US20150370770A1 - Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system - Google Patents

Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150370770A1
US20150370770A1 US14/754,375 US201514754375A US2015370770A1 US 20150370770 A1 US20150370770 A1 US 20150370770A1 US 201514754375 A US201514754375 A US 201514754375A US 2015370770 A1 US2015370770 A1 US 2015370770A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
document
region
reviewer
file
display
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/754,375
Inventor
Deepak Massand
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Litera Tech LLC
Litera Corp
Original Assignee
Litera Technologies LLC
Litera Tech LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US10/285,910 priority Critical patent/US7818678B2/en
Priority to US12/766,321 priority patent/US9105007B2/en
Priority to US14/754,375 priority patent/US20150370770A1/en
Application filed by Litera Technologies LLC, Litera Tech LLC filed Critical Litera Technologies LLC
Publication of US20150370770A1 publication Critical patent/US20150370770A1/en
Assigned to LITERA CORPORATION reassignment LITERA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LITERA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Assigned to PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION reassignment PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LITERA CORPORATION
Assigned to SARATOGA INSVESTMENT CORP. SBIC LP, AS AGENT reassignment SARATOGA INSVESTMENT CORP. SBIC LP, AS AGENT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: Litéra Corporation
Assigned to LITERA TECHNOLOGY LLC reassignment LITERA TECHNOLOGY LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MASSAND, DEEPAK
Assigned to LITERA CORPORATION reassignment LITERA CORPORATION MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LITERA CORPORATION
Assigned to Litera Technologies, LLC reassignment Litera Technologies, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MASSAND, DEEPAK
Assigned to Litéra Corporation reassignment Litéra Corporation TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF GRANT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED AT REEL 043861, FRAME 0043 AND REEL 045626, FRAME 0582 Assignors: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Assigned to Litéra Corporation reassignment Litéra Corporation TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT REEL 044396, FRAME 0217 Assignors: SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. SBIC LP
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/21Text processing
    • G06F17/24Editing, e.g. insert/delete
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/93Document management systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/21Text processing
    • G06F17/22Manipulating or registering by use of codes, e.g. in sequence of text characters
    • G06F17/2229Fragmentation of text-files, e.g. reusable text-blocks, including linking to the fragments, XInclude, Namespaces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/21Text processing
    • G06F17/22Manipulating or registering by use of codes, e.g. in sequence of text characters
    • G06F17/2288Version control
    • G06F17/30011
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/40Services or applications
    • H04L65/403Arrangements for multiparty communication, e.g. conference
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/10Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/10Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/104Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for peer-to-peer [P2P] networking; Functionalities or architectural details of P2P networks
    • H04L67/1087Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for peer-to-peer [P2P] networking; Functionalities or architectural details of P2P networks involving cross functional networking aspects
    • H04L67/1089Hierarchical topologies

Abstract

A computer software product for allowing simultaneous multi-level collaboration, including in real time between an author and a group of reviewers invited by the author to comment on a document stored in a computer file. The computer software enables each reviewer to view the document and make changes thereto which are stored in a secondary data file without modifying the contents of the original document. The author receives and views the secondary data files from the reviewers and selectively incorporates the changes into the document. Each reviewer may invite an unlimited number of sub-reviewers to review the document, the comments of each sub-reviewer similarly being stored in a secondary data file wherein only the author may edit the document directly.

Description

  • This is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/766,321, filed Apr. 23, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/285,910, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,678, filed Oct. 31, 2002, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates generally to a computer-based document development and review system, and more particularly to a computer product which allows document collaboration among a plurality of computer users over a network.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Prior to the widespread introduction of computers, document collaboration was typically accomplished by distributing a paper copy of a document sequentially, or by distributing multiple copies simultaneously, to a number of reviewers for comment.
  • In sequential review, as shown in FIG. 1, a document owner 10 designates a number of reviewers 20 to review a document. Each reviewer 20 makes comments, often in the form of notes written by hand, directly on a single paper copy of the document, passing the document along to the next reviewer when finished. The result is a single document indicating all of the proposed changes. The most obvious drawback of this editing method is that it is inherently time-consuming, especially when the number of reviewers is large. Furthermore, although it may be desirable to ascertain the author of a particular comment, the fact that all the comments are contained on the same document complicates such identification. Finally, it may not be desirable to permit later reviewers to read comments made by those who came earlier.
  • Simultaneous review, as shown in FIG. 2, by its nature is less time-consuming than sequential review, and results in a plurality of edited copies of a document, each prepared by a particular reviewer 20. However, the collaborative process is not complete until a central reviewer aggregates the comments of each individual reviewer into a complete document. Often, the owner 10 performs this function. Thus, the owner 10 must resolve conflicts among the comments of the several reviewers which might not have occurred had some of the reviewers been able to read the comments of others.
  • Connecting personal computers to communication networks has eliminated the need for distribution of paper copies, and for the notation of comments on documents by hand. Unfortunately, however, the collaborative process generally continues to be patterned after the work flow models described above. For example, Microsoft Word®, by Microsoft Corporation, of Redmond, Wash. provides revision tracking tools such as “redlining” which enable a reviewer to insert revisions as comments within a document in much the same way as comments are indicated on a manually marked-up paper copy of a document.
  • Although Microsoft Word® and other word processing software allows the author of a document to send a copy to many reviewers via e-mail or over the web or intranets, and each reviewer can make and track changes, the redlined document may only represent the changes suggested by one or more of several reviewers. When a large number of reviewers are involved in the collaboration, it becomes difficult to combine each reviewer's comments into a finished document. Extensive merging and/or cutting and pasting is necessary before the author even has a single document containing all the comments suggested by the reviewers.
  • There are some products, such as Workshare Synergy® by Workshare Technology of London, England that add collaboration features to Microsoft Word by changing the view and the process of compiling and integrating proposed changes from multiple individuals into a single document. However, Synergy is an applet, or software that is dependent entirely upon an application such as Microsoft Word® for its functionality. Furthermore, in Workshare Synergy®, the comments are sorted by reviewer with separate tabs denoting each reviewer's comments. This is problematic for multi-user collaborations because the most common world low for authors is to review all the comments on a section-by-section or paragraph-by paragraph basis. Still further, the document and the reviewers' comments cannot be reviewed side-by-side.
  • An additional drawback of current collaboration products will be noted by the author who, having received the comments of the reviewers, wishes to accept one or more of the suggested changes. In order to do so, the author must “scroll through” every comment made by every reviewer and elect to accept or reject the suggestions one by one. Thus, an author wishing to accept even one of 100 changes suggested must reject the remaining 99.
  • Thus, current computer-based collaboration products closely follow the paper-based collaboration methods upon which they are based, directly incorporating features of paper-based collaboration that are not necessary to or appropriate for the electronic transfer of documents. Particularly, the current collaboration products emulate the practice of directly “marking up” a paper copy of the document by its reviewers. Although this has proven to be the most efficient way to conduct manual document collaboration, it does not translate well into a method for electronic document collaboration.
  • Therefore, a need exists for a computer-based document collaboration system in the form of stand-alone software that will allow a plurality of reviewers to simultaneously review a single document on a plurality of computers and submit comments on the document wherein the comments of each reviewer are stored and indexed separately from the document and from those of other reviewers and forwarded to an editor or author without modifying the underlying document.
  • A further need exists for a computer-based document collaboration system that displays the comments of the plurality of reviewers in a first window on a single screen at the same time as it displays the document in a second window, allowing the editor or author to scroll through portions of the document and view the identity of the reviewer and the comments suggested on that portion of the document. It is desirable for such a system to enable the author or editor to selectively incorporate the comments of each reviewer into the document. It is further desirable, but not essential to provide a “thin client” in the form of software that can be sent with or separately from the document to an author, editor or reviewer to enable the display of the document and comments, and to allow the selective incorporation of comments by an author or editor independent of other word-processing software.
  • A still further need exists for a computer-based document collaboration system having a hierarchical structure wherein an author or editor may, for example, submit a document to a plurality of first-level reviewers hierarchically subordinate to the author or editor. Each first-level reviewer may in turn submit the document to a line of hierarchically subordinate second-level reviewers. It is desirable for an unlimited number of lines of reviewers of a document to be accommodated within unlimited hierarchical levels. A set of rules associated with the hierarchy defines which hierarchical rank and line may review comments generated by those in other ranks within the same line.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with the invention, a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided. A master data file contains a document which may be in anyone of a number of known document formats such as HTML, TXT, DOC, RTF, DOT, etc. stored on at least one computer for display on one or more display devices. A secondary data file is associated with the document and with at least one of the reviewers. When the reviewer modifies the document displayed on the display device, the computer captures the modifications and stores them in the secondary data file. It is desirable that the secondary data file include an index referencing the portion of the document in which the modification was made and the contents of the modification, for example, on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis. In further accordance with this aspect of the invention, a plurality of computers may be connected over a network so that the master data file can be viewed on several computers simultaneously. Each of the computers thus connected to the network are preferably provided with an editing means, allowing a reviewer stationed at one of the networked computers to make what appear to be ordinary modifications to the document which are instead stored to the secondary data file associated with that reviewer. The secondary data file can then be sent, for example, to the author of the document.
  • In accordance with a further aspect of the invention a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided wherein, for example, the author of a document invites a number of users to act as reviewers and receives a secondary data file from one or more of the reviewers. At least one computer is provided with a graphical user interface which divides its display into at least a first portion in which the document is displayed, and a second portion in which the contents of the secondary file are displayed. Ideally, each of the paragraphs, that has generated a comment or modification from anyone or multiple reviewers, is demarcated with a color object or glyph to allow easy spotting of where the modifications are. Additionally, as the author scrolls through the document in the first portion of the graphical user interface, the contents of the indexed modifications are displayed in the second portion of the display. The author may then selectively accept the modifications into the document. Thus, the author or editor of a document, having sent the document, for example, over a network to several reviewers and having received a secondary document associated with at least one of the reviewers, may review all the proposed changes to the document simultaneously on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis.
  • In accordance with a still further aspect of the invention, a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided having a hierarchical structure wherein ideally the author or editor of a document is designated as the document “owner”, and is assigned the highest rank. The document is locked within owner's master data file and ideally the owner is the only one who may modify the contents of the master data file directly. The owner may invite a number of reviewers, these reviewers known for example as “level 1” reviewers, having a rank below that of the owner. In accordance with this aspect of the invention, each level 1 reviewer may view the document and make modifications which are recorded in the level 1 reviewer's secondary file without modifying the contents of the master data file. Additionally, each level 1 reviewer may invite additional reviewers having a rank below that of the level 1 reviewer, e.g. “level 2” reviewer. The level 2 reviewer may also make modifications to the document that are stored in that reviewer's secondary file without modifying the contents of the master data file. Thus, in accordance with this aspect of the invention, an unlimited number of hierarchical levels are created wherein review of the document contained in the master data file can take place simultaneously without directly editing the document.
  • In accordance with a still further aspect of the invention, a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided wherein the owner or any reviewer may designate an assistant to take over the rights of the respective owner or reviewer to accept or suggest changes to the document.
  • In accordance with a still further aspect of the invention, a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided wherein the owner may designate only select reviewers to provide input on specifically designated portions of the document.
  • In accordance with a still further aspect of the invention, a computer based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided wherein data management may be carried out entirely by a central database system.
  • In accordance with a still further aspect of the invention, a computer-based document collaboration system for managing the input of a plurality of reviewers is provided having a “thin client” which comprises sufficient computer code to enable a reviewer to view the contents of a master data file and record modifications in a secondary data file.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a prior art method of document collaboration.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a second prior art method of document collaboration.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the document review system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the hierarchical structure of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the document review system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred data flow of an aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a plan view of a computer display showing an aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a plan view of a computer display showing an aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a chart illustrating an aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a plan view of a computer display showing an aspect of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention provides a computer-based document collaboration system. As shown in FIG. 3, an embodiment of the document collaboration system of the present invention is shown having a central database 102 connected to a network 110 of conventional personal computers or terminals 120. Such computer networks are well known in the art and typically but not necessarily comprise computers having a processing unit, a system memory, an input device, a display device and a system bus that couples these components to the processing unit. Additionally, a network controller is connected to the system bus for permitting the computer to communicate over a network. When used in a Local Area Network (LAN) environment, each personal computer 120 is connected to the local network 110 through such a network controller which may be configured to exchange information in one or more well known communication protocols such as TCP/IP. Alternatively, the computers in network 110 may be connected across a Wide Area Network (WAN) or over a Virtual Private Network (VPN) or other networks known in the art in which case other means such as a modem may be used for the purpose of establishing connections over the internet among personal computers 120.
  • Central database 102 is shown connected to network 110 and may be one of a number of well known database systems such as DB2 of IBM Corporation, Annonk, N.Y., Oracle® of Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores Calif., SQL Server from Microsoft Corp., or Borland Paradox® of Borland Software Corporation, Scotts Valley, Calif. As shown below, the method and system of the present invention enables a plurality of users linked over network 110 to collaborate on a document simultaneously, the system being distributed between software components implemented in central database 102 and on personal computers 120. Preferably, as described in greater detail below, each of personal computers 120 is provided with some database capabilities, requiring the installation of some database components redundant to those of central database 102 on some or all of personal computers 120. Alternatively, it is possible to implement the system of the present invention without installing any software components on personal computers 120. In the latter case, personal computers 120 could function as or be replaced by terminals having only a display and suitable input/output capability.
  • The method and system of document collaboration is illustrated in FIG. 3 wherein user 130 is shown at step 1 having generated version 1.0 of a document 122. As the author of the document, user 130 is considered the “owner” with respect to document 122 which is stored in central database 102 and locked. Moving clockwise to step 2, the locked document 122 becomes the master data file 124 which preferably may be modified only by owner 130.
  • Next, as shown in step 3, the owner 130 then designates a number of users to whom master data file 124 is to be distributed or allowed access to by inviting those users to become reviewers of the document. For purposes of the present invention, a reviewer is an individual user or group of individual users who provide input on a document in the form of suggested changes which may include, but are not limited to, specific comments or edits to specific portions of the document. The owner 130 provides a list of reviewers to the central database 102 as distribution list 126. As shown, the owner 130 may invite reviewers, for example 202, 204 and 206 as reviewers of document 122. Each of reviewers 202, 204 and 206 are users preferably having personal computers 120 connected to network 110. In step 4, central database 102 then generates and preferably sends a secondary data file 128 to each reviewer designated in distribution list 126 and provides to each a copy of document 122 as locked master data file 124.
  • As shown in greater detail in FIG. 4, a hierarchical relationship exists between owner 130 and reviewers 202, 204 and 206. Because they are one level below owner 130, reviewers 202, 204 and 206 are considered “level 1” or “L1” reviewers. An unlimited number of reviewers can exist at each level, and may be designated sequentially as reviewer 1, reviewer 2, reviewer 3, etc. or “R1, R2, R3 . . . ”. Thus, each reviewer can be uniquely identified by the server based on the reviewer's level and order. As shown in FIG. 4, reviewer 202 is identified as “L1RI” which is a unique designation representing the reviewer's rank of level 1 and order as reviewer 1. Similarly, reviewer 204 is identified as “L1R2”, and reviewer 206 is identified as “L1R3”. Subsequent level 1 reviewers would be identified as “L1R4”, “L1R5”, etc. Although any identification scheme may be used in place of that shown in FIG. 4, the unique identification of each reviewer invited by owner 130 by the central database 102 is critical as described in detail below.
  • Corresponding to the hierarchy shown in FIG. 4, each secondary data file 128 (FIG. 3) is uniquely associated with one of the reviewers invited by owner 130 and is also associated with master data file 124. Although different hierarchies may be defined from that shown in FIG. 4, it is critical that each secondary data file have a unique association with only one reviewer, and that each reviewer's place on the hierarchy be ascertainable by the system. In the event that only one secondary data file is assigned to more than one individual, those individuals will be considered to be a single reviewer for purposes of the system of the present invention. Furthermore, although owner 130 may be recognized as the owner of document 122, owner 130 may simultaneously serve and be recognized by the system of the present invention as a reviewer of a different document, the author of that document having designated owner 130 by invitation to serve as reviewer.
  • Unlike the master data file 124 which contains a copy of document 122, the secondary data files contain no data when they are first received, by the designated reviewers 202, 204 and 206 in step 4 of FIG. 3, or created by the local or central database. To review the document, as shown in step 5 of FIG. 3, the reviewers may each view contents of master data file 124 and secondary data file 128 on a single display simultaneously, for example in separate side-by-side windows. An example of such a display 70 is shown in FIG. 7, wherein the text of a document contained in the master data file is displayed in editing window 72 and the contents of the secondary data file are shown in comment window 74.
  • A reviewer such as 202 who, as discussed above, has been assigned the unique hierarchical designation L1R1 may scroll through the document in editing window 72 and make changes which are recorded in the secondary data file and displayed in comment window 74 as shown in FIG. 8. Changes made in the text in editing window 72 appear as a suggestion 76 in comment window 74 along with the identity of the reviewer and the time of the change. The reviewer may also make comments 78 directly into the comment window such as an explanation or description of the comment. Alternatively, the document editing window itself can show the text of document 122 and any changes made thereto by the individual reviewer. In this case, window 74 showing the contents of the secondary data file can be toggled on or off by the reviewer. However, whether or not the reviewer's display shows the changes in the editing window 72, the contents of the document 122 are not modified. As discussed above, the text shown in editing window 72 is merely a copy of that found in master data file 124 which has been locked in step 2 of FIG. 3 to prevent the modification thereof by any reviewer.
  • The reviewers' suggested changes are captured and indexed in the secondary data file. As shown in step 5 of FIG. 3, each of reviewers 202, 204 and 206 populates secondary data files 128 a, 128 b and 128 c respectively with suggested changes to document 122. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, the contents of an example of a secondary data file are shown wherein changes suggested by a reviewer such as reviewer 202 (identified as L1 R1) have been captured in secondary data file 128 a and indexed to the paragraphs in document 122 to which the suggested changes apply. Specifically, the file contains the identity 92 of the reviewer, the name 94 of the document being edited (identified as Doc1.txt) and a table. 96 containing an indexed list of suggested changes made by a specific reviewer such as reviewer 202. Although many approaches to storing data such as that shown in FIG. 9 are known in the art, it is critical that the secondary data file 128 be associated with at least one document, such as document 122 and at least one reviewer, such as reviewer 202.
  • In the preferred embodiment, sufficient database capabilities are provided by software installed on the personal computers 120 used by reviewers 202, 204 and 206 such as Borland Paradox® to carry out the function of capturing the input made by each reviewer into the document editing window and copying that input to the respective secondary data files 128. This embodiment has the advantage of allowing each reviewer to populate a secondary file with suggested changes independently of their connection to the central database 102. Thus, in the event that the network connection between a particular personal computer 120 and the central database 102 is temporarily unavailable or interrupted, a reviewer could continue to add suggested changes to their secondary file to be synchronized with central database 102 when the network connection has been restored.
  • Further, the local database software necessary to enable any personal computer 120 connected to the network to carry out the functions of displaying and capturing suggested changes can be provided, for example by central database 102, as an attachment to master data file 124 or secondary data file 128. This software, or “thin client” 125 is shown in FIG. 3 as distributed to reviewers with master data file 124 and secondary data file 128 in step 4 in the event that any reviewers such as 202, 204 and 206 do not have the local database software installed on the personal computer 120 that the reviewer is using. However, the thin client 125 can be distributed to the reviewers at any point prior to step 5 wherein the editing actually takes place. Alternately, database capability similar to that provided by thin client 125 may be pre-installed on personal computers 120.
  • In an alternate embodiment, all database functions related to the capture of suggested changes are carried out by the central database 102. In this configuration, local database software is not required by the system of the present invention to enable a reviewer to populate a secondary data file, thus no software installation or thin client 125 is necessary. This provides the advantage of a significantly reduced computational capability on the part of personal computers 120. Fully implemented, the central database of such a system can take on the role of an application service provider wherein even the functions related to the display of the contents of the master data file and secondary data file can be centralized. This embodiment, however, requires that personal computers 120 remain connected to the central database, as by a network connection, at all times in order to function.
  • As shown in FIG. 3, step 5 is completed after each of the reviewers 202, 204 and 206 designated by owner 130 have completed their review of document 122 contained in master data file 124, their respective secondary data files 128 a, 128 b and 128 c are sent to central database 102. Although it is well known in the art to send data to a database via a data file, it is critical that the process for generating the secondary data files not alter the contents of the master data file 124.
  • In step 6, central database 102 integrates the secondary data files from each of the reviewers, generating integrated data file 140 which is returned to owner 130. Owner 130 preferably views document 122 and the comments of reviewers 202, 204 and 206 on a single display simultaneously. FIG. 10 shows display 70 having editing window 72 wherein document 122 is displayed, and comment window 74 wherein the comments 76 of reviewers 202 (L1R1), 204 (L1R2) and 206 (L1R3) are displayed. Ideally, each of the paragraphs, that has generated a comment or modification from anyone or multiple reviewers, is demarcated with a color object or glyph 75 to allow easy spotting of where the modifications are. Owner 130 accepts or rejects the changes from all the reviewers and free edits the document 122. Alternately, as described in detail below, in lieu of generating an integrated data file 140, central database 102 may virtually integrate the contents of the secondary data files 128 a, 128 b and 128 c by displaying the suggested changes of multiple reviewers by reference to the index.
  • At the completion of step 6 of FIG. 3, a new version of document 122 is then published, at which time the review process may begin again at step 1 followed by the creation of a new master data file 124 containing the revised document 122 a and selection by owner 130 of a distribution list identifying the same or different reviewers.
  • Although FIG. 3 illustrates the system of the present invention as applied to a single level of reviewers subordinate to owner 130, it is possible to carry out the review process shown in FIG. 3 through multiple levels of reviewers. As shown in FIG. 5, the process shown in FIG. 3 can be expanded such that the reviewers 202, 204 and 206 as designated by owner 130, upon receiving a copy of the master data file and respective secondary data file may themselves designate a number of subordinate reviewers to which the document is to be distributed for comment.
  • With reference to FIG. 5, it can be seen that steps 1 through 6 are the same as those disclosed in the embodiment of FIG. 3. Specifically, in step 1 owner 130 creates a document 122 which is stored by central database 102 in master data file 124 and locked in step 2. In step 3, owner 130 designates a distribution list 126 identifying a plurality of reviewers 202, 204 and 206. In step 4, each of the reviewers designated by owner 130 receives a copy of master data file 124 containing document 122 and a unique secondary data file 128 associated with document 122 and the reviewer. In step 5, reviewers 202, 204 and 208 return their respective secondary data files 128 a, 128 b and 128 c containing suggested changes to central database 102 which in step 6 are integrated and viewed by owner 130 who accepts or rejects the suggested changes, free-editing the document 122.
  • However, the embodiment of FIG. 5 differs from that shown in FIG. 3 in that after each of the reviewers 202, 204 and 206 invited to review document 122 by owner 130 have received master data file 124 and secondary data file 128 in step 4, each of the reviewers may designate by invitation their own distribution list of reviewers. This step, shown in FIG. 5 as step 3 a wherein reviewer 202 designates a distribution list 200 inviting reviewers 208, 210 and 212, is similar to step 3 with the result that the relationship between first level reviewer 202 and second level reviewers 208, 210 and 212 is similar to the relationship between owner 130 and first level reviewer 202. Therefore, in a similar manner to the distribution of files shown in step 4, central database 102 distributes in step 4 a of FIG. 5 a copy of master data file 124 and a unique secondary data file to each of reviewers 208, 210 and 212 designated, for example by reviewer 202. Any additional reviewers designated by reviewers 204 and 206 would similarly receive master data file 124 and a unique secondary file 128 in step 4 a.
  • It is also possible that between steps 4 and 4 a, one or more of the second level reviewers 202, 204 or 206 may populate their respective secondary data files with suggested changes prior to inviting a second level of reviewers such as 208, 210 and 212 to comment thereon. For example, the master data file sent to reviewers 208, 210 and 212 could be either master data file 124 containing the same document 122 reviewed by reviewer 202, or the file distributed in step 4 a could be master data file 124 a containing document 122 plus the changes suggested by reviewer 202. If reviewer 202's changes are sent to reviewers 208, 210 and 212 in step 4 a, they would preferably be viewable by those reviewers through integration by central database 102 as though the changes were part of the original document. However, such integration would be virtual as changes to document 122 are preferably permitted only by owner 130.
  • The next step in FIG. 5, step 5 a is similar to step 5 in that each of the level 2 reviewers 208, 210 and 212 submit their respective secondary data files 128 d, 128 e and 128 f to the central database. Thereafter, in step 6 a, the secondary data files of the level 2 reviewers are integrated by central database 102 into an integrated file 150 which is viewed by the designating level 1 reviewer. Preferably, only reviewer 202, for example, may view the changes suggested by reviewers 208, 210 and 212. Conversely, only reviewers 204 and 206 may view the comments of their respectively designated reviewers, if any. Alternately, reviewer 202 may allow reviewers 208, 210 and 212 to view each other's comments. As discussed in greater detail below, this step is similar to step 6 with the exception that level 1 reviewers such as 202 may not edit the document 122 directly. Instead, any changes accepted or suggested, for example, by reviewer 202 are merely incorporated into reviewer 202's secondary data file without modifying the contents of master data file 124.
  • The process disclosed in FIG. 5 allows for an unlimited number of subordinate reviewers at each level as well as an unlimited number of levels of sub-distribution. Ideally, the sub-distribution of documents takes place hierarchically. With particular reference to FIG. 4 the hierarchy among reviewers in a multiple levels can be shown in greater detail.
  • As discussed above, owner 130 has designated a first level, Level 1 or L1 of subordinate reviewers 202, 204 and 206, (R1, R2 and R3 respectively) to review a document, shown in FIG. 3 as 122. The designation of reviewers of document 122 as master data file 124 is shown by the arrows linking the owners and the multiple levels of reviewers. As discussed above, each reviewer is identified by a unique designation associated with the secondary file allocated to that reviewer by central database 102 (FIG. 3) shown as a concatenation of the rank L1 of the reviewer and the reviewers order within that level R1, R2 and R3. In turn, each reviewer 202, 204 and 206 may designate a second level, Level 2 or L2 of subordinate reviewers. For example, reviewer 202 has designated reviewers 208, 210 and 212. Similarly to the reviewers at Level 1, the Level 2 reviewers each receive a copy of master data file 124 and have a unique secondary data file allocated by central database 102, and associated with one particular reviewer identified in FIG. 4 as a concatenation of the designating reviewer's (202's) identification, L1 R1, which forms the prefix of reviewer′ 208's hierarchical identity, and 208's order within in L2 as R1. Hence, reviewer 208 can be uniquely identified as L1R1-L2R1, as can the secondary data file associated with reviewer 208.
  • The convention of identifying the reviewer's secondary file by concatenating the identity of the designating reviewer with that of the designated reviewer is shown in FIG. 4 carried out to Level 4. As would be obvious to one skilled in the art, this process can be carried out indefinitely resulting in a hierarchy as broad and deep as the size of the population of reviewers requires or permits. Furthermore, although it is preferable that each secondary file be uniquely linked to a single reviewer, any known method of establishing the identity of each reviewer associated with a particular secondary file would achieve the same result.
  • In addition to the rank of the reviewers, distinctions can be made among “lines” of reviewers based upon their relationship to the reviewers hierarchically above them. FIG. 4 shows reviewers 202, 204 and 206 having been designated by owner 130. As level 1 reviewers 202, 204 and 206 designate subordinate reviewers, they become the head of a line of reviewers, I, II and Ill respectively. For example, as discussed above, reviewer 202 has designated subordinate reviewers 208, 210 and 212. Reviewer 208 has, in turn, designated subordinate reviewer 220. Reviewers 210 and 212 have similarly designated subordinate reviewers. Every reviewer for which “lineage” can be traced to reviewer 202 belong to the same “line” of reviewers. Similarly, reviewer 204 has designated subordinate reviewer 214 who belongs to line II and reviewer 206 has designated reviewers 216 and 218 belonging to line III. Hierarchical sublines exist when a subordinate reviewer designates further subordinate reviewers. Therefore, the heads of sub lines A, B and C can be identified as reviewers 208, 210 and 212 respectively.
  • The existence of each hierarchical line and subline as well as the place of a particular reviewer within it can readily be determined by referring to the reviewers hierarchical identity. For example, the prefix of reviewer 230's hierarchical identity of L1R1L2R2L3R2 identifies each of reviewer 202 (L1R1), 210 (L2R2) and 222 (L3R2) as the head of progressively subordinate hierarchical lines.
  • Therefore, the hierarchy established by the sub-distribution of the document 122 in FIG. 5 creates relationships among the reviewers that can be defined by hierarchical rules. For example, the relationship between reviewer 202 and 208 is similar to that established between owner 130 and reviewer 202. Therefore, the review process shown in FIG. 3 and described above between owner 130 and Level 1 reviewers 202, 204 and 206 is applied in the same manner in FIG. 5 between reviewer 202 and Level 2 reviewers 208, 210 and 212 with reviewer 202 in the place of the owner.
  • Thus, as shown in FIG. 5, after step 4 a, the L2 reviewers suggest changes which are captured in their secondary data files. In the case of reviewers 208, 210 and 212, secondary data files, uniquely associated with hierarchical identifications L1R1-L2R1, L1R1-L2R2 and L1R1-L2R3 (FIG. 4) respectively are received by central database 102. The central database integrates the files and submits the integrated secondary data file 150 to reviewer 202 who selectively incorporates the changes suggested by reviewers 208, 210 and 212. These changes are incorporated into reviewer 202's secondary data file, associated with level and rank L1 R1, which is then submitted, with any changes reviewer 202 independently suggests, back to central database 102 for return with the other Level 1 reviewers to owner 130.
  • Therefore, as discussed above, the review process between hierarchical levels shown in FIG. 5 follows the same process as that set forth in FIG. 3 with the critical exception that only the owner may modify the document 122. Although each reviewer who designates reviewers at a subordinate level stands in the same position, hierarchically, over those reviewers as owner 130 stands over Level 1 reviewers 202, 204 and 206, each reviewer may only modify the contents of a secondary data file 128 which has no direct effect on the contents of the master data file 124. The owner, however, has no hierarchical superior, and therefore is allocated no secondary data file, but instead modifies document 122 directly.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the multi-level review process illustrated by FIG. 5 in greater detail as it may take place in practice. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 5, owner 130 has designated by invitation level 1 reviewers 202, 204 and 206 and distributed master data file 124 and secondary data file 128 in steps 1 to 4. Reviewer 202 has similarly invited and distributed to level 2 reviewers 208, 210 and 212 in steps 3 a to 4 a. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 6, level 1 reviewer 202 and 202's level 2 reviewers have received copies of master data file 124. Using software such as local database or thin client 125, each level 2 reviewer 208, 210 and 212 views the contents of master data file 124 and populates a unique secondary data file 128 d 128 e and 128 f with suggested changes respectively without modifying the contents of master data file 124 as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 as step 5 a.
  • In practice, the process of reviewing a document may be completed at different times by different reviewers. For example, a particular level 2 reviewer may be waiting for suggested changes from designated reviewers at level 3, or may be temporarily disconnected from the network which may cause delay in submission of that reviewer's secondary data file to central database 102. Therefore, although the level 1 reviewers such as 202 would ordinarily wait until the review process was completed by all of the subordinate reviewers before undertaking his or her own review, a level 1 reviewer may query the central database 102 at any time to initiate step 6 a to view the contents the secondary files currently submitted by subordinate reviewers. As shown in FIG. 6, the secondary data files 128 d and 128 e have been transmitted to the central database 102 at a time when reviewer 212 has not yet 10 submitted secondary data file 128 f. Thus, integrated secondary file 150 would contain only the suggested changes stored in the secondary data files 128 d and 128 e. However, when reviewer 212 has finished reviewing document 122, reviewer 202 may again query the central database 102, thereby repeating step 6 a. Integrated secondary data file 150 would then contain the suggested changes of all three level 2 reviewers.
  • Upon querying central Database 102, level 1 reviewer 202 receives integrated secondary data file 150 which contains the suggested changes contained in the secondary data files 128 d and 128 e submitted to the central database 102 by level 2 reviewers 208 and 210 who have completed their review of the contents of master data file 124. In step 5, reviewer 202 views the contents of master data file 124 and the suggested changes of the level 2 reviewers using software such as local database or thin client 125. The suggested changes in integrated secondary data file 150 that are accepted by level 1 reviewer 202 as well as those changes independently suggested by reviewer 202 are captured in secondary data file 128 a which is submitted to central database 102 where it is integrated with the suggested changes of the other level 1 reviewers without modifying the contents of master data file 124 into integrated secondary data file 140. Owner 130 may then, as shown in step 6, view the integrated secondary data file 140 to modify the contents of document 122 as discussed above using software such as local database or thin client 125.
  • Thus, whereas FIG. 3 illustrates the document collaboration process of the present invention in a single line two-level review, the process ideally takes place simultaneously across multiple lines and levels. Therefore, the review process shown in FIG. 5 is a recursive process managed by central database 102 and repeated from the bottom of the hierarchy illustrated in FIG. 4 to the owner 130 at the top. However, as illustrated by FIGS. 5 and 6, the multi-level review process at no time modifies the contents of the master data file. The modification of the master data file is undertaken only upon final review by owner 130.
  • Ideally, the review process is structured hierarchically such that the suggested changes of a particular reviewer are only viewable by those designating reviewers of immediately superior rank and within the same line. Thus, the suggested changes of third level reviewer 220 as shown in FIG. 4 are viewable only by that reviewer's designating reviewer, second level reviewer 208. Likewise, the suggested changes of second level reviewer 208 are only viewable by first level reviewer 202.
  • The embodiments of the present invention described above have generally been directed to a system for developing and reviewing documents wherein each reviewer at every level has the ability to view the entire document distributed for review by a document owner. Although such a system may work well for document review within a single organization defined as those connected to the same central database, there may still be cases where it would be desirable to invite certain reviewers within an organization to comment on only part of a document. Furthermore, it is possible that an owner may wish to send a document for review to an outside organization and may therefore wish to conceal confidential information while still obtaining meaningful suggestions as to non-confidential portions of a document.
  • For example, as shown in FIG. 4, owner 130 may invite a sub-owner 330 who may belong to a different organization to review a document. Sub-owner 330 may create an independent collaboration tree 340 within the sub-owner's organization using the system of the present invention and a central database other than central database 102. Therefore, should owner 130 wish to exclude specific portions of document 122, such portions could be extracted prior to sending the document to sub-owner 330 resulting in modified document 122 a which may be submitted in locked format as master data file 124 a. Thus, after document 122 a is reviewed by sub owner 330 and collaboration tree 340, secondary data file 328 containing suggested changes is returned to owner 130.
  • Although submitting modified document 122 a is shown implemented when document 122 is sent to an outside organization, similar restrictions are possible within owner 130's organization, either by creating a modified document such as 122 a or by managing access to document 122 by implementing access restrictions through central database 102.
  • Further, the system of the present invention can be utilized to conduct document review in real-time wherein a group of physically remote reviewers can simultaneously view and comment on a document. In this embodiment, the suggested changes of invited reviewers at each level would be instantaneously viewable to the inviting reviewers above them.
  • While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (23)

1.-19. (canceled)
20. A computer-implemented document collaboration system for managing the input of reviewers connected over a network of computers, the document collaboration system comprising:
a processor; and
a memory coupled to the processor, the memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
store a master data file including a document having content created by an owner;
create a hierarchical distribution file for tracking access to the document, the hierarchical distribution file including:
first data identifying the owner of the document,
second data identifying a first level reviewer designated by the owner, and
third data identifying a second level reviewer designated the first level reviewer;
create a first data file associated with the first level reviewer comprising:
first edit data reflecting a first edit made to the content of the document by the first level reviewer, and
first index data reflecting a first index to a location of the first edit in the document;
create a second data file associated with the second level reviewer comprising:
second edit data reflecting a second edit made to the content of the document by the second level reviewer, and
second index data reflecting a second index to a location of the second edit in the document;
generate information to display the document in a first region;
generate information to display a control in the first region that is associated with a portion of the document displayed in the first region; and
generate information to display in a second region the first edit indexed to the portion of the document associated with the control.
21.-34. (canceled)
35. A computer-implemented document collaboration method for managing the input of reviewers connected over a network of computers, the document collaboration method comprising:
storing a master data file including a document having content created by an owner;
creating, by a processor, a hierarchical distribution file for tracking access to the document, the hierarchical distribution file including:
first data identifying the owner of the document,
second data identifying a first level reviewer designated by the owner, and
third data identifying a second level reviewer designated the first level reviewer;
creating, by the processor, a first data file associated with the first level reviewer comprising:
first edit data reflecting a first edit made to the content of the document by the first level reviewer, and
first index data reflecting a first index to a location of the first edit in the document;
creating, by the processor, a second data file associated with the second level reviewer comprising:
second edit data reflecting a second edit made to the content of the document by the second level reviewer, and
second index data reflecting a second index to a location of the second edit in the document;
generating, by the processor, information that is used to display the document adjacent to at least one of the first edit and the second edit;
generating, by the processor, information to display the document in a first region;
generating, by the processor, information to display a control in the first region that is associated with a portion of the document displayed in the first region; and
in response to activation of the control, generating information to display in a second region the first edit indexed to the portion of the document associated with the control.
36.-48. (canceled)
49. A computer-based document editing system comprising:
a processor; and
a memory coupled to the processor, the memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
receive a document having content, and store the document in a document file,
receive first edits in a first data file, the first data file comprising the first edits reflecting a change to the content of the document indexed to a portion of the document associated with the change,
generate display data that is used to simultaneously display:
a first region reflecting portions of the document, and
a second region reflecting the first edits in the first data file that are indexed to the portions of the document displayed in the first region,
receive a second edit reflecting a change to the content of one of the portions of the document displayed in the first region, and
store the second edit in the first data file, wherein the second edit does not modify the content of the document stored in the document file.
50. The computer-based document editing system of claim 49, wherein the first data file also comprises a comment indexed to a portion of the content of document.
51. The computer-based document editing system of claim 50, wherein the processor generates information to display in the second region the comment indexed to the portions of the document reflected in the first region.
52. The computer-based document editing system of claim 49, wherein the processor creates a second data file comprising third edits reflecting a second change to the content of the document indexed to a portion of the document associated with the second change.
53. The computer-based document editing system of claim 52, wherein the second region reflects the first edits and the third edits that are indexed to the portions of the document reflected in the first region.
54. A computer-implemented document editing method comprising:
receiving, by a processor, a document having content, and storing the document in an electronic document file;
receiving, by the processor, first edits in a first data file, the first data file comprising the first edits reflecting a change to the content of the document indexed to a portion of the document associated with the change;
generating, by the processor, display data that is used to simultaneously display:
a first region reflecting portions of the document, and
a second region reflecting the first edits in the first data file that are indexed to the portions of the document displayed in the first region;
receiving, by the processor, a second edit reflecting a change to the content of one of the portions of the document displayed in the first region; and
storing the second edit in the first data file, wherein the second edit does not modify the content of the document stored in the document file.
55. The method of claim 54, wherein the first data file also comprises a comment indexed to a portion of the content of document.
56. The method of claim 55, further comprising generating information to display in the second region the comment indexed to the portions of the document reflected in the first region.
57. The method of claim 54, further comprising creating a second data file comprising third edits reflecting a second change to the content of the document indexed to a portion of the document associated with the second change.
58. The method of claim 57, wherein the second region reflects the first edits and the third edits that are indexed to the portions of the document reflected in the first region.
59. A document collaboration system, comprising:
a storage device; and
a computer system configured to:
receive a document from an owner;
store the document in a first file in the storage device;
receive first edits for a first portion of the document from a first level reviewer, wherein the first level reviewer is designated by the owner,
store the first edits for the first portion of the document in a second file in the storage device,
provide, based on the first file and the second file, information that is used to display the document in a first region of a display and the first edits in a second region of the display.
60. The system of claim 59, wherein the computer system is further configured to:
receive second edits for a second portion of the document from a second level reviewer, wherein the second level reviewer is designated by the first level reviewer;
store the second edits for the second portion of the document in a third file in the storage device; and
provide, based on the first file, the second file, and the third file, information that is used to display the document in the first region of the display, the first edits in the second region of the display, and the second edits in a third region of the display.
61. The system of claim 60, wherein the computer system is further configured to:
receive a designation from the first level reviewer identifying the second level reviewer and providing authorization for the second level reviewer to provide edits to the second portion of the document.
62. The system of claim 59, wherein the computer system is further configured to:
receive a designation from the owner identifying the first level reviewer and providing authorization for the first level reviewer to provide edits to the first portion of the document.
63. The system of claim 59, wherein the computer system is further configured to:
generate a first index that references the first portion of the document; and
use the first index to generate the information that is used to display the first edits in the second region of the display.
64. The system of claim 59, wherein the computer system is further configured to: receive data reflecting a sub-owner of the document.
65. The system of claim 64, wherein the computer system is further configured to:
receive, from the sub-owner, a designation of a second first level reviewer that is authorized to edit a third portion of the document,
receive third edits to the third portion of the document from the second first level reviewer,
store the third edits in a fourth file in the storage device, and
provide, based on the first file and fourth file, information that is used to display the document in the first region of a second display and the third edits in the second region of the second display.
66.-70. (canceled)
US14/754,375 2002-10-31 2015-06-29 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system Abandoned US20150370770A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/285,910 US7818678B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2002-10-31 Collaborative document development and review system
US12/766,321 US9105007B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2010-04-23 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US14/754,375 US20150370770A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2015-06-29 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/754,375 US20150370770A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2015-06-29 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US16/230,649 US20190197091A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2018-12-21 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/766,321 Division US9105007B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2010-04-23 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/230,649 Continuation US20190197091A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2018-12-21 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150370770A1 true US20150370770A1 (en) 2015-12-24

Family

ID=32175294

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/285,910 Active 2025-06-08 US7818678B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2002-10-31 Collaborative document development and review system
US12/766,321 Active 2025-05-08 US9105007B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2010-04-23 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US14/724,184 Abandoned US20150317294A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2015-05-28 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US14/754,375 Abandoned US20150370770A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2015-06-29 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US16/230,649 Pending US20190197091A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2018-12-21 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/285,910 Active 2025-06-08 US7818678B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2002-10-31 Collaborative document development and review system
US12/766,321 Active 2025-05-08 US9105007B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2010-04-23 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US14/724,184 Abandoned US20150317294A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2015-05-28 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/230,649 Pending US20190197091A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2018-12-21 Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (5) US7818678B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (203)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6374274B1 (en) * 1998-09-16 2002-04-16 Health Informatics International, Inc. Document conversion and network database system
JP3782369B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2006-06-07 株式会社日立製作所 Storage device, a method of distributing content distribution system and content
FR2848755A1 (en) * 2002-12-16 2004-06-18 France Telecom Electronic document spreading and formatting protocol for Internet user, transmits document to spread in distinct format accompanied by invited users, and transforms format into HTML format to align documents on Internet site
US20040122843A1 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-06-24 Terris John F. XML browser markup and collaboration
US20040133574A1 (en) 2003-01-07 2004-07-08 Science Applications International Corporaton Vector space method for secure information sharing
US20040237045A1 (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-11-25 Eintelligence, Inc. Method for asynchronous sharing of integrated spreadsheets using a network
WO2005013162A1 (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-10 Trialstat Corporation Systematic review system
US7398470B2 (en) * 2003-08-22 2008-07-08 Vistaprint Technologies Limited System and method for remote assistance
US7536636B2 (en) * 2004-04-26 2009-05-19 Kodak Graphic Communications Canada Company Systems and methods for comparing documents containing graphic elements
US7383568B1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2008-06-03 Symantec Corporation Security management administration system and method
CN1989498B (en) * 2004-07-20 2012-10-17 富士通株式会社 Electronic document management system
US7966556B1 (en) 2004-08-06 2011-06-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated Reviewing and editing word processing documents
US8418051B1 (en) * 2004-08-06 2013-04-09 Adobe Systems Incorporated Reviewing and editing word processing documents
GB0425355D0 (en) * 2004-11-18 2004-12-22 Ibm Publishing documents in a publish subscribe data processing system
JP2006260546A (en) * 2005-03-15 2006-09-28 Oce Technologies Bv Document management system
US20070027706A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2007-02-01 Murray Frank H System and methods for interactive evaluation of media content
US20070027707A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2007-02-01 Murray Frank H System and methods for interactive selection of a reviewer of media content
US7904802B1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2011-03-08 Parasoft Corporation System and method for software code review
FR2890516A1 (en) * 2005-09-08 2007-03-09 Thomson Licensing Sas A method of selecting a button in a bar graph, and receiver embodying the METHOD
US8595628B2 (en) * 2005-11-29 2013-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for reviewing text files using distributable review data packets
US7877692B2 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-01-25 Accommodata Corporation Accessible display system
US20070156785A1 (en) * 2006-01-03 2007-07-05 Hines Wallis G Iii Method and system for revising manuals
US20090196570A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2009-08-06 Eyesopt Corporation System and methods for online collaborative video creation
US7818660B2 (en) * 2006-01-29 2010-10-19 Litera Technology Llc Method of compound document comparison
US8214395B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2012-07-03 Microsoft Corporation Tracking and editing a resource in a real-time collaborative session
US8219543B2 (en) * 2006-06-12 2012-07-10 Etrial Communications, Inc. Electronic documentation
US10339208B2 (en) 2006-06-12 2019-07-02 Brief-Lynx, Inc. Electronic documentation
US8447731B1 (en) 2006-07-26 2013-05-21 Nextpoint, Inc Method and system for information management
US20080028302A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-01-31 Steffen Meschkat Method and apparatus for incrementally updating a web page
US8453052B1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2013-05-28 Google Inc. Real-time document sharing and editing
JP2008059063A (en) * 2006-08-29 2008-03-13 Fujitsu Ltd Information management program
US8688992B2 (en) * 2006-11-02 2014-04-01 Recombo, Inc. System and method for generating agreements
US20100077316A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2010-03-25 Omansky Adam H Method and system for inspectng and managing information
US8166451B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2012-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation Simultaneous static analysis on disparate resource types
US20080162557A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-03 Nokia Corporation Systems, methods, devices, and computer program products providing for reflective media
US8205150B2 (en) * 2007-01-22 2012-06-19 Cfph, Llc Document changes
US7907794B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2011-03-15 Bluebeam Software, Inc. Method for aligning a modified document and an original document for comparison and difference highlighting
US8990681B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2015-03-24 Bluebeam Software, Inc. Method for aligning a modified document and an original document for comparison and difference highlighting
US7895276B2 (en) 2007-01-29 2011-02-22 Litera Technology Llc Method of managing metadata in attachments to e-mails in a network environment
US8464209B2 (en) * 2007-03-19 2013-06-11 Microsoft Corporation Using collaborative development information in a team environment
US20080244418A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Distributed multi-party software construction for a collaborative work environment
US20080250149A1 (en) * 2007-04-09 2008-10-09 Morris Robert P Methods And System For Providing Concurrent Access To A Resource In A Communication Session
US20080256186A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Hartmann Thomas W Collaboration system
US20080295085A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Microsoft Corporation Integrated code review tool
US7672953B2 (en) * 2007-06-28 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Publishing work activity information key tags associated with shared databases in social networks
US7937663B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Integrated collaborative user interface for a document editor program
US8849909B2 (en) 2007-07-06 2014-09-30 Yahoo! Inc. Real-time asynchronous event aggregation systems
US20090044134A1 (en) * 2007-08-06 2009-02-12 Apple Inc Dynamic interfaces for productivity applications
JP5501232B2 (en) * 2007-09-04 2014-05-21 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation System and method for verifying electronic documents
US8694958B1 (en) * 2007-09-14 2014-04-08 The Mathworks, Inc. Marking up objects in code generation
US7756824B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2010-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Spreadsheet collaboration between rich and browser clients
US7941399B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2011-05-10 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative authoring
US8171388B2 (en) * 2007-11-15 2012-05-01 Yahoo! Inc. Trust based moderation
US8825758B2 (en) 2007-12-14 2014-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative authoring modes
US20090249224A1 (en) * 2008-03-31 2009-10-01 Microsoft Corporation Simultaneous collaborative review of a document
US20090254800A1 (en) * 2008-04-07 2009-10-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method for providing user-definitions of terms
US8352870B2 (en) 2008-04-28 2013-01-08 Microsoft Corporation Conflict resolution
US20090271450A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative Document Versioning
US8825594B2 (en) 2008-05-08 2014-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Caching infrastructure
US8321784B1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2012-11-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Reviewing objects
WO2009149127A1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2009-12-10 Salary.Com, Inc. Job competency modeling
US8286171B2 (en) 2008-07-21 2012-10-09 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems to fingerprint textual information using word runs
US8108777B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2012-01-31 Microsoft Corporation Sections of a presentation having user-definable properties
WO2010059747A2 (en) 2008-11-18 2010-05-27 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for exact data match filtering
US9785914B2 (en) * 2008-12-08 2017-10-10 Adobe Systems Incorporated Collaborative review apparatus, systems, and methods
US20100174678A1 (en) * 2009-01-07 2010-07-08 Deepak Massand System and method for comparing digital data in spreadsheets or database tables
US20100235403A1 (en) * 2009-01-14 2010-09-16 Mathematical Science Publishers Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Method and system for on-line edit flow peer review
US8327278B2 (en) * 2009-02-17 2012-12-04 Microsoft Corporation Synchronizing metadata describes user content updates and an indication of user gestures being performed within the document, and across client systems using different communication channels
US20130132455A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2013-05-23 Adobe Systems Incorporated Electronic content editing platform environment
US9292481B2 (en) * 2009-02-27 2016-03-22 Adobe Systems Incorporated Creating and modifying a snapshot of an electronic document with a user comment
US8930843B2 (en) * 2009-02-27 2015-01-06 Adobe Systems Incorporated Electronic content workflow review process
US8136031B2 (en) * 2009-03-17 2012-03-13 Litera Technologies, LLC Comparing the content of tables containing merged or split cells
US20100257457A1 (en) * 2009-04-07 2010-10-07 De Goes John A Real-time content collaboration
US20100275130A1 (en) * 2009-04-23 2010-10-28 Mcbride Patrick Thomas Application personas
US8769421B2 (en) * 2009-04-30 2014-07-01 Apple Inc. Graphical user interface for a media-editing application with a segmented timeline
US8881013B2 (en) * 2009-04-30 2014-11-04 Apple Inc. Tool for tracking versions of media sections in a composite presentation
US10127524B2 (en) 2009-05-26 2018-11-13 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Shared collaboration canvas
US20100306018A1 (en) * 2009-05-27 2010-12-02 Microsoft Corporation Meeting State Recall
US8943431B2 (en) 2009-05-27 2015-01-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Text operations in a bitmap-based document
US8943408B2 (en) 2009-05-27 2015-01-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Text image review process
US8898282B2 (en) * 2009-07-10 2014-11-25 Novell, Inc. Auto generated and inferred group chat presence
US8370628B2 (en) * 2009-07-16 2013-02-05 Oracle International Corporation Document collaboration system with alternative views
US20110178981A1 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Collecting community feedback for collaborative document development
CN102934105B (en) 2010-04-12 2016-10-05 谷歌公司 Collaboration cursor resides in a word processor
US8321426B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2012-11-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Electronically linking and rating text fragments
US9418356B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2016-08-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Streamlined collaboration on document
US8434134B2 (en) 2010-05-26 2013-04-30 Google Inc. Providing an electronic document collection
US20110307802A1 (en) * 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Shreyank Gupta Review of requests to modify contextual data of a programming interface
US20120131102A1 (en) * 2010-08-18 2012-05-24 Gabos John S One-to-many and many-to-one transfer, storage and manipulation of digital files
US9158778B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2015-10-13 Novell, Inc. Techniques for content services
US8707187B2 (en) * 2010-09-16 2014-04-22 Siemens Products Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. Concurrent document markup
CN102467493A (en) * 2010-10-29 2012-05-23 方正国际软件(北京)有限公司 Method and system for collaboratively editing layout
US8739021B2 (en) * 2010-11-04 2014-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Version history inside document
US10025759B2 (en) 2010-11-29 2018-07-17 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for monitoring documents exchanged over email applications
US9165285B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2015-10-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Shared attachments
US9383888B2 (en) * 2010-12-15 2016-07-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Optimized joint document review
US9118612B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2015-08-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Meeting-specific state indicators
US9864612B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2018-01-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Techniques to customize a user interface for different displays
US8886015B2 (en) 2011-01-28 2014-11-11 Apple Inc. Efficient media import
US10324605B2 (en) 2011-02-16 2019-06-18 Apple Inc. Media-editing application with novel editing tools
US9997196B2 (en) 2011-02-16 2018-06-12 Apple Inc. Retiming media presentations
US10140320B2 (en) 2011-02-28 2018-11-27 Sdl Inc. Systems, methods, and media for generating analytical data
US8996985B1 (en) 2011-03-16 2015-03-31 Google Inc. Online document processing service for displaying comments
US9137185B2 (en) 2011-04-28 2015-09-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Uploading attachment to shared location and replacing with a link
US8682989B2 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-03-25 Microsoft Corporation Making document changes by replying to electronic messages
US9600801B2 (en) * 2011-05-03 2017-03-21 Architectural Computer Services, Inc. Systems and methods for integrating research and incorporation of information into documents
US10185932B2 (en) 2011-05-06 2019-01-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Setting permissions for links forwarded in electronic messages
US8965983B2 (en) 2011-05-06 2015-02-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Changes to documents are automatically summarized in electronic messages
US20120323842A1 (en) * 2011-05-16 2012-12-20 Izhikevich Eugene M System and methods for growth, peer-review, and maintenance of network collaborative resources
US9519682B1 (en) 2011-05-26 2016-12-13 Yahoo! Inc. User trustworthiness
US9122817B2 (en) * 2011-06-09 2015-09-01 Brigham Young University Collaborative CAx apparatus and method
US9613340B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2017-04-04 Workshare Ltd. Method and system for shared document approval
JP5843514B2 (en) * 2011-06-22 2016-01-13 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, control method, and program
CA2747549A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-27 James A. Mcalear Product and method for electronic information management
WO2013016719A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2013-01-31 School Improvement Network, Llc Management and provision of interactive content
US9984054B2 (en) * 2011-08-24 2018-05-29 Sdl Inc. Web interface including the review and manipulation of a web document and utilizing permission based control
US9336137B2 (en) 2011-09-02 2016-05-10 Google Inc. System and method for performing data management in a collaborative development environment
US9544158B2 (en) 2011-10-05 2017-01-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Workspace collaboration via a wall-type computing device
US8682973B2 (en) 2011-10-05 2014-03-25 Microsoft Corporation Multi-user and multi-device collaboration
US9996241B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2018-06-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Interactive visualization of multiple software functionality content items
CN103858127B (en) * 2011-10-12 2017-01-25 国际商业机器公司 The method is used to delete information in order to maintain the security level of the system and Mediation Server
US10198485B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2019-02-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Authoring of data visualizations and maps
US9069743B2 (en) * 2011-10-13 2015-06-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Application of comments in multiple application functionality content
US9176933B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2015-11-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Application of multiple content items and functionality to an electronic content item
US8471871B1 (en) 2011-10-17 2013-06-25 Google Inc. Authoritative text size measuring
US8434002B1 (en) * 2011-10-17 2013-04-30 Google Inc. Systems and methods for collaborative editing of elements in a presentation document
US8266245B1 (en) 2011-10-17 2012-09-11 Google Inc. Systems and methods for incremental loading of collaboratively generated presentations
US8397153B1 (en) 2011-10-17 2013-03-12 Google Inc. Systems and methods for rich presentation overlays
US8812946B1 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-08-19 Google Inc. Systems and methods for rendering documents
EP3249592A1 (en) 2011-12-29 2017-11-29 INTEL Corporation Management of collaborative teams
US8856640B1 (en) 2012-01-20 2014-10-07 Google Inc. Method and apparatus for applying revision specific electronic signatures to an electronically stored document
US9064237B2 (en) * 2012-01-23 2015-06-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Collaborative communication in a web application
US9348802B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2016-05-24 Litéra Corporation System and method for synchronizing bi-directional document management
US20130268849A1 (en) * 2012-04-09 2013-10-10 Charles Qiao Du Method and System for Multi-Party Collaborative Content Management through an Inverted Social Network
US9367522B2 (en) 2012-04-13 2016-06-14 Google Inc. Time-based presentation editing
US9262420B1 (en) 2012-04-23 2016-02-16 Google Inc. Third-party indexable text
US20130326330A1 (en) * 2012-06-01 2013-12-05 Google Inc. Integrating collaboratively proposed changes and publishing
US9082132B2 (en) * 2012-06-04 2015-07-14 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Selectively reenabling an interactive element for the collection of user feedback
US20130339427A1 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 The One Page Company Inc. Proposal system
WO2014032014A2 (en) * 2012-08-24 2014-02-27 Kao Chia Lung Cumulative encyclopedia method, system and device
US9916306B2 (en) 2012-10-19 2018-03-13 Sdl Inc. Statistical linguistic analysis of source content
US10176156B2 (en) * 2012-10-30 2019-01-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc System and method for providing linked note-taking
US9529916B1 (en) 2012-10-30 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Managing documents based on access context
US9529785B2 (en) * 2012-11-27 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Detecting relationships between edits and acting on a subset of edits
US9384285B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-07-05 Google Inc. Methods for identifying related documents
US9495341B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-11-15 Google Inc. Fact correction and completion during document drafting
JP5572771B1 (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-08-13 楽天株式会社 Communication system, electronic book terminal, communication method, program, and recording medium
US20140195899A1 (en) * 2013-01-04 2014-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative presentation of extracted information
US9462037B2 (en) 2013-01-07 2016-10-04 Google Inc. Dynamically sizing chunks in a partially loaded spreadsheet model
US9311622B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2016-04-12 Google Inc. Resolving mutations in a partially-loaded spreadsheet model
US9424347B2 (en) 2013-01-16 2016-08-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L. P. Techniques pertaining to document creation
WO2014153010A2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Quip, Inc. Systems and methods for concurrent online and offline document processing
US9483451B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-11-01 Scribestar Ltd. System and method for handling user editing history based on spawning, merging data structures of directed acyclic graph
US20140282091A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Carefusion 303, Inc. Collaborative Review and Approval of Medical Device Data Sets
US20140281872A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Workshare, Ltd. System for Tracking Changes in a Collaborative Document Editing Environment
US9170990B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-10-27 Workshare Limited Method and system for document retrieval with selective document comparison
US20130218829A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2013-08-22 Deneen Lizette Martinez Document management system and method
US9256341B2 (en) * 2013-03-20 2016-02-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Tracking changes in collaborative authoring environment
US10341275B2 (en) * 2013-04-03 2019-07-02 Dropbox, Inc. Shared content item commenting
JP2014203406A (en) * 2013-04-09 2014-10-27 富士通株式会社 Control device, control method, and control program
US9715476B2 (en) * 2013-04-10 2017-07-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Collaborative authoring with scratchpad functionality
US20140310613A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2014-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative authoring with clipping functionality
US9461870B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2016-10-04 Google Inc. Systems and methods for providing third-party application specific storage in a cloud-based storage system
US20140351716A1 (en) * 2013-05-23 2014-11-27 Microsoft Corporation Notes Page Sharing and Notification Features
US9588954B2 (en) * 2013-06-15 2017-03-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Application/document collaboration in a multi-device environment
US10025782B2 (en) * 2013-06-18 2018-07-17 Litera Corporation Systems and methods for multiple document version collaboration and management
US9948676B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2018-04-17 Workshare, Ltd. System and method for securing documents prior to transmission
US9514113B1 (en) 2013-07-29 2016-12-06 Google Inc. Methods for automatic footnote generation
US9971752B2 (en) 2013-08-19 2018-05-15 Google Llc Systems and methods for resolving privileged edits within suggested edits
US9245256B2 (en) 2013-08-21 2016-01-26 International Business Machines Corporation Assigning and managing reviews of a computing file
US9842113B1 (en) 2013-08-27 2017-12-12 Google Inc. Context-based file selection
US9189517B2 (en) 2013-10-02 2015-11-17 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Integrating search with application analysis
US10025464B1 (en) * 2013-10-07 2018-07-17 Google Llc System and method for highlighting dependent slides while editing master slides of a presentation
US10176611B2 (en) * 2013-10-21 2019-01-08 Cellco Partnership Layer-based image updates
US9348803B2 (en) * 2013-10-22 2016-05-24 Google Inc. Systems and methods for providing just-in-time preview of suggestion resolutions
US9407596B2 (en) 2013-11-20 2016-08-02 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive splitting of entries in social collaboration environments
US9529791B1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Template and content aware document and template editing
US9372858B1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2016-06-21 Google Inc. Systems and methods to present automated suggestions in a document
US20150180966A1 (en) * 2013-12-21 2015-06-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Authoring through crowdsourcing based suggestions
US20150177925A1 (en) * 2013-12-21 2015-06-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Authoring through suggestion
US20150178391A1 (en) * 2013-12-21 2015-06-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intent based content related suggestions as small multiples
US9756002B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2017-09-05 Litera Technologies, LLC Systems and methods for email attachments management
EP3161663A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2017-05-03 Google, Inc. Systems and methods for managing suggested edits in a collaborative document editing environment
US9609032B2 (en) * 2014-06-26 2017-03-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Joint ownership of protected information
JP6512763B2 (en) * 2014-07-16 2019-05-15 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
US9612826B2 (en) 2014-07-31 2017-04-04 Facebook, Inc. Attributing authorship to segments of source code
US9703763B1 (en) 2014-08-14 2017-07-11 Google Inc. Automatic document citations by utilizing copied content for candidate sources
US10331775B2 (en) * 2014-10-15 2019-06-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Collaborative document editing using state-based revision
US20160173467A1 (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-06-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Document collaboration through networking credentials
US10133723B2 (en) 2014-12-29 2018-11-20 Workshare Ltd. System and method for determining document version geneology
US9367854B1 (en) 2015-03-31 2016-06-14 Workiva Inc. Methods and a computing device for carrying out data collection
US9626347B2 (en) 2015-06-08 2017-04-18 International Business Machines Corporation Managing file changes made during a review process
US20160378737A1 (en) * 2015-06-26 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc. Rumored changes for real-time coauthoring
US10051020B2 (en) * 2015-06-26 2018-08-14 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Real-time distributed coauthoring via vector clock translations
RU2609081C2 (en) * 2015-06-29 2017-01-30 Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Яндекс" Method (versions) and system (versions) of document processing in distributed architecture
US20170039182A1 (en) * 2015-08-07 2017-02-09 Workshare, Ltd. Transaction document management system and method
US10120552B2 (en) * 2015-09-25 2018-11-06 International Business Machines Corporation Annotating collaborative content to facilitate mining key content as a runbook
US10078627B2 (en) 2015-11-20 2018-09-18 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Collaboration cards for communication related to a collaborated document
US9413708B1 (en) 2015-12-31 2016-08-09 Dropbox, Inc. User notifications for interaction information
US10019427B2 (en) 2016-03-04 2018-07-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Managing comments for collaborative editing of electronic documents
US10176155B2 (en) 2016-08-09 2019-01-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Modifying a document graph to reflect information relating to a document it represents
US10261953B2 (en) * 2017-03-03 2019-04-16 Chegg, Inc. Document review management system
CN107197018A (en) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-22 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 Inter-system data synchronization method and apparatus

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6405226B1 (en) * 1997-03-05 2002-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for taggable digital portfolio creation and report generation
US20020072947A1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2002-06-13 Ibm Corporation Owner identification of collaboration work object
US6438566B1 (en) * 1993-06-30 2002-08-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Document processing method and apparatus which can add comment data added to an original document to a revised document
US20020116367A1 (en) * 2001-02-17 2002-08-22 Richard Brown Digital certificates
US20020184517A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-05 Bijan Tadayon Method and apparatus for hierarchical assignment of rights to documents and documents having such rights
US20020194100A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2002-12-19 Choban Gary M. Computerized portfolio and assessment system
US6502113B1 (en) * 1998-11-23 2002-12-31 John E. Crawford Negotiation manager incorporating clause modification and markers for tracking negotiation progress
US6560637B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2003-05-06 Polycom, Inc. Web-enabled presentation device and methods of use thereof
US20030112273A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Workshare Technology, Ltd. Document collaboration suite using a common database

Family Cites Families (109)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3920896A (en) 1974-03-29 1975-11-18 Xerox Corp Communications systems having a selective facsimile output
US3920895A (en) 1974-03-29 1975-11-18 Xerox Corp Communications systems having a selective facsimile output
US5008853A (en) 1987-12-02 1991-04-16 Xerox Corporation Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment
DE68926446D1 (en) * 1989-03-14 1996-06-13 Ibm Electronic system for approving documents
US5146552A (en) 1990-02-28 1992-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method for associating annotation with electronically published material
US5129082A (en) 1990-03-27 1992-07-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for searching database component files to retrieve information from modified files
US5204947A (en) 1990-10-31 1993-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Application independent (open) hypermedia enablement services
US5321505A (en) 1991-01-11 1994-06-14 Microelectronics & Computer Technology Corporation Computer scalable visualization system
US5341469A (en) 1991-05-13 1994-08-23 Arcom Architectural Computer Services, Inc. Structured text system
CA2045907C (en) * 1991-06-28 1998-12-15 Gerald B. Anderson A method for storing and retrieving annotations and redactions in final form documents
US5671428A (en) 1991-08-28 1997-09-23 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Collaborative document processing system with version and comment management
ZA9300881B (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-09-13 Gerhardus Johannes Stoltz Automatic pool cleaner and steering device therefor.
US5758313A (en) 1992-10-16 1998-05-26 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5539871A (en) 1992-11-02 1996-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for accessing associated data sets in a multimedia environment in a data processing system
US5339433A (en) 1992-11-19 1994-08-16 Borland International, Inc. Symbol browsing in an object-oriented development system
US5515491A (en) 1992-12-31 1996-05-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for managing communications within a collaborative data processing system
US5596700A (en) 1993-02-17 1997-01-21 International Business Machines Corporation System for annotating software windows
AU6161594A (en) 1993-02-26 1994-09-14 Taligent, Inc. Collaborative work system
JPH06266662A (en) 1993-03-12 1994-09-22 Toshiba Corp Cooperative work support device
US5608872A (en) 1993-03-19 1997-03-04 Ncr Corporation System for allowing all remote computers to perform annotation on an image and replicating the annotated image on the respective displays of other comuters
EP0622930A3 (en) 1993-03-19 1996-06-05 At & T Global Inf Solution Application sharing for computer collaboration system.
EP0698242A1 (en) 1993-05-10 1996-02-28 Apple Computer, Inc. System for automatically determining the status of contents added to a document
US5623679A (en) 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects
JPH0816514A (en) 1994-07-01 1996-01-19 Hitachi Ltd Coopperation support system
US5544255A (en) 1994-08-31 1996-08-06 Peripheral Vision Limited Method and system for the capture, storage, transport and authentication of handwritten signatures
JP3489219B2 (en) 1994-09-20 2004-01-19 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Document processing apparatus and document processing method
US5659676A (en) 1994-09-20 1997-08-19 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and methods for creating and refreshing compound documents
US5768607A (en) 1994-09-30 1998-06-16 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for freehand annotation and drawings incorporating sound and for compressing and synchronizing sound
US6178431B1 (en) 1994-10-05 2001-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for providing side notes in word processing
JPH08297669A (en) 1994-12-27 1996-11-12 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> System for automatically linking plurality of parts in composite document and method therefor
US5801702A (en) 1995-03-09 1998-09-01 Terrabyte Technology System and method for adding network links in a displayed hierarchy
US5596705A (en) 1995-03-20 1997-01-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for linking and presenting movies with their underlying source information
JP3338585B2 (en) 1995-05-16 2002-10-28 富士通株式会社 Conversion apparatus and method of presentation data
US5664208A (en) * 1995-05-16 1997-09-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for seamless compound document processing
US5878421A (en) 1995-07-17 1999-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Information map
US5860073A (en) 1995-07-17 1999-01-12 Microsoft Corporation Style sheets for publishing system
JP3471526B2 (en) 1995-07-28 2003-12-02 松下電器産業株式会社 Information providing device
US5708845A (en) 1995-09-29 1998-01-13 Wistendahl; Douglass A. System for mapping hot spots in media content for interactive digital media program
US5787175A (en) 1995-10-23 1998-07-28 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for collaborative document control
US5958006A (en) 1995-11-13 1999-09-28 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for communicating summarized data
US5706452A (en) 1995-12-06 1998-01-06 Ivanov; Vladimir I. Method and apparatus for structuring and managing the participatory evaluation of documents by a plurality of reviewers
US5781901A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-07-14 Intel Corporation Transmitting electronic mail attachment over a network using a e-mail page
US5761499A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-06-02 Novell, Inc. Method for managing globally distributed software components
US6092090A (en) * 1996-01-11 2000-07-18 Bhp Minerals International Inc. Management system for documents stored electronically
US5706502A (en) 1996-03-25 1998-01-06 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Internet-enabled portfolio manager system and method
US6343313B1 (en) 1996-03-26 2002-01-29 Pixion, Inc. Computer conferencing system with real-time multipoint, multi-speed, multi-stream scalability
US5890177A (en) * 1996-04-24 1999-03-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for consolidating edits made by multiple editors working on multiple document copies
US5870754A (en) 1996-04-25 1999-02-09 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Video retrieval of MPEG compressed sequences using DC and motion signatures
US5987469A (en) 1996-05-14 1999-11-16 Micro Logic Corp. Method and apparatus for graphically representing information stored in electronic media
US5781732A (en) 1996-06-20 1998-07-14 Object Technology Licensing Corp. Framework for constructing shared documents that can be collaboratively accessed by multiple users
US5881292A (en) * 1996-09-26 1999-03-09 Microsoft Corporation Dynamic versioning system for multiple users of multi-module software system
US5956736A (en) 1996-09-27 1999-09-21 Apple Computer, Inc. Object-oriented editor for creating world wide web documents
US5937066A (en) 1996-10-02 1999-08-10 International Business Machines Corporation Two-phase cryptographic key recovery system
US5864870A (en) 1996-12-18 1999-01-26 Unisys Corp. Method for storing/retrieving files of various formats in an object database using a virtual multimedia file system
US5911776A (en) 1996-12-18 1999-06-15 Unisys Corporation Automatic format conversion system and publishing methodology for multi-user network
US5949413A (en) 1996-12-31 1999-09-07 International Business Machines Corporation Database graphical user interface with tabbed user view
US6029171A (en) 1997-02-10 2000-02-22 Actioneer, Inc. Method and apparatus for group action processing between users of a collaboration system
US6014135A (en) 1997-04-04 2000-01-11 Netscape Communications Corp. Collaboration centric document processing environment using an information centric visual user interface and information presentation method
US5931906A (en) 1997-04-18 1999-08-03 Creative Communications Group System for creating a multimedia presentation by integrating local program materials with remotely accessible program materials
US6009462A (en) 1997-06-16 1999-12-28 Digital Equipment Corporation Replacing large bit component of electronic mail (e-mail) message with hot-link in distributed computer system
US5978836A (en) 1997-07-28 1999-11-02 Solectron Corporation Workflow systems and methods
US6182080B1 (en) 1997-09-12 2001-01-30 Netvoyage Corporation System, method and computer program product for storage of a plurality of documents within a single file
US6546405B2 (en) 1997-10-23 2003-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Annotating temporally-dimensioned multimedia content
US6067551A (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-23 Microsoft Corporation Computer implemented method for simultaneous multi-user editing of a document
US6243722B1 (en) 1997-11-24 2001-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for a network-based document review tool utilizing comment classification
US6088702A (en) * 1998-02-25 2000-07-11 Plantz; Scott H. Group publishing system
US20020091725A1 (en) * 1998-05-12 2002-07-11 David Skok Method and apparatus for providing client-based web page content creation and management
US6353817B1 (en) * 1998-06-26 2002-03-05 Charles M Jacobs Multi-user system for creating and maintaining a medical-decision-making knowledge base
US6275223B1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2001-08-14 Nortel Networks Limited Interactive on line code inspection process and tool
US6119147A (en) 1998-07-28 2000-09-12 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Method and system for computer-mediated, multi-modal, asynchronous meetings in a virtual space
US6230171B1 (en) * 1998-08-29 2001-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Markup system for shared HTML documents
US6360236B1 (en) 1998-08-31 2002-03-19 Cubus Corporation Computer product for integrated document development
US7194679B1 (en) * 1998-10-20 2007-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Web-based file review system utilizing source and comment files
US6263340B1 (en) * 1998-10-20 2001-07-17 International Business Machines Corp. User registration in file review systems
US6363352B1 (en) 1998-11-13 2002-03-26 Microsoft Corporation Automatic scheduling and formation of a virtual meeting over a computer network
US6411989B1 (en) 1998-12-28 2002-06-25 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for sharing information in simultaneously viewed documents on a communication system
US6334141B1 (en) 1999-02-02 2001-12-25 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed server for real-time collaboration
US6551357B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2003-04-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for storing and retrieving markings for display to an electronic media file
US6567830B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for displaying added text to an electronic media file
US6687878B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2004-02-03 Real Time Image Ltd. Synchronizing/updating local client notes with annotations previously made by other clients in a notes database
JP3644580B2 (en) * 1999-03-19 2005-04-27 富士通株式会社 Display control method and apparatus
US6317777B1 (en) 1999-04-26 2001-11-13 Intel Corporation Method for web based storage and retrieval of documents
US6212534B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2001-04-03 X-Collaboration Software Corp. System and method for facilitating collaboration in connection with generating documents among a plurality of operators using networked computer systems
JP3918362B2 (en) * 1999-05-17 2007-05-23 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Image editing apparatus
US6289460B1 (en) 1999-09-13 2001-09-11 Astus Corporation Document management system
US6643663B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2003-11-04 The Belo Company Method and system for operating a content management system
US6708172B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-03-16 Urbanpixel, Inc. Community-based shared multiple browser environment
EP1256051A4 (en) 2000-01-25 2004-09-29 Autodesk Inc Method and apparatus for providing access to and working with architectural drawings on the internet
US20010034845A1 (en) * 2000-02-15 2001-10-25 Brunt George B. Secure web-based document control process and system
US7007232B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2006-02-28 Neoplasia Press, Inc. System and method for facilitating the pre-publication peer review process
US7069592B2 (en) * 2000-04-26 2006-06-27 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Web-based document system
US7890405B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2011-02-15 Collaborate Solutions Inc. Method and system for enabling collaboration between advisors and clients
US7848984B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2010-12-07 Collaborate Solutions Inc. Method and system for collaborating advisors
US20020133628A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-09-19 Ulf Asplund Data caching and annotation system with application to document annotation
US20010037367A1 (en) * 2000-06-14 2001-11-01 Iyer Sridhar V. System and method for sharing information via a virtual shared area in a communication network
US7072940B1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2006-07-04 Ford Motor Company System and method for managing communications and collaboration among team members
AU8742101A (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-03-04 Thoughtslinger Corp Simultaneous multi-user document editing system
JP2002140344A (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-05-17 Toshiba Corp Method and device for document management
US20020059343A1 (en) 2000-11-10 2002-05-16 Masahiro Kurishima Client apparatus and recording medium that records a program thereof
US7346841B2 (en) 2000-12-19 2008-03-18 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for collaborative annotation of a document
US20020085030A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Jamal Ghani Graphical user interface for an interactive collaboration system
US7299257B2 (en) * 2001-02-06 2007-11-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for use in collaboration services
US20020107886A1 (en) 2001-02-07 2002-08-08 Gentner Donald R. Method and apparatus for automatic document electronic versioning system
US7107518B2 (en) 2001-04-03 2006-09-12 Microsoft Corporation Automating a document review cycle
US6976009B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2005-12-13 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for assigning consequential rights to documents and documents having such rights
US7496841B2 (en) 2001-12-17 2009-02-24 Workshare Technology, Ltd. Method and system for document collaboration
US7343365B2 (en) * 2002-02-20 2008-03-11 Microsoft Corporation Computer system architecture for automatic context associations
US7120622B2 (en) * 2002-06-10 2006-10-10 Xerox Corporation Authoring tools, including content-driven treetables, for fluid text
US7251680B2 (en) 2003-10-31 2007-07-31 Veritas Operating Corporation Single instance backup of email message attachments

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6438566B1 (en) * 1993-06-30 2002-08-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Document processing method and apparatus which can add comment data added to an original document to a revised document
US6405226B1 (en) * 1997-03-05 2002-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for taggable digital portfolio creation and report generation
US6502113B1 (en) * 1998-11-23 2002-12-31 John E. Crawford Negotiation manager incorporating clause modification and markers for tracking negotiation progress
US6560637B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2003-05-06 Polycom, Inc. Web-enabled presentation device and methods of use thereof
US20020072947A1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2002-06-13 Ibm Corporation Owner identification of collaboration work object
US20020116367A1 (en) * 2001-02-17 2002-08-22 Richard Brown Digital certificates
US20020184517A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-05 Bijan Tadayon Method and apparatus for hierarchical assignment of rights to documents and documents having such rights
US20030112273A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Workshare Technology, Ltd. Document collaboration suite using a common database
US20020194100A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2002-12-19 Choban Gary M. Computerized portfolio and assessment system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
MacKenzie et al., "Comparing and Merging Files," 1993, <http://kirste.userpage.fu-berlin.de/chemnet/use/infor/diff/diff_toc.html>, pp. 1-19. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040085354A1 (en) 2004-05-06
US7818678B2 (en) 2010-10-19
US20150317294A1 (en) 2015-11-05
US9105007B2 (en) 2015-08-11
US20100235763A1 (en) 2010-09-16
US20190197091A1 (en) 2019-06-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Khoshafian et al. Multimedia and imaging databases
Strauss et al. Basics of qualitative research
ES2645565T3 (en) Management and access system for electronic document repositories
US7487154B2 (en) Method and apparatus for generating page-level security in a computer generated report
Ellis et al. Groupware: some issues and experiences
US9348802B2 (en) System and method for synchronizing bi-directional document management
US8041739B2 (en) Automated system and method for patent drafting and technology assessment
US7257593B2 (en) Method for selecting terms from vocabularies in a category-based system
US7624125B2 (en) Machine-implemented activity management system using asynchronously shared activity data objects and journal data items
KR101608099B1 (en) Simultaneous collaborative review of a document
US5107419A (en) Method of assigning retention and deletion criteria to electronic documents stored in an interactive information handling system
RU2317585C2 (en) Contacts circuit
Rezayat The enterprise-web portal for life-cycle support
US8171387B2 (en) Method of and system for collaboration web-based publishing
US6018716A (en) Apparatus and method for analysis of continuous process lines
US7472341B2 (en) Multi-user, multi-timed collaborative annotation
US6266683B1 (en) Computerized document management system
US7392254B1 (en) Web-enabled transaction and matter management system
US20030179228A1 (en) Instance browser for ontology
US20020029218A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for collaborative engineering using component and file oriented tools
US20080147661A1 (en) System and method for publishing manuscripts
US5666490A (en) Computer network system and method for managing documents
JP2957702B2 (en) Semantic object modeling system to generate a relational database schema
US6632251B1 (en) Document producing support system
Waters et al. Preserving Digital Information. Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: LITERA CORPORATION, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LITERA TECHNOLOGIES LLC;REEL/FRAME:043332/0040

Effective date: 20170811

AS Assignment

Owner name: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LITERA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:043861/0043

Effective date: 20171006

AS Assignment

Owner name: SARATOGA INSVESTMENT CORP. SBIC LP, AS AGENT, NEW

Free format text: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LITERA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:044396/0217

Effective date: 20171006

AS Assignment

Owner name: LITERA TECHNOLOGY LLC, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MASSAND, DEEPAK;REEL/FRAME:044743/0988

Effective date: 20081121

AS Assignment

Owner name: LITERA CORPORATION, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:LITERA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:044907/0080

Effective date: 20170824

AS Assignment

Owner name: LITERA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MASSAND, DEEPAK;REEL/FRAME:046342/0085

Effective date: 20120202

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: LITERA CORPORATION, ILLINOIS

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF GRANT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED AT REEL 043861, FRAME 0043 AND REEL 045626, FRAME 0582;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:049354/0544

Effective date: 20190531

Owner name: LITERA CORPORATION, ILLINOIS

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT REEL 044396, FRAME 0217;ASSIGNOR:SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. SBIC LP;REEL/FRAME:049350/0390

Effective date: 20190531