2) U.S. application Ser. No. 11/322,136 filed Dec. 29, 2005, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure pertain to a system and method for providing credit.
The provision of a credit account to a applicant is well-known and readily appreciated by those of skill in the art. Typically, an applicant will request a credit account from a credit provider using an application. These credit applications do not result in an immediately usable general use credit account, rather, there is either a period of time which must pass for a general use credit account to issue and be activated, or else the credit account will not be general use but will rather have restrictions on its use. The period of time between the request and the issuance of a general use credit account raises a number of issues.
Due to the period of time between the request for and the issuance of the general use credit account, the applicant is not provided the convenience of immediate use of the credit account. Furthermore, the period of time between the request for and the issuance of the general use credit account foregoes the opportunity to immediately cross-sell goods and services to the applicant using the general use credit account.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide such a system and method for providing credit.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to systems and methods for providing credit. The systems and methods provide techniques for receiving a credit request from an applicant, determining immediately whether or not credit will be provided to the applicant and, if so, providing an immediately usable general use credit account to the applicant.
Referring now to
Each of the provider 110 and the applicants 115, 120, and 125 includes a respective network interface for communicating with the network 105 (e.g., outputting information to, and receiving information from, the network 105), such as by transferring information (e.g., instructions, data, signals) between such applicants and the network 105. Accordingly, through the network 105, the provider 110 communicates with the applicants 115, 120, and 125, and the applicants 115, 120, and 125 communicate with the provider 110.
For clarity,
Each of the provider 110 and the applicants 115, 120, and 125 includes a respective information handling system (IHS), a subsystem, or a part of a subsystem for executing processes and performing operations (e.g., processing or communicating information) in response thereto, as discussed further below. Each such IHS is formed by various electronic circuitry components. Moreover, as illustrated in
An IHS is an electronic device capable of processing, executing or otherwise handling information. Examples of an IHS include a server computer, a personal computer (e.g., a desktop computer or a portable computer such as, for example, a laptop computer), or a handheld computer. Examples of an IHS also include a router, a switch and other devices coupled to a network (e.g. the network 105).
Referring now to
For example, the IHS 130 includes (a) a network interface (e.g., circuitry) for communicating between the processor 130 a and the network 105 and (b) a memory device (e.g., random access memory (RAM) device or read only memory (ROM) device for storing information (e.g., instructions executed by processor 130 a and data operated upon by processor 130 a in response to such instructions)). Accordingly the processor 130 a is operably coupled to the network 105, the input devices 130 b, the display device 130 c, the print device 130 d, and the computer-readable medium 130 e, as illustrated in
For example, in response to signals from the processor 130 a, the display device 130 c displays visual images. Information may be input to the processor 130 a from the input devices 130 b, and the processor 130 a may receive such information from the input devices 130 b. Also, in response to signals from the processor 130 a, the print device 130 d prints visual images on paper.
The input devices include a variety of input devices known in the art such as, for example, a conventional electronic keyboard and a pointing device such as, for example, a conventional electronic “mouse”, rollerball, or light pen. The keyboard may be operated to input alphanumeric text information to the processor 130 a, and the processor 130 a may receive such alphanumeric text information from the keyboard. The pointing device may be operated to input cursor-control information to the processor 130 a, and the processor 130 a may receive such cursor control information from the pointing device.
The computer-readable medium 130 e and the processor 130 a are structurally and functionally interrelated with one another as described below in further detail. Each IHS of the illustrative embodiment is structurally and functionally interrelated with a respective computer-readable medium, similar to the manner in which the processor 130 a is structurally and functionally interrelated with the computer-readable medium 130 e. In that regard, the computer-readable medium 130 e is a representative one of such computer-readable media including, for example, but not limited to, a hard disk drive.
The computer-readable medium 130 e stores (e.g., encodes, records, or embodies) functional descriptive material (e.g., including but not limited to software (also referred to as computer programs or applications) or data structures). Such functional descriptive material imparts functionality when encoded on the computer-readable medium 130 e. Also, such functional descriptive material is structurally and functionally interrelated to the computer-readable medium 130 e.
With such functional descriptive material, data structures define structural and functional interrelationships between such data structures and the computer-readable medium 130 e (and other aspects of the system 100). Such interrelationships permit the data structures' functionality to be realized. Also, within such functional descriptive material, computer programs define structural and functional interrelationships between such computer programs and the computer-readable medium 130 e (and other aspects of the system 100). Such interrelationships permit the computer programs' functionality to be realized.
For example, the processor 130 a reads (e.g., accesses or copies) such functional descriptive material from the computer-readable medium 130 e onto the memory device of the IHS 130, and the IHS 130 (more particularly, the processor 130 a) performs its operations (as described elsewhere herein) in response to such material which is stored in the memory device of the IHS 130. More particularly, the processor 130 a performs the operation of processing a computer application (that is stored, encoded, recorded, or embodied on a computer-readable medium) for causing the processor 130 a to perform additional operations (as described elsewhere herein). Accordingly, such functional descriptive material exhibits a functional interrelationship with the way in which processor 130 a executes its processes and performs its operations.
Further, the computer-readable medium 130 e is an apparatus from which the computer application is accessible by the processor 130 a, and the computer application is processable by the processor 130 a for causing the processor 130 a to perform such additional operations. In addition to reading such functional descriptive material from the computer-readable medium 130 e, the processor 130 a is capable of reading such functional descriptive material from (or through) the network 105 which is also a computer-readable medium (or apparatus). Moreover, the memory device of the IHS 130 is itself a computer-readable medium (or apparatus).
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The method 200 then proceeds to step 204 where applicant information such as, for example, the applicant information 110 ca, 110 cb, 110 cc, 110 cd, and 110 ce, described above with respect to
Referring now to
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 a where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of applicant eligibility rules. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 must be 18 years of age in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 must have a primary address in a non-restricted country in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 must have a social security number in the applicant database 110 c in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 must have a date of birth in the applicant database 110 c in order for the credit request application to not be denied.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 b where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of credit worthiness rules. In an embodiment, the credit worthiness rules vary depending on the category the applicant 115 falls under such as, for example, a pre-commission program, a college program, and/or a provider pre-approval program. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 may not fall under any of the categories listed above. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a pre-commission program, the applicants 115 card mailing address and statement mailing address must not be in a restricted country, the applicant 115 must not have caused the provider 110 a prior loss, the applicants 115 credit score must be 600 or greater, the applicant 115 must be a United States citizen, and the applicant 115 must not have payment past due delinquencies, bankruptcy or wage earner plans, foreclosure, repossession, collection, or judgments in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a college program, the applicants 115 card mailing address and statement mailing address must not be in a restricted country, the applicant 115 must not have caused the provider 110 a prior loss, the applicants 115 credit score must be 600 or greater, the applicant 115 must be a United States citizen, and the applicant 115 must not have payment past due delinquencies, bankruptcy or wage earner plans, foreclosure, repossession, collection, or judgments in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a provider pre-approval program, the applicants 115 card mailing address and statement mailing address must not be in a restricted country, the applicant 115 must not have caused the provider 110 a prior loss, the applicants 115 credit score must be 580 or greater, the applicant 115 must be a United States citizen, and the applicant 115 must not have payment past due delinquencies, bankruptcy or wage earner plans, foreclosure, repossession, collection, or judgments in order for the credit request application to not be denied. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 does not fall under any of the categories, the applicants 115 card mailing address and statement mailing address must not be in a restricted country, the applicant 115 must not have caused the provider 110 a prior loss, the applicant 115 must either be Bank P&C and their credit score must be 630 or greater or non-Bank P&C and their credit score must be 660 or greater, the applicant must not be a student, unemployed, or employed, self employed, or in the military for less than 1 year, the applicant 115 must be a United States citizen, and the applicant 115 must not have payment past due delinquencies, bankruptcy or wage earner plans, foreclosure, repossession, collection, or judgments in order for the credit request application to not be denied.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 c where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of repayment capacity rules. In an embodiment, the repayment capacity rules vary depending on the category the applicant 115 falls under such as, for example, a pre-commission program, a college program, and/or a provider pre-approval program. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 may not fall under any of the categories listed above. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 falls under a pre-commission program, a college program, and/or a provider pre-approval program, the credit request application is not denied. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 does not fall under any of the categories, the credit request application is denied if the applicants 115 debt to income ratio is greater than 55%.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 d where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of fraud rules. In an embodiment, if the card mailing or primary address zip code is high risk, the credit application request is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the card mailing address or primary address is foreign, the credit application request is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the primary address effective date is less than 30 days prior to or less than 10 days after the receiving of the credit request application by the provider 110, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the card mailing address is different than the primary address, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if a provider service representative, underwriter, or fraud analyst suspect the applicant 115 is falsely identifying themselves, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 credit report has a fraud alert, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 credit report has an identity theft tag, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 credit report social security number does not match the applicants 115 social security number provided in the credit request application, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 credit report has a Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act alert, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, the FACT Act alert is a consumer placed fraud alert on the consumer credit report. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 credit report has a deceased alert, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicants 115 home phone number, work phone number, other phone number, primary address, or card mailing address is in an internal fraud database, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if applicant 115 has not been a member of the providers 110 membership organization for at least 90 days before the credit request application, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is not Bank Property and Casualty eligible, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, Bank Property and Casualty eligibility is only provided to members of the providers 110 membership organization and ensures the provider 110 that the applicant 115 is not a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if any of the applicants 115 existing credit card accounts are coded as lost, frozen, or authorization prohibited, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 e where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of credit line assignment rules. In an embodiment, the credit line assignment rules vary depending on the category the applicant 115 falls under such as, for example, a pre-commission program, a college program, and/or a provider pre-approval program. In an embodiment, the applicant 115 may not fall under any of the categories listed above.
In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a pre-commission program and in a military academy, the qualified amount varies depending on the applicants 115 classification such as, for example: $500 for 1st class, $1000 for 2nd class, $1500 for 3st class, $2000 for 4th class, and $2500 for an officer. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a pre-commission program and in an Officers Candidate School/Officers Training School (OCS/OTS) program, the qualified amount is $2000. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a pre-commission program and in an Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) program, the qualified amount varies depending on the applicants 115 classification such as, for example: $500 for freshman, $1000 for sophomore, $1500 for junior, $2000 for senior, and $2500 for an officer.
In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is in a college program, the qualified amount varies depending on the applicants 115 classification such as, for example: $500 for freshman, $750 for sophomore, $1000 for junior, and $1500 for senior. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is pre-approved with a credit score greater than 580, the qualified amount is $500. In an embodiment, if the applicant is not pre-approved and has a credit score greater than 630, the qualified amount is $500.
In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 790 and 850, the maximum credit amount is $25000. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 760 and 789, the maximum credit amount is $25000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $20000 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 720 and 759, the maximum credit amount is $25000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $15000 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 680 and 719, the maximum credit amount is $25000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $10000 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 660 and 679, the maximum credit amount is $25000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $5000 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 630 and 659, the maximum credit amount is $25000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $2000 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score between 580 and 629, the maximum credit amount is $1000 if the applicant is pre-approved and $500 if the applicant is not pre-approved. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has a credit score under 580, the maximum credit amount is $500.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 f where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of review rules. In an embodiment, if the applicants 115 primary address in the credit request application and the address in the credit report does not match when one of the addresses is in California, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 is potentially Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) positive, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has another submitted credit request application, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the applicant 115 has been a member of the providers 110 membership organization and has had their member number rescinded, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk. In an embodiment, if the credit request application is missing a social security number, a first name, a last name, a date of birth, and/or a primary address, the credit request application is marked a fraud risk.
In an embodiment, even if the credit request application is approved for a certain amount, the credit application request may be sent for review for a number of reasons, such as, for example, if the applicant 115 requests to qualify for an amount which is greater than the approved amount, if the total balance transfers is greater than the approved amount, if the approved amount is greater than 200% of the greatest revolving tradeline, and/or if the applicant 115 has had a credit request application within the past 6 months.
In an embodiment, even if the credit request application is denied, the credit request application may be sent for review for a number of reasons, such as, for example, if the applicant 115 has been a member of the providers 110 membership organization for 20 years or more, if the sum of all the applicants 115 assets with the provider are $25000 or greater, if the applicant is in a pre-commission program, if the applicant 115 has responded to a pre-approval offer from the provider 110, if the applicant 115 has applied for a college program with the provider 110, and/or if the applicant 115 is Bank Property and Casualty eligible and has a credit score greater than or equal to 580. In an embodiment, Bank Property and Casualty eligibility is only provided to members of the providers 110 membership organization and indicates to the provider 110 that the applicant 115 is a relatively lower risk for offering credit than someone whom is not Bank Property and Casualty eligible.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 g where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of pricing rules. In an embodiment, the pricing of the credit account may be determined by a number of things such as, for example, the type of program the applicant 115 is in (e.g. a college program, a pre-commission program, a pre-approval program, or no program.), the applicant's 115 credit score, and/or a type of rewards program that the applicant 115 is in with the provider 110.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 h where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of decision authority rules. In an embodiment, the required approval authority of an underwriter used to approve the credit application request will change depending on the status of the applicant 115, and that required approval authority is determined in step 206 h.
The method 200 then proceeds to step 206 i where the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 are run through the plurality of user approval authorization check rules. In an embodiment, if the approved amount is greater than the requested amount, the credit request application is denied. In an embodiment, if the approved amount is greater than the applicants 115 lending limit, the credit request application is denied. In an embodiment, if the approved amount plus the unsecured aggregate the applicant 115 has with the provider 110 is greater than the applicants 115 lending limit, the credit request application is denied.
The method 200 then proceeds to decision block 208 where it is determined whether the applicants 115 credit request application is flagged for review. During the processing of the credit request application in step 206 of the method 200, the processing of the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 through the series of rules provides a determination of whether the applicant 115 is a risk for fraud and/or needs to be reviewed. If it is determined that the applicant 115 is a risk for fraud and/or needs to be reviewed, the method 200 proceeds to step 210 where the credit request application is referred for review. The applicant 115 is immediately informed that the credit request application has been referred for review and that an immediately useable general use credit account may not be issued. However, a general use credit account may be issued to the applicant 115 at a time following the credit application session. The referral of the credit request application at step 210 of the method 200 results in the end of the credit application session between the provider 110 and the applicant 115 which began at step 202 of the method 200.
If, at decision block 208, it is determined that the credit request application is not a risk for fraud and/or does not need to be reviewed, the method 200 proceeds to decision block 212 where it is determined whether the credit request application is approved. During the processing of the credit request application in step 206 of the method 200, the processing of the information provided by the applicant 115 in the credit request application and any information about the applicant 115 which may have been retrieved from the applicant database 110 c in step 204 of the method 200 through the series of rules provides a determination of whether the credit request application is approved. If it is determined that the credit request application is not approved, the method 200 proceeds to step 214 where the credit request application is denied. The applicant 115 is immediately informed that the credit request application has been denied and that an immediately usable general use credit account may not be issued. The denial of the credit request application at step 214 of the method 200 may result in the end of the credit application session between the provider 110 and the applicant 115 which began at step 202 of the method 200.
If, at decision block 212, it is determined that that the credit request application is approved, the method 200 proceeds to step 216 where the applicant 115 is supplied with a plurality of general use credit account information. In an exemplary embodiment, upon approval of the credit request application, the applicant 115 is supplied with a credit account number, a credit account expiration date, and a credit account security code, such that the applicant 115 is in possession of the necessary information needed to immediately charge purchases, from the provider 110 or any other entity offering products and/or service for purchase on credit, to a general use credit account corresponding to the credit account number, the credit account expiration date, and the credit account security code. The general use credit account is defined as a credit account for which there are no restrictions by the credit provider 110 relating to which entities purchases on the general use credit account may be made from. The approval of the credit request application and the provision of credit account information at step 216 of the method 200 results in the end of the credit application session between the provider 110 and the applicant 115 which began at step 202 of the method 200. Thus, a system and method are provided which allow a request for a general use credit account and the provision of immediately usable credit information within a credit application session, the credit application session defined as a period of continuous contact with the applicant 115 beginning with the credit request at step 202 of the method 200 and ending with one of either issuing the applicant 115 a general use credit account and supplying the applicant with credit information at step 216 of the method 200, or denying the applicant 115 for an immediately useable general use credit account at steps 210 or 214.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The method 400 then proceeds to step 406 where the entity 310 offers the customer 305 a credit purchase option which allows the customer 305 to attempt to acquire a general use credit account with which to purchase the product and/or service. In an embodiment, the entity 310 may offer the customer 305 a plurality of different credit providers such as, for example, the provider 110, with which to acquire a general use credit account, and the customer 305 selects one of the credit providers such as, for example, the provider 110. The method 400 then proceeds to step 408 where the customer 305 is directed to the provider 110 in order to submit a credit request application. The customer 305 may be put in contact with the provider 110 in a variety of ways such as, for example, through the network 105 using, for example, information handling systems such as the information handling system 130, described above with reference to
