US20150168950A1 - Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150168950A1
US20150168950A1 US14/629,600 US201514629600A US2015168950A1 US 20150168950 A1 US20150168950 A1 US 20150168950A1 US 201514629600 A US201514629600 A US 201514629600A US 2015168950 A1 US2015168950 A1 US 2015168950A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
algorithm
prognostication
probability
output
prdictr
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/629,600
Inventor
Ronald E. Wagner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Original Assignee
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc filed Critical BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Priority to US14/629,600 priority Critical patent/US20150168950A1/en
Publication of US20150168950A1 publication Critical patent/US20150168950A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • G05B23/0254Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model based on a quantitative model, e.g. mathematical relationships between inputs and outputs; functions: observer, Kalman filter, residual calculation, Neural Networks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/26Pc applications
    • G05B2219/2637Vehicle, car, auto, wheelchair

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the provision of on-board diagnostics for vehicle fleet maintenance and more particularly to the embedding of a microprocessor programmed with a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle.
  • prognostication algorithms have been utilized to predict faults in the operation of vehicles. More importantly the prognostics algorithm, referred to herein as the PRDICTR algorithm, is used to analyze data from vehicles at a central or remote location where the algorithms can be run on relatively complex large fast computers. As originally described, the PRDICTR algorithms are computationally intense and were developed mainly for Class 8 vehicles which are greater than 30,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. Even if the prognostication algorithms are run at a vehicle, they require computational assets that are far in excess of those that can be offered by microprocessors. Thus hosting a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle requires not only a considerable amount of computer power, but also a considerable amount of space.
  • the problem therefore becomes is how to embed prognostication in lightweight vehicles where only microprocessors are available for performing any on-board computation. There is therefore a requirement for a stripped down version of the prognostication algorithm to be able to operate on smaller processors such as microprocessors.
  • a prognostication algorithm is provided for use in lightweight vehicles that can be run on local microprocessors in which the prognostication algorithms are altered to be able to operate on the smaller processors.
  • these algorithms are referred to as PRDICTR Light or on-board diagnostic vehicle OBD2 algorithms.
  • a modified algorithm is utilized that reconfigures the failure modes and effects analysis which is the front end of the prognostication algorithm. After providing a stripped down version of the prognostication algorithm, one must then find and apply reasoners that operate faster in this kind of environment.
  • PRDICTR algorithm is ordinarily configured by modeling and simulation to create an acceptable probability for a node for a given set of inputs and an observed set of outputs.
  • the on-board PRDICTR algorithm runs all inputs each time to change the model and simulation. This is of course computationally intense.
  • the PRDICTR algorithm is run at the point of performance for a number of inputs. Then for a given output the input I y and the output O x is assigned a probability, with the PRDICTR algorithm then developed based on an acceptable probability. Once the PRDICTR algorithm has been developed based on the probability of one input and one output, modeling and simulation is utilized to create a modified PRDICTR algorithm, with this algorithm being embedded at the point of performance on a microprocessor. The result is improved fault determination which is faster, more accurate, and requires less infrastructure than the prior instantiation of the prognostication algorithms.
  • on-board diagnostics for fleet maintenance is improved by embedding a microprocessor programmed with a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a prior art 30,000 plus gross ton vehicle having an onboard PRDICTR algorithm within the cab of the vehicle;
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a light vehicle in which a microprocessor with a PRDICTR Light algorithm is utilized to permit the use of microprocessors;
  • FIG. 3 is a listing of the on-board PRDICTR prior art requirements for modeling and simulation that creates a probability of a node for a given set of inputs, indicating that all inputs must be run each time in order to change the model and simulation used in the prognostication algorithm;
  • FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of a set of inputs and outputs that describe the operation of a system at a point of performance, in which selected inputs and outputs are analyzed as to probability, thereby to be able to develop a stripped down PRDICTR algorithm based on acceptable probability, with the stripped, down PRDICTR algorithm embedded at the point of performance.
  • the prior PRDICTR algorithms are utilized on Class 8 vehicles those such as vehicle 10 that are 30,000 plus gross weight vehicles, in which the on-board PRDICTR algorithm 12 is run on an embedded computer 14 within the vehicle.
  • computer 14 The size and computational capabilities of computer 14 are not those associated with microprocessors, but rather these computers have massive computational power, unsuitable for use in light vehicles due to size and complexity.
  • a light vehicle 20 includes a microprocessor with a light version of the PRDICTR algorithm as illustrated at 22 , with the microprocessor being embedded in the vehicle.
  • the algorithm takes inputs from selected vehicle sensors and provides prognostic predications of vehicle failure modes. It is the purpose of the subject invention to provide a PRDICTR Light version of at prognostication algorithm to permit the use of microprocessors by eliminating running massive numbers of inputs each time in order to exercise the prognostication algorithm.

Abstract

On-board diagnostics for fleet maintenance is improved by embedding a microprocessor programmed with a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This Application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/807,923 filed Sep. 16, 2010 and claims rights under 35 USC §119(e) from U.S. Application Ser. No. 61/342,133 filed Apr. 9, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to the provision of on-board diagnostics for vehicle fleet maintenance and more particularly to the embedding of a microprocessor programmed with a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • As discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/548,683 by Carolyn Spier filed on Aug. 27, 2009, assigned to the assignee hereof incorporated herein reference, prognostication algorithms have been utilized to predict faults in the operation of vehicles. More importantly the prognostics algorithm, referred to herein as the PRDICTR algorithm, is used to analyze data from vehicles at a central or remote location where the algorithms can be run on relatively complex large fast computers. As originally described, the PRDICTR algorithms are computationally intense and were developed mainly for Class 8 vehicles which are greater than 30,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. Even if the prognostication algorithms are run at a vehicle, they require computational assets that are far in excess of those that can be offered by microprocessors. Thus hosting a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle requires not only a considerable amount of computer power, but also a considerable amount of space.
  • The problem therefore becomes is how to embed prognostication in lightweight vehicles where only microprocessors are available for performing any on-board computation. There is therefore a requirement for a stripped down version of the prognostication algorithm to be able to operate on smaller processors such as microprocessors.
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION
  • A prognostication algorithm is provided for use in lightweight vehicles that can be run on local microprocessors in which the prognostication algorithms are altered to be able to operate on the smaller processors. In one embodiment these algorithms are referred to as PRDICTR Light or on-board diagnostic vehicle OBD2 algorithms.
  • In order to provide a stripped down version of the prognostication algorithm, a modified algorithm is utilized that reconfigures the failure modes and effects analysis which is the front end of the prognostication algorithm. After providing a stripped down version of the prognostication algorithm, one must then find and apply reasoners that operate faster in this kind of environment.
  • Once having provided a stripped down PRDICTR algorithm that exhibits appropriate validity, then this algorithm is embedded into the smaller vehicles.
  • In order to provide the stripped down version of the PRDICTR algorithm, it is noted that PRDICTR algorithm is ordinarily configured by modeling and simulation to create an acceptable probability for a node for a given set of inputs and an observed set of outputs. In the prior art, the on-board PRDICTR algorithm runs all inputs each time to change the model and simulation. This is of course computationally intense.
  • Rather than running all inputs each time one wishes to change a model and simulation, in the subject invention the PRDICTR algorithm is run at the point of performance for a number of inputs. Then for a given output the input Iy and the output Ox is assigned a probability, with the PRDICTR algorithm then developed based on an acceptable probability. Once the PRDICTR algorithm has been developed based on the probability of one input and one output, modeling and simulation is utilized to create a modified PRDICTR algorithm, with this algorithm being embedded at the point of performance on a microprocessor. The result is improved fault determination which is faster, more accurate, and requires less infrastructure than the prior instantiation of the prognostication algorithms.
  • In summary, on-board diagnostics for fleet maintenance is improved by embedding a microprocessor programmed with a prognostication algorithm on a vehicle.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These and other features of the subject invention will be better understood in connection with the Detailed Description, in conjunction with the Drawings, of which:
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a prior art 30,000 plus gross ton vehicle having an onboard PRDICTR algorithm within the cab of the vehicle;
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a light vehicle in which a microprocessor with a PRDICTR Light algorithm is utilized to permit the use of microprocessors;
  • FIG. 3 is a listing of the on-board PRDICTR prior art requirements for modeling and simulation that creates a probability of a node for a given set of inputs, indicating that all inputs must be run each time in order to change the model and simulation used in the prognostication algorithm; and,
  • FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of a set of inputs and outputs that describe the operation of a system at a point of performance, in which selected inputs and outputs are analyzed as to probability, thereby to be able to develop a stripped down PRDICTR algorithm based on acceptable probability, with the stripped, down PRDICTR algorithm embedded at the point of performance.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • As can be seen from FIG. 1, the prior PRDICTR algorithms are utilized on Class 8 vehicles those such as vehicle 10 that are 30,000 plus gross weight vehicles, in which the on-board PRDICTR algorithm 12 is run on an embedded computer 14 within the vehicle.
  • The size and computational capabilities of computer 14 are not those associated with microprocessors, but rather these computers have massive computational power, unsuitable for use in light vehicles due to size and complexity.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, a light vehicle 20 includes a microprocessor with a light version of the PRDICTR algorithm as illustrated at 22, with the microprocessor being embedded in the vehicle. The algorithm takes inputs from selected vehicle sensors and provides prognostic predications of vehicle failure modes. It is the purpose of the subject invention to provide a PRDICTR Light version of at prognostication algorithm to permit the use of microprocessors by eliminating running massive numbers of inputs each time in order to exercise the prognostication algorithm.
  • As shown in FIG. 3, it was the practice hereinbefore when using an on-board PRDICTR to provide modeling and simulation that would describe the probability of a node for a given set of inputs and an observed set of outputs. Thus, for a potential failure mode in a vehicle, it was necessary to run all of the inputs from all of the sensors each time it was necessary to change a model and simulation. This is an incredibly and computationally intense process; and one not readily adapted to light vehicles where only microprocessor processing is available.
  • Referring to FIG. 4, it is possible to develop a stripped down prognostication algorithm by providing a large number of inputs and a large number of outputs, and then ascertaining the probability for a given input and a given output. This involves a reduced data set wherein for instance the interaction of input I1 with input In, for instance at a node 30, and again at a node 32 produces an output 34 having an ascertainable probability. Having ascertained that the probability is sufficiently high, one can develop a PRDICTR algorithm and embed this PRDICTR algorithm at the point of performance on a microprocessor. The result is improved fault predictions and especially fault predictions that can be made at the vehicle and on common microprocessors. The result is improved fault determination which is faster, more accurate and requires less infrastructure.
  • Thus, what is developed is the ability to slim down the standard PRDICTR algorithm by sensing only a few of the input variables and developing a PRDICTR algorithm based on the result of these particular inputs.
  • While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function, of the present invention without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the recitation of the appended claims.

Claims (7)

What is claimed is:
1. A method of providing a computationally less intense prognostication algorithm by providing a stripped down version of a standard prognostication algorithm by using selected input sets and a selected output of a monitored system, determining the probability of the output and developing a prognostication algorithm utilizing modeling and simulation based on an acceptable probability.
2. The method of claim 2, and further including the step of embedding the developed prognostication algorithm at the point of performance.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein only one selected input and one selected output that describes the operation of the monitored system to determine the acceptable probability.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the result of the analysis of the single input and the single output is used to develop the prognostication algorithm.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein multiple inputs are utilized with at single output for ascertaining acceptable probability.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the monitored system has nodes, and wherein when the probability of a node is sufficiently high, the inputs and output are used in he modeling and simulation to develop the prognostication algorithm.
7. The method of claim 3, wherein the selected input and selected output determine the probability at a predetermined node in the monitored system, whereby a reduced set of inputs is utilized in developing the prognostication algorithm.
US14/629,600 2010-04-09 2015-02-24 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics Abandoned US20150168950A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/629,600 US20150168950A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-02-24 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US34213310P 2010-04-09 2010-04-09
US12/807,923 US8977529B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2010-09-16 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics
US14/629,600 US20150168950A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-02-24 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/807,923 Continuation US8977529B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2010-09-16 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150168950A1 true US20150168950A1 (en) 2015-06-18

Family

ID=50100660

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/807,923 Expired - Fee Related US8977529B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2010-09-16 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics
US14/629,600 Abandoned US20150168950A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-02-24 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/807,923 Expired - Fee Related US8977529B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2010-09-16 Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8977529B2 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040168100A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2004-08-26 Thottan Marina K. Fault detection and prediction for management of computer networks
US7260501B2 (en) * 2004-04-21 2007-08-21 University Of Connecticut Intelligent model-based diagnostics for system monitoring, diagnosis and maintenance

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040168100A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2004-08-26 Thottan Marina K. Fault detection and prediction for management of computer networks
US7260501B2 (en) * 2004-04-21 2007-08-21 University Of Connecticut Intelligent model-based diagnostics for system monitoring, diagnosis and maintenance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8977529B2 (en) 2015-03-10
US20140052418A1 (en) 2014-02-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112559315B (en) Test framework for automation objects
Velez et al. Embedding vision‐based advanced driver assistance systems: a survey
CN107066375A (en) Security critical software automation need-based test case generation system and method
CN112558555B (en) Maintenance and debugging
US8103490B2 (en) Method to aid the design of a system architecture
EP4006733A1 (en) Fuzzy testing a software system
CN111046027A (en) Missing value filling method and device for time series data
CN112818966B (en) Multi-mode remote sensing image data detection method and system
CN111145076A (en) Data parallelization processing method, system, equipment and storage medium
CN107220539A (en) Need-based IMA safety verification analysis methods
Aslansefat et al. Toward improving confidence in autonomous vehicle software: A study on traffic sign recognition systems
US8751094B2 (en) Method for validation of a graphically based executable control specification using model extraction
Chen et al. AI maintenance: a robustness perspective
US20110106515A1 (en) System and method for resource identification
Macher et al. Dependable integration concepts for human-centric ai-based systems
US8977529B2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing on-board diagnostics
Soubra et al. Functional size measurement for processor load estimation in AUTOSAR
US8751093B2 (en) Hierarchical accumulated validation system and method
CN115033471A (en) Method and system for automatically generating integrated test program by using system test program
Steimers et al. Sources of risk and design principles of trustworthy artificial intelligence
KR20210023722A (en) Method for testing a system to a request
US20200104234A1 (en) Event log processing
CN114651190A (en) Method, device and computer program for approving the use of a sensor system for detecting objects in the environment of a vehicle
Frisk et al. A toolbox for design of diagnosis systems
US20240045728A1 (en) Method for processing sensor data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION