US5584661A - Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade - Google Patents

Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5584661A
US5584661A US08/498,807 US49880795A US5584661A US 5584661 A US5584661 A US 5584661A US 49880795 A US49880795 A US 49880795A US 5584661 A US5584661 A US 5584661A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
swept
rotor blade
section
blade
noise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US08/498,807
Inventor
Thomas F. Brooks
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA
Original Assignee
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA filed Critical National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA
Priority to US08/498,807 priority Critical patent/US5584661A/en
Assigned to NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES, THE reassignment NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BROOKS, THOMAS F.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5584661A publication Critical patent/US5584661A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C27/00Rotorcraft; Rotors peculiar thereto
    • B64C27/32Rotors
    • B64C27/46Blades
    • B64C27/467Aerodynamic features

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to a helicopter rotor blade and more particularly to a forward sweep, low noise rotor blade.
  • Blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise is one of the most objectionable sources of helicopter noise. This impulsive blade-slap noise can be particularly intense during low-speed landing approach and maneuvers. Over the years, a number of flight and model rotor tests have examined blade tip modification and other blade design changes to reduce this noise.
  • Impulsive rotor noise is generally caused by localized aerodynamic events on the blade. At high advancing tip speeds, it is due to the presence of transonic flow and associated shocks about the blade tip region. For this, blade tip speed and thickness effects are the most important parameters in defining the noise mechanism and thus its control. At lower speeds, where BVI noise dominates, the number of important parameters increases because the complexity of the rotor wake and its embedded tip vortices becomes central to the problem.
  • the resulting BVI noise is most strongly directed upstream on the advancing side below the rotor. Strong BVI can also occur on the retreating side in the fourth quadrant, with noise directed below and downstream of the rotor.
  • the local parameters which govern the intensity and directivity of BVI noise include the strength and core size of the tip vortex at the time of interaction, the interaction geometry (angles and "miss distances") of the blade and vortex and the interaction Mach numbers. Of course, in turn, these parameters are determined by operational requirements, such as rotor thrust and flight conditions, and design parameters, such as rotor speed, number of blades, and blade section (i.e. chord width), plan form, twist and tip shape.
  • Rotor tip speed reduction was used successfully on a light helicopter to reduce noise 3 to 4 dB by reducing rotor speed to 90 percent of standard rpm.
  • Another method employed higher harmonic control (HHC) of blade pitch to reduce BVI noise. Results have shown up to 6 dB BVI noise reduction depending on operating condition and control phase.
  • a rotor blade which includes a straight inboard section, a forward-swept outboard section and an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section.
  • the forward-swept outboard section measures between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 30% of the span of the rotor blade.
  • the forward-sweep angle of the outboard section is between about 25° and 45°, preferably, 35°.
  • the inboard section measures between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 45% of the span of the rotor blade.
  • the aft-swept section measures between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 25% of the span of the rotor blade.
  • the aft-sweep angle of the aft-swept section is between about 15° and 40°, preferably, 20°.
  • the preferred rotor blade embodiment has a constant chord width along the entire blade length.
  • Alternate rotor blade embodiments include a chord width which decreases linearly from the blade root to the blade tip; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard section then decreases linearly in the aft-swept and forward swept sections to the blade tip thereafter; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard and aft-swept sections then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section to the blade tip thereafter.
  • FIG. 1 is a top view of the rotor blade
  • FIG. 2 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width
  • FIG. 3 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost section.
  • FIG. 4 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost two sections.
  • FIG. 1 shows a rotor blade 10 of constant chord width 22 having an inboard section 12, an aft-swept section 14 and an outboard forward-swept section 16.
  • the inboard section 12 measures 45% of the span of the blade 10
  • the aft-swept section 14 measures 25% of the span of the blade 10
  • the forward-swept section 16 measures 30% of the span of the blade 10.
  • the span of the blade 10 refers to the distance between the center of the rotor hub, upon which the blade is mounted, and the blade tip.
  • the aft-swept section 14 is swept back from the inboard section 12 at an angle 18 of 20°.
  • the forward swept section 16 is swept forward from the inboard section 12 at an angle 20 of 35°.
  • Alternate embodiments include a rotor blade 10 of chord width 22 wherein the chord width 22 decreases linearly between the blade root and the blade tip (see FIG. 2); a rotor blade 10 wherein the chord width 22 is constant in the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 which then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 3); or a rotor blade of constant chord width 22 in the straight inboard section 12 which then decreases linearly in the aft-swept section and forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 4).
  • the actual dimensions of the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 are dependent on aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations after establishing the spanwise extent and sweep angle 20 of the forward swept section 16. Aerodynamically, the design should set the location of the effective lift center to be close to the blade pitch axis to minimize the control loads. The lift from the aft-swept section 14 and that portion of the forward-swept section 16 which is located aft of the 1/4 chord projection line should nominally balance with the outboard forward blade portion. Iterations with standard aeroelastic calculations are then required to establish structural design details.
  • the purpose of this rotor blade is to reduce the noise of rotor craft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors.
  • the primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the platform over a large portion of the outer blade radius.
  • the purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade.
  • the aft-swept section permits both an aerodynamic and dynamic force balance for the blade along the 1/4 chord line, and its projection, of the straight inboard section. This allows hub-hinge forces and moments to remain within practical bounds.
  • the aft-swept section also provides the stabilizing blade forces and moments to counteract any forward-sweep-dependant instability which occurs during the blade's rotation.
  • the noise source showing maximum noise reduction is BVI noise, as the forward-swept section intercepts the advancing side tip vortices at skew angles to the blade rather than at near parallel angles, causing the BVI occurrences to lose much of their impulsive character, thus reducing noise.
  • High speed thickness noise is also significantly reduced due to favorable surface thickness gradients for this planform.
  • Compressive noise sources are reduced and high advance ratio performance is improved over standard plan forms due to the "forward-sweep" relief of the tip region compressive effect.
  • the forward sweep maintains this benefit into the forward rotor quadrant on the advancing side and does not suffer from an unsweeping effect which may occur for swept back designs due to locally parallel vortex orientations in that quadrant. Cabin vibration and loading noise are reduced due to a "load averaging" effect of the double sweep planform.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Abstract

A forward-swept, low-noise rotor blade includes an inboard section, an aft-swept section and a forward-swept outboard section. The rotor blade reduces the noise of rotorcraft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors. The primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the planform over a large portion of the outer blade radius. The rotor blade also includes an aft-swept section. The purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade. The rotor blade has a constant chord width; or has a chord width which decreases linearly along the entire blade span; or combines constant and decreasing chord widths, wherein the blade is of constant chord width from the blade root to a certain location on the rotor blade, then decreases linearly to the blade tip thereafter. The noise source showing maximum noise reduction is blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise. Also reduced are thickness, noise, high speed impulsive noise, cabin vibration and loading noise.

Description

ORIGIN OF THE INVENTION
The invention described herein was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
This is a continuation-in-part application for patent application Ser. No. 08/238,044, filed May 2, 1994, now abandoned.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a helicopter rotor blade and more particularly to a forward sweep, low noise rotor blade.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise is one of the most objectionable sources of helicopter noise. This impulsive blade-slap noise can be particularly intense during low-speed landing approach and maneuvers. Over the years, a number of flight and model rotor tests have examined blade tip modification and other blade design changes to reduce this noise.
Impulsive rotor noise is generally caused by localized aerodynamic events on the blade. At high advancing tip speeds, it is due to the presence of transonic flow and associated shocks about the blade tip region. For this, blade tip speed and thickness effects are the most important parameters in defining the noise mechanism and thus its control. At lower speeds, where BVI noise dominates, the number of important parameters increases because the complexity of the rotor wake and its embedded tip vortices becomes central to the problem.
The important interactions on the advancing side of the rotor occur in the first quadrant (between azimuth angles of ψ=0 to 90 deg.) where blades interact with tip vortices which were shed upstream. The resulting BVI noise is most strongly directed upstream on the advancing side below the rotor. Strong BVI can also occur on the retreating side in the fourth quadrant, with noise directed below and downstream of the rotor. The local parameters which govern the intensity and directivity of BVI noise include the strength and core size of the tip vortex at the time of interaction, the interaction geometry (angles and "miss distances") of the blade and vortex and the interaction Mach numbers. Of course, in turn, these parameters are determined by operational requirements, such as rotor thrust and flight conditions, and design parameters, such as rotor speed, number of blades, and blade section (i.e. chord width), plan form, twist and tip shape.
One early BVI noise reduction approach taken was to modify the blade tip vortex structure by tip shape design changes. While this approach was unsuccessful, general lessons learned through theoretical and experimental work were used to improve the blade designs. The newer design rotors were generally four-bladed with lower tip speed, thinner blade sections and swept tips. The effect was to decrease thickness and high speed impulsive noises and, to a lesser extent, the BVI noise. Much of the progress in recent years has been in areas other than blade design. For example, flight operation procedures, such as changes in landing speed and descent rate for fixed glide slope approach, were found to reduce main rotor impulsive noise levels some 2 to 5 dB. Rotor tip speed reduction was used successfully on a light helicopter to reduce noise 3 to 4 dB by reducing rotor speed to 90 percent of standard rpm. Another method employed higher harmonic control (HHC) of blade pitch to reduce BVI noise. Results have shown up to 6 dB BVI noise reduction depending on operating condition and control phase. Although the progress of these studies is impressive, the operational and active control methods may be difficult to apply in practice. Also, for many rotorcraft, they may be less effective than passive blade and tip design changes.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces rotorcraft noise.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces BVI noise in a passive manner.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which is applicable to standard helicopters and tiltrotors.
It is yet another object of the present invention to accomplish the foregoing objects in a simple manner.
Additional objects and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the drawing and specification that follow.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A rotor blade is described which includes a straight inboard section, a forward-swept outboard section and an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section. The forward-swept outboard section measures between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 30% of the span of the rotor blade. The forward-sweep angle of the outboard section is between about 25° and 45°, preferably, 35°. The inboard section measures between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 45% of the span of the rotor blade. The aft-swept section measures between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 25% of the span of the rotor blade. The aft-sweep angle of the aft-swept section is between about 15° and 40°, preferably, 20°. The preferred rotor blade embodiment has a constant chord width along the entire blade length. Alternate rotor blade embodiments include a chord width which decreases linearly from the blade root to the blade tip; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard section then decreases linearly in the aft-swept and forward swept sections to the blade tip thereafter; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard and aft-swept sections then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section to the blade tip thereafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a top view of the rotor blade;
FIG. 2 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width;
FIG. 3 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost section; and
FIG. 4 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost two sections.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows a rotor blade 10 of constant chord width 22 having an inboard section 12, an aft-swept section 14 and an outboard forward-swept section 16. In a preferred embodiment, the inboard section 12 measures 45% of the span of the blade 10, the aft-swept section 14 measures 25% of the span of the blade 10 and the forward-swept section 16 measures 30% of the span of the blade 10. The span of the blade 10 refers to the distance between the center of the rotor hub, upon which the blade is mounted, and the blade tip. The aft-swept section 14 is swept back from the inboard section 12 at an angle 18 of 20°. The forward swept section 16 is swept forward from the inboard section 12 at an angle 20 of 35°.
Alternate embodiments include a rotor blade 10 of chord width 22 wherein the chord width 22 decreases linearly between the blade root and the blade tip (see FIG. 2); a rotor blade 10 wherein the chord width 22 is constant in the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 which then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 3); or a rotor blade of constant chord width 22 in the straight inboard section 12 which then decreases linearly in the aft-swept section and forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 4).
The actual dimensions of the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 are dependent on aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations after establishing the spanwise extent and sweep angle 20 of the forward swept section 16. Aerodynamically, the design should set the location of the effective lift center to be close to the blade pitch axis to minimize the control loads. The lift from the aft-swept section 14 and that portion of the forward-swept section 16 which is located aft of the 1/4 chord projection line should nominally balance with the outboard forward blade portion. Iterations with standard aeroelastic calculations are then required to establish structural design details.
The purpose of this rotor blade is to reduce the noise of rotor craft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors. The primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the platform over a large portion of the outer blade radius. The purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade. The aft-swept section permits both an aerodynamic and dynamic force balance for the blade along the 1/4 chord line, and its projection, of the straight inboard section. This allows hub-hinge forces and moments to remain within practical bounds. The aft-swept section also provides the stabilizing blade forces and moments to counteract any forward-sweep-dependant instability which occurs during the blade's rotation. The noise source showing maximum noise reduction is BVI noise, as the forward-swept section intercepts the advancing side tip vortices at skew angles to the blade rather than at near parallel angles, causing the BVI occurrences to lose much of their impulsive character, thus reducing noise. High speed thickness noise is also significantly reduced due to favorable surface thickness gradients for this planform. Compressive noise sources are reduced and high advance ratio performance is improved over standard plan forms due to the "forward-sweep" relief of the tip region compressive effect. The forward sweep maintains this benefit into the forward rotor quadrant on the advancing side and does not suffer from an unsweeping effect which may occur for swept back designs due to locally parallel vortex orientations in that quadrant. Cabin vibration and loading noise are reduced due to a "load averaging" effect of the double sweep planform.
Although my invention has been illustrated and described with reference to the preferred and alternate embodiments thereof, I wish to have it understood that it is in no way limited to the details of such embodiment, but is capable of numerous modifications for many mechanisms, and is capable of numerous modifications within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (24)

I claim:
1. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width,
a forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section.
2. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
3. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
4. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
5. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
6. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
7. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width;
a forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire length of the forward-swept section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section.
8. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
9. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
10. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
11. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
12. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
13. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width;
a forward-swept outboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire lengths of the aft-swept and forward-swept sections.
14. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
15. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
16. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
17. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
18. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
19. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section;
a forward-swept outboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire length of the rotor blade.
20. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
21. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
22. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
23. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
24. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
US08/498,807 1994-05-02 1995-07-06 Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade Expired - Fee Related US5584661A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/498,807 US5584661A (en) 1994-05-02 1995-07-06 Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23804494A 1994-05-02 1994-05-02
US08/498,807 US5584661A (en) 1994-05-02 1995-07-06 Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US23804494A Continuation-In-Part 1994-05-02 1994-05-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5584661A true US5584661A (en) 1996-12-17

Family

ID=22896270

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/498,807 Expired - Fee Related US5584661A (en) 1994-05-02 1995-07-06 Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US5584661A (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2768121A1 (en) * 1997-09-10 1999-03-12 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) BLADE WITH REDUCED SOUND SIGNATURE, FOR AIRCRAFT TURNING WING, AND TURNING WING COMPRISING SUCH A BLADE
EP0867363A3 (en) * 1997-03-24 1999-06-02 Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter-Helicopter, Ltd. Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft.
US6476534B1 (en) 2000-08-08 2002-11-05 General Dynamics Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. Permanent magnet phase-control motor
USRE38040E1 (en) 1995-11-17 2003-03-18 United Technologies Corporation Swept turbomachinery blade
US20040126241A1 (en) * 2002-12-30 2004-07-01 Gecheng Zha Forward swept high efficiency airplane propeller blades
JP2005206148A (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Eurocopter Forward/backward rotary vane blade having limited tapering ratio
US20060067828A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-03-30 Wetzel Kyle K Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and method for making same
US20060216153A1 (en) * 2003-01-02 2006-09-28 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
CN100425826C (en) * 2003-01-02 2008-10-15 艾劳埃斯·乌本 Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US20110171037A1 (en) * 2008-09-22 2011-07-14 Walter Enthammer Blade for a turbomachine
KR101275846B1 (en) * 2010-11-30 2013-06-17 부산대학교 산학협력단 Rotor blade with protruding trailing edge
EP2761170B1 (en) 2012-01-25 2017-03-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep
US20180366007A1 (en) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-20 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa Device for Providing Real-Time Rotorcraft Noise Abatement Information
US10179646B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-01-15 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Reconfiguring propellers during aerial vehicle operation
US10287006B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-05-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Adjustable propeller blades for sound control
US10370098B1 (en) * 2015-12-18 2019-08-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Adjustable propeller blade with sound flaps
US20200049166A1 (en) * 2015-11-16 2020-02-13 R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade
US20240035440A1 (en) * 2020-12-17 2024-02-01 Vestas Wind Systems A/S A pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1146121A (en) * 1914-11-27 1915-07-13 Theodore Amnelius Propeller.
US1692081A (en) * 1925-11-24 1928-11-20 Cierva Juan De La Aircraft with rotative wings
US2128780A (en) * 1937-12-20 1938-08-30 Lawrence C Lake Airplane propeller
US3972646A (en) * 1974-04-12 1976-08-03 Bolt Beranek And Newman, Inc. Propeller blade structures and methods particularly adapted for marine ducted reversible thrusters and the like for minimizing cavitation and related noise
US4168939A (en) * 1977-09-08 1979-09-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Acoustically swept rotor
SU924429A1 (en) * 1980-08-20 1982-04-30 Всесоюзный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Горной Механики И Технической Кибернетики Им.М.М.Федорова Working blade of axial fan
US4684324A (en) * 1985-08-02 1987-08-04 Gate S.P.A. Axial fan, particularly for motor vehicles

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1146121A (en) * 1914-11-27 1915-07-13 Theodore Amnelius Propeller.
US1692081A (en) * 1925-11-24 1928-11-20 Cierva Juan De La Aircraft with rotative wings
US2128780A (en) * 1937-12-20 1938-08-30 Lawrence C Lake Airplane propeller
US3972646A (en) * 1974-04-12 1976-08-03 Bolt Beranek And Newman, Inc. Propeller blade structures and methods particularly adapted for marine ducted reversible thrusters and the like for minimizing cavitation and related noise
US4168939A (en) * 1977-09-08 1979-09-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Acoustically swept rotor
SU924429A1 (en) * 1980-08-20 1982-04-30 Всесоюзный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Горной Механики И Технической Кибернетики Им.М.М.Федорова Working blade of axial fan
US4684324A (en) * 1985-08-02 1987-08-04 Gate S.P.A. Axial fan, particularly for motor vehicles

Cited By (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USRE38040E1 (en) 1995-11-17 2003-03-18 United Technologies Corporation Swept turbomachinery blade
USRE45689E1 (en) * 1995-11-17 2015-09-29 United Technologies Corporation Swept turbomachinery blade
USRE43710E1 (en) 1995-11-17 2012-10-02 United Technologies Corp. Swept turbomachinery blade
EP0867363A3 (en) * 1997-03-24 1999-06-02 Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter-Helicopter, Ltd. Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft.
FR2768121A1 (en) * 1997-09-10 1999-03-12 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) BLADE WITH REDUCED SOUND SIGNATURE, FOR AIRCRAFT TURNING WING, AND TURNING WING COMPRISING SUCH A BLADE
EP0901961A1 (en) * 1997-09-10 1999-03-17 ONERA (Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches Aérospatiales) Rotorcraft rotor blade with reduced acoustic signature
US6116857A (en) * 1997-09-10 2000-09-12 Onera Blade with reduced sound signature, for aircraft rotating aerofoil, and rotating aerofoil comprising such a blade
US6476534B1 (en) 2000-08-08 2002-11-05 General Dynamics Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. Permanent magnet phase-control motor
US20040126241A1 (en) * 2002-12-30 2004-07-01 Gecheng Zha Forward swept high efficiency airplane propeller blades
US20110158816A1 (en) * 2003-01-02 2011-06-30 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US7841836B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2010-11-30 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US8241002B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2012-08-14 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
WO2004061298A3 (en) * 2003-01-02 2008-06-19 Aloys Wobben Wind turbine rotor blade with reduced noise emission
CN100425826C (en) * 2003-01-02 2008-10-15 艾劳埃斯·乌本 Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US20090068019A1 (en) * 2003-01-02 2009-03-12 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US7540716B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2009-06-02 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
US20060216153A1 (en) * 2003-01-02 2006-09-28 Aloys Wobben Rotor blade for a wind power plant
JP4551778B2 (en) * 2004-01-21 2010-09-29 ユーロコプテール Forward and backward rotor blades with limited taper ratio
JP2005206148A (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Eurocopter Forward/backward rotary vane blade having limited tapering ratio
CN100376456C (en) * 2004-01-21 2008-03-26 欧洲直升机公司 Two-sweep rotary wing blade with limited taper ratio
US8757982B2 (en) 2004-09-29 2014-06-24 General Electric Company Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and methods for making same
US20060067828A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-03-30 Wetzel Kyle K Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and method for making same
US7344360B2 (en) 2004-09-29 2008-03-18 General Electric Company Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and methods for making same
US8899938B2 (en) 2008-09-22 2014-12-02 Walter Enthammer Blade for a turbomachine
US20110171037A1 (en) * 2008-09-22 2011-07-14 Walter Enthammer Blade for a turbomachine
KR101275846B1 (en) * 2010-11-30 2013-06-17 부산대학교 산학협력단 Rotor blade with protruding trailing edge
EP2761170B1 (en) 2012-01-25 2017-03-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep
US9920741B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2018-03-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep
US11795975B2 (en) * 2015-11-16 2023-10-24 R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade
US20200049166A1 (en) * 2015-11-16 2020-02-13 R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade
US10287006B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-05-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Adjustable propeller blades for sound control
US10370098B1 (en) * 2015-12-18 2019-08-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Adjustable propeller blade with sound flaps
US10179646B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-01-15 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Reconfiguring propellers during aerial vehicle operation
US10822077B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2020-11-03 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Geometrically reconfigurable propellers
US11161604B1 (en) * 2015-12-18 2021-11-02 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Anti-sound production using adjustable propeller blades
US10796585B2 (en) * 2017-06-12 2020-10-06 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa Device for providing real-time rotorcraft noise abatement information
US20180366007A1 (en) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-20 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa Device for Providing Real-Time Rotorcraft Noise Abatement Information
US20240035440A1 (en) * 2020-12-17 2024-02-01 Vestas Wind Systems A/S A pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members
US12066003B2 (en) * 2020-12-17 2024-08-20 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5584661A (en) Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade
US5492448A (en) Rotary blades
EP1984244B1 (en) An airfoil for a helicoptor rotor blade
US20200023946A1 (en) Tiltrotor Aircraft having Rotatable Wing Extensions with Winglets
JP6214851B2 (en) Method and apparatus for aircraft noise reduction
US5082204A (en) All wing aircraft
US5813625A (en) Active blowing system for rotorcraft vortex interaction noise reduction
US3822105A (en) Helicopter blade
EP2505500B1 (en) Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
US20020074452A1 (en) Aircraft
US5108044A (en) Shroud-fin integration shelf for a helicopter empennage structure
EP3178739A1 (en) Rotor blade twist distribution for a high speed rotary-wing aircraft
US6260809B1 (en) Ovate loop for rotary-wing blades
JPS62168793A (en) Helicopter having high advanced speed
US20190300143A1 (en) Aircraft with strut-braced wing system
EP0250062A2 (en) Propeller blade
US4130377A (en) Helicopter blade and rotor
EP3919379A1 (en) Flight efficiency improving system for compound helicopter
CN111674546B (en) Rotor wing pneumatic appearance suitable for small and medium-sized unmanned tilt rotor wing aircraft
US4533101A (en) Wingtip vortex propeller
US5927948A (en) Propeller
US20040113013A1 (en) Rotary/fixed wing aircraft
CN115092390A (en) Overall aerodynamic layout of turboprop vertical take-off and landing fixed-wing aircraft
Orchard et al. The fundamental configuration and design of the compound helicopter
EP0103478A1 (en) Airfoil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, UNI

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROOKS, THOMAS F.;REEL/FRAME:007582/0362

Effective date: 19950706

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20001217

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362