The method 400 then proceeds to step 410 where the entity 310 retrieves the customer 305 from the provider 110. If the customer 305 received the general use credit account from the provider 110, the method proceeds to step 412 where the customer 305 is sold the product and/or service on the general use credit account. Furthermore, the customer 305 may be cross-sold a cross-sell product and/or a cross-sell service on the general use credit account which are related to the product and/or service purchased on the general use credit account. The method 400 then proceeds to step 414, where the customer 305 is directed to the second entity 315 in order to make purchases on the general use credit account. The customer 305 may be put in contact with the second entity 315 in a variety of ways such as, for example, through the network 105 using, for example, information handling systems such as the information handling system 130, described above with reference to
Referring now to
The method 500 then proceeds to step 506 where the customer 305 redirects to the provider 110. The method 500 then proceeds to step 202 of the method 200, described above with respect to
Although illustrative embodiments have been shown and described, a wide range of modification, change and substitution is contemplated in the foregoing disclosure and in some instances, some features of the embodiments may be employed without a corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the embodiments disclosed herein.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/322,137 US8150762B1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2005-12-29 | System and method for providing credit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/322,137 US8150762B1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2005-12-29 | System and method for providing credit |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US8150762B1 true US8150762B1 (en) | 2012-04-03 |
Family
ID=45877444
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/322,137 Active 2026-11-22 US8150762B1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2005-12-29 | System and method for providing credit |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8150762B1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120215606A1 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2012-08-23 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Non pre-approved channel filtering for card acquisition |
WO2014011688A1 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2014-01-16 | Ebay Inc. | Creditor offers for taking a user debt |
WO2015187446A1 (en) * | 2014-06-02 | 2015-12-10 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for provisioning transaction data to mobile communications devices |
US20160371772A1 (en) * | 2015-06-17 | 2016-12-22 | Cesar Augusto Zuluaga Rueda | Method for Facilitating Personal Loans |
US10373185B1 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2019-08-06 | Square, Inc. | Dynamically financed customer engagement campaign |
Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5231569A (en) * | 1990-06-12 | 1993-07-27 | Sears Payment Systems, Inc. | Account transaction system |
WO1999059084A1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 1999-11-18 | Douglas Lebda | Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the internet |
WO2000005666A1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-02-03 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Apparatus and method for on-line price comparison of competitor's goods and/or services over a computer network |
US6088686A (en) * | 1995-12-12 | 2000-07-11 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method to performing on-line credit reviews and approvals |
US6119103A (en) * | 1997-05-27 | 2000-09-12 | Visa International Service Association | Financial risk prediction systems and methods therefor |
US6226623B1 (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 2001-05-01 | Citibank, N.A. | Global financial services integration system and process |
WO2001063520A1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2001-08-30 | Insun Yun | Method and system for maximizing credit card purchasing power and minimizing interest costs over the internet |
WO2001065398A2 (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2001-09-07 | Junum.Com, Inc. | Financial management and planning system |
US20010042785A1 (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2001-11-22 | Walker Jay S. | Method and apparatus for funds and credit line transfers |
US20010047307A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2001-11-29 | Bennett James D. | Online purchasing system supporting buyer affordability screening |
US20020023051A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2002-02-21 | Kunzle Adrian E. | System and method for recommending financial products to a customer based on customer needs and preferences |
WO2002023431A1 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2002-03-21 | Capital One Financial Corporation | System and method for providing a credit card with multiple credit lines |
US6405181B2 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2002-06-11 | Nextcard, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real time on line credit approval |
US20020156723A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-10-24 | Lilly Joseph D. | System and method for providing extra lines of credit |
US20030212790A1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-13 | Sunil Thambidurai | Network verification systems and methods |
WO2005022348A2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2005-03-10 | Equifax, Inc. | Application processing and decision systems and processes |
US20050145691A1 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2005-07-07 | Dillard Regina F. | Reprove prepaid credit card |
US6999569B2 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2006-02-14 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for using a prepaid card |
US20060036484A1 (en) | 2004-08-13 | 2006-02-16 | Michael Voticky | Method of providing recyclable, immediately-redeemable award points |
-
2005
- 2005-12-29 US US11/322,137 patent/US8150762B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5231569A (en) * | 1990-06-12 | 1993-07-27 | Sears Payment Systems, Inc. | Account transaction system |
US6088686A (en) * | 1995-12-12 | 2000-07-11 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method to performing on-line credit reviews and approvals |
US6226623B1 (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 2001-05-01 | Citibank, N.A. | Global financial services integration system and process |
US6119103A (en) * | 1997-05-27 | 2000-09-12 | Visa International Service Association | Financial risk prediction systems and methods therefor |
US20010042785A1 (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2001-11-22 | Walker Jay S. | Method and apparatus for funds and credit line transfers |
WO1999059084A1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 1999-11-18 | Douglas Lebda | Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the internet |
WO2000005666A1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-02-03 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Apparatus and method for on-line price comparison of competitor's goods and/or services over a computer network |
US6999569B2 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2006-02-14 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for using a prepaid card |
US6405181B2 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2002-06-11 | Nextcard, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real time on line credit approval |
WO2001063520A1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2001-08-30 | Insun Yun | Method and system for maximizing credit card purchasing power and minimizing interest costs over the internet |
WO2001065398A2 (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2001-09-07 | Junum.Com, Inc. | Financial management and planning system |
US20010047307A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2001-11-29 | Bennett James D. | Online purchasing system supporting buyer affordability screening |
US20020023051A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2002-02-21 | Kunzle Adrian E. | System and method for recommending financial products to a customer based on customer needs and preferences |
WO2002023431A1 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2002-03-21 | Capital One Financial Corporation | System and method for providing a credit card with multiple credit lines |
US20020156723A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-10-24 | Lilly Joseph D. | System and method for providing extra lines of credit |
US20030212790A1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-13 | Sunil Thambidurai | Network verification systems and methods |
WO2005022348A2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2005-03-10 | Equifax, Inc. | Application processing and decision systems and processes |
US20050145691A1 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2005-07-07 | Dillard Regina F. | Reprove prepaid credit card |
US20060036484A1 (en) | 2004-08-13 | 2006-02-16 | Michael Voticky | Method of providing recyclable, immediately-redeemable award points |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120215606A1 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2012-08-23 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Non pre-approved channel filtering for card acquisition |
US8571929B2 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2013-10-29 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Non pre-approved channel filtering for card acquisition |
WO2014011688A1 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2014-01-16 | Ebay Inc. | Creditor offers for taking a user debt |
WO2015187446A1 (en) * | 2014-06-02 | 2015-12-10 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for provisioning transaction data to mobile communications devices |
US20160371772A1 (en) * | 2015-06-17 | 2016-12-22 | Cesar Augusto Zuluaga Rueda | Method for Facilitating Personal Loans |
US10373185B1 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2019-08-06 | Square, Inc. | Dynamically financed customer engagement campaign |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Barr | Credit where it counts: The Community Reinvestment Act and its critics | |
Carnegie et al. | Making accounting accountable in the public sector | |
US7379913B2 (en) | Anonymous transaction system | |
US7676408B2 (en) | Risk identification system and methods | |
US7499875B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments | |
AU2003217732B2 (en) | Credit extension process using a prepaid card | |
US7076462B1 (en) | System and method for electronic loan application and for correcting credit report errors | |
US7707103B2 (en) | System and method for rating lenders | |
Greenlee et al. | An investigation of fraud in nonprofit organizations: Occurrences and deterrents | |
Hiller et al. | Privacy strategies for electronic government | |
AU2001256575B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing credit inquiries within account receivables | |
US6807533B1 (en) | Web-based method and system for managing account receivables | |
AU2001252496B9 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing remittance processing within account receivables | |
US7778933B2 (en) | System and method for categorizing transactions | |
Smith | Managing privacy: Information technology and corporate America | |
US7424455B2 (en) | Method and systems for providing merchant services with right-time creation and updating of merchant accounts | |
US7194436B2 (en) | Method and system for internet based financial auto credit application | |
US7556192B2 (en) | Systems and methods for decisioning or approving a financial credit account based on a customer's check-writing behavior | |
US20080235063A1 (en) | Method for determining insurance benefits and premiums from dynamic credit information | |
US20020029194A1 (en) | System and method of managing financial transactions over an electronic network | |
US8660943B1 (en) | Methods and systems for financial transactions | |
US20030009418A1 (en) | Systems and methods for electronically verifying and processing information | |
RU2451337C2 (en) | Card-based rule enforcement in program | |
US20030074311A1 (en) | Self-administered automatic payroll deduction | |
US7546271B1 (en) | Mortgage fraud detection systems and methods |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA), TEX Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REED, DANIEL;REEL/FRAME:017510/0737 Effective date: 20060418 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |