US579680A - Lithographic stone - Google Patents

Description

(No Model.)

P. J. KALLENBAGH. LITHOGRAPHIG STONE.

No. 579,680. Patented Mar. 30, 1897.

INVENTOR ATTORNEY WITNESSES:

llNirn rarns Arana nuten.

FERDINAND J. KALLENBAOII, OF BROOKLYN, NEV YORK,

Ln'i-ieeaAPi-uc STONE.

SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 579,680, dated I'fareh 30, 189'?.

Application tiled February 1l, 1897. Serial No. 622,979. (No model.)

To all whom t may concern:

Be it known that I, FERDINAND J. KALLEN- BACH, a citizen of the United States, residing at Brooklyn, Kings county, New York, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Lithographie Stones, of which the following is a specification.

My invention relates to stones used for lithographie printing.

It is well known to those familiar with the art of lithographie printing that the cost of a lithographie stone increases in an exaggerated proportion to its size, the larger stones costing much more per square inch than the smaller. At the same tiine'the smaller stones are often quite perfect, but their usefulness is restricted because of their size.

The purpose of my invention is to produce a composite lithographie stone with which printing may be donc of the same character as if the stone was actually in one piece.

'In carrying out my invention I take the lithographie stones and after preparing their edges so that they are perfectly true, smooth, and square I pla ce them together edge te edge, making a joint so perfect and accurate that it will not showin printing. The stones being so arranged, I proceed to secure them immovably in this position, so that they will not shift with relation to each other and so that the joint will not open. While this may be accomplished in various ways, I have found that the most practical and satisfactory way is to unite the edges of the several stones forming the composite stone by cement and then to mount the stones so united on a backing or slab of slate, to which they are cemented. The slate base or backing ties the several lithographie stones together so as to form a large composite stone, and as the slate has substantially the same coefficient of eX- pansion as the lithographie stone there is no liability for the joint to open when the composite stone is subjected to changes of temperature. The slate backing also adds strength to the structure, the whole forming an exceedingly strong and practically integral stone.

In the accompanying drawings, illustrating the invention, Figure l is a face view of an oblong lithographie stone constructed according to my invention from three smaller stones, and Fig. 2 is a longitudinal section of the same. Fig. 3 is a view similar to Fig.. l, showing a stone built up of four smaller lithographic stones; and Fig. 4 is a longitudinal section of the same at line .fc4 in Fig. 1i. Fig. 5 is a sectional viewof a composite stone havn ing a backing composed of two pieces. Fig. G illustrates mechanical means for binding the stones together so that they will not shift at the joints.

Referring particularly to Figs. l and 2, a represents the several sections of lithographie stone tted together edgewise along the lilies ac, and Z9, Fig. 2, is the slate base upon which the sections a are mounted.

The stones a are dressed on both faces and their meeting edges so carefully dressed that when fitted together the joints x will not print -that is,will not be visi ble-in prints made from the composite stone. The stones or sections are then preferably placed en a carefully-dressed slab or base Z9 and cemented firmly thereto. They may also be cemented to each other, though this may not be necessary in all cases. Preferably, also, the printing-face of the composite stone will be carefully finished after the sections are mounted on the backing slab or base.

It will be obvious that any number-two or moreof the smaller lithographie stones may be thus combined to ferm a larger conv posite stone.

Vhen the above-described mode of mounting the stones is employed, the backing used should having substantially the same characteristics as to expansion and contraction as lithographie stones and have a sufficient strength, and I find slate to be a satisfactory material for the purpose.

I prefer to cement the stones together at the joint or joints, and when this mode of uniting them is employed I prefer to employ the kind of cement used by lithographers for backing worn stones with slate. This cement will resist the action of the acid used by lithographers for etching stones to about the same extent as the stone itself. Such cement is primarily in a liquid condition, and when it is to be used at the joints between the stones I prefer to strain it so as to remove all coarse particles therefrom, as this insures the edges of the stones being brought snugly together at all points. Vhere the cement is more readily acted on by the acid IOO than the stone, it is apt, in the course of time, to be eaten away and allow the aeid to penetrate the joint and injure it.

Figs. 3 and i illustrate the preferred construction where cross-joints are required in making the composite stone. I find it somewhat difficult to dress up the two adjacent edges et a lithographie stone so as to preserve a perfect corner at the junction of the four stones, and to obviate this diflieulty I mount the stones (tx eX on a backing (JX, Fig. l, and the stones a e on a backing b. These two built-up sections, backing and all, are then carefullydressed at their meeting edges to form the cross-joint y andare then mounted on another auxiliary backing b2, as clcarl y shown.

It is not.absolutelyessential that the backing shall be in one piece, although it will be ordinarily and by preference of this character, Fig. 5 shows a composite stone in which the two lithographie stones are of different sizes and the backing is made up of two pieces, the larger being arranged to overlap the joint .fr between the lithographie stones.

Fig, 6 shows a means of clamping and binding the several stones together with bands e and bolts d.

I am aware that segments of lithographie stone with convex surfaces have been mounted on a drum for printing on a web, and I am also aware that it has been proposed to embed thin slabs of lithographie stone in plastic artificial stone; also, that a thin worn lithographie stone has been mounted on a cheaper quality of stone or slate to impart strength. My invention, however, in no respect resembles the product produced by either oi these operations. I join two or more pieces of lithographie stone in order to form a surface for lithographie printing which is like that afforded by a single larger lithographie stone. So far as I am aware this has never been done before.

I have defined both in this specification and in the claims appended thereto the kind of joint I produce as a joint that will not show up in printing. I mean by this expression that I so unite a pluralitj7 of stones that a composite stone is produced which may have placed upon it a design, either by transfer or in any other of the ways known to lithography, with the lines crossing the joint, and when a print is taken the lines of the design will be substantially unbrokenthat is to say, the print will have the same characteristics it would have if it were taken from an integral stone.

Vhile I have discovered that lithographie stones can be so united that the line of joining will not show in printing the most delicate kinds of work, such, for instance, as lineline tints and delicate stipple-work, yet it is not always necessary to make so close a joint for printing all kinds of work, such, for instance, as the coarser kinds of color-worker work in which a number of colors are to be l superposed.

The phrase hereinafter' used in the claims to deiine the joint between the stones-viz., such a joint that it will not show up in printing-is therefore to be understood in a relative sense, as the joints made may vary in accordance with the kind of printing to be performed by my composite stone.

Such a stone as is made by means ot my invention has also the advantage that the joints or points where the smaller stones are joined will not be disclosed in use to the same extent that the veins which are ordinarily found in the natural stones of a larger size are disclosed in the use and manipulation ol such larger stones.

IIaving thus described my invention, I'

claim- I. A composite lithographie stone, consisting of two or more lithographie stones so litted together at their meeting edges that the joint will not show up in printing and suitable mcans for holding the said stones with their edges in such contact, whereby an increased and a substantially continuous printing-surface is secured.

2. A composite lithographie stone, consisting of two or more lithographie stones so litted together at their meeting edges that the joint will not show up in printing, and a slate backing on which said stones are secured, said backing serving to hold the stones with their edges in such contact, whereby an increased and a substantially continuous printing-surface is secured.

3. A composite lithographie stone, consisting of two or more lithographie stones so fitted and cemented together at their meeting edges that the joint will not show up in printing, and suitable means for holding the said stones with their edges in such contact, whereby an increased and a substantially continuous printing-surface is secured.

4. A composite lithographie stone consisting of a plurality of minor composite lithographie stones, each with a backing-slab, the said minor composite stones being so iitted and cemented together at their meeting edges that the joints will not show up in printing, and an auxiliarybacking on which said minor composite stones are mounted and cemented.

5. A composite lithographie stone, consisting of two or more lithographie stones so iitted together at their meeting edges that the joint will not show up in printing, and a backing on which said stones are secured, the stones being cemented together at said meeting edges by a cement which will resist the etching acid to substantially the same extent as the lithographie stone.

In witness whereof I have hereunto signed my name in the presence of two subscribing witnesses.

FERDINAND J. KALLENBACII.

Titnessesz HENRY CONNETT, 'PETER A. Ross.

IOO

IIO

Images