US2754314A - Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil - Google Patents

Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2754314A
US2754314A US294408A US29440852A US2754314A US 2754314 A US2754314 A US 2754314A US 294408 A US294408 A US 294408A US 29440852 A US29440852 A US 29440852A US 2754314 A US2754314 A US 2754314A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
catalyst
product
gasoline
oil
upgrading
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US294408A
Inventor
Henry G Mcgrath
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MW Kellogg Co
Original Assignee
MW Kellogg Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MW Kellogg Co filed Critical MW Kellogg Co
Priority to US294408A priority Critical patent/US2754314A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2754314A publication Critical patent/US2754314A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G17/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge
    • C10G17/095Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge with "solid acids", e.g. phosphoric acid deposited on a carrier
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G29/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S208/00Mineral oils: processes and products
    • Y10S208/95Processing of "fischer-tropsch" crude

Description

PROCESS FOR UPGRADING HYDROCARBON SYNTHESIS OIL July 10, 1956 m m w m M V G Q flaw m M 6 w Rm W M 0-. ww r L PH; LN AV v. wwmumwfl Q B d w NM. N mokufim hm a u N U. Q. \NN Q is H 135x52 12 x25 &\ a fl w ww ATTOR N EYS United States Patent PROCESS FOR UPGRADING HYDROCARBON SYNTE'ESIS E Henry G. McGrath, Union, N. 5., assignor to The M. W. Kellogg Company, Jersey City, N. J., a corporation of Delaware Application June 19, 1952, Serial No. 294,463
Claims. (Cl. 26il45ll) This is a continuation-in-part of application Serial No.
This invention relates to an improved process for upgrading or treating a hydrocarbon oil containing oxygenated organic compounds to yield a product of higher octane quality and stability, and more particularly pertains to an improved process for treating an oil product derived by the synthesis of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to improve the anti-knock quality and stability of the gasoline product and the stability of the diesel fraction.
The presence of oxygenated organic compounds in hydrocarbon oils is disadvantageous from the standpoint of stability when such materials are present in gasoline and diesel oil fractions. The presence of the oxygenated organic compounds renders the diesel oil and gasoline products unstable by reason of the corrosive action and/ or further oxidation or decomposition of the oxygen- .containing compounds. This problem is particularly acute in the case of diesel oils and gasoline products which are produced by the synthesis of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Normally, in a hydrocarbon synthesis operation, a substantial part of the product is constituted of oxygenated organic compounds, both the water soluble and water insoluble types. The oil product is usually subjected to a separation treatment in order that the various compounds of the product can be utilized in the best manner known. It is difiicult to completely separate all of the oxygenated organic compounds from the normally liquid hydrocarbon materials, and even if such an operation is possible, it is not economical for use on a commercial scale. As a result, it is usually found that a small amount of the oil product which has undergone a separation treatment consists of oxygenated organic compounds. Therefore, it has been the practice to subject the entire hydrocarbon material or the gasoline fraction thereof containing small amounts of oxygenated organic compounds to a treating step whereby the hydrocarbon fractions are upgraded for specific uses, e. g., the anti-knock quality of the gasoline product, as well as for deoxygenation of the hydrocarbon fractions.
It was found that the treatment of the entire oil product leads to serious operating difiiculties, because of the presence of metal contaminants in the oil product, as 80 well as the high boiling components, comprising the wax fractions, which are present in the oil. The metal contaminants cause plugging of the heating means wherein the oil product is preheated to a desired temperature.
Furthermore, these metals contaminate the catalytic boiling materials and as a result they are readily converted to coke and normally gaseous products which possess little or no economic value. Therefore, any
' undergoes branching.
upgrading operation in which the oil feed contains the wax fraction results in an undesired conversion of the oil feed material to such products as coke and normally gaseous materials. This phenomenon is to be avoided because of the economic loss incurred.
In order to avoid the production of coke and normally gaseous materials in the upgrading treatment, it was suggested heretofore that the oil feed be diluted with an inert gas, such as for example, steam, nitrogen, etc., to reduce the oil partial pressure and obtain a less severe upgrading treatment. The presence of an inert diluent during the upgrading treatment does result in lower yields of coke and normally gaseous materials, but it was also found that such a practice may adversely effect the deoxygenation of the oil product. This indicates that the reactions involving the removal of oxygen from the oxygenated organic compounds takes place at a slower rate than those reactions involving the upgrading treatment of the hydrocarbon materials. Normally, in the upgrading treatment, the gasoline production is improved by isomerization reactions involving the shift of the double bond from the terminal position in the olefins to a position farther from the terminal carbon atoms in the molecule. To a lesser extent, the molecule In the case of the oxygenated organic compounds, the removal of oxygen is effected mainly by decarboxylation and dehydration reactions. As a result, there is produced water, CO and CO2 in the deoxygenation and upgrading treatment. It can be seen therefore, that while the use of an inert diluent has reduced the loss of oil product through the formation of coke and normally gaseous materials, the upgrading treatment is deficient insofar as oxygen removal is concerned.
The processing of the gasoline fraction alone results in a decreased quantity of upgraded product by reason that a portion thereof is converted to coke and normally gaseous product materials. Heretofore, it was attempted to overcome the disadvantage of lower yields of up- 0 graded gasoline product by processing the entire oil product including gasoline, diesel oil and wax fraction, and as previously indicated, this technique resulted in an undesirable loss of feed material to coke and gas by reason of the coke forming tendencies of the high boiling components in the wax fraction and/or the presence of metal contaminants. When an upgrading operation is conducted for maximum production of high quality gasoline, the aforementioned procedures are not as efficient as is desired, consequently, it is proposed to overcome this problem by means of the present invention.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved upgrading treatment for a hydrocarbon material containing oxygenated organic compounds.
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved process for the upgrading of an oil product derived by the synthesis of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
Still another object of this invention is to provide an improved method for deoxygenation of gasoline fractions containing oxygenated organic compounds whereby the yields are substantially improved.
A further object of this invention is to provide a method for deoxygenating a diesel fraction containing oxygenated organic compounds.
A still further object of this invention is to provide an improved method for the cetane improvement of diesel fractions which are derived by the synthesis of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description and explanation thereof.
By means of the present invention, it is contemplated improving the quality of hydrocarbon materials having included therein oxygenated organic compounds by the method which comprises contacting the said hydrocarbon material having an end point'of between about 650 and 750 F. with an alumina-containing upgrading catalyst at an elevated temperature sufiicient to deoxygenate a substantial amount of the oxygenated organic compounds and improve the quality of the hydrocarbon material.
More particularly, the present invention is concerned with an upgrading treatment for an oil fraction which is derived by the synthesis of carbon monoxide and hydrogen and which contains oxygenated organic compounds by the method which comprises separating that portion of the oil product which boils above about 650 or above about 750 F. from the remainder of the oil product, contacting the separated oil fraction boiling below about 650 or below about 750 F. with an alumina-containing upgrading catalyst at a temperature sufiicient to deoxygenate a substantial part of the oxygenated organic compounds contained therein and to improve the quality of i the hydrocarbon material which is present in the'traction.
hydrocarbon material having present therein oxygenated organic compounds regardless of the source from which this material is derived. The hydrocarbon material can comprise a diesel oil alone or a mixture of diesel oil and gasoline fractions. The hydrocarbon oil to be processed has an end point between about 650 and 750 F. When this oil constitutes diesel oil alone, it can have an initial boiling point of about 400 to about 500 F.; whereas the gasoline fraction when processed with the diesel oil can have an initial boiling point of about 85 to 325 F. and an end point of about 350 to about 450 F. The present invention is particularly applicable for upgrading a hydrocarbon synthesis product, e. g., a fraction boiling from about 100 to 650 F. and about 400 to 650 F.
The product derived by the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen contains a variety of compounds boiling in the gasoline and diesel oil and heavy oil or wax fractions. In addition, the oil product from hydrocarbon synthesis contains a variety of oxygenated organic compounds, both of the water soluble and water insoluble types. Normally, a substantial part of the oxygenated organic compounds are removed by a simple water washing operation. It is to be expected that a small amount of the water soluble oxygenated organic compounds remain in the oil product, however, for the most part the oxygenated organic compounds which remain are water insoluble. Such organic compounds are of high molecular weight and thus readilysolubilize with the hydrocarbon materials. Another technique for the removal of at least part of the oxygenated organic compounds, as well as those materials which are normally gaseous under atmospheric conditions involves partial condensation of the reactor etfiuent from'the synthesis operation in one or more steps. The oil product is normally condensed and further processed to improve the quality of the desired products. An unusually effective method of separation which is adapted especially for use with the present invention involves a two-stage condensation of the reactor efiluent from the hydrocarbon synthesis operation. In the first condensation step, the temperature is controlled in order to condense substantially all of the heavy oil or wax fraction with or without all or a part of the diesel oil fraction. This partial condensation is effected at a temperature of about 150 to 450 Frand a pressure of about 150 to 650 p. s. i. g.
Preferably the partial condensation is efiected at a temperature of 300 F. and a pressure of 250 p. s. i. g. in the second step, the gasoline fraction is condensed with or without all or a part of the'diesel oil fraction. By
7 this technique, the volume or quantity of the oil product which must be subjected to a preliminary separation treatment'for the separation of the heavy oil having an initial boiling point of about 650 to about 750 F. is
kept to a minimum. This results in reduced operating costs for the preliminary separation as well as a decrease in the equipment investment which is required for the preliminary separation. As previously indicated, it is desirable to separate the wax or heavy oil fraction having an intial boiling point of about 650 to about 750 F., because of the loss of material which results in the upgrading treatment through coke and normally gaseous materials, as well as the decline in catalyst activity in the upgrading treatment resulting from contamination of the'catalyst with the metal normally used. in the synthesis operation as catalyst, as well as the metal which is picked up by having the oil product in contact with steel equipment. 7
The synthesis of hydrocarbons is conducted by contacting hydrogen and carbon monoxide in suitable relative quantities over a catalyst comprising a group Vlll metal or a carbide of the group ll metal. Generally, on a volumetric basis, about 0.5l0:l of hydrogen to CO are employed in the reaction. In the case of the iron type of catalyst, it is preferred to use about 2-5zl of hydrogen to CO on a volumetric basis. In this respect, cobalt and nickel types of catalyst yield better results by using the preferred volumetric ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the order of about 25:l. The hydrogen and carbon monoxide are in contact with the synthesis catalyst as a vapor or liquid phase reaction. The iron catalyst is employed as, for example, a precipitated iron type derived by reacting an iron salt with a suitable reagent to form iron oxide. Another iron type of catalyst is prepared by fusing iron oxide with an alumina and with or without a suitable metal compound, such as for example, the carbonate, hydroxide and oxide of sodium, potassium, etc. Ordinarily, the cobalt and nickel catalysts contain the catalytic agent supported on a carbon material, such as, for example, kieselguhr, alumina,'fullers earth, pumice, silica-alumina, activated carbon, etc. Oftentimes, cobalt and nickel in the suitable form are precipitated as a basic carbonate on the carrier material in the preparation thereof. An alkali metal oxide is a suitable promoter which is preferably used with the iron type of catalyst. This promoter serves to promote the reaction between hydrogen and carbon monoxide and results in higher yields for a given reaction than is ordinarily obtained without the use thereof. Generally, the group Vlli metal types of catalyst are either partially or completely reduced before use in the synthesis operation;
Other types of catalyst which have been used for synthesis reactions involving carbon monoxide and hydrogen are, for example, cobalt--magnesia-thoria-lzieselguhr, nickel-manganese-alumina-kieselguhr, zinc oxide-aluminathoria, molybdena-alltali metal oxide, chromia-allrali metal oxide, etc. Another group Vlll metal which has been used successfully for the synthesis of high boiling hydrocarbons from hydrogen and carbon monoxide is The synthesis reaction is usually conducted at a temperature of about 300 to about 675 F. In the case of an iron type of catalyst, it is preferred to employ a temperature of about 450 to about 650 F. With a cobalt or nickel type of catalyst, it is preferred to employ a temperature of about 350 to about 475 F. At these temperatures, the reaction pressure may vary from about 1' atmosphere to about 650 p. s. i. g. synthesizing hydrocarbons with an iron type of catalyst is preferably conducted at a pressure in the order of about 80 to about 600 p. s. i. g. The cobalt type of catalyst gives better results at a preferred pressure of about 1 atmosphere to about 250 p. s. i. g. The nickel type of catalyst is preferably used at a reaction pressure in the order of about 1 atmosphere to about 75 p. s. i. g. The relationship between the quantity of synthesis gas and the catalyst which is present during the reaction period is conveniently expressed as the volumetric space velocity, namely, the volume of synthesis gas (C hydrogen) measured at 60 F. and 760 mm., which is supplied to the reaction zone on an hourly basis per volume of catalyst which is present in the reaction zone. Usually, for the synthesis operation, the volumetric space velocity may vary in the range of about 100 to about 5000 Vo/hI'-/Vc- In the case of an iron catalyst it is preferred to use about 100 to about 500 Vo/hL/Vc; whereas the space velocity for a nickel or cobalt type of catalyst is about 100 to about 1000 Vo/hL/Vc. Although not necessary, the synthesis operation is conducted for recycling of the normally gaseous material to the reaction zone. This recycle gas is customarily referred to as a tail gas and it is recycled usually at a rate of about 0.5-3.5:1 on a volumetric basis, based on the fresh feed throughput. In the case of an iron type of catalyst, it is preferred to control operating conditions in order to maintain less than about 16% by volume of carbon monoxide in the cooled gas and also preferably less than about 25% carbon dioxide in the inlet feed gas.
The synthesis of hydrocarbons can be conducted as either a fixed or moving bed system involving a fluid or non-fluid technique. In the non-fluid operation, the catalyst is employed as a pelleted or granular material; whereas for fluid operation the catalyst is in a finely divided form having a particle size in the range of about 5 to about 250 microns, preferably about to about 100 microns. In the fiuid system, the catalyst is fluidized by the upward passage by gaseous materials through a mass of finely divided catalyst material at a superficial linear gas velocity in the order of about 0.5 to about 25 feet per second, more usually, about 1 to about 7 feet per second. In a high velocity reaction system, the superficial linear gas velocity of the reactants is in the order of about 4.5 to about 7 feet per second.
The oil product from the synthesis operation having included therein water insoluble oxygenated organic compounds and water soluble oxygenated organic compounds is treated in accordance with the present invention in order to upgrade the quality and stability of the diesel oil, with or without doing the same to the gasoline product. This upgrading involves deoxygenating the oxygenated organic compounds and isomerizing the olefins which are present in the product materials. The present invention is effective for the deoxygenation of oxygenated organic compounds whether they are water soluble or Water insoluble. As a practical matter, it is desirable to separate as much of the oxygenated organic compounds as is possible from the oil product in order to decrease the cost of operating the upgrading treatment. In this manner, a substantial part of the oxygenated organic compounds can be advantageously utilized for specific purposes. Generally, the hydrocarbon oil to be treated contains about 0.02 to about 0.5 m.e./gm. acidity. If diesel oil alone is processed about 0.004 to about 0.25 m.e./gm. acidity is usually encountered; whereas with the gasoline fraction about 0.03 to about 0.7 m.e./ gm. acidity is usual- 1y found. Generally, the upgrading treatment is conducted at a temperature in the order of about 700 to about 950 F., preferably about 750 to about 850 F. The operation can be accomplished by employing atmospheric pressure, however, higher pressures can be used in order to facilitate material handling problems, etc. For this purpose, a reaction pressure in the order of about 0 to about 100 p. s. i. g. can be used advantageously, preferably about 0 to about p. s. i. g.
The material to be upgraded is contacted with the catalytic material containing alumina. The catalyst can be solely alumina or alumina in combination with silica or another suitable catalytic material. For the purpose of this specification and the appended claims, an alumina containing catalyst is intended to generically include alumina alone as well as catalysts comprising alumina and some other active component, e. g., silica. Better results are obtained in the use of silica and alumina containing catalyst over a catalyst comprised of alumina alone, although an alumina catalyst is useful for the purposes of this invention. Specific examples of catalysts which are used for the purpose of upgrading oil products containing oxygenated organic compounds are bauxite, Porocel, activated alumina, alumina gel, silicastabilized alumina, Montmorillonite clays, such as for example, Superfiltrol, synthetic alumina cracking catalysts, etc. In the case of a silica-alumina containing catalyst generally about to about 99% of the catalyst contains silica and the remainder about 1 to about 30% by weight is alumina, based on the total weight of the catalyst. It is preferred, however, to have about to about of silica and about 25 to about 5% of alumina in the catalyst for this invention.
The oil product to be upgraded is brought into contact with a catalytic material in the vapor phase for a period of about 1 to about 50, preferably about 2 to about 12 hours. It is convenient to express the relative quantities of feed and catalytic material employed in the reaction in terms of the volumetric space velocity which is defined as the volume of liquid feed charged to the reaction zone on an hourly basis per volume of catalyst which is present in the reaction zone. Generally, the space velocity is about 0.2 to about 20 Vo/hL/Vc, preferably in the range of about 2 to about 5. As a result of treating the liquid product with the catalytic material under reaction conditions, a carbonaceous material is deposited on the catalyst which causes a decline in catalytic activity. The drop in catalyst activity is temporary, because a catalyst can be regenerated by burning the carbonaceous material with an oxygen-containing gas. Ordinarily, air or oxygen can be used for this purpose, however, in view that small quantities of carbonaceous material are formed in the process, it is desirable for the sake of temperature control to employ diluted air for the regeneration of the catalyst. If a highly concentrated form of an oxygen containing stream were employed for the regeneration of the catalyst, there is a tendency for excessive temperatures to occur by reason of the difi'iculty to control the regeneration temperature. The regeneration gas stream generally contains about 1 to about 10% by volume of oxygen, preferably about 2 to about 5% by volume of oxygen. The regeneration is usually conducted at a temperature of about 700 to about 1200" F., preferably about 900 to about 1050" F. At the temperature specified the regeneration can be effected at atmospheric pressure or it can be effected at the same pressure employed for the reaction phase of the process. Accordingly, the pressures specified above for the upgrading treatment can also be employed for the regeneration step.
The upgrading operation can be accomplished as a fixed or moving bed system involving the fluid or nonfluid technique. By reason that the quantity of coke formed in the upgrading treatment is relatively small compared to other operations, the reaction phase or period of operation may run for about 1 to about 40 hours in the case of a fixed bed non-fluid system. In the preferred instance, the reaction period is conducted for about 2 to about 8 hours. The regeneration cycle or period may be operated for the same length of time as the reaction period however, generally, it can be run for about 3 to about 50 hours, preferably about 6 to about 24 hours. In a fixed bed system, it is desirable to employ two vessels for the upgrading treatment. In this manner, it is possible to maintain a continuous flow of processing materials. While V treating operation one one vessel is processing or upgrading the liquid product, the other vessel is being regenerated. The fixed bed system may involve either fluid or non-fluid techniques depending upon the size of the catalytic material. For a fluid system, the catalyst is used as particles having a size in the order of about 2 to about 250 microns, or "more usually, about 10 to abouflO-l microns. finely divided catalyst material capable of being fluidized by the upward passage therethrough of the gaseous reactant at a superficial linear gas velocity of about 0.1 to about 59 feet per second, more usually, about l to about 6 feet per second. in the conventional dense phase operation, it is preferred to use a Superficial linear gas velocity in the order of about l2.5 feet per second. On the other hand, it is also conemplated using the high velocity catalyst circulation system in which the superficial linear gas velocity is in the order of about 4.5 to about 7 feet per second. For a moving bed system, a separate vessel is employed as the regenerator and another vessel as the reactor. After the nuid catalyst has in the reaction zone for a given period of'time, it is contaminated with carbonaceous materials which lowers its activity, thus it is continuously v ndrawn from the reaction zone and circulated to the regeneration zone wherein the contaminating deposits are removed by combustion. A continuous stream or regenerued catalysts is recirculated to the reaction There greater flexibility of operation in a fluid system and in some cases, it is a highly desirable method of operation.
In the upgrading treatment, it is also contemplated employing an inert diluent for the purpose of reducing the oil partial pressure and thus the severity of the treating step. W rile this is not necessary for the purposes of this invention, it may under certain conditions where the oil feed contains an unusual amount of diesel oil be especially ellective. Accordingly, inert diluent can be used in the amount of about 10 to about standard cubic feet per barrel of oil feed (measured at 60 F. and 760 mm.) preferably about 580 to about 260 s. c. f per barrel of oil feed. The inert diluent includes any material which is gaseous under reaction conditions and which will not react or decompose. Speci examples of the inert diluout are steam, nitrogen, normally gaseous hydrocarbons, such as for example, methane, ethane, etc.
The oil feed to the upgrading operation comprises a hydrocarbon mat al having an end point of about 659 to about 750 Ordinarily, the endpoint specified is sufficient to eliminate in the heavier boiling fractions any of the metal contaminants, as well as those components which have a high tendency to produce carbon and/or normail gaseous materials under treating conditions. in the case of upgrading, the oil pro act from a hydrocarbon synthesis ation, the selection of an end point for the feed mate dependent the type of catalyst employed in tne synthesis operation in order to obtain optimum results. For example, the use of an iron type of catalyst in the synthesis operation produces a product containing relatively less WEIX' or heavy material than 'a synthesis operation in which is employed as the catalyst. Since less wax or heavy boiling mater produced in the synthesis operation using the iron type of catalyst, it is preferred to use as a feed material in the than about 656 similarly, in the case of rading or treating a l quid product which was produced in synthesis operation employing a cobalt type of catalyst, it is preferred to employ as a feed material to the treating operation one which has an end point rgreater than 756 F. Various grada us of points of fee 7 materials to the treating operationcan be used depending upon the quantity of wax material and the boiling characteristics thereof which are present in the synthesis liquid product. The quality of the disel oil fraction in the liquid product derived from the synthesis operation it .ng the cobalt type of catalyst warrants raising the end point of 'ch has an end point of not more the diesel fraction in order to obtain the utmost benefits therefrom. On the other hand, a diesel cut having an end point not greater than 650 F. in the case of synthesis by means of an iron type catalyst is preferred because the quality of the material boiling above about 650 F. does not warrant inclusion with the diesel oil fraction.
Various experiments were conducted on a laboratory scale in order to evaluate various conditions for upgrading treatment of hydrocarbon materials containing oxygenated organic compounds. Figure 1 contains a schematic illustration of a laboratory test unit which was used for the purpose of evaluating the upgrading treatment of various hydrocarbon materials. a
In Figure 1, the hydrocarbon material was supplied from an oil feed tank 5 and passed fromthe bottom thereof by means of a valved line 6 which is connected to the suction side of a pump 7 by means of line 8. The oil can be discharged from tank 5 by means of a vent line 9 containing a valve 10 which is connected to the tank bottom by line 6. The oil feed was pumped through the discarge line 11 of the pump containing a valve 12. When the oil feed was discontinued valve 12 was maintained in a closed position in order to avoid any backflow of processing materials which may have leaked through valve 14 which is located at the other end of line 11. The oil feed was passed through a'line 16, part of which is submerged in a molten lead bath 17 contained in an open ended vessel 18.
Line 16 extends approximately the entire length of the open ended vessel 18 which contains the molten lead 7 tial part of the length' of the reactor before entering through the wall thereof at a point about 4 inches from the top end. Coil 21 terminates as oil inlet 22 within the reactor vessel 19. The reactor is a vessel 30 inches in length and has an internal diameter of 1 inch. The catalytic material in the granularor pelleted form occupied 21 inches of its length for a total volume of 230- 250 cc. The reaction temperatures were indicated by two thermocouples, thermocouple 24- is located about. 4 inches from the top and thennocouple 25 is located about 3 inches from the bottom of catalyst bed. The reaction product was discharged from the bottom of the reactor through a line 27 and this line is joined with a coil 29 contained within a closed vessel 31. The coil 2% was surrounded by cooling water which was introduced into vessel 31 by means of an inlet 3 located at the bottom thereof, and it was discharged from the top of vessel 31 by means of a line 34. The reaction product was cooled at substantially the same pressure as eristed within the reactor. The total product passed through coil 29 and then entered a product receiver 36 by means of line 3'7 'therebetween. The product receiver is equipped with a valved line 38 at the bottornthereof for discharging the condensed liquid, and also, with an overhead vapor or gas line 40' at the top thereof. The pressure within receiver was maintained at a desired level by means of a control valve 42, and thence, the gaseous material passed to the suction side of a wet test gas meter 43 by means of a line 44-. After the gaseous material was measured, it was vented from the system by a line 45.
When nitrogen was employed as a diluent for the upgrading treatment, it was supplied from a source 59 which contains a valve 51. The nitrogen then passed from line 5% into a header 52 which contained a valve 53 at the other end to prevent leakage from line 16 into header 52. Header 52 is directly connected to line 16 thereby permitting nitrogen to flow into the reactor via coil 21 Similarly, air is supplied from a source 55 which contains avalve 58. The air line 56 is in turn connected to header 52. Insome experiments, steam was employedas a diluent and in order to avoid introducing 9 foreign materials, it was generated from vaporizing water. For this purpose, a water tank 60 served as the supply for water which was discharged from the bottom thereof through a valved line 61 to the suction side of a pump 63. The water was discharged from the pumps through a line 64 which contains a valved bleed line 65 for the purpose of emptying the discharge line of the pump whenever desired. Line 64 is also connected to a line 67 in which is installed a valve 68, and line 67 is connected to a water vaporizer drum 70. The vaporizer drum is submerged in a molten bath of lead 71 contained within an open ended vessel 72. The water is introduced into one end of the vaporizer drum by means of line 67 and steam emerges from the other end thereof by means of line 74 which is coiled around the outer surface of drum 70. The coiled line 74 terminates outside of the molten bath as line 75, and in turn it is connected to line 16. Line 16 also contains a valve 76, which serves to prevent back-flow of materials from line 16 into the vaporizer drum 70, when steam is not flowing through line 75.
In operation the steam produced in the water vaporizer had a temperature of about 750 to about 850 F. The conditions which existed in the product condenser reduced the temperature of the reactor efliuent from about 2 Table I Feed Designation I II III IV V VI API Gravity. 42. 2 55. l 53. 3 53. 0 48. 5 48. 4 ASTM Distilla IB 180 101 174 182 218 204 5 240 130 240 250 271 256 10- 260 150 254 259 281 270 20 291 180 266 272 302 291 30- 314 212 274 279 324 312 356 246 288 292 343 337 5!) 384 280 300 312 373 366 423 320 314 328 407 400 471 374 330 346 452 444 536 444 350 364 507 505 368 392 576 580 88% 388 413 617 632 E. P. 416 434 644 650 Acidity, rue/gm 0. 25 0 147 0. 15 0. l2 0. 04 0. 078 \Vater \Vasbed Oil:
Acidity, Ina/gin 0. 21 0 072 Iron Content, Wt. Percent (As F6203) 0.13 0.008 Distribution of Oil, Vol. Percen Gasoline 430 E. P Diesel Oil 650 E. P Wax (650 F.+) 430 F., E. P. Gasoline:
Acidity, me /gm RVP, p. s. L. CFRM, clear Feed Source for IBP650 F.
or IBP-430 F. Fraction I I I I Wt. Percent Fraction, based on feed source 82. 4 83. 1
1 Cracked at 580 F. Cracked at 460 F. 3 400 E. P.
The total liquid product which was derived from a synthesis operation was treated in the laboratory equipment shown in Figure 1. The results of these experiments are reported in Table II below.
Table II Run No 1 2 3 4 Feed I I II II II Catalyst N0, of Re eneration 0 0 O 0 0 Length of Run, Hrs 1. 27 1. 62 3(0-3) '2(35) 1(5-6) 1.12 Operating Conditions: 7
Temperature, "F 795 800 800 800 800 800 Outlet pressure, p. s. i 15 15 15 15 10 Vol. of Catalyst, cc 236 250 230 230 230 230 Vol. of feed (00.) per Vol of Cat. (cc.) 4. 9 8. 9 23.5 23. 5 23. 5 4. 7 Feed rate, coJhr 910 1, 370 890 890 890 960 H2O rate, cc./hr 0 0 0 0 0 150 N rate, S. C. F. H 0 11 9 9 9 5 Yields (Output Basis):
C4 Gasoline (430 E. P.), Vol. percent 79.8 71. 7 84. 0 84. 7 80. 3 89.0 C4 Gasoline (430 E. P.), Vol. percent 73.4 69. 5 74.6 78.0 78.6 83.2 Diesel Cut (650 E. P.), Vol. percent 12. 7 20. 5 7. 5 10. 3 13. 5 9. 7 Polymer (650+), Vol. percent-.- 6. 1 8. 7 1.8 2.9 3.2 2. 2 H2O produced, Wt. percent" 0. 6 '1. 9 1. 3 Product Gas, Wt. percent 9.2 2. 3 2.1 2.2 Carbon, Wt. percent 0.4 0.4 0.3 1. 3 Inspections:
C5430 E. P. Gas0line Gravity, API 56. 4 54.8 60. 2 60. 6 60.6 66. 7 71. 4 75.0 0.011 0.025
.1 3. 2 1. 7 7.8 2.3 RVP,p.s. 3.3 1.8 3.4 3.4 3.3 4.7 Diesel Cut, 650 E.
Gravity, API 34. 7 38. 3 36. 5 36. 5 36. 5 35. 4 Octane No. 45. 0 45. 0 45.0 Acidity, meJg'm 0. 001 0.001 0. 003 Aniline Point, F 119 137 137 137 137 133 Wax650.+
Gravity, API 23.2 28.1 22.7 26.8 27. 9 24. 6
1 A (granules). A (pellets).
Me./gm. is milli-equivalent of acid per gram of sample tested.
11 From Table II, it is to'be noted that processing the total liquid containing the wax fraction without the use of a diluent gave unusual results with respect to deoxygenation, however, it is to be noted that the carbon yield is undesirably high. Furthermore, this experiment was conducted for a short period of time, in order to 12 A series of runs were made in order to determine what effect, if any, the regeneration of the catalyst would have upon the deoxygenation efliciency and octane improvement of the gasoline product when processing the total oil product including the wax fraction from a synthesis operation. These results are reported in Table III avoid the preheater C011, shown as coil 21 in F1gure 1, below.
Table III Run 570 1 2 3 4 5 Feed I I I I Catalyst N0. of Regeuerations. 1 2 3 0 1 Length of Run, Hrs 2.0 2.88 4. 23 4. 0 4.0 Operating Conditions:
Temperature, F 850 750 800 800 800 Outlet P- ssure, p. s. i. 15 10 10 10 Vol. of catalyst, cc 230 230 230 230 236 Yo}. of Feed/Vol. of Cat. (00.). 10.4 5. 5 19.0 14.9 16.3 Feed rate, cc./l1r l, 200 440 1,030 850 940 rate, co./br 0 0 150 150 150 N9 ate, SCFH 11 ll 0 0 0 Yields (Output Basis 100% C1 Gasoline (430 E. R), Vol. Percent 80. 3 65. 8 67. 8 71.0 64. 6 04 free Gasoline (430 E. P.), Vol. Percent. 76.6 63.9 66.6 67.9 64.2 Diesel Out (650 E. P.), Vol. Percent 16. 7 24.1 23.6 24. 6 21.4 Polymer, (650+), V01. Percent 4.1 5.7 10. 2 6.1 15. 6 11 0 produced, Wt. Percent.-. 3.0 4. 2 1.1 Product Gas, Wt. Percent". 3. 7 p 2.4 1.2 1.8 0.4 Carbon, Wt. Percent. 0.7 0.2 Inspections: 1 (-430 E. P. Gasoline- Gr vit'y, API 56.1 54.6 54.3 OJ. RBI, clear 73.0 65.8 62.5 Acidity, me./gm 0.005 0.083 0. 185 Stability, Hrs to Clear. 5. 4 l. 0 0. 6 Inhibit 8+ 0.9 0. 7 RVP, s. 2.4 l. 2 '1. 9 Diesel Cut, (650 E. P.)-
Gravity, API Cetane No Acidity, Ina/gm-.. Aniline Point, F Wax-(650 F. l-)' Gravity, 111 1.... 22.1 26.1 26. 9 25. 6 26. 5
l A (granules).
from plugging as a result of coke production and from the deposition of metal contaminants in the oil feed. 4,0 From other experiments, it was found that in runs of longer operating periods, the quality of the product would suffer appreciably and the preheater coil would become fouled with iron and coke containing deposits. Run 7 No. 2 illustrates the eflect of nitrogen dilution in the upgrading of the total oil. It is to be noted that there has been a significant decrease in the amount of deoxygena-' tion, although the carbon yield has been decreased. The decrease in deoxygenation is'best illustrated by reference to the 430 end point gasoline. However, the use of a diluent did not prevent the deposition of metal contaminants on the catalyst. Run No. 3 involves an operation of 6 hours during which three samples were'taken at the times designated within the table. It is to be noted in the case of the gasoline product, the oxygen content, measured as acidity increased'from 0.001 to 0011 over a" three hour period. In these runs, nitrogen was used'as the inert diluent, similarly as in the case of Run No. 2.
contaminated with carbon thus causing catalyst activity to decrease significantly. Run No. 4 in Table II is illustrative of a run in which both nitrogen and water were employed as the inert diluent. It should be particularly noted that while the carbon decreased significantly, the oxygen content of the gasoline product was undesirably high, thus demonstrating that the oil partial pressure was reduced to a greater extent than is desired to efiect good oxygen removal.
'uct obtained from the synthol operation.
7 Runs 1, 2 and 3 in Tables III above involve regeneration of catalyst after each of the runs shown in the table. It should be noted that the oxygen content of the gasoline product, measured as acidity, became progressively worse despite the regeneration of the catalyst after each run. For example, in run 1, the acidity for the gasoline produce wat 0.005; whereas the acidity of the same prodact in run No. 3 was 0.185. This clearly establishes that carbon deposition on the catalyst is not the prime factor 'for the poor deoxygenation which is obtained when processing the total liquid product from a synthesis operation. Furthermore, it should be noted that the octane improvement of the gasoline product became progres .sively worse after continued use of the catalyst even 7 with intermittent regeneration as indicated in runs l-3, inclusive Runs 4 and 5 involved a 4 hour reaction period with the use of steam as an inert diluent. After each run a sample of material which was plugging the preheater coil, shown as 21 in Figure l, was analyzed for iron content. The sample showed 88.71% by weight of iron determined as FezOs. .Hence, it is to be noted that the presence of steam was not effective in overcoming the tendency for the preheater coil to plug. Furthermore, in another experiment a sample of the catalyst *was. analyzed for iron content and theanalysis showed that 5.58% by weight of iron determined as F6203 was present. These series of runs illustrate that metal con- .tarnination of catalyst and plugging of the preheater coil due to the presence of metal contaminants in the oil feed are serious operating difiiculties, notwithstanding the use of inert diluents, such as nitrogen and steam, in order to reduce the oil partial pressure under reaction conditions 7 7' v A series of runs were also made on the gasoline prod- These data serve to give an indication of the oxygen removal and octane quality improvement which can be etfected, withis out the adverse effect caused by the presence of the wax fraction in the feed material.
141 notwithstanding the long period of treatment. During these series of runs, it was noted that the preheater coil Table IV Run No 1 2 3 4 Feed III I IV I IV Catalyst No. of Regenerations. 1 2 3 4 Lengt of run, Hrs.-. 2 2 2 2 2 Operating Conditions Temperature, F 800 800 800 800 800 Outlet Pressure, p. 1O 10 10 10 Vol. of Catalyst, co. 230 230 230 230 230 Vol. of Feed/V01 of 9.4 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.4 Feed Rate, cc. 1, 075 970 970 1, 000 970 H2O rate, cc./hr. 0 0 O 0 0 N2 rate, S. C. F. 0 0 0 0 0 Yields (Output Basis):
100% C4 Gasoline (430 E. P.) Vol. Percent. 95.3 94.7 95.2 93.2 95. 7 0; free Gasoline (430 E. P.), Vol. Percent. 87. 1 88.2 88.4 87. 4 89. 8 Polymer (430+), Vol. Percent 3. 5 4.3 3. 8 3. 7 2. 5 H2O produced, Wt. Percent 3.0 Y 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.5 Product Gas, Wt. Percent 2. 2 2. 7 2.6 2.0 2.4 Inspections:
(la-430 F. Gasoline- Gravity, API 60. 7 56. 7 58. 6 58.3 57. 8 CFRM, clear 1 75. a 74.4 74.5 74. 2 74.0 Acidity, me./gm 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Stability, Hrs. 2# drop:
Clear 3. 5 6. 3 5. 5 Inhibited 8+ RVP, p. 5.1 2.9 3.1 2.6 2.8
1 A (granules).
did not plug nor was there evidence of plugging at the end of run No. 5 in the above table. In the first five runs, steam was employed as the inert diluent and the results obtained therefrom show good octane improvement of the gasoline product as Well as efiective deoxygenation. Run No. 6 in Table V involves an operation in which an inert diluent was not employed. This run was made over a 4 hour period following which there was no evidence of preheater coil plugging and as is noted from the table above, still better deoxygenation and gasoline product upgrading was achieved than the previous runs.
these runs are reported in Table V. 0 The important feature of processing the gasoline and Table V Run No 1 2 3 4 5 6 Feed V V V V V VII at y (9 (9 No. of Regenerations 0 1 2 3 4 Length of Run, Hrs 4 4 4 4 4 4 Operating Conditions:
Temperature, F 802 800 800 801 806 807 Outlet pressure, p. s. i 10 10 l0 l0 10 10 Space VeL, Vn/hI./Vc 4. 3 4. 2 4. 3 4. 1 4. 1 4. 1 Feed Rate, cc./hr 998 958 994 950 956 954 1320 rate, cc./Hr 166 190 158 160 152 Yields (Output Basis 100% O4 Gasoline (430 E. P.), V01. Percent. 86.9 83. 9 82.7 82. 4 84.1 87. 1 430 E. P. Gasoline (C4 free), Vol. Percent 80.8 79. 5 79. 4 79. 7 81. 1 79. 6 Diesel Cut (650 E. P.), Vol. Percent b 11.7 8.6 a 11.2 d 4.4 d 4.1 11.5 Polymer (650+), Vol. Percent 0. 6 1. 5 1. 3 1. 5 0. 9 1. 1 1120 produced, Wt. Percent 3. 0 3.2 1. 4 2. 3 1. 3 2. 4 Product gas, Wt. Percent 2.1 1.7 1. 4 1.2 1. 3 2. 8 Inspections: 7
C4 iree430 E. P. Gasoline Gravity, API 57. 8 57. 1 56. 1 56. 1 56. 1 58. 6 Octane No. CFRM, clear 74. 9 73. 2 72.0 71. 3 71.5 74. 9 Acidity, me./gm 0. 04 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.001 RVP,p.S.i 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.9 1.7 3.3 Stability, Hrs. to 2# drop:
Clear"; 4. O 5. 5 3v 4 3. 9 6. 1 Inhibited 4. 5 5 0 6. 0 5. 6 l5. 0 Diesel Cut Gravity, API 34. 9 35. 7 37. 5 35. 0 35. 4 32. 3 Cetane No 47 47 45 Aniline Pt., F 152 152 Maximum Pour Pt., F +25 +25 +10 8 A (granules). 470650 F. 500-650 F. d 550650 F.
In Table V above, it is demonstrated that the deoxygenation remains fairly constant over an extended period of time, namely, 20 hours, With intermittent regeneration of catalyst after each 4 hour period of reaction. Furthermore, the quality of the gasoline is substantially the same 7 the yield of treated gasoline is less than because part this invention is illustrated in Table VI below.
1.5 of the gasoline is converted to material boiling higher than gasoline, dry or product gas and carbon. 7 On the other hand processing the mixture of gasoline and diesel oil results in yields of gasoline which are higher than what is originally present in the feed. In the case of feed No. V, there is present about 76.6 volume per cent of 430 F. end point gasoline. treatment of feed No. V, significantly more than 76.6% by volume of 430 F. end point gasoline is produced. Therefore, from the standpoint of gasoline production, it
is advantageous to treat the gasoline and diesel fractions together, rather than treat the gasoline fraction alone, or the entire oil including gasoline, diesel oil and wax fraction. By comparison of run N0. 1 in Table IV with run No. 6 in Table V, it is seen that it is easier to remove oxygenated compounds from the gasoline fraction alone to a figure of 0.001 acidity than when processing diesel oil plus gasoline to obtain a gasoline of the same acidity. The greater severity required for the gasoline plus diesel oil feed results in higher yields of gasoline product because of decomposition of diesel oil. Further, it is not desirable to include the Wax fraction with the diesel fraction for the upgrading operation, because the wax fraction contains compounds of high coke forming tend encies and/ or it may contain metal contaminants.
In every run involving the The treatment of diesel oil alone in accordance with In this operation activated alumina was employed as catalyst,
V and the treatment was effected at 850 B, one atmosphere pressure, 'a space velocity of 1.8 Vo/hI./Cc, and for a period of 8 hours.
From Table VI above, it is to be noted that the treated diesel oil had improved in performance quality, and the amount of water, CO and CO2 produced indicated that deoxygenation was also attained.
Having thus described my invention by reference to specific examples, it should be understood that no undue limitations or restrictions are to be imposed by reason thereof, but that the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims. a
I claim:
1. A method of upgrading the quality of a synthetic normally liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a synthesis catalyst, the product characterized by having an end point of about 650 to about 750 F. and containing oxygenated compounds, which method comprises contacting said product with'an alumina containing catalyst at an elevated temperature and such other conditions that substantial deoxygenation occursand the qual-' ity of the hydrocarbon material is improved.
2. A method of upgrading the quality of a synthetic normally liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a synthesis catalyst, the product consisting essentimly of diesel oil and gasolineis characterized by having an end point of about 650 to about 750 F. and contains 16 oxygenated compounds, which method comprises contacting said product with an alumina containing catalyst at an elevated temperature and such otherconditions that substantial deoxygenation occurs and the octane quality of the gasoline fraction is improved.
3. A method of upgrading the qualityof a synthetic normally liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the pres. ence of a synthesis catalyst, the product consisting essentially of gasoline and diesel oil is characterized by having an end point of about 650 to about 750 F. and contains oxygenated compounds, which method comprises contacting said product with an alumina containing catalyst at a temperature of about 700 to about 950 F., a total pressure of 1 atmosphere to about p, s. i. g., and a volumetric space velocity of about 0.2 to about 20 such that substantial deoxygenation occurs and the octane quality of the gasoline fraction is improved.
4. A method of upgrading the quality of a synthetic normally liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a synthesis catalyst, the product consisting essentially of gasoline and diesel oil is characterized by having an end point of about 650 to about 750 F. and contains oxygenated compounds, which method comprises contacting said product with an alumina containing catalyst at a temperature of about 750 to about-850 E, a total pressure of about 1 atmosphere to about 20 p. s. i. g. and a volumetric space velocity of about 2 to about 5 such that substantial deoxygenation occurs and the octane quality of the gasoline fraction is improved.
5. A method for upgrading the quality of a synthetic normally liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a synthesis catalyst which comprises removing from said liquid hydrocarbon product of said synthesis reaction a high boiling Wax fraction having an initial boiling point between about 650 and about 750 F. and recovering a lower boiling liquid fraction containing oxygenated organic compounds, contacting said lower boiling fraction containing oxygenated organic compounds with an alumina containing catalyst at an elevated temperature and such other conditions that substantial deoxygenation occurs and the quality of the hydrocarbon material is improved. 7
Reference Cited in the file of this patent V UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,895,081 Miller et a1. ..V Jan. 24, 1933 1,949,749 Lowry Mar. 6, 1934 2,016,271 Buett et a1. Oct. 8, 1935 2,116,061 Dorrer May 3, 1938 2,319,738 Jones May 18, 1943 2,324,066 Connolly July 13, 1943 2,340,922 Bent et al. Feb. 8, 1944 2,360,787 Murphree et a1. Oct. 17, 1944 2,384,315 Kuhl Sept. 4, 1945 2,450,724 Grotc Oct. 5, 1948 2,452,121 Grahame Oct. 26, 1948 2,461,064 Kemp Feb. 8, 1949 2,461,069 Marisic et a1; Feb. 8, 1949 2,476,788 White July 19, 1949 2,528,586 Ford Nov. 7, 1950 2,528,587 Nov. 7, 1950' 2,537,620 Brandon Ian. 9, 1951 2,542,471 Brandon Feb. 20, 1951 2,558,137 Hepp June 26, 1951 2,600,452 Voorhies 1une 17, 1952 FOREIGN PATENTS France Sept. 30, 1940

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD OF UPGRADING THE QUALITY OF A SYNTHETIC NORMALLY LIQUID HYDROCARBON PRODUCT DERIVED FROM THE REACTION OF CARBON MONOXIDE AND HYDROGEN IN THE PRESENCE OF A SYNTHESIS CATALYST, THE PRODUCT CHARACTERIZED BY HAVING AN END POINT OF ABOUT 650* TO ABOUT 750* F. AND CONTAINING OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS, WHICH METHOD COMPRISES CONTACTING SAID PRODUCT WITH AN ALUMINA CONTAINING CATALYST AND AN ELEVATED TEMPERATURE AND SUCH OTHER CONDITIONS THAT SUBSTANTIAL DEOXYGENATION OCCURS AND THE QUALITY OF THE HYDROCARBON MATERIAL IS IMPROVED.
US294408A 1952-06-19 1952-06-19 Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil Expired - Lifetime US2754314A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US294408A US2754314A (en) 1952-06-19 1952-06-19 Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US294408A US2754314A (en) 1952-06-19 1952-06-19 Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2754314A true US2754314A (en) 1956-07-10

Family

ID=23133278

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US294408A Expired - Lifetime US2754314A (en) 1952-06-19 1952-06-19 Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2754314A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2943104A (en) * 1957-05-08 1960-06-28 Pan American Petroleum Corp Treatment of hydrocarbon solutions of oxygenated chemicals
US4013737A (en) * 1975-06-16 1977-03-22 Universal Oil Products Company Upgrading synthetic gasoline
US4086262A (en) * 1976-09-20 1978-04-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4096163A (en) * 1975-04-08 1978-06-20 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4157338A (en) * 1975-04-08 1979-06-05 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4159995A (en) * 1977-08-22 1979-07-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures utilizing dual reactors
US4410637A (en) * 1980-12-15 1983-10-18 Shell Oil Company Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture from H2 /CO mixtures

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1895081A (en) * 1931-01-26 1933-01-24 Continental Oil Co Method for converting hydrocarbon materials
US1949749A (en) * 1931-05-02 1934-03-06 Universal Oil Prod Co Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2016271A (en) * 1932-09-10 1935-10-08 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for desulphurizing hydrocarbons
US2116061A (en) * 1929-10-26 1938-05-03 Standard Ig Co Purification of mineral oils, tars, their distillation products, and the like
FR860383A (en) * 1938-10-09 1941-01-13 Int Koolwaterstoffen Synthese Manufacturing process for indetonating fuels
US2319738A (en) * 1940-12-28 1943-05-18 Standard Oil Dev Co Refining mineral oils
US2324066A (en) * 1940-08-03 1943-07-13 Standard Oil Dev Co Purification of hydrocarbon oils
US2340922A (en) * 1941-04-15 1944-02-08 Atlantic Refining Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2360787A (en) * 1940-12-27 1944-10-17 Standard Catalytic Co Chemical process
US2384315A (en) * 1942-08-06 1945-09-04 Standard Oil Dev Co Process for cracking crude hydrocarbon oil
US2450724A (en) * 1946-12-28 1948-10-05 Universal Oil Prod Co Conversion of sulfur containing hydrocarbons
US2452121A (en) * 1947-11-26 1948-10-26 Texas Co Conversion of synthetic hydrocarbons containing oxygenated compounds to hydrocarbons of high octane value
US2461069A (en) * 1944-06-10 1949-02-08 Socony Vacuum Oil Co Inc Simultaneous catalytic cracking and desulfurization of hydrocarbons
US2461064A (en) * 1945-10-20 1949-02-08 Texas Co Method of manufacturing motor fuel
US2476788A (en) * 1945-09-28 1949-07-19 Standard Oil Co Method for the recovery of hydrocarbon synthesis products
US2528587A (en) * 1947-08-20 1950-11-07 Houdry Process Corp Art of desulfurizing diesel fuel and similar hydrocarbon fractions
US2528586A (en) * 1947-06-03 1950-11-07 Houdry Process Corp Catalytic desulfurization and cracking of sulfur-containing petroleum
US2537620A (en) * 1947-09-09 1951-01-09 Standard Oil Dev Co Process for desulfurizing petroleum oils
US2542471A (en) * 1946-06-15 1951-02-20 Standard Oil Dev Co Removal of peroxides from cracked gasoline by catalytic hydrogenation
US2558137A (en) * 1947-12-29 1951-06-26 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for sulfur removal
US2600452A (en) * 1947-07-01 1952-06-17 Standard Oil Dev Co Catalytic improvement of hydrocarbon synthesis product

Patent Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2116061A (en) * 1929-10-26 1938-05-03 Standard Ig Co Purification of mineral oils, tars, their distillation products, and the like
US1895081A (en) * 1931-01-26 1933-01-24 Continental Oil Co Method for converting hydrocarbon materials
US1949749A (en) * 1931-05-02 1934-03-06 Universal Oil Prod Co Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2016271A (en) * 1932-09-10 1935-10-08 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for desulphurizing hydrocarbons
FR860383A (en) * 1938-10-09 1941-01-13 Int Koolwaterstoffen Synthese Manufacturing process for indetonating fuels
US2324066A (en) * 1940-08-03 1943-07-13 Standard Oil Dev Co Purification of hydrocarbon oils
US2360787A (en) * 1940-12-27 1944-10-17 Standard Catalytic Co Chemical process
US2319738A (en) * 1940-12-28 1943-05-18 Standard Oil Dev Co Refining mineral oils
US2340922A (en) * 1941-04-15 1944-02-08 Atlantic Refining Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2384315A (en) * 1942-08-06 1945-09-04 Standard Oil Dev Co Process for cracking crude hydrocarbon oil
US2461069A (en) * 1944-06-10 1949-02-08 Socony Vacuum Oil Co Inc Simultaneous catalytic cracking and desulfurization of hydrocarbons
US2476788A (en) * 1945-09-28 1949-07-19 Standard Oil Co Method for the recovery of hydrocarbon synthesis products
US2461064A (en) * 1945-10-20 1949-02-08 Texas Co Method of manufacturing motor fuel
US2542471A (en) * 1946-06-15 1951-02-20 Standard Oil Dev Co Removal of peroxides from cracked gasoline by catalytic hydrogenation
US2450724A (en) * 1946-12-28 1948-10-05 Universal Oil Prod Co Conversion of sulfur containing hydrocarbons
US2528586A (en) * 1947-06-03 1950-11-07 Houdry Process Corp Catalytic desulfurization and cracking of sulfur-containing petroleum
US2600452A (en) * 1947-07-01 1952-06-17 Standard Oil Dev Co Catalytic improvement of hydrocarbon synthesis product
US2528587A (en) * 1947-08-20 1950-11-07 Houdry Process Corp Art of desulfurizing diesel fuel and similar hydrocarbon fractions
US2537620A (en) * 1947-09-09 1951-01-09 Standard Oil Dev Co Process for desulfurizing petroleum oils
US2452121A (en) * 1947-11-26 1948-10-26 Texas Co Conversion of synthetic hydrocarbons containing oxygenated compounds to hydrocarbons of high octane value
US2558137A (en) * 1947-12-29 1951-06-26 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for sulfur removal

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2943104A (en) * 1957-05-08 1960-06-28 Pan American Petroleum Corp Treatment of hydrocarbon solutions of oxygenated chemicals
US4096163A (en) * 1975-04-08 1978-06-20 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4157338A (en) * 1975-04-08 1979-06-05 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4013737A (en) * 1975-06-16 1977-03-22 Universal Oil Products Company Upgrading synthetic gasoline
US4086262A (en) * 1976-09-20 1978-04-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures
US4159995A (en) * 1977-08-22 1979-07-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures utilizing dual reactors
US4410637A (en) * 1980-12-15 1983-10-18 Shell Oil Company Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture from H2 /CO mixtures

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2452121A (en) Conversion of synthetic hydrocarbons containing oxygenated compounds to hydrocarbons of high octane value
US2322863A (en) Dehydroaromatization and hydroforming
US2752382A (en) Process for upgrading diesel oil fractions derived from fischer-tropsch synthesis
US4345992A (en) Catalytic cracking process
US3038855A (en) Process for the oxidation of mercaptans
US2754314A (en) Process for upgrading hydrocarbon synthesis oil
US2894900A (en) Hydroforming process using improved silica-alumina catalyst base
US2485073A (en) Hydrocarbon conversions
US2282922A (en) Conversion of hydrocarbons
US2663744A (en) Catalytic hydration of olefins
US4377504A (en) Cracking catalyst improvement with gallium compounds
US4377494A (en) Cracking catalysts passivated by barium
Crowell et al. Pilot plants. Fischer-Tropsch Oil Circulation Processes
US4415440A (en) Cracking catalyst improvement with gallium compounds
US4473463A (en) Use of cracking catalysts passivated by barium
US4334979A (en) Hydrocarbon cracking process using a catalyst containing germanium
US2574355A (en) Hydrogenation process
US2539847A (en) Synthesis of organic compounds
US2600452A (en) Catalytic improvement of hydrocarbon synthesis product
US2768933A (en) Reforming process
US2636011A (en) Fischer-tropsch catalyst preparation and regeneration
US2778805A (en) Iron synthesis catalyst
US2608568A (en) Regeneration of catalyst
US2720550A (en) Dehydrogenation of naphthenes by means of sulfur dioxide
US2516699A (en) Processing of hydrocarbon synthesis products