New! View global litigation for patent families

US5513314A - Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol - Google Patents

Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5513314A
US5513314A US08378966 US37896695A US5513314A US 5513314 A US5513314 A US 5513314A US 08378966 US08378966 US 08378966 US 37896695 A US37896695 A US 37896695A US 5513314 A US5513314 A US 5513314A
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
server
file
data
request
primary
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08378966
Inventor
David R. Kandasamy
Mitchel B. Butler
Andrew L. Foss
Bradley M. Peterson
Chintamani M. Patwardhan
Michael T. Ribble
Dieter Rothmeier
Gaudencio Ramil
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NetApp Inc
Original Assignee
Auspex Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G11INFORMATION STORAGE
    • G11CSTATIC STORES
    • G11C29/00Checking stores for correct operation ; Subsequent repair; Testing stores during standby or offline operation
    • G11C29/70Masking faults in memories by using spares or by reconfiguring
    • G11C29/74Masking faults in memories by using spares or by reconfiguring using duplex memories, i.e. using dual copies
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/16Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
    • G06F11/20Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
    • G06F11/202Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant
    • G06F11/2048Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant where the redundant components share neither address space nor persistent storage
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/16Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
    • G06F11/20Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
    • G06F11/2097Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements maintaining the standby controller/processing unit updated
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30067File systems; File servers
    • G06F17/30182File system types
    • G06F17/30194Distributed file systems
    • G06F17/30197Distributed file systems implemented using NAS architecture
    • G06F17/30203Details of providing network file services by network file servers, e.g. by using NFS, CIFS
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/16Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
    • G06F11/1658Data re-synchronization of a redundant component, or initial sync of replacement, additional or spare unit
    • G06F11/1662Data re-synchronization of a redundant component, or initial sync of replacement, additional or spare unit the resynchronized component or unit being a persistent storage device
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/16Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
    • G06F11/20Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
    • G06F11/202Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant
    • G06F11/2038Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant with a single idle spare processing component

Abstract

A network computer system providing for the fault tolerant storage and retrieval of data files includes a client system connected to a data communication network that may source a first data transfer request to said data communication network for the transfer or retrieval of data. A first server system, including first medium for storing data files, is connected to the data communication network so as to be responsive to first data transfer requests. A second server system, including second medium for storing data files is also connected to said data communication network to also be responsive to first data transfer requests. A control protocol, established between the first and second server systems, coordinates an asymmetric response by the first and second server systems to a first data transfer request, such that file data transferred by the client with the first data transfer request is replicated to the first and second storing mediums and such that file data transferred to the client system in response to the first data transfer is non-replicatively provided to the client system by either the first or second server system.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention is generally related to fault tolerant computer systems and, in particular, to computer systems that provide fault tolerant network filesystem (NFS) data serving.

2. Description of the Related Art

With the increasing reliance on computers throughout society, increasing emphasis is placed upon providing computer systems with insured availability. In general, such systems are referred to as fault tolerant computer systems. There are a number of quite disparate system implementations of fault tolerance, largely due to how critical operations are identified. What constitutes a critical operation is, in turn, dependant on the particular type of tasks required of such computer systems. Consequently, the particular construction of fault tolerancing features implemented in any given computer system may and generally does take significantly different architectural forms.

Several common fault tolerancing considerations exist with regard to most if not all of the disparately architected computer systems. These considerations include minimizing performance loss due to the addition of fault tolerance capabilities, reducing costs and maximizing the utilization of hardware and software in a fault tolerant system, minimizing administration of the fault tolerant features, limiting the impact of the implementation of fault tolerant features on the end users of the services provided by the computer system and, finally, reducing the practical significance of architectural constraints on the expendability or modular enhancement capabilities of the computer system.

One form of fault tolerance in computer systems is known as intra-server fault tolerance. This form of fault tolerance applies to a unified computer system utilizing multiple central processor units (CPUs) operating internally in a mutually redundant fashion. A dedicated error detection control subsystem is provided typically at the CPU base level to identify any operational discrepancies in the programs executed synchronously by the redundant CPUs. A malfunctioning CPU can thus be identified and functionally eliminated from further participation in providing computer system services. The remaining CPU or CPUs may then continue to provide all requested services, pending identification and correction of the faulty CPU.

Conventional intra-server fault tolerant computer systems, though providing a high degree of reliability, inherently embody two significant disadvantages. These disadvantages include a requirement of a highly constrained or specialized architectural design and a high cost due to substantial duplicated hardware. Offsetting these disadvantages is the very high degree of reliability obtained by insuring correct operation down to an essentially machine cycle level of operation.

Another known form of fault tolerance is obtained through the close coupling of computer systems at the data subsystem level. A typical architecture employing such an inter-server approach utilizes redundant pair of computer systems cross coupled through dual ported disk subsystems. Each system is thus permitted to perform as a master initiator of disk data transfer requests. Should either of the computer systems fail, to the exclusion of the corresponding disk subsystem, the remaining computer system can have complete access to the data of the failed system.

The disadvantages of this form of fault tolerance is that there is little protection against the corruption of data written by a failing system and exposure to a failure occurring in either of the disk subsystems. There is also the significant additional cost of providing and maintaining dual-ported disk subsystems on all of the fault tolerance protected computer systems. An architectural limitation is also present in that dual-porting only allows paired systems to be mutually protected. Also, the paired systems must be mutually local, thereby requiring single site survival as a prerequisite to fault tolerant operation. Finally, a substantial performance penalty is involved at the point of any failover. Since the two computer systems only have port-based access to the disk subsystem of the other computer system, the disk subsystem of the failed host must be first cleaned and then remounted by the remaining host. Where large disk subsystems are in use, this process may take several hours.

Finally, another approach for providing fault tolerance occurs in networked computer environments. This approach operates by use of network filesystem shadowing and may be generally implemented as either a client initiated or a server-only compatibility. Client initiated shadowing requires that the client computer system send all network operation requests to two or more pre-established remote server systems. This approach to fault tolerance allows each client to independently insure the identity of the client data in two or more physically separate data storage locations. The client is, however, burdened with the responsibility of monitoring and analyzing the completion of all such duplicated requests. The client must be able to resolve both conventional network transmission errors as well as the loss of access to any of the remote network server systems.

A clear disadvantage of client initiated shadowing is, of course, the requirement for modified operating system software to be executed on each fault tolerant protected client. This approach also admits of inconsistent administration of the client shadowed data storage areas on remote servers by requiring each client to define and control the areas of fault tolerance. Client initiated shadowing also shifts the responsibility for responding to shadowing errors, and their correction, to the user of the client.

The known use of NFS shadowing at the server system level relies on delayed writes of shadowed data from a primary to a secondary server system. NFS server level shadowing thus requires only the real-time logging of all data modifications stored on one server to be replicated to at least the second server. The inter-server transfer of such logged data is performed as a low priority background task so as to have minimal impact on the normal function and performance of the primary server system. Even so, the delayed background transfer of logged data from the primary to backup server system may consume a substantial portion of the network resources of a primary server. Another problem with NFS server shadowing is that, at the point of any failover, the delayed write of logged data to the surviving system creates an exposure window for the loss of data.

Consequently, in view of the necessity of client software modification and user administration in client based NFS shadowing and the performance penalties and real potential for data loss in server based NFS shadowing, the use of NFS based fault tolerant systems has not been generally well received in the industry where data fault tolerance is a requirement.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Thus, a general purpose of the present invention is to provide a robust fault tolerant computer system and control protocol for network filesystem data transactions.

This purpose is achieved by the present invention through the use of a network computer system providing for the fault tolerant storage and retrieval of data files that includes a client system connected to a data communication network that may source a first data transfer request to said data communication network for the transfer or retrieval of data. A first server system, including first medium for storing data files, is connected to the data communication network so as to be responsive to first data transfer requests. A second server system, including second medium for storing data files is also connected to said data communication network to also be responsive to first data transfer requests. A control protocol, established between the first and second server systems, coordinates an asymmetric response by the first and second server systems to a first data transfer request, such that file data transferred by the client with the first data transfer request is automatically replicated to the first and second storing mediums and such that file data transferred to the client system in response to the first data transfer is non-replicatively provided to the client system by either the first or second server system.

The present invention thus realizes the advantage of a high degree of fault tolerance protection for data manipulated within a network filesystem environment through the use of a specialized NFS transaction protocol for insuring a robust, fault tolerance mirroring of data among two or more network file servers.

Another advantage of the present invention is that failover between a mutually fault tolerance protected server systems of the present invention is relatively instantaneous. That is, the failure detection aspect of the protocol of the present invention can detect and handle failure events consistent with recovery from normal NFS error conditions.

A further advantage of the present invention is that no additional hardware and minimal additional software is required for the implementation of the present invention. The protocol utilizes the same network connectivity existent for communication with a client to establish the fault tolerance data communication path between two or more fault tolerance server network systems. The only specific hardware cost involved is the cost of providing for additional disk data storage on each of the server systems that functions as a mirror back-up to the filesystem storage of another server system. A related advantage is that no change is required either to the system software or hardware of a client station in order to make use of the present invention. Furthermore, administration of the present invention is centralized on the server systems.

Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the fault tolerant network protocol of the present invention may be implemented on both conventional and specialized server systems and may be further operative to establish a fault tolerant pairing of server systems that are not nearly identical.

A still further advantage of the present invention is that fault tolerant operation is established in a flexible manner that allows any filesystem or other data object to be established as either a primary or back-up fault tolerant protected element. Consequently, load sharing between multiple file servers may be readily established to minimize the practical implications of establishing fault tolerance behavior between the file servers with respect to specific fault tolerance protected filesystems or data objects.

Yet still another advantage of the present invention is that each primary file server, succeeding a failover event or other operational data handling inconsistency, may readily establish a local record of all data modifications occurring from the point in time of the failover event, thereby permitting a rapid data reconstruction of the back-up file server prior to re-establishing the fault tolerant pairing of filesystems.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other advantages and features of the present invention will become better understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention when considered in connection of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures thereof, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an inter-server system suitable for employing the fault tolerant network filesystem protocol of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the normal client and inter-server protocol transactions necessary to implement a normal NFS write operation in a fault tolerant NFS mode in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 provides a state transition diagram illustrating the sequence of operative states executed by a fault tolerant pairing of NFS servers in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention in performance of a normal NFS write operation;

FIG. 4 provides a state transition diagram illustrating the sequence of states executed in the event of a back-up NFS server failure to complete a client write request in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 provides a state transition diagram illustrating the state transitions in the event of a primary NFS server failure to perform a client write requests in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 provides a state transition diagram illustrating the states executed by a fault tolerant pairing of NFS servers in execution of a client read request in accordance with a preferred and an alternate embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 7 provides a state transition diagram illustrating the states executed by a fault tolerant pairing of NFS servers in execution of a client create request in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A generalized client-server architecture network based computer system 10 is shown in FIG. 1. Network data file servers 12, 14 are commonly connected to, in a typical instance, a local area network (LAN) 16. For purposes of the present invention, each of the file servers 12, 14 includes a disk subsystem at least logically partitioned into a number of mutually discrete filesystems. These filesystems represent separately manageable non-volatile disk data storage spaces. Individual client workstations 18, 20 are also connected directly, as shown, or indirectly to the LAN 16. Each of the workstations 18, 20 and file servers 12, 14, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, may use any one of a number of variants of the UNIX™ operation system, which is generally described in Maurice J. Bach, THE DESIGN OF THE UNIX OPERATING SYSTEM, published by Prentice-Hall, Inc., Copyright 1986 by Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein, and specifically SunOS version 4.1 as distributed by Sun MicroSystems, Inc., 2550 Garcia Avenue, Moutain View, Calif. 94043. The preferred hardware implementation of the workstations 18, 20 is any of the workstation products of Sun MicroSystems, Inc. or Sun NFS network compatible workstation products of other manufacturers. The preferred software implementation of the file servers 12, 14 uses a modified version of the SunOS, version 4.1, operating system, generally as described in Multiple Facility Operating System Architecture, application Ser. No. 08/225,356, filed Apr. 8, 1994, assigned to assignee of the present invention and which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. The preferred hardware implementation of the servers 12, 14 is a multiprocessor file server as detailed in Parallel I/O Network File Server Architecture, U.S. Pat. No. 5,163,131, issued Nov. 10, 1992; Enhanced VMEBUS Protocol Utilizing Synchronous Handshaking and Block Mode Data Transfer, application Ser. No. 08/226,398, filed Apr. 12, 1994; High Speed, Flexible Source/Destination Data Burst Direct Memory Access Controller, U.S. Pat. No. 5,175,825, issued Dec. 29, 1992; Bus Locking Fifo Multi-Processor Communication System, application Ser. No. 07/933,962, filed Aug. 24, 1992; and High-Performance Non-Volatile RAM Protected Write Cache Accelerator System, application Ser. No. 08/152,245, filed Nov. 29, 1993, all assigned to the assignee of the present invention and which are all expressly incorporated herein by reference.

In the preferred operating environment of the present invention, the fundamental transmission control protocol utilized to control the issuance and reissuance of data packets, or datagrams, onto the LAN 16 is a conventional Ethernet (CSMA/CD) protocol. Each datagram provided onto the LAN 16 is encoded with internet addresses (IPs) designating the logical source and destination of the datagram. Each logical entity present on the LAN 16 can thus potentially establish a network dialog with another entity present on the LAN 16 by specifying the assigned internet address of the destination entity in a datagram. The source internet address of the datagram allows the destination entity to responsively identify the unique source of the datagram. Each logical entity on the LAN 16 also nominally uses the destination internet address as a means for screening out datagrams not intended for that logical entity. The use and implementation of the network protocols preferably used by the present invention is described in Andrew S. Tanenbaum, COMPUTER NETWORKS, Second Edition, published by Prentice hall, 1988, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.

In accordance with the preferred embodiments of the present invention, a fault tolerant protocol is implemented for a specific class of remote procedure calls (RPCs) transferred via the LAN 16 as a series of one or more datagrams. Specifically, the class of RPCs encompassed by the fault tolerant protocol include those known as Network Filesystem (NFS) requests. In general, NFS requests provide for two categories of operations: inquiries and updates. Inquiry requests include read data, get attributes, look up, read directory, read link, status, and null. Update requests include write data, set attributes, rename, remove directory, remove file, link, create file, make directory, and make symbolic link. These NFS requests are monitored and managed by the fault tolerant protocol of the present invention in a manner that results in the mirroring of all data within predetermined filesystems present on a primary 12 and least one secondary 14 file server. The mirroring of data to both the primary and secondary file servers 12, 14 is performed essentially concurrently in response to any client workstation 18, 20 that issues NFS requests with respect to the mirrored filesystems.

In brief, the fault tolerant mirroring protocol of the present invention provides for the secondary server 14 to operate in a proxy mode relative to all NFS requests that are otherwise specifically directed to the primary file server 12 and further identified as specific to mirror filesystems physically present on the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. Thus, by proxy operation, the secondary file server 14 concurrently performs all file creation type NFS operations and NFS data update operations requested by any client workstations 18, 20 and directed to the mirror filesystem present on the primary file server 12. Particularly due to the concurrent performance of all NFS data writes, the present invention does not incur the substantial performance penalty of the prior art where serialized data transfers are required in order to maintain synchronization of the data on secondary file servers.

The preferred approach to enabling proxy operation is to establish a virtual server system formed as a logical composite of a primary and one or more secondary servers, constituting an active group, relative to a specific set of mutually fault tolerantly protected individual filesystems. The virtual server is identified by a unique hostname and IP address. A MAC layer multicast address, commonly subscribed to and accessible by the primary and secondary servers, is also assigned to the virtual server. Client workstations access the fault tolerant protected filesystems of the active group by reference to the IP address and through the MAC multicast address of the virtual server. Consequently, NFS requests directed to the virtual server are commonly received by the primary and secondary servers of the active group.

The fault tolerant protocol of the present invention provides for the configuration of the primary and secondary servers so that multiple active groups can be formed. Each active group thus appears to be a unique virtual server the serves a set of one or more filesystems. A primary server in one active group may perform as a primary or secondary server of another active group.

The protocol of the present invention includes a set of protocols used to (1) establish and maintain coordinated operation of the primary and secondary servers in fault tolerant operation, (2) coordinate the transfer of data between client workstations and the primary and secondary servers, and (3) manage the data resynchronization of fault tolerant protected filesystems.

An exported filesystem map is used to initially define and establish coordinated operation of the primary and secondary servers of an active group. An exported filesystem map is provided on each of the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. This map establishes the identity of the local filesystems that are available, or exported, for network access. The map also defines the access privileges of other network entities to the exported filesystems. In the preferred embodiments of the present invention, this map further provides an identification of the mirror filesystems that are to be served through a virtual server system and the host name of the virtual server. Each of the export maps should be identical with respect to the mirrored filesystems of each active group. The export map also provides a preferred ordered identification of the actual server systems that are to participate the virtual server system for each of the mirror filesystems.

The exported filesystem map is consulted by a server system whenever a client requests the mounting of a filesystem. Consistent with the present invention, a mount request is issued by a client 26 against a mirrored filesystem exported by a virtual server. The request is therefore multicast to all of the servers of the relevant active group. The primary server of the relevant active group is responsible for generating an NFS filesystem ID that is to be returned to the client 26 for use in future NFS requests. The primary server 12 is also responsible for initiating a directed network transaction with each of the secondary servers 14 of the active group to provide the secondary servers 14 with the mounted filesystem name and generated NFS filesystem ID. Consequently, each of the servers of the active group maintain a common reference filesystem ID for each exported mirror filesystem.

The fault tolerant data protocols of the present invention will be further described in relation to FIG. 2. For purposes of description only, the network entities are assumed to have simple, non-subnetted Class "C" IP addresses. Also assumed is that the network entities are capable of mutually transmitting and receiving datagrams using a common MAC multicast address.

A client workstation 26, identified by an internet address of 0.33, may issue an NFS request to write data to a client NFS mounted filesystem physically associated with a primary file server 12 having a designated internet address (IP) of 0.121 and a MAC unicast address of :37. Since the NFS write request is to be effectively broadcast on the LAN 16, a secondary file server 14, designated with an internet address of 0.145 and a MAC unicast address of :64, simultaneously receives the NFS write request 30.

On both the primary files server 12 and secondary file server 14, the datagram representing the NFS write request is processed by a substantially conventional TCP/IP stack. In relevant part, this network stack includes a physical layer, a data link layer, a network layer, a transport layer, a session layer and an. application layer.

The physical layer on each primary and secondary server 12, 14 corresponds to the network hardware interface. The data link layer provides the lowest level of datagram integrity checking and flow control. The network layer provides IP routing services including IP destination filtering. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the network layer is implemented as a substantially conventional IP protocol layer, though specifically capable of accepting proxy IP destined datagrams. Proxy operation is enabled by registering a MAC multicast address, such as :99, with the network layer. For system management convenience, a virtual server system internet address 0.116 and a unique hostname are correlated to the MAC multicast address of the virtual server by initialization entries made in the address resolution protocol (ARP) tables on both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. Consequently, datagrams transferred with reference to the internet address of the virtual server will be automatically multicast on the LAN 16 and both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 will receive and accept such datagrams through the network layers of their respective TCP/IP stacks.

The transport layer provides connection based and connectionless transport services. The former is preferably implemented through the use of the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) and the latter through the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Each NFS request is, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, implemented as a remote procedure call (RPC) encapsulated in a UDP datagram. The session layer provides for the establishment of entity sessions based on an underlying connectionless protocol, including specifically UDP packets that contain NFS type RPCs. In the preferred embodiments, the RPC protocol is itself implemented in the session layer.

Finally, the application layer provides for well-known file services, such as file transfer and remote file access. An NFS server layer is the preferred embodiment of the application layer used by the present invention. Each read, write or other NFS request is managed through the NFS server under the control of generally respective network control processes (conventionally nfsd processes).

Now considering the processing of datagrams, those not having a destination IP address of 0.121 or 0.116, as received by the primary server 12, or 0.145 or 0.116, as received by the secondary server 14, are filtered out or blocked in the network layer of the TCP/IP stack. Particular to the present invention, for those NFS requests that are destined for IP address 0.116 the datagram is routed through the UDP portion of the transport layer, the RPC portion of the session layer and to the NFS server. If the NFS request is a permitted operation, as discussed, below, the file request may be processed through the virtual filesystem switch of a conventional Unix operating system kernel or directly, as in the preferred embodiment, to the UNIX filesystem (UFS) portion of the operating system. The UFS 32 is responsible for processing the NFS originated request whereby filesystem data may be read or written to disk. Conventionally, the results of such disk read and write operations are waited on by the UFS 32 before returning any appropriate data and acknowledging completion of the operation ultimately to the client workstation 26.

There are several determinations that are made by the NFS server prior to permitting an NFS request to be processed by the UFS 32. An initial determination must be made as to whether the request is directed to an exported filesystem of the virtual server that is mounted and available. Another determination is whether this actual server is the active primary server or a secondary server for the specific NFS referenced mirror filesystem. These determinations are further made in conjunction with the conventional determination of whether the request is directed to an exported filesystem for which the requesting client workstation has proper access privileges.

A determination is also made by the NFS server as to whether the specific NFS request is a duplicate of a prior received and potentially prior processed request. Thus, for each received NFS request, an entry is made in a Duplicate Request Cache (DRC) structure maintained in-memory by the NFS server. This structure, as modified for use in conjunction with the present invention, is detailed in Table I below.

              TABLE I______________________________________Duplicate Request Cache______________________________________struct dupreq {  u.sub.-- long        dr.sub.-- xid;                    /* transaction ID */  u.sub.-- long        dr.sub.-- proc;                    /* procedure called */  u.sub.-- long        dr.sub.-- vers;                    /* version number                    called */  u.sub.-- long        d.sub.-- prog;                    /* program number                    called */  char       dr.sub.-- inprogress;                    /* 1 if request is                    in progress */  char       dr.sub.-- status;                    /* status of                    original reply */  u.sub.-- short        dr.sub.-- port;                    /* UDP port of                    sender */  struct in.sub.-- addr        dr.sub.-- hostaddr;                    /* IP address of                    sender */  struct timeval        dr.sub.-- timestamp;                    /* time stamp */  struct duprply        *dr.sub.-- reply;                    /* reply for non-                    idempotent req */  struct dupreq        *dr.sub.-- next;                    /* LRU cache                    chain */  struct dupreq        *dr.sub.-- chain;                    /* hash chain */#ifdef FTNFS  char       dr.sub.-- ack;                    /* bit mask of                    backup acks rec'd */  u.sub.-- long        dr.sub.-- inode;                    /* new file inode                    and generation */  u.sub.-- long        dr.sub.-- generation;                    /* as provided by                    the primary */#endif /* FTNFS */};______________________________________

The DRC structure is used to successively record all NFS requests that are accepted for execution by the NFS server. The entries are cached indefinitely, though subject to a least recently used (LRU) entry replacement algorithm. Thus, before an NFS request is accepted and passed to the UFS 30 for execution, the DRC structure is searched to identify any entry that represents a prior duplicate of the present NFS request. This operation of the DRC structure allows for the practical, imperfect nature of the LAN connection between clients and servers wherein datagrams can be lost, corrupted, duplicated, routed out of order, and delayed. Of particular significance is that when NFS requests or their responsive completion datagrams are lost, corrupted, or simply delayed in their delivery, a client workstation may reissue the original NFS request. If the NFS server encounters such a duplicate request, the new request is generally discarded. If the requested operation is currently in progress, the operation continues to its normal conclusion. If the request operation has already completed and a completion datagram sent to the client workstation, though apparently not received, the completion datagram is resent. In general, a repeated completion datagram will ultimately be received by the workstation 26.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the NFS server code, including daemon process executed code generally corresponding to the function of the conventional nfsds on each participating server, is modified to implement the fault tolerant data protocols. As part of the NFS code modification, the DRC structure is also modified to include the following new data fields for each DRC entry. A dr-- ack field is used as a character sized bit-map mask of the potentially multiple secondary servers that have completed this request. Each bit corresponds to one of up to eight secondary servers mapped in the ordered sequence of such servers as established in the export map statically initialized from the /etc/exports file, as further described below. The dr-- inode field is specific to create file, make symbolic link, and make directory NFS requests. This field is used to store the inode number that is to be used in completing the NFS request operation; this field is only used on secondary servers. Finally, the dr-- generation field is again specific to create file, make symbolic link, and make directory NFS requests. The generation number is preferably a timestamp of the time the request referenced inode was originally allocated, typically on a primary server. Since inodes are reused in the course of cyclical file creation and deletion, the generation field is used to verify whether a file referred to by an inode number is truly intended for the current instance of the inode.

The fault tolerant data protocol of an exemplary NFS write operation is shown in FIG. 2. A secondary server 14 operates as a proxy for the primary 12, at least with respect to NFS requests directed against a mirrored filesystem present physically on both of the servers 12, 14. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the file storage space available in the mirror filesystem of the secondary server 14 is at least as large as the corresponding mirror filesystem on the primary server 12. Likewise the number of inodes available in the secondary server mirror filesystem must be at least as many as allocated for the primary server mirror filesystem.

In order to establish proxy operation, the MAC multicast address is programmed into the network layer of the TCP/IP stack at least upon proxy initialization to pass datagrams having IP addresses that match the IP address of the virtual server. Thus, in the case of a NFS write data request 30 directed to a filesystem, designated /usr/homel, physically managed by the server 12 and mirrored by a /usr/homel filesystem provided on the secondary server 14, the datagram containing the NFS write request and accompanying write data is delivered simultaneously by multicast to both servers 2, 14. The NFS server of server 12 recognizes the request 30 as directed to a virtual server exported filesystem for which the server 12 (hostname SvrAB-1) is designated as the primary mirror server and that a secondary mirror filesystem is present specifically on the secondary server 14 (hostname SvrAB-2).

              TABLE II______________________________________/etc/exports______________________________________# Syntax:#filesystem.sub.-- name      keyword=ordered list of#          primary and secondary servers- single secondary server/usr/home1ftnfs=SvrAB-1:SvrAB-2- two secondary servers using High Consistency Read protocol/usr/home2ftnfs=SvrAB-1:SvrAB-2:SvrAB-3,HighRead- alternately ordered servers to load share/usr/home3ftnfs=SvrAB-2:SvrAB-1:SvrAB-3- reversed primary read and write servers/usr/home4ftnfsr=SvrAB-1:SvrAB-2,      ftnfsw=SvrAB-2,SvrAB-1______________________________________

This information is dynamically obtained by the server 12 from the in-memory export map initially constructed from the /etc/exports data file statically stored by the server 12. The preferred format of this data file, as stored in an otherwise conventional /etc/exports data file, is generally provided in Table II.

In similar manner, the secondary server 14 also recognizes that the request is directed to a file system exported by the virtual server. By the ordering of the actual active server hostnames for the /usr/homel filesystem, identically determined from the secondary server's own /etc/exports file, the server 14 self-determines to be the secondary mirror server with respect to this file system.

In normal operation then, the request 30 is processed through to the NFS server layers of both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. Both create corresponding DRC entries. The NFS server of the primary server 12 ultimately passes the write data request to the UFS 32. The write data operation 40 is then executed 40 by the UFS 32. In parallel, the write data request is ultimately passed and executed 42 by the UFS 34 of the secondary file server 14. On completion of the write operation, the UFS 32 write process 40 sleeps 44 pending an update of the DRC entry corresponding to the write request 30. That is, specific for mirrored filesystems in accordance with the present invention, the write data process 40 does not immediately pass through to the generation of a completion datagram to the client on completion of the write operation. Rather, the controlling nfsd process 40 goes to sleep on a wait system call pending an update to the dr-- ack field of the corresponding DRC entry. This field is updated in response to the receipt of an acknowledge datagram 46 from the secondary server 14 issued as a consequence of completion of the write operation 42.

On update of the last acknowledge field bit for the known set of secondary servers 14, the sleeping write process 40 is awakened 48 and execution continues with the generation 50 of a completion datagram 52 that is then returned to the client workstation 26.

Although the primary server 12 may sleep on completion of the write operation, and thereby introduce a delay in the generation and transfer of a completion datagram to the client workstation 36, this delay is small relative to the transfer time of large block NFS write datagrams and the absolute period of time required to write the data to the physical filesystem. The controlling factor in the length of the delay imposed by the present invention is then largely the relative difference in time required by the file servers 12, 14 to each complete the write data operation 40, 42. Where the secondary server 14 is relatively less busy, resulting in a more rapid execution of the write operation 42, the acknowledge field of the corresponding DRC entry in the structure 36 may be updated prior to completion of the write operation 40. Consequently, the added sleep delay is zero. Where the primary server 12 is relatively less burdened, the sleep delay is substantially equal to the difference in time required by the secondary server 14 to complete the write operation 42. In all normal events then, the additional delay imposed by operation of the present invention is generally only the difference in the actual write operation completion time of the servers 12, 14. Thus, the servers 12, 14 can be seen to be operating in a parallel, asynchronous or a loosely concurrent relationship that exhibits minimal re-synchronization delay in order to obtain and maintain identicality between the data stored by mirrored filesystems on the servers 12, 14.

Referring now to FIG. 3, a more detailed control and data flow 60 describing a client write request operation is shown. The flow 60 illustrates the states involved in a successful completion of the NFS write request. The servers 12, 14 each receive and qualify the request 62, 64. Corresponding entries are made in the DRC table structures. The servers then asynchronously perform the write data requests 66, 68. The primary server 12, on completion of the write, initially determines whether an acknowledgment message corresponding to this write request has been received from the secondary server 14. Where an acknowledge has not yet been received, the controlling nfsd server process sleeps 70 waiting for the expected eventual receipt of an acknowledgment datagram.

When the secondary server 14 completes execution of the write request, an acknowledgment datagram is prepared and sent 72 to the primary server 12. The acknowledge datagram includes the client specified transaction ID and client IP address (dr-- xid, dr-- hostaddr) as specified in the originating NFS write request and recorded in the DRC entry on both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. By using the information contained in the acknowledge datagram, the primary server 12 updates the appropriate dr-- ack bit field in the DRC structure 36. The specific DRC entry is found by searching the DRC structure for a DRC entry with the same transaction ID and client IP address (dr-- xid, dr-- hostaddr). The specific dr-- ack bit to update is determinable from the IP source address of the acknowledge datagram and by reference to the ordered list of secondary servers in the in-memory copy of the exports map. When all expected acknowledges have been received, the specific sleeping nfsd process is found by correlation to the position of the DRC entry in the DRC structure. The nfsd process is then awakened. The NFS write request process on the primary server 12 then continues on to the preparation of a conventional NFS completion datagram that is sent to the client 76.

Operation of the present invention in a secondary server failure scenario is generally illustrated in FIG. 4. Again, a client write request is issued by the client 26. The request is received and performed 62, 66 by the primary server 12. As before, the corresponding nfsd process on the primary server 12 then sleeps relative to the specific write request awaiting an acknowledgment datagram from the secondary server 14.

The primary server 12 may fail to receive an acknowledge datagram from the secondary server 14 for a number of reasons. The secondary server 14, in a first instance, may have failed to properly receive the client write request. Alternately, the secondary server 14, in performing the request, may fail for some reason to complete the request. In either case, no acknowledgment datagram is issued by the secondary server 14. Another possibility is that the client write request was properly received and performed by the secondary server 14, but the issued acknowledgment datagram was not properly received by the primary server 12.

In each of these events, the primary server 12 is left sleeping on the DRC entry for an acknowledgment datagram that is not received. However, in accordance with the present-invention, a sleep timer is set by the primary server 12 in putting the nfsd process to sleep on DRC entry. The nfsd process awakes 86 on timeout of the sleep timer in the absence of any received acknowledge datagram. Alternately, the sleep timer is effectively expired upon the aging of the DRC entry through operation of the DRC-LRU algorithm. In either event, the primary server 12 then transitions to a backup failure recovery mode 88.

Where the backup failure occurs in a circumstance where the mirrored filesystems of the active group continue to be properly available, and the integrity of the virtual server is intact but for the failure to receive the acknowledgment datagram, a partial resynchronization of the mirrored file systems is possible. The availability of mirrored filesystems is established by use of a heart-beat protocol, preferably performed on a per mirrored filesystem basis by all active group servers on the LAN 16, to continually broadcast evidence of the continuing availability of the corresponding exported filesystems on the LAN 16. Preferably, this heart-beat protocol is implemented through the issuance of a custom UDP datagram multicast to the fileservers of the active group. Where such heart-beat datagrams are still being exchanged between at least the active group servers 12, 14 of a given mirrored filesystem, thereby indicating that the mirror filesystem on the secondary server 14 is available even though a sleep event for an acknowledge packet has timed out on the primary server 12, the primary server 12 may intentionally withhold issuing any completion datagram to the client 26. Subject to the conventional operation of the NFS protocol, the client 26 will ultimately time-out waiting for the completion datagram and reissue the NFS write request.

Alternately, the primary server 12, prior to issuing a completion datagram for the NFS write request, may itself initiate a conventional NFS write operation directly to the secondary server 14 to force completion of the client requested NFS write operation. In this latter case, the NFS writes to the affected virtual server filesystem location must generally be ordered and queued pending completion of the retry as generally provided for by conventional locking protocols. In both instances, a limited number of either client or primary server 12 retries are monitored by at least the primary server 12 before a failover event is declared. Of course, should a retry be successful, the number and nature of the retries are preferably logged by the servers 12, 14 and a completion datagram is sent to the client 26.

If a failover event is declared by the primary server 12, the in-memory export map maintained by the primary server 12 for the virtual server is updated to effectively delete the secondary server references for the affected filesystem. Where other secondary servers exist for the affected filesystem, the primary server 12 maintains operation of the fault tolerant protocol of the present invention with respect to those remaining secondary servers. If all secondary servers have failed, the primary server continues operation relative to the affected filesystem generally in a conventionally NFS filesystem server mode.

The primary server 14 will declare a failover event on a per filesystem basis immediately on failure to receive a heart-beat datagram for a given mirrored filesystem within a user programmable threshold time period. The absence of these datagrams indicates that corresponding filesystem of the secondary server 14 is unavailable or that there has been a hard network communications failure between the primary and secondary servers 12, 14.

Once a failover event is declared, the primary server 12 ultimately issues a completion datagram to the client workstation 26 indicating a proper completion of the pending NFS write request. The primary server 12 also preferably logs the failover event and issues appropriate status messages to the administrator's console.

Referring now to FIG. 5, the failover scenario associated with a primary server failure is shown. A client write request is properly received by the secondary server 14 and performed 64, 68. An acknowledgment datagram is generated 72 and issued to the primary server 12. However, either due to an initial failure to receive the write request 90 or a failure in execution of the request 92, the client write request was not performed. In either case, a corresponding DRC entry does not exist; the DRC entry never existed or was discarded by the primary server 12 on encountering a write execution error. Consequently, the acknowledgment datagram from the secondary server 14 is received by the primary server 12 as an acknowledgment for an unknown request. The primary server 12 then transitions to a failure handling state 96.

The primary server 12 preferably sends an alert datagram to the secondary server 14. The alert datagram contains sufficient information to identify the unknown acknowledgment datagram as received by the primary server; specifically the transaction ID and client IP address provided in the unknown acknowledgement datagram. The secondary server 14 could, in symmetry to the primary server failover scenario, initiate an NFS write request to the primary server 12 to force success of the original client write request. However, a policy is preferably implemented to the effect that the data on the active primary server for a given filesystem is to be considered at all times to be correct, even in the event of a write failure. Preferably then, the secondary server 14 generally only counts and logs the receipt of such alert datagrams. The primary server 12 also counts and logs but otherwise generally ignores the unknown acknowledge datagram. Both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 rely on the client 26 to repeat any unacknowledged NFS write request.

However, should either the primary or secondary server 12, 14 recognize that a user programmable threshold number of unknown acknowledge or corresponding alert datagrams have been received, a failover event is declared to exclude the primary server 12 from the active group mirroring the affected filesystem.

Another primary server failure scenario occurs on a partial failure of the primary server 12. In this instance, the secondary server 14 will recognize that a filesystem of the primary server 12 is unavailable by a failure recorded by the heart-beat protocol. In this event, the secondary server 14, assuming that the server 14 is the first listed secondary server, updates its in-memory export map to exclude active group participation by the primary server 12 relative to the affected filesystem and to establish the secondary server 14 as the new active primary server for the affected filesystem. Any other secondary servers similarly update their in-memory export maps to recognize secondary server 14 as the new primary server. In all events, no acknowledgment datagram is sent to the primary server 12 by the secondary server 14 at state 72. Rather, a conventional NFS completion datagram is sent directly to the client 26 by the secondary server 14.

Where a secondary server 14 looses all communication with an active primary server 12, the secondary server 14 should not assume that the primary server 12 has failed. Rather, the likely failure point is the LAN 16. In that case, the possibility of multiple active primary servers 12 serving the same file system must be avoided. Therefore, a secondary server 14 should not be promoted to an active primary state where all communication with an active primary server 12 is lost.

The present invention provides three methods of satisfying a client read request, with each method providing a greater degree of synchronization between the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. The first two methods of responding to a client read request are generally shown in FIG. 6. The first and simplest method of performing a client read request is the asynchronous read. For an asynchronous read, the primary server 12 receives the client read request 100, performs the request 102, and then immediately acknowledges completion of the read request to the client workstation 26.

The client read request is also received 106 in parallel by the secondary server 14. The read request itself is ignored, though a DRC entry is created in the DRC structure 38 on the secondary server 14. The last access time field associated with the referenced inode of the read request is also updated on the corresponding filesystem to essentially the time that the read request was received and processed by the secondary server 14. This updated access time may differ from the access time recorded for the corresponding inode on the primary server 12. However, the significance of the difference in time is mitigated by the fact that few programs are sensitive to such a slight difference in the last access timestamp of a data file. Further, the access times recorded by the secondary server will be biased in a generally consistent manner relative to the access times recorded on the primary server 12.

Where assurance that access times are properly recorded by the secondary server 14 or where a higher level of robustness in performing the read request is desired, an acknowledged read operation may be implemented. An acknowledged read differs from the asynchronous read in that the server process on the primary server 12 will sleep 110 on the primary DRC entry corresponding to the client read request rather than immediately issuing a completion datagram 104 to the client 26. The operation of the secondary server 14 similarly differs in that an acknowledgment datagram is generated 112 and issued to the primary server 12 following a successful update of the inode access time on the secondary server 14. The corresponding server process on the primary server 12 will then wake 114 in response to receipt of the acknowledgment datagram and proceed to generate and issue 104 a completion datagram to the client workstation 26 to provide the read data and signal completion of the read request.

Finally, a fully serialized method of responding to a client read request is shown in FIG. 7. The states executed by the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 are essentially the same for performing a serialized read as used in responding to a client create request, as will be discussed subsequently.

The fully serialized client read operation establishes essential identity in the inode information maintained on both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 for the request referenced read data file. This is accomplished by establishing multiple interactions between the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 to transfer last access time inode information to the secondary server 14.

In operation, the primary server 12 receives 120 a client read request and performs 122 the requested operation. Concurrently and so far asynchronously, the secondary server 14 also receives the request 124. As with the prior methods of responding to read requests, the secondary server 14 effectively ignores the read request, though a DRC entry is prepared and entered in the DRC structure 38 on the secondary server 14. The secondary server 14 read server process then sleeps 126 on the DRC entry.

The primary server 12, on completion of the read request 122, prepares a send datagram 128 containing at least the last access timestamp of the inode read in response to the client read request, the transaction ID, inode number and the generation of the inode. This datagram is then sent to the secondary server 14 to wake 132 the sleeping server read process on the secondary server 14. The secondary server 14 then updates 134 the corresponding inode with the last access timestamp provided. The secondary server 14 then returns 136 an acknowledgment datagram to the primary server 12.

In response, the appropriate read server process on the primary server, having slept 130 on the DRC entry corresponding to the read request, is awakened 138 in response to the receipt of the acknowledge datagram. A completion datagram is then prepared 140 and forwarded to the client workstation 26.

As can be seen, the inode date information present on both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 is maintained identically by use of the serialized read method. Identity of inode date information in this manner, however, requires serialized updating of the inodes on the primary and secondary servers 12, 14. A cumulatively significant though atomically small delay may be incurred through the use of the serialized read method.

In accordance with the present invention, the handling of the create NFS requests requires that the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 allocate directly corresponding inodes for files created on the mirrored filesystems. For these operations, the use of a serialized request response method is desirable.

The create NFS operations include: file creation, directory creation, and symbolic link creation. In each of these create operations, the essential requirement is the establishment and maintenance of uniquely corresponding inodes in each of the mirror filesystems. This is accomplished in accordance with the present invention by the transmission, from the primary 12 to the secondary server 14 and any other secondary servers, of selected inode related information first generated by the primary server 12 in performing a NFS create request 122. At least the allocated inode number, generation number and file creation timestamp, are sent 128 as part of a send datagram from the primary-server 12 to the secondary server 14 and any other secondary servers. This information is then uniquely passed by the NFS client of the secondary server 14 to the UFS 34 for use in actually performing the create request operation 142. Conventionally, the UFS 34 would independently allocate a new inode within the designated filesystem in performing a file creation operation. However, by forcing all inodes in the secondary mirror filesystem to be allocated identically as in the primary mirror filesystem, the primary server 12 can preemptively specify the new inode number to be used in the file creation operation performed by the secondary server 14. Naturally, before using the primary server specified inode number, the secondary server 14 preferably checks to ensure that the specified inode is not presently in use. If determined to be in use, a error has occurred and a failover event is declared against the affected filesystem on the secondary server 14.

Consequently, so long as client create requests are successfully executed by the secondary server 14, each inode on a mirror filesystem maintained by the secondary server 14 is created in each corresponding mirror filesystem with an identical inode number relative to the primary server 12. Consequently, subsequent client read and write requests that identify the request against a specific filesystem, inode number and generation can be commonly performed by both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 with the assurance that the request is performed against mirrored data.

A further and desirable consequence is that, on the occurrence of a failover event, no exceptional action must be taken with regard to the client workstations that have mounted a filesystem from the virtual server. All NFS file handles held by client workstations remain equally valid as against both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 of the virtual server. Indeed, the client workstation 26 is largely unaffected and unaware of the occurrence of any failure or failover as between the servers 12, 14.

Another consideration dealt with by the present invention is the recovery of mirrored status between mirror filesystems on the primary and secondary servers 12, 14 following the correction of the cause of a failover event. A number of different approaches to recovery are contemplated by the present invention. The simplest recovery technique is to simply quiesce the failover surviving server and copy all data files within the surviving mirror filesystem to the mirror filesystem of the rejoining server. This copy can be performed selectively based at least on last modification timestamps that are subsequent to the moment of the failover event. The exact time of occurrence of the failover event is preferably recorded at the time of occurrence by the surviving server through the /etc/syslogd service or an equivalent event logging service.

The preferred partial resynchronization approach to recovery is to provide for the logging of all file data modifications, including file creations and deletions, that are made to the mirror filesystem of the surviving server from the point of the failover event to the quiescing of read/write activity in preparation for recovery. The backup logs may store the accumulated incremental changes to the data files present on the mirror filesystem. While the mirror filesystems are otherwise quiesced, this log may simply be transferred or replayed from the surviving server to the rejoining server, thereby resynchronizing the data present on the mirrored filesystems. Where write activity is not quiesced on the surviving server during the partial resynchronization, a new log of write information can be accumulated by the surviving server while writing a prior log to the rejoining server. Successive logs will be smaller until either no writes occur to the affected filesystem during the transfer of a log or, once the current log is of a sufficiently small size, writes to the filesystem on the surviving fileserver are temporarily suspended or held off until the final log is written to the rejoining server.

Finally, where the failover event is the result of a catastrophic failure of a server, the mirror filesystem of the rejoining server may need to be completely reconstructed using a full resynchronization of the affected filesystem. In this event, the filesystem of the surviving file server is quiesced and an entire filesystem copy performed to transfer an image copy of the surviving filesystem to the rejoining server. Significantly, this disk copy must be performed so as to preserve the inode number and generation designation associated with each of the files present on the mirror filesystems.

Once a data identity has been re-established between the mirror filesystems of the primary and secondary servers 12, 14, the filesystem export map stored in memory by both the primary and secondary servers 12, 14, and any other secondary servers, can be updated to reflect subsequent operation subject to the fault tolerant mirroring protocol of the present invention. The mirror filesystems can then be placed in an active state available for service with respect to client requests.

Finally, the present invention provides for a negotiation between the fileservers of an active group to establish and, as necessary, change roles as primary and secondary servers in the active group. During ordinary startup operations, the mirror filesystems that combine to form a filesystem of a virtual server cannot be assured to become available from each of the servers of the active group at the same time. Consequently, the new availability of a mirror filesystem is treated in the same manner as the filesystem of a fileserver rejoining the active group following a failover. Thus, the first fileserver of an active group, preferably with manual confirmation, will generally become the active primary for a given mirror filesystem, though the fileserver may only be listed as a secondary server for that filesystem. A partial resynchronization log is started at least with the first client workstation write to the filesystem. If, however, the partial resynchronization log has reached a user programmable size, the logging of write data will have been terminated. In that case, a full resynchronization of the mirror filesystems is required.

As a second fileserver, serving the same mirror filesystem, completes its startup, a partial or full resynchronization is performed. The mirror filesystem of the second fileserver is then included in the operation of the virtual server for that filesystem. However, the rejoining server may be the /etc/exports listed primary server for the rejoining filesystem. Preferably then, the active primary fileserver will preferably switch to its listed secondary role for the affected filesystem and the rejoining server will assume the role of the active primary.

A fault tolerant NFS mirroring protocol has thus been described. The protocol enables substantially asynchronous mirroring of filesystems on physically separate file servers necessarily interconnected only by the pre-existing network LAN. All client requests directed to the mirrored filesystems proceed as ordinary NFS request operations and, by operation of the present fault tolerant protocol, result in concurrent operations on the separate file servers to implement the mirroring of the NFS data.

Naturally, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above disclosure. These modifications may include the use of redundant, alternate and concurrent LAN or other logical data connections to interconnect the client with the involved filesystem mirroring file servers. The protocol may also be applied to transport services other than the NFS class of UDP services. In particular, the protocol may be extended to cover TCP/IP protocols and other sets of RPC transactions. Finally, it should be recognized that the protocol of the present invention is not limited to inter-operability among the products of a single vendor, but may be implemented independent of the specific hardware and software executed by any particular file server. Accordingly, it is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims (18)

We claim:
1. A computer system providing for the fault tolerant storage and retrieval of data files, said computer system comprising:
a) a client computer system connected to a data communication network, said client computer system providing a first data transfer request to said data communication network;
b) first file server computer system, including first means for storing data files, connected to said data communication network, said first file server computer system being responsive to said first data transfer request;
c) second file server computer system, including second means for storing data files, connected to said data communication network, said second file server computer system being responsive to said first data transfer request; and
d) control means, distributed among and coupling said first and second file server computer systems, for coordinating an asymmetric response by said first and second file server computer systems to said first data transfer request, such that file data transferred by said client computer system with said first data transfer request is implicitly replicated to said first and second storing means and such that file data transferred to said client computer system in response to said first data transfer is non-replicatively provided to said client computer system by either of said first and second file server computer systems.
2. The computer system of claim 1 wherein data referenced by a predetermined data transfer request is stored by said first and second file server computer systems referencable by a common data identifier.
3. The computer system of claim 2 wherein said first and second file server computer systems each include means for determining whether data referencable by said common data identifier is transferrable by the other one of said first and second file server computer systems.
4. A server computer system providing for the fault-tolerant serving of data mutually communicating over a network with another server computer system and a client system in response to a network request having a source address and a destination address, said server computer system comprising:
a) a mass storage device; and
b) a processor coupleable to a communications network, said processor being coupled to said mass storage device and providing for the exchange of data between said communications network and said mass storage device in response to a predetermined request for the transfer of data by a client system, said processor including
means for defining qualifications applicable to the transfer of predetermined data; and
means, capable of distinguishing between a multiplicity of destination addresses, for processing network requests having one of a plurality of destination addresses, said processing means selecting between a plurality of response processes based on the destination address of said predetermined request, at least one of said response processes providing for the confirmation of the mutual performance of said predetermined request with another server computer system.
5. A fileserver system comprising:
a) a first server system including a first mass storage device providing a first data storage area; and
b) a second server system including a second mass storage device and providing a second data storage area,
said first and second server systems being separately coupleable to a network that provides for the transmission of network requests between a client system and said first and second server systems, said first and second server systems each including means for selectively processing network requests having a predetermined network destination address, said first and second server systems each including means for coordinating between said first and second server systems the loosely concurrent processing of network requests having said predetermined network destination address by said first and second server systems.
6. The fileserver system of claim 5 wherein said coordinating means of each of said first and second server systems provides for the selection between a primary and a secondary method of processing said predetermined network request, said coordinating means of said first and second server systems providing for the selection of a single primary method from among said first and second server systems for processing said predetermined network request, the other one of said first and second server systems selecting said secondary method for processing said predetermined network request.
7. The fileserver system of claim 6 wherein said coordinating means provides for the generation of a common identification datum for said first and second data storage areas in response to said predetermined network request and wherein said single primary process provides for the generation and transmission of said common identification datum to said client system.
8. A process of cooperatively operating a plurality of file server computer systems with respect to a client computer system coupled to said plurality of file server computer systems by a communications network, said process comprising the steps of:
a) transmitting by said client computer system a predetermined file request onto said communications network;
b) selectively receiving said file request by a first file server computer system, said first file server determining to perform said predetermined file request, selectively performing said predetermined file request and transmitting a predetermined file request response onto said communications network to said client computer system; and
c) selectively receiving said predetermined file request by a second file server, said second file server determining to perform said predetermined file request and selectively performing said predetermined file request.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein said predetermined file request is received by said second server computer system logically in parallel with the receipt of said predetermined file request by said first file server computer system.
10. The process of claim 8 and 9 wherein said step of receiving said predetermined file request by said first file server computer system further includes the step of determining whether a predetermined file request acknowledgement should be received from said second file server computer system prior to transmitting said predetermined file request response onto said communications network to said client computer system.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein said step of receiving said predetermined file request by said first file server computer system further includes the step of determining whether a predetermined message, responsive to said predetermined file request, should be transmitted to said second file server computer system prior to transmitting said file request response onto said communications network to said client computer system.
12. The process of claim 11 wherein said step of receiving said predetermined file request by said first file server computer system further includes the step of determining predetermined file identifier data in response to said predetermined file request and transmitting said predetermined file identifier data to said second file server computer system with said predetermined message.
13. A process of maintaining the logically synchronous operation of a plurality of file server computer systems with respect to the providing of file services to a client computer system, said process comprising the steps of:
a) providing for the transmission of file requests by said client computer system to a logical file server network address;
b) providing for a plurality of file server computer systems to receive in common file requests transmitted to said logical file server network address;
c) providing for the mutual coordination of said plurality of file server computer systems to provide a unique response to said client computer system in response to a predetermined file request.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein said step of providing for the mutual coordination of said plurality of file server computer systems includes the transmission of a predetermined request acknowledgement between said plurality of file server computer systems in response to the receipt of said predetermined file request.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein said step of providing for the mutual coordination of said plurality of file server computer systems further includes the transmission of a predetermined message between said plurality of file server computer systems in response to the receipt of said predetermined file request wherein said predetermined message provides coordinating data from a first file server computer system to a second file server computer system.
16. A method of operating a file server having a processor, a data storage device, and a network interface coupleable to a network for transmitting and receiving network messages including file requests and file responses, said method comprising the steps of:
a) establishing a first network address for enabling receipt of network communications;
b) establishing a proxy network address for enabling receipt of file requests by said network interface, said proxy network address being shared with another file server;
c) receiving a predetermined file request identified by said proxy network address, said predetermined file request defining an operation to transfer file data with respect to said data storage device;
d) determining whether to perform a file operation against said data storage device, responsive to said predetermined file request, as a primary or secondary file server with respect to said proxy network address;
e) performing said file operation either as a primary or secondary file server including, when performing said file operation as said primary file server, transmitting a file response with said proxy network address and responsive to said predetermined file request to said network and, when performing said file operation as said secondary file server, selectively transmitting an acknowledgement message to said another file server.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein said step of performing said file operation includes, when performing said file operation as a primary file server, selectively waiting for the receipt of said acknowledgement message from said another file server prior to transmitting said file response with said proxy network address and responsive to said predetermined file request to said network.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein said step of performing said file operation includes, when performing said file operation as a primary file server, transmitting a predetermined message for said another file server to said network providing predetermined information obtained from performing said file operation, waiting for the receipt of said acknowledgement message from said another file server prior to transmitting said file response with said proxy network address and responsive to said predetermined file request to said network and, when performing said file operation as said secondary file server, waiting for receipt of said predetermined message prior to performing said file operation, performing said file operation, and selectively transmitting an acknowledgement message to said file server.
US08378966 1995-01-27 1995-01-27 Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol Expired - Lifetime US5513314A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08378966 US5513314A (en) 1995-01-27 1995-01-27 Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08378966 US5513314A (en) 1995-01-27 1995-01-27 Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol
JP52300896A JP4005631B2 (en) 1995-01-27 1996-01-23 Fault tolerant nfs server system and mirroring protocol
EP19960903668 EP0806010A4 (en) 1995-01-27 1996-01-23 Fault tolerant nfs server system and mirroring protocol
CA 2211654 CA2211654C (en) 1995-01-27 1996-01-23 Fault tolerant nfs server system and mirroring protocol
PCT/US1996/001007 WO1996023259A1 (en) 1995-01-27 1996-01-23 Fault tolerant nfs server system and mirroring protocol

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5513314A true US5513314A (en) 1996-04-30

Family

ID=23495275

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08378966 Expired - Lifetime US5513314A (en) 1995-01-27 1995-01-27 Fault tolerant NFS server system and mirroring protocol

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US5513314A (en)
EP (1) EP0806010A4 (en)
JP (1) JP4005631B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2211654C (en)
WO (1) WO1996023259A1 (en)

Cited By (302)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5594863A (en) * 1995-06-26 1997-01-14 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for network file recovery
US5613079A (en) * 1994-04-20 1997-03-18 Microsoft Corporation System for verifying the proper operation of a replication facility
US5628005A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-05-06 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing opportunistic file access in a network environment
US5644698A (en) * 1996-05-30 1997-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Configurable reuse delay criterion for storage volumes
US5649152A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-07-15 Vinca Corporation Method and system for providing a static snapshot of data stored on a mass storage system
US5675723A (en) * 1995-05-19 1997-10-07 Compaq Computer Corporation Multi-server fault tolerance using in-band signalling
US5692155A (en) * 1995-04-19 1997-11-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for suspending multiple duplex pairs during back up processing to insure storage devices remain synchronized in a sequence consistent order
US5696895A (en) * 1995-05-19 1997-12-09 Compaq Computer Corporation Fault tolerant multiple network servers
US5704031A (en) * 1995-03-30 1997-12-30 Fujitsu Limited Method of performing self-diagnosing hardware, software and firmware at a client node in a client/server system
US5713017A (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Dual counter consistency control for fault tolerant network file servers
DE19623126A1 (en) * 1996-06-10 1998-01-29 Stn Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Electronic information and orientation system for military application troop movements
US5745748A (en) * 1994-12-09 1998-04-28 Sprint Communication Co. L.P. System and method for direct accessing of remote data
US5748897A (en) * 1996-07-02 1998-05-05 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Apparatus and method for operating an aggregation of server computers using a dual-role proxy server computer
US5765173A (en) * 1996-01-11 1998-06-09 Connected Corporation High performance backup via selective file saving which can perform incremental backups and exclude files and uses a changed block signature list
US5771344A (en) * 1995-04-27 1998-06-23 Tandem Computers Incorporated Computer system with remotely duplicated and dynamically reconfigurable memory
US5799141A (en) * 1995-06-09 1998-08-25 Qualix Group, Inc. Real-time data protection system and method
US5802298A (en) * 1995-08-28 1998-09-01 Fujitsu Limited Defect-free type remote procedure call system and method thereof
US5812748A (en) * 1993-06-23 1998-09-22 Vinca Corporation Method for improving recovery performance from hardware and software errors in a fault-tolerant computer system
US5815649A (en) * 1995-10-20 1998-09-29 Stratus Computer, Inc. Distributed fault tolerant digital data storage subsystem for fault tolerant computer system
US5819310A (en) * 1996-05-24 1998-10-06 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for reading data from mirrored logical volumes on physical disk drives
US5819020A (en) * 1995-10-16 1998-10-06 Network Specialists, Inc. Real time backup system
US5828651A (en) * 1995-12-28 1998-10-27 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Device for duplicating connectionless server
WO1998049620A1 (en) * 1997-04-25 1998-11-05 Symbios, Inc. Redundant server failover in networked environment
US5835953A (en) 1994-10-13 1998-11-10 Vinca Corporation Backup system that takes a snapshot of the locations in a mass storage device that has been identified for updating prior to updating
WO1999023571A1 (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-05-14 Inca Technology, Inc. Automatically configuring network-name-services
US5909540A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-06-01 Mangosoft Corporation System and method for providing highly available data storage using globally addressable memory
US5918229A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-06-29 Mangosoft Corporation Structured data storage using globally addressable memory
US5941947A (en) * 1995-08-18 1999-08-24 Microsoft Corporation System and method for controlling access to data entities in a computer network
US5941999A (en) * 1997-03-31 1999-08-24 Sun Microsystems Method and system for achieving high availability in networked computer systems
US5951694A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-09-14 Microsoft Corporation Method of redirecting a client service session to a second application server without interrupting the session by forwarding service-specific information to the second server
US5956489A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation Transaction replication system and method for supporting replicated transaction-based services
US5956509A (en) * 1995-08-18 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
US5983360A (en) * 1996-06-27 1999-11-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Information processing system with communication system and hot stand-by change-over function therefor
US5987506A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-11-16 Mangosoft Corporation Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment
US5987554A (en) * 1997-05-13 1999-11-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of controlling the transfer of information across an interface between two buses
US5996086A (en) * 1997-10-14 1999-11-30 Lsi Logic Corporation Context-based failover architecture for redundant servers
US6009541A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-12-28 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for performing an extensive diagnostic test in conjunction with a bios test routine
US6014676A (en) * 1996-12-03 2000-01-11 Fairbanks Systems Group System and method for backing up computer files over a wide area computer network
US6018805A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-01-25 Recipio Transparent recovery of distributed-objects using intelligent proxies
US6026474A (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-02-15 Mangosoft Corporation Shared client-side web caching using globally addressable memory
US6029168A (en) * 1998-01-23 2000-02-22 Tricord Systems, Inc. Decentralized file mapping in a striped network file system in a distributed computing environment
US6032271A (en) * 1996-06-05 2000-02-29 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying faulty devices in a computer system
US6038665A (en) * 1996-12-03 2000-03-14 Fairbanks Systems Group System and method for backing up computer files over a wide area computer network
US6058445A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-05-02 Micron Electronics, Inc. Data management method for adding or exchanging components on a running computer
US6065053A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-05-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for resetting a server
US6073255A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-06-06 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of reading system log
US6079028A (en) * 1997-04-23 2000-06-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Fault tolerant architectures for continuous media servers
US6081807A (en) * 1997-06-13 2000-06-27 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for interfacing with a stateless network file system server
US6088721A (en) * 1998-10-20 2000-07-11 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Efficient unified replication and caching protocol
US6088816A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-07-11 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of displaying system status
US6105089A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-08-15 Micron Electronics, Inc. Data management system for adding or exchanging components on a running computer
US6122758A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-09-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for mapping environmental resources to memory for program access
US6122629A (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-09-19 Compaq Computer Corporation Filesystem data integrity in a single system image environment
US6122746A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-09-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for powering up and powering down a server
US6125372A (en) * 1997-10-03 2000-09-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Server system and method of updating server software
US6134673A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for clustering software applications
US6134668A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of selective independent powering of portion of computer system through remote interface from remote interface power supply
US6138250A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for reading system log
US6138179A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for automatically partitioning and formatting a primary hard disk for installing software in which selection of extended partition size is not related to size of hard disk
US6145090A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-11-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Switch control method of redundantly structured computer system
US6144992A (en) * 1997-05-09 2000-11-07 Altiris, Inc. Method and system for client/server and peer-to-peer disk imaging
US6145089A (en) * 1997-11-10 2000-11-07 Legato Systems, Inc. Server fail-over system
US6145098A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-07 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for displaying system status
US6148355A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-14 Micron Electronics, Inc. Configuration management method for hot adding and hot replacing devices
US6151023A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-21 Micron Electronics, Inc. Display of system information
US6154835A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-11-28 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for automatically configuring and formatting a computer system and installing software
US6163825A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot adding a network adapter by identifying and executing the adapter driver based upon the logical board number of the network adapter
US6163856A (en) * 1998-05-29 2000-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for file system disaster recovery
US6163849A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of powering up or powering down a server to a maintenance state
US6163853A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6170028B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-02 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable network adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6173346B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-09 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable storage adapter using a programmable processor for selectively enabling or disabling power to adapter slot in response to respective request signals
US6175490B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-01-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Fault tolerant computer system
US6178441B1 (en) * 1998-09-21 2001-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system in a computer network for the reliable and consistent ordering of client requests
US6182224B1 (en) * 1995-09-29 2001-01-30 Cisco Systems, Inc. Enhanced network services using a subnetwork of communicating processors
US6182180B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-30 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for interfacing buses
US6179486B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-30 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot add of a mass storage adapter on a system including a dynamically loaded adapter driver
US6192434B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-20 Micron Electronics, Inc System for hot swapping a programmable adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6195717B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-27 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of expanding bus loading capacity
US6199173B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-03-06 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for mapping environmental resources to memory for program access
WO2001017153A2 (en) * 1999-09-01 2001-03-08 Netkingcall, Co., Ltd. Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way tcp
US6202111B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-03-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of a network adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6202160B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-03-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for independent powering of a computer system
US6205503B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-03-20 Mallikarjunan Mahalingam Method for the hot swap and add of input/output platforms and devices
US6212521B1 (en) * 1997-09-25 2001-04-03 Fujitsu Limited Data management system, primary server, and secondary server for data registration and retrieval in distributed environment
US6212585B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-04-03 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of automatically configuring a server after hot add of a device
US6219734B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-04-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of a mass storage adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6223234B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-04-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for the hot swap and add of input/output platforms and devices
US6223231B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2001-04-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for highly-available processing of I/O requests while application processing continues
US6240105B1 (en) 1998-03-30 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corporation Video server streaming synchronization
US6243773B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-05 Micron Electronics, Inc. Configuration management system for hot adding and hot replacing devices
US6243385B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2001-06-05 Sercomm Corp. Simultaneous multi-user/single connection internet access method and system
US6243838B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-05 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for automatically reporting a system failure in a server
US6247139B1 (en) 1997-11-11 2001-06-12 Compaq Computer Corp. Filesystem failover in a single system image environment
US6247080B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-12 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of devices
US6247141B1 (en) 1998-09-24 2001-06-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Protocol for providing replicated servers in a client-server system
US6246666B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2001-06-12 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling an input/output subsystem in a failed network server
US6247079B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2001-06-12 Micron Electronics, Inc Apparatus for computer implemented hot-swap and hot-add
US6249828B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot swap of a mass storage adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6249879B1 (en) * 1997-11-11 2001-06-19 Compaq Computer Corp. Root filesystem failover in a single system image environment
US6249834B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-19 Micron Technology, Inc. System for expanding PCI bus loading capacity
US6253334B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-26 Micron Electronics, Inc. Three bus server architecture with a legacy PCI bus and mirrored I/O PCI buses
US6260125B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2001-07-10 Ncr Corporation Asynchronous write queues, reconstruction and check-pointing in disk-mirroring applications
US6260124B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically resynchronizing backup data
US6260155B1 (en) 1998-05-01 2001-07-10 Quad Research Network information server
US6263387B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-07-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for automatically configuring a server after hot add of a device
US6266721B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System architecture for remote access and control of environmental management
US6266785B1 (en) 1998-09-01 2001-07-24 Ncr Corporation File system filter driver apparatus and method
US6266335B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2001-07-24 Cyberiq Systems Cross-platform server clustering using a network flow switch
US6269412B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-31 Micron Technology, Inc. Apparatus for recording information system events
US6269417B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-31 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for determining and displaying the physical slot number of an expansion bus device
US6275953B1 (en) * 1997-09-26 2001-08-14 Emc Corporation Recovery from failure of a data processor in a network server
US6282673B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-08-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of recording information system events
US6289390B1 (en) 1993-08-18 2001-09-11 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
US6292905B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2001-09-18 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for providing a fault tolerant network using distributed server processes to remap clustered network resources to other servers during server failure
US6304929B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-10-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6311215B1 (en) * 1997-03-25 2001-10-30 Intel Corporation System for dynamic determination of client communications capabilities
US20010042221A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2001-11-15 Moulton Gregory Hagan System and method for redundant array network storage
US6324608B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-11-27 Micron Electronics Method for hot swapping of network components
US20010047412A1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2001-11-29 Weinman Joseph B. Method and apparatus for maximizing distance of data mirrors
US6330690B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-12-11 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of resetting a server
US20020010797A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2002-01-24 Moulton Gregory Hagan System and method for representing and maintaining redundant data sets utilizing DNA transmission and transcription techniques
US6363497B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-03-26 Micron Technology, Inc. System for clustering software applications
US6374329B1 (en) 1996-02-20 2002-04-16 Intergraph Corporation High-availability super server
US6378129B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Video server content synchronization
US20020049845A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-04-25 Padmanabhan Sreenivasan Maintaining membership in high availability systems
US6389459B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2002-05-14 Ncr Corporation Virtualized storage devices for network disk mirroring applications
US20020069245A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-06-06 Han-Gyoo Kim Disk system adapted to be directly attached to network
US20020069369A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-06-06 Tremain Geoffrey Donald Method and apparatus for providing computer services
US6408314B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2002-06-18 Synscort Incorporated Method of performing a high-performance sort which gains efficiency by reading input file blocks sequentially
US20020078397A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 Simon Qin Backup / recovery system and methods for protecting a computer system
US6415300B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2002-07-02 Syncsort Incorporated Method of performing a high-performance backup which gains efficiency by reading input file blocks sequentially
US6418492B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-07-09 Micron Electronics Method for computer implemented hot-swap and hot-add
US6421701B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2002-07-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for replication support in a remote method invocation system
US20020107971A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-08-08 Bailey Brian W. Network transport accelerator
US20020116555A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-08-22 Jeffrey Somers Method and apparatus for efficiently moving portions of a memory block
WO2002067120A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-08-29 Road Runner System and method for multicast stream failover
US20020124202A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-05 John Doody Coordinated Recalibration of high bandwidth memories in a multiprocessor computer
US20020138559A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-09-26 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamically distributed file system
US20020147815A1 (en) * 2001-04-09 2002-10-10 Alexander Tormasov Distributed network data storage system and method
EP1250649A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2002-10-23 Legato Systems Inc. Crash recovery without complete remirror
US20020156974A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-10-24 Ulrich Thomas R. Redundant dynamically distributed file system
US20020156931A1 (en) * 2001-04-20 2002-10-24 Erik Riedel Remote file system using network multicast
US6473902B1 (en) * 1997-04-04 2002-10-29 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for transmitting programs
US6477591B1 (en) * 1998-03-03 2002-11-05 Highground Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for storing and copying data via a first path and a second path wherein second path bypasses mirror driver
US20020194523A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-12-19 Ulrich Thomas R. Replacing file system processors by hot swapping
US20020194548A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-19 Mark Tetreault Methods and apparatus for computer bus error termination
US6499073B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-12-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System using programmable processor for selectively enabling or disabling power to adapter in response to respective request signals
US20020198996A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-12-26 Padmanabhan Sreenivasan Flexible failover policies in high availability computing systems
US6504915B1 (en) 1998-09-25 2003-01-07 Unisys Corporation Multiple node messaging system wherein nodes have shared access to message stores of other nodes
US20030014569A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-16 Han-Gyoo Kim Scheme for dynamically connecting I/O devices through network
US20030018927A1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-01-23 Gadir Omar M.A. High-availability cluster virtual server system
US20030061305A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2003-03-27 Chyron Corporation System and method for enhancing streaming media delivery and reporting
US6545872B1 (en) 2001-10-12 2003-04-08 Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. Heat sink for edge connectors
US20030074596A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-17 Mashayekhi Victor V. System and method for state preservation in a stretch cluster
US20030079156A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. System and method for locating a failed storage device in a data storage system
US20030079102A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. System and method for generating point in time storage copy
US20030079014A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. System and method for interfacing with virtual storage
US20030079062A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Method and apparatus for sensing positions of device enclosures within multi-shelf cabinets
US20030079083A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. High performance multi-controller processing
US20030079082A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Unified management system and method for multi-cabinet data storage complexes
US20030079074A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Method and apparatus for controlling communications in data storage complexes
US20030093638A1 (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-05-15 Margerie Sylvain De System and method for removing latency effects in acknowledged data transfers
US6578120B1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2003-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation Synchronization and resynchronization of loosely-coupled copy operations between a primary and a remote secondary DASD volume under concurrent updating
US6587879B1 (en) * 1999-11-18 2003-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Architecture for testing pervasive appliances
US20030131179A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-07-10 Jasmin Ajanovic General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to provide isochronous channels
US20030145134A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-07-31 Wehage Eric R. General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to manage data integrity
US20030154305A1 (en) * 2002-02-11 2003-08-14 Sun Microsystems, Inc., A Delaware Corporation High availability lightweight directory access protocol service
US20030172093A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2003-09-11 Mitsugu Nagoya Server duplexing method and duplexed server system
EP1344135A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-09-17 Bull HN Information Systems Inc. Write logging in mirrored disk subsystems
US20030177323A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-09-18 Mathias Popp Remote mirrored disk pair resynchronization monitor
US20030195942A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-10-16 Mark Muhlestein Method and apparatus for encapsulating a virtual filer on a filer
US20030208766A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-11-06 Nobuyuki Tanaka System for reproducing and delivering digital content
US6647393B1 (en) 1996-11-22 2003-11-11 Mangosoft Corporation Dynamic directory service
US20030233438A1 (en) * 2002-06-18 2003-12-18 Robin Hutchinson Methods and systems for managing assets
US6704730B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-03-09 Avamar Technologies, Inc. Hash file system and method for use in a commonality factoring system
US20040068563A1 (en) * 2002-10-08 2004-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks enabling access to a shared resource
US6725392B1 (en) 1999-03-03 2004-04-20 Adaptec, Inc. Controller fault recovery system for a distributed file system
US20040078419A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2004-04-22 Stephen Ferrari Switching system
US20040111523A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2004-06-10 Howard Hall Tcp/udp acceleration
US20040122935A1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Network station adjustable fail-over time intervals for booting to backup servers when transport service is not available
US6757698B2 (en) * 1999-04-14 2004-06-29 Iomega Corporation Method and apparatus for automatically synchronizing data from a host computer to two or more backup data storage locations
US6766413B2 (en) 2001-03-01 2004-07-20 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Systems and methods for caching with file-level granularity
US6772226B1 (en) 2000-08-15 2004-08-03 Avaya Technology Corp. VPN device clustering using a network flow switch and a different mac address for each VPN device in the cluster
US20040153709A1 (en) * 2002-07-03 2004-08-05 Burton-Krahn Noel Morgen Method and apparatus for providing transparent fault tolerance within an application server environment
US6779039B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2004-08-17 Avaya Technology Corp. System and method for routing message traffic using a cluster of routers sharing a single logical IP address distinct from unique IP addresses of the routers
US20040160957A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-08-19 Coffman Stephen Blaine Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US20040177175A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2004-09-09 Greg Pellegrino System, machine, and method for maintenance of mirrored datasets through surrogate writes during storage-area network transients
US6799224B1 (en) 1998-03-10 2004-09-28 Quad Research High speed fault tolerant mass storage network information server
US6801944B2 (en) * 1997-03-13 2004-10-05 Yamaha Corporation User dependent control of the transmission of image and sound data in a client-server system
US6802022B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2004-10-05 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Maintenance of consistent, redundant mass storage images
US20040205143A1 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-10-14 Tetsuya Uemura Network storage virtualization method and system
US20040205382A1 (en) * 2003-03-27 2004-10-14 Yusuke Noda Methods and apparatus for recovering work of one computer by another computers
US6810398B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2004-10-26 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for unorchestrated determination of data sequences using sticky byte factoring to determine breakpoints in digital sequences
US20040220913A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2004-11-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
US20040225738A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2004-11-11 Patel Dipak M. Methods, systems and computer program products for replicating servers and network traffic for problem determination and/or tuning
US20040236798A1 (en) * 2001-09-11 2004-11-25 Sudhir Srinivasan Migration of control in a distributed segmented file system
US6826615B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2004-11-30 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and method for hardware implementation or acceleration of operating system functions
US6826711B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-11-30 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for data protection with multidimensional parity
US20040268175A1 (en) * 2003-06-11 2004-12-30 Eternal Systems, Inc. Transparent TCP connection failover
US20050021660A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2005-01-27 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US20050027795A1 (en) * 1998-08-24 2005-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US6854072B1 (en) 2000-10-17 2005-02-08 Continuous Computing Corporation High availability file server for providing transparent access to all data before and after component failover
US20050038851A1 (en) * 1996-07-25 2005-02-17 Xcelera, A Delaware Corporation Web serving system
US6862689B2 (en) 2001-04-12 2005-03-01 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Method and apparatus for managing session information
US6880089B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2005-04-12 Avaya Technology Corp. Firewall clustering for multiple network servers
US6886171B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2005-04-26 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Caching for I/O virtual address translation and validation using device drivers
US20050097391A1 (en) * 2003-10-20 2005-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and article of manufacture for data replication
US6895467B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2005-05-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for atomizing storage
US6901481B2 (en) 2000-04-14 2005-05-31 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Method and apparatus for storing transactional information in persistent memory
US20050144514A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2005-06-30 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamic redistribution of parity groups
US20050144178A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2005-06-30 Chrin David M. Distributing files across multiple, permissibly heterogeneous, storage devices
US20050149682A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2005-07-07 Han-Gyoo Kim Virtual multiple removable media jukebox
US20050160401A1 (en) * 1999-10-16 2005-07-21 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for adding user-defined objects to a modeling tool
US20050172293A1 (en) * 2004-01-27 2005-08-04 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and apparatus for allocating resources in a shared resource processor
US6938071B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2005-08-30 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Fault tolerant storage system having an interconnection fabric that also carries network traffic
US20050193245A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2005-09-01 Hayden John M. Internet protocol based disaster recovery of a server
US20050193189A1 (en) * 2004-02-17 2005-09-01 Han-Gyoo Kim Device and method for booting an operating system for a computer from a passive directly attached network device
US20050193017A1 (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-09-01 Han-Gyoo Kim Portable multimedia player/recorder that accesses data contents from and writes to networked device
US20050203989A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2005-09-15 Richard Dellacona High speed information processing and mass storage system and method, particularly for information and application servers
US20050228835A1 (en) * 2004-04-12 2005-10-13 Guillermo Roa System and method for supporting block-based protocols on a virtual storage appliance executing within a physical storage appliance
US20050265346A1 (en) * 2000-12-07 2005-12-01 Nokia, Inc. Router and routing protocol redundancy
US20050278389A1 (en) * 2004-05-07 2005-12-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for distributing digital data in particular for a peer-to-peer network
US20060015635A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for handling address resolution protocol requests for a device having multiple interfaces
US6990667B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2006-01-24 Adaptec, Inc. Server-independent object positioning for load balancing drives and servers
US20060026165A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US20060045130A1 (en) * 2004-07-22 2006-03-02 Han-Gyoo Kim Low-level communication layers and device employing same
US20060067356A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-03-30 Han-Gyoo Kim Method and apparatus for network direct attached storage
US20060069884A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2006-03-30 Han-Gyoo Kim Universal network to device bridge chip that enables network directly attached device
US7047377B2 (en) 2002-08-20 2006-05-16 Gruintine Pueche, Inc. System and method for conducting an auction-based ranking of search results on a computer network
US7055173B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2006-05-30 Avaya Technology Corp. Firewall pooling in a network flowswitch
US7054927B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2006-05-30 Adaptec, Inc. File system metadata describing server directory information
US7058696B1 (en) 1996-11-22 2006-06-06 Mangosoft Corporation Internet-based shared file service with native PC client access and semantics
US20060129627A1 (en) * 1996-11-22 2006-06-15 Mangosoft Corp. Internet-based shared file service with native PC client access and semantics and distributed version control
US20060155805A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2006-07-13 Netkingcall, Co., Ltd. Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way TCP
US7089449B1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2006-08-08 Micron Technology, Inc. Recovering a system that has experienced a fault
US7095828B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2006-08-22 Unisys Corporation Distributed network applications platform architecture
US20060198296A1 (en) * 2005-03-07 2006-09-07 Sumandra Majee Method and apparatus for replicating a transport layer protocol stream
US7116764B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2006-10-03 Unisys Corporation Network interface unit having an embedded services processor
US20060225030A1 (en) * 1999-10-16 2006-10-05 Deffler Tad A Method and System for Generating Dynamic Comparison Models
US7127506B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2006-10-24 Teradyne, Inc. PC configuration fault analysis
US20060265392A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Akira Sunada Data management system, data server, and data management method
US7143307B1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-11-28 Network Appliance, Inc. Remote disaster recovery and data migration using virtual appliance migration
US20060271692A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US20060288080A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2006-12-21 Ibrix, Inc. Balanced computer architecture
US20070005603A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Namit Jain Sharing state information among a plurality of file operation servers
US20070008988A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2007-01-11 Han-Gyoo Kim Enhanced network direct attached storage controller
US20070055674A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Akira Sunada Data server, data management method, and data management system
US20070067664A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Failure transparency for update applications under single-master configuration
US7197555B1 (en) 2000-09-13 2007-03-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Directory server tracking tool
US20070094529A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2007-04-26 Lango Jason A Method and apparatus for increasing throughput in a storage server
US20070101193A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2007-05-03 Johnson Karl S Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US7219260B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2007-05-15 Emc Corporation Fault tolerant system shared system resource with state machine logging
WO2007077132A2 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-12 International Business Machines Corporation File system dump/restore by node numbering
US20070260717A1 (en) * 2006-04-18 2007-11-08 Yoshiki Kano Method and apparatus of WAFS backup managed in centralized center
US20070282966A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2007-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks and transactions
US7327832B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2008-02-05 Unisys Corporation Adjunct processing of multi-media functions in a messaging system
US20080040385A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2008-02-14 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and Method for Hardware-Based File System
US7389312B2 (en) 1997-04-28 2008-06-17 Emc Corporation Mirroring network data to establish virtual storage area network
US7406484B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2008-07-29 Tbrix, Inc. Storage allocation in a distributed segmented file system
US20080209258A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-08-28 Luca Casale Disaster Recovery Architecture
US7457880B1 (en) 2003-09-26 2008-11-25 Ximeta Technology, Inc. System using a single host to receive and redirect all file access commands for shared data storage device from other hosts on a network
US7509420B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2009-03-24 Emc Corporation System and method for intelligent, globally distributed network storage
US7529778B1 (en) 2001-12-12 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing access to consistent point-in-time file versions
US7533289B1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and computer program product for performing live cloning
US20090177720A1 (en) * 2006-06-08 2009-07-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Failover method of remotely-mirrored clustered file servers
US20090271586A1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2009-10-29 Kom Networks Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US7627574B2 (en) 2004-12-16 2009-12-01 Oracle International Corporation Infrastructure for performing file operations by a database server
US7647460B1 (en) * 1997-09-23 2010-01-12 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing a remote mirroring data facility without employing a dedicated leased line to form the link between two remotely disposed storage devices
US7711685B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2010-05-04 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Method and system for an extensible macro language
US20100114904A1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2010-05-06 Aol Inc. System and method for geographically organizing and classifying businesses on the world-wide web
US20100202442A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2010-08-12 William Allan Telephony and data network services at a telephone
US7796066B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2010-09-14 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method for common mode translation
US7836017B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2010-11-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. File replication in a distributed segmented file system
US7849257B1 (en) 2005-01-06 2010-12-07 Zhe Khi Pak Method and apparatus for storing and retrieving data
US20110107358A1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Symantec Corporation Managing remote procedure calls when a server is unavailable
US8041735B1 (en) 2002-11-01 2011-10-18 Bluearc Uk Limited Distributed file system and method
USRE42860E1 (en) 1995-09-18 2011-10-18 Velez-Mccaskey Ricardo E Universal storage management system
US8140888B1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2012-03-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. High availability network processing system
US20120197918A1 (en) * 2010-09-10 2012-08-02 International Business Machines Corporation Abstracting special file interfaces to concurrently support multiple operating system levels
US20120254901A1 (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-10-04 Denso Corporation Method and system for restoring an application in a dynamically linked environment
US8601220B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2013-12-03 Netapp, Inc. Transparent data migration in a storage system environment
US20130325916A1 (en) * 2004-09-09 2013-12-05 William M. Pitts Full text search capabilities integrated into distributed file systems - Incrementally Indexing Files
US8621154B1 (en) * 2008-04-18 2013-12-31 Netapp, Inc. Flow based reply cache
US8627331B1 (en) 2010-04-30 2014-01-07 Netapp, Inc. Multi-level parallelism of process execution in a mutual exclusion domain of a processing system
US8631277B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2014-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Providing transparent failover in a file system
US20140040477A1 (en) * 2012-07-31 2014-02-06 F5 Networks, Inc. Connection mesh in mirroring asymmetric clustered multiprocessor systems
US8732162B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2014-05-20 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Systems and methods for server management
US8788579B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Clustered client failover
US8856582B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Transparent failover
US8935307B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2015-01-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Independent data access in a segmented file system
US9037545B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2015-05-19 Hybir Inc. Group based complete and incremental computer file backup system, process and apparatus
US9100330B1 (en) * 2012-07-13 2015-08-04 Emc Corporation Introduction of read delay or write delay in servers of a geographically distributed data processing system so that clients read up-to-date data
US9244015B2 (en) 2010-04-20 2016-01-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Self-arranging, luminescence-enhancement device for surface-enhanced luminescence
US9274058B2 (en) 2010-10-20 2016-03-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Metallic-nanofinger device for chemical sensing
US9279767B2 (en) 2010-10-20 2016-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Chemical-analysis device integrated with metallic-nanofinger device for chemical sensing
US9331955B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transporting operations of arbitrary size over remote direct memory access
US9361243B2 (en) 1998-07-31 2016-06-07 Kom Networks Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US9497285B1 (en) 2012-02-21 2016-11-15 F5 Networks, Inc. Connection bucketing in mirroring asymmetric clustered multiprocessor systems
US9516102B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2016-12-06 F5 Networks, Inc. Server to client reverse persistence
US9836424B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2017-12-05 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9923829B1 (en) 2011-09-22 2018-03-20 F5 Networks, Inc. Automatic proxy device configuration

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7240080B2 (en) * 2003-07-30 2007-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for determining using least recently used protocol if one or more computer files should be written to one or more information storage media and synchronously providing one or more computer files between first and storage devices
JP5130538B2 (en) * 2007-06-22 2013-01-30 日本電気株式会社 Network File System and Network File System recovery method

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5307481A (en) * 1990-02-28 1994-04-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Highly reliable online system
US5257369A (en) * 1990-10-22 1993-10-26 Skeen Marion D Apparatus and method for providing decoupling of data exchange details for providing high performance communication between software processes
US5371852A (en) * 1992-10-14 1994-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for making a cluster of computers appear as a single host on a network

Non-Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"A Comparison of Two Approaches to Build Reliable Distributed File Servers", Bhide, et al.
"A Highly Available Network File Server", USENIX Winter Conference, 1991, Bhide, et al. pp. 199-205.
"Attributes of Total Performance for NFS File Server Users--Beyond Speed to Real-World Performance", IDC Opinion #8860, Frankle & Finos, Jun., 1994, pp. 1-7.
"Deceit: A Flexible Distributed File System", NASA Report, Dec. 7, 1989, Siegel, et al. 1-34.
"Implementation of Ficus Replicated File System", USENIX Summer Conference, Jun., 1990, Guy, et al., pp. 63-70.
A Comparison of Two Approaches to Build Reliable Distributed File Servers , Bhide, et al. *
A Highly Available Network File Server , USENIX Winter Conference, 1991, Bhide, et al. pp. 199 205. *
Attributes of Total Performance for NFS File Server Users Beyond Speed to Real World Performance , IDC Opinion 8860, Frankle & Finos, Jun., 1994, pp. 1 7. *
Deceit: A Flexible Distributed File System , NASA Report, Dec. 7, 1989, Siegel, et al. 1 34. *
Disk Arrays Explained by Roger C. Alford, an article appearing in the Oct. 92 edition of Byte. *
Implementation of Ficus Replicated File System , USENIX Summer Conference, Jun., 1990, Guy, et al., pp. 63 70. *
Modern Operating Systems by Andrew S. Tanenbaum ©1992 by Prentice-Hall Inc., pp. 145-146.
Modern Operating Systems by Andrew S. Tanenbaum 1992 by Prentice Hall Inc., pp. 145 146. *
Operating System Concepts by Abraham Silverschatz et al. ©1994 by Addison-Wesley Co. Inc., pp. 349-354.
Operating System Concepts by Abraham Silverschatz et al. 1994 by Addison Wesley Co. Inc., pp. 349 354. *

Cited By (533)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5812748A (en) * 1993-06-23 1998-09-22 Vinca Corporation Method for improving recovery performance from hardware and software errors in a fault-tolerant computer system
US6289390B1 (en) 1993-08-18 2001-09-11 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
US5613079A (en) * 1994-04-20 1997-03-18 Microsoft Corporation System for verifying the proper operation of a replication facility
US5649152A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-07-15 Vinca Corporation Method and system for providing a static snapshot of data stored on a mass storage system
US5835953A (en) 1994-10-13 1998-11-10 Vinca Corporation Backup system that takes a snapshot of the locations in a mass storage device that has been identified for updating prior to updating
US5745748A (en) * 1994-12-09 1998-04-28 Sprint Communication Co. L.P. System and method for direct accessing of remote data
US5704031A (en) * 1995-03-30 1997-12-30 Fujitsu Limited Method of performing self-diagnosing hardware, software and firmware at a client node in a client/server system
US5692155A (en) * 1995-04-19 1997-11-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for suspending multiple duplex pairs during back up processing to insure storage devices remain synchronized in a sequence consistent order
US5771344A (en) * 1995-04-27 1998-06-23 Tandem Computers Incorporated Computer system with remotely duplicated and dynamically reconfigurable memory
US5675723A (en) * 1995-05-19 1997-10-07 Compaq Computer Corporation Multi-server fault tolerance using in-band signalling
US5696895A (en) * 1995-05-19 1997-12-09 Compaq Computer Corporation Fault tolerant multiple network servers
US5978802A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-11-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing opportunistic file access in a network environment
US5956489A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation Transaction replication system and method for supporting replicated transaction-based services
US20050027797A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2005-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US5713017A (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Dual counter consistency control for fault tolerant network file servers
US5951694A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-09-14 Microsoft Corporation Method of redirecting a client service session to a second application server without interrupting the session by forwarding service-specific information to the second server
US7577092B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2009-08-18 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US20050027796A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2005-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US5628005A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-05-06 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing opportunistic file access in a network environment
US6901433B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2005-05-31 Microsoft Corporation System for providing users with a filtered view of interactive network directory obtains from remote properties cache that provided by an on-line service
US20050021660A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2005-01-27 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US7502832B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2009-03-10 Microsoft Corporation Distributed directory service using junction nodes for providing network users with an integrated hierarchical directory services
US7437431B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2008-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Method for downloading an icon corresponding to a hierarchical directory structure from a directory service
US7814365B2 (en) * 1995-06-09 2010-10-12 Emc Corporation Backing up selected files of a computer system
US20020049925A1 (en) * 1995-06-09 2002-04-25 Galipeau Kenneth J. Backing up selected files of a computer system
US20060253733A1 (en) * 1995-06-09 2006-11-09 Emc Corporation Backing up selected files of a computer system
US6308283B1 (en) * 1995-06-09 2001-10-23 Legato Systems, Inc. Real-time data protection system and method
US7100072B2 (en) * 1995-06-09 2006-08-29 Emc Corporation Backing up selected files of a computer system
US5799141A (en) * 1995-06-09 1998-08-25 Qualix Group, Inc. Real-time data protection system and method
US5594863A (en) * 1995-06-26 1997-01-14 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for network file recovery
US5956509A (en) * 1995-08-18 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
US5941947A (en) * 1995-08-18 1999-08-24 Microsoft Corporation System and method for controlling access to data entities in a computer network
US6430607B1 (en) 1995-08-18 2002-08-06 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
US5802298A (en) * 1995-08-28 1998-09-01 Fujitsu Limited Defect-free type remote procedure call system and method thereof
USRE42860E1 (en) 1995-09-18 2011-10-18 Velez-Mccaskey Ricardo E Universal storage management system
US6640243B1 (en) 1995-09-29 2003-10-28 Cisco Technology, Inc. Enhanced network services using a subnetwork of communicating processors
US6182224B1 (en) * 1995-09-29 2001-01-30 Cisco Systems, Inc. Enhanced network services using a subnetwork of communicating processors
US5974563A (en) * 1995-10-16 1999-10-26 Network Specialists, Inc. Real time backup system
US5819020A (en) * 1995-10-16 1998-10-06 Network Specialists, Inc. Real time backup system
US5815649A (en) * 1995-10-20 1998-09-29 Stratus Computer, Inc. Distributed fault tolerant digital data storage subsystem for fault tolerant computer system
US5828651A (en) * 1995-12-28 1998-10-27 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Device for duplicating connectionless server
US5765173A (en) * 1996-01-11 1998-06-09 Connected Corporation High performance backup via selective file saving which can perform incremental backups and exclude files and uses a changed block signature list
US6374329B1 (en) 1996-02-20 2002-04-16 Intergraph Corporation High-availability super server
US7584330B2 (en) 1996-02-20 2009-09-01 Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company Multi-processor data coherency
US20130173625A1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2013-07-04 Facebook, Inc. System and method for geographically organizing and classifying businesses on the world-wide web
US8768912B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2014-07-01 Facebook, Inc. System and method for geographically organizing and classifying businesses on the world-wide web
US9183300B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2015-11-10 Facebook, Inc. System and method for geographically classifying business on the world-wide web
US9075881B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2015-07-07 Facebook, Inc. System and method for identifying the owner of a document on the world-wide web
US20100114904A1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2010-05-06 Aol Inc. System and method for geographically organizing and classifying businesses on the world-wide web
US9043331B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2015-05-26 Facebook, Inc. System and method for indexing documents on the world-wide web
US8954442B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2015-02-10 Facebook, Inc. System and method for classifying an electronic document
US8938455B2 (en) * 1996-05-10 2015-01-20 Facebook, Inc. System and method for determining a homepage on the world-wide web
US8949256B2 (en) 1996-05-10 2015-02-03 Facebook, Inc. System and method for identifying an owner of a web page on the World-Wide Web
US5819310A (en) * 1996-05-24 1998-10-06 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for reading data from mirrored logical volumes on physical disk drives
US5987566A (en) * 1996-05-24 1999-11-16 Emc Corporation Redundant storage with mirroring by logical volume with diverse reading process
US5644698A (en) * 1996-05-30 1997-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Configurable reuse delay criterion for storage volumes
US6032271A (en) * 1996-06-05 2000-02-29 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying faulty devices in a computer system
DE19623126A1 (en) * 1996-06-10 1998-01-29 Stn Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Electronic information and orientation system for military application troop movements
DE19623126C2 (en) * 1996-06-10 1999-10-28 Stn Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Electronic device to informing and orientation
US5983360A (en) * 1996-06-27 1999-11-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Information processing system with communication system and hot stand-by change-over function therefor
US5748897A (en) * 1996-07-02 1998-05-05 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Apparatus and method for operating an aggregation of server computers using a dual-role proxy server computer
US20050038851A1 (en) * 1996-07-25 2005-02-17 Xcelera, A Delaware Corporation Web serving system
US8019869B2 (en) 1996-07-25 2011-09-13 Xcelera Inc. Web serving system
US6915329B2 (en) 1996-07-25 2005-07-05 Xcelera Web serving system
US5909540A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-06-01 Mangosoft Corporation System and method for providing highly available data storage using globally addressable memory
US7136903B1 (en) 1996-11-22 2006-11-14 Mangosoft Intellectual Property, Inc. Internet-based shared file service with native PC client access and semantics and distributed access control
US7058696B1 (en) 1996-11-22 2006-06-06 Mangosoft Corporation Internet-based shared file service with native PC client access and semantics
US20060129627A1 (en) * 1996-11-22 2006-06-15 Mangosoft Corp. Internet-based shared file service with native PC client access and semantics and distributed version control
US6148377A (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-11-14 Mangosoft Corporation Shared memory computer networks
US6026474A (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-02-15 Mangosoft Corporation Shared client-side web caching using globally addressable memory
US6647393B1 (en) 1996-11-22 2003-11-11 Mangosoft Corporation Dynamic directory service
US5918229A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-06-29 Mangosoft Corporation Structured data storage using globally addressable memory
US5987506A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-11-16 Mangosoft Corporation Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment
US6038665A (en) * 1996-12-03 2000-03-14 Fairbanks Systems Group System and method for backing up computer files over a wide area computer network
US6014676A (en) * 1996-12-03 2000-01-11 Fairbanks Systems Group System and method for backing up computer files over a wide area computer network
US6049874A (en) * 1996-12-03 2000-04-11 Fairbanks Systems Group System and method for backing up computer files over a wide area computer network
US6801944B2 (en) * 1997-03-13 2004-10-05 Yamaha Corporation User dependent control of the transmission of image and sound data in a client-server system
US6311215B1 (en) * 1997-03-25 2001-10-30 Intel Corporation System for dynamic determination of client communications capabilities
US5941999A (en) * 1997-03-31 1999-08-24 Sun Microsystems Method and system for achieving high availability in networked computer systems
US6473902B1 (en) * 1997-04-04 2002-10-29 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for transmitting programs
US6079028A (en) * 1997-04-23 2000-06-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Fault tolerant architectures for continuous media servers
WO1998049620A1 (en) * 1997-04-25 1998-11-05 Symbios, Inc. Redundant server failover in networked environment
US7389312B2 (en) 1997-04-28 2008-06-17 Emc Corporation Mirroring network data to establish virtual storage area network
US6144992A (en) * 1997-05-09 2000-11-07 Altiris, Inc. Method and system for client/server and peer-to-peer disk imaging
US20100146346A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2010-06-10 Micron Technology, Inc. Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US6195717B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-27 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of expanding bus loading capacity
US6179486B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-30 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot add of a mass storage adapter on a system including a dynamically loaded adapter driver
US6182180B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-30 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for interfacing buses
US6202111B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-03-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of a network adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6202160B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-03-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for independent powering of a computer system
US20040210701A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2004-10-21 Papa Stephen E.J. Method of providing an interface to a plurality of peripheral devices using bus adapter chips
US6499073B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-12-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System using programmable processor for selectively enabling or disabling power to adapter in response to respective request signals
US6173346B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-09 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable storage adapter using a programmable processor for selectively enabling or disabling power to adapter slot in response to respective request signals
US6219734B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-04-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of a mass storage adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6170028B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-02 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable network adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6332202B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-12-18 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of remote access and control of environmental conditions
US6243838B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-05 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for automatically reporting a system failure in a server
US6243773B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-05 Micron Electronics, Inc. Configuration management system for hot adding and hot replacing devices
US7669064B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2010-02-23 Micron Technology, Inc. Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US6192434B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-20 Micron Electronics, Inc System for hot swapping a programmable adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6742069B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2004-05-25 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of providing an interface to a plurality of peripheral devices using bus adapter chips
US6247080B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-12 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot add of devices
US6163853A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6701453B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2004-03-02 Micron Technology, Inc. System for clustering software applications
US6247079B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2001-06-12 Micron Electronics, Inc Apparatus for computer implemented hot-swap and hot-add
US6249828B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for the hot swap of a mass storage adapter on a system including a statically loaded adapter driver
US6163849A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of powering up or powering down a server to a maintenance state
US6249834B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-19 Micron Technology, Inc. System for expanding PCI bus loading capacity
US6253334B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-06-26 Micron Electronics, Inc. Three bus server architecture with a legacy PCI bus and mirrored I/O PCI buses
US8468372B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2013-06-18 Round Rock Research, Llc Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US6163825A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-12-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot adding a network adapter by identifying and executing the adapter driver based upon the logical board number of the network adapter
US6895526B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2005-05-17 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6151023A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-21 Micron Electronics, Inc. Display of system information
US6266721B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System architecture for remote access and control of environmental management
US6148355A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-14 Micron Electronics, Inc. Configuration management method for hot adding and hot replacing devices
US20050229027A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2005-10-13 Bruce Findlay System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6145098A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-11-07 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for displaying system status
US6269412B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-31 Micron Technology, Inc. Apparatus for recording information system events
US6269417B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-07-31 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for determining and displaying the physical slot number of an expansion bus device
US6272648B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-08-07 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6073255A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-06-06 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of reading system log
US6282673B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-08-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of recording information system events
US20050229026A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2005-10-13 Bruce Findlay System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6292905B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2001-09-18 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for providing a fault tolerant network using distributed server processes to remap clustered network resources to other servers during server failure
US6304929B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-10-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for hot swapping a programmable adapter by using a programmable processor to selectively disabling and enabling power thereto upon receiving respective control signals
US6058445A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-05-02 Micron Electronics, Inc. Data management method for adding or exchanging components on a running computer
US7065600B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2006-06-20 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of providing an interface to a plurality of peripheral devices using bus adapter chips
US20050229028A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2005-10-13 Bruce Findlay System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6324608B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-11-27 Micron Electronics Method for hot swapping of network components
US20070101193A1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2007-05-03 Johnson Karl S Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US7552364B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2009-06-23 Micron Technology, Inc. Diagnostic and managing distributed processor system
US6330690B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-12-11 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of resetting a server
US6604207B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2003-08-05 Micron Technology, Inc. System architecture for remote access and control of environmental management
US6341322B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2002-01-22 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for interfacing two buses
US6598173B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2003-07-22 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of remote access and control of environmental conditions
US6363497B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-03-26 Micron Technology, Inc. System for clustering software applications
US6138250A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for reading system log
US6134668A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of selective independent powering of portion of computer system through remote interface from remote interface power supply
US6134673A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-10-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for clustering software applications
US7263570B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2007-08-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of providing an interface to a plurality of peripheral devices using bus adapter chips
US6523131B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2003-02-18 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6122746A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-09-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for powering up and powering down a server
US7370226B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2008-05-06 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US5987554A (en) * 1997-05-13 1999-11-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of controlling the transfer of information across an interface between two buses
US7370225B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2008-05-06 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US7451343B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2008-11-11 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6418492B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-07-09 Micron Electronics Method for computer implemented hot-swap and hot-add
US7444537B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2008-10-28 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6122758A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-09-19 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for mapping environmental resources to memory for program access
US6105089A (en) * 1997-05-13 2000-08-15 Micron Electronics, Inc. Data management system for adding or exchanging components on a running computer
US6697963B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2004-02-24 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of updating a system environmental setting
US7444550B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2008-10-28 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for communicating a software-generated pulse waveform between two servers in a network
US6484226B2 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-11-19 Micron Technology, Inc. System and method for the add or swap of an adapter on an operating computer
US6081807A (en) * 1997-06-13 2000-06-27 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for interfacing with a stateless network file system server
US6578120B1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2003-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation Synchronization and resynchronization of loosely-coupled copy operations between a primary and a remote secondary DASD volume under concurrent updating
US20030177322A1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2003-09-18 Crockett Robert Nelson Synchronization and resynchronization of loosely-coupled copy operations between a primary and a remote secondary DASD volume under concurrent updating
US6842834B2 (en) * 1997-06-24 2005-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation Synchronization and resynchronization of loosely-coupled copy operations between a primary and a remote secondary DASD volume under concurrent updating
US6145090A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-11-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Switch control method of redundantly structured computer system
US7647460B1 (en) * 1997-09-23 2010-01-12 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing a remote mirroring data facility without employing a dedicated leased line to form the link between two remotely disposed storage devices
US6212521B1 (en) * 1997-09-25 2001-04-03 Fujitsu Limited Data management system, primary server, and secondary server for data registration and retrieval in distributed environment
US6275953B1 (en) * 1997-09-26 2001-08-14 Emc Corporation Recovery from failure of a data processor in a network server
US6199173B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-03-06 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for mapping environmental resources to memory for program access
US6088816A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-07-11 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of displaying system status
US6263387B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-07-17 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for automatically configuring a server after hot add of a device
US6138179A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for automatically partitioning and formatting a primary hard disk for installing software in which selection of extended partition size is not related to size of hard disk
US6212585B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-04-03 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of automatically configuring a server after hot add of a device
US6009541A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-12-28 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for performing an extensive diagnostic test in conjunction with a bios test routine
US6154835A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-11-28 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method for automatically configuring and formatting a computer system and installing software
US6175490B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2001-01-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. Fault tolerant computer system
US6065053A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-05-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for resetting a server
US6125372A (en) * 1997-10-03 2000-09-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Server system and method of updating server software
US5996086A (en) * 1997-10-14 1999-11-30 Lsi Logic Corporation Context-based failover architecture for redundant servers
US6167446A (en) * 1997-11-03 2000-12-26 Inca Technology, Inc. Automatically configuring network-name-services
WO1999023571A1 (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-05-14 Inca Technology, Inc. Automatically configuring network-name-services
US6145089A (en) * 1997-11-10 2000-11-07 Legato Systems, Inc. Server fail-over system
US6247139B1 (en) 1997-11-11 2001-06-12 Compaq Computer Corp. Filesystem failover in a single system image environment
US6249879B1 (en) * 1997-11-11 2001-06-19 Compaq Computer Corp. Root filesystem failover in a single system image environment
US6018805A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-01-25 Recipio Transparent recovery of distributed-objects using intelligent proxies
US6266335B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2001-07-24 Cyberiq Systems Cross-platform server clustering using a network flow switch
US7055173B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2006-05-30 Avaya Technology Corp. Firewall pooling in a network flowswitch
US6922688B1 (en) 1998-01-23 2005-07-26 Adaptec, Inc. Computer system storage
US6029168A (en) * 1998-01-23 2000-02-22 Tricord Systems, Inc. Decentralized file mapping in a striped network file system in a distributed computing environment
US6477591B1 (en) * 1998-03-03 2002-11-05 Highground Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for storing and copying data via a first path and a second path wherein second path bypasses mirror driver
US20050193059A1 (en) * 1998-03-10 2005-09-01 Richard Dellacona High speed fault tolerant mass storage network information server
US6799224B1 (en) 1998-03-10 2004-09-28 Quad Research High speed fault tolerant mass storage network information server
US6240105B1 (en) 1998-03-30 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corporation Video server streaming synchronization
US6378129B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Video server content synchronization
US6246666B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2001-06-12 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling an input/output subsystem in a failed network server
US6122629A (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-09-19 Compaq Computer Corporation Filesystem data integrity in a single system image environment
US6260155B1 (en) 1998-05-01 2001-07-10 Quad Research Network information server
US6163856A (en) * 1998-05-29 2000-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for file system disaster recovery
US6205503B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-03-20 Mallikarjunan Mahalingam Method for the hot swap and add of input/output platforms and devices
US6223234B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-04-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for the hot swap and add of input/output platforms and devices
US9361243B2 (en) 1998-07-31 2016-06-07 Kom Networks Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US8234477B2 (en) 1998-07-31 2012-07-31 Kom Networks, Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US9881013B2 (en) 1998-07-31 2018-01-30 Kom Software Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US20090271586A1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2009-10-29 Kom Networks Inc. Method and system for providing restricted access to a storage medium
US20010010070A1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-07-26 Crockett Robert Nelson System and method for dynamically resynchronizing backup data
US6260124B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically resynchronizing backup data
US6772303B2 (en) * 1998-08-13 2004-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically resynchronizing backup data
US7305451B2 (en) 1998-08-24 2007-12-04 Microsoft Corporation System for providing users an integrated directory service containing content nodes located in different groups of application servers in computer network
US20050027795A1 (en) * 1998-08-24 2005-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Directory service for a computer network
US6266785B1 (en) 1998-09-01 2001-07-24 Ncr Corporation File system filter driver apparatus and method
US6178441B1 (en) * 1998-09-21 2001-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system in a computer network for the reliable and consistent ordering of client requests
US6247141B1 (en) 1998-09-24 2001-06-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Protocol for providing replicated servers in a client-server system
US6504915B1 (en) 1998-09-25 2003-01-07 Unisys Corporation Multiple node messaging system wherein nodes have shared access to message stores of other nodes
US7711685B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2010-05-04 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Method and system for an extensible macro language
US6088721A (en) * 1998-10-20 2000-07-11 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Efficient unified replication and caching protocol
US6223231B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2001-04-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for highly-available processing of I/O requests while application processing continues
US6389459B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2002-05-14 Ncr Corporation Virtualized storage devices for network disk mirroring applications
US6260125B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2001-07-10 Ncr Corporation Asynchronous write queues, reconstruction and check-pointing in disk-mirroring applications
US6243385B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2001-06-05 Sercomm Corp. Simultaneous multi-user/single connection internet access method and system
US6421701B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2002-07-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for replication support in a remote method invocation system
US6725392B1 (en) 1999-03-03 2004-04-20 Adaptec, Inc. Controller fault recovery system for a distributed file system
US6757698B2 (en) * 1999-04-14 2004-06-29 Iomega Corporation Method and apparatus for automatically synchronizing data from a host computer to two or more backup data storage locations
US20100202442A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2010-08-12 William Allan Telephony and data network services at a telephone
US8964727B2 (en) * 1999-05-05 2015-02-24 Rockstar Consortium Us Lp Telephony and data network services at a telephone
US7127506B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2006-10-24 Teradyne, Inc. PC configuration fault analysis
US6415300B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2002-07-02 Syncsort Incorporated Method of performing a high-performance backup which gains efficiency by reading input file blocks sequentially
US6408314B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2002-06-18 Synscort Incorporated Method of performing a high-performance sort which gains efficiency by reading input file blocks sequentially
US20060155805A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2006-07-13 Netkingcall, Co., Ltd. Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way TCP
US7483967B2 (en) 1999-09-01 2009-01-27 Ximeta Technology, Inc. Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way TCP
WO2001017153A2 (en) * 1999-09-01 2001-03-08 Netkingcall, Co., Ltd. Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way tcp
WO2001017153A3 (en) * 1999-09-01 2001-12-06 Netkingcall Co Ltd Scalable server architecture based on asymmetric 3-way tcp
US8180897B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2012-05-15 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and method for hardware implementation or acceleration of operating system functions
US20050021764A1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2005-01-27 Barrall Geoffrey S. Apparatus and method for hardware implementation or acceleration of operating system functions
US6826615B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2004-11-30 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and method for hardware implementation or acceleration of operating system functions
US20050160401A1 (en) * 1999-10-16 2005-07-21 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for adding user-defined objects to a modeling tool
US7734457B2 (en) 1999-10-16 2010-06-08 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Method and system for generating dynamic comparison models
US20060225030A1 (en) * 1999-10-16 2006-10-05 Deffler Tad A Method and System for Generating Dynamic Comparison Models
US6587879B1 (en) * 1999-11-18 2003-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Architecture for testing pervasive appliances
EP1250649A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2002-10-23 Legato Systems Inc. Crash recovery without complete remirror
EP1250649A4 (en) * 1999-12-06 2007-08-22 Emc Corp Crash recovery without complete remirror
US7194504B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2007-03-20 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for representing and maintaining redundant data sets utilizing DNA transmission and transcription techniques
US6826711B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-11-30 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for data protection with multidimensional parity
US20020010797A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2002-01-24 Moulton Gregory Hagan System and method for representing and maintaining redundant data sets utilizing DNA transmission and transcription techniques
US7558856B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2009-07-07 Emc Corporation System and method for intelligent, globally distributed network storage
US7062648B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2006-06-13 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for redundant array network storage
US7509420B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2009-03-24 Emc Corporation System and method for intelligent, globally distributed network storage
US6704730B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-03-09 Avamar Technologies, Inc. Hash file system and method for use in a commonality factoring system
US20010042221A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2001-11-15 Moulton Gregory Hagan System and method for redundant array network storage
US20020049845A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-04-25 Padmanabhan Sreenivasan Maintaining membership in high availability systems
US7627694B2 (en) 2000-03-16 2009-12-01 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Maintaining process group membership for node clusters in high availability computing systems
US9405640B2 (en) 2000-03-16 2016-08-02 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc Flexible failover policies in high availability computing systems
US20020198996A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-12-26 Padmanabhan Sreenivasan Flexible failover policies in high availability computing systems
US8769132B2 (en) 2000-03-16 2014-07-01 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Flexible failover policies in high availability computing systems
US20110214007A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2011-09-01 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Flexible failover policies in high availability computing systems
US6779039B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2004-08-17 Avaya Technology Corp. System and method for routing message traffic using a cluster of routers sharing a single logical IP address distinct from unique IP addresses of the routers
US6880089B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2005-04-12 Avaya Technology Corp. Firewall clustering for multiple network servers
US20030208766A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-11-06 Nobuyuki Tanaka System for reproducing and delivering digital content
US6802022B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2004-10-05 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Maintenance of consistent, redundant mass storage images
US6901481B2 (en) 2000-04-14 2005-05-31 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Method and apparatus for storing transactional information in persistent memory
US20010047412A1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2001-11-29 Weinman Joseph B. Method and apparatus for maximizing distance of data mirrors
US7219260B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2007-05-15 Emc Corporation Fault tolerant system shared system resource with state machine logging
US7263476B1 (en) 2000-06-12 2007-08-28 Quad Research High speed information processing and mass storage system and method, particularly for information and application servers
US20050203989A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2005-09-15 Richard Dellacona High speed information processing and mass storage system and method, particularly for information and application servers
US20050223146A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2005-10-06 Richard Dellacona High speed information processing and mass storage system and method, particularly for information and application servers
US7448079B2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2008-11-04 Ernst & Young, Llp Method and apparatus for providing computer services
US20020069369A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-06-06 Tremain Geoffrey Donald Method and apparatus for providing computer services
US7095828B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2006-08-22 Unisys Corporation Distributed network applications platform architecture
US7327832B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2008-02-05 Unisys Corporation Adjunct processing of multi-media functions in a messaging system
US7116764B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2006-10-03 Unisys Corporation Network interface unit having an embedded services processor
US6772226B1 (en) 2000-08-15 2004-08-03 Avaya Technology Corp. VPN device clustering using a network flow switch and a different mac address for each VPN device in the cluster
US20040122935A1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Network station adjustable fail-over time intervals for booting to backup servers when transport service is not available
US7401247B2 (en) * 2000-09-07 2008-07-15 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte Ltd Network station adjustable fail-over time intervals for booting to backup servers when transport service is not available
US7769711B2 (en) 2000-09-12 2010-08-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Migration of control in a distributed segmented file system
US20050144178A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2005-06-30 Chrin David M. Distributing files across multiple, permissibly heterogeneous, storage devices
US8935307B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2015-01-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Independent data access in a segmented file system
US20060288080A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2006-12-21 Ibrix, Inc. Balanced computer architecture
US20070226331A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2007-09-27 Ibrix, Inc. Migration of control in a distributed segmented file system
US8977659B2 (en) 2000-09-12 2015-03-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Distributing files across multiple, permissibly heterogeneous, storage devices
US7836017B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2010-11-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. File replication in a distributed segmented file system
US20070288494A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2007-12-13 Ibrix, Inc. Distributing files across multiple, permissibly heterogeneous, storage devices
US7406484B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2008-07-29 Tbrix, Inc. Storage allocation in a distributed segmented file system
US7197555B1 (en) 2000-09-13 2007-03-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Directory server tracking tool
US7849153B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2010-12-07 Zhe Khi Pak Disk system adapted to be directly attached
US20060010287A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2006-01-12 Han-Gyoo Kim Disk system adapted to be directly attached
US7792923B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2010-09-07 Zhe Khi Pak Disk system adapted to be directly attached to network
US20020069245A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-06-06 Han-Gyoo Kim Disk system adapted to be directly attached to network
US7870225B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2011-01-11 Zhe Khi Pak Disk system adapted to be directly attached to network
US6854072B1 (en) 2000-10-17 2005-02-08 Continuous Computing Corporation High availability file server for providing transparent access to all data before and after component failover
US6938071B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2005-08-30 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Fault tolerant storage system having an interconnection fabric that also carries network traffic
US20040111523A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2004-06-10 Howard Hall Tcp/udp acceleration
US8949471B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2015-02-03 Oracle America, Inc. TCP/UDP acceleration
US7089449B1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2006-08-08 Micron Technology, Inc. Recovering a system that has experienced a fault
US20040225655A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2004-11-11 Moulton Gregory Hagan System and method for unorchestrated determination of data sequences using sticky factoring to determine breakpoints in digital sequences
US7272602B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2007-09-18 Emc Corporation System and method for unorchestrated determination of data sequences using sticky byte factoring to determine breakpoints in digital sequences
US20060271819A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2006-11-30 Cluff Scott A Recovering a system that has experienced a fault
US6810398B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2004-10-26 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for unorchestrated determination of data sequences using sticky byte factoring to determine breakpoints in digital sequences
US20040177175A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2004-09-09 Greg Pellegrino System, machine, and method for maintenance of mirrored datasets through surrogate writes during storage-area network transients
US7584377B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2009-09-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System, machine, and method for maintenance of mirrored datasets through surrogate writes during storage-area networks transients
US20020107971A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-08-08 Bailey Brian W. Network transport accelerator
US7392424B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2008-06-24 Nokia Inc. Router and routing protocol redundancy
US20050265346A1 (en) * 2000-12-07 2005-12-01 Nokia, Inc. Router and routing protocol redundancy
US7039830B2 (en) * 2000-12-14 2006-05-02 Far Stone Technology Corporation Backup/recovery system and methods for protecting a computer system
US20020078397A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 Simon Qin Backup / recovery system and methods for protecting a computer system
US20020116555A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-08-22 Jeffrey Somers Method and apparatus for efficiently moving portions of a memory block
EP1344135A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-09-17 Bull HN Information Systems Inc. Write logging in mirrored disk subsystems
EP1344135A4 (en) * 2000-12-22 2007-08-29 Bull Hn Information Syst Write logging in mirrored disk subsystems
WO2002067120A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-08-29 Road Runner System and method for multicast stream failover
US6839865B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2005-01-04 Road Runner System and method for multicast stream failover
US8214590B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2012-07-03 Overland Storage, Inc. Systems and methods for storing parity groups
US7054927B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2006-05-30 Adaptec, Inc. File system metadata describing server directory information
US6871295B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2005-03-22 Adaptec, Inc. Dynamic data recovery
US20020194523A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-12-19 Ulrich Thomas R. Replacing file system processors by hot swapping
US20020165942A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-11-07 Ulrich Thomas R. Data path accelerator with variable parity, variable length, and variable extent parity groups
US20050144514A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2005-06-30 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamic redistribution of parity groups
US20020156974A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-10-24 Ulrich Thomas R. Redundant dynamically distributed file system
US7917695B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2011-03-29 Overland Storage, Inc. Systems and methods for storing parity groups
US20060041718A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2006-02-23 Ulrich Thomas R Fault-tolerant computer network file systems and methods
US6775792B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2004-08-10 Snap Appliance, Inc. Discrete mapping of parity blocks
US20060031287A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2006-02-09 Ulrich Thomas R Systems and methods for load balancing drives and servers
US6990667B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2006-01-24 Adaptec, Inc. Server-independent object positioning for load balancing drives and servers
US8943513B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2015-01-27 Overland Storage, Inc. Systems and methods for load balancing drives and servers by pushing a copy of a frequently accessed file to another disk drive
US20020138559A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2002-09-26 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamically distributed file system
US7356730B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2008-04-08 Adaptec, Inc. Dynamic redistribution of parity groups
US8782661B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2014-07-15 Overland Storage, Inc. Systems and methods for load balancing drives and servers
US6754773B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2004-06-22 Snap Appliance, Inc. Data engine with metadata processor
US6745286B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2004-06-01 Snap Appliance, Inc. Interface architecture
US20080126704A1 (en) * 2001-01-29 2008-05-29 Adaptec, Inc. Systems and methods for storing parity groups
US6990547B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2006-01-24 Adaptec, Inc. Replacing file system processors by hot swapping
US6886171B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2005-04-26 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Caching for I/O virtual address translation and validation using device drivers
US6766413B2 (en) 2001-03-01 2004-07-20 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Systems and methods for caching with file-level granularity
US6874102B2 (en) 2001-03-05 2005-03-29 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Coordinated recalibration of high bandwidth memories in a multiprocessor computer
US20020124202A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-05 John Doody Coordinated Recalibration of high bandwidth memories in a multiprocessor computer
US7340637B2 (en) * 2001-03-26 2008-03-04 Duaxes Corporation Server duplexing method and duplexed server system
US20030172093A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2003-09-11 Mitsugu Nagoya Server duplexing method and duplexed server system
US20030061305A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2003-03-27 Chyron Corporation System and method for enhancing streaming media delivery and reporting
US7930382B1 (en) 2001-04-09 2011-04-19 Parallels Holdings, Ltd. Distributed network data storage system and method using cryptographic algorithms
US20020147815A1 (en) * 2001-04-09 2002-10-10 Alexander Tormasov Distributed network data storage system and method
US7209973B2 (en) 2001-04-09 2007-04-24 Swsoft Holdings, Ltd. Distributed network data storage system and method
US7574527B1 (en) 2001-04-09 2009-08-11 Swsoft Holdings, Ltd. Distributed network data storage system and method
US6862689B2 (en) 2001-04-12 2005-03-01 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. Method and apparatus for managing session information
US20020156931A1 (en) * 2001-04-20 2002-10-24 Erik Riedel Remote file system using network multicast
US6918120B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2005-07-12 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Remote file system using network multicast
US20020194548A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-19 Mark Tetreault Methods and apparatus for computer bus error termination
US7290102B2 (en) 2001-06-01 2007-10-30 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Point in time storage copy
US20030079102A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. System and method for generating point in time storage copy
US6915397B2 (en) 2001-06-01 2005-07-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for generating point in time storage copy
US20050160243A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2005-07-21 Lubbers Clark E. Point in time storage copy
US7783761B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2010-08-24 Zhe Khi Pak Scheme for dynamically connecting I/O devices through network
US20030014569A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-16 Han-Gyoo Kim Scheme for dynamically connecting I/O devices through network
CN1554055B (en) 2001-07-23 2011-08-03 网络装置公司 High-availability cluster virtual server system
US20030018927A1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-01-23 Gadir Omar M.A. High-availability cluster virtual server system
US6944785B2 (en) * 2001-07-23 2005-09-13 Network Appliance, Inc. High-availability cluster virtual server system
WO2003010678A1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-02-06 Network Appliance, Inc. High-availability cluster virtual server system
US20030145134A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-07-31 Wehage Eric R. General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to manage data integrity
US9836424B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2017-12-05 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US20090193164A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2009-07-30 Jasmin Ajanovic General Input/Output Architecture, Protocol and Related Methods to Implement Flow Control
US9071528B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2015-06-30 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US20070038793A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2007-02-15 Wehage Eric R General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to manage data integrity
US9088495B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2015-07-21 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9736071B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2017-08-15 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9049125B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2015-06-02 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US7177971B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2007-02-13 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to provide isochronous channels
US8566473B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2013-10-22 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9602408B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2017-03-21 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US20030131179A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-07-10 Jasmin Ajanovic General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to provide isochronous channels
US20030158992A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-08-21 Jasmin Ajanovic General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9860173B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2018-01-02 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US7353313B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2008-04-01 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to manage data integrity
US7152128B2 (en) * 2001-08-24 2006-12-19 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to manage data integrity
US8819306B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2014-08-26 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture with PCI express protocol with credit-based flow control
US7231486B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2007-06-12 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to support legacy interrupts
US7536473B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2009-05-19 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US9565106B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2017-02-07 Intel Corporation General input/output architecture, protocol and related methods to implement flow control
US20040236798A1 (en) * 2001-09-11 2004-11-25 Sudhir Srinivasan Migration of control in a distributed segmented file system
US20050149682A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2005-07-07 Han-Gyoo Kim Virtual multiple removable media jukebox
US6545872B1 (en) 2001-10-12 2003-04-08 Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. Heat sink for edge connectors
US6910150B2 (en) * 2001-10-15 2005-06-21 Dell Products L.P. System and method for state preservation in a stretch cluster
US20030074596A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-17 Mashayekhi Victor V. System and method for state preservation in a stretch cluster
US6920511B2 (en) 2001-10-19 2005-07-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for controlling communications in data storage complexes
US6912599B2 (en) 2001-10-19 2005-06-28 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for sensing positions of device enclosures within multi-shelf cabinets
US6889345B2 (en) 2001-10-19 2005-05-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Lp. System and method for locating a failed storage device in a data storage system
US20030079082A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Unified management system and method for multi-cabinet data storage complexes
US20030079062A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Method and apparatus for sensing positions of device enclosures within multi-shelf cabinets
US20030079074A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. Method and apparatus for controlling communications in data storage complexes
US6988136B2 (en) 2001-10-19 2006-01-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Unified management system and method for multi-cabinet data storage complexes
US20030079156A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-04-24 Sicola Stephen J. System and method for locating a failed storage device in a data storage system
US20030079083A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. High performance multi-controller processing
US8046469B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2011-10-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for interfacing with virtual storage
US6931487B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2005-08-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P. High performance multi-controller processing
US6895467B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2005-05-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for atomizing storage
US20030079014A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Lubbers Clark E. System and method for interfacing with virtual storage
US20040078419A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2004-04-22 Stephen Ferrari Switching system
US7958199B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2011-06-07 Oracle America, Inc. Switching systems and methods for storage management in digital networks
US6859865B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2005-02-22 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for removing latency effects in acknowledged data transfers
US20030093638A1 (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-05-15 Margerie Sylvain De System and method for removing latency effects in acknowledged data transfers
US7529778B1 (en) 2001-12-12 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing access to consistent point-in-time file versions
US20080281967A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2008-11-13 Mark Muhlestein Method and apparatus for encapsulating a virtual filer on a filer
US7647461B2 (en) 2001-12-28 2010-01-12 Netapp, Inc. Method and apparatus for allocating resources among virtual filers on a filer
US20030195942A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-10-16 Mark Muhlestein Method and apparatus for encapsulating a virtual filer on a filer
US7269696B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2007-09-11 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and apparatus for encapsulating a virtual filer on a filer
US8782232B2 (en) 2001-12-28 2014-07-15 Netapp, Inc. Method and apparatus for encapsulating a virtual filer on a filer
US7162596B2 (en) * 2002-01-11 2007-01-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Remote mirrored disk pair resynchronization monitor
US20030177323A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-09-18 Mathias Popp Remote mirrored disk pair resynchronization monitor
US20030154305A1 (en) * 2002-02-11 2003-08-14 Sun Microsystems, Inc., A Delaware Corporation High availability lightweight directory access protocol service
US7107355B2 (en) * 2002-02-11 2006-09-12 Sun Microsystems, Inc. High availability lightweight directory access protocol service
US7143307B1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-11-28 Network Appliance, Inc. Remote disaster recovery and data migration using virtual appliance migration
US7904748B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2011-03-08 Netapp, Inc. Remote disaster recovery and data migration using virtual appliance migration
US8140888B1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2012-03-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. High availability network processing system
US20030233438A1 (en) * 2002-06-18 2003-12-18 Robin Hutchinson Methods and systems for managing assets
US9047582B2 (en) 2002-06-18 2015-06-02 Ca, Inc. Methods and systems for managing enterprise assets
US20040010571A1 (en) * 2002-06-18 2004-01-15 Robin Hutchinson Methods and systems for managing enterprise assets
WO2003107211A1 (en) * 2002-06-18 2003-12-24 Esecurityonline Methods and systems for managing enterprise assets
US7668947B2 (en) 2002-06-18 2010-02-23 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Methods and systems for managing assets
US20040153709A1 (en) * 2002-07-03 2004-08-05 Burton-Krahn Noel Morgen Method and apparatus for providing transparent fault tolerance within an application server environment
US7047377B2 (en) 2002-08-20 2006-05-16 Gruintine Pueche, Inc. System and method for conducting an auction-based ranking of search results on a computer network
US20040068563A1 (en) * 2002-10-08 2004-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks enabling access to a shared resource
US8495131B2 (en) 2002-10-08 2013-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks enabling access to a shared resource
US8639731B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2014-01-28 Hitachi Data Engineering UK Limited Apparatus for managing plural versions of a root node for an object of a file system
US8041735B1 (en) 2002-11-01 2011-10-18 Bluearc Uk Limited Distributed file system and method
US8224877B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2012-07-17 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and method for hardware-based file system
US9753848B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2017-09-05 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Apparatus for managing a plurality of root nodes for file systems
US8788530B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2014-07-22 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Distributed file system and method
US9542310B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2017-01-10 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited File server node with non-volatile memory processing module coupled to cluster file server node
US20080040385A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2008-02-14 Bluearc Uk Limited Apparatus and Method for Hardware-Based File System
US7433934B2 (en) * 2003-02-07 2008-10-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Network storage virtualization method and system
US20040205143A1 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-10-14 Tetsuya Uemura Network storage virtualization method and system
US9066293B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2015-06-23 Facebook, Inc. Wireless communication system based on power resources
US8059654B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2011-11-15 AOL, Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US8665878B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2014-03-04 Facebook, Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US6965564B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2005-11-15 America Online, Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US7746787B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2010-06-29 Aol Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US20040160957A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-08-19 Coffman Stephen Blaine Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US20100220660A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2010-09-02 Aol Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US20050286447A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2005-12-29 Coffman Stephen B Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US20040205382A1 (en) * 2003-03-27 2004-10-14 Yusuke Noda Methods and apparatus for recovering work of one computer by another computers
US6990605B2 (en) * 2003-03-27 2006-01-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Methods and apparatus for recovering work of one computer by another computers
US8768905B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2014-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Managing locks and transactions
US8161018B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2012-04-17 International Business Machines Corporation Managing locks and transactions
US7870111B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2011-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
US20040220913A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2004-11-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
US20070282839A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2007-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
US7844585B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2010-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks and transactions
US20070282966A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2007-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for managing locks and transactions
US8200643B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2012-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Lock and transaction management
US20080263549A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2008-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Managing locks and transactions
US7496574B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2009-02-24 International Business Machines Corporation Managing locks and transactions
US7289992B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2007-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
US20110078126A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2011-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for lock and transaction management
WO2004099991A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2004-11-18 International Business Machines Corporation Methods, systems and computer program products for replicating servers and network traffic for problem determination and/or tuning
US20040225738A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2004-11-11 Patel Dipak M. Methods, systems and computer program products for replicating servers and network traffic for problem determination and/or tuning
US7251745B2 (en) * 2003-06-11 2007-07-31 Availigent, Inc. Transparent TCP connection failover
US20040268175A1 (en) * 2003-06-11 2004-12-30 Eternal Systems, Inc. Transparent TCP connection failover
WO2005025289A3 (en) * 2003-06-11 2007-02-22 Eternal Systems Inc Transparent tcp connection failover
US7457880B1 (en) 2003-09-26 2008-11-25 Ximeta Technology, Inc. System using a single host to receive and redirect all file access commands for shared data storage device from other hosts on a network
US20090043971A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2009-02-12 Ximeta Technology, Inc. Data integrity for data storage devices shared by multiple hosts via a network
US20050097391A1 (en) * 2003-10-20 2005-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and article of manufacture for data replication
US7376859B2 (en) * 2003-10-20 2008-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and article of manufacture for data replication
US8171480B2 (en) 2004-01-27 2012-05-01 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and apparatus for allocating shared resources to process domains according to current processor utilization in a shared resource processor
US20050172293A1 (en) * 2004-01-27 2005-08-04 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and apparatus for allocating resources in a shared resource processor
US20050193245A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2005-09-01 Hayden John M. Internet protocol based disaster recovery of a server
US7383463B2 (en) * 2004-02-04 2008-06-03 Emc Corporation Internet protocol based disaster recovery of a server
US7664836B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2010-02-16 Zhe Khi Pak Device and method for booting an operation system for a computer from a passive directly attached network device
US20050193189A1 (en) * 2004-02-17 2005-09-01 Han-Gyoo Kim Device and method for booting an operating system for a computer from a passive directly attached network device
US20050193017A1 (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-09-01 Han-Gyoo Kim Portable multimedia player/recorder that accesses data contents from and writes to networked device
US20060069884A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2006-03-30 Han-Gyoo Kim Universal network to device bridge chip that enables network directly attached device
US20050228835A1 (en) * 2004-04-12 2005-10-13 Guillermo Roa System and method for supporting block-based protocols on a virtual storage appliance executing within a physical storage appliance
US8230085B2 (en) 2004-04-12 2012-07-24 Netapp, Inc. System and method for supporting block-based protocols on a virtual storage appliance executing within a physical storage appliance
US8463936B2 (en) * 2004-05-07 2013-06-11 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for distributing digital data in particular for a peer-to-peer network
US20050278389A1 (en) * 2004-05-07 2005-12-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for distributing digital data in particular for a peer-to-peer network
US20060015635A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for handling address resolution protocol requests for a device having multiple interfaces
US7617256B2 (en) * 2004-07-19 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US20060026165A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US7746900B2 (en) 2004-07-22 2010-06-29 Zhe Khi Pak Low-level communication layers and device employing same
US20060045130A1 (en) * 2004-07-22 2006-03-02 Han-Gyoo Kim Low-level communication layers and device employing same
US20070008988A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2007-01-11 Han-Gyoo Kim Enhanced network direct attached storage controller
US20060067356A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-03-30 Han-Gyoo Kim Method and apparatus for network direct attached storage
US7860943B2 (en) 2004-08-23 2010-12-28 Zhe Khi Pak Enhanced network direct attached storage controller
US20130325916A1 (en) * 2004-09-09 2013-12-05 William M. Pitts Full text search capabilities integrated into distributed file systems - Incrementally Indexing Files
US7627574B2 (en) 2004-12-16 2009-12-01 Oracle International Corporation Infrastructure for performing file operations by a database server
US7849257B1 (en) 2005-01-06 2010-12-07 Zhe Khi Pak Method and apparatus for storing and retrieving data
US7672223B2 (en) 2005-03-07 2010-03-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for replicating a transport layer protocol stream
US20060198296A1 (en) * 2005-03-07 2006-09-07 Sumandra Majee Method and apparatus for replicating a transport layer protocol stream
US8266473B2 (en) * 2005-03-10 2012-09-11 Telecom Italia S.P.A. Disaster recovery architecture
US20080209258A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-08-28 Luca Casale Disaster Recovery Architecture
CN1866249B (en) 2005-05-20 2011-01-05 富士施乐株式会社 Data management system, data server, and data management method
US20060265392A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Akira Sunada Data management system, data server, and data management method
US20060271692A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US9438696B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2016-09-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication protocol
US8332526B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2012-12-11 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol including negotiation and command compounding
US9071661B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2015-06-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US8316129B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2012-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US8825885B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2014-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol
US8850025B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2014-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US9332089B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US20060271697A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol
US20070005603A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Namit Jain Sharing state information among a plurality of file operation servers
US7809675B2 (en) * 2005-06-29 2010-10-05 Oracle International Corporation Sharing state information among a plurality of file operation servers
US7630985B2 (en) * 2005-09-02 2009-12-08 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Data server, data management method, and data management system
US20070055674A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Akira Sunada Data server, data management method, and data management system
US7600149B2 (en) * 2005-09-20 2009-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Failure transparency for update applications under single-master configuration
US20070067664A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Failure transparency for update applications under single-master configuration
US20070094529A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2007-04-26 Lango Jason A Method and apparatus for increasing throughput in a storage server
US8347293B2 (en) * 2005-10-20 2013-01-01 Network Appliance, Inc. Mutual exclusion domains to perform file system processes on stripes
WO2007077132A3 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-11-29 Ibm File system dump/restore by node numbering
WO2007077132A2 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-12 International Business Machines Corporation File system dump/restore by node numbering
US9886508B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2018-02-06 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc Systems and methods for server management
US8732162B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2014-05-20 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Systems and methods for server management
US7664785B2 (en) * 2006-04-18 2010-02-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus of WAFS backup managed in centralized center
US20070260717A1 (en) * 2006-04-18 2007-11-08 Yoshiki Kano Method and apparatus of WAFS backup managed in centralized center
US9679146B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2017-06-13 Hybir Inc. Group based complete and incremental computer file backup system, process and apparatus
US9037545B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2015-05-19 Hybir Inc. Group based complete and incremental computer file backup system, process and apparatus
US20090177720A1 (en) * 2006-06-08 2009-07-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Failover method of remotely-mirrored clustered file servers
US8099622B2 (en) * 2006-06-08 2012-01-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Failover method of remotely-mirrored clustered file servers
US7796066B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2010-09-14 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method for common mode translation
US8621154B1 (en) * 2008-04-18 2013-12-31 Netapp, Inc. Flow based reply cache
US7533289B1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and computer program product for performing live cloning
US9141449B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2015-09-22 Symantec Corporation Managing remote procedure calls when a server is unavailable
US20110107358A1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Symantec Corporation Managing remote procedure calls when a server is unavailable
US9244015B2 (en) 2010-04-20 2016-01-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Self-arranging, luminescence-enhancement device for surface-enhanced luminescence
US9071622B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2015-06-30 Netapp, Inc. Multi-level parallelism of process execution in a mutual exclusion domain of a processing system
US8627331B1 (en) 2010-04-30 2014-01-07 Netapp, Inc. Multi-level parallelism of process execution in a mutual exclusion domain of a processing system
US9189436B2 (en) * 2010-09-10 2015-11-17 International Business Machines Corporation Abstracting special file interfaces to concurrently support multiple operating system levels
US20120197918A1 (en) * 2010-09-10 2012-08-02 International Business Machines Corporation Abstracting special file interfaces to concurrently support multiple operating system levels
US9279767B2 (en) 2010-10-20 2016-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Chemical-analysis device integrated with metallic-nanofinger device for chemical sensing
US9274058B2 (en) 2010-10-20 2016-03-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Metallic-nanofinger device for chemical sensing
US9594022B2 (en) 2010-10-20 2017-03-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Chemical-analysis device integrated with metallic-nanofinger device for chemical sensing
US8631277B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2014-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Providing transparent failover in a file system
US20120254901A1 (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-10-04 Denso Corporation Method and system for restoring an application in a dynamically linked environment
US8516506B2 (en) * 2011-03-29 2013-08-20 Denso International America, Inc. Method and system for restoring an application in a dynamically linked environment
US8601220B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2013-12-03 Netapp, Inc. Transparent data migration in a storage system environment
US9331955B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transporting operations of arbitrary size over remote direct memory access
US8856582B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Transparent failover
US9462039B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2016-10-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transparent failover
US8788579B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Clustered client failover
US9923829B1 (en) 2011-09-22 2018-03-20 F5 Networks, Inc. Automatic proxy device configuration
US9497285B1 (en) 2012-02-21 2016-11-15 F5 Networks, Inc. Connection bucketing in mirroring asymmetric clustered multiprocessor systems
US9100330B1 (en) * 2012-07-13 2015-08-04 Emc Corporation Introduction of read delay or write delay in servers of a geographically distributed data processing system so that clients read up-to-date data
US20140040477A1 (en) * 2012-07-31 2014-02-06 F5 Networks, Inc. Connection mesh in mirroring asymmetric clustered multiprocessor systems
CN104508651A (en) * 2012-07-31 2015-04-08 F5网络公司 Connection mesh in mirroring asymmetric clustered multiprocessor systems
US9516102B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2016-12-06 F5 Networks, Inc. Server to client reverse persistence

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
JP4005631B2 (en) 2007-11-07 grant
WO1996023259A1 (en) 1996-08-01 application
CA2211654A1 (en) 1996-08-01 application
EP0806010A4 (en) 2005-10-19 application
CA2211654C (en) 2009-03-31 grant
EP0806010A1 (en) 1997-11-12 application
JPH11502644A (en) 1999-03-02 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Borr Transaction monitoring in Encompass
US6044367A (en) Distributed I/O store
US6031978A (en) System, method and program for enabling a client to reconnect to a same server in a network of computer systems after the server has moved to a different network address
US7200726B1 (en) Method and apparatus for reducing network traffic during mass storage synchronization phase of synchronous data mirroring
US7047377B2 (en) System and method for conducting an auction-based ranking of search results on a computer network
US6578160B1 (en) Fault tolerant, low latency system resource with high level logging of system resource transactions and cross-server mirrored high level logging of system resource transactions
US6839752B1 (en) Group data sharing during membership change in clustered computer system
US7167963B2 (en) Storage system with multiple remote site copying capability
US7627694B2 (en) Maintaining process group membership for node clusters in high availability computing systems
US6279032B1 (en) Method and system for quorum resource arbitration in a server cluster
US6920579B1 (en) Operator initiated graceful takeover in a node cluster
US5271013A (en) Fault tolerant computer system
US6185601B1 (en) Dynamic load balancing of a network of client and server computers
US7653668B1 (en) Fault tolerant multi-stage data replication with relaxed coherency guarantees
US6760861B2 (en) System, method and apparatus for data processing and storage to provide continuous operations independent of device failure or disaster
US20050021751A1 (en) Cluster data port services for clustered computer system
US20030126200A1 (en) Dynamic load balancing of a network of client and server computer
US6671705B1 (en) Remote mirroring system, device, and method
US20040133607A1 (en) Metadata based file switch and switched file system
US7143307B1 (en) Remote disaster recovery and data migration using virtual appliance migration
US20040193625A1 (en) Data control method for duplicating data between computer systems
US6393485B1 (en) Method and apparatus for managing clustered computer systems
Bhide et al. A highly available network file server
US20050027892A1 (en) Flexible remote data mirroring
US20020194015A1 (en) Distributed database clustering using asynchronous transactional replication

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AUSPEX SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KANDASAMY, DAVID R.;BUTLER, MITCHEL B.;FOSS, ANDREW L.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:007335/0741;SIGNING DATES FROM 19950116 TO 19950123

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: FOOTHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AUSPEX SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010470/0939

Effective date: 19991222

AS Assignment

Owner name: AUSPEX SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL (FKA FOOTHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:014220/0663

Effective date: 20030612

AS Assignment

Owner name: NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AUSPEX SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013933/0292

Effective date: 20030619

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed