US5584661A - Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade - Google Patents
Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US5584661A US5584661A US08/498,807 US49880795A US5584661A US 5584661 A US5584661 A US 5584661A US 49880795 A US49880795 A US 49880795A US 5584661 A US5584661 A US 5584661A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- swept
- rotor blade
- section
- blade
- noise
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C27/00—Rotorcraft; Rotors peculiar thereto
- B64C27/32—Rotors
- B64C27/46—Blades
- B64C27/467—Aerodynamic features
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a helicopter rotor blade and more particularly to a forward sweep, low noise rotor blade.
- Blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise is one of the most objectionable sources of helicopter noise. This impulsive blade-slap noise can be particularly intense during low-speed landing approach and maneuvers. Over the years, a number of flight and model rotor tests have examined blade tip modification and other blade design changes to reduce this noise.
- Impulsive rotor noise is generally caused by localized aerodynamic events on the blade. At high advancing tip speeds, it is due to the presence of transonic flow and associated shocks about the blade tip region. For this, blade tip speed and thickness effects are the most important parameters in defining the noise mechanism and thus its control. At lower speeds, where BVI noise dominates, the number of important parameters increases because the complexity of the rotor wake and its embedded tip vortices becomes central to the problem.
- the resulting BVI noise is most strongly directed upstream on the advancing side below the rotor. Strong BVI can also occur on the retreating side in the fourth quadrant, with noise directed below and downstream of the rotor.
- the local parameters which govern the intensity and directivity of BVI noise include the strength and core size of the tip vortex at the time of interaction, the interaction geometry (angles and "miss distances") of the blade and vortex and the interaction Mach numbers. Of course, in turn, these parameters are determined by operational requirements, such as rotor thrust and flight conditions, and design parameters, such as rotor speed, number of blades, and blade section (i.e. chord width), plan form, twist and tip shape.
- Rotor tip speed reduction was used successfully on a light helicopter to reduce noise 3 to 4 dB by reducing rotor speed to 90 percent of standard rpm.
- Another method employed higher harmonic control (HHC) of blade pitch to reduce BVI noise. Results have shown up to 6 dB BVI noise reduction depending on operating condition and control phase.
- a rotor blade which includes a straight inboard section, a forward-swept outboard section and an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section.
- the forward-swept outboard section measures between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 30% of the span of the rotor blade.
- the forward-sweep angle of the outboard section is between about 25° and 45°, preferably, 35°.
- the inboard section measures between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 45% of the span of the rotor blade.
- the aft-swept section measures between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 25% of the span of the rotor blade.
- the aft-sweep angle of the aft-swept section is between about 15° and 40°, preferably, 20°.
- the preferred rotor blade embodiment has a constant chord width along the entire blade length.
- Alternate rotor blade embodiments include a chord width which decreases linearly from the blade root to the blade tip; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard section then decreases linearly in the aft-swept and forward swept sections to the blade tip thereafter; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard and aft-swept sections then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section to the blade tip thereafter.
- FIG. 1 is a top view of the rotor blade
- FIG. 2 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width
- FIG. 3 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost section.
- FIG. 4 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost two sections.
- FIG. 1 shows a rotor blade 10 of constant chord width 22 having an inboard section 12, an aft-swept section 14 and an outboard forward-swept section 16.
- the inboard section 12 measures 45% of the span of the blade 10
- the aft-swept section 14 measures 25% of the span of the blade 10
- the forward-swept section 16 measures 30% of the span of the blade 10.
- the span of the blade 10 refers to the distance between the center of the rotor hub, upon which the blade is mounted, and the blade tip.
- the aft-swept section 14 is swept back from the inboard section 12 at an angle 18 of 20°.
- the forward swept section 16 is swept forward from the inboard section 12 at an angle 20 of 35°.
- Alternate embodiments include a rotor blade 10 of chord width 22 wherein the chord width 22 decreases linearly between the blade root and the blade tip (see FIG. 2); a rotor blade 10 wherein the chord width 22 is constant in the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 which then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 3); or a rotor blade of constant chord width 22 in the straight inboard section 12 which then decreases linearly in the aft-swept section and forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 4).
- the actual dimensions of the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 are dependent on aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations after establishing the spanwise extent and sweep angle 20 of the forward swept section 16. Aerodynamically, the design should set the location of the effective lift center to be close to the blade pitch axis to minimize the control loads. The lift from the aft-swept section 14 and that portion of the forward-swept section 16 which is located aft of the 1/4 chord projection line should nominally balance with the outboard forward blade portion. Iterations with standard aeroelastic calculations are then required to establish structural design details.
- the purpose of this rotor blade is to reduce the noise of rotor craft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors.
- the primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the platform over a large portion of the outer blade radius.
- the purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade.
- the aft-swept section permits both an aerodynamic and dynamic force balance for the blade along the 1/4 chord line, and its projection, of the straight inboard section. This allows hub-hinge forces and moments to remain within practical bounds.
- the aft-swept section also provides the stabilizing blade forces and moments to counteract any forward-sweep-dependant instability which occurs during the blade's rotation.
- the noise source showing maximum noise reduction is BVI noise, as the forward-swept section intercepts the advancing side tip vortices at skew angles to the blade rather than at near parallel angles, causing the BVI occurrences to lose much of their impulsive character, thus reducing noise.
- High speed thickness noise is also significantly reduced due to favorable surface thickness gradients for this planform.
- Compressive noise sources are reduced and high advance ratio performance is improved over standard plan forms due to the "forward-sweep" relief of the tip region compressive effect.
- the forward sweep maintains this benefit into the forward rotor quadrant on the advancing side and does not suffer from an unsweeping effect which may occur for swept back designs due to locally parallel vortex orientations in that quadrant. Cabin vibration and loading noise are reduced due to a "load averaging" effect of the double sweep planform.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
Abstract
A forward-swept, low-noise rotor blade includes an inboard section, an aft-swept section and a forward-swept outboard section. The rotor blade reduces the noise of rotorcraft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors. The primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the planform over a large portion of the outer blade radius. The rotor blade also includes an aft-swept section. The purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade. The rotor blade has a constant chord width; or has a chord width which decreases linearly along the entire blade span; or combines constant and decreasing chord widths, wherein the blade is of constant chord width from the blade root to a certain location on the rotor blade, then decreases linearly to the blade tip thereafter. The noise source showing maximum noise reduction is blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise. Also reduced are thickness, noise, high speed impulsive noise, cabin vibration and loading noise.
Description
The invention described herein was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
This is a continuation-in-part application for patent application Ser. No. 08/238,044, filed May 2, 1994, now abandoned.
1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a helicopter rotor blade and more particularly to a forward sweep, low noise rotor blade.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise is one of the most objectionable sources of helicopter noise. This impulsive blade-slap noise can be particularly intense during low-speed landing approach and maneuvers. Over the years, a number of flight and model rotor tests have examined blade tip modification and other blade design changes to reduce this noise.
Impulsive rotor noise is generally caused by localized aerodynamic events on the blade. At high advancing tip speeds, it is due to the presence of transonic flow and associated shocks about the blade tip region. For this, blade tip speed and thickness effects are the most important parameters in defining the noise mechanism and thus its control. At lower speeds, where BVI noise dominates, the number of important parameters increases because the complexity of the rotor wake and its embedded tip vortices becomes central to the problem.
The important interactions on the advancing side of the rotor occur in the first quadrant (between azimuth angles of ψ=0 to 90 deg.) where blades interact with tip vortices which were shed upstream. The resulting BVI noise is most strongly directed upstream on the advancing side below the rotor. Strong BVI can also occur on the retreating side in the fourth quadrant, with noise directed below and downstream of the rotor. The local parameters which govern the intensity and directivity of BVI noise include the strength and core size of the tip vortex at the time of interaction, the interaction geometry (angles and "miss distances") of the blade and vortex and the interaction Mach numbers. Of course, in turn, these parameters are determined by operational requirements, such as rotor thrust and flight conditions, and design parameters, such as rotor speed, number of blades, and blade section (i.e. chord width), plan form, twist and tip shape.
One early BVI noise reduction approach taken was to modify the blade tip vortex structure by tip shape design changes. While this approach was unsuccessful, general lessons learned through theoretical and experimental work were used to improve the blade designs. The newer design rotors were generally four-bladed with lower tip speed, thinner blade sections and swept tips. The effect was to decrease thickness and high speed impulsive noises and, to a lesser extent, the BVI noise. Much of the progress in recent years has been in areas other than blade design. For example, flight operation procedures, such as changes in landing speed and descent rate for fixed glide slope approach, were found to reduce main rotor impulsive noise levels some 2 to 5 dB. Rotor tip speed reduction was used successfully on a light helicopter to reduce noise 3 to 4 dB by reducing rotor speed to 90 percent of standard rpm. Another method employed higher harmonic control (HHC) of blade pitch to reduce BVI noise. Results have shown up to 6 dB BVI noise reduction depending on operating condition and control phase. Although the progress of these studies is impressive, the operational and active control methods may be difficult to apply in practice. Also, for many rotorcraft, they may be less effective than passive blade and tip design changes.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces rotorcraft noise.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which reduces BVI noise in a passive manner.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rotor blade which is applicable to standard helicopters and tiltrotors.
It is yet another object of the present invention to accomplish the foregoing objects in a simple manner.
Additional objects and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the drawing and specification that follow.
A rotor blade is described which includes a straight inboard section, a forward-swept outboard section and an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section. The forward-swept outboard section measures between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 30% of the span of the rotor blade. The forward-sweep angle of the outboard section is between about 25° and 45°, preferably, 35°. The inboard section measures between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 45% of the span of the rotor blade. The aft-swept section measures between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade, and preferably measures 25% of the span of the rotor blade. The aft-sweep angle of the aft-swept section is between about 15° and 40°, preferably, 20°. The preferred rotor blade embodiment has a constant chord width along the entire blade length. Alternate rotor blade embodiments include a chord width which decreases linearly from the blade root to the blade tip; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard section then decreases linearly in the aft-swept and forward swept sections to the blade tip thereafter; or a rotor blade wherein the chord width is constant in the straight inboard and aft-swept sections then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section to the blade tip thereafter.
FIG. 1 is a top view of the rotor blade;
FIG. 2 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width;
FIG. 3 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost section; and
FIG. 4 is a top view of a rotor blade with decreasing chord width along the outermost two sections.
FIG. 1 shows a rotor blade 10 of constant chord width 22 having an inboard section 12, an aft-swept section 14 and an outboard forward-swept section 16. In a preferred embodiment, the inboard section 12 measures 45% of the span of the blade 10, the aft-swept section 14 measures 25% of the span of the blade 10 and the forward-swept section 16 measures 30% of the span of the blade 10. The span of the blade 10 refers to the distance between the center of the rotor hub, upon which the blade is mounted, and the blade tip. The aft-swept section 14 is swept back from the inboard section 12 at an angle 18 of 20°. The forward swept section 16 is swept forward from the inboard section 12 at an angle 20 of 35°.
Alternate embodiments include a rotor blade 10 of chord width 22 wherein the chord width 22 decreases linearly between the blade root and the blade tip (see FIG. 2); a rotor blade 10 wherein the chord width 22 is constant in the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 which then decreases linearly in the forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 3); or a rotor blade of constant chord width 22 in the straight inboard section 12 which then decreases linearly in the aft-swept section and forward-swept section 16 to the blade tip (see FIG. 4).
The actual dimensions of the straight inboard section 12 and the aft-swept section 14 are dependent on aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations after establishing the spanwise extent and sweep angle 20 of the forward swept section 16. Aerodynamically, the design should set the location of the effective lift center to be close to the blade pitch axis to minimize the control loads. The lift from the aft-swept section 14 and that portion of the forward-swept section 16 which is located aft of the 1/4 chord projection line should nominally balance with the outboard forward blade portion. Iterations with standard aeroelastic calculations are then required to establish structural design details.
The purpose of this rotor blade is to reduce the noise of rotor craft, including both standard helicopters and advanced systems such as tiltrotors. The primary noise reduction feature is the forward sweep of the platform over a large portion of the outer blade radius. The purpose of the aft-swept region is to provide a partial balance to pitching moments produced by the outboard forward-swept portion of the blade. The aft-swept section permits both an aerodynamic and dynamic force balance for the blade along the 1/4 chord line, and its projection, of the straight inboard section. This allows hub-hinge forces and moments to remain within practical bounds. The aft-swept section also provides the stabilizing blade forces and moments to counteract any forward-sweep-dependant instability which occurs during the blade's rotation. The noise source showing maximum noise reduction is BVI noise, as the forward-swept section intercepts the advancing side tip vortices at skew angles to the blade rather than at near parallel angles, causing the BVI occurrences to lose much of their impulsive character, thus reducing noise. High speed thickness noise is also significantly reduced due to favorable surface thickness gradients for this planform. Compressive noise sources are reduced and high advance ratio performance is improved over standard plan forms due to the "forward-sweep" relief of the tip region compressive effect. The forward sweep maintains this benefit into the forward rotor quadrant on the advancing side and does not suffer from an unsweeping effect which may occur for swept back designs due to locally parallel vortex orientations in that quadrant. Cabin vibration and loading noise are reduced due to a "load averaging" effect of the double sweep planform.
Although my invention has been illustrated and described with reference to the preferred and alternate embodiments thereof, I wish to have it understood that it is in no way limited to the details of such embodiment, but is capable of numerous modifications for many mechanisms, and is capable of numerous modifications within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (24)
1. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width,
a forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section.
2. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
3. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
4. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
5. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
6. The rotor blade according to claim 1, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
7. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width;
a forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire length of the forward-swept section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section having the same chord width as the straight inboard section.
8. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
9. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
10. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
11. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
12. The rotor blade according to claim 7, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
13. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section of constant chord width;
a forward-swept outboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire lengths of the aft-swept and forward-swept sections.
14. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
15. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
16. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
17. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
18. The rotor blade according to claim 13, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
19. A rotor blade, comprising:
a straight inboard section;
a forward-swept outboard section; and
an aft-swept section located between the straight inboard section and the forward-swept outboard section, wherein the chord width decreases linearly along the entire length of the rotor blade.
20. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the forward-swept outboard section comprises between about 20% and 55% of the span of the rotor blade.
21. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the forward-swept outboard section is swept forward between about 25° and 45°.
22. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the inboard section comprises between about 25% and 50% of the span of the rotor blade.
23. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the aft-swept section comprises between about 15% and 40% of the span of the rotor blade.
24. The rotor blade according to claim 19, wherein the aft-swept section is swept back between about 15° and 40°.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/498,807 US5584661A (en) | 1994-05-02 | 1995-07-06 | Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US23804494A | 1994-05-02 | 1994-05-02 | |
US08/498,807 US5584661A (en) | 1994-05-02 | 1995-07-06 | Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US23804494A Continuation-In-Part | 1994-05-02 | 1994-05-02 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US5584661A true US5584661A (en) | 1996-12-17 |
Family
ID=22896270
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/498,807 Expired - Fee Related US5584661A (en) | 1994-05-02 | 1995-07-06 | Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5584661A (en) |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2768121A1 (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 1999-03-12 | Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) | BLADE WITH REDUCED SOUND SIGNATURE, FOR AIRCRAFT TURNING WING, AND TURNING WING COMPRISING SUCH A BLADE |
EP0867363A3 (en) * | 1997-03-24 | 1999-06-02 | Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter-Helicopter, Ltd. | Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft. |
US6476534B1 (en) | 2000-08-08 | 2002-11-05 | General Dynamics Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. | Permanent magnet phase-control motor |
USRE38040E1 (en) | 1995-11-17 | 2003-03-18 | United Technologies Corporation | Swept turbomachinery blade |
US20040126241A1 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-07-01 | Gecheng Zha | Forward swept high efficiency airplane propeller blades |
JP2005206148A (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2005-08-04 | Eurocopter | Forward/backward rotary vane blade having limited tapering ratio |
US20060067828A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-03-30 | Wetzel Kyle K | Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and method for making same |
US20060216153A1 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2006-09-28 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
CN100425826C (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2008-10-15 | 艾劳埃斯·乌本 | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US20110171037A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2011-07-14 | Walter Enthammer | Blade for a turbomachine |
KR101275846B1 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2013-06-17 | 부산대학교 산학협력단 | Rotor blade with protruding trailing edge |
EP2761170B1 (en) | 2012-01-25 | 2017-03-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep |
US20180366007A1 (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2018-12-20 | United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa | Device for Providing Real-Time Rotorcraft Noise Abatement Information |
US10179646B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-01-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reconfiguring propellers during aerial vehicle operation |
US10287006B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-05-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adjustable propeller blades for sound control |
US10370098B1 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2019-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adjustable propeller blade with sound flaps |
US20200049166A1 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2020-02-13 | R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. | Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade |
US20240035440A1 (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2024-02-01 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | A pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1146121A (en) * | 1914-11-27 | 1915-07-13 | Theodore Amnelius | Propeller. |
US1692081A (en) * | 1925-11-24 | 1928-11-20 | Cierva Juan De La | Aircraft with rotative wings |
US2128780A (en) * | 1937-12-20 | 1938-08-30 | Lawrence C Lake | Airplane propeller |
US3972646A (en) * | 1974-04-12 | 1976-08-03 | Bolt Beranek And Newman, Inc. | Propeller blade structures and methods particularly adapted for marine ducted reversible thrusters and the like for minimizing cavitation and related noise |
US4168939A (en) * | 1977-09-08 | 1979-09-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Acoustically swept rotor |
SU924429A1 (en) * | 1980-08-20 | 1982-04-30 | Всесоюзный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Горной Механики И Технической Кибернетики Им.М.М.Федорова | Working blade of axial fan |
US4684324A (en) * | 1985-08-02 | 1987-08-04 | Gate S.P.A. | Axial fan, particularly for motor vehicles |
-
1995
- 1995-07-06 US US08/498,807 patent/US5584661A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1146121A (en) * | 1914-11-27 | 1915-07-13 | Theodore Amnelius | Propeller. |
US1692081A (en) * | 1925-11-24 | 1928-11-20 | Cierva Juan De La | Aircraft with rotative wings |
US2128780A (en) * | 1937-12-20 | 1938-08-30 | Lawrence C Lake | Airplane propeller |
US3972646A (en) * | 1974-04-12 | 1976-08-03 | Bolt Beranek And Newman, Inc. | Propeller blade structures and methods particularly adapted for marine ducted reversible thrusters and the like for minimizing cavitation and related noise |
US4168939A (en) * | 1977-09-08 | 1979-09-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Acoustically swept rotor |
SU924429A1 (en) * | 1980-08-20 | 1982-04-30 | Всесоюзный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Горной Механики И Технической Кибернетики Им.М.М.Федорова | Working blade of axial fan |
US4684324A (en) * | 1985-08-02 | 1987-08-04 | Gate S.P.A. | Axial fan, particularly for motor vehicles |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
USRE38040E1 (en) | 1995-11-17 | 2003-03-18 | United Technologies Corporation | Swept turbomachinery blade |
USRE45689E1 (en) * | 1995-11-17 | 2015-09-29 | United Technologies Corporation | Swept turbomachinery blade |
USRE43710E1 (en) | 1995-11-17 | 2012-10-02 | United Technologies Corp. | Swept turbomachinery blade |
EP0867363A3 (en) * | 1997-03-24 | 1999-06-02 | Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter-Helicopter, Ltd. | Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft. |
FR2768121A1 (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 1999-03-12 | Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) | BLADE WITH REDUCED SOUND SIGNATURE, FOR AIRCRAFT TURNING WING, AND TURNING WING COMPRISING SUCH A BLADE |
EP0901961A1 (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 1999-03-17 | ONERA (Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches Aérospatiales) | Rotorcraft rotor blade with reduced acoustic signature |
US6116857A (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 2000-09-12 | Onera | Blade with reduced sound signature, for aircraft rotating aerofoil, and rotating aerofoil comprising such a blade |
US6476534B1 (en) | 2000-08-08 | 2002-11-05 | General Dynamics Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. | Permanent magnet phase-control motor |
US20040126241A1 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-07-01 | Gecheng Zha | Forward swept high efficiency airplane propeller blades |
US20110158816A1 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2011-06-30 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US7841836B2 (en) | 2003-01-02 | 2010-11-30 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US8241002B2 (en) | 2003-01-02 | 2012-08-14 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
WO2004061298A3 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2008-06-19 | Aloys Wobben | Wind turbine rotor blade with reduced noise emission |
CN100425826C (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2008-10-15 | 艾劳埃斯·乌本 | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US20090068019A1 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2009-03-12 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US7540716B2 (en) | 2003-01-02 | 2009-06-02 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
US20060216153A1 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2006-09-28 | Aloys Wobben | Rotor blade for a wind power plant |
JP4551778B2 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2010-09-29 | ユーロコプテール | Forward and backward rotor blades with limited taper ratio |
JP2005206148A (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2005-08-04 | Eurocopter | Forward/backward rotary vane blade having limited tapering ratio |
CN100376456C (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2008-03-26 | 欧洲直升机公司 | Two-sweep rotary wing blade with limited taper ratio |
US8757982B2 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2014-06-24 | General Electric Company | Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and methods for making same |
US20060067828A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-03-30 | Wetzel Kyle K | Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and method for making same |
US7344360B2 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2008-03-18 | General Electric Company | Wind turbine rotor blade with in-plane sweep and devices using same, and methods for making same |
US8899938B2 (en) | 2008-09-22 | 2014-12-02 | Walter Enthammer | Blade for a turbomachine |
US20110171037A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2011-07-14 | Walter Enthammer | Blade for a turbomachine |
KR101275846B1 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2013-06-17 | 부산대학교 산학협력단 | Rotor blade with protruding trailing edge |
EP2761170B1 (en) | 2012-01-25 | 2017-03-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep |
US9920741B2 (en) | 2012-01-25 | 2018-03-20 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Wind turbine blade having a geometric sweep |
US11795975B2 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2023-10-24 | R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. | Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade |
US20200049166A1 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2020-02-13 | R.E.M. Holding S.R.L. | Low noise and high efficiency blade for axial fans and rotors and axial fan or rotor comprising said blade |
US10287006B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-05-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adjustable propeller blades for sound control |
US10370098B1 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2019-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adjustable propeller blade with sound flaps |
US10179646B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-01-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reconfiguring propellers during aerial vehicle operation |
US10822077B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2020-11-03 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Geometrically reconfigurable propellers |
US11161604B1 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2021-11-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Anti-sound production using adjustable propeller blades |
US10796585B2 (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2020-10-06 | United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa | Device for providing real-time rotorcraft noise abatement information |
US20180366007A1 (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2018-12-20 | United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa | Device for Providing Real-Time Rotorcraft Noise Abatement Information |
US20240035440A1 (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2024-02-01 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | A pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members |
US12066003B2 (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2024-08-20 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Pitch controlled wind turbine with blade connecting members |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5584661A (en) | Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade | |
US5492448A (en) | Rotary blades | |
EP1984244B1 (en) | An airfoil for a helicoptor rotor blade | |
US20200023946A1 (en) | Tiltrotor Aircraft having Rotatable Wing Extensions with Winglets | |
JP6214851B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for aircraft noise reduction | |
US5082204A (en) | All wing aircraft | |
US5813625A (en) | Active blowing system for rotorcraft vortex interaction noise reduction | |
US3822105A (en) | Helicopter blade | |
EP2505500B1 (en) | Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter | |
US20020074452A1 (en) | Aircraft | |
US5108044A (en) | Shroud-fin integration shelf for a helicopter empennage structure | |
EP3178739A1 (en) | Rotor blade twist distribution for a high speed rotary-wing aircraft | |
US6260809B1 (en) | Ovate loop for rotary-wing blades | |
JPS62168793A (en) | Helicopter having high advanced speed | |
US20190300143A1 (en) | Aircraft with strut-braced wing system | |
EP0250062A2 (en) | Propeller blade | |
US4130377A (en) | Helicopter blade and rotor | |
EP3919379A1 (en) | Flight efficiency improving system for compound helicopter | |
CN111674546B (en) | Rotor wing pneumatic appearance suitable for small and medium-sized unmanned tilt rotor wing aircraft | |
US4533101A (en) | Wingtip vortex propeller | |
US5927948A (en) | Propeller | |
US20040113013A1 (en) | Rotary/fixed wing aircraft | |
CN115092390A (en) | Overall aerodynamic layout of turboprop vertical take-off and landing fixed-wing aircraft | |
Orchard et al. | The fundamental configuration and design of the compound helicopter | |
EP0103478A1 (en) | Airfoil |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, UNI Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROOKS, THOMAS F.;REEL/FRAME:007582/0362 Effective date: 19950706 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20001217 |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |