Classifications

• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
  • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
  • C22B60/00—Obtaining metals of atomic number 87 or higher, i.e. radioactive metals
  • C22B60/02—Obtaining thorium, uranium, or other actinides
  • C22B60/0204—Obtaining thorium, uranium, or other actinides obtaining uranium
  • C22B60/0213—Obtaining thorium, uranium, or other actinides obtaining uranium by dry processes

Definitions

• Uranium metal is currently produced on a large scale by reduction of UP, with magnesium in a thermite-type reaction. In this process finely divided UR, and a slight stoichiometric excess of magnesium are blended, and the resulting mixture is compacted in a metallic reactor, com monly referred to as a reduction bomb, lined with the reaction by-product magnesium fluoride. The charged reduction bomb is then heated in a furnace to initiate the exothermic reduction reaction. Uranium metal formed in this reaction separates from the lighter by-product slag and collects as a regulus or derby at the bottom of the reactor. After cooling, the reactor is opened, and the uranium regulus is recovered.
• Adhering slag is then removed from the regulus by mechanical chipping, followed by chemical pickling with an acid solution. Further details of speific embodiments of this process may be seen by reference to Uranium Production Technology by C. D. Harrington and A. E. Ruehle, pp. 245293 (1959).
• One of the problems presented in this process is control of the furnace temperature in heating the charged bomb to obtain maximum metal yield and quality.
• Furnace temperatures of about 1100 F. to 1400 F. have been employed, and the particular temperature used for a given operation, e.g., 1320 F. for charges producing 330 pounds uranium, has been selected to provide optimum yield and quality.
• the firing time required to initiate the reaction decreases with increasing furnace temperatures and higher temperatures Woud be advantageous in allowing a higher production rate in this step.
• the metal yield is decreased.
• the maximum temperature that is, 1400 F., both the yield and quality of the metal decrease sharply, probably because of a pre-reaction wherein UF is partially reduced to UF instead of to metal.
• the heat of this pre-reaetion is dissipated before the metalproducing reaction occurs, and the temperature of the reaction mass is not sufficiently high to maintain fluidity long enough to allow adequate separation of the metal and slag. It is desired to eliminate this effect so that higher firing temperatures and, consequently, shorter firing times, may be employed without decreasing the yield or quality of the metal.
• Another object is to provide a method of increasing the firing temperature in the initiation of said reduction process without adversely afifecting metal yield and quality.
• Another object is to provide a method of decreasing the firing time in the initiation of said reduction process.
• Another object is to provide a method of increasing the uranium metal yield and quality in said process.
• the process for preparing uranium metal which comprises charging a refractory-lined reduction bomb with an intimate mixture of UP, and magnesium and heating the charged reactor in a furnace zone maintained at an elevated temperature until the mixture reacts, whereby uranium metal and slag are formed, is improved by providing a small mass of metallic lithium in the interior of said mixture and maintaining the heating zone at a temperature above 1400" F.
• the firing time required for initiation of the reaction is substantially decreased by these measures; the uranium metal yield is increased; and the quality of the uranium regulus is improved.
• lithium additive in the reaction mixture allows the use of high firing temperatures which were previously unsuitable for initiation of this reaction.
• myinvention is not to be understood as limited to a particular theory, it is postulated that the UF -producing pre-reaction previously encountered at these temperatures is eliminated because the metal-producing reduction reaction is initiated by lithium before the pre reaction has time to occur. It is believed that the metalproducing reaction isinitiated as a result of melting of the lithium, the molten lithium providing intimate solid-liquid contact between the reactants. Once initiated the reaction propagates rapidly because of its exothermic nature. The reaction is initiated in the interior of the charge rather than at the heated edge, thus providing a better distribution of reaction heat and enhancing slag-metal separation.
• the effect of lithium in combination with the higher firing temperature is in no way apparent from the previous use of lithium in the reduction of UR, with calcium.
• lithium is added to obtain irnproved metal-slag separation by decreasing the melting ration, while in the present magnesium system only a small mass of lithium, e.g., 35 grams, 'and not enough to appreciably affect slag properties, is required.
• the calcium system with added lithium requires a heat-supplying agent such as iodine to initiate the reaction, while no additive other than lithium is employed in the magnesium system, this function being performed by the lithium itself.
• a firing temperature of at least 1400 F. is critical to the attainment of significant advantages with the lithium additive in the magnesium system.
• the firing time is decreased, e.g., about 30 percent at 1250" F., but metal yield and quality are not significantly changed.
• Temperatures up to about 1700 F. may be employed, but maximum advantage is obtained at about 1400 F. to 1500 F., and a temperature in this range is accordingly preferred.
• the firing time is decreased to about 40 percent of that required under the conditions previously preferred for typical lots of material.
• Metal yield is increased about 1 to,2- percent and the quality of the regulus with respect to slag inclusions and surface roughness is substantially improved.
• Lithium metal is provided in an amount of at least 25 grams, and preferably about 35 grams. No additional benefit is obtained with larger amounts.
• the lithium is amassed at one position within the reactant mixture, since this additive is ineffective in a dispersed state.
• the lithium may be conveniently, applied in the form of a single lump or small pieces or shot, e.g., about inch in diameter, placed together. Finely divided material presents a disadvantage in its difiiculty of handling.
• the lithium mass is positioned within the charge to provide initiation at the desired locus. Placement of the lithium at the edge of the charge is ineffective since the reaction is initiated before the interior of the charge is heated to the extent required for slag-metal separation.
• the optimum position for the lithium may be varied with the size and geometry of the charge and the firing temperature used. For small, experimental-scale reactors, e.g., 7 inches in diameter,.it is preferred to place the lithium in an axial position slightly below the center of the charge. For larger reactors such as the 15-inch-diameter bomb currently used for large-scale production, place ment of the lithium in an intermediate position about one-half the distance between the center and diametral edge of the charge is preferred. An intermediate position is also preferred for the 42-inch-diameter dingot process reactor, wherein the exact location will depend on the number and location of internal heaters in the charge.
• the method of my invention is not limited to a reactant charge of a particular size. This method, however, is particularly applicable to the process wherein a 330-pound uranium-content charge is reacted in a slightly tapered cylindricalvessel 15 inches in diameter and 42 inches high, this process being commonly referred to as the derby process.
• the reaction charge which consists of a finely divided mixture of UF and magnesium, is compacted to form a continuous mass in a metallic container lined with a refractory material, normally magnesium fluoride,and the container is capped and placed in a furnace for firing.
• the lithium additive may also be employed for the 3300-pound uranium charge in the dingot process. In this process furnace firing is supplemented by heating elements placed within the charge.
• the lithium additive and increased firing temperature in combination with reaction conditions previously employed for optmum results.
• a stoichiometric excess of magnesium of about 1 to 6 percent is preferred for maximum yield.
• UF of a particle size within the range of 1 micron to 200 microns and a tap density of 3.8 to 4.2 grams per cubic centimeter is also preferred, as well as a uranyl fluoride content of 0.5 to 2.5 weight percent in the UF
• the apparatus employed for the method of my invention is critical only to the extentthat'the reactant charge is contained in a refractory-lined metallic reactor.
• the preferred firing temperature that is, 1400 F.
• the uraniumcontaining reactor may be handled by previously known methods to recover the uranium regulus.
• the reactor is preferably allowed to cool to a skin temperature of about 200 F. and is then quenched in water.
• the cooled reactor is opened, and the uranium regulus and slag are removed. Adhering slag is removed by mechanical chipping and/or chemical pickling.
• the uranium may then be fabricated by melting and casting to form ingots and working the ingots. V
• EXAMPLE A series of small-scale reduction experiments were conducted to determine the effect of added lithium and increased firing temperature on metal yield and quality.
• a steel reactor 7 inches in diameter and 19 inches high was lined by jolt-packing with magnesiurn fluoride at a thickness of one-half inch. Thereact'or was then charged wtih 46.44 pounds of a blend. of UF and magnesium at a 4 percent stoichiometric excess.
• the composition and properties of the UF in weight percent were as follows: UF 96.4; UO F 1.49; ammonium oxalate insoluble (uranium oxides), 2.02; H O,- 0.0l; tap density, 3.85 gm./cm.
• the blend was packed in the reactor by hand tamping, and the char'ged reactor was capped with magnesium fluoride and sealed with a steel cover.
• the sealed reactor was then placed-in a resistanceheated electric furnace and the furnace was maintained at a temperature of either 1250 F., 1400 F., or 1500 F. until the reduction reaction was initiated.
• the reactor was then removed from the furnace and allowed to cool in air.
• the cooled reactor was opened and the uranium regulus was jolted loose. Adhering slag was then removed to the extent possible by chipping with a hammer.
• the metal yield was calculated from the weightof the regulus.
• the quality of the regulus was des g nated l, 2, or 3, 1 representing the least extent of slag inclusionand surfaceroughness and 3 representing the worst value for these factors. v particularly for 3, or very rough reguluses, removal of. all the slag by chipping was not possibleso that the yleld figures for these derbies are unduly high owing to the weight of the included slag.
• the improvement which comprises providing a small amount of metallic lithium in an amassed state within the interior of said mixture and maintaining said zone at a temperature of at least 1400 F.
• the process for preparing uranium metal which comprises intimately mixing finely divided UF and a slight stoichiometric excess of magnesium, compacting the resulting mixture in a refractory-lined metallic reduction bomb, providing at least about 25 grams lithium metal in an amassed state within the interior of said mixture, heating the resulting charged reactor in a zone maintained at a temperature of at least 1400 F. until said mixture reacts, whereby uranium metal and slag are formed, and recovering the resulting uranium metal.
• the lithium additive in combination with a firing temperature of 1400 F. or 1500 F. results in higher yield, better metal quality and substantially shorter firing time than is the case without lithium at the previous optimum temperature (1250 F.) for this size batch.
• the lithium additive in combination with a 1250 F. firing temperature slightly shortened the firing time, but did not significantly altect metal yield or quality.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Geology (AREA)
• Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
• Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
• Materials Engineering (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Metallurgy (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)
• Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Priority Applications (4)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=22791249

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Cited By (2)

Citations (4)

• 0
  • BE BE635023D patent/BE635023A/xx unknown
• 1962
  • 1962-07-25 US US212492A patent/US3140171A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
• 1963
  • 1963-04-16 GB GB14813/63A patent/GB983930A/en not_active Expired
  • 1963-07-03 FR FR940195A patent/FR1362859A/fr not_active Expired

Patent Citations (4)

Also Published As

Similar Documents