US20150168539A1 - Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems - Google Patents

Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150168539A1
US20150168539A1 US14/634,083 US201514634083A US2015168539A1 US 20150168539 A1 US20150168539 A1 US 20150168539A1 US 201514634083 A US201514634083 A US 201514634083A US 2015168539 A1 US2015168539 A1 US 2015168539A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
reception power
power threshold
threshold value
transceiver unit
radar signals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/634,083
Inventor
Armin Himmelstoss
Juergen Hildebrandt
Stefan Heilmann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority to US14/634,083 priority Critical patent/US20150168539A1/en
Publication of US20150168539A1 publication Critical patent/US20150168539A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S13/08Systems for measuring distance only
    • G01S13/32Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
    • G01S13/34Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/93Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
    • G01S13/931Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to radar systems in general.
  • the present invention relates to FMCW radar systems and interference recognition methods for FMCW radar systems.
  • FMCW radar systems are presently used in a plurality of applications.
  • FMCW radar systems in particular, may be used in motor vehicles.
  • FMCW radar systems in motor vehicles are, for example, used to detect objects which are located in the surroundings of the motor vehicle.
  • the data received by the FMCW radar systems regarding objects which are located around the vehicle may then be used, for example, for automatic cruise control of a motor vehicle.
  • FMCW radar systems make it possible to determine a speed and a distance of an object relative to the FMCW radar system.
  • multiple modulations are transmitted by the radar and the reflected radar signals are evaluated.
  • a series of transmitted modulations is referred to as a sequence.
  • the individual modulations are each characterized by different modulation parameters, in particular by a modulation slope of the transmission frequency.
  • a modulation may have a modulation slope of 400 MHz/ms.
  • a plurality of modulations of radar signals is transmitted.
  • the modulations may have identical or different modulation parameters.
  • radar systems are in general based on transmitting electromagnetic waves and detecting and evaluating the reflections of these transmitted electromagnetic waves from objects, radar systems are susceptible to interferences of other radar systems. Interferences are mutual disruptions of radar systems. Interferences may, for example, delimit the sensitivity of a radar sensor or have an influence on its detection range. Furthermore, an interference may result in an erroneous recognition or non-recognition of objects.
  • Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2002 168947 (A) describes a method for interference recognition in which a threshold value is established for the output signal of a mixer of a receiver unit. If the level of the output signal exceeds the threshold value, an interference is assumed.
  • the threshold value is determined as a function of a relative speed or a distance between the radar system and a detected object.
  • the present invention relates to an FMCW radar system and an interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems.
  • An example FMCW radar system having a transceiver unit which is designed to transmit radar signals, which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter, and to receive radar signals, which are reflected from objects, and having an interference detector for detecting interferences in the received radar signals based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value corresponding to the particular modulation parameters, one of the modulation parameters being a modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal.
  • An example interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems having the steps of providing an FMCW radar system according to the present invention; transmitting radar signals which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter; receiving radar signals which are reflected from objects; detecting interferences in the received radar signals based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value corresponding to the particular modulation parameters, one of the modulation parameters being a modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal.
  • a reception power of radar signals usually does not exceed certain maximum values for actual existing objects.
  • an interference recognition is carried out based on the threshold values for the reception power of radar signals, the reception power threshold values being determined with the aid of at least one modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal.
  • a signature or a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values which indicate a reception power threshold value for each of the frequencies occurring in the particular modulation, is determined for any given modulation slope.
  • a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values is determined for each modulation slope, a very effective and simple interference recognition is possible.
  • One individual set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values makes it possible to determine for one modulation whether an interference has occurred within the modulation.
  • an interference may be detected for individual frequencies of a modulation. Furthermore, an interference may also be detected across a partial frequency range or the entire frequency range of a modulation. In particular, interferences may be differentiated from actual targets even within the frequency range, in which targets usually occur, with the aid of the modulation- and/or frequency-dependent reception power threshold value. Furthermore, the present invention offers the possibility of detecting any type of interferences in the admissible frequency range.
  • interferences may, for example, be caused by other FMCW radar systems, FSK, step FMCW, chirp and/or pulsed radar systems, as well as other radar systems.
  • a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values for a known modulation may be determined once and then stored. It is then possible to detect an interference by effortlessly and very quickly comparing the reception power for a certain frequency to the reception power threshold value which is indicated for this frequency by the set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values.
  • a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values for a certain modulation slope may, for example, be determined with the aid of the FMCW equation, the general radar equation, or a conditional equation derived from one of these equations.
  • a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values may not only be determined as a function of a certain modulation slope.
  • the set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values may also be determined, for example, as a function of a relative speed range and/or of a target distance range and/or for a maximally expected radar backscatter cross section of objects which are to be detected with the aid of the radar.
  • a weighting between the recognition accuracy of interferences and the likelihood of a false alarm regarding the interference recognition may be performed when determining the set of reception power threshold values. It is, in particular, possible to illustrate a set of the frequency-dependent reception power threshold values according to the present invention as a curve in a diagram.
  • the interference detector has an evaluation unit, which is designed to determine the reception power and the frequency of the received radar signals, a threshold value unit, which is designed to determine at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value based on the certain frequency and the particular modulation parameters, and a comparison unit which is designed to compare the determined reception power threshold value to the reception power of the received radar signals and to indicate the presence of an interference if the reception power is greater than the reception power threshold value.
  • the threshold value unit is designed to determine the frequency-dependent reception power threshold value based on the certain frequency from a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values corresponding to the particular modulation parameters.
  • the modulation parameters also have a transmission power of the transceiver unit and/or an antenna output of the transceiver unit and/or a maximally occurring radar backscatter cross section of expected objects and/or a speed at which the FMCW radar system moves and/or data of previously detected objects, such as relative speed and/or distance. If other modulation parameters are used to determine the frequency-dependent reception power threshold value, the tolerance for detecting an interference may be significantly reduced. In this way, interferences are detected more reliably and the likelihood of a false alarm is reduced. This increases the availability and the quality of the object recognition of the FMCW radar system.
  • the threshold value unit is designed to also determine the reception power threshold value based on an installation situation of the transceiver unit. Additionally or alternatively, the threshold value unit is designed to also determine the reception power threshold value based on a transceiver characteristic of the transceiver unit.
  • the transceiver characteristic of the transceiver unit influences the reception power of the FMCW radar system and depends on the particular electrical as well as mechanical construction and the installation situation of the FMCW radar system. If the installation situation and the transceiver characteristic are taken into account when determining the reception power threshold value, the accuracy of the interference recognition is further increased.
  • the influences, which the installation situation and the transceiver characteristic have on the particular reception power threshold values may be ascertained in simulations or may be determined through measurements at the actual FMCW radar system.
  • a first memory in which for each set of reception power threshold values at least two reception power threshold values are stored for any differing frequencies, the interference detector being designed to interpolate a reception power threshold value for frequencies for which no reception power threshold value is stored based on the at least two stored reception power threshold values. If only a selection of reception power threshold values of one set of reception power threshold values is stored, it is possible to store the particular set in a very efficient manner. In this case, storing fewer reception power threshold values of a set of reception power threshold values reduces the memory requirements for storing the particular set to a fraction of the memory necessary to store the entire set. Due to the interpolation, the possibility is maintained to determine a reception power threshold value for any frequency of a modulation.
  • a second memory in which, for a plurality of sets of reception power threshold values, at least two reception power threshold values for any differing frequencies are stored in each case in one characteristics field. If the reception power threshold values for different sets of reception power threshold values are stored in one characteristics field in one single memory, a particularly efficient access to the individual reception power threshold values is possible.
  • the sets of reception power threshold values may be stored in the characteristics field according to the sequence in which the modulations corresponding to the individual sets are transmitted by the FMCW radar system. The memory locations of the subsequent set of the reception power threshold values may then be accessed by simply adding an offset to an index to the reception power threshold values.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of one specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of one specific embodiment of an interference recognition method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of another specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a diagram of an exemplary specific embodiment of a set of reception power threshold values according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of one specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system 1 according to the present invention.
  • FMCW radar system 1 has a transceiver unit 2 which transmits radar signals 3 and receives radar signals 3 a. Transmitted radar signals 3 are modulated with the aid of predefined modulation parameters.
  • transceiver unit 2 makes received radar signals 3 a available to interference detector 6 which detects interferences in received radar signals 3 a based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value 8 corresponding to the particular modulation parameters.
  • Interference detector 6 is designed as a microcontroller 6 which converts received radar signals 3 a into digital data with the aid of analog/digital converters and detects interferences in received radar signals 3 a.
  • interference detector 6 is designed as an embedded computer, as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), as a programmable logic component or the like.
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of one specific embodiment of an interference recognition method according to the present invention.
  • an FMCW radar system 1 is made available in a first step S 1 .
  • radar signals 3 are transmitted which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter.
  • Transmitted radar signals 3 which are reflected from objects are received in a third step S 3 .
  • interferences are detected in received radar signals 3 a based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value 8 corresponding to the particular modulation parameters. Steps S 3 and S 4 may run simultaneously in one specific embodiment.
  • Interferences are detected in another specific embodiment in particular by comparing the value of the reception power of received radar signals 3 a to a corresponding reception power threshold value 8.
  • reception power threshold value 8 is taken from the set of reception power threshold values 8 at the location corresponding to the frequency of the received radar signal 3 a.
  • a set of reception power threshold values 8 is made available for each variant of modulation parameters used by FMCW radar system 1 .
  • the individual sets of reception power threshold values 8 are stored in the memory in the form of one single characteristics field.
  • the individual sets of reception power threshold values 8 may be calculated based on the FMCW equation, for example. In other specific embodiments, the sets of reception power threshold values may be calculated with the aid of the general radar equation or calculation specifications derived therefrom. In yet other specific embodiments, the sets of reception power threshold values may be determined experimentally, or the calculated sets of reception power threshold values may be adjusted to the particular application based on experimental studies.
  • a set of reception power threshold values may be determined in real time by threshold value unit 7 and/or adjusted as a function of other data.
  • These data may, for example, be a speed of a vehicle having FMCW radar system 1 or a speed of an FMCW radar system 1 , data of detected objects, e.g., relative speed and distance, transmission power of the transceiver unit or the like.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of another specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system 1 according to the present invention.
  • the block diagram in FIG. 3 differs from the block diagram in FIG. 1 in that interference detector 6 has an evaluation unit 9 which evaluates received radar signals 3 a and makes available reception power 11 of received radar signals 3 a to a comparison unit 10 as well as frequency 12 of received radar signals 3 a to a threshold value unit 7 .
  • Threshold value unit 7 determines an appropriate reception power threshold value 8 for reception power 11 of received radar signals 3 a at least based on a predefined modulation parameter and frequency 12 .
  • Comparison unit 10 then compares reception power 11 to reception power threshold value 8 and indicates an interference when reception power 11 exceeds reception power threshold value 8.
  • threshold value unit 7 may read reception power threshold values 8 from a memory or calculate them in real time.
  • FIG. 4 shows a diagram of an exemplary specific embodiment of a set of the reception power threshold values according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 a diagram of an exemplary set of reception power threshold values for a modulation slope of 400 MHz/ms is illustrated in the form of a threshold value curve.
  • the diagram is further based on a radar backscatter cross section of 3000 m 2 , a relative speed range from ⁇ 75 m/s to +20 m/s, and a target distance from 1 m to 200 m.
  • the threshold value curve is stored in the form of a set of reception power threshold values.
  • the points of the threshold value curve in the set of reception power threshold values are stored as pairs of frequency and reception power.
  • the frequency distance of the pairs corresponds to the frequency resolution of the transceiver unit.
  • the frequency of received radar signal 3 a is plotted on the abscissa.
  • the plotted frequency starts at 0 kHz and ends at 300 kHz; steps of 50 kHz are indicated on the abscissa in each case.
  • the reception power is plotted in dB from 0 dB to ⁇ 60 dB in 10 dB steps.
  • a curve is plotted in the diagram. The curve proceeds from 0 Hz to approximately 40 kHz at approximately ⁇ 8 dB. Subsequently, the curve drops to 300 kHz at an increasingly lower gradient up to approximately ⁇ 57 dB.
  • the range above the upper curve is the range which is considered as the interference detection range. If a reception power, which is above the upper curve, is determined for a received radar signal 3 a at a frequency it is assumed that an interference exists. If the reception power of received radar signals 3 a is in the range below the curve, it may be assumed that an object is located in the recognition range of transceiver unit 2 .
  • the frequency-dependent reception power threshold values correspond to the upper curve of the diagram. In other specific embodiments, other curve variations are possible as a function of the modulation slope, other modulation parameters, and vehicle-specific parameters.

Abstract

An FMCW radar system is provided having a transceiver unit which is designed to transmit radar signals, which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter, and to receive radar signals, which are reflected from objects, and having an interference detector for detecting interferences in the received radar signals based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value corresponding to the particular modulation parameters, one of the modulation parameters being a modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal. An interference recognition method is also provided.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE
  • The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Patent Application No. DE 102011079615.0 filed on Jul. 22, 2011, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to radar systems in general. In particular, the present invention relates to FMCW radar systems and interference recognition methods for FMCW radar systems.
  • BACKGROUND INFORMATION
  • FMCW radar systems are presently used in a plurality of applications. For example, FMCW radar systems, in particular, may be used in motor vehicles. FMCW radar systems in motor vehicles are, for example, used to detect objects which are located in the surroundings of the motor vehicle. The data received by the FMCW radar systems regarding objects which are located around the vehicle may then be used, for example, for automatic cruise control of a motor vehicle.
  • FMCW radar systems make it possible to determine a speed and a distance of an object relative to the FMCW radar system. For this purpose, multiple modulations are transmitted by the radar and the reflected radar signals are evaluated. A series of transmitted modulations (radar signals) is referred to as a sequence. Here, the individual modulations are each characterized by different modulation parameters, in particular by a modulation slope of the transmission frequency. For example, a modulation may have a modulation slope of 400 MHz/ms.
  • For object recognition, usually a plurality of modulations of radar signals is transmitted. The modulations may have identical or different modulation parameters.
  • Since radar systems are in general based on transmitting electromagnetic waves and detecting and evaluating the reflections of these transmitted electromagnetic waves from objects, radar systems are susceptible to interferences of other radar systems. Interferences are mutual disruptions of radar systems. Interferences may, for example, delimit the sensitivity of a radar sensor or have an influence on its detection range. Furthermore, an interference may result in an erroneous recognition or non-recognition of objects.
  • In modern radar systems, methods for detecting interferences are thus used.
  • U.S. Published Patent Application No. US 2007/0018886 A1 describes an interference recognition method in which interferences are detected based on a rate of change of the amplitude of the received radar signal.
  • Furthermore, Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2002 168947 (A) describes a method for interference recognition in which a threshold value is established for the output signal of a mixer of a receiver unit. If the level of the output signal exceeds the threshold value, an interference is assumed. The threshold value is determined as a function of a relative speed or a distance between the radar system and a detected object.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention relates to an FMCW radar system and an interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems.
  • An example FMCW radar system is provided having a transceiver unit which is designed to transmit radar signals, which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter, and to receive radar signals, which are reflected from objects, and having an interference detector for detecting interferences in the received radar signals based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value corresponding to the particular modulation parameters, one of the modulation parameters being a modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal.
  • An example interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems is provided having the steps of providing an FMCW radar system according to the present invention; transmitting radar signals which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter; receiving radar signals which are reflected from objects; detecting interferences in the received radar signals based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value corresponding to the particular modulation parameters, one of the modulation parameters being a modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal.
  • In accordance with the present invention, a reception power of radar signals usually does not exceed certain maximum values for actual existing objects.
  • According to the present invention, an interference recognition is carried out based on the threshold values for the reception power of radar signals, the reception power threshold values being determined with the aid of at least one modulation slope of the transmitted radar signal. For this purpose, a signature or a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values, which indicate a reception power threshold value for each of the frequencies occurring in the particular modulation, is determined for any given modulation slope.
  • If a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values is determined for each modulation slope, a very effective and simple interference recognition is possible. One individual set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values makes it possible to determine for one modulation whether an interference has occurred within the modulation.
  • Here, an interference may be detected for individual frequencies of a modulation. Furthermore, an interference may also be detected across a partial frequency range or the entire frequency range of a modulation. In particular, interferences may be differentiated from actual targets even within the frequency range, in which targets usually occur, with the aid of the modulation- and/or frequency-dependent reception power threshold value. Furthermore, the present invention offers the possibility of detecting any type of interferences in the admissible frequency range.
  • These interferences may, for example, be caused by other FMCW radar systems, FSK, step FMCW, chirp and/or pulsed radar systems, as well as other radar systems.
  • Furthermore, a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values for a known modulation may be determined once and then stored. It is then possible to detect an interference by effortlessly and very quickly comparing the reception power for a certain frequency to the reception power threshold value which is indicated for this frequency by the set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values.
  • A set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values for a certain modulation slope may, for example, be determined with the aid of the FMCW equation, the general radar equation, or a conditional equation derived from one of these equations.
  • A set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values may not only be determined as a function of a certain modulation slope. The set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values may also be determined, for example, as a function of a relative speed range and/or of a target distance range and/or for a maximally expected radar backscatter cross section of objects which are to be detected with the aid of the radar. For this purpose, a weighting between the recognition accuracy of interferences and the likelihood of a false alarm regarding the interference recognition may be performed when determining the set of reception power threshold values. It is, in particular, possible to illustrate a set of the frequency-dependent reception power threshold values according to the present invention as a curve in a diagram.
  • In one specific embodiment, the interference detector has an evaluation unit, which is designed to determine the reception power and the frequency of the received radar signals, a threshold value unit, which is designed to determine at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value based on the certain frequency and the particular modulation parameters, and a comparison unit which is designed to compare the determined reception power threshold value to the reception power of the received radar signals and to indicate the presence of an interference if the reception power is greater than the reception power threshold value. In another specific embodiment, the threshold value unit is designed to determine the frequency-dependent reception power threshold value based on the certain frequency from a set of frequency-dependent reception power threshold values corresponding to the particular modulation parameters.
  • In another specific embodiment, the modulation parameters also have a transmission power of the transceiver unit and/or an antenna output of the transceiver unit and/or a maximally occurring radar backscatter cross section of expected objects and/or a speed at which the FMCW radar system moves and/or data of previously detected objects, such as relative speed and/or distance. If other modulation parameters are used to determine the frequency-dependent reception power threshold value, the tolerance for detecting an interference may be significantly reduced. In this way, interferences are detected more reliably and the likelihood of a false alarm is reduced. This increases the availability and the quality of the object recognition of the FMCW radar system.
  • In one specific embodiment, the threshold value unit is designed to also determine the reception power threshold value based on an installation situation of the transceiver unit. Additionally or alternatively, the threshold value unit is designed to also determine the reception power threshold value based on a transceiver characteristic of the transceiver unit. The transceiver characteristic of the transceiver unit influences the reception power of the FMCW radar system and depends on the particular electrical as well as mechanical construction and the installation situation of the FMCW radar system. If the installation situation and the transceiver characteristic are taken into account when determining the reception power threshold value, the accuracy of the interference recognition is further increased. The influences, which the installation situation and the transceiver characteristic have on the particular reception power threshold values, may be ascertained in simulations or may be determined through measurements at the actual FMCW radar system.
  • In one specific embodiment, a first memory is provided in which for each set of reception power threshold values at least two reception power threshold values are stored for any differing frequencies, the interference detector being designed to interpolate a reception power threshold value for frequencies for which no reception power threshold value is stored based on the at least two stored reception power threshold values. If only a selection of reception power threshold values of one set of reception power threshold values is stored, it is possible to store the particular set in a very efficient manner. In this case, storing fewer reception power threshold values of a set of reception power threshold values reduces the memory requirements for storing the particular set to a fraction of the memory necessary to store the entire set. Due to the interpolation, the possibility is maintained to determine a reception power threshold value for any frequency of a modulation.
  • In one specific embodiment, a second memory is provided in which, for a plurality of sets of reception power threshold values, at least two reception power threshold values for any differing frequencies are stored in each case in one characteristics field. If the reception power threshold values for different sets of reception power threshold values are stored in one characteristics field in one single memory, a particularly efficient access to the individual reception power threshold values is possible. In particular, the sets of reception power threshold values may be stored in the characteristics field according to the sequence in which the modulations corresponding to the individual sets are transmitted by the FMCW radar system. The memory locations of the subsequent set of the reception power threshold values may then be accessed by simply adding an offset to an index to the reception power threshold values.
  • The above-mentioned embodiments and refinements may be combined in any desired manner, provided that the combination is reasonable. Other possible embodiments, refinements, and implementations of the present invention also include not explicitly named combinations of features of the present invention described previously or in the following with regard to the exemplary embodiments. In particular, those skilled in the art will add individual aspects as improvements or enhancements to the particular base form of the present invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention is explained below in greater detail with reference to the exemplary embodiments shown in the figures.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of one specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of one specific embodiment of an interference recognition method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of another specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a diagram of an exemplary specific embodiment of a set of reception power threshold values according to the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
  • In all figures, elements and devices which are identical or have identical functions are identified with identical reference numerals, unless otherwise indicated.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of one specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system 1 according to the present invention. FMCW radar system 1 has a transceiver unit 2 which transmits radar signals 3 and receives radar signals 3 a. Transmitted radar signals 3 are modulated with the aid of predefined modulation parameters. Furthermore, transceiver unit 2 makes received radar signals 3 a available to interference detector 6 which detects interferences in received radar signals 3 a based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value 8 corresponding to the particular modulation parameters.
  • Interference detector 6 is designed as a microcontroller 6 which converts received radar signals 3 a into digital data with the aid of analog/digital converters and detects interferences in received radar signals 3 a.
  • In other specific embodiments, interference detector 6 is designed as an embedded computer, as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), as a programmable logic component or the like.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of one specific embodiment of an interference recognition method according to the present invention.
  • In FIG. 2, an FMCW radar system 1 according to the present invention is made available in a first step S1. In a second step S2, radar signals 3 are transmitted which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter. Transmitted radar signals 3 which are reflected from objects are received in a third step S3. In a fourth step S4, interferences are detected in received radar signals 3 a based on at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value 8 corresponding to the particular modulation parameters. Steps S3 and S4 may run simultaneously in one specific embodiment.
  • Interferences are detected in another specific embodiment in particular by comparing the value of the reception power of received radar signals 3 a to a corresponding reception power threshold value 8. For this purpose, reception power threshold value 8 is taken from the set of reception power threshold values 8 at the location corresponding to the frequency of the received radar signal 3 a. For this purpose, a set of reception power threshold values 8 is made available for each variant of modulation parameters used by FMCW radar system 1. In another specific embodiment, the individual sets of reception power threshold values 8 are stored in the memory in the form of one single characteristics field.
  • In one specific embodiment, the individual sets of reception power threshold values 8 may be calculated based on the FMCW equation, for example. In other specific embodiments, the sets of reception power threshold values may be calculated with the aid of the general radar equation or calculation specifications derived therefrom. In yet other specific embodiments, the sets of reception power threshold values may be determined experimentally, or the calculated sets of reception power threshold values may be adjusted to the particular application based on experimental studies.
  • In other specific embodiments, a set of reception power threshold values may be determined in real time by threshold value unit 7 and/or adjusted as a function of other data. These data may, for example, be a speed of a vehicle having FMCW radar system 1 or a speed of an FMCW radar system 1, data of detected objects, e.g., relative speed and distance, transmission power of the transceiver unit or the like.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of another specific embodiment of an FMCW radar system 1 according to the present invention.
  • The block diagram in FIG. 3 differs from the block diagram in FIG. 1 in that interference detector 6 has an evaluation unit 9 which evaluates received radar signals 3 a and makes available reception power 11 of received radar signals 3 a to a comparison unit 10 as well as frequency 12 of received radar signals 3 a to a threshold value unit 7. Threshold value unit 7 determines an appropriate reception power threshold value 8 for reception power 11 of received radar signals 3 a at least based on a predefined modulation parameter and frequency 12. Comparison unit 10 then compares reception power 11 to reception power threshold value 8 and indicates an interference when reception power 11 exceeds reception power threshold value 8. For this purpose, threshold value unit 7 may read reception power threshold values 8 from a memory or calculate them in real time.
  • FIG. 4 shows a diagram of an exemplary specific embodiment of a set of the reception power threshold values according to the present invention.
  • In FIG. 4, a diagram of an exemplary set of reception power threshold values for a modulation slope of 400 MHz/ms is illustrated in the form of a threshold value curve. The diagram is further based on a radar backscatter cross section of 3000 m2, a relative speed range from −75 m/s to +20 m/s, and a target distance from 1 m to 200 m.
  • In one specific embodiment of a radar system according to the present invention, the threshold value curve is stored in the form of a set of reception power threshold values. Here, the points of the threshold value curve in the set of reception power threshold values are stored as pairs of frequency and reception power. Here, the frequency distance of the pairs corresponds to the frequency resolution of the transceiver unit.
  • In the diagram, the frequency of received radar signal 3 a is plotted on the abscissa. The plotted frequency starts at 0 kHz and ends at 300 kHz; steps of 50 kHz are indicated on the abscissa in each case. On the ordinate, the reception power is plotted in dB from 0 dB to −60 dB in 10 dB steps. Furthermore, a curve is plotted in the diagram. The curve proceeds from 0 Hz to approximately 40 kHz at approximately −8 dB. Subsequently, the curve drops to 300 kHz at an increasingly lower gradient up to approximately −57 dB.
  • The range above the upper curve is the range which is considered as the interference detection range. If a reception power, which is above the upper curve, is determined for a received radar signal 3 a at a frequency it is assumed that an interference exists. If the reception power of received radar signals 3 a is in the range below the curve, it may be assumed that an object is located in the recognition range of transceiver unit 2.
  • In one specific embodiment of the present radar system, the frequency-dependent reception power threshold values correspond to the upper curve of the diagram. In other specific embodiments, other curve variations are possible as a function of the modulation slope, other modulation parameters, and vehicle-specific parameters.
  • Although the present invention was described above with reference to preferred exemplary embodiments, it is not limited thereto, but is modifiable in many ways. In particular, the present invention may be changed or modified in various ways without deviating from the core of the present invention.

Claims (5)

1-12. (canceled)
13. An FMCW radar system, comprising:
a transceiver unit configured to transmit radar signals which are modulated according to at least one modulation parameter, and to receive radar signals which are reflected from objects; and
an interference detector configured to detect interferences in the received radar signals based on a comparison of reception power of the received radar signals to at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value, wherein the at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value is set based on at least one of a transmission power of the transceiver unit, an antenna output of the transceiver unit, a maximally occurring radar backscatter cross section of expected objects, a speed at which the FMCW radar system moves, and data of previously detected objects.
14. The FMCW radar system as recited in claim 13, wherein the reception power threshold value is set based on at least one of the transmission power of the transceiver unit, and the antenna output of the transceiver unit.
15. An interference recognition method for a FMCW radar system, comprising:
providing an FMCW radar system, the system including a transceiver unit configured to transmit radar signals which are modulated according to at least one modulation parameter, and to receive radar signals which are reflected from objects, and an interference detector configured to detect interferences in the received radar signals based on a comparison of reception power of the received radar signals to at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value;
transmitting, by the transceiver unit, the radar signals which are modulated with the aid of at least one modulation parameter;
receiving, by the transceiver unit, the radar signals which are reflected from objects; and
detecting, by the interference detector, interferences in the received radar signals based on a comparison of reception power of the received radar signals to the at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value, wherein the at least one frequency-dependent reception power threshold value is set based on at least one of a transmission power of the transceiver unit, an antenna output of the transceiver unit, a maximally occurring radar backscatter cross section of expected objects, a speed at which the FMCW radar system moves, and data of objects detected previously by the FMCW radar system.
16. The interference recognition method as recited in claim 15, wherein the reception power threshold value is set based on at least one of the transmission power of the transceiver unit and the antenna output of the transceiver unit.
US14/634,083 2011-07-22 2015-02-27 Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems Abandoned US20150168539A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/634,083 US20150168539A1 (en) 2011-07-22 2015-02-27 Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011079615.0 2011-07-22
DE102011079615A DE102011079615A1 (en) 2011-07-22 2011-07-22 FMCW radar system and interference detection method for FMCW radar systems
US13/554,045 US9063213B2 (en) 2011-07-22 2012-07-20 FMCW radar system and interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems
US14/634,083 US20150168539A1 (en) 2011-07-22 2015-02-27 Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/554,045 Division US9063213B2 (en) 2011-07-22 2012-07-20 FMCW radar system and interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150168539A1 true US20150168539A1 (en) 2015-06-18

Family

ID=46197033

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/554,045 Active 2033-07-05 US9063213B2 (en) 2011-07-22 2012-07-20 FMCW radar system and interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems
US14/634,083 Abandoned US20150168539A1 (en) 2011-07-22 2015-02-27 Fmcw radar system and interference recognition method for fmcw radar systems

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/554,045 Active 2033-07-05 US9063213B2 (en) 2011-07-22 2012-07-20 FMCW radar system and interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US9063213B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2549292B1 (en)
DE (1) DE102011079615A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10120073B2 (en) * 2013-06-21 2018-11-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a surroundings-detection system of a vehicle
US20200116849A1 (en) * 2018-10-12 2020-04-16 Axis Ab Method, device, and system for interference reduction in a frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar unit
WO2022099603A1 (en) * 2020-11-13 2022-05-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Radar interference mitigation

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012021240A1 (en) * 2012-10-27 2014-04-30 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh A method of suppressing interference in a received signal of a radar sensor of a motor vehicle and corresponding driver assistance means
US9473182B2 (en) * 2014-11-07 2016-10-18 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Oportunistic interference cancellation of radar signals
US9846228B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2017-12-19 Uhnder, Inc. Software defined automotive radar systems
WO2017175190A1 (en) 2016-04-07 2017-10-12 Uhnder, Inc. Adaptive transmission and interference cancellation for mimo radar
US10261179B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2019-04-16 Uhnder, Inc. Software defined automotive radar
US9791551B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-10-17 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicular radar system with self-interference cancellation
WO2017187306A1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Adaptive filtering for fmcw interference mitigation in pmcw radar systems
EP3449272B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2022-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicle radar system with a shared radar and communication system, and method for managing such a system in a vehicle
WO2017187304A2 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Digital frequency modulated continuous wave radar using handcrafted constant envelope modulation
WO2017187299A2 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Successive signal interference mitigation
WO2017187278A1 (en) * 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Pmcw – pmcw interference mitigation
US10573959B2 (en) 2016-04-25 2020-02-25 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicle radar system using shaped antenna patterns
US9753121B1 (en) 2016-06-20 2017-09-05 Uhnder, Inc. Power control for improved near-far performance of radar systems
WO2018051288A1 (en) 2016-09-16 2018-03-22 Uhnder, Inc. Virtual radar configuration for 2d array
US10866306B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2020-12-15 Uhnder, Inc. Increasing performance of a receive pipeline of a radar with memory optimization
WO2018146530A1 (en) 2017-02-10 2018-08-16 Uhnder, Inc. Reduced complexity fft-based correlation for automotive radar
US11454697B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2022-09-27 Uhnder, Inc. Increasing performance of a receive pipeline of a radar with memory optimization
EP3373027A1 (en) 2017-03-10 2018-09-12 Nxp B.V. Wireless communication unit, interference detection circuit and method for interference detection
EP3435043B1 (en) * 2017-07-25 2020-04-29 VEGA Grieshaber KG Radar fill level measuring device, method and program item for operating a radar fill level measuring device
EP3444628A1 (en) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-20 Nxp B.V. Radar unit, integrated circuit and methods for detecting and mitigating mutual interference
US11105890B2 (en) 2017-12-14 2021-08-31 Uhnder, Inc. Frequency modulated signal cancellation in variable power mode for radar applications
EP3502732B1 (en) 2017-12-21 2021-10-20 Nxp B.V. Radar unit and method for detecting an existence of interference in a radar unit
JP7014041B2 (en) * 2018-05-11 2022-02-01 株式会社デンソー Radar device
EP4071497A1 (en) * 2018-05-18 2022-10-12 Aptiv Technologies Limited Radar system and method for receiving and analyzing radar signals
JP6992704B2 (en) * 2018-08-22 2022-01-13 株式会社デンソー Object detection device
EP3620810B1 (en) * 2018-09-05 2022-07-13 Nxp B.V. Radar interference detection
US11474225B2 (en) 2018-11-09 2022-10-18 Uhnder, Inc. Pulse digital mimo radar system
US11681017B2 (en) 2019-03-12 2023-06-20 Uhnder, Inc. Method and apparatus for mitigation of low frequency noise in radar systems
CN110988823B (en) * 2019-11-22 2021-07-16 中船重工(武汉)凌久电子有限责任公司 Interference signal modulation method for injection type interference semi-physical radar simulator
WO2021144711A2 (en) 2020-01-13 2021-07-22 Uhnder, Inc. Method and system for intefrence management for digital radars
US11899095B2 (en) * 2020-09-17 2024-02-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Doppler processing in frequency-modulated continuous wave radar systems using dither
US20210325508A1 (en) * 2021-06-24 2021-10-21 Intel Corporation Signal-to-Noise Ratio Range Consistency Check for Radar Ghost Target Detection

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4044357A (en) * 1975-12-04 1977-08-23 Westinghouse Electric Corporation FM/CW radar including a novel receiver protector of general utility
US5896103A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-04-20 Honeywell Inc. Method and aparatus for dynamically calibrating a radar receiver
US7227493B2 (en) * 2000-02-08 2007-06-05 Cambridge Consultants Limited Methods and apparatus for obtaining positional information
US8125374B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2012-02-28 Bae Systems Plc Method of preventing false detections in sensors
US20130038484A1 (en) * 2009-12-09 2013-02-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Obstacle detection device

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4217827A (en) * 1970-04-23 1980-08-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Radar fuzing system
NL8300178A (en) * 1983-01-18 1984-08-16 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv PULSE RADAR DEVICE.
JPH05107351A (en) * 1991-10-16 1993-04-27 Fujitsu Ten Ltd Measuring apparatus for distance to vehicle ahead having means for determining threshold
US6094160A (en) * 1999-06-10 2000-07-25 Delco Electronics Corp. Interference rejection method for an automotive radar CW/ICC system
JP2002168947A (en) 2000-11-30 2002-06-14 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Fm-cw radar system
US7683827B2 (en) * 2004-12-15 2010-03-23 Valeo Radar Systems, Inc. System and method for reducing the effect of a radar interference signal
US7403153B2 (en) * 2004-12-15 2008-07-22 Valeo Raytheon Systems, Inc. System and method for reducing a radar interference signal
JP4747652B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2011-08-17 株式会社デンソー FMCW radar
FI121980B (en) * 2007-02-16 2011-06-30 Voyantic Oy Method for characterizing a radio link
DE102009000472A1 (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-08-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for detecting precipitation with a radar tracking device for motor vehicles
DE102010029699A1 (en) * 2010-06-04 2011-12-22 Robert Bosch Gmbh Radar sensor and method for detecting precipitation with a radar sensor

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4044357A (en) * 1975-12-04 1977-08-23 Westinghouse Electric Corporation FM/CW radar including a novel receiver protector of general utility
US5896103A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-04-20 Honeywell Inc. Method and aparatus for dynamically calibrating a radar receiver
US7227493B2 (en) * 2000-02-08 2007-06-05 Cambridge Consultants Limited Methods and apparatus for obtaining positional information
US8125374B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2012-02-28 Bae Systems Plc Method of preventing false detections in sensors
US20130038484A1 (en) * 2009-12-09 2013-02-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Obstacle detection device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10120073B2 (en) * 2013-06-21 2018-11-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a surroundings-detection system of a vehicle
US20200116849A1 (en) * 2018-10-12 2020-04-16 Axis Ab Method, device, and system for interference reduction in a frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar unit
US11567167B2 (en) * 2018-10-12 2023-01-31 Axis Ab Method, device, and system for interference reduction in a frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar unit
WO2022099603A1 (en) * 2020-11-13 2022-05-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Radar interference mitigation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2549292A1 (en) 2013-01-23
DE102011079615A1 (en) 2013-01-24
US20130021196A1 (en) 2013-01-24
US9063213B2 (en) 2015-06-23
EP2549292B1 (en) 2018-02-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9063213B2 (en) FMCW radar system and interference recognition method for FMCW radar systems
US10509105B2 (en) Radar device and frequency interference cancellation method thereof
US10126410B2 (en) Determination of an elevation misalignment angle of a radar sensor of a motor vehicle
CN105093213B (en) The radar system distinguished with improved multiple target
US8589116B2 (en) Object sensor
US5923282A (en) Radar system
US10481251B2 (en) Radar device and target detecting method
US10228457B2 (en) Radar device and sensor fusion system using the same
US10473760B2 (en) Radar device and vertical axis-misalignment detecting method
US10386458B2 (en) Radar signal processing device and method
US9977126B2 (en) Radar apparatus
KR101040315B1 (en) A target detecting apparatus which is adapted to clutter environment
US8836572B2 (en) Method for detecting precipitation using a radar sensor system for motor vehicles
US8823582B2 (en) FMCW radar sensor system having a device for detecting a radome coating
US10656242B2 (en) Radar sensor
US20200408878A1 (en) A radar transceiver with reduced false alarm rate
US10794992B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting and correcting for blockage of an automotive radar sensor
CN106482807A (en) Article position measuring device including interferer signal detection
KR20150051679A (en) Vechicle radar for discriminating false target using variable wave and method for discriminating false target using it
US20160153822A1 (en) Method for ascertaining and monitoring fill level of a medium in a container using a travel time measuring method
US9429649B2 (en) Radar device
KR101752651B1 (en) Clutter elimination and multi target trace method of radar system
US20170234967A1 (en) Radar sensor
CN109752699B (en) Target detection based on curve detection in distance-chirp graph
CN109263649B (en) Vehicle, object recognition method and object recognition system thereof in automatic driving mode

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION