US7006084B1 - Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis - Google Patents

Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7006084B1
US7006084B1 US09/670,192 US67019200A US7006084B1 US 7006084 B1 US7006084 B1 US 7006084B1 US 67019200 A US67019200 A US 67019200A US 7006084 B1 US7006084 B1 US 7006084B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
model
physical object
point
computer
files
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US09/670,192
Inventor
Siegfried Kurt Buss
Frank Farid Qualitsen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Faro Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Faro Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Faro Technologies Inc filed Critical Faro Technologies Inc
Priority to US09/670,192 priority Critical patent/US7006084B1/en
Assigned to FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC. reassignment FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: OUALITSEN, FRANK FARID, BUSS, SIEGFRIED KURT
Priority to GB0118644A priority patent/GB2369907B/en
Priority to CA002354919A priority patent/CA2354919A1/en
Priority to FR0112009A priority patent/FR2814565B1/en
Priority to DE10146834.2A priority patent/DE10146834B4/en
Priority to JP2001290597A priority patent/JP4933008B2/en
Priority to IT2001MI001987A priority patent/ITMI20011987A1/en
Publication of US7006084B1 publication Critical patent/US7006084B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/408Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by data handling or data format, e.g. reading, buffering or conversion of data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T17/00Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/35Nc in input of data, input till input file format
    • G05B2219/351343-D cad-cam
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37Measurements
    • G05B2219/37443Program cmm, coordinate measuring machine, use cad data
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement (CAM2) analysis.
  • CAM2 computer aided manufacturing measurement
  • the instant invention assists in managing large computer-aided design (CAD) files and to the reorganization of the data from those large CAD files into smaller more manageable and quickly accessible files.
  • CAD computer-aided design
  • the instant invention provides for improved CAD model surface selection when comparing manufactured assembly surfaces to the CAD model.
  • CAD computer-aided design
  • CAM computer-aided manufacturing
  • CAM2 Computer-Aided Manufacturing Measurement
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a conventional three dimensional measuring system generally including a coordinate measuring system generally including a coordinate measuring machine (CCM) 10 composed of a manually operated multi-jointed arm 12 and a support base or post 14 , a controller or serial box 16 and a host computer 18 .
  • CCM coordinate measuring machine
  • CAD files demand powerful computers.
  • the CAM2 market is limited by the power of the computers generally found and distributed in an affordable way to that market. It may be common for a company to have one or two powerful and expensive computers in its quality control lab, but unlikely for that same company to have numerous expensive computers distributed throughout a factory. Since the adaptive measurement hardware devices mentioned above typically are standalone stations assigned at different points in the manufacturing process, cost is a primary concern. Hence, the requirement to handle the CAD files becomes a limiting factor. Typical PC capabilities must be sufficient to handle large computer files, which are ordinarily handled by much more powerful workstations.
  • This invention provides a computer-based method and system to facilitate quality control for manufactured assemblies.
  • the instant method and system assists the measurement of such assemblies and their comparison to large CAD files.
  • An embodiment of the invention mitigates the problems encountered with large CAD files by decomposing each of such files into a multi-file format.
  • a large CAD file is thereby broken-down into smaller files that organize the information contained in the larger file.
  • the organization is performed in such a way that the information pertinent to the measurement process is segregated into a different smaller file than the information not needed to calculate measurements.
  • the computer running the computation accesses a smaller file containing a higher percentage of required information.
  • one embodiment uses selection regions for each surface.
  • a selection region indexes each surface.
  • a list of surface regions is automatically scanned in order to determine which region contains that point. The corresponding distance of that measurement point to the surface is then calculated.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a conventional coordinate measuring system.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of the method and system of managing large CAD files using decomposition and reconfiguration techniques.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the relationship and decomposition of a CAD file into CAM2 format.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a simple multi-surfaced CAD assembly drawing.
  • FIG. 5 is an illustration of a relief view of the CAD assembly seen in FIG. 4 , showing the visualization of a surface selection region enclosing the top surface of a screw head.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram of the method and system of surface measurement comparison between an assembly and its CAD model in one embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of the method of managing a large CAD file in one embodiment.
  • the method may be a computer-implemented process in which a microprocessor executes steps in response to a computer program contained in a storage medium.
  • the host computer executes the process.
  • a less sophisticated arm-based controller may execute the program as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,748.
  • a user initiates the process by importing a large CAD file containing a model of an identified assembly at 100 .
  • Standard CAD files contain a large number of layers that each includes large stores of information that, while important to the design phase of the model, are not entirely relevant to CAM2.
  • the large CAD file is then analyzed, identifying the function of the data contained therein at 200 .
  • each piece of data can be linked to surface entities contained in the CAD model.
  • an index file (FLI file) is generated that links each piece of file data to related surface entities in the CAD model at 300 .
  • all the functions of CAD file data is broken-down into two groups. The first group relates to data used for viewing the CAD model through viewing data files 500 and the second group relates to data used for analysis of the CAD model through data analysis files 600 .
  • the CAD data is separated by these functional distinctions into smaller files at 400 . It is important to note that even within these two main functional distinctions, further functional distinctions can be made.
  • the original CAD file data has been decomposed and reconfigured, it always remains linked to its related surface entity in the CAD model by the FLI file.
  • Viewing Data includes information necessary to allow a user to view and select entities on the CAD model.
  • the speed of the viewing system is achieved by not processing the core mathematics for the CAD surfaces when viewing. Normal CAD engines must process the math associated with the surfaces in order to display them.
  • the Analysis Data includes information necessary to enable the comparison of measurements from a physical assembly model with the CAD model. By not processing the imaging data when analyzing the geometric comparison, further speed enhancements are achieved.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the decomposition of a CAD file into smaller files and their relationship to the linking index file (FLI file).
  • the smaller files are arranged into two groups, the Viewing Data files 500 and the Analysis Data files 600 .
  • the Viewing Data files 500 are further broken down into four distinct files, the WIF 510 , DRE 520, SET 530 , and BMP 540 files.
  • the WIF file 510 contains the curves for the visual representation of the wireframe model.
  • the DRE file 520 contains the points and vectors on the surfaces for shaded display of the model.
  • the SET file 530 contains the layers settings for filtering entities.
  • the BMP file 540 contains the preview of the model.
  • the Analysis Data files 600 are only broken-down into two smaller files, the REGION 610 and FLC 620 files.
  • the REGION file 610 contains a list of specified surfaces and data relating to the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose each surface.
  • a selection region may be a three-dimensional rectangular box just large enough to enclose each individual surface. It is understood that other geometries may be used for the selection region.
  • the FLC file 620 contains the actual mathematics that represent the model surface.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a simple multi-surfaced CAD assembly drawing. Such an assembly is usually measured in a standard Cartesian coordinate system. Thus, any point on the assembly can be measured relative to any other point. As with generally used CAD files, a datum or reference point is generally defined, from which all other points are measured. In other words, the distance of a point on an assembly drawing is measured relative to that datum point.
  • FIG. 5 is an illustration of a relief view of the screw seen in the assembly of FIG. 4 . Also, included in FIG. 5 is a visualization of a surface selection region enclosing the top of the screw head.
  • a surface selection region enclosing the top of the screw head.
  • Each surface of an assembly that can potentially be inspected after manufacture should be enclosed by its own surface selection region.
  • Each region should enclose its corresponding surface with the smallest possible three-dimensional region.
  • the screw head outer surface is enclosed by a region. Thus, that region includes not only the numerous point that make-up the screw-head surface, but also many other points near the surface.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram of the method of surface measurement comparison between an assembly and its CAD model.
  • the method may be computer-implemented as discussed above.
  • a physical object such as a manufactured assembly is identified for inspection.
  • that manufactured assembly is based on the parameters contained in an associated CAD file or files. In this way, measurement comparisons can be made between the physical model and the virtual one.
  • the associated CAD file will be translated into the CAM2 format at 1100 .
  • the large CAD file is then decomposed and then saved into six smaller files.
  • the next step involves generating three-dimensional selection regions enclosing each inspection surface at 1200 .
  • the data corresponding to each selection region, including what volume it defines, is saved in a Region file 610 .
  • That Region file 610 can then be used later to associate any point within that volume with a particular defined inspection surface.
  • a measurement is then taken and recorded of the relative position of a point on the physical inspection surface at 1400 .
  • a datum point is used, so that any measured points are measured relative to that datum point.
  • the datum points for both the physical assembly and virtual model are the same.
  • the physical assembly and virtual model may be aligned through an alignment algorithm performed based on measured datums. Any difference in the relative location of these datum points will change the quality or accuracy of the instant comparison.
  • the physically measured point will have an analogous point on or near the virtual model.
  • the point analogous to the physically measured point may not lie on the surface of the virtual model. However, although the point does not lie on the surface it does probably lie near that surface and thus within a previously mentioned selection region.
  • the computer uses the Region file 610 to identify a selection region containing or closest to the recorded point at 1500 .
  • the selection region is chosen automatically by the software. If a point lands inside multiple regions, the software will then consider both surfaces when looking for the closest surface. The purpose of the selection regions is so the software does not have to calculate distances to all the surfaces in the CAD model to determine the closest surface point. This is designed to limit the selection set. As described herein, the output to the user is simply distance to surface.
  • Region file 610 Once a Region file 610 is identified, surface data can then be extracted in order to analyze the relative position of the analogous surface point to that surface at 1600 . Finally, a distance calculation is performed measuring the distance between the measured surface point and the CAD model surface at 1700 . Thus should provide the user with information about how different the assembled model is relative to the originally designed model.
  • the present invention can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes.
  • the present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMS, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention.
  • the present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention.
  • the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.

Abstract

The invention relates to a computer-based method and system to facilitate quality control for manufactured assemblies based on computer aided design (CAD) files. The instant invention mitigates the problems encountered with large CAD files by decomposing each of such files into a multi-file format. A large CAD file is thereby broken-down into smaller files that organize the information contained in the larger file. The organization is performed in such a way that the information pertinent to the measurement process is segregated into a different smaller file than the information not needed to calculate measurements. Thus, the computer running the computation accesses a smaller file containing a higher percentage of required information. Additionally, assisting the user in coordinating a match-up between the physical surfaces being measured and the proper associated CAD model version of that surface further increases the handling speed. In particular, the instant invention uses selection regions for each surface. A selection region consists of the representation of a three-dimensional rectangle region just large enough to enclose each individual surface. A selection region indexes each surface. Thus, when a measurement point is taken, a list of surface regions is automatically scanned in order to determine which region contains that point. The corresponding distance of that measurement point to the surface is then calculated.

Description

BACKGROUND
The invention relates to a method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement (CAM2) analysis. In particular, the instant invention assists in managing large computer-aided design (CAD) files and to the reorganization of the data from those large CAD files into smaller more manageable and quickly accessible files. Further, the instant invention provides for improved CAD model surface selection when comparing manufactured assembly surfaces to the CAD model.
The manufacturing/industrial marketplace commonly uses computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). CAD software allowed engineers to produce 3-D images in the front end of the design process, which shortened the production cycle and led to tremendous gains in productivity. CAM software and equipment increased the efficiency and quality of machined parts. Despite these technological advances in design and manufacturing, something important was missing from the production cycle. That is, a highly accurate, efficient, and convenient measurement methodology for ensuring that the products and components met the original CAD specifications. Historically, measuring assemblies made of numerous parts against the CAD model has been unwieldy, expensive and unreliable.
Traditionally, the measurement and quality inspection function in the manufacturing process has been time-consuming and limited in size, scope, and effectiveness for a number of reasons. Manual measurement tools, such as calipers and scales may be slow, imprecise, and always one-dimensional. Analog test fixtures are costly and inflexible. Also, standard coordinate measurement machines, while providing a high degree of precision, are generally located in quality control labs or inspection facilities at a distance from the manufacturing floor. Parts must be removed one at a time and transported to the lab for components—which often translates into significant “down time” for the production line. In essence, traditional measurement techniques—also known as metrology—have lagged far behind in the technological advances of the production process.
The CAD/CAM and metrology markets, as well as a worldwide emphasis on quality in all aspects of the manufacturing process, are driving the need for a missing link, which is referred to as Computer-Aided Manufacturing Measurement (CAM2). In other words, CAM2 is a CAD-based total quality assurance technology. To date, adaptive measurement hardware and usable CAD-based measurement software have yet to be fully implemented in the manufacturing industry.
More recently, advances have been made in adaptive measurement hardware, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,582, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Such hardware allows the measurement of points on an object and the comparison of the location of those points to CAD specifications. In order to speed the overall comparison process, the hardware should be connected to a local computer. Alternatively, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,748, the contents of which are also incorporated herein by reference, the hardware can be equipped with an on-board computer. Such systems allow precision measurement of assemblies at every step of the manufacturing process and at any location. Earlier systems required the assembly being measured to be taken to the confines of a quality control lab, which is time consuming and often impractical.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a conventional three dimensional measuring system generally including a coordinate measuring system generally including a coordinate measuring machine (CCM) 10 composed of a manually operated multi-jointed arm 12 and a support base or post 14, a controller or serial box 16 and a host computer 18.
One significant drawback of the current state of technology referred to above is that CAD files demand powerful computers. Thus, the CAM2 market is limited by the power of the computers generally found and distributed in an affordable way to that market. It may be common for a company to have one or two powerful and expensive computers in its quality control lab, but unlikely for that same company to have numerous expensive computers distributed throughout a factory. Since the adaptive measurement hardware devices mentioned above typically are standalone stations assigned at different points in the manufacturing process, cost is a primary concern. Hence, the requirement to handle the CAD files becomes a limiting factor. Typical PC capabilities must be sufficient to handle large computer files, which are ordinarily handled by much more powerful workstations.
Many manufactured products today are highly curved in three-dimensions. Quality control inspections of such products requires the ability to measure points on the object's surface and compare them to the surfaces in the CAD file. CAD files are usually quite large since they contain information regarding these curves, and points, vectors, various layer settings and other features and information important to each particular CAD format and yet not always relevant to measurement.
Further, when comparing measurements on an assembly the user must select a surface on the CAD model from which to make that comparison. Very often, due to the complexity of the numerous surfaces contained in a CAD model, the basic act of selecting a surface can be difficult and time intensive. A single CAD model could contain hundreds or thousands of surfaces from which to choose. Even if the user narrows his or her search to a specific region of the model, those surfaces can sometimes be difficult to distinguish because they overlap, are small, or are grouped closely.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The above discussed and other drawbacks and deficiencies of the prior art are overcome or alleviated by the instant invention. This invention provides a computer-based method and system to facilitate quality control for manufactured assemblies. In particular, the instant method and system assists the measurement of such assemblies and their comparison to large CAD files.
An embodiment of the invention mitigates the problems encountered with large CAD files by decomposing each of such files into a multi-file format. A large CAD file is thereby broken-down into smaller files that organize the information contained in the larger file. The organization is performed in such a way that the information pertinent to the measurement process is segregated into a different smaller file than the information not needed to calculate measurements. Thus, the computer running the computation accesses a smaller file containing a higher percentage of required information.
Additionally, assisting the user in coordinating a match-up between the physical surfaces being measured and the proper associated CAD model version of that surface further increases the handling speed. In particular, one embodiment uses selection regions for each surface. A selection region indexes each surface. Thus, when a measurement point is taken, a list of surface regions is automatically scanned in order to determine which region contains that point. The corresponding distance of that measurement point to the surface is then calculated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a conventional coordinate measuring system.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of the method and system of managing large CAD files using decomposition and reconfiguration techniques.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the relationship and decomposition of a CAD file into CAM2 format.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of a simple multi-surfaced CAD assembly drawing.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of a relief view of the CAD assembly seen in FIG. 4, showing the visualization of a surface selection region enclosing the top surface of a screw head.
FIG. 6 is a diagram of the method and system of surface measurement comparison between an assembly and its CAD model in one embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 2 is a diagram of the method of managing a large CAD file in one embodiment. The method may be a computer-implemented process in which a microprocessor executes steps in response to a computer program contained in a storage medium. In an exemplary embodiment, the host computer executes the process. Alternatively, a less sophisticated arm-based controller may execute the program as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,748. As shown, a user initiates the process by importing a large CAD file containing a model of an identified assembly at 100. Standard CAD files contain a large number of layers that each includes large stores of information that, while important to the design phase of the model, are not entirely relevant to CAM2. The large CAD file is then analyzed, identifying the function of the data contained therein at 200. Also, each piece of data can be linked to surface entities contained in the CAD model. Thus, in order to not lose track of what data relates to each entity, an index file (FLI file) is generated that links each piece of file data to related surface entities in the CAD model at 300. In one embodiment, all the functions of CAD file data is broken-down into two groups. The first group relates to data used for viewing the CAD model through viewing data files 500 and the second group relates to data used for analysis of the CAD model through data analysis files 600. Thus, the CAD data is separated by these functional distinctions into smaller files at 400. It is important to note that even within these two main functional distinctions, further functional distinctions can be made. Also, although the original CAD file data has been decomposed and reconfigured, it always remains linked to its related surface entity in the CAD model by the FLI file.
Viewing Data includes information necessary to allow a user to view and select entities on the CAD model. The speed of the viewing system is achieved by not processing the core mathematics for the CAD surfaces when viewing. Normal CAD engines must process the math associated with the surfaces in order to display them. In contrast, the Analysis Data includes information necessary to enable the comparison of measurements from a physical assembly model with the CAD model. By not processing the imaging data when analyzing the geometric comparison, further speed enhancements are achieved.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the decomposition of a CAD file into smaller files and their relationship to the linking index file (FLI file). As discussed above, the smaller files are arranged into two groups, the Viewing Data files 500 and the Analysis Data files 600. The Viewing Data files 500 are further broken down into four distinct files, the WIF 510, DRE 520, SET 530, and BMP 540 files. The WIF file 510 contains the curves for the visual representation of the wireframe model. The DRE file 520 contains the points and vectors on the surfaces for shaded display of the model. The SET file 530 contains the layers settings for filtering entities. The BMP file 540 contains the preview of the model. The Analysis Data files 600 are only broken-down into two smaller files, the REGION 610 and FLC 620 files. The REGION file 610 contains a list of specified surfaces and data relating to the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose each surface. A selection region may be a three-dimensional rectangular box just large enough to enclose each individual surface. It is understood that other geometries may be used for the selection region. The FLC file 620 contains the actual mathematics that represent the model surface.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of a simple multi-surfaced CAD assembly drawing. Such an assembly is usually measured in a standard Cartesian coordinate system. Thus, any point on the assembly can be measured relative to any other point. As with generally used CAD files, a datum or reference point is generally defined, from which all other points are measured. In other words, the distance of a point on an assembly drawing is measured relative to that datum point.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of a relief view of the screw seen in the assembly of FIG. 4. Also, included in FIG. 5 is a visualization of a surface selection region enclosing the top of the screw head. Each surface of an assembly that can potentially be inspected after manufacture should be enclosed by its own surface selection region. Each region should enclose its corresponding surface with the smallest possible three-dimensional region. As seen in FIG. 5, the screw head outer surface is enclosed by a region. Thus, that region includes not only the numerous point that make-up the screw-head surface, but also many other points near the surface.
FIG. 6 is a diagram of the method of surface measurement comparison between an assembly and its CAD model. The method may be computer-implemented as discussed above. In the initial step 1000, a physical object such as a manufactured assembly is identified for inspection. In order to relate to the instant system, that manufactured assembly is based on the parameters contained in an associated CAD file or files. In this way, measurement comparisons can be made between the physical model and the virtual one. Next the associated CAD file will be translated into the CAM2 format at 1100. As previously explained, the large CAD file is then decomposed and then saved into six smaller files. The next step involves generating three-dimensional selection regions enclosing each inspection surface at 1200. As described above, the data corresponding to each selection region, including what volume it defines, is saved in a Region file 610. That Region file 610 can then be used later to associate any point within that volume with a particular defined inspection surface. A measurement is then taken and recorded of the relative position of a point on the physical inspection surface at 1400. Thus, as with the model, a datum point is used, so that any measured points are measured relative to that datum point. The datum points for both the physical assembly and virtual model are the same. The physical assembly and virtual model may be aligned through an alignment algorithm performed based on measured datums. Any difference in the relative location of these datum points will change the quality or accuracy of the instant comparison. Thus the physically measured point, will have an analogous point on or near the virtual model. Due to differences in machining, the point analogous to the physically measured point may not lie on the surface of the virtual model. However, although the point does not lie on the surface it does probably lie near that surface and thus within a previously mentioned selection region. The computer thus uses the Region file 610 to identify a selection region containing or closest to the recorded point at 1500. The selection region is chosen automatically by the software. If a point lands inside multiple regions, the software will then consider both surfaces when looking for the closest surface. The purpose of the selection regions is so the software does not have to calculate distances to all the surfaces in the CAD model to determine the closest surface point. This is designed to limit the selection set. As described herein, the output to the user is simply distance to surface.
Once a Region file 610 is identified, surface data can then be extracted in order to analyze the relative position of the analogous surface point to that surface at 1600. Finally, a distance calculation is performed measuring the distance between the measured surface point and the CAD model surface at 1700. Thus should provide the user with information about how different the assembled model is relative to the originally designed model.
As described above, the present invention can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMS, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the invention.

Claims (10)

1. A computer based method comprising:
decomposing data from a computer aided design file of a model,
saving said decomposed data in a plurality of smaller files wherein at least one of said smaller files is an analysis file which does not contain imaging data,
accessing at least one of said analysis files to analyze the surface geometry of said model;
wherein at least one of said smaller files comprises a list of specified surfaces on said model and data relating to the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose each specified surface;
obtaining the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of a physical object, at least one physical inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model, wherein each said surface on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
defining at least one target volume from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein,
each of said defined volumes comprises the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose said inspection surface.
3. A computer based method comprising:
inputting a computer aided design file containing a model of a physical object, at least one inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model, wherein each of said surfaces on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
including a datum point common to both said model and said physical object,
inputting the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of said physical object,
defining at least one target volume from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein,
if no defined volume encloses said point then said target volume comprises that defined volume closest to said point.
5. A computer based method comprising:
inputting a computer aided design file containing a model of a physical object, at least one inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model wherein each of said surfaces on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
including a datum point common to both said model and said physical object,
inputting the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of said physical object,
defining at least one target volume is from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object, wherein,
each of said at least one of said defined volumes comprise the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose said inspection surface.
6. A medium including machine-readable computer program code for managing computer aided design data, the medium including instructions for causing a computer to implement a method comprising:
decomposing data from a computer aided design file of a model,
saving said decomposed data in a plurality of smaller files wherein at least one of said smaller files is an analysis file which does not contain imaging data,
accessing at least one of said analysis files to analyze the surface geometry of said model,
wherein at least one of said smaller files comprises a list of specified surfaces on said model and data relating to the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose each specified surface;
obtaining the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of a physical object, at least one physical inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model, wherein each said surface on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
defining at least one target volume from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object.
7. The medium of claim 6 wherein,
each of said defined volumes comprises the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose said inspection surface.
8. A medium including machine-readable computer program code for use in measuring a physical object, the medium including instructions for causing a computer to implement a method comprising:
inputting a computer aided design file containing a model of a physical object, at least one inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model, wherein each of said surfaces on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
including a datum point common to both said model and said physical object,
inputting the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of said physical object,
defining at least one target volume from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object.
9. The medium of claim 8, wherein,
if no defined volume encloses said point then said target volume comprises that defined volume closest to said point.
10. A medium including machine-readable computer program code for use in measuring a physical object, the medium including instructions for causing a computer to implement a method comprising:
inputting a computer aided design file containing a model of a physical object, at least one inspection surface on said physical object corresponding to an equivalent surface on said model, wherein each of said surfaces on said model is enclosed by a different defined volume,
including a datum point common to both said model and said physical object,
inputting the position of a surface point on an inspection surface of said physical object,
defining at least one target volume is from said defined volume that encloses said surface point,
determining the distance between the surface on said model enclosed by said at least one target volume and said point on said physical object, wherein,
each of said at least one of said defined volumes comprise the smallest possible three-dimensional region that can enclose said inspection surface.
US09/670,192 2000-09-26 2000-09-26 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis Expired - Fee Related US7006084B1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/670,192 US7006084B1 (en) 2000-09-26 2000-09-26 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis
GB0118644A GB2369907B (en) 2000-09-26 2001-07-31 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis
CA002354919A CA2354919A1 (en) 2000-09-26 2001-08-08 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis
FR0112009A FR2814565B1 (en) 2000-09-26 2001-09-17 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPUTER-ASSISTED MANUFACTURING MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS
DE10146834.2A DE10146834B4 (en) 2000-09-26 2001-09-24 Method and storage medium for computer-aided manufacturing measurement analysis
JP2001290597A JP4933008B2 (en) 2000-09-26 2001-09-25 Method and medium for computer-aided manufacturing measurement analysis
IT2001MI001987A ITMI20011987A1 (en) 2000-09-26 2001-09-25 COMPUTER-BASED PROCEDURE AND SYSTEM FOR THE MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/670,192 US7006084B1 (en) 2000-09-26 2000-09-26 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US7006084B1 true US7006084B1 (en) 2006-02-28

Family

ID=24689379

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/670,192 Expired - Fee Related US7006084B1 (en) 2000-09-26 2000-09-26 Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7006084B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4933008B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2354919A1 (en)
DE (1) DE10146834B4 (en)
FR (1) FR2814565B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2369907B (en)
IT (1) ITMI20011987A1 (en)

Cited By (66)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100095542A1 (en) * 2008-10-16 2010-04-22 Romer, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US20110107614A1 (en) * 2009-11-06 2011-05-12 Hexagon Metrology Ab Enhanced position detection for a cmm
US20110178762A1 (en) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machine with Multiple Communication Channels
US8284407B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2012-10-09 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measuring machine having an illuminated probe end and method of operation
US8533967B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-09-17 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8615893B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-12-31 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine having integrated software controls
US8630314B2 (en) 2010-01-11 2014-01-14 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing measurements taken by multiple metrology devices
US8638446B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-01-28 Faro Technologies, Inc. Laser scanner or laser tracker having a projector
US8677643B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-03-25 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8832954B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-09-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8875409B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-11-04 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8898919B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-12-02 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machine with distance meter used to establish frame of reference
US8942838B2 (en) 2011-04-15 2015-01-27 Cummins Intellectual Property, Inc. Measurement systems analysis system and method
US8997362B2 (en) 2012-07-17 2015-04-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine with optical communications bus
US9074883B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2015-07-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9113023B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2015-08-18 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with spectroscopic energy detector
US9163922B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2015-10-20 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machine with distance meter and camera to determine dimensions within camera images
US9168654B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2015-10-27 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measuring machines with dual layer arm
US9210288B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2015-12-08 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with dichroic beam splitters to capture a variety of signals
US9222771B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2015-12-29 Kla-Tencor Corp. Acquisition of information for a construction site
CN105204439A (en) * 2015-08-28 2015-12-30 北京卫星制造厂 Numerical control program converter of three-coordinate measuring machine
US20160091439A1 (en) * 2014-09-30 2016-03-31 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. System and method for measuring an object using x-ray projections
US9329271B2 (en) 2010-05-10 2016-05-03 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9372265B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2016-06-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Intermediate two-dimensional scanning with a three-dimensional scanner to speed registration
US9417316B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2016-08-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9417056B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2016-08-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9513107B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2016-12-06 Faro Technologies, Inc. Registration calculation between three-dimensional (3D) scans based on two-dimensional (2D) scan data from a 3D scanner
US9529083B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2016-12-27 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with enhanced spectroscopic energy detector
US9551575B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2017-01-24 Faro Technologies, Inc. Laser scanner having a multi-color light source and real-time color receiver
US9606701B1 (en) 2013-10-14 2017-03-28 Benko, LLC Automated recommended joining data with presented methods for joining in computer-modeled structures
US9607239B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2017-03-28 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine having a 2D camera and method of obtaining 3D representations
WO2017053744A1 (en) * 2015-09-24 2017-03-30 Mitutoyo Corporation Inspection program editing environment including integrated alignment program planning and editing features
US9613020B1 (en) 2014-09-15 2017-04-04 Benko, LLC Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US9628775B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2017-04-18 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine having a 2D camera and method of obtaining 3D representations
US9875535B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-01-23 Caterpillar Inc. Wear measurement system using computer vision
US9880075B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-01-30 Caterpillar Inc. Wear measurement system using a computer model
US10025805B1 (en) 2014-06-24 2018-07-17 Benko, LLC Systems and methods for automated help
US10036627B2 (en) 2014-09-19 2018-07-31 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Multi-mode portable coordinate measuring machine
US10067231B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2018-09-04 Faro Technologies, Inc. Registration calculation of three-dimensional scanner data performed between scans based on measurements by two-dimensional scanner
US10073439B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2018-09-11 Desprez, Llc Methods, systems, and software for processing expedited production or supply of designed products
US10095217B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2018-10-09 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US10162337B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2018-12-25 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US10175037B2 (en) 2015-12-27 2019-01-08 Faro Technologies, Inc. 3-D measuring device with battery pack
US10235009B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2019-03-19 Desprez, Llc Product variable optimization for manufacture or supply of designed products
US10281259B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2019-05-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine that uses a 2D camera to determine 3D coordinates of smoothly continuous edge features
US10373183B1 (en) 2013-10-16 2019-08-06 Alekhine, Llc Automatic firm fabrication price quoting and fabrication ordering for computer-modeled joining features and related structures
US10401824B2 (en) 2016-04-14 2019-09-03 The Rapid Manufacturing Group LLC Methods and software for reducing machining equipment usage when machining multiple objects from a single workpiece
US10462444B2 (en) 2017-04-17 2019-10-29 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional inspection
US10460342B1 (en) 2014-08-12 2019-10-29 Benko, LLC Methods and software for providing targeted advertising to a product program
US10545481B2 (en) 2016-12-28 2020-01-28 Proto Labs Inc Methods and software for providing graphical representations of a plurality of objects in a central through opening
US10552882B1 (en) 2014-05-20 2020-02-04 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for enabling custom pricing in an electronic commerce system
US10556309B1 (en) 2016-03-24 2020-02-11 Proto Labs Inc. Methods of subtractively manufacturing a plurality of discrete objects from a single workpiece using a removable fixating material
US10591880B2 (en) * 2014-11-12 2020-03-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method for repairing with 3D printing
US10713394B1 (en) 2014-06-12 2020-07-14 Benko, LLC Filtering components compatible with a computer-modeled structure
US10803501B1 (en) 2015-03-17 2020-10-13 Desprez, Llc Systems, methods, and software for generating, customizing, and automatedly e-mailing a request for quotation for fabricating a computer-modeled structure from within a CAD program
US10836110B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2020-11-17 Desprez, Llc Method and system for ordering expedited production or supply of designed products
US10929904B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2021-02-23 Protolabs, Inc. Automated fabrication price quoting and fabrication ordering for computer-modeled structures
US11004126B1 (en) 2016-03-17 2021-05-11 Desprez, Llc Systems, methods, and software for generating, customizing, and automatedly e-mailing a request for quotation for fabricating a computer-modeled structure from within a CAD program
US11023934B1 (en) 2014-10-30 2021-06-01 Desprez, Llc Business variable optimization for manufacture or supply of designed products
US11276095B1 (en) 2014-10-30 2022-03-15 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for a pricing-method-agnostic ecommerce marketplace for manufacturing services
US11392396B1 (en) 2014-06-24 2022-07-19 Desprez, Llc Systems and methods for automated help
US11410224B1 (en) * 2014-03-28 2022-08-09 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for requesting a pricing in an electronic marketplace using a user-modifiable spectrum interface
US11415961B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2022-08-16 Desprez, Llc Automated correlation of modeled product and preferred manufacturers
US11423449B1 (en) 2016-03-23 2022-08-23 Desprez, Llc Electronic pricing machine configured to generate prices based on supplier willingness and a user interface therefor
US11537765B1 (en) 2014-02-20 2022-12-27 Benko, LLC Placement and pricing of part marks in computer-modeled structures
US11599086B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2023-03-07 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005017940A1 (en) * 2005-04-18 2006-11-02 Ogp Messtechnik Gmbh Arrangement for system-independent programming of a measuring system for workpieces
CN102798362B (en) * 2012-06-20 2014-10-29 北京航空航天大学 Point cloud data-based method for estimating working allowance of casting
CN103895061A (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-02 中国航空工业集团公司第六三一研究所 Method for machining holes in printed boards
JP2017528714A (en) * 2014-09-10 2017-09-28 ファロ テクノロジーズ インコーポレーテッド Method for optical measurement of three-dimensional coordinates and control of a three-dimensional measuring device
US9602811B2 (en) 2014-09-10 2017-03-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for optically measuring three-dimensional coordinates and controlling a three-dimensional measuring device
DE102014013678B3 (en) 2014-09-10 2015-12-03 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for optically sensing and measuring an environment with a handheld scanner and gesture control
CN104460525B (en) * 2014-11-11 2017-07-14 Abb技术有限公司 Method and system for building method of processing parts

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4676002A (en) 1984-06-25 1987-06-30 Slocum Alexander H Mechanisms to determine position and orientation in space
US4794513A (en) 1985-03-29 1988-12-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Position control system for computer-controlled processing machines
US5392222A (en) * 1991-12-30 1995-02-21 Schlumberger Technologies Inc. Locating a field of view in which selected IC conductors are unobscured
US5402582A (en) 1993-02-23 1995-04-04 Faro Technologies Inc. Three dimensional coordinate measuring apparatus
WO1997040336A1 (en) 1996-04-23 1997-10-30 Eaton Homer L Spatial measuring device
WO1998008050A1 (en) 1996-08-23 1998-02-26 Nino Camurri Coordinate measuring apparatus
US5724264A (en) 1993-07-16 1998-03-03 Immersion Human Interface Corp. Method and apparatus for tracking the position and orientation of a stylus and for digitizing a 3-D object
US5754842A (en) 1993-09-17 1998-05-19 Fujitsu Limited Preparation system for automatically preparing and processing a CAD library model
US5850348A (en) 1996-05-01 1998-12-15 Viewlogic Systems, Inc. Automated circuit design case management
US5907850A (en) 1994-12-23 1999-05-25 Gary Matthew Krause Method and system for manipulating construction blueprint documents with hypermedia hotspot reference links from a first construction document to a related secondary construction document
US5978748A (en) 1998-07-07 1999-11-02 Faro Technologies, Inc. Host independent articulated arm
WO2000006969A1 (en) 1998-07-28 2000-02-10 General Electric Company Finding shape deformations in objects with transformation parameters after registering
US6089742A (en) * 1989-11-01 2000-07-18 Warmerdam; Thomas P. H. Method and apparatus for controlling robots and the like using a bubble data hierarchy placed along a medial axis
US6556206B1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2003-04-29 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Automated viewpoint selection for 3D scenes

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07100278B2 (en) * 1986-11-13 1995-11-01 本田技研工業株式会社 Forming tool path data creation method
JP3057960B2 (en) * 1993-06-22 2000-07-04 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Evaluation equipment for three-dimensional workpieces
JPH10185544A (en) * 1996-11-11 1998-07-14 Amada Co Ltd Method and device for measuring size of sheet metal product and sheet metal working system using them
JPH11138388A (en) * 1997-11-14 1999-05-25 Toyoda Mach Works Ltd Three-dimensional molding device
JPH11338532A (en) * 1998-05-22 1999-12-10 Hitachi Ltd Teaching device
JP2000005939A (en) * 1998-06-24 2000-01-11 Hitachi Ltd Three-dimensional product fabrication system

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4676002A (en) 1984-06-25 1987-06-30 Slocum Alexander H Mechanisms to determine position and orientation in space
US4794513A (en) 1985-03-29 1988-12-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Position control system for computer-controlled processing machines
US6089742A (en) * 1989-11-01 2000-07-18 Warmerdam; Thomas P. H. Method and apparatus for controlling robots and the like using a bubble data hierarchy placed along a medial axis
US5392222A (en) * 1991-12-30 1995-02-21 Schlumberger Technologies Inc. Locating a field of view in which selected IC conductors are unobscured
US5402582A (en) 1993-02-23 1995-04-04 Faro Technologies Inc. Three dimensional coordinate measuring apparatus
US5724264A (en) 1993-07-16 1998-03-03 Immersion Human Interface Corp. Method and apparatus for tracking the position and orientation of a stylus and for digitizing a 3-D object
US5754842A (en) 1993-09-17 1998-05-19 Fujitsu Limited Preparation system for automatically preparing and processing a CAD library model
US5907850A (en) 1994-12-23 1999-05-25 Gary Matthew Krause Method and system for manipulating construction blueprint documents with hypermedia hotspot reference links from a first construction document to a related secondary construction document
WO1997040336A1 (en) 1996-04-23 1997-10-30 Eaton Homer L Spatial measuring device
US5850348A (en) 1996-05-01 1998-12-15 Viewlogic Systems, Inc. Automated circuit design case management
WO1998008050A1 (en) 1996-08-23 1998-02-26 Nino Camurri Coordinate measuring apparatus
US5978748A (en) 1998-07-07 1999-11-02 Faro Technologies, Inc. Host independent articulated arm
WO2000006969A1 (en) 1998-07-28 2000-02-10 General Electric Company Finding shape deformations in objects with transformation parameters after registering
US6556206B1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2003-04-29 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Automated viewpoint selection for 3D scenes

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Foley et al., Computer Graphics Principles and Practice: Second Edition in C, 1996, Addison-Wesley, Chapter 7. *
Preliminary International Search Report, FA 612519, FR 0112009, Jun. 10, 2005.
Wocke, P., "KMG Automatisch Programmieren Generierung, Visualisierung Und Modifizierung Von Antastpunkten Und Verfahrwegen", F & M. Feinwerktechnik Mikrotechnik Messtechnik, Hanser, Munchen, DE, vol. 102, No. 4, Apr. 1, 1994, pp. 181-186.

Cited By (107)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11029142B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2021-06-08 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US20110192043A1 (en) * 2008-10-16 2011-08-11 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US8438747B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2013-05-14 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US10337853B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2019-07-02 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US20100095542A1 (en) * 2008-10-16 2010-04-22 Romer, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US9618330B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2017-04-11 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US7908757B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2011-03-22 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US8176646B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2012-05-15 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with laser scanner
US8955229B2 (en) 2008-10-16 2015-02-17 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Articulating measuring arm with optical scanner
US9551575B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2017-01-24 Faro Technologies, Inc. Laser scanner having a multi-color light source and real-time color receiver
US9074883B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2015-07-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US8099877B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2012-01-24 Hexagon Metrology Ab Enhanced position detection for a CMM
US8327555B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2012-12-11 Hexagon Metrology Ab Enhanced position detection for a CMM
US20110107614A1 (en) * 2009-11-06 2011-05-12 Hexagon Metrology Ab Enhanced position detection for a cmm
US9529083B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2016-12-27 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with enhanced spectroscopic energy detector
US9417316B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2016-08-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9210288B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2015-12-08 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with dichroic beam splitters to capture a variety of signals
US9113023B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2015-08-18 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional scanner with spectroscopic energy detector
US8630314B2 (en) 2010-01-11 2014-01-14 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing measurements taken by multiple metrology devices
US20110173823A1 (en) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Mounting device for a coordinate measuring machine
US20110173828A1 (en) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Intelligent repeatable arm mounting system
US8601702B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-12-10 Faro Technologies, Inc. Display for coordinate measuring machine
US8638446B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-01-28 Faro Technologies, Inc. Laser scanner or laser tracker having a projector
US8677643B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-03-25 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8683709B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-04-01 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine with multi-bus arm technology
US8763266B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-07-01 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement device
US8832954B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-09-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8875409B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-11-04 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US8898919B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2014-12-02 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machine with distance meter used to establish frame of reference
US10281259B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2019-05-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine that uses a 2D camera to determine 3D coordinates of smoothly continuous edge features
US8942940B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2015-01-27 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine and integrated electronic data processing system
US8171650B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2012-05-08 Faro Technologies, Inc. Intelligent repeatable arm mounting system
US20110178762A1 (en) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machine with Multiple Communication Channels
US9009000B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2015-04-14 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for evaluating mounting stability of articulated arm coordinate measurement machine using inclinometers
US8028432B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2011-10-04 Faro Technologies, Inc. Mounting device for a coordinate measuring machine
US8537374B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-09-17 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measuring machine having an illuminated probe end and method of operation
US9163922B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2015-10-20 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machine with distance meter and camera to determine dimensions within camera images
US20110173825A1 (en) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Counter balance for coordinate measurement device
US8533967B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-09-17 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measurement machines with removable accessories
US9628775B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2017-04-18 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine having a 2D camera and method of obtaining 3D representations
US8615893B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2013-12-31 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine having integrated software controls
US8284407B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2012-10-09 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measuring machine having an illuminated probe end and method of operation
US9607239B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2017-03-28 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine having a 2D camera and method of obtaining 3D representations
US8001697B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2011-08-23 Faro Technologies, Inc. Counter balance for coordinate measurement device
US8276286B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2012-10-02 Faro Technologies, Inc. Display for coordinate measuring machine
US10060722B2 (en) 2010-01-20 2018-08-28 Faro Technologies, Inc. Articulated arm coordinate measurement machine having a 2D camera and method of obtaining 3D representations
US9684078B2 (en) 2010-05-10 2017-06-20 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9329271B2 (en) 2010-05-10 2016-05-03 Faro Technologies, Inc. Method for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US9168654B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2015-10-27 Faro Technologies, Inc. Coordinate measuring machines with dual layer arm
US8942838B2 (en) 2011-04-15 2015-01-27 Cummins Intellectual Property, Inc. Measurement systems analysis system and method
US9222771B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2015-12-29 Kla-Tencor Corp. Acquisition of information for a construction site
US9417056B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2016-08-16 Faro Technologies, Inc. Device for optically scanning and measuring an environment
US8997362B2 (en) 2012-07-17 2015-04-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Portable articulated arm coordinate measuring machine with optical communications bus
US11035955B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2021-06-15 Faro Technologies, Inc. Registration calculation of three-dimensional scanner data performed between scans based on measurements by two-dimensional scanner
US9618620B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2017-04-11 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using depth-camera images to speed registration of three-dimensional scans
US11815600B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2023-11-14 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using a two-dimensional scanner to speed registration of three-dimensional scan data
US9513107B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2016-12-06 Faro Technologies, Inc. Registration calculation between three-dimensional (3D) scans based on two-dimensional (2D) scan data from a 3D scanner
US10739458B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2020-08-11 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using two-dimensional camera images to speed registration of three-dimensional scans
US9739886B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2017-08-22 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using a two-dimensional scanner to speed registration of three-dimensional scan data
US10203413B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2019-02-12 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using a two-dimensional scanner to speed registration of three-dimensional scan data
US9372265B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2016-06-21 Faro Technologies, Inc. Intermediate two-dimensional scanning with a three-dimensional scanner to speed registration
US9746559B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2017-08-29 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using two-dimensional camera images to speed registration of three-dimensional scans
US11112501B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2021-09-07 Faro Technologies, Inc. Using a two-dimensional scanner to speed registration of three-dimensional scan data
US10067231B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2018-09-04 Faro Technologies, Inc. Registration calculation of three-dimensional scanner data performed between scans based on measurements by two-dimensional scanner
US10929904B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2021-02-23 Protolabs, Inc. Automated fabrication price quoting and fabrication ordering for computer-modeled structures
US9606701B1 (en) 2013-10-14 2017-03-28 Benko, LLC Automated recommended joining data with presented methods for joining in computer-modeled structures
US10373183B1 (en) 2013-10-16 2019-08-06 Alekhine, Llc Automatic firm fabrication price quoting and fabrication ordering for computer-modeled joining features and related structures
US11537765B1 (en) 2014-02-20 2022-12-27 Benko, LLC Placement and pricing of part marks in computer-modeled structures
US11410224B1 (en) * 2014-03-28 2022-08-09 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for requesting a pricing in an electronic marketplace using a user-modifiable spectrum interface
US10552882B1 (en) 2014-05-20 2020-02-04 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for enabling custom pricing in an electronic commerce system
US10713394B1 (en) 2014-06-12 2020-07-14 Benko, LLC Filtering components compatible with a computer-modeled structure
US11392396B1 (en) 2014-06-24 2022-07-19 Desprez, Llc Systems and methods for automated help
US10025805B1 (en) 2014-06-24 2018-07-17 Benko, LLC Systems and methods for automated help
US10460342B1 (en) 2014-08-12 2019-10-29 Benko, LLC Methods and software for providing targeted advertising to a product program
US10162337B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2018-12-25 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US10229679B1 (en) 2014-09-15 2019-03-12 Benko, LLC Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US10095217B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2018-10-09 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US9613020B1 (en) 2014-09-15 2017-04-04 Benko, LLC Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US10079016B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2018-09-18 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US11599086B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2023-03-07 Desprez, Llc Natural language user interface for computer-aided design systems
US11215442B2 (en) 2014-09-19 2022-01-04 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Multi-mode portable coordinate measuring machine
US10036627B2 (en) 2014-09-19 2018-07-31 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Multi-mode portable coordinate measuring machine
US10663284B2 (en) 2014-09-19 2020-05-26 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. Multi-mode portable coordinate measuring machine
US9709513B2 (en) * 2014-09-30 2017-07-18 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. System and method for measuring an object using X-ray projections
CN106605122A (en) * 2014-09-30 2017-04-26 海克斯康测量技术有限公司 System and method for measuring an object using x-ray projections
US20160091439A1 (en) * 2014-09-30 2016-03-31 Hexagon Metrology, Inc. System and method for measuring an object using x-ray projections
US11023934B1 (en) 2014-10-30 2021-06-01 Desprez, Llc Business variable optimization for manufacture or supply of designed products
US11276095B1 (en) 2014-10-30 2022-03-15 Desprez, Llc Methods and software for a pricing-method-agnostic ecommerce marketplace for manufacturing services
US10235009B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2019-03-19 Desprez, Llc Product variable optimization for manufacture or supply of designed products
US10836110B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2020-11-17 Desprez, Llc Method and system for ordering expedited production or supply of designed products
US11415961B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2022-08-16 Desprez, Llc Automated correlation of modeled product and preferred manufacturers
US11474498B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2022-10-18 Desprez Llc Methods and systems for ordering expedited production or supply of designed products
US10073439B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2018-09-11 Desprez, Llc Methods, systems, and software for processing expedited production or supply of designed products
US10591880B2 (en) * 2014-11-12 2020-03-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method for repairing with 3D printing
US10803501B1 (en) 2015-03-17 2020-10-13 Desprez, Llc Systems, methods, and software for generating, customizing, and automatedly e-mailing a request for quotation for fabricating a computer-modeled structure from within a CAD program
CN105204439B (en) * 2015-08-28 2018-02-09 北京卫星制造厂 A kind of numerical control program converter of three coordinate measuring machine
CN105204439A (en) * 2015-08-28 2015-12-30 北京卫星制造厂 Numerical control program converter of three-coordinate measuring machine
WO2017053744A1 (en) * 2015-09-24 2017-03-30 Mitutoyo Corporation Inspection program editing environment including integrated alignment program planning and editing features
US10175037B2 (en) 2015-12-27 2019-01-08 Faro Technologies, Inc. 3-D measuring device with battery pack
US9880075B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-01-30 Caterpillar Inc. Wear measurement system using a computer model
US9875535B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-01-23 Caterpillar Inc. Wear measurement system using computer vision
US11004126B1 (en) 2016-03-17 2021-05-11 Desprez, Llc Systems, methods, and software for generating, customizing, and automatedly e-mailing a request for quotation for fabricating a computer-modeled structure from within a CAD program
US11423449B1 (en) 2016-03-23 2022-08-23 Desprez, Llc Electronic pricing machine configured to generate prices based on supplier willingness and a user interface therefor
US10556309B1 (en) 2016-03-24 2020-02-11 Proto Labs Inc. Methods of subtractively manufacturing a plurality of discrete objects from a single workpiece using a removable fixating material
US10401824B2 (en) 2016-04-14 2019-09-03 The Rapid Manufacturing Group LLC Methods and software for reducing machining equipment usage when machining multiple objects from a single workpiece
US10545481B2 (en) 2016-12-28 2020-01-28 Proto Labs Inc Methods and software for providing graphical representations of a plurality of objects in a central through opening
US10462444B2 (en) 2017-04-17 2019-10-29 Faro Technologies, Inc. Three-dimensional inspection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2369907B (en) 2005-02-23
GB2369907A (en) 2002-06-12
DE10146834A1 (en) 2002-07-04
JP2002222007A (en) 2002-08-09
DE10146834B4 (en) 2014-04-17
ITMI20011987A1 (en) 2003-03-25
GB0118644D0 (en) 2001-09-19
CA2354919A1 (en) 2002-03-26
FR2814565A1 (en) 2002-03-29
JP4933008B2 (en) 2012-05-16
ITMI20011987A0 (en) 2001-09-25
FR2814565B1 (en) 2006-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7006084B1 (en) Method and system for computer aided manufacturing measurement analysis
US6879933B2 (en) Method and system for assisting a user taking measurements using a coordinate measurement machine
JP4244768B2 (en) Defect influence degree evaluation method and design support system
US20060052977A1 (en) Combined feature dimensional parameter analysis
de Araujo et al. Computer vision system for workpiece referencing in three-axis machining centers
Barkallah et al. Evaluation of manufacturing tolerance using a statistical method and experimentation
Kosarevsky et al. Detection of screw threads in computed tomography 3D density fields
US20120303333A1 (en) System and method for non-destructive testing
US10685147B2 (en) Non-conformance mapping and visualization
JP5143252B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, method, and program
JP3825994B2 (en) Information processing apparatus and method
US20200051277A1 (en) Locating a region of interest on an object
JP2003330972A (en) Information processing device and method
Gąska et al. Challenges for uncertainty determination in dimensional metrology put by industry 4.0 revolution
KR100264968B1 (en) Fixture and workpiece measuring device and method
JP4881941B2 (en) Optical element design manufacturing support system
JP4845289B2 (en) Information processing apparatus and method
Kalaskar et al. Innovative PMI-Based Inspection Planning for Planar and Cylindrical Features
Van Thiel Feature based automated part inspection
JPH07104827A (en) Process managing system based on drawing information
Tomasiak Rapid technology in industrial fitting
Dietze et al. Visualization of deviations between different geometries using a multi-level voxel-based representation
Robinson et al. Adaptive Machining Toolkit
Weper Analysis and Implementation of Product Manufacturing Information at TAMK
Stănăşel et al. A REVERSE ENGINEERING APPROACH TO OBTAIN THE 3D MODEL OF A SPARE PART

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC., FLORIDA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUSS, SIEGFRIED KURT;OUALITSEN, FRANK FARID;REEL/FRAME:011501/0155;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010108 TO 20010118

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.)

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20180228