US2759857A - Process for purifying molasses and crystallizing sugar therefrom - Google Patents

Process for purifying molasses and crystallizing sugar therefrom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2759857A
US2759857A US390104A US39010453A US2759857A US 2759857 A US2759857 A US 2759857A US 390104 A US390104 A US 390104A US 39010453 A US39010453 A US 39010453A US 2759857 A US2759857 A US 2759857A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
molasses
sugar
weight
methyl alcohol
liquid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US390104A
Inventor
Jacob Van Julsingha
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Corbion NV
Original Assignee
Centrale Suiker Maatschappij NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Centrale Suiker Maatschappij NV filed Critical Centrale Suiker Maatschappij NV
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2759857A publication Critical patent/US2759857A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C13SUGAR INDUSTRY
    • C13BPRODUCTION OF SUCROSE; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • C13B35/00Extraction of sucrose from molasses

Definitions

  • the acid can be added to the molasses, to the methyl alcohol or to the mixture of molasses and methyl alcohol.
  • the addition of the acid to the molasses has the drawback that it is difiicult to mix the small quantity of acid homogeneously with the molasses; it is particularly when sulphuric acid is used that this involves difliculties (risk of local carbonization).
  • the precipitate formed by addition of the acid can be removed, e. g. filtered 01f, at ordinary temperature. It has, however, been found that the removal of the precipitate can be appreciably accelerated by causing the precipitate to form at a temperature above that of the surroundings or heating the liquid with the precipitate to temperatures above that of the surroundings, then cooling everything approximately to room temperature, and subsequently bringing about the separation of precipitate and liquid. Even a slight heating of the liquid or of liquid and precipitate to, say, 30-35 C. will subsequently give rise to an appreciably increased rate of filtration. With continued raising of the temperature this rate is increased considerably more. Little is to be gained, however, by raising the temperature beyond C. For practical purposes a temperature of 40-50 C. was found to be sufilcient.
  • another liquid is preferably added, which has to satisfy several requirements. It should be practically unable to dissolve sugar, it should be miscible with methyl alcohol, and it must not flocculate molasses, at least not in the quantity in which it is added. For a good yield of reasonably pure surgar in not too long a time the addition of this other liquid is of great importance.
  • the quantity of methyl alcohol that is added may vary within wide limits. In practice no more than 2 kg. of methyl alcohol per kg. of molasses will be taken, since a larger quantity of methyl alcohol will not cause the process to proceed any more satisfactorily. If too small a quantity of methyl alcohol is taken, the mixture obtained will contain too much water, owing to which the yield .of sugar is greatly lowered; in view of this, less than 0.5 kg. of methyl alcohol per kg. of molasses will never be used, but in practice the lower limit will at least be raised to 0.6 kg. Research has revealed that in general the best proportion by weight of molasses to methyl alcohol to operate with is about 1:1.
  • the methyl alcohol need not be anhydrous. It should, however, be borne in mind that an increase of the water content causes a lowering of the yield of sugar.
  • the most varied organic liquids can be used.
  • ethyl acetate, benzene, chloroform, and also ethyl alcohol are mentioned here.
  • the optimum quantities of these different substances which are required generally vary owing to the nature of the substances.
  • ethyl acetate and benzene are the first to be considered; the two liquids can be used in approximately equal quantities.
  • this other liquid calculated on the mixture of methyl alcohol and molasses, is best determined experimentally; this quantity may fluctuate between wide limits. If too large a quantity of the other liquid is taken, the limit of flocculation of the molasses is frequently reached, or even exceeded, which has an adverse effect on the colour of the sugar separated off. On the other hand one may considerably reduce the quantity of the other liquid, but this has the drawback that the crystallization of the sugar proceeds more slowly. For ethyl acetate and benzene, for example, it is suitable to take 45200 g. of the said other liquids, but preferably about 100 g. to every kg. of the mixture of methyl alcohol and molasses.
  • the solution will preferably be inoculated with a small amount of fine crystallized sugar.
  • the desalted solution may moreover be cooled.
  • the separated salts as well as the sugar still contain some methyl alcohol. This can easily be removed from the solid substance and be recovered, if desired.
  • the mother liquor left after the crystallization of the sugar naturally contains the organic liquids added in the early stage of the process. They can be recovered by distillation and rectification. Molasses is then left behind. If desired, it can be condensed somewhat more, but as a rule this is not necessary. It forms the second molasses, which contains practically no more potassium compounds, in view of whichif necessary, after evaporationit is eminently suited for cattle food or for ensilage.
  • Example II where benzene has been used instead of ethyl acetate
  • Example III where a different type of beet sugar molasses is started from.
  • Example I Two parts by weight of beet sugar molasses with a moisture content of 23% and a sugar content of 50% are stirred together with 2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol until a perfectly homogeneous, thinly liquid mass has been obtained. Then 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses, is
  • Example II 2.5 parts by weight of the molasses used in Example I are stirred together with 2.5 parts by weight of methyl alcohol until everything is completely dissolved.
  • Example I Just as in Example I, 6.5% by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses, is added. The pH is then 3.0. The process is further carried out as described in Example I, but benzene is used instead of ethyl acetate, in a quantity of 0.44 part by weight. After the crystallization of the sugar it is dried, and the yield is 0.870 part by weight. There is practically no difference between the effect of ethyl acetate and benzene.
  • Example III Beet sugar molasses with a moisture content of 15% and a sugar content of 53% is used. The procedure is completely identical with that in Example I. The yield of dried sugar is now 0.778 part by weight. Owing to the lower moisture content of the molasses the quantity of sugar recovered is larger.
  • Example IV Two parts by weight of molasses with a moisture content of 23% and a sugar content of 50% are stirred together with 2 parts by Weight of methyl alcohol until a perfectly homogeneous mass has been obtained. Then there is added, with stirring, 0.13 part by Weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses; the pH of the liquid is then 3. The precipitate is filtered off. To the clear liquid 0.18 part by weight of ethyl acetate is now added, and the sugar is left to crystallize; this takes place in about 16 hours. When 0.36 part by weight of ethyl acetate is used, the crystallization is completed after 7 hours. In both cases the yield is about 0.69 part by weight.
  • Example V Two parts by weight of molasses are mixed with 1.2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol and 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid is added. The quantity of the precipitate is now 0.187 part by weight. This is considerably lower than in Example I, because a larger quantity of water is present. Owing to the higher viscosity of the mixture, it is difficult to filter off the precipitate. After addition of ethyl acetate, 0.54 part by weight of sugar crystallizes.
  • Example VI To 2 parts by weight of molasses there are added 4 parts by weight of methyl alcohol, and, after mixing, 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid is added. The precipitate formed is filtered off. After addition of ethyl acetate the liquid is introduced into a crystallizing apparatus. The yield of sugar is 0.711 part by Weight, i. e. practically the same as in Example I. From this it is clear that there is no sense in increasing the quantity of methyl alcohol, since the higher cost of the evaporation of the methyl alcohol is not set off by the very slight increase of the yield of sugar.
  • Example VII Five kg. of molasses are mixed with kg. of methyl alcohol and the mixture is heated to 50 C. There is added 6% by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on molasses. After this the mixture is rapidly cooled to room temperature. The precipitate formed is then sucked off in a Biichner funnel With a filter area of 5 dm. the pressure below the filter is 40 cm. of mercury. The filtration time is 5 minutes. If the precipitate is formed and sucked off at room temperature, the filtration time is 15 minutes.
  • Process of recovering sugar from molasses which comprises mixing 1 part by weight of molasses with from 0.6 to 2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol and an acid whose salts with the cations present in the molasses are substantially insoluble in the mixture of molasses and methyl alcohol in quantity suificient to give the mixture a pH value within the range from about 1 to 5 at a temperature within the range from room temperature to about 80, separating the liquid and solid phases of the resulting mixture and crystallizing sugar from the separated liquid phase.

Description

J. VAN JULSINGHA PROCESS FOR PURIFYING MOLASSES AND CRYSTALLIZING SUGAR THEREFROM Filed NOV 4, 1953 OO mwm 4 .imzm 1356 & QQU &
Aug. 21, 1956 Parcaokogz of Maker of Hm mohsses is 23% United States Patent PROCESS FOR PURIFYING MOLASSES AND CRYSTALLIZING SUGAR THEREFROM Jacob Van Julsingha, Amsterdam, Netherlands, assignor to N. V. Centrale Suiker Maatschappij, Amsterdam, Netherlands, a company of the Netherlands Application November 4, 1953, Serial No. 390,104
Claims priority, application Netherlands December 11, 1952 9 Claims. (Cl. 127-48) In view of the fairly high sugar content of molasses several suggestions have been made for recovering sugar from molasses.
Thus Margueritte .added to every kilogram of molasses 1 litre of 85% ethyl alcohol and such a quantity of sulphuric acid that the alkali compounds present were converted into sulphates; on an average of sulphuric acid was sufiicient for this. The sulphates were removed and the liquid was mixed with an equal volume of 95% ethyl alcohol. It was then alleged that in a few hours the sugar had separated out in the crystallized state and after purification had been recovered in a yield of 70% (vide Der Praktishce Rii-benzuckerfabrikant und Raflinadeur, by L. Walkhoif, 4th ed. (187-), vol. 2, pp. 441-442, published by Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig). Careful 0 experiments have by no means been able to confirm this high yield of sugar, while moreover, owing to the flocculation of molasses, the sugar separated off was dark brown. The cause of the latter is the use of the large amount of ethyl alcohol. The rather slight yield of sugar is due to the water content of the mixture of molasses and ethyl alcohol; Margueritte, however, was bound to operate in the presence of such a large quantity of water because otherwise no homogeneous mixture of molasses and ethyl alcohol is formed.
According to the German patent specification No. 435,515 glacial acetic acid and benzene were added to condensed molasses. In the example 60 kg. of glacial acetic acid and 1 kg. of benzene were used for 100 kg. of molasses; the benzene reduces the viscosity of the mixture, and is said to decrease the quantity of glacial acetic acid that is required. It is said that after a few hours the sugar has crystallized and can be recovered in a yield of at least 70%. A large quantity of glacial acetic acid has to be used, owing to which the process is uneconomical; the salts remain in the molasses.
In the German patent specification No. 528,564 a similar process is described. In this case 50-60% by weight of glacial acetic acid was added to molasses which had been condensed as much as possible, and subsequently an approximately equal weight of dehydrated ethyl acetate (it was also possible to use methyl, propyl, isopropyl or butyl acetate. After a few hours all the sugar was said to have crystallized. The admixing of methyl alcohol and ethyl alcohol to glacial acetic acid for the same purpose was also said to be known.
As far as is known, none of these methods has been applied in practice. The main causes of this have already been mentioned above.
For the recovery of sugar from molasses the Steffen process has been applied. According to this process, from a highly diluted solution of molasses there are precipitated, with the aid of quick-lime, calcium saccharates, which are decomposed in saturation chests with carbon dioxide, upon which sugar is recovered from the sugar solution. Instead of calcium oxide, barium .or strontium oxide may also be used.
Patented Aug. 21,, 1956 Now it has been found that by the use of methyl alcohol and an acid it is not only easy to crystallize the larger part of the sugar from molasses, but that the sugar is thus obtained in the form of anhydrous crystals and in a high degree of purity without any purification, i. e. direct; the latter is at once to be seen from the colour. In order to achieve this, the molasses is mixed with methyl alcohol and an acid whose salts with the cations present in molasses are substantially insoluble in the molasses-methyl alcohol medium, until a thinly liquid mass with a pH lower than '5 has been obtained, the precipitated sulphates are removed, and the sugar is crystallized from the remaining solution. Suitable acids are, for example, sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid, and sulphurous acid. For practical purposes sulphuric acid was found very suitable.
in the course of the research it was found that only little sugar separates ofi? at pH 5, and that no sugar precipitates at all when acidification does not proceed beyond pH 6. According as a lower pH value is chosen, more sugar crystallizes. The optimum of the pH is between 1 and 4; the process is preferably carried out at a pH of about 3. It is also possible to use pH values lower than 1. However, there is no sense in adding considerably larger quantities of acid, because in that case there are no more cations to be fixed, While moreover certain amino acids, such as betaine, will precipitate. The relation between the pH of the liquid and the quantity of crystallized sugar, as found in various experiments with sulphuric acid, is illustrated in the graph.
The acid can be added to the molasses, to the methyl alcohol or to the mixture of molasses and methyl alcohol. in practice the addition of the acid to the molasses has the drawback that it is difiicult to mix the small quantity of acid homogeneously with the molasses; it is particularly when sulphuric acid is used that this involves difliculties (risk of local carbonization).
The precipitate formed by addition of the acid can be removed, e. g. filtered 01f, at ordinary temperature. It has, however, been found that the removal of the precipitate can be appreciably accelerated by causing the precipitate to form at a temperature above that of the surroundings or heating the liquid with the precipitate to temperatures above that of the surroundings, then cooling everything approximately to room temperature, and subsequently bringing about the separation of precipitate and liquid. Even a slight heating of the liquid or of liquid and precipitate to, say, 30-35 C. will subsequently give rise to an appreciably increased rate of filtration. With continued raising of the temperature this rate is increased considerably more. Little is to be gained, however, by raising the temperature beyond C. For practical purposes a temperature of 40-50 C. was found to be sufilcient.
In order to promote the crystallization of the sugar, another liquid is preferably added, which has to satisfy several requirements. It should be practically unable to dissolve sugar, it should be miscible with methyl alcohol, and it must not flocculate molasses, at least not in the quantity in which it is added. For a good yield of reasonably pure surgar in not too long a time the addition of this other liquid is of great importance.
The quantity of methyl alcohol that is added may vary within wide limits. In practice no more than 2 kg. of methyl alcohol per kg. of molasses will be taken, since a larger quantity of methyl alcohol will not cause the process to proceed any more satisfactorily. If too small a quantity of methyl alcohol is taken, the mixture obtained will contain too much water, owing to which the yield .of sugar is greatly lowered; in view of this, less than 0.5 kg. of methyl alcohol per kg. of molasses will never be used, but in practice the lower limit will at least be raised to 0.6 kg. Research has revealed that in general the best proportion by weight of molasses to methyl alcohol to operate with is about 1:1.
The methyl alcohol need not be anhydrous. It should, however, be borne in mind that an increase of the water content causes a lowering of the yield of sugar.
For the other liquid the most varied organic liquids can be used. As examples, ethyl acetate, benzene, chloroform, and also ethyl alcohol are mentioned here. The optimum quantities of these different substances which are required generally vary owing to the nature of the substances. For practical purposes ethyl acetate and benzene are the first to be considered; the two liquids can be used in approximately equal quantities.
The quantity of this other liquid, calculated on the mixture of methyl alcohol and molasses, is best determined experimentally; this quantity may fluctuate between wide limits. If too large a quantity of the other liquid is taken, the limit of flocculation of the molasses is frequently reached, or even exceeded, which has an adverse effect on the colour of the sugar separated off. On the other hand one may considerably reduce the quantity of the other liquid, but this has the drawback that the crystallization of the sugar proceeds more slowly. For ethyl acetate and benzene, for example, it is suitable to take 45200 g. of the said other liquids, but preferably about 100 g. to every kg. of the mixture of methyl alcohol and molasses.
In order that the sugar may crystallize more rapidly, the solution will preferably be inoculated with a small amount of fine crystallized sugar. The desalted solution may moreover be cooled. There is no harm in the methyl alcohol added to the molasses already containing a small amount of the other liquid. This should not, however, be too much; the upper limit is set by the requirement that the removal of the salts has to be completed before the sugar crystallizes. If, however, all the constituents are quickly mixed and the mixture is quickly filtered, the whole of the quantity of the other liquid may even be previously added to the methyl alcohol.
The separated salts as well as the sugar still contain some methyl alcohol. This can easily be removed from the solid substance and be recovered, if desired.
The mother liquor left after the crystallization of the sugar naturally contains the organic liquids added in the early stage of the process. They can be recovered by distillation and rectification. Molasses is then left behind. If desired, it can be condensed somewhat more, but as a rule this is not necessary. It forms the second molasses, which contains practically no more potassium compounds, in view of whichif necessary, after evaporationit is eminently suited for cattle food or for ensilage.
Although the process described is specially suitable for working up beet sugar molasses, it is also possible to use cane sugar molasses as starting material. It should, however, be kept in mind that the latter molasses contains less sugar than beet sugar molasses.
The following examples illustrate the invention; from these it can also be seen what influence various factors have on the yield of sugar. In order to facilitate comparison, the same substances have always been used in the examples, except in Example II, where benzene has been used instead of ethyl acetate, and in Example III, where a different type of beet sugar molasses is started from.
Example I Two parts by weight of beet sugar molasses with a moisture content of 23% and a sugar content of 50% are stirred together with 2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol until a perfectly homogeneous, thinly liquid mass has been obtained. Then 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses, is
4 slowly added with stirring; the pH of the liquid is 3. There is formed a precipitate of sulphates, mainly potassium sulphate, as also a small precipitate of proteins. The precipitate is removed, washed with methyl alcohol, and dried. The weight of the precipitate is now 0.265 part by weight.
To the clear liquid there is added 0.36 part by weight of ethyl acetate; the liquid remains homogeneous. It is then inoculated with 0.010 part by weight of fine crystallized sugar and introduced into a crystallizing apparatus. After a few hours sugar has crystallized in fine crystals. The precipitate is centrifuged and dried; the weight is 0.698 part by weight; the polarization is 98.2.
Example II 2.5 parts by weight of the molasses used in Example I are stirred together with 2.5 parts by weight of methyl alcohol until everything is completely dissolved.
Just as in Example I, 6.5% by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses, is added. The pH is then 3.0. The process is further carried out as described in Example I, but benzene is used instead of ethyl acetate, in a quantity of 0.44 part by weight. After the crystallization of the sugar it is dried, and the yield is 0.870 part by weight. There is practically no difference between the effect of ethyl acetate and benzene.
Example III Beet sugar molasses with a moisture content of 15% and a sugar content of 53% is used. The procedure is completely identical with that in Example I. The yield of dried sugar is now 0.778 part by weight. Owing to the lower moisture content of the molasses the quantity of sugar recovered is larger.
Example IV Two parts by weight of molasses with a moisture content of 23% and a sugar content of 50% are stirred together with 2 parts by Weight of methyl alcohol until a perfectly homogeneous mass has been obtained. Then there is added, with stirring, 0.13 part by Weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on the molasses; the pH of the liquid is then 3. The precipitate is filtered off. To the clear liquid 0.18 part by weight of ethyl acetate is now added, and the sugar is left to crystallize; this takes place in about 16 hours. When 0.36 part by weight of ethyl acetate is used, the crystallization is completed after 7 hours. In both cases the yield is about 0.69 part by weight.
If 0.9 part by weight of ethyl acetate is added, the liquid becomes turbid and upon standing quietly, molasses gradually fiocculates. If the mass is then introduced into a crystallizing apparatus, the sugar crystallizes in a very dark brown, syrupy form, with a purity considerably lower than in the preceding cases. The yield is slightly lower than in Example IV, viz. 0.61 part by weight.
Example V Two parts by weight of molasses are mixed with 1.2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol and 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid is added. The quantity of the precipitate is now 0.187 part by weight. This is considerably lower than in Example I, because a larger quantity of water is present. Owing to the higher viscosity of the mixture, it is difficult to filter off the precipitate. After addition of ethyl acetate, 0.54 part by weight of sugar crystallizes.
Example VI To 2 parts by weight of molasses there are added 4 parts by weight of methyl alcohol, and, after mixing, 0.13 part by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid is added. The precipitate formed is filtered off. After addition of ethyl acetate the liquid is introduced into a crystallizing apparatus. The yield of sugar is 0.711 part by Weight, i. e. practically the same as in Example I. From this it is clear that there is no sense in increasing the quantity of methyl alcohol, since the higher cost of the evaporation of the methyl alcohol is not set off by the very slight increase of the yield of sugar.
Example VII Five kg. of molasses are mixed with kg. of methyl alcohol and the mixture is heated to 50 C. There is added 6% by weight of concentrated sulphuric acid, calculated on molasses. After this the mixture is rapidly cooled to room temperature. The precipitate formed is then sucked off in a Biichner funnel With a filter area of 5 dm. the pressure below the filter is 40 cm. of mercury. The filtration time is 5 minutes. If the precipitate is formed and sucked off at room temperature, the filtration time is 15 minutes.
I claim:
1. Process of recovering sugar from molasses which comprises mixing 1 part by weight of molasses with from 0.6 to 2 parts by weight of methyl alcohol and an acid whose salts with the cations present in the molasses are substantially insoluble in the mixture of molasses and methyl alcohol in quantity suificient to give the mixture a pH value within the range from about 1 to 5 at a temperature within the range from room temperature to about 80, separating the liquid and solid phases of the resulting mixture and crystallizing sugar from the separated liquid phase.
2. Process as defined in claim 1 in which the acid is a member of the group consisting of sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid and sulfurous acid.
3. Process as defined in claim 2 in which the acid is sulfuric acid.
4. Process as defined in claim 2 in which the acid is phosphoric acid.
5. Process as defined in claim 2 in which an organic liquid of the group consisting of ethyl acetate, benzene, chloroform and ethyl alcohol in quantity insuflicient to flocculate the molasses is added to said liquid phase after separation of said solid phase and prior to the crystallization of sugar therefrom.
6. Process as defined in claim 5 in which the organic liquid is ethyl acetate and the quantity thereof added is Within the range from about to about 200 grams per kilogram of said liquid phase.
7. Process as defined in claim 5 in which the organic liquid is benzene and the quantity thereof added is within the range from about 45 to about 200 grams per kilogram of said liquid phase.
8. Process as defined in claim 1 in which about 1 part by Weight of methyl alcohol is mixed with about 1 part by weight of molasses, sulfuric acid is added until the pH value of the mixture is about 3, the mixture is subjected to a temperature within the range from about 30 to about C. and then cooled to room temperature prior to separation of the solid and liquid phases of the mixture.
9. Process as defined in claim 8 in which the mixture is subjected to a temperature within the range 40-50 C.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 345,810 Schwengers July 20, 1886 1,776,819 Ricard Sept. 30, 1930 2,000,202 Vazquez May 7, 1935 2,109,503 Reich Mar. 1, 1938 2,130,029 Reich Sept. 13, 1938 2,442,804 Gaylor June 8, 1948 2,501,914 Payne Mar. 28, 1950

Claims (1)

1. PROCESS OF RECOVERING SUGAR FROM MOLASSES WHICH COMPRISES MIXING 1 PART BY WEIGHT OF MOLASSES WITH FROM 0.6 TO 2 PARTS BY WEIGHT OF METHYL ALCOHOL AND AN ACID WHOSE SALTS WITH THE CATIONS PRESENT IN THE MOLASSES ARE SUBSTANTIALLY INSOLUBLE IN THE MIXTURE OF MOLASSES AND METHYL ALCOHOL IN QUANTITY SUFFICIENT TO GIVE THE MIXTURE A PH VALUE WITHIN THE RANGE FFROM ABOUT 1 TO 5 AT A TEMPERATURE WITHIN THE RANGE FROM ROOM TEMPERATURE TO ABOUT 80*, SEPARATING THE LIQUID AND SOLID PHASES OF THE RESULTING MIXTURE AND CRYSTALLIZING SUGAR FROM THE SEPARATED LIQUID PHASE.
US390104A 1952-12-11 1953-11-04 Process for purifying molasses and crystallizing sugar therefrom Expired - Lifetime US2759857A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL2759857X 1952-12-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2759857A true US2759857A (en) 1956-08-21

Family

ID=19875611

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US390104A Expired - Lifetime US2759857A (en) 1952-12-11 1953-11-04 Process for purifying molasses and crystallizing sugar therefrom

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2759857A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2943004A (en) * 1958-03-31 1960-06-28 Simco Inc Sugar manufacture by alcohol extraction
US3174877A (en) * 1963-05-16 1965-03-23 Sun Oil Co Decolorizing sugar by extracting coloring matter therefrom with a methanol solution of a hydrocarbon
US4116712A (en) * 1977-09-06 1978-09-26 Othmer Donald F Solvent refining of sugar

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US345810A (en) * 1886-07-20 Franz schwengers
US1776819A (en) * 1925-09-05 1930-09-30 Distilleries Des Deux Sevres Process for increasing the output in the extraction of crystallized sugar from molasses and sirups
US2000202A (en) * 1932-07-20 1935-05-07 Vasques Eugenio Antonio Process for the recovery of sugar and salts from sugar cane molasses
US2109503A (en) * 1936-07-07 1938-03-01 Gustave T Reich Separation of saccharides
US2130029A (en) * 1936-04-24 1938-09-13 Gustave T Reich Process for the recovery of nonsugars from liquid saccharine materials
US2442804A (en) * 1944-06-21 1948-06-08 Peter J Gaylor Purification of sirups by solvent extraction
US2501914A (en) * 1945-08-13 1950-03-28 Pacific Chemical & Fertilizer Recovery of sucrose from molasses

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US345810A (en) * 1886-07-20 Franz schwengers
US1776819A (en) * 1925-09-05 1930-09-30 Distilleries Des Deux Sevres Process for increasing the output in the extraction of crystallized sugar from molasses and sirups
US2000202A (en) * 1932-07-20 1935-05-07 Vasques Eugenio Antonio Process for the recovery of sugar and salts from sugar cane molasses
US2130029A (en) * 1936-04-24 1938-09-13 Gustave T Reich Process for the recovery of nonsugars from liquid saccharine materials
US2109503A (en) * 1936-07-07 1938-03-01 Gustave T Reich Separation of saccharides
US2442804A (en) * 1944-06-21 1948-06-08 Peter J Gaylor Purification of sirups by solvent extraction
US2501914A (en) * 1945-08-13 1950-03-28 Pacific Chemical & Fertilizer Recovery of sucrose from molasses

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2943004A (en) * 1958-03-31 1960-06-28 Simco Inc Sugar manufacture by alcohol extraction
US3174877A (en) * 1963-05-16 1965-03-23 Sun Oil Co Decolorizing sugar by extracting coloring matter therefrom with a methanol solution of a hydrocarbon
US4116712A (en) * 1977-09-06 1978-09-26 Othmer Donald F Solvent refining of sugar

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2588449A (en) Levulose dihydrate
US2759857A (en) Process for purifying molasses and crystallizing sugar therefrom
US1973574A (en) Process for manufacturing and recovering glutamic acid
US2535117A (en) Process for recovery of glutamic acid and other values from steffen waste water
US4634472A (en) Enrichment of fructose syrups
US2615053A (en) Process for refining crude inositolcontaining solutions and for recovering inositol therefrom
US3391187A (en) Purification of malic acid
EP0072919B1 (en) Process for the preparation of 1,2-dimethyl-5-nitroimidazole of high purity
US2929839A (en) Process for recovering glutamic acid
US2708166A (en) Process for the flocculation of colloids in cheddar cheese whey
US2010384A (en) Process for the separation of isomeric pentanones
US2574165A (en) Process for the manufacture of the gamma isomer of hexachlorocyclohexane
US2175369A (en) Manufacture of dextrose
US2357838A (en) Preparation of a sugar
US2688037A (en) Manufacture of glutamic acid
US3141035A (en) Process for the preparation of choline salicylate
US3029280A (en) Process for recovering glutamic acid from fermentation broth
US2102380A (en) Process of crystallizing pure d-glucono-delta-lactone
US2275835A (en) Extraction of theobromine
US1947563A (en) Process for manufacturing and recovering glutamic acid and its compounds
US2929840A (en) Isolation of cystine
McGlumphy et al. Commercial Production of Levulose I-Generation Considerations
US2430855A (en) Purification of tartaric acid
US2933524A (en) Glutamic acid recovery
US2380890A (en) Preparation of glutamic acid hydrochloride