US20130304585A1 - Advertising and incentives over a social network - Google Patents

Advertising and incentives over a social network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130304585A1
US20130304585A1 US13/938,928 US201313938928A US2013304585A1 US 20130304585 A1 US20130304585 A1 US 20130304585A1 US 201313938928 A US201313938928 A US 201313938928A US 2013304585 A1 US2013304585 A1 US 2013304585A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
users
user
method
social network
incentives
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/938,928
Inventor
Ron Atazky
Ehud Barone
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bees and Pollen Ltd
Original Assignee
Bees and Pollen Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US59614605P priority Critical
Priority to US11/512,595 priority patent/US8560385B2/en
Application filed by Bees and Pollen Ltd filed Critical Bees and Pollen Ltd
Priority to US13/938,928 priority patent/US20130304585A1/en
Assigned to BEES & POLLEN LTD. reassignment BEES & POLLEN LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ATAZKY, RON, BARONE, EHUD
Publication of US20130304585A1 publication Critical patent/US20130304585A1/en
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0207Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons, rebates, offers or upsales
    • G06Q30/0214Referral award systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisement based on user profile or attribute
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/01Social networking
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00Arrangements for user-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, e.g. e-mail or instant messages
    • H04L51/32Messaging within social networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/02Details
    • H04L12/16Arrangements for providing special services to substations
    • H04L12/18Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast
    • H04L12/185Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast with management of multicast group membership
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00Arrangements for user-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, e.g. e-mail or instant messages
    • H04L51/14Arrangements for user-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, e.g. e-mail or instant messages with selective forwarding

Abstract

A method whereby advertisers wish to deliver at least one of offerings and advertising messages relative to at least one of a product and a service to a target audience of users selected by a system operator during an advertising campaign. The method includes defining the users within the context of a social network, selecting the users from among the users of the social network, storing the information relevant to the defined users and utilizing the information stored/defined within the social network to deliver the messages to the users in an optimal manner.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/512,595, filed Aug. 30, 2006 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which claims priority to U.S. Application No. 60/596,146, filed Sep. 2, 2005. All disclosures of the document(s) named above are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates generally to marketing over the Internet, and more particularly to a method for marketing, advertising and offering incentives over a social network implemented over the Internet.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • The purpose of advertising is to influence people into changing/enforcing behavior. In order to produce maximum effect using minimum resources promoters aim to tailor the message to the target audience and to target message delivery to the appropriate audience.
  • Additionally, a form of advertising called viral or word-of-mouth has become increasingly popular in recent years. The core concept is to seed” the advertised message with a select group of the target audiences and have the message spread by word-of-mouth.
  • In parallel, the concept of formalizing, modeling and utilizing social networks has become popular in the Internet industry. Numerous examples exist: MySpace, LinkedIn, epinions, Amazon's friends & recommendations and others. Additionally, a large amount of academic work has been published relating to the modeling of trust relationship within a social network, on context-sensitive trust, on deriving the trust relations from communication patterns, etc.
  • The prior art includes a Method and System to Utilize a User Network Within a Network-Based Commerce Platform, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/968,197, to Mengerink, et al filed Oct. 18, 2004. The application discloses a method and a system to utilize a user network within a network-based commerce platform. For example, the method includes identifying a target group including at least one other user of the network-based commerce system based on at least one group association rule, the at least one group association rule being selected by a first user, communicating transaction information to the identified target group, and facilitating the transaction between at least one target user of the identified target group and the first user, wherein the first user and the identified target group have an existing relationship.
  • In U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/000,707 to Tseng, et al, filed Nov. 30, 2004, titled: “Enhancing Virally-Marketed Facilities”, disclose a method and apparatus for enhancing a virally marketed facility. In one embodiment, the invention is a method of operating a virally marketed facility. The method includes measuring virality of the facility based on a conversion rate and a propagation rate. The method also includes determining potential options for increasing virality. The method further includes executing potential options for increasing virality. In an alternate embodiment, the invention is a method of operating a virally marketed facility. The method includes measuring virality of the facility. Also, the method includes determining potential options for increasing virality. Further, the method includes concurrently executing potential options for increasing virality.
  • The existence of social networks is well known, allowing for ranking of more and less influential individuals, etc. However, the use of a social network for more focused delivery of advertising based on the opportunities available with the advent of the Internet remains undeveloped.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, it is a principal object of the present invention to provide a system of targeted advertising utilizing a social network.
  • It is another principal object of the present invention to provide to achieve the goal of any advertising campaign, which is to advance a message and communicate it in the most convincing way to the target audience.
  • It is a further principal object of the present invention to identify key members of a social network and provide them with incentives to review and then spread by word-of-mouth the product or service in question, wherein minimum resources are expended to produce maximum effect.
  • It is one other principal object of the present invention to provide advertisements and promotions to affect people's behavior by addressing them with information and incentives.
  • A method is disclosed whereby marketers and advertisers wish to deliver at least one of offerings and advertising messages relative to at least one of a product and a service to a target audience of users selected by a system operator during a marketing/advertising campaign. The method includes defining the users within the context of a social network, selecting the users from among the users of the social network, storing the information relevant to the defined users and utilizing the information stored/defined within the social network to deliver the messages to the users in an optimal manner.
  • Applicable Configurations:
  • Social network—can be MySpace, email, telephone log;
  • E-Commerce sites, classified sites promoting diverse products/services;
  • Context sensitive advertisement mediums (e.g. search-engines); and
  • User forums (e.g. emails, blogs).
  • The social network can be comprised of one or more:
      • Integrated social network where accessibility to all data is available;
      • Data mining existing social networks (e.g. MySpace), limited to data available to public; and
      • Traceable virally distributed messages (e.g. coupons, emails).
  • Media advertising, however, is only one of the ways by which one learns of new products, services or events. Another is word of mouth from friends, from business associates, from professional reporters and reviewers who are trusted, or even by watching celebrities who are enamored. Such an approach has the advantage of combining information with a relationship of trust. One trusts the origin of the message, and hence the message.
  • A company's reputation, for example, is built over time from an extensive support network of word-of-mouth. When close people refer to a supplier as reliable, one tends to take that on faith.
  • The importance of social contexts in distributing messages has not escaped the notice of advertisers, and so was born the concept of viral advertising. A message is “injected” into the population to a select group and then spreads person-to-person. Movies sometimes use this approach to create excitement and large attendances in the opening weekend. Another example is free/VIP passes offered to celebrities at clubs and other entertainment venues.
  • In parallel, the academic research into social networks has matured into deployed systems: Friendster, Linked-In, Amazon's “Friends & Recommendations”, and many other examples, which can be found, for example, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social network.
  • These implementations of social networks map the interrelations between users. The idea is to ascertain which users are more “central” than others, extract typical flows of information between members, etc. The more central users, those with whom more people communicate, to whom more people listen and who more people trust are termed “opinion leaders”.
  • It is important to note that being an opinion leader is a matter of degree. Some members of the social network have more influence and higher ranking, and some lower. But there is no clear distinction between opinion leaders and regular users.
  • The present invention discloses embodiments wherein the system described is separate from the social network, which is owned/operate by some 3 party; and embodiments where the system of the present invention makes use of multiple social networks simultaneously. This will be discussed in detail in the following sections.
  • The following differentiates between the present invention and the prior art patents in the background in the prior art findings.
  • The above-referenced application no. 20060085253 is referred to hereinafter as 253.
  • The present invention, referred to hereinafter as P1, concentrates on ways to encourage opinion leaders to advertise and market products or services.
  • As such P1 addresses:
  • Inter-trust (not addressed by 253):
  • Sorting opinion leaders based on context (e.g. category); and
  • Sorting opinion leaders based on non-contextual (e.g. degree of separation) and contextual inter-trust (ratings on one another's′ reviews, communication level)
  • No-relations (as opposed to 253, claims 24, 33):
  • To leverage credibility P1 prefers opinion leaders who are not biased, thus having no relations (direct or indirect) with the advertiser. P1 targets only the most influential users and motivates them to perform actions.
  • Transaction Related:
  • P1 transactions are based on incentive to encourage the user to try out a product. Rather than generating a purchase order by auction or other means, P1 tries to get the target user to try out the product and contribute his opinion.
  • P1 provides a review serving the advertiser's benefit. Thus, the transaction type can be broader than a purchase or an auction.
  • Opinions Dissemination:
  • The whole topic of opinions dissemination is disregarded by patent 253. In P1 each user can sort the opinions/reviews by different criteria:
  • Credibility—persuade consumers that are closely related to the opinion leaders and trust them most;
  • Recentness—persuade consumers that are influenced by the latest opinions; and
  • Quantity—persuade consumers that act on critical mass/popularity. Intelligent incentives policy—
  • Further to ‘Opinions dissemination above. P1 studies the users’ online behavior and accordingly operates the most efficient incentives policy:
  • Credibility—in case the target users' are looking for credibility (sort by relations), the incentives would be targeted to more centralized opinion leaders
  • Recentness—where users' sort by date of review, incentives will be granted periodically
  • Quantity—where users' sort by quantity, incentives will focus on small crowds in order to leverage total quantity
  • Opinion leader credit—P1 incentives policy can also account for the opinion leader's cooperation level. This approach can operate similarly to the “US credit program” which entitles people to build their credit in a progressive manner only after they have proven themselves in smaller sums. P1 can adapt this scheme, letting opinion leaders enjoy smaller incentives at first and gradually, when they enter reviews and reviews of higher quality (e.g. attached videos, pictures, better stories) they'll be granted higher incentives. Thus satisfied, creative customers are rewarded for creating powerful word-of-mouth advertising.
  • System application/architecture: 253 discusses a user network of a network-based commerce platform. P1 is more diverse, extending to support and integrating one or more social network sites, one or more commerce sites, one or more reviews forum blog sites. These three can be united or distributed. Exemplary applications:
  • eBay and Skype—powerful mix where the auction site can utilize a social network partner to encourage opinion leaders to generate a powerful buzz to leverage sales.
  • Classifieds mixed with social networks (e.g. MySpace)—opportunity to attract opinion leaders from the social network to tryout classified products and services, contribute their word of mouth and help sales.
  • Scope of operation—P1 selects only the most promising and suitable social networks and operates on them alone.
  • Campaign management—the whole issue of campaign management arid the incentives budget management is disregarded by 253.
  • The above-referenced application no. 20050216338 is referred to hereinafter as 338.
  • 338 focuses on viral effect measurement and the options for increasing it. P1 also relates to this issue but in an innovative way, and uses a more specific method of targeted reputation building.
  • P1 may operate on numerous facilities rather than one. P1 may not advertise to or act in the name of a single restaurant or Web-site. P1 may connect a community (or more) of opinion leaders with a community (or more) of advertisers.
  • 338 disregards the whole cycle of reviews provisioning.
  • P1 may operate on behalf of numerous advertisers, as opposed to 253 and 338. P1 may aggregate a whole set of advertisers that together gives the opinion leaders much more added value in building their reputation and credit. After all, the opinion leaders have something to gain arid lose from the aggregated total of offerings and not just from one advertiser.
  • Invention Overview
  • The system of the present invention is designed to make full and rigorous use of social networks to achieve a new level of advertising, primarily via word-of-mouth.
  • Using knowledge of the social network, in what context the inter-personal connection is made and how strong/trustworthy this connection is, the system of the present invention allows an advertiser to deliver relatively small scale, but very highly focused advertising, possibly with associated incentives, to the key people in the most appropriate communities in the sense of targeted social-networks.
  • This message would then propagate via the social interaction, as modeled by the social network, and would not only gain the advantage of free dissemination, but also would benefit from the level of trust in which members of the social network hold each other.
  • Alongside the original advertiser's message, such as product offering, the social network allows the addition of user reviews, endorsements and other feedback. Thus, the message may be either very significantly re-enforced by positive reviews from trusted members of the network, or detracted.
  • In a preferred embodiment, advertisers specify the message(s) they wish the system to deliver, and specify various characteristics of the target audience. The system then queries the social network(s) for the appropriate users and delivers the message to them. In many cases, the advertisers would be charged for this service.
  • To encourage endorsement of the advertiser's offering, the advertiser would often attach incentives to the message delivered to the opinion leaders. These may take various forms, such as giveaways, early access to offerings or even a cash giveaway. Note that the offering of the incentive predates the generation of possible endorsement and is therefore not directly linked to producing a positive review. When applicable, the user may be given the incentive only after posting his review of the product offering.
  • In some instances, such as when the use of an incentive requires reservation, or when the user receives the incentive prior to making his opinion of the product known, the user may be asked to pay a token fee to obtain higher chances that the incentive will be used and a review will be generated.
  • There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof that follows hereinafter may be better understood. Additional details and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description, and in part will be appreciated from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
  • Additional aspects and/or advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows and, in part, will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These and/or other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an overview of the advertising campaign process, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the relationship between a network and one embodiment of the system and method for generating an incentive driven social network advertisement, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary implementation of the system breakdown into functional modules, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 4 is a screenshot of a typical user's screen in the dedicated promotion system manifestation of the invention, depicting typical element, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary screenshot of a Website promoting businesses which uses campaign management to promote advertised businesses by encouraging users to try out the business and send a review in return for an incentive, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic Illustration of integration of the campaign management system into a book store, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an enhanced product review campaign management system, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 8 a is an advertiser secured login into his account, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 8 b depicts an input display where the advertiser specifies the parameters of a campaign, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 8C shows an exemplary embodiment of a schematic diagram of a display screen for campaign management presenting a list of active campaigns of a logged-in advertiser, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a campaign database, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of a simplified database scheme containing useful data, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram of the user's rating database, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram comparing two users who were qualified for a campaign in terms of contexts matching, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 13 is a schematic flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of incentive budgeting for allocations to eligible users, constructed according the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating how the incentive budgeting process iteratively integrates within the campaign pricing procedure, performed according the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 15 is an exemplary database schematic diagram of a data structure for tracking users' behavior in order to evaluate campaign costs, constructed according the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of the rewards state for an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 17 is a schematic block diagram illustrating two potential dissemination methods for coupons 1750 published by opinion leaders, performed according to the principles of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 18 is a schematic block diagram of an overview of the advertising campaign process concerning more than one social network, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to the like elements throughout. The embodiments are described below in order to explain the present invention by referring to the figures.
  • The principles and operation of a method and an apparatus according to the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description, it being understood that these drawings are given for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be limiting.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an overview of the advertising campaign process 100, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. An advertiser 110, with inputs of campaign information 115 and incentive information 117, provides input to search the social network for users fitting the campaign requirements 120. Then users are sorted by opinion-making order 130 and incentives are distributed to the users 140. If the time runs out or the contract is not fulfilled 150 the user is marked as having forfeited the incentive 155. If the incentive is used the user is marked as having used the incentive 163 and the spread of the review is followed through the network, such as sent to whom, who read it, etc 166. Finally, the user's opinion-makers status is updated 170 and the cost to the advertiser is calculated 180.
  • System Framework
  • The present invention can be implemented in any of the following alternative embodiments:
  • a stand-alone Web site/portal with its own social network;
  • an advertisement/incentive system integrated into an existing social-network, community or commerce site;
  • a single system integrated into multiple existing social-network, community or commerce site;
  • such an implementation will require identifying a single user across multiple social networks, and most likely be performed by a user identifying himself with a common identifier in all member systems;
  • a standalone site integrating social network information from multiple networks.
  • a similar inter-network identity matching will be required; and
  • a standalone advertisement/incentive system data mining one or more existing social-network, community or commerce sites.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the relationship between a network 230 and one embodiment of the system and method for generating an incentive driven social network advertisement, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Components appearing in the diagram are as follows:
      • Social network sites 210—one or plurality of social network sites 210 in which users' profiles are defined and the social ties between users are conceived and developed over time;
  • the robustness of the social network can vary from a full-fledged online site such as Friendster and MySpace down to a simple list of friends connected to one another. In certain manifestations, the interpersonal relationships may even be generated by data mining past interactions, including extraneous collaborative systems, such as email databases or even virally distributed messages.
  • Promoted items Web-server 240, either:
      • A dedicated Website which displays advertising messages and offers incentives to users; or
      • One or a plurality of sites in which different items (e.g. merchandise, articles, digital music files) are offered (example: Amazon, iTunes, etc), To these items, promotional messages and incentives may be attached and viewed next to word-of-mouth (reviews) of people who the social network indicates as trusted by the user;
      • Client 250—a device the user uses to access the network. This may be a personal computer equipped with a Web browser, an internet-enabled phone, an internet-enabled television, PDA, etc.
  • The user may access any of the sites described above—one of the social networks, a commerce site, the dedicated promotional site, etc.
  • The linking of user identity across multiple sites may be achieved by having the user explicitly creating the link using the system of the present invention; and
      • Campaign management server 220, the system of the present invention.
    System Components
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary implementation of the Campaign management server 220, the system of the present invention, breakdown into functional modules, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention,
      • A users rating system 330 rates each user's value to each of his peers (accounting parameters such as inter-trust level, communication volume, etc.) and to the advertisers (accounting parameters such as activity level, invited peers' activity, etc.). It should be noted that the rating may be context-sensitive, thus calculated per context;
      • An users assigned incentives management system 320 manages the lifecycle of an incentive from the moment it was reserved by a user for more detail reference is made to FIG. 16, the “Rewards State Diagram” below;
      • An incentives budgeting system 350 processes the active campaigns and classify incentives to users based on their ratings (e.g. social network influence, correlation with campaign target audience specifications) and other optional rules derived from advertiser's or operator's policies;
      • A payment and credit system 340 is a credit card payment system through which a user and/or an advertiser manage their account credit and charged for a commission based on the pricing policy applied.
      • A reviews management system 360 accumulates reviews sent by users, ranks reviews based on the author's inter-trust in respect to its viewer, provide reviews to promoted items Web-servers given the logged in user identity, distributes new reviews to subscribed users and more; and
      • A Web-server, which allows terminal clients running Web-browsers to connect through a secured HTTP connection (or other protocol) to various administrative tools related to described systems.
    The User's Perspective
  • This section depicts the system of the present invention as seen from the point of view of the end user. Several possible manifestations of the invention are presented.
  • In certain embodiments of the system, the promotional messages, incentives and social-network trust enhanced reviews are not presented in a dedicated Website, but are rather integrated into other sites, such as
      • E-Commerce retails sites (e.g. Amazon)
      • User aware search engines (e.g. Yahoo)
      • Social network sites (e.g. MySpace, Friendster)
      • E-mail server featuring targeted advertisements (eg. Gmail)
      • Search engines featuring targeted advertisements (e.g. Google)
      • Comparison shopping sites
      • Retailers catalog distributed by email
  • Examples of some possible manifestations are presented below.
  • A Dedicated System
  • An exemplary embodiment of the system includes a site dedicated to presenting the users with advertiser's messages and associated incentives. In addition, the system will promote the word-of-mouth advertising which it implements by displaying most-endorsed offerings in the user's area of interest. Similarly, the system may promote higher incentives by putting them in a more prominent placement then the lower ones.
  • FIG. 4 is a screenshot of a typical user's screen 400 in the dedicated promotion system manifestation of the invention, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The logged-in user is identified by name 410 and the results are geographic-context sensitive 420. The personalized recommendations/warnings of the businesses reviewed by the user's trusted friends and associates 430 are listed, along with the personalized rewards the user is entitled to, based on his influence upon social network members 440. The system also shows awareness of social network of the user 450.
  • Embedding in a Business Directory
  • Another possible embodiment of the present invention will integrate the word-of-mouth endorsement offerings on pre-existing Yellow-Pages like site. This is by contrast with the simple listings available on current sites, or listings matched with anonymous reviews or reviews by those who are unknown and not trusted by the user.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary screen shot of a Website promoting businesses which use campaign management to promote advertised businesses by encouraging users to try out the business and send a review in return for an incentive, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Elements worth noting are marked by arrows. A logged in user identified by name 510 and the total incentives to boost users' activity is shown 520. Business rating based on the reviewers' trust by the logged in user (viewer) is given 530 and the personalized incentives offered to a specific user is displayed next to promoted items or businesses 540.
  • Embedding in a Commerce Site
  • In a possible manifestation of the system, the recommendations, incentives and information derived from the social networks are embedded into an existing site, such as a commerce, review or auction site.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic Illustration of integration of the campaign management system into a book store 600, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The campaign management system allows the book publishers to promote their items effectively, while generating high quality reviews reaching large advocate audiences of the reviewer. The user receives targeted incentives next to the items. Upon clicking, a window presenting terms of contract pops-up and once he accepts them, he can get the discount coupon in email or in an online Web printable window or in other secured media 610.
  • In FIG. 7, below, a further example of commerce site integration is presented, in the form of an enhanced book review campaign management system. Unlike existing review mechanisms available, the present system allows the user to view additional parameters of the reviewer, such as:
      • Trust level—denotes inter-trust between the user and the author. Note, trust can also be in negative sense, what's known as distrust,
      • Degree the shortest path length connecting the user with the reviewer
      • “Connected through x contacts” —through how many close friends (ist degree) this reviewer can be accessed.
  • Note that reviews originating from reviewer's who are not closely linked to the user on the social network are not ranked, arid may even be discarded to leverage information credibility, relevancy and reduce noise level.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an enhanced product review campaign management system 700, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Personalized information about the User relationship with the reviewer is shown 705. An exemplary enhanced book review is shown. Unlike existing review mechanisms available, the present invention allows the user to view additional parameters of the reviewer's, such as:
      • Gsa Trust level 710, which denotes inter-trust between the user and the author. Note, trust can also be manifested as distrust;
      • Degree 720, the shortest path length connecting the user with the reviewer; and
      • “Connected through x contacts” 730, i.e., through how many close friends (151 degree) this reviewer can be accessed.
    The Advertiser's Perspective Sample Interface
  • FIGS. 8 a-8 c demonstrate display screens and input screens presented to an advertiser accessing the campaign management server in one exemplary embodiment of the present invention:
  • FIG. 8 a is an advertiser secured login into his account 810, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. FIG. 8 b depicts an input display where the advertiser specifies the parameters of a campaign 820, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention:
      • Gsd Campaign name—used as identifier for this campaign
      • Target audience location—defines target audience residential location
      • Promoted item—the item the campaign is targeted to promote/advertise
      • Max monthly budget—the maximal budget (total discounts) the system is entitled to spend for this specific item
      • Discount value—the value of the discount to be granted to the “opinion leader”
      • Discount expiration time—the maximal period of time the “opinion leader” can redeem his discount once he has reserved it.
  • Note that the specific embodiment above does not cover all methods of campaign definition as described in this invention (and described both in the “claims” and “description” sections).
  • FIG. 8C shows an exemplary embodiment of a schematic diagram of a display screen for campaign management presenting a list of active campaigns of a logged-in advertiser 830, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. This screen may be used for a campaign to deactivate, reactivate, make budgetary changes and other administrative tasks.
  • Definition of a Campaign
  • In the most basic manifestation, the advertiser passes to the Present system (either by a Web interface, via an electronic channel using an XML formatting, or by other means), the definition of the campaign it wishes to launch. The definition of the campaign includes multiple instances of:
      • The promotional message.
  • Typically the message would be “rich” —not only text but also graphics, animation, etc. (possible format: Web content).
  • Definition of the target audience:
      • Users' Demographic context (filters on common fields such as age, sex, education, address, etc).
      • Target users' contexts of interest—a set of keywords the campaign is associated with. These keywords are to be matched with the targeted users' contexts of interest.
      • Information entered by the users into the social network.
      • Behavioral information of the users within the system, including but not limited to their track-record in responding to advertisements and incentives.
      • Behavioral information of the users within the social network, including but not limited to their ranking within a specified context.
      • Information obtained from 3rt party resources, such as data-mining of information available on the net for each user.
      • Minimal requirements—for example minimal size of target user social network
      • Cross-checking of information between the various sources
  • Incentive(s):
      • Target audience per incentive, as defined above.
      • The visual elements (text, graphics, etc.) associated with the incentive
      • Time limits
      • Type (see below section)
      • Value (dependent on the type, e.g. dollars, percentage of the marketed product or service)
      • Contract details (will be specified below, alongside the handling of said contracts).
  • Beyond abstract messages, the advertised service or product may specifically be linked to a listed items and/or item categories representing for example:
      • Physical service—offering discount as incentive
      • Physical product manufacturer—offering a giveaway shipment on request as
      • incentive
      • Digital item such as MP3 music—offering free download as incentive
      • Website domain—offering temporary subscription as incentive
      • Book category under Amazon—offering discount as incentive
  • From a perspective of the system, the advertisers defined a set of incentives to be distributed to some or all of the users to whom the campaign is delivered. The incentives need not be homogenous, but instead may be of disparate types and values. For example the incentive may be giveaways, early or privileged (VIP) access, discounts, “limited time offers”, etc.
  • Note that there is no restriction for a user to be eligible to multiple incentive types in the same campaign.
  • Campaign Database
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a campaign database 310, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary embodiment of the campaigns database, which allows the advertiser to login 910. The advertiser can initiate multiple campaigns. Each campaign addresses one or more items presented in one or more Websites 930, associated with one or more contexts, and the campaign data includes budget management related information 920. In a preferred embodiment the campaign database also includes target audience specifications. The campaigns promote a URL, which can represent a specific item or a wide selection of products and services 940. In an alternative, the URL may present a database record associated with a product/service, not essentially published on the Web.
  • The Cost of a Campaign—Pricing by the System
  • In certain embodiments of the invention, the advertiser may be charged for the campaign.
  • The pricing of services to advertisers may be as simple as a flat fee, or as complicated as to take into account the predicted impact of the campaign, which depends on the whole social network structure and its history. Pricing may be such that it can be determined before the campaign is launched, or after the incentives have been used, or both. It may depend on incentives actually used, actual spread of word-of-mouth, etc.
  • Pricing may further depend on the parameters of the users which have been offered the incentive and/or users which have reserved the incentive and/or that successfully completed the task and received the incentive. Said parameters may include all those used to specify the target audience of the campaign.
  • For the both cases, the definition of the campaign may include budgetary considerations. The advertiser may:
      • Manual budgeting: Send a proposed campaign definition to the system to be priced and to calculate projected market impact, adjust the campaign accordingly, re-price, etc. until the goal target is met.
      • Automatic budgeting: Specify a specific budget available and indicate which of the target audience definitions should be adjusted to fit the budget.
  • Of course, as said charge may depend on, among other considerations, the size of the target audience and the ranking of members within the social network, advertisers would have to consider how much to invest in the campaign, with more money giving both higher quality and a higher number of users to whom the message is communicated.
  • A good example of this is the prime opinion leaders. The system of the present invention is aware of how many messages overall opinion leaders are sent, and realizes that over a certain number the impact of every specific message decreases.
  • This allows for an embodiment of the invention whereby advertisers bid on pricing of services so as to have their message delivered and/or incentive offered to users of higher rank in the social network and/or have better match to target audience and/or are more likely to make use of the incentive.
  • It is clear that planning an advertising campaign is a complicated matter—both as related to cost and as related to projected impact. In certain embodiments, the system may therefore provide assistance to advertisers in the planning stages:
      • Providing results of previous campaigns, simulating impact of new campaigns, etc., taking into account an advertiser's budgetary and other limitations.
      • The process of defining a target audience may be “interactive”: the advertiser sends a proposed “audience filter” to the system (by demographics, ranking as opinion-maker, context, etc.) and the system returns the number of users who fit the match and statistical information regarding said group. Details of individual users will typically not be returned, both for reasons of privacy and to maintain control of the advertising channel within the system.
    User Information
  • The system composes a comprehensive user view from the available resources (e.g. user registration profile, social network sites, data mining results, etc). A typical view may comprise of:
      • A Unique user identifier (e.g. user name)
      • User profile—personal details (e.g. name, address, sex, age)
      • User social network—contacts the user is connected with in his social network scope (up to a certain degree)
      • User contexts of interest—a set of contexts the user is interested and/or active in. In this regard the system maintains a record regarding the activity level in each context.
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of a simplified database scheme containing useful data for a social network database 1000, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The data includes 1st degree friends 1020 of a user 1010 and a user's activity 1030 within his contexts of interest. Contexts can represent a set of keywords, line of interest or other kind of classification scope.
  • As described above, the exact implementation of the social network is outside the scope of this patent (and in certain embodiments may be outside the scope of the Present system). To make things clear, however, listed below are several ways in which the user's context could potentially be derived within the social network:
      • Areas of interest stated explicitly by the user. These may be in a professional, recreational or advertisement-specific context.
      • If the social system contains a home page, blog or other ways of personal expression, the text itself may be analyzed, as is done by search engines.
      • Bookmarks and external links maintained by the user within the social network.
      • A context may be enforced by close ties to people belonging to the same context, forming a context-centric community.
    User Rating—a Measure of Influence
  • As in the real world, the conjuncture of a social network structure and contexts, allow people to be opinion leaders in one field, but not in another.
  • An example of such context dependence may be as follows: Linus Torvald may be generally considered an opinion-maker in the Linux context, but his opinions regarding good plumbers in Bangalore are held in significantly lower regard.
  • The system models these relations using users rating database. It is generated from one or a plurality of social network databases. In addition to the context activity of the user, it rates all the user's social network members (limited by max degree) connected to this user in parameters implying on the inter-trust between the user and the contact at each context of mutual interest. These parameters can include: total reviews authored by contact and responded by user, total questions initiated by the user to the contact and the total reviews authored by the contact, but which may have been contradicted by the user's reviews or voting.
  • More implicit rating related indicators may also be used in form of user-to-user interactions (e.g. messages, impressions, etc.) and other activities performed in the scope of a group/affiliate.
  • It should be noted that it's the system responsibility to maintain and update this database in order to project current inter-trust state.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram of the user's rating database 1100, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. User's rating database 1100 provides information about the user 1110, the context 1120 and the content rating 1130.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, other information sources for a user's contexts of interest may be deduced from:
      • The marketed items Web-server/s in which the user search and browse
      • The campaign management server in which the user expresses and exercises incentives.
    Targeting Users Participating in the Campaign
  • The parameters of context and social connection between the various people are merged into a unified ranking of users as related to a specific advertising campaign.
  • As specified above, multiple concurrent parameters exist for the selection of the target audience. Some are easily implemented (such as age or sex), while some are not. Below, is a discussion of the more subtle criteria.
  • One of the primary ways of selecting a target audience is by contexts with which both the users and the advertisement are associated. The advertisement context is stated explicitly by the advertiser, whereas the user's keywords are extracted from the social network and other available user information, such as demographic details.
  • The present invention may also take into account overlap between contexts and the context's relative scope. For example, “iMac” is a context which is part of the more generalized “computer” context. The “iPod” and “mp3” contexts are strongly related, while “iPod” and “radishes” are not. The creation/derivation of the context map is outside the scope of this patent. The use of this map for advertising over a social network is not.
  • Targeting Incentives to Participant Users
  • It is clear, however, that simply targeting specific influential users with messages may be insufficient, as the users have little motivation to echo the message. To this end, an advertiser may elect to couple the message with an incentive. The range of possible incentives is vast, and generally well known.
  • The system than elects the optimal distribution of incentives to higher and lower ranked opinion leaders as to achieve maximum impact. As part of this process, the conjunction of user contexts and user ranking within said context can be combined in a multitude of ways. For example, the system may first find the strongest opinion leaders, and then filter out those unrelated to desired contexts, or the system may first filter the users to those of the desired context and then rank them by influence. Atypical manifestation of the system, however, will do neither of these extremes, but instead assign a (non-linear) weight function to match of user to context and (non-linear) weight function of user influence and combine the two.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram comparing two users who were qualified for a campaign in terms of context matching, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention, On the left side a user ranked as highly trusted 1210 thanks to strong inter-trust streaming in from his social network members. Thick arrows denote a high inter-trust level flowing in. Conversely, on the right-side is shown a lowly trusted user 1220, who wins less trust from fewer of his network members. In this specific scenario, highly trusted user 1210 may be privileged to get a higher reward or other preference over less trusted user 1220. Note, that both users may belong to the same social network, but still may be reward discriminated due to inter-trust differentiation.
  • When the system operates over several social networks, the optimization may span the networks.
  • As the question of user influence ranking is of high importance, the system may seek to periodically validate a user's ranking by targeting said user an incentive above the level he is usually presented with, thus increasing the chance the user will take part in the campaign, and subsequently follow the impact that user's opinion had on other users.
  • FIG. 13 is a schematic flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of incentive budgeting for allocations to eligible users, constructed according the principles of the present invention. Incentive budgeting begins with the extraction of all users whose profiles correlate with the specification of the target campaign audience, i.e., above a predefined threshold 1310. Next, calculate each target user's “importance” perceived by all other target user participants 1320 and distribute incentives to target users by sorting the target users by weighted importance and sharing their incentive eligibility based on time 1330. Required data is extracted from the Social Network database (may also be data mined). Users rating database and the Campaigns database 1325. An exemplary campaign of one month is depicted 1335. The resulting data tables show the Target User 1341, the User Correlation Factor with the Campaign Target Audience 1342, the Weighted Importance 1343 and the Incentive Eligible Since Date 1344.
  • When the system of the present invention spans multiple social networks and/or sites, the system may distribute the incentive to several networks/sites, optimizing distributions for best predicated impact.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating how the incentive budgeting process iteratively integrates within the campaign pricing procedure 1400, performed according the principles of the present invention, Once the advertiser specifies the campaign 1410, the incentive budgeting is executed to generate results used to evaluate campaign costs 1420, as detailed in Table I below. If the campaign is out of budget and there is a need to fine-tune 1430, the advertiser can fine-tune the campaign specifications 1435, e.g., by increasing the budget, playing with other campaign settings such as the threshold of target users correlation factor with the campaign target audience and/or, targeting smaller users group by selecting a more focused geographical region, etc. Once fine-tuning is complete, the advertiser can save the campaign for launch or discard the campaign 1440.
  • FIG. 15 is an exemplary database schematic diagram of a data structure for tracking users' behavior in order to evaluate campaign costs 1500, constructed according the principles of the present invention. The monitored behaviors of a user 1510 are context-sensitive 1520 and can be managed as an extension of the users' ratings database, with reference to FIG. 11 above. FIG. 15 shows tracking of the user's average number of times within a month he gets impressions of incentives, within a specific context 1520, and his tendency to act upon them by reserving incentives. This is referred to as “the incentive reservation conversion rate 1530”.
  • Table I, below, is an exemplary formulation of an equation to evaluate total campaign cost where the advertiser is charged for campaign registration fees, cost-per-incentive-impression and cost-per-incentive-reservation, formulated according the principles of the present invention. Payment for later word-of-mouth dissemination is not included. The pricing also compiles each opinion leaders “weighted importance,” with reference to FIG. 11 above, in such a way that when more influential opinion leaders reserve an incentive the charge is higher than less influential ones.
  • This is all in the context of the campaigns' target audience specifications. Note that while this is a comparatively simple embodiment, it can easily be expanded to compile more intricate behavioral hints, in conjunction with additional database acquisition of statistics related to users' conversion rates and other actions. For example, the conversion rates can also account for a broader scope of the conversion rates beyond the scope of the user. Another option is to weight the advertiser incentive value compared to others offered to a specific user. After all there is a higher probability that the opinion leader will choose the more valuable incentive.
  • TABLE I Ctotal Forecast monthly campaign cost Reg Campaign registration fees U Collection of target users u A single target user Fins(u) Forecast of total incentives impressions Creserve(u) Cost per incentive reservation Cconvert(u) Costs of converted incentives reservations I(u) User's weighted importance Imonthly(u) User's average monthly impressions Emonthly(u) Incentive eligibility over month (see FIG. 13 “Incentive eligible since date”) R(u) User's incentive reservation conversion rate C total = R eg + u U ( F ins ( u ) × C reserve ( u ) + C convert ( u ) × I ( u ) ) F ins ( u ) = I monthly ( u ) × E monthly ( u ) C convert ( u ) = C reserve ( u ) × R ( u )
  • Incentives Lifecycle
  • From the perspective of the user, the system presents him with a list of messages with associated incentives. The user may elect to make use of them or not.
  • Some incentives will have time limits (which may, of course, be different to different user ranks). Some incentives may be mutually exclusive with others (a user may elect to take incentive A or incentive B, but not both).
  • Some incentives will have conditions attached. For example:
      • Gs An opinion leader will get his money back for purchase of product X provided she writes a review of said product/service.
      • An incentive is given only if user elects to purchase a minimum amount of goods or services from advertiser.
      • More than one condition may also apply (for example, write a review and send messages to 5 other users notifying them of the new review).
      • A free giveaway is given only if the user commits to promote/advertise the product service.
  • In cases conditions apply, users must consent to the terms prior to reserving and subsequently receiving the incentive.
  • In some cases, however, a condition need not apply. For example: night clubs may provide free VIP tickets to movie starts and fashion models, content with having them be seen in their establishment.
  • When incentives are dependent on some action by the user, said action may have a time limit. In some cases, a user will be required to indicate he intends to take advantage of an incentive (such as a theater ticket, for example) and that incentive will be reserved (allocated to it). In some embodiments the choice to make use of an incentive may incur a price on the user.
  • Alternatively, in some embodiments, failure to act on an incentive once reserved” may result in a penalty, whether monetary or otherwise (such as lowering his scope as an opinion leader, and hence leading to lesser incentives be offered to him in the future).
  • Conversely, a user may announce he declines the incentive, in which case the incentive may be re-offered to another user. This may also occur automatically after the period for which the incentive is offered has lapsed.
  • FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of the rewards state for an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
      • On reservation 1620—the campaign budget is updated, making the incentive value on reserve.
      • On abort 1650—reverse the checkout operation in sense of campaign budget
      • Incentive authenticated 1640—the campaign budget is updated, the formerly reserved incentive is now spent after having been paid 1630.
      • Closed-on-penalty 1660—user is charged by penalty fees for reserving an incentive but not using it.
      • Closed-on-review 1670—review is disseminated among target user's 1610 social members.
      • Closed-on-expiration 1680—as in “upon abort”, the campaign budget is rolled back
  • FIG. 17 is a schematic block diagram illustrating two potential dissemination methods for coupons 1750 published by opinion leaders, performed according to the principles of the present invention. The opinion leader is free to advertise his opinion wherever he likes. That includes emails 1720, forums and personal blogs 1730, social network user pages 1730, groups, etc. Anyone interested can click the attached coupon hyperlink and print a coupon 1740 of the promoted item (product/service).
  • The coupons, for example, provide simple links directing to promotional online resources (e.g. video clips, articles). What's important to note is that these links, just like the coupons, can be monitored to allow measurement of opinion leader's influence.
  • In this embodiment the opinion leaders can help advertise/market an item (e.g. a product or service) by distributing coupons, which are delivered in the context of a personal recommendation written by them.
  • This approach has several benefits:
  • I. Vast exposure in any online medium—there is no need for integration with any 3 party. It only involves the operator and the public online resources available to all (e.g. forums, blogs, social networks, etc).
  • II. Advanced compensation schemes—exact measurement of the actual sales and exposure originated by each opinion leader. This measurement enables new compensation schemes, such as revenue sharing, performance based contracts, etc.
  • One of the principal objects of the present invention is to keep track of the opinion leaders' viral influence. For this aim Table ha illustrates a simple database capable of tracking the disseminated coupons described above. This data is eventually utilized to check the opinion leader's performance thus promoting/demoting his status.
  • TABLE LLA CAMPAIGN COUPONS DATABASE campaignId promotedItemid discount percentage terms of use total coupons total printed coupons total exercised coupons
  • Table IIa provides an addition to the campaigns database. The table comprises general coupon information and statistics about its current usage.
  • Table IIb tracks the converted coupons. The conversion may be of several kinds:
      • Coupon print
      • Coupon exercising
      • Call for more info
  • Beyond historical records, this conversion data serves the operator in updating the opinion leaders' status. Opinion leaders that did well are promoted and others may even be demoted when not meeting minimal benchmarks.
  • TABLE LLB COUPON USAGE couponId camapignId opinionLeaderId printedOn: date calledUpon: boolean expirationDate: date exercisedOn: date
  • Opinion Leaders' Inter-Trust Maintenance
  • Once the user has been presented with the message (regardless of incentives, but especially when a user comments/reviews an offering), the system will monitor the spread of his comment to other users within his social network. This will then feed back into the social network and strengthen or weaken the opinion leader's ranking.
  • Another factor of importance is this regard is whether, in instances where the review is quantitative, whether the opinion of the opinion leader is echoed by others, or contradicted by them. One possible implementation of this can be a voting mechanism in which a user can vote for or against a review.
  • Campaign Benefits Reputation
  • In many cases, the benefit of the advertiser is in the dissemination of the opinion leader's response to their social network members. This dissemination can take form in multiple ways, for example:
      • Next to the advertised item, display a list of opinion leaders, which have responded to it. The list may include the respondents' personal details, day of response and other response information such as their authored reviews, purchase dates, etc.
      • Calculate an overall, reputation score to the advertised item—weight the opinion leaders' response (e.g. positive vote, negative vote, assigned customer satisfaction grade) with their personal inter-trust by the user (viewer)
      • Next to the advertised item, display statistics about the actions performed by the opinion leaders, such as total views, amount of coupons printed, etc.
    Contexts
  • The system maintains information regarding the coupling and overlap between the various contexts. For example: the “flowers” and “muscle car” contexts are unrelated, “flowers” and “anniversary” are related, whereas “lilies” is a sub-context of “flowers”.
  • The definition of contexts and their interrelations is not unique to the system of the present invention. It is present in many search engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc) as in their attached advertising systems. This is a tool which may be used by the present invention and is not part of the claimed invention.
  • The present invention aims to capture and model trust relationships in the real world. This implies:
      • It is intended to trust those with wide-spread reputation in the field.
      • It is intended to trust those close to us in their field of expertise (if my brother is a medical doctor, I would tend to trust his recommendations beyond those of a doctor unknown to me of equal qualifications and reputation).
      • Trust is transitive. Meaning if I trust X and X trusts Y, then one may assume that I trust Y (at least to some degree).
  • Ranking of trust within the context of a social network is outside the scope of this patent. It may be performed in a myriad of ways, and extensive work has been done on the subject. In particular, reference is made to a provisional patent application by the applicant of the present invention. A few references discuss social network trust algorithms:
      • Gs“Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social. Networks”, December 2000, Ronald S. Burt, University of Chicago and INSEAD, http://www.google.com/urPsa=U&start=1 &p=http:llasbwww. uchicago, edu/fac/ronald burtlresearchfB %26E. pdf&e747
      • “Extracting reputation in Multi Agent Systems by Means of Social Network Topology”, Josep M. Pujol, Ramon Sanguesa, Jordi Delgado, University of Catalonia http://ccs. mit.edu/dell/reoutationlp467-pujol. pdf
      • “Supporting trust in Virtual Communities”, Alfarez Abdul-Rabman, Stephen Hailes, University College London http://www.cs. ucl.ac. uk/staff/F.AbdulRahman/docs/hicss33. Pdf
      • “Trust Network-based Filtering to Retrieve Trustworthy Word-Of-Mouth Information”, Hironmitsu Kato, Yoshinori Sato, Takashi Fukumoto, Koichi Homma, Toshiro Sasaki, and Motohisa Funabashi, Systems Development Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd. http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/events/ubicomp2003sec/papers/secubio3 p05.pdf
  • FIG. 18 is a schematic block diagram of an overview of the advertising campaign process concerning more than one social network, constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Multiple social networks are searched for users meeting the campaign requirements 1810, for example by demographics 1815. Users that are missing any valuable demographic necessary for the campaign are sent surveys to complement this information and achieve better targeting 1820, e.g., for seating arrangements, “smoking or non-smoking?” 1825.
  • The next step is to filter out from the selected users group, users that are not eligible to get incentives 1830, e.g., blocked users, etc. 1S35. Once the final list of participant users is obtained, independently grades each social network to which they belong 1840, by weighting factors that concern the whole network scope, rather than an individual scope (e.g. advertisers current reputation, overall competition, total users answering campaign profile, etc) 1845. The graded networks are sorted according to the users with the most potential 1850, and those, accordingly, are passed for further sorting into opinion-making order 1860 (with reference to step 130, FIG. 1 described above).
  • Having described the present invention with regard to certain specific embodiments thereof, t is to be understood that the description is not meant as a limitation, since further modifications will now suggest themselves to those skilled in the art, and it is intended to cover such modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
  • Although a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in this embodiment without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A method whereby marketers and advertisers wish to deliver at least one of offerings and marketing and advertising messages relative to at least one of a product and a service to a target audience of users selected by a system operator during a marketing arid advertising campaign, said method comprising:
defining the users within the context of a social network;
selecting the users from among the users of said social network; storing the information relevant to said defined users; and
utilizing the information stored/defined within said social network to deliver said messages to the users in an optimal manner.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the system operator optionally charges said marketers and markers and advertisers for his services.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising ranking of the users, wherein the selection of users from within the target audience is limited to said selected group of the users of highest ranking opinion leaders within the social network, within the relevant context of the offering/advertising message.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said ranking may be according to trust by which the social network members deem the user to be of higher influence than others as defined in said network at the time of said selection.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein said ranking may be according to popularity by which the social network members deem the user to be of higher influence than others as defined in said network at the time of said selection.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein said ranking may be according to reputation by which the social network members deem the user to be of higher influence than others as defined in said network at the time of said selection.
7. The method of claim 3, further comprising the offering of incentives by the advertisers to said opinion leaders to perform an action relevant to the marketers' and advertisers' offering/message.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said action is to review the marketers' and advertisers' offering/message.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein said action is to comment on the marketers' and advertisers offering/message.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein said action is to consume the advertisers' offering.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein said action is to endorse the marketers' and advertisers' offering/message.
12. The method of claim 7, further comprising calculating the optimal distribution of a given package of said incentives among said opinion-makers of all ranks to produce the maximum predicted effect where the systems operator knows said opinion-makers ranking in a certain context of marketing and advertising, and knows said opinion-makers' response to various forms of incentives and knows said user's response to said opinion-maker's action on the marketers' and advertisers' messages and incentives.
13. The method of claim 7, further comprising the giving of said incentives to the user.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising the user performing at least one of the following: fulfilling specified requirements from among at least the following: using the product; writing a review; sending a message to a specified number of people before said giving step; promoting the products/services; adding links to coupons; generating word of mouth; and creating a market buzz.
15. The method of claim 7, wherein more than one group of said opinion leaders are defined, wherein the parameters of said incentive offerings are dependent upon said groups.
16. The method of claim 7, wherein the more valuable of said opinion leaders are offered more valuable of said incentives relative to those lower-ranked among said opinion leaders.
17. The method of claim 7, wherein said opinion leaders are given a limited time frame in which to comment on said advertisers' message.
18. The method of claim 7, wherein after a given limited time-frame said incentive changes/decreases.
19. The method of claim 7, further comprising dividing said incentives among said opinion leaders and the system operator offering the more effective/valuable of aid incentives to those higher-ranked among said opinion leaders.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising offering said incentives unused by those among said higher-ranked opinion leaders to those lower-ranked among said opinion leaders.
US13/938,928 2005-09-02 2013-07-10 Advertising and incentives over a social network Abandoned US20130304585A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59614605P true 2005-09-02 2005-09-02
US11/512,595 US8560385B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2006-08-30 Advertising and incentives over a social network
US13/938,928 US20130304585A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2013-07-10 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/938,928 US20130304585A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2013-07-10 Advertising and incentives over a social network
US14/560,931 US20150106178A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2014-12-04 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/512,595 Continuation US8560385B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2006-08-30 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/560,931 Continuation US20150106178A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2014-12-04 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130304585A1 true US20130304585A1 (en) 2013-11-14

Family

ID=38087522

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/512,595 Active 2030-08-15 US8560385B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2006-08-30 Advertising and incentives over a social network
US13/938,928 Abandoned US20130304585A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2013-07-10 Advertising and incentives over a social network
US14/560,931 Pending US20150106178A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2014-12-04 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/512,595 Active 2030-08-15 US8560385B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2006-08-30 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/560,931 Pending US20150106178A1 (en) 2005-09-02 2014-12-04 Advertising and incentives over a social network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US8560385B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140019225A1 (en) * 2012-07-10 2014-01-16 International Business Machines Corporation Multi-channel, self-learning, social influence-based incentive generation
US20140279036A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Yahoo! Inc. Ad targeting system
US20150066624A1 (en) * 2013-08-27 2015-03-05 Jon Anthony ASTORE Method and system for providing a social media ecosystem cooperative marketplace
US20160381158A1 (en) * 2015-06-29 2016-12-29 Google Inc. Automatic Invitation Delivery System
US10366421B1 (en) * 2011-08-09 2019-07-30 Google Llc Content offers based on social influences

Families Citing this family (395)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8352400B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US7966078B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2011-06-21 Steven Hoffberg Network media appliance system and method
US20120166260A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2012-06-28 Chad Steelberg System and method for providing celebrity endorsed discounts
US9400589B1 (en) 2002-05-30 2016-07-26 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information
US9710852B1 (en) 2002-05-30 2017-07-18 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit report timeline user interface
US9443268B1 (en) 2013-08-16 2016-09-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Bill payment and reporting
US7962361B2 (en) 2002-11-07 2011-06-14 Novitaz Customer relationship management system for physical locations
US7640267B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2009-12-29 Radar Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for managing entities in a computing device using semantic objects
US7269590B2 (en) * 2004-01-29 2007-09-11 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user
US7433876B2 (en) 2004-02-23 2008-10-07 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US9826046B2 (en) * 2004-05-05 2017-11-21 Black Hills Media, Llc Device discovery for digital entertainment network
FI20041323A (en) * 2004-10-12 2006-04-13 Xtract Oy Analyzer, system, and method for determining the desired user population
US10354280B2 (en) 2004-12-27 2019-07-16 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for distribution of targeted advertising between mobile communication devices
CA2615659A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-05-10 Yogesh Chunilal Rathod Universal knowledge management and desktop search system
US7698061B2 (en) 2005-09-23 2010-04-13 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for selecting and presenting a route to a user
JP4878149B2 (en) * 2005-11-17 2012-02-15 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Advertisement delivery system and advertisement delivery method
US8429184B2 (en) * 2005-12-05 2013-04-23 Collarity Inc. Generation of refinement terms for search queries
US8903810B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2014-12-02 Collarity, Inc. Techniques for ranking search results
NZ545529A (en) * 2006-02-24 2008-11-28 Ammas Com Ltd Improvements in or relating to a promotional system
US20090119173A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2009-05-07 Buzzlogic, Inc. System and Method For Advertisement Targeting of Conversations in Social Media
US20070214097A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-09-13 Todd Parsons Social analytics system and method for analyzing conversations in social media
WO2007124429A2 (en) 2006-04-20 2007-11-01 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US9507778B2 (en) 2006-05-19 2016-11-29 Yahoo! Inc. Summarization of media object collections
US7783710B2 (en) * 2006-05-21 2010-08-24 Venkat Ramaswamy Systems and methods for spreading messages online
WO2007139857A2 (en) * 2006-05-24 2007-12-06 Archetype Media, Inc. Storing data related to social publishers and associating the data with electronic brand data
US8892541B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2014-11-18 Topsy Labs, Inc. System and method for query temporality analysis
US9454586B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2016-09-27 Apple Inc. System and method for customizing analytics based on users media affiliation status
US9280597B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2016-03-08 Apple Inc. System and method for customizing search results from user's perspective
US20120290552A9 (en) * 2009-12-01 2012-11-15 Rishab Aiyer Ghosh System and method for search of sources and targets based on relative topicality specialization of the targets
US9110979B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2015-08-18 Apple Inc. Search of sources and targets based on relative expertise of the sources
US9129017B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2015-09-08 Apple Inc. System and method for metadata transfer among search entities
US7747745B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2010-06-29 Almondnet, Inc. Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery
WO2007149888A2 (en) 2006-06-19 2007-12-27 Almondnet, Inc. Providing collected profiles to media properties having specified interests
US8725830B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2014-05-13 Linkedin Corporation Accepting third party content contributions
US20080004959A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Tunguz-Zawislak Tomasