US3847800A - Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils - Google Patents

Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3847800A
US3847800A US00385894A US38589473A US3847800A US 3847800 A US3847800 A US 3847800A US 00385894 A US00385894 A US 00385894A US 38589473 A US38589473 A US 38589473A US 3847800 A US3847800 A US 3847800A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oil
nitrogen
oxidizing gas
sulfur
solvent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00385894A
Inventor
E Guth
A Diaz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
KVB Inc
Original Assignee
KVB ENG Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by KVB ENG Inc filed Critical KVB ENG Inc
Priority to US00385894A priority Critical patent/US3847800A/en
Priority to GB2156674A priority patent/GB1437569A/en
Priority to DE2424274A priority patent/DE2424274C3/en
Priority to CA200,763A priority patent/CA1046004A/en
Priority to NL7407257A priority patent/NL7407257A/en
Priority to IN1365/CAL/74A priority patent/IN141762B/en
Priority to JP7863974A priority patent/JPS5337081B2/ja
Priority to IE1506/74A priority patent/IE39619B1/en
Priority to AU71509/74A priority patent/AU492349B2/en
Priority to FR7425960A priority patent/FR2240280B1/fr
Priority to SU2049070A priority patent/SU508220A3/en
Priority to BE147170A priority patent/BE818350A/en
Priority to BR6369/74A priority patent/BR7406369D0/en
Priority to IT26012/74A priority patent/IT1017927B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3847800A publication Critical patent/US3847800A/en
Assigned to KVB, INC. reassignment KVB, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). EFFECTIVE APRIL 10, 1972. Assignors: KVB ENGINEERING, INC. A CA CORP.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G27/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation
    • C10G27/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation with oxygen or compounds generating oxygen
    • C10G27/12Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation with oxygen or compounds generating oxygen with oxygen-generating compounds, e.g. per-compounds, chromic acid, chromates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G27/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation
    • C10G27/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation with oxygen or compounds generating oxygen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G53/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes
    • C10G53/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only
    • C10G53/14Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one oxidation step

Definitions

  • the oxidant gas may be 11641546 1/1965 208/36 regenerated by the addition of oxygen and recircu- 2,976,229 3/1961 Brown et al. 208/2 lated.
  • Harder et al 208/276 may be decomposed hydlolysls reacuo 3,294,677 12/1966 Martin et almn 208/224 lute base to separate inorganic sulfate and sulfite, and
  • Prior Art The presently used methodfor performing the function of the present invention involves the useof a high temperature-high pressure process to desulfurize hydrocarbon fuels using hydrogen, and an acid extractionprocess for the removal of basic nitrogen compounds.
  • the old methods have major disadvantages.
  • Hydrogen is a valuable material, made in refineries by pyrolyzing (heating to decompose) l hydrocarbon materials or through combustion to form carbon monoxide which is subsequently reacted catalytically with water athigh temperature. In any case, it is costly to use hydrogen to remove sulfur (as-hydrogen sulfide) from fuels.
  • the reaction of hydrogen is nonselective in that some of the hydrogen will react with-the oil to saturate hydrocarbon molecules (aromatics, olefins) in addition to the desired reactionforminghydrogen sulfide. This means that a large quantity of hydrogen is required to.desul-' furize hydrocarbon fuels.
  • the second disadvantage of the present method for sulfur removal is that it requires a heterogeneous catalyst.
  • the surface of the solid catalyst tends to become fouled, particularly when residual oils are desulfurized, and this makes the oldmethod inefficient or inoperable with some residual fuels.
  • the third disadvantage of the present method'for sulfur removal is that it requires high temperatures and high pressures for desulfurizing fuels.
  • the reaction conditions make it necessary to use expensive equipment for the old process.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 1,968,842 issued to Malisoff proposes to treat the sulfur containing oil with a solution of an alkali in an organic solvent.
  • the alkali reacts with mercaptans in the oil forming sulfur compounds which are more'soluble in the solvent than in the oil.
  • the Malisoff patent is directed specifically to sulfur in the form of mercaptansin the oil and does not deal in any way with the broad range of sulfur and nitrogen compounds susceptible to the method of the present invention.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,267,027 issued to Fierce discloses reacting light petroleum distillates with N followed by washing with an aqueous caustic and finally a water wash. The temperature of the reaction is limited to C.
  • This process also is directed primarily to the removal of mercaptans and thus also has limited applicabilit S weetening" of petroleum oils has also been known to applicant as having been proposed by several people, and is a related process. While not considered directly applicable, the most pertinent of these is U.S. Pat. No. 3,224,618 issued to Dimond. Again, the process considers only mercaptans and proposes to convert any mercaptans present in hydrocarbons to disulfrdes by 2]. reacting the mercaptansywith:oxygen'in the presence of an oxide of nitrogen. Theresulting disulfides are not as odorous as the mercaptans and thus the treated oil is considered sweet.
  • the major disadvantage of the old method for nitrogen removal is that it achievesonly partial nitrogen removal. Specifically, it removes only some of the basic nitrogen compounds.
  • thegeneral purpose of the present invention is to provide such'a low cost process.
  • the process is low cost since it is carried out at low pressures and temperatures, that is, the process equipment is inexpensive compared to the equipment required for high pressure, high temperature processes. Further, the process uses only lowcost chemicals (i.-e., oxygen, nitrogen oxides an-methanol, the latter two being recycled) to remove substantially all of the sulfur and nitrogen from the fuels.
  • the process has broad applicability since it can be .used .to'treatliquid petroleum distillates (diesel oil, jet fuel) as well as residual oils.
  • the process makes it possible to upgrade hydrocarbon fractions from initially low value-high sulfur and nitrogen materials to produce'high value-low sulfur and nitrogen materials for use particularly as fuels.
  • the process signifi cantly' increases the quantity of fossil fuels available to use within the current air pollution regulations and makes possible a large future. reduction in the oxidesof sulfur and oxides of nitrogen emissions by fuel users.
  • the present invention is a process based on the selective oxidation of the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in liquid petroleum oil.
  • Petroleum oil is used herein to signify diesel oil, jet fuel, furnace oil, residual oil, crude oil, topped crude oil, and similar hydrocarbon mixtures.
  • Oxygen is used to regenerate the gas phase oxidizers (oxides of nitrogen containing two or more oxygen atoms, e.g., N0 which are recycled.
  • the process can be carried out batch-wise or continuously as desired.
  • a batch of oil can be placed in a vessel and treated with the gas phase.
  • oxidizer to oxidize the sulfur and nitrogen compounds or the oil can be continuously pumped through a-reactor in which the oxidation is accomplished.
  • the oxidizing gas may be passed upward through a vessel while the oil passes downward.
  • the vessel maybe packed with a material (like Berl saddles) which permits the two flows to occur without interference or a large pressure drop.
  • the reacted oil is extracted with a suitable solvent to separate the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds.
  • the extraction can also be carried out continuously or batch-wise. Atthis point, a major fraction of the oil has low sulfur and nitrogen content and is solvent stripped and removed from the process for use.
  • One difficulty which may occur in this process is that some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke. This problem may be obviated by preheating the feed oil to 300 to 600 F for some time, typically 2 to 20 hours to permit the reactive groups in the oil to combine with parts of the other hydrocarbon molecules and thus become less active.
  • An alternate pretreatment procedure is to react the oil with a reactant such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia to remove the active groups in the oil.
  • the solvent containing dissolved sulfur and nitrogen compound and a fraction of dissolved oil can be separated from its solute either by evaporating the solvent or cooling the mixture to a temperature where the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds have low solubility.
  • the solvent is then recycled through the process.
  • the sulfur and nitrogen may be separated from the solute, for example, by hydrolysis or pyrolysis.
  • the process consumes oxygen and energy and produces a low sulfur, low nitrogen oil having physical properties similar to the feed, a lighter oil fraction (from the solute) and inorganic sulfur as sulfite or sulfate ions and inorganic nitrogen as nitrate and nitrite ions or nitrogen.
  • the process steps are all carried out at near ambient pressure and temperatures below about 300 F so the equipment, tanks, piping, etc., are all inexpensive compared to those needed for a high temperature, high pressure process.
  • FIG. I is a block diagram of the process of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the oxidizing gas recirculating system.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a first pretreatment step.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an alternative pretreatment step.
  • Disulfides while not having the objectionable odor of mercaptans, are, unfortunately, not easily separated from the oil and thus the oxidation step contemplated by the method of this invention is intended to oxidize the sulfur compounds into a higher state which exhibits low solubility in oil, but relatively good solubility in some other solvent so that the compounds can be subsequently removed by the process of preferential solubilit 2.
  • a suitable solvent such as methanol, which is immiscible with the oil, but in which the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds readily dissolve.
  • Methanol is not the only possible solvent, but is presently preferred since it embodies the characteristics desired in a suitable solvent. The desired characteristics are as follows:
  • the different densities of the oil and the solvent allow separation of the oil (with reduced sulfur and nitrogen content) from the solvent (in which the sulfur and nitrogen compounds are dissolved) by gravitational settling or centrifuging.
  • the resulting oil has a low sulfur and nitrogen content as is necessary to meet the present stringent requirements for fuels.
  • pretreatment of the oil in some circumstances.
  • one difficulty which may occur in the process is that some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke.
  • This problem is obviated by preheating the feed oil to 300 to 600 F for some time, typically 2 to 20 hours to permit the reactive groups in the oil to combine with parts of the other hydrocarbon molecules and thus become less active.
  • An alternate pretreatment procedure is to react the oil with a reactant such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia to remove the active groups in the oil.
  • oils which have a high volatility portion can be topped at temperatures up to 800F, at atmospheric pressure, or 1,000F., in vacuum, before processing.
  • the high volatility portion of the oil is low in sulfur.
  • oils having a methanol soluble portion can be treated with methanol first to separate the methanol soluble portion.
  • FIG. 1 a block diagram of one preferred embodiment of the process of this invention is shown in the form of a continuous process.
  • the process can also be a combination of batch and continuous, for example, the pretreatment steps, if utilized, can be done batch-wise while the remainder of the process is continuous. Other combinations of batch and continuous processing are also possible and practical within the spirit of the present invention.
  • the process, as illustrated in FIG. 1, does not include any pretreatment steps, it being assumed that such steps are either unnecessary or already performed on the particular oil being processed.
  • the reactor preferably operates at near atmospheric pressure since this results in simple and relatively inexpensive processing equipment. No particular advantage is to be gained by increasing the pressure of the system, butto some extent a somewhat higher than room temperature can be of advantage. A higher temperature will tend to cause the reaction in which mercaptans become disulfides to proceed further converting the disulfides into sulfoxides. Typical temperatures which are desirable range from about 50 to 350 F. As the temperature increases some undesirable side reactions such as polymerization and coke formation begin to occur. The process temperature should not be so high nor the time of application so long that these side reactions become a problem.
  • the reactor is the vessel which provides contact between the feed oil and the oxidizing gas allowing the reaction to take place. It can take many forms, but in the particular embodiment being described, is a relatively tall cylindrical vessel in which the oil is introduced at the top and the oxidizing gas at the bottom. The oil flows downward due to gravity, flowing over baffles, or other packing which provide a large surface over which the oil can flow. The oil flows in thin layers so that a large surface of oil is presented to the oxidizing gas.
  • a typical reactor 11 may be packed with Berl saddles 12, which occupy about 50 percent of the reactor volume, leaving open spaces through which the oxidizing gas can pass in contact with the oil on the surface of the saddles.
  • reactors to obtain intimate contact between the oil and oxidizing gas may, of course, be used, for example, agitated vessels.
  • the volume of the reactor is a function of the volumetric flow rate of the oil and usually ranges from about 10 to 100 times the hourly oil flow rate.
  • the flow of oil is such that the flowing oil remains in the reactor for up to about minutes at temperatures up to about 350 F., the time and temperature being enough to allow the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the oil to oxidize as needed to form the compounds which will preferentially dissolve in the solvent used, but not so hot or so long as to cause polymerization or side reactions.
  • the use of too high a temperature tends to cause polymerization of the oil and is thus not desirable, while overlong exposure to the oxidant allows other unwanted side reactions to occur which are also undesirable.
  • the oxidizing gas is comprised of oxides of nitrogen. It can be a single oxide, or a mixture of nitrogen oxides.
  • the oxides which have been found to be useful are N0 N 0 N 0 and N 0
  • a preferred composition of oxidizing gas is l to 9 percent by volume NO N0 1 to 19 percent by volume 0 with the balance N
  • the oxidizing gas is introduced at inlet l3 located near the bottom of the reactor and flows upward through the reactor contacting the oil which is flowing over the surfaces of the Berl saddles 12.
  • the oxidizer flows out through outlet 14. It will be found to be most economical to reconstitute the oxidizer and continuously recycle the gas through the reactor. The procedure for accomplishing this will be discussed below.
  • organic nitrogen compounds present in the oil having one or more carbon bonds e.g., amines, saturated aliphatic compounds or parts of an aromatic ring
  • Typical reactions could be as follows:
  • RN NO R N N0 R NO NO The oxidized compounds formed are soluble in methanol and are thus susceptible to removal from the oil in the process as described below.
  • the oil containing the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds flows out of the bottom of reactor 11 and is pumped by pump 19 to mixer 20 where it is mixed with a solvent, which is preferably methanol, pumped into mixer 20 by pump 21 from solvent storage tank 22.
  • a solvent which is preferably methanol
  • a quantity of solvent about 1 to 5 times the volume of oil insures that substantially all of the soluble components in the oil dissolve in the solvent.
  • the solvent must be selective, that is, one in which the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds are soluble but in which the oil itself is not soluble.
  • Methanol is the presently preferred solvent but other solvents such as methanolwater mixtures, methanol-ethanol-water mixtures, and methanol-inorganic salt (e.g., sodium chloride, potassium chloride and calcium chloride) solutions can be used.
  • the mixer may be a stirred vessel or simply a static mixer in which the flow streamlines are broken up by the shape of the vessel or by obtructions therein. Again the mixing may be done at atmospheric pressure. and the temperature is not criticalbut is preferably between 80 and F, the upper temperature limit being the boiling point of solvent.
  • the mixture flows to separator 23 where the fluid is brought essentially to rest andthe lighter liquid, which in the case of a methanol-diesel oil system is the methanol, rises to the top and the oil sinks to the bottom.
  • the desulfurized and denitrogenated oil flows out of a bottom tap 24 of separator 23 while the solvent carrying the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds in solution is decanted from tap 25 at the top of separator 23.
  • the separator is preferably maintained at 1 atmosphere pressure and between 80 and 150 F., neither condition being critical. Separation of the fluids occurs in about to 30 minutes and a separator vessel with sufficient volume to hold 10 to 30 minutes of flow would be satisfactory.
  • a continuous flow from taps 24 and 25, keeping the line of demarcation between the oil and the methanol solution about in the middle of the vessel allows the separation to take place and prevents contamination of the separator output streams.
  • any residual solvent remaining in the oil leaving tap 24 is removed in holding tank 26 which is maintained at a relatively high temperature, for example, 160 F which causes the solvent to vaporize.
  • the vaporized solvent flows to condenser 27 where it is condensed and is then added to the solvent in solvent tank 22.
  • the solvent stream including the dissolved sulfur and nitrogen compounds, as well as a small fraction of oil (generally 2 to 5 percent of the initial oil volume), flows from separator 23 through outlet 25 to the solvent still 29, which is maintained at a high enough temperature to evaporate the solvent.
  • the solvent vapor is condensed in condenser 27 and the distilled liquid solvent then flows to tank 22 for recycling.
  • the residue of the solvent distillation, containing sulfur and nitrogen compounds, oil, and some amount of solvent is passed through a holding tank 30, maintained at over the boiling point of the solvent, where the last vestiges of solvent are stripped from the liquid and recovered in condenser 27.
  • the high sulfur, high nitrogen oil remaining as the residue can either be used as is, for applications where the high sulfur and nitrogen content is unimportant, or the oil can be further processed in decomposer 31 which subjects the oil to a pressure of l to 5 atmospheres at 150 to 300 F for 5 to 30 minutes in the presence of air and a dilute inorganic base such as sodium hydroxide.
  • decomposer 31 which subjects the oil to a pressure of l to 5 atmospheres at 150 to 300 F for 5 to 30 minutes in the presence of air and a dilute inorganic base such as sodium hydroxide.
  • the ensuing hydrolysis reaction decomposes the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds forming hydrocarbons and sulfite or sulfate compounds and nitrite or nitrate compounds.
  • FIG. 2 shows how this may be accomplished.
  • the reaction in the reactor reduces the N0 to NO while oxidizing the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the oil.
  • the reaction in the reactor reduces the N0 to NO while oxidizing the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the oil.
  • the reaction of NO and 0 present to maintain an equilibrium of N0 NO, and 0 as follows:
  • makeup gas is NO and 0 which are reacted as will be presently described to form N0
  • the oxidizing and makeup gases may be any one or more of the higher oxides of nitrogen previously mentioned and in such case it would not be necessary to provide the NO reacting means.
  • Pump 17 circulates the oxidizer in the system.
  • the rate of circulation is not critical, the most desirable rate depending on the temperature of the reactor, the quality of the contact of the oxidant with the oil and the length of time the oil is in contact with the gas.
  • the order of magnitude of the circulation is 10 to 20 moles of oxygen per mole of sulfur and nitrogen removed.
  • NO reactor 18 is a heated vessel maintained at 200 to 450 F. in which the NO and O react forming N0 so that the gas stream entering reactor 11 will be rich in N0 the primary oxidant.
  • NO reactor 18 is preferably of a size which allows the gas to remain in it for l to 3 minutes in order that the desired reaction take place.
  • the gas having the desired composition After leaving NO reactor 18, the gas having the desired composition enters reactor 11 through inlet 13. After exiting through outlet 14, the gas is fed through oil trap 33 and filter 34 before any portion of the gas is vented through bleed 35.
  • the purpose of these units is to help clean up the circulating gas and to prevent oil vapors or solid particles from being vented to the atmosphere. It may be necessary in order to comply with anti-pollution statutes, to further treat the bleed stream 35 before allowing it to escape to the atmosphere.
  • Some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke.
  • a pretreatment as illustrated in FIGS. 3 or 4 might be found advantageous.
  • a pump 43 drives oil from a reservoir or other source, not shown, into prereactor 40.
  • the prereactor 40 is maintained at an elevated temperature of 300 to 600 F and is of sufficient size to that oil will remain in the prereactor for from 2 to 20 hours.
  • reactive groupsin the oil combine with parts of other hydrocarbon molecules and become less active.
  • the purpose of this step is to reduce undesirable side reactions in the oxidation step which follows. Active groups in the oil, unless disposed of in some manner, may tend to react nonselectively in the oxidation reactor to form undesirable polymers and coke. By pretreating the oil to reduce the activity of these groups, the side reactions can be held to a minimum.
  • FIG. 4 An alternate pretreatment is illustrated in FIG. 4 where that portion of the apparatus used in the pre treatment step only is shown.
  • a pump 41 pumps a suitable reactant, such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia, into prereactor 42.
  • a suitable reactant such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia
  • Prereactor 42 need not be heated but agitation means, not shown, should be supplied to insure good mixing of the feed oil and the reactant.
  • the reactant reacts with the active groups in the feed oil thereby reducing the amount of active material in the oil.
  • topping oils which have a high volatility portion by heating the feed oil to 800 F at atmospheric pressure or 1,000 F in vacuum.
  • the high volatility portion of oil is low in sulfur and removing such portion before processing will increase the efficiency of the process.
  • An oil which contains a methanol solubleportion can be treated with methanol first to separate the soluble portion.
  • the oil is fed to reactor 11 and processed in the manner previously described.
  • Table II the results for a variety of residual oils show that the method removes sulfur and nitrogen from thqssfys s- In treating the high sulfur oil remaining from the residue in Test 41-1 at 250F and one atmosphere for minutes using an equal-volume of 10 percent sodium hydroxide in water with air passingthrough the oil at,
  • Thetreatin g gas was prepared by mixing air and nitrogen oxide (NOT and heating the mix ture to 250F RESIDUAL OIL TESTS Process Conditions Initial Oxidation Oxidizer Extraction Sample Type of Oil Wt. S,Wt. N Time Temp. Conc. Vol. Solv/ Final Removal F Vol.% NO Vol. Oil Wt. S Wt. N S N Batch Reactor Tests lg u ur 2.2 3 hrs. 225 I0 4 1.8 14

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A method for the removal of sulfur and nitrogen components from petroleum oils is disclosed. The unwanted sulfur and nitrogen is oxidized to the extent that the resultant compounds exhibit preferential solubility characteristics in some solvent with respect to the oil. The oxidation step involves reacting the sulfur and nitrogen compounds present with an oxide of nitrogen. In particular instances, pretreatment of the oil to remove active groups which cause undesirable side reactions or removal of low sulfur fractions prior to the oxidation step will increase the efficiency of the process. The oil containing the oxidized forms of sulfur and nitrogen is then mixed with a selective solvent, which is immiscible in the oil and in which the sulfur and nitrogen compounds will dissolve. Methanol is the presently preferred solvent. Separation of the oil from the methanoloxidized compound solution may be effected in a gravity separator. The oxidant gas may be regenerated by the addition of oxygen and recirculated. The oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds may be decomposed in a hydrolysis reaction with a dilute base to separate inorganic sulfate and sulfite, and nitrate and nitrite compounds from the hydrocarbon parts of the compounds.

Description

United States Patent 1191 Guth et al.
1451 Nov. 12, 1974 METHOD FOR REMOVING SULFUR AND NITROGEN IN PETROLEUM OILS Primary ExaminereDelbert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-Juanita M. Nelson [75] Inventors: Eugene Daniel Guth, Palos Verdes; l
Arthur F Dial, University City, Attorney, Agent, or P rmSpenslcy, Horn & Lubitz both of Calif.
. 57 AB R [73] Asstgnee: KVB Engineering, lne., Justin, Cal1f. 1 ST ACT A method for the removal of sulfur and nitrogen coml22] Flled' 1973 ponents from petroleum oils is disclosed. The un- 21 APPL 335,894 wanted sulfur and nitrogen is oxidized to the extent that the resultant compounds exhibit preferential solubility characteristics in some solvent with respect to [52] U.S. Cl 208/236, 208/254, 208/2 the oil. The oxidation step involves reacting the sulfur 208/207 and nitrogen compounds present with an oxide of ni- [51] ll lt. Cl ClOg 19/08 trogerh In particular instances, pretreatment of the Oil [58] Field of Search 208/254, 236, 289, 207, to remove active groups which cause undesirable side 208/205 reactions or removal of low sulfur fractions prior to the oxidation step will increase the efficiency ofvthe [56] References C'ted process. The oil containing the oxidized forms of sul- UNITED STA PATENTS fur and nitrogen is then mixed with a selective solvent,
3,244,618 4 1966 Dimond et ill. 208/236 whi h is immiscible in the oil and in which the sulfur 3,267,027 8/1966 Fierce et al 208/228 and nitrogen compounds will dissolve. Methanol is the 2,556,836 6/1951 de et u 208/205 presently preferred solvent. Separation of the oil from 1968342 8/1934 Mallsoff 4 4 4 208/236 the methanol-oxidized compound solution may be ef- 3'l35-680 6/1964 f a] 208/215 fected in a gravity separator. The oxidant gas may be 11641546 1/1965 208/36 regenerated by the addition of oxygen and recircu- 2,976,229 3/1961 Brown et al. 208/2 lated. The oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds 3,34l,448 12/1967 Ford et al. 1 208/211 1,935,207 11 1933 Harder et al 208/276 may be decomposed hydlolysls reacuo 3,294,677 12/1966 Martin et almn 208/224 lute base to separate inorganic sulfate and sulfite, and
3,135,078 6/1964 Fi rce t 53 23 nitrate and nitrite compounds from the hydrocarbon 2,925,442 2/1960 Goheen et al. 260/607 parts of the compounds.
2,702,824 2 1955 Wetterholm 260 607 2.581.051) 1 1952 Halfdan 260 607 31 Clalms, 4 Drawmg FIgllle-S 2g low SULFUR 0/2 our/ w" METHOD FORREMOVING. SULFUR AND NITROGEN IN PETROLEUM OILS BACKGROUND'OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to a method of removing unwanted sulfur and nitrogen compounds from petroleum oils.
2. Prior Art The presently used methodfor performing the function of the present invention involves the useof a high temperature-high pressure process to desulfurize hydrocarbon fuels using hydrogen, and an acid extractionprocess for the removal of basic nitrogen compounds. The old methods have major disadvantages. Hydrogen is a valuable material, made in refineries by pyrolyzing (heating to decompose) l hydrocarbon materials or through combustion to form carbon monoxide which is subsequently reacted catalytically with water athigh temperature. In any case, it is costly to use hydrogen to remove sulfur (as-hydrogen sulfide) from fuels. The reaction of hydrogen is nonselective in that some of the hydrogen will react with-the oil to saturate hydrocarbon molecules (aromatics, olefins) in addition to the desired reactionforminghydrogen sulfide. This means that a large quantity of hydrogen is required to.desul-' furize hydrocarbon fuels.
The second disadvantage of the present method for sulfur removal is that it requires a heterogeneous catalyst. The surface of the solid catalyst tends to become fouled, particularly when residual oils are desulfurized, and this makes the oldmethod inefficient or inoperable with some residual fuels.
The third disadvantage of the present method'for sulfur removal is that it requires high temperatures and high pressures for desulfurizing fuels. The reaction conditions make it necessary to use expensive equipment for the old process.
Several other methods of removing sulfur from hydrocarbons have been proposed and are known to the applicant but these have not become commercially popular.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,968,842 issued to Malisoff proposes to treat the sulfur containing oil with a solution of an alkali in an organic solvent. The alkali reacts with mercaptans in the oil forming sulfur compounds which are more'soluble in the solvent than in the oil.
The Malisoff patent is directed specifically to sulfur in the form of mercaptansin the oil and does not deal in any way with the broad range of sulfur and nitrogen compounds susceptible to the method of the present invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,267,027 issued to Fierce discloses reacting light petroleum distillates with N followed by washing with an aqueous caustic and finally a water wash. The temperature of the reaction is limited to C. This process also is directed primarily to the removal of mercaptans and thus also has limited applicabilit S weetening" of petroleum oils has also been known to applicant as having been proposed by several people, and is a related process. While not considered directly applicable, the most pertinent of these is U.S. Pat. No. 3,224,618 issued to Dimond. Again, the process considers only mercaptans and proposes to convert any mercaptans present in hydrocarbons to disulfrdes by 2]. reacting the mercaptansywith:oxygen'in the presence of an oxide of nitrogen. Theresulting disulfides are not as odorous as the mercaptans and thus the treated oil is considered sweet.
The major disadvantage of the old method for nitrogen removal is that it achievesonly partial nitrogen removal. Specifically, it removes only some of the basic nitrogen compounds.
While in concept the old methods can be used to desulfurize and partiallydenitrogenatefuels they lead to large economic penalties. In some cases the cost of desulfurizing may exceed the'cost of the .fuel.
Alow cost simple method of removing sulfur and nitrogen' from petroleum fuels is mandatory if current and projected air pollution regulations are to be met. Accordingly, thegeneral purpose of the present invention is to provide such'a low cost process. The process is low cost since it is carried out at low pressures and temperatures, that is, the process equipment is inexpensive compared to the equipment required for high pressure, high temperature processes. Further, the process uses only lowcost chemicals (i.-e., oxygen, nitrogen oxides an-methanol, the latter two being recycled) to remove substantially all of the sulfur and nitrogen from the fuels. The process has broad applicability since it can be .used .to'treatliquid petroleum distillates (diesel oil, jet fuel) as well as residual oils. The process makes it possible to upgrade hydrocarbon fractions from initially low value-high sulfur and nitrogen materials to produce'high value-low sulfur and nitrogen materials for use particularly as fuels. The process signifi cantly' increases the quantity of fossil fuels available to use within the current air pollution regulations and makes possible a large future. reduction in the oxidesof sulfur and oxides of nitrogen emissions by fuel users.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention isa process based on the selective oxidation of the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in liquid petroleum oil. Petroleum oil is used herein to signify diesel oil, jet fuel, furnace oil, residual oil, crude oil, topped crude oil, and similar hydrocarbon mixtures. Oxygen is used to regenerate the gas phase oxidizers (oxides of nitrogen containing two or more oxygen atoms, e.g., N0 which are recycled. The process can be carried out batch-wise or continuously as desired. A batch of oil can be placed in a vessel and treated with the gas phase. oxidizer to oxidize the sulfur and nitrogen compounds or the oil can be continuously pumped through a-reactor in which the oxidation is accomplished. For example, the oxidizing gas may be passed upward through a vessel while the oil passes downward. The vessel maybe packed with a material (like Berl saddles) which permits the two flows to occur without interference or a large pressure drop. The reacted oil is extracted with a suitable solvent to separate the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds. The extraction can also be carried out continuously or batch-wise. Atthis point, a major fraction of the oil has low sulfur and nitrogen content and is solvent stripped and removed from the process for use.
One difficulty which may occur in this process is that some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke. This problem may be obviated by preheating the feed oil to 300 to 600 F for some time, typically 2 to 20 hours to permit the reactive groups in the oil to combine with parts of the other hydrocarbon molecules and thus become less active. An alternate pretreatment procedure is to react the oil with a reactant such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia to remove the active groups in the oil.
The solvent containing dissolved sulfur and nitrogen compound and a fraction of dissolved oil can be separated from its solute either by evaporating the solvent or cooling the mixture to a temperature where the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds have low solubility. The solvent is then recycled through the process. Finally, the sulfur and nitrogen may be separated from the solute, for example, by hydrolysis or pyrolysis.
The process consumes oxygen and energy and produces a low sulfur, low nitrogen oil having physical properties similar to the feed, a lighter oil fraction (from the solute) and inorganic sulfur as sulfite or sulfate ions and inorganic nitrogen as nitrate and nitrite ions or nitrogen. The process steps are all carried out at near ambient pressure and temperatures below about 300 F so the equipment, tanks, piping, etc., are all inexpensive compared to those needed for a high temperature, high pressure process.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIG. I is a block diagram of the process of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the oxidizing gas recirculating system.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a first pretreatment step.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an alternative pretreatment step.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION The general functions to be accomplished in the removal of sulfur and nitrogen compounds from petroleum oils are:
l. Oxidation. Sulfur and nitrogen exist in petroleum oils in various forms as mercaptans, disulfides, sulfides, amines, and other organic nitrogen compounds having one or more carbon bonds. By exposing feed oil containing such compounds to a gas which includes one or more oxides of nitrogen, these compounds are oxidized into sulfoxides aminoxides or similar compounds which can easily be removed from the oil. The useful oxides of nitrogen for this process are those containing two or more oxygen atoms, e.g., N N 0 N 0 N 0 The prior art (e.g., US. Pat. No. 3,244,618) discusses the oxidation or mercaptans in petroleum oils into disulfides for the purpose of sweetening the oils. Disulfides, while not having the objectionable odor of mercaptans, are, unfortunately, not easily separated from the oil and thus the oxidation step contemplated by the method of this invention is intended to oxidize the sulfur compounds into a higher state which exhibits low solubility in oil, but relatively good solubility in some other solvent so that the compounds can be subsequently removed by the process of preferential solubilit 2. Mixing. The oxidized oil is mised with a suitable solvent, such as methanol, which is immiscible with the oil, but in which the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds readily dissolve. Methanol is not the only possible solvent, but is presently preferred since it embodies the characteristics desired in a suitable solvent. The desired characteristics are as follows:
a. Immiscibility in oil;
b. A solvent for oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds;
c. Low boiling point to simplify separation from sulfoxides, aminoxides, etc. and oil.
d. does not readily form an emulsion with the oil;
e. density substantially different from the oil for ease in separation;
f. Low.cost-comparable to oil;
g. Does not degrade fuel properties of the oil.
The significance of items (f) and (g) is that small amounts of solvent which cannot economically be separated from the final oil stream will not either increase the cost of the product or render it less desirable as a fuel.
3. Separation. The different densities of the oil and the solvent allow separation of the oil (with reduced sulfur and nitrogen content) from the solvent (in which the sulfur and nitrogen compounds are dissolved) by gravitational settling or centrifuging. The resulting oil has a low sulfur and nitrogen content as is necessary to meet the present stringent requirements for fuels.
While the solvent is generally immiscible with the oil, a small part of the oil will inevitably dissolve in the solvent along with the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds. This oil may be recovered by distilling off the solvent (which is then reused), and removing the sulfur and nitrogen compounds by decomposition in a hydrolysis or pyrolysis reaction, as further described below.
It will be appreciated that the three basic steps outlined above may be supplemented by other steps, such as pretreatment of the oil, in some circumstances. For example, one difficulty which may occur in the process is that some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke. This problem is obviated by preheating the feed oil to 300 to 600 F for some time, typically 2 to 20 hours to permit the reactive groups in the oil to combine with parts of the other hydrocarbon molecules and thus become less active. An alternate pretreatment procedure is to react the oil with a reactant such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia to remove the active groups in the oil.
In order to improve the efficiency of the process, oils which have a high volatility portion (such as an untopped crude oil) can be topped at temperatures up to 800F, at atmospheric pressure, or 1,000F., in vacuum, before processing. In general, the high volatility portion of the oil is low in sulfur. Also, oils having a methanol soluble portion can be treated with methanol first to separate the methanol soluble portion.
Referring now to FIG. 1 where a block diagram of one preferred embodiment of the process of this invention is shown in the form of a continuous process. It will be understood that the steps of this process leading to the removal of unwanted sulfur and nitrogen compounds from oil can be accomplished by batch processing as well as by the continuous process described. The process can also be a combination of batch and continuous, for example, the pretreatment steps, if utilized, can be done batch-wise while the remainder of the process is continuous. Other combinations of batch and continuous processing are also possible and practical within the spirit of the present invention. The process, as illustrated in FIG. 1, does not include any pretreatment steps, it being assumed that such steps are either unnecessary or already performed on the particular oil being processed.
Pump pumps the oil from its previous location, not shown, into the top of reactor 11. The reactor preferably operates at near atmospheric pressure since this results in simple and relatively inexpensive processing equipment. No particular advantage is to be gained by increasing the pressure of the system, butto some extent a somewhat higher than room temperature can be of advantage. A higher temperature will tend to cause the reaction in which mercaptans become disulfides to proceed further converting the disulfides into sulfoxides. Typical temperatures which are desirable range from about 50 to 350 F. As the temperature increases some undesirable side reactions such as polymerization and coke formation begin to occur. The process temperature should not be so high nor the time of application so long that these side reactions become a problem.
The reactor is the vessel which provides contact between the feed oil and the oxidizing gas allowing the reaction to take place. It can take many forms, but in the particular embodiment being described, is a relatively tall cylindrical vessel in which the oil is introduced at the top and the oxidizing gas at the bottom. The oil flows downward due to gravity, flowing over baffles, or other packing which provide a large surface over which the oil can flow. The oil flows in thin layers so that a large surface of oil is presented to the oxidizing gas. A typical reactor 11 may be packed with Berl saddles 12, which occupy about 50 percent of the reactor volume, leaving open spaces through which the oxidizing gas can pass in contact with the oil on the surface of the saddles. Other forms of reactor to obtain intimate contact between the oil and oxidizing gas may, of course, be used, for example, agitated vessels. The volume of the reactor is a function of the volumetric flow rate of the oil and usually ranges from about 10 to 100 times the hourly oil flow rate.
The flow of oil is such that the flowing oil remains in the reactor for up to about minutes at temperatures up to about 350 F., the time and temperature being enough to allow the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the oil to oxidize as needed to form the compounds which will preferentially dissolve in the solvent used, but not so hot or so long as to cause polymerization or side reactions. The use of too high a temperature tends to cause polymerization of the oil and is thus not desirable, while overlong exposure to the oxidant allows other unwanted side reactions to occur which are also undesirable.
The oxidizing gas is comprised of oxides of nitrogen. It can be a single oxide, or a mixture of nitrogen oxides. The oxides which have been found to be useful are N0 N 0 N 0 and N 0 A potential problem exists if the oxidizing gas is used undiluted in that a possible explosive mixture with the petroleum vapors may be formed within the reactor. To prevent this, it is preferable to dilute the oxidizing agent with some relatively inert gas such as nitrogen, Typically the gas used is l to 20 percent oxidizer, the balance being inert or, as will be discussed below, partly oxygen and partly inert, the oxygen being utilized in a regenerating cycle for the oxidizer. Presently, a preferred composition of oxidizing gas is l to 9 percent by volume NO N0 1 to 19 percent by volume 0 with the balance N The func- Since the unwanted sulfur and nitrogen compounds appear in'the oil in various forms, no single reaction can be presented which describes the process whereby these compounds are oxidized, however the following reactions, among others, are probably involved.
R S N0 R NO The oxidizing gas is introduced at inlet l3 located near the bottom of the reactor and flows upward through the reactor contacting the oil which is flowing over the surfaces of the Berl saddles 12. The oxidizer flows out through outlet 14. It will be found to be most economical to reconstitute the oxidizer and continuously recycle the gas through the reactor. The procedure for accomplishing this will be discussed below.
At the same time that sulfur compounds in the oil are being oxidized, organic nitrogen compounds present in the oil having one or more carbon bonds (e.g., amines, saturated aliphatic compounds or parts of an aromatic ring) also react with the oxygen present to form an oxidized form of the compound. Typical reactions could be as follows:
RN NO R N N0 R NO NO The oxidized compounds formed are soluble in methanol and are thus susceptible to removal from the oil in the process as described below.
The oil containing the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds flows out of the bottom of reactor 11 and is pumped by pump 19 to mixer 20 where it is mixed with a solvent, which is preferably methanol, pumped into mixer 20 by pump 21 from solvent storage tank 22. A quantity of solvent about 1 to 5 times the volume of oil insures that substantially all of the soluble components in the oil dissolve in the solvent. The solvent must be selective, that is, one in which the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds are soluble but in which the oil itself is not soluble. Methanol is the presently preferred solvent but other solvents such as methanolwater mixtures, methanol-ethanol-water mixtures, and methanol-inorganic salt (e.g., sodium chloride, potassium chloride and calcium chloride) solutions can be used.
The mixer may be a stirred vessel or simply a static mixer in which the flow streamlines are broken up by the shape of the vessel or by obtructions therein. Again the mixing may be done at atmospheric pressure. and the temperature is not criticalbut is preferably between 80 and F, the upper temperature limit being the boiling point of solvent.
After the oxidized compounds are dissolved in the solvent, the mixture flows to separator 23 where the fluid is brought essentially to rest andthe lighter liquid, which in the case of a methanol-diesel oil system is the methanol, rises to the top and the oil sinks to the bottom.
The desulfurized and denitrogenated oil flows out of a bottom tap 24 of separator 23 while the solvent carrying the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds in solution is decanted from tap 25 at the top of separator 23. The separator is preferably maintained at 1 atmosphere pressure and between 80 and 150 F., neither condition being critical. Separation of the fluids occurs in about to 30 minutes and a separator vessel with sufficient volume to hold 10 to 30 minutes of flow would be satisfactory. A continuous flow from taps 24 and 25, keeping the line of demarcation between the oil and the methanol solution about in the middle of the vessel allows the separation to take place and prevents contamination of the separator output streams.
Any residual solvent remaining in the oil leaving tap 24 is removed in holding tank 26 which is maintained at a relatively high temperature, for example, 160 F which causes the solvent to vaporize. The vaporized solvent flows to condenser 27 where it is condensed and is then added to the solvent in solvent tank 22.
The solvent stream, including the dissolved sulfur and nitrogen compounds, as well as a small fraction of oil (generally 2 to 5 percent of the initial oil volume), flows from separator 23 through outlet 25 to the solvent still 29, which is maintained at a high enough temperature to evaporate the solvent. The solvent vapor is condensed in condenser 27 and the distilled liquid solvent then flows to tank 22 for recycling.
The residue of the solvent distillation, containing sulfur and nitrogen compounds, oil, and some amount of solvent is passed through a holding tank 30, maintained at over the boiling point of the solvent, where the last vestiges of solvent are stripped from the liquid and recovered in condenser 27.
The high sulfur, high nitrogen oil remaining as the residue can either be used as is, for applications where the high sulfur and nitrogen content is unimportant, or the oil can be further processed in decomposer 31 which subjects the oil to a pressure of l to 5 atmospheres at 150 to 300 F for 5 to 30 minutes in the presence of air and a dilute inorganic base such as sodium hydroxide. The ensuing hydrolysis reaction decomposes the oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds forming hydrocarbons and sulfite or sulfate compounds and nitrite or nitrate compounds.
As previously mentioned, it is desirable to recirculate the oxidizer gas continuously for reasons of economy. FIG. 2 shows how this may be accomplished.
Assuming that the oxidizing gas being used is the presently preferred mixture previously referred to (N0 0 and N the reaction in the reactor reduces the N0 to NO while oxidizing the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the oil. As the N0 is being reduced, it is replenished to a large extent by the reaction of NO and 0 present to maintain an equilibrium of N0 NO, and 0 as follows:
Thus the net reaction with the compounds in the oil results in consumption of oxygen. At the same time the oil will emit some vapors which tend to contaminate the oxidant gas, notably CO and CO In order to maintain the composition, therefore, it is necessary to somehow remove the contaminants. This may be conveniently done by venting a small fraction (typically 1 to 5 percent) of the circulating gas and to replace the vented portion with makeup gas. This gas is shown in FIG. 2 as being vented at bleed 35 and makeup oxygen and NO are shown being supplied at 36 and 37. While in the preferred embodiment described, makeup gas is NO and 0 which are reacted as will be presently described to form N0 it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the oxidizing and makeup gases may be any one or more of the higher oxides of nitrogen previously mentioned and in such case it would not be necessary to provide the NO reacting means. Pump 17 circulates the oxidizer in the system. The rate of circulation is not critical, the most desirable rate depending on the temperature of the reactor, the quality of the contact of the oxidant with the oil and the length of time the oil is in contact with the gas. The order of magnitude of the circulation is 10 to 20 moles of oxygen per mole of sulfur and nitrogen removed.
NO reactor 18 is a heated vessel maintained at 200 to 450 F. in which the NO and O react forming N0 so that the gas stream entering reactor 11 will be rich in N0 the primary oxidant. NO reactor 18 is preferably of a size which allows the gas to remain in it for l to 3 minutes in order that the desired reaction take place.
After leaving NO reactor 18, the gas having the desired composition enters reactor 11 through inlet 13. After exiting through outlet 14, the gas is fed through oil trap 33 and filter 34 before any portion of the gas is vented through bleed 35. The purpose of these units is to help clean up the circulating gas and to prevent oil vapors or solid particles from being vented to the atmosphere. It may be necessary in order to comply with anti-pollution statutes, to further treat the bleed stream 35 before allowing it to escape to the atmosphere.
As is well known to those skilled in the art, petroleum products have very complicated structures and contain varying impurities and fractions. For this reason it is not possible to describe a single inflexible process for handling all such products. The process as has been described to this point is general and it will be noted that the parameters given are subject to wide variation to accommodate a particular oil product to be processed. Even this latitude may not be enough in some cases, however, and a pretreatment of the oil may be desirable in order to fully utilize the capabilities and efficiency of the method.
Some oils may tend to react non selectively during the oxidation step and form undesirable polymers and coke. For such products, a pretreatment as illustrated in FIGS. 3 or 4 might be found advantageous.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, a pump 43 drives oil from a reservoir or other source, not shown, into prereactor 40. The prereactor 40 is maintained at an elevated temperature of 300 to 600 F and is of sufficient size to that oil will remain in the prereactor for from 2 to 20 hours. During residence in the prereactor 40, reactive groupsin the oil combine with parts of other hydrocarbon molecules and become less active. The purpose of this step is to reduce undesirable side reactions in the oxidation step which follows. Active groups in the oil, unless disposed of in some manner, may tend to react nonselectively in the oxidation reactor to form undesirable polymers and coke. By pretreating the oil to reduce the activity of these groups, the side reactions can be held to a minimum.
Sample Oxidation An alternate pretreatment is illustrated in FIG. 4 where that portion of the apparatus used in the pre treatment step only is shown.
In addition to pump 44 pumping feed oil, a pump 41 pumps a suitable reactant, such as water, hydrogen, or ammonia, into prereactor 42. Prereactor 42 need not be heated but agitation means, not shown, should be supplied to insure good mixing of the feed oil and the reactant. The reactant reacts with the active groups in the feed oil thereby reducing the amount of active material in the oil.
Other pretreatments which might be used to improve the efficiency of the sulfur/nitrogen reduction process include topping oils which have a high volatility portion by heating the feed oil to 800 F at atmospheric pressure or 1,000 F in vacuum. In general, the high volatility portion of oil is low in sulfur and removing such portion before processing will increase the efficiency of the process. An oil which contains a methanol solubleportion can be treated with methanol first to separate the soluble portion.
After any pretreatment process or processes, the oil is fed to reactor 11 and processed in the manner previously described.
In Tables land 11 a group of test results are presented indicating the efficacy of the invented method using! methanol as the solvent. As can be seen, up to 97 per-' cent of the sulfur and 93 percent of the nitrogen presnt rwsmpysd..-
TABLE I invention as set forth in the appended claims. .JQQ Q;
Table II the results for a variety of residual oils show that the method removes sulfur and nitrogen from thqssfys s- In treating the high sulfur oil remaining from the residue in Test 41-1 at 250F and one atmosphere for minutes using an equal-volume of 10 percent sodium hydroxide in water with air passingthrough the oil at,
the rate of 4 volumes per minute per volume of oil the sulfur content of said oil was reduced 62 percent and thjzaitrq sn was re u e 8 WWW;
What has been described is a novel method for re- 1 ducing the sulfur and nitrogen content of petroleum oil.
Various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art and are considered to be within the spirit of 1. The method of reducing sulfur and nitrogen compound concentrations in petroleum oil which coma. exposing petroleum oil to an oxidizing gas containing one or more oxides of nitrogen chosen from the f ollowing list: N9 N O; N 0 N O whereby sul- DIESEL OIL TESTS Initial Wt. 5-0.2]; Initial Wt. N -0.035
Temp. F
i as
Oxidizer Extraction 5 Time Conc. Vol. Solv/ Removed Removed Vol. NO Vol. Oil
Batch Reactor Tests 17-3 21 his. 150 5 0 0 17-2 21 hrs. 150 5 4 76 17-1 17 hrs. 150 5 4 76 16-1 6 hrs. 150 5 4 66 19-! 6 hrs. 105 7 4 76 14 19-2 27 hrs. 105 7 4 97 13-2 2 hrs. 205 5 5 57 13-3 5 hrs. 205 5 3 76 14-1 8 hrs. 205 5 1 43 Continuous Reactor Tests 1-1 10 min. 85 5 4 43 22 22-2 3 min. 200 2 3 29 26-1 12 min. 200 10 3 48 41-] 12min. 170 10 3 72 91 41-3 12 min. 170 10 3 72 93 20-4 12 min. 170 10 3 81 TABLE II .Thetreatin g gas was prepared by mixing air and nitrogen oxide (NOT and heating the mix ture to 250F RESIDUAL OIL TESTS Process Conditions Initial Oxidation Oxidizer Extraction Sample Type of Oil Wt. S,Wt. N Time Temp. Conc. Vol. Solv/ Final Removal F Vol.% NO Vol. Oil Wt. S Wt. N S N Batch Reactor Tests lg u ur 2.2 3 hrs. 225 I0 4 1.8 14
Stock I V 32-2 Topped Alaskan 0.36 7 hrs. 210 I0 4 .I3 64 Crude 10-1 Kern County 1.0 2 hrs. 200 4 .30 70 Stock Continuous'Reactor Tests 42-2 High Sulfur 2.2 2.45 4 mins. 275 I0 5 .3 1.34 86 45 Stock 37-3 Topped Alaskan .36 8 mins. 150 I0 5 .16 56 12 I: Sulfur determined by ASTM Method D 1266-; Nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method. I I
' g air and nitrogen oxide (NO) and heating the mixture to 250F for 30 seconds before passing the gas through the reactor.
2. The treating gas'was prepared by fur and nitrogen compounds in said petroleum oil' will be oxidized:
b. mixing said petroleum oil with a solvent selected from the group consisting of methanol, methanolwater mixtures, methanol-ethanol-water mixtures and methanol-inorganic salt solutions, said solvent being substantially immiscible with said oil but being a solvent for said oxidized sulfur compounds, said oxidized sulfur compounds dissolving in said solvent; and
c. separating said oil from said solvent solution.
2. The method of claim 1 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
3. The method of claim 1 where said oxide of nitrogen chosen is N 4. The method of claim 3 where said oxidizing gas contains about l-20 percent N0 and about 70 to 98 percent N 5. The method of claim 4 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50 to 350 F.
6. The method of claim 5 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
7. The method of claim 1 where an oxide of nitrogen in said oxidizing gas is formed by reacting NO with O 8. The method of claim 7 where said oxidizing gas contains NO, N0 and O 9. The method of claim 8 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
10. The method of claim 9 where said oxidizing gas is comprised of:
l-9 percent by volume NO+NO l-l9 percent by volume 0 and the balance nitrogen.
ll. The method of claim 10 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50 to 350F.
12. The method of claim 11 where said exposure is for less than minutes.
13. The method of claim 1 where said solvent is methanol.
14. The method of claim I where said separation is performed by gravitational settling.
15. The method of claim 14 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
16. The method of claim 14 where said oxide of nitrogen chosen is N0 17. The method of claim 16 where said oxidizing gas contains about 1-20 percent N0 and about 70 to 98 percent N 18. The method of claim 17 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50 to 350F.
19. The method of claim 18 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
20. The method of claim 14 where an oxide of nitrogen in said oxidizing gas is formed by reacting NO with O 21. The method of claim 20 where said oxidizing gas contains NO, N0 and O 22. The method of claim 21 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
23. The method of claim 22 where said oxidizing gas is comprised of:
l-9 percent by volume NO+NO ll9 percent by volume 0 and the balance nitrogen.
24. The method of claim 23 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50 to 350F.
25. The method of claim 24 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
26. The method of claim 1 including the steps in which said solvent stream is further treated after said separation: 1
a. evaporating said solvent from said solvent solution;
b. exposing the residue of said solvent solution to air and a dilute mixtureof an inorganic base and water whereby said oxidized sulfur compounds will react to form inorganic sulfur compounds and a hydrocarbon fraction; and
c. separating said hydrocarbon fraction from said inorganic sulfur compounds.
27. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of from 300 to 600F for from 2 to 20 hours.
28. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of mixing a reactant with said oil prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, said reactant being chosen from the following: water, hydrogen, ammonia.
29. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of 800F at atmospheric pressure.
30. The method of claim 1 and further including the steps of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of l,000F in a vacuum.
31. The method of claim 1 and further including the steps of:
a. mixing said oil with methanol;
b. allowing said oil to separate from said methanol;
and
c. decanting said methanol from said oil, said steps being taken prior to exposure of said oil to said oxidizing gas.

Claims (31)

1. THE METHOD OF REDUCING OF REDUCING SULFUR AND NITROGEN COMPOU CONCENTRATIONS IN PETROLEUM OIL WHICH COMPRISES; A. EXPOSING PETROLEUM OIL TO AN OXIDIZING GAS CONTAINING ONE OR MORE OXIDES OF NITROGEN CHSOSE FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST: NO2, N2O4, N2O5, WHEREBY SULFUR AND NITROGEN COMPOUNDS IN SAID PETROLEUM OIL WILL BE OXIDIZED: B. MIXING SAID PETROLEUM OIL WITH A SOLVENT SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF METHANOL, ETHANOL-WATER MIXTURES, METHANOL-ETHANOL-WATER MIXTURES AND METHANOLINORGANIC SALT SOLUTIONS, SAID SOLVENT BEING SUBSTANTIALLY IMMISCIBLE WITH SAID OIL BUT BEING A SOLVENT FOR SAID OXIDIZED SULFUR COMPOUNDS, SAID OXIDIZED SULFUR COMPOUNDS DISSOLVING IN SAID SOLVENT; AND C. SEPARATING SAID OIL FROM SAID SOLVENT SOLUTION.
2. The method of claim 1 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
3. The method of claim 1 where said oxide of nitrogen chosen is NO2.
4. The method of claim 3 where said oxidizing gas contains about 1-20 percent NO2 and about 70 to 98 percent N2.
5. The method of claim 4 where said petroleum oil is exposed tO said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50* to 350* F.
6. The method of claim 5 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
7. The method of claim 1 where an oxide of nitrogen in said oxidizing gas is formed by reacting NO with O2.
8. The method of claim 7 where said oxidizing gas contains NO, NO2 and O2.
9. The method of claim 8 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
10. The method of claim 9 where said oxidizing gas is comprised of: 1-9 percent by volume NO+NO2, 1-19 percent by volume O2, and the balance nitrogen.
11. The method of claim 10 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50* to 350*F.
12. The method of claim 11 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
13. The method of claim 1 where said solvent is methanol.
14. The method of claim 1 where said separation is performed by gravitational settling.
15. The method of claim 14 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
16. The method of claim 14 where said oxide of nitrogen chosen is NO2.
17. The method of claim 16 where said oxidizing gas contains about 1-20 percent NO2 and about 70 to 98 percent N2.
18. The method of claim 17 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50* to 350*F.
19. The method of claim 18 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
20. The method of claim 14 where an oxide of nitrogen in said oxidizing gas is formed by reacting NO with O2.
21. The method of claim 20 where said oxidizing gas contains NO, NO2 and O2.
22. The method of claim 21 where said oxidizing gas further contains an inert gas.
23. The method of claim 22 where said oxidizing gas is comprised of: 1-9 percent by volume NO+NO2, 1-19 percent by volume O2, and the balance nitrogen.
24. The method of claim 23 where said petroleum oil is exposed to said oxidizing gas at a temperature of 50* to 350*F.
25. The method of claim 24 where said exposure is for less than 20 minutes.
26. The method of claim 1 including the steps in which said solvent stream is further treated after said separation: a. evaporating said solvent from said solvent solution; b. exposing the residue of said solvent solution to air and a dilute mixture of an inorganic base and water whereby said oxidized sulfur compounds will react to form inorganic sulfur compounds and a hydrocarbon fraction; and c. separating said hydrocarbon fraction from said inorganic sulfur compounds.
27. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of from 300* to 600*F for from 2 to 20 hours.
28. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of mixing a reactant with said oil prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, said reactant being chosen from the following: water, hydrogen, ammonia.
29. The method of claim 1 and further including the step of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of 800*F at atmospheric pressure.
30. The method of claim 1 and further including the steps of heating said oil, prior to exposure to said oxidizing gas, to a temperature of 1,000*F in a vacuum.
31. The method of claim 1 and further including the steps of: a. mixing said oil with methanol; b. allowing said oil to separate from said methanol; and c. decanting said methanol from said oil, said steps being taken prior to exposure of said oil to said oxidizing gas.
US00385894A 1973-08-06 1973-08-06 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils Expired - Lifetime US3847800A (en)

Priority Applications (14)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00385894A US3847800A (en) 1973-08-06 1973-08-06 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
GB2156674A GB1437569A (en) 1973-08-06 1974-05-15 Method for removing sulphur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
DE2424274A DE2424274C3 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-05-18 Process for reducing the content of sulfur and nitrogen compounds in petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures
CA200,763A CA1046004A (en) 1973-08-06 1974-05-24 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
NL7407257A NL7407257A (en) 1973-08-06 1974-05-30 PROCESS FOR REMOVING SULFUR AND NITROGEN FROM OIL FORCES AND THE EQUIPMENT FOR PERFORMING THIS PROCESS.
IN1365/CAL/74A IN141762B (en) 1973-08-06 1974-06-20
JP7863974A JPS5337081B2 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-07-09
IE1506/74A IE39619B1 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-07-16 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
AU71509/74A AU492349B2 (en) 1974-07-22 method FOR REMOVING SULFUR AND NITROGEN PETROLEUM OILS
FR7425960A FR2240280B1 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-07-25
SU2049070A SU508220A3 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-07-26 The method of purification of oil and oil fractions from sulfur and nitrogen-containing compounds
BE147170A BE818350A (en) 1973-08-06 1974-07-31 PROCESS FOR REDUCING THE CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR AND NITROGEN COMPOUNDS IN PETROLEUM OIL
BR6369/74A BR7406369D0 (en) 1973-08-06 1974-08-02 PROCESS TO REDUCE THE CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR COMPOUNDS AND NITROGEN IN PETROLEUM OILS
IT26012/74A IT1017927B (en) 1973-08-06 1974-08-06 METHOD FOR ELIMINATING SULFUR AND NITROGEN FROM PETROLEUM OILS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00385894A US3847800A (en) 1973-08-06 1973-08-06 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3847800A true US3847800A (en) 1974-11-12

Family

ID=23523298

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00385894A Expired - Lifetime US3847800A (en) 1973-08-06 1973-08-06 Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (1) US3847800A (en)
JP (1) JPS5337081B2 (en)
BE (1) BE818350A (en)
BR (1) BR7406369D0 (en)
CA (1) CA1046004A (en)
DE (1) DE2424274C3 (en)
FR (1) FR2240280B1 (en)
GB (1) GB1437569A (en)
IE (1) IE39619B1 (en)
IN (1) IN141762B (en)
IT (1) IT1017927B (en)
NL (1) NL7407257A (en)
SU (1) SU508220A3 (en)

Cited By (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919402A (en) * 1973-08-06 1975-11-11 Kvb Inc Petroleum oil desulfurization process
US4382855A (en) * 1981-10-28 1983-05-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Process for removal of hydroxy- and/or mercapto-substituted hydrocarbons from coal liquids
EP0097055A2 (en) * 1982-06-15 1983-12-28 REI Technologies Inc. Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
US4643820A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-02-17 Oxiprocessing Process for enhancing the cetane number of diesel fuel
EP0234878A2 (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-09-02 ENSR Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) Process for upgrading diesel oils
US4711713A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-12-08 Rei Technologies, Inc. Process for enhancing the cetane number and color of diesel fuel
US4743360A (en) * 1985-10-24 1988-05-10 Labofina, S.A. Process for removing basic nitrogen compounds from gas oils
FR2657620A1 (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-02 Elf France METHOD FOR STABILIZING GASES FROM CATALYTIC CRACKING, GASOL SO OBTAINED AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAID STABILIZED GASOLINE.
CN1062294C (en) * 1995-09-05 2001-02-21 新疆石油管理局克拉玛依炼油厂 Deacidifying process for petroleum cut fraction with amino-alcohol
US6368495B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 Uop Llc Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
US20020148756A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-17 Morris George Ernest Preparation of components for transportation fuels
US20020148754A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-17 Gong William H. Integrated preparation of blending components for refinery transportation fuels
US20020152673A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-24 Huff George A. Transportation fuels
US6544409B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2003-04-08 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the catalytic oxidation of sulfur, nitrogen and unsaturated compounds from hydrocarbon streams
US6596177B2 (en) 1999-06-03 2003-07-22 Grt, Inc. Method of improving the quality of diesel fuel
US6673230B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2004-01-06 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Process for oxygenation of components for refinery blending of transportation fuels
US20040108252A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2004-06-10 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the upgrading of raw hydrocarbon streams
US20040222134A1 (en) * 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw hydrocarbon streams
US6838060B1 (en) * 1996-09-24 2005-01-04 Institut Francais Dupetrole Process and apparatus for the production of catalytic cracking gasoline with a low sulphur content
US6846406B2 (en) 2000-10-11 2005-01-25 Consejo Superior De Investigaciones Cientificas Process and catalysts for eliminating sulphur compounds from the gasoline fraction
US20060131214A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw fuel streams catalyzed by iron oxides
US20070227951A1 (en) * 2004-05-31 2007-10-04 Jeyagorwy Thirugnanasampanthar Novel Process for Removing Sulfur from Fuels
US20100025301A1 (en) * 2004-05-31 2010-02-04 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Novel process for removing sulfur from fuels
US20100319241A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Cyubu Enzyme Ltd. Fuel production method, fuel production apparatus, and fuel oil
KR101042093B1 (en) 2009-06-19 2011-06-16 유겐가이샤 추부엔자임 Fuel manufacturing method and fuel manufacturing device
US20110220547A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Abdennour Bourane Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US20110220550A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Abdennour Bourane Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating targeted oxidative desulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US20110233110A1 (en) * 2010-03-29 2011-09-29 Omer Refa Koseoglu Integrated hydrotreating and oxidative desulfurization process
WO2014074958A1 (en) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
US8906227B2 (en) 2012-02-02 2014-12-09 Suadi Arabian Oil Company Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating gas phase catalytic oxidation to produce fuels having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US8920635B2 (en) 2013-01-14 2014-12-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating gas phase oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US9290712B2 (en) 2010-09-03 2016-03-22 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Natural Resources Canada Production of high-cetane diesel product
US9410042B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-08-09 Aditya Birla Science And Technology Company Ltd. Process for obtaining carbon black powder with reduced sulfur content
US9873797B2 (en) 2011-10-24 2018-01-23 Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited Process for the production of carbon black
CN108239556A (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-07-03 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for separating and enriching alkaline and non-alkaline nitrides in coker gas oil
CN108795483A (en) * 2017-05-02 2018-11-13 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for separating and refining non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds in petroleum fractions

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1935207A (en) * 1930-03-27 1933-11-14 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process for the purification of a crude hydrocarbon
US1968842A (en) * 1930-11-03 1934-08-07 Atiantic Refining Company Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2556836A (en) * 1949-03-11 1951-06-12 Standard Oil Dev Co Method of treating sour petroleum distillates
US2581050A (en) * 1944-07-18 1952-01-01 Centrallaboratorium Ab Method for the production of dimethyl sulfoxide
US2702824A (en) * 1952-08-18 1955-02-22 Nitroglycerin Ab Liquid-vapor phase method for producing lower dialkyl sulfoxides
US2925442A (en) * 1958-07-16 1960-02-16 Crown Zellerbach Corp Process for the oxidation of organic sulfides
US2976229A (en) * 1959-04-24 1961-03-21 Universal Oil Prod Co Purification of acid oils
US3135078A (en) * 1961-05-31 1964-06-02 Phillips Petroleum Co Package wrapping
US3135680A (en) * 1961-09-11 1964-06-02 Pure Oil Co Process of refining diesel fuel with nitrogen dioxide
US3164546A (en) * 1961-12-22 1965-01-05 Pure Oil Co Two stage process of refining diesel fuel
US3244618A (en) * 1964-04-22 1966-04-05 Gulf Research Development Co Sweetening process using nitrogen oxide catalyst
US3267027A (en) * 1961-07-17 1966-08-16 Union Oil Co Process of desulfurization employing alkali and nitrogen dioxide
US3294677A (en) * 1964-02-05 1966-12-27 Howe Baker Eng Desulfurizing petroleum fractions with nitrogen dioxide and sulfuric acid
US3341448A (en) * 1961-11-24 1967-09-12 British Petroleum Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbons using oxidative and hydro-treatments

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1935207A (en) * 1930-03-27 1933-11-14 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process for the purification of a crude hydrocarbon
US1968842A (en) * 1930-11-03 1934-08-07 Atiantic Refining Company Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2581050A (en) * 1944-07-18 1952-01-01 Centrallaboratorium Ab Method for the production of dimethyl sulfoxide
US2556836A (en) * 1949-03-11 1951-06-12 Standard Oil Dev Co Method of treating sour petroleum distillates
US2702824A (en) * 1952-08-18 1955-02-22 Nitroglycerin Ab Liquid-vapor phase method for producing lower dialkyl sulfoxides
US2925442A (en) * 1958-07-16 1960-02-16 Crown Zellerbach Corp Process for the oxidation of organic sulfides
US2976229A (en) * 1959-04-24 1961-03-21 Universal Oil Prod Co Purification of acid oils
US3135078A (en) * 1961-05-31 1964-06-02 Phillips Petroleum Co Package wrapping
US3267027A (en) * 1961-07-17 1966-08-16 Union Oil Co Process of desulfurization employing alkali and nitrogen dioxide
US3135680A (en) * 1961-09-11 1964-06-02 Pure Oil Co Process of refining diesel fuel with nitrogen dioxide
US3341448A (en) * 1961-11-24 1967-09-12 British Petroleum Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbons using oxidative and hydro-treatments
US3164546A (en) * 1961-12-22 1965-01-05 Pure Oil Co Two stage process of refining diesel fuel
US3294677A (en) * 1964-02-05 1966-12-27 Howe Baker Eng Desulfurizing petroleum fractions with nitrogen dioxide and sulfuric acid
US3244618A (en) * 1964-04-22 1966-04-05 Gulf Research Development Co Sweetening process using nitrogen oxide catalyst

Cited By (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919402A (en) * 1973-08-06 1975-11-11 Kvb Inc Petroleum oil desulfurization process
US4382855A (en) * 1981-10-28 1983-05-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Process for removal of hydroxy- and/or mercapto-substituted hydrocarbons from coal liquids
EP0097055A2 (en) * 1982-06-15 1983-12-28 REI Technologies Inc. Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
US4485007A (en) * 1982-06-15 1984-11-27 Environmental Research And Technology Inc. Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
EP0097055A3 (en) * 1982-06-15 1985-01-09 Environmental Research And Technology, Inc. Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
US4743360A (en) * 1985-10-24 1988-05-10 Labofina, S.A. Process for removing basic nitrogen compounds from gas oils
EP0234878A2 (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-09-02 ENSR Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) Process for upgrading diesel oils
US4711713A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-12-08 Rei Technologies, Inc. Process for enhancing the cetane number and color of diesel fuel
US4746420A (en) * 1986-02-24 1988-05-24 Rei Technologies, Inc. Process for upgrading diesel oils
EP0234878A3 (en) * 1986-02-24 1989-01-18 Ensr Corp Process for upgrading diesel oils
US4643820A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-02-17 Oxiprocessing Process for enhancing the cetane number of diesel fuel
FR2657620A1 (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-02 Elf France METHOD FOR STABILIZING GASES FROM CATALYTIC CRACKING, GASOL SO OBTAINED AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAID STABILIZED GASOLINE.
EP0441677A1 (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-14 Elf Antar France Process for stabilising catalytically cracked gasoils, obtained gasoils and compositions containing this stabilised gasoil
CN1062294C (en) * 1995-09-05 2001-02-21 新疆石油管理局克拉玛依炼油厂 Deacidifying process for petroleum cut fraction with amino-alcohol
US6838060B1 (en) * 1996-09-24 2005-01-04 Institut Francais Dupetrole Process and apparatus for the production of catalytic cracking gasoline with a low sulphur content
US6596177B2 (en) 1999-06-03 2003-07-22 Grt, Inc. Method of improving the quality of diesel fuel
US6368495B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 Uop Llc Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
US6846406B2 (en) 2000-10-11 2005-01-25 Consejo Superior De Investigaciones Cientificas Process and catalysts for eliminating sulphur compounds from the gasoline fraction
US6872231B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2005-03-29 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Transportation fuels
US20020152673A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-24 Huff George A. Transportation fuels
US6673230B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2004-01-06 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Process for oxygenation of components for refinery blending of transportation fuels
US20020148756A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-17 Morris George Ernest Preparation of components for transportation fuels
US20020148754A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-10-17 Gong William H. Integrated preparation of blending components for refinery transportation fuels
US6881325B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2005-04-19 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Preparation of components for transportation fuels
US6544409B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2003-04-08 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the catalytic oxidation of sulfur, nitrogen and unsaturated compounds from hydrocarbon streams
US20040108252A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2004-06-10 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the upgrading of raw hydrocarbon streams
US7153414B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2006-12-26 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras Process for the upgrading of raw hydrocarbon streams
US20040222134A1 (en) * 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw hydrocarbon streams
US7175755B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2007-02-13 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw hydrocarbon streams
US20100025301A1 (en) * 2004-05-31 2010-02-04 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Novel process for removing sulfur from fuels
US8016999B2 (en) 2004-05-31 2011-09-13 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Process for removing sulfur from fuels
US20070227951A1 (en) * 2004-05-31 2007-10-04 Jeyagorwy Thirugnanasampanthar Novel Process for Removing Sulfur from Fuels
US20060131214A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw fuel streams catalyzed by iron oxides
EP1674158A1 (en) 2004-12-21 2006-06-28 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - PETROBAS A process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw fuel streams catalyzed by iron oxides
US7803270B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2010-09-28 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Process for the extractive oxidation of contaminants from raw fuel streams catalyzed by iron oxides
US9023120B2 (en) * 2009-06-19 2015-05-05 Cyuba Enzyme Ltd. Fuel production method, fuel production apparatus, and fuel oil
US20100319241A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Cyubu Enzyme Ltd. Fuel production method, fuel production apparatus, and fuel oil
KR101042093B1 (en) 2009-06-19 2011-06-16 유겐가이샤 추부엔자임 Fuel manufacturing method and fuel manufacturing device
US20110220547A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Abdennour Bourane Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US20110220550A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Abdennour Bourane Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating targeted oxidative desulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US9644156B2 (en) 2010-03-15 2017-05-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization apparatus integrating oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US9296960B2 (en) 2010-03-15 2016-03-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US20110233110A1 (en) * 2010-03-29 2011-09-29 Omer Refa Koseoglu Integrated hydrotreating and oxidative desulfurization process
US9464241B2 (en) 2010-03-29 2016-10-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrotreating unit with integrated oxidative desulfurization
US8658027B2 (en) 2010-03-29 2014-02-25 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated hydrotreating and oxidative desulfurization process
US9290712B2 (en) 2010-09-03 2016-03-22 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Natural Resources Canada Production of high-cetane diesel product
US9873797B2 (en) 2011-10-24 2018-01-23 Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited Process for the production of carbon black
US8906227B2 (en) 2012-02-02 2014-12-09 Suadi Arabian Oil Company Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating gas phase catalytic oxidation to produce fuels having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US9410042B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-08-09 Aditya Birla Science And Technology Company Ltd. Process for obtaining carbon black powder with reduced sulfur content
CN104919025B (en) * 2012-11-09 2017-07-28 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 The system of oxidisability sulfur method charging enhanced with gaseous oxidizer is used
CN104919025A (en) * 2012-11-09 2015-09-16 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
WO2014074958A1 (en) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
KR20150105946A (en) * 2012-11-09 2015-09-18 사우디 아라비안 오일 컴퍼니 Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
US9719029B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2017-08-01 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
KR102187212B1 (en) 2012-11-09 2020-12-04 사우디 아라비안 오일 컴퍼니 Oxidative desulfurization process and system using gaseous oxidant-enhanced feed
US8920635B2 (en) 2013-01-14 2014-12-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating gas phase oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
CN108239556A (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-07-03 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for separating and enriching alkaline and non-alkaline nitrides in coker gas oil
CN108239556B (en) * 2016-12-23 2020-08-07 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for separating and enriching alkaline and non-alkaline nitrides in coker gas oil
CN108795483A (en) * 2017-05-02 2018-11-13 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for separating and refining non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds in petroleum fractions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2240280B1 (en) 1979-02-16
BR7406369D0 (en) 1975-05-27
DE2424274B2 (en) 1979-03-01
IE39619B1 (en) 1978-11-22
JPS5039704A (en) 1975-04-12
NL7407257A (en) 1975-02-10
IN141762B (en) 1977-04-16
CA1046004A (en) 1979-01-09
DE2424274A1 (en) 1975-03-13
IT1017927B (en) 1977-08-10
IE39619L (en) 1975-03-06
AU7150974A (en) 1976-01-22
SU508220A3 (en) 1976-03-25
GB1437569A (en) 1976-05-26
JPS5337081B2 (en) 1978-10-06
BE818350A (en) 1974-11-18
DE2424274C3 (en) 1979-10-18
FR2240280A1 (en) 1975-03-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3847800A (en) Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
US4485007A (en) Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
US3029201A (en) Water treatment
EP3441442A1 (en) A process for the reduction of the sulphur content of fuels
US5310479A (en) Process for reducing the sulfur content of a crude
US5961820A (en) Desulfurization process utilizing an oxidizing agent, carbonyl compound, and hydroxide
US5723039A (en) Process for removal of organo-sulfur compounds from liquid hydrocarbons
US3098705A (en) Process for removing carbonyl sulfide from petroleum gases
US3919402A (en) Petroleum oil desulfurization process
US2987379A (en) Production of sulfur
US4875997A (en) Process for treating hydrocarbons containing mercaptans
EP0236021A2 (en) Process for upgrading diesel oils
US4808341A (en) Process for the separation of mercaptans contained in gas
EP0076100B1 (en) A method of refining sour hydrocarbon distillates
US3352777A (en) Oxidation of mercaptans
US4412913A (en) Use of alkanolamines in sweetening sour liquid hydrocarbon streams
US9718712B2 (en) Methods and systems for treating caustic materials
US2664345A (en) Manufacture of sulfur from hs-hydrocarbon containing gases
US2624694A (en) Removal of hydrogen sulfide
US5378441A (en) Method to scavenge hydrogen sulfide from natural gas
US2503486A (en) Method of desulfurization by treatment with elemental halogens
US2915461A (en) Multi-stage sweetening process employing an alkaline hypochlorite solution
Andreev et al. Demercaptanization of Light Hydrocarbon Fractions with Strong Aqueous Ammonia without Producing Sulfur Caustic Wastewater
JP2003193066A (en) Method for oxidative desulfurization of liquid petroleum product and oxidative desulfurization plant
US2063491A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KVB, INC.

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KVB ENGINEERING, INC. A CA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:003862/0572

Effective date: 19801112