US20150344376A1 - Taggant for cement authentication - Google Patents
Taggant for cement authentication Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150344376A1 US20150344376A1 US14/292,334 US201414292334A US2015344376A1 US 20150344376 A1 US20150344376 A1 US 20150344376A1 US 201414292334 A US201414292334 A US 201414292334A US 2015344376 A1 US2015344376 A1 US 2015344376A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- taggant
- cement
- volume
- concrete
- taggants
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 362
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 114
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 83
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000011573 trace mineral Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000000655 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 116
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 23
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000002083 X-ray spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003302 ferromagnetic material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001669 Mossbauer spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005670 electromagnetic radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 2
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011398 Portland cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000221535 Pucciniales Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000950638 Symphysodon discus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000012241 calcium silicate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005672 electromagnetic field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007542 hardness measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000887 hydrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011396 hydraulic cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002329 infrared spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-OUBTZVSYSA-N iron-52 Chemical compound [57Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- HOQADATXFBOEGG-UHFFFAOYSA-N isofenphos Chemical compound CCOP(=S)(NC(C)C)OC1=CC=CC=C1C(=O)OC(C)C HOQADATXFBOEGG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013102 re-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012779 reinforcing material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052703 rhodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010948 rhodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- MHOVAHRLVXNVSD-UHFFFAOYSA-N rhodium atom Chemical compound [Rh] MHOVAHRLVXNVSD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B40/00—Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability
- C04B40/0096—Provisions for indicating condition of the compositions or the final products, e.g. degree of homogeneous mixing, degree of wear
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B28/00—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements
- C04B28/02—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing hydraulic cements other than calcium sulfates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B28/00—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements
- C04B28/02—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing hydraulic cements other than calcium sulfates
- C04B28/04—Portland cements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/38—Concrete; Lime; Mortar; Gypsum; Bricks; Ceramics; Glass
- G01N33/383—Concrete or cement
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N9/00—Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity
- G01N9/36—Analysing materials by measuring the density or specific gravity, e.g. determining quantity of moisture
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2103/00—Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone
- C04B2103/54—Pigments; Dyes
Definitions
- Concrete is a mixture of cement and various other materials.
- the cement and other materials are often mixed at a concrete plant and transported (e.g., with concrete mixer trucks) to a jobsite.
- Concrete used in certain applications may have a strength, ductility, or other characteristic that is specified by a customer, engineer, or still another person.
- the amount and grade of cement impacts the strength and other characteristics of the concrete. While certain characteristics of the concrete (e.g., slump, etc.) may be tested by an inspector, other characteristics (e.g., composition) may be more difficult to determine by an inspector in the field thereby making it difficult for an inspector to verify that the delivered concrete satisfies the identified specifications.
- a driver delivers paperwork that identifies the composition and other characteristics of the concrete load (e.g., the identity of the mixing plant, etc.). Tracking a particular load requires monitoring the paperwork supplied by the driver. However, an inspector may not be able to independently authenticate various characteristics of the cement or the concrete (e.g., composition). The location of a particular concrete load may also be difficult for an inspector to track. Such load tracking may be particularly relevant during subsequent inspection of a structure after initial construction (e.g., during routine surveying, to determine the ability of a structure to withstand a storm or explosion, etc.). Despite these shortcomings, inspectors traditionally rely on paperwork provided upon delivery of the concrete load for initial authentication and subsequent inspection.
- One embodiment relates to a traceable cement mixture including a volume of cementitious material and a taggant disposed within the volume of cementitious material.
- the taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- Another embodiment relates to a structure including a volume of concrete.
- the volume of concrete forms a base configured to interface with a ground volume.
- the volume of concrete includes a volume of cementitious material and a taggant disposed within the volume of cementitious material.
- the taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of concrete.
- Still another embodiment relates to a cement authentication apparatus including a housing, a sensor, and a processor.
- the housing is configured to contain a volume of cementitious material having a taggant.
- the taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- the sensor is positioned to interface with the taggant and provide a sensor signal relating to the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- the processor is configured to determine the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material by evaluating the sensor signal.
- Yet another embodiment relates to a method of manufacturing a traceable cement mixture including providing a volume of cementitious material and positioning a taggant within the volume of cementitious material.
- the taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- Another embodiment relates to a method of authenticating a cement mixture including scanning a volume of cementitious material for a taggant with a sensor.
- the method also includes sending or receiving data as a sensor signal with the sensor.
- the data relates to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- the method also includes determining the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material with a processor by evaluating the sensor signal.
- FIG. 1 is a side plan view of a traceable cement mixture, according to one embodiment
- FIG. 2 is a side plan view of a traceable cement mixture, according to another embodiment
- FIG. 3 is a side plan view of a building including a concrete base, according to one embodiment
- FIG. 4 is a side plan view of a bridge including a concrete base, according to one embodiment
- FIGS. 5-6 are isometric views of a cement authentication apparatus, according to two embodiments.
- FIG. 7 is a side plan view of a cement authentication apparatus, according to another embodiment.
- FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a cement production process, according to one embodiment.
- Taggants are intended to facilitate the authentication of a cementitious mixture.
- the taggants may be active (e.g., RFID, ultrasonic, etc.) and store authentication data or passive and be detected (e.g., with radiofrequency waves, with x-rays, etc.) to facilitate an authentication process.
- Active taggants may store energy (e.g., with a battery, etc.) or may be remotely powered (e.g., with an electromagnetic field, etc.).
- Authentication may ensure that a batch of concrete includes cement originating from an approved source.
- Taggants may be used to verify that the mix ratio of authenticated cement to other materials in a batch of concrete is within a specified range.
- Taggants also allow for the prospective or retrospective analysis of structures (e.g., buildings, bridges, etc.) to determine whether the appropriate concrete was poured during initial construction.
- a mixture shown as traceable cement mixture 10
- traceable cement mixture 10 includes cementitious material, shown as cement particles 20
- a taggant shown as cement taggant 30
- traceable cement mixture 10 is disposed within a housing, shown as container 40 .
- Container 40 may have a variety of shapes and may be rigid (e.g., made of rigid plastic, metal, etc.) or flexible (e.g., a plastic or paper bag, etc.). In other embodiments, container 40 is a portion of a machine used during the production of cement (e.g., a mix hopper, etc.).
- traceable cement mixture 10 includes a volume of cement particles 20 .
- cement particles 20 have a generally spherical shape. In other embodiments, cement particles 20 have another shape (e.g., ovular, discus, irregular, etc.).
- Cement particles 20 may be Portland cement composed primarily of hydraulic calcium silicates. In other embodiments, cement particles 20 may be another type of cement (e.g., a blended cement, another hydraulic cement, etc.) or still another material. Cement particles 20 may have a size of approximately 1 micron.
- cement particles 20 are larger than one micron (e.g., 10 microns, 50 microns, 90 microns, etc.) or smaller than one micron (e.g., 0.5 microns, etc.).
- cement particles 20 are hydrated (e.g., with water) and cure to form cured concrete.
- the shape, composition, size, and density of cement particles 20 may impact the strength, hardness, toughness, or other features of the cured concrete.
- the shape, composition, size, or other feature of cement particles 20 may be specified (e.g., by a structural engineer, by a designer, by a regulatory agency, etc.) to produce concrete having specified characteristics (i.e. specified concrete).
- cement particles 20 may be produced.
- mineral deposits are mined, and larger pieces are milled, ground, or otherwise processed to form cement particles 20 .
- the manufacturer of cement particles 20 is tasked with producing cement particles 20 having the specified features.
- Such specified features may be identified as an acceptable range (e.g., a density of between 830 and 1650 kilograms per cubic meter), as a mean value (e.g., an average particle size of thirty microns, etc.), or as still another requirement.
- Some manufacturers may produce cement particles 20 having specified features that are outside the acceptable range or otherwise fail to conform with the identified requirements. By way of example, some manufacturers may lack the quality control processes, equipment, know-how, or other skills needed to produce cement particles 20 having specified features within the identified requirements.
- cement particles 20 may disingenuously produce cement particles 20 that fail to meet the identified requirements (e.g., by failing to sufficiently grind cement particles 20 as a cost cutting measure, by cutting cement particles 20 with other, non-specified types of cement, contaminants, other materials, etc.).
- the particular features of cement particles 20 relate to the strength, hardness, toughness, or other features of the cured concrete, selection and verification of a particular manufacturer may impact the quality, life, strength, or other features of a structure.
- cement taggants 30 are disposed within a volume of cement particles 20 .
- Cement taggants 30 are intended to reduce the risk that improper cement particles 20 will be introduced into specified concrete.
- Cement taggants 30 are also intended to reduce the risk that cement particles 20 may be improperly processed or blended with other materials.
- cement taggants 30 include data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cement particles 20 .
- the characteristic of the volume of cement particles 20 may be a grade, a quality, a manufacturer, a manufacture date, an inspection status, an inspection date, an approval status, or still other properties.
- Cement taggants 30 may be introduced at various points during the manufacture and use of cement particles 20 .
- cement taggants 30 are introduced to traceable cement mixture 10 before the processing of the raw material (e.g., before cement particles 20 are formed through a grinding process, etc.). In other embodiments, cement taggants 30 are introduced to traceable cement mixture 10 after a cement particles 20 are processed (e.g., during a certification of cement particles 20 , etc.) or after cement particles 20 are introduced into concrete, among other alternatives.
- cement taggant 30 is a discrete object that is configured to be individually monitored, handled, or examined. In other embodiments, cement taggant 30 is configured to be monitored, handled, or examined in aggregate with other cement taggants 30 . By way of example, a scoop of cement taggants 30 may be monitored, handled, or examined as a group. Cement taggant 30 may have a size that is larger or smaller than one millimeter. In one embodiment, cement taggants 30 are nanoparticles and are configured to be monitored, handled, or examined in aggregate.
- the size of cement taggant 30 corresponds with the size of cement particles 20 .
- the density of cement taggant 30 corresponds with the density of cement particles 20 .
- cement taggant 30 may include a hollow shell having at least one of a specified weight and a specified volume such that the density of cement taggant 30 corresponds with the density of cement particles 20 .
- Corresponding a feature (e.g., size, density, etc.) of cement taggant 30 with that of cement particles 20 reduces the risk that cement taggants 30 will separate from cement particles 20 .
- separation may otherwise occur during shipping, handling, due to an increase in viscosity of cement particles 20 post-hydration, or during another process.
- cement taggant 30 is configured to react with water such that a property (e.g., density, etc.) of cement taggant 30 changes to facilitate post-hydration separation.
- cement taggant 30 may absorb more water than cement particles 20 and sink post hydration.
- cement taggants 30 are secured (e.g., the data is secured according to an encryption scheme).
- Securing cement taggants 30 is intended to reduce the risk of forgery of cement taggants 30 .
- a manufacturer may employ a certification process whereby an inspector evaluates cement particles 20 . After authenticating the characteristic of cement particles 20 , the inspector may introduce cement taggants 30 into a volume of cement particles 20 . Securing cement particles 20 reduces the risk that the cement manufacturer, an intermediate party (e.g., a concrete mixing plant, a concrete transportation company, etc.), or still others will introduce cement taggants 30 into the volume of cement particles 20 or concrete produced therewith.
- cement taggants 30 are secured and are configured to respond only to a specified request signal. An operator may retrieve the data only if the specified request signal is sent. If the operator does not know the specified request signal, cement taggants 30 may not respond at all or may not provide the data. In other embodiments, the data relating to the characteristic of cement particles 20 may be retrieved (e.g., read, etc.) only by those with a decryption key. In still other embodiments, cement taggants 30 have a specified feature intended to provide security. By way of example, cement taggants 30 may be difficult to produce (e.g., replicatable biological information encoded molecule taggants, specified isotopes, etc.).
- cement taggant 30 includes an RFID device that provides security.
- the RFID device may employ an algorithm or provide a different code (e.g., number) based on a date or day of the week of interest (e.g., the manufacture date of cement particles 20 , the mix date of cement mixture 10 , etc.).
- the RFID device may employ an algorithm to provide a code that varies based upon still other inputs. While RFID devices are explicitly discussed herein, it should be understood that acoustic devices (e.g., ultrasonic devices, etc.) may provide similar functionality. Securing cement taggants 30 thereby facilitates distinguishing legitimate and illegitimate cement taggants 30 and also facilitates authenticating at least one of cement mixture 10 and cement particles 20 .
- cement taggant 30 includes a storage device (e.g., a flash memory, a computer storage medium, etc.) having a memory configured to store the data.
- a storage device e.g., a flash memory, a computer storage medium, etc.
- Such cement taggants 30 may include an integrated circuit to facilitate the storage or retrieval of the data from the memory.
- the data is stored in the memory as ciphertext.
- Such ciphertext may vary based on the encryption scheme (e.g., symmetric-key, public key, etc.), the particular security protocol utilized, a date of encryption, or still other features of the encryption or data.
- Cement taggants 30 have fluorescent properties, according to one embodiment.
- cement taggant 30 may include a material having fluorescent properties, the material thereby configured to at least one of provide information and identify cement taggant 30 within the volume of cement particles 20 .
- the material is polymeric.
- Cement taggants 30 having fluorescent properties may facilitate the inspection of traceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith.
- the material fluoresces when exposed to ultraviolet light. In other embodiments, the material fluoresces when exposed to electricity, heat, or still another form of energy.
- An inspector may authenticate a mixture by exposing the traceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith to an ultraviolet light and evaluating (e.g., visually, with a sensor, etc.) the presence of cement taggants 30 (e.g., the color, the intensity of the fluorescence, the number of cement taggants 30 present in the sample, etc.).
- the color cement taggant 30 fluoresces may facilitate identifying a particular volume of concrete mixture 10 , cement particles 20 , or cement taggants 30 .
- cement taggants 30 are colored (e.g., painted, etc.) to and used to identify a particular volume of concrete mixture 10 , cement particles 20 , or cement taggants 30 .
- different cement taggants 30 fluoresce different colors.
- the different colors may correspond to different characteristics of cement particles 20 .
- a blue fluorescence may indicate that the cement particles 20 were produced or mixed by a first manufacturer and a red fluorescence may indicate that the cement particles 20 were produced or mixed by a second manufacturer.
- different color fluorescence may correspond to different grades of cement particles 20 . While manufacturer identity and grades have been explicitly discussed, cement taggants 30 fluorescing with different colors may be used to distinguish between samples of cement particles 20 according to still other characteristics.
- cement taggants 30 are layered ceramic chips.
- the layered ceramic chips may have a size that is larger than one millimeter.
- the cement taggants 30 may include microprocessors and other devices (e.g., sensors, timers, etc.) configured to evaluate a property of cement particles 20 (e.g., moisture content, duration since processing, etc.).
- cement taggant 30 may include a RFID device. Such a RFID device may be configured to interface with a sensing device to facilitate retrieval of the data (e.g., during an authentication process).
- cement taggant 30 includes a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, such as at least one of DNA and RNA.
- cement taggant 30 may include a marker disposed within a capsule. The capsule may prevent degradation or dehydration of the marker when cement taggant 30 is introduced into the volume of cement particles 20 .
- the replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be configured to fluoresce when exposed to a source of energy (e.g., ultraviolet light, electricity, heat, etc.).
- a source of energy e.g., ultraviolet light, electricity, heat, etc.
- the replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule is otherwise undetectable to an observer of traceable cement mixture 10 .
- Fluorescing replicatable biological information encoded molecules may facilitate the inspection of traceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith.
- the fluorescing replicatable biological information encoded molecule may facilitate an inspector's efforts to locate cement taggant 30 or may be used as a preliminary marker.
- the replicatable biological information encoded molecule itself encodes data (e.g., a code that is designed to indicate or store particular information).
- the replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be disposed within a material having a density different than the density of cement particles 20 , or the replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be disposed within a capsule such that cement taggant 30 has a density different than the density of cement particles 20 .
- the replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule is positioned within a material having a density different than the density of water.
- materials may be organic materials, inorganic materials (e.g., foam, etc.), or hollow shells, among other alternatives.
- Replicatable biological information encoded molecule positioned within materials having a different density may float or sink within traceable cement mixture 10 or hydrated concrete. Such floating or sinking may facilitate the authentication of traceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith.
- cement taggant 30 includes a ferromagnetic material.
- Cement taggants 30 that include a ferromagnetic material may be extracted from cement mixture 10 with a magnetic field, thereby facilitating an authentication process involving removal or in-situ examination.
- magnetized cement taggants 30 may be extracted using a non-magnetic material (e.g., iron, etc.).
- cement taggants 30 including a ferromagnetic material may be at least one of examined and detected using a magnetic field, the presence or response thereof authenticating cement mixture 10 .
- cement taggant 30 includes a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum. Such a material may absorb and re-emit electromagnetic radiation at a specific resonance frequency. The specific resonance frequency facilitates distinguishing cement taggant 30 from the various other materials within concrete (e.g., cement particles 20 , aggregates, etc.) thereby facilitating authentication.
- cement taggant 30 includes a trace element that may be electromagnetically, chemically, or otherwise detected. The trace element facilitates authentication by identifying cement taggant 30 within a volume of cement particles 20 .
- cement taggant 30 includes an isotope configured to identify cement taggant 30 within a volume of cement particles 20 .
- the isotope may be a Mossbauer active isotope that produces a Mossbauer spectrum when exposed to a corresponding gamma-ray source.
- the isotope may be iron-57.
- the isotope may be mixed with cement particles 20 on a certain date (e.g., a manufacture date, a mix date, etc.).
- the isotope may be short lived and degrade at a particular rate.
- An inspector may evaluate the age of at least one of cement mixture 10 and cement particles 20 based on the ratios of the different isotopes therein. Accordingly, secured cement taggants 30 that include an isotope may be used to authenticate at least one of cement mixture 10 and cement particles 20 .
- cement taggant 30 includes a gamma-ray watermark having a combination of gamma-ray-emitting isotopes.
- gamma-ray watermarks are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,875, granted on May 25, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- a cement verification apparatus may include a sensor configured to interface with (e.g., detect, etc.) the electromagnetic radiation, the trace element, the Mossbauer spectrum, or the gamma-rays to identify cement taggant 30 within traceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith.
- cement taggant 30 changes upon exposure to a threshold level of water (e.g., exposed to any quantity of water, a specified humidity level, liquid water, etc.).
- cement taggant 30 includes a RFID device configured to provide a response signal (e.g., to a request signal, etc.) that varies based on the moisture content of cement particles 20 or cement mixture 10 .
- moisture changes at least one of the optical spectrum (e.g., color, etc.), the infrared spectrum, and the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of cement taggant 30 .
- the moisture content of cement may impact the strength, toughness, durability, or other features of concrete produced therewith. Where specified concrete is required, the moisture content of cement particles 20 must be controlled.
- cement particles 20 may be dried to a preferred moisture content during initial manufacture (e.g., in a drying oven, etc.), subsequent storage may expose cement particles 20 to moisture.
- storage outside of a climate-controlled environment e.g., outside, etc.
- Such subsequent storage may increase the moisture content of cement particles 20 and change a property of concrete produced therefrom (e.g., strength, toughness, etc.).
- the moisture content of cement particles 20 may also be greater than a preferred level due to insufficient drying during initial manufacture. A greater-than-preferred moisture content of cement particles 20 may be difficult to observe.
- cement taggants 30 that change (e.g. permanently, temporarily, etc.) when exposed to water facilitates the authentication of cement particles 20 .
- an inspector may evaluate cement taggants 30 (e.g., pre-hydration, within hydrated concrete, etc.) to determine whether cement particles 20 have been exposed beyond a threshold level.
- cement taggant 30 includes a property that degrades at a specific rate in the presence of water.
- the property of cement taggant 30 may be density, size, or magnetic permeability.
- cement taggants 30 are introduced to cement particles 20 during initial manufacture, and the magnetic permeability of cement taggant 30 degrades as cement taggant 30 is exposed to water.
- Cement taggants 30 may include iron, and the magnetic permeability may change due to oxidation or reduction (i.e. the magnetic permeability of cement taggant 30 may degrade due to rusting) or by still another mechanism. Subsequent evaluation of the magnetic permeability of cement taggant 30 thereby allows an inspector to determine a water exposure level for cement particles 20 .
- cement taggant 30 includes a material that changes color when exposed to a threshold level of water (e.g., exposed to any quantity of water, a specified humidity level, liquid water, etc.). Such a color change may occur due to oxidation or reduction.
- cement taggant 30 may include iron, which changes color as it rusts.
- the material includes a water-sensitive dye configured to change color when exposed to water.
- cement taggants 30 configured to change color are introduced to cement particles 20 during initial manufacture.
- the exposure to water needed to produce the color change may be specified.
- the specified exposure may be identified in terms of at least one of a time, a threshold humidity, or another measurement of exposure. After the period of time, in the presence of the threshold humidity, or as the exposure condition occurs, the material changes color.
- the change in color may be binary (e.g., white below the threshold and red above the threshold, etc.) or may occur gradually (e.g., initially white, pink after thirty days, and red after sixty days).
- the color change varies based on both the intensity of exposure (e.g., humidity in the air, liquid water, etc.) and based on the duration of exposure (i.e. the time cement taggant 30 is exposed to the particular intensity of water).
- An inspector may evaluate cement taggants 30 (e.g., pre-hydration, etc.) to determine whether cement particles 20 have been exposed beyond a threshold level. Such evaluation may occur visually (e.g., traceable cement mixture 10 is red, thereby indicating excess exposure to water or humidity, etc.) or may occur through the use of a sensor (e.g., an image sensor) and a processor configured to evaluate a sensor signal from the sensor, determine the color of traceable cement mixture 10 or cement taggants 30 , and correspond the color with a level of exposure to water.
- a sensor e.g., an image sensor
- cement mixture 100 a mixture, shown as cement mixture 100 , is positioned within a housing, shown as container 110 .
- cement mixture 100 includes cementitious material, shown as cement particles 120 , a plurality of taggants, shown as cement taggants 130 , and an additional material, shown as supplementary particles 140 .
- Supplementary particles 140 may include aggregates, a reinforcement fiber, a chemical admixture, a mineral admixture (e.g., fly ash, sand, etc.), unauthenticated cement (i.e. wild cement), or still other materials.
- taggants are added to supplementary particles 140 to indicate the presence thereof.
- Cement mixture 100 may be formed by mixing a volume of supplementary particles 140 with cement taggants 130 and a volume of cement particles 120 .
- the volume of supplementary particles 140 mixed with the volume of cement particles 120 is specified, the ratio forming an additional material mix ratio.
- the amount of supplementary particles 140 relative to cement particles 120 may impact the strength of the concrete.
- a volume of cement taggants 130 may be disposed within the volume of cement particles 120 according to a taggant mix ratio.
- an amount (e.g., volume, number, etc.) of cement taggants 130 are added according to the taggant mix ratio during the initial manufacture of cement particles 120 (e.g., upon grinding, upon authentication, etc.).
- the amount of cement taggants 130 added to cement particles 120 may be associated with the quality of the cement (e.g., more cement taggants 130 may be added to premium cement while fewer cement taggants 130 may be added to standard quality cement, etc.).
- Such a mixture of cement taggants 130 and cement particles 120 may form a traceable cement mixture.
- Supplementary particles 140 may be later introduced to the traceable cement mixture.
- supplementary particles 140 are wild cement, the wild cement having properties (e.g., moisture content, size, shape, grade, etc.) that reduce the cost of supplementary particles 140 relative to cement particles 120 .
- Authenticating a cement mixture may include monitoring the taggant mix ratio to determine a dilution of tagged cement with wild cement.
- Supplementary particles 140 may be introduced into cement particles 120 during a mixing operation either inadvertently (e.g., a mixing plant may accidentally add grades of cement or other materials that are inappropriate for the specified concrete) or disingenuously (e.g., a mixing plant may add filler materials to increase the volume of concrete produced).
- Specified concrete includes a preferred ratio of cement.
- Introducing cement taggants 130 according to the taggant mix ratio establishes a specified amount (e.g., volume, number, etc.) of cement taggants 130 that should be present within the specified concrete.
- a specified concrete including the preferred ratio of cement but less than the specified amount of cement taggants 130 suggests the introduction of supplementary particles 140 .
- Strength testing, hardness testing, or observation of the mixing process may be used to verify that the specified concrete includes the preferred ratio of cement.
- An authentication process may be used to determine whether the specified concrete includes a sufficient amount of cement taggants 130 .
- the observed amount of cement taggants 130 within a volume of cement particles i.e. cementitious material that has not been mixed
- a specified amount of cement taggants 130 e.g., according to the taggant mix ratio used during authentication
- a processor of an authentication apparatus is configured to compare the observed amount of cement taggants 130 with the specified amount.
- the processor may provide a confirmation signal when or if the observed amount of cement taggants 130 reaches or exceeds the specified amount of cement taggants 130 .
- cement taggants 130 include a material that fluoresces, and the amount of cement taggants 130 may be determined by counting or otherwise measuring the fluorescence.
- the cementitious material or concrete is otherwise evaluated (e.g., with scanning, through resonance imaging, etc.) to determine the amount of cement taggants 130 therein.
- cement mixture 100 includes a first taggant including data relating to a characteristic of cement particles 120 and a second taggant including different data relating to a characteristic of cement particles 120 .
- the data of the first taggant and the second taggant may relate to the same or different characteristics of cement particles 120 .
- the first taggant may include data relating to an inspection status of cement particles 120 (e.g., inspected but did not meet specifications) and the second taggant may also include data relating to an inspection status of cement particles 120 (e.g., inspected and met specifications). Verification of the mixture may occur by scanning for taggants including data indicating that cement particles 120 were authenticated and met specifications.
- the first taggant includes data relating to the manufacturer of cement particles 120
- the second taggant includes data relating to the manufacturing date of cement particles 120 .
- Taggants having data relating to different characteristics facilitates gathering more information during a subsequent authentication of cement particles 120 (e.g., by an inspector, etc.).
- cement taggants 130 include one piece of data.
- cement taggants 130 include multiple pieces of data. Including multiple pieces of data may facilitate subsequent verification efforts (e.g., an inspector may determine information about different characteristics of cement particles 120 from a single cement taggant 130 ).
- the ratio of the first taggant to the second taggant may code information (e.g., premium cement may have more of a first taggant, etc.).
- a manufacturer may begin a period by adding a first taggant (e.g., a taggant including platinum such that an x-ray spectrum having a recognizable feature is produced, etc.) and incrementally (e.g., each day, each week, etc.) adding more of a second taggant (e.g., a taggant including rhodium such that an x-ray spectrum having a recognizable feature is produced, etc.), the ratio of the two taggants (e.g., a ratio of the two materials as indicated by the x-ray spectrum, etc.) relating to the date of manufacture.
- a first taggant e.g., a taggant including platinum such that an x-ray spectrum having a recognizable feature is produced, etc.
- a second taggant e.g., a taggan
- the first taggant and the second taggant include the same identification mechanism (i.e. both taggants are the same type).
- the first taggant and the second taggant may be RFID devices or taggants that are responsive to x-rays.
- taggants may include or be configured to provide different data (e.g., the first taggant may indicate the manufacture name and the second taggant may indicate the date of manufacture, etc.).
- the first taggant is a different type of identification device than the second taggant.
- the first taggant may include at least one of a fluorescent material, a nanoparticle, a RFID device, a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, a trace element, an particular isotope, and a gamma-ray watermark
- the second taggant may include another of a fluorescent material, a nanoparticle, a RFID device, a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, a trace element, an particular isotope, and a gamma-ray watermark.
- the first taggant includes an RFID device, an x-ray type tag, or another type of taggant that may be examined after the concrete has set whereas the second taggant includes a replicatable biological information encoded molecule or another type of taggant that may be examined before the concrete has set.
- the first taggant includes an additive (e.g., manganese, etc.) that is detectable within a spectrum (e.g., an x-ray spectrum) to identify a first piece of data (e.g., manganese may be associated with a particular manufacture of cement), and the second taggant may include an additive (e.g., platinum, etc.) that is detectable within a spectrum to identify a second piece of data (e.g., to indicate a premium grade cement, etc.).
- a single taggant may include both pieces of data, according to an alternative embodiment. In other embodiments, at least one of a plurality of identification mechanisms is different between the first taggant and the second taggant.
- a structure, shown as building 200 includes a base, shown as footing 210 , and a supported portion, shown as elevated portion 220 .
- footing 210 includes a column 212 and a lateral support portion 214 . While shown in FIG. 3 as having two columns 212 coupled by lateral support portion 214 , building 200 may be otherwise shaped.
- footing 210 includes concrete and a reinforcing material (e.g., rebar, etc.). Columns 212 interface with a ground volume, shown as ground surface 202 .
- Footing 210 supports elevated portion 220 . The weight of elevated portion 220 , forces due to wind acting on elevated portion 220 , forces due to seismic activity, and still other loads may be imparted on footing 210 .
- footing 210 is manufactured from authenticated concrete to reduce the risk that an inappropriate concrete mixture (e.g., inferior concrete) may be relied upon to support the loads imparted on footing 210 .
- concrete including a taggant shown as cement taggants 216
- cement taggants 216 is shaped (e.g., poured into forms, assembled using pre-formed concrete components, etc.) to produce footing 210 .
- Cement taggants 216 may remain within footing 210 during the life of building 200 , as shown in FIG. 3 .
- all of the concrete within footing 210 includes cement taggants 216 .
- footing 210 only a portion of the concrete within footing 210 includes cement taggants 216 (e.g., concrete within columns 212 , etc.). While footing 210 is explicitly discussed herein, still other portions of building 200 may be manufactured from concrete that includes cement taggants 216 (e.g., elevator shafts, floor support beams, other structural components, etc.).
- cement taggants 216 e.g., concrete within columns 212 , etc.
- different portions of building 200 are manufactured from concrete and include different cement taggants 216 .
- Different cement taggants 216 may identify different portions of building 200 .
- cement taggants 216 may include an RFID device that responds (e.g., to a request signal) with a design location for the corresponding concrete (i.e. a floor or portion of the building for which the concrete should have been or should be poured). An inspector may scan the concrete before pouring to verify that the concrete will be poured into a form for the appropriate portion of the building.
- An inspector may also scan the concrete after the concrete is poured (e.g., during a subsequent investigation where a portion of the building has failed) and retrieve the design location for the concrete to verify that the appropriate concrete was poured in the appropriate location. Such identification may reduce the risk that a particular portion of building 200 may be manufactured from concrete having properties other than those specified (e.g., by an architect or engineer, etc.).
- concrete for columns 212 may have a characteristic (e.g., strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.) that is different than the characteristic of concrete for lateral support portion 214 .
- column 212 includes concrete having a characteristic that is specified to facilitate compressive loading wherein lateral support portion 214 includes concrete having a characteristic that is specified to facilitate bending loading.
- Cement taggants 216 include data identifying such characteristics. In one embodiment, cement taggants 216 reduce the risk of applying (e.g., inadvertently, disingenuously, etc.) concrete intended to carry compressive loading in columns 212 at locations exposed primarily to bending stresses (e.g., lateral support portion 214 ).
- the concrete of footing 210 may be authenticated by cement taggants 216 in-situ (e.g., data on cement taggants 216 , the presence of cement taggants 216 , the amount of cement taggants 216 , etc.).
- a cement authentication apparatus shown as scanner 230 , interfaces with cement taggants 216 to determine a characteristic of the concrete in footing 210 .
- scanner 230 is used to authenticate the composition, history, grade, or other characteristic of concrete in-situ (i.e. in position within footing 210 ).
- the authentication of the concrete may be accomplished non-invasively (i.e. without sampling, coring, or otherwise removing the concrete from footing 210 ).
- Non-invasive testing of footing 210 is intended to collect data without risking damage to building 200 or requiring subsequent concrete repair.
- scanner 230 is used to proactively determine buildings 200 that may be at risk for damage (e.g., due to a potential or anticipated storm, due to potential or historical seismic loading, etc.).
- a risk factor may be associated with building 200 based on a feature of cement taggants 216 (e.g., an amount of cement taggants 216 , data in cement taggants 216 , etc.).
- the risk factor may correspond to a potential for damage due to wind, seismic, or other types of loading.
- scanner 230 is used as part of an investigation into potential causes for damage to building 200 . Cement taggants 216 remain within the concrete and remain readable even after an extended period of time.
- cement taggants 216 may identify a manufacturer even after jobsite records have been discarded or as part of an authentication process during initial construction.
- Cement taggants 216 may include materials (e.g., polymers, etc.) selected to reduce the risk of damage (e.g., during collapse of a building).
- cement taggants 216 are disposed within and protected by concrete thereby reducing the risk of damage during collapse of a building.
- scanner 230 may be used to inspect footing 210 to verify the quality of the concrete.
- scanner 230 may be used to identify voids in concrete by scanning for taggants.
- scanner 230 may be used to identify a particular portion of building 200 from which a sample of material was taken (e.g., scanner 230 may separate the concrete of upper floors from the concrete of lower floors, etc.).
- scanner 230 includes a housing, shown as body 232 , at least partially surrounding a generator 234 .
- Generator 234 is configured to produce an interrogation signal, according to an embodiment.
- generator 234 produces a radio frequency wave (e.g., to interface with cement taggants 216 having RFID devices).
- generator 234 is a gamma-ray source (e.g., to interface with cement taggants 216 having particular isotopes, etc.).
- generator 234 is a neutron generator configured to interrogate taggant 216 and trigger a response spectrum.
- the interrogation signal may include an x-ray, an ultraviolet wave, or an acoustic wave.
- cement taggants 216 may respond to the acoustic wave and provide authenticating information (e.g., resonate at a particular frequency, scatter the acoustic wave according to a specified pattern to provide authentication information, store energy from a probe signal and provide a response signal, etc.).
- generator 234 is positioned to direct the interrogation signal toward footing 210 .
- a waveguide directs the interrogation signal from generator 234 toward footing 210 .
- Scanner 230 may further include a sensor 236 positioned to receive response signal (e.g., an electromagnetic wave produced by cement taggant 216 , an electromagnetic wave re-radiated or reflected from cement taggant 216 , etc.).
- a processor 238 is configured to evaluate the interrogation signal produced by generator 234 and the response signal received by sensor 236 to determine a characteristic of the cement within footing 210 (e.g., pour quality, strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.).
- scanner 230 does not include generator 234 .
- Processor 238 of scanner 230 may be configured to evaluate response signals produced by cement taggants 216 (e.g., cement taggants 216 including RFID devices, light waves produced by fluorescent cement taggants 216 , etc.), identify a trace element of cement taggant 216 , or otherwise interact with cement taggants 216 . Such interaction may facilitate the retrieval of data or determine the amount (e.g., quantity, density, presence, etc.) of cement taggants 216 within footing 210 .
- a structure shown as bridge 250 , includes a base, shown as footing 260 , and a supported portion, shown as roadway 270 .
- Footing 260 may include concrete having specified characteristics (e.g., strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.).
- Roadway 270 may include concrete or may include another material (e.g., asphalt, gravel, etc.).
- a cement authentication apparatus shown as scanner 280 , is used to authenticate the concrete of footing 260 .
- Scanner 280 may direct interrogation signals 282 toward footing 260 .
- scanner 280 otherwise interfaces with footing 260 to retrieve data or determine the amount (e.g., quantity, density, presence, etc.) of taggants within footing 260 .
- Scanner 280 facilitates post-pour inspection of bridge 250 and reduces subsequent reliance on jobsite records to determine characteristics of the cement.
- taggants within footing 260 have properties that facilitate post-pour interrogation thereof.
- the taggants may have a RFID device or may be a gamma-ray-sensitive device such that data encoded therein may be retrieved even if the surface of footing 260 is covered (e.g., covered with soil or gravel, etc.).
- the taggants are infra-red sensitive or fluoresce and are configured to facilitate examination thereof when the surface of footing 260 is visible or accessible.
- a cement authentication apparatus may be used to determine a characteristic of cement.
- a cement authentication apparatus shown as authentication assembly 300
- Chute 310 is configured to contain a volume of cementitious material, shown as concrete 320 , that includes a taggant, shown as cement taggant 322 .
- chute 310 is a concrete chute for a concrete mixer truck.
- the other components of authentication assembly 300 may be fixed or removably coupled to chute 310 .
- an inspector may couple chute 310 to the concrete mixer truck at a jobsite to authenticate concrete 320 .
- Concrete 320 may include a mixture of cement and additional materials or may include only cementitious material and cement taggants 322 .
- Concrete 320 may be dry (e.g., cement powder and other materials, etc.) or may be wet (e.g., a mixture of cement powder, other materials, and water, etc.).
- concrete 320 flows within chute 310 along flow direction 312 .
- a sensor 330 is positioned to interface with cement taggant 322 .
- Sensor 330 may detect response signals (e.g., light waves, radio waves, gamma rays, etc.) produced by cement taggant 322 within concrete 320 .
- sensor 330 otherwise interfaces with cement taggants 322 to detect data or the amount of cement taggants 322 within concrete 320 .
- sensor 330 is configured to provide a sensor signal relating to a characteristic of concrete 320 .
- sensor 330 provides a plurality of sensor signals at a sampling rate.
- Authentication assembly 300 may include a processor configured to determine the characteristic of concrete 320 by evaluating the sensor signal, according to an exemplary embodiment.
- the processor may be configured to evaluate the plurality of sensor signals to authenticate an entire batch of concrete 320 , average data from the plurality of sensors signals, or evaluate the amount of cement taggants 322 within different portions of concrete 320 (e.g., an amount of cement taggants 322 during the initial pour relative to a mid-pour amount of cement taggants 322 ), among other alternatives.
- authentication assembly 300 includes a flow rate sensor configured to provide flow rate signals relating to the flow rate of concrete 320 along chute 310 .
- the processor may be configured to determine the characteristic of cement within concrete 320 by evaluating the flow rate signals.
- the processor may divide the amount of cement taggants 322 detected by sensor 330 in a period of time by the flow rate of concrete 320 to estimate the total number of cement taggants 322 within a batch of concrete 320 .
- cement taggants 322 are positioned within a hollow shell (e.g., a polymeric shell, etc.) or include a material having a density that is less than the density of concrete 320 .
- sensor 330 is coupled to a rod 332 with a fin 334 .
- rod 332 is rotatably coupled to brackets 314 of chute 310 and defines an axis of rotation. Concrete 320 flowing along chute 310 contacts fin 334 and rotates rod 332 about the axis of rotation and relative to brackets 314 . As shown in FIG.
- sensor 330 is positioned at an end of fin 334 such that rotation of fin 334 and rod 332 positions sensor 330 along an upper surface of concrete 320 (e.g., to interface with a greater amount of cement taggants 322 floating along an upper surface of concrete 320 , etc.).
- rod 332 is fixed to brackets 314 such that fin 334 remains stationary relative to chute 310 .
- Cement taggants 322 interface with sensor 330 as concrete 320 flows within chute 310 .
- Authentication assembly 300 having a stationary fin 334 positions sensor 330 within the volume of concrete 320 (e.g., thereby interfacing with cement taggants 322 having a density equal to or greater than the density of concrete 320 ).
- authentication assembly 300 includes a fixed or rotating fin 334 to selectively interface with cement taggants 322 having particular data.
- concrete 320 may include a first set of cement taggants 322 having a first density and a second set of cement taggants 322 having a second density.
- Authentication assembly 300 may include a rotating fin 334 to position sensor 330 for interfacing with either the first set of cement taggants 322 or the second set of cement taggants 322 .
- fin 334 is fixed (e.g., within a plane orthogonal to flow direction 312 ), and a plurality of sensors 330 interface with cement taggants 322 .
- a first sensor 330 may be positioned to interface with the first set of cement taggants 322 (e.g., along the surface of concrete 320 , etc.), and a second sensor 330 may be positioned to interface with the second set of cement taggants 322 (e.g., at an end of fin 334 , etc.).
- authentication assembly 300 includes a plurality of sensors 330 coupled to rod 332 with a plurality of fins 334 .
- the plurality of sensors 330 provide a plurality of sensor signals.
- a processor may evaluate the plurality of sensor signals to determine the characteristic of concrete 320 .
- Concrete 320 flowing along flow direction 312 rotates fins 334 thereby sequentially exposing sensors 330 to concrete 320 .
- sensors 330 are identical and the processor is configured to average or otherwise manipulate signals from sensors 330 (e.g., to reduce the risk of false negative readings from one sensor 330 ).
- sensors 330 detect different cement taggants 322 (e.g., a first sensor 330 is a photo sensor to detect the fluorescence of cement taggants 322 and a second sensor is a radiofrequency antenna configured to receive radio waves from cement taggants 322 , etc.).
- a first sensor 330 is a photo sensor to detect the fluorescence of cement taggants 322
- a second sensor is a radiofrequency antenna configured to receive radio waves from cement taggants 322 , etc.
- concrete 320 is positioned within a housing, shown as container 316 .
- an inspector authenticates concrete 320 by positioning a sample in container 316 and operating authentication assembly 300 .
- concrete 320 includes cement taggants 322 , a volume of cementitious material, shown as cement particles 324 , and additional material, shown as aggregate 326 .
- Sensors 330 are coupled to a driver, shown as drill 340 , with rod 332 and fin 334 . Drill 340 moves (e.g., rotates, etc.) rod 332 and fin 334 within concrete 320 .
- a processor is configured to evaluate sensor signals provided by sensors 330 to determine a characteristic of concrete 320 .
- authentication assembly 300 may authenticate wet or dry concrete 320 .
- concrete 320 does not flow through container 316 thereby reducing the need to couple authentication assembly 300 along the flow path between the batch of concrete (e.g., within a drum of a concrete mixer truck, etc.) and work area (e.g., a concrete form).
- Authentication assembly 300 as shown in FIG. 7 is intended to facilitate the remote authentication of concrete 320 (e.g., within a dedicated test area on a jobsite, etc.).
- sensor 330 is positioned outside the volume of concrete 320 .
- Sensor 330 may authenticate concrete 320 by interfacing with cement taggants 322 therein (e.g., by sensing response signals generated by cement taggants 322 , by identifying the trace elements of cement taggants 322 , etc.).
- raw cementitious material is mined ( 410 ) and processed (e.g., milled, ground, etc.) at 420 .
- the processed cementitious material may be provided to a concrete plant at 430 .
- additional materials e.g., aggregates, reinforcement fibers, chemical admixtures, fly ash, sand, etc.
- the mixed concrete is thereafter distributed to a jobsite ( 440 ).
- the mixed concrete may be distributed with concrete trucks to a remote jobsite or transported to an internal manufacturing facility (e.g., to produce pre-form concrete products).
- the distributed concrete is thereafter poured into a concrete form ( 450 ).
- taggants may be introduced into the cementitious material at a plurality of points within process 400 .
- Taggants may be introduced after the raw cementitious material is processed between 420 and 430 .
- Such taggants may include data relating to a characteristic of the cementitious material (e.g., processor's identity, processing date, etc.).
- the processed cementitious material is provided to a concrete plant at 430 where it may be authenticated before or after being mixed with additional materials (i.e. the cementitious material may be authenticated between 430 and 440 ).
- a concrete plant may authenticate the processor, the processing date, the moisture content, or still another characteristic of the cementitious material to ensure that the concrete produced therefrom conforms with predetermined specifications (e.g., standards, customer requests, etc.).
- a processor may monitor a mix status of the concrete by evaluating a homogeneity of the taggants in the concrete mixture. The mix status may include whether the concrete has been mixed to a specified degree.
- taggants are introduced between 430 and 440 (e.g., to identify a production time, etc.) by the concrete plant or an inspector.
- the concrete is thereafter delivered to the jobsite at 440 .
- the concrete may be authenticated by an inspector upon arrival or at another point before entering the concrete form (e.g., as the concrete flows down the concrete chute, etc.).
- Taggants may be added to the concrete between 440 and 450 (e.g., taggants specifying the area of the building where the concrete is intended to be placed).
- the concrete After the concrete is poured into the form at 450 , the concrete may be authenticated (i.e. in-situ authentication) either before or after the concrete sets.
- inspectors introduce taggants at various points throughout process 400 after the authentication process and before the following process (e.g., taggants relating to an authentication status of the cementitious material).
- the present disclosure contemplates methods, systems, and program products on any machine-readable media for accomplishing various operations.
- the embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented using existing computer processors, or by a special purpose computer processor for an appropriate system, incorporated for this or another purpose, or by a hardwired system.
- Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure include program products comprising machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon.
- Such machine-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor.
- machine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor.
- a network or another communications connection either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless
- any such connection is properly termed a machine-readable medium.
- Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data, which cause a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- On-Site Construction Work That Accompanies The Preparation And Application Of Concrete (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Concrete is a mixture of cement and various other materials. The cement and other materials are often mixed at a concrete plant and transported (e.g., with concrete mixer trucks) to a jobsite. Concrete used in certain applications (e.g., for buildings, footings, etc.) may have a strength, ductility, or other characteristic that is specified by a customer, engineer, or still another person. The amount and grade of cement impacts the strength and other characteristics of the concrete. While certain characteristics of the concrete (e.g., slump, etc.) may be tested by an inspector, other characteristics (e.g., composition) may be more difficult to determine by an inspector in the field thereby making it difficult for an inspector to verify that the delivered concrete satisfies the identified specifications.
- Traditionally, a driver delivers paperwork that identifies the composition and other characteristics of the concrete load (e.g., the identity of the mixing plant, etc.). Tracking a particular load requires monitoring the paperwork supplied by the driver. However, an inspector may not be able to independently authenticate various characteristics of the cement or the concrete (e.g., composition). The location of a particular concrete load may also be difficult for an inspector to track. Such load tracking may be particularly relevant during subsequent inspection of a structure after initial construction (e.g., during routine surveying, to determine the ability of a structure to withstand a storm or explosion, etc.). Despite these shortcomings, inspectors traditionally rely on paperwork provided upon delivery of the concrete load for initial authentication and subsequent inspection.
- One embodiment relates to a traceable cement mixture including a volume of cementitious material and a taggant disposed within the volume of cementitious material. The taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- Another embodiment relates to a structure including a volume of concrete. The volume of concrete forms a base configured to interface with a ground volume. The volume of concrete includes a volume of cementitious material and a taggant disposed within the volume of cementitious material. The taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of concrete.
- Still another embodiment relates to a cement authentication apparatus including a housing, a sensor, and a processor. The housing is configured to contain a volume of cementitious material having a taggant. The taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material. The sensor is positioned to interface with the taggant and provide a sensor signal relating to the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material. The processor is configured to determine the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material by evaluating the sensor signal.
- Yet another embodiment relates to a method of manufacturing a traceable cement mixture including providing a volume of cementitious material and positioning a taggant within the volume of cementitious material. The taggant includes data relating to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material.
- Another embodiment relates to a method of authenticating a cement mixture including scanning a volume of cementitious material for a taggant with a sensor. The method also includes sending or receiving data as a sensor signal with the sensor. The data relates to a characteristic of the volume of cementitious material. The method also includes determining the characteristic of the volume of cementitious material with a processor by evaluating the sensor signal.
- The foregoing summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. In addition to the illustrative aspects, embodiments, and features described above, further aspects, embodiments, and features will become apparent by reference to the drawings and the following detailed description.
- The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a side plan view of a traceable cement mixture, according to one embodiment; -
FIG. 2 is a side plan view of a traceable cement mixture, according to another embodiment; -
FIG. 3 is a side plan view of a building including a concrete base, according to one embodiment; -
FIG. 4 is a side plan view of a bridge including a concrete base, according to one embodiment; -
FIGS. 5-6 are isometric views of a cement authentication apparatus, according to two embodiments; -
FIG. 7 is a side plan view of a cement authentication apparatus, according to another embodiment; and -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a cement production process, according to one embodiment. - In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.
- Taggants are intended to facilitate the authentication of a cementitious mixture. The taggants may be active (e.g., RFID, ultrasonic, etc.) and store authentication data or passive and be detected (e.g., with radiofrequency waves, with x-rays, etc.) to facilitate an authentication process. Active taggants may store energy (e.g., with a battery, etc.) or may be remotely powered (e.g., with an electromagnetic field, etc.). Such authentication reduces the risk that concrete having an improper composition will be used during construction. Authentication may ensure that a batch of concrete includes cement originating from an approved source. Taggants may be used to verify that the mix ratio of authenticated cement to other materials in a batch of concrete is within a specified range. Taggants also allow for the prospective or retrospective analysis of structures (e.g., buildings, bridges, etc.) to determine whether the appropriate concrete was poured during initial construction.
- Referring to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 1 , a mixture, shown astraceable cement mixture 10, includes cementitious material, shown ascement particles 20, and a taggant, shown as cement taggant 30. As shown inFIG. 1 ,traceable cement mixture 10 is disposed within a housing, shown ascontainer 40.Container 40 may have a variety of shapes and may be rigid (e.g., made of rigid plastic, metal, etc.) or flexible (e.g., a plastic or paper bag, etc.). In other embodiments,container 40 is a portion of a machine used during the production of cement (e.g., a mix hopper, etc.). - As shown in
FIG. 1 ,traceable cement mixture 10 includes a volume ofcement particles 20. In one embodiment,cement particles 20 have a generally spherical shape. In other embodiments,cement particles 20 have another shape (e.g., ovular, discus, irregular, etc.).Cement particles 20 may be Portland cement composed primarily of hydraulic calcium silicates. In other embodiments,cement particles 20 may be another type of cement (e.g., a blended cement, another hydraulic cement, etc.) or still another material.Cement particles 20 may have a size of approximately 1 micron. In other embodiments,cement particles 20 are larger than one micron (e.g., 10 microns, 50 microns, 90 microns, etc.) or smaller than one micron (e.g., 0.5 microns, etc.). In use,cement particles 20 are hydrated (e.g., with water) and cure to form cured concrete. The shape, composition, size, and density ofcement particles 20, among other characteristics, may impact the strength, hardness, toughness, or other features of the cured concrete. The shape, composition, size, or other feature ofcement particles 20 may be specified (e.g., by a structural engineer, by a designer, by a regulatory agency, etc.) to produce concrete having specified characteristics (i.e. specified concrete). - Various manufactures may produce
cement particles 20. According to one embodiment, mineral deposits are mined, and larger pieces are milled, ground, or otherwise processed to formcement particles 20. The manufacturer ofcement particles 20 is tasked with producingcement particles 20 having the specified features. Such specified features may be identified as an acceptable range (e.g., a density of between 830 and 1650 kilograms per cubic meter), as a mean value (e.g., an average particle size of thirty microns, etc.), or as still another requirement. Some manufacturers may producecement particles 20 having specified features that are outside the acceptable range or otherwise fail to conform with the identified requirements. By way of example, some manufacturers may lack the quality control processes, equipment, know-how, or other skills needed to producecement particles 20 having specified features within the identified requirements. In other instances, some manufacturers may disingenuously producecement particles 20 that fail to meet the identified requirements (e.g., by failing to sufficiently grindcement particles 20 as a cost cutting measure, by cuttingcement particles 20 with other, non-specified types of cement, contaminants, other materials, etc.). As the particular features ofcement particles 20 relate to the strength, hardness, toughness, or other features of the cured concrete, selection and verification of a particular manufacturer may impact the quality, life, strength, or other features of a structure. - Referring again to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 1 ,cement taggants 30 are disposed within a volume ofcement particles 20.Cement taggants 30 are intended to reduce the risk thatimproper cement particles 20 will be introduced into specified concrete.Cement taggants 30 are also intended to reduce the risk thatcement particles 20 may be improperly processed or blended with other materials. In some embodiments,cement taggants 30 include data relating to a characteristic of the volume ofcement particles 20. The characteristic of the volume ofcement particles 20 may be a grade, a quality, a manufacturer, a manufacture date, an inspection status, an inspection date, an approval status, or still other properties.Cement taggants 30 may be introduced at various points during the manufacture and use ofcement particles 20. In some embodiments,cement taggants 30 are introduced totraceable cement mixture 10 before the processing of the raw material (e.g., beforecement particles 20 are formed through a grinding process, etc.). In other embodiments,cement taggants 30 are introduced totraceable cement mixture 10 after acement particles 20 are processed (e.g., during a certification ofcement particles 20, etc.) or aftercement particles 20 are introduced into concrete, among other alternatives. - In one embodiment,
cement taggant 30 is a discrete object that is configured to be individually monitored, handled, or examined. In other embodiments,cement taggant 30 is configured to be monitored, handled, or examined in aggregate withother cement taggants 30. By way of example, a scoop ofcement taggants 30 may be monitored, handled, or examined as a group.Cement taggant 30 may have a size that is larger or smaller than one millimeter. In one embodiment,cement taggants 30 are nanoparticles and are configured to be monitored, handled, or examined in aggregate. - According to one embodiment, the size of
cement taggant 30 corresponds with the size ofcement particles 20. In still other embodiments, the density ofcement taggant 30 corresponds with the density ofcement particles 20. By way of example,cement taggant 30 may include a hollow shell having at least one of a specified weight and a specified volume such that the density ofcement taggant 30 corresponds with the density ofcement particles 20. Corresponding a feature (e.g., size, density, etc.) ofcement taggant 30 with that ofcement particles 20 reduces the risk thatcement taggants 30 will separate fromcement particles 20. By way of example, separation may otherwise occur during shipping, handling, due to an increase in viscosity ofcement particles 20 post-hydration, or during another process. In other embodiments, the size, density, or other feature ofcement taggants 30 is greater or less than the corresponding feature ofcement particles 20 to encourage separation and facilitate detection ofcement taggants 30 withintraceable cement mixture 10. In still other embodiments,cement taggant 30 is configured to react with water such that a property (e.g., density, etc.) ofcement taggant 30 changes to facilitate post-hydration separation. By way of example,cement taggant 30 may absorb more water thancement particles 20 and sink post hydration. - In some embodiments,
cement taggants 30 are secured (e.g., the data is secured according to an encryption scheme). Securingcement taggants 30 is intended to reduce the risk of forgery ofcement taggants 30. By way of example, a manufacturer may employ a certification process whereby an inspector evaluatescement particles 20. After authenticating the characteristic ofcement particles 20, the inspector may introducecement taggants 30 into a volume ofcement particles 20. Securingcement particles 20 reduces the risk that the cement manufacturer, an intermediate party (e.g., a concrete mixing plant, a concrete transportation company, etc.), or still others will introducecement taggants 30 into the volume ofcement particles 20 or concrete produced therewith. In one embodiment,cement taggants 30 are secured and are configured to respond only to a specified request signal. An operator may retrieve the data only if the specified request signal is sent. If the operator does not know the specified request signal,cement taggants 30 may not respond at all or may not provide the data. In other embodiments, the data relating to the characteristic ofcement particles 20 may be retrieved (e.g., read, etc.) only by those with a decryption key. In still other embodiments,cement taggants 30 have a specified feature intended to provide security. By way of example,cement taggants 30 may be difficult to produce (e.g., replicatable biological information encoded molecule taggants, specified isotopes, etc.). In still other embodiments,cement taggant 30 includes an RFID device that provides security. By way of example, the RFID device may employ an algorithm or provide a different code (e.g., number) based on a date or day of the week of interest (e.g., the manufacture date ofcement particles 20, the mix date ofcement mixture 10, etc.). By way of another example, the RFID device may employ an algorithm to provide a code that varies based upon still other inputs. While RFID devices are explicitly discussed herein, it should be understood that acoustic devices (e.g., ultrasonic devices, etc.) may provide similar functionality. Securingcement taggants 30 thereby facilitates distinguishing legitimate andillegitimate cement taggants 30 and also facilitates authenticating at least one ofcement mixture 10 andcement particles 20. - In one embodiment,
cement taggant 30 includes a storage device (e.g., a flash memory, a computer storage medium, etc.) having a memory configured to store the data.Such cement taggants 30 may include an integrated circuit to facilitate the storage or retrieval of the data from the memory. In some embodiments, the data is stored in the memory as ciphertext. Such ciphertext may vary based on the encryption scheme (e.g., symmetric-key, public key, etc.), the particular security protocol utilized, a date of encryption, or still other features of the encryption or data. -
Cement taggants 30 have fluorescent properties, according to one embodiment. By way of example,cement taggant 30 may include a material having fluorescent properties, the material thereby configured to at least one of provide information and identifycement taggant 30 within the volume ofcement particles 20. In one embodiment, the material is polymeric.Cement taggants 30 having fluorescent properties may facilitate the inspection oftraceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith. In one embodiment, the material fluoresces when exposed to ultraviolet light. In other embodiments, the material fluoresces when exposed to electricity, heat, or still another form of energy. An inspector may authenticate a mixture by exposing thetraceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith to an ultraviolet light and evaluating (e.g., visually, with a sensor, etc.) the presence of cement taggants 30 (e.g., the color, the intensity of the fluorescence, the number ofcement taggants 30 present in the sample, etc.). By way of example, thecolor cement taggant 30 fluoresces may facilitate identifying a particular volume ofconcrete mixture 10,cement particles 20, orcement taggants 30. In other embodiments,cement taggants 30 are colored (e.g., painted, etc.) to and used to identify a particular volume ofconcrete mixture 10,cement particles 20, orcement taggants 30. - In some embodiments,
different cement taggants 30 fluoresce different colors. The different colors may correspond to different characteristics ofcement particles 20. By way of example, a blue fluorescence may indicate that thecement particles 20 were produced or mixed by a first manufacturer and a red fluorescence may indicate that thecement particles 20 were produced or mixed by a second manufacturer. In another embodiment, different color fluorescence may correspond to different grades ofcement particles 20. While manufacturer identity and grades have been explicitly discussed,cement taggants 30 fluorescing with different colors may be used to distinguish between samples ofcement particles 20 according to still other characteristics. - In some embodiments,
cement taggants 30 are layered ceramic chips. The layered ceramic chips may have a size that is larger than one millimeter. Thecement taggants 30 may include microprocessors and other devices (e.g., sensors, timers, etc.) configured to evaluate a property of cement particles 20 (e.g., moisture content, duration since processing, etc.). By way of example,cement taggant 30 may include a RFID device. Such a RFID device may be configured to interface with a sensing device to facilitate retrieval of the data (e.g., during an authentication process). - In other embodiments,
cement taggant 30 includes a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, such as at least one of DNA and RNA. By way of example,cement taggant 30 may include a marker disposed within a capsule. The capsule may prevent degradation or dehydration of the marker whencement taggant 30 is introduced into the volume ofcement particles 20. The replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be configured to fluoresce when exposed to a source of energy (e.g., ultraviolet light, electricity, heat, etc.). In some embodiments, the replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule is otherwise undetectable to an observer oftraceable cement mixture 10. Fluorescing replicatable biological information encoded molecules may facilitate the inspection oftraceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith. By way of example, the fluorescing replicatable biological information encoded molecule may facilitate an inspector's efforts to locatecement taggant 30 or may be used as a preliminary marker. According to another embodiment, the replicatable biological information encoded molecule itself encodes data (e.g., a code that is designed to indicate or store particular information). The replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be disposed within a material having a density different than the density ofcement particles 20, or the replicatable biological information encoded molecule may be disposed within a capsule such thatcement taggant 30 has a density different than the density ofcement particles 20. In another embodiment, the replicatable biological information encoded molecule or the organism containing the replicatable biological information encoded molecule is positioned within a material having a density different than the density of water. Such materials may be organic materials, inorganic materials (e.g., foam, etc.), or hollow shells, among other alternatives. Replicatable biological information encoded molecule positioned within materials having a different density may float or sink withintraceable cement mixture 10 or hydrated concrete. Such floating or sinking may facilitate the authentication oftraceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith. According to another embodiment,cement taggant 30 includes a ferromagnetic material.Cement taggants 30 that include a ferromagnetic material may be extracted fromcement mixture 10 with a magnetic field, thereby facilitating an authentication process involving removal or in-situ examination. In other embodiments,magnetized cement taggants 30 may be extracted using a non-magnetic material (e.g., iron, etc.). In still other embodiments,cement taggants 30 including a ferromagnetic material may be at least one of examined and detected using a magnetic field, the presence or response thereof authenticatingcement mixture 10. - In still other embodiments,
cement taggant 30 includes a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum. Such a material may absorb and re-emit electromagnetic radiation at a specific resonance frequency. The specific resonance frequency facilitates distinguishingcement taggant 30 from the various other materials within concrete (e.g.,cement particles 20, aggregates, etc.) thereby facilitating authentication. In one embodiment,cement taggant 30 includes a trace element that may be electromagnetically, chemically, or otherwise detected. The trace element facilitates authentication by identifyingcement taggant 30 within a volume ofcement particles 20. - In another embodiment,
cement taggant 30 includes an isotope configured to identifycement taggant 30 within a volume ofcement particles 20. The isotope may be a Mossbauer active isotope that produces a Mossbauer spectrum when exposed to a corresponding gamma-ray source. By way of example, the isotope may be iron-57. The isotope may be mixed withcement particles 20 on a certain date (e.g., a manufacture date, a mix date, etc.). The isotope may be short lived and degrade at a particular rate. An inspector may evaluate the age of at least one ofcement mixture 10 andcement particles 20 based on the ratios of the different isotopes therein. Accordingly, securedcement taggants 30 that include an isotope may be used to authenticate at least one ofcement mixture 10 andcement particles 20. - According to another embodiment,
cement taggant 30 includes a gamma-ray watermark having a combination of gamma-ray-emitting isotopes. Such gamma-ray watermarks are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,875, granted on May 25, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference. A cement verification apparatus may include a sensor configured to interface with (e.g., detect, etc.) the electromagnetic radiation, the trace element, the Mossbauer spectrum, or the gamma-rays to identifycement taggant 30 withintraceable cement mixture 10 or concrete produced therewith. - In some embodiments,
cement taggant 30 changes upon exposure to a threshold level of water (e.g., exposed to any quantity of water, a specified humidity level, liquid water, etc.). In another embodiment,cement taggant 30 includes a RFID device configured to provide a response signal (e.g., to a request signal, etc.) that varies based on the moisture content ofcement particles 20 orcement mixture 10. In other embodiments, moisture changes at least one of the optical spectrum (e.g., color, etc.), the infrared spectrum, and the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum ofcement taggant 30. The moisture content of cement may impact the strength, toughness, durability, or other features of concrete produced therewith. Where specified concrete is required, the moisture content ofcement particles 20 must be controlled. Whilecement particles 20 may be dried to a preferred moisture content during initial manufacture (e.g., in a drying oven, etc.), subsequent storage may exposecement particles 20 to moisture. By way of example, storage outside of a climate-controlled environment (e.g., outside, etc.) exposescement particles 20 to liquid water (e.g., due to rain) and water vapor (e.g., due to humidity in the surrounding air). Such subsequent storage may increase the moisture content ofcement particles 20 and change a property of concrete produced therefrom (e.g., strength, toughness, etc.). The moisture content ofcement particles 20 may also be greater than a preferred level due to insufficient drying during initial manufacture. A greater-than-preferred moisture content ofcement particles 20 may be difficult to observe. While re-testing may occur whencement particles 20 are isolated (e.g., prior to mixing), determining the moisture content ofcement particles 20 after hydrating and mixing the concrete may be difficult.Cement taggants 30 that change (e.g. permanently, temporarily, etc.) when exposed to water facilitates the authentication ofcement particles 20. By way of example, an inspector may evaluate cement taggants 30 (e.g., pre-hydration, within hydrated concrete, etc.) to determine whethercement particles 20 have been exposed beyond a threshold level. - According to one embodiment,
cement taggant 30 includes a property that degrades at a specific rate in the presence of water. By way of example, the property ofcement taggant 30 may be density, size, or magnetic permeability. In one embodiment,cement taggants 30 are introduced tocement particles 20 during initial manufacture, and the magnetic permeability ofcement taggant 30 degrades ascement taggant 30 is exposed to water.Cement taggants 30 may include iron, and the magnetic permeability may change due to oxidation or reduction (i.e. the magnetic permeability ofcement taggant 30 may degrade due to rusting) or by still another mechanism. Subsequent evaluation of the magnetic permeability ofcement taggant 30 thereby allows an inspector to determine a water exposure level forcement particles 20. - In another embodiment,
cement taggant 30 includes a material that changes color when exposed to a threshold level of water (e.g., exposed to any quantity of water, a specified humidity level, liquid water, etc.). Such a color change may occur due to oxidation or reduction. By way of example,cement taggant 30 may include iron, which changes color as it rusts. In other embodiments, the material includes a water-sensitive dye configured to change color when exposed to water. In one embodiment,cement taggants 30 configured to change color are introduced tocement particles 20 during initial manufacture. - The exposure to water needed to produce the color change may be specified. The specified exposure may be identified in terms of at least one of a time, a threshold humidity, or another measurement of exposure. After the period of time, in the presence of the threshold humidity, or as the exposure condition occurs, the material changes color. The change in color may be binary (e.g., white below the threshold and red above the threshold, etc.) or may occur gradually (e.g., initially white, pink after thirty days, and red after sixty days). In some embodiments, the color change varies based on both the intensity of exposure (e.g., humidity in the air, liquid water, etc.) and based on the duration of exposure (i.e. the
time cement taggant 30 is exposed to the particular intensity of water). An inspector may evaluate cement taggants 30 (e.g., pre-hydration, etc.) to determine whethercement particles 20 have been exposed beyond a threshold level. Such evaluation may occur visually (e.g.,traceable cement mixture 10 is red, thereby indicating excess exposure to water or humidity, etc.) or may occur through the use of a sensor (e.g., an image sensor) and a processor configured to evaluate a sensor signal from the sensor, determine the color oftraceable cement mixture 10 orcement taggants 30, and correspond the color with a level of exposure to water. - Referring next to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 2 , a mixture, shown ascement mixture 100, is positioned within a housing, shown ascontainer 110. As shown inFIG. 2 ,cement mixture 100 includes cementitious material, shown ascement particles 120, a plurality of taggants, shown ascement taggants 130, and an additional material, shown assupplementary particles 140.Supplementary particles 140 may include aggregates, a reinforcement fiber, a chemical admixture, a mineral admixture (e.g., fly ash, sand, etc.), unauthenticated cement (i.e. wild cement), or still other materials. In one embodiment, taggants are added tosupplementary particles 140 to indicate the presence thereof.Cement mixture 100 may be formed by mixing a volume ofsupplementary particles 140 withcement taggants 130 and a volume ofcement particles 120. According to an embodiment, the volume ofsupplementary particles 140 mixed with the volume ofcement particles 120 is specified, the ratio forming an additional material mix ratio. The amount ofsupplementary particles 140 relative to cementparticles 120 may impact the strength of the concrete. A volume ofcement taggants 130 may be disposed within the volume ofcement particles 120 according to a taggant mix ratio. - In some embodiments, an amount (e.g., volume, number, etc.) of
cement taggants 130 are added according to the taggant mix ratio during the initial manufacture of cement particles 120 (e.g., upon grinding, upon authentication, etc.). The amount ofcement taggants 130 added tocement particles 120 may be associated with the quality of the cement (e.g.,more cement taggants 130 may be added to premium cement whilefewer cement taggants 130 may be added to standard quality cement, etc.). Such a mixture ofcement taggants 130 andcement particles 120 may form a traceable cement mixture.Supplementary particles 140 may be later introduced to the traceable cement mixture. In some embodiments,supplementary particles 140 are wild cement, the wild cement having properties (e.g., moisture content, size, shape, grade, etc.) that reduce the cost ofsupplementary particles 140 relative to cementparticles 120. Authenticating a cement mixture may include monitoring the taggant mix ratio to determine a dilution of tagged cement with wild cement.Supplementary particles 140 may be introduced intocement particles 120 during a mixing operation either inadvertently (e.g., a mixing plant may accidentally add grades of cement or other materials that are inappropriate for the specified concrete) or disingenuously (e.g., a mixing plant may add filler materials to increase the volume of concrete produced). - Specified concrete includes a preferred ratio of cement. Introducing
cement taggants 130 according to the taggant mix ratio establishes a specified amount (e.g., volume, number, etc.) ofcement taggants 130 that should be present within the specified concrete. A specified concrete including the preferred ratio of cement but less than the specified amount ofcement taggants 130 suggests the introduction ofsupplementary particles 140. - Strength testing, hardness testing, or observation of the mixing process, among other alternatives, may be used to verify that the specified concrete includes the preferred ratio of cement. An authentication process may be used to determine whether the specified concrete includes a sufficient amount of
cement taggants 130. The observed amount ofcement taggants 130 within a volume of cement particles (i.e. cementitious material that has not been mixed) may be compared with a specified amount of cement taggants 130 (e.g., according to the taggant mix ratio used during authentication) to verify thatsupplementary particles 140 have not been introduced. According to one embodiment, a processor of an authentication apparatus is configured to compare the observed amount ofcement taggants 130 with the specified amount. The processor may provide a confirmation signal when or if the observed amount ofcement taggants 130 reaches or exceeds the specified amount ofcement taggants 130. In some embodiments,cement taggants 130 include a material that fluoresces, and the amount ofcement taggants 130 may be determined by counting or otherwise measuring the fluorescence. In other embodiments, the cementitious material or concrete is otherwise evaluated (e.g., with scanning, through resonance imaging, etc.) to determine the amount ofcement taggants 130 therein. - In one embodiment,
cement mixture 100 includes a first taggant including data relating to a characteristic ofcement particles 120 and a second taggant including different data relating to a characteristic ofcement particles 120. The data of the first taggant and the second taggant may relate to the same or different characteristics ofcement particles 120. By way of example, the first taggant may include data relating to an inspection status of cement particles 120 (e.g., inspected but did not meet specifications) and the second taggant may also include data relating to an inspection status of cement particles 120 (e.g., inspected and met specifications). Verification of the mixture may occur by scanning for taggants including data indicating thatcement particles 120 were authenticated and met specifications. - In another embodiment, the first taggant includes data relating to the manufacturer of
cement particles 120, and the second taggant includes data relating to the manufacturing date ofcement particles 120. Taggants having data relating to different characteristics facilitates gathering more information during a subsequent authentication of cement particles 120 (e.g., by an inspector, etc.). According to one embodiment,cement taggants 130 include one piece of data. According to another embodiment,cement taggants 130 include multiple pieces of data. Including multiple pieces of data may facilitate subsequent verification efforts (e.g., an inspector may determine information about different characteristics ofcement particles 120 from a single cement taggant 130). In still other embodiments, the ratio of the first taggant to the second taggant may code information (e.g., premium cement may have more of a first taggant, etc.). By way of example, a manufacturer may begin a period by adding a first taggant (e.g., a taggant including platinum such that an x-ray spectrum having a recognizable feature is produced, etc.) and incrementally (e.g., each day, each week, etc.) adding more of a second taggant (e.g., a taggant including rhodium such that an x-ray spectrum having a recognizable feature is produced, etc.), the ratio of the two taggants (e.g., a ratio of the two materials as indicated by the x-ray spectrum, etc.) relating to the date of manufacture. - In some embodiments, the first taggant and the second taggant include the same identification mechanism (i.e. both taggants are the same type). By way of example, the first taggant and the second taggant may be RFID devices or taggants that are responsive to x-rays. Such taggants may include or be configured to provide different data (e.g., the first taggant may indicate the manufacture name and the second taggant may indicate the date of manufacture, etc.). In other embodiments, the first taggant is a different type of identification device than the second taggant. By way of example, the first taggant may include at least one of a fluorescent material, a nanoparticle, a RFID device, a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, a trace element, an particular isotope, and a gamma-ray watermark whereas the second taggant may include another of a fluorescent material, a nanoparticle, a RFID device, a replicatable biological information encoded molecule, a material having a specified nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, a trace element, an particular isotope, and a gamma-ray watermark. In one embodiment, the first taggant includes an RFID device, an x-ray type tag, or another type of taggant that may be examined after the concrete has set whereas the second taggant includes a replicatable biological information encoded molecule or another type of taggant that may be examined before the concrete has set. In another embodiment, the first taggant includes an additive (e.g., manganese, etc.) that is detectable within a spectrum (e.g., an x-ray spectrum) to identify a first piece of data (e.g., manganese may be associated with a particular manufacture of cement), and the second taggant may include an additive (e.g., platinum, etc.) that is detectable within a spectrum to identify a second piece of data (e.g., to indicate a premium grade cement, etc.). A single taggant may include both pieces of data, according to an alternative embodiment. In other embodiments, at least one of a plurality of identification mechanisms is different between the first taggant and the second taggant.
- Referring next to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 3 , a structure, shown as building 200, includes a base, shown asfooting 210, and a supported portion, shown aselevated portion 220. As shown inFIG. 3 , footing 210 includes acolumn 212 and alateral support portion 214. While shown inFIG. 3 as having twocolumns 212 coupled bylateral support portion 214, building 200 may be otherwise shaped. In one embodiment, footing 210 includes concrete and a reinforcing material (e.g., rebar, etc.).Columns 212 interface with a ground volume, shown asground surface 202.Footing 210 supportselevated portion 220. The weight ofelevated portion 220, forces due to wind acting onelevated portion 220, forces due to seismic activity, and still other loads may be imparted onfooting 210. - In one embodiment, footing 210 is manufactured from authenticated concrete to reduce the risk that an inappropriate concrete mixture (e.g., inferior concrete) may be relied upon to support the loads imparted on
footing 210. As shown inFIG. 3 , concrete including a taggant, shown ascement taggants 216, is shaped (e.g., poured into forms, assembled using pre-formed concrete components, etc.) to producefooting 210.Cement taggants 216 may remain withinfooting 210 during the life of building 200, as shown inFIG. 3 . In some embodiments, all of the concrete withinfooting 210 includescement taggants 216. In other embodiments, only a portion of the concrete withinfooting 210 includes cement taggants 216 (e.g., concrete withincolumns 212, etc.). Whilefooting 210 is explicitly discussed herein, still other portions of building 200 may be manufactured from concrete that includes cement taggants 216 (e.g., elevator shafts, floor support beams, other structural components, etc.). - In some embodiments, different portions of building 200 are manufactured from concrete and include
different cement taggants 216.Different cement taggants 216 may identify different portions ofbuilding 200. By way of example,cement taggants 216 may include an RFID device that responds (e.g., to a request signal) with a design location for the corresponding concrete (i.e. a floor or portion of the building for which the concrete should have been or should be poured). An inspector may scan the concrete before pouring to verify that the concrete will be poured into a form for the appropriate portion of the building. An inspector may also scan the concrete after the concrete is poured (e.g., during a subsequent investigation where a portion of the building has failed) and retrieve the design location for the concrete to verify that the appropriate concrete was poured in the appropriate location. Such identification may reduce the risk that a particular portion of building 200 may be manufactured from concrete having properties other than those specified (e.g., by an architect or engineer, etc.). By way of example, concrete forcolumns 212 may have a characteristic (e.g., strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.) that is different than the characteristic of concrete forlateral support portion 214. In one embodiment,column 212 includes concrete having a characteristic that is specified to facilitate compressive loading whereinlateral support portion 214 includes concrete having a characteristic that is specified to facilitate bending loading.Cement taggants 216 include data identifying such characteristics. In one embodiment,cement taggants 216 reduce the risk of applying (e.g., inadvertently, disingenuously, etc.) concrete intended to carry compressive loading incolumns 212 at locations exposed primarily to bending stresses (e.g., lateral support portion 214). The concrete offooting 210 may be authenticated bycement taggants 216 in-situ (e.g., data oncement taggants 216, the presence ofcement taggants 216, the amount ofcement taggants 216, etc.). - Referring again to the exemplary embodiment shown in
FIG. 3 , a cement authentication apparatus, shown as scanner 230, interfaces withcement taggants 216 to determine a characteristic of the concrete infooting 210. In one embodiment, scanner 230 is used to authenticate the composition, history, grade, or other characteristic of concrete in-situ (i.e. in position within footing 210). The authentication of the concrete may be accomplished non-invasively (i.e. without sampling, coring, or otherwise removing the concrete from footing 210). Non-invasive testing offooting 210 is intended to collect data without risking damage to building 200 or requiring subsequent concrete repair. - In one embodiment, scanner 230 is used to proactively determine
buildings 200 that may be at risk for damage (e.g., due to a potential or anticipated storm, due to potential or historical seismic loading, etc.). By way of example, a risk factor may be associated with building 200 based on a feature of cement taggants 216 (e.g., an amount ofcement taggants 216, data incement taggants 216, etc.). The risk factor may correspond to a potential for damage due to wind, seismic, or other types of loading. In another embodiment, scanner 230 is used as part of an investigation into potential causes for damage to building 200.Cement taggants 216 remain within the concrete and remain readable even after an extended period of time. By way of example,cement taggants 216 may identify a manufacturer even after jobsite records have been discarded or as part of an authentication process during initial construction.Cement taggants 216 may include materials (e.g., polymers, etc.) selected to reduce the risk of damage (e.g., during collapse of a building). In other embodiments,cement taggants 216 are disposed within and protected by concrete thereby reducing the risk of damage during collapse of a building. In other embodiments, scanner 230 may be used to inspect footing 210 to verify the quality of the concrete. By way of example, scanner 230 may be used to identify voids in concrete by scanning for taggants. In still other embodiments, scanner 230 may be used to identify a particular portion of building 200 from which a sample of material was taken (e.g., scanner 230 may separate the concrete of upper floors from the concrete of lower floors, etc.). - As shown in
FIG. 3 , scanner 230 includes a housing, shown asbody 232, at least partially surrounding agenerator 234.Generator 234 is configured to produce an interrogation signal, according to an embodiment. In some embodiments,generator 234 produces a radio frequency wave (e.g., to interface withcement taggants 216 having RFID devices). In other embodiments,generator 234 is a gamma-ray source (e.g., to interface withcement taggants 216 having particular isotopes, etc.). In still other embodiments,generator 234 is a neutron generator configured to interrogatetaggant 216 and trigger a response spectrum. In still other embodiments, the interrogation signal may include an x-ray, an ultraviolet wave, or an acoustic wave. By way of example,cement taggants 216 may respond to the acoustic wave and provide authenticating information (e.g., resonate at a particular frequency, scatter the acoustic wave according to a specified pattern to provide authentication information, store energy from a probe signal and provide a response signal, etc.). - In one embodiment,
generator 234 is positioned to direct the interrogation signal towardfooting 210. In another embodiment, a waveguide directs the interrogation signal fromgenerator 234 towardfooting 210. Scanner 230 may further include asensor 236 positioned to receive response signal (e.g., an electromagnetic wave produced bycement taggant 216, an electromagnetic wave re-radiated or reflected fromcement taggant 216, etc.). Aprocessor 238 is configured to evaluate the interrogation signal produced bygenerator 234 and the response signal received bysensor 236 to determine a characteristic of the cement within footing 210 (e.g., pour quality, strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.). - In another embodiment, scanner 230 does not include
generator 234.Processor 238 of scanner 230 may be configured to evaluate response signals produced by cement taggants 216 (e.g.,cement taggants 216 including RFID devices, light waves produced byfluorescent cement taggants 216, etc.), identify a trace element ofcement taggant 216, or otherwise interact withcement taggants 216. Such interaction may facilitate the retrieval of data or determine the amount (e.g., quantity, density, presence, etc.) ofcement taggants 216 withinfooting 210. - Referring next to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 4 , a structure, shown asbridge 250, includes a base, shown asfooting 260, and a supported portion, shown asroadway 270. Footing 260 may include concrete having specified characteristics (e.g., strength, grade, quality, manufacturer, manufacture date, inspection status, approval status, etc.).Roadway 270 may include concrete or may include another material (e.g., asphalt, gravel, etc.). As shown inFIG. 4 , a cement authentication apparatus, shown asscanner 280, is used to authenticate the concrete offooting 260.Scanner 280 may direct interrogation signals 282 towardfooting 260. In other embodiments,scanner 280 otherwise interfaces withfooting 260 to retrieve data or determine the amount (e.g., quantity, density, presence, etc.) of taggants withinfooting 260.Scanner 280 facilitates post-pour inspection ofbridge 250 and reduces subsequent reliance on jobsite records to determine characteristics of the cement. In one embodiment, taggants withinfooting 260 have properties that facilitate post-pour interrogation thereof. By way of example, the taggants may have a RFID device or may be a gamma-ray-sensitive device such that data encoded therein may be retrieved even if the surface offooting 260 is covered (e.g., covered with soil or gravel, etc.). In other embodiments, the taggants are infra-red sensitive or fluoresce and are configured to facilitate examination thereof when the surface offooting 260 is visible or accessible. - Referring next to
FIGS. 5-7 , a cement authentication apparatus may be used to determine a characteristic of cement. As shown inFIGS. 5-6 , a cement authentication apparatus, shown asauthentication assembly 300, includes a housing, shown aschute 310.Chute 310 is configured to contain a volume of cementitious material, shown asconcrete 320, that includes a taggant, shown ascement taggant 322. In some embodiments,chute 310 is a concrete chute for a concrete mixer truck. The other components ofauthentication assembly 300 may be fixed or removably coupled tochute 310. By way of example, an inspector may couplechute 310 to the concrete mixer truck at a jobsite to authenticate concrete 320. Such authentication may occur for each concrete mixer truck or with a sample of concrete mixer trucks (e.g., one truck within a group of trucks, etc.).Concrete 320 may include a mixture of cement and additional materials or may include only cementitious material andcement taggants 322.Concrete 320 may be dry (e.g., cement powder and other materials, etc.) or may be wet (e.g., a mixture of cement powder, other materials, and water, etc.). - In one embodiment, concrete 320 flows within
chute 310 alongflow direction 312. As shown inFIGS. 5-6 , asensor 330 is positioned to interface withcement taggant 322.Sensor 330 may detect response signals (e.g., light waves, radio waves, gamma rays, etc.) produced bycement taggant 322 withinconcrete 320. In other embodiments,sensor 330 otherwise interfaces withcement taggants 322 to detect data or the amount ofcement taggants 322 withinconcrete 320. According to one embodiment,sensor 330 is configured to provide a sensor signal relating to a characteristic ofconcrete 320. In some embodiments,sensor 330 provides a plurality of sensor signals at a sampling rate.Authentication assembly 300 may include a processor configured to determine the characteristic ofconcrete 320 by evaluating the sensor signal, according to an exemplary embodiment. The processor may be configured to evaluate the plurality of sensor signals to authenticate an entire batch ofconcrete 320, average data from the plurality of sensors signals, or evaluate the amount ofcement taggants 322 within different portions of concrete 320 (e.g., an amount ofcement taggants 322 during the initial pour relative to a mid-pour amount of cement taggants 322), among other alternatives. - In some embodiments,
authentication assembly 300 includes a flow rate sensor configured to provide flow rate signals relating to the flow rate ofconcrete 320 alongchute 310. The processor may be configured to determine the characteristic of cement withinconcrete 320 by evaluating the flow rate signals. By way of example, the processor may divide the amount ofcement taggants 322 detected bysensor 330 in a period of time by the flow rate ofconcrete 320 to estimate the total number ofcement taggants 322 within a batch ofconcrete 320. - In one embodiment,
cement taggants 322 are positioned within a hollow shell (e.g., a polymeric shell, etc.) or include a material having a density that is less than the density ofconcrete 320. As shown inFIG. 5 ,sensor 330 is coupled to arod 332 with afin 334. In some embodiments,rod 332 is rotatably coupled tobrackets 314 ofchute 310 and defines an axis of rotation.Concrete 320 flowing alongchute 310contacts fin 334 and rotatesrod 332 about the axis of rotation and relative tobrackets 314. As shown inFIG. 5 ,sensor 330 is positioned at an end offin 334 such that rotation offin 334 androd 332positions sensor 330 along an upper surface of concrete 320 (e.g., to interface with a greater amount ofcement taggants 322 floating along an upper surface ofconcrete 320, etc.). - In another embodiment,
rod 332 is fixed tobrackets 314 such thatfin 334 remains stationary relative tochute 310.Cement taggants 322 interface withsensor 330 asconcrete 320 flows withinchute 310.Authentication assembly 300 having astationary fin 334positions sensor 330 within the volume of concrete 320 (e.g., thereby interfacing withcement taggants 322 having a density equal to or greater than the density of concrete 320). In some embodiments,authentication assembly 300 includes a fixed orrotating fin 334 to selectively interface withcement taggants 322 having particular data. By way of example, concrete 320 may include a first set ofcement taggants 322 having a first density and a second set ofcement taggants 322 having a second density.Authentication assembly 300 may include arotating fin 334 to positionsensor 330 for interfacing with either the first set ofcement taggants 322 or the second set ofcement taggants 322. In still other embodiments,fin 334 is fixed (e.g., within a plane orthogonal to flow direction 312), and a plurality ofsensors 330 interface withcement taggants 322. Afirst sensor 330 may be positioned to interface with the first set of cement taggants 322 (e.g., along the surface ofconcrete 320, etc.), and asecond sensor 330 may be positioned to interface with the second set of cement taggants 322 (e.g., at an end offin 334, etc.). - Referring to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 6 ,authentication assembly 300 includes a plurality ofsensors 330 coupled torod 332 with a plurality offins 334. In one embodiment, the plurality ofsensors 330 provide a plurality of sensor signals. A processor may evaluate the plurality of sensor signals to determine the characteristic ofconcrete 320.Concrete 320 flowing alongflow direction 312 rotatesfins 334 thereby sequentially exposingsensors 330 to concrete 320. According to one embodiment,sensors 330 are identical and the processor is configured to average or otherwise manipulate signals from sensors 330 (e.g., to reduce the risk of false negative readings from one sensor 330). According to another embodiment,sensors 330 detect different cement taggants 322 (e.g., afirst sensor 330 is a photo sensor to detect the fluorescence ofcement taggants 322 and a second sensor is a radiofrequency antenna configured to receive radio waves fromcement taggants 322, etc.). - Referring next to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 7 ,concrete 320 is positioned within a housing, shown ascontainer 316. In one embodiment, an inspector authenticates concrete 320 by positioning a sample incontainer 316 and operatingauthentication assembly 300. As shown inFIG. 7 ,concrete 320 includescement taggants 322, a volume of cementitious material, shown ascement particles 324, and additional material, shown asaggregate 326.Sensors 330 are coupled to a driver, shown asdrill 340, withrod 332 andfin 334. Drill 340 moves (e.g., rotates, etc.)rod 332 andfin 334 withinconcrete 320. A processor is configured to evaluate sensor signals provided bysensors 330 to determine a characteristic ofconcrete 320. As shown inFIG. 7 ,authentication assembly 300 may authenticate wet ordry concrete 320. In some embodiments,concrete 320 does not flow throughcontainer 316 thereby reducing the need to coupleauthentication assembly 300 along the flow path between the batch of concrete (e.g., within a drum of a concrete mixer truck, etc.) and work area (e.g., a concrete form).Authentication assembly 300 as shown inFIG. 7 is intended to facilitate the remote authentication of concrete 320 (e.g., within a dedicated test area on a jobsite, etc.). In other embodiments,sensor 330 is positioned outside the volume ofconcrete 320.Sensor 330 may authenticate concrete 320 by interfacing withcement taggants 322 therein (e.g., by sensing response signals generated bycement taggants 322, by identifying the trace elements ofcement taggants 322, etc.). - Referring next to the embodiment shown in
FIG. 8 , concrete is produced and distributed according to aprocess 400. As shown inFIG. 8 , raw cementitious material is mined (410) and processed (e.g., milled, ground, etc.) at 420. The processed cementitious material may be provided to a concrete plant at 430. In some embodiments, additional materials (e.g., aggregates, reinforcement fibers, chemical admixtures, fly ash, sand, etc.) are mixed into the processed cementitious material by the concrete plant at 430. The mixed concrete is thereafter distributed to a jobsite (440). The mixed concrete may be distributed with concrete trucks to a remote jobsite or transported to an internal manufacturing facility (e.g., to produce pre-form concrete products). The distributed concrete is thereafter poured into a concrete form (450). - As shown in
FIG. 8 , taggants may be introduced into the cementitious material at a plurality of points withinprocess 400. Taggants may be introduced after the raw cementitious material is processed between 420 and 430. Such taggants may include data relating to a characteristic of the cementitious material (e.g., processor's identity, processing date, etc.). The processed cementitious material is provided to a concrete plant at 430 where it may be authenticated before or after being mixed with additional materials (i.e. the cementitious material may be authenticated between 430 and 440). By way of example, a concrete plant may authenticate the processor, the processing date, the moisture content, or still another characteristic of the cementitious material to ensure that the concrete produced therefrom conforms with predetermined specifications (e.g., standards, customer requests, etc.). A processor may monitor a mix status of the concrete by evaluating a homogeneity of the taggants in the concrete mixture. The mix status may include whether the concrete has been mixed to a specified degree. - In some embodiments, taggants are introduced between 430 and 440 (e.g., to identify a production time, etc.) by the concrete plant or an inspector. The concrete is thereafter delivered to the jobsite at 440. The concrete may be authenticated by an inspector upon arrival or at another point before entering the concrete form (e.g., as the concrete flows down the concrete chute, etc.). Taggants may be added to the concrete between 440 and 450 (e.g., taggants specifying the area of the building where the concrete is intended to be placed). After the concrete is poured into the form at 450, the concrete may be authenticated (i.e. in-situ authentication) either before or after the concrete sets. In some embodiments, inspectors introduce taggants at various points throughout
process 400 after the authentication process and before the following process (e.g., taggants relating to an authentication status of the cementitious material). - While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements. It should be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the enclosure may be constructed from any of a wide variety of materials that provide sufficient strength or durability, in any of a wide variety of colors, textures, and combinations. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present inventions. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to other embodiments. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
- The present disclosure contemplates methods, systems, and program products on any machine-readable media for accomplishing various operations. The embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented using existing computer processors, or by a special purpose computer processor for an appropriate system, incorporated for this or another purpose, or by a hardwired system. Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure include program products comprising machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a machine, the machine properly views the connection as a machine-readable medium. Thus, any such connection is properly termed a machine-readable medium. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable media. Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data, which cause a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.
- Although the figures may show a specific order of method steps, the order of the steps may differ from what is depicted. Also two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Such variation will depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. All such variations are within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, software implementations could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule-based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps, and decision steps.
Claims (46)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/292,334 US9751812B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2014-05-30 | Taggant for cement authentication |
US15/694,310 US20170369383A1 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-09-01 | Taggant for cement authentication |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/292,334 US9751812B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2014-05-30 | Taggant for cement authentication |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/694,310 Continuation US20170369383A1 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-09-01 | Taggant for cement authentication |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150344376A1 true US20150344376A1 (en) | 2015-12-03 |
US9751812B2 US9751812B2 (en) | 2017-09-05 |
Family
ID=54700975
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/292,334 Expired - Fee Related US9751812B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2014-05-30 | Taggant for cement authentication |
US15/694,310 Abandoned US20170369383A1 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-09-01 | Taggant for cement authentication |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/694,310 Abandoned US20170369383A1 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-09-01 | Taggant for cement authentication |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9751812B2 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9610597B1 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-04-04 | Copilot Ventures Fund Iii Llc | Methods of delivery of encapsulated perfluorocarbon taggants |
EP3456696A1 (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2019-03-20 | PCT Chemie GmbH | Additive composition for the addition to a building material, their use and method for detecting the additive composition |
WO2019066812A1 (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2019-04-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Detection of location of cement |
US10370578B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2019-08-06 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method of encapsulating signaling agents for use downhole |
EP3570026A3 (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2019-12-11 | KH miljø ApS | Method with tracing agent for detecting a quantity of building material |
JP2022517910A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2022-03-11 | ガイ スティーブンス、ヘンリー | Paints and other substances containing taggants |
CN115082447A (en) * | 2022-07-25 | 2022-09-20 | 三一汽车制造有限公司 | Method and device for measuring uniformity of mortar, readable storage medium and electronic equipment |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11236234B2 (en) | 2018-01-03 | 2022-02-01 | United States Gypsum Company | Joint compounds and plasters with a complexometric dye and methods |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US205598A (en) * | 1878-07-02 | Improvement in cements | ||
US4131064A (en) * | 1977-07-15 | 1978-12-26 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Tagging particles which are easily detected by luminescent response, or magnetic pickup, or both |
US4209302A (en) * | 1979-05-10 | 1980-06-24 | Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. | Marker for petroleum fuels |
US5306343A (en) * | 1993-04-26 | 1994-04-26 | Morton International, Inc. | Tagging and identifying asphalt additives |
US5902750A (en) * | 1997-08-07 | 1999-05-11 | Morton International, Inc. | Tagging of waterborne compositions with oil-soluble markers |
US6531528B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2003-03-11 | Dap Products Inc. | Ready to use spackle/repair product containing dryness indicator |
US20090289765A1 (en) * | 2008-05-21 | 2009-11-26 | Mitomo Corporation | Wireless identification tag |
US20110138887A1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2011-06-16 | Targosz Thomas C | Inspection of installed asphalt |
US20130104797A1 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2013-05-02 | Jorge G. Chiappo | System, method and apparatus for forensic marking of cementitious materials |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DK0477220T3 (en) | 1989-05-22 | 1996-10-21 | Hoffmann La Roche | Method for labeling and tracing materials with nucleic acids |
US5541855A (en) | 1991-08-28 | 1996-07-30 | Atrof Bauphysik Ag | Device for testing unset concrete and mortar |
US6740875B1 (en) | 1999-02-11 | 2004-05-25 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Gamma watermarking |
US6806478B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2004-10-19 | Cryovac, Inc. | Authentication system and methodology |
-
2014
- 2014-05-30 US US14/292,334 patent/US9751812B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-09-01 US US15/694,310 patent/US20170369383A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US205598A (en) * | 1878-07-02 | Improvement in cements | ||
US4131064A (en) * | 1977-07-15 | 1978-12-26 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Tagging particles which are easily detected by luminescent response, or magnetic pickup, or both |
US4209302A (en) * | 1979-05-10 | 1980-06-24 | Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. | Marker for petroleum fuels |
US5306343A (en) * | 1993-04-26 | 1994-04-26 | Morton International, Inc. | Tagging and identifying asphalt additives |
US5902750A (en) * | 1997-08-07 | 1999-05-11 | Morton International, Inc. | Tagging of waterborne compositions with oil-soluble markers |
US6531528B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2003-03-11 | Dap Products Inc. | Ready to use spackle/repair product containing dryness indicator |
US20110138887A1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2011-06-16 | Targosz Thomas C | Inspection of installed asphalt |
US20090289765A1 (en) * | 2008-05-21 | 2009-11-26 | Mitomo Corporation | Wireless identification tag |
US20130104797A1 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2013-05-02 | Jorge G. Chiappo | System, method and apparatus for forensic marking of cementitious materials |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9610597B1 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-04-04 | Copilot Ventures Fund Iii Llc | Methods of delivery of encapsulated perfluorocarbon taggants |
US10543503B1 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2020-01-28 | Copilot Ventures Fund Iii Llc | Methods of delivery of encapsulated perfluorocarbon taggants |
US10370578B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2019-08-06 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method of encapsulating signaling agents for use downhole |
US10435613B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2019-10-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method of encapsulating signaling agents for use downhole |
EP3456696A1 (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2019-03-20 | PCT Chemie GmbH | Additive composition for the addition to a building material, their use and method for detecting the additive composition |
WO2019066812A1 (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2019-04-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Detection of location of cement |
GB2578993A (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2020-06-03 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Detection of location of cement |
US11143015B2 (en) | 2017-09-27 | 2021-10-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Detection of location of cement |
GB2578993B (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2022-02-23 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Detection of location of cement |
EP3570026A3 (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2019-12-11 | KH miljø ApS | Method with tracing agent for detecting a quantity of building material |
JP2022517910A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2022-03-11 | ガイ スティーブンス、ヘンリー | Paints and other substances containing taggants |
CN115082447A (en) * | 2022-07-25 | 2022-09-20 | 三一汽车制造有限公司 | Method and device for measuring uniformity of mortar, readable storage medium and electronic equipment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9751812B2 (en) | 2017-09-05 |
US20170369383A1 (en) | 2017-12-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9751812B2 (en) | Taggant for cement authentication | |
US11740224B2 (en) | Embedded wireless monitoring sensors | |
US11454606B2 (en) | Method and systems relating to construction material assessment | |
JP5480144B2 (en) | Assembly of concrete reinforcement and markers | |
CA2573475C (en) | Quality control system of concrete and cement products using wireless ic tag | |
Verma et al. | Review of nondestructive testing methods for condition monitoring of concrete structures | |
US10184928B2 (en) | Measuring device, systems, and methods for obtaining data relating to condition and performance of concrete mixtures | |
CN100494890C (en) | Method of determining a dimension of a sample of a construction material and associated apparatus | |
Mahmoud | Development of experimental methods for the evaluation of aggregate resistance to polishing, abrasion, and breakage | |
Qin et al. | Microscopic Texture of Polypropylene Fiber‐Reinforced Concrete with X‐Ray Computed Tomography | |
JP2007033238A (en) | Method for managing and assuring quality of concrete | |
Weise et al. | A multiscale and multimethod approach to assess and mitigate concrete damage due to alkali–silica reaction | |
Gavilan et al. | Variations of in situ concrete strength by European Standard and American Code | |
Varner et al. | Variability of cement-treated layers in MDOT road projects. | |
Karlovsek et al. | Frequency-dependant dielectric parameters of steel fiber reinforced concrete | |
Lindgård et al. | Field experience from investigation of more than 100 Norwegian bridges with respect to Alkali Aggregate Reactions (AAR) | |
Rupnow et al. | Effect of Sampling Location on the Air Void Analyzer Test Results on Concrete Pavements: Evaluation of Data from a 16 State-Pooled Fund Project | |
Robertson | Use of Self-Consolidating Concrete for Bridge Drilled Shaft Construction | |
Chang et al. | Evaluation of nonnuclear density tests on hot mix asphalt segregation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ELWHA LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BOWERS, JEFFREY A.;FERREN, BRAN;HILLIS, W. DANIEL;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20140811 TO 20150615;REEL/FRAME:036266/0916 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20210905 |