US2603423A - Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron - Google Patents

Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2603423A
US2603423A US720326A US72032647A US2603423A US 2603423 A US2603423 A US 2603423A US 720326 A US720326 A US 720326A US 72032647 A US72032647 A US 72032647A US 2603423 A US2603423 A US 2603423A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sponge iron
particles
sulfur
sulfur content
iron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US720326A
Inventor
Russell C Buehl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US720326A priority Critical patent/US2603423A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2603423A publication Critical patent/US2603423A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D3/00Diffusion processes for extraction of non-metals; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D3/02Extraction of non-metals

Definitions

  • This'invention relates to the removal 'of-sulfur from metals reduced from their ores at temperatures sufiiciently low so that melting does not occur and, in particular, to the removal of sulfur fro-m sponge iron.
  • Sponge iron has been found to be a desirable melting stock for the production of steels, especially tool steels in electric arc furnaces, but its sulfur content is often undesirably high for this application. Sponge iron can be produced economically and the sulfur content can be controlled by theme of lime, limestone, or dolomite as described in U. S. Patent 2,380,406 and in the Co-pending application of Buehl et al. Serial No. 778,452,
  • process herein described may be employed to advantage to further lower the sulfur content of abrading the surface of sulfur bearing sponge iron and separating therefrom the fines thereby broken from said surface, whereby a low sulfur bearing sponge iron product is produced.
  • the method accordingly comprises a means of surface layer is broken off as" powdered fines without appreciably decreasing the size'of the malleable sponge iron particles.
  • Grinding equipment' that involves thefimpact, of the iron particles at high'velocities has been foundto accornplish the abradin'g in a satisfactory manner and is presently, preferred? Thereafter," the fines or the broken surface particles, are separated from the sponge? iron. particles by suitable particle classifying means such as sieving,'rnagnetic sep'a ration, sink and float separation,- air classification, and the like.
  • suitable particle classifying means such as sieving,'rnagnetic sep'a ration, sink and float separation,- air classification, and the like.
  • the more massive particles so obtained are found to have a considerably lower sulfur content than the initial spongeiron product.
  • Example I A sample of sponge iron containing 0.061 percent sulfur was mechanically sieved to remove the minus 200 mesh particles; This sieving lowered the sulfur content of the sponge iron to 0.051 percent with a loss of only 1.9 percent of the iron content of the sample.
  • Example II A sponge iron containing 0.061 sulfur was ball milled for 10 minutes then sieved. The removal.
  • Example III 7 'tent to 0.075 percent.
  • a sulfur bearing sponge iron product is subjected to suitable abrading treatment such as selective grinding, roll crushing,
  • sponge iron which comprises treating the iron ore at a temperature below the melting point of the constituents of said ore in the presence; 7 15 of a solid carbonaceous material as the reducing agent and a desulfurizing agent selected from the group consisting of dolomite, lime and limestoneto produce sponge iron particles having a closely adhering, brittle surface coating of high sulfur content basic slag, then abrading the surface of the so produced sponge iron'particles'to re- "fnove .the brittle surface layenand then separating from the abraded sponge iron particles the fines of high sulfur content slag Which have been broken from the surface of said particles.
  • a solid carbonaceous material as the reducing agent and a desulfurizing agent selected from the group consisting of dolomite, lime and limestoneto produce sponge iron particles having a closely adhering, brittle surface coating of high sulfur content basic slag, then abrading the surface of the so produced sponge iron'particles'to re- "fnove .the

Description

Patented July 15, 1952 METHOD Secretary of the Interior I. N0 Drawing. Application Januar Serial No. {120,326
, UNITED? STAT- Es :B I I QFHCE j I U V 412,603,4725; 7' s I A i I FOR THE REMQVKI 'OF V V} ,Y FROM SPONGE H r v Russell, 0. Buehl, Edgewood. assignorto' the p ,7
United States ofAmericaas represented'bylthe I .s'cilims. ici. 241,-14) H a I (Granted underfthe act of 'March 3, 1883, as
amended April 30, 1928 3700. G. 75 7') The invention described herein maybe manu 'factured and used by or for the Government of ;the United States for governmental." purposes withoutthe payment to me of any royaltyjthereon in accordance with the provisions of'the act of April 30, 1928 (Ch. 460, 45"Stat. L. 467).
This'invention relates to the removal 'of-sulfur from metals reduced from their ores at temperatures sufiiciently low so that melting does not occur and, in particular, to the removal of sulfur fro-m sponge iron. 1
In order to produce certain grades of steel,
especially tool steels, it is necessary to use iron having a very low sulfur content, generally less than 0.06 percent sulfur by weight. Sponge iron has been found to be a desirable melting stock for the production of steels, especially tool steels in electric arc furnaces, but its sulfur content is often undesirably high for this application. Sponge iron can be produced economically and the sulfur content can be controlled by theme of lime, limestone, or dolomite as described in U. S. Patent 2,380,406 and in the Co-pending application of Buehl et al. Serial No. 778,452,
filed October 7, 1947, now United States Patent No. 2,495,225. However, these sulfur control agents increase the cost of production of the material and do not always yield sponge iron with as low a sulfur content as is desired. The
process herein described may be employed to advantage to further lower the sulfur content of abrading the surface of sulfur bearing sponge iron and separating therefrom the fines thereby broken from said surface, whereby a low sulfur bearing sponge iron product is produced.
The method accordingly comprises a means of surface layer is broken off as" powdered fines without appreciably decreasing the size'of the malleable sponge iron particles. Grinding equipment' that involves thefimpact, of the iron particles at high'velocities has been foundto accornplish the abradin'g in a satisfactory manner and is presently, preferred? Thereafter," the fines or the broken surface particles, are separated from the sponge? iron. particles by suitable particle classifying means such as sieving,'rnagnetic sep'a ration, sink and float separation,- air classification, and the like. The more massive particles so obtained are found to have a considerably lower sulfur content than the initial spongeiron product. i
The following examples show how the invention may be carried out, but it is not limited thereto. Percentages are by weight unless specifled to the contrary.
Example I A sample of sponge iron containing 0.061 percent sulfur was mechanically sieved to remove the minus 200 mesh particles; This sieving lowered the sulfur content of the sponge iron to 0.051 percent with a loss of only 1.9 percent of the iron content of the sample.
Example II A sponge iron containing 0.061 sulfur was ball milled for 10 minutes then sieved. The removal.
of the minus 325 mesh particles lowered the sulfur content of the sponge iron to 0.053 percent with a loss of 3.1 percent of the iron; and the removal of the minus 200 mesh particles lowered the sulfur content of the sponge iron to 0.045 percent with a loss of 8.2 percent of the iron.
Example III 7 'tent to 0.075 percent.
removing sulfur from sponge iron or other metals reduced from their ores at temperatures below the melting point of the constituents.
In operation, a sulfur bearing sponge iron product is subjected to suitable abrading treatment such as selective grinding, roll crushing,
While the invention has been particularly de- Q scribed employing specific abrading means, it is tumbling, and the like. By this action the brittle not limited thereto.
While the invention has been particularly described employing specific separating or classifying meansiitisi not limited thereto.- 7
Since -many apparently widely. differing -embodiments of the invention will occur to one skilled in the art, the invention is not limited to the specific details illustrated and described and various changes may be madetherern witheout departing from the spirit and scope thereof;
What is claimed is:
sponge iron which comprises treating the iron ore at a temperature below the melting point of the constituents of said ore in the presence; 7 15 of a solid carbonaceous material as the reducing agent and a desulfurizing agent selected from the group consisting of dolomite, lime and limestoneto produce sponge iron particles having a closely adhering, brittle surface coating of high sulfur content basic slag, then abrading the surface of the so produced sponge iron'particles'to re- "fnove .the brittle surface layenand then separating from the abraded sponge iron particles the fines of high sulfur content slag Which have been broken from the surface of said particles. "2;- The method of claim 1 wherein the abrad- 'ing is accomplished by b'allniill'g'rindi'ng.
is. The methodfof claim 1 wherein the abradin t H 10. 1. The method of producing low'sulfui' content lithe fines.
4 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the abrading is accomplished by roll crushing.
5. The method of claim: 1 wherein the abrading is accomplished by ball mill grinding and the separating is accomplished by sieving to remove RUSSELL C. BUEHL.
REFERENCES CITED The'fol-lovving references are of record inthe :file of this patent:
is accomplished by high velocity impact "grinding.
STATES PATENTS

Claims (1)

1. THE METHOD OF PRODUCING LOW SULFUR CONTENT SPONGE IRON WHICH COMPRISES TREATING THE IRON ORE AT A TEMPERATURE BELOW THE MELTING POINT OF THE CONSTITUENTS OF SAID ORE IN THE PRESENCE OF A SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL AS THE REDUCING AGENT AND A DESULFURIZING AGENT SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF DOLOMITE, LIME AND LIMESTONE TO PRODUCE SPONGE IRON PARTICLES HAING A CLOSELY ADHERNG, BRITTLE SURFACE COATING OF HIGH SULFUR CONTENT BASIC SLAG, THEN ABRADING THE SURFACES OF THE SO PRODUCED SPONGE IRON PARTICLES TO REMOVE THE BRITTLE SURFACE LAYER, AND THEN SEPARATING FROM THE ABRADED SPONGE IRON PARTICLES THE FINES OF HIGH SLFUR CONTENT SLAG WHICH HAVE BEEN BROKEN FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID PARTICLES.
US720326A 1947-01-06 1947-01-06 Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron Expired - Lifetime US2603423A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US720326A US2603423A (en) 1947-01-06 1947-01-06 Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US720326A US2603423A (en) 1947-01-06 1947-01-06 Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2603423A true US2603423A (en) 1952-07-15

Family

ID=24893579

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US720326A Expired - Lifetime US2603423A (en) 1947-01-06 1947-01-06 Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2603423A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2765988A (en) * 1951-06-06 1956-10-09 Nat Lead Co Reduction of iron ores
US2880083A (en) * 1954-05-06 1959-03-31 R N Corp Method of producing sponge iron
US3081954A (en) * 1960-06-27 1963-03-19 Harsco Corp Method and apparatus for recovering reusable metallics from steel making slag and refuse
US3103315A (en) * 1959-05-27 1963-09-10 Beteiligungs & Patentverw Gmbh Method of recovering iron from reduced ores
US3165267A (en) * 1962-06-29 1965-01-12 Harbison Walker Refractories Comminution and beneficiation of refractory flour

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US957157A (en) * 1910-01-04 1910-05-03 Edward F Goltra Process for cleaning iron ores.
US1822647A (en) * 1929-06-13 1931-09-08 American Gypsum Company Apparatus for grinding and separating minerals
GB466048A (en) * 1935-01-31 1937-05-21 Hans Vogt A process for making magnetic powder
US2232696A (en) * 1938-07-11 1941-02-25 Earle Theodore Method for detaching and cleaning constituent particles of naturally granular material
US2240718A (en) * 1938-08-13 1941-05-06 Schiffman Le Roy Edgar Concentration of ores
US2264204A (en) * 1939-09-09 1941-11-25 Eric H Heckett Method and apparatus for reclaiming metal
US2287663A (en) * 1940-12-07 1942-06-23 Minerals And Metals Corp Metal production
US2352712A (en) * 1941-11-24 1944-07-04 Eric H Heckett Recovery and use of scrap steel
US2380406A (en) * 1943-10-27 1945-07-31 Russell C Buchi Production of low sulphur sponge iron
US2381022A (en) * 1940-06-04 1945-08-07 Wulff John Iron and iron alloy powders
GB2462900A (en) * 2008-08-28 2010-03-03 Boeing Co Composite leg structure for lightweight aircraft seat assembly

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US957157A (en) * 1910-01-04 1910-05-03 Edward F Goltra Process for cleaning iron ores.
US1822647A (en) * 1929-06-13 1931-09-08 American Gypsum Company Apparatus for grinding and separating minerals
GB466048A (en) * 1935-01-31 1937-05-21 Hans Vogt A process for making magnetic powder
US2232696A (en) * 1938-07-11 1941-02-25 Earle Theodore Method for detaching and cleaning constituent particles of naturally granular material
US2240718A (en) * 1938-08-13 1941-05-06 Schiffman Le Roy Edgar Concentration of ores
US2264204A (en) * 1939-09-09 1941-11-25 Eric H Heckett Method and apparatus for reclaiming metal
US2381022A (en) * 1940-06-04 1945-08-07 Wulff John Iron and iron alloy powders
US2287663A (en) * 1940-12-07 1942-06-23 Minerals And Metals Corp Metal production
US2352712A (en) * 1941-11-24 1944-07-04 Eric H Heckett Recovery and use of scrap steel
US2380406A (en) * 1943-10-27 1945-07-31 Russell C Buchi Production of low sulphur sponge iron
GB2462900A (en) * 2008-08-28 2010-03-03 Boeing Co Composite leg structure for lightweight aircraft seat assembly

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2765988A (en) * 1951-06-06 1956-10-09 Nat Lead Co Reduction of iron ores
US2880083A (en) * 1954-05-06 1959-03-31 R N Corp Method of producing sponge iron
US3103315A (en) * 1959-05-27 1963-09-10 Beteiligungs & Patentverw Gmbh Method of recovering iron from reduced ores
US3081954A (en) * 1960-06-27 1963-03-19 Harsco Corp Method and apparatus for recovering reusable metallics from steel making slag and refuse
US3165267A (en) * 1962-06-29 1965-01-12 Harbison Walker Refractories Comminution and beneficiation of refractory flour

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104195328A (en) Method for preparing iron oxide ore reduction roasting green ball by using iron selection tailings
US2603423A (en) Method for the removal of sulfur from sponge iron
US2359401A (en) Metal powders
US4154608A (en) Production of high purity iron powder
Hallbauer, DK & Joughin The size distribution and morphology of gold particles in Witwatersrand reefs and their crushed products
CN110606675A (en) Vanadium-titanium slag superfine powder admixture and preparation method thereof
Good Beneficiation of unweathered Indian calcareous phosphate rock by calcination and hydration
GB2032896A (en) Upgrading nickel ores
JPS5950731B2 (en) How to recover metallic iron powder from converter dust
US2368489A (en) Production of metal powder
US3748116A (en) Method for producing metallic iron powder from iron ore concentrate
US2765988A (en) Reduction of iron ores
US2890795A (en) Metallurgical processing of uranium ores
US954808A (en) Electric-furnace product and method of making same.
US4175790A (en) Process for the preconcentration of metalliferous products
NO129208B (en)
US3068090A (en) Alkali metal salts and base additions in non-titaniferous ore reductions
US6848973B2 (en) Method for blast cleaning using ilmenite tailing particles
US1696188A (en) Process of treating iron ores
JPH02111840A (en) Treatment for nickel oxide ore
US3295957A (en) Production of high strength briquettes from solid-state-reduced iron ores
CN102766704B (en) Steelmaking desulfurization slag treatment system and steelmaking desulfurization slag treatment method
US2381024A (en) Process of producing iron powder from cheap source material
SU1484370A1 (en) Method of extraction abrasive material from slag for surface blasting
JP2945053B2 (en) Nickel oxide ore processing method