US2850442A - Bath for the manufacture of sodium - Google Patents

Bath for the manufacture of sodium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2850442A
US2850442A US577439A US57743956A US2850442A US 2850442 A US2850442 A US 2850442A US 577439 A US577439 A US 577439A US 57743956 A US57743956 A US 57743956A US 2850442 A US2850442 A US 2850442A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sodium
chloride
bath
weight
strontium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US577439A
Inventor
Wilson S Cathcart
William J Greeley
Jerome J Hargarten
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority to US577439A priority Critical patent/US2850442A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2850442A publication Critical patent/US2850442A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/02Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of alkali or alkaline earth metals

Definitions

  • Metallic sodium is usually obtained from the electrolysis of sodium chloride. This is the cheapest and most abundant salt of the metal but melts at too high a temperature for conver use alone in electrolytic baths. As a consequence, it is generally employed in admixture with calcium chloride. The resultant mixtures melt at a temperature sufhciently low for commercial acceptance and, upon electrolysis, yield sodium primarily.
  • the mixtures generally contain a small percentage of barium chloride added as an impurity in the sodium chloride. As electrolysis proceeds, the concentration of this impurity increases until an equilibrium is reached.
  • a typical conventional bath consists principally of 5660% of calcium chloride, 15% of barium chloride and a remainder of sodium chloride.
  • Filtration of the sodium contaminated with calcium as by a micrometallic filter can remove some of the impurity but undesirable quantities remain.
  • Other methods are also available to reduce the calcium content but add an expensive step to the manufacturing process.
  • An object of this invention is therefore provision of a new method for producing metallic sodium.
  • Another object is provision of a method for producing electrolytic sodium of a purity-hitherto unattainable commercially.
  • a further object is provision of a novel and useful composition of matter suitable, in the fused state, for the electrolytic production of sodium.
  • the preferred strontium-containing bath for producing sodium is one of a composition lying in the neighborhood of the SrCl -BaCl -N-aCl eutectic mixture, i. e., about 60% by weight SrCl 14% BaCl and 26% NaCl.
  • the equivalent molar percentages are about 42.5, 7.5, and 50.0 respectively.
  • the melting point of this mixture is 560 C.
  • the bath should contain between about 55 and 65% by weight of SrCl about 1020% by Weight of Bacl and a remainder of NaCl.
  • the ternary system is discussed at some length by Vortisch, Neues lahrb. Min. Geo Palaeoutol, 38, 201-217 (l9l4l5).
  • the preferred operating temperature of the bath is between about 560 C. and 625 C. Higher temperatures can be used but are unnecessary.
  • the sodium obtained from the present ternary baths is the purest yet produced commercially. It usually contaius less than about 0.1% by weight of metallic impurities, largely strontium. If the sodium is cooled to about 115 C. and filtered or settled, i. e. allowed to stand, and decanted, the quantity of metallic impurities present can be reduced to less than 25 p. p. m. Filtration of sodium produced from the calcium-containing bath of a conventional Downs cell does not reduce the metallic impurities to less than about 0.04% by weight (400 p. p. 111.).
  • Production of sodium from the strontium baths has other advantages than the elemination of impurities. Two of the most important of these are increase in current efficiency and increase in the life of the cell, particularly of the diaphragms interposed between the electrodes.
  • a Downs cell normally operates at a current efliciency of about 83-85%.
  • the ternary strontium bath improves this efliciency to about 85-89%.
  • the life of the diaphragm is more than doubled in the calciumfree strontium baths.
  • Still further improvements in current efiiciency can be obtained by adding about 12% by Weight of sodium (or potassium) fluoride to the bath, the ratios of the other components remaining substantially unchanged.
  • a preferred bath contains about 60% by Weight of SrCI about 15% BaCl 1-2% NaF and a remainder of NaCl.
  • Baths of this composition will readily yield sodium with a current efiiciency of about -95%.
  • This high current efhciency is believed due to the effect of the sodium fluoride in suppressing the formation of a metallic sodium fog in the bath.
  • the fluoride also lowers the eutectic melting point of the bath to a slight extent, i. e., to about 550 C.
  • the purity of sodium obtained from and the diaphragm life in the quaternary bath are about the same as in the ternary bath discussed above.
  • a disadvantage of the quaternary baths is that they attack the brickwork present in most commercial sodium cells.
  • Example 1 This example shows the use of a ternary mixture of strontium, barium and sodium chlorides in producing sodium; a
  • a salt mixture was formed consisting essentially of 58-60% strontium chloride (SrCl 18-20% barium chloride (BaCl and a remainder of sodium chloride. This mixture was melted at 560-570 C. in a substantially conventional Downs cell and electrolyzed at a potential varying between 6.2 and 7.4 volts.
  • Example 2 The procedure of Example 1 was substantially repeated except that the salt mixture electrolyzed was the SrCl BaCl -NaCl eutectic mixture consisting of 60% SrCl 14% BaCl and 26% NaCl. essentially the same as those of the previous example.
  • Example 3 This example shows the use of a quaternary mixture according to the practice of this invention.
  • An anhydrous salt mixture was made up containing about 55-60% strontium chloride, about 17-21% barium chloride, about 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) and a remainder of sodium chloride. This mixture was melted in a Downs type cell at a steady temperature of 550- 555 C. and electrolyzed at about 600 C. with direct current supplied at a potential of 6.4 volts. The chlorine liberated at the anode was almost free of fluorine. The sodium generally contained less than 0.1% strontium.
  • the bath composition was maintained approximately constant by regular additions of, sodium chloride and occasional additions of small amounts of strontium and barium chlorides and sodium fluoride.
  • test cell produced sodium with a current efiiciency of 87-88% for periods totaling several weeks.
  • the average current efiiciency of fourteen cells operating with the conventional calcium chloride bath but otherwise comparable was 82-84% during these periods.
  • the cell diaphragm renewed periodically, had a life at least double that in conventional Downs baths.
  • Example 4 Tests similar to those of Example 3 were repeated. For a 45-day period the current efficiency in the test cell averaged 90%, with a maximum of 94%. The sodium, after filtration, contained less than 25 p. p. m. of alkaline earth metal impurities. Current efficiencies of 94% and The results obtained were purities of the figure given have never been obtained with calcium chloride baths.
  • the method of producing metallic sodium containing less than 0.1% by weight of impurities which comprises electrolyzing with direct current a fused salt mixture comprising, by weight, 5565% of strontium chloride, 10-20% of barium chloride and a remainder consisting essential of sodium chloride.
  • the process of continuously producing high purity metallic sodium which comprises (1) electrolyzing with direct current a fused salt mixture at about 560-625 C. containing by weight about 55-65% of strontium chloride, 10-20% of barium chloride, and a remainder consisting essentially of sodium chloride, (2) withdrawing sodium from the mixture as it is formed and (3) replenishing the mixture by additions thereto of sodium chloride and smaller additions of strontium chloride and barium chloride.
  • a composition of matter comprising, by weight, about 55-65% of strontium chloride, about 10-20% of barium chloride, about 1-2% of fluoride of an alkali.
  • a composition of matter comprising, by weight, about 60% of strontium chloride, about 20% of barium chloride, about 2% of sodium fluoride and a remainder consisting essentially of sodium chloride.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)

Description

BATH FDR MANUFACTURE OF SODIUM Wilson S. Cathcart, Claymont, Del, William J. Greeley, Kenmore, N. Y., and .lerome .T. Hargarten, Birm1ng= ham, Mich, assiguors to E. 1. du Pont de Nemcurs and Company, Wilmington, DeL, a corporation or Delaware No Drawing. Application April 11, 1956 Serial No. 577,439
11 Claims. (Cl. 20468) This application, a continuation-in-part of our copending application Serial Number 376,982, filed August 27, 1953, relates to the electrolytic production of metallic sodium and more particularly to a novel and useful bath and process for such production.
Metallic sodium is usually obtained from the electrolysis of sodium chloride. This is the cheapest and most abundant salt of the metal but melts at too high a temperature for conver use alone in electrolytic baths. As a consequence, it is generally employed in admixture with calcium chloride. The resultant mixtures melt at a temperature sufhciently low for commercial acceptance and, upon electrolysis, yield sodium primarily. The mixtures generally contain a small percentage of barium chloride added as an impurity in the sodium chloride. As electrolysis proceeds, the concentration of this impurity increases until an equilibrium is reached. A typical conventional bath consists principally of 5660% of calcium chloride, 15% of barium chloride and a remainder of sodium chloride.
The fused salt baths of prior practice have given good results. One disadvantage they possess, however, is that they codeposit some calcium at the cathode along with the sodium. In the conventional Downs cell of U. S. Patent 1,501,756, for example, a solution of calcium in liquid sodium is formed and rises into a sodium receiver. As this solution cools, some of the calcium precipitates and drops back into the bath. Since the precipitated calcium tends to block the pipe leading to the receiver, it is necessary to operate a stirring device to maintain sodium flow. Precipitated calcium also tends to cause shortcircuits between the diaphragm and cathodes, decreasing diaphragm life and cell efliciency.
Another difliculty arises from the fact that all the calcium does not precipitate, as its solubility in sodium is still significant at the lowered temperature. The sodium produced from the conventional baths therefore contains a relatively high percentage of calcium metal, in some cases almost 1% by Weight. Such a percentage of calcium cannot be tolerated in some modern applications of sodium and expensive procedures have been necessary to remove it.
Suggestions have been made from time to time as to the use of alternative bath compositions avoiding some of the disadvantages mentioned above but these baths have not found much favor. The Seward and Von Kiigelgen U. S. Patents 841,724 and 868,670 and the Grabau Patent 464,097, for example,-show several alternative baths. Although these patents are quite old, the baths disclosed therein have found no commercial acceptance as far as we are aware.
Filtration of the sodium contaminated with calcium as by a micrometallic filter can remove some of the impurity but undesirable quantities remain. Other methods are also available to reduce the calcium content but add an expensive step to the manufacturing process.
rates atent ice An object of this invention is therefore provision of a new method for producing metallic sodium.
Another object is provision of a method for producing electrolytic sodium of a purity-hitherto unattainable commercially.
A further object is provision of a novel and useful composition of matter suitable, in the fused state, for the electrolytic production of sodium.
The above-mentioned and still further objects are achieved in accordance with this invention by electrolysis of a fused bath consisting principally of strontium chloride. in practice a ternary salt mixture is formed containing strontium chloride, barium chloride and sodium chloride, and electrolyzed with direct current.
The preferred strontium-containing bath for producing sodium is one of a composition lying in the neighborhood of the SrCl -BaCl -N-aCl eutectic mixture, i. e., about 60% by weight SrCl 14% BaCl and 26% NaCl. The equivalent molar percentages are about 42.5, 7.5, and 50.0 respectively. The melting point of this mixture is 560 C. For the purposes of this invention, the bath should contain between about 55 and 65% by weight of SrCl about 1020% by Weight of Bacl and a remainder of NaCl. The ternary system is discussed at some length by Vortisch, Neues lahrb. Min. Geo Palaeoutol, 38, 201-217 (l9l4l5).
The preferred operating temperature of the bath is between about 560 C. and 625 C. Higher temperatures can be used but are unnecessary.
The sodium obtained from the present ternary baths is the purest yet produced commercially. It usually contaius less than about 0.1% by weight of metallic impurities, largely strontium. If the sodium is cooled to about 115 C. and filtered or settled, i. e. allowed to stand, and decanted, the quantity of metallic impurities present can be reduced to less than 25 p. p. m. Filtration of sodium produced from the calcium-containing bath of a conventional Downs cell does not reduce the metallic impurities to less than about 0.04% by weight (400 p. p. 111.).
Production of sodium from the strontium baths has other advantages than the elemination of impurities. Two of the most important of these are increase in current efficiency and increase in the life of the cell, particularly of the diaphragms interposed between the electrodes. A Downs cell normally operates at a current efliciency of about 83-85%. The ternary strontium bath improves this efliciency to about 85-89%. The life of the diaphragm is more than doubled in the calciumfree strontium baths.
Still further improvements in current efiiciency can be obtained by adding about 12% by Weight of sodium (or potassium) fluoride to the bath, the ratios of the other components remaining substantially unchanged. Thus a preferred bath contains about 60% by Weight of SrCI about 15% BaCl 1-2% NaF and a remainder of NaCl. Baths of this composition will readily yield sodium with a current efiiciency of about -95%. This high current efhciency is believed due to the effect of the sodium fluoride in suppressing the formation of a metallic sodium fog in the bath. The fluoride also lowers the eutectic melting point of the bath to a slight extent, i. e., to about 550 C. The purity of sodium obtained from and the diaphragm life in the quaternary bath are about the same as in the ternary bath discussed above. A disadvantage of the quaternary baths is that they attack the brickwork present in most commercial sodium cells.
There follow some examples which illustrate the practice of the invention in more detail. In these examples all percentages are by Weight unless otherwise noted.
7 Example 1 This example shows the use of a ternary mixture of strontium, barium and sodium chlorides in producing sodium; a
A salt mixture was formed consisting essentially of 58-60% strontium chloride (SrCl 18-20% barium chloride (BaCl and a remainder of sodium chloride. This mixture was melted at 560-570 C. in a substantially conventional Downs cell and electrolyzed at a potential varying between 6.2 and 7.4 volts.
Sodium was produced from this cell for several months. This sodium was exceptionally pure, generally containing less than 0.1% of foreign matter.. Settling the liquid sodium at about 115 C. and decanting off the top portion reduced the content of metallic impurities in the decanted liquid'to less than 25 p. p. m. Such pure sodium has never been obtained from a calcium chloride bath.
The life of the diaphragm in this bath was more than double that in a conventional fused-salt mixture.
Additions of sodium chloride and of small quantities of strontium and barium chlorides were employed to maintain the bath composition.
Stirring was employed occasionally'but much less often than in the calcium-containing cells.
Example 2 The procedure of Example 1 was substantially repeated except that the salt mixture electrolyzed was the SrCl BaCl -NaCl eutectic mixture consisting of 60% SrCl 14% BaCl and 26% NaCl. essentially the same as those of the previous example.
Example 3 This example shows the use of a quaternary mixture according to the practice of this invention.
An anhydrous salt mixture was made up containing about 55-60% strontium chloride, about 17-21% barium chloride, about 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) and a remainder of sodium chloride. This mixture was melted in a Downs type cell at a steady temperature of 550- 555 C. and electrolyzed at about 600 C. with direct current supplied at a potential of 6.4 volts. The chlorine liberated at the anode was almost free of fluorine. The sodium generally contained less than 0.1% strontium.
The bath composition was maintained approximately constant by regular additions of, sodium chloride and occasional additions of small amounts of strontium and barium chlorides and sodium fluoride.
The test cell produced sodium with a current efiiciency of 87-88% for periods totaling several weeks. The average current efiiciency of fourteen cells operating with the conventional calcium chloride bath but otherwise comparable was 82-84% during these periods.
The cell diaphragm, renewed periodically, had a life at least double that in conventional Downs baths.
Example 4 Tests similar to those of Example 3 were repeated. For a 45-day period the current efficiency in the test cell averaged 90%, with a maximum of 94%. The sodium, after filtration, contained less than 25 p. p. m. of alkaline earth metal impurities. Current efficiencies of 94% and The results obtained were purities of the figure given have never been obtained with calcium chloride baths.
It may be noted that the cell voltage is generally not much increased over that required for comparable operation in calcium chloride baths and in some cases has actually been lower. Thus over-all power efficiency may be improved with the present bath.
Having described our invention, we claim:
1. The method of producing metallic sodium containing less than 0.1% by weight of impurities which comprises electrolyzing with direct current a fused salt mixture comprising, by weight, 5565% of strontium chloride, 10-20% of barium chloride and a remainder consisting essential of sodium chloride.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the fusion temperature is about 560-625? C.
3. The method of claim 2 in which the bath consists essentially of about 60 by weight of strontium chloride, about 14% by Weight of barium chloride and about 26% by weight of sodium chloride.
4. The method of claim 1 to which isadded the additional step of filtering the metallic sodium to reduce the 7. The method of claim 6 in which the temperature of the fused salt mixture is between about 550-625 C.
8. The process of continuously producing high purity metallic sodium which comprises (1) electrolyzing with direct current a fused salt mixture at about 560-625 C. containing by weight about 55-65% of strontium chloride, 10-20% of barium chloride, and a remainder consisting essentially of sodium chloride, (2) withdrawing sodium from the mixture as it is formed and (3) replenishing the mixture by additions thereto of sodium chloride and smaller additions of strontium chloride and barium chloride.
9. The process of claim 8 which'the salt mixture contains up to about 2% by weight of sodium fluoride.
10. A composition of matter comprising, by weight, about 55-65% of strontium chloride, about 10-20% of barium chloride, about 1-2% of fluoride of an alkali.
metal and a remainder consisting essentially of sodium chloride.
11. A composition of matter comprising, by weight, about 60% of strontium chloride, about 20% of barium chloride, about 2% of sodium fluoride and a remainder consisting essentially of sodium chloride.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 464,097 Grabau Dec. 1, 1891 801,199 Ashcroft Oct. '10, 1905 841,724 Seward et al Apr. 23, 1906 FOREIGN PATENTS Germany July 20, 1904

Claims (2)

1. THE METHOD OF PRODUCING METALLIC SODIUM CONTAINING LESS THAN 0.1% BY WEIGHT OF IMPURITIES WHICH COMPRISES ELECTROLYZING WITH DIRECT CURRENT A FUSED SALT MIXTURE COMPRISING, BY WEIGHT, 55-65% OF STRONTIUM CHLORIDE, 10-20% OF BARIUM CHLORIDE AND A REMAINDER CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF SODIUM CHLORIDE.
10. A COMPOSITION OF MATTER COMPRISING, BY WEIGHT, ABOUT 55-65% OF STRONTIUM CHLORIDE, ABOUT 10-20% OF BARIUM CHLORIDE, ABOUT 1-2% OF FLUROIDE OF AN ALKALI METAL AND A REMAINDER CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF SODIUM CHLORIDE.
US577439A 1956-04-11 1956-04-11 Bath for the manufacture of sodium Expired - Lifetime US2850442A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US577439A US2850442A (en) 1956-04-11 1956-04-11 Bath for the manufacture of sodium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US577439A US2850442A (en) 1956-04-11 1956-04-11 Bath for the manufacture of sodium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2850442A true US2850442A (en) 1958-09-02

Family

ID=24308737

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US577439A Expired - Lifetime US2850442A (en) 1956-04-11 1956-04-11 Bath for the manufacture of sodium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2850442A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3020221A (en) * 1960-06-20 1962-02-06 Du Pont Process for producing sodium
US3037927A (en) * 1958-07-25 1962-06-05 Du Pont Device for purifying alkali metal
US3119756A (en) * 1962-10-22 1964-01-28 Ethyl Corp Production of sodium
DE1162575B (en) * 1959-12-21 1964-02-06 Ethyl Corp Process for the production of pure sodium by fused salt electrolysis
DE1173261B (en) * 1961-02-17 1964-07-02 Ici Ltd Process for the production of sodium by fused salt electrolysis
US3226311A (en) * 1959-05-13 1965-12-28 Solvay Process of producing calcium by electrolysis
US3257297A (en) * 1961-02-17 1966-06-21 Ici Ltd Production of sodium
US6063247A (en) * 1998-08-07 2000-05-16 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Modified electrolyte and diaphragm for fused salt electrolysis
US6669836B2 (en) 2000-05-19 2003-12-30 New Mexico Tech Research Foundation Molten salt electrolysis of alkali metals

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE160540C (en) *
US464097A (en) * 1891-12-01 Ludwig grabaij
US801199A (en) * 1903-10-03 1905-10-10 Edgar Arthur Ashcroft Process for the production of metals of the alkali group by electrolysis.
US841724A (en) * 1906-04-23 1907-01-22 George O Seward Production of alkali metals.

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE160540C (en) *
US464097A (en) * 1891-12-01 Ludwig grabaij
US801199A (en) * 1903-10-03 1905-10-10 Edgar Arthur Ashcroft Process for the production of metals of the alkali group by electrolysis.
US841724A (en) * 1906-04-23 1907-01-22 George O Seward Production of alkali metals.

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3037927A (en) * 1958-07-25 1962-06-05 Du Pont Device for purifying alkali metal
US3226311A (en) * 1959-05-13 1965-12-28 Solvay Process of producing calcium by electrolysis
DE1162575B (en) * 1959-12-21 1964-02-06 Ethyl Corp Process for the production of pure sodium by fused salt electrolysis
US3020221A (en) * 1960-06-20 1962-02-06 Du Pont Process for producing sodium
DE1173261B (en) * 1961-02-17 1964-07-02 Ici Ltd Process for the production of sodium by fused salt electrolysis
US3257297A (en) * 1961-02-17 1966-06-21 Ici Ltd Production of sodium
US3119756A (en) * 1962-10-22 1964-01-28 Ethyl Corp Production of sodium
US6063247A (en) * 1998-08-07 2000-05-16 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Modified electrolyte and diaphragm for fused salt electrolysis
US6117303A (en) * 1998-08-07 2000-09-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Modified electrolyte for fused salt electrolysis
US6669836B2 (en) 2000-05-19 2003-12-30 New Mexico Tech Research Foundation Molten salt electrolysis of alkali metals

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5024737A (en) Process for producing a reactive metal-magnesium alloy
SU1416060A3 (en) Method of producing metals
US2850442A (en) Bath for the manufacture of sodium
US2148404A (en) Production of alkali metals
US3114685A (en) Electrolytic production of titanium metal
US3294656A (en) Method of producing aluminium
US2034339A (en) Refining of aluminum
US3226311A (en) Process of producing calcium by electrolysis
US5114545A (en) Electrolyte chemistry for improved performance in modern industrial alumina reduction cells
US4135994A (en) Process for electrolytically producing aluminum
US3103472A (en) Electrolytic production of aluminum
US2592686A (en) Electrolytic production of fatty
US2731402A (en) Production of metallic titanium
US2707170A (en) Electrodeposition of titanium
US3020221A (en) Process for producing sodium
US4464234A (en) Production of aluminum metal by electrolysis of aluminum sulfide
US2915443A (en) Electrolyte for aluminum reduction
US2665244A (en) Refining aluminum electrolytically
CN105803490B (en) A kind of electrolyte composition for aluminium electroloysis
US1937509A (en) Method of making beryllium and light alloys thereof
US3257297A (en) Production of sodium
US2111470A (en) Process for electrolytic preparation of alkaline-earth alloys
US6669836B2 (en) Molten salt electrolysis of alkali metals
US2956936A (en) Process for the production of metallic niobium or tantalum by the electrolysis of melts
US3712858A (en) Production of sodium