US3218199A - Process for hardening metals using explosive means - Google Patents

Process for hardening metals using explosive means Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3218199A
US3218199A US306650A US30665063A US3218199A US 3218199 A US3218199 A US 3218199A US 306650 A US306650 A US 306650A US 30665063 A US30665063 A US 30665063A US 3218199 A US3218199 A US 3218199A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
explosive
steel
layer
metal sheet
inch
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US306650A
Inventor
George R Cowan
Arnold H Holtzman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority to US306650A priority Critical patent/US3218199A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3218199A publication Critical patent/US3218199A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49805Shaping by direct application of fluent pressure
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49805Shaping by direct application of fluent pressure
    • Y10T29/49806Explosively shaping

Description

Nov. 16, 1965 G. R. COWAN ETAL 3,218,199
PROCESS FOR HARDENING' METALS USING EXPLOSIVE MEANS Original Filed June 23, 1960 INVENTORS GE E R. COWAN ARNOL .HOLTZMAN United States Patent 3,218,199 PROCESS FOR HARDENING METALS USING EXPLOSIVE MEANS George R. Cowan, Woodbury, and Arnold H. Holtzman, Cherry Hill Township, N.J., assignors to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wihnington, DeL, a corporation of Delaware Continuation of application Ser. No. 87,053, Feb. 2, 1961, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 38,261, June 23, 1960. This application Aug. 14, 1963, Ser. 306,650
7 Claims. (Cl. 1484) This application is a continuation of our application Serial No. 87,053, filed February 2, 1961, now abandoned, which in turn, is a continuation of our application Serial No. 38,261 filed June 23, 1960, now abandoned.
The present invention relates to a process for hardening metal surfaces.
In US. Patent 2,703,297 to N. A. MacLeod a process is described for hardening the surface of manganese steel. This process comprises placing a layer of explosive material contiguous to the surface to be hardened and detonating the explosive. This process is capable of providing a hardness of about 400 on the Vickers scale on the surface of manganese steel, this hardness gradually decreasing to a value of 200 Vickers at a depth below the surface of one inch. This process is quite satisfactory for many applications. However in other instances a greater increase in hardness, both in magnitude and in depth, than can be attained by this process is desirable.
We have found that we are able to harden metallic surfaces to a substantially greater degree and depth than has been heretofore possible when we position a metal sheet parallel to the surface to be hardened and separated therefrom by an air space, place a layer of explosiveon the outside surface of the said metal sheet, and initiate the explosive. Moreover, we have determined that through the use of the above-described process we are able to harden not only manganese steel, as described in the aforesaid MacLeod patent, but other steel alloys, such as stainless steel, vanadium steel and the like, and also non-ferrous metals and alloys thereof, such as nickel, niobium, cobalt, and their alloys.
A more completed understanding of the process of the present invention may be had by reference to the accompanying figure which is a schematic representation of an assembly for carrying out the hardening process. In the figure, 1 represents a supporting means of a shock-transmitting material, for example, alloy steel. The metallic specimen, the upper surface of which is to be hardened, is indicated by 2. 3 is a flexible metal sheet, for example, a brass or steel shim, that is supported above the surface of specimen 2 at a uniform spacing therefrom by small projections 7 in the surface of the sheet. The air space separating sheet 3 from the surface of the specimen is indicated at 8. 4 is a layer of explosive on the outer surface of sheet 3 and which preferably extends somewhat beyond the steel in at least one direction to provide a convenient portion for attachment of an electric initiator as at 5. Energy is carried to initiator 5 by lead wires 6.
The following examples further describe the process of our invention. They are illustrative only, however, and are not to be considered as limiting the invention in any manner. In all cases, unless otherwise specified, the explosive composition used was prepared by blending 85 parts of PETN, 7.5 parts of butyl rubber, and 7.5 parts of a thermoplastic terpene resin (mixture of polymers of fi-pinene having the formula (C H commercially available as Piccolyte S10 manufactured by the Penn- 3,Zl8,l99 Patented Nov. 16, 1965 sylvania Industrial Corporation), and rolling the blend into sheet, the thickness of the sheet determining the weight per unit area. The composition has a velocity of detonation of about 7200 meters per second, and the sheets are strong, flexible, and nonresilient. Compositions of this type and their preparation are described in detail in US. Patent 2,999,743 which is incorporated herein by reference.
EXAMPLE 1 A rectangular block of Hadfields manganese steel was placed on a supporting plate of stainless steel. A thin (0.002 in.) sheet of shim steel having dimension corresponding to those of the manganese steel block was cemented to a 0.165 inch-thick sheet of the abovedescribed explosive having a weight per unit area of 4 grams per square inch. Convex protrusions of 0.01 inch were located in the surface of the shim steel as a convenient means of providing the required air space. This composite layer was placed, shim-side down, on the steel block, and an electric initiator was taped to the explosive layer, and subsequently actuated. Before detonation of the explosive, the manganese steel had a uniform hardness of 200 Vickers; after detonation of the explosive the hardness at 0.005 inch below the surface was 550 Vickers an increase of 350 in the hardness value. The hardened surface was smooth and free of contamination by the shim layer. The hardness at 0.025 inch below the surface was 430 and at 0.035 inch 375. After a second treatment, following the same steps, the hardness of the Hadfields steel sample near the surface was not noticeably increased, the surface hardness obtained with the first shot being approximately the maximum hardness known for Hadfields steel. However, at a depth of 0.25 inch below the surface the hardness had been increased from a value of 280, obtained by the initial treatment, to a value of 380.
EXAMPLE 2 In experiments done for comparative purposes, the conditions of Example 1 were reproduced, i.e., the explosive and manganese steel sample were identical, however no thin layer of steel was employed, the explosive being placed directly on the surface to be hardened, as described in the aforementioned US. Patent 2,703,297 to MacLeod. After detonation of the explosive, the steel at a depth of 0.005 inch had a hardness value of 370 Vickers. At a depth of 0.025 inch the hardness was 320 and at 0.035 inch 310. Similarly, in other experiments, the surface hardness of a nickel specimen was observed to be only 200 when the explosive was detonated directly on the surface, whereas a surface hardness value of 310 Vickers was obtained when the technique of Example 1 was ap plied to a second nickel specimen.
EXAMPLE 3 The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that the air space between the surface to be hardened and the thin flexible steel sheet was increased from 0.010 inch to 0.040 inch. The hardening eflect obtained was somewhat less than that obtained in Example 1. At a depth of 0.005 inch the hardness of the Hadfields steel was 460, and at 0.025 inch 380. When a gap of 0.020 inch was employed, hardening results intermediate between those from the gaps of 0.010 inch and 0.040 inch were obtained.
EXAMPLE 4 Table I, which follows, shows the results obtained with a series of shots carried out on Hadfields steel with various explosive loadings. The steel shim was 0.005 inch thick, and the air space was 0.020 inch.
3 Table I Viclrers hardness of Hadfields steel sample at depth of in. in. in. in
Explosive loading (g./sq. in.) O. 005 0. 075 0.150 0. 250 2 540 320 275 240 550 340 300 285 550 355 320 305 Thus it is apparent that, as the amount of explosive was increased, the degree, of the hardening effect also increased.
EXAMPLE 5 Table Ilf'which follows, shows the effect on the metal hardening of variations in thickness of the flexible steel shim. The explosive was that of Example 1, the metal sample wasl-ladfields steel, and the air space provided was 0.020 inch.
As indicated by the above example, the depth of the hardening effect is increased by an increase in the thickness of the flexible metal sheet. Consequently, by varying the thickness of this sheet and the mass of the explosive employed it is possible to exercise great control over the hardness profile of the metal or alloy.
As we have demonstrated in the foregoing examples, our process is applicable to both ferrous and non-ferrous metals and alloys, and the hardening effect which is achieved is surprisingly and materially increased over that which results when the evplosive is placed directly on the surface to be hardened according to prior known techniques. Moreover, we have shown that increasing hardcning at a substantial depth below the surface of the metal is achieved by successive shots in accordance with the novel process.
Naturally, the physical conditions requisite for optimum results will depend somewhat on the nature of the metallic surface to be hardened. Generally speaking, the greatest increase in hardness for any metallic surface will result when the air space provided is between 0.010 and 0.025 inch. As an alternative to the exemplified projections in the metal sheet, the air space may be provided by small metallic particles or other supporting means. Such alternatives are within the purview of the invention.
It is preferably that the metal sheet be flexible for reasons of facile contouring to surfaces of irregular configuration. Hence, its thickness will preferably not exceed a value of a few mils. Sometimes it is beneficial to lubricate the surface to be hardened slightly, e.g., by applying a thin coating of petrolatum, to insure against adherence of the thin metal sheet, although this is not usually necessary.
The thickness of the explosive layer will, of course, depend upon the depth of the hardening effect that is desired to be attained. The only maximum parameter imposed on the amount of explosive used, is that it must not be so great as to cause disintegration of the thin metal sheet or extensive deformation or fracture of the specimen. Obviously, the explosive layer must be of at least sufficient thickness to propagate a detonation. Usually, explosive loadings of about from 1 to grams per square 4 inch, corresponding to thicknesses of about from 40 to 420 mils, are employed.
We have determined that the detonation velocity of the explosive composition must exceed by at least 25% the sonic velocity of both the metal specimen to be hardened and the metal sheet adjacent the explosive for satisfactory hardening results, and this represents a critical feature of the invention. At lower detonation velocities, the hardening is substantially diminished, and the metal sheet invariably tends to adhere to the substrate despite efforts to discourage this, as for example, by the use of a lubricant described above. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the term sonic velocity of the metal referred to in this paragraph has somewhat different meanings in differing circumstances. For example, this term will have a different significance to the physicist when dealing with plastic shock wave phenomena in solids as contrasted with elastic shock wave phenomena. It is the former with which we are concerned for purposes or" the present invention. The term sonic velocity as used throughout this application in connection with metals and metallic compositions refers to the velocity of the plastic shock wave which forms when a stress which is applied just exceeds the elastic limit for unidimensional compression of the particular metal or metallic system involved. The value of this sonic velocity may be obtained by means of the relation.
V:\/K/d where V is the sonic velocity in cm./sec.; K is the adiabatic bulk modulus in dynes/cm. and d is the density in g./crn. Values of K may be obtained from values of Youngs modulus, E and Poissons ratio, 1/ by means of the relation Values of d and K or E and 1/ are readily available in the literature (see for example American Institute of Physics Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1957).
Alternatively, the sonic velocity may be ascertained from published values of the velocity of the plastic shock wave as a function of the particle velocity imparted to the metal by the shock wave in the manner described by R. G. McQueen and S. P. Marsh, Journal of Applied Physics 31 (7), 1253 (1960).
In those cases where literature data are unavailable, values of V may be obtained by carrying out shock wave measurements as described by R. G. McQueen and S. P. Marsh (loc. cit.) in the references cited by them. Alternatively, V may be ascertained from the relation where C is the velocity of elastic compressional waves and C is the velocity of elastic shear waves in the metal. The required velocities of the elastic waves may be measured by well-known methods. For illustration purposes, sonic velocity values as used herein for representative metals are set forth in the following table:
Metal: Sonic velocity, m./scc.
Zinc 3000 Copper 4000 Magnesium 4500 Niobium -Q 4500 Austenitic stainless steel 4500 Nickel 4700 Titanium 4800 Iron 4800 Molybdenum 5200 Aluminum 5500 The explosive layer may be initiated by any conventional means, and the positioning of the initiating means on the explosive layer is not critical. Thus, the layer of explosive may be initiated at a corner, in the center, or at any point along an edge. If desired, a line-wave initiator may be used to initiate simultaneously an entire edge of the explosive layer. In the Examples the explosive used was in the form of a coherent, flexible, self-supporting sheet, and this represents a preferred form of explosive for purposes of the present invention inasmuch as uniformity of loading and ease of application are greatly facilitated therewith. However, if desired, the explosive could be applied in a paste or gelled form, or could be in a packaged form suitable for this particular use. The explosive layer may be bonded to the metal sheet prior to the positioning of the metal sheet over the surface to he hardened or simply may be rested on the metal sheet after the metal sheet has been positioned.
No limitations are imposed on the dimensions or nature of the metallic specimen that may be hardened by the described process. Those metals whose ductility is so slight that they fracture after only a 5% or less elongation in tension are, in general, so brittle that they do not lend themselves readily to hardening. Thus, it is with those metals which may be elongated in tension to an extent greater than 5% without fracture that this inventiOn wil find its greatest utility.
Although We have illustrated the use of a steel block as a shock-transmitting support for the specimen, it is to be noted that such is not critical to the invention. Further, although We have exemplified, and for economic reasons generally prefer, steel as the material of the thin metal sheet, other materials, e.g., lead or brass, may be employed. The nature of the composition of the thin metal sheet is not critical; because it functions solely as an impact means its metallurgical properties are of little significance.
Having described our invention fully, we intend to be limited only by the following claims.
We claim:
1. A process for hardening metallic surfaces which comprises positioning a thin, flexible metal sheet parallel to the metal surface to be hardened and adjacent thereto but separated therefrom to provide an air space between said surface and said sheet, placing a layer of a detonating explosive on the exterior surface of said metal sheet, said layer of explosive having a velocity of detonation greater than about of the sonic velocity of the said metals, and initiating said explosive layer, the amount of said explosive being sufiicient to propagate a detonation but insufficient to disintegrate said metal sheet.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the said metallic surface is of a metal which can be elongated in tension to an extent greater than 5% without fracture.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein the said metallic surface is austenitic manganese steel.
4. A process according to claim 3 wherein said metal sheet is a flexible sheet of steel.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said air space is between about 0.010 and 0.025 inch in thickness.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said air space is maintained prior to initiation of said explosive layer by scattering small metallic particles on said surface to be hardened prior to positioning said metal sheet and explosive layer thereover.
7. The process for hardening metallic surfaces which comprises applying a thin coating of petrolatum to the metal surface to be hardened, applying a plurality of small metal particles to said surface having said petrolatum coating, positioning a sheet of resilient metal parallel to said surface and spaced therefrom by said metallic particles a distance of about from 0.010 to 0.025 inch, placing a layer of detonating explosive on the exterior surface of said metal sheet, said layer of explosive having a velocity of detonation greater than about 125% of the sonic velocity of said metal sheet and said metal to be hardened, and initiating said explosive layer, the amount of said explosive being sutficient to propagate a detonation but insufiicient to disintegrate said metal sheet.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,440,601 1/1923 Holran 102-24 2,412,967 12/1946 Church et al. 891.02 2,628,559 2/1953 Jasse 10224 2,667,836 2/1954 Church et a1. 89-1.02 XR 2,703,297 3/1955 MacLcod 184-4 HYLAND BIZOT, Primary Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A PROCESS FOR HARDENING METALLIC SURFACES WHICH COMPRISES POSITIONED A THIN, FLEXIBLE METAL SHEET PARALLEL TO THE METAL SURFACE TO BE HARDENED AND ADJACENT THERETO BUT SEPARATED THEREFROM TO PROVIDE AN AIR SPACE BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND SAID SHEET, PLACING A LAYER OF A DETONATING EXPLOSIVE ON THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF SAID METAL SHEET, SAID LAYER OF EXPLOSIVE HAVING A VELOCITY OF DETONATION GREATER THAN ABOUT 125% OF THE SONIC VELOCITY OF THE SAID METALS, AND INITIATING SAID EXPLOSIVE LAYER, THE AMOUNT OF SAID EXPLOSIVE BEING SUFFICIENT TO PROPAGATE A DETONATION BUT SUFFICIENT TO DISINTEGRATE SAID METAL SHEET.
US306650A 1963-08-14 1963-08-14 Process for hardening metals using explosive means Expired - Lifetime US3218199A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US306650A US3218199A (en) 1963-08-14 1963-08-14 Process for hardening metals using explosive means

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US306650A US3218199A (en) 1963-08-14 1963-08-14 Process for hardening metals using explosive means

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3218199A true US3218199A (en) 1965-11-16

Family

ID=23186237

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US306650A Expired - Lifetime US3218199A (en) 1963-08-14 1963-08-14 Process for hardening metals using explosive means

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3218199A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3624237A (en) * 1968-09-23 1971-11-30 Nitro Nobel Ab Apparatus for bonding together metal sheets by explosive welding
US3726460A (en) * 1971-07-29 1973-04-10 Creative Metals Inc Explosive bonding device
US3850698A (en) * 1972-06-23 1974-11-26 Ind Materials Ltd Altering material properties
US3987529A (en) * 1971-11-01 1976-10-26 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Valve and method for manufacturing the same
US4401477A (en) * 1982-05-17 1983-08-30 Battelle Development Corporation Laser shock processing
US6071357A (en) * 1997-09-26 2000-06-06 Guruswamy; Sivaraman Magnetostrictive composites and process for manufacture by dynamic compaction
WO2016037231A1 (en) * 2014-09-08 2016-03-17 Bradken Resources Pty Limited Explosive hardening of track shoes
US9719158B2 (en) 2014-12-29 2017-08-01 Progress Rail Services Corporation Explosively depth hardened crawler shoes

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1440601A (en) * 1921-01-06 1923-01-02 John R Holran Explosive charge
US2412967A (en) * 1941-04-23 1946-12-24 Joseph H Church Petard missile
US2628559A (en) * 1945-02-06 1953-02-17 Ct D Etudes M B A Soc Explosive drill
US2667836A (en) * 1950-03-28 1954-02-02 Joseph H Church Apparatus for the use of shaped explosive charges
US2703297A (en) * 1951-03-26 1955-03-01 Kelly L Taulbee Method of hardening manganese steel

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1440601A (en) * 1921-01-06 1923-01-02 John R Holran Explosive charge
US2412967A (en) * 1941-04-23 1946-12-24 Joseph H Church Petard missile
US2628559A (en) * 1945-02-06 1953-02-17 Ct D Etudes M B A Soc Explosive drill
US2667836A (en) * 1950-03-28 1954-02-02 Joseph H Church Apparatus for the use of shaped explosive charges
US2703297A (en) * 1951-03-26 1955-03-01 Kelly L Taulbee Method of hardening manganese steel

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3624237A (en) * 1968-09-23 1971-11-30 Nitro Nobel Ab Apparatus for bonding together metal sheets by explosive welding
US3726460A (en) * 1971-07-29 1973-04-10 Creative Metals Inc Explosive bonding device
US3987529A (en) * 1971-11-01 1976-10-26 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Valve and method for manufacturing the same
US3850698A (en) * 1972-06-23 1974-11-26 Ind Materials Ltd Altering material properties
US4401477A (en) * 1982-05-17 1983-08-30 Battelle Development Corporation Laser shock processing
US6071357A (en) * 1997-09-26 2000-06-06 Guruswamy; Sivaraman Magnetostrictive composites and process for manufacture by dynamic compaction
WO2016037231A1 (en) * 2014-09-08 2016-03-17 Bradken Resources Pty Limited Explosive hardening of track shoes
US9719158B2 (en) 2014-12-29 2017-08-01 Progress Rail Services Corporation Explosively depth hardened crawler shoes

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3137937A (en) Explosive bonding
US3218199A (en) Process for hardening metals using explosive means
US3834881A (en) Foamed metal article
EP0324231B1 (en) Improved method of making explosively bonded multi-laminar composite metal plate
US2383511A (en) Method of making same
US5067649A (en) Bonding metal components
JPH01157785A (en) Method of explosive-welding alloy aluminum
US4120439A (en) Method for welding by explosion of powder material on a firm surface
US2818360A (en) Method for the aluminum cladding of ferrous base metal and product thereof
Meyers Shock waves and high-strain-rate phenomena in metals: concepts and applications
US3081498A (en) Explosive method of powder compaction
US3493353A (en) Metal composites with low-melt content bonds
US3238071A (en) Process of treating explosively clad metals
US3282743A (en) Process for relieving residual stresses in metals
Rohde et al. The dynamic yield behavior of annealed and cold-worked Fe-0.17 pct Ti alloy
JPS63166953A (en) Blasting treatment for hot dip galvanized-type steel sheet
Inoue et al. Texture, tensile properties and press formability of Mg-3Al-1Zn/Ti clad sheets produced by roll-bonding
Mamalis et al. A consolidation mechanism for the compaction of copper powder at high pressures
Raghukandan et al. An experimental investigation on the effect of h/D ratio on dynamic form—Cladding of domes
CN212311143U (en) Copper-titanium-aluminum metal explosive welding composite board
Vingsbo et al. On the dislocation density of a fatigued α-iron
SU1052277A1 (en) Method of producing coats
Sanders et al. Correlation of Microstructural Features With Low-Cycle Fatigue and Corrosion Behavior in Aluminum-Zinc-Magnesium Single Crystals
Messerschmidt et al. X‐ray topographic in‐situ observation of slip band propagation in MgO single crystals
AT233913B (en) Process for the production of metal composite bodies