US20150168592A1 - Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement - Google Patents

Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150168592A1
US20150168592A1 US14/635,430 US201514635430A US2015168592A1 US 20150168592 A1 US20150168592 A1 US 20150168592A1 US 201514635430 A US201514635430 A US 201514635430A US 2015168592 A1 US2015168592 A1 US 2015168592A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gamma
neutron
downhole tool
rays
neutrons
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/635,430
Inventor
Christian Stoller
Peter Wraight
Bradley A. Roscoe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Technology Corp filed Critical Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority to US14/635,430 priority Critical patent/US20150168592A1/en
Publication of US20150168592A1 publication Critical patent/US20150168592A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V5/00Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity
    • G01V5/04Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging
    • G01V5/08Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays
    • G01V5/10Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources
    • G01V5/101Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources and detecting the secondary Y-rays produced in the surrounding layers of the bore hole
    • G01V5/102Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources and detecting the secondary Y-rays produced in the surrounding layers of the bore hole the neutron source being of the pulsed type

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to well logging with neutron-induced gamma-rays and, more particularly, to well logging with neutron-induced activation gamma-rays.
  • the elemental composition of a subterranean formation may be determined in a variety of ways.
  • An indirect determination of formation lithology may be obtained using information from density and photoelectric effect (PEF) measurements from gamma-ray scattering in the formation.
  • a direct detection of formation elements may be obtained by detecting neutron-induced gamma-rays. Neutron-induced gamma-rays may be created when a neutron source emits neutrons into a formation, which may interact with formation elements through inelastic scattering, high-energy nuclear reactions, or neutron capture.
  • each radioactive isotope in the formation may have a characteristic half-life and a characteristic decay path to a non-radioactive element.
  • the decay of most radioactive elements may be accompanied by the emission of one or more characteristic gamma-rays. These characteristic gamma-rays may be used to identify the element of the formation that is decaying, and thus may indicate a unique formation element that has been activated by inelastic scattering or neutron capture.
  • Various formation measurements may be obtained based on the above-described nuclear reactions.
  • fracture height determination in a formation may be undertaken by injecting radioactive tracer elements into a formation with fracture fluid and proppant, subsequently measuring characteristic gamma-rays emitted by the tracer.
  • the use of a radioactive tracer may introduce a number of regulatory, environmental, and other challenges, as the radioactive tracer may be in liquid form and thus easily dispersible.
  • certain techniques have been developed to avoid the use of radioactive tracer in fracture height determination. These techniques may involve the injection of an inert liquid tracer into the formation, which may be subsequently bombarded with neutron radiation to activate the tracer in the liquid.
  • the source of the activating neutron radiation may be moved away from the point of measurement, and the activation radiation may be measured at a later time when a gamma-ray detector or other detector passes by this point.
  • the intervening time between activation and measurement may allow materials in the tracer-containing fracture fluid to move, which may result in an incorrect interpretation of a formation fracture or other formation properties.
  • a downhole tool for measuring neutron-induced activation gamma-rays may include a neutron source and a gamma-ray detector.
  • the neutron source may emit neutrons according to a pulsing scheme that includes a delay between two pulses. The delay may be sufficient to allow substantially all neutron capture events due to the emitted neutrons to cease.
  • the gamma-ray detector may be configured to detect activation gamma-rays produced when elements activated by the emitted neutrons decay to a non-radioactive state.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system including a downhole tool and data processing circuitry for measuring neutron-induced gamma-rays, in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a well logging operation using the downhole tool of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 3 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating a neutron pulsing scheme for the downhole tool of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 4 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating a microbursting scheme for use in the neutron pulsing scheme of FIG. 3 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 5 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating another neutron pulsing scheme, in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart describing an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements for determining a characteristic of a subterranean formation using the downhole tool of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 7 is flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements for a fracture height determination using the downhole tool of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating a relative gamma-ray count over time using the downhole tool of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements at specific times, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining neutron-induced gamma-ray measurements with neutrons supplied by d-D and d-T reactions, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • Embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter relate generally to systems and methods for neutron-induced gamma-ray well logging.
  • the presently disclosed subject matter relates to activating nuclei of a subterranean formation by bombarding the formation with neutrons, which may thereafter emit gamma-rays (“activation gamma-rays”) having characteristic spectra.
  • activation gamma-rays gamma-rays
  • the presently disclosed subject matter may involve bombarding the subterranean formation with neutrons using a neutron pulsing scheme that includes a specific delay between pulses.
  • neutrons may be emitted into the formation for a specific amount of time, during which the formation nuclei may become activated by inelastic scattering events and/or neutron capture events. These events may produce “inelastic gamma-rays” and “neutron capture gamma-rays,” respectively, while the neutrons are being emitted into the formation and for a short time afterward.
  • the presence of the delay in the neutron pulsing scheme may allow time for the inelastic gamma-rays and neutron capture gamma-rays to die away, leaving substantially only the activation gamma-rays from the activated formation nuclei.
  • the activation gamma-rays may then be detected during the delay, rather than at a later time when the neutron source has been moved away. Additionally or alternatively, the presently disclosed subject matter may also enable the measurement of inelastic gamma-rays and/or neutron capture gamma-rays in conjunction with the activation gamma-rays.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 for determining subterranean formation properties using activation gamma-rays that includes a downhole tool 12 and a data processing system 14 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may be a slickline or wireline tool for logging an existing well, or may be installed in a borehole assembly for logging while drilling (LWD).
  • the data processing system 14 may be incorporated into the downhole tool 12 or may be at a remote location.
  • the downhole tool 12 may be surrounded by a housing 16 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may include a neutron source 18 configured to emit neutrons into a formation according to a neutron pulsing scheme, as described below.
  • the neutron source 18 may be an electronic neutron source, such as a MinitronTM by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, which may produce pulses of neutrons through d-D and/or d-T reactions.
  • a neutron monitor 20 may monitor neutron emissions from the neutron source 18 to more precisely observe the quantity of neutrons emitted by the neutron source 18 .
  • the neutron monitor 20 may be a plastic scintillator and photomultiplier that may primarily detect unscattered neutrons directly from the neutron source 18 , and may provide a count rate signal proportional to the neutron output rate from the neutron source 18 .
  • a neutron shield 22 may separate the neutron source 18 from various detectors in the downhole tool 12 .
  • a similar shield 24 which may contain elements such as lead, may prevent gamma-rays from traveling between the various detectors of the downhole tool 12 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may include one or more gamma-ray detectors, and may include three or more gamma-ray detectors.
  • the downhole tool 12 illustrated in FIG. 1 includes two gamma-ray detectors 26 and 28 .
  • the relative positions of the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 in the downhole tool 12 may vary.
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and 28 may be located on opposite sides of the neutron source 18 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be contained in respective housings 30 .
  • Scintillator crystals 32 in the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may enable detection counts or spectra of gamma-rays by producing light when gamma-rays scatter or are captured in the scintillator crystals 32 .
  • the scintillator crystals 32 may be inorganic scintillation detectors containing, for example, NaI(Tl), LaCl 3 , LaBr 3 , BGO, GSO, YAP, and/or other suitable materials. Housings 34 may surround the scintillator crystals 32 .
  • Photodetectors 36 may detect light emitted by the scintillator crystals 32 when a gamma-ray is absorbed and the light has passed through an optical window 38 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be configured to obtain a gamma-ray count and/or gamma-ray spectra.
  • the signals from the neutron monitor 20 and gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be transmitted to the data processing system 14 as data 40 .
  • the data processing system 14 may include a general-purpose computer, such as a personal computer, configured to run a variety of software, including software implementing all or part of the present techniques.
  • the data processing system 14 may include, among other things, a mainframe computer, a distributed computing system, or an application-specific computer or workstation configured to implement all or part of the present technique based on specialized software and/or hardware provided as part of the system.
  • the data processing system 14 may include either a single processor or a plurality of processors to facilitate implementation of the presently disclosed functionality. Processing may be done at least in part by an embedded processor in the downhole tool.
  • the data processing system 14 may include data processing circuitry 44 , which may be a microcontroller or microprocessor, such as a central processing unit (CPU), which may execute various routines and processing functions.
  • the data processing circuitry 44 may execute various operating system instructions as well as software routines configured to effect certain processes and stored in or provided by a manufacture including a computer readable-medium, such as a memory device (e.g., a random access memory (RAM) of a personal computer) or one or more mass storage devices (e.g., an internal or external hard drive, a solid-state storage device, CD-ROM, DVD, or other storage device).
  • the data processing circuitry 44 may process data provided as inputs for various routines or software programs, including the data 40 .
  • Such data associated with the present techniques may be stored in, or provided by, the memory or mass storage device of the data processing system 14 .
  • data may be provided to the data processing circuitry 44 of the data processing system 14 via one or more input devices.
  • data acquisition circuitry 42 may represent one such input device; however, the input devices may also include manual input devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, or the like.
  • the input devices may include a network device, such as a wired or wireless Ethernet card, a wireless network adapter, or any of various ports or devices configured to facilitate communication with other devices via any suitable communications network, such as a local area network or the Internet.
  • the data processing system 14 may exchange data and communicate with other networked electronic systems, whether proximate to or remote from the system.
  • the network may include various components that facilitate communication, including switches, routers, servers or other computers, network adapters, communications cables, and so forth.
  • the downhole tool 12 may transmit the data 40 to the data acquisition circuitry 42 of the data processing system 14 via, for example, a telemetry system communication downlink or a communication cable.
  • the data acquisition circuitry 42 may transmit the data 40 to data processing circuitry 44 .
  • the data processing circuitry 44 may process the data 40 to ascertain one or more properties of a subterranean formation surrounding the downhole tool 12 . Such processing may involve, for example, one or more techniques for determining a formation property based on activation gamma-rays and/or inelastic or neutron capture gamma-rays.
  • the data processing circuitry 44 may thereafter output a report 46 indicating the one or more ascertained properties of the formation.
  • the report 46 may be stored in memory or may be provided to an operator via one or more output devices, such as an electronic display and/or a printer.
  • the data processing circuitry 44 may determine a composition of a subterranean formation based on activation gamma-rays, using such techniques as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,876, “LOGGING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ABSOLUTE ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS OF SUBSURFACE FORMATIONS,” and/or U.S. Pat. No.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a neutron-induced gamma-ray well-logging operation 48 , which involves the placement of the downhole tool 12 into a surrounding subterranean formation 50 .
  • the downhole tool 12 has been lowered into an existing well 52 .
  • the well-logging operation 48 may begin when the neutron source 18 outputs a series of neutron bursts 54 according to a neutron pulsing scheme incorporating an activation delay. Suitable neutron pulsing schemes are discussed in greater detail below. If the neutron source 18 emits neutrons produced via d-T reactions, the neutron burst 54 may include neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV.
  • These 14.1 MeV neutrons may collide with nuclei in the surrounding formation 50 through inelastic scattering events 56 , which may produce inelastic gamma-rays 58 and may cause the neutrons of the burst of neutrons 54 to lose energy. As the neutrons of the burst of neutrons 54 lose energy, the neutrons may be absorbed by formation 50 nuclei in neutron capture events 60 , which may produce neutron capture gamma-rays 62 .
  • Both the inelastic scattering events 56 and the neutron capture events 60 may cause the formation 50 elements involved in the events 56 and/or 60 to activate 64 , or become radioactive.
  • Each of the activated 64 radioactive isotopes may have a characteristic half-life and a characteristic decay path to a non-radioactive element.
  • the decay of most radioactive elements of the formation 50 may be accompanied by the emission of one or more characteristic activation gamma-rays 66 . Because the activation gamma-rays 66 may correspond to the element that is decaying, by detecting the activation gamma-rays 66 , unique formation 50 elements may be identified.
  • the neutron burst 54 may include neutrons of approximately 2.5 MeV. These 2.5 MeV neutrons may not cause inelastic scattering events 56 , which may require neutrons of higher energy, but may cause neutron capture events 60 . Thus, the activation 64 that occurs, when the neutron burst 54 includes substantially only neutrons produced via d-D reactions, may result only from neutron capture events 60 .
  • certain formation 50 elements may be activated 64 only through neutron capture events 60 , and certain other formation 50 elements may be activated only through inelastic scattering events 56 , certain techniques described herein may involve multiple passes of the downhole tool 12 through the formation 50 , during which neutron bursts 54 of different energy levels are emitted.
  • the inelastic gamma-rays 58 , neutron capture gamma-rays 62 , and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be detected by the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 .
  • the gamma-rays 58 , 62 , and 66 may be produced at different points in time after the neutron burst 54 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect mostly inelastic gamma-rays 58 and neutron capture gamma-rays 62 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect substantially only activation gamma-rays 66 , since the inelastic scattering events 56 and neutron capture events 60 may largely cease.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme used by the neutron source 18 for emitting neutrons into the formation 50 may include a delay between neutron bursts 54 .
  • the delay between neutron bursts 54 may be sufficient to permit substantially all inelastic gamma-rays 58 and neutron capture gamma-rays 62 to die away (e.g., greater than 2 ms), leaving among the neutron-induced gamma-rays substantially only activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • a neutron pulsing scheme that incorporates such a delay between pulses may be described in a neutron pulse diagram 68 , shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the neutron pulse diagram 68 includes an ordinate 70 indicating whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an abscissa 72 indicating time in unit of seconds (s).
  • the neutron bursts 54 may be pulsed from the neutron source 18 in a relatively slow sequence.
  • a neutron ON time for a pulse 74 of the neutron pulsing scheme may be approximately one second, and the neutron OFF time between pulses 74 may also be on the order of approximately one second.
  • the neutron OFF time between the neutron pulses 74 may be shorter or longer than the neutron ON time for the neutron pulses 74 .
  • the neutron ON and OFF times may be lengthened.
  • the neutrons need not be emitted at a constant rate during each neutron pulse 74 .
  • each of the neutron pulses 74 may be subdivided into multiple neutron microbursts and pauses representing such a microbursting scheme, as discussed below.
  • more than one distinct microbursting scheme may be employed in the neutron pulsing scheme described by the neutron pulse diagram 68 .
  • one neutron pulse 74 may be subdivided into a microbursts and pauses representing a first bursting scheme, and another neutron pulse 74 may be subdivided into a microbursts and pauses representing a second bursting scheme.
  • FIG. 4 is a neutron pulse diagram 76 illustrating a microbursting scheme that may be employed within pulses 74 of a neutron pulsing scheme, such as the neutron pulsing scheme described by the neutron pulse diagram 68 of FIG. 3 .
  • the neutron pulse diagram 76 includes an ordinate 78 , which indicates whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an ordinate 80 , which indicates time in units of microseconds ( ⁇ s).
  • each neutron microburst 82 of ON time may have a length of approximately 20 ⁇ s, which may be followed by approximately 80 ⁇ s of OFF time. This sequence may be repeated rapidly throughout a pulse 74 .
  • Alternative microbursting schemes may be employed.
  • Such schemes may include the dual-burst scheme described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,926,044, “THERMAL DECAY TIME LOGGING METHOD AND APPARATUS”, or the scheme used in the EcoScope tool by Schlumberger and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,703,606 “NEUTRON BURST TIMING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE MEASUREMENT PULSED NEUTRON FORMATION EVALUATION.” Both of the above-referenced patents are assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • microbursting schemes are intended to be exemplary and not exhaustive, and that any number of microbursting schemes may be employed during the neutron pulse 74 .
  • the microbursting scheme employed during the neutron pulse 74 may be used to obtain additional measurements, such as inelastic gamma-ray spectroscopy, capture gamma-ray spectroscopy, and/or Sigma measurements. The particular measurements that may be obtained may vary depending on the particular microbursting scheme employed during the neutron pulse 74 .
  • FIG. 5 is a neutron pulse diagram 84 describing another neutron pulsing scheme for use by the neutron source 18 in the downhole tool 12 .
  • the neutron pulse diagram 84 includes an ordinate 86 , which indicates whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an ordinate 88 , which indicates time in units of microseconds ( ⁇ s).
  • the neutron pulse diagram 84 may be divided into an ON segment 90 and an OFF segment 92 . During the ON segment 90 , microbursts of neutrons may be emitted as the neutron source 18 is switched ON and OFF approximately 600 times with a period of 100 ⁇ s.
  • the neutron source 18 may be ON for 20 ⁇ s, followed by a pause of approximately 80 ⁇ s, for each microburst during the ON segment 90 .
  • the thermal neutron population may disappear completely, such that substantially no neutron capture gamma-rays 62 may be observed by the end of the OFF segment 92 .
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart 94 describing an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements due to activation, neutron capture, and/or inelastic scattering using the downhole tool 12 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may move through the well 52 on a wireline, a slickline, or as part of a borehole assembly (BHA).
  • BHA borehole assembly
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 at a predetermined logging speed, or the logging speed may vary based on the particular neutron pulsing scheme applied or based on the resulting gamma-ray measurements.
  • the neutron source 18 may emit neutrons according to a particular neutron pulsing scheme.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme may include, for example, any of the neutron pulsing schemes or neutron microburst schemes described above with reference to FIGS. 3-5 , any suitable variations thereof, or any neutron pulsing scheme incorporating a sufficient delay to allow the detection of activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied during step 98 may include neutron pulses 74 and delays short enough such that, following activation 64 of formation 50 nuclei, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may not have moved substantially.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may or may not be adapted to the logging speed of step 96 .
  • neutron pulses 74 and OFF times between the neutron pulses 74 may be proportional to the movement rate of the downhole tool 12 through the formation 50 .
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may be different from a neutron pulsing scheme applied when the downhole tool 12 is currently moving through the formation.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme may be a single, predetermined neutron pulsing scheme configured to effectively activate 64 the formation 50 while permitting sufficient time for the detection of resulting activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • a predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may involve multiple neutron pulses 74 of various duration and/or including various microbursting schemes.
  • the single predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may include sufficient variation to effectively enable a range of logging speeds for activation gamma-ray 66 logging.
  • the predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may include certain pulses 74 with corresponding delays tailored for measurements at certain logging speeds, and may include other pulses 74 with corresponding delays tailored for stationary measurements.
  • the neutron source 18 may be capable of generating neutrons at one or more energy levels.
  • the neutron source 18 may be a d-T neutron generator, capable of emitting 14.1 MeV neutrons, or a d-D neutron generator, capable of emitting 2.5 MeV neutrons.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may involve neutron pulses or microbursts of substantially only 14.1 MeV neutrons, of substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons, or of both 14.1 MeV neutrons and 2.5 MeV neutrons.
  • inelastic scattering events 56 may occur in the formation 50 , producing inelastic gamma-rays 58 , and providing certain formation 50 elements a path to activation 64 .
  • the neutron burst 54 may produce almost no inelastic scattering events 56 , and thus neutron capture events 60 may dominate.
  • the activated 64 isotopes may be limited almost entirely to those activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60 . This may eliminate, for example, the production of 28 Al through the high-energy reaction 28 Si(n,p) 28 Al. As a result, the activation 64 of 27 Al through the 27 Al(n, ⁇ ) 28 Al thermal capture reaction 60 may be unambiguously detected.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may also involve the use of a neutron source 18 that can produce neutrons through d-T and d-D reactions in a separate controlled manner. This may allow the separation of activation 64 caused by fast neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV (via inelastic scattering events 56 ) and thermal neutrons of approximately 2.5 MeV (via neutron capture events 60 ). The activation 64 may be accomplished using alternate pulses 74 or alternate bursts 54 of these low and high energy neutrons. Such a neutron generator 18 may also emit fast and thermal neutrons in parallel, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 2007/839757 “DOWNHOLE TOOLS HAVING COMBINED D-D AND D-T NEUTRON GENERATORS” assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • step 100 based on the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 , resulting gamma-rays 58 , 62 , and/or 66 may be detected due to inelastic scattering events 56 , neutron capture events 60 , and/or activation events 64 , respectively.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 is similar to the neutron pulsing scheme illustrated in FIG. 5 and the neutron source 18 emits neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect inelastic gamma-rays 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-rays 62 throughout the ON segment 90 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect substantially only activation gamma-rays 66 . Due to the pulsing scheme applied in step 98 , the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect the gamma-rays 58 , 62 , and/or 66 before the downhole tool 12 has moved away from the location in the formation 50 where the neutrons were emitted. Thus, the downhole tool 12 may gain measurements of inelastic gamma-rays 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-rays 62 substantially simultaneously with activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may obtain gamma-ray counts and/or measure spectra of the gamma-rays 58 , 62 , and/or 66 .
  • the neutron-induced inelastic gamma-ray 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-ray 62 counts or spectra may be obtained in concert with activation gamma-ray 66 counts or spectra.
  • the obtained gamma-ray 58 and/or 62 spectra may be processed in the data processing system 14 to enhance and/or complement the information of the activation gamma-ray 66 spectra.
  • the measured gamma-ray 58 , 62 , and 66 intensity may be related to the total neutron output during the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 .
  • the macroscopic formation capture cross section (Sigma) may also be measured.
  • Neutron pulsing schemes suitable for a Sigma measurement are discussed briefly above with reference to FIG. 4 .
  • the Sigma measurement may provide additional information and may be important for various environmental corrections, and particularly for the measurement of activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart 102 of an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements for fracture height determination in the formation 50 .
  • a fracture fluid containing an inert tracer material may be injected into fractures inside a formation 50 proximate to a well, such as the well 52 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation via the well 52 .
  • a neutron pulsing scheme may be applied to activate 64 the inert tracer materials in the fracture fluid.
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 108 may be any of the neutron pulsing schemes described above with reference to FIGS. 3-5 , as well as any variation of the neutron pulsing schemes described above with reference to step 98 of FIG. 6 .
  • the neutron pulsing scheme 108 may involve emitting the neutron burst 54 using only a d-D neutron generator, which may emit substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons.
  • the use of low-energy neutrons from the d-D reaction may be useful for the detection of non radioactive tracers that may be activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60 , but not inelastic scattering events 56 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may record the gamma-ray response from the activated fracture fluid. It should be appreciated that the activation gamma-rays 66 detected from the activated fracture fluid may be used for determination of fracture heights in the formation 50 .
  • FIG. 8 is a plot 112 representing an exemplary gamma-ray response that may result after bombarding the formation 50 with neutrons emitted according to one of the neutron pulsing schemes described herein.
  • the exemplary gamma-ray response of the plot 112 may represent a count of gamma-rays obtained during step 100 of the flowchart 94 or during step 110 of the flowchart 102 .
  • an ordinate 114 represents a relative gamma-ray count including inelastic gamma-rays 58 , neutron capture gamma-rays 62 , and activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • An abscissa 116 represents relative time, starting during a neutron pulse 74 and ending during a delay that follows the neutron pulse 74 .
  • Time bins A, B, and C represent times during which only certain gamma-rays may be observed.
  • the detected gamma-rays may include mostly inelastic gamma-rays 58 , but may also include some neutron capture gamma-rays 62 and activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • time bin B which may begin immediately after the final neutron burst 54 of a neutron pulse 74 , the detected gamma-rays may include mostly neutron capture gamma-rays 62 , but may also include some activation gamma-rays 66 .
  • Time bin C which may begin following a delay sufficient to allow the neutron capture gamma-rays 62 to die away, substantially only activation gamma-rays 66 may be detected.
  • Time bin C may be further subdivided into time bins based on the half-lives of various activated 64 isotopes of the formation 50 .
  • Each of the subdivided time bins within time bin C may correspond to certain isotopes that may be present and activated 64 in the formation 50 .
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart 120 representing an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements and storing the gamma-ray measurements into specific time bins.
  • the method of the flowchart 120 may or may not involve the injection of an inert tracer in fracture fluid into the formation 50 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in steps 96 or 106 .
  • one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in the same manner as in steps 98 or 108 .
  • the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect the inelastic gamma-rays 58 , neutron capture gamma-rays 62 , and/or activation gamma-rays 66 that result.
  • the gamma-rays 58 , 62 , and/or 66 recorded by the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 they may be stored in particular time bins.
  • the time bins may have equal lengths or may have lengths that vary.
  • the length of the time bins may depend on the amount of time that has passed since the last neutron burst 54 of a neutron pulse 74 . Additionally or alternatively, the length of the time bins may vary depending on the logging speed of the downhole tool 12 or depending on the pulsing scheme applied during step 124 . By way of example, the time bins may have relative lengths comparable to the time bins A, B, and/or C shown in FIG. 8 . As another example, the lengths of the time bins corresponding to measured activation gamma-rays 66 may be shorter or longer if the pulsing scheme applied in step 124 involves primarily 2.5 MeV neutrons or 14.1 MeV, as may be suitable.
  • FIG. 10 is a flowchart 128 representing an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements using two distinct neutron energy levels.
  • steps 130 - 134 represent a first pass through the formation 50 , during which substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons may be emitted.
  • steps 136 - 140 represent a second pass through the formation 50 , during which substantially only 14.1 MeV neutrons may be emitted.
  • the method of the flowchart 120 may or may not involve the injection of an inert tracer in fracture fluid into the formation 50 .
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in steps 96 or 106 .
  • one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in the same manner as in steps 98 or 108 .
  • the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 130 may involve emitting neutron bursts 54 using 2.5 MeV neutrons from d-D reactions.
  • the use of low-energy neutrons from d-D reactions may be particularly useful for the detection of non-radioactive tracers that may be activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60 , but not inelastic scattering events 56 .
  • the low-energy neutrons may activate 64 only certain elements in the formation 50 .
  • the neutron burst 54 may produce almost no inelastic scattering events 56 , and thus neutron capture events 60 may dominate.
  • the activated 64 isotopes may be limited almost entirely to those activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60 .
  • This may eliminate, for example, the production of 28 Al through the high-energy reaction 28 Si(n,p) 28 Al.
  • the activation 64 of 27 Al through the 27 Al(n, ⁇ ) 28 Al thermal capture reaction 60 may be unambiguously detected.
  • measurements of resulting neutron capture gamma-rays 62 and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be obtained.
  • the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in step 130 .
  • one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in approximately the same manner as in step 132 , except that the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 138 may involve emitting neutron bursts 54 using 14.1 MeV neutrons from d-T reactions.
  • the 14.1 MeV neutrons may cause both inelastic scattering events 56 and neutron capture events 60 .
  • step 140 certain formation 50 elements and/or tracer elements that may only become activated 64 via inelastic scattering events 56 , which were not activated during the first pass of steps 130 - 134 , may become activated 64 .
  • steps 136 - 140 measurements of resulting inelastic gamma-rays 58 , neutron capture gamma-rays 62 , and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be obtained.

Abstract

Systems and methods for measuring neutron-induced activation gamma-rays in a subterranean formation are provided. In one example, a downhole tool for measuring neutron-induced activation gamma-rays may include a neutron source and a gamma-ray detector. The neutron source may emit neutrons according to a pulsing scheme that includes a delay between two pulses. The delay may be sufficient to allow substantially all neutron capture events due to the emitted neutrons to cease. The gamma-ray detector may be configured to detect activation gamma-rays produced when elements activated by the emitted neutrons decay to a non-radioactive state.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/996,541, filed Jun. 26, 2009, which is a 371 of International Application No. PCT/US09/48810, filed Jun. 26, 2009, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/077,524, filed Jul. 2, 2008. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The present disclosure relates generally to well logging with neutron-induced gamma-rays and, more particularly, to well logging with neutron-induced activation gamma-rays.
  • Using nuclear downhole tools, the elemental composition of a subterranean formation may be determined in a variety of ways. An indirect determination of formation lithology may be obtained using information from density and photoelectric effect (PEF) measurements from gamma-ray scattering in the formation. A direct detection of formation elements may be obtained by detecting neutron-induced gamma-rays. Neutron-induced gamma-rays may be created when a neutron source emits neutrons into a formation, which may interact with formation elements through inelastic scattering, high-energy nuclear reactions, or neutron capture.
  • As a result of inelastic or capture reactions, certain formation nuclei may become radioactive. Each radioactive isotope in the formation may have a characteristic half-life and a characteristic decay path to a non-radioactive element. The decay of most radioactive elements may be accompanied by the emission of one or more characteristic gamma-rays. These characteristic gamma-rays may be used to identify the element of the formation that is decaying, and thus may indicate a unique formation element that has been activated by inelastic scattering or neutron capture.
  • Various formation measurements may be obtained based on the above-described nuclear reactions. For example, fracture height determination in a formation may be undertaken by injecting radioactive tracer elements into a formation with fracture fluid and proppant, subsequently measuring characteristic gamma-rays emitted by the tracer. However, the use of a radioactive tracer may introduce a number of regulatory, environmental, and other challenges, as the radioactive tracer may be in liquid form and thus easily dispersible. As such, certain techniques have been developed to avoid the use of radioactive tracer in fracture height determination. These techniques may involve the injection of an inert liquid tracer into the formation, which may be subsequently bombarded with neutron radiation to activate the tracer in the liquid. In carrying out these techniques, however, the source of the activating neutron radiation may be moved away from the point of measurement, and the activation radiation may be measured at a later time when a gamma-ray detector or other detector passes by this point. In certain cases, the intervening time between activation and measurement may allow materials in the tracer-containing fracture fluid to move, which may result in an incorrect interpretation of a formation fracture or other formation properties.
  • SUMMARY
  • Certain aspects commensurate in scope with the originally claimed embodiments are set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of certain forms the embodiments might take and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments. Indeed, the embodiments may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
  • Embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter relate generally to systems and methods for measuring neutron-induced activation gamma-rays. For example, a downhole tool for measuring neutron-induced activation gamma-rays may include a neutron source and a gamma-ray detector. The neutron source may emit neutrons according to a pulsing scheme that includes a delay between two pulses. The delay may be sufficient to allow substantially all neutron capture events due to the emitted neutrons to cease. The gamma-ray detector may be configured to detect activation gamma-rays produced when elements activated by the emitted neutrons decay to a non-radioactive state.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Advantages of the present disclosure may become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system including a downhole tool and data processing circuitry for measuring neutron-induced gamma-rays, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a well logging operation using the downhole tool of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 3 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating a neutron pulsing scheme for the downhole tool of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 4 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating a microbursting scheme for use in the neutron pulsing scheme of FIG. 3, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 5 is a neutron pulse diagram illustrating another neutron pulsing scheme, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart describing an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements for determining a characteristic of a subterranean formation using the downhole tool of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 7 is flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements for a fracture height determination using the downhole tool of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating a relative gamma-ray count over time using the downhole tool of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements at specific times, in accordance with an embodiment; and
  • FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for obtaining neutron-induced gamma-ray measurements with neutrons supplied by d-D and d-T reactions, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
  • One or more specific embodiments are described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • Embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter relate generally to systems and methods for neutron-induced gamma-ray well logging. In particular, the presently disclosed subject matter relates to activating nuclei of a subterranean formation by bombarding the formation with neutrons, which may thereafter emit gamma-rays (“activation gamma-rays”) having characteristic spectra. Unlike other techniques, the presently disclosed subject matter may involve bombarding the subterranean formation with neutrons using a neutron pulsing scheme that includes a specific delay between pulses.
  • Using such a neutron pulsing scheme, neutrons may be emitted into the formation for a specific amount of time, during which the formation nuclei may become activated by inelastic scattering events and/or neutron capture events. These events may produce “inelastic gamma-rays” and “neutron capture gamma-rays,” respectively, while the neutrons are being emitted into the formation and for a short time afterward. The presence of the delay in the neutron pulsing scheme may allow time for the inelastic gamma-rays and neutron capture gamma-rays to die away, leaving substantially only the activation gamma-rays from the activated formation nuclei. The activation gamma-rays may then be detected during the delay, rather than at a later time when the neutron source has been moved away. Additionally or alternatively, the presently disclosed subject matter may also enable the measurement of inelastic gamma-rays and/or neutron capture gamma-rays in conjunction with the activation gamma-rays.
  • With the foregoing in mind, FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 for determining subterranean formation properties using activation gamma-rays that includes a downhole tool 12 and a data processing system 14. By way of example, the downhole tool 12 may be a slickline or wireline tool for logging an existing well, or may be installed in a borehole assembly for logging while drilling (LWD). The data processing system 14 may be incorporated into the downhole tool 12 or may be at a remote location. The downhole tool 12 may be surrounded by a housing 16.
  • The downhole tool 12 may include a neutron source 18 configured to emit neutrons into a formation according to a neutron pulsing scheme, as described below. By way of example, the neutron source 18 may be an electronic neutron source, such as a Minitron™ by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, which may produce pulses of neutrons through d-D and/or d-T reactions. In some embodiments, a neutron monitor 20 may monitor neutron emissions from the neutron source 18 to more precisely observe the quantity of neutrons emitted by the neutron source 18. The neutron monitor 20 may be a plastic scintillator and photomultiplier that may primarily detect unscattered neutrons directly from the neutron source 18, and may provide a count rate signal proportional to the neutron output rate from the neutron source 18. A neutron shield 22 may separate the neutron source 18 from various detectors in the downhole tool 12. A similar shield 24, which may contain elements such as lead, may prevent gamma-rays from traveling between the various detectors of the downhole tool 12.
  • The downhole tool 12 may include one or more gamma-ray detectors, and may include three or more gamma-ray detectors. The downhole tool 12 illustrated in FIG. 1 includes two gamma- ray detectors 26 and 28. The relative positions of the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 in the downhole tool 12 may vary. In some embodiments, the gamma- ray detectors 26 and 28 may be located on opposite sides of the neutron source 18.
  • The gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be contained in respective housings 30. Scintillator crystals 32 in the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may enable detection counts or spectra of gamma-rays by producing light when gamma-rays scatter or are captured in the scintillator crystals 32. The scintillator crystals 32 may be inorganic scintillation detectors containing, for example, NaI(Tl), LaCl3, LaBr3, BGO, GSO, YAP, and/or other suitable materials. Housings 34 may surround the scintillator crystals 32. Photodetectors 36 may detect light emitted by the scintillator crystals 32 when a gamma-ray is absorbed and the light has passed through an optical window 38. The gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be configured to obtain a gamma-ray count and/or gamma-ray spectra.
  • The signals from the neutron monitor 20 and gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may be transmitted to the data processing system 14 as data 40. The data processing system 14 may include a general-purpose computer, such as a personal computer, configured to run a variety of software, including software implementing all or part of the present techniques. Alternatively, the data processing system 14 may include, among other things, a mainframe computer, a distributed computing system, or an application-specific computer or workstation configured to implement all or part of the present technique based on specialized software and/or hardware provided as part of the system. Further, the data processing system 14 may include either a single processor or a plurality of processors to facilitate implementation of the presently disclosed functionality. Processing may be done at least in part by an embedded processor in the downhole tool.
  • In general, the data processing system 14 may include data processing circuitry 44, which may be a microcontroller or microprocessor, such as a central processing unit (CPU), which may execute various routines and processing functions. For example, the data processing circuitry 44 may execute various operating system instructions as well as software routines configured to effect certain processes and stored in or provided by a manufacture including a computer readable-medium, such as a memory device (e.g., a random access memory (RAM) of a personal computer) or one or more mass storage devices (e.g., an internal or external hard drive, a solid-state storage device, CD-ROM, DVD, or other storage device). In addition, the data processing circuitry 44 may process data provided as inputs for various routines or software programs, including the data 40.
  • Such data associated with the present techniques may be stored in, or provided by, the memory or mass storage device of the data processing system 14. Alternatively, such data may be provided to the data processing circuitry 44 of the data processing system 14 via one or more input devices. In one embodiment, data acquisition circuitry 42 may represent one such input device; however, the input devices may also include manual input devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, or the like. In addition, the input devices may include a network device, such as a wired or wireless Ethernet card, a wireless network adapter, or any of various ports or devices configured to facilitate communication with other devices via any suitable communications network, such as a local area network or the Internet. Through such a network device, the data processing system 14 may exchange data and communicate with other networked electronic systems, whether proximate to or remote from the system. The network may include various components that facilitate communication, including switches, routers, servers or other computers, network adapters, communications cables, and so forth.
  • The downhole tool 12 may transmit the data 40 to the data acquisition circuitry 42 of the data processing system 14 via, for example, a telemetry system communication downlink or a communication cable. After receiving the data 40, the data acquisition circuitry 42 may transmit the data 40 to data processing circuitry 44. In accordance with one or more stored routines, the data processing circuitry 44 may process the data 40 to ascertain one or more properties of a subterranean formation surrounding the downhole tool 12. Such processing may involve, for example, one or more techniques for determining a formation property based on activation gamma-rays and/or inelastic or neutron capture gamma-rays. The data processing circuitry 44 may thereafter output a report 46 indicating the one or more ascertained properties of the formation. The report 46 may be stored in memory or may be provided to an operator via one or more output devices, such as an electronic display and/or a printer. By way of example, the data processing circuitry 44 may determine a composition of a subterranean formation based on activation gamma-rays, using such techniques as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,876, “LOGGING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ABSOLUTE ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS OF SUBSURFACE FORMATIONS,” and/or U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,594, “NUCLEAR ACTIVATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING EARTH ELEMENTS,” both of which are assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation and incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a neutron-induced gamma-ray well-logging operation 48, which involves the placement of the downhole tool 12 into a surrounding subterranean formation 50. In the operation 48 depicted in FIG. 2, the downhole tool 12 has been lowered into an existing well 52. The well-logging operation 48 may begin when the neutron source 18 outputs a series of neutron bursts 54 according to a neutron pulsing scheme incorporating an activation delay. Suitable neutron pulsing schemes are discussed in greater detail below. If the neutron source 18 emits neutrons produced via d-T reactions, the neutron burst 54 may include neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV. These 14.1 MeV neutrons may collide with nuclei in the surrounding formation 50 through inelastic scattering events 56, which may produce inelastic gamma-rays 58 and may cause the neutrons of the burst of neutrons 54 to lose energy. As the neutrons of the burst of neutrons 54 lose energy, the neutrons may be absorbed by formation 50 nuclei in neutron capture events 60, which may produce neutron capture gamma-rays 62.
  • Both the inelastic scattering events 56 and the neutron capture events 60 may cause the formation 50 elements involved in the events 56 and/or 60 to activate 64, or become radioactive. Each of the activated 64 radioactive isotopes may have a characteristic half-life and a characteristic decay path to a non-radioactive element. In particular, the decay of most radioactive elements of the formation 50 may be accompanied by the emission of one or more characteristic activation gamma-rays 66. Because the activation gamma-rays 66 may correspond to the element that is decaying, by detecting the activation gamma-rays 66, unique formation 50 elements may be identified.
  • If the neutron source 18 emits neutrons produced via d-D reactions, the neutron burst 54 may include neutrons of approximately 2.5 MeV. These 2.5 MeV neutrons may not cause inelastic scattering events 56, which may require neutrons of higher energy, but may cause neutron capture events 60. Thus, the activation 64 that occurs, when the neutron burst 54 includes substantially only neutrons produced via d-D reactions, may result only from neutron capture events 60. Since certain formation 50 elements may be activated 64 only through neutron capture events 60, and certain other formation 50 elements may be activated only through inelastic scattering events 56, certain techniques described herein may involve multiple passes of the downhole tool 12 through the formation 50, during which neutron bursts 54 of different energy levels are emitted.
  • The inelastic gamma-rays 58, neutron capture gamma-rays 62, and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be detected by the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28. As noted briefly above, the gamma- rays 58, 62, and 66 may be produced at different points in time after the neutron burst 54. In particular, during and immediately after the neutron burst 54, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect mostly inelastic gamma-rays 58 and neutron capture gamma-rays 62. However, following a sufficient delay after the neutron burst 54, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect substantially only activation gamma-rays 66, since the inelastic scattering events 56 and neutron capture events 60 may largely cease.
  • For this reason, among others, the neutron pulsing scheme used by the neutron source 18 for emitting neutrons into the formation 50 may include a delay between neutron bursts 54. The delay between neutron bursts 54 may be sufficient to permit substantially all inelastic gamma-rays 58 and neutron capture gamma-rays 62 to die away (e.g., greater than 2 ms), leaving among the neutron-induced gamma-rays substantially only activation gamma-rays 66. A neutron pulsing scheme that incorporates such a delay between pulses may be described in a neutron pulse diagram 68, shown in FIG. 3. The neutron pulse diagram 68 includes an ordinate 70 indicating whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an abscissa 72 indicating time in unit of seconds (s).
  • In the neutron pulse diagram 68 of FIG. 3, the neutron bursts 54 may be pulsed from the neutron source 18 in a relatively slow sequence. By way of example, a neutron ON time for a pulse 74 of the neutron pulsing scheme may be approximately one second, and the neutron OFF time between pulses 74 may also be on the order of approximately one second. The neutron OFF time between the neutron pulses 74 may be shorter or longer than the neutron ON time for the neutron pulses 74. By way of example, if a slower logging speed is chosen, the neutron ON and OFF times may be lengthened. Moreover, the neutrons need not be emitted at a constant rate during each neutron pulse 74. Rather, a microbursting scheme, such as those used in C/O logging, Sigma, or spectroscopy logging may be employed. As such, each of the neutron pulses 74 may be subdivided into multiple neutron microbursts and pauses representing such a microbursting scheme, as discussed below. Moreover, more than one distinct microbursting scheme may be employed in the neutron pulsing scheme described by the neutron pulse diagram 68. In particular, one neutron pulse 74 may be subdivided into a microbursts and pauses representing a first bursting scheme, and another neutron pulse 74 may be subdivided into a microbursts and pauses representing a second bursting scheme.
  • FIG. 4 is a neutron pulse diagram 76 illustrating a microbursting scheme that may be employed within pulses 74 of a neutron pulsing scheme, such as the neutron pulsing scheme described by the neutron pulse diagram 68 of FIG. 3. The neutron pulse diagram 76 includes an ordinate 78, which indicates whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an ordinate 80, which indicates time in units of microseconds (μs). As shown by the neutron pulse diagram 76, each neutron microburst 82 of ON time may have a length of approximately 20 μs, which may be followed by approximately 80 μs of OFF time. This sequence may be repeated rapidly throughout a pulse 74. Alternative microbursting schemes may be employed. Such schemes may include the dual-burst scheme described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,926,044, “THERMAL DECAY TIME LOGGING METHOD AND APPARATUS”, or the scheme used in the EcoScope tool by Schlumberger and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,703,606 “NEUTRON BURST TIMING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE MEASUREMENT PULSED NEUTRON FORMATION EVALUATION.” Both of the above-referenced patents are assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • It should be understood that such microbursting schemes are intended to be exemplary and not exhaustive, and that any number of microbursting schemes may be employed during the neutron pulse 74. Moreover, the microbursting scheme employed during the neutron pulse 74 may be used to obtain additional measurements, such as inelastic gamma-ray spectroscopy, capture gamma-ray spectroscopy, and/or Sigma measurements. The particular measurements that may be obtained may vary depending on the particular microbursting scheme employed during the neutron pulse 74.
  • FIG. 5 is a neutron pulse diagram 84 describing another neutron pulsing scheme for use by the neutron source 18 in the downhole tool 12. The neutron pulse diagram 84 includes an ordinate 86, which indicates whether the neutron source 18 is set to ON or OFF, and an ordinate 88, which indicates time in units of microseconds (μs). The neutron pulse diagram 84 may be divided into an ON segment 90 and an OFF segment 92. During the ON segment 90, microbursts of neutrons may be emitted as the neutron source 18 is switched ON and OFF approximately 600 times with a period of 100 μs. Thus, the neutron source 18 may be ON for 20 μs, followed by a pause of approximately 80 μs, for each microburst during the ON segment 90. During the OFF segment 92, which may last between approximately 2 ms to 100 ms, the thermal neutron population may disappear completely, such that substantially no neutron capture gamma-rays 62 may be observed by the end of the OFF segment 92.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart 94 describing an embodiment of a method for obtaining gamma-ray measurements due to activation, neutron capture, and/or inelastic scattering using the downhole tool 12. In a first step 96, the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52. As described above, the downhole tool 12 may move through the well 52 on a wireline, a slickline, or as part of a borehole assembly (BHA). The downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 at a predetermined logging speed, or the logging speed may vary based on the particular neutron pulsing scheme applied or based on the resulting gamma-ray measurements.
  • In step 98, the neutron source 18 may emit neutrons according to a particular neutron pulsing scheme. The neutron pulsing scheme may include, for example, any of the neutron pulsing schemes or neutron microburst schemes described above with reference to FIGS. 3-5, any suitable variations thereof, or any neutron pulsing scheme incorporating a sufficient delay to allow the detection of activation gamma-rays 66. The neutron pulsing scheme applied during step 98 may include neutron pulses 74 and delays short enough such that, following activation 64 of formation 50 nuclei, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may not have moved substantially.
  • The neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may or may not be adapted to the logging speed of step 96. In one example, if the neutron pulsing scheme is adapted to the logging speed, neutron pulses 74 and OFF times between the neutron pulses 74 may be proportional to the movement rate of the downhole tool 12 through the formation 50. In another example, if the downhole tool 12 becomes stationary in the formation 50, the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may be different from a neutron pulsing scheme applied when the downhole tool 12 is currently moving through the formation. If the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 is not adapted to the logging speed, the neutron pulsing scheme may be a single, predetermined neutron pulsing scheme configured to effectively activate 64 the formation 50 while permitting sufficient time for the detection of resulting activation gamma-rays 66. By way of example, such a predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may involve multiple neutron pulses 74 of various duration and/or including various microbursting schemes. The single predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may include sufficient variation to effectively enable a range of logging speeds for activation gamma-ray 66 logging. For example, the predetermined neutron pulsing scheme may include certain pulses 74 with corresponding delays tailored for measurements at certain logging speeds, and may include other pulses 74 with corresponding delays tailored for stationary measurements.
  • As described above with reference to FIG. 1, the neutron source 18 may be capable of generating neutrons at one or more energy levels. For example, the neutron source 18 may be a d-T neutron generator, capable of emitting 14.1 MeV neutrons, or a d-D neutron generator, capable of emitting 2.5 MeV neutrons. As such, the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may involve neutron pulses or microbursts of substantially only 14.1 MeV neutrons, of substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons, or of both 14.1 MeV neutrons and 2.5 MeV neutrons. As described above with reference to FIG. 2, when a neutron burst 54 that occurs during a neutron pulse 74 includes the 14.1 MeV neutrons, inelastic scattering events 56 may occur in the formation 50, producing inelastic gamma-rays 58, and providing certain formation 50 elements a path to activation 64.
  • If substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons are emitted in a neutron burst 54 during a neutron pulse 74 of the pulsing scheme applied in step 98, certain specific elements of the formation 50 may be determined more easily. At 2.5 MeV, the neutron burst 54 may produce almost no inelastic scattering events 56, and thus neutron capture events 60 may dominate. Thus, the activated 64 isotopes may be limited almost entirely to those activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60. This may eliminate, for example, the production of 28Al through the high-energy reaction 28Si(n,p)28Al. As a result, the activation 64 of 27Al through the 27Al(n,γ)28Al thermal capture reaction 60 may be unambiguously detected.
  • The neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 may also involve the use of a neutron source 18 that can produce neutrons through d-T and d-D reactions in a separate controlled manner. This may allow the separation of activation 64 caused by fast neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV (via inelastic scattering events 56) and thermal neutrons of approximately 2.5 MeV (via neutron capture events 60). The activation 64 may be accomplished using alternate pulses 74 or alternate bursts 54 of these low and high energy neutrons. Such a neutron generator 18 may also emit fast and thermal neutrons in parallel, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 2007/839757 “DOWNHOLE TOOLS HAVING COMBINED D-D AND D-T NEUTRON GENERATORS” assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • In step 100, based on the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98, resulting gamma- rays 58, 62, and/or 66 may be detected due to inelastic scattering events 56, neutron capture events 60, and/or activation events 64, respectively. For example, if the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98 is similar to the neutron pulsing scheme illustrated in FIG. 5 and the neutron source 18 emits neutrons of approximately 14.1 MeV, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect inelastic gamma-rays 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-rays 62 throughout the ON segment 90. Meanwhile, during the OFF segment 92, after the inelastic gamma-rays 58 and neutron capture gamma-rays 62 have died away, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect substantially only activation gamma-rays 66. Due to the pulsing scheme applied in step 98, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect the gamma- rays 58, 62, and/or 66 before the downhole tool 12 has moved away from the location in the formation 50 where the neutrons were emitted. Thus, the downhole tool 12 may gain measurements of inelastic gamma-rays 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-rays 62 substantially simultaneously with activation gamma-rays 66.
  • It should be understood that, in step 100, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may obtain gamma-ray counts and/or measure spectra of the gamma- rays 58, 62, and/or 66. In this way, the neutron-induced inelastic gamma-ray 58 and/or neutron capture gamma-ray 62 counts or spectra may be obtained in concert with activation gamma-ray 66 counts or spectra. For example, the obtained gamma-ray 58 and/or 62 spectra may be processed in the data processing system 14 to enhance and/or complement the information of the activation gamma-ray 66 spectra. Additionally, if the neutron monitor 20 is present in the downhole tool 12, the measured gamma- ray 58, 62, and 66 intensity may be related to the total neutron output during the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98.
  • Depending on the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 98, in step 100, the macroscopic formation capture cross section (Sigma) may also be measured. Neutron pulsing schemes suitable for a Sigma measurement are discussed briefly above with reference to FIG. 4. The Sigma measurement may provide additional information and may be important for various environmental corrections, and particularly for the measurement of activation gamma-rays 66.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart 102 of an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements for fracture height determination in the formation 50. In a first step 104, a fracture fluid containing an inert tracer material may be injected into fractures inside a formation 50 proximate to a well, such as the well 52. In step 106, the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation via the well 52.
  • In step 108, a neutron pulsing scheme may be applied to activate 64 the inert tracer materials in the fracture fluid. The neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 108 may be any of the neutron pulsing schemes described above with reference to FIGS. 3-5, as well as any variation of the neutron pulsing schemes described above with reference to step 98 of FIG. 6. In particular, in one embodiment, the neutron pulsing scheme 108 may involve emitting the neutron burst 54 using only a d-D neutron generator, which may emit substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons. The use of low-energy neutrons from the d-D reaction may be useful for the detection of non radioactive tracers that may be activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60, but not inelastic scattering events 56.
  • In step 110, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may record the gamma-ray response from the activated fracture fluid. It should be appreciated that the activation gamma-rays 66 detected from the activated fracture fluid may be used for determination of fracture heights in the formation 50.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot 112 representing an exemplary gamma-ray response that may result after bombarding the formation 50 with neutrons emitted according to one of the neutron pulsing schemes described herein. By way of example, the exemplary gamma-ray response of the plot 112 may represent a count of gamma-rays obtained during step 100 of the flowchart 94 or during step 110 of the flowchart 102. In the plot 112, an ordinate 114 represents a relative gamma-ray count including inelastic gamma-rays 58, neutron capture gamma-rays 62, and activation gamma-rays 66. An abscissa 116 represents relative time, starting during a neutron pulse 74 and ending during a delay that follows the neutron pulse 74.
  • Time bins A, B, and C represent times during which only certain gamma-rays may be observed. In particular, since time bin A represents a time when the neutron source 18 is emitting neutrons into the formation 50, during time bin A, the detected gamma-rays may include mostly inelastic gamma-rays 58, but may also include some neutron capture gamma-rays 62 and activation gamma-rays 66. During time bin B, which may begin immediately after the final neutron burst 54 of a neutron pulse 74, the detected gamma-rays may include mostly neutron capture gamma-rays 62, but may also include some activation gamma-rays 66. During time bin C, which may begin following a delay sufficient to allow the neutron capture gamma-rays 62 to die away, substantially only activation gamma-rays 66 may be detected. Time bin C may be further subdivided into time bins based on the half-lives of various activated 64 isotopes of the formation 50. Each of the subdivided time bins within time bin C may correspond to certain isotopes that may be present and activated 64 in the formation 50.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart 120 representing an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements and storing the gamma-ray measurements into specific time bins. In this way, the temporal characteristics of the gamma-ray response described above with reference to FIG. 8 may be employed to identify the origination of certain detected gamma-rays. The method of the flowchart 120 may or may not involve the injection of an inert tracer in fracture fluid into the formation 50. In a first step 122, the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in steps 96 or 106. Similarly, in step 124, one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in the same manner as in steps 98 or 108.
  • Following the application of the neutron pulsing scheme in step 124, in step 126, the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28 may detect the inelastic gamma-rays 58, neutron capture gamma-rays 62, and/or activation gamma-rays 66 that result. In particular, when the gamma- rays 58, 62, and/or 66 recorded by the gamma-ray detectors 26 and/or 28, they may be stored in particular time bins. The time bins may have equal lengths or may have lengths that vary. For example, the length of the time bins may depend on the amount of time that has passed since the last neutron burst 54 of a neutron pulse 74. Additionally or alternatively, the length of the time bins may vary depending on the logging speed of the downhole tool 12 or depending on the pulsing scheme applied during step 124. By way of example, the time bins may have relative lengths comparable to the time bins A, B, and/or C shown in FIG. 8. As another example, the lengths of the time bins corresponding to measured activation gamma-rays 66 may be shorter or longer if the pulsing scheme applied in step 124 involves primarily 2.5 MeV neutrons or 14.1 MeV, as may be suitable.
  • FIG. 10 is a flowchart 128 representing an embodiment of a method for obtaining activation gamma-ray 66 measurements using two distinct neutron energy levels. Specifically, steps 130-134 represent a first pass through the formation 50, during which substantially only 2.5 MeV neutrons may be emitted. Steps 136-140 represent a second pass through the formation 50, during which substantially only 14.1 MeV neutrons may be emitted. The method of the flowchart 120 may or may not involve the injection of an inert tracer in fracture fluid into the formation 50.
  • In the first step 130 of the first pass through the formation 50, the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in steps 96 or 106. Similarly, in step 132, one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in the same manner as in steps 98 or 108. In particular, in step 132, the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 130 may involve emitting neutron bursts 54 using 2.5 MeV neutrons from d-D reactions. The use of low-energy neutrons from d-D reactions may be particularly useful for the detection of non-radioactive tracers that may be activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60, but not inelastic scattering events 56. Additionally, however, the low-energy neutrons may activate 64 only certain elements in the formation 50. For example, at 2.5 MeV, the neutron burst 54 may produce almost no inelastic scattering events 56, and thus neutron capture events 60 may dominate. As such, the activated 64 isotopes may be limited almost entirely to those activated 64 by thermal neutron capture events 60. This may eliminate, for example, the production of 28Al through the high-energy reaction 28Si(n,p)28Al. As a result, the activation 64 of 27Al through the 27Al(n,γ)28Al thermal capture reaction 60 may be unambiguously detected. In step 134, measurements of resulting neutron capture gamma-rays 62 and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be obtained.
  • In the first step 136 of the second pass through the formation 50, the downhole tool 12 may be moved through the formation 50 via the well 52 in the same manner as described in step 130. Similarly, in step 138, one of the neutron pulsing schemes may be applied in approximately the same manner as in step 132, except that the neutron pulsing scheme applied in step 138 may involve emitting neutron bursts 54 using 14.1 MeV neutrons from d-T reactions. The 14.1 MeV neutrons may cause both inelastic scattering events 56 and neutron capture events 60. Thus, in the second pass of steps 136-140, certain formation 50 elements and/or tracer elements that may only become activated 64 via inelastic scattering events 56, which were not activated during the first pass of steps 130-134, may become activated 64. In step 140, measurements of resulting inelastic gamma-rays 58, neutron capture gamma-rays 62, and/or activation gamma-rays 66 may be obtained.
  • While only certain features have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the present disclosure.

Claims (18)

What is claimed is:
1. A downhole tool comprising:
a neutron source configured to emit neutrons according to a pulsing scheme, wherein the pulsing scheme includes a delay between two pulses, wherein the delay is sufficient to allow substantially all neutron capture events due to the emitted neutrons to cease; and
a gamma-ray detector configured to detect activation gamma-rays produced when elements activated by the emitted neutrons decay to a non-radioactive state.
2. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the delay is greater than or equal to approximately 2 ms.
3. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the delay is greater than or equal to approximately 1 s.
4. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the pulsing scheme is configured to vary depending on a logging speed of the downhole tool.
5. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the pulsing scheme is configured to vary depending on whether the downhole tool is moving or is approximately stationary.
6. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the pulsing scheme is configured to be independent of a logging speed of the downhole tool and configured to comprise a plurality of predetermined burst patterns for a plurality of logging speeds.
7. The downhole tool of claim 1, wherein the pulsing scheme is configured such that one of the pulses of the pulsing scheme is subdivided into a plurality of microbursts.
8. The downhole tool of claim 7, wherein the plurality of microbursts comprises a carbon/oxygen (C/O) microbursting scheme, a gamma-ray spectroscopy microbursting scheme, a dual-burst microbursting scheme, or a Sigma measurement microbursting scheme, or any combination thereof.
9. The downhole tool of claim 7, wherein the plurality of microbursts comprises less than or equal to approximately 50% of the one of the pulses of the pulsing scheme and wherein a plurality of delays between the plurality of microbursts comprises greater than or equal to approximately 50% of the one of the pulses of the pulsing scheme.
10. A downhole tool for use in a subterranean formation, comprising:
a neutron source configured to emit neutrons into the subterranean formation in pulses separated by a delay of at least approximately 2 ms; and
a gamma-ray detector configured to detect activation gamma-rays and either or both inelastic gamma-rays or neutron capture gamma-rays resulting from interactions between the emitted neutrons and the subterranean formation.
11. The downhole tool of claim 10, wherein the neutron source comprises a d-D neutron generator or a d-T neutron generator, or a combination thereof.
12. The downhole tool of claim 10, wherein the gamma-ray detector is configured for detecting counts of the activation gamma-rays or detecting spectra of the activation gamma-rays, or any combination thereof.
13. The downhole tool of claim 10, comprising a second gamma-ray detector, wherein the neutron source is disposed in the downhole tool between the gamma-ray detector and the second gamma-ray detector.
14. The downhole tool of claim 10, comprising a second gamma-ray detector, wherein the second gamma-ray detector is disposed in the downhole tool between the gamma-ray detector and the neutron source.
15. A method comprising:
injecting fracture fluid containing an inert tracer material into a subterranean formation;
emitting neutrons into the subterranean formation to activate the tracer material using a neutron generator configured to emit neutrons according to a pulsing scheme that includes a delay between pulses of at least approximately 2 ms; and
detecting activation gamma-rays from the activated tracer material using a gamma-ray detector.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein injecting the fracture fluid comprises injecting fracture fluid containing the inert tracer material, wherein the inert tracer material is configured to be activated through thermal neutron capture and wherein the emitted neutrons have energies sufficient to cause neutron capture events but not to cause substantially any inelastic scattering events.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the activation gamma-rays are detected at least approximately 2 ms after an emitted neutron pulse has ended.
18. The method of claim 15, comprising detecting either or both inelastic gamma-rays or neutron capture gamma-rays resulting from interactions between the emitted neutrons and the subterranean formation or the tracer material.
US14/635,430 2008-07-02 2015-03-02 Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement Abandoned US20150168592A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/635,430 US20150168592A1 (en) 2008-07-02 2015-03-02 Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US7752408P 2008-07-02 2008-07-02
PCT/US2009/048810 WO2010002727A2 (en) 2008-07-02 2009-06-26 Downhole neutron activation measurement
US99654111A 2011-03-30 2011-03-30
US14/635,430 US20150168592A1 (en) 2008-07-02 2015-03-02 Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/048810 Continuation WO2010002727A2 (en) 2008-07-02 2009-06-26 Downhole neutron activation measurement
US12/996,541 Continuation US8969793B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2009-06-26 Downhole neutron activation measurement

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150168592A1 true US20150168592A1 (en) 2015-06-18

Family

ID=41466538

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/996,541 Active 2031-02-02 US8969793B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2009-06-26 Downhole neutron activation measurement
US14/635,430 Abandoned US20150168592A1 (en) 2008-07-02 2015-03-02 Downhole Neutron Activation Measurement

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/996,541 Active 2031-02-02 US8969793B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2009-06-26 Downhole neutron activation measurement

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US8969793B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2729642C (en)
GB (1) GB2473994B8 (en)
NO (1) NO20110064A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2502096C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2010002727A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107656318A (en) * 2017-08-25 2018-02-02 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 The determination method and apparatus of Geologic Time

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10061055B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2018-08-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Absolute elemental concentrations from nuclear spectroscopy
US8421004B2 (en) * 2009-06-12 2013-04-16 Baker Hughes Incorporated Nuclear detectors built directly into shielding or modulating material
US8399849B1 (en) * 2009-08-08 2013-03-19 Redpine Signals, Inc Fast neutron detector
GB0917216D0 (en) * 2009-10-01 2009-11-18 Johnson Matthey Plc Method and apparatus for determining a fluid density
US8791407B2 (en) * 2010-02-24 2014-07-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Gamma-gamma density measurement system for high-pressure, high-temperature measurements
US9715035B2 (en) * 2010-05-19 2017-07-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pulse neutron formation gas identification with LWD measurements
US8927923B2 (en) 2011-03-14 2015-01-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Test formation apparatus for a downhole tool
WO2015048618A1 (en) * 2013-09-28 2015-04-02 Schlumberger Canada Limited Estimation of skin effect from multiple depth of investigation well logs
US20150124921A1 (en) * 2013-11-05 2015-05-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole Gamma Ray Source Using Neutron Activation
US9274245B2 (en) * 2014-05-30 2016-03-01 Baker Hughes Incorporated Measurement technique utilizing novel radiation detectors in and near pulsed neutron generator tubes for well logging applications using solid state materials
US10161237B2 (en) * 2014-07-25 2018-12-25 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Identification of proppant in subterranean fracture zones using a ratio of capture to inelastic gamma rays
US9389334B2 (en) 2014-11-13 2016-07-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Radiation generator having an actively evacuated acceleration column
US10107935B2 (en) * 2015-03-11 2018-10-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Non-radioactive tracer materials for monitoring treatment fluids in subterranean formations
BR112017014168A2 (en) 2015-03-17 2018-03-06 Halliburton Energy Services Inc method to evaluate cement in a wellbore and profiling tool to evaluate cement in a wellbore
EP3325767A4 (en) 2015-07-20 2019-03-20 Pietro Fiorentini S.P.A. Systems and methods for monitoring changes in a formation while dynamically flowing fluids
GB2565730B (en) 2016-05-13 2021-09-01 Carbo Ceramics Inc Capture gamma ray spectroscopy for analyzing gravel-packs, frac-packs and cement
RU2650794C1 (en) * 2017-02-01 2018-04-17 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Научно-производственное предприятие "ИНГЕО" Method and device for carrying out of the pulse neutron gamma logging (options)
KR102442077B1 (en) * 2017-05-31 2022-09-08 아헨 인스티튜트 포 뉴클리어 트레이닝 게엠베하 Method and apparatus for multi-element analysis based on neutron activation, and usage
CN109577958A (en) * 2018-11-02 2019-04-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of method of pulsed neutron log time spectrum evaluation tracer ceramic fracturing slit width
US10895662B2 (en) * 2018-12-18 2021-01-19 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Inelastic spectrum measurement system and method

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4085798A (en) * 1976-12-15 1978-04-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for investigating the front profile during flooding of formations
US4151413A (en) * 1977-06-29 1979-04-24 Texaco Inc. Method of measuring horizontal fluid flow behind casing in subsurface formations with sequential logging for interfering isotope compensation and increased measurement accuracy
US4390783A (en) * 1980-08-04 1983-06-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spectroscopic analysis with background compensation
US5322126A (en) * 1993-04-16 1994-06-21 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5413179A (en) * 1993-04-16 1995-05-09 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5543617A (en) * 1994-06-27 1996-08-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of measuring flow velocities using tracer techniques
US20030029995A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2003-02-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and methods for determining velocity of oil in a flow stream
US20050067563A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors
US20060065824A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-03-30 Medhat Mickael Gain stabilization apparatus and methods for spectraal gamma ray measurement systems
US20070023625A1 (en) * 2005-07-26 2007-02-01 Baker Hughes Incorporated Measurement of formation gas pressure and gas saturation in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation
US20070034373A1 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-15 Mcdaniel Robert R Methods and compositions for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations
US7365308B2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2008-04-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Measurement of formation gas saturation in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation
US20080251710A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and Apparatus for Determining Silicon Content of the Earth Formations in Cased Well Bores
US20090045329A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole Tools Having Combined D-D and D-T Neutron Generators
US20090090505A1 (en) * 2006-08-09 2009-04-09 Mcdaniel Robert R Method and tool for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations based on in-situ neutron activation analysis

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3707700A (en) * 1969-08-21 1972-12-26 Schlumberger Technology Corp Telemetry system incorporating synchromization of receiver with transmitter
US3665195A (en) * 1969-10-16 1972-05-23 Dresser Ind Thermal neutron activation radioactivity logging method
US3662173A (en) * 1969-10-27 1972-05-09 Dresser Ind Well logging method for determining the presence of aluminum and magnesium
US3829687A (en) * 1973-04-25 1974-08-13 Mobil Oil Corp Radioactive well logging to distinguish water and hydrocarbon saturation by delayed neutrons from oxygen
US3943362A (en) * 1974-01-18 1976-03-09 Texaco Inc. Simultaneous oxygen and silicon neutron activation well log using pulsed neutron source
US4102185A (en) * 1976-12-09 1978-07-25 Texaco Inc. Acoustic-nuclear permeability logging system
US4350888A (en) * 1980-09-02 1982-09-21 Halliburton Company Method and system for determining thermal neutron lifetime of earth formations
US4712007A (en) * 1985-04-01 1987-12-08 S.I.E., Inc. Pulsed neutron logging method using cumulative count curves
US4721853A (en) * 1986-01-31 1988-01-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Thermal decay time logging method and apparatus
US4926044A (en) * 1986-01-31 1990-05-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Thermal decay time logging method and apparatus
US4810876A (en) * 1986-09-05 1989-03-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Logging apparatus and method for determining absolute elemental concentrations of subsurface formations
US5219518A (en) * 1989-10-02 1993-06-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Nuclear oxygen activation method and apparatus for detecting and quantifying water flow
US5237594A (en) * 1990-03-22 1993-08-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Nuclear activation method and apparatus for detecting and quantifying earth elements
US5404752A (en) * 1993-09-28 1995-04-11 Western Atlas International, Inc. Method for measuring the velocity of water flow through nested conduits
US5699246A (en) * 1995-09-22 1997-12-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method to estimate a corrected response of a measurement apparatus relative to a set of known responses and observed measurements
GB9610574D0 (en) * 1996-05-20 1996-07-31 Schlumberger Ltd Downhole tool
RU2092876C1 (en) 1996-12-30 1997-10-10 Научно-техническое товарищество с ограниченной ответственностью фирма "Геокон" Radioactive logging process and device
US6150655A (en) * 1998-03-06 2000-11-21 Computalog Research, Inc. Inferential measurement of photoelectric absorption cross-section of geologic formations from neutron-induced, gamma-ray spectroscopy
US20050139759A1 (en) * 1999-01-04 2005-06-30 Robert Pitts Lifetime pulsed neutron/chlorine combination logging tool
US6703606B2 (en) * 2000-09-28 2004-03-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Neutron burst timing method and system for multiple measurement pulsed neutron formation evaluation
US7148471B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2006-12-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Well logging apparatus and method for measuring formation properties
GB2399111B (en) * 2003-03-07 2005-10-05 Schlumberger Holdings Methods for detecting while drilling underbalanced the presence and depth of water produced from the formation and for measuring parameters related thereto
US8050866B2 (en) * 2003-09-25 2011-11-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Pulsed-neutron formation density
US7166834B2 (en) * 2003-12-08 2007-01-23 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining the thermal neutron capture cross-section of a subsurface formation from a borehole
RU2262124C1 (en) 2004-05-26 2005-10-10 Закрытое акционерное общество Научно-производственная фирма "Каротаж" (ЗАО НПФ "Каротаж") Method for pulse neutron logging and device for realization of said method
US7186971B2 (en) * 2004-06-29 2007-03-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Flowshot technique
US7402797B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2008-07-22 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining aluminum concentration in earth formations
US7365307B2 (en) * 2005-02-28 2008-04-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sigma/porosity tools with neutron monitors
US7366615B2 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-04-29 Schlumber Technology Corporation Methods and apparatus using both nuclear capture and inelastic spectroscopy in deriving elemental concentrations
US8100177B2 (en) * 2008-02-20 2012-01-24 Carbo Ceramics, Inc. Method of logging a well using a thermal neutron absorbing material

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4085798A (en) * 1976-12-15 1978-04-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for investigating the front profile during flooding of formations
US4151413A (en) * 1977-06-29 1979-04-24 Texaco Inc. Method of measuring horizontal fluid flow behind casing in subsurface formations with sequential logging for interfering isotope compensation and increased measurement accuracy
US4390783A (en) * 1980-08-04 1983-06-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spectroscopic analysis with background compensation
US5322126A (en) * 1993-04-16 1994-06-21 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5413179A (en) * 1993-04-16 1995-05-09 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5543617A (en) * 1994-06-27 1996-08-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of measuring flow velocities using tracer techniques
US20030029995A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2003-02-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and methods for determining velocity of oil in a flow stream
US20050067563A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors
US20060065824A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-03-30 Medhat Mickael Gain stabilization apparatus and methods for spectraal gamma ray measurement systems
US20070023625A1 (en) * 2005-07-26 2007-02-01 Baker Hughes Incorporated Measurement of formation gas pressure and gas saturation in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation
US7365308B2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2008-04-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Measurement of formation gas saturation in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation
US20070034373A1 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-15 Mcdaniel Robert R Methods and compositions for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations
US20090090505A1 (en) * 2006-08-09 2009-04-09 Mcdaniel Robert R Method and tool for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations based on in-situ neutron activation analysis
US20080251710A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and Apparatus for Determining Silicon Content of the Earth Formations in Cased Well Bores
US20090045329A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole Tools Having Combined D-D and D-T Neutron Generators

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107656318A (en) * 2017-08-25 2018-02-02 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 The determination method and apparatus of Geologic Time

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2729642A1 (en) 2010-01-07
CA2729642C (en) 2017-08-08
RU2011103563A (en) 2012-08-10
US8969793B2 (en) 2015-03-03
US20110198488A1 (en) 2011-08-18
GB2473994B8 (en) 2024-03-27
GB2473994A8 (en) 2024-03-27
NO20110064A1 (en) 2011-01-14
RU2502096C2 (en) 2013-12-20
WO2010002727A3 (en) 2010-07-15
WO2010002727A2 (en) 2010-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8969793B2 (en) Downhole neutron activation measurement
US6703606B2 (en) Neutron burst timing method and system for multiple measurement pulsed neutron formation evaluation
US7538319B2 (en) Use of thorium-uranium ratio as an indicator of hydrocarbon source rock
US7148471B2 (en) Well logging apparatus and method for measuring formation properties
US7615741B2 (en) Determining organic carbon downhole from nuclear spectroscopy
US6376838B1 (en) Formation evaluation combination system for petrophysical well log analysis
US3780303A (en) Pulsed neutron logging with background compensation
US20070241275A1 (en) Neutron source for well logging
CA2693563C (en) Method and apparatus for determining silicon content of the earth formations in cased well bores
US10520641B2 (en) Gamma calibration
US7718956B2 (en) Use of elemental pulse neutron spectroscopy measurements for indexing bitumen viscosity in the well
US7718955B2 (en) Inelastic background correction for a pulsed-neutron instrument
US3838279A (en) Determination of borehole washout by use of inelastic neutron scattering gamma ray measurements
AU2023200483A1 (en) Neutron Time Of Flight Wellbore Logging
US11733421B2 (en) Method for obtaining near-wellbore true borehole sigma and true formation sigma by using a nuclear logging tool during oil and gas exploration
KR800000167B1 (en) Simultaneous oxygen and silicon neutron activation well log using pulsed neutron source

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION