US20180045440A1 - Ideal Liquid Compression Refrigeration Cycle - Google Patents
Ideal Liquid Compression Refrigeration Cycle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180045440A1 US20180045440A1 US15/686,739 US201715686739A US2018045440A1 US 20180045440 A1 US20180045440 A1 US 20180045440A1 US 201715686739 A US201715686739 A US 201715686739A US 2018045440 A1 US2018045440 A1 US 2018045440A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cycle
- pressure
- refrigerant
- lcrc
- isentropic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25B—REFRIGERATION MACHINES, PLANTS OR SYSTEMS; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS
- F25B23/00—Machines, plants or systems, with a single mode of operation not covered by groups F25B1/00 - F25B21/00, e.g. using selective radiation effect
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to the mechanical power engineering for refrigeration and heat pumps.
- Refrigeration cycles transfer thermal energy from a region of low temperature to one of higher temperature
- the reversed Carnot cycle is the perfect model for the refrigeration cycle operating between two fixed temperatures, the most ideal cycle, which has the maximum thermal efficiency, maximum coefficient of performance, and serves as a standard against which actual refrigerator cycles can be compared
- reversed Carnot cycle consist of 4 processes, 2 isentropic processes for expansion and compression, and 2 isothermal processes for heat rejection and heat absorption.
- the intent of this invention is to prove a new ideal refrigerator cycle (the Liquid compression cycle) which has a coefficient of performance higher than the Vapor compression cycle.
- VCRC Vapor compression refrigeration cycle
- liquid refrigerant pump in the liquid compression refrigeration cycle is acting the same function of the compressor in the VCRC to solve all the above problems.
- FIG. 1 showing the LCRC on T-S and T-H diagram.
- FIG. 2 showing the COP levels for Carnot, LCRC, and VCRC.
- FIG. 3 showing the VCRC on T-S and T-H diagrams.
- FIG. 4 showing a simple schematic diagram for the main components.
- Liquid compression cycle is a cycles, that can be applied in the refrigeration and heat pumps applications, this cycle has achieved the performance of the reversed Carnot cycle, unlike the vapor compression cycle, where a clear deviation from the reversed Carnot cycle is appeared in it's ideal case, the deviation is occur due to the compression process where the refrigerant has to be compressed to a temperature higher than the condensing temperature, and the constant enthalpy process in the expansion valve, where energy loss has occurred due to the irreversibility of the process, these deviations from Carnot cycle have been solved in the Liquid Compression Cycle (LCRC) to achieve a thermal efficiency more than the Vapor Compression Cycle (VCRC) efficiency, and we will prove that later.
- LCRC Liquid Compression Cycle
- Liquid compression cycle consists of 5 processes, 3 isentropic processes, one isothermal process, and one isobaric process, the cycle (T-H) and (T-S) diagrams are shown in FIG. 1 .
- Liquid compression cycle is working between 3 levels of pressure, the refrigerant enter the pump at state 1 as a saturated liquid and compressed from the condenser pressure to a higher level pressure, then the refrigerant enters the expansion nozzle to reach the evaporator pressure, during this expansion process the refrigerant lose a lot of internal energy as well as the pressure is decreasing during the expansion, these amount of energy is converted to kinetic energy at state 3, then the refrigerant is absorbing heat during the isothermal process in the evaporator to reach state 4 in a 2 phase region, then the pressure is regained in the diffuser by converting a part of the kinetic energy again to enthalpy, the refrigerant is isentropic compressed to the condenser pressure at state 5, then the heat is rejected to the ambient at constant pressure to enter the pump again at state 1,
- FIG. 4 is showing a schematic diagram for the cycle main components.
- the following example is showing how the Liquid compression cycle has achieved the performance of the reversed Carnot cycle comparing with the Vapor compression cycle at the same levels of condenser and evaporator pressure.
- V 4 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ h D 1 - 0.0153 ⁇ A 4 2 A 5 2
- V 3 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ h N 1 - 0.003 ⁇ A 3 2 A 2 2
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Engine Equipment That Uses Special Cycles (AREA)
- Jet Pumps And Other Pumps (AREA)
- Compressors, Vaccum Pumps And Other Relevant Systems (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Liquid compression refrigeration cycle (LCRC) is a new cycle, that can be applied in the refrigeration and heat pump applications, this cycle has achieved the coefficient of performance of the reversed Carnot cycle, unlike the vapor compression cycle, where a clear deviation from the reversed Carnot cycle is appeared in it's ideal case, these deviations from the reversed Carnot cycle have been solved in the Liquid Compression Cycle (LCRC) to achieve a thermal efficiency more than the Vapor Compression Cycle (VCRC) efficiency.
Description
- The present invention is directed to the mechanical power engineering for refrigeration and heat pumps.
- Refrigeration cycles transfer thermal energy from a region of low temperature to one of higher temperature, the reversed Carnot cycle is the perfect model for the refrigeration cycle operating between two fixed temperatures, the most ideal cycle, which has the maximum thermal efficiency, maximum coefficient of performance, and serves as a standard against which actual refrigerator cycles can be compared, reversed Carnot cycle consist of 4 processes, 2 isentropic processes for expansion and compression, and 2 isothermal processes for heat rejection and heat absorption.
- Now most of the refrigerators and heat pumps are working on the principle of the ideal Vapor compression cycle, that cycle was built on the principals of the reversed Carnot cycle, but this cycle is deviate from the reversed Carnot for the following reasons:
-
- 1—The refrigerant shall enter the compressor at the vapor phase, for the compressor operation.
- 2—Throttling valve is used in expansion process (constant enthalpy process)
- 3—The heat rejection and absorption at a constant pressure process, for more practicality.
- The intent of this invention is to prove a new ideal refrigerator cycle (the Liquid compression cycle) which has a coefficient of performance higher than the Vapor compression cycle.
- The coefficient of performance for the ideal Vapor compression refrigeration cycle (VCRC) is lower than the reversed Carnot cycle due to the deviation of its ideal process from the reversed Carnot, this means that the ideal VCRC will consume more electric power than the reversed Carnot cycle at the same refrigeration capacity or when the two cycles are operating at the same maximum and minimum temperatures.
- Moreover, all issues related to the compressors in the actual VCRC, for example the maintenance, lubrication system, and it's high cost, etc.
- The liquid refrigerant pump in the liquid compression refrigeration cycle (LCRC) is acting the same function of the compressor in the VCRC to solve all the above problems.
-
FIG. 1 showing the LCRC on T-S and T-H diagram. -
FIG. 2 showing the COP levels for Carnot, LCRC, and VCRC. -
FIG. 3 showing the VCRC on T-S and T-H diagrams. -
FIG. 4 showing a simple schematic diagram for the main components. - Liquid compression cycle (LCRC) is a cycles, that can be applied in the refrigeration and heat pumps applications, this cycle has achieved the performance of the reversed Carnot cycle, unlike the vapor compression cycle, where a clear deviation from the reversed Carnot cycle is appeared in it's ideal case, the deviation is occur due to the compression process where the refrigerant has to be compressed to a temperature higher than the condensing temperature, and the constant enthalpy process in the expansion valve, where energy loss has occurred due to the irreversibility of the process, these deviations from Carnot cycle have been solved in the Liquid Compression Cycle (LCRC) to achieve a thermal efficiency more than the Vapor Compression Cycle (VCRC) efficiency, and we will prove that later.
- Liquid compression cycle consists of 5 processes, 3 isentropic processes, one isothermal process, and one isobaric process, the cycle (T-H) and (T-S) diagrams are shown in
FIG. 1 . - Process (1-2) isentropic compression in a liquid pump
- Process (2-3) isentropic expansion in a nozzle
- Process (3-4) isothermal heat absorption in an evaporator
- Process (4-5) isentropic compression in a diffuser
- Process (5-1) isobaric heat rejection in a condenser
- Liquid compression cycle is working between 3 levels of pressure, the refrigerant enter the pump at
state 1 as a saturated liquid and compressed from the condenser pressure to a higher level pressure, then the refrigerant enters the expansion nozzle to reach the evaporator pressure, during this expansion process the refrigerant lose a lot of internal energy as well as the pressure is decreasing during the expansion, these amount of energy is converted to kinetic energy atstate 3, then the refrigerant is absorbing heat during the isothermal process in the evaporator to reachstate 4 in a 2 phase region, then the pressure is regained in the diffuser by converting a part of the kinetic energy again to enthalpy, the refrigerant is isentropic compressed to the condenser pressure atstate 5, then the heat is rejected to the ambient at constant pressure to enter the pump again atstate 1,FIG. 4 is showing a schematic diagram for the cycle main components. - The following example is showing how the Liquid compression cycle has achieved the performance of the reversed Carnot cycle comparing with the Vapor compression cycle at the same levels of condenser and evaporator pressure.
- As shown in
FIG. 2 a comparison between Carnot, LCRC, and VCRC according to the COP levels - Assume refrigerant 134 a in the Liquid compression cycle is working between the condenser pressure P1=1.2 Mpa, and the evaporator pressure P3=0.36 Mpa, with refrigerant effect 14 kJ/(kg of refrigerant), now, we can describe and calculate the properties at each state.
-
- @state 1: saturated liquid phase, P1=1.2 Mpa, T1=46° C., =117.77 kj/kg, s1=0.424 kj/kg. K, v1=0.00089 m3/kg.
- @state 2: sub-cooled phase, P2 shall be calculated by applying the energy equation on the total cycle, as follows:
-
w p =q co −q ev=(T 1 −T 3)Δs -
And, -
Δs=14/(5.8+273)=0.05 KJ/Kg -
Hence, -
w p=(46−5.8)0.05=2.01 KJ/Kg -
But, -
w p =v 1(P 2 −P 1) -
P 2=(2.01/0.00089)+1200=3458 Kpa=3.46 Mpa -
For isentropic compression, s 2 =s 1=0.424 KJ/Kg·K -
And, -
h 2 =v 1(P 2 −P 1)+h 1=0.00089(3458−1200)+117.77=119.8 KJ/Kg -
- @state 3: P3=0.36 Mpa, for isentropic expansion s2=s3=0.424 KJ/Kg·K, T3=5.8° C., x3=0.275, h3=hf+x3hfg=59.72+(0.275×194.08)=113.1 kj/kg.
- @state 4: P4=P3=0.36 Mpa, calculating s4=Δs+s3=0.424+0.05=0.474 kj/kg·K, x4=0.347, calculating h4=hf+x4hfg=59.72+(0.347×194.08)=127.04 kj/kg
- @state 5: P5=P1=1.2 Mpa, for isentropic compression s5=s4=0.474 kj/kg·K, x5=0.1015, h5=hf+x5hfg=117.77+(0.102×156.1)=133.61 kj/kg
- Assume that the ideal Vapor Compression cycle (VCRC) is working at the same evaporator and condenser pressure as shown in
FIG. 3 : - @state 1: P1=1.2 Mpa, h1=117.77 kj/kg
- @state 2: at throttling process, h2=h1=117.77 kj/kg
- @state 3: P3=0.36 Mpa, h3=253.81 kj/kg, s3=0.9283 kj/kg
- @state 4: for isentropic compression s4=s3=0.928 kj/kg·K, T4=50° C., P4=1.2 Mpa, h4=278.27 kj/kg
- A—the Coefficient of Performance (COP) for the Rev. Carnot, LCRC, and VCRC:
-
COPcarnot =T 3/(T 1 −T 3)=278.8/(46−5.8)=7 -
COPLCC =q ev /w p=14/2=7 -
COPVCC =q ev /w c=(h 3 −h 2)/(h 4 −h 3)=136.04/24.46=5.56 - B— Special Configuration of the Nozzle and Diffuser Devices for the LCRC:
- In the theoretical study of the liquid compression cycle, special considerations into nozzle and diffuser shall be considered:
- i. Diffuser Inlet Velocities
- Defining the relation between the inlet and outlet velocities by applying the energy balancing equation on the diffuser,
-
h 4+(V 4 2/2)=h 5+(V 5 2/2), -
(V 4 2/2)−(V 5 2/2)=Δh D - Dividing the two terms by (V4 2/2)
-
- Defining the relation between the inlet and outlet velocities by applying the mass balancing equation on the diffuser,
-
- From equation (1a) and (2a)
-
- By substituting in
equation 3, where, - v4=0.0202 m3/kg, and v5=0.0025 m3/kg (From the previous example)
-
- But from the above relation, we found that;
-
- Hence,
-
V 4≈√{square root over (2Δh D)} (4a) - ii. Nozzle Outlet Velocities
- Defining the relation between the inlet and outlet velocities by applying the energy balancing equation on the diffuser,
-
h 2+(V 2 2/2)=h 3+(V 3 2/2), -
(V 3 2/2)−(V 2 2/2)=Δh N - Dividing the two terms by (V2 2/2)
-
- Defining the relation between the inlet and outlet velocities by applying the mass balancing equation on the diffuser,
-
- From equation (1b) and (2b)
-
- By substituting in equation 3b,
- Where,
- v3=0.016 m3/kg, and v2=0.00089 m3/kg (From the previous example)
-
- From the above equation, we find that;
-
- Hence,
-
V 3≈√{square root over (2Δh N)} (4b) - C— General Configuration on the Actual Liquid Compression Cycle:
-
- 1. As shown in the previous example the higher pressure level is calculated according to the minimum potential work needed for the reversible Liquid compression cycle, in the actual cycle, that pressure shall be increased to overcome all irreversibilities in the cycle.
- 2. The expansion process occur in the nozzle will be adiabatic irreversible process, where;
-
-
- 3. The compression process occur in the diffuser will be adiabatic irreversible process, where;
-
-
- 4. The compression process occur in the pump will be adiabatic irreversible process.
- 5. A pressure drop shall occur in evaporator and condenser coil, the same as the actual Vapor compression cycle.
- Advantages of the Liquid Compression Cycle on the Vapor Compression Cycle:
-
- 1. The coefficient of performance of LCRC is higher than VCRC.
- 2. If the refrigerant leaving the condenser in the sub-cooled region, or
state 1 is fall in the sub-cooled region, the COP of the LCRC will slightly raised above the reversed Carnot cycle, the limitation for this raise depending on the minimum temperature approach between the refrigerant and the ambient or the cooling medium. - 3. The work addition process is occur in the liquid phase, thus the actual process will be close to the isentropic process, unlike the VCRC, the work addition process in the superheat region, where more irreversibility has occur in the actual cycle.
- 4. The constant enthalpy process in the expansion valve for the VCRC, increasing the irreversibility in the ideal VCRC cycle, as well as, the actual cycle, where there no expansion valve throttling process in the LCRC.
- 5. The low refrigerant velocity for the vapor line and condenser coil, will decreasing the friction loss in pipes, and hence the irreversibility (or energy loss) will decrease in LCRC comparing with VCRC.
- 6. The lubrication system challenges in the VCRC are not exist in the LCRC by separating the lubricant from the refrigerant path.
- 7. The LCRC is more economic than VCRC in maintenance, by replacing the compressor with pump for work addition process.
- 8. The initial cost of LCRC is lower than VCRC in the reason of using pump instead of the compressor.
- Disadvantages of the Liquid Compression Cycle on the Vapor Compression Cycle
-
- 1. The required refrigerant mass flow rate is much higher than VCRC for the same evaporator capacity however this increasing in mass flow rate will not affecting on the total volume of the cycle, that because the density of the liquid stat is much higher than density at vapor stat, so the volume of the pump will not increasing as compressors at higher refrigerant mass flow rate, in addition the decreasing in condenser and evaporator effect (heat transfer in KW/Kg of refrigerant mass) will balance the increasing in refrigerant mass flow rate in LCRC, so the total surface area of the condenser and evaporator in LCRC will be close to the VCRC for the same cycle capacity.
- 2. The high refrigerant velocity for the liquid line and evaporator coil in the LCRC, will increasing the friction loss in pipes, and hence the irreversibility (or energy loss) will increased in LCRC comparing with VCRC, however this energy loss is too low if compared with the VCRC energy loss as discussed above.
- General Recommendation on the Liquid Compression Cycle:
-
- 1. The positive displacement pump could be more suitable for the higher compression ratio compared to the required mass flow rate.
- 2. Installing a refrigerant distributor before the evaporator and condenser coils to divide the mass flow rate on a multiple paths, will increase the heat transfer area and decreasing the refrigerant paths, also the nozzle could be a part of the pump casing, or installed directly after the pump to insure that the expansion is occurred suddenly after compression process.
- 3. For preventing cavitations at the centrifugal pump suction line a pressurized tank shall installed at the pump suction, also the tank for keeping the condenser, and the suction line at a constant pressure.
-
- LCRC Liquid Compression Refrigeration Cycle
- VCRC Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle
- T Temperature
- P Pressure
- H enthalpy per unit of refrigerant mass
- S entropy per unit of refrigerant mass
- wp Mechanical pump work per unit of refrigerant mass
- wc Mechanical compressor work per unit of refrigerant mass
- qco Heat rejected from condenser per unit of refrigerant mass
- qev Heat absorbed to evaporator per unit of refrigerant mass
- COP Coefficient Of Performance
- X Mass quality, the ratio of the vapor mass to the total mass of the mixture.
- ΔhN Total Enthalpy difference in the diversion-conversion nozzle
- ΔhN=ΔhN2−ΔhN1
- ΔhN1 Enthalpy difference in the diversion section of the diversion-conversion nozzle
- ΔhN2 Enthalpy difference in the conversion section of the diversion-conversion nozzle
- ΔhD Total Enthalpy difference in the diversion-conversion diffuser
- ΔhD=ΔhD1−ΔhD2
- ΔhD1 Enthalpy difference in the diversion section of the diversion-conversion diffuser
- ΔhD2 Enthalpy difference in the conversion section of the diversion-conversion diffuser
- P Pump.
- N Nozzle.
- D Diffuser.
- CO Condenser coil.
- EV Evaporator coil.
- Δhact Actual enthalpy difference
- Δhis Isentropic enthalpy difference
- Vact 2/2 Actual Kinetic energy
- Vis 2/2 Isentropic Kinetic energy
- ηis,N Isentropic efficiency of the nozzle
- ηis,D Isentropic efficiency of the diffuser
Claims (4)
1. The Liquid compression refrigeration cycle (LCRC).
Liquid compression refrigeration cycle (LCRC) is a new operating theory for refrigeration and heat pump applications derived from the idea of the reversed Carnot cycle, the cycle is consisting of 5 processes, 3 isentropic processes, one isothermal process, and one isobaric process, the cycle (T-H) and (T-S) diagrams are shown in FIG. 1 .
Process (1-2) isentropic compression in a liquid pump
Process (2-3) isentropic expansion in a nozzle
Process (3-4) isothermal heat absorption in an evaporator coil
Process (4-5) isentropic compression in a diffuser
Process (5-1) isobaric heat rejection in a condenser coil
2. LCRC components
a) Pump
b) Nozzle
c) Evaporator coil
d) Diffuser
e) Condenser coil
3. LCRC theory of operation
Liquid compression cycle is working between 3 levels of pressure, the refrigerant enter the pump at state 1 as a saturated liquid and compressed from the condenser pressure to a higher level pressure, then the refrigerant enters the expansion nozzle to reach the evaporator pressure, during this expansion process the refrigerant lose a lot of internal energy as well as the pressure is decreasing during the expansion, these amount of energy is converted to kinetic energy at state 3, then the refrigerant is absorbing heat during the isothermal process in the evaporator to reach state 4 in a 2 phase region, then the pressure is regained in the diffuser by converting a part of the kinetic energy again to enthalpy, the refrigerant is isentropic compressed to the condenser pressure at state 5, then the heat is rejected to the ambient at constant pressure to enter the pump again at state 1, FIG. 4 is showing a schematic diagram for the cycle main components.
4. (canceled)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EG2015/000005 WO2016134731A2 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2015-02-25 | The ideal liquid compression refrigeration cycle |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EG2015/000005 Continuation-In-Part WO2016134731A2 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2015-02-25 | The ideal liquid compression refrigeration cycle |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180045440A1 true US20180045440A1 (en) | 2018-02-15 |
Family
ID=56787899
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/686,739 Abandoned US20180045440A1 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2017-08-25 | Ideal Liquid Compression Refrigeration Cycle |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20180045440A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016134731A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111721019A (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2020-09-29 | 李华玉 | First-class thermally-driven compression heat pump |
US10808646B2 (en) | 2019-01-09 | 2020-10-20 | Haier Us Appliance Solutions, Inc. | Cooled piston and cylinder for compressors and engines |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016134731A2 (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-09-01 | Hossain Khaled Mohammed | The ideal liquid compression refrigeration cycle |
CN109447483B (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2021-11-12 | 国电科学技术研究院有限公司 | Method for calculating influence quantity of low-temperature economizer on heat consumption rate of steam turbine unit |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5343711A (en) * | 1993-01-04 | 1994-09-06 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Method of reducing flow metastability in an ejector nozzle |
US5819554A (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 1998-10-13 | Refrigeration Development Company | Rotating vane compressor with energy recovery section, operating on a cycle approximating the ideal reversed Carnot cycle |
ATE464516T1 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2010-04-15 | Star Refrigeration | IMPROVED SUPERCRITICAL REFRIGERANT SYSTEM |
CN1304797C (en) * | 2005-01-10 | 2007-03-14 | 深圳清华大学研究院 | Steam compression type refrigeration cycle device of approximate ideal inverse Carnot cycle efficiency |
US20060242992A1 (en) * | 2005-05-02 | 2006-11-02 | Mark Nicodemus | Thermodynamic apparatus and methods |
JP4737001B2 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2011-07-27 | 株式会社デンソー | Ejector refrigeration cycle |
WO2007110991A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2007-10-04 | Mayekawa Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Vapor compression refrigerating cycle, control method thereof, and refrigerating apparatus to which the cycle and the control method are applied |
US20110225990A1 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2011-09-22 | Air Generate Inc | Efficient heat pump |
WO2016134731A2 (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-09-01 | Hossain Khaled Mohammed | The ideal liquid compression refrigeration cycle |
-
2015
- 2015-02-25 WO PCT/EG2015/000005 patent/WO2016134731A2/en active Application Filing
-
2017
- 2017-08-25 US US15/686,739 patent/US20180045440A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111721019A (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2020-09-29 | 李华玉 | First-class thermally-driven compression heat pump |
US10808646B2 (en) | 2019-01-09 | 2020-10-20 | Haier Us Appliance Solutions, Inc. | Cooled piston and cylinder for compressors and engines |
CN111721019B (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2023-03-24 | 李华玉 | First-class thermally-driven compression heat pump |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2016134731A3 (en) | 2017-06-01 |
WO2016134731A2 (en) | 2016-09-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20180045440A1 (en) | Ideal Liquid Compression Refrigeration Cycle | |
Chen et al. | A review on versatile ejector applications in refrigeration systems | |
Bilir et al. | Performance improvement of the vapour compression refrigeration cycle by a two‐phase constant area ejector | |
JP5613122B2 (en) | Method for controlling refrigerant pressure and flow | |
Ko et al. | The selection of volume ratio of two-stage rotary compressor and its effects on air-to-water heat pump with flash tank cycle | |
CN101171465A (en) | Refrigeration cycle device | |
CN103808056A (en) | Compound type cryogenic refrigerator with pulse tube capable of recycling acoustic power and J-T throttle | |
US20120260673A1 (en) | Cooling system utilizing a reciprocating piston | |
US20160363351A1 (en) | Heat exchange apparatus and heat pump apparatus | |
Zhang et al. | Comparative analysis of typical improvement methods in transcritical carbon dioxide refrigeration cycle | |
Li et al. | Thermodynamic analysis of a modified ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle with hot vapor bypass | |
KR101980332B1 (en) | Auto-cascade refrigeration system using phase change wave rotors | |
Dubey et al. | Performance evaluation and optimal configuration analysis of a transcritical carbon dioxide/propylene cascade system with vortex tube expander in high-temperature cycle | |
Aprea et al. | An experimental study on charge optimization of a trans-critical CO 2 cycle | |
US4094169A (en) | Expander-compressor transducer | |
Dubey et al. | Numerical optimization of a transcritical CO 2/propylene cascaded refrigeration-heat pump system with economizer in HT cycle | |
Rashidi et al. | Utilization of waste heat in combined power and ejector refrigeration for a solar energy source | |
US11466902B2 (en) | Vapor compression refrigeration system | |
WO2021089014A1 (en) | Waste heat energy conversion system | |
Chen et al. | Performance analysis of a two-stage mechanical compression–ejector cooling cycle intended for micro-trigeneration system | |
Arsana et al. | Thermodynamic analysis of two-phase ejector as expansion device with dual evaporator temperatures on split type air conditioning systems | |
Abdellaoui et al. | Thermodynamic analysis of a new dual evaporator CO 2 transcritical refrigeration cycle | |
ZHANG et al. | Performance Analysis of Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems with Oil-free Linear Compressor Vapor Injection and Regeneration | |
Yu et al. | Theoretical study on an innovative ejector enhanced Joule‐Thomson cycle | |
Pardiñas et al. | Ejector for the world: simplified ejector-supported CO2 refrigeration systems for all climates |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |