US20160061592A1

US20160061592A1 - Systems and methods for using white light interferometry to measure undercut of a bi-layer structure

Info

Publication number: US20160061592A1
Application number: US14/937,971
Authority: US
Inventors: Robert W. Beye; Sean T. Poh
Original assignee: Western Digital Fremont LLC
Current assignee: Western Digital Technologies Inc
Priority date: 2013-12-06
Filing date: 2015-11-11
Publication date: 2016-03-03
Also published as: US9194692B1

Abstract

Systems and methods for using white light interferometry to measure undercut of a bi-layer structure are provided. One such method involves performing a first scan of a first bi-layer structure with a microscope using a first scan range, where the microscope is configured for white light interferometry, generating a first interferogram using data from the first scan, performing a second scan of the first bi-layer structure with the microscope using a second scan range, generating a second interferogram using data from the second scan, determining a first distance between features of the first interferogram, determining a second distance between features of the second interferogram, and calculating a width of the undercut based on the first distance and the second distance. One such system involves using the microscope and/or a computer to perform one or more actions of this method.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/275,502, filed on May 12, 2014, having Attorney Docket No. F6715, and entitled, “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING WHITE LIGHT INTERFEROMETRY TO MEASURE UNDERCUT OF A BI-LAYER STRUCTURE”, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/913,223 filed on Dec. 6, 2013, having Attorney Docket No. F6715.P, and entitled, “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING WHITE LIGHT INTERFEROMETRY TO MEASURE UNDERCUT OF A BI-LAYER STRUCTURE”, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

Lift-off processes and bi-layer structures are commonly used in the fabrication of surface features on semiconductor substrates/wafers. A parameter of great interest for the bi-layer structures used in the lift-off processes is the undercut, or the distance that the upper layer cantilevers beyond the lower layer. Undercut photoresist structures are used in the semiconductor industry and more particularly in the metal lift-off process as a means of providing a template for metal deposition while minimizing the occurrence of defects such as ‘fencing’. Such defects are the result of the deposited material blanketing both the intended substrate area and the template itself. Removal of the template material then leaves deposited material extending beyond its intended limits. By providing a gap between the substrate and the template by way of an undercut, such defects can be minimized. The amount or width of an undercut should generally be large enough to provide the necessary discontinuity but not so large as to compromise the structural integrity of the template feature.
The bi-layer structure itself often consists of a layer of photoresist over a bottom layer, such as polymethylglutarimide (PMGI), whose dimensions may be tailored through the developer process. Before exposure to developer, both the photoresist and the bottom layer possess the same lateral dimensions. Exposure to photo developer degrades the bottom layer from the outside-in, thereby undercutting the photoresist as a function of time.
The standard method for monitoring undercut (e.g., with widths of less than about 1-2 microns or “um”) involves using a focused ion beam and a scanning electron microscope (FIB/SEM), where undercut parameters such as width are directly obtained from the cross-sectional images of the bi-layer structure. Although the FIB/SEM method for undercut metrology provides a reasonable characterization of the undercut structure, the method is limited due to high capital expenses, service expenses, and operator expenses combined with inherently long processing times associated with the FIB/SEM bi-layer metrology. Further, the FIB/SEM method is a destructive process, thereby requiring the use of sampling to estimate the parameters of the device population. Accordingly, an improved system and method for measuring undercut is needed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system for using white light interferometry to measure an undercut of a bi-layer structure including a microscope coupled to a computer in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 a is a schematic top view of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 1 having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 b is a schematic cross sectional view of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 2 a and undercut to be measured using white light interferometry in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process for using white light interferometry to measure an undercut of a bi-layer structure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is an expanded cross sectional view of an edge area of a bi-layer structure showing the locations of inner and outer edges of an undercut used to determine a width of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 a is a top view of a bi-layer structure having an undercut, where the outer edges of the undercut are to be located using white light interferometry scans (interferograms) having a first range in a direction extending into the page (Z-axis direction) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 b is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the X-axis of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 5 a that can be used to determine the X-axis width between the outer edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 c is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the Y-axis of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 5 a that can be used to determine the Y-axis width between the outer edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 a is a top view of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 5 a, where the inner edges of the undercut are to be located using white light interferometry scans (interferograms) having a second range in the Z-axis direction in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 b is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the X-axis of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 6 a that can be used to determine the X-axis width between the inner edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 c is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the Y-axis of the bi-layer structure of FIG. 6 a that can be used to determine the Y-axis width between the inner edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 7 is a graph of measurements taken using an inventive white light interferometry scan method, depicted on the vertical axis, correlated with a comparative method, depicted on the horizontal axis, that shows substantially accurate measurement data can be obtained using the inventive white light interferometry scan method as compared to conventional methods in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 8 a illustrates top and cross sectional views of a first bi-layer structure having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 8 b illustrates top and cross sectional views of two adjacent bi-layer structures having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 9 a illustrates top and cross sectional views of a second bi-layer structure having an undercut associated with a centrally disposed hole to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 9 b illustrates top and cross sectional views of a bi-layer structure having undercuts associated with two centrally disposed holes to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For relatively large undercut dimensions, standard light microscopes may be used to view the bi-layer structures top-down. Edges at the outer extent of the entire structure and the inner extent of the undercut are represented by fringes whose appearance is a function of focus. Optimal focus is difficult to determine as the outer and inner points of the undercut structure are found at different focal planes. Undercut is therefore determined through a two image technique or by selecting a compromise focus setting in a single image. However, at smaller undercut dimensions (e.g., at about 1 to 2 microns), the fringes of outer and inner edges begin to overlap, limiting the capability of this technique.
In addressing these disadvantages and those described in the background section above, it has been determined that white-light interferometry (WLI) may be used for undercut metrology as measured undercut values display a substantially linear relationship to those obtained by FIB/SEM measurements for undercut values above about 0.3 microns (um) and up.
Referring now to the drawings, embodiments of systems and methods for measuring an undercut of bi-layer structures on a wafer are illustrated. The methods can involve using white light interferometry in a two stage process to measure bi-layer undercut. In such case, the inner edges of the undercut can generate sharp peaks in an interferogram while the outer edges are found at the points of maximum slope (e.g., edges) in a second interferogram. These edges and peaks can be used to determine the width of the undercut (e.g., on a semiconductor wafer). If the measured width is outside of acceptable parameters for fabrication of the wafer, the fabrication process can be changed accordingly. The systems can include a microscope configured for white light interferometry and a computer configured to calculate the undercut width based on the locations of the edges and peaks in the interferograms from the microscope. As a result, the systems and methods described herein can provide fast, inexpensive, and non-destructive techniques that show promise to greatly reduce metrology costs and to improve yields.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system 100 for using white light interferometry to measure an undercut of a bi-layer structure 102 including a microscope 104 coupled to a computer 106 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The bi-layer structure 102 is positioned on the stage of the microscope 104 and is thus ready to be analyzed using white light interferometry. In several embodiments, the bi-layer structure 102 is one of a plurality of such structures positioned on a wafer.
FIG. 2 a is a schematic top view of the bi-layer structure 102 of FIG. 1 having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 b is a schematic cross sectional view of the bi-layer structure 102 of FIG. 2 a and undercut to be measured using white light interferometry in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. As can be seen in FIGS. 2 a and 2 b, the bi-layer structure 102 consists of an upper layer cantilevered over a lower layer, where the area of the lower layer is less than that of the upper layer. The undercut is defined by the outer edge 102 a of the upper layer as it extends to the outer edge 102 b (e.g., depicted as dashed line in FIG. 2 a) of the lower layer.
Referring now to FIGS. 1, 2 a, and 2 b, in operation, the microscope 104 can perform a first scan of the bi-layer structure 102 using a first scan range and perform a second scan of the bi-layer structure 102 using a second scan range. In several embodiments, the first scan range and the second scan range relate to a depth of scanning in a direction normal to the top surface of the bi-layer structure 102. In one embodiment, the first scan range can be sufficiently high as to sense the location of the outer edge 102 a of the upper layer of the bi-layer structure 102. In such case, the second scan range can be sufficiently high as to sense the outer edge 102 b of the lower layer of the bi-layer structure 102. In some instances the outer edge 102 b of the lower layer can be referred to as the inner edge of the bi-layer structure 102. In such case, the first scan range can be less than the second scan range. In other embodiments, the second scan range can be less than the first scan range and the functional roles can be reversed (e.g., first scan senses inner edge and second scan senses outer edge).
Returning now to the operation, the microscope 104 can also generate a first interferogram using data obtained from the first scan and generate a second interferogram using data obtained from the second scan. The interferograms can be thought of as graphs of thickness versus position resulting from the white light interferometry measurements. As will be discussed in greater detail below, certain features in the interferograms can be used to determine an approximate width between the outer edge 102 a and the inner edge 102 b that define the undercut. The computer 106 can obtain the first and second interferograms from the microscope 104 and then determine a first distance between the certain features of the first interferogram. The computer 106 can also determine a second distance between features of the second interferogram, and calculate a width of the undercut based on the first distance and the second distance.
In some embodiments, the system can be used to measure an undercut having a width in a range of about 0.3 to about 1.3 microns. In one such case, the undercut is intended for use in a metal deposition process.
In this context, the computer 106 refers to any machine or selection of logic that is capable of executing a sequence of instructions and should be taken to include, but not limited to, general purpose computers such as a laptop, general purpose microprocessors, special purpose microprocessors, central processing units (CPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), signal processors, microcontrollers, and other suitable circuitry. Further, it should be appreciated that the term processor, microprocessor, circuitry, controller, and other such terms, refer to any type of logic or circuitry capable of executing logic, commands, instructions, software, firmware, functionality, or other such information.
In some embodiments, the computer 106 is integrated within the microscope 104 such that there is no external computer and all of the processing can be performed using the microscope. In several embodiments, the microscope 104 can be any suitable microscope configured for white light interferometry.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process 200 for using white light interferometry to measure an undercut of a bi-layer structure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In particular embodiments, the process 200 can be performed using the microscope and computer of FIG. 1, or possibly using only the microscope. In block 202, the process first performs a first scan of a first bi-layer structure with a microscope using a first scan range, where the microscope is configured for white light interferometry. In block 204, the process generates a first interferogram using data from the first scan. In block 206, the process performs a second scan of the first bi-layer structure with the microscope using a second scan range. In block 208, the process generates a second interferogram using data from the second scan. In block 210, the process determines a first distance between features of the first interferogram. In block 212, the process determines a second distance between features of the second interferogram. In block 214, the process calculates a width of the undercut based on the first distance and the second distance.
In one embodiment, the first scan range is less than the second scan range. In such case, the process first senses the outer edge of the undercut and then senses the inner edge. In another embodiment, the second scan range is less than the first scan range. In such case, the process first senses the inner edge of the undercut and then senses the outer edge. In several embodiments, the first and second ranges extend in a direction that is about normal to a top surface of the bi-layer structure defining the undercut.
In several embodiments, the process 200 further includes modifying a fabrication process for forming the bi-layer structure if the width of the undercut is outside of a preselected range. In one such case, the process can further include adjusting a duration of a development sub-process used in forming the undercut of the first bi-layer structure.
In several embodiments, the first interferogram includes a rectangularly shaped waveform where edges thereof correspond in position to outer edges of the undercut being measured. In such case, the second interferogram can include two peaks where each corresponds in position to an inner edge of the undercut being measured. In some embodiments, the second interferogram includes the rectangularly shaped waveform and the first interferogram includes the two peaks. In other embodiments, other combinations of these shapes may be found in the interferograms. A number of possible interferogram shapes and bi-layer structures are described below in reference to FIGS. 8 a, 8 b, 9 a, and 9 b.
In a number of embodiments, the bi-layer structures are scanned and data from the scans is extracted in both an X-direction and a Y-direction for each of the first scan and the second scan, where X and Y are about orthogonal to one another. In several embodiments, the process can determine the difference in position between the edges and peaks in the X-direction and can determine the difference in position between the edges and peaks in the Y-direction and then compute an average difference for the width of the undercut. In some embodiments, where the bi-layer structure is symmetric about the X and Y directions (e.g., a square), the process can make the computations in just one of the X and Y directions to determine the undercut width.
The examples that follow will provide more specific details on these computations and the potential shapes for the bi-layer structures.
In one embodiment, the process 200 is a sub-process of a larger fabrication process that includes providing the wafer, depositing a lower layer of polymethylglutarimide (PMGI) on the wafer, depositing an upper layer of photo resist on the lower layer, patterning the lower layer and the upper layer, where the patterning involves developing the lower layer and the upper layer to form the first bi-layer structure, and then performing the process 200 for using white light interferometry to measure the undercut.
In several embodiments, the systems and methods described herein can be used in conjunction with a number of fabrication processes for processing semiconductor wafers, and particularly those that involve plating. In some embodiments, the methods described herein are applied after a wafer has been fabricated. In one embodiment, the methods described herein are applied during wafer fabrication.
In one embodiment, the process can perform the sequence of actions in a different order. In another embodiment, the process can skip one or more of the actions. In other embodiments, one or more of the actions are performed simultaneously. In some embodiments, additional actions can be performed.
FIG. 4 is an expanded cross sectional view 300 of an edge area of a bi-layer structure 302 showing the locations of an outer edge 302 a and an inner edge 302 b of an undercut 304 used to determine a width of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The bi-layer structure 302 is disposed on a substrate 306 (e.g., a wafer). As indicated in FIG. 4, the techniques for measuring the outer edge 302 a and inner edge 302 b will be discussed in further detail when FIGS. 5 a, 5 b, 5 c, 6 a, 6 b, and 6 c are described below. In several embodiments, the substrate/wafer 306 is made of silicon and the bi-layer structure 302 is formed of an upper layer of photo resist on a lower layer of PMGI. In several embodiments, the position of the inner edge 302 b is a function of the duration of the development stage of the bi-layer structure fabrication process, where the greater the duration, the greater the undercut width.
FIG. 5 a is a top view of a bi-layer structure 402 having an undercut, where the outer edges of the undercut are to be located using white light interferometry scans (interferograms) having a first range in a direction extending into the page (Z-axis direction) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. A coordinate system (e.g., Cartesian coordinate system) has been superimposed near the bi-layer structure 402 to illustrate relative position of the edges of the bi-layer structure 402. The coordinate system includes an X-axis (horizontal axis) measured in microns or “um” and a Y-axis (vertical axis) also measured in microns or “um”.
FIG. 5 b is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the X-axis (horizontal axis) of the bi-layer structure 402 of FIG. 5 a that can be used to determine the X-axis width between the outer edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. As can be seen in FIG. 5 b, the interferogram has a number of features reflecting a substantially rectangular shape. In several embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 determines a distance between features in the first interferogram in block 210 by locating the edges (404 a, 404 b) of the rectangular shape. To locate the edges (404 a, 404 b), the process determines the locations having a maximum slope (e.g., a roughly vertical orientation corresponding to about maximum slope) across the interferogram. The edges (404 a, 404 b) of the rectangular shape in the interferogram correspond in position to the outer edges of the bi-layer structure 402 taken along the X-axis direction. As can be seen in FIG. 5 b, the X-axis width of the outer edge of the undercut is 20.3607 um as defined by those edges (404 a, 404 b).
FIG. 5 c is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the Y-axis (vertical axis) of the bi-layer structure 402 of FIG. 5 a that can be used to determine the Y-axis width between the outer edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. As can be seen in FIG. 5 c, the interferogram has a number of features reflecting a substantially rectangular shape. In several embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 determines a distance between features in the first interferogram in block 210 by locating the edges (406 a, 406 b) of the rectangular shape. To locate the edges (406 a, 406 b), the process determines the locations having a maximum slope (e.g., a roughly vertical orientation corresponding to about maximum slope) across the interferogram. The edges (406 a, 406 b) of the rectangular shape in the interferogram correspond in position to the outer edges of the bi-layer structure 402 taken along the Y-axis direction. As can be seen in FIG. 5 c, the Y-axis width of the outer edge of the undercut is 20.4484 um defined by those edges (406 a, 406 b).
FIG. 6 a is a top view of the bi-layer structure 402 of FIG. 5 a, where the inner edges of the undercut are to be located using white light interferometry scans (interferograms) having a second range in the Z-axis direction in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Note that the inner edges of the undercut of the bi-layer structure 402 are depicted with the thicker line that is within the outer perimeter of the bi-layer structure 402. Similar to FIG. 5 a, a coordinate system (e.g., Cartesian coordinate system) has been superimposed near the bi-layer structure 402 to illustrate relative position of the edges of the bi-layer structure 402. The coordinate system includes an X-axis (horizontal axis) measured in microns or “um” and a Y-axis (vertical axis) also measured in microns or “um”. In the embodiment of FIG. 6 a, the second scan range is greater than the first scan range used for FIGS. 5 a, 5 b, and 5 c.
FIG. 6 b is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the X-axis of the bi-layer structure 402 of FIG. 6 a that can be used to determine the X-axis width between the inner edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. As can be seen in FIG. 6 b, the interferogram has a number of features including two well defined peaks (408 a, 408 b). In several embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 determines a second distance between features of the second interferogram in block 212 by locating the peaks (408 a, 408 b). To locate these peaks (408 a, 408 b), the process determines the two locations having about peak amplitude (e.g., about maximum amplitude) across the interferogram. The peaks (408 a, 408 b) in the interferogram correspond in position to inner edges of the undercut of the bi-layer structure 402 taken along the X-axis direction. As can be seen in FIG. 6 b, the X-axis width of the inner edge of the undercut is 17.5082 um as defined by those peaks (408 a, 408 b).
FIG. 6 c is a graph of thickness versus position (interferogram) along the Y-axis (vertical axis) of the bi-layer structure 402 of FIG. 6 a that can be used to determine the Y-axis width between the inner edges of the undercut in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. As can be seen in FIG. 6 c, the interferogram has a number of features including two well defined peaks (410 a, 410 b). In several embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 determines a second distance between features of the second interferogram in block 212 by locating the peaks (410 a, 410 b). To locate these peaks (410 a, 410 b), the process determines the two locations having about peak amplitude (e.g., about maximum amplitude) across the interferogram. The peaks (410 a, 410 b) in the interferogram correspond in position to inner edges of the undercut of the bi-layer structure 402 taken along the Y-axis direction. As can be seen in FIG. 6 c, the Y-axis width of the inner edge of the undercut is 17.4991 um as defined by those peaks (410 a, 410 b).
To avoid the need for absolute positions in each scan, a symmetric undercut feature is examined in FIGS. 5 a and 6 a and the undercut can simply be determined by the width between the outer edges minus the width between the inner edges divided by two. More specifically, in several embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 calculates a width of the undercut based on the first distance and the second distance in block 214 by subtracting the respective X and Y profile widths, dividing by two, and averaging the undercut widths. For example, the average undercut for the examples of FIGS. 5 a and 6 a is given by the average of (20.3607−17.5082)/2 and (20.4484−17.4991)/2, which comes to 1.45045 um. In some cases, averaging X-axis and Y-axis widths may be unnecessary. For example, in one such case, the bi-layer structure is symmetric (e.g., having a square shape).
To test the applicability of this method, features with undercut dimensions ranging from about 0.3 um to about 1.3 um were made and measured using both FIB/SEM methods and the proposed white light interferometry methods. The resulting correlation is shown in FIG. 7.
FIG. 7 is a graph of measurements taken using an inventive white light interferometry scan method (UC WLI), depicted on the vertical axis, correlated with a comparative method (UC FIB/SEM), depicted on the horizontal axis, that shows substantially accurate measurement data can be obtained using the inventive white light interferometry scan method as compared to conventional methods in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. More specifically, FIG. 7 shows undercut measurement by white light interferometry (UC WLI on vertical axis) and by SEM after FIB sectioning (UC FIB/SEM on horizontal axis). Both undercut measurements are made in microns or “um”. Among other things, FIG. 7 shows that the white-light interferometry (WLI) may be used for undercut metrology as the measured WLI undercut values display a linear relationship (e.g., about linear) to those of FIB/SEM for undercut values above about 0.3 microns (um). The equation for the fitted line is shown in the lower right area of the graph of FIG. 7 along with the R squared value (e.g., coefficient of determination) reflecting the degree of the correlation of the data to a line.
FIG. 8 a illustrates top and cross sectional views of a first bi-layer structure 502 having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) 504 and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) 506 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This first bi-layer structure 502 and corresponding edge profile interferogram 504 and peak profile interferogram 506 are similar to those described above for FIGS. 2 a, 2 b, 5 b, 5 c, 6 b, and 6 c.
FIG. 8 b illustrates top and cross sectional views of two adjacent bi-layer structures (602 a, 602 b) having an undercut to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) 604 and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) 606 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. If the process of FIG. 3 were applied to the two adjacent bi-layer structures (602 a, 602 b) of FIG. 8 b, the performing the first scan in block 202 would involve performing the first scan of the first bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 a) and the second bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 b) with the microscope using the first scan range. In such case, the performing the second scan in block 206 would then involve performing the second scan of the first bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 a) and the second bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 b) with the microscope using the second scan range.
In addition, the features of the first interferogram (e.g., edge profile 604) would include four edges (e.g., 604 a, 604 b, 604 c, 604 d) each corresponding to a portion of the first interferogram having a maximum slope. In such case, two edges (e.g., 604 a, 604 b) of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the upper layer of the first bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 a). The other two edges (e.g., 604 c, 604 d) of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the upper layer of the second bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 b). Similarly, the features of the second interferogram (e.g., peak profile 606) would include four peaks (e.g., 606 a, 606 b, 606 c, 606 d) each corresponding to a point of the second interferogram having a peak amplitude. In such case, two peaks (e.g., 606 a, 606 b) of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the lower layer of the first bi-layer structure (e.g., 602 a). The other two peaks (e.g., 606 c, 606 d) of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the lower layer of the second bi-layer structure (602 b).
FIG. 9 a illustrates top and cross sectional views of a second bi-layer structure 702 having an undercut associated with a centrally disposed hole 702 a to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) 704 and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) 706 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The second bi-layer structure 702 has an upper layer cantilevered over a lower layer, where an area of the lower layer is less than that of the upper layer. The hole 702 a extends through both the upper layer and the lower layer. The edge profile interferogram 704 includes two edges (704 a, 704 b) which correspond in position to edges of the upper layer (e.g., inner edges) defining the hole 702 a. The peak profile interferogram 706 includes two peaks (706 a, 706 b) which correspond in position to edges of the lower layer defining the hole 702 a. While FIG. 9 a depicts the second bi-layer structure 702 as having a certain size, it is noted that the hollowed arrows extending from the second bi-layer structure 702 are meant to show that it may extend substantially beyond the depicted outer boundaries.
FIG. 9 b illustrates top and cross sectional views of a bi-layer structure 802 having undercuts associated with two centrally disposed holes (802 a, 802 b) to be measured using white light interferometry along with graphs of the corresponding measurements (interferograms) of the outer edges (“Edge profile”) 804 and the inner edges (“Peak profile”) 806 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The bi-layer structure 802 has an upper layer cantilevered over a lower layer, where an area of the lower layer is less than that of the upper layer. The two holes (802 a, 802 b) of the bi-layer structure 802 extend through both the upper layer and the lower layer.
The first two edges (804 a, 804 b) of the four edges (804 a, 804 b, 804 c, 804 d) of the edge profile interferogram 804 correspond in position to edges of the upper layer of the bi-layer structure 802 defining the first hole 802 a. The second two edges (804 c, 804 d) of the four edges (804 a, 804 b, 804 c, 804 d) of the edge profile interferogram 804 correspond in position to edges of the upper layer of the bi-layer structure 802 defining the second hole 802 b.
Similarly, the first two peaks (806 a, 806 b) of the four peaks (806 a, 806 b, 806 c, 806 d) of the peak profile interferogram 806 correspond in position to edges of the lower layer of the bi-layer structure 802 defining the first hole 802 a. The second two peaks (806 c, 806 d) of the four peaks (806 a, 806 b, 806 c, 806 d) of the peak profile interferogram 806 correspond in position to edges of the lower layer of the bi-layer structure 802 defining the second hole 802 b.
While FIG. 9 b depicts the second bi-layer structure 802 as having a certain size, it is noted that the hollowed arrows extending from the second bi-layer structure 802 are meant to show that it may extend substantially beyond the depicted outer boundaries. It is also noted that holes 802 a and 802 b are located centrally along the vertical direction across the second bi-layer structure 802.
While FIGS. 8 a, 8 b, 9 a, and 9 b depict various embodiments of bi-layer structures, the inventive systems and methods described herein can be applied to other bi-layer structures having an undercut that might need to be measured.
Aspects of the proposed techniques can include a number of advantages over the traditional FIB/SEM methods. For example, the proposed methods are non-destructive, meaning that devices are not typically destroyed in the measurement process. On the other hand, the FIB/SEM methods are destructive. Throughput per device using the proposed methods can be about 10 seconds, while throughput per device can be about 10 minutes using the FIB/SEM methods. Thus the proposed methods can be about 60 times faster than the conventional methods. Capital requirements for the proposed methods are much lower than with the FIB/SEM methods, even if the throughput were the same. More specifically, the FIB/SEM systems typically cost about several million dollars versus a few hundred thousand dollars for a WLI system that can be used to administer the proposed methods. Furthermore, annual service expenses for a FIB/SEM system are on the order of one hundred thousand dollars per year versus perhaps several thousand dollars for a WLI system. As such, these throughput and capital advantages for the proposed methods can encourage more sampling and thus better yield.
While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as examples of specific embodiments thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
The terms “above,” “below,” and “between” as used herein refer to a relative position of one layer with respect to other layers. As such, one layer deposited or disposed above or below another layer may be directly in contact with the other layer or may have one or more intervening layers. Moreover, one layer deposited or disposed between layers may be directly in contact with the layers or may have one or more intervening layers.
The various features and processes described above may be used independently of one another, or may be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and sub-combinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, certain method, event, state or process blocks may be omitted in some implementations. The methods and processes described herein are also not limited to any particular sequence, and the blocks or states relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described tasks or events may be performed in an order other than that specifically disclosed, or multiple may be combined in a single block or state. The example tasks or events may be performed in serial, in parallel, or in some other suitable manner. Tasks or events may be added to or removed from the disclosed example embodiments. The example systems and components described herein may be configured differently than described. For example, elements may be added to, removed from, or rearranged compared to the disclosed example embodiments.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A system for measuring an undercut of bi-layer structures on a wafer, the system comprising:

a microscope configured for white light interferometry, wherein the microscope is configured to:

perform a first scan of a first bi-layer structure using a first scan range;

perform a second scan of the first bi-layer structure using a second scan range;

generate a first interferogram using data from the first scan; and

generate a second interferogram using data from the second scan; and

a computer coupled to the microscope and configured to:

determine a first distance between features of the first interferogram;

determine a second distance between features of the second interferogram; and

calculate a width of the undercut based on the first distance and the second distance.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first scan range is less than the second scan range, wherein the first and second ranges extend in a direction that is about normal to a top surface of the first bi-layer structure.

3. The system of claim 2:

wherein the features of the first interferogram comprise two edges each corresponding to a portion of the first interferogram having a maximum slope; and

wherein the features of the second interferogram comprise two peaks each corresponding to a point of the second interferogram having a peak amplitude.

4. The system of claim 3:

wherein the first bi-layer structure comprises an upper layer on a lower layer, where an area of the lower layer is less than that of the upper layer;

wherein the two edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the upper layer; and

wherein the two peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the lower layer.

5. The system of claim 3:

wherein the first bi-layer structure comprises a centrally disposed hole extending through both the upper layer and the lower layer;

wherein the two edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to edges of the upper layer defining the hole; and

wherein the two peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to edges of the lower layer defining the hole.

6. The system of claim 2:

wherein the features of the first interferogram comprise four edges each corresponding to a portion of the first interferogram having a maximum slope;

wherein the features of the second interferogram comprise four peaks each corresponding to a point of the second interferogram having a peak amplitude;

wherein the microscope is configured to perform the first scan of the first bi-layer structure and a second bi-layer structure using the first scan range; and

wherein the microscope is configured to perform the second scan of the first bi-layer structure and the second bi-layer structure using the second scan range.

7. The system of claim 6:

wherein the first bi-layer structure comprises an upper layer on a lower layer, where an area of the lower layer of the first bi-layer structure is less than that of the upper layer of the first bi-layer structure;

wherein the second bi-layer structure comprises an upper layer on a lower layer, where an area of the lower layer of the second bi-layer structure is less than that of the upper layer of the second bi-layer structure;

wherein a first two edges of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the upper layer of the first bi-layer structure;

wherein a second two edges of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the upper layer of the second bi-layer structure;

wherein a first two peaks of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the lower layer of the first bi-layer structure; and

wherein a second two peaks of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to outer edges of the lower layer of the second bi-layer structure.

8. The system of claim 2:

wherein the first bi-layer structure comprises a first hole and a second hole, each extending through both the upper layer and the lower layer;

wherein a first two edges of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to edges of the upper layer of the first bi-layer structure defining the first hole;

wherein a second two edges of the four edges of the first interferogram correspond in position to edges of the upper layer of the first bi-layer structure defining the second hole;

wherein a first two peaks of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to edges of the lower layer of the first bi-layer structure defining the first hole; and

wherein a second two peaks of the four peaks of the second interferogram correspond in position to edges of the lower layer of the first bi-layer structure defining the second hole.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the second scan range is less than the first scan range, wherein the first and second ranges extend in a direction that is about normal to a top surface of the first bi-layer structure.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein if the width of the undercut is outside of a preselected range, then a fabrication process for forming the first bi-layer structure is modified.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the fabrication process is modified by adjusting a duration of a development sub-process used in forming the undercut of the first bi-layer structure.