US3163864A - End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles - Google Patents

End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3163864A
US3163864A US242863A US24286362A US3163864A US 3163864 A US3163864 A US 3163864A US 242863 A US242863 A US 242863A US 24286362 A US24286362 A US 24286362A US 3163864 A US3163864 A US 3163864A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
antenna
elements
band
array
impedance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US242863A
Inventor
Greenberg Harry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Channel Master Corp
Original Assignee
Channel Master Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37464784&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US3163864(A) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Channel Master Corp filed Critical Channel Master Corp
Priority to US242863A priority Critical patent/US3163864A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3163864A publication Critical patent/US3163864A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q11/00Electrically-long antennas having dimensions more than twice the shortest operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q11/02Non-resonant antennas, e.g. travelling-wave antenna
    • H01Q11/10Logperiodic antennas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66CCRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/18Control systems or devices
    • B66C13/46Position indicators for suspended loads or for crane elements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21FPROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
    • G21F7/00Shielded cells or rooms
    • G21F7/06Structural combination with remotely-controlled apparatus, e.g. with manipulators
    • G21F7/067Transferring devices within cells or boxes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q5/00Arrangements for simultaneous operation of antennas on two or more different wavebands, e.g. dual-band or multi-band arrangements
    • H01Q5/40Imbricated or interleaved structures; Combined or electromagnetically coupled arrangements, e.g. comprising two or more non-connected fed radiating elements
    • H01Q5/48Combinations of two or more dipole type antennas
    • H01Q5/49Combinations of two or more dipole type antennas with parasitic elements used for purposes other than for dual-band or multi-band, e.g. imbricated Yagi antennas
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q9/00Electrically-short antennas having dimensions not more than twice the operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q9/04Resonant antennas
    • H01Q9/44Resonant antennas with a plurality of divergent straight elements, e.g. V-dipole, X-antenna; with a plurality of elements having mutually inclined substantially straight portions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to antennas for the propagation or reception of electromagnetic energy of radio frequencies and more particularly to such antennas adapted for use in noncontiguous frequency bands such as the high band and the low band portions of the frequencies allocated to VHF television, or in very wide frequency bands, where the ratio of the highestfrequency to the lowest frequency may be 3 or more.
  • a prime requisite for such an antenna is that it has a high degree of signal gathering ability. This ability is commonly referred to in terms of gain, gain being defined as the antennas signal-gathering ability compared to a standard dipole antenna, and usually expressed in decibels (db). Another important requisite is that the antenna be able to discriminate against broadcasts from other than desired directions. This requires that the receptivity pattern have essentially a single major lobe or at most two oppositely directed lobes, of as much sharpness as is practicable or desirable for particular situations.
  • Antennas are inherently frequency selective devices which respond best to a limited range of frequencies and are substantially ineffective outside of this range. While one could provide a separate television antenna for each television channel to be received, this would obviously be impractical. It is, of course, most desirable to have a single antenna for all television channels. Such an an tenna is customarily known as an all-channel antenna. The manner in which television frequencies in the VHF television band have been allocated has rendered it most difficult to provide an efficient all-channel VHF television antenna.
  • VHF television channels While there are only twelve VHF television channels, each six megacycles wide, these channels are not allocated to wholly contiguous frequency ranges, but are divided into a low band extending from 54 megacycles to 88 megacycles and a high band extending from 174 megacycles to 216 megacycles. Thus the highest VHF television frequency of 216 megacycles exceeds the lowest VHF television frequency of 54 megacycles by a factor of four. This band-width has heretofore rendered exceedingly difficult the design of a single all-channel antenna.
  • a television antenna for all VHF television channels is provided which is of remarkable efliciency. This is accomplished by providing a 3,163,864 Patented Dec. 29, 1964 ice front-fed, in-line television antenna with multiple driven elements which effectively covers the low band portion of the VHF television frequencies, operating throughout the low band in a single mode. Features are included which render the antenna elements and the array taken as a whole also effective on the high-band portion of the VHF television range.
  • Suitable operation of the antenna on the high-band is achieved by specially designing the individual element configuration to obtain a good radiation or reception pattern on the high-band channels, and, at the same time, providing a particular impedance relationship between the elements of the array on the high-band which provides a high efficiency for the array as a whole; this is accomplished while maintaining proper low band operation.
  • the basic configuration of the antenna also provides an exceptionally good directivity characteristic and frontto-back-ratio.
  • This ratio is a measure of the ability of the antenna to reject signals from directions opposite to those of the desired signal. This is a particularly important consideration at the present time in fringe areas due to the increased number of television transmitters, and due to the fact that, in fringe areas, transmitters within the range of a particular receiver will usually be located in several different directions.
  • a high degree of directivity and a high front-to-back-ratio is very desirable for eliminating both co-channel and adjacent channel interference.
  • the high front-to-back-ratio of antennas according to the present invention is provided in a substantial part by the transposition-type of connection of the transmission line and the front-fed arrangement of the array, for reasons which will be morefully explained hereinafter.
  • the antennas provided by the present invention in particular represent an improvement over antennas disclosed in US. Patent No. 2,817,085 issued Dec. 17, 1957 to Jerome Schwartz and Yuen Tze Lo, but as will later be explained, some basic theories upon which the antennas of the aforementioned Schwartz et a1. patent are based may be utilized in antennas according to the present 7 invention.
  • a dipole which is one-half wavelength in the lower band will be approximately three-half wavelengths long in the upper band.
  • three-halves wavelength operation results in a clover leaf radiation pattern with a forward null and oriented side lobes. Tilting the arms forward tends to produce a centered forward lobe and eliminate the lobes oriented 4 from center forward.
  • multiple-element end-fire arrays have been suggested, in which the several elements have had different resonant frequencies in order to operate at more than one frequency.
  • Such antennas have had relatively limited band width. While the band width could be increased by addition of further elements, to expand the array enough to cover a frequency range of the order of 300% or more leads to an impracticable array because of the large number of elements which would be required.
  • the present invention has overcome these disadvantages and has solved the problem of providing a dual-band antenna effective on both the high and low band portions of the VHF television frequency allocation or effective over a band width of the order of 4 to 1 or more.
  • the antenna of FIGURE 1 belongs to the broad family of end-fire antenna arrays. An important feature of the present antenna is that it is fed from the front end (i.e. the signal line 18 is coupled there) and transpositions are provided in the interconnecting transmiss on line harness 31 between adjacent antenna elements. It should further be noted that the antenna of FIGURES 1 to 3 is not of the type where the active elements are respectively designed to be individually resonant each at a particular channel or portion of the antenna operating frequency range, but rather, at each frequency range portion or television channel several active elements cooperate to increase signal gathering ability. This cooperation is achieved by caus ing those antenna elements which are active to have individual impedances which are graduated and decrease as one progresses toward the feed point of the antenna array.
  • Antennas according to the present invention with a transposition-type of interconnecting transmission line harness provide an exceptionally good front-to-back-ratio even as compared with previously successful end-fire antenna arrays such as that shown in Schwartz et a1.
  • Patent No. 2,817,085. An intuitive understanding of how the antenna operates to provide superior front-to-back-ratio may be acquired from the following explanation.
  • the antenna will be considered as a transmitting antenna to aid in the explanation. Referring to FIGURE 3, consider a particular signal transmitted to the input terminals 32. This signal will be partially absorbed and radiated by the first antenna element 21 while a portion of the signal will continue along transmission line harness 31 and will then be partially absorbed and radiated by antenna element 22.
  • the wave radiated from antenna element 22 toward the right in FIGURE 3 should arrive at antenna element 21 in phase with the wave radiated from that element.
  • the front-fed, end-fire antenna array with transpositions in the interconnecting transmission line harness between adjacent antenna elements is well adapted to provide an eiiicient VHF television antenna with high front-to-backratio.
  • an antenna would be suitable for use only for a relatively limited band such as the low band of VHF television broadcasting.
  • a desired impedance relationship between the various antenna active elements on both bands may be achieved by determine tion of two parameters, for at least some of the elements, one of which desirably is the length of the antenna element.
  • a capacitor is inserted in series with each arm of certain antenna elements at their inboard ends. The capacitance value of each capacitor is chosen in relation to the element length, to determine the impedance value of its associated antenna element so as to obtain a desired '7 relationship between the various elementsfor operation in both bands.
  • a desirable 'Way to design the antenna is to first select element lengths suitable for high band operation.
  • FIGURES 6 and 7 an alternative embodiment of the invention is illustrated utilizing substantially straight rather than the V-shaped dipole elements, with each straight dipole having a relatively close-spaced short, parasitic element in front of it.
  • the antenna of FIGURES 6 and 7 is otherwise generally similar to the embodiment of FIGURES 1 to 3.
  • the antenna array 44 has a supporting mast 46 and a horizontal boom 48.
  • a signal transmission line 50 is provided to connect the antenna array to a utilization device such as a television receiver.
  • the array 44 has ten active elements 51 to 69 of progressively varying length, each, comprising substantially co-linear arms 51:: and 5115 through 63a and 60b, inclusive.
  • the active elements 51 to 69 are interconnected by an interconnecting transmission line harness 61 in a fashion similar to that shown in FIGURES l to 3.
  • Insulating supports 510 to see are provided for securing the arms of the antenna elements in insulated relation to the boom 48 and to each other.
  • Each of the dipoles 51 to so is provided with a respective close-spaced short parasitic element 51d to 60d, on the front side of the dipole.
  • the short parasitic elements 510' to 60d do not substantially affect the operation of the dipoles 51 to 69 on the low-band frequencies; hence the lengths of the dipole arms can be selected as appropriate for low-band operation, and to the extent that the operation is affected compensation can be made by slightly altering the lengths of the dipole arms.
  • the parasitic elements 51d to 69:] are effective at high-band frequencies to provide a sharp directivity pattern for the active elements and hence for the array as a whole.
  • the length of each parasitic element 51a to 69d and its spacing from its respective dipole can be individually selected in order that the im pedance of the dipole-parasite combination on the hig band can be determined substantially independently of the dipole impedance at lov -band frequencies.
  • the close-spaced parasites of the embodiment of FIGURES 6 and 7 provide an independent parameter for determination of impedance at high-band frequencies in a manner comparable to that of the capacitors in the embodiment of the antenna array illustrated in FIGURES 1 to 3.
  • the antenna array 44 is provided with parasitic director elements 62, 53 and 54.
  • Parasitic elements 62 and 64 are of the dual-band type and comprise, respectively, conductive segments 62a, 62b, 62c and conductive segments 64a, 64b and 64c.
  • Insulating junctions 62d and 62e are provided for parasitic element 62 and corresponding insulating junctions 64d and 64@ are provided for parasitic element 64, so that the segments 62a, 62b, 52c are insulated from one another, asare segments 64a, 64b, 64c.
  • Director 63 is a unitary low-band director.
  • the parasites 62, 63, and 64 operate in a substantially conventional manner to increase the directivity and gain of the antenna array, both at high-band and low-b and frequencies.
  • other forms of parasite may be used.
  • the present invention is of course not limited to use with the forms of active elements shown with respect to the above described embodiments of the invention.
  • Other types of element and of impedance adjusting means may be employed, suitable to derive the impedancerelations described herein below in. gerater detail.
  • an array of simple straight dipoles can be utilized, graduated in length as in FIGS. 6 and 7, or an array of V-dipoles as in FIGURE 1 but at least some utilizing an individual tuning stub or impedance element at its terminals, to determine its desired impedance value.
  • any combination of various types of elements may be utilized, for example longer elements may be of the V-type while shorter elements are straight, the shorter elements having close-spaced parasites or not as preferred.
  • An important aspect of the invention resides in the imthe capacitors in the embodiment of FIGURES 1 to 3 or by the characteristics of'the close-spaced short parasitic elements in the embodiment of FIGURES 6 and 7, or by other means.
  • FIGURE 5 A schematic diagram of an antenna vention is shown in FIGURE 5 wherein each of the antenna elements 21 to 30 has been replaced by its impedance at a particular frequency represented by boxes labeled Z to Z
  • a television signal for example a signal of channel 2 frequency is supplied to the input terminals 32.
  • impedance Z is very small invalue compared to the impedance value looking along the terminals of impedance 31 will be substantially ineffective. not be an advantageous for the other successive p e 10)- On the other arrangement.
  • impedances except the last imwith greater relative absorption for those effective antenna 7 elements which are farther from the feed point 32.
  • FIGURES 8 to 11 are Smith chart impedance diagrams of certain antenna elements for the extremes of the high and low bands, such as VHF television channels 2, 6, 7 and 13, which illustrate this impedance relationship.
  • antenna element complex impedances are plotted on the well known Smith chart curved coordinate system.
  • the impedances plotted are those which would be measured for the particular active antenna element individually and apart from the array as a whole.
  • the impedance plotted is that relative to the transmission line harness characteristic impedance, that is, it is the normalized impedance.
  • the transmission line will be considered to be terminated in a matched load for simplicity. Although this is not actually the case the assumption is believed justified in pre senting a simple explanation of the basic principles involved.
  • impedance coordinates are given by the dashed-line curves in FIGURES 8 to 11, the resistance component of normalized impedance being plotted on the closed circular dashed-line curves 81, and the reactance component being plotted on the dashed-line curves 83 converging toward the right as indicated by the legends.
  • the complex impedances of three antenna elements have been plotted in each figure. The values plotted actually represent those of the embodiment of the antenna shown inFIGURES 6 and 7, but generally similar values would be found for other embodiments of the invention also. Accordingly the points labeled Element No. 1 and Element No. it? in FIGURES 8 to 11 may be considered to represent the complex impedances of either elements 21 and 30 of the antenna shown in FIGURES l to 3 or of elements 51 and 66 of the antenna shown in FIGURES 6 and 7. Intermediate points represent respect've intermediate elements.
  • the solid-line closed circular curves 85 in FIGURES 8 to 11 are the loci of impedance values for which the percentage of impinging power absorbed by an antenna element would have the value as indicated (i.e. 67%, 50%, 33% or Considering first FIGURE 8, showing the impedance relations of the antenna array for channel 2, it will be noted that the power absorbed by various antenna elements is greatest for element No. 16 farthest from the antenna feed point and generally decreases for elements nearer the feed point.
  • One of the features of the present invention is that for certain channels some of the antenna elements are effective, while for different channels another group of elements is effective. These various groups which are effective on various channels will generally overlap. In considering which elements are effective at any channel, it should be noted that there are a relatively large number of elements illustratively ten. If all were equally effective, each would have the same induced current as the others, and each would contribute 10% of the total. However, this condition is a theoretical one which could only exist at a single channel, and in fact does not exist on any channel, due to the necessity of design compromise to assure useful action on all channels. In actual practice, the currents in the various elements vary widely from element to element and from channel to channel. If the maximum current for all elements at a single frequency is considered unity, then any element whose current is less in A that maximum contributes so little to operation However,
  • FIG. 8 the points 101a and 101b. have been indicated respectively with crossed circles and open circles to indicate the elements of the antenna which are essentially effective at channel 2.
  • FIGURE 9 shows the impedance relationships at channel 6, near the high end of the low-frequency band, at which a small portion of the antenna elements are predominantly effective as indicated by the relatively fewer crossed circle points 102a. It will be noted for example that for this channel elements 5 through It are relatively ineffective. For the shorter forward' antenna elements 1 to 4, however, which are effective, the relationship of greater power absorption for elements farther from the antenna feed point prevails as in the case of channel 2.
  • the impedance relationships thus far indicated for lowband frequencies can be achieved simply by selection of the length of the active antenna elements. It may be noted that while there are some similarities between the basis of the operation of the antenna and that of antennas disclosed in Schwartz et al. Patent No. 2,817,085 mentioned above, there are also marked dissimilarities between the present antenna and those disclosed in the previous patent. For example, in the present antenna the impedances of the effective elements are highest nearest the front, while in the prior patented antenna, they are highest nearest the rear. Also, the present transmission line harness is transposed instead of straight, and those antenna elements primarily operational at any particular frequency are predominantly capacitively reactive rather than being inductively reactive as were the elements in the antennas disclosed in that patent.
  • the individual antenna element impedances at the high band have also been determined so that the predominantly effective elements at each frequency are arranged in order of' increasing percentage of absorption toward the rear of the antenna as shown by points 103a, 103b, 104a and 19415. Particularly those elements near the antenna feed point have the desired absorption relation; this is important to prevent the middle and rear elements from being ineffective.
  • FIGURES 8 to 11 Another advantageous aspect of antennas according to the present invention is illustrated in FIGURES 8 to 11. Dot-dash curved lines 105, 106 are drawn showing normalized impedance values at which the percentage of energy reflected at the antenna element-transmission line junction would be 35% and 12% respectively.
  • the dimensions ofrepresentative samples of the This feature of the antenna pro- Table I.FIG. 1 Form Spacing From Foward Capacity Elem. No. Length, Rear Tilt Value, inches Adjac. Angle, m.m.f. Elem. degree inches 37 12 38% 12 3O 40% 12 30 42% 12 30 44 12 30 45% 12 30 47% 12 3O 49 12 30 50% 12' 3O 52 30 Element diameter-%. Element terminals-3 inch spacing. Harness wire-%" diameter.
  • FIG. 7 Form Spacing Length, From Rear Elem. N 0. inches djac.
  • Antennas according to the present invention may also be varied or modified by changing the type of interconnecting transmission line toother than an air-dielectric two-wire transmission line or by varying the physical dimensions such as spacing between elements, element lengths, transmission line wire spacing and the like so long as the electrical characteristics conform to those described and claimed as within the scope of the invention.
  • parasitic elements could be added to the embodiment shown in FIGURES l to 3 or that different parasitic elements could be utilized in conjunction with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURES 6 and 7, or alternatively the parasitic elements could be dispensed with. Further active elements could also be added, for example in front of the feed point, and such elements need not utilize a transposed transmission line harness.
  • a directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end and comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna'elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic-of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group.
  • a directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active V-shaped dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said ⁇ /.-shaped antenna elements individually having frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group.
  • A'dircctive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from itsfront end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common 13 substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising an air dielectric transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group and having a length between said active elements substantially equal to the physical spacing therebetween.
  • a directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, the electrical length of the longest dipole element of said array being not greater than approximately twice that of the shortest dipole element of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last saidmeans comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group. 7

Description

Dec. 29, 1964 H. GREENBERG 3,163,864
END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY OF VSHAPED MULTI-BAND DIPOLES Original Filed Oct. 19, 1960 4 Sheets-Sheet 1 20m 274,. 284 27 ,6 6" 29c 16 w C Z? Z6 256 INVENTOR.
Dec. 29, 1964 H. GREENBERG 3,163,364
END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY CF V-SHAPED MULTI-BAND DIPOLES ori inal Filed Oct. 19,1960 4 Sheets-Sheet 2 fig. '3..-
5/ L a 0 0 Q 4v 4 3/ A Z2 23 24 Z! 2 1 1 1-"- Mew finer/1mm Dec. 29, 1964 H. GREENBERG 3,163,864
END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY OF V-SHAPED MULTI-BAND DIPOLES Original Filed Oct. 19, 1960 4 Sheets-Sheet 5 INVENTOR.
Dec. 29, 1964 H. GREENBERG 3,163,864
END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY OF V-SHAPED MULTI-BAND DIPOLES Original Filed Oct. 19, 19 60 4 Sheets-Sheet ,4
Tia. 5.
we Em to mmvron. #4,? deftwflfid United States Patent New York @riginal application 0st. 19, 1969, Ser. No. 63,520, new Patent No. 3,h$6,2tl6, dated April 16, 1963. Divided and this application (let. 3% 1962, Ser. No. 242,863
4- Claims. (Cl. $43-$09) This is a division of application Serial No. 63,520, filed October 19, 1960 which issued as Patent No. 3,086,206, dated A ril 16, 1963. An application for reissue filed November 21, 1963, Serial No. 334,069 has reissued as Patent No. Re. 25,604, dated June 16, 1964.
The present invention relates to antennas for the propagation or reception of electromagnetic energy of radio frequencies and more particularly to such antennas adapted for use in noncontiguous frequency bands such as the high band and the low band portions of the frequencies allocated to VHF television, or in very wide frequency bands, where the ratio of the highestfrequency to the lowest frequency may be 3 or more.
The wide-spread use of television receivers has brought about a demand for highly developed television receiving antennas, particularly for use in areas far removed from transmitters from which it is desied to receive television broadcasts. Antennas for these remote areas are customarily called fringe-area antennas. A prime requisite for such an antenna is that it has a high degree of signal gathering ability. This ability is commonly referred to in terms of gain, gain being defined as the antennas signal-gathering ability compared to a standard dipole antenna, and usually expressed in decibels (db). Another important requisite is that the antenna be able to discriminate against broadcasts from other than desired directions. This requires that the receptivity pattern have essentially a single major lobe or at most two oppositely directed lobes, of as much sharpness as is practicable or desirable for particular situations.
Antennas are inherently frequency selective devices which respond best to a limited range of frequencies and are substantially ineffective outside of this range. While one could provide a separate television antenna for each television channel to be received, this would obviously be impractical. It is, of course, most desirable to have a single antenna for all television channels. Such an an tenna is customarily known as an all-channel antenna. The manner in which television frequencies in the VHF television band have been allocated has rendered it most difficult to provide an efficient all-channel VHF television antenna.
While there are only twelve VHF television channels, each six megacycles wide, these channels are not allocated to wholly contiguous frequency ranges, but are divided into a low band extending from 54 megacycles to 88 megacycles and a high band extending from 174 megacycles to 216 megacycles. Thus the highest VHF television frequency of 216 megacycles exceeds the lowest VHF television frequency of 54 megacycles by a factor of four. This band-width has heretofore rendered exceedingly difficult the design of a single all-channel antenna.
By the present invention a television antenna for all VHF television channels is provided which is of remarkable efliciency. This is accomplished by providing a 3,163,864 Patented Dec. 29, 1964 ice front-fed, in-line television antenna with multiple driven elements which effectively covers the low band portion of the VHF television frequencies, operating throughout the low band in a single mode. Features are included which render the antenna elements and the array taken as a whole also effective on the high-band portion of the VHF television range.
Suitable operation of the antenna on the high-band is achieved by specially designing the individual element configuration to obtain a good radiation or reception pattern on the high-band channels, and, at the same time, providing a particular impedance relationship between the elements of the array on the high-band which provides a high efficiency for the array as a whole; this is accomplished while maintaining proper low band operation.
The basic configuration of the antenna also provides an exceptionally good directivity characteristic and frontto-back-ratio. This ratio is a measure of the ability of the antenna to reject signals from directions opposite to those of the desired signal. This is a particularly important consideration at the present time in fringe areas due to the increased number of television transmitters, and due to the fact that, in fringe areas, transmitters within the range of a particular receiver will usually be located in several different directions. Thus a high degree of directivity and a high front-to-back-ratio is very desirable for eliminating both co-channel and adjacent channel interference. The high front-to-back-ratio of antennas according to the present invention is provided in a substantial part by the transposition-type of connection of the transmission line and the front-fed arrangement of the array, for reasons which will be morefully explained hereinafter.
The antennas provided by the present invention in particular represent an improvement over antennas disclosed in US. Patent No. 2,817,085 issued Dec. 17, 1957 to Jerome Schwartz and Yuen Tze Lo, but as will later be explained, some basic theories upon which the antennas of the aforementioned Schwartz et a1. patent are based may be utilized in antennas according to the present 7 invention.
In addition to providing the advantages and features described above, it is an object of the present invention to provide a high-gain television antenna having multiple in-line active elements, which antenna is effective on two separated frequency bands, and particularly where such two bands bear approximately a harmonic relationship.
It is another object of the present invention toprovide a television antenna having several in-line active dipole elements fed from the front of the array by a transmission line.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an antenna of the foregoing type wherein the absorption of energy by the individual elements is successively greater in a direction away from the feed point or front of the antenna for two or more of the elements at all frequencies within the operating frequency range of the antenna. i
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an antenna of the foregoing type wherein the transmission line connecting the antenna elements has a transposition between each antenna' element and its succeeding element.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a television antenna of the foregoing type wherein the antenna elements are caused to have a good foughly three times the frequencies of the other half of the television channels. It has been found that the response curve of a dipole antenna as a function of frequency for dual-band VHF television signals can be improved by tilting the arms of the dipole forward by an angle of approximately to degrees, leaving a subtended angle of 120 to 100 degrees between the arms.
A dipole which is one-half wavelength in the lower band will be approximately three-half wavelengths long in the upper band. A dipole as is shown in FIG. 4 with dashed lines 37 indicating current distribution for low band signals and dotted lines 33 indicating current distribution for high-band signals. In a straight dipole, three-halves wavelength operation results in a clover leaf radiation pattern with a forward null and oriented side lobes. Tilting the arms forward tends to produce a centered forward lobe and eliminate the lobes oriented 4 from center forward.
Previously, multiple-element end-fire arrays have been suggested, in which the several elements have had different resonant frequencies in order to operate at more than one frequency. Such antennas have had relatively limited band width. While the band width could be increased by addition of further elements, to expand the array enough to cover a frequency range of the order of 300% or more leads to an impracticable array because of the large number of elements which would be required.
Similarly, while individual dual-band antenna elements such as V-dipoles have been known, it is not generally possible to convert a multi-element single-band antenna array to a dual-band antenna array simply by substituting dualband elements for the elements in the multi-element single-band array; this is believed to be caused by the erratic impedance relations which then exist among the various elements, particularly at high-band frequencies, and to the effects of higher-mode operation at such frequencies, which normally cause degraded reception patterns and gain.
The present invention has overcome these disadvantages and has solved the problem of providing a dual-band antenna effective on both the high and low band portions of the VHF television frequency allocation or effective over a band width of the order of 4 to 1 or more.
The antenna of FIGURE 1 belongs to the broad family of end-fire antenna arrays. An important feature of the present antenna is that it is fed from the front end (i.e. the signal line 18 is coupled there) and transpositions are provided in the interconnecting transmiss on line harness 31 between adjacent antenna elements. It should further be noted that the antenna of FIGURES 1 to 3 is not of the type where the active elements are respectively designed to be individually resonant each at a particular channel or portion of the antenna operating frequency range, but rather, at each frequency range portion or television channel several active elements cooperate to increase signal gathering ability. This cooperation is achieved by caus ing those antenna elements which are active to have individual impedances which are graduated and decrease as one progresses toward the feed point of the antenna array.
Antennas according to the present invention with a transposition-type of interconnecting transmission line harness provide an exceptionally good front-to-back-ratio even as compared with previously successful end-fire antenna arrays such as that shown in Schwartz et a1. Patent No. 2,817,085. An intuitive understanding of how the antenna operates to provide superior front-to-back-ratio may be acquired from the following explanation. The antenna will be considered as a transmitting antenna to aid in the explanation. Referring to FIGURE 3, consider a particular signal transmitted to the input terminals 32. This signal will be partially absorbed and radiated by the first antenna element 21 while a portion of the signal will continue along transmission line harness 31 and will then be partially absorbed and radiated by antenna element 22. Obviously it is desirable that the wave radiated from antenna element 22 toward the right in FIGURE 3 should arrive at antenna element 21 in phase with the wave radiated from that element. Three major factors affect this relationship: the length of transmission line harness 31 between the two active elements, the free space distance between the two elements, and the phase shift imparted by the transposition in transmission line harness 31. The first two of these factors can readily be adjusted so that the total phase shift is 360 and so that the waves radiated to the right by antenna elements 21 and 22 are respectively in phase at each point along direction 19. Similar considerations would apply to the remaining pairs of elements.
To achieve a high front-to-back-ratio it is conversely desirable that little or no energy be radiated to the left in FIGURE 3. This will be accomplished if the radiation from the various elements is approximately equal and the radiation from adjacent elements is substantially 180 out of space phase, since the velocity of propagation in transmission line harness 31 is equal to the free space velocity of propagation and the length of transmission line harness 31 is substantially equal to the spacing between adjacent elements 21 and 22. In such a case, the phase delay of the wave from element 21 to any point differs 180 from that of element 22 due to the phase shift in the transposed transmission line of length equal to the element spacing. It is also noteworthy that the antiphase condition for adjacent elements for backward propagation obtains substantially without regard to frequency, which provides the good front-to-back-ratio for all elements. In view of the inherently high front-to-back-ratio of the antenna array according to the present in 'ention, it may not be necessary to provide a parasitic reflector element, and in fact, no such element is required in the antenna of FIGURES l3.
From the forgoing explanation, it will be seen that the front-fed, end-fire antenna array with transpositions in the interconnecting transmission line harness between adjacent antenna elements is well adapted to provide an eiiicient VHF television antenna with high front-to-backratio. However, without special provision according to other features and aspects of the present invention, such an antenna would be suitable for use only for a relatively limited band such as the low band of VHF television broadcasting.
It might be thought that such a single-band antenna could be readily adapted for duel-band operation for both the high and low bands of the VHF television fre quency allocations, merely by replacing each simple element with a dual-band element. However, the complexity of the interactions of the elements under the widely differing frequencies encountered in such an antenna places numerous difficultties in the way of extending the operation of such an antenna to dual-band operation. Important impedance relationships which may exist in the low band,'would not automatically exist in the high band, where each active dipole element operates in a harmonic mode and hence at a different region of its impedance characteristic. By the present invention it has been made possible to utilize a front-bed end-fire antenna array on the low band as Well as the high band, by use of features providing proper impedance relationships both on the high band and on the low band.
In accordance with the present invention, a desired impedance relationship between the various antenna active elements on both bands may be achieved by determine tion of two parameters, for at least some of the elements, one of which desirably is the length of the antenna element. In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIGURES l-3, utilizing V-type dual-band antenna elements, a capacitor is inserted in series with each arm of certain antenna elements at their inboard ends. The capacitance value of each capacitor is chosen in relation to the element length, to determine the impedance value of its associated antenna element so as to obtain a desired '7 relationship between the various elementsfor operation in both bands. A desirable 'Way to design the antenna is to first select element lengths suitable for high band operation. Then, since the ellect produced by the capacitors is relatively sma l for the highband frequencies, either the selected length will remain unchanged, or a compensating adjustment can be made in the length of the dipole arms to completely off-set the effect ofthe capacitor at high-band frequencies.
Other means can be utilized to provide the desired mpedance relationship in both bands. In FIGURES 6 and 7 for example, an alternative embodiment of the invention is illustrated utilizing substantially straight rather than the V-shaped dipole elements, with each straight dipole having a relatively close-spaced short, parasitic element in front of it.
The antenna of FIGURES 6 and 7 is otherwise generally similar to the embodiment of FIGURES 1 to 3. The antenna array 44 has a supporting mast 46 and a horizontal boom 48. A signal transmission line 50 is provided to connect the antenna array to a utilization device such as a television receiver.
The array 44 has ten active elements 51 to 69 of progressively varying length, each, comprising substantially co-linear arms 51:: and 5115 through 63a and 60b, inclusive. The active elements 51 to 69 are interconnected by an interconnecting transmission line harness 61 in a fashion similar to that shown in FIGURES l to 3. Insulating supports 510 to see are provided for securing the arms of the antenna elements in insulated relation to the boom 48 and to each other. Each of the dipoles 51 to so is provided with a respective close-spaced short parasitic element 51d to 60d, on the front side of the dipole.
The short parasitic elements 510' to 60d do not substantially affect the operation of the dipoles 51 to 69 on the low-band frequencies; hence the lengths of the dipole arms can be selected as appropriate for low-band operation, and to the extent that the operation is affected compensation can be made by slightly altering the lengths of the dipole arms. The parasitic elements 51d to 69:] are effective at high-band frequencies to provide a sharp directivity pattern for the active elements and hence for the array as a whole. In addition the length of each parasitic element 51a to 69d and its spacing from its respective dipole can be individually selected in order that the im pedance of the dipole-parasite combination on the hig band can be determined substantially independently of the dipole impedance at lov -band frequencies. Thus the close-spaced parasites of the embodiment of FIGURES 6 and 7 provide an independent parameter for determination of impedance at high-band frequencies in a manner comparable to that of the capacitors in the embodiment of the antenna array illustrated in FIGURES 1 to 3.
Although they are not essential to the operation of the antenna arnay, the antenna array 44 is provided with parasitic director elements 62, 53 and 54. Parasitic elements 62 and 64 are of the dual-band type and comprise, respectively, conductive segments 62a, 62b, 62c and conductive segments 64a, 64b and 64c. Insulating junctions 62d and 62e are provided for parasitic element 62 and corresponding insulating junctions 64d and 64@ are provided for parasitic element 64, so that the segments 62a, 62b, 52c are insulated from one another, asare segments 64a, 64b, 64c. Director 63 is a unitary low-band director. The parasites 62, 63, and 64 operate in a substantially conventional manner to increase the directivity and gain of the antenna array, both at high-band and low-b and frequencies. Optionally, other forms of parasite may be used.
The present invention is of course not limited to use with the forms of active elements shown with respect to the above described embodiments of the invention. Other types of element and of impedance adjusting means may be employed, suitable to derive the impedancerelations described herein below in. gerater detail. By way of example, an array of simple straight dipoles can be utilized, graduated in length as in FIGS. 6 and 7, or an array of V-dipoles as in FIGURE 1 but at least some utilizing an individual tuning stub or impedance element at its terminals, to determine its desired impedance value.
Alternatively any combination of various types of elements may be utilized, for example longer elements may be of the V-type while shorter elements are straight, the shorter elements having close-spaced parasites or not as preferred.
An important aspect of the invention resides in the imthe capacitors in the embodiment of FIGURES 1 to 3 or by the characteristics of'the close-spaced short parasitic elements in the embodiment of FIGURES 6 and 7, or by other means.
This impedance relationship which contributes substantially to the efficiency of the antenna may be understood by reference to FIGURE 5 and FIGURES 8-11. A schematic diagram of an antenna vention is shown in FIGURE 5 wherein each of the antenna elements 21 to 30 has been replaced by its impedance at a particular frequency represented by boxes labeled Z to Z Returning to the technique of considering the antenna as a transmitting antenna, assume that a television signal, for example a signal of channel 2 frequency is supplied to the input terminals 32. impedance Z is very small invalue compared to the impedance value looking along the terminals of impedance 31 will be substantially ineffective. not be an advantageous for the other successive p e 10)- On the other arrangement. The same is true impedances (except the last imwith greater relative absorption for those effective antenna 7 elements which are farther from the feed point 32.
According to the invention this relationship of relartive absorption of power from the transmission line is according to the in-.
This, obviously, would,
maintained for at least several of the antenna elements at all frequencies within the antenna operating frequency range. This can be accomplished throughout the low band by proper selection of element length and is accomplished also in the high band by provision of additional means for independently determining the antenna element impedance on the high band. The opposite technique of selecting high band impedances by element length and low band impedances otherwise might alternatively be used.
FIGURES 8 to 11 are Smith chart impedance diagrams of certain antenna elements for the extremes of the high and low bands, such as VHF television channels 2, 6, 7 and 13, which illustrate this impedance relationship.
In FIGURES 8 to 11, antenna element complex impedances are plotted on the well known Smith chart curved coordinate system. The impedances plotted are those which would be measured for the particular active antenna element individually and apart from the array as a whole. The impedance plotted is that relative to the transmission line harness characteristic impedance, that is, it is the normalized impedance. In the analysis presented in connection with FIGURES 8 to 11, the transmission line will be considered to be terminated in a matched load for simplicity. Although this is not actually the case the assumption is believed justified in pre senting a simple explanation of the basic principles involved.
impedance coordinates are given by the dashed-line curves in FIGURES 8 to 11, the resistance component of normalized impedance being plotted on the closed circular dashed-line curves 81, and the reactance component being plotted on the dashed-line curves 83 converging toward the right as indicated by the legends. The complex impedances of three antenna elements have been plotted in each figure. The values plotted actually represent those of the embodiment of the antenna shown inFIGURES 6 and 7, but generally similar values would be found for other embodiments of the invention also. Accordingly the points labeled Element No. 1 and Element No. it? in FIGURES 8 to 11 may be considered to represent the complex impedances of either elements 21 and 30 of the antenna shown in FIGURES l to 3 or of elements 51 and 66 of the antenna shown in FIGURES 6 and 7. Intermediate points represent respect've intermediate elements.
The solid-line closed circular curves 85 in FIGURES 8 to 11 are the loci of impedance values for which the percentage of impinging power absorbed by an antenna element would have the value as indicated (i.e. 67%, 50%, 33% or Considering first FIGURE 8, showing the impedance relations of the antenna array for channel 2, it will be noted that the power absorbed by various antenna elements is greatest for element No. 16 farthest from the antenna feed point and generally decreases for elements nearer the feed point.
One of the features of the present invention is that for certain channels some of the antenna elements are effective, while for different channels another group of elements is effective. These various groups which are effective on various channels will generally overlap. In considering which elements are effective at any channel, it should be noted that there are a relatively large number of elements illustratively ten. If all were equally effective, each would have the same induced current as the others, and each would contribute 10% of the total. However, this condition is a theoretical one which could only exist at a single channel, and in fact does not exist on any channel, due to the necessity of design compromise to assure useful action on all channels. In actual practice, the currents in the various elements vary widely from element to element and from channel to channel. If the maximum current for all elements at a single frequency is considered unity, then any element whose current is less in A that maximum contributes so little to operation However,
than at that channel as to be relatively ineffective. at another channel, such an ineifective element may be highly effective. In FIG. 8, the points 101a and 101b. have been indicated respectively with crossed circles and open circles to indicate the elements of the antenna which are essentially effective at channel 2.
Referring now to FIGURE 9, this figure shows the impedance relationships at channel 6, near the high end of the low-frequency band, at which a small portion of the antenna elements are predominantly effective as indicated by the relatively fewer crossed circle points 102a. It will be noted for example that for this channel elements 5 through It are relatively ineffective. For the shorter forward' antenna elements 1 to 4, however, which are effective, the relationship of greater power absorption for elements farther from the antenna feed point prevails as in the case of channel 2.
The impedance relationships thus far indicated for lowband frequencies can be achieved simply by selection of the length of the active antenna elements. It may be noted that while there are some similarities between the basis of the operation of the antenna and that of antennas disclosed in Schwartz et al. Patent No. 2,817,085 mentioned above, there are also marked dissimilarities between the present antenna and those disclosed in the previous patent. For example, in the present antenna the impedances of the effective elements are highest nearest the front, while in the prior patented antenna, they are highest nearest the rear. Also, the present transmission line harness is transposed instead of straight, and those antenna elements primarily operational at any particular frequency are predominantly capacitively reactive rather than being inductively reactive as were the elements in the antennas disclosed in that patent.
By reference to FIGURES l0 and 11 relating to channel 7 and channel 13 respectively, it will be seen that the individual antenna element impedances at the high band have also been determined so that the predominantly effective elements at each frequency are arranged in order of' increasing percentage of absorption toward the rear of the antenna as shown by points 103a, 103b, 104a and 19415. Particularly those elements near the antenna feed point have the desired absorption relation; this is important to prevent the middle and rear elements from being ineffective.
Another advantageous aspect of antennas according to the present invention is illustrated in FIGURES 8 to 11. Dot-dash curved lines 105, 106 are drawn showing normalized impedance values at which the percentage of energy reflected at the antenna element-transmission line junction would be 35% and 12% respectively.
In the discussion of the percentage of absorption previously presented, the absorption figures were given only for that power which was not reflected. Obviously to the extent that there is an impedance mismatch at the junction of the transmission line harness and the antenna element some reflection will take place.
From FIGURES 8 to 11 it will be observed that the percentage of reflection is generally less toward the right of the diagram. The antenna performance will obviously be enhanced if the reflection is minimized, and it is particularly important that there be a relatively low value of reflection for these antenna elements closest to the antenna feed point, for as one approaches the antenna feed point a greater proportion of the total power is subject to reflection. It will be observed in FIGURES 8 to 11 that in all cases element No; 1 is well below the 35% reflection value and in most cases it is below the 12% reflection value. vides a good impedance match throughout its operating frequency range and contributes to its superior signal gathering ability.
As illustrations of specific embodiments of the antenna, the dimensions ofrepresentative samples of the This feature of the antenna pro- Table I.FIG. 1 Form Spacing From Foward Capacity Elem. No. Length, Rear Tilt Value, inches Adjac. Angle, m.m.f. Elem. degree inches 37 12 38% 12 3O 40% 12 30 42% 12 30 44 12 30 45% 12 30 47% 12 3O 49 12 30 50% 12' 3O 52 30 Element diameter-%. Element terminals-3 inch spacing. Harness wire-%" diameter.
Table II.FIG. 7 Form Spacing Length, From Rear Elem. N 0. inches djac.
. Elem inches It will be understood that the foregoing illustrations of specific embodiments of antennas are presented by way of example only and are not intended to be limiting. Numerous variations in the actual. construction of the antenna will be apparent to those of skill in the art.: For example, active elements of types different than those illustrated may be utilized. However, it is preferred that the active elements be of the type which operate in higher order modes in at least part of the frequency range. It is also somewhat to be preferred that the active elements be of the .type which operate in a higher order mode in such a manner as to have greater signal gathering ability than the standard half-wave dipole, that is, that they operate as a longer-than-half Wave dipole or as a set of colinear half-wave dipoles, so as to have positive gain. This enhances the high-band efficiency of the dipoles of the antenna arrays disclosed in FIGURES l to 3 and 6 to 7. The positive element gain 'of the elements of the illustrated antennas in the high order made makes them superior to previous high band end-fire antennas and they are accordingly adaptable for use even where no low order mode .(half-wave) operation is contemplated. In such case the antenna parameters may be optimized for solely high band or high order mode operation.
Antennas according to the present invention may also be varied or modified by changing the type of interconnecting transmission line toother than an air-dielectric two-wire transmission line or by varying the physical dimensions such as spacing between elements, element lengths, transmission line wire spacing and the like so long as the electrical characteristics conform to those described and claimed as within the scope of the invention.
It will also be apparent that parasitic elements could be added to the embodiment shown in FIGURES l to 3 or that different parasitic elements could be utilized in conjunction with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURES 6 and 7, or alternatively the parasitic elements could be dispensed with. Further active elements could also be added, for example in front of the feed point, and such elements need not utilize a transposed transmission line harness.
While the present invention has been specifically described with respect to the two-band VHF television broadcasting, the principles of the invention are useful whenever extremely wide frequency ranges are used of the order of 3 to l or more, and is particularly not limited to harmonically related frequency bands.
Numerous other variations will be apparent to those of skill in the art in addition to those described or suggested and it is accordingly desired that the scope of the invention not be restricted to those embodiments shown or suggested but that it shall be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
Certain theories of operation of antennas according to the present invention have been set forth which are believed to be correct, but the scope of the invention is in. no way intended to be limited by the theory of operation described, and the opcrabiiity of the antenna is based upon performance of the actual embodiments presented by way of example and not upon theoretical considerations.
What is claimed is:
1. A directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end and comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna'elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic-of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group.
2. A directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active V-shaped dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said \/.-shaped antenna elements individually having frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group. 1
3. A'dircctive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from itsfront end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common 13 substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last said means comprising an air dielectric transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group and having a length between said active elements substantially equal to the physical spacing therebetween.
4. A directive antenna array having a direction of greater effectiveness extending from its front end comprising a group of at least three adjacent active dipole antenna elements arrayed in file in horizontally, substantially equally spaced relation with corresponding arms of said dipole antenna elements disposed in a common substantially horizontal plane, said elements being of graduated electrical length decreasing toward the front of said array, the electrical length of the longest dipole element of said array being not greater than approximately twice that of the shortest dipole element of said array, said antenna elements each having means for causing said antenna elements individually to have frontward directivity characteristics for at least one odd harmonic of the fundamental antenna element frequency, means for connecting a signal transmission line to the front one of said elements, harness means for electrically connecting each other antenna element of said group to the antenna element forward thereof, the last saidmeans comprising a transmission line harness having a line transposition between each pair of adjacent antenna elements of said group. 7
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,192,532 3/40 Katzin 343-811 2,429,629 10/ 47 Kandoian 343-844 X 2,817,085 12/57 Schwartz et a1 343-804 X 2,964,748 12/ 6O Radford 343908 3,108,280 10/63 Mayes et al 343792.5
FOREIGN PATENTS 4%,473 4/34 Great Britain.
OTHER REFERENCES IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, May 1960, vol. AP-8, No. 3, pages 260267.
HERMAN KARL SAALBACH, Primary Examiner.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3 ,163, 864 December 29, 1964 Harry Greenberg It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
In the heading to the four sheets of drawings, line 2, and in the heading to the printed specification, lines 2 and 3 for "END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY OF V-SHAPED MULTI-BAND DIPOLES" read END FIRE PLANAR ARRAY OF MULTI-BAND DIPOLES ;Y column 6 line 47 for "duel-band" read dual-band line 53, for "difficultties" read difficulties column 7 line 5,
for "highband" read high-band line 8, for "ofthe" read 9 of the column 8, line 2, for Y'gerater" read greater column 11 line 63 for "made" read mode Signed and sealed this 22nd day of June 1965;
(SEAL) Attest:
EDWARD 'J. BRENNER Commissioner of Patents 1

Claims (1)

  1. 2. A DIRECTIVE ANTENNA ARRAY HAVING A DIRECTION OF GREATER EFFECTIVENESSEXTENDING FROM ITS FRONT END COMPRISING A GROUP OF AT LEAST THREE ADJACENT ACTIVE-V-SHAPED DIPOLE ANTENNA ELEMENTS ARRAYED IN FILE IN HORIZONTALLY, SUBSTANTIALLY EQUALLY SPACED RELATION WITH CORRESPONDING ARMS OF SAID DIPOLE ANTENNA ELEMENTS DISPOSED IN A COMMON SUBSTANTIALLY HORIZONTAL PLANE, SAID ELEMENTS BEING OF GRADUATED ELECTRICAL LENGTH DECREASING TOWARD THE FRONT OF SAID ARRAY, AND V-SHAPED ANTENNA ELEMENTS INDIVIDUALLY HAVING FRONTWARD DIRECTIVITY CHARACTERISTICS FOR AT LEAST
US242863A 1960-10-19 1962-10-30 End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles Expired - Lifetime US3163864A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US242863A US3163864A (en) 1960-10-19 1962-10-30 End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US63520A US3086206A (en) 1960-10-19 1960-10-19 End fire planar dipole array with line transposition between dipoles and impedance increase towards feed
US242863A US3163864A (en) 1960-10-19 1962-10-30 End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3163864A true US3163864A (en) 1964-12-29

Family

ID=37464784

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US63520A Expired - Lifetime US3086206A (en) 1960-10-19 1960-10-19 End fire planar dipole array with line transposition between dipoles and impedance increase towards feed
US242863A Expired - Lifetime US3163864A (en) 1960-10-19 1962-10-30 End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles
US33406963 Expired USRE25604E (en) 1960-10-19 1963-11-21 Grfrnrrnr

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US63520A Expired - Lifetime US3086206A (en) 1960-10-19 1960-10-19 End fire planar dipole array with line transposition between dipoles and impedance increase towards feed

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US33406963 Expired USRE25604E (en) 1960-10-19 1963-11-21 Grfrnrrnr

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US3086206A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3267479A (en) * 1964-05-18 1966-08-16 Leonard L Smith Television antenna
US3475759A (en) * 1967-10-10 1969-10-28 Winegard Co Television antenna with built-in cartridge preamplifier
US3683391A (en) * 1970-10-19 1972-08-08 Rca Corp Antenna system for television reception within both the uhf and vhf television band of frequencies
US20140232605A1 (en) * 2013-02-15 2014-08-21 Agency For Defense Development Log-periodic dipole array antenna and smart skin having the same

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL276499A (en) * 1961-03-29
US3257661A (en) * 1962-04-11 1966-06-21 Robert L Tanner Log-periodic antenna
US3277491A (en) * 1963-10-11 1966-10-04 Channel Master Corp Multiband television antenna with multiband parasites
US3259904A (en) * 1963-11-21 1966-07-05 Blonder Tongue Elect Antenna having combined support and lead-in
US3286268A (en) * 1964-01-02 1966-11-15 Sylvania Electric Prod Log periodic antenna with parasitic elements interspersed in log periodic manner
US3276028A (en) * 1964-02-18 1966-09-27 Jfd Electronics Corp High gain backfire antenna array
US3454950A (en) * 1964-12-01 1969-07-08 Jfd Electronics Corp Multiple mode operational antennas employing reactive elements
US3471859A (en) * 1965-09-30 1969-10-07 Sylvan Simons Increased gain broad-band television antenna
US3466655A (en) * 1966-01-27 1969-09-09 Jfd Electronics Corp Log periodic dipole array with dual band directors
US3321764A (en) * 1966-08-26 1967-05-23 Winegard Co Television antenna
US3453375A (en) * 1966-11-22 1969-07-01 Amp Inc Terminal for assembling antennas
US3440658A (en) * 1967-04-17 1969-04-22 Richard D Bogner Dual band coplanar dipole array with disc type director
US3534369A (en) * 1967-04-20 1970-10-13 Jerrold Electronics Corp Multiband tv-fm antenna
US3530484A (en) * 1968-05-06 1970-09-22 Sylvania Electric Prod Broadband log periodic antenna with phase reversing parasitic elements
US3618103A (en) * 1969-10-24 1971-11-02 Antennacraft Co Plural antennas with impedance matching to couple to single leadin
US6677913B2 (en) * 2001-06-19 2004-01-13 The Regents Of The University Of California Log-periodic antenna
US8054237B2 (en) * 2009-05-28 2011-11-08 Winegard Company Compact high definition digital television antenna
US10594044B1 (en) 2019-03-07 2020-03-17 Jon C. Taenzer Wide-direction antenna

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB408473A (en) * 1932-06-24 1934-04-12 Nicolaas Koomans Improvements in or relating to uni-laterally directed aerials
US2192532A (en) * 1936-02-03 1940-03-05 Rca Corp Directive antenna
US2429629A (en) * 1942-12-16 1947-10-28 Standard Telephones Cables Ltd Antenna array
US2817085A (en) * 1956-11-14 1957-12-17 Channel Master Corp Broad-band end-fire television antenna
US2964748A (en) * 1958-11-18 1960-12-13 Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co Wide band aerial
US3108280A (en) * 1960-09-30 1963-10-22 Univ Illinois Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2375580A (en) * 1942-06-25 1945-05-08 Rca Corp Directive antenna

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB408473A (en) * 1932-06-24 1934-04-12 Nicolaas Koomans Improvements in or relating to uni-laterally directed aerials
US2192532A (en) * 1936-02-03 1940-03-05 Rca Corp Directive antenna
US2429629A (en) * 1942-12-16 1947-10-28 Standard Telephones Cables Ltd Antenna array
US2817085A (en) * 1956-11-14 1957-12-17 Channel Master Corp Broad-band end-fire television antenna
US2964748A (en) * 1958-11-18 1960-12-13 Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co Wide band aerial
US3108280A (en) * 1960-09-30 1963-10-22 Univ Illinois Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3267479A (en) * 1964-05-18 1966-08-16 Leonard L Smith Television antenna
US3475759A (en) * 1967-10-10 1969-10-28 Winegard Co Television antenna with built-in cartridge preamplifier
US3683391A (en) * 1970-10-19 1972-08-08 Rca Corp Antenna system for television reception within both the uhf and vhf television band of frequencies
US20140232605A1 (en) * 2013-02-15 2014-08-21 Agency For Defense Development Log-periodic dipole array antenna and smart skin having the same
US9368874B2 (en) * 2013-02-15 2016-06-14 Agency For Defense Development Log-periodic dipole array antenna and smart skin having the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US3086206A (en) 1963-04-16
USRE25604E (en) 1964-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3163864A (en) End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles
US6133891A (en) Quadrifilar helix antenna
US3721990A (en) Physically small combined loop and dipole all channel television antenna system
US6693600B1 (en) Ultra-broadband antenna achieved by combining a monocone with other antennas
US4063249A (en) Small broadband antenna having polarization sensitive reflector system
US9478871B2 (en) Wideband bow tie antenna
EP3741006B1 (en) A dual directional log-periodic antenna and an antenna arrangement
US3044063A (en) Directional antenna system
US3727230A (en) Antenna having a combined dipole and loop portion
US3696437A (en) Broadside log periodic antenna
US2580798A (en) Broad-band antenna system
US2281429A (en) Antenna
US3761933A (en) Loop antenna with distributed impedance near the terminating gap
USRE23960E (en) lorusso
US5995061A (en) No loss, multi-band, adaptable antenna
US3487415A (en) Combination uhf-vhf television receiving antenna
US2691730A (en) Wide band antenna
US2611868A (en) Broadband helical antenna
US4315264A (en) Circularly polarized antenna with circular arrays of slanted dipoles mounted around a conductive mast
US2112282A (en) Ultrashort wave antenna system
US3218645A (en) Endfire array having vertically and horizontally spaced parasitic arrays
CN107591614B (en) High-gain omnidirectional array antenna
US3277491A (en) Multiband television antenna with multiband parasites
US4250509A (en) Circularly polarized zigzag antenna
US2886813A (en) Directional antenna