US20140061031A1 - Processing method utilizing cluster - Google Patents

Processing method utilizing cluster Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140061031A1
US20140061031A1 US13/778,555 US201313778555A US2014061031A1 US 20140061031 A1 US20140061031 A1 US 20140061031A1 US 201313778555 A US201313778555 A US 201313778555A US 2014061031 A1 US2014061031 A1 US 2014061031A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
volume
gas
reactive
gas mixture
inert gas
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/778,555
Inventor
Yu Yoshino
Kunihiko Koike
Takehiko Senoo
Jiro Matsuo
Toshio Seki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kyoto University
Iwatani Corp
Original Assignee
Kyoto University
Iwatani Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kyoto University, Iwatani Corp filed Critical Kyoto University
Assigned to IWATANI CORPORATION, KYOTO UNIVERSITY reassignment IWATANI CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KOIKE, KUNIHIKO, SENOO, TAKEHIKO, MATSUO, JIRO, YOSHINO, YU, SEKI, TOSHIO
Publication of US20140061031A1 publication Critical patent/US20140061031A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/302Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F1/00Etching metallic material by chemical means
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B81MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
    • B81CPROCESSES OR APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS
    • B81C1/00Manufacture or treatment of devices or systems in or on a substrate
    • B81C1/00436Shaping materials, i.e. techniques for structuring the substrate or the layers on the substrate
    • B81C1/00523Etching material
    • B81C1/00531Dry etching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02041Cleaning
    • H01L21/02043Cleaning before device manufacture, i.e. Begin-Of-Line process
    • H01L21/02046Dry cleaning only
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/302Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
    • H01L21/306Chemical or electrical treatment, e.g. electrolytic etching
    • H01L21/3065Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B81MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
    • B81CPROCESSES OR APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS
    • B81C2201/00Manufacture or treatment of microstructural devices or systems
    • B81C2201/01Manufacture or treatment of microstructural devices or systems in or on a substrate
    • B81C2201/0101Shaping material; Structuring the bulk substrate or layers on the substrate; Film patterning
    • B81C2201/0128Processes for removing material
    • B81C2201/013Etching
    • B81C2201/0132Dry etching, i.e. plasma etching, barrel etching, reactive ion etching [RIE], sputter etching or ion milling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a processing method for etching or cleaning a surface of a sample using reactive clusters produced from a reactive gas.
  • the present inventors have proposed a method utilizing neutral reactive clusters in order to solve problems associated with etching or cleaning of a sample using cluster ions (see, for example, WO 2010-021265).
  • a reactive gas and an additive gas that is inert to the reactive gas and has a lower boiling point than the reactive gas form neutral reactive clusters.
  • the reactive clusters collide with a sample and react with the surface of the sample, thereby allowing anisotropic processing of the surface of the sample.
  • the neutral reactive clusters are nonionized electroneutral clusters and therefore advantageously cause no electrical damage to the sample.
  • this processing method has poor processing performance, such as a low etch rate.
  • a vacuum processing chamber must be evacuated of a large amount of gas in order to maintain a vacuum in the vacuum processing chamber. This is limited by exhaust capacity and may reduce processing capacity per nozzle. Thus, desired processing performance must sometimes be achieved with a small gas supply.
  • One aspect of the present invention is a method for processing a surface of a sample using reactive clusters produced by adiabatic expansion of a gas mixture ejected from a nozzle into a vacuum processing chamber.
  • the gas mixture contains a reactive gas chlorine trifluoride, a first inert gas argon, and a second inert gas xenon.
  • the gas mixture in an inlet of the nozzle has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (based on absolute pressure; hereinafter referred to simply as abs) or more.
  • the reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less.
  • the first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less.
  • the second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
  • the pressure of the gas mixture and the concentration of the reactive gas in the nozzle inlet are in predetermined ranges, and argon and xenon are used as inert gases. Under these conditions, excellent processing performance can be achieved at a low flow rate.
  • the gas mixture in the nozzle inlet may have a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more.
  • the reactive gas may constitute 5% by volume or more and 7% by volume or less.
  • the first inert gas may constitute 43% by volume or more and 89% by volume or less.
  • the second inert gas may constitute 6% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
  • This processing method has excellent processing performance particularly in the depth direction and is therefore very useful for applications requiring a high aspect ratio, such as micromachining.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic explanatory view of a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon and the etch rate (weight base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon and the etch rate (depth base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate and the etch rate (weight base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate and the etch rate (depth base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to a schematic explanatory view of FIG. 1 .
  • reference numeral 1 denotes a gas mixture supply line
  • reference numeral 2 denotes a nozzle
  • reference numeral 3 denotes a vacuum processing chamber
  • reference numeral 4 denotes a sample.
  • the gas mixture supply line 1 is connected to a gas cylinder 11 through a pressure-regulating valve 12 having a pressure-reducing function, a flowmeter 13 , and a pressure gauge 14 .
  • the gas cylinder 11 may contain a gas mixture 15 of a reactive gas, a first inert gas, and a second inert gas in a predetermined ratio at a predetermined pressure.
  • the gas cylinder 11 may separately contain the reactive gas, the first inert gas, and the second inert gas in their respective containers and is controlled to supply the gas mixture 15 in a predetermined mixing ratio.
  • the reactive gas is chlorine trifluoride.
  • Chlorine trifluoride has a high reactivity with silicon and is effective for a sample surface 41 made of a silicon single crystal.
  • reactive clusters require a certain pressure. Because of its high boiling point, the reactive gas condenses (becomes liquid) and cannot be adiabatically expanded in the nozzle at high pressure. Thus, high pressure required for the formation of reactive clusters cannot be produced with the reactive gas alone.
  • an inert gas to the reactive gas can reduce the partial pressure of the reactive gas and prevent the reactive gas from becoming liquid, thereby producing primary pressure required for the formation of reactive clusters.
  • argon is used as a first inert gas
  • xenon is used as a second inert gas
  • the first inert gas and the second inert gas are inert to the reactive gas in the gas cylinder 11 and the gas mixture supply line 1 .
  • the first inert gas and the second inert gas do not react with the reactive gas in the gas cylinder 11 and the gas mixture supply line 1 , allowing the stable formation of reactive clusters, and do not inhibit the processing of the sample surface 41 .
  • the reactive clusters play the leading role in processing and, as described above, the inert gases only reduce the partial pressure of the reactive gas and prevent the reactive gas from becoming liquid, thereby producing primary pressure required for the formation of the reactive clusters. It is therefore supposed that the important thing is not the types of the inert gases but the partial pressure of the inert gases.
  • the reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less
  • the first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less
  • the second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture 15 .
  • the reactive gas constitutes less than 3% by volume of the gas mixture 15 , this results in an insufficient reaction between the reactive gas and the sample.
  • the reactive gas constitutes 10% by volume of the gas mixture 15 , the reactive gas may become liquid.
  • the reactive gas preferably constitutes 5% by volume or more and 7% by volume or less.
  • the first inert gas preferably constitutes 43% by volume or more and 89% by volume or less.
  • the second inert gas preferably constitutes 6% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less in terms of processing performance in the depth direction.
  • the gas mixture 15 in a nozzle inlet 21 has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (abs) or more. It is difficult to form reactive clusters at a pressure of less than 0.4 MPa (abs).
  • the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 preferably has a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more, more preferably 0.8 MPa (abs) or more.
  • the maximum pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 is not particularly limited and may be 1 MPa (abs) or less in order to prevent an excessive load on the apparatus and the liquefaction of the reactive gas.
  • the vacuum processing chamber 3 is connected to an outlet 35 .
  • the outlet 35 is connected to an abatement unit 34 for making the exhaust gas harmless through an open-close valve 31 , a turbo-molecular pump 32 , and a dry pump 33 .
  • the vacuum processing chamber 3 is maintained at a secondary pressure of approximately 10 Pa (abs).
  • the pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3 is measured with a pressure gauge 36 .
  • a differential pressure between the primary pressure of the nozzle inlet 21 , for example, 0.68 MPa (abs) and the secondary pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3 , for example, 10 Pa (abs) allows the gas mixture 15 from the nozzle 2 to be adiabatically expanded to form reactive clusters 37 .
  • the gas mixture 15 of the reactive gas, the first inert gas, and the second inert gas ejected from the nozzle outlet 22 into the vacuum processing chamber 3 is adiabatically expanded to form the neutral reactive clusters 37 .
  • the neutral reactive clusters 37 thus formed collide with the sample surface 41 in the vacuum processing chamber 3 to anisotropically process the sample surface 41 at a high speed.
  • a sample 4 is fixed at a predetermined position on a sample stage 42 .
  • the etch rate (weight base) was calculated as a difference between the sample weights measured with a chemical balance “ER-182A” (manufactured by A&D Co., Ltd.) before and after one-minute processing.
  • the etch rate (depth base) refers to the maximum etching depth in the one-minute processing.
  • An etching depth of less than 60 ⁇ m was measured with a stylus-based surface profiler “DekTak 3” (manufactured by Veeco Instruments Inc.).
  • An etching depth of 60 ⁇ m or more was measured with a scanning electron microscope “JSM-7505FS” (manufactured by JEOL Ltd.).
  • the gas mixture flow rate (sccm) is the volume flow rate of the gas mixture per minute.
  • the volume flow rate is converted from the mass flow rate measured with the flowmeter 13 using the volume percentages and the molecular weights of the gas components of the gas mixture.
  • the sample surface 41 to be processed with the reactive clusters 37 in the vacuum processing chamber 3 was made of a silicon single crystal.
  • the gas mixture 15 contained chlorine trifluoride (ClF 3 ) as the reactive gas, argon (Ar) as the first inert gas, and xenon (Xe) as the second inert gas.
  • the supply pressure (primary pressure) of the gas mixture 15 in the gas mixture supply line 1 was controlled with the pressure-regulating valve 12 .
  • the internal pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3 was maintained at approximately 10 Pa (abs) with the turbo-molecular pump 32 and the dry pump 33 .
  • the distance between the nozzle outlet 22 and the sample surface 41 was 13 mm.
  • the irradiation time of the sample surface 41 with the reactive clusters 37 was 1 minute.
  • the primary pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 and the composition of the gas mixture 15 were changed.
  • the primary pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 was 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, or 0.95 MPa (abs).
  • the gas mixture 15 contained 6% by volume chlorine trifluoride, 0%, 3%, 6%, 50%, or 94% by volume xenon, and the remainder argon (100% by volume in total).
  • the pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 was changed while the composition of the gas mixture 15 was fixed, the pressure of the gas mixture 15 having a predetermined composition was increased above the experimental pressure (0.95 MPa (abs)) in the gas cylinder 11 and was reduced to a predetermined pressure (0.40, 0.60, 0.80, or 0.95 MPa (abs)) with the pressure-regulating valve 12 .
  • the gas mixture 15 having the different composition was prepared in the gas cylinder 11 .
  • the gas mixture 15 contained only one inert gas, which is outside the scope of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (weight base: mg/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (depth base: ⁇ m/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 4 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (weight base: mg/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (depth base: ⁇ m/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show that the addition of xenon improves processing performance.
  • a high pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 tends to result in high processing performance.
  • FIGS. 4 and 5 show that the addition of xenon can achieve excellent processing performance as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 at a reduced flow rate.
  • the excellent processing performance at a reduced flow rate indicates high reaction efficiency (a high percentage of reactive gas contributing to processing of the sample).
  • the number of nozzles can be increased to increase the gas mixture flow rate, which allows the processing method to be applied to large area processing and other applications.
  • FIGS. 2 to 5 show that a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more and the presence of 6% to 50% by volume xenon result in particularly excellent processing performance on the depth base.
  • the processing method is very useful for applications requiring a high aspect ratio.
  • Table 1 shows that the etch rate (depth base) for 6% or 50% by volume xenon is much higher than the etch rate for 0% by volume xenon at pressures of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more. This is particularly remarkable at a pressure of 0.8 MPa (abs) or more.
  • processing performance on the depth base is not particularly high. However, this does not necessarily mean that the processing method has poor processing performance.
  • the processing method may be preferred in wide and narrow processing. In other words, the processing method according to the present embodiment may be of technical value in changing the reactive processing performance of clusters using two inert gases argon and xenon.
  • the percentage of the reactive gas chlorine trifluoride is controlled so as to achieve a certain level of processing performance without causing the liquefaction of the reactive gas.
  • the reactive gas chlorine trifluoride constitutes 6% by volume, the boiling point of chlorine trifluoride, and the reactivity of chlorine trifluoride with the sample, it is supposed by experience that use of 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less chlorine trifluoride can also result in a certain level of processing performance without causing the liquefaction of the reactive gas.
  • argon and xenon can improve processing performance.

Abstract

A processing method having excellent processing performance at a low flow rate is provided. A method for processing a surface of a sample uses reactive clusters produced by adiabatic expansion of a gas mixture ejected from a nozzle into a vacuum processing chamber. The gas mixture contains a reactive gas chlorine trifluoride, a first inert gas argon, and a second inert gas xenon. The gas mixture in an inlet of the nozzle has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (abs) or more. The reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less. The first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less. The second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a processing method for etching or cleaning a surface of a sample using reactive clusters produced from a reactive gas.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • The present inventors have proposed a method utilizing neutral reactive clusters in order to solve problems associated with etching or cleaning of a sample using cluster ions (see, for example, WO 2010-021265).
  • In accordance with the method described in WO 2010-021265, a reactive gas and an additive gas that is inert to the reactive gas and has a lower boiling point than the reactive gas form neutral reactive clusters. The reactive clusters collide with a sample and react with the surface of the sample, thereby allowing anisotropic processing of the surface of the sample. The neutral reactive clusters are nonionized electroneutral clusters and therefore advantageously cause no electrical damage to the sample.
  • However, this processing method has poor processing performance, such as a low etch rate.
  • In general, in order to improve the processing performance of clusters, it may be possible to increase the concentration or the supply pressure of a reactive gas before the formation of the clusters. When the reactive gas has a high boiling point, however, the reactive gas may become liquid before reaching a nozzle and not be able to form clusters by adiabatically expanding in the nozzle. Thus, the method has its limits.
  • Furthermore, treatment of a large area may require the use of a plurality of nozzles, which requires an increase in gas supply. Thus, a vacuum processing chamber must be evacuated of a large amount of gas in order to maintain a vacuum in the vacuum processing chamber. This is limited by exhaust capacity and may reduce processing capacity per nozzle. Thus, desired processing performance must sometimes be achieved with a small gas supply.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In order to improve the poor processing performance of the method described in WO 2010-021265 in anisotropic etching using neutral clusters, it is an object of the present invention to provide a processing method having excellent processing performance at a low flow rate.
  • One aspect of the present invention is a method for processing a surface of a sample using reactive clusters produced by adiabatic expansion of a gas mixture ejected from a nozzle into a vacuum processing chamber. The gas mixture contains a reactive gas chlorine trifluoride, a first inert gas argon, and a second inert gas xenon. The gas mixture in an inlet of the nozzle has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (based on absolute pressure; hereinafter referred to simply as abs) or more. The reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less. The first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less. The second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
  • The pressure of the gas mixture and the concentration of the reactive gas in the nozzle inlet are in predetermined ranges, and argon and xenon are used as inert gases. Under these conditions, excellent processing performance can be achieved at a low flow rate.
  • The gas mixture in the nozzle inlet may have a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more. The reactive gas may constitute 5% by volume or more and 7% by volume or less. The first inert gas may constitute 43% by volume or more and 89% by volume or less. The second inert gas may constitute 6% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
  • This processing method has excellent processing performance particularly in the depth direction and is therefore very useful for applications requiring a high aspect ratio, such as micromachining.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic explanatory view of a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon and the etch rate (weight base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon and the etch rate (depth base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 4 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate and the etch rate (weight base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate and the etch rate (depth base) on a surface of a sample in a processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • A processing method utilizing clusters according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to a schematic explanatory view of FIG. 1.
  • In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes a gas mixture supply line, reference numeral 2 denotes a nozzle, reference numeral 3 denotes a vacuum processing chamber, and reference numeral 4 denotes a sample.
  • The gas mixture supply line 1 is connected to a gas cylinder 11 through a pressure-regulating valve 12 having a pressure-reducing function, a flowmeter 13, and a pressure gauge 14.
  • The gas cylinder 11 may contain a gas mixture 15 of a reactive gas, a first inert gas, and a second inert gas in a predetermined ratio at a predetermined pressure. The gas cylinder 11 may separately contain the reactive gas, the first inert gas, and the second inert gas in their respective containers and is controlled to supply the gas mixture 15 in a predetermined mixing ratio.
  • The reactive gas is chlorine trifluoride. Chlorine trifluoride has a high reactivity with silicon and is effective for a sample surface 41 made of a silicon single crystal.
  • The formation of reactive clusters requires a certain pressure. Because of its high boiling point, the reactive gas condenses (becomes liquid) and cannot be adiabatically expanded in the nozzle at high pressure. Thus, high pressure required for the formation of reactive clusters cannot be produced with the reactive gas alone.
  • The addition of an inert gas to the reactive gas can reduce the partial pressure of the reactive gas and prevent the reactive gas from becoming liquid, thereby producing primary pressure required for the formation of reactive clusters.
  • In the present embodiment, argon is used as a first inert gas, and xenon is used as a second inert gas.
  • The first inert gas and the second inert gas are inert to the reactive gas in the gas cylinder 11 and the gas mixture supply line 1. Thus, the first inert gas and the second inert gas do not react with the reactive gas in the gas cylinder 11 and the gas mixture supply line 1, allowing the stable formation of reactive clusters, and do not inhibit the processing of the sample surface 41.
  • Since processing results from a reaction between reactive clusters and the sample surface, the reactive clusters play the leading role in processing and, as described above, the inert gases only reduce the partial pressure of the reactive gas and prevent the reactive gas from becoming liquid, thereby producing primary pressure required for the formation of the reactive clusters. It is therefore supposed that the important thing is not the types of the inert gases but the partial pressure of the inert gases.
  • However, the experiments of the present inventors demonstrated that combined use of the first inert gas argon and the second inert gas xenon can improve processing performance (see examples described below).
  • In the present embodiment, the reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less, the first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less, and the second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture 15.
  • When the reactive gas constitutes less than 3% by volume of the gas mixture 15, this results in an insufficient reaction between the reactive gas and the sample. When the reactive gas constitutes 10% by volume of the gas mixture 15, the reactive gas may become liquid. The reactive gas preferably constitutes 5% by volume or more and 7% by volume or less.
  • When the first inert gas constitutes less than 40% by volume or more than 94% by volume, this results in high or low percentages of the reactive gas and the second inert gas. In both cases, it is difficult to control the percentages of the reactive gas and the second inert gas within the predetermined ranges. The first inert gas preferably constitutes 43% by volume or more and 89% by volume or less.
  • When the second inert gas constitutes less than 3% by volume, this results in insufficient effects of the second inert gas and an insufficient reaction between the reactive gas and the sample. When the second inert gas constitutes more than 50% by volume, this results in increased costs because of expensive xenon and reduces practicality. The second inert gas preferably constitutes 6% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less in terms of processing performance in the depth direction.
  • In the present embodiment, in order to achieve a certain level of processing performance, the gas mixture 15 in a nozzle inlet 21 has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (abs) or more. It is difficult to form reactive clusters at a pressure of less than 0.4 MPa (abs). The gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 preferably has a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more, more preferably 0.8 MPa (abs) or more. The maximum pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 is not particularly limited and may be 1 MPa (abs) or less in order to prevent an excessive load on the apparatus and the liquefaction of the reactive gas.
  • The adiabatic expansion of the gas mixture 15 ejected from a nozzle 2 into a vacuum processing chamber 3 will be described below.
  • The vacuum processing chamber 3 is connected to an outlet 35. The outlet 35 is connected to an abatement unit 34 for making the exhaust gas harmless through an open-close valve 31, a turbo-molecular pump 32, and a dry pump 33. Using the turbo-molecular pump 32 and the dry pump 33, the vacuum processing chamber 3 is maintained at a secondary pressure of approximately 10 Pa (abs).
  • The pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3 is measured with a pressure gauge 36.
  • A differential pressure between the primary pressure of the nozzle inlet 21, for example, 0.68 MPa (abs) and the secondary pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3, for example, 10 Pa (abs) allows the gas mixture 15 from the nozzle 2 to be adiabatically expanded to form reactive clusters 37.
  • In the present embodiment, in order to improve the processing performance of the reactive clusters 37, the gas mixture 15 of the reactive gas, the first inert gas, and the second inert gas ejected from the nozzle outlet 22 into the vacuum processing chamber 3 is adiabatically expanded to form the neutral reactive clusters 37.
  • The neutral reactive clusters 37 thus formed collide with the sample surface 41 in the vacuum processing chamber 3 to anisotropically process the sample surface 41 at a high speed.
  • A sample 4 is fixed at a predetermined position on a sample stage 42.
  • The following examples demonstrated that combined use of the first inert gas argon and the second inert gas xenon improved processing performance.
  • In the following examples, the etch rate (weight base) was calculated as a difference between the sample weights measured with a chemical balance “ER-182A” (manufactured by A&D Co., Ltd.) before and after one-minute processing. The etch rate (depth base) refers to the maximum etching depth in the one-minute processing. An etching depth of less than 60 μm was measured with a stylus-based surface profiler “DekTak 3” (manufactured by Veeco Instruments Inc.). An etching depth of 60 μm or more was measured with a scanning electron microscope “JSM-7505FS” (manufactured by JEOL Ltd.).
  • The gas mixture flow rate (sccm) is the volume flow rate of the gas mixture per minute. The volume flow rate is converted from the mass flow rate measured with the flowmeter 13 using the volume percentages and the molecular weights of the gas components of the gas mixture.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The sample surface 41 to be processed with the reactive clusters 37 in the vacuum processing chamber 3 was made of a silicon single crystal. The gas mixture 15 contained chlorine trifluoride (ClF3) as the reactive gas, argon (Ar) as the first inert gas, and xenon (Xe) as the second inert gas.
  • The supply pressure (primary pressure) of the gas mixture 15 in the gas mixture supply line 1 was controlled with the pressure-regulating valve 12. The internal pressure of the vacuum processing chamber 3 was maintained at approximately 10 Pa (abs) with the turbo-molecular pump 32 and the dry pump 33.
  • The distance between the nozzle outlet 22 and the sample surface 41 was 13 mm. The irradiation time of the sample surface 41 with the reactive clusters 37 was 1 minute.
  • The primary pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 and the composition of the gas mixture 15 were changed.
  • More specifically, the primary pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 was 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, or 0.95 MPa (abs). The gas mixture 15 contained 6% by volume chlorine trifluoride, 0%, 3%, 6%, 50%, or 94% by volume xenon, and the remainder argon (100% by volume in total).
  • When the pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 was changed while the composition of the gas mixture 15 was fixed, the pressure of the gas mixture 15 having a predetermined composition was increased above the experimental pressure (0.95 MPa (abs)) in the gas cylinder 11 and was reduced to a predetermined pressure (0.40, 0.60, 0.80, or 0.95 MPa (abs)) with the pressure-regulating valve 12.
  • Before an experiment using the gas mixture 15 having a different composition, the gas mixture 15 having the different composition was prepared in the gas cylinder 11.
  • When xenon constituted 0% by volume, argon constituted 94% by volume, and when xenon constituted 94% by volume, argon constituted 0% by volume. In both cases, the gas mixture 15 contained only one inert gas, which is outside the scope of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (weight base: mg/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of the relationship between the percentage of xenon (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (depth base: μm/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 4 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (weight base: mg/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of the relationship between the gas mixture flow rate (horizontal axis) and the etch rate (depth base: μm/min) on the sample surface 41 (vertical axis).
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show that the addition of xenon improves processing performance. A high pressure of the gas mixture 15 in the nozzle inlet 21 tends to result in high processing performance.
  • FIGS. 4 and 5 show that the addition of xenon can achieve excellent processing performance as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 at a reduced flow rate.
  • The excellent processing performance at a reduced flow rate indicates high reaction efficiency (a high percentage of reactive gas contributing to processing of the sample).
  • This can reduce the gas mixture flow rate per nozzle and ease exhaust capacity conditions for maintaining a vacuum in the vacuum processing chamber 3. Thus, the number of nozzles can be increased to increase the gas mixture flow rate, which allows the processing method to be applied to large area processing and other applications.
  • The results of FIGS. 2 to 5 show that a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more and the presence of 6% to 50% by volume xenon result in particularly excellent processing performance on the depth base. Thus, the processing method is very useful for applications requiring a high aspect ratio.
  • In order to clarify the excellent processing performance in the depth direction at a pressure (a pressure of the gas mixture in the nozzle inlet) of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more in the presence of 6% to 50% by volume xenon, the following table lists the specific numerical data of the graph of FIG. 3.
  • TABLE 1
    Pressure Xe Etch rate
    (MPa (abs)) (% by volume) (depth base: μm/min)
    0.60 0 3.3
    6 10.9
    50 5.4
    0.80 0 16.0
    6 26.1
    50 33.5
    0.95 0 33.0
    6 108
    50 115
  • Table 1 shows that the etch rate (depth base) for 6% or 50% by volume xenon is much higher than the etch rate for 0% by volume xenon at pressures of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more. This is particularly remarkable at a pressure of 0.8 MPa (abs) or more.
  • When xenon constitutes 3% by volume, processing performance on the depth base is not particularly high. However, this does not necessarily mean that the processing method has poor processing performance. The processing method may be preferred in wide and narrow processing. In other words, the processing method according to the present embodiment may be of technical value in changing the reactive processing performance of clusters using two inert gases argon and xenon.
  • Although the addition of 94% by volume xenon results in a high etch rate on the weight base, it is not advantageous from a practical standpoint because xenon is expensive. Furthermore, the processing method using 94% by volume xenon had a lower etch rate on the depth base than the processing method using argon and xenon according to the present embodiment.
  • In the present embodiment, the percentage of the reactive gas chlorine trifluoride is controlled so as to achieve a certain level of processing performance without causing the liquefaction of the reactive gas. On the basis of the results of the example in which the reactive gas chlorine trifluoride constitutes 6% by volume, the boiling point of chlorine trifluoride, and the reactivity of chlorine trifluoride with the sample, it is supposed by experience that use of 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less chlorine trifluoride can also result in a certain level of processing performance without causing the liquefaction of the reactive gas. Thus, combined use of argon and xenon can improve processing performance.

Claims (2)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for processing a surface of a sample using reactive clusters produced by adiabatic expansion of a gas mixture ejected from a nozzle into a vacuum processing chamber, the gas mixture containing a reactive gas chlorine trifluoride, a first inert gas argon, and a second inert gas xenon, wherein
the gas mixture in an inlet of the nozzle has a pressure of 0.4 MPa (abs) or more, the reactive gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 10% by volume or less, the first inert gas constitutes 40% by volume or more and 94% by volume or less, and the second inert gas constitutes 3% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gas mixture in an inlet of the nozzle has a pressure of 0.6 MPa (abs) or more, the reactive gas constitutes 5% by volume or more and 7% by volume or less, the first inert gas constitutes 43% by volume or more and 89% by volume or less, and the second inert gas constitutes 6% by volume or more and 50% by volume or less of the gas mixture.
US13/778,555 2012-08-30 2013-02-27 Processing method utilizing cluster Abandoned US20140061031A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012-189770 2012-08-30
JP2012189770A JP5964182B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2012-08-30 Processing method by cluster

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140061031A1 true US20140061031A1 (en) 2014-03-06

Family

ID=50185910

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/778,555 Abandoned US20140061031A1 (en) 2012-08-30 2013-02-27 Processing method utilizing cluster

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20140061031A1 (en)
JP (1) JP5964182B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102036195B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130056033A1 (en) * 2010-02-19 2013-03-07 Iwatani Corporation Substrate cleaning method and substrate cleaning device

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130029431A1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-01-31 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method for manufacturing nonvolatile memory device

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2639158B2 (en) * 1989-08-02 1997-08-06 日本電気株式会社 Etching method and etching apparatus
US5286331A (en) * 1991-11-01 1994-02-15 International Business Machines Corporation Supersonic molecular beam etching of surfaces
CN102124544B (en) * 2008-08-18 2013-11-13 岩谷产业株式会社 Cluster jet processing method, semiconductor element, microelectromechanical element, and optical component
JP2012061585A (en) * 2010-09-17 2012-03-29 Tokyo Electron Ltd Vacuum processing apparatus, vacuum processing method and micro-machining apparatus

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130029431A1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-01-31 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method for manufacturing nonvolatile memory device

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130056033A1 (en) * 2010-02-19 2013-03-07 Iwatani Corporation Substrate cleaning method and substrate cleaning device
US9209010B2 (en) * 2010-02-19 2015-12-08 Tokyo Electron Limited Substrate cleaning method and substrate cleaning device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR102036195B1 (en) 2019-10-24
JP5964182B2 (en) 2016-08-03
KR20140030027A (en) 2014-03-11
JP2014049530A (en) 2014-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6257638B2 (en) Fluorocarbon molecules for high aspect ratio oxide etching
CN107924837A (en) Dry etching method
CN104969333B (en) The dry-etching method of silicon
CN103153858B (en) The boron-containing compound of isotopic enrichment and preparation and application thereof
CN102132387A (en) Plasma processing apparatus, plasma processing method, method for cleaning plasma processing apparatus and pressure control valve for plasma processing apparatus
CN107112232A (en) Plasma-etching method
JP2009503905A (en) Method for removing surface deposits and passivating internal surfaces inside chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chambers
TW202014375A (en) Storage and sub-atmospheric delivery of dopant compositions for carbon ion implantation
CN106884167A (en) A kind of hydrogen peroxide stabilizer and hydrogen peroxide etching solution
US20140061031A1 (en) Processing method utilizing cluster
JP2022515063A (en) Systems and Methods for Storage and Supply of F3NO-Free FNO Gases and F3NO-Free FNO Gas Mixtures for Semiconductor Processes
WO2009044681A1 (en) Method for ethcing silicon
US20050279382A1 (en) Method for cleaning a process chamber
CN103531464B (en) Etching method for silicon nitride high depth-to-width ratio hole
US10090168B2 (en) Plasma etching method
CN101894750A (en) Method for carrying out dry etching on TaN electrode
Tanarro et al. Large effects of small pressure changes in the kinetics of low pressure glow discharges
CN105070644B (en) The growing method of low stress nitride silicon thin film
JP2013046001A (en) Processing method by cluster
US20200035502A1 (en) Plasma etching method
EP3813097A1 (en) Plasma etching method using gas molecule containing sulfur atom
CN111916349A (en) Silicon etching method
TWI763129B (en) Pumping device, pumping method, and multi-chamber plasma processor
JP2020136584A (en) Etching gas and etching method by using the same
KR102388963B1 (en) Plasma etching method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KYOTO UNIVERSITY, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YOSHINO, YU;KOIKE, KUNIHIKO;SENOO, TAKEHIKO;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130220 TO 20130227;REEL/FRAME:030171/0748

Owner name: IWATANI CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YOSHINO, YU;KOIKE, KUNIHIKO;SENOO, TAKEHIKO;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130220 TO 20130227;REEL/FRAME:030171/0748

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION