US3775290A - Integrated hydrotreating and catalytic cracking system for refining sour crude - Google Patents

Integrated hydrotreating and catalytic cracking system for refining sour crude Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3775290A
US3775290A US00157528A US3775290DA US3775290A US 3775290 A US3775290 A US 3775290A US 00157528 A US00157528 A US 00157528A US 3775290D A US3775290D A US 3775290DA US 3775290 A US3775290 A US 3775290A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oil
fraction
stream
process according
crude
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00157528A
Inventor
A Peterson
F Dormish
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Marathon Oil Co
Original Assignee
Marathon Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Marathon Oil Co filed Critical Marathon Oil Co
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3775290A publication Critical patent/US3775290A/en
Assigned to MARATHON OIL COMPANY, AN OH CORP reassignment MARATHON OIL COMPANY, AN OH CORP ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE INTEREST Assignors: MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G69/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process
    • C10G69/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process plural serial stages only
    • C10G69/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process plural serial stages only including at least one step of catalytic cracking in the absence of hydrogen

Definitions

  • y portions of the products from said hydrotreater can be [56] References Cited reformed and/or coked with liquid fractions from said coker optionally being recycled to join the crude oil UNITED STATES PATENTS feed to the hydrotreater. 3,617,501 11/1971 Eng 208/89 2,526,966 10/1950 Oberfell et a1 208/64 23 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures l2 V a w F u R N A c E E I :o
  • the present invention relates generally to the field of hydrocarbon conversion processes, and more specifically to hydrotreating and catalytic cracking generally classified in U.S. Patent Office Class 208, subclass 212.
  • the present invention produces gasolines and can optionally produce reformed gasoline of improved octane and/or coke. These products have utilities as motor fuels, improved motor fuels, and carbon for the production of electrodes, respectively.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a refinery system hydrotreating whole crude and catalytically cracking according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a refinery which hydrotreats and catalytically cracks as in FIG. 1, but additionally cokes a residual fraction to produce coker liquids which can optionally be recycled back to mix with the feed of the hydrotreater.
  • Hydrocarbons It is an important aspect of the present invention that whole crude oil is hydrotreated. Previous processes have hydrotreated residuals, e.g., 650F. plus portions without achieving the advantages of the present invention. Crudes which are particularly useful for the practice of the invention are those which are relatively high in sulfur content but low in asphaltene and heavy metals content. Sour West Texas crude is a good example of this type of crude.
  • Topped crudes e.g., those having the portion boiling below about 400F. fractioned out, can be utilized in place of the whole crude oil.
  • the preferred gas-oil fraction to be fed to the catalytic cracking unit according to the present invention is preferablythat portion of the mixed overheads from both an atmospheric and a vacuum distillation which remains after the removal of gasoline and ⁇ light distillates, and will preferably boil within the range of from about 500 to 1,150, more preferably from 550 to 1,l00, and most preferably from 600 to about 1,050F.
  • Residual fraction is the fraction generally boiling above about 900F, more preferably above about 1,000F, and most preferably above about 1,050F.
  • Catalytic cracking unit liquid products A catalytic cracking unit produces a liquid output which is conventionally fractionated into a variety of products including catalytic gasoline, catalytic cracker middle distillate, catalytic cracker gasoil, and a slurry containing entrained catalysts, all or part of which is recovered and recycled to the catalytic cracker unit.
  • Coker Liquid products The coker liquid products selected for recycle will generally consist of the entire liquid product from C or C up through the highest boiling liquid products produced.
  • the lower molecular weight material, particularly the C C and perhaps C portion are advantageously separated for olefin recovery. Any other portions of the coker liquid product may also be separated for separate use, if desired. From about 1 to about 100, more preferably from 50 to about 100, and more preferably from 75 to about 100 volume percent of liquid (C -plus) products from the coker will be mixed with the whole crude entering the hydrotreating process.
  • the remaining coker liquids, if any, can be utilized for conventional purposes, e.g., for gasoline and heavier fuels.
  • the hydrogen utilized with the present invention can be of commercial purity such as that derived from the reforming of naphtha as by any of the reforming processes described on pp. 184-193 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing or can be manufactured specially for the purpose such as by steam reforming or partial oxidation of hydrocarbons (ibid pp. 269-270). From about 1,000 to about 6,000, more preferably from 2,000 to about 5,000, and most preferably from about 2,500 to about 4,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen will be contacted with each barrel of oil fed to the hydrotreater.
  • Hydrotreating Catalyst A wide variety of hydrogenation catalysts, especially those containing metals selected from the group nickel, molybdenum, cobalt and tungsten, or compounds containing such metals, can be employed including those marketed by the Girdler Division of Chemetron Corp. under the tradename Girdler G-5 l," Girdler G-76; those marketed by Union Oil Company of California under the tradename N-2l those marketed by American Cyanamid Company under the tradename Cyanamid HDS-2A and Cyanamid HDS-1450, Cyanamid HDS-l441, Cyanamid HDS-9A, and Cyanamid HDS-3A; those marketed by the Davison Chemical Company Division of W. R. Grace & Co.
  • the preferred catalyst supports are alumina, silica, magnesia or combinations thereof. In general, the support should not be sufficiently acidic so as to cause extensive hydrocracking of the oil under the preferred reaction conditions.
  • the temperature during the hydrotreating reaction should be from 600 to about 850F., more preferably from 650 to about 800F., and most preferably from 675 to about 775F.
  • the temperature used will depend on the relative hydrosulfurization and hydrocracking activities of the particular catalyst used and will normally be increased during a run to compensate for catalyst deactivation.
  • the liquid hourly space velocity will generally be in the range of from about 0.5 to about 6, more preferably 0.5 to about 4, and most preferably 1 to about 3 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour.
  • Catalytic cracking The catalytic cracking is carried out under conventional conditions, e.g., those described on pages 174-179 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing and in the reference cited therein.
  • the catalytic cracking catalysts will generally be mixtures of silica and alumina or magnesia and preferably will contain crystalline compounds of silica and alumina commonly known as Zeolites" or "molecular sieves.”
  • Suitable catalytic cracking catalysts are described in Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol. 47, No. 2, pages -132 (Feb. 1968).
  • Coking The coking is carried out under conventional conditions, e.g., those described on pages 180-181 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing and in the references cited therein.
  • Examples 1 and III are according to the invention.
  • Examples 11 and IV are comparative examples to illustrate the loss of advantages when the crude oil and recycle stream are not hydrotreated.
  • Example V demonstrates the use of the naphtha product as reformer feedstock.
  • EXAMPLE I Hydrorotreating whole crude and catalytically cracking, according to the invention
  • whole crude l0 enters the desalter 11 of conventional design which removes inorganic halides.
  • the desalted crude is heated in heat exchanger 12, contacted with make-up hydrogen 14 and recycle hydrogen 33 and further heated in furnace 13.
  • the hot crude plus hydrogen steam is passed over a bed of American Cyanamid HDS-3A nickel-molybdenum catalyst in hydrotreater 115 at 700F., 1,500 psig, liquid hourly space velocity of 1.64 hr. and hydrogen to oil ratio of 3,350 scf per barrel.
  • the hydrotreated stream is cooled in heat exchanger 16 and fed to separator 17 which separatesthe gaseous from the liquid products.
  • the gaseous products from separator 17 are scrubbed to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia from recycle hydrogen stream 33. A small stream 34 is taken off to prevent-build-upof C through C hydrocarbons in the recyclev stream.
  • the liquid products from separator 17 are fed to the main distillation columns 18 where they are fractionated into product streams; gas, 19 (composed primarily of C through C which is sent to a conventional gas concentration facility); gasoline, 20 (composed primarily of C through C fractions boiling up to about 400F.
  • middle distillate 211 (which may be more than one fraction and which is composed primarily of kerosine, diesel fuel, and jet fuel); gas oil, 23 (consisting of both atmospheric and vacuum gas oil) .which is sent to the catalytic cracker 43 via heater 48;
  • Catalytic cracking unit 43 is operated at 900F. weight hourly space velocity of 2.14 hr. and catalyst to oil ratio (weight) of 5.6 with equilibrium American Cyanamid TS-170 catalyst.
  • Fraction 45 from fractionating tower 27 consists primarily of hydrocarbons boiling from about 600 to 850F. and is recycled back to mix with the effluent from desalter 11.
  • the residual fraction from fractionating tower 27 is cooled in heat exchanger 49 and entrained catalyst is optionally separated in slurry settler 47 for return to the catalytic cracking unit 43 as stream 29.
  • the liquid products obtained after hydrotreating and fractionation have the composition shown below.
  • Example Example 1 11 111 IV Dry Gas (scf/bbl) 111 128 114 129 Propane 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 Propylene 7.2 7.0 7.1 7.5 lsobutane 5.6 4.6 5.8 5.2 Normal Butane 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 Butylenes 6.4 6.8 6.8 7.9 C -400F 59.4 50.8 63.1 56.3 400600F 16.1 18.7 14.7 17.2 600F plus 11.5 17.3 8.5 12.7 Coke (wt.%) 4.75 5.8 4.75 5.57
  • Example 111 This example demonstrates the advantages of hydrotreating coker condensate together with crude oil in the preparation of catalytic cracking charge stock.
  • crude oil 10 is processed as in F16. l to obtain a residual fraction 22 which is used as feedstock to a delayed or fluid coking unit 60.
  • the products from coking unit 60 consist of coke 64 and a hot vapor stream which is cooled and then split in separator 61 into a gaseous stream 62 consisting primarily of hydrogen and C through C hydrocarbons which may be sent to a light ends or gas concentration plant for separation and further processing and a liquid stream 63 which consists principally of C and higher boiling hydrocarbons to an end point of about 950F. which is comingled with the crude stream from desalter 11.
  • the liquid product stream 63 can be fractionated or divided and only a portion of this stream comingled with the effluent from desalter 11, with the remainder being used in product blending and other conventional refinery uses.
  • Example I The crude oil of Example I, together with volume percent of a coker condensate obtained by delayed coking of a 975F. plus residual fraction from the crude oil of Example I which has been hydrotreated under the conditions of Example I is hydrotreated and catalytically cracked as in Example I.
  • the coking unit is operated at 925F. bed temperature with an inlet feed temperature of 1,000F.
  • the oil to steam feed ratio is 20.5 volume of oil to volume of water.
  • the coking time is 9 hours. Yields obtained by catalytically cracking the 600 to 975F. gas oil fraction obtained from the hydrotreated mixture of 15 volume percent coker condensate and 85 volume percent crude oil are shown in Table 3.
  • Example IV This comparative example shows the lower yield of gasoline which is obtained by conventionally catalytically cracking virgin and coker gas oil which have not been hydrotreated.
  • Example III A blend of 15 volume percent coker gas oil as described in Example III and 85 volume percent crude oil as described in Example I is distilled to obtain a gas oil out boiling from about 600 to about 975F. This gas oil is catalytically cracked as in Example llI. Yields are shown in Table 3. The gasoline (C -4O0F.) yield is significantly lower than when the process of this invention is used in Example III and the coke make is higher, indicating a greater loss of valuable products to coke and correspondingly greater air requirement to generate the catalyst.
  • Example V product stream is cooled and subsequently separated in a separator 51 into a high octane liquid product 52 and a gas stream 53 consisting predominantly of hydrogen which is partially recycled as stream 54 to the reforming reactor and partially withdrawn as stream 55 for use elsewhere as, for example, in hydrotreating unit 15.
  • said hydrotreating catalyst comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, molybdenum, cobalt and tungsten or a compound containing one of the foregoing metals.
  • catalytic cracker liquid products include gas-oil, at least a portion of which is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
  • liquid products from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater; and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
  • a process according to claim 20 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.

Abstract

Desalted crude oil plus a recycle stream from a catalytic cracking unit, e.g., catalytic gas oil (heavy catalytic cycle oil), with or without other cat cracking products, e.g., gasoline and light cycle oil, are mixed and hydrotreated together in a single operation; then fractionated into the desired fractions. Optionally, portions of the products from said hydrotreater can be reformed and/or coked with liquid fractions from said coker optionally being recycled to join the crude oil feed to the hydrotreater.

Description

United States Patent 1191 Peterson et al.
[4 1 Nov. 27, 1973 [54] INTEGRATED HYDROTREATING AND 2,871,182 1/1959 Weekman 208/50 CATALYTIC CKI SYSTEM FOR 2,785,120 341957 Metcalf 208/88 3,567,602 3 1971 Child et a1. 208/89 REFINING SOUR CRUDE 2,358,573 9/1944 Hemminger 208/50 [75] Inventors: Alan H. Peterson, Littleton; Frank Donmsh Denver both of Colo Primary Examinerl-ierbert Levine [73] Assignee: Marathon Oil Company, Findlay, y- P Herring et Ohio [22] Filed: June 28, 1971 [57] ABSTRACT [211 App]. No.: 157,528 Desalted crude oil plus a recycle stream from a catalytic cracking unit, e.g., catalytic gas oil (heavy cata- [52] Us CL 2085) 208/89 208/92 lytic cycle oil), with or without other cat cracking [51] Int .Cl Clg 37/00 products, e.g., gasoline and light cycle oil, are mixed [58] ,Fieid 92 8] 82 and hydrotreated together in a single operation; then 2 fractionated into the desired fractions. Optionally, y portions of the products from said hydrotreater can be [56] References Cited reformed and/or coked with liquid fractions from said coker optionally being recycled to join the crude oil UNITED STATES PATENTS feed to the hydrotreater. 3,617,501 11/1971 Eng 208/89 2,526,966 10/1950 Oberfell et a1 208/64 23 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures l2 V a w F u R N A c E E I :o
4 o 4 1Q H 2 O a 13 1'1. I 43 i u 28 rn :u (/1 2 Q 3 2 -"*E o :u n 18 -1 i 27 2 g z 44 5 E u 2o 'w s n 71 g '9 -n 2l 4 n A g 62 45 E 29 23 g A K w 49 if, 1 E j c :0 law 22 g PATENTEUHDVQYISIS 3.775.29U SHEET 2 CF 3 mm mm INVENTORS ALAN H. PETERSON DORMiSH SETTLER v sLuR'RY COLU MN REFORMER SEPARATOR CAT.
MAIN COLUMN(S) L vm N CAT. CRACK SEPARATOR HYDROTREATE R mmk iqmwo INTEGRATED IIYDRO'IREA'IING AND CATALYTIC CRACKING SYSTEM FOR REFINING SOUR CRUDE CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to the field of hydrocarbon conversion processes, and more specifically to hydrotreating and catalytic cracking generally classified in U.S. Patent Office Class 208, subclass 212.
2. Description of the Prior Art Separate hydrotreating of catalytic cracking recycle streams has been proposed, e.g., in R. A. Flinn and GA. Larson, The Effects of Hydrogenation and Catalytic Cracking of Various Molecular Types and Middle Distillates, J. Appl. Chem., 11, July, 1961, pp. 271-6 and M. D. Abbott, R. C. Archibald and R. W. Dom, Hydrogen Improves Catalytic Cracker Feed, Petroleum Refiner, 37, 161-6, 1958.
Hydrotreating of petroleum residual is taught by the following: Netherlands Patent NL-69l6 218-Q which claims priority of US. patent application Ser. 'No. 771,248 filed Oct. 28, 1968, teaches processes for converting sulfurous, hydrocarbonaceous black oils into lower boiling, normally liquid-hydrocarbon products of reduced sulfur content with an integrated process involving cracking in the presence of hydrocarbon and fixed bed catalytic desulfurization. Netherlands patent NL-6916 017-Q which claims priority of US. Patent application Ser. No. 770,724 filed Oct. 25, 1968 teaches hydrodesulfurization of crude oil or reduced crudecontaining asphaltene fractions at low temperatures in the presence of a Group VI/Group VII metal catalyst on alumina.
I-lydrotreating of whole crude oil is described in detail in the recent paper lsomax Desulfurization of Residum and Whole Crude Oil, by S. G. Paradis, G. D. Gould, D. A. Bea and E. M. Reed as paper 310 presented at the Houston meeting of the American institute of Chemical Engineers, Feb. 28-Mar. 4, 1971. US. Pat. No. 3,562,800 deals with hydrodesulfurization of crude or reduced crude, without recycle of liquid products from other units to mix with incoming crude. US. Pat. No. 3,617,501 is also made of reference.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION General Statement of the Invention According to the present invention, whole crude is hydrotreated, then fractionated and a gas oil fraction is catalytically cracked to produce liquid products, whereupon at least a portion of the liquid products are recycled back to the crude oil feed prior to the hydrotreating step. The advantages of the invention include: capital cost saving by reducing number of'fractionating columns and number of=hydrotreating units required; reduced quantities of coke\(where applicable) and corresponding increases in quantities of more valuable liquid products; lower sulfur content in liquid products, and in any coke produced from the residual fractions; reduced corrosion due to the sulfur removal before contact with crude tower, catalytic cracker, coker and subsequent downstream processing units; high throughput throughout the hydrotreater (the light fractions are hydrotreated in a unit no larger than that required for conventional hydrotreating of the heavier fractions only); and, optionally, lower olefin contents in naptha products, particularly gasoline, in those embodiments where catalytic or coker naptha is recycled.
Utility of the Invention The present invention produces gasolines and can optionally produce reformed gasoline of improved octane and/or coke. These products have utilities as motor fuels, improved motor fuels, and carbon for the production of electrodes, respectively.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a refinery system hydrotreating whole crude and catalytically cracking according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a refinery which additionally reforms to produce higher octane gasoling (reformate) and hydrogen which can optionally be recycled to the hydrotreater.
FIG. 3 shows a refinery which hydrotreats and catalytically cracks as in FIG. 1, but additionally cokes a residual fraction to produce coker liquids which can optionally be recycled back to mix with the feed of the hydrotreater.
DESCRIPTION or THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Starting Materials Hydrocarbons: It is an important aspect of the present invention that whole crude oil is hydrotreated. Previous processes have hydrotreated residuals, e.g., 650F. plus portions without achieving the advantages of the present invention. Crudes which are particularly useful for the practice of the invention are those which are relatively high in sulfur content but low in asphaltene and heavy metals content. Sour West Texas crude is a good example of this type of crude.
Topped crudes, e.g., those having the portion boiling below about 400F. fractioned out, can be utilized in place of the whole crude oil.
The preferred gas-oil fraction to be fed to the catalytic cracking unit according to the present invention, is preferablythat portion of the mixed overheads from both an atmospheric and a vacuum distillation which remains after the removal of gasoline and\ light distillates, and will preferably boil within the range of from about 500 to 1,150, more preferably from 550 to 1,l00, and most preferably from 600 to about 1,050F. Residual fraction: The preferred residual fraction for coking according to the present invention, is the fraction generally boiling above about 900F, more preferably above about 1,000F, and most preferably above about 1,050F.
Catalytic cracking unit liquid products: A catalytic cracking unit produces a liquid output which is conventionally fractionated into a variety of products including catalytic gasoline, catalytic cracker middle distillate, catalytic cracker gasoil, and a slurry containing entrained catalysts, all or part of which is recovered and recycled to the catalytic cracker unit.
Catalytic cracker gas-oil: In many conventional operations, gasoline is taken as product with middle distillate and/or catalytic cycle gas-oil being recycled to the catalytic cracking unit. The present invention employs the catalytic cracker gas-oil (and, optionally, the middle distillate and/or gasoline) for comingling with the crude oil feed to the hydrotreater. Catalytic cracking unit gas-oil will generally boil in the range of from about 450 to about 950, more preferably from 500 to about 925, and most preferably from 600 to about 900F.
Coker Liquid products: The coker liquid products selected for recycle will generally consist of the entire liquid product from C or C up through the highest boiling liquid products produced. The lower molecular weight material, particularly the C C and perhaps C portion are advantageously separated for olefin recovery. Any other portions of the coker liquid product may also be separated for separate use, if desired. From about 1 to about 100, more preferably from 50 to about 100, and more preferably from 75 to about 100 volume percent of liquid (C -plus) products from the coker will be mixed with the whole crude entering the hydrotreating process. The remaining coker liquids, if any, can be utilized for conventional purposes, e.g., for gasoline and heavier fuels.
Hydrogen: The hydrogen utilized with the present invention can be of commercial purity such as that derived from the reforming of naphtha as by any of the reforming processes described on pp. 184-193 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing or can be manufactured specially for the purpose such as by steam reforming or partial oxidation of hydrocarbons (ibid pp. 269-270). From about 1,000 to about 6,000, more preferably from 2,000 to about 5,000, and most preferably from about 2,500 to about 4,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen will be contacted with each barrel of oil fed to the hydrotreater.
Hydrotreating Catalyst: A wide variety of hydrogenation catalysts, especially those containing metals selected from the group nickel, molybdenum, cobalt and tungsten, or compounds containing such metals, can be employed including those marketed by the Girdler Division of Chemetron Corp. under the tradename Girdler G-5 l," Girdler G-76; those marketed by Union Oil Company of California under the tradename N-2l those marketed by American Cyanamid Company under the tradename Cyanamid HDS-2A and Cyanamid HDS-1450, Cyanamid HDS-l441, Cyanamid HDS-9A, and Cyanamid HDS-3A; those marketed by the Davison Chemical Company Division of W. R. Grace & Co. under the tradename Davison-HDS and that marketed by Nalco Chemical Company under the tradename Nalco NM-502 and that marketed by Catalyst and Chemicals, Inc. under the tradename CCI C-20-07. Of these, nickelmolybdenum catalysts, e.g., American Cyanamid HDS- 3A, HDS-9A and Nalco NM-502 are most preferred. Hydrotreating Catalyst Support: The preferred catalyst supports are alumina, silica, magnesia or combinations thereof. In general, the support should not be sufficiently acidic so as to cause extensive hydrocracking of the oil under the preferred reaction conditions. For use in a fixed-bed hydrotreating unit a catalyst in the form of an extrudate, pellet or sphere of such size as to avoid excessive pressure drop through the catalyst bed but small enough to provide good transport of the oil into the center of the catalyst particle is used. Sizes from about l/8 to 1/16 inch are generally preferred. In a moving or ebulating bed hydrotreating reactor, l/32 inch or smaller extrudates or other shaped particles can be used to advantage.
Hydrotreating Temperature: While not narrowly critical, the temperature during the hydrotreating reaction should be from 600 to about 850F., more preferably from 650 to about 800F., and most preferably from 675 to about 775F. The temperature used will depend on the relative hydrosulfurization and hydrocracking activities of the particular catalyst used and will normally be increased during a run to compensate for catalyst deactivation.
Hydrotreating Pressure: While also not narrowly critical, pressure during the hydrotreating reaction should be from about 250 to about 5,000, more preferably from about 600 to about 2,500 and most preferably from 800 to about 2,000 psig.
Hydrotreating Liquid Hourly Space Velocity: The liquid hourly space velocity will generally be in the range of from about 0.5 to about 6, more preferably 0.5 to about 4, and most preferably 1 to about 3 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour. Catalytic cracking: The catalytic cracking is carried out under conventional conditions, e.g., those described on pages 174-179 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing and in the reference cited therein. The catalytic cracking catalysts will generally be mixtures of silica and alumina or magnesia and preferably will contain crystalline compounds of silica and alumina commonly known as Zeolites" or "molecular sieves."
Suitable catalytic cracking catalysts are described in Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol. 47, No. 2, pages -132 (Feb. 1968).
Coking: The coking is carried out under conventional conditions, e.g., those described on pages 180-181 of the September, 1970 issue of Hydrocarbon Processing and in the references cited therein.
Apparatus: Conventional hydrotreating, distillation, catalytic cracking, reforming, and coking apparatus can be employed. Though not necessary to the invention, with crude having high content of metals and/or particulates, a conventional guard case filled with inexpensive catalyst can be provided upstream of the main hydrotreating reactor to protect the more expensive main catalyst.
Examples: Examples 1 and III are according to the invention. Examples 11 and IV are comparative examples to illustrate the loss of advantages when the crude oil and recycle stream are not hydrotreated. Example V demonstrates the use of the naphtha product as reformer feedstock.
EXAMPLE I (Hydrotreating whole crude and catalytically cracking, according to the invention) Referring to FIG. 1, whole crude l0 enters the desalter 11 of conventional design which removes inorganic halides. The desalted crude is heated in heat exchanger 12, contacted with make-up hydrogen 14 and recycle hydrogen 33 and further heated in furnace 13. The hot crude plus hydrogen steam is passed over a bed of American Cyanamid HDS-3A nickel-molybdenum catalyst in hydrotreater 115 at 700F., 1,500 psig, liquid hourly space velocity of 1.64 hr. and hydrogen to oil ratio of 3,350 scf per barrel. The hydrotreated stream is cooled in heat exchanger 16 and fed to separator 17 which separatesthe gaseous from the liquid products. The gaseous products from separator 17 are scrubbed to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia from recycle hydrogen stream 33. A small stream 34 is taken off to prevent-build-upof C through C hydrocarbons in the recyclev stream. The liquid products from separator 17 are fed to the main distillation columns 18 where they are fractionated into product streams; gas, 19 (composed primarily of C through C which is sent to a conventional gas concentration facility); gasoline, 20 (composed primarily of C through C fractions boiling up to about 400F. is sent to blending and/or catalyticreforming); middle distillate, 211 (which may be more than one fraction and which is composed primarily of kerosine, diesel fuel, and jet fuel); gas oil, 23 (consisting of both atmospheric and vacuum gas oil) .which is sent to the catalytic cracker 43 via heater 48;
and residuals 22 which are optionally sent to a conventional delayed or fluid coker to produce coke.
Catalytic cracking unit 43 is operated at 900F. weight hourly space velocity of 2.14 hr. and catalyst to oil ratio (weight) of 5.6 with equilibrium American Cyanamid TS-170 catalyst.
Product from the catalytic cracker 43 is fractioned in fractionating column 27. Overhead 28 from column 27 is partially condensed to separate in separator 40, an overhead 30composedprimarily of C and lighter hydrocarbons which is sent to gas concentration, and a bottoms stream 46 which consists primarily of hydrocarbons from C. through 400F. boiling range which are sent to gasoline blending, or optionally may be comingled with the crude oil stream from desalter 111 for recycle to the hydrotreating unit 15. Fraction 44 from fractionating column 27 consists primarily of hydrocarbons boiling in the range of from about 400 to 600F. and is used for blending of diesel fuel, heating oil, kerosine and turbine fuel, or optionally may be comingled with the crude oil stream for desalter 1111 for recycle to the hydrotreater 115. Fraction 45 from fractionating tower 27 consists primarily of hydrocarbons boiling from about 600 to 850F. and is recycled back to mix with the effluent from desalter 11. The residual fraction from fractionating tower 27 is cooled in heat exchanger 49 and entrained catalyst is optionally separated in slurry settler 47 for return to the catalytic cracking unit 43 as stream 29.
The crude oil used in Examples l-lV, is a sour West Texas crude containing 1.67 wt. percent sulfur. Sulfur contents of the various distillation fractions of the raw crude oil are shown below.
TABLE 1 Raw Crude Oil Distillation Fraction Volume Percent Wt. Sulfur F.
below 400 18.96 0.16 400-600 22.1 3 0.63 600-1050 38.00 1.65 1050 plus 20.91 2.62
The liquid products obtained after hydrotreating and fractionation have the composition shown below.
TABLE 2 l-lydrotreated Products Distillation Fraction Volume Percent Wt. 3b Sulfur below 400 18.66 0.01 400-600 24.38 0.01 600-1050 41.64 0.12 1050 plus 15.32 0.74
oil are cracked. These do not represent the balanced flows of gas oil in each case since less gas oil is produced (under equivalent cracking conditions) from the hydrotreated feed. Yields are shown in the following tables as volume percent of feed unless specified other- Catalytic cracking runs to substantiate this invention are carried out in a small fixed-bed laboratory reactor. The yields are converted by use of unit factors defined as the yield in a refinery unit/yield in laboratory unit to correspond more closely to the yields expected from a refinery fluidized bed catalytic cracking unit under balanced conditions at about the same temperature. The same set of unit factors is used in all examples.
TABLE 3 Example Example Example Example 1 11 111 IV Dry Gas (scf/bbl) 111 128 114 129 Propane 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 Propylene 7.2 7.0 7.1 7.5 lsobutane 5.6 4.6 5.8 5.2 Normal Butane 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 Butylenes 6.4 6.8 6.8 7.9 C -400F 59.4 50.8 63.1 56.3 400600F 16.1 18.7 14.7 17.2 600F plus 11.5 17.3 8.5 12.7 Coke (wt.%) 4.75 5.8 4.75 5.57
Example II This is a comparative example to demonstrate the cracking yields resulting from conventional processing of gas oil obtained from sour crude oil without benefit of the invention. The gas oil described in Table 1 of Example l is cracked under the cracking conditions of Example l. The yields of cracked products are shown in Table 3. The inclusion of 12 volume percent catalytic cracking oil in the crude oil is equivalent to a conventional catalytic cracking operation in which the combined feed ratio (total feed/fresh feed) is about 1.4 to 1. Comparison of the yields from Examples 1 and 11 shows the markedly improved conversion and'selectively to gasoline as well as reduced coke make resulting from use of this invention.
Example 111 This example demonstrates the advantages of hydrotreating coker condensate together with crude oil in the preparation of catalytic cracking charge stock.
Referring to H6. 3, crude oil 10 is processed as in F16. l to obtain a residual fraction 22 which is used as feedstock to a delayed or fluid coking unit 60. The products from coking unit 60 consist of coke 64 and a hot vapor stream which is cooled and then split in separator 61 into a gaseous stream 62 consisting primarily of hydrogen and C through C hydrocarbons which may be sent to a light ends or gas concentration plant for separation and further processing and a liquid stream 63 which consists principally of C and higher boiling hydrocarbons to an end point of about 950F. which is comingled with the crude stream from desalter 11. Optionally, the liquid product stream 63 can be fractionated or divided and only a portion of this stream comingled with the effluent from desalter 11, with the remainder being used in product blending and other conventional refinery uses.
The crude oil of Example I, together with volume percent of a coker condensate obtained by delayed coking of a 975F. plus residual fraction from the crude oil of Example I which has been hydrotreated under the conditions of Example I is hydrotreated and catalytically cracked as in Example I. The coking unit is operated at 925F. bed temperature with an inlet feed temperature of 1,000F. The oil to steam feed ratio is 20.5 volume of oil to volume of water. The coking time is 9 hours. Yields obtained by catalytically cracking the 600 to 975F. gas oil fraction obtained from the hydrotreated mixture of 15 volume percent coker condensate and 85 volume percent crude oil are shown in Table 3.
Example IV This comparative example shows the lower yield of gasoline which is obtained by conventionally catalytically cracking virgin and coker gas oil which have not been hydrotreated.
A blend of 15 volume percent coker gas oil as described in Example III and 85 volume percent crude oil as described in Example I is distilled to obtain a gas oil out boiling from about 600 to about 975F. This gas oil is catalytically cracked as in Example llI. Yields are shown in Table 3. The gasoline (C -4O0F.) yield is significantly lower than when the process of this invention is used in Example III and the coke make is higher, indicating a greater loss of valuable products to coke and correspondingly greater air requirement to generate the catalyst.
Example V product stream is cooled and subsequently separated in a separator 51 into a high octane liquid product 52 and a gas stream 53 consisting predominantly of hydrogen which is partially recycled as stream 54 to the reforming reactor and partially withdrawn as stream 55 for use elsewhere as, for example, in hydrotreating unit 15.
Modifications of the Invention lt should be understood that the invention is capable of a variety of modifications and variations which will be made apparent to those skilled in the art by a reading of the specification and which are to be included within the spirit of the claims appended hereto.
What is claimed is:
1. In a process for the manufacture of gasoline from gas-oil derived from the fractionation of crude oil, the improvement comprising hydrotreating said crude oil prior to said fractionation which produces said gas-oil, said hydrotreating being accomplished by contacting said crude oil with from about 1,000 to about 6,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of crude oil at a temperature of from about 600 to about 850F. and at a pressure of from about 250 to about 5,000 psig in the presence of a hydrotreating catalyst, fractionating and catalytically cracking the gas-oil fraction of the resulting hydrotreated crude oil, and recycling at least a portion of the liquid products from said catalytic cracker to mix with said crude oil prior to said hydrotreating.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the crude oil is topped to remove its fraction boiling below about 400F prior to said hydrotreating of said crude oil.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein the crude oil is contacted with from about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of crude oil at a temperature of from about 650 to about 800F. and at a pressure of from about 600 to about 2,500 psig.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include gasoline, at least a portion of which is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater and wherein at least a portion of the effluent from said hydrotreater is reformed to produce a higher octane gasoline.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein the hydrotreated products from said hydrotreater are fractionated to produce a residual and wherein at least a portion of said residual is coked to produce coke and liquid products.
6. A process according to claim 5 wherein at least a portion of said liquid products from said coker are recycled for admixture with the crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
7. A process according to claim 1 wherein said hydrotreating catalyst comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, molybdenum, cobalt and tungsten or a compound containing one of the foregoing metals.
8. A process according to claim 4 wherein the crude oil is contacted with from about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of crude oil at a temperature of from about 650 to about 800F. and at a pressure of from about 600 to about 2,500 psig.
9. A process according to claim 5 wherein the crude oil is topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400F. prior to said hydrotreating of said crude oil.
10. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include gas-oil, at least a portion of which is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
11. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include both a gas-oil and a middle distillate and wherein at least a portion of each of said gas-oil and said middle distillate is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
12. A process for the manufacture of gasoline and refined liquid hydrocarbons by cracking in a catalytic cracker, a gas oil fraction obtained from a whole crude or crude which has been topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400F., said process comprising in combination:
a. desalting said crude as necessary to reduce the content of inorganic halides,
b. contacting said crude with at least a portion of the liquid products from said catalytic cracker and with about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of oil to form a hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream,
c. passing said hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream over a hydrotreating catalyst at a temperature of from about 675 to about 755F. and at a pressure of from about 800 to about 2,000 psig and at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 to about 4 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour to produce a hydrotreated product stream,
d. fractionating said hydrotreated product stream to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream,
e. cracking in a catalytic cracking unit the gas-oil fraction boiling from about 600 to about 1,100F. from said fractionating step,
f. coking at least a portion of said residual stream in a delayed coker to produce coke and coker overhead,
g. fractionating said coker overhead to produce a lower boiling fraction comprising C and lighter hydrocarbons and at least one high boiling stream comprising C and heavier hydrocarbons.
13. A process according to claim 12 wherein at least a portion of said higher boiling fraction from said fractionation of said coker overhead is recycled for mixing with said crude oil or topped crude being fed to said hydrotreater.
14. A process for the manufacture of gasoline and refined liquid hydrocarbons from whole crude or crude which has been topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400F., said process comprising in combination:
a. desalting said crude as necessary to reduce the content of inorganic halides,
b. contacting said crude with at least a portion of the liquid products from said catalytic cracker and with about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of oil to form a hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream,
passing said hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream over a hydrotreating catalyst at a temperature of from about 675 to about 775F. and at a pressure of from about 800 to about 2,000 psig and at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 to about 4 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour to produce a hydrotreated product stream,
d. fractionating said hydrotreated product stream to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream,
e. reforming at least a portion of said refined liquid hydrocarbon products in a reformer to produce gasoline of improved octane and hydrogen,
f. cracking in a catalytic cracking unit the gas-oil fraction boiling from about 600 to about 1,100F.
from said fractionating step.
15. A process according to claim 14 wherein at least a portion of said hydrogen is recycled to said hydrotreater.
16. A process according to claim 14 wherein said hy drotreated product stream is fractionated to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream, and wherein at least a portion of said residual stream is coked in a coker to produce coke and coker overheads, fractionating said coker overhead to produce an overhead comprising C and lighter hydrocarbons and at least one high boiling stream comprising C and heavier hydrocarbons.
17. A process according to claim 16 wherein at least a portion of said higher boiling fraction from said fraction-ation of said coker overhead is recycled for mixing with said crude oil or topped crude being fed to said hydrotreater.
18. A process according to claim 1 wherein said liquid products from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater; and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
19. A process according to claim 18 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
20. A process according to claim 12 wherein said liquid product from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater, and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
21. A process according to claim 20 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
22. A process according to claim 14 wherein said liquid products from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater, and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
23. A process according to claim 22 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 'g 7'7 -3 790 Dated NOV. 27, 1973 Inventor(s) Man U Dm-erqcm et al It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Col. 4, line 13: Delete "hydrosulfurization" and insert therefor hydrodesulfurization.
Col. 7, line 42: Delete "generate" and insert therefor -regenerate.
Claim 12, C01. 9, line 12: Delete "755F." end insert therefor 775F.-.
Signed and Scaled this Sixth Day Of September 1977 [SEAL] A ttest:
RUTH C. MASON LUTRELLE F. PARKER Attesting Officer Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

Claims (22)

  1. 2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the crude oil is topped to remove its fraction boiling below about 400*F prior to said hydrotreating of said crude oil.
  2. 3. A process according to claim 1 wherein the crude oil is contacted with from about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of crude oil at a temperature of from about 650 to about 800*F. and at a pressure of from about 600 to about 2,500 psig.
  3. 4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include gasoline, at least a portion of which is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater and wherein at least a portion of the effluent from said hydrotreater is reformed to produce a higher octane gasoline.
  4. 5. A process according to claim 1 wherein the hydrotreated products from said hydrotreater are fractionated to produce a residual and wherein at least a portion of said residual is coked to produce coke and liquid products.
  5. 6. A process according to claim 5 wherein at least a portion of said liquid products from said coker are recycled for admixture with the crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
  6. 7. A process according to claim 1 wherein said hydrotreating catalyst comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, molybdenum, cobalt and tungsten or a compound containing one of the foregoing metals.
  7. 8. A process according to claim 4 wherein the crude oil is contacted with from about 2,000 to abOut 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of crude oil at a temperature of from about 650 to about 800*F. and at a pressure of from about 600 to about 2,500 psig.
  8. 9. A process according to claim 5 wherein the crude oil is topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400*F. prior to said hydrotreating of said crude oil.
  9. 10. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include gas-oil, at least a portion of which is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
  10. 11. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic cracker liquid products include both a gas-oil and a middle distillate and wherein at least a portion of each of said gas-oil and said middle distillate is recycled for mixture with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater.
  11. 12. A process for the manufacture of gasoline and refined liquid hydrocarbons by cracking in a catalytic cracker, a gas oil fraction obtained from a whole crude or crude which has been topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400*F., said process comprising in combination: a. desalting said crude as necessary to reduce the content of inorganic halides, b. contacting said crude with at least a portion of the liquid products from said catalytic cracker and with about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of oil to form a hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream, c. passing said hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream over a hydrotreating catalyst at a temperature of from about 675 to about 755*F. and at a pressure of from about 800 to about 2,000 psig and at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 to about 4 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour to produce a hydrotreated product stream, d. fractionating said hydrotreated product stream to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream, e. cracking in a catalytic cracking unit the gas-oil fraction boiling from about 600 to about 1,100*F. from said fractionating step, f. coking at least a portion of said residual stream in a delayed coker to produce coke and coker overhead, g. fractionating said coker overhead to produce a lower boiling fraction comprising C4 and lighter hydrocarbons and at least one high boiling stream comprising C5 and heavier hydrocarbons.
  12. 13. A process according to claim 12 wherein at least a portion of said higher boiling fraction from said fractionation of said coker overhead is recycled for mixing with said crude oil or topped crude being fed to said hydrotreater.
  13. 14. A process for the manufacture of gasoline and refined liquid hydrocarbons from whole crude or crude which has been topped to remove a fraction boiling below about 400*F., said process comprising in combination: a. desalting said crude as necessary to reduce the content of inorganic halides, b. contacting said crude with at least a portion of the liquid products from said catalytic cracker and with about 2,000 to about 5,000 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of oil to form a hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream, c. passing said hydrocarbon plus hydrogen stream over a hydrotreating catalyst at a temperature of from about 675 to about 775*F. and at a pressure of from about 800 to about 2,000 psig and at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 to about 4 volumes of liquid per volume of hydrotreating catalyst per hour to produce a hydrotreated product stream, d. fractionating said hydrotreated product stream to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream, e. reforming at least a portion of said refined liquid hydrocarbon products in a reformer to produce gasoline of improved octane and hydrogen, f. cracking in a catalytic cracking unit the gas-oil fraction boiling from about 600 to about 1,100*F. from said fractionating step.
  14. 15. A process according to claim 14 wherein at least a portion of said hydrogen is recycled to said hydrotreater.
  15. 16. A process according to claim 14 wherein said hydrotreated product stream is fractionated to produce a plurality of refined liquid hydrocarbon products and a residual stream, and wherein at least a portion of said residual stream is coked in a coker to produce coke and coker overheads, fractionating said coker overhead to produce an overhead comprising C4 and lighter hydrocarbons and at least one high boiling stream comprising C5 and heavier hydrocarbons.
  16. 17. A process according to claim 16 wherein at least a portion of said higher boiling fraction from said fraction-ation of said coker overhead is recycled for mixing with said crude oil or topped crude being fed to said hydrotreater.
  17. 18. A process according to claim 1 wherein said liquid products from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850*F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater; and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
  18. 19. A process according to claim 18 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C4 and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
  19. 20. A process according to claim 12 wherein said liquid product from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850*F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater, and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
  20. 21. A process according to claim 20 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C4 and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
  21. 22. A process according to claim 14 wherein said liquid products from said catalytic cracker are fractionated to produce a fraction boiling within the range of from about 600 to about 850*F. and wherein this fraction is recycled back to mix with said crude oil being fed to said hydrotreater; and a substantially residual fraction, at least a portion of which is recycled back to mix with said gas-oil fraction being catalytically cracked.
  22. 23. A process according to claim 22 additionally comprising the fractionating from said liquid products of said catalytic cracker of a substantially overhead stream comprised primarily of C4 and lighter hydrocarbons which stream is not recycled to either said hydrotreating step or said catalytic cracking step.
US00157528A 1971-06-28 1971-06-28 Integrated hydrotreating and catalytic cracking system for refining sour crude Expired - Lifetime US3775290A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15752871A 1971-06-28 1971-06-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3775290A true US3775290A (en) 1973-11-27

Family

ID=22564121

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00157528A Expired - Lifetime US3775290A (en) 1971-06-28 1971-06-28 Integrated hydrotreating and catalytic cracking system for refining sour crude

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US3775290A (en)
DE (1) DE2215665C3 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3891538A (en) * 1973-06-21 1975-06-24 Chevron Res Integrated hydrocarbon conversion process
US4302323A (en) * 1980-05-12 1981-11-24 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
US4521277A (en) * 1983-02-09 1985-06-04 Intevep, S.A. Apparatus for upgrading heavy hydrocarbons employing a diluent
US4551232A (en) * 1983-02-09 1985-11-05 Intevep, S.A. Process and facility for making coke suitable for metallurgical purposes
US4859310A (en) * 1988-03-25 1989-08-22 Amoco Corporation Catalytic cracking of whole crude oil
WO1992010557A1 (en) * 1990-12-07 1992-06-25 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Method of refining crude oil
US5851381A (en) * 1990-12-07 1998-12-22 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Method of refining crude oil
US6168709B1 (en) 1998-08-20 2001-01-02 Roger G. Etter Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke
US20030000867A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-01-02 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Crude oil desulfurization
US20060032788A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2006-02-16 Etter Roger G Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke
CN100467575C (en) * 2001-07-06 2009-03-11 艾尼股份公司 Converting process of heavy material, such as heavy raw oil and distilled residue
US20090145810A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-06-11 Etter Roger G Addition of a Reactor Process to a Coking Process
US20090152165A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-06-18 Etter Roger G System and Method for Introducing an Additive into a Coking Process to Improve Quality and Yields of Coker Products
US20090209799A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-08-20 Etter Roger G System and Method of Introducing an Additive with a Unique Catalyst to a Coking Process
US20100170827A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2010-07-08 Etter Roger G Selective Cracking and Coking of Undesirable Components in Coker Recycle and Gas Oils
CN102911733A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method of high-sulfur wax oil
CN102911731A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 High-sulfur wax oil catalytic conversion method
CN102911735A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method for high sulfur wax oil
WO2012078835A3 (en) * 2010-12-10 2013-03-21 Shell Oil Company Process for treating a hydrocarbon-containing feed
US8529753B2 (en) 2006-12-27 2013-09-10 Research Institute Of Petroleum Processing, Sinopec Combined process for hydrotreating and catalytic cracking of residue
US20140275673A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2014-09-18 China Petroleum Chemical Corporation Process for producing light olefins and aromatics
US9011672B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2015-04-21 Roger G. Etter System and method of introducing an additive with a unique catalyst to a coking process
US9260667B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-02-16 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Combined process of hydrotreating and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oils

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102017127417B4 (en) 2017-11-21 2021-01-21 Egm-Holding-International Gmbh Reaction chamber

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2358573A (en) * 1941-04-09 1944-09-19 Standard Oil Dev Co Chemical process
US2526966A (en) * 1947-12-15 1950-10-24 Phillips Petroleum Co Treatment and transportation of hydrocarbons
US2785120A (en) * 1952-08-29 1957-03-12 Gulf Oil Corp Process for phenol recovery and crude oil desalting
US2871182A (en) * 1956-08-17 1959-01-27 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Hydrogenation and coking of heavy petroleum fractions
US3567602A (en) * 1968-02-29 1971-03-02 Texaco Inc Production of motor and jet fuels
US3617501A (en) * 1968-09-06 1971-11-02 Exxon Research Engineering Co Integrated process for refining whole crude oil

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2358573A (en) * 1941-04-09 1944-09-19 Standard Oil Dev Co Chemical process
US2526966A (en) * 1947-12-15 1950-10-24 Phillips Petroleum Co Treatment and transportation of hydrocarbons
US2785120A (en) * 1952-08-29 1957-03-12 Gulf Oil Corp Process for phenol recovery and crude oil desalting
US2871182A (en) * 1956-08-17 1959-01-27 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Hydrogenation and coking of heavy petroleum fractions
US3567602A (en) * 1968-02-29 1971-03-02 Texaco Inc Production of motor and jet fuels
US3617501A (en) * 1968-09-06 1971-11-02 Exxon Research Engineering Co Integrated process for refining whole crude oil

Cited By (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3891538A (en) * 1973-06-21 1975-06-24 Chevron Res Integrated hydrocarbon conversion process
US4302323A (en) * 1980-05-12 1981-11-24 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
US4521277A (en) * 1983-02-09 1985-06-04 Intevep, S.A. Apparatus for upgrading heavy hydrocarbons employing a diluent
US4551232A (en) * 1983-02-09 1985-11-05 Intevep, S.A. Process and facility for making coke suitable for metallurgical purposes
US4859310A (en) * 1988-03-25 1989-08-22 Amoco Corporation Catalytic cracking of whole crude oil
WO1992010557A1 (en) * 1990-12-07 1992-06-25 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Method of refining crude oil
US5851381A (en) * 1990-12-07 1998-12-22 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Method of refining crude oil
US6168709B1 (en) 1998-08-20 2001-01-02 Roger G. Etter Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke
US20060032788A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2006-02-16 Etter Roger G Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke
US9475992B2 (en) 1999-08-20 2016-10-25 Roger G. Etter Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke
US20030000867A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-01-02 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Crude oil desulfurization
EP1273649A3 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-03-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Crude oil desulfurization
CN100371424C (en) * 2001-06-28 2008-02-27 切夫里昂美国公司 Crude oil desulfurization
EP1273649A2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-01-08 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Crude oil desulfurization
CN100467575C (en) * 2001-07-06 2009-03-11 艾尼股份公司 Converting process of heavy material, such as heavy raw oil and distilled residue
US9771529B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2017-09-26 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Process for producing light olefins and aromatics
US20140275673A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2014-09-18 China Petroleum Chemical Corporation Process for producing light olefins and aromatics
US8968553B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2015-03-03 Roger G. Etter Catalytic cracking of undesirable components in a coking process
US20100170827A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2010-07-08 Etter Roger G Selective Cracking and Coking of Undesirable Components in Coker Recycle and Gas Oils
US8361310B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-01-29 Etter Roger G System and method of introducing an additive with a unique catalyst to a coking process
US20090145810A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-06-11 Etter Roger G Addition of a Reactor Process to a Coking Process
US20090152165A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-06-18 Etter Roger G System and Method for Introducing an Additive into a Coking Process to Improve Quality and Yields of Coker Products
US9187701B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2015-11-17 Roger G. Etter Reactions with undesirable components in a coking process
US8372264B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-02-12 Roger G. Etter System and method for introducing an additive into a coking process to improve quality and yields of coker products
US8372265B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-02-12 Roger G. Etter Catalytic cracking of undesirable components in a coking process
US8394257B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-03-12 Roger G. Etter Addition of a reactor process to a coking process
US9150796B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2015-10-06 Roger G. Etter Addition of a modified vapor line reactor process to a coking process
US9011672B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2015-04-21 Roger G. Etter System and method of introducing an additive with a unique catalyst to a coking process
US8206574B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2012-06-26 Etter Roger G Addition of a reactor process to a coking process
US8888991B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2014-11-18 Roger G. Etter System and method for introducing an additive into a coking process to improve quality and yields of coker products
US20090209799A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2009-08-20 Etter Roger G System and Method of Introducing an Additive with a Unique Catalyst to a Coking Process
US8529753B2 (en) 2006-12-27 2013-09-10 Research Institute Of Petroleum Processing, Sinopec Combined process for hydrotreating and catalytic cracking of residue
US9260667B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-02-16 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Combined process of hydrotreating and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oils
US9309467B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-04-12 China Petroleum And Chemical Corp. Integrated process for hydrogenation and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oil
WO2012078835A3 (en) * 2010-12-10 2013-03-21 Shell Oil Company Process for treating a hydrocarbon-containing feed
CN102911733B (en) * 2011-08-04 2015-05-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method of high-sulfur wax oil
CN102911735B (en) * 2011-08-04 2015-07-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method for high sulfur wax oil
CN102911735A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method for high sulfur wax oil
CN102911731B (en) * 2011-08-04 2015-11-25 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of catalysis conversion method of high-sulfur wax oil
CN102911731A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 High-sulfur wax oil catalytic conversion method
CN102911733A (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method of high-sulfur wax oil

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE2215665C3 (en) 1975-01-23
DE2215665A1 (en) 1973-01-18
DE2215665B2 (en) 1974-06-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3775290A (en) Integrated hydrotreating and catalytic cracking system for refining sour crude
US3775294A (en) Producing coke from hydrotreated crude oil
EP0040018B1 (en) Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
KR102447300B1 (en) A conversion process comprising fixed bed hydrotreating for the manufacture of marine fuels, separation of the hydrotreated resid fraction and catalytic cracking steps
CN107406778B (en) Method and apparatus for hydrotreating and cracking hydrocarbons
US4090949A (en) Upgrading of olefinic gasoline with hydrogen contributors
US3974062A (en) Conversion of full range crude oils with low molecular weight carbon-hydrogen fragment contributors over zeolite catalysts
US5026472A (en) Hydrocracking process with integrated distillate product hydrogenation reactor
US5164070A (en) Hydrocracking product recovery process
EP1288277B1 (en) Hydrocracking process product recovery method
US3733260A (en) Hydrodesulfurization process
US3671419A (en) Upgrading of crude oil by combination processing
US3172842A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process includ- ing a hydrocracking stage, two stages of catalytic cracking, and a reform- ing stage
US3245900A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US4798665A (en) Combination process for the conversion of a distillate hydrocarbon to maximize middle distillate production
CN102311795A (en) Hydrogenation method for producing high-octane gasoline components by diesel oil raw material
US4324935A (en) Special conditions for the hydrogenation of heavy hydrocarbons
US2763358A (en) Integrated process for the production of high quality motor fuels and heating oils
US3755141A (en) Catalytic cracking
US3306845A (en) Multistage hydrofining process
Aitani Oil refining and products
US4792390A (en) Combination process for the conversion of a distillate hydrocarbon to produce middle distillate product
US3321395A (en) Hydroprocessing of metal-containing asphaltic hydrocarbons
WO2022150265A1 (en) Integrated fcc and aromatic recovery complex to boost btx and light olefin production
US5318692A (en) FCC for producing low emission fuels from high hydrogen and low nitrogen and aromatic feeds

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MARATHON OIL COMPANY, AN OH CORP

Free format text: ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE INTEREST IN ALL PATENTS AS OF JULY 10,1982 EXCEPT PATENT NOS. 3,783,944 AND 4,260,291. ASSIGNOR ASSIGNS A FIFTY PERCENT INTEREST IN SAID TWO PATENTS AS OF JULY 10,1982;ASSIGNOR:MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:004172/0421

Effective date: 19830420