US20160234683A1 - Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device - Google Patents

Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160234683A1
US20160234683A1 US15/021,881 US201415021881A US2016234683A1 US 20160234683 A1 US20160234683 A1 US 20160234683A1 US 201415021881 A US201415021881 A US 201415021881A US 2016234683 A1 US2016234683 A1 US 2016234683A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
key
server
gba
lwm2m
client
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/021,881
Inventor
Nick BONE
Tim Snape
Jorge BENTO
Yakeen PRABDIAL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vodafone IP Licensing Ltd
Original Assignee
Vodafone IP Licensing Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB201316370A external-priority patent/GB201316370D0/en
Priority claimed from GB201318339A external-priority patent/GB201318339D0/en
Application filed by Vodafone IP Licensing Ltd filed Critical Vodafone IP Licensing Ltd
Publication of US20160234683A1 publication Critical patent/US20160234683A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/04—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
    • G06F13/14—Handling requests for interconnection or transfer
    • G06F13/16—Handling requests for interconnection or transfer for access to memory bus
    • G06F13/1668—Details of memory controller
    • G06F13/1689—Synchronisation and timing concerns
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
    • G06F13/14—Handling requests for interconnection or transfer
    • G06F13/20—Handling requests for interconnection or transfer for access to input/output bus
    • G06F13/28—Handling requests for interconnection or transfer for access to input/output bus using burst mode transfer, e.g. direct memory access DMA, cycle steal
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
    • G06F13/38—Information transfer, e.g. on bus
    • G06F13/40—Bus structure
    • G06F13/4004—Coupling between buses
    • G06F13/4027—Coupling between buses using bus bridges
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60—Protecting data
    • G06F21/606—Protecting data by securing the transmission between two devices or processes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/70—Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
    • G06F21/71—Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer to assure secure computing or processing of information
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • G06F9/4401—Bootstrapping
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/38—Transceivers, i.e. devices in which transmitter and receiver form a structural unit and in which at least one part is used for functions of transmitting and receiving
    • H04B1/3816—Mechanical arrangements for accommodating identification devices, e.g. cards or chips; with connectors for programming identification devices
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
    • H04L63/029—Firewall traversal, e.g. tunnelling or, creating pinholes
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/04—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks
    • H04L63/0428—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/04—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks
    • H04L63/0428—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload
    • H04L63/0442—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload wherein the sending and receiving network entities apply asymmetric encryption, i.e. different keys for encryption and decryption
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/06—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network
    • H04L63/061—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network for key exchange, e.g. in peer-to-peer networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/06—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network
    • H04L63/062—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network for key distribution, e.g. centrally by trusted party
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/06—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network
    • H04L63/068—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network using time-dependent keys, e.g. periodically changing keys
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0823—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using certificates
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0853—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using an additional device, e.g. smartcard, SIM or a different communication terminal
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0869—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities for achieving mutual authentication
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0876—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities based on the identity of the terminal or configuration, e.g. MAC address, hardware or software configuration or device fingerprint
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/16—Implementing security features at a particular protocol layer
    • H04L63/166—Implementing security features at a particular protocol layer at the transport layer
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/20—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for managing network security; network security policies in general
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1095—Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/12—Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks
    • H04L67/125—Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks involving control of end-device applications over a network
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08—Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816—Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08—Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816—Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0819—Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s)
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08—Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0861—Generation of secret information including derivation or calculation of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/02—Protecting privacy or anonymity, e.g. protecting personally identifiable information [PII]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/04—Key management, e.g. using generic bootstrapping architecture [GBA]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/04—Key management, e.g. using generic bootstrapping architecture [GBA]
    • H04W12/043—Key management, e.g. using generic bootstrapping architecture [GBA] using a trusted network node as an anchor
    • H04W12/0431—Key distribution or pre-distribution; Key agreement
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06—Authentication
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/08—Access security
    • H04W12/084—Access security using delegated authorisation, e.g. open authorisation [OAuth] protocol
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/30—Security of mobile devices; Security of mobile applications
    • H04W12/37—Managing security policies for mobile devices or for controlling mobile applications
    • H04W4/005—
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/12—Messaging; Mailboxes; Announcements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/12—Messaging; Mailboxes; Announcements
    • H04W4/14—Short messaging services, e.g. short message services [SMS] or unstructured supplementary service data [USSD]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/50—Service provisioning or reconfiguring
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/70—Services for machine-to-machine communication [M2M] or machine type communication [MTC]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
    • H04W52/02—Power saving arrangements
    • H04W52/0209—Power saving arrangements in terminal devices
    • H04W52/0225—Power saving arrangements in terminal devices using monitoring of external events, e.g. the presence of a signal
    • H04W52/0229—Power saving arrangements in terminal devices using monitoring of external events, e.g. the presence of a signal where the received signal is a wanted signal
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W8/00—Network data management
    • H04W8/005—Discovery of network devices, e.g. terminals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W8/00—Network data management
    • H04W8/02—Processing of mobility data, e.g. registration information at HLR [Home Location Register] or VLR [Visitor Location Register]; Transfer of mobility data, e.g. between HLR, VLR or external networks
    • H04W8/04—Registration at HLR or HSS [Home Subscriber Server]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W80/00—Wireless network protocols or protocol adaptations to wireless operation
    • H04W80/06—Transport layer protocols, e.g. TCP [Transport Control Protocol] over wireless
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/02—Terminal devices
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/02—Terminal devices
    • H04W88/06—Terminal devices adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2463/00—Additional details relating to network architectures or network communication protocols for network security covered by H04L63/00
    • H04L2463/061—Additional details relating to network architectures or network communication protocols for network security covered by H04L63/00 applying further key derivation, e.g. deriving traffic keys from a pair-wise master key
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/083—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using passwords
    • H04L63/0838—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using passwords using one-time-passwords
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/03—Protecting confidentiality, e.g. by encryption
    • H04W12/033—Protecting confidentiality, e.g. by encryption of the user plane, e.g. user's traffic
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/40—Security arrangements using identity modules
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and system for operating a machine to machine (M2M) device.
  • M2M machine to machine
  • M2M devices are often numerous, hard-to-reach, and have constrained capabilities (owing to low cost, small size, low processing power or limited battery life). All of this makes their management, often remote, very complicated. Moreover, M2M devices often need to be managed in a secure manner. For example, they may contain information that is commercially sensitive and/or confidential for the one or more entities that manage and/or own said devices. There is a need to remotely manage them in a secure way, while respecting these constraints.
  • WO 2012/035340 describes forming secure associations between IP-enabled devices.
  • An originating device establishes a secure connection to a first server.
  • a target device establishes a secure connection to a second server.
  • the first and second servers establish an IPSec or TLS connection to form a chain of secure associations between the two devices.
  • M2M devices may require key data to restore connectivity, for example. Obtaining such material securely under these circumstances can be problematic.
  • GAA Generic Authentication Architecture
  • GBA Generic Bootstrapping Architecture
  • GAA Generic Bootstrapping Architecture
  • GBA is a standard which enables a shared secret to be derived (bootstrapped) from the existing security association between a mobile network and a SIM card. This involves a network element called a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF).
  • BSF Bootstrapping Server Function
  • GBA leverages the security of a SIM card (UICC) to authenticate mobile equipment, and then derive key material for general-purpose applications.
  • GBA may be advantageously used to provide high-security to the communication between a client and the server, thus allowing remotely managing, controlling and, in general, communicating with a device in a high security manner.
  • GBA (or a GBA-like architecture) is used for enabling a secure communication with the device (which, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, may be an M2M device), said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, and wherein this communication is done for managing the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device, thus enabling a secure management of that device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device.
  • the device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device can be safely, securely and efficiently managed in a remote manner via a remote server.
  • GBA has been developed mainly for securing mobile broadcast (e.g. pay TV and equivalents). Indeed, standards for Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS) rely on GBA. Similarly, Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Mobile Broadcast Services Enabler Suite (BCAST) smartcard profile relies on GBA. To date, most of the limited number of deployments of GBA in the world has been for mobile broadcast. GBA has also been standardised as an optional feature in conjunction with presence services, and within miscellaneous “federated identity” services (e.g. Liberty Alliance, OpenID). In general, it is understood that GBA has been designed for use with mobile devices, such as mobile phones, laptop, computers, and many of the designed features have been provisioned with this in mind.
  • OMA Open Mobile Alliance
  • BCAST Mobile Broadcast Services Enabler Suite
  • GBA Push A variant of GBA, called “GBA Push”, has been proposed for securing a message between a client and a DM server in the context of OMA Device Management Security.
  • Device Management is specifically designed for management of mobile devices such as mobile phones, tablet, computers, etc.
  • TS 102 690 A different recent standard document (TS 102 690) merely mentions, in the context of M2M communications, the use of a standard GBA to secure communications between a device/gateway service layer and a network service layer.
  • the service provider can request the user to enter their phone number, send an SMS one-time password to that phone number, and ask the user to read the SMS and enter the password.
  • SIM card e.g. PCs, laptops, Wi-fi-only tablets etc.
  • GBA relies on a SIM card/UICC in order to work, there has been no interest in using it.
  • the OMA Device Management uses GBA Push for securing a message between a client and a DM server, and there is no explanation of how a similar architecture could be used or even modified for managing the device.
  • the OMA Device Management is not compatible for use with an M2M device, as discussed above.
  • the standard document mentioned above uses a standard GBA to secure communications between a device/gateway service layer and a network service layer.
  • the communication is not used for device/service management-related communications, and it is not clear, based on the observations made above, how a similar architecture could be used or even modified for managing the device from the server.
  • the OMA Device Management and the standard document are incompatible, and a combination of the GBA Push for OMA Device Management with the standard document is not feasible, as it would result in the wrong device management protocol (i.e. one that is not suitable for M2M devices, particularly simple M2M devices), and some very laborious effort to make the two compatible and delete the elements which are redundant.
  • the OMA has defined a lightweight protocol for managing (as well as interacting with) M2M devices and managing services provided by M2M devices (e.g. remote control of attached sensors or machines). This protocol is called LWM2M, which is described in detail at http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/lightweightM2M_v1_0.a spx
  • CoAP analogous to http
  • DTLS coaps
  • http http over TLS
  • coaps requires a secure association to be provisioned between a device and a network server (DM Server) while providing no strong means to provision such an association from scratch.
  • OMA LWM2M Lightweight Machine to Machine Technical Specification Candidate Version 1.0-10 Dec. 2013 (OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0-20131210-C).
  • the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) channel security for [COAP] is defined by the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) [RFC6347], which is the equivalent of TLS v1.2 [RFC5246] for HTTP and utilizes a subset of the Cipher Suites defined in TLS. (Refers to TLS Cipher Suite registry http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xml)
  • the DTLS binding for CoAP is defined in Section 9 of [CoAP].
  • DTLS is a long-lived session based security solution for UDP. It provides a secure handshake with session key generation, mutual authentication, data integrity and confidentiality.
  • the keying material used to secure the exchange of information within a DTLS session may be obtained using one of the bootstrap modes defined in Section 5.1.2 Bootstrap Modes of OMA LWM2M.
  • the formats of the keying material carried in the LWM2M Security Object Instances are defined in Appendix E.1.1.
  • HTTP Digest authentication is defined in RFC 3310 (entitled “Hypertext Transfer protocol (HTTP) Digest Authentication using Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA)”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3310.txt).
  • the GAA cluster of specifications TS 33.222 (entitled “Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Access to network application functions using Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Transport Layer Security (HTTPS)”) defines a general approach for pre-shared key TLS (TLS-PSK, RFC 4279). This can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/33222.htm). For example, see especially Section 5.4.
  • 3GPP Specification TS 33.220 defines the components and interfaces that are shown in FIG. 1 . These are further described as:
  • the “Network Application Function” is a server-side component of an application that will be secured using GBA.
  • BSF, “Bootstrapping Server Function”, 130 is a server-side component, which obtains authentication vectors from the HLR/HSS 140 , and sends a challenge to the mobile device, “UE”, 110 during the GBA protocol. On successful authentication, it derives the shared secret.
  • HLR/HSS 140 the “Home Location Register” or “Home Subscriber System” is the existing 3GPP system which stores subscription details and credentials (the K and IMSI) for each SIM card (UICC) issued by a mobile operator. It may be “GBA-aware” (so that it stores details for a GBA user subscription) or may be a legacy component.
  • the “User Equipment”, 110 is a mobile device containing a SIM card (UICC).
  • the UE 110 supports a client application which communicates with the NAF 122 , as well as a service which interfaces to the UICC, communicates with the BSF 130 , and derives the shared secret before passing it to the client application.
  • This service is (somewhat confusingly) called a “GAA Server” in TR 33 . 905 (entitled “Recommendations for Trusted Open Platforms”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/htmlinfo/33905.htm).
  • Ua 150 is the interface between the Mobile Device (UE) 110 and the Network Application Function (NAF) 120 .
  • UE Mobile Device
  • NAF Network Application Function
  • Ub 160 is the interface between the Mobile Device (UE) 110 and the Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF) 130 . This is specified in detail in TS 24.109 (entitled “Bootstrapping interface (Ub) 160 and network application function interface (Ua) 150 ; Protocol details”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24109.htm).
  • Zh/Zh′ 180 is the interface between the BSF 130 and the HSS or HLR 140 .
  • the Zh 180 interface is used with an HSS 140 that is “GBA Aware”.
  • the Zh′ 180 interface is used with a legacy HLR or HSS 140 .
  • the Zh and Zh′ 180 interfaces are specified in detail in TS 29.109 (entitled “Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Zh and Zn Interfaces based on Diameter protocol; Stage 3 ”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29109.htm) and TS 29.229 (entitled “Cx and Dx interfaces based on the Diameter protocol; protocol details”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29229.htm).
  • GAA Generic Authentication Architecture
  • TS 29.229 Entitled “Cx and Dx interfaces based on the Diameter protocol; protocol details”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29229.htm).
  • Zn 170 is the interface between the NAF 122 and the BSF 130 : this can use either a Web Services protocol (SOAP over http) or the Diameter protocol (RFC 3588). This is specified in detail in TS 29.109 (see above).
  • SOAP over http Web Services protocol
  • RRC 3588 Diameter protocol
  • GBA-ME GBA-ME
  • GBA-U GBA-SIM
  • GBA-SIM GBA-ME
  • 3G SIM a USIM
  • other versions may be used.
  • a method for communicating with a machine to machine, M2M, device comprising the steps of:
  • certificate validation may be easier. Protection of the data may be by encryption or digital signature or both.
  • the second key may a public key of a public and private key pair.
  • the first key may be a session key used to secure a data connection with the M2M device and the second key is sent to the M2M device protected by the session key.
  • the second key is sent by a first entity and the protected data is sent by a second entity.
  • the first and second entities may be separate, associated or part of the same device or organisation, for example.
  • the second entity may be an emergency service or a customer, for example.
  • the second key may be used to verify provision by the second entity of the data to the M2M device.
  • the second entity may be an emergency service or customer, for example.
  • the protected data may be of a type selected from the group consisting of: firmware or M2M firmware, a warning message, a broadcast message, a unicast message, a traffic alert, an emergency message, and a peer-to-peer communication.
  • firmware or M2M firmware a warning message, a broadcast message, a unicast message, a traffic alert, an emergency message, and a peer-to-peer communication.
  • Other data types may be sent.
  • firmware data then this method may be used to ensure that unmonitored devices especially are updated correctly and with the appropriate ROM image.
  • the sending the protected data and/or sending the second key to the M2M device uses OMA lightweight M2M, LWM2M, protocol.
  • Example protocols may include TR69, TR111, MQTT, OMA DM, or any other device management protocols performing equivalent or similar functions.
  • apparatus for providing a key to a machine to machine, M2M, device comprising:
  • the M2M device may be provided with a new or updated key from a trusted key provider even when it has lost connectivity with its usual key source.
  • the apparatus may be described as a Key-ring or key conduit.
  • Example implementations include:
  • Both key-ring and server support a known key derivation function, which when applied to key one gives key two.
  • Key-ring passes key two to the M2M device.
  • Both M2M device and server support a known key derivation function, which applied to key one gives key two.
  • Key-ring passes key one to the M2M device, which then derives key two.
  • Key-ring is integrity-protected using key one.
  • Key two is then derived from the Diffie-Hellman shared secret. (An advantage of this approach is that the key-ring never has visibility of key 2).
  • the apparatus may further comprise an indicator configured to indicate transmission of the key to the M2M device over the second interface.
  • the indicator may be selected from the group consisting of: light, LED, audio sounder, and display screen.
  • the apparatus may further comprise an access control mechanism, and the logic may be further configured to provide access to the M2M device or an entity associated with the M2M device when the key is derived.
  • a toll booth, car park, car wash, drive-through restaurant, exercise machine, or other physical entity comprising or associated with the apparatus previously described.
  • a method of establishing secure associations between devices comprising the steps of:
  • obtaining at the second device the second key data from the server may use generic bootstrapping architecture
  • the method may further comprise the steps of:
  • a method for managing a machine to machine, M2M, device comprising the steps of:
  • the protected data may include an instruction to the M2M device to conduct a test or tests. This prevents unauthorised operation of typically unmonitored devices.
  • test or tests may be a self-test or a device diagnostic test.
  • the method may further comprise the step of sending results of the test from the M2M device.
  • the results may be sent protected.
  • the protected data include a decommissioning instruction to the M2M device.
  • the decommissioning instruction is an instruction list the M2M device for sale and/or an instruction to order a replacement M2M device.
  • the methods described above may be implemented as a computer program comprising program instructions to operate a computer.
  • the computer program may be stored on a computer-readable medium.
  • the computer system may include a processor such as a central processing unit (CPU).
  • the processor may execute logic in the form of a software program.
  • the computer system may include a memory including volatile and non-volatile storage medium.
  • a computer-readable medium may be included to store the logic or program instructions.
  • the different parts of the system may be connected using a network (e.g. wireless networks and wired networks).
  • the computer system may include one or more interfaces.
  • the computer system may contain a suitable operation system such as UNIX, Windows® or Linux, for example.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of components and interfaces with which GBA may be used
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an example of an architecture that can be used in accordance with the present invention, in particular when GBA is used;
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary flow diagram of communications exchanged within the exemplary architecture of FIG. 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an example of an alternative architecture that can be used in accordance with the present invention, in particular when generic bootstrapping architecture (GBA) is used;
  • GBA generic bootstrapping architecture
  • FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram of a device management (DM) server in communication with a Machine to Machine (M2M) device;
  • DM device management
  • M2M Machine to Machine
  • FIG. 6 shows a schematic diagram of a system and method for initiating communications between the DM server and M2M device of FIG. 5 ;
  • FIG. 7 shows a schematic diagram of a further system and method for initiating communications between the DM server and M2M device of FIG. 5 ;
  • FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of the method of FIG. 7 ;
  • FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method for communication with a M2M device
  • FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a method for communication between a M2M device and a device management server
  • FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of an apparatus for transferring keys to a device.
  • a device may communicate securely with a server.
  • the device may be a Machine to Machine (M2M) device, or an equivalent device (e.g. a device, a generic or specific communication device, including one or more modules capable of providing M2M capabilities).
  • M2M Machine to Machine
  • an equivalent device e.g. a device, a generic or specific communication device, including one or more modules capable of providing M2M capabilities.
  • GBA Generic Authentication Architecture
  • GBA Generic Bootstrapping Architecture
  • GBA Generic Bootstrapping Architecture
  • a network e.g. a mobile network
  • a card e.g. a SIM card or UICC
  • the method can advantageously use the GBA to derive the security elements (e.g. a shared secret) to enable the client associated with the device to securely communicate with the server.
  • the device could be advantageously adapted so that it is associated with the card and the client and uses GBA to derive the security elements for secure communication with the server.
  • GBA is standards-based, the impact of the required modifications may be relatively limited and the overall solution would be very attractive (in particular, to M2M users/owners as well as to network operators and/or service providers).
  • M2M devices are different from the mobile devices that OMA Device Management was originally designed for (such as mobile phones, laptops, computers, as explained in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above), and use of GBA (in any of its versions) with M2M is not a straightforward implementation.
  • GBA Push A variant of GBA, called “GBA Push” has been proposed for securing a message between a client and a DM server in the context of OMA Device Management Security, and is identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above. It is noted that, although GBA Push and GBA are related, it is not trivial to use GBA in place of GBA Push (and vice versa). This is because these two architectures have some important differences. First, in GBA the device has to contact the BSF in order to request a RAND and AUTN (and use this to derive a Ks_local). To the contrary, in GBA Push, the client does not have to talk to the BSF—it just receives a message prepared by the BSF.
  • GBA Push there is no need to modify the Ua interface.
  • either the Ua interface has to be modified in some way to carry the push message or a new interface must be added. Accordingly, GBA Push cannot be used with an arbitrary application protocol.
  • the application protocol has to be “GBA aware” in some sense (e.g. so it can carry the GBA Push Info (GPI) messages).
  • GBA Push the Ks_local can be used to derive several different Ks_NAFs (e.g. for different application servers).
  • GBA Push only one NAF can use/rely on the Ks_local. Accordingly, GBA Push is slightly less efficient than GBA.
  • the GBA Push Info is described in 3GPP TS 33.223, Section 5.2.1.
  • the encoding is defined in Section 5.3.5. See in particular table 5.2.1.1 and figure 5.3.5.1 in 3GPP TS 33.223 V12.0.0 (2013-12) that may be found: http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33_series/33.223/33223-c00.zip
  • M2M devices are very constrained in their capabilities (e.g. computation, communication, life, etc.) and these constraints make their management more complex and harder to implement in a simple manner.
  • GBA requires a number of interfaces and components which are hard to implement with M2M (for examples and description of these interfaces and components, please refer to the sections below).
  • these interfaces and components need to be modified or otherwise adapted so they can properly and effectively work with M2M devices.
  • the standard Ub interface uses HTTP and HTTP digest.
  • GBA was designed having mobile devices, such as mobile phones, in mind. So, since all phones use HTTP, and therefore all have an HTTP stack, then HTTP was the easiest protocol to be used for the Ub interface.
  • M2M devices For example, according to the Lightweight M2M (LWM2M) protocol (see below for more details), a protocol called CoAP is used in M2M devices, precisely because it is a simpler/more efficient alternative to HTTP.
  • this Ub interface could be tunnelled, for example via another interface (e.g. the Ua), so that the system may be simplified.
  • GBA is not widely used.
  • use of GBA requires support in the device, in the network (e.g. BSF—see below) and by individual services (which may be deployed, for example, by a mobile operator or by other parties).
  • BSF network
  • individual services which may be deployed, for example, by a mobile operator or by other parties.
  • mobile broadcast mobile broadcast support is also required in the SIM card (as it uses GBA-U).
  • GBA-U mobile broadcast
  • GBA (or a GBA-like architecture, for example a variant and/or a suitably modified version) may be used for enabling a secure communication with a device (in particular, an M2M device).
  • the communication may be between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, and wherein this communication may be done for managing the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device.
  • This enables a secure management of that device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device and creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages.
  • the GBA will provide a higher and very strong level of security to the device/service management-related communications with M2M devices, which is a very critical and important point.
  • an M2M service provider does not have the cost/complexity of setting up their own security solutions, as the solution can be provided directly by the mobile operator implementing the solution described in this application.
  • a service provider does not have to set up a PKI, issue certificates, pre-load keys to devices and so on.
  • the method may further comprise that the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device.
  • the card may be embedded within the device (e.g. soldered in the device) or provided to the device by way of a suitable connection.
  • the card may be associated in any suitable manner so that there is an association between the card and the device.
  • the network can be a mobile network, or any equivalent network, while the card can be a SIM card, a UICC, or any card associated with the network.
  • the method may further comprise deriving a shared secret based on the security association.
  • the method may further comprise providing the client and the server with the shared secret so as to enable the secure communication.
  • the server may be a server adapted to manage the device (e.g. remotely manage the device, send updates, transfer information to and from the device, control device parameters, etc.) and to manage services provided by the device (e.g. device is used to switch on/off and/or dim streetlights).
  • the shared secret may be a key and/or a similar security arrangement.
  • the method may further comprise authentication between the client and the server.
  • the authentication may be based on the shared secret.
  • the authentication may be performed via an authentication component.
  • the authentication may be performed by means of a first authentication between the client and an authentication component and of a second authentication between the server and the authentication component.
  • the client and the server may be independently authenticated by an authentication component.
  • both the client and the server may share the shared secret.
  • the authentication may be performed by means of the shared secret.
  • the shared secret may be shared between the client and the server.
  • the shared secret may be shared between the client, the server and the authentication component.
  • the authentication may implicitly result from the client, the server and the authentication component sharing the shared secret.
  • the method may further comprise deriving a second shared secret based on the shared secret, the second shared secret being shared between the client and the server. This second shared secret may then be used for the authentication as discussed above.
  • the obtainment of the shared secret at the client may be based on an identifier associated with a server authentication component.
  • the shared secret may be obtained at the server from the authentication component.
  • the obtainment of the shared secret at the server is obtained based on an identifier associated with the shared secret.
  • the identifier is generated by the authentication component.
  • the identifier may be provided to the server by the client.
  • the OMA LWM2M protocol for managing (as well as interacting with) M2M devices and managing services provided by M2M devices may be used. However, other device management protocols may be used or the method and system may be extended to other M2M services (for example, securing the delivery of binary SMS).
  • GBA could be advantageously used in conjunction with LWM2M in order, for example, to establish keys for LWM2M, whilst at the same time LWM2M and the procedures specified therein could be used to transport and/or carry any message and/or communication which relates to GBA. For example, this can be done by using specific tunnels (e.g. Ub) or GBA Push Info (GPI) messages.
  • GBA GBA Push Info
  • the use of GBA together with LWM2M creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages. For example, it allows addressing many more low-end devices, such as M2M devices.
  • GBA with LWM2M securely supports low-cost devices which are unattended or have no UI, where there is no option for user interaction (such as entry of PIN), and where there is no user who is able to notice and recover from authentication failures (spoof server, spoof client or Man In The Middle), Moreover, GBA works without requiring any public key or certificate processing on the device. This is particularly advantageous on simpler devices, as these devices may have minimal public key support or implementation errors when handling certificates.
  • the shared secret may be used as a key in the LWM2M standard.
  • the LWM2M standard procedures may be used for transmission and/or reception of any communication used within the GBA.
  • the shared secret may be used as a key or shared secret within the DTLS protocol (identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above), either when the LWM2M is used in conjunction with a DTLS protocol or when the DTLS is used alone or in conjunction with one or more other protocols.
  • the secure communication may further be a data communication.
  • the data communication may be an SMS-based communication.
  • An SMS binding may be used.
  • the data communication may be a UDP-based communication.
  • the method may further comprise encrypting a communication over the secure data communication.
  • the encryption may be performed using an Advanced Encryption Standard.
  • the SMS-based communication may be further secured by use of an Over-The-Air (OTA) protocol, e.g. a Secured Packet Structure for UICC Applications. This protocol is defined in ETSI standard 102.225.
  • OTA protocol may be arranged to secure the communication with the identification card associated with the device.
  • the OTA protocol can be used advantageously in conjunction with the LWM2M standard, in which the LWM2M can be used to manage parameters, keys and similar elements for the OTA protocol.
  • OTA is a solution designed for SIM card security, as it has some real technical challenges if used for LWM2M.
  • software written for SIM cards and SIM OTA servers to support ETSI standard 102.225 a similar software does not exist in the device management space for devices (and, in particular, not for OMA DM clients and servers).
  • M2M device manufacturers do not have a code-base that they can easily adapt for use with these devices.
  • the ETSI standard 102.225 does not explain how to set up the keys and parameters for use with the standard. It simply assumes the keys and parameters are all pre-loaded and known to both SIM card and OTA server. Although this assumption is acceptable in the SIM space—because SIM cards can be securely provisioned with the necessary keys at the manufacturing stage, and SIM manufacturers have interfaces with operators for communicating the necessary keys and parameters—the same cannot be said about LWM2M, where that infrastructure does not exist.
  • the LWM2M standard procedures may be used to manage parameters and/or keys used in the OTA protocol.
  • the method may further be used in conjunction with LWM2M, as described above.
  • GBA can be used in conjunction with SMS so that the GBA can be employed to establish keys for secure SMS-based communications (e.g. SMS), while at the same time SMS-based communications can be used to transport or carry messages associated with GBA—for example, carry GBA Push Info (GPI) messages.
  • SMS-based communications together with GBA creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages.
  • GBA can be used to establish the shared keys that are needed to protect SMS, while using SMS as a transport to deliver the necessary GBA messages.
  • SMS used to deliver the GBA messages can themselves be integrity protected (and partly encrypted) using the keys that will be established by GBA, so at no point is there a reliance on not secure SMS.
  • This synergistic combination allow use of SMS as the sole bearer for M2M traffic, something which would not otherwise be possible, except by preloading the keys needed to secure SMS traffic, or switching to a different protocol to negotiate these keys: both of these alternatives would add complexity and cost.
  • the GBA may be used to establish keys for secure transmission and/or delivery of SMS.
  • SMS-based communications may be used for transmission and/or reception of any communication used within the GBA, noting that these communications may themselves be protected using the keys that will be derived in GBA.
  • the server may further comprise a server authentication component.
  • the client may further comprise a client authentication component.
  • the server authentication component may perform authentication of the server with the authentication component.
  • the client authentication component may perform authentication of the client with the authentication component.
  • the authentication component may be a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF)
  • the server authentication component may be a Network Application Function (NAF)
  • the client authentication component may be a GAA Server.
  • BSF Bootstrapping Server Function
  • NAF Network Application Function
  • the method may further comprise communicating between the server and the client for determining security parameters to be used for the secure communication, wherein the communicating is performed by using a device management protocol (for example, the GBA).
  • the secure communication may be for use in the device management protocol.
  • a method of enabling secure communication for use in a device and/or service/application management protocol the secure communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with a device, the secure communication requiring security parameters to be agreed between the client and server, the method comprising communicating between the server and client to agree the security parameters, wherein the communicating is performed by using the device management protocol.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure communication with a device, said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device.
  • the apparatus, system, module or network may further include means for performing any one of the steps or features of the methods described above.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure communication for use in a device and/or service/application management protocol, the secure communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with a device, the secure communication requiring security parameters to be agreed between the client and server, the method comprising communicating between the server and client to agree the security parameters, wherein the communicating is performed by using the device management protocol.
  • the apparatus, system, module or network may further include means for performing any one of the steps or features of the methods described above.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • a client including any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the client as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • a server including any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the server as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • a device comprising a card and a client, wherein the device is arranged for enablement of secure communication, the secure communication being between a server and the client, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and the card.
  • the client may comprise any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the client as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • a server arranged for enablement of secure communication with a device, the secure communication being between the server and a client associated with the device, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device.
  • the server may comprise any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the server as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • a system for enabling secure communication with a device said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • a method of enabling secure data communication with a device the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security of the communication is enabled by a bootstrapped secret.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • the security protocol may be used to secure the data communication.
  • the bootstrapped secret may be used to obtain the security elements used for the secure protocol.
  • the bootstrapped secret may be a pre-shared secret, said secret being directly provided to the server and the client.
  • the pre-shared secret may be permanently provided to the server and the client (e.g. by pre-provisioning the client and/or the server with said pre-shared secret, e.g. at manufacturing stage or before the client and/or server are used in a system).
  • the pre-shared secret may be a strong, high entropy or a temporary, low-entropy pre-shared secret.
  • the bootstrapped secret may be based on a public key or a certificate-based method.
  • the bootstrapped secret may be provided via a bootstrap server.
  • the security elements can be keys and/or similar arrangements well known in the art.
  • the communication may be an SMS-based communication.
  • the security protocol is defined by ETSI TS 102.225.
  • the method may use SMS binding.
  • the device may be further associated with a card, and the security of the data communication may be controlled by means of the card. Any incoming SMS-based communication may be decrypted and/or checked by means of the card, and/or any outgoing SMS-based communication may be encrypted and/or checked by means of the card.
  • the communication may be a UDP-based communication.
  • the security protocol may be a DTLS protocol.
  • the secure data communication may be provided over a communication interface.
  • the communication interface may be used for managing the device of for managing the bootstrapping operations.
  • the data communication may be performed according to the LWM2M protocol.
  • an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security of the communication is enabled by a bootstrapped secret.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • a method of retrieving security elements required for enabling secure data communication with a device the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security elements are retrieved using a bootstrapping protocol.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • the bootstrapping protocol may retrieve the security elements in a secure session.
  • the session may be secured based on a security protocol.
  • the security protocol may be a DTLS protocol.
  • the bootstrapping protocol may be based on GBA.
  • the data communication may be an SMS-based communication.
  • the bootstrapping protocol may be a LWM2M bootstrap protocol.
  • the security elements can be keys and/or similar arrangements well known in the art.
  • an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security elements are retrieved using a bootstrapping protocol.
  • the device can be an M2M device.
  • the secure communication may be for the purpose of managing the device and/or the client and/or services (e.g. provided by the device) by the server.
  • Both the device and the server may be machines (i.e. not requiring any human intervention to work).
  • the server may be used to manage it. Again, the management may be done without any human intervention (e.g. automatically).
  • the solution could be used in conjunction with the LWM2M protocol, but the solution could be extended to other Device Management protocols, or to other M2M services (e.g. securing delivery of binary SMS).
  • M2M-specific protocol such as LWM2M
  • the use of the solution in conjunction with an M2M-specific protocol, such as LWM2M allows the solution to be very efficient when used with M2M devices, and in particular, when used to manage the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device.
  • all the advantages mentioned above are further enhanced and optimised when the solution is used in conjunction with an M2M-specific protocol.
  • a device 110 in the example, an M2M Device and/or a User Equipment
  • a card 112 in the example, a UICC
  • a Client 116 in the example, a Device Management (DM) client.
  • this client could also be an LWM2M Client, namely a client that can manage the device itself and service/applications provided by the device e.g. asset control).
  • the device 110 is also associated with a device authentication component 114 (in the example, a GAA server).
  • a server 120 is provided (in the example, a DM server), the server associated with a server authentication component 122 (in the example, a Network Application Function (NAF)).
  • a server authentication component 122 in the example, a Network Application Function (NAF)
  • an authentication component 130 is provided (in the example, a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF)) and a register 140 (in the example, an HLR or HSS).
  • BSF Bootstrapping Server Function
  • register 140 in the example, an HLR or HSS.
  • four different interfaces are provided for communication between the various components, in particular interface Ua 150 between device 110 and server 120 , interface Ub 160 between device 110 and authentication component 130 , interface Zn 170 between authentication component 130 and server 120 , and interface Zh/Zh′ between authentication component 130 and register 140 .
  • NAF the “Network Application Function”
  • DM Device Management
  • Some aspects of a BSF, HLR/HSS, UE, Ua, Ub, Zh/Zh′ and Zn are provided in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • the BSF 130 derives the shared secret Ks_NAF, which is retrieved by the NAF.
  • the BSF 130 would most likely be on a separate server from the HLR/HSS 140 , but within an M2M platform cluster.
  • the HLR/HSS may be “GBA-aware” (so that it stores details for a GBA user subscription) or may be a legacy component.
  • the HLR/HSS would be the HLR or HSS of an M2M mobile operator (i.e. one dedicated specifically to serving M2M connections).
  • the UE 110 is, in the proposed solution, an M2M device.
  • the Ua is the interface between a Device Management client 116 and Device Management server 120 .
  • the Ub would be the interface between the “GAA Server” component 114 of the device and the BSF 130 .
  • the Zn interface is used.
  • this interface is between the Device Management Server 120 and the BSF 130 .
  • the WS version of the interface would allow placement of a DM Server in multiple locations (not just in the M2M operator/platform cluster), and allow future NAFs in multiple locations.
  • the UE 110 contacts over interface Ua the NAF 122 (in the described embodiment, the Device Management client 116 contacts the Device Management server 122 ) and discovers that the NAF requires it to acquire a shared secret using GBA. This could be because there is no existing secret, or the existing secret has expired, or is otherwise considered invalid by the NAF.
  • the exact interface and communication method may be specific to the application concerned.
  • One possible interface and communication method for OMA Lightweight M2M is discussed below.
  • the DM client 116 requests the GAA server 114 to obtain a shared secret. It presents an identifier for the corresponding NAF (NAF_Id).
  • the UE 110 contacts the BSF (GAA Server 114 contacts the BSF 130 ). This may be a basic http GET request.
  • the UE presents an “IMPI” (equivalent of an IMSI) or a “TMPI” (equivalent of a TMSI) for anonymity reasons, if one is available.
  • the BSF 130 requests an authentication vector from the HLR/HSS 140 .
  • the HLR/HSS 140 returns a fresh vector, consisting of a RAND, AUTN, XRES, CK, and IK, for example.
  • the BSF 130 generates a transaction identifier (B-TID) and passes ( 230 ) the B-TID together with the RAND and AUTN back to the UE 110 . It may also indicate the lifetime of the B-TID, and the associated key.
  • B-TID transaction identifier
  • the GAA Server 114 forwards the RAND and AUTN to the UICC 112 which validates the AUTN. If the AUTN is valid, then the BSF 130 is authenticated. At 240 , the UICC 112 returns a RES, CK and IK to the GAA Server 114 .
  • the UE 110 (GAA Server 114 ) contacts the BSF 130 again, using the resulting RES for HTTP Digest authentication (which is identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above).
  • the BSF 130 verifies the HTTP Digest using the XRES. If it matches, then the UE 110 has been successfully authenticated.
  • the BSF 130 stores the tuple ⁇ IMPI, B-TID, RAND, CK, IK> and tells at 250 the UE 110 that the authentication was successful.
  • the UE 110 stores ⁇ B-TID, RAND, CK, IK>.
  • the UE 110 Over the internal UE 110 interface from DM client 116 to GAA server 114 : the UE 110 (GAA Server 114 ) derives a secret Ks_NAF using the CK, IK, RAND, IMPI and NAF_Id. At 255 , it passes Ks_NAF and the B-TID back to the DM client 116 .
  • the UE 110 (DM Client 116 ) contacts the NAF (DM Server 122 ) and presents the B-TID as retrieved above.
  • the NAF 122 contacts the BSF 130 , and presents the BTID.
  • the BSF 130 authenticates the NAF, derives the corresponding Ks_NAF, and at 270 returns it to the NAF, together with an indicator of key lifetime.
  • the UE 110 (DM Client 116 ) and NAF (DM Server 122 ) now both share Ks_NAF. They can use it directly, or to derive their own session keys for further communication.
  • the exemplary flow described with reference to FIG. 3 is very generic, and can be used with many different sorts of device management protocols (or other application protocols). As can be seen, many details of the Ua interface are outside the scope of 3GPP and are left to other standards to complete (or left to proprietary implementations). However, integration with the LWM2M standard is possible, as described in these examples.
  • OMA LWM2M is based on DTLS v1.2 (see above) and CoAP (see above). Both the client and server must support pre-shared key DTLS (e.g. see section 7.1.1, page 41), whereas support for certificate-based authentication is only optional. This means that a key derived by GBA (Ks_NAF) could be used as a DTLS pre-shared key and it would work with any DM client/DM server pair.
  • Ks_NAF key derived by GBA
  • the “Server Hello” message contains a field where the server can indicate that it supports GBA-bootstrapping, and in response, the client can then provide an identifier (B-TID) for an already bootstrapped key ( 260 ). Or if the client doesn't already have a bootstrapped key, it asks the GAA server to get one, before resuming the “Client Hello” and “Server Hello” at 260 .
  • the use of the Ks_NAF to derive session keys is then specified entirely within the TLS-PSK protocol.
  • the 3GPP spec assumes HTTP/TLS, but the basic approach looks the same for CoAP/DTLS.
  • the LWM2M spec may need to define a “protocol identifier” for DTLS pre-shared key and have it registered by OMNA (see section 5.2.1 of OMA GBA Profile, Approved Version 1.1—31 Jul. 2012 found at http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/sec_cf_archive.aspx).
  • the M2M device may be configured to support the security of OMA LWM2M, which is referenced in_“Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • the M2M device may contain several internal components. It should support a DM client which is “GBA aware”, as well as a “GAA Server” component.
  • the GAA Server component should support internal interfaces to the DM client and to the SIM card (UICC) as well as the external Ub interface to the BSF.
  • the interface to the UICC may be particularly challenging, as the M2M device may not expose an existing API to allow device software to send commands to the UICC.
  • One possibility (that may be used) is for the modem to expose AT commands. However, this may not be at a sufficiently low level (AT+CSIM allows raw APDUs to be communicated to the UICC) in every case.
  • AT+CSIM allows raw APDUs to be communicated to the UICC
  • the interface to the BSF is based on http and HTTP Digest authentication.
  • One alternative may be “tunnelling” the Ub interface within the Ua interface, so that the device only needs to support the CoAP protocol (not HTTP as well).
  • GBA push A related alternative is using the GBA “Push” variant, and carrying push messages (Upa interface) within the Ua interface. Both of these would require identifying suitable commands and parameters in the Ua interface (i.e. the relevant Device Management protocol) to carry the tunnel or push messages.
  • the interfaces and message flow for GBA push are outlined below (see also 3GPP TS 33.223, entitled “3G Security; Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) Push function”, it can currently be retrieved by http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/33223.htm).
  • a NAF establishes a shared NAF SA with a UE which is registered for Push services. It knows the identity of the subscriber.
  • the Push-NAF generates the GPI (GBA Push info) Request and sends the GPI Request to the BSF.
  • the BSF Upon receiving the request from the NAF, the BSF checks that the NAF is authorized, and resolves the requested subscriber identifier to a private identifier (e.g. IMSI).
  • a private identifier e.g. IMSI
  • the BSF fetches a new AV (authentication vector) and subscriber's GUSS (GBA User Security Settings) from the HSS.
  • the HSS sends the AV and the GUSS to the BSF.
  • the BSF When the BSF receives the AV Response from the HSS, it generates the NAF keys based on the requested NAF_Id and creates the relevant GPI Response.
  • the BSF sends the GPI Response to the NAF.
  • the NAF stores the received information together with other user information in a NAF SA.
  • the NAF then forwards the GPI to the UE over Upa using the selected transport mechanism and the given transport address.
  • the UE When the UE receives the message containing the GPI, it processes the GPI as for regular GBA, and stores the corresponding NAF SA(s)
  • the UE and NAF are now ready to use the established NAF SA.
  • TR33.223 specifies that Upa is a new interface that is separate from Ua—“a new reference point Upa is introduced between the NAF and the UE” (Section 4.2.1). As such, the Ua interface should be unaware of whether GBA or GBA-push is being used.
  • the address of the BSF may be pre-loaded when the device is manufactured. It could be device managed itself, which would seem to create a “chicken-and-egg” problem, but the DM Server could, for instance, provide an address for an acceptable BSF in the ServerHello. Or http traffic might be routed by the M2M mobile operator to a default BSF address. Similarly, the location of the preferred DM Server might need to be pre-loaded, or the M2M mobile operator could route CoAP traffic to a default DM Server address.
  • GBA-U has security advantages, but also logistic advantages: it permits a longer lifetime for the B-TID as the derived key is stored more securely. It allows safe retention of Ks during power-off cycles for instance.
  • GBA-U requires specific support from the UICC, so would have a (modest) increment to the cost. Since M2M devices are typically provided with a new UICC anyway at manufacture, it is a software/development cost rather than a hardware cost. Also, in a model with a customised UICC, this may allow for a solution using restricted AT commands to the modem, rather than full AT+CSIM.
  • the architecture example allows for there to be several DM Servers in different locations: it could be part of an M2M platform (e.g. M2M mobile operator) cluster, or hosted elsewhere by a network operator/service provider, or perhaps by a customer of said operator/provider.
  • the BSF may need to be located within a firewalled Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), or perhaps connected via an http proxy in the DMZ (so allowing external http Web Service access from NAFs), and then would execute the Diameter interface to the HLR/HSS. It may be undesirable to expose an http interface directly onto the server supporting the HLR, or to tunnel Diameter through firewalls. However, if the DM Server is itself part of the M2M platform cluster then this may be over-engineering. Possibly, a Diameter solution for the Zn interface then becomes acceptable.
  • DMZ Demilitarized Zone
  • the HLR may be upgraded to a full HSS with support for the Zh reference point.
  • the HLR/HSS only supports Zh′ then the BSF will need to be more complicated, and take on some of the subscription management functions (profiling, lifetime, security policies) typically associated with the HSS.
  • GBA keys could be used to protect SMS (e.g. encrypt/integrity protect SMS using a secure packet interface e.g. like ETSI TS 102.225 which is used for SIM OTA). This SMS channel is likely to be more efficient than DTLS.
  • a secure SMS protocol could be linked to a Device and/or Service management protocol, namely: using a secure SMS protocol (e.g. originally designed for SIM OTA (102 225)), but now adapted for LWM2M communications, combined with using the LWM2M protocol to define (and manage) the necessary parameters for the secure SMS protocol (i.e. the relevant Klc, KID, SPI, TAR, and keys).
  • a secure SMS protocol e.g. originally designed for SIM OTA (102 225)
  • LWM2M LWM2M protocol
  • GBA could be used to securely derive the keys.
  • LWM2M needs a security solution for the SMS bearer. Without a solution, SMS will not be usable as a bearer, severely limiting scope of LWM2M.
  • a solution to this problem is to use SIM OTA security (e.g. see TS 102 225).
  • TS 102.225 relies on the keys and parameters being already agreed between client and server. However, it is difficult to pre-load these into LWM2M client devices, and ensure that they are sent to servers, because there is no present infrastructure for doing so. It would be pointless to deliver the keys and parameters over unsecured SMS.
  • a first solution there is provided switching bearer to UDP/Coap and running DTLS.
  • the DTLS session can be used to secure the LWM2M Bootstrap protocol.
  • the LWM2M Bootstrap can be used to set the TS 102.225 keys and parameters securely. Note that managed resources/objects need to be defined to allow the Bootstrap server to update them; the format of these resources is specified in the numbered paragraphs below.
  • GBA GBA Push Info
  • the GPI GBA Push Info
  • the delivery of the parameters like Kic, KID, SPI and TAR is not obvious, but these are only 6 bytes, and there are fields in the GPI e.g. App_Lbl, NAF_Id, P-TID which could be used to carry this info.
  • UDP channel security for [COAP] is referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • the LWM2M Client and LWM2M Server SHOULD keep a DTLS session in use for as long a period as can be safely achieved without risking compromise to the session keys and counters. If a session persists across sleep cycles, encrypted and integrity-protected storage SHOULD be used for the session keys and counters.
  • Client-Server relationship of DTLS i.e. who initiated the handshake
  • Client-Server relationship of LWM2M is separate from the Client-Server relationship of LWM2M.
  • Cipher Suites are not limited to the list defined in Section 9 of [CoAP]. Due to the sensitive nature of Bootstrap Information, particular care has to be taken to ensure protection of that data including constraints and dependencies within a LWM2M Client/Bootstrap Server relationship according to the adopted security mode.
  • the keying material used to secure the exchange of information using a DTLS session may be obtained using one of the bootstrap modes referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • the Resources i.e. “Security Mode”, “Public Key or Identity”, “Server Public Key or Identity” and “Secret Key” in the LWM2M Security Object that are associated with the keying material are used either
  • LWM2M Clients MUST either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode) or else be provisioned for secure bootstrapping with an LWM2M Bootstrap Server.
  • Any LWM2M Client which supports Client or Server initiated bootstrap mode MUST support at least one of the following secure methods:
  • a LWM2M Bootstrap Server SHALL support all of these methods.
  • the Secured Packet Structure is based on [3GPP TS 31 115]/[ETSI TS 102 225]] which is defining secured packets for different transport mechanisms.
  • the solution was originally designed for securing packet structures for UICC based applications, however, for LWM2M it is suitable for securing the SMS payload exchanged between client and server.
  • the SMS Secured Packet Structure mode specified in this section MUST be supported when the SMS binding is used.
  • a LWM2M Client which uses the SMS binding MUST either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode or Smart Card Provisioning) or else be able to bootstrap via the UDP binding.
  • the end-point for the SMS channel (delivery of mobile terminated SMS, and sending of mobile originated SMS) SHALL be either on the smartcard or on the device.
  • the end-point is on the LWM2M Client device.
  • a LWM2M Client, Server or Bootstrap Server supporting SMS binding SHALL discard SMS messages which are not correctly protected using the expected parameters stored in the “SMS Binding Key Parameters” Resource and the expected keys stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource, and SHALL NOT respond with an error message secured using the correct parameters and keys.
  • TP-OA the TP-OA (originating address as defined in [3GPP 23.040] of an incoming command packet (e.g. CoAP request) MUST be re-used as the TP-DA of the outgoing packet (e.g. CoAP response)
  • SMS channel end-point is on the smart card the following settings SHALL be applied:
  • a SMS Secured Packet encapsulating a CoAP request received by the LWM2M device MUST be—according to [ETSI TS 102 225]/[3GPP TS 31.115]—addressed to the LWM2M UICC Application in the Smartcard where it will be decrypted, aggregated if needed, and checked for integrity.
  • the message contained in the SMS MUST be provided to the LWM2M Client.
  • SMS MUST be discarded.
  • coap_msg:: COAP_TAG ⁇ coap_request_length> ⁇ coap_request>
  • the LWM2M Client For sending a CoAP message to the LWM2M Server, the LWM2M Client prepares a data containing the right TP-DA to use, concatenated with the CoAP message and MUST provide that data to the LWM2M UICC Application in using the [GP SCP03] STORE-DATA command.
  • the Smartcard will be in charge to prepare (encryption/concatenation) the CoAP message before sending it as a SMS Secure Packet ([ETSI TS 102 223] SEND SMS command).
  • the SMS Secured Packet MUST be formatted as Secured Data specified in section 7.3.1.2.
  • the SMS channel security is provided by the Secured Packet Structure [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080] which is defining secured packets for different transport mechanisms.
  • the SMS channel security specified in this section MUST be applied when the SMS binding is used.
  • the security SHOULD be terminated on the smartcard.
  • the LWM2M client SHOULD pass SMS messages to the smartcard for encryption and integrity protection before sending, and SHOULD pass encrypted SMS messages received from the LWM2M server to the smartcard for decryption and integrity checking.
  • a LWM2M Client which supports the SMS binding SHALL support the Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080].
  • the LWM2M Client SHALL share the relevant keys—identified by KIc and KID—with a LWM2M Bootstrap Server during bootstrapping, or with a LWM2M Server otherwise.
  • a LWM2M Bootstrap Server which supports the SMS binding SHALL support the Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080].
  • a LWM2M Server which supports the SMS binding SHALL support Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080].
  • SMS Secured Packet Structure mode a CoAP message as defined in [CoAP] MUST be encapsulated in [3GPP 31.115] Secured Packets, in implementing—for SMS Point to Point (SMS_PP)—the general [ETSI 102 225] specification for UICC based applications.
  • SMS_PP SMS Point to Point
  • LWM2M Client and LWM2M Bootstrap Server and LWM2M Server The following applies to LWM2M Client and LWM2M Bootstrap Server and LWM2M Server:
  • the keys and associated counter values are not stored in the above recommended way, they SHALL be treated as session keys with a lifetime no greater than the duration of the Registration Lifetime.
  • the LWM2M Client SHALL acquire fresh discard the key material on each “Register” or “Update” operation, load fresh key material using one of the mechanisms described below, and reset the counters.
  • the Smart Card SHALL place the updated session keys in the provisioning file EF_LWM2M_Bootstrap.
  • the LWM2M Server SHOULD send SMS to the LWM2M Client to refresh the session keys before the next attempted “Register” or “Update” operation. If the LWM2M Client attempts to contact the LWM2M Server using an expired registration, or attempts to “Register” or “Update” using a stale key, the LWM2M Server SHALL respond with an error (4.00 Bad Request) and SHALL send SMS to refresh the session keys.
  • the LWM2M Server SHOULD send such SMS prior to the expiry of the current Registration, if the LWM2M Client is awake; or if the LWM2M Client is in a sleep cycle, the LWM2M Server (or Bootstrapping Server) SHOULD send such SMS on the next wake up.
  • the LWM2M Server or Bootstrapping Server SHOULD send such SMS on the next wake up.
  • the corresponding key values should be stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource.
  • a LWM2M Client which uses the SMS binding may either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode) or else be able to bootstrap via the UDP binding.
  • a LWM2M Client, Server or Bootstrap Server supporting SMS binding SHALL discard SMS messages which are not correctly protected using the expected parameters stored in the “SMS Binding Key Parameters” Resource and the expected keys stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource, and SHALL NOT respond with an error message secured using the correct parameters and keys.
  • This LWM2M object provides the keying material of a LWM2M Client appropriate to access a specified LWM2M Server.
  • One Object Instance SHOULD address a LWM2M Bootstrap Server
  • LWM2M object resources MUST only be changed by a LWM2M Bootstrap Server or SmartCard provisioning and MUST NOT be accessible by any other LWM2M Server.
  • Range or Resource Name Type Enumeration Units Descriptions LWM2M Server String 0-255 bytes — Uniquely identifies the URI LWM2M Server or LWM2M Bootstrap Server, and is in the form: “coaps://host:port”, where host is an IP address or FQDN, and port is the UDP port of the Server.
  • Bootstrap Server Boolean Determines if the current instance concerns a LWM2M Bootstrap Server (true) or a standard LWM2M Server (false) Security Mode Integer 0-3 — Determines which UDP channel security mode is used 0: Pre-Shared Key mode 1: Raw Public Key mode 2: Certificate mode 3: NoSec mode Public Key or Opaque — Stores the LWM2M Client's Identity Certificate (Certificate mode), public key (RPK mode) or PSK Identity (PSK mode). The format is defined in Section E.1.1.
  • Server Public Key Opaque Stores the LWM2M Server's or Identity or LWM2M Bootstrap Server's Certificate (Certificate mode), public key (RPK mode) or PSK Identity (PSK mode).
  • the format is defined in Section E.1.1.
  • Secret Key Opaque Stores the secret key or private key of the security mode.
  • the format of the keying material is defined by the security mode in Section E.1.1. This resource MUST only be changed by a bootstrap server and MUST NOT be readable by any server.
  • SMS Security Integer 0-255 Determines which SMS Mode payload security mode is used (see section 7.2) 0: Reserved for future use 1: Secure Packet Structure mode device terminated 2: Secure Packet Structure mode smartcard terminated 3: NoSec mode 255: Proprietary modes SMS Binding Key Opaque 6 bytes — Stores the KIc, KID, SPI and Parameters TAR. The format is defined in Section D.1.2. SMS Binding Opaque 32-48 bytes — Stores the values of the keys Secret Keys for the SMS binding. This resource MUST only be changed by a bootstrap server and MUST NOT be readable by any server.
  • LWM2M Server Integer MSISDN used by the SMS Number LWM2M Client to send messages to the LWM2M Server via the SMS binding.
  • the LWM2M Client SHALL silently ignore any SMS not originated from unknown MSISDN Short Server ID Integer 1-65535 — This identifier uniquely identifies each LWM2M Server configured for the LWM2M Client. This resource MUST be set when the Bootstrap Server resource has false value. Default Short Server ID (i.e. 0) MUST NOT be used for identifying the LWM2M Server.
  • Client Hold Off Integer s Relevant information for a Time Bootstrap Server only. The number of seconds to wait before initiating a Client Initiated Bootstrap once the LWM2M Client has determined it should initiate this bootstrap mode
  • This section defines the format of the Secret Key and Public Key and Identity resources of the LWM2M Server and LWM2M Bootstrap Objects when using UDP Channel security. These resources are used to configure the security mode and keying material that a Client uses with a particular Server. The Objects are configured on the Client using one of the Bootstrap mechanisms described in Section 5.1 of OMA LWM2M. The use of this keying material for each security mode is defined in Section 7.1 of OMA LWM2M.
  • PSK Pre-Shared Key
  • the PSK is a binary shared secret key between the Client and Server of the appropriate length for the Cipher Suite used [RFC4279]. This key is composed of a sequence of binary bytes in the Secret Key resource.
  • the default PSK Cipher Suites defined in this specification use a 128-bit AES key. Thus this key would be represented in 16 bytes in the Secret Key Resource.
  • the corresponding PSK Identity for this PSK is stored in the Public Key or Identity resource.
  • the PSK Identity is simply stored as a UTF-8 String as per [RFC4279].
  • Clients and Servers MUST support a PSK Identity of at least 128 bytes in length as required by [RFC4279].
  • the raw-public key mode requires a public key and a private key of the appropriate type and length for the Cipher Suite used. These keys are carried as a sequence of binary bytes with the public key stored in the Public Key or Identity Resource, and the private key stored in the Secret Key Resource.
  • the default RPK Cipher Suites defines in this specification use a 256-bit ECC key. Thus the Certificate Resource would contain a 32 byte public key and the Secret Key Resource a 32 byte private key.
  • the Certificate mode requires an X.509v3 Certificate along with a matching private key.
  • the private key is stored in the Secret Key Resource as in RPK mode.
  • the Certificate is simply represented as binary X.509v3 in the value of the Public Key or Identity Resource.
  • This section defines the format of the Secret Key and Public Key and Identity resources of the LWM2M Server and LWM2M Bootstrap Objects when using SMS Payload security. These resources are used to configure keying material that a Client uses with a particular Server. The Objects are configured on the Client using one of the Bootstrap mechanisms described in Section 5.1. The use of this keying material is defined in Section 7.2.
  • the SMS key parameters are stored in the order Klc, KID, SRI, TAR (Klc is byte 0 ).
  • the Object Instance and the corresponding the Access Control Object Instance MUST be deleted
  • the Client MUST choose the Server who has highest sum of each number assigned to an access right (Write: 1, Delete: 1) for the Access Control Owner. If two or more Servers have the same sum, the Client MUST choose one of them as the Access Control Owner.
  • the Server Object Instance MUST be deleted
  • the GBA BSF may be merged into the LWM2M bootstrap server. This makes it easier to discover a single server. This is shown in FIG. 5 in which a combined server 420 holds both the BSF 130 and the LWM2M 440 .
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show schematic diagrams indicating how the combined BSF LWM2M server may be reached by the M2M device 110 .
  • the combined BSF LWM2M 420 are shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 , other embodiments may operate where the BSF and LWM2M are embodied as separate entities (e.g. as shown in FIG. 2 ). However, the same or similar discovery techniques may be used, as described below.
  • the M2M device 110 requires some mechanism for finding a server and in particular the LWM2M server (DM server) or the BSF server. As described previously, the LWM2M server uses interface Ua and the BSF server uses interface Ub. The M2M device 110 therefore requires the correct IP addresses, URLs and/or ports to contact and communicate with the various servers. As discussed previously, it may not be particularly feasible or convenient to pre-provision the M2M device 110 with all necessary addresses and URLs as this would require such settings to be specified at the date of manufacture and it would not be easy to change or alter these data later on.
  • the OMA device management standards propose the use of a bootstrapping server to load the relevant server details of a DM server. However, this transfers the problem to one of provisioning the details on the bootstrapping server.
  • a gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) 410 supplies a default access point name (APN) 430 to act as a default routing for CoAP traffic 620 when the M2M device 110 first connects 610 . Therefore, traffic may be automatically routed 630 to a default DM server 420 .
  • the GGSN 410 may vary the default server (e.g.
  • LWM2M/BSF combination server 420 depending on the IMSI provided by the M2M device 110 (certain groups of IMSI numbers may be routed to one server 420 and other IMSI number groups may be routed to a different server 420 ′).
  • CoAP traffic will have a dedicated port (5683) and so a short-lived default routing rule may be applied for this port.
  • all communications on this port may be sent to a default LWM2M/BSF combination server 420 (DM server) or there may be a short-lived default routing for all UDP traffic, for example.
  • DM server LWM2M/BSF combination server 420
  • the default server 420 may indicate an address for an alternative server 640 and/or preferred BSF server (e.g. LWM2M/BSF server 420 ′ combination). This may allow for load balancing or other network configurations to be achieved.
  • FIG. 7 shows how this can be done in schematic form.
  • the default DM server 420 may provide the M2M device 110 with a pre-shared key (psk) hint including the alternative server's 420 ′ address details. For example a psk hint may be included when running TLS or DTLS.
  • the alternative server's 420 ′ address may be supplied using other mechanisms.
  • the APN (and so routing) may be assigned or reassigned based on other detected properties or parameters such as the present APN or a characteristic of the communication traffic between the M2M device and the server 420 , for example.
  • a LWM2M bootstrap message may use a write logical operation (message) on custom resources (such as a “NAF_ID” and “BSF_ID”). If the write message contains no security then the M2M device may formally reject the write operation but may use the information that the write operation contains to derive the address of the alternative server 420 ′. In other words, the write logical operation fails (as intended) but the message that was received contains enough information to allow the M2M device 110 to locate the alternative server 420 ′.
  • the BSF may be merged into the LWM2M bootstrap server 440 to form a combined DM server 420 . Therefore, there will be only a single entity to discover.
  • the LWM2M bootstrap server 440 may deliver credentials for interacting with an alternative or production DM server 420 ′. Therefore the write message instructs the M2M device to write to a Server Access Security Object (but this message is intended to fail authentication).
  • the combined BSF/LWM2M server 420 may deliver a GBA Push Info (GPI) message which allows the relevant production credentials to be derived on the M2M device 110 . This optimisation may lead to a particularly simplified BSF 130 .
  • GBA Push Info GPS
  • GBA 3GPP standard
  • PKI public key infrastructure
  • the M2M device may have a preloaded public-private keypair, or may generate a public-private key-pair on first power up. It presents its “raw public key” (or a hash of the raw public key) to the BSF, protected using HTTP digest and RES (this could be over a tunnelled Ub protocol, since that already requires some customisation). Alternatively, the raw public key may be presented to the NAF (LWM2M server or LWM2M bootstrapping server) protected using the GBA-derived key Ks_NAF. (The device could, for example, present its raw public key over CoAP, integrity protected using Ks_NAF, or present it within a CoAPs session secured using a pre-shared-key cipher suite and Ks_NAF).
  • the DM server (or bootstrapping server) may then use one of the public key ciphersuites, such as:
  • the DM Server may use a mixed pre-shared key/public key ciphersuite like:
  • these ciphersuites may provide perfect forward secrecy.
  • the device may present its raw public key unauthenticated, and the DM server or Bootstrapping may accept this raw public key temporarily.
  • the device may use a weak secret (like PIN+IMSI+IMEI) together with TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256, for example, to secure a first connection with a bootstrap server.
  • a weak secret like PIN+IMSI+IMEI
  • the DM server may present its own “raw public key” to the client, protected by HTTP digest and RES, or other techniques, or by an integrity check or
  • PSK session set up using the GBA-derived key Ks_NAF, for example.
  • Ks_NAF GBA-derived key
  • the device may require a preloaded copy or digest of the expected public key (e.g. the public key used by the LWM2M Bootstrap server) or a pre-loaded weak secret.
  • This digest or secret may be retrieved from the SIM card (UICC) to avoid the need to provision directly to the device at manufacture.
  • it may be sent to the device by SMS or the device may accept the raw server public key unauthenticated, at least at first connection.
  • these back-up methods provide no (or weak) authentication of the server public key, but they at least allow the protocol to get started, including providing the connectivity to tunnel GBA or run GBA-push, and so establish a subsequent strong authentication of the server pubic key.
  • the above-mentioned techniques for authenticating “Raw” public keys from the client may also apply to certificate modes e.g. instead of a raw public key, the device may present a self-signed certificate (or certificate signed by an unknown CA).
  • the server may present a self-signed certificate, or an unknown root CA certificate to M2M device. This also avoids the complexity and expense of provisioning the M2M device at manufacture with a public key certificate signed by a pre-existing CA (e.g. device manufacturer's CA) or provisioning multiple root certificates.
  • GBA could be used to secure messages from a trusted timesource (e.g. a network time), or provide a secure channel to retrieve certificate validation information (CRLs or OCSP responses.) This can address some problems with obtaining correct and up-to-date information for certificate validation.
  • a trusted timesource e.g. a network time
  • CTLs or OCSP responses This can address some problems with obtaining correct and up-to-date information for certificate validation.
  • a M2M client device may be advised of a different server-side public key.
  • This different public key may be used to sign firmware updates (over a unicast, broadcast or multicast or peer-to-peer system, for example).
  • This functionality may be extended to other sorts of secure broadcast, for example distributing a public key to sign public warning messages (bomb alerts, tsunami alerts), emergency messages (ambulance approaching, get out of the way), traffic alerts etc.
  • a public key (protected by a key established using GBA) may be sent where the public key is then used to verify broadcast messages or firmware updates, for example.
  • LWM2M doesn't have a broadcast channel and firmware updates in LWM2M operate as follows:
  • a “Firmware Update” object It may write the update itself to a “Package” resource, but since updates are often large (and difficult to carry over CoAP), it most likely writes a URI to the “Package URI” resource.
  • the LWM2M server performs a “Write” operation on the “Package” resource, but rather than writing the firmware update itself, it writes the (typically public) key that the LWM2M client requires in order to verify the firmware update.
  • the LWM2M server simultaneously (or sequentially) performs a “Write” operation on the “Package URI” resource, telling the LWM2M client where it can find the update itself.
  • the URI here may well take the form of a broadcast URI, for example—see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2838—or http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102800_102899/102851/01.01.01 60/ts_102851v010101 p.pdf
  • the LWM2M client Once the LWM2M client has downloaded the update, then it can verify it using the public key that was written in the “Package” resource.
  • the LWM2M server performs a “Write” operation on the “Package URI” resource, but the URI contains an encoding of the public key that will be needed to verify the firmware update. For example, take the form of:
  • the LWM2M client can verify it using the public key that was contained within the “Package URI” resource.
  • a key established by GBA may be used to secure a session between the LWM2M client and LWM2M server (for example the Ks_NAF is used as a DTLS pre-shared key) and then the second key is provided within that secured session.
  • the Ks_NAF is used as a DTLS pre-shared key
  • FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method 700 for communicating with a M2M device.
  • a first key is derived either by receiving it directly or as a derived shared secret. This may take place at a M2M device and at a server (e.g. NAF), using GBA.
  • This first key is used to protect (encrypt and or sign) and send a further or second key to the M2M device (step 720 ).
  • the second key is in turn is used to secure, protect, encrypt and/or sign data transmitted to the M2M device (step 730 ).
  • the M2M device can then verify the data using the second key.
  • residential gas meters may require firmware updates (e.g. a bug is discovered which means that they will incorrectly report gas consumed.
  • the cellular operator provides some broadcast capabilities on their network—for example via MBMS.
  • One of the broadcast channels is “free to air” (i.e. it is unencrypted) but consists of a stream of firmware updates for many types of M2M devices (gas meters, electricity meters, engine management systems etc.)
  • Each update may be signed by a separate private key, and the key-pairs may be refreshed regularly (to ensure that only the most recent updates are signed by the latest keys).
  • each gas meter When each gas meter next contacts the device management server, it is provided with an authenticated public key.
  • the public key may be integrity protected using the shared secret (Ks_NAF) that has been established between the gas meter and M2M device management server using GBA.
  • Ks_NAF shared secret
  • the gas meter monitors the MBMS broadcast channel to detect when an update is being broadcast and which has been signed with the corresponding private key. It downloads the update, verifies it using the public key, and if verified installs the update.
  • a third party organisation may wish to introduce a new service or services and these services may be categorised by device type and device category (i.e. road traffic alerts may be an information-alert type having a device category as transportation.
  • a tsunami warning system may be of type emergency public safety message, and device category “all”. This taxonomical device categorisation system may be further refined to ensure that service advertisements were routed to appropriate devices.)
  • the third party organisation may inform a service provider (for example, a telecommunications service provider) of the service.
  • the service provider may validate the service and may use the mechanism described above in relation to secure message broadcast to distribute a description of the service to devices.
  • This service could be used recursively to advise of other service advertisers.
  • the service provide could advertise the existence of a Regulatory body (A government agency) that could be authorised to advertise government services.
  • These services may be of three types opt in, opt out and mandatory.
  • a service for national security purposes advertised by a government agency may be mandatory
  • a service for road traffic alerts provided by a commercial company may be opt in
  • a service advertised by a government agency for a public safety purpose may be opt out.
  • a third party organisation may wish to introduce one or more new services.
  • These services may be categorised by device type and device category (i.e. road traffic alerts would be of type information-alert, and device category transportation, tsunami warning system would be of type emergency public safety message, and device category all.
  • This taxonomical device categorisation system could be further refined to ensure that service advertisements were routed to appropriate devices.
  • the third party organisation may inform a telecommunications network operator of the service.
  • the network operator may validate the service and may use the method of communicating with M2M devices described above to distribute a description of the service to devices.
  • This service could be used recursively to advise of other service advertisers.
  • a network operator could advertise the existence of a regulatory body (i.e. a government agency) that could be authorised to advertise government services, for example.
  • Examples services may be of three types in general: opt in/opt out/mandatory. For example, a service for national security purpose advertised by a government agency would be mandatory, a service for road traffic alerts provided by a commercial company would be opt in and a service advertised by a government agency for a public safety purpose could be opt out.
  • GBA keys One example use of GBA keys is to protect SMS (encrypt/integrity protect SMS using secure packet interface e.g. like ETSI TS 102.225 which is used for SIM OTA).This SMS channel is likely to be more efficient than DTLS.
  • Encrypted SMS functionality is currently missing from OMA LWM2M.
  • a secured SMS protocol may be used with a Device management protocol. For example:
  • FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a method 800 for communicating between a M2M device and a DM server.
  • a key is derived from a smartcard within the M2M device. This key is shared with the DM server. Data to be communicated is secured using the key at step 820 and the data is communicated between the DM server and the M2M device (e.g. one or two way communications in either or both directions) at step 830 .
  • an industrial thermostat system e.g. in a warehouse
  • the SMS may be encrypted and integrity protected using the secure packet protocol described in ETSI TS 102 225.
  • GBA is used to establish a KS_NAF between the thermostat and the LWM2M server.
  • GPI GBA push info
  • This GPI contains an authentication challenge to pass to a SIM card (UICC), which might be in the thermostat, or perhaps elsewhere in the warehouse network (it might be in a communications hub).
  • SIM card UICC
  • the challenge is processed by the USIM application on the SIM card, and a CK and IK are returned.
  • the Ks_NAF is 256 bits (or total number of bits); the first 128 bits (or set of bits) are used as an AES encryption key (for the Kc) and the last 128 bits (or next or final set of bits) are used as an integrity key (for the Kid).
  • an automated test-suite may be used by added value service providers that could be used to supply additional maintenance services (in this case diagnostics and performance analysis) for the purpose of ensuring optimal device behaviour.
  • additional maintenance services in this case diagnostics and performance analysis
  • this would be a service offered by the original device vendor as an added-value service.
  • specialist service providers might supply these services (e.g. car maintenance/tuning service).
  • the benefit to the equipment vendor is that it creates a revenue and on-sell opportunities.
  • Another use case would be where there was a complex device ecosystem (e.g. a home area network (HAN) with many peripheral devices of different types).
  • a HAN maintenance service provider would have (or would create) signature data for a correct and incorrect operation of supported devices and would provide diagnostic services for those devices.
  • GBA Use GBA to send a secured message which starts a self-test/diagnostic test of device. This covers LWM2M functionality, or general functionality. Results of the self-test can also be reported back using a GBA-secured message. This could build on SMS security, as described in Idea 16, or use a different messaging channel.
  • This example implementation illustrates the ability to create a trust relationship between devices and service providers, creates opportunities to offer security services to all devices in a symmetric fashion.
  • a toaster can be used as an appliance to facilitate a user to vote in a Government election, and an e-purse can acquire road traffic information.
  • Security services can be offered on an any-to-any basis in a device agnostic fashion.
  • the authorisation for the device to participate in an auction to sell itself or/and to procure a replacement would be supplied by the owner of the appliance (by some means), and the responsibility for participating in an auction sale/bid would be delegated to the device in question.
  • the device may use a secure association established using GBA to list itself on eBay for example, and order a replacement.
  • This example implementation describes a mechanism for transferring security protected material in an asymmetric fashion, from a secured device using GBA, to a (potentially) unsecured device. Many examples can be given for this use case using the keyring analogy. These transfers may be automated or under user control or a combination of both.
  • the devices recognise the presence and the identity of each other (i.e. they have visibility of each other such as a car passing through a toll booth.
  • the toll booth could use an induction loop to detect the presence of a car, and use Bluetooth/RFID (or other sensor) to supply other information in plain text, for example) and would acquire signature information from the other device.
  • Each device communicates by secure means to their Device Management platform the existence of the other device+security credentials+the security signatures (received and given).
  • the Device Management platforms (which would have a pre-existing trust relationship between each other, such as by means of trusted CA certificates) then validate the supplied signatures for each device and negotiate security keys to support inter communication between the devices. (This may be a simple symmetric key).
  • the derived keys are sent to the devices and the devices are then able to communicate with each other securely and initiate a monetary transfer (for example).
  • FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of a system including a keyring 910 (or apparatus for providing a key to a M2M device 930 ) and a DM server 920 for providing the key.
  • the keyring 910 has a cellular interface to communicate with the DM server 920 and an interface (either the same or different interface) to communication with the M2M device 930 .
  • the keyring 910 has logic (e.g. stored within a processor) configured to derive a key using GBA over the cellular interface and transmit the key to the M2M device.
  • logic e.g. stored within a processor
  • Examples implementations include:
  • use of the “keyring” 910 is to authorise a third party (e.g. an approved dealer/garage) to perform an action on the SIM that would otherwise only be allowed using a secured OTA (over the air) mechanism. This may be used where the OTA mechanism was not possible or unavailable for some reason.
  • a third party e.g. an approved dealer/garage
  • OTA over the air
  • an embedded SIM e.g. to a global M2M subscription or provisioning subscription
  • an alternative subscription e.g. to a global M2M subscription or provisioning subscription
  • the only alternatives may be to replace the entire comms module in a car, or to return the car back to a location where there is suitable mobile coverage (which might be in a different country).
  • the keyring may then act as a trusted companion M2M device.
  • GBA is used to securely transfer a sensitive transformation key to the trusted companion device and the trusted companion device will then physically transfer (by whatever means are most convenient) the key to the (out of coverage) vehicle device that will trigger the OTA transform operation.
  • Example transfer mechanisms include using the vehicle's OBD port, or using the keyring as a femtocell to establish a pocket of temporary coverage for the vehicle, and thereby deliver the transformation key. This would allow a vehicle manufacturer (or other equipment manufacturer) to supply their dealer network with equipment that can be used to perform the transforms in a trusted and simple fashion.
  • the sensitive transformation key might be a temporary subscription credential (IMSI or K or both) for the alternative subscription (e.g. for a short-lived provisioning subscription), or it might be a key which the eUICC can combine or process with existing key material to recover a new subscription credential. Or, it might simply take the form of an unlock key, PIN, or password, allowing the eUICC to activate an alternative subscription that is already installed on the eUICC but in an inactive state.
  • IMSI temporary subscription credential
  • K key which the eUICC can combine or process with existing key material to recover a new subscription credential.
  • it might simply take the form of an unlock key, PIN, or password, allowing the eUICC to activate an alternative subscription that is already installed on the eUICC but in an inactive state.
  • a keyring 910 with cellular connectivity and correct implementation of the GBA protocol stack can be issued with keys using normal GBA protocols.
  • the keyring 910 supports a mechanism to physically transfer such keys to appliances that do not have cellular connectivity. This can be facilitated using any (secure) physical communications link (e.g. Ethernet, NFC, RS232 etc). This can be achieved in at least two ways:
  • Enhancements to the GBA protocol to support this feature may be used. For example, to indicate what is the target device or appliance; use inputs like random nonces supplied by the keyring 910 and target device, hashes of temporary public keys, address of the target device (e.g. MAC address etc.) as part of the input to the key derivation (to help protect against interception over a local wireless protocol); to detect at the NAF if the key is being used by a different sort of target/appliance (or wrong address), and to quickly expire or invalidate keys which get lost etc.
  • GBA is used to establish a P2P security association between unrelated devices and using GBA provides a good solution.
  • the keyring will support a visual (or other feedback mechanism such as sound or vibrate) to indicate when security keys have been successfully transferred to the target device.
  • This feedback mechanism can be implemented on the keyring or the target device or preferably both.
  • the keyring 910 may also have an indicator 940 for indicating the status of the transmission of the key to the M2M device.
  • the M2M device may also have a similar indicator 950 .
  • the keyring glows blue for a few seconds to indicate success. While transferring keys from the keyring to the target device the keyring glows blue and target device glows blue for a few seconds. Other colours or indicator types may be used.
  • the car may be equipped with, incorporate or otherwise associated with a GBA enabled M2M capability and local near field device recognition (e.g. the interface between the apparatus and the M2M device may be RFID, Zigbee, WiFi, NFC, BLE, etc.) and a toll booth operated by an unrelated commercial entity which is similarly equipped.
  • a GBA enabled M2M capability and local near field device recognition e.g. the interface between the apparatus and the M2M device may be RFID, Zigbee, WiFi, NFC, BLE, etc.
  • a toll booth operated by an unrelated commercial entity which is similarly equipped.
  • the car may approach the Toll booth (or other infrastucture) and:
  • the car and the toll booth would exchange (untrusted) identity information.
  • the toll booth may also capture other metrics (car number plate, car size/weight/colour etc.)
  • the car would communicate the toll booth's untrusted identity information to a modified NAF Server: this communication is secured (or has already been secured) using the GBA protocol. Similarly, the toll booth would do the same and communicate the car's untrusted identity information (and any other metrics) using its modified NAF Server.
  • the two unrelated NAF servers would then communicate with each other using known security protocols and certificate authority authenticated certificates and confirm that the supplied untrusted identity information could be trusted. Keys would be created and communicated to the car and the toll booth by their respective NAF servers, and these keys would then allow them to complete commercial transactions.
  • untrusted and unrelated devices can create trust relationships. Typically, this would be for the purpose of financial transaction but it could also be used where other data items may need to be integrity/confidentiality protected (e.g. an exercise machine in a health club).
  • a biometric scanner may be used to confirm the identity of a person.
  • the asset being secured here is the information “this person is real and has been biometrically authenticated”.
  • the other (partner) device might be a keyring, a domestic appliance, a car or other device.
  • the car/vehicle manufacturer does not require prior association with the biometric scanner/manufacturer.
  • the connection between the two NAFs allows the car to trust the results from the (unknown) scanner, and so open accordingly.
  • the user may want to purchase domestic appliances from multiple vendors.
  • the interoperation of those devices may be desirable.
  • An example may be white goods that would communicate with a power monitoring device.

Abstract

Method and apparatus for communicating with a machine to machine, M2M, device comprising: deriving at a M2M device using generic bootstrapping architecture, GBA, a first key. Sending a second key to the M2M device protected using the first key, wherein the second key is different to the first key. Sending protected data to the M2M device, wherein the protected data is verifiable by the M2M device using the second key.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method and system for operating a machine to machine (M2M) device.
    • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Machine to Machine (M2M) devices are often numerous, hard-to-reach, and have constrained capabilities (owing to low cost, small size, low processing power or limited battery life). All of this makes their management, often remote, very complicated. Moreover, M2M devices often need to be managed in a secure manner. For example, they may contain information that is commercially sensitive and/or confidential for the one or more entities that manage and/or own said devices. There is a need to remotely manage them in a secure way, while respecting these constraints.
  • WO 2012/035340 describes forming secure associations between IP-enabled devices. An originating device establishes a secure connection to a first server. A target device establishes a secure connection to a second server. The first and second servers establish an IPSec or TLS connection to form a chain of secure associations between the two devices.
  • However, such an approach is not suited to securing broadcasts such as firmware updates or public warning messages. Furthermore, there is a need to provide secure communications to M2M devices that have limited computing resources.
  • Furthermore, M2M devices may require key data to restore connectivity, for example. Obtaining such material securely under these circumstances can be problematic.
  • Therefore, there is required a system and method that allows the M2M devices to communicate more reliably and more securely.
    • Details of 3GPP Standards and Technologies Used to Implement Aspects of the Method and System
  • One of these architectures of 3GPP is a Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA), which is a complex of standards which is described, for example, in 3GPP TS 33.919 (entitled “3G Security; Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); System description”, currently it may be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/33919.htm).
  • Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) is a 3GPP standard defined in 3GPP TS 33.220 (entitled “Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA)”, it could be currently retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/html-info/33220.htm). GBA is part of the complex of standards called GAA (see above).
  • GBA is a standard which enables a shared secret to be derived (bootstrapped) from the existing security association between a mobile network and a SIM card. This involves a network element called a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF). In other words, GBA leverages the security of a SIM card (UICC) to authenticate mobile equipment, and then derive key material for general-purpose applications.
  • GBA may be advantageously used to provide high-security to the communication between a client and the server, thus allowing remotely managing, controlling and, in general, communicating with a device in a high security manner. In particular, GBA (or a GBA-like architecture) is used for enabling a secure communication with the device (which, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, may be an M2M device), said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, and wherein this communication is done for managing the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device, thus enabling a secure management of that device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device. In this way, the device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device can be safely, securely and efficiently managed in a remote manner via a remote server.
  • GBA has been developed mainly for securing mobile broadcast (e.g. pay TV and equivalents). Indeed, standards for Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS) rely on GBA. Similarly, Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Mobile Broadcast Services Enabler Suite (BCAST) smartcard profile relies on GBA. To date, most of the limited number of deployments of GBA in the world has been for mobile broadcast. GBA has also been standardised as an optional feature in conjunction with presence services, and within miscellaneous “federated identity” services (e.g. Liberty Alliance, OpenID). In general, it is understood that GBA has been designed for use with mobile devices, such as mobile phones, laptop, computers, and many of the designed features have been provisioned with this in mind.
  • A variant of GBA, called “GBA Push”, has been proposed for securing a message between a client and a DM server in the context of OMA Device Management Security. The OMA
  • Device Management is specifically designed for management of mobile devices such as mobile phones, tablet, computers, etc.
  • A different recent standard document (TS 102 690) merely mentions, in the context of M2M communications, the use of a standard GBA to secure communications between a device/gateway service layer and a network service layer.
  • There are some alternatives for identifying/authenticating a mobile user/device to a service. All of these alternatives are simpler than using GBA. For example, mobile operators and service providers can use WAP header enrichment.
  • Alternatively, the service provider can request the user to enter their phone number, send an SMS one-time password to that phone number, and ask the user to read the SMS and enter the password. These alternatives all work well with mobile devices and operators already, so service providers use them, although they are not as secure as GBA.
  • Additionally, many service providers prefer to offer services to a huge range of mobile devices, many of which do not contain a SIM card (e.g. PCs, laptops, Wi-fi-only tablets etc.). Since GBA relies on a SIM card/UICC in order to work, there has been no interest in using it.
  • Strong security is not possible with current alternatives such as a user-entered PIN or a bootstrapping message delivered by an SMS. These alternatives would either not be feasible or they would not provide the required level of security. First, there might not be a user around to enter a PIN (as most M2M devices operate independently from human intervention). Second, the service provider may be likely to want strong security (e.g. because M2M devices may include critical infrastructure), whereas PIN-based bootstrapping has weaker security. Third, if a PIN or SMS-based bootstrapping goes wrong (server connects to wrong client, client connects to wrong server, or there is a Man-In-The-Middle), then the user is likely to notice, complain and get it fixed, whereas an M2M device is unlikely to notice and complain, so may be permanently compromised. Neither is particularly practical by way of existing methods. For example, the OMA Device Management uses GBA Push for securing a message between a client and a DM server, and there is no explanation of how a similar architecture could be used or even modified for managing the device. Moreover, as mentioned above, the OMA Device Management is not compatible for use with an M2M device, as discussed above. This is particularly true for low cost, simple M2M devices, such as simple sensors, switches, low cost trackers etc. Further, the standard document mentioned above uses a standard GBA to secure communications between a device/gateway service layer and a network service layer. Thus, the communication is not used for device/service management-related communications, and it is not clear, based on the observations made above, how a similar architecture could be used or even modified for managing the device from the server. Moreover, for the reasons mentioned above, the OMA Device Management and the standard document are incompatible, and a combination of the GBA Push for OMA Device Management with the standard document is not feasible, as it would result in the wrong device management protocol (i.e. one that is not suitable for M2M devices, particularly simple M2M devices), and some very laborious effort to make the two compatible and delete the elements which are redundant.
  • The OMA has defined a lightweight protocol for managing (as well as interacting with) M2M devices and managing services provided by M2M devices (e.g. remote control of attached sensors or machines). This protocol is called LWM2M, which is described in detail at http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/lightweightM2M_v1_0.a spx
  • This protocol runs over the CoAP protocol (analogous to http)—more specifically CoAP over DTLS (coaps) which is analogous to http over TLS (https). However, coaps requires a secure association to be provisioned between a device and a network server (DM Server) while providing no strong means to provision such an association from scratch.
  • A security aspect of OMA LWM2M is defined in Lightweight Machine to Machine Technical Specification Candidate Version 1.0-10 Dec. 2013 (OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0-20131210-C).
  • In addition, there exists two protocols, the first one called DTLS defined in RFC 6347 (entitled “Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2”; it could be currently retrieved at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6347); the second one called CoAP defined in draft-ietf-core-coap-18 (entitled “Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)”; it could be currently retrieved at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/). Both protocols are currently used in LWM2M. CoAP is still only an IETF draft (not a full RFC), and DTLS version 1.2 is also comparatively new (January 2012): versions of TLS have often existed as RFCs for several years before receiving widespread adoption.
  • The User Datagram Protocol (UDP) channel security for [COAP] is defined by the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) [RFC6347], which is the equivalent of TLS v1.2 [RFC5246] for HTTP and utilizes a subset of the Cipher Suites defined in TLS. (Refers to TLS Cipher Suite registry http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xml) The DTLS binding for CoAP is defined in Section 9 of [CoAP]. DTLS is a long-lived session based security solution for UDP. It provides a secure handshake with session key generation, mutual authentication, data integrity and confidentiality.
  • The keying material used to secure the exchange of information within a DTLS session may be obtained using one of the bootstrap modes defined in Section 5.1.2 Bootstrap Modes of OMA LWM2M. The formats of the keying material carried in the LWM2M Security Object Instances are defined in Appendix E.1.1.
  • There also exists an authentication protocol HTTP Digest authentication, which is defined in RFC 3310 (entitled “Hypertext Transfer protocol (HTTP) Digest Authentication using Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA)”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3310.txt).
  • The GAA cluster of specifications TS 33.222 (entitled “Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Access to network application functions using Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Transport Layer Security (HTTPS)”) defines a general approach for pre-shared key TLS (TLS-PSK, RFC 4279). This can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/33222.htm). For example, see especially Section 5.4.
  • In particular, with reference to GBA, 3GPP Specification TS 33.220 defines the components and interfaces that are shown in FIG. 1. These are further described as:
  • NAF 122, the “Network Application Function” is a server-side component of an application that will be secured using GBA.
  • BSF, “Bootstrapping Server Function”, 130 is a server-side component, which obtains authentication vectors from the HLR/HSS 140, and sends a challenge to the mobile device, “UE”, 110 during the GBA protocol. On successful authentication, it derives the shared secret.
  • HLR/HSS 140, the “Home Location Register” or “Home Subscriber System”, is the existing 3GPP system which stores subscription details and credentials (the K and IMSI) for each SIM card (UICC) issued by a mobile operator. It may be “GBA-aware” (so that it stores details for a GBA user subscription) or may be a legacy component.
  • UE, the “User Equipment”, 110 is a mobile device containing a SIM card (UICC). The UE 110 supports a client application which communicates with the NAF 122, as well as a service which interfaces to the UICC, communicates with the BSF 130, and derives the shared secret before passing it to the client application. This service is (somewhat confusingly) called a “GAA Server” in TR 33.905 (entitled “Recommendations for Trusted Open Platforms”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/htmlinfo/33905.htm).
  • Ua 150 is the interface between the Mobile Device (UE) 110 and the Network Application Function (NAF) 120.
  • Ub 160 is the interface between the Mobile Device (UE) 110 and the Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF) 130. This is specified in detail in TS 24.109 (entitled “Bootstrapping interface (Ub) 160 and network application function interface (Ua) 150; Protocol details”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24109.htm).
  • Zh/Zh′ 180 is the interface between the BSF 130 and the HSS or HLR 140. The Zh 180 interface is used with an HSS 140 that is “GBA Aware”. The Zh′ 180 interface is used with a legacy HLR or HSS 140. The Zh and Zh′ 180 interfaces are specified in detail in TS 29.109 (entitled “Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Zh and Zn Interfaces based on Diameter protocol; Stage 3”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29109.htm) and TS 29.229 (entitled “Cx and Dx interfaces based on the Diameter protocol; protocol details”, it can currently be retrieved at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29229.htm).
  • Zn 170 is the interface between the NAF 122 and the BSF 130: this can use either a Web Services protocol (SOAP over http) or the Diameter protocol (RFC 3588). This is specified in detail in TS 29.109 (see above).
  • There are a few other components and interfaces defined within the GAA standards, but these are not described in detail here.
  • There are several different versions of GBA defined in the standards. The flavours of GBA may include GBA-ME, GBA-U, GBA-SIM etc. The version called “GBA-ME” may require no special customizations of the UICC, except that the UICC does contain a 3G SIM (a USIM). However, other versions may be used. There may be a need to use the 2G variant of GBA (using a SIM rather than a USIM).
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • According to a first aspect there is provided a method for communicating with a machine to machine, M2M, device, the method comprising the steps of:
      • deriving at a M2M device using generic bootstrapping architecture, GBA, a first key;
      • sending a second key to the M2M device protected using the first key, wherein the second key is different to the first key; and
  • sending protected data to the M2M device, wherein the protected data is verifiable by the M2M device using the second key.
  • This has an advantage of reduced or no PKI. Furthermore, certificate validation may be easier. Protection of the data may be by encryption or digital signature or both.
  • Preferably, the second key may a public key of a public and private key pair.
  • Optionally, the first key may be a session key used to secure a data connection with the M2M device and the second key is sent to the M2M device protected by the session key.
  • Optionally, the second key is sent by a first entity and the protected data is sent by a second entity. The first and second entities may be separate, associated or part of the same device or organisation, for example. The second entity may be an emergency service or a customer, for example.
  • Advantageously, the second key may be used to verify provision by the second entity of the data to the M2M device. The second entity may be an emergency service or customer, for example.
  • Advantageously, the protected data may be of a type selected from the group consisting of: firmware or M2M firmware, a warning message, a broadcast message, a unicast message, a traffic alert, an emergency message, and a peer-to-peer communication. Other data types may be sent. However, with firmware data then this method may be used to ensure that unmonitored devices especially are updated correctly and with the appropriate ROM image.
  • Preferably, the sending the protected data and/or sending the second key to the M2M device uses OMA lightweight M2M, LWM2M, protocol. Example protocols may include TR69, TR111, MQTT, OMA DM, or any other device management protocols performing equivalent or similar functions.
  • In accordance with a second aspect, there is provided apparatus for providing a key to a machine to machine, M2M, device, the apparatus comprising:
      • a first communications interface;
      • a second interface configured to communicate with a M2M device; and
      • logic configured to:
        • derive a first key using generic bootstrapping architecture over the first communications interface, and
        • transmit a second key to the M2M device using the second interface, wherein the second key is the same as the first key or is protected by the first key. The second interface may be for example, a beacon. Example beacons include iBeacons® as produced by Apple Inc. Such beacons may be low-powered, low-cost transmitters that can notify nearby devices of their presence. These beacons may work on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), for example. The second interface may also be of any other suitable type.
  • Therefore, the M2M device may be provided with a new or updated key from a trusted key provider even when it has lost connectivity with its usual key source.
  • The apparatus may be described as a Key-ring or key conduit.
  • Example implementations include:
      • 1. Server and Key-ring share key one (which has been established using GBA).
  • Both key-ring and server support a known key derivation function, which when applied to key one gives key two.
  • Key-ring passes key two to the M2M device.
      • 2. Server and Key-ring share key one (which has been established using GBA).
  • Both M2M device and server support a known key derivation function, which applied to key one gives key two.
  • Key-ring passes key one to the M2M device, which then derives key two.
      • 3. Server and Key-ring use key one to establish an encrypted session: key two is transmitted through this encrypted session,
  • and then Key-ring passes key two to M2M device.
      • 4. M2M device and server run a Diffie-Hellman exchange using Key-ring as a conduit. Any messages relayed
  • between Key-ring and server are integrity-protected using key one. Key two is then derived from the Diffie-Hellman shared secret. (An advantage of this approach is that the key-ring never has visibility of key 2).
  • These are four example mechanisms but other mechanisms or equivalents may work as well.
  • Advantageously, the apparatus may further comprise an indicator configured to indicate transmission of the key to the M2M device over the second interface.
  • Optionally, the indicator may be selected from the group consisting of: light, LED, audio sounder, and display screen.
  • Optionally, the apparatus may further comprise an access control mechanism, and the logic may be further configured to provide access to the M2M device or an entity associated with the M2M device when the key is derived.
  • In accordance with a third aspect, there is provided a toll booth, car park, car wash, drive-through restaurant, exercise machine, or other physical entity comprising or associated with the apparatus previously described.
  • According to a fourth aspect, there is provided a method of establishing secure associations between devices, the method comprising the steps of:
      • obtaining at a first device first key data from a server using generic bootstrapping architecture;
      • obtaining at a second device second key data from a server; and
      • establishing a secure association between the first and second devices using the first and second key data. At least one device uses GBA. A broker may act as a “trusting” entity between the entities that manage these devices. One advantage of using GBA in this case is that it allows these keys may be provided in a simple and efficient manner.
  • Optionally, obtaining at the second device the second key data from the server may use generic bootstrapping architecture
  • Optionally, the method may further comprise the steps of:
      • obtaining at a third device third key data from a server using generic bootstrapping architecture; and
      • establishing a secure association between the first, second and third devices using the third key data.
  • According to a firth aspect there is provided a method for managing a machine to machine, M2M, device, the method comprising the steps of:
      • deriving at a M2M device using generic bootstrapping architecture, GBA, a key;
      • sending protected data to the M2M device, wherein the protected data is verifiable by the M2M device using the key. The protected data may be used for product life cycle management, e.g., registration, commissioning, re-purposing, change of owner, and decommissioning, for example.
  • Optionally, the protected data may include an instruction to the M2M device to conduct a test or tests. This prevents unauthorised operation of typically unmonitored devices.
  • Optionally, the test or tests may be a self-test or a device diagnostic test.
  • Optionally, the method may further comprise the step of sending results of the test from the M2M device.
  • Preferably, the results may be sent protected.
  • Optionally, the protected data include a decommissioning instruction to the M2M device.
  • Optionally, the decommissioning instruction is an instruction list the M2M device for sale and/or an instruction to order a replacement M2M device.
  • The methods described above may be implemented as a computer program comprising program instructions to operate a computer. The computer program may be stored on a computer-readable medium.
  • The computer system may include a processor such as a central processing unit (CPU). The processor may execute logic in the form of a software program. The computer system may include a memory including volatile and non-volatile storage medium. A computer-readable medium may be included to store the logic or program instructions. The different parts of the system may be connected using a network (e.g. wireless networks and wired networks). The computer system may include one or more interfaces. The computer system may contain a suitable operation system such as UNIX, Windows® or Linux, for example.
  • It should be noted that any feature described above may be used with any particular aspect or embodiment of the invention.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • The present invention may be put into practice in a number of ways and embodiments will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of components and interfaces with which GBA may be used;
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an example of an architecture that can be used in accordance with the present invention, in particular when GBA is used;
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary flow diagram of communications exchanged within the exemplary architecture of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an example of an alternative architecture that can be used in accordance with the present invention, in particular when generic bootstrapping architecture (GBA) is used;
  • FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram of a device management (DM) server in communication with a Machine to Machine (M2M) device;
  • FIG. 6 shows a schematic diagram of a system and method for initiating communications between the DM server and M2M device of FIG. 5;
  • FIG. 7 shows a schematic diagram of a further system and method for initiating communications between the DM server and M2M device of FIG. 5;
  • FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of the method of FIG. 7;
  • FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method for communication with a M2M device;
  • FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a method for communication between a M2M device and a device management server; and
  • FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of an apparatus for transferring keys to a device.
    •
  • It should be noted that the figures are illustrated for simplicity and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Like features are provided with the same reference numerals.
    • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • A device may communicate securely with a server. The device may be a Machine to Machine (M2M) device, or an equivalent device (e.g. a device, a generic or specific communication device, including one or more modules capable of providing M2M capabilities).
  • Aspects of the Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA) and Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) are identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above. In particular, the specific architecture on which the method and system may be based is GBA.
  • Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) uses existing security associations between a network (e.g. a mobile network) and a card (e.g. a SIM card or UICC) to derive a key that can be used for the secure communication between the client and the server. Accordingly, if the device is associated with such a card, as well as with the client, the method can advantageously use the GBA to derive the security elements (e.g. a shared secret) to enable the client associated with the device to securely communicate with the server. Accordingly, the device could be advantageously adapted so that it is associated with the card and the client and uses GBA to derive the security elements for secure communication with the server. Moreover, as GBA is standards-based, the impact of the required modifications may be relatively limited and the overall solution would be very attractive (in particular, to M2M users/owners as well as to network operators and/or service providers).
  • M2M devices are different from the mobile devices that OMA Device Management was originally designed for (such as mobile phones, laptops, computers, as explained in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above), and use of GBA (in any of its versions) with M2M is not a straightforward implementation.
  • A variant of GBA, called “GBA Push” has been proposed for securing a message between a client and a DM server in the context of OMA Device Management Security, and is identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above. It is noted that, although GBA Push and GBA are related, it is not trivial to use GBA in place of GBA Push (and vice versa). This is because these two architectures have some important differences. First, in GBA the device has to contact the BSF in order to request a RAND and AUTN (and use this to derive a Ks_local). To the contrary, in GBA Push, the client does not have to talk to the BSF—it just receives a message prepared by the BSF. Furthermore, in GBA, there is no need to modify the Ua interface. In GBA Push, either the Ua interface has to be modified in some way to carry the push message or a new interface must be added. Accordingly, GBA Push cannot be used with an arbitrary application protocol. For GBA Push, the application protocol has to be “GBA aware” in some sense (e.g. so it can carry the GBA Push Info (GPI) messages). In GBA, the Ks_local can be used to derive several different Ks_NAFs (e.g. for different application servers). In GBA Push, only one NAF can use/rely on the Ks_local. Accordingly, GBA Push is slightly less efficient than GBA.
  • The GBA Push Info is described in 3GPP TS 33.223, Section 5.2.1. The encoding is defined in Section 5.3.5. See in particular table 5.2.1.1 and figure 5.3.5.1 in 3GPP TS 33.223 V12.0.0 (2013-12) that may be found: http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33_series/33.223/33223-c00.zip
  • Moreover, as discussed above, M2M devices are very constrained in their capabilities (e.g. computation, communication, life, etc.) and these constraints make their management more complex and harder to implement in a simple manner. GBA requires a number of interfaces and components which are hard to implement with M2M (for examples and description of these interfaces and components, please refer to the sections below).
  • In order to more efficiently and securely manage the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device, these interfaces and components need to be modified or otherwise adapted so they can properly and effectively work with M2M devices.
  • For example, carrying the Ub interface (and associated protocol) over constrained M2M devices is very difficult. For example, the standard Ub interface uses HTTP and HTTP digest. The likely rationale for this is that, as mentioned above, GBA was designed having mobile devices, such as mobile phones, in mind. So, since all phones use HTTP, and therefore all have an HTTP stack, then HTTP was the easiest protocol to be used for the Ub interface. However, this is not true for M2M devices. For example, according to the Lightweight M2M (LWM2M) protocol (see below for more details), a protocol called CoAP is used in M2M devices, precisely because it is a simpler/more efficient alternative to HTTP. Alternatively, this Ub interface could be tunnelled, for example via another interface (e.g. the Ua), so that the system may be simplified.
  • Additionally, building all the necessary components (e.g. GAA server, interfaces) into a capacity-constrained M2M device appears to be very difficult. For example, physical and virtual space constraints, as well as computational constraints, create considerable problems for building the necessary components. Moreover, having one or more interfaces between M2M application(s) and a card on the device, such as a UICC, is very difficult. This is due, for example, to the fact that most M2M modems do not support the required low level interface(s). In general, the overall integration of the GBA required interfaces and components with an M2M device appear very difficult. A possible, but not optimal solution, could be to pre-provision the M2M devices (e.g. having the M2M devices already designed and/or manufactured with the required components and interfaces) and the associated elements required for use of GBA (e.g. the card being capable of interfacing with the M2M device) so that the GBA could be used. To date, no M2M device is pre-provisioned with these characteristics.
  • In addition, as noted above, GBA is not widely used. There are other reasons why GBA is not widely used. For example, use of GBA requires support in the device, in the network (e.g. BSF—see below) and by individual services (which may be deployed, for example, by a mobile operator or by other parties). In the preferred use-case (mobile broadcast) support is also required in the SIM card (as it uses GBA-U). Accordingly, a lack of coordination and willingness to act/cooperate between the various parties involved in this deployment (e.g. device manufacturers, mobile operators, service providers) has so far blocked implementation of GBA.
  • For all the above reasons, GBA (or a GBA-like architecture, for example a variant and/or a suitably modified version) may be used for enabling a secure communication with a device (in particular, an M2M device). The communication may be between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, and wherein this communication may be done for managing the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device. This enables a secure management of that device and/or the services provided by (or via) the device and creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages.
  • For instance, as already mentioned above, the GBA will provide a higher and very strong level of security to the device/service management-related communications with M2M devices, which is a very critical and important point.
  • Another advantage, in addition or combined with the strong security described above, is in terms of full automation. Moreover, an M2M service provider does not have the cost/complexity of setting up their own security solutions, as the solution can be provided directly by the mobile operator implementing the solution described in this application. In particular, a service provider does not have to set up a PKI, issue certificates, pre-load keys to devices and so on.
  • Accordingly, the method may further comprise that the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device. For example, the card may be embedded within the device (e.g. soldered in the device) or provided to the device by way of a suitable connection. In general, the card may be associated in any suitable manner so that there is an association between the card and the device. The network can be a mobile network, or any equivalent network, while the card can be a SIM card, a UICC, or any card associated with the network. The method may further comprise deriving a shared secret based on the security association. The method may further comprise providing the client and the server with the shared secret so as to enable the secure communication. The server may be a server adapted to manage the device (e.g. remotely manage the device, send updates, transfer information to and from the device, control device parameters, etc.) and to manage services provided by the device (e.g. device is used to switch on/off and/or dim streetlights). The shared secret may be a key and/or a similar security arrangement.
  • The method may further comprise authentication between the client and the server. The authentication may be based on the shared secret. The authentication may be performed via an authentication component. The authentication may be performed by means of a first authentication between the client and an authentication component and of a second authentication between the server and the authentication component. The client and the server may be independently authenticated by an authentication component. As a result of the client and the server being authenticated by the authentication component, both the client and the server may share the shared secret. The authentication may be performed by means of the shared secret. The shared secret may be shared between the client and the server. Alternatively, the shared secret may be shared between the client, the server and the authentication component. The authentication may implicitly result from the client, the server and the authentication component sharing the shared secret. The method may further comprise deriving a second shared secret based on the shared secret, the second shared secret being shared between the client and the server. This second shared secret may then be used for the authentication as discussed above.
  • The obtainment of the shared secret at the client may be based on an identifier associated with a server authentication component. The shared secret may be obtained at the server from the authentication component. The obtainment of the shared secret at the server is obtained based on an identifier associated with the shared secret. The identifier is generated by the authentication component. The identifier may be provided to the server by the client.
  • The OMA LWM2M protocol for managing (as well as interacting with) M2M devices and managing services provided by M2M devices (as described in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system”) may be used. However, other device management protocols may be used or the method and system may be extended to other M2M services (for example, securing the delivery of binary SMS).
  • GBA could be advantageously used in conjunction with LWM2M in order, for example, to establish keys for LWM2M, whilst at the same time LWM2M and the procedures specified therein could be used to transport and/or carry any message and/or communication which relates to GBA. For example, this can be done by using specific tunnels (e.g. Ub) or GBA Push Info (GPI) messages. The use of GBA together with LWM2M creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages. For example, it allows addressing many more low-end devices, such as M2M devices. This is due, for example, to the use of a device management protocol which is properly optimized for M2M, rather than one repurposed from the consumer space (e.g. OMA DM v1, TR-069). This optimised protocol can be used to transport GBA messages—avoiding the need for a separate HTTP stack—and to manage GBA parameters (identifiers for device and application, lifetimes, key derivation methods, etc.). Further, when accompanied by appropriate network systems to provide automated routing and discovery (e.g. of LWM2M server and BSF), GBA and LWM2M advantageously combine to eliminate the cost of pre-loading settings and credentials, so facilitating low cost devices. GBA with LWM2M securely supports low-cost devices which are unattended or have no UI, where there is no option for user interaction (such as entry of PIN), and where there is no user who is able to notice and recover from authentication failures (spoof server, spoof client or Man In The Middle), Moreover, GBA works without requiring any public key or certificate processing on the device. This is particularly advantageous on simpler devices, as these devices may have minimal public key support or implementation errors when handling certificates.
  • Accordingly, the shared secret may be used as a key in the LWM2M standard. Also, the LWM2M standard procedures may be used for transmission and/or reception of any communication used within the GBA.
  • The shared secret may be used as a key or shared secret within the DTLS protocol (identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above), either when the LWM2M is used in conjunction with a DTLS protocol or when the DTLS is used alone or in conjunction with one or more other protocols.
  • The secure communication may further be a data communication. The data communication may be an SMS-based communication. An SMS binding may be used. The data communication may be a UDP-based communication.
  • The method may further comprise encrypting a communication over the secure data communication. The encryption may be performed using an Advanced Encryption Standard. The SMS-based communication may be further secured by use of an Over-The-Air (OTA) protocol, e.g. a Secured Packet Structure for UICC Applications. This protocol is defined in ETSI standard 102.225. The OTA protocol may be arranged to secure the communication with the identification card associated with the device.
  • It has also been noted that the OTA protocol can be used advantageously in conjunction with the LWM2M standard, in which the LWM2M can be used to manage parameters, keys and similar elements for the OTA protocol.
  • The use of OTA with LWM2M is not a straightforward implementation. OTA is a solution designed for SIM card security, as it has some real technical challenges if used for LWM2M. In particular, while there is software written for SIM cards and SIM OTA servers to support ETSI standard 102.225, a similar software does not exist in the device management space for devices (and, in particular, not for OMA DM clients and servers). Thus, M2M device manufacturers do not have a code-base that they can easily adapt for use with these devices.
  • Further, the ETSI standard 102.225 does not explain how to set up the keys and parameters for use with the standard. It simply assumes the keys and parameters are all pre-loaded and known to both SIM card and OTA server. Although this assumption is acceptable in the SIM space—because SIM cards can be securely provisioned with the necessary keys at the manufacturing stage, and SIM manufacturers have interfaces with operators for communicating the necessary keys and parameters—the same cannot be said about LWM2M, where that infrastructure does not exist.
  • Thus, the use of OTA together with LWM2M creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages. For example, the SMS bearer needs to be secured, and so far no solution has been found. Use of OTA enables the SMS bearer to be used in LWM2M. Without it, it would not be possible to use SMS-based communications in LWM2M, and that would limit the applicability of the overall LWM2M standard.
  • Accordingly, the LWM2M standard procedures may be used to manage parameters and/or keys used in the OTA protocol. The method may further be used in conjunction with LWM2M, as described above.
  • It has also been noted that the method described above, implemented using the GBA (or a similar architecture), can be used in conjunction with SMS so that the GBA can be employed to establish keys for secure SMS-based communications (e.g. SMS), while at the same time SMS-based communications can be used to transport or carry messages associated with GBA—for example, carry GBA Push Info (GPI) messages. The use of SMS-based communications together with GBA creates a new and innovative combination which produces a synergistic effect and provides many technical advantages. For example, GBA can be used to establish the shared keys that are needed to protect SMS, while using SMS as a transport to deliver the necessary GBA messages. Further the SMS used to deliver the GBA messages can themselves be integrity protected (and partly encrypted) using the keys that will be established by GBA, so at no point is there a reliance on not secure SMS. This synergistic combination allow use of SMS as the sole bearer for M2M traffic, something which would not otherwise be possible, except by preloading the keys needed to secure SMS traffic, or switching to a different protocol to negotiate these keys: both of these alternatives would add complexity and cost. Thus, it would provide a very high security solution for obtaining shared keys so that the security of the keys is not compromised, and at the same time an-SMS-based communication is enabled by virtue of the provisioning of the keys.
  • Accordingly, when the method is implemented using GBA, the GBA may be used to establish keys for secure transmission and/or delivery of SMS. SMS-based communications may be used for transmission and/or reception of any communication used within the GBA, noting that these communications may themselves be protected using the keys that will be derived in GBA.
  • In addition to the above, the server may further comprise a server authentication component. Also, the client may further comprise a client authentication component. The server authentication component may perform authentication of the server with the authentication component. The client authentication component may perform authentication of the client with the authentication component.
  • Further, the authentication component may be a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF), the server authentication component may be a Network Application Function (NAF) and the client authentication component may be a GAA Server.
  • The method may further comprise communicating between the server and the client for determining security parameters to be used for the secure communication, wherein the communicating is performed by using a device management protocol (for example, the GBA). The secure communication may be for use in the device management protocol.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a method of enabling secure communication for use in a device and/or service/application management protocol, the secure communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with a device, the secure communication requiring security parameters to be agreed between the client and server, the method comprising communicating between the server and client to agree the security parameters, wherein the communicating is performed by using the device management protocol. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure communication with a device, said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device. In addition, the apparatus, system, module or network may further include means for performing any one of the steps or features of the methods described above. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure communication for use in a device and/or service/application management protocol, the secure communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with a device, the secure communication requiring security parameters to be agreed between the client and server, the method comprising communicating between the server and client to agree the security parameters, wherein the communicating is performed by using the device management protocol. In addition, the apparatus, system, module or network may further include means for performing any one of the steps or features of the methods described above. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a client including any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the client as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a server including any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the server as recited by any one of the methods described above.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a device comprising a card and a client, wherein the device is arranged for enablement of secure communication, the secure communication being between a server and the client, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and the card. The client may comprise any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the client as recited by any one of the methods described above. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a server arranged for enablement of secure communication with a device, the secure communication being between the server and a client associated with the device, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device. The server may comprise any means, features or functionalities corresponding to the means, features or functionalities relative to the server as recited by any one of the methods described above. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a system for enabling secure communication with a device, said communication being between a server and a client, the client being associated with the device, wherein the provision of the secure communication is based on a security association between a network and a card, the card being associated with the device. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a method of enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security of the communication is enabled by a bootstrapped secret. The device can be an M2M device. The security protocol may be used to secure the data communication. The bootstrapped secret may be used to obtain the security elements used for the secure protocol. The bootstrapped secret may be a pre-shared secret, said secret being directly provided to the server and the client. The pre-shared secret may be permanently provided to the server and the client (e.g. by pre-provisioning the client and/or the server with said pre-shared secret, e.g. at manufacturing stage or before the client and/or server are used in a system). The pre-shared secret may be a strong, high entropy or a temporary, low-entropy pre-shared secret. The bootstrapped secret may be based on a public key or a certificate-based method. The bootstrapped secret may be provided via a bootstrap server. The security elements can be keys and/or similar arrangements well known in the art.
  • The communication may be an SMS-based communication. The security protocol is defined by ETSI TS 102.225. The method may use SMS binding. The device may be further associated with a card, and the security of the data communication may be controlled by means of the card. Any incoming SMS-based communication may be decrypted and/or checked by means of the card, and/or any outgoing SMS-based communication may be encrypted and/or checked by means of the card.
  • The communication may be a UDP-based communication. The security protocol may be a DTLS protocol.
  • The secure data communication may be provided over a communication interface. The communication interface may be used for managing the device of for managing the bootstrapping operations.
  • The data communication may be performed according to the LWM2M protocol.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security of the communication is enabled by a bootstrapped secret. The device can be an M2M device.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided a method of retrieving security elements required for enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security elements are retrieved using a bootstrapping protocol. The device can be an M2M device. The bootstrapping protocol may retrieve the security elements in a secure session. The session may be secured based on a security protocol. The security protocol may be a DTLS protocol. The bootstrapping protocol may be based on GBA. The data communication may be an SMS-based communication. The bootstrapping protocol may be a LWM2M bootstrap protocol. The security elements can be keys and/or similar arrangements well known in the art.
  • In a further embodiment, there is provided an apparatus, system, module or network for enabling secure data communication with a device, the communication being between a server and a client associated with the device, wherein the security elements are retrieved using a bootstrapping protocol. The device can be an M2M device.
  • The secure communication may be for the purpose of managing the device and/or the client and/or services (e.g. provided by the device) by the server. Both the device and the server may be machines (i.e. not requiring any human intervention to work). When the device is a machine, the server may be used to manage it. Again, the management may be done without any human intervention (e.g. automatically).
  • As discussed above, the solution could be used in conjunction with the LWM2M protocol, but the solution could be extended to other Device Management protocols, or to other M2M services (e.g. securing delivery of binary SMS). In particular, and as discussed above, the use of the solution in conjunction with an M2M-specific protocol, such as LWM2M, allows the solution to be very efficient when used with M2M devices, and in particular, when used to manage the device and/or services provided by (or via) the device. In other words, all the advantages mentioned above are further enhanced and optimised when the solution is used in conjunction with an M2M-specific protocol.
  • In addition, there is also provided any aspects or combination of aspects according to any one of the claims.
  • Any combination of the features described in connection with any of the aspects is also provided, even if not explicitly disclosed.
  • With reference to FIG. 2, an exemplary architecture (100) is shown that may be implemented, in particular when GBA is used. A device 110 (in the example, an M2M Device and/or a User Equipment) is associated with a card 112 (in the example, a UICC) and a Client 116 (in the example, a Device Management (DM) client. Note that this client could also be an LWM2M Client, namely a client that can manage the device itself and service/applications provided by the device e.g. asset control). The device 110 is also associated with a device authentication component 114 (in the example, a GAA server). Further, a server 120 is provided (in the example, a DM server), the server associated with a server authentication component 122 (in the example, a Network Application Function (NAF)). Further, an authentication component 130 is provided (in the example, a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF)) and a register 140 (in the example, an HLR or HSS). Also, four different interfaces are provided for communication between the various components, in particular interface Ua 150 between device 110 and server 120, interface Ub 160 between device 110 and authentication component 130, interface Zn 170 between authentication component 130 and server 120, and interface Zh/Zh′ between authentication component 130 and register 140.
  • In particular, with reference to GBA, document TS 33.220 defines the following components and interfaces, which are shown on FIG. 2. NAF, the “Network Application Function”, is a server-side component of an application that may be secured using GBA. In a preferred embodiment, the NAF may be a software component within a Device Management (DM) Server.
  • Some aspects of a BSF, HLR/HSS, UE, Ua, Ub, Zh/Zh′ and Zn are provided in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • On successful authentication of the device 110, the BSF 130 derives the shared secret Ks_NAF, which is retrieved by the NAF. In a preferred embodiment, the BSF 130 would most likely be on a separate server from the HLR/HSS 140, but within an M2M platform cluster.
  • The HLR/HSS may be “GBA-aware” (so that it stores details for a GBA user subscription) or may be a legacy component. In a preferred embodiment, the HLR/HSS would be the HLR or HSS of an M2M mobile operator (i.e. one dedicated specifically to serving M2M connections).
  • The UE 110 is, in the proposed solution, an M2M device.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the Ua is the interface between a Device Management client 116 and Device Management server 120.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the Ub would be the interface between the “GAA Server” component 114 of the device and the BSF 130.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the Zn interface is used.
  • In the proposed solution, this interface is between the Device Management Server 120 and the BSF 130. The WS version of the interface would allow placement of a DM Server in multiple locations (not just in the M2M operator/platform cluster), and allow future NAFs in multiple locations.
  • With reference to FIG. 3, the procedure for setting up the secure communication in accordance with the present invention is now described, in particular when GBA is used.
  • At 205, the UE 110 contacts over interface Ua the NAF 122 (in the described embodiment, the Device Management client 116 contacts the Device Management server 122) and discovers that the NAF requires it to acquire a shared secret using GBA. This could be because there is no existing secret, or the existing secret has expired, or is otherwise considered invalid by the NAF.
  • The exact interface and communication method may be specific to the application concerned. One possible interface and communication method for OMA Lightweight M2M is discussed below.
  • Over the internal UE interface from DM client to GAA server: at 210, the DM client 116 requests the GAA server 114 to obtain a shared secret. It presents an identifier for the corresponding NAF (NAF_Id).
  • Over the Ub Interface: at 215, The UE 110 contacts the BSF (GAA Server 114 contacts the BSF 130). This may be a basic http GET request. The UE presents an “IMPI” (equivalent of an IMSI) or a “TMPI” (equivalent of a TMSI) for anonymity reasons, if one is available.
  • Over the Zh or Zh′ Interface: at 220, the BSF 130 requests an authentication vector from the HLR/HSS 140. At 225, the HLR/HSS 140 returns a fresh vector, consisting of a RAND, AUTN, XRES, CK, and IK, for example.
  • The BSF 130 generates a transaction identifier (B-TID) and passes (230) the B-TID together with the RAND and AUTN back to the UE 110. It may also indicate the lifetime of the B-TID, and the associated key.
  • Over the internal UE interface from the GAA Server to the UICC: at 235, the GAA Server 114 forwards the RAND and AUTN to the UICC 112 which validates the AUTN. If the AUTN is valid, then the BSF 130 is authenticated. At 240, the UICC 112 returns a RES, CK and IK to the GAA Server 114.
  • At 245, the UE 110 (GAA Server 114) contacts the BSF 130 again, using the resulting RES for HTTP Digest authentication (which is identified in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above).
  • The BSF 130 verifies the HTTP Digest using the XRES. If it matches, then the UE 110 has been successfully authenticated. The BSF 130 stores the tuple <IMPI, B-TID, RAND, CK, IK> and tells at 250 the UE 110 that the authentication was successful. The UE 110 stores <B-TID, RAND, CK, IK>.
  • Over the internal UE 110 interface from DM client 116 to GAA server 114: the UE 110 (GAA Server 114) derives a secret Ks_NAF using the CK, IK, RAND, IMPI and NAF_Id. At 255, it passes Ks_NAF and the B-TID back to the DM client 116.
  • Over the Ua interface again: at 260, the UE 110 (DM Client 116) contacts the NAF (DM Server 122) and presents the B-TID as retrieved above.
  • Over the Zn Interface: at 265, the NAF 122 contacts the BSF 130, and presents the BTID. The BSF 130 authenticates the NAF, derives the corresponding Ks_NAF, and at 270 returns it to the NAF, together with an indicator of key lifetime.
  • The UE 110 (DM Client 116) and NAF (DM Server 122) now both share Ks_NAF. They can use it directly, or to derive their own session keys for further communication.
  • Again, the exact interface and communication method may be specific to the application concerned. One possible interface and communication method for OMA Lightweight M2M is discussed below.
  • As discussed above, the solution could be used in conjunction with the LWM2M standard. This standard can be viewed as a successor to existing OMA Device management standards (OMA DM 1.0 to 1.3), but heavily optimized for low end machine-type devices, and with an extended management scope beyond the device itself including the management of services provided by the M2M device such as asset control. This contrasts for instance with OMA DM 2.0 which is the successor for consumer devices like smart-phones, tablets etc. Other widely-used Device Management standards include TR-069, which was developed by the Broadband Forum for managing Customer Premises Equipment (in particular DSL modems).
  • The exemplary flow described with reference to FIG. 3 is very generic, and can be used with many different sorts of device management protocols (or other application protocols). As can be seen, many details of the Ua interface are outside the scope of 3GPP and are left to other standards to complete (or left to proprietary implementations). However, integration with the LWM2M standard is possible, as described in these examples.
  • Under the specification (see above), the security for OMA LWM2M is based on DTLS v1.2 (see above) and CoAP (see above). Both the client and server must support pre-shared key DTLS (e.g. see section 7.1.1, page 41), whereas support for certificate-based authentication is only optional. This means that a key derived by GBA (Ks_NAF) could be used as a DTLS pre-shared key and it would work with any DM client/DM server pair.
  • The general approach for pre-shared key TLS is referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above. The GBA and TLS-PSK protocols work well together. In 205 described above, the “Server Hello” message contains a field where the server can indicate that it supports GBA-bootstrapping, and in response, the client can then provide an identifier (B-TID) for an already bootstrapped key (260). Or if the client doesn't already have a bootstrapped key, it asks the GAA server to get one, before resuming the “Client Hello” and “Server Hello” at 260. The use of the Ks_NAF to derive session keys is then specified entirely within the TLS-PSK protocol. The 3GPP spec assumes HTTP/TLS, but the basic approach looks the same for CoAP/DTLS.
  • To improve consistency with the OMA profile of GBA, the LWM2M spec may need to define a “protocol identifier” for DTLS pre-shared key and have it registered by OMNA (see section 5.2.1 of OMA GBA Profile, Approved Version 1.1—31 Jul. 2012 found at http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/sec_cf_archive.aspx).
  • Aside from GBA aspects, the M2M device may be configured to support the security of OMA LWM2M, which is referenced in_“Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • Additional Aspects
  • 1. Device Development for GBA
  • As can be seen from FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the M2M device may contain several internal components. It should support a DM client which is “GBA aware”, as well as a “GAA Server” component.
  • The GAA Server component should support internal interfaces to the DM client and to the SIM card (UICC) as well as the external Ub interface to the BSF. The interface to the UICC may be particularly challenging, as the M2M device may not expose an existing API to allow device software to send commands to the UICC. One possibility (that may be used) is for the modem to expose AT commands. However, this may not be at a sufficiently low level (AT+CSIM allows raw APDUs to be communicated to the UICC) in every case. Further, there may be security issues: while the GAA Server must be able to interface to the UICC, general applications installed on the device should not be able to use this interface, as that could allow external parties to impersonate the device (and engender fraud on the cellular network). So the API to the SIM Card should be privileged, as well as being sufficiently low level to be usable.
  • 2. Ub Tunnelling, or GBA Push
  • The interface to the BSF is based on http and HTTP Digest authentication. One alternative may be “tunnelling” the Ub interface within the Ua interface, so that the device only needs to support the CoAP protocol (not HTTP as well).
  • A related alternative is using the GBA “Push” variant, and carrying push messages (Upa interface) within the Ua interface. Both of these would require identifying suitable commands and parameters in the Ua interface (i.e. the relevant Device Management protocol) to carry the tunnel or push messages. The interfaces and message flow for GBA push are outlined below (see also 3GPP TS 33.223, entitled “3G Security; Generic Authentication Architecture (GAA); Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) Push function”, it can currently be retrieved by http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/33223.htm).
  • With reference to FIG. 4, an example Processing and message flow for GBA Push follows:
  • 1. A NAF establishes a shared NAF SA with a UE which is registered for Push services. It knows the identity of the subscriber.
  • 2. The Push-NAF generates the GPI (GBA Push info) Request and sends the GPI Request to the BSF.
  • 3. Upon receiving the request from the NAF, the BSF checks that the NAF is authorized, and resolves the requested subscriber identifier to a private identifier (e.g. IMSI).
  • 4. The BSF fetches a new AV (authentication vector) and subscriber's GUSS (GBA User Security Settings) from the HSS.
  • 5. The HSS sends the AV and the GUSS to the BSF.
  • 6. When the BSF receives the AV Response from the HSS, it generates the NAF keys based on the requested NAF_Id and creates the relevant GPI Response.
  • 7. The BSF sends the GPI Response to the NAF.
  • 8. The NAF stores the received information together with other user information in a NAF SA.
  • 9. The NAF then forwards the GPI to the UE over Upa using the selected transport mechanism and the given transport address.
  • 10. When the UE receives the message containing the GPI, it processes the GPI as for regular GBA, and stores the corresponding NAF SA(s)
  • The UE and NAF are now ready to use the established NAF SA.
  • TR33.223 specifies that Upa is a new interface that is separate from Ua—“a new reference point Upa is introduced between the NAF and the UE” (Section 4.2.1). As such, the Ua interface should be unaware of whether GBA or GBA-push is being used.
  • 3. Provisioning the Address of the BSF and the NAF
  • The address of the BSF (http URL) may be pre-loaded when the device is manufactured. It could be device managed itself, which would seem to create a “chicken-and-egg” problem, but the DM Server could, for instance, provide an address for an acceptable BSF in the ServerHello. Or http traffic might be routed by the M2M mobile operator to a default BSF address. Similarly, the location of the preferred DM Server might need to be pre-loaded, or the M2M mobile operator could route CoAP traffic to a default DM Server address.
  • 4. Flavour of GBA (GBA-ME, GBA-U, GBA-SIM etc.)
  • Several different versions of GBA are referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system”. GBA-U has security advantages, but also logistic advantages: it permits a longer lifetime for the B-TID as the derived key is stored more securely. It allows safe retention of Ks during power-off cycles for instance. GBA-U requires specific support from the UICC, so would have a (modest) increment to the cost. Since M2M devices are typically provided with a new UICC anyway at manufacture, it is a software/development cost rather than a hardware cost. Also, in a model with a customised UICC, this may allow for a solution using restricted AT commands to the modem, rather than full AT+CSIM.
  • 5. Location of the NAF (DM Server) and Type of Zn Interface
  • The architecture example allows for there to be several DM Servers in different locations: it could be part of an M2M platform (e.g. M2M mobile operator) cluster, or hosted elsewhere by a network operator/service provider, or perhaps by a customer of said operator/provider. The BSF may need to be located within a firewalled Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), or perhaps connected via an http proxy in the DMZ (so allowing external http Web Service access from NAFs), and then would execute the Diameter interface to the HLR/HSS. It may be undesirable to expose an http interface directly onto the server supporting the HLR, or to tunnel Diameter through firewalls. However, if the DM Server is itself part of the M2M platform cluster then this may be over-engineering. Possibly, a Diameter solution for the Zn interface then becomes acceptable.
  • 6. Use of Zh or Zh′ Interface
  • Ideally, the HLR may be upgraded to a full HSS with support for the Zh reference point. However, if the HLR/HSS only supports Zh′ then the BSF will need to be more complicated, and take on some of the subscription management functions (profiling, lifetime, security policies) typically associated with the HSS.
  • 7. Development of NAF Component
  • While the NAF functionality looks fairly straightforward, it will need to be developed for each DM Server used, and for each additional application which uses GBA.
  • GBA keys could be used to protect SMS (e.g. encrypt/integrity protect SMS using a secure packet interface e.g. like ETSI TS 102.225 which is used for SIM OTA). This SMS channel is likely to be more efficient than DTLS.
  • In addition, regardless of GBA, a secure SMS protocol could be linked to a Device and/or Service management protocol, namely: using a secure SMS protocol (e.g. originally designed for SIM OTA (102 225)), but now adapted for LWM2M communications, combined with using the LWM2M protocol to define (and manage) the necessary parameters for the secure SMS protocol (i.e. the relevant Klc, KID, SPI, TAR, and keys).
  • GBA could be used to securely derive the keys.
  • Further aspects and advantageous or preferable features are described in the following paragraphs.
  • LWM2M needs a security solution for the SMS bearer. Without a solution, SMS will not be usable as a bearer, severely limiting scope of LWM2M. A solution to this problem is to use SIM OTA security (e.g. see TS 102 225).
  • TS 102.225 relies on the keys and parameters being already agreed between client and server. However, it is difficult to pre-load these into LWM2M client devices, and ensure that they are sent to servers, because there is no present infrastructure for doing so. It would be pointless to deliver the keys and parameters over unsecured SMS.
  • There are various proposed solutions for delivering these keys and parameters in a secure way.
  • In a first solution, there is provided switching bearer to UDP/Coap and running DTLS. The DTLS session can be used to secure the LWM2M Bootstrap protocol. The LWM2M Bootstrap can be used to set the TS 102.225 keys and parameters securely. Note that managed resources/objects need to be defined to allow the Bootstrap server to update them; the format of these resources is specified in the numbered paragraphs below.
  • In a second solution, there is provided relying on a SIM card (UICC) which has already having been provisioned with keys and parameters, and using this card to terminate TS 102 225 security. Please note that, because this solution provides a secure channel, the same channel can be used to deliver other keys and parameters.
  • In a third solution, there is provided use of GBA to set up the keys and parameters. This works because the GPI (GBA Push Info) can be delivered over unsecured SMS. So, there is no requirement to have an initial key to protect the SMS. (Note that the delivery of the parameters like Kic, KID, SPI and TAR is not obvious, but these are only 6 bytes, and there are fields in the GPI e.g. App_Lbl, NAF_Id, P-TID which could be used to carry this info.)
  • Further details are provided in the numbered paragraphs below.
  • UDP channel security for [COAP] is referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • Since the LWM2M protocol utilizes DTLS for authentication, data integrity and confidentiality purposes, the LWM2M Client and LWM2M Server SHOULD keep a DTLS session in use for as long a period as can be safely achieved without risking compromise to the session keys and counters. If a session persists across sleep cycles, encrypted and integrity-protected storage SHOULD be used for the session keys and counters.
  • Note that the Client-Server relationship of DTLS (i.e. who initiated the handshake) is separate from the Client-Server relationship of LWM2M.
  • Considering that any device with a LWM2M Client can be managed by any LWM2M Server and LWM2M Bootstrap Server the choice of Cipher Suites is not limited to the list defined in Section 9 of [CoAP]. Due to the sensitive nature of Bootstrap Information, particular care has to be taken to ensure protection of that data including constraints and dependencies within a LWM2M Client/Bootstrap Server relationship according to the adopted security mode.
  • Concerning Bootstrap from a Smartcard, the same care has to be taken and a secure channel between the Smartcard and the LWM2M Device SHOULD be established as described in Appendix H of OMA LWM2M in reference to GlobalPlatform Secure Channel Protocol 03 (SCP 03) Amendment D v1.1 September 2009.
  • The keying material used to secure the exchange of information using a DTLS session may be obtained using one of the bootstrap modes referenced in “Details of 3GPP standards and technologies used to implement aspects of the method and system” above.
  • The Resources (i.e. “Security Mode”, “Public Key or Identity”, “Server Public Key or Identity” and “Secret Key”) in the LWM2M Security Object that are associated with the keying material are used either
  • 1) for providing UDP channel security in “Device Registration”, “Device Management & Service Enablement”, and “Information Reporting” Interfaces if the LWM2M Security Object Instance relates to a LWM2M Server, or,
  • 2) for providing channel security in the Bootstrap Interface if the LWM2M Security Object instance relates to a LWM2M Bootstrap Server.
  • LWM2M Clients MUST either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode) or else be provisioned for secure bootstrapping with an LWM2M Bootstrap Server. Any LWM2M Client which supports Client or Server initiated bootstrap mode MUST support at least one of the following secure methods:
  • 1) Bootstrapping with a strong (high-entropy) pre-shared secret, as described in section 7.1 of OMA LWM2M. The cipher-suites defined in this section MUST NOT be used with only a low-entropy pre-shared secret.
  • 2) Bootstrapping with a temporary, low-entropy pre-shared secret (such as a PIN, password and private serial number) using the cipher-suite TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256, as defined in RFC5489.
  • 3) Bootstrapping with a public key or certificate-based method (as described in sections 7.1.2 and 7.1.3 of OMA LWM2M). The LWM2M client MUST use a unique key-pair, one which is unique to each LWM2M client.
  • For full interoperability, a LWM2M Bootstrap Server SHALL support all of these methods.
  • NOTE: The above security methods can also be used by the LWM2M Bootstrap Server to provision Klc and KID for SMS channel security (see below for SMS channel security).
  • SMS Channel Security
  • SMS Secured Packet Structure mode
  • The Secured Packet Structure is based on [3GPP TS 31 115]/[ETSI TS 102 225]] which is defining secured packets for different transport mechanisms. The solution was originally designed for securing packet structures for UICC based applications, however, for LWM2M it is suitable for securing the SMS payload exchanged between client and server.
  • The SMS Secured Packet Structure mode specified in this section MUST be supported when the SMS binding is used.
  • A LWM2M Client which uses the SMS binding MUST either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode or Smart Card Provisioning) or else be able to bootstrap via the UDP binding.
  • The end-point for the SMS channel (delivery of mobile terminated SMS, and sending of mobile originated SMS) SHALL be either on the smartcard or on the device. When the LWM2M Client device doesn't support a smartcard, the end-point is on the LWM2M Client device.
  • A LWM2M Client, Server or Bootstrap Server supporting SMS binding SHALL discard SMS messages which are not correctly protected using the expected parameters stored in the “SMS Binding Key Parameters” Resource and the expected keys stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource, and SHALL NOT respond with an error message secured using the correct parameters and keys.
  • Device End-Point
  • If the SMS channel end-point is on the device the following settings SHALL be applied: Class 1 SMS as specified in [3GPP TS 23.038]
  • TP-PID of 111101 (ME Data Download) as specified in [3GPP TS 23.040]
  • TP-OA: the TP-OA (originating address as defined in [3GPP 23.040] of an incoming command packet (e.g. CoAP request) MUST be re-used as the TP-DA of the outgoing packet (e.g. CoAP response)
  • Smartcard End-Point
  • If the SMS channel end-point is on the smart card the following settings SHALL be applied:
  • Class 2 SMS as specified in [3GPP TS 23.038]. The [3GPP TS 23.040] SMS header MUST be defined as below:
      • TP-PID: 111111 (USIM Data Download) as specified in [3GPP TS 23.040]
      • TP-OA: the TP-OA (originating address as defined in [3GPP 23.040] of an incoming command packet (e.g. CoAP request) MUST be re-used as the TP-DA of the outgoing packet (e.g. CoAP response)
  • SMS Secured Packet Mode Mechanisms
  • 1. Secure SMS Transfer to UICC
  • A SMS Secured Packet encapsulating a CoAP request received by the LWM2M device, MUST be—according to [ETSI TS 102 225]/[3GPP TS 31.115]—addressed to the LWM2M UICC Application in the Smartcard where it will be decrypted, aggregated if needed, and checked for integrity.
  • If decryption and integrity verification succeed, the message contained in the SMS MUST be provided to the LWM2M Client.
  • If decryption or integrity verification failed, SMS MUST be discarded.
  • The mechanism for providing the decrypted CoAP Request to the LWM2M Client relies on basic GET_DATA commands of [GP SCP03].This data MUST follow the format as below
  • data_rcv_::=<address> <coap_msg>
  • address::=TP_OA; originated address
  • coap_msg::=COAP_TAG <coap_request_length> <coap_request>
  • coap_request_length::=16BITS_VALUE
  • coap_request::=CoAP message payload
  • NOTE: In current LWM2M release, the way the LWM2M Client Application is triggered for retrieving the available message from the Smartcard is at the discretion of the device: i.e. a middle class LWM2M Device implementing [ETSI TS 102 223] ToolKit with class “e” and “k” support could be automatically triggered by Toolkit mechanisms, whereas a simpler LWM2M device could rely on a polling mechanisms on Smartcard for fetching data when available.
  • 2. Secured SMS Transfer to LWM2M Server
  • For sending a CoAP message to the LWM2M Server, the LWM2M Client prepares a data containing the right TP-DA to use, concatenated with the CoAP message and MUST provide that data to the LWM2M UICC Application in using the [GP SCP03] STORE-DATA command.
  • According to [ETSI TS 102 225]/[3GPP TS 31.115] the Smartcard will be in charge to prepare (encryption/concatenation) the CoAP message before sending it as a SMS Secure Packet ([ETSI TS 102 223] SEND SMS command).
  • The SMS Secured Packet MUST be formatted as Secured Data specified in section 7.3.1.2.
  • The Secure Channel as specified in Annex H SHOULD be used to provide the prepared data to the Smartcard.
  • The SMS channel security is provided by the Secured Packet Structure [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080] which is defining secured packets for different transport mechanisms.
  • The solution was originally designed for securing packet structures for UICC based applications, however, for LWM2M it is suitable for securing the SMS channel between client and server.
  • The SMS channel security specified in this section MUST be applied when the SMS binding is used.
  • When the LWM2M device supports a smartcard, the security SHOULD be terminated on the smartcard. The LWM2M client SHOULD pass SMS messages to the smartcard for encryption and integrity protection before sending, and SHOULD pass encrypted SMS messages received from the LWM2M server to the smartcard for decryption and integrity checking.
  • A LWM2M Client which supports the SMS binding SHALL support the Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080]. The LWM2M Client SHALL share the relevant keys—identified by KIc and KID—with a LWM2M Bootstrap Server during bootstrapping, or with a LWM2M Server otherwise.
  • A LWM2M Bootstrap Server which supports the SMS binding SHALL support the Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080].
  • A LWM2M Server which supports the SMS binding SHALL support Secured Packet Structure as defined in [ETSI TS 102 225] and [SCP080].
  • In SMS Secured Packet Structure mode, a CoAP message as defined in [CoAP] MUST be encapsulated in [3GPP 31.115] Secured Packets, in implementing—for SMS Point to Point (SMS_PP)—the general [ETSI 102 225] specification for UICC based applications.
  • The following applies to LWM2M Client and LWM2M Bootstrap Server and LWM2M Server:
      • The “Command Packet” command specified in [3GPP 31.115]/[ETSI TS 102 225] MUST be used for both CoAP Request and Response message.
      • The Structure of the Command Packet contained in the Short Message MUST follow [3GPP 31.115] specification.
      • Single DES SHALL NOT be relied on.
      • AES or Triple DES with three different keys MUST be used.
      • Preferably, AES should be used. Where AES is used it should be used with CBC mode for encryption (see coding of KIc in [ETSI TS 102 225] section 5.1.2) and in CMAC mode for integrity (see coding of KID in [ETSI TS 102 225] section 5.1.3).
      • SPI SHALL be set as follows (see coding of SPI in [ETSI TS 102 225] section 5.1.1).:
      • cryptographic checksum
      • ciphering
        • The ciphering and crypto graphic checksum MUST use either AES or Triple DES
        • Single DES SHALL NOT be used
        • AES SHOULD be used
        • When Triple DES is used, then it MUST be used in outer CBC mode and 3 different keys MUST be used
        • When AES is used it MUST be used with CBC mode for ciphering (see coding of Klc in [ETSI TS 102 225] section 5.1.2) and in CMAC mode for integrity (see coding of KID in [ETSI TS 102 225] section 5.1.3
      • process if and only if counter value is higher than the value in the RE
      • Preferably, TAR (see coding of TAR in [ETSI TS 101 220], section 6) SHALL be set to a value in the range BF FF 00-BF FF FF.
  • NOTE: A TAR for LWM2M SMS security will be requested from ETSI SCP and the range above applies only until the TAR has been assigned.
      • Secured Data: contains the Secured Application Message which MUST be coded as a BER-TLV, the Tag (TBD: e.g. 0x05) will indicate the type (e.g. CoAP type) of that message.
  • There will be two different TARs for terminating the security on the smartcard or on the device.
  • The ciphering and integrity keys and associated counter values SHOULD be held in a smart card or other tamper-resistant secure storage environment (e.g. embedded secure element). The client SHOULD pass MT SMS to the smart card/SE for decryption and integrity checking, and SHOULD pass MO SMS to the smart card/SE for encryption and integrity protection before sending.
  • If the keys and associated counter values are not stored in the above recommended way, they SHALL be treated as session keys with a lifetime no greater than the duration of the Registration Lifetime. The LWM2M Client SHALL acquire fresh discard the key material on each “Register” or “Update” operation, load fresh key material using one of the mechanisms described below, and reset the counters.
      • Re-bootstrapping via the GBA Push mechanism, as described in [OMA DM v2.0] section 9.3.1.3. GBA Push uses a UICC to generate a so called Ks_(ext/int)_NAF shared secret both in the network and in the device. From this master key Ks_(ext/int)_NAF, two session secrets are then generated: the DMBEK and the DMBIK. The value of the Klc (ciphering key for SMS) SHALL be set by truncating DMBEK to the relevant key length (taking bits 0 to 127 for AES-128, or bits 0 to 167 bits for 3DES), and the value of the KID (integrity key for SMS) SHALL similarly be set by truncating DMBIK to the relevant key length (bits 0 to 127 for AES-128, or bits 0 to 167 for 3DES). The GBA Push Info SHALL be delivered to the LWM2M Client using a Class 1 SMS as specified in [3GPP TS 23.038] with a TP-PID of 111101 (ME Data Download) as specified in [3GPP TS 23.040].
  • Re-bootstrapping from the Smart Card by one of the following methods:
      • Using the above-described GBA Push mechanism, specifically with GBA-U, and with the Smart Card generating the DMBIK and DMBEK from Ks_int_NAF.
      • Using Remote File Management (RFM) or Remote Application Management (RAM) as specified in [ETSI TS 102.226]. The LWM2M Server SHALL generate random new key data of appropriate length for Klc and KID and ensure these are delivered to the Smart Card by a Class 2 SMS as specified in [3GPP TS 23.038] with a TP-PID of 111111 (USIM Data Download) as specified in [3GPP TS 23.040], protected using the relevant OTA security keys for RFM or RAM.
  • The Smart Card SHALL place the updated session keys in the provisioning file EF_LWM2M_Bootstrap.
      • Re-bootstrapping via the UDP binding, secured as described in Section 7.1 (UDP Security).
  • Where the UDP binding is unavailable, the LWM2M Server (or Bootstrapping Server) SHOULD send SMS to the LWM2M Client to refresh the session keys before the next attempted “Register” or “Update” operation. If the LWM2M Client attempts to contact the LWM2M Server using an expired registration, or attempts to “Register” or “Update” using a stale key, the LWM2M Server SHALL respond with an error (4.00 Bad Request) and SHALL send SMS to refresh the session keys. However, the LWM2M Server SHOULD send such SMS prior to the expiry of the current Registration, if the LWM2M Client is awake; or if the LWM2M Client is in a sleep cycle, the LWM2M Server (or Bootstrapping Server) SHOULD send such SMS on the next wake up. These measures will avoid a failed “Register” or “Update” operation.
  • As for Section 7.1 (UDP Security), where a session persists across sleep cycles, encrypted and integrity-protected storage SHOULD be used for the session keys and counters. Alternatively, new session keys SHALL be established by one of the above mechanisms on wake up from a sleep cycle.
  • Preferably, Klc, KID, SPI and TAR SHALL be stored in the “SMS Binding Key Parameters” Resource.
  • Preferably, the corresponding key values should be stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource.
  • A LWM2M Client which uses the SMS binding may either be directly provisioned for use with a target LWM2M Server (Manufacturer Pre-configuration bootstrap mode) or else be able to bootstrap via the UDP binding.
  • A LWM2M Client, Server or Bootstrap Server supporting SMS binding SHALL discard SMS messages which are not correctly protected using the expected parameters stored in the “SMS Binding Key Parameters” Resource and the expected keys stored in the “SMS Binding Secret Keys” Resource, and SHALL NOT respond with an error message secured using the correct parameters and keys.
  • LWM2M Object: LWM2M Security
  • Description: This LWM2M object provides the keying material of a LWM2M Client appropriate to access a specified LWM2M Server. One Object Instance SHOULD address a LWM2M Bootstrap Server
  • These LWM2M object resources MUST only be changed by a LWM2M Bootstrap Server or SmartCard provisioning and MUST NOT be accessible by any other LWM2M Server.
  • Example Object Info:
  • Object Object Multiple
    Object ID URN Instances? Mandatory?
    LWM2M 0 Yes Yes
    Security
  • Resource Info:
  • Range or
    Resource Name Type Enumeration Units Descriptions
    LWM2M Server String 0-255 bytes — Uniquely identifies the
    URI LWM2M Server or LWM2M
    Bootstrap Server, and is in
    the form: “coaps://host:port”,
    where host is an IP address
    or FQDN, and port is the
    UDP port of the Server.
    Bootstrap Server Boolean — Determines if the current
    instance concerns a LWM2M
    Bootstrap Server (true) or a
    standard LWM2M Server (false)
    Security Mode Integer 0-3 — Determines which UDP
    channel security mode is used
    0: Pre-Shared Key mode
    1: Raw Public Key mode
    2: Certificate mode
    3: NoSec mode
    Public Key or Opaque — Stores the LWM2M Client's
    Identity Certificate (Certificate mode),
    public key (RPK mode) or
    PSK Identity (PSK mode).
    The format is defined in
    Section E.1.1.
    Server Public Key Opaque — Stores the LWM2M Server's
    or Identity or LWM2M Bootstrap
    Server's Certificate
    (Certificate mode), public key
    (RPK mode) or PSK Identity
    (PSK mode). The format is
    defined in Section E.1.1.
    Secret Key Opaque — Stores the secret key or
    private key of the security
    mode. The format of the
    keying material is defined by
    the security mode in Section
    E.1.1. This resource MUST
    only be changed by a
    bootstrap server and MUST
    NOT be readable by any server.
    SMS Security Integer 0-255 Determines which SMS
    Mode payload security mode is
    used (see section 7.2)
    0: Reserved for future use
    1: Secure Packet Structure
    mode device terminated
    2: Secure Packet Structure
    mode smartcard terminated
    3: NoSec mode
    255: Proprietary modes
    SMS Binding Key Opaque    6 bytes — Stores the KIc, KID, SPI and
    Parameters TAR. The format is defined
    in Section D.1.2.
    SMS Binding Opaque 32-48 bytes — Stores the values of the keys
    Secret Keys for the SMS binding.
    This resource MUST only be
    changed by a bootstrap
    server and MUST NOT be
    readable by any server.
    LWM2M Server Integer MSISDN used by the
    SMS Number LWM2M Client to send
    messages to the LWM2M
    Server via the SMS binding.
    The LWM2M Client SHALL
    silently ignore any SMS not
    originated from unknown MSISDN
    Short Server ID Integer 1-65535 — This identifier uniquely
    identifies each LWM2M
    Server configured for the
    LWM2M Client.
    This resource MUST be set
    when the Bootstrap Server
    resource has false value.
    Default Short Server ID (i.e.
    0) MUST NOT be used for
    identifying the LWM2M Server.
    Client Hold Off Integer s Relevant information for a
    Time Bootstrap Server only.
    The number of seconds to
    wait before initiating a Client
    Initiated Bootstrap once the
    LWM2M Client has
    determined it should initiate
    this bootstrap mode
  • UDP Channel Security: Security Key Resource Format
  • This section defines the format of the Secret Key and Public Key and Identity resources of the LWM2M Server and LWM2M Bootstrap Objects when using UDP Channel security. These resources are used to configure the security mode and keying material that a Client uses with a particular Server. The Objects are configured on the Client using one of the Bootstrap mechanisms described in Section 5.1 of OMA LWM2M. The use of this keying material for each security mode is defined in Section 7.1 of OMA LWM2M.
  • Pre-Shared Key (PSK) Mode
  • The PSK is a binary shared secret key between the Client and Server of the appropriate length for the Cipher Suite used [RFC4279]. This key is composed of a sequence of binary bytes in the Secret Key resource. The default PSK Cipher Suites defined in this specification use a 128-bit AES key. Thus this key would be represented in 16 bytes in the Secret Key Resource.
  • The corresponding PSK Identity for this PSK is stored in the Public Key or Identity resource. The PSK Identity is simply stored as a UTF-8 String as per [RFC4279]. Clients and Servers MUST support a PSK Identity of at least 128 bytes in length as required by [RFC4279].
  • Raw-Public Key (RPK) Mode
  • The raw-public key mode requires a public key and a private key of the appropriate type and length for the Cipher Suite used. These keys are carried as a sequence of binary bytes with the public key stored in the Public Key or Identity Resource, and the private key stored in the Secret Key Resource. The default RPK Cipher Suites defines in this specification use a 256-bit ECC key. Thus the Certificate Resource would contain a 32 byte public key and the Secret Key Resource a 32 byte private key.
  • Certificate Mode
  • The Certificate mode requires an X.509v3 Certificate along with a matching private key. The private key is stored in the Secret Key Resource as in RPK mode. The Certificate is simply represented as binary X.509v3 in the value of the Public Key or Identity Resource.
  • SMS Payload Security: Security Key Resource Format
  • This section defines the format of the Secret Key and Public Key and Identity resources of the LWM2M Server and LWM2M Bootstrap Objects when using SMS Payload security. These resources are used to configure keying material that a Client uses with a particular Server. The Objects are configured on the Client using one of the Bootstrap mechanisms described in Section 5.1. The use of this keying material is defined in Section 7.2. The SMS key parameters are stored in the order Klc, KID, SRI, TAR (Klc is byte 0).
  • Ordering of bits within bytes SHALL follow ETSI TS 102 221 “Coding Conventions” (b8 MSB, b1 LSB).
  • Unbootstrapping
  • If a Security Object Instance is to be deleted, some related resources and configurations need to be deleted or modified. Therefore when Delete operation is sent via Bootstrap Interface, the Client MUST proceed following procedure.
  • 1. If there is an Object Instance that can be accessed only by a Server of the Server Object Instance (i.e. the Server is Access Control Owner and the LWM2M Server can access the Object Instance only in an Access Control Object Instance), the Object Instance and the corresponding the Access Control Object Instance MUST be deleted
  • 2. If an Object Instance can be accessed by multiple Servers including the Server, which Security Object Instance is to be deleted, then:
      • An ACL Resource Instance for the Server in Access Control Object Instance for the Object Instance MUST be deleted
      • If the Server is Access Control Owner of the Access Control Object Instance, then the Access Control Owner MUST be changed to another Server according to the rules below:
  • The Client MUST choose the Server who has highest sum of each number assigned to an access right (Write: 1, Delete: 1) for the Access Control Owner. If two or more Servers have the same sum, the Client MUST choose one of them as the Access Control Owner.
  • 3. Observation from the Server MUST be deleted
  • 4. The Server Object Instance MUST be deleted
  • 5. Client MAY send “De-register” operation to the Server
  • Note: To monitor the change of Access Control Owner, the Server MAY observe Access Control Owner Resource.
  • As a further enhancement, the GBA BSF may be merged into the LWM2M bootstrap server. This makes it easier to discover a single server. This is shown in FIG. 5 in which a combined server 420 holds both the BSF 130 and the LWM2M 440.
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show schematic diagrams indicating how the combined BSF LWM2M server may be reached by the M2M device 110. Whilst the combined BSF LWM2M 420 are shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, other embodiments may operate where the BSF and LWM2M are embodied as separate entities (e.g. as shown in FIG. 2). However, the same or similar discovery techniques may be used, as described below.
  • The M2M device 110 requires some mechanism for finding a server and in particular the LWM2M server (DM server) or the BSF server. As described previously, the LWM2M server uses interface Ua and the BSF server uses interface Ub. The M2M device 110 therefore requires the correct IP addresses, URLs and/or ports to contact and communicate with the various servers. As discussed previously, it may not be particularly feasible or convenient to pre-provision the M2M device 110 with all necessary addresses and URLs as this would require such settings to be specified at the date of manufacture and it would not be easy to change or alter these data later on. The OMA device management standards propose the use of a bootstrapping server to load the relevant server details of a DM server. However, this transfers the problem to one of provisioning the details on the bootstrapping server.
  • The following describes how routing infrastructure may be used to achieve automated discovery of the LWM2M (DM) server and/or BSF. An example of this method 600 is shown as a flowchart in FIG. 8. A gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) 410 supplies a default access point name (APN) 430 to act as a default routing for CoAP traffic 620 when the M2M device 110 first connects 610. Therefore, traffic may be automatically routed 630 to a default DM server 420. The GGSN 410 may vary the default server (e.g. LWM2M/BSF combination server) 420 depending on the IMSI provided by the M2M device 110 (certain groups of IMSI numbers may be routed to one server 420 and other IMSI number groups may be routed to a different server 420′).
  • Furthermore, CoAP traffic will have a dedicated port (5683) and so a short-lived default routing rule may be applied for this port. In other words, all communications on this port may be sent to a default LWM2M/BSF combination server 420 (DM server) or there may be a short-lived default routing for all UDP traffic, for example. There may be similar default routing rules for HTTP traffic (BSF 130) or all TCP traffic, or a default DNS which sends all HTTP traffic to the BSF 130 until device management configuration is completed.
  • Once the default DM server 420 has been reached (either by the method 400 described with respect to FIG. 6 or 8 or by other means) the default server 420 may indicate an address for an alternative server 640 and/or preferred BSF server (e.g. LWM2M/BSF server 420′ combination). This may allow for load balancing or other network configurations to be achieved. FIG. 7 shows how this can be done in schematic form. The default DM server 420 may provide the M2M device 110 with a pre-shared key (psk) hint including the alternative server's 420′ address details. For example a psk hint may be included when running TLS or DTLS. The alternative server's 420′ address may be supplied using other mechanisms. The APN (and so routing) may be assigned or reassigned based on other detected properties or parameters such as the present APN or a characteristic of the communication traffic between the M2M device and the server 420, for example.
  • For example, a LWM2M bootstrap message may use a write logical operation (message) on custom resources (such as a “NAF_ID” and “BSF_ID”). If the write message contains no security then the M2M device may formally reject the write operation but may use the information that the write operation contains to derive the address of the alternative server 420′. In other words, the write logical operation fails (as intended) but the message that was received contains enough information to allow the M2M device 110 to locate the alternative server 420′.
  • As described with reference to FIG. 5, the BSF may be merged into the LWM2M bootstrap server 440 to form a combined DM server 420. Therefore, there will be only a single entity to discover. In the write bootstrap message described with reference to FIG. 7, the LWM2M bootstrap server 440 may deliver credentials for interacting with an alternative or production DM server 420′. Therefore the write message instructs the M2M device to write to a Server Access Security Object (but this message is intended to fail authentication). The combined BSF/LWM2M server 420 may deliver a GBA Push Info (GPI) message which allows the relevant production credentials to be derived on the M2M device 110. This optimisation may lead to a particularly simplified BSF 130.
  • Extensions for Use with Public Key Solutions
  • One problem with the key(s) derived using GBA is that they are based on the long-term secrecy of the underlying (U)SIM key, K or Ki. If that key ever leaks in the future, or if the operator is forced to disclose it for some reason, then any derived keys ever used in GBA may be considered compromised. An adversary or third party who had been recording all conversations with a device may potentially recover all past keys and messages protected by them.
  • One solution for this is to ensure that the GBA keys are only used temporarily when enrolling in a public key scheme: that scheme may for instance support “perfect forward secrecy” which avoids the problem of future key compromise leading to a recovery of all encrypted messages.
  • The 3GPP standard (GAA) provides some methods for using GBA to enrol for public key certificates. However, but they are particularly complex, and the necessary public key infrastructure (PKI) may be too great an overhead for LWM2M or other M2M protocols.
  • Authenticate “Raw” public keys from the client:
  • The M2M device may have a preloaded public-private keypair, or may generate a public-private key-pair on first power up. It presents its “raw public key” (or a hash of the raw public key) to the BSF, protected using HTTP digest and RES (this could be over a tunnelled Ub protocol, since that already requires some customisation). Alternatively, the raw public key may be presented to the NAF (LWM2M server or LWM2M bootstrapping server) protected using the GBA-derived key Ks_NAF. (The device could, for example, present its raw public key over CoAP, integrity protected using Ks_NAF, or present it within a CoAPs session secured using a pre-shared-key cipher suite and Ks_NAF).
  • The DM server (or bootstrapping server) may then use one of the public key ciphersuites, such as:
      • TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM_8 as defined in Section 9.1.3.2 of [CoAP]
      • TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 as defined in [RFC5289]
  • Alternatively, the DM Server may use a mixed pre-shared key/public key ciphersuite like:
      • TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256, as defined in [RFC5489] using the Ks_NAF as the pre-shared key.
  • Preferably, these ciphersuites may provide perfect forward secrecy. There may be several procedures that can be carried out before a Ks_NAF is established. In particular, these procedures may be carried out for devices that don't support GBA, or where the SIM card of the M2M device is not yet provisioned for GBA.
  • The device may present its raw public key unauthenticated, and the DM server or Bootstrapping may accept this raw public key temporarily. The device may use a weak secret (like PIN+IMSI+IMEI) together with TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256, for example, to secure a first connection with a bootstrap server.
  • These back-up methods provide no (or weak) authentication of the device public key, but they at least allow the protocol to get started, including providing the connectivity to tunnel GBA or run GBA-push, and so establish a subsequent strong authentication of the device pubic key.
  • Authenticate “Raw” public keys from the server.
  • As an alternative, or in addition to the above-mentioned procedure for authenticating “Raw” public keys from the client, the DM server may present its own “raw public key” to the client, protected by HTTP digest and RES, or other techniques, or by an integrity check or
  • PSK session set up using the GBA-derived key Ks_NAF, for example. The similar cipher-suites to those described above may also be used to provide perfect forward secrecy.
  • If there has been no opportunity to establish a Ks_NAF then the device may require a preloaded copy or digest of the expected public key (e.g. the public key used by the LWM2M Bootstrap server) or a pre-loaded weak secret. This digest or secret may be retrieved from the SIM card (UICC) to avoid the need to provision directly to the device at manufacture. In an alternative, it may be sent to the device by SMS or the device may accept the raw server public key unauthenticated, at least at first connection.
  • Again, these back-up methods provide no (or weak) authentication of the server public key, but they at least allow the protocol to get started, including providing the connectivity to tunnel GBA or run GBA-push, and so establish a subsequent strong authentication of the server pubic key.
  • The above-mentioned techniques for authenticating “Raw” public keys from the client may also apply to certificate modes e.g. instead of a raw public key, the device may present a self-signed certificate (or certificate signed by an unknown CA). The server may present a self-signed certificate, or an unknown root CA certificate to M2M device. This also avoids the complexity and expense of provisioning the M2M device at manufacture with a public key certificate signed by a pre-existing CA (e.g. device manufacturer's CA) or provisioning multiple root certificates.
  • These embodiments also allow the frequent refresh of private/public keys or certificates, which addresses some revocation problems. However, there is no need to do revocation checking, as the private/public key doesn't last long. The lifetime of the private/public key may be linked to the lifetime of a B-TID (or key_LT).
  • Alternatively, GBA could be used to secure messages from a trusted timesource (e.g. a network time), or provide a secure channel to retrieve certificate validation information (CRLs or OCSP responses.) This can address some problems with obtaining correct and up-to-date information for certificate validation.
  • The following describes particular uses of the perfect forward security and authentication of raw public key procedures or other secure communication methods. These include secure firmware updates, and secure broadcasts.
  • A M2M client device may be advised of a different server-side public key. This different public key may be used to sign firmware updates (over a unicast, broadcast or multicast or peer-to-peer system, for example).
  • This functionality may be extended to other sorts of secure broadcast, for example distributing a public key to sign public warning messages (bomb alerts, tsunami alerts), emergency messages (ambulance approaching, get out of the way), traffic alerts etc.
  • This procedure has the advantages of reduced or no PKI, and no or easier certificate validation. A public key (protected by a key established using GBA) may be sent where the public key is then used to verify broadcast messages or firmware updates, for example.
  • The LWM2M specification doesn't have a broadcast channel and firmware updates in LWM2M operate as follows:
      • The LWM2M Server performs a “Write” (or “Create”) operation to alter (or create a new instance of)
  • a “Firmware Update” object. It may write the update itself to a “Package” resource, but since updates are often large (and difficult to carry over CoAP), it most likely writes a URI to the “Package URI” resource.
      • If the “Package URI” resource has been written to, then the LWM2M Client “performs the download at the next practical opportunity”. While downloading, the LWM2M client sets the “State” resource to “2” (which means “Downloading”). On completion of download, the LWM2M client sets the “State” resource to “3” (which means “Downloaded”). If the “Package” resource was written to directly, then when the LWM2M client has completed the Write operation, it sets the “State” resource to “3” straight away.
      • The LWM2M server can perform a “Read” operation whenever it likes in order to find out the value of the “State”. When the state is “3” it can then perform an “Execute” operation on the “Update” resource, which instructs the LWM2M client to install the firmware update.
      • The LWM2M client sets the “Update Result” resource to indicate whether the update succeeded or failed, and any reason for failure. The client also sets the “State” resource back to “1” (which means “Idle”).
      • The LWM2M server can perform another “Read” operation whenever it likes in order to find out the value of the “Update Result” and “State” resources.
  • No verification of the update package occurs in this process.
  • However, the following describes improvements to this method. These are illustrated in two example mechanisms. In these examples, a key is carried within LWM2M operations.
  • Mechanism 1
  • The LWM2M server performs a “Write” operation on the “Package” resource, but rather than writing the firmware update itself, it writes the (typically public) key that the LWM2M client requires in order to verify the firmware update. The LWM2M server simultaneously (or sequentially) performs a “Write” operation on the “Package URI” resource, telling the LWM2M client where it can find the update itself.
  • NOTE: The URI here may well take the form of a broadcast URI, for example—see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2838—or http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102800_102899/102851/01.01.01 60/ts_102851v010101 p.pdf
  • Once the LWM2M client has downloaded the update, then it can verify it using the public key that was written in the “Package” resource.
  • Mechanism 2
  • The LWM2M server performs a “Write” operation on the “Package URI” resource, but the URI contains an encoding of the public key that will be needed to verify the firmware update. For example, take the form of:
  • dvb://channel135/key=9ICYfQ4RHZO3a3jb6hrQWRQiga7lmCqCaG9JemD7F6r
  • Once the LWM2M client has downloaded the update, then it can verify it using the public key that was contained within the “Package URI” resource.
  • A key established by GBA may be used to secure a session between the LWM2M client and LWM2M server (for example the Ks_NAF is used as a DTLS pre-shared key) and then the second key is provided within that secured session.
  • FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method 700 for communicating with a M2M device. At step 710, a first key is derived either by receiving it directly or as a derived shared secret. This may take place at a M2M device and at a server (e.g. NAF), using GBA. This first key is used to protect (encrypt and or sign) and send a further or second key to the M2M device (step 720). The second key is in turn is used to secure, protect, encrypt and/or sign data transmitted to the M2M device (step 730). The M2M device can then verify the data using the second key.
  • In one example, residential gas meters may require firmware updates (e.g. a bug is discovered which means that they will incorrectly report gas consumed. Hackers may be trying to exploit this and a patch is required). The cellular operator provides some broadcast capabilities on their network—for example via MBMS. One of the broadcast channels is “free to air” (i.e. it is unencrypted) but consists of a stream of firmware updates for many types of M2M devices (gas meters, electricity meters, engine management systems etc.) Each update may be signed by a separate private key, and the key-pairs may be refreshed regularly (to ensure that only the most recent updates are signed by the latest keys).
  • When each gas meter next contacts the device management server, it is provided with an authenticated public key. The public key may be integrity protected using the shared secret (Ks_NAF) that has been established between the gas meter and M2M device management server using GBA. The gas meter then monitors the MBMS broadcast channel to detect when an update is being broadcast and which has been signed with the corresponding private key. It downloads the update, verifies it using the public key, and if verified installs the update.
  • In another example implementation, a third party organisation (commercial, government, or non-commercial, for example) may wish to introduce a new service or services and these services may be categorised by device type and device category (i.e. road traffic alerts may be an information-alert type having a device category as transportation. A tsunami warning system may be of type emergency public safety message, and device category “all”. This taxonomical device categorisation system may be further refined to ensure that service advertisements were routed to appropriate devices.)
  • The third party organisation may inform a service provider (for example, a telecommunications service provider) of the service. The service provider may validate the service and may use the mechanism described above in relation to secure message broadcast to distribute a description of the service to devices.
  • This service could be used recursively to advise of other service advertisers. In other words, the service provide could advertise the existence of a Regulatory body (A government agency) that could be authorised to advertise government services.
  • These services may be of three types opt in, opt out and mandatory. In other words, a service for national security purposes advertised by a government agency may be mandatory, a service for road traffic alerts provided by a commercial company may be opt in and a service advertised by a government agency for a public safety purpose may be opt out.
  • In a further example, a third party organisation (commercial, government, or non-commercial) may wish to introduce one or more new services. These services may be categorised by device type and device category (i.e. road traffic alerts would be of type information-alert, and device category transportation, tsunami warning system would be of type emergency public safety message, and device category all. This taxonomical device categorisation system could be further refined to ensure that service advertisements were routed to appropriate devices.)
  • The third party organisation may inform a telecommunications network operator of the service. The network operator may validate the service and may use the method of communicating with M2M devices described above to distribute a description of the service to devices.
  • This service could be used recursively to advise of other service advertisers. In other words, a network operator could advertise the existence of a regulatory body (i.e. a government agency) that could be authorised to advertise government services, for example.
  • Examples services may be of three types in general: opt in/opt out/mandatory. For example, a service for national security purpose advertised by a government agency would be mandatory, a service for road traffic alerts provided by a commercial company would be opt in and a service advertised by a government agency for a public safety purpose could be opt out.
  • One example use of GBA keys is to protect SMS (encrypt/integrity protect SMS using secure packet interface e.g. like ETSI TS 102.225 which is used for SIM OTA).This SMS channel is likely to be more efficient than DTLS.
  • Encrypted SMS functionality is currently missing from OMA LWM2M. In other implementations, a secured SMS protocol may be used with a Device management protocol. For example:
  • a) Using a secure SMS protocol, originally designed for SIM OTA (102 225), but now adapted for LWM2M communications, and
  • b) Using the LWM2M protocol to define (and manage) the necessary parameters for a secure SMS protocol, e.g. the relevant Klc, KID, SRI, TAR, and keys.
  • Use of GBA then becomes a further extension to this idea, as it is used to securely derive the keys.
  • FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a method 800 for communicating between a M2M device and a DM server. At step 810 a key is derived from a smartcard within the M2M device. This key is shared with the DM server. Data to be communicated is secured using the key at step 820 and the data is communicated between the DM server and the M2M device (e.g. one or two way communications in either or both directions) at step 830.
  • In one particular example, an industrial thermostat system (e.g. in a warehouse) may have the temperature set remotely via a device management server. Since the temperature data is very short (just a number in degrees C.), then it (or any other data) may be transmitted in a single SMS, for example using the OMA LWM2M protocol with a SMS bearer.
  • Therefore, there is a need to protect the SMS to prevent malicious tampering with the thermostat (or other equipment that may rely on sensor or parameter data) and possible damage to goods stored in the warehouse, unnecessary energy bills etc. The SMS may be encrypted and integrity protected using the secure packet protocol described in ETSI TS 102 225. First, GBA is used to establish a KS_NAF between the thermostat and the LWM2M server. For convenience, an initial SMS may be used to deliver a GPI (GBA push info) message from the LWM2M server to the thermostat.
  • This GPI contains an authentication challenge to pass to a SIM card (UICC), which might be in the thermostat, or perhaps elsewhere in the warehouse network (it might be in a communications hub). The challenge is processed by the USIM application on the SIM card, and a CK and IK are returned.
  • These are then used to derive the Ks, and then the Ks_NAF which is passed to the thermostat. The thermostat (or other equipment) then extracts keys for the Kc and Kid and stores them for use by the LWM2M client on the thermostat. A solution could be as follows: The Ks_NAF is 256 bits (or total number of bits); the first 128 bits (or set of bits) are used as an AES encryption key (for the Kc) and the last 128 bits (or next or final set of bits) are used as an integrity key (for the Kid). Once this has been set up, an encrypted and integrity protected SMS with the desired temperature can be sent whenever needed from the LWM2M server to the LWM2M client on the thermostat. The client then decrypts and verifies the desired temperature, and the thermostat sets that temperature (or device changes a particular setting or parameter).
  • Automated Test-Suite.
  • In this example implementation, an automated test-suite may be used by added value service providers that could be used to supply additional maintenance services (in this case diagnostics and performance analysis) for the purpose of ensuring optimal device behaviour. Typically, this would be a service offered by the original device vendor as an added-value service. However, it is feasible that specialist service providers might supply these services (e.g. car maintenance/tuning service). The benefit to the equipment vendor is that it creates a revenue and on-sell opportunities. Another use case would be where there was a complex device ecosystem (e.g. a home area network (HAN) with many peripheral devices of different types). A HAN maintenance service provider would have (or would create) signature data for a correct and incorrect operation of supported devices and would provide diagnostic services for those devices.
  • Other messaging channels (and this applies to all the described examples) could be conventional DSL and WiFi where there was a low level of security over the physical infrastructure and easy to intercept and interfere with communications.
  • Use GBA to send a secured message which starts a self-test/diagnostic test of device. This covers LWM2M functionality, or general functionality. Results of the self-test can also be reported back using a GBA-secured message. This could build on SMS security, as described in Idea 16, or use a different messaging channel.
  • For performance, and power-management reasons, we don't want just anyone to be able to trigger a self-test, which is why this should be a secured message. Also, for privacy and security reasons, we don't want the results of the self-test to be revealed to anyone who asks. However, it is unlikely that anyone would ever set up special strong security just to do this. So it is a good use-case for GBA as opposed to other security architectures.
  • End-of-Life Sale and Decommissioning of Device.
  • This example implementation illustrates the ability to create a trust relationship between devices and service providers, creates opportunities to offer security services to all devices in a symmetric fashion. For example, a toaster can be used as an appliance to facilitate a user to vote in a Government election, and an e-purse can acquire road traffic information. Security services can be offered on an any-to-any basis in a device agnostic fashion. In the end of life cases, the authorisation for the device to participate in an auction to sell itself or/and to procure a replacement would be supplied by the owner of the appliance (by some means), and the responsibility for participating in an auction sale/bid would be delegated to the device in question.
  • Once the trust relationship is in place, it creates an opportunity to add value. In the end of life case, this could include providing service/life histories to potential buyers or scheduling collection of the device for disposal and recycling.
  • The device may use a secure association established using GBA to list itself on eBay for example, and order a replacement.
  • These sorts of automated sale and order applications require strong security. Therefore, this is a good use of the particular described GBA implementation.
  • Security Keyring
  • This example implementation describes a mechanism for transferring security protected material in an asymmetric fashion, from a secured device using GBA, to a (potentially) unsecured device. Many examples can be given for this use case using the keyring analogy. These transfers may be automated or under user control or a combination of both.
  • A further extension of this would be symmetric use where two unrelated GBA aware appliances needed to exchange information (as described in WO2012/035340).
  • The devices recognise the presence and the identity of each other (i.e. they have visibility of each other such as a car passing through a toll booth. The toll booth could use an induction loop to detect the presence of a car, and use Bluetooth/RFID (or other sensor) to supply other information in plain text, for example) and would acquire signature information from the other device. Each device communicates by secure means to their Device Management platform the existence of the other device+security credentials+the security signatures (received and given). The Device Management platforms (which would have a pre-existing trust relationship between each other, such as by means of trusted CA certificates) then validate the supplied signatures for each device and negotiate security keys to support inter communication between the devices. (This may be a simple symmetric key). The derived keys are sent to the devices and the devices are then able to communicate with each other securely and initiate a monetary transfer (for example).
  • FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of a system including a keyring 910 (or apparatus for providing a key to a M2M device 930) and a DM server 920 for providing the key.
  • The keyring 910 has a cellular interface to communicate with the DM server 920 and an interface (either the same or different interface) to communication with the M2M device 930.
  • The keyring 910 has logic (e.g. stored within a processor) configured to derive a key using GBA over the cellular interface and transmit the key to the M2M device.
  • Examples implementations include:
  • Cars+toll booths+parking facilities+car wash+any car service.
  • Personal monitoring appliances+gym machines+health services+emergency responders.
  • HANs+fridges+cookers+TVs+ . . . . Any other domestic appliance to:
      • 1) Communicate energy use information.
      • 2) Security monitoring (your toaster becomes a burglar alarm, for example).
      • 3) Environment monitoring (your toaster becomes a fire alarm, for example).
  • In one example use of the “keyring” 910 is to authorise a third party (e.g. an approved dealer/garage) to perform an action on the SIM that would otherwise only be allowed using a secured OTA (over the air) mechanism. This may be used where the OTA mechanism was not possible or unavailable for some reason.
  • In particular, it may be required to trigger OTA SIM transforms of an embedded SIM (eUICC) from a current subscription to an alternative subscription (e.g. to a global M2M subscription or provisioning subscription) in a case where there is no mobile OTA coverage for its current subscription (e.g. in a vehicle that has moved to a country without a roaming agreement for its current subscription). In the absence of a secure local change capability, the only alternatives may be to replace the entire comms module in a car, or to return the car back to a location where there is suitable mobile coverage (which might be in a different country).
  • The keyring may then act as a trusted companion M2M device. GBA is used to securely transfer a sensitive transformation key to the trusted companion device and the trusted companion device will then physically transfer (by whatever means are most convenient) the key to the (out of coverage) vehicle device that will trigger the OTA transform operation. Example transfer mechanisms include using the vehicle's OBD port, or using the keyring as a femtocell to establish a pocket of temporary coverage for the vehicle, and thereby deliver the transformation key. This would allow a vehicle manufacturer (or other equipment manufacturer) to supply their dealer network with equipment that can be used to perform the transforms in a trusted and simple fashion.
  • The sensitive transformation key might be a temporary subscription credential (IMSI or K or both) for the alternative subscription (e.g. for a short-lived provisioning subscription), or it might be a key which the eUICC can combine or process with existing key material to recover a new subscription credential. Or, it might simply take the form of an unlock key, PIN, or password, allowing the eUICC to activate an alternative subscription that is already installed on the eUICC but in an inactive state.
  • The same approach could potentially be used to manage sensitive instructions for any non-connected appliance (resetting burglar alarms, or the locks on car doors, for example).
  • A keyring 910 with cellular connectivity and correct implementation of the GBA protocol stack can be issued with keys using normal GBA protocols. The keyring 910 supports a mechanism to physically transfer such keys to appliances that do not have cellular connectivity. This can be facilitated using any (secure) physical communications link (e.g. Ethernet, NFC, RS232 etc). This can be achieved in at least two ways:
      • 1) Store and forward—keys are transferred to the keyring for subsequent transfer to the target devices.
  • 2) Man in middle—where the keyring functions as a man in middle allowing the target device to utilise the keyring for the cellular leg.
  • The actual mechanism uses different security protocols. Enhancements to the GBA protocol to support this feature may be used. For example, to indicate what is the target device or appliance; use inputs like random nonces supplied by the keyring 910 and target device, hashes of temporary public keys, address of the target device (e.g. MAC address etc.) as part of the input to the key derivation (to help protect against interception over a local wireless protocol); to detect at the NAF if the key is being used by a different sort of target/appliance (or wrong address), and to quickly expire or invalidate keys which get lost etc.
  • Therefore, GBA is used to establish a P2P security association between unrelated devices and using GBA provides a good solution.
  • In one example implementation, the keyring will support a visual (or other feedback mechanism such as sound or vibrate) to indicate when security keys have been successfully transferred to the target device. This feedback mechanism can be implemented on the keyring or the target device or preferably both.
  • This is illustrated further in FIG. 11. The keyring 910 may also have an indicator 940 for indicating the status of the transmission of the key to the M2M device. The M2M device may also have a similar indicator 950.
  • For example, while transferring security keys the keyring glows blue for a few seconds to indicate success. While transferring keys from the keyring to the target device the keyring glows blue and target device glows blue for a few seconds. Other colours or indicator types may be used.
  • This improves usability and acts as a mechanism to communicate a trust relationship establishment in a user friendly fashion.
  • Automotive Example:
  • In this further embodiment, the following may be considered:
  • A car plus a:
      • 1) Toll booth;
      • 2) Car Park;
      • 3) Car wash; or
      • 4) Drive thru.
  • The car may be equipped with, incorporate or otherwise associated with a GBA enabled M2M capability and local near field device recognition (e.g. the interface between the apparatus and the M2M device may be RFID, Zigbee, WiFi, NFC, BLE, etc.) and a toll booth operated by an unrelated commercial entity which is similarly equipped.
  • The car may approach the Toll booth (or other infrastucture) and:
      • 1) The car would broadcast that it was a car and needed to access the tolled area (or other service); or
      • 2) The driver would indicate to the car that it needed to access the tolled area and then step 1) may proceed; or
      • 3) The toll booth would sense the presence of the car and would broadcast its presence and request the car to confirm it required access to the toll area then step 2) or step 1).
  • The car and the toll booth would exchange (untrusted) identity information. The toll booth may also capture other metrics (car number plate, car size/weight/colour etc.)
  • The car would communicate the toll booth's untrusted identity information to a modified NAF Server: this communication is secured (or has already been secured) using the GBA protocol. Similarly, the toll booth would do the same and communicate the car's untrusted identity information (and any other metrics) using its modified NAF Server.
  • The two unrelated NAF servers would then communicate with each other using known security protocols and certificate authority authenticated certificates and confirm that the supplied untrusted identity information could be trusted. Keys would be created and communicated to the car and the toll booth by their respective NAF servers, and these keys would then allow them to complete commercial transactions.
  • Therefore, untrusted and unrelated devices (e.g. car and toll both) can create trust relationships. Typically, this would be for the purpose of financial transaction but it could also be used where other data items may need to be integrity/confidentiality protected (e.g. an exercise machine in a health club).
  • In another example, a biometric scanner may be used to confirm the identity of a person. The asset being secured here is the information “this person is real and has been biometrically authenticated”. The other (partner) device might be a keyring, a domestic appliance, a car or other device.
  • The car/vehicle manufacturer does not require prior association with the biometric scanner/manufacturer. The connection between the two NAFs allows the car to trust the results from the (unknown) scanner, and so open accordingly.
  • In another example implementation, the user may want to purchase domestic appliances from multiple vendors. The interoperation of those devices may be desirable. An example may be white goods that would communicate with a power monitoring device.
  • It is to be understood that the above description is given by way of example and only for the benefit of understanding the solution, and it must include also any combination of the above features, as well as any alterations, modifications or otherwise addition which could be done by a skilled person by use of his/her skills and/or general knowledge in the relevant and/or neighbouring art.
  • Many combinations, modifications, or alterations to the features of the above embodiments will be readily apparent to the skilled person and are intended to form part of the invention. Any of the features described specifically relating to one embodiment or example may be used in any other embodiment by making the appropriate changes.

Claims (29)

1. A method for communicating with a machine to machine, M2M, device, the method comprising the steps of:
deriving at a M2M device using generic bootstrapping architecture, GBA, a first key;
sending a second key to the M2M device protected using the first key, wherein the second key is different to the first key; and
sending protected data to the M2M device, wherein the protected data is verifiable by the M2M device using the second key.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second key is a public key of a public and private key pair.
3. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the first key is a session key used to secure a data connection with the M2M device and the second key is sent to the M2M device protected by the session key.
4. The method according to any previous claim, wherein the second key is sent by a first entity and the protected data is sent by a second entity.
5. The method according to any previous claim, wherein the second key is used to verify provision by the second entity of the data to the M2M device.
6. The method according to any previous claim, wherein the protected data are any suitable type of data, and preferably selected from the group consisting of: M2M firmware, a warning message, a broadcast message, a unicast message, a traffic alert, an emergency message, and a peer-to-peer communication.
7. The method according to any previous claim, wherein sending the protected data and/or sending the second key to the M2M device uses OMA lightweight M2M, LWM2M, protocol.
8. The method according to any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the protocol is any one of: TR69, TR111, MQTT, and OMA DM.
9. The method according to any of claims 1 to 3 or 5 to 7, wherein the second key and the protected data are sent by the same entity.
10. Apparatus for providing a key to a machine to machine, M2M, device, the apparatus comprising:
a first communications interface;
a second interface configured to communicate with a M2M device; and
logic configured to:
derive a first key using generic bootstrapping architecture over the first communications interface, and
transmit a second key to the M2M device using the second interface,
wherein the second key is the same as the first key or is protected by the first key.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 further comprising an indicator configured to indicate transmission of the key to the M2M device over the second interface.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the indicator is selected from the group consisting of: light, LED, audio sounder, and display screen.
13. The apparatus according to any of claims 10 to 12 further comprising an access control mechanism, and wherein the logic is further configured to provide access to the M2M device or an entity associated with the M2M device when the key is derived.
14. A toll booth, car park, car wash, drive-through restaurant, exercise machine, or other physical entity comprising or associated with the apparatus of claim 13.
15. A method of establishing secure associations between devices, the method comprising the steps of:
obtaining at a first device first key data from a server using generic bootstrapping architecture;
obtaining at a second device second key data from a server; and
establishing a secure association between the first and second devices using the first and second key data.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein obtaining at the second device the second key data from the server uses generic bootstrapping architecture.
17. The method of claim 15 or claim 16 further comprising the steps of:
obtaining at a third device third key data from a server using generic bootstrapping architecture; and
establishing a secure association between the first, second and third devices using the third key data.
18. A method for managing a machine to machine, M2M, device, the method comprising the steps of:
deriving at a M2M device using generic bootstrapping architecture, GBA, a key;
sending protected data to the M2M device, wherein the protected data is verifiable by the M2M device using the key.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the protected data includes an instruction to the M2M device to conduct a test or tests.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the test or tests is a self-test or a device diagnostic test.
21. The method of claim 19 or claim 20 further comprising the step of sending results of the test from the M2M device.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the results are sent protected.
23. The method of claim 18, wherein the protected data include a decommissioning instruction to the M2M device.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the decommissioning instruction is an instruction to list the M2M device for sale and/or an instruction to order a replacement M2M device.
25. A method substantially as described with reference to any of the accompanying drawings.
26. An apparatus substantially as described and shown in any of the accompanying drawings.
27. A computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed on a computer cause the computer to perform the method of any of claims 1 to 9 or 15 to 25.
28. A computer-readable medium carrying a computer program according to claim 27.
29. A computer programmed to perform the method of any of claims 1 to 9 or 15 to 25.
US15/021,881 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device Abandoned US20160234683A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB201316370A GB201316370D0 (en) 2013-09-13 2013-09-13 Secure device management
GB1316370.4 2013-09-13
GB1318339.7 2013-10-16
GB201318339A GB201318339D0 (en) 2013-10-16 2013-10-16 Machine to machine architecture
GB1409663.0 2014-05-30
GB1409663.0A GB2518257A (en) 2013-09-13 2014-05-30 Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device
PCT/GB2014/052768 WO2015036773A2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160234683A1 true US20160234683A1 (en) 2016-08-11

Family

ID=51214488

Family Applications (14)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/021,912 Active 2035-03-03 US10305862B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Secure communication with a mobile device
US15/021,913 Active 2034-09-18 US10313308B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a device
US15/021,871 Active US10673820B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,876 Abandoned US20160226828A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,881 Abandoned US20160234683A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Methods and systems for operating a secure mobile device
US15/021,900 Abandoned US20160234183A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,879 Active 2034-11-25 US10313307B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,873 Active 2035-01-30 US10439991B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,910 Active US9635057B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with machine to machine devices
US15/021,888 Active 2035-09-05 US10412052B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Managing machine to machine devices
US15/021,885 Active US10630646B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device
US15/496,860 Active US10764252B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2017-04-25 Communicating with machine to machine devices
US16/357,727 Active US11044234B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-03-19 Communicating with a device
US16/821,378 Active US11063912B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2020-03-17 Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/021,912 Active 2035-03-03 US10305862B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Secure communication with a mobile device
US15/021,913 Active 2034-09-18 US10313308B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a device
US15/021,871 Active US10673820B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,876 Abandoned US20160226828A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device

Family Applications After (9)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/021,900 Abandoned US20160234183A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,879 Active 2034-11-25 US10313307B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,873 Active 2035-01-30 US10439991B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with a machine to machine device
US15/021,910 Active US9635057B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Communicating with machine to machine devices
US15/021,888 Active 2035-09-05 US10412052B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Managing machine to machine devices
US15/021,885 Active US10630646B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-12 Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device
US15/496,860 Active US10764252B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2017-04-25 Communicating with machine to machine devices
US16/357,727 Active US11044234B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-03-19 Communicating with a device
US16/821,378 Active US11063912B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2020-03-17 Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (14) US10305862B2 (en)
EP (15) EP3800862B1 (en)
CN (1) CN105706469B (en)
ES (2) ES2893353T3 (en)
GB (15) GB2586549B (en)
WO (12) WO2015036791A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150282223A1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2015-10-01 Gemtek Technology Co., Ltd. Method and system for binding mobile device with intelligent apparatus
US20160100311A1 (en) * 2014-10-06 2016-04-07 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US20170339128A1 (en) * 2016-05-23 2017-11-23 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for authenticating a device using bluetooth technology
US10313307B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-06-04 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Communicating with a machine to machine device
WO2019173371A1 (en) * 2018-03-08 2019-09-12 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation A secure ble just works pairing method against man-in-the-middle attack
US10650621B1 (en) 2016-09-13 2020-05-12 Iocurrents, Inc. Interfacing with a vehicular controller area network
CN112654013A (en) * 2019-09-25 2021-04-13 华为技术有限公司 Certificate issuing method and device
US11252239B2 (en) * 2016-12-15 2022-02-15 Arm Ip Limited Enabling communications between devices
WO2023055659A1 (en) * 2021-10-01 2023-04-06 TrustFour Technologies, Inc. Mutual key management service system and method
EP4187845A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-05-31 Sandvik Mining and Construction Oy User authentication in an industrial system

Families Citing this family (167)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013183971A1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2013-12-12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and system for selective protection of data exchanged between user equipment and network
US10101988B2 (en) * 2013-01-15 2018-10-16 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Dynamic firmware updating
KR20160009597A (en) 2013-05-06 2016-01-26 콘비다 와이어리스, 엘엘씨 Device triggering
US9350550B2 (en) 2013-09-10 2016-05-24 M2M And Iot Technologies, Llc Power management and security for wireless modules in “machine-to-machine” communications
US9100175B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2015-08-04 M2M And Iot Technologies, Llc Embedded universal integrated circuit card supporting two-factor authentication
US10700856B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2020-06-30 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Key derivation for a module using an embedded universal integrated circuit card
US9871889B1 (en) * 2014-03-18 2018-01-16 EMC IP Holing Company LLC Techniques for automated capture of configuration data for simulation
WO2015179917A1 (en) * 2014-05-27 2015-12-03 Resmed Limited Remote diagnostics of respiratory therapy devices
WO2016014662A1 (en) * 2014-07-22 2016-01-28 Convida Wireless, Llc Interworking light weight machine-to-machine protocol with device management protocol
GB2529838B (en) 2014-09-03 2021-06-30 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Bootstrap Mechanism For Endpoint Devices
EP3198893A1 (en) * 2014-09-25 2017-08-02 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Device mobility with coap
US9807079B2 (en) * 2014-10-23 2017-10-31 Palo Alto Network, Inc. Single sign on proxy for regulating access to a cloud service
US10374876B2 (en) * 2014-12-11 2019-08-06 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Configuration of server apparatus
WO2016113593A1 (en) * 2015-01-13 2016-07-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Application protocol query for securing gba usage
US9591027B2 (en) * 2015-02-17 2017-03-07 Qualys, Inc. Advanced asset tracking and correlation
US10200486B2 (en) * 2015-02-26 2019-02-05 Urban Airship, Inc. Mobile event notifications for network enabled objects
US10084865B2 (en) 2015-02-26 2018-09-25 Urban Airship, Inc. Mobile event notifications
ES2881632T3 (en) 2015-02-27 2021-11-30 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Security provisions in communication between a communication device and a network device
GB2536698A (en) * 2015-03-26 2016-09-28 Eoghan Hynes Secure communications between a beacon and a handset
WO2016160626A1 (en) 2015-03-27 2016-10-06 Globallogic, Inc. Determining actions based on imputing meaning to sensed information in a distributed computing environment
WO2016162382A1 (en) * 2015-04-07 2016-10-13 Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh Machine-to-machine and machine to cloud end-to-end authentication and security
US10701111B2 (en) * 2015-04-10 2020-06-30 Nokia Of America Corporation Method and apparatus for device management
KR102423885B1 (en) * 2015-05-08 2022-07-21 한국전자통신연구원 Method and system for additive homomorphic encryption scheme with error detection functionality
WO2016191176A1 (en) * 2015-05-22 2016-12-01 Nix John A Cryptographic unit for public key infrastructure (pki) operations
GB2538773A (en) * 2015-05-28 2016-11-30 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Device key security
CN105045114B (en) * 2015-05-29 2019-11-19 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 A kind of information processing method, cloud service platform and information processing system
US10135871B2 (en) * 2015-06-12 2018-11-20 Accenture Global Solutions Limited Service oriented software-defined security framework
EP3311321B1 (en) 2015-06-17 2021-08-04 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Method for enabling a secure provisioning of a credential, and related wireless devices and servers
CN108028829A (en) 2015-07-02 2018-05-11 瑞典爱立信有限公司 For obtaining the method being initially accessed and relevant wireless device and network node to network
US10749731B2 (en) * 2015-07-06 2020-08-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Facilitating secure communication between a client device and an application server
GB2540354A (en) * 2015-07-13 2017-01-18 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Generci bootstrapping architecture protocol
CN106487501B (en) * 2015-08-27 2020-12-08 华为技术有限公司 Key distribution and reception method, key management center, first network element and second network element
US10057382B2 (en) * 2015-09-24 2018-08-21 Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Intelligent “IoT gateway”
KR101707602B1 (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-02-17 상명대학교 천안산학협력단 Method for authenticating secure message based on hash tree and apparatus therefor
WO2017061815A1 (en) * 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for resource mapping between restful server and onem2m system
EP3366002B1 (en) * 2015-10-23 2021-03-10 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Establishment of operational status of a machine-to-machine device
US10194033B2 (en) * 2015-11-24 2019-01-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Charging record authentication for anonymized network service utilization
CN108293062B (en) * 2015-12-03 2021-08-24 瑞典爱立信有限公司 Method and apparatus for managing constrained devices
WO2017131564A1 (en) * 2016-01-27 2017-08-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method for setting up a secure connection between lwm2m devices
WO2017139046A1 (en) * 2016-02-09 2017-08-17 Presenso, Ltd. System and method for unsupervised root cause analysis of machine failures
US10268495B2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2019-04-23 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Virtual device model system
US10172000B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2019-01-01 M2MD Technologies, Inc. Method and system for managing security keys for user and M2M devices in a wireless communication network environment
US10158991B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2018-12-18 M2MD Technologies, Inc. Method and system for managing security keys for user and M2M devices in a wireless communication network environment
US10135946B2 (en) 2016-04-11 2018-11-20 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Sending messages to mobile devices
EP3465000A1 (en) 2016-05-23 2019-04-10 HSL Energy Holding APS An apparatus for production of steam from an aqueous liquid
EP3466012B1 (en) 2016-05-26 2024-04-10 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Network application function registration
US9847875B1 (en) * 2016-06-20 2017-12-19 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Methods and systems for bootstrapping an end-to-end application layer session security keyset based on a subscriber identity master security credential
US11075806B1 (en) 2016-06-30 2021-07-27 Juniper Networks, Inc. Hierarchical naming scheme for state propagation within network devices
EP3270620A1 (en) * 2016-07-13 2018-01-17 Gemalto Sa Method and devices for managing a secure element
EP3270321B1 (en) * 2016-07-14 2020-02-19 Kontron Modular Computers SAS Technique for securely performing an operation in an iot environment
US10298996B2 (en) 2016-08-18 2019-05-21 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Satellite TV user community smart device monitoring and management
US10791108B2 (en) * 2016-10-04 2020-09-29 Joseph Jay Austin Apparatuses, systems and methods for tracking network connected devices
CN117170876A (en) * 2016-10-07 2023-12-05 康维达无线有限责任公司 Service layer resource management for universal interworking and extensibility
CN107995673A (en) * 2016-10-27 2018-05-04 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of voice data processing apparatus, method and terminal
US20180139090A1 (en) * 2016-11-15 2018-05-17 John Geiger Method for secure enrollment of devices in the industrial internet of things
US10455057B2 (en) * 2016-11-29 2019-10-22 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. System and method for Lightweight-Machine-to-Machine device registration and assignment
US10887173B2 (en) 2016-12-21 2021-01-05 Juniper Networks, Inc. Communicating state information in distributed operating systems
US11316744B2 (en) 2016-12-21 2022-04-26 Juniper Networks, Inc. Organizing execution of distributed operating systems for network devices
US11316775B2 (en) 2016-12-21 2022-04-26 Juniper Networks, Inc. Maintaining coherency in distributed operating systems for network devices
JP2018101724A (en) * 2016-12-21 2018-06-28 株式会社村田製作所 Multilayer ceramic capacitor
US20180184290A1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Embedded Certificate Method for Strong Authentication and Ease of Use for Wireless IoT Systems
US10430566B2 (en) * 2016-12-27 2019-10-01 Paypal, Inc. Vehicle based electronic authentication and device management
CN108306911B (en) * 2017-01-12 2020-12-29 中移物联网有限公司 Internet of things event monitoring method and equipment
US10439895B2 (en) * 2017-01-31 2019-10-08 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Dynamic selection of channels for incoming communication
US10389593B2 (en) * 2017-02-06 2019-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Refining of applicability rules of management activities according to missing fulfilments thereof
ES2742128T3 (en) * 2017-03-03 2020-02-13 Boeing Co System and method implemented by computer for the authentication between machines of an apparatus
US10929573B2 (en) * 2017-03-21 2021-02-23 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for designing and modeling products in a cloud environment
US10992711B2 (en) * 2017-04-13 2021-04-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network aware data driven internet of things service engine
US10972453B1 (en) * 2017-05-03 2021-04-06 F5 Networks, Inc. Methods for token refreshment based on single sign-on (SSO) for federated identity environments and devices thereof
CN107231275B (en) * 2017-05-31 2021-07-30 普天智能照明研究院有限公司 Method for connection configuration of user equipment and household equipment
US10548185B2 (en) * 2017-06-23 2020-01-28 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Facilitating integrated management of connected assets that utilize different technologies and that are located across disparate wireless communications networks
US10528293B2 (en) 2017-06-26 2020-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Grouping devices as a virtual device for providing better quality of device data
EP3649760A1 (en) * 2017-07-03 2020-05-13 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Secure communications using network access identity
JP6934762B2 (en) * 2017-07-04 2021-09-15 株式会社ソラコム Devices, methods and programs for remote management of equipment
CN107493571B (en) * 2017-07-20 2020-04-14 深圳市盛路物联通讯技术有限公司 Type-based uplink data encryption control method and device for Internet of things repeater
US20190036896A1 (en) * 2017-07-27 2019-01-31 Cisco Technology, Inc. Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) Based Security Over Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) for IoT Devices
US10628151B2 (en) * 2017-08-10 2020-04-21 Dell Products L.P. Systems and methods for usage driven determination of update criticality
US10944753B2 (en) * 2017-08-17 2021-03-09 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. IoT devices wireless network connectivity policy management
TWI685227B (en) * 2017-08-28 2020-02-11 大同股份有限公司 Gateway, internet of things device control system and method thereof
US11096058B2 (en) 2017-08-30 2021-08-17 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Reconfiguration of communications devices
US10901812B2 (en) * 2017-09-18 2021-01-26 Rapyuta Robotics Co., Ltd. Managing communication between cloud and heterogeneous devices across networks
US10560326B2 (en) * 2017-09-22 2020-02-11 Webroot Inc. State-based entity behavior analysis
CN107749878B (en) * 2017-10-16 2021-05-14 新华三信息安全技术有限公司 Method and device for synchronizing files
WO2019075608A1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2019-04-25 Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 Method and device for identifying encrypted data stream, storage medium, and system
US10833923B2 (en) 2017-10-26 2020-11-10 Skylo Technologies Inc. Dynamic multiple access for distributed device communication networks with scheduled and unscheduled transmissions
KR102005361B1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-07-30 주식회사 디케이아이테크놀로지 Cloud-Based Terminal Integrating Management System Using OTA Technique of IoT Terminal Over LPWA Network
US10469600B2 (en) * 2017-11-14 2019-11-05 Dell Products, L.P. Local Proxy for service discovery
US10833926B2 (en) * 2017-11-17 2020-11-10 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Touchless secure bootstrapping of IoT devices
US11212246B2 (en) 2017-11-27 2021-12-28 Realnetworks, Inc. Messaging platform communication processing using message cluster detection and categorization
EP3718279A1 (en) * 2017-11-30 2020-10-07 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Serving-network based perfect forward security for authentication
US10306442B1 (en) 2018-01-16 2019-05-28 Skylo Technologies Inc. Devices and methods for specialized machine-to-machine communication transmission network modes via edge node capabilities
CN108337308B (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-08-10 高新兴物联科技有限公司 Data communication method, device and system for LWM2M client and upper computer
EP3746905A4 (en) * 2018-02-02 2021-10-20 ATC Technologies, LLC Network device date exchange coordination
US10747290B1 (en) * 2018-03-30 2020-08-18 Shopkick, Inc. Varying application strategy based on device state
KR20190118862A (en) * 2018-04-11 2019-10-21 에스케이하이닉스 주식회사 Memory system and operating method of memory controller
JP7056731B2 (en) * 2018-04-17 2022-04-19 日本電信電話株式会社 Equipment control device, equipment control method, and equipment control system
US20190332814A1 (en) * 2018-04-27 2019-10-31 Nxp B.V. High-throughput privacy-friendly hardware assisted machine learning on edge nodes
US10990593B2 (en) * 2018-05-04 2021-04-27 Saleforce.com, inc. Providing matching security between data stores in a database system
US10594549B2 (en) * 2018-05-18 2020-03-17 Nant Holdings Ip, Llc Fine grained network management to edge device features
WO2019227473A1 (en) * 2018-06-01 2019-12-05 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for performing communication in internet of things
WO2020001728A1 (en) * 2018-06-25 2020-01-02 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Bootstrapping devices on a network
GB2575433B (en) * 2018-06-26 2020-07-08 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Automatic client device registration
US11438447B2 (en) * 2018-07-03 2022-09-06 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) First node, communication device, and methods performed thereby for handling positioning information
US10778444B2 (en) 2018-07-11 2020-09-15 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Devices and methods for application attestation
FR3084181A1 (en) * 2018-07-20 2020-01-24 Orange METHOD FOR COORDINATING A PLURALITY OF EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SERVERS
US10868876B2 (en) * 2018-08-10 2020-12-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Authenticated service discovery using a secure ledger
CN110831002B (en) * 2018-08-10 2021-12-03 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for key deduction and computing storage medium
US11100228B2 (en) * 2018-10-25 2021-08-24 Dell Products, L.P. System and method to recover FPGA firmware over a sideband interface
CN111147421B (en) * 2018-11-02 2023-06-16 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Authentication method based on general guide architecture GBA and related equipment
WO2020102637A1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2020-05-22 Convida Wireless, Llc Control plane and user plane selection for small data
GB2579571B (en) * 2018-12-03 2021-05-12 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Device bootstrapping
US11144045B2 (en) * 2018-12-18 2021-10-12 General Electric Company Apparatus and method for repair of edge devices
US11516263B2 (en) * 2019-03-14 2022-11-29 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Secure and transparent transport of application level protocols to non-IP data delivery communication channels
US11095742B2 (en) 2019-03-27 2021-08-17 Juniper Networks, Inc. Query proxy for delivery of dynamic system state
WO2020199827A1 (en) * 2019-04-04 2020-10-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods and apparatuses for communication between lwm2m client and server
US11552781B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2023-01-10 Honeywell International Inc. Using error detection bits for cryptographic integrity and authentication
GB2582947B (en) * 2019-04-10 2021-10-13 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Provisioning data on a device
US11175899B2 (en) * 2019-04-17 2021-11-16 Vmware, Inc. Service upgrade integration for virtualized computing environments
GB2584527B (en) * 2019-05-10 2021-12-08 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Machine to machine communications
KR20200131167A (en) * 2019-05-13 2020-11-23 현대자동차주식회사 Method and apparatus for deleting resource in machine to machine system
CN110213744A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-06 恒宝股份有限公司 A kind of smart card realizes the method, apparatus and smart card of M2M business
JP6856090B2 (en) * 2019-06-07 2021-04-07 ダイキン工業株式会社 Equipment management system
JP7315825B2 (en) * 2019-06-14 2023-07-27 ダイキン工業株式会社 Device management system and authentication method
EP3767909A1 (en) * 2019-07-17 2021-01-20 Siemens Mobility GmbH Method and communication unit for cryptographically protected unidirectional data transmission of useful data between two networks
US11050699B2 (en) 2019-08-06 2021-06-29 Airship Group, Inc. Cross-channel orchestration of messages
CN110533128B (en) * 2019-08-21 2023-08-04 上海唯链信息科技有限公司 Encryption-based anti-counterfeiting traceability data processing method, device, system and medium
US11089062B2 (en) * 2019-08-29 2021-08-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automated security architecture formulation and deployment
CN110505307B (en) * 2019-08-30 2022-04-26 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Method and system for exchanging traffic flow data between networks
CA3154730A1 (en) * 2019-09-18 2021-03-25 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating secure transmission of location
CN114365453A (en) * 2019-09-19 2022-04-15 谷歌有限责任公司 Network filtering using private resolvable addresses
US11023220B2 (en) 2019-09-26 2021-06-01 Dell Products L.P. Firmware update with integrated smart sequence and action engine
US11429457B2 (en) 2019-09-26 2022-08-30 Dell Products L.P. System and method to securely exchange system diagnostics information between firmware, operating system and payload
EP3809259B1 (en) * 2019-10-16 2023-08-16 NXP USA, Inc. Network node firmware update
CN112714421B (en) * 2019-10-24 2023-03-17 华为云计算技术有限公司 Communication method, network device and terminal device
US11109343B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2021-08-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Transport protocol usage of confirmable versus non-confirmable notifications based on criticality of the observation
JP7092843B2 (en) * 2019-10-31 2022-06-28 アシュラント，インコーポレーテッド Systems, methods, equipment, and computer program products for managing and synchronizing independent computing resources.
US11206135B2 (en) 2019-11-11 2021-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation Forward secrecy in Transport Layer Security (TLS) using ephemeral keys
FR3103586B1 (en) * 2019-11-22 2023-04-14 St Microelectronics Alps Sas Method for managing the operation of a system on chip forming for example a microcontroller, and corresponding system on chip
US11658963B2 (en) 2019-12-04 2023-05-23 International Business Machines Corporation Cooperative communication validation
CN111181970B (en) * 2019-12-31 2022-03-11 广州邦讯信息系统有限公司 Method and system for applying national cryptographic algorithm to localization FSU
US10827329B1 (en) 2020-02-26 2020-11-03 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6G or other next generation network
US11418933B2 (en) 2020-03-19 2022-08-16 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Facilitation of container management for internet of things devices for 5G or other next generation network
US11627464B2 (en) 2020-05-14 2023-04-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Grouping users by pre-shared key (PSK) in hospitality
US11275576B2 (en) 2020-06-19 2022-03-15 Apple Inc. Techniques for firmware updates with accessories
CN111769940B (en) * 2020-07-09 2023-02-03 天翼物联科技有限公司 Online key distribution method, system and medium
CN111556487B (en) * 2020-07-13 2020-11-06 深圳杰睿联科技有限公司 SIM card air transmission system based on hybrid protocol and working method thereof
US11337096B2 (en) * 2020-07-17 2022-05-17 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Predicting whether a user of a wireless telecommunication network will report a problem
CN111935697B (en) * 2020-08-06 2022-08-19 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 eSIM discovery service method, discovery server and eSIM terminal
CN114143016A (en) * 2020-08-14 2022-03-04 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Authentication method based on general guide architecture GBA and corresponding device
US11811932B2 (en) * 2020-10-26 2023-11-07 Proofpoint, Inc. Using signed tokens to verify short message service (SMS) message bodies
CN114765550B (en) * 2020-12-31 2023-11-21 网联清算有限公司 Business security processing method and system
CN112911728B (en) * 2021-01-29 2023-05-02 极米科技股份有限公司 Method for searching peer-to-peer terminal in tunnel direct link establishment, terminal and medium
CN112862994A (en) * 2021-02-07 2021-05-28 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 ETC anti-disassembly authentication method, ETC, vehicle-mounted equipment terminal and system
JP2022130947A (en) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-07 株式会社日立製作所 Encryption communication system and communication terminal
US11689896B2 (en) * 2021-02-26 2023-06-27 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Secure remote access to private networks without internet connectivity
US11895133B2 (en) 2021-04-05 2024-02-06 Bank Of America Corporation Systems and methods for automated device activity analysis
US11558850B2 (en) * 2021-04-13 2023-01-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods for handling anomaly notification messages
CN113065830B (en) * 2021-04-19 2022-01-18 深圳市库宝软件有限公司 Storage system attribute pre-modification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
US11784981B2 (en) 2021-06-04 2023-10-10 Bank Of America Corporation Data processing transactions using machine to machine (M2M) data transfer
US11792165B2 (en) 2021-06-04 2023-10-17 Bank Of America Corporation Supporting data processing transactions using machine to machine (M2M) data transfer
GB2608634A (en) 2021-07-08 2023-01-11 Vodafone Group Services Ltd Device data validity
GB2609242A (en) * 2021-07-26 2023-02-01 Vodafone Group Services Ltd Waking up a device
US11265370B1 (en) * 2021-07-27 2022-03-01 Bank Of America Corporation Machine to machine (M2M) data transfer between data servers
US11785018B2 (en) 2021-07-29 2023-10-10 Bank Of America Corporation Mobile device management system for securely managing device communication
US11941266B2 (en) 2021-10-20 2024-03-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Resource isolation in computational storage devices
US20230367575A1 (en) * 2022-05-13 2023-11-16 Micron Technology, Inc. Techniques for managing offline identity upgrades
US11709660B1 (en) 2022-10-12 2023-07-25 Stodge Inc. Integrated third-party application builder trigger for message flow

Family Cites Families (147)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US102690A (en) * 1870-05-03 Improvement in pipe-tongs
US6185678B1 (en) * 1997-10-02 2001-02-06 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Secure and reliable bootstrap architecture
US6578066B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2003-06-10 Alteon Websystems Distributed load-balancing internet servers
WO2000068856A2 (en) * 1999-05-11 2000-11-16 Webvan Group, Inc. Electronic commerce enabled delivery system and method
US7069452B1 (en) 2000-07-12 2006-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Methods, systems and computer program products for secure firmware updates
US7774231B2 (en) * 2000-09-29 2010-08-10 Nokia Corporation Electronic payment methods for a mobile device
US7184984B2 (en) 2000-11-17 2007-02-27 Valaquenta Intellectual Properties Limited Global electronic trading system
US20020136410A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-09-26 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for extinguishing ephemeral keys
US20020157002A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2002-10-24 Messerges Thomas S. System and method for secure and convenient management of digital electronic content
EP1271875A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-01-02 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Device arranged for exchanging data, and method of manufacturing
US7058926B2 (en) * 2001-08-13 2006-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Tool for implementing Floating-Point related applications using customized language
US8140845B2 (en) 2001-09-13 2012-03-20 Alcatel Lucent Scheme for authentication and dynamic key exchange
US7076657B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2006-07-11 Siemens Communications, Inc. Use of short message service (SMS) for secure transactions
US6804777B2 (en) 2002-05-15 2004-10-12 Threatguard, Inc. System and method for application-level virtual private network
US20030229686A1 (en) 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 Kris Kortright System and method for synchronizing the configuration of distributed network management applications
US7296156B2 (en) * 2002-06-20 2007-11-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for SMS authentication
FI20030943A (en) * 2003-06-25 2004-12-26 Nokia Corp Procedure for configuring parameters for a machine-to-machine module and a machine-to-machine module
JP4617763B2 (en) * 2003-09-03 2011-01-26 ソニー株式会社 Device authentication system, device authentication server, terminal device, device authentication method, and device authentication program
KR20050049222A (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-05-25 에스케이텔레텍주식회사 Method for exchanging short messages securely
US20050120106A1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2005-06-02 Nokia, Inc. System and method for distributing software updates to a network appliance
US7360129B2 (en) * 2003-12-30 2008-04-15 Broadcom Corporation Simultaneous switch test mode
FR2867652B1 (en) * 2004-03-15 2006-05-26 Wavecom SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING REMOTE EQUIPMENT USING AT CONTROLS, DEVICE, RADIO COMMUNICATION MODULE AND PROGRAM THEREOF
JP2008530879A (en) 2005-02-11 2008-08-07 ノキア コーポレイション Method and apparatus for providing a bootstrapping procedure in a communication network
US7628322B2 (en) * 2005-03-07 2009-12-08 Nokia Corporation Methods, system and mobile device capable of enabling credit card personalization using a wireless network
FI20050384A0 (en) 2005-04-14 2005-04-14 Nokia Corp Use of generic authentication architecture for distribution of Internet protocol keys in mobile terminals
US9167471B2 (en) * 2009-05-07 2015-10-20 Jasper Technologies, Inc. System and method for responding to aggressive behavior associated with wireless devices
US9226151B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2015-12-29 Jasper Wireless, Inc. System and method for enabling a wireless device with customer-specific services
US8122240B2 (en) 2005-10-13 2012-02-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for establishing a security association
US8005879B2 (en) * 2005-11-21 2011-08-23 Sap Ag Service-to-device re-mapping for smart items
WO2007063420A2 (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 Nokia Corporation Authentication in communications networks
US8522025B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2013-08-27 Nokia Corporation Authenticating an application
US8037522B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2011-10-11 Nokia Corporation Security level establishment under generic bootstrapping architecture
US20070248232A1 (en) 2006-04-10 2007-10-25 Honeywell International Inc. Cryptographic key sharing method
US20070254711A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Young David C Accessing a SIM card to obtain configuration information by a remote embedded communication module
DE102006054091B4 (en) * 2006-11-16 2008-09-11 Siemens Ag Bootstrapping procedure
US20080120705A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products Supporting Provision of Web Services Using IMS
US7774008B2 (en) 2006-12-22 2010-08-10 Cellco Partnership MDN-less SMS messaging (network solution) for wireless M2M application
US7992198B2 (en) * 2007-04-13 2011-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Unified authentication for web method platforms
US9332575B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2016-05-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for enabling connectivity in a communication network
WO2009004590A2 (en) 2007-07-03 2009-01-08 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Method, apparatus, system and computer program for key parameter provisioning
US8201219B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2012-06-12 Bridgewater Systems Corp. Systems and methods for server load balancing using authentication, authorization, and accounting protocols
WO2009046400A1 (en) * 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Interdigital Technology Corporation Techniques for secure channelization between uicc and a terminal
US7984486B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2011-07-19 Nokia Corporation Using GAA to derive and distribute proxy mobile node home agent keys
WO2009080095A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-07-02 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for use in a communications network
KR101731200B1 (en) * 2008-01-18 2017-05-11 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 Method and apparatus for enabling machine to machine communication
US8090963B2 (en) * 2008-02-19 2012-01-03 Research In Motion Limited Automated power management of a peripheral device
WO2009128791A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-10-22 Vinko Kunc Method for reducing a noise in a signal received in a contactless-card interrogator and a circuit to perform said method
EP3242436A1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2017-11-08 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cryptographic key generation
US8750506B2 (en) 2008-07-31 2014-06-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods, nodes, system, computer programs and computer program products for secure user subscription or registration
US8386767B2 (en) * 2008-08-15 2013-02-26 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Methods and systems for bootstrapping security key information using session initiation protocol
US8472388B2 (en) * 2008-10-10 2013-06-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Gateway apparatus, authentication server, control method thereof and computer program
US8578153B2 (en) 2008-10-28 2013-11-05 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and arrangement for provisioning and managing a device
EP2187592A1 (en) 2008-11-13 2010-05-19 Vodafone Holding GmbH Machine-to machine device and smartcard for use in the device
US20100199095A1 (en) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Texas Instruments Inc. Password-Authenticated Association Based on Public Key Scrambling
EP2404459A2 (en) 2009-03-06 2012-01-11 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Platform validation and management of wireless devices
US8213971B2 (en) * 2009-04-27 2012-07-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for activating computer applications with SMS messaging
EP2259610B1 (en) 2009-06-02 2012-08-08 Vodafone Holding GmbH Registering a mobile device in a mobile communication network
EP2264642B1 (en) 2009-06-02 2014-02-26 Vodafone Holding GmbH Data exchange with a man-machine-device using short range radio communication
US8682903B2 (en) * 2009-06-30 2014-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for synchronized content directories on cluster devices
US9590961B2 (en) * 2009-07-14 2017-03-07 Alcatel Lucent Automated security provisioning protocol for wide area network communication devices in open device environment
US8958306B2 (en) * 2009-10-16 2015-02-17 Tekelec, Inc. Methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing diameter signaling router with integrated monitoring functionality
US8782743B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2014-07-15 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods and apparatus for use in a generic bootstrapping architecture
EP2336986A1 (en) 2009-12-17 2011-06-22 Gemalto SA Method of personalizing an application embedded in a secured electronic token
WO2011084117A1 (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-07-14 Nokia Corporation Credential transfer
EP2343916B1 (en) 2010-01-12 2018-05-09 Koninklijke KPN N.V. Secure coupling of hardware components
EP2524532B1 (en) 2010-01-14 2016-09-21 Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy Method and device for data processing in a wireless network
DE102010001076A1 (en) 2010-01-21 2011-07-28 PMDTechnologies GmbH, 57076 Inductive proximity sensor and proximity measurement method
EP3002965B1 (en) 2010-01-28 2019-08-21 Koninklijke KPN N.V. Efficient terminal authentication in telecommunication networks
KR20120120955A (en) * 2010-02-09 2012-11-02 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 Method and apparatus for trusted federated identity
US8447970B2 (en) * 2010-02-09 2013-05-21 Microsoft Corporation Securing out-of-band messages
DE102010010760B4 (en) * 2010-03-09 2012-02-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method of assigning a key to a subscriber device to be newly added to a wireless sensor-actuator network
CN102196436B (en) * 2010-03-11 2014-12-17 华为技术有限公司 Security authentication method, device and system
US9037112B2 (en) * 2010-03-15 2015-05-19 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and system for secured remote provisioning of a universal integrated circuit card of a user equipment
US8432871B1 (en) 2010-03-26 2013-04-30 Juniper Networks, Inc. Offloading mobile traffic from a mobile core network
US9729516B2 (en) * 2010-04-09 2017-08-08 Gemalto Sa Method of machine-to-machine communication
WO2011131220A1 (en) * 2010-04-19 2011-10-27 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Gba and ims authentication procedures
US8661257B2 (en) * 2010-05-18 2014-02-25 Nokia Corporation Generic bootstrapping architecture usage with Web applications and Web pages
US9602277B2 (en) * 2010-06-07 2017-03-21 Protected Mobilty, Llc User interface systems and methods for secure message oriented communications
US9143324B2 (en) * 2010-06-07 2015-09-22 Protected Mobility, Llc Secure messaging
CN102299797A (en) * 2010-06-23 2011-12-28 财团法人工业技术研究院 Authentication method, key distribution method and authentication and key distribution method
WO2011163561A1 (en) * 2010-06-25 2011-12-29 Interdigital Patend Holdings, Inc. Interface of an m2m server with the 3gpp core network
US8464061B2 (en) * 2010-08-30 2013-06-11 Apple Inc. Secure wireless link between two devices using probes
GB201015324D0 (en) 2010-09-14 2010-10-27 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Secure association
US9185054B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2015-11-10 Oracle International Corporation System and method for providing zero buffer copying in a middleware machine environment
CN102136934B (en) * 2010-10-21 2015-01-21 华为技术有限公司 Method, device and network system for realizing remote upgrading of Zigbee equipment
CN102469455B (en) * 2010-11-08 2016-04-13 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Based on equipment for machine type communication group management method and the system of universal guiding structure
EP2461613A1 (en) * 2010-12-06 2012-06-06 Gemalto SA Methods and system for handling UICC data
KR20120067459A (en) * 2010-12-16 2012-06-26 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for authenticating per m2m device between service provider and mobile network operator
CN102595389B (en) 2011-01-14 2017-11-03 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of method and system of MTC server shared key
WO2012113136A1 (en) * 2011-02-22 2012-08-30 Renesas Mobile Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing a device-to-device connection
US9369378B2 (en) 2011-02-25 2016-06-14 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Enabling IP-communication with a machine to machine unit
TR201103175A2 (en) 2011-04-01 2012-10-22 Turkcell �Let���M H�Zmetler� Anon�M ��Rket� A system and method for secure message transmission
DE102011007534A1 (en) 2011-04-15 2012-10-18 Vodafone Holding Gmbh Data transmission to an identification module in a mobile radio terminal
WO2011157115A2 (en) * 2011-05-30 2011-12-22 华为技术有限公司 Method, apparatus and system for informing network capabilities
JP2013005430A (en) 2011-06-15 2013-01-07 Lg Electronics Inc Data transmission method and device in radio communication system
GB2492750A (en) 2011-07-04 2013-01-16 Sony Corp Communications system with reconfigurable user identification module
CN102869015B (en) * 2011-07-04 2017-12-15 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of method and system of MTC device triggering
KR101295580B1 (en) * 2011-07-15 2013-08-09 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and Apparatus for supporting an HARQ operation using an HARQ channel identifier in a Wireless Access System
US9131330B2 (en) * 2011-07-15 2015-09-08 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) M2M services enablement architecture for cellular access networks
US9185080B2 (en) 2011-08-12 2015-11-10 Intel Deutschland Gmbh Data transmitting devices, data receiving devices, methods for controlling a data transmitting device, and methods for controlling a data receiving device
WO2013051827A2 (en) 2011-10-03 2013-04-11 Lg Electronics Inc. Mobility management entity having mobile switching center functionality
CN105577364B (en) 2011-10-27 2019-11-05 华为技术有限公司 A kind of encryption method, decryption method and relevant apparatus
WO2013064509A1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2013-05-10 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Securing data communications in a communications network
CN103108311B (en) * 2011-11-11 2017-11-28 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of MTC device and the method, apparatus and system of UICC bindings
CN102497630B (en) * 2011-11-25 2015-07-01 北京握奇数据系统有限公司 Machine to machine (M2M) equipment, method for realizing service, intelligent card and communication module
WO2013113162A1 (en) * 2012-02-02 2013-08-08 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Group based bootstrapping in machine type communication
US20130212236A1 (en) * 2012-02-13 2013-08-15 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) M2m service enablement over access networks
WO2013120225A1 (en) * 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Method and system for group based service bootstrap in m2m environment
US8577337B2 (en) * 2012-03-05 2013-11-05 Rogers Communications Inc. Radio management method and system using embedded universal integrated circuit card
US9380038B2 (en) * 2012-03-09 2016-06-28 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Bootstrap authentication framework
GB2501724A (en) 2012-05-02 2013-11-06 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Routing messages in a telecommunications network to machine-to-machine devices
KR20130127826A (en) * 2012-05-15 2013-11-25 엠디에스테크놀로지 주식회사 System for managing applications of m2m device using ota
CN103428666A (en) 2012-05-24 2013-12-04 华为技术有限公司 Charging method and device
US10097646B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2018-10-09 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and device for enabling or disabling server in wireless communication system
MX344082B (en) * 2012-09-03 2016-12-02 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Methods and apparatuses for automatic provisioning of external identifiers used for machine type devices in a 3gpp network.
US20140067902A1 (en) * 2012-09-04 2014-03-06 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for using multiple universal resource identifiers in m2m communications
US9167042B1 (en) * 2012-09-10 2015-10-20 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Maintaining communication channel for device notifications
CN104704790A (en) * 2012-09-13 2015-06-10 日本电气株式会社 Key management in machine type communication system
EP2896230B1 (en) * 2012-09-14 2017-07-26 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Operating a data back end node in a data layered architecture network
CN104685825B (en) * 2012-09-26 2018-07-06 英派尔科技开发有限公司 A kind of method of secure communication, computing device and non-transient computer readable storage medium storing program for executing
WO2014069898A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-08 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for authenticating access authority for specific resource in wireless communication system
KR101538424B1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2015-07-22 주식회사 케이티 Terminal for payment and local network monitoring
US9769801B2 (en) * 2012-11-05 2017-09-19 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for updating information regarding specific resource in wireless communication system
US20140126548A1 (en) * 2012-11-05 2014-05-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamic paging channel selection in a machine-to-machine wireless wide area network
CN103812644B (en) * 2012-11-09 2017-04-26 华为终端有限公司 Information configuration method, device and system
EP2741465B1 (en) * 2012-12-04 2021-03-17 Orange Method and device for managing secure communications in dynamic network environments
CN104838618B (en) * 2012-12-05 2019-05-10 Lg电子株式会社 The method and apparatus of authentication-access authorization in a wireless communication system
US20150319156A1 (en) 2012-12-12 2015-11-05 Interdigital Patent Holdings Inc. Independent identity management systems
US9277378B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2016-03-01 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Short message service validation engine
US9262242B2 (en) * 2012-12-31 2016-02-16 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Machine-to-machine (“M2M”) device client systems, methods, and interfaces
US9232524B2 (en) * 2013-01-05 2016-01-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Multiple access scheme for multi-channels of a network with a limited link budget
US8787554B1 (en) * 2013-01-11 2014-07-22 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for a digital network for switching web service messages
WO2014112781A1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2014-07-24 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for controlling access in wireless communication system
US9002997B2 (en) 2013-01-22 2015-04-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Instance host configuration
US8782774B1 (en) * 2013-03-07 2014-07-15 Cloudflare, Inc. Secure session capability using public-key cryptography without access to the private key
EP2965553B1 (en) 2013-03-08 2020-02-26 Nokia Technologies Oy Method and apparatus for multisim devices with embedded sim functionality
CN105103578A (en) 2013-04-05 2015-11-25 交互数字专利控股公司 Securing peer-to-peer and group communications
US9124403B2 (en) * 2013-04-30 2015-09-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Puncturing scheme based decoder optimizations
KR20160009597A (en) 2013-05-06 2016-01-26 콘비다 와이어리스, 엘엘씨 Device triggering
US20150019686A1 (en) * 2013-07-12 2015-01-15 Seven Networks, Inc. Distributed caching systems with configurable extended caching optimization
CN105580339B (en) * 2013-07-25 2019-04-09 康维达无线有限责任公司 Method and apparatus for end-to-end M2M service layer conversation
US9189930B2 (en) * 2013-08-20 2015-11-17 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Customizing alerts on an alerting device
US9100175B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2015-08-04 M2M And Iot Technologies, Llc Embedded universal integrated circuit card supporting two-factor authentication
US9350550B2 (en) * 2013-09-10 2016-05-24 M2M And Iot Technologies, Llc Power management and security for wireless modules in “machine-to-machine” communications
GB2586549B (en) 2013-09-13 2021-05-26 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Communicating with a machine to machine device
US9426729B2 (en) * 2013-10-22 2016-08-23 Cisco Technology, Inc. Network selection for mobile client devices in integrated cellular and Wi-Fi networks
US10601815B2 (en) * 2013-11-15 2020-03-24 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods and devices for bootstrapping of resource constrained devices

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10412052B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-09-10 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Managing machine to machine devices
US11063912B2 (en) * 2013-09-13 2021-07-13 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device
US10313307B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-06-04 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Communicating with a machine to machine device
US10630646B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2020-04-21 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device
US10673820B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2020-06-02 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Communicating with a machine to machine device
US10439991B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-10-08 Vodafone Ip Licensing Limited Communicating with a machine to machine device
US9894693B2 (en) * 2014-03-27 2018-02-13 Gemtek Technology Co., Ltd. Method and system for binding mobile device with intelligent apparatus
US20150282223A1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2015-10-01 Gemtek Technology Co., Ltd. Method and system for binding mobile device with intelligent apparatus
US20160100311A1 (en) * 2014-10-06 2016-04-07 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US9763063B2 (en) * 2014-10-06 2017-09-12 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US9860718B2 (en) * 2014-10-06 2018-01-02 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US20180091957A1 (en) * 2014-10-06 2018-03-29 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US10075820B2 (en) * 2014-10-06 2018-09-11 Derek D. Kumar Secure broadcast beacon communications
US10484363B2 (en) * 2016-05-23 2019-11-19 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for authenticating a device using Bluetooth technology
US20170339128A1 (en) * 2016-05-23 2017-11-23 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for authenticating a device using bluetooth technology
US10650621B1 (en) 2016-09-13 2020-05-12 Iocurrents, Inc. Interfacing with a vehicular controller area network
US11232655B2 (en) 2016-09-13 2022-01-25 Iocurrents, Inc. System and method for interfacing with a vehicular controller area network
US11252239B2 (en) * 2016-12-15 2022-02-15 Arm Ip Limited Enabling communications between devices
WO2019173371A1 (en) * 2018-03-08 2019-09-12 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation A secure ble just works pairing method against man-in-the-middle attack
US11729612B2 (en) * 2018-03-08 2023-08-15 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Secure BLE just works pairing method against man-in-the-middle attack
CN112654013A (en) * 2019-09-25 2021-04-13 华为技术有限公司 Certificate issuing method and device
WO2023055659A1 (en) * 2021-10-01 2023-04-06 TrustFour Technologies, Inc. Mutual key management service system and method
EP4187845A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-05-31 Sandvik Mining and Construction Oy User authentication in an industrial system
WO2023094636A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-06-01 Sandvik Mining And Construction Oy User authentication in an industrial system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2518975A (en) 2015-04-08
US10673820B2 (en) 2020-06-02
EP3044982B1 (en) 2021-07-21
EP3832982B1 (en) 2024-02-21
US11063912B2 (en) 2021-07-13
GB2518522A (en) 2015-03-25
GB2518254B (en) 2020-12-16
CN105706469B (en) 2020-03-10
GB2518522B (en) 2020-07-22
GB2519429B (en) 2020-12-23
WO2015036791A1 (en) 2015-03-19
EP3044934A2 (en) 2016-07-20
GB2583432A (en) 2020-10-28
US10313308B2 (en) 2019-06-04
GB201415931D0 (en) 2014-10-22
WO2015036771A1 (en) 2015-03-19
US20160234255A1 (en) 2016-08-11
EP3044983B1 (en) 2021-05-19
GB2518301A (en) 2015-03-18
GB2583432B (en) 2021-02-24
GB2518976A (en) 2015-04-08
GB201415927D0 (en) 2014-10-22
WO2015036789A3 (en) 2015-06-11
GB2518254A (en) 2015-03-18
EP3044976A1 (en) 2016-07-20
US20200322315A1 (en) 2020-10-08
EP3044983A1 (en) 2016-07-20
EP3044928A1 (en) 2016-07-20
WO2015036778A1 (en) 2015-03-19
US20160234177A1 (en) 2016-08-11
WO2015036783A1 (en) 2015-03-19
WO2015036789A2 (en) 2015-03-19
WO2015036793A1 (en) 2015-03-19
GB2518296A (en) 2015-03-18
GB2518521A (en) 2015-03-25
EP3044975B8 (en) 2021-06-30
GB201415921D0 (en) 2014-10-22
WO2015036776A1 (en) 2015-03-19
EP3044984B1 (en) 2021-07-21
GB2520591B (en) 2020-09-23
WO2015036777A1 (en) 2015-03-19
EP3044973B1 (en) 2021-03-17
EP3044985A1 (en) 2016-07-20
EP3044976B1 (en) 2021-11-03
GB2520591A (en) 2015-05-27
US20160234181A1 (en) 2016-08-11
GB201414997D0 (en) 2014-10-08
EP3044928B1 (en) 2020-11-04
GB201415918D0 (en) 2014-10-22
US20160232116A1 (en) 2016-08-11
EP3044973A1 (en) 2016-07-20
US20160226828A1 (en) 2016-08-04
GB2518975B (en) 2020-12-30
GB2518257A (en) 2015-03-18
US9635057B2 (en) 2017-04-25
US10439991B2 (en) 2019-10-08
WO2015036773A3 (en) 2015-06-11
GB2519429A (en) 2015-04-22
EP3044975B1 (en) 2021-05-26
US20190306123A1 (en) 2019-10-03
GB201414999D0 (en) 2014-10-08
US10630646B2 (en) 2020-04-21
EP3044982A1 (en) 2016-07-20
EP3044927A1 (en) 2016-07-20
GB201409641D0 (en) 2014-07-16
GB2518296B (en) 2021-02-24
EP3044984A1 (en) 2016-07-20
CN105706469A (en) 2016-06-22
WO2015036782A1 (en) 2015-03-19
US20160234686A1 (en) 2016-08-11
GB2586549A (en) 2021-02-24
GB2584371A (en) 2020-12-02
EP3767984A1 (en) 2021-01-20
US20160234182A1 (en) 2016-08-11
GB202012324D0 (en) 2020-09-23
US20160234170A1 (en) 2016-08-11
US10313307B2 (en) 2019-06-04
EP3044974A1 (en) 2016-07-20
US20160226847A1 (en) 2016-08-04
EP3044975A1 (en) 2016-07-20
US11044234B2 (en) 2021-06-22
US20160234183A1 (en) 2016-08-11
GB201409643D0 (en) 2014-07-16
EP3767984B1 (en) 2024-02-21
EP3800862B1 (en) 2022-11-09
WO2015036773A2 (en) 2015-03-19
EP3832982A1 (en) 2021-06-09
GB2518976B (en) 2020-11-04
GB2518256A (en) 2015-03-18
US20170295143A1 (en) 2017-10-12
GB201415925D0 (en) 2014-10-22
ES2933426T3 (en) 2023-02-08
WO2015036772A1 (en) 2015-03-19
GB202016853D0 (en) 2020-12-09
US10305862B2 (en) 2019-05-28
US10764252B2 (en) 2020-09-01
GB2518255A (en) 2015-03-18
US10412052B2 (en) 2019-09-10
GB2518301B (en) 2020-07-15
GB201415003D0 (en) 2014-10-08
WO2015036785A1 (en) 2015-03-19
GB201409652D0 (en) 2014-07-16
ES2893353T3 (en) 2022-02-08
GB2584371B (en) 2021-03-17
EP3855701A1 (en) 2021-07-28
EP3800862A1 (en) 2021-04-07
GB2586549B (en) 2021-05-26
GB202012632D0 (en) 2020-09-30
GB201409663D0 (en) 2014-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11063912B2 (en) Methods and systems for communicating with an M2M device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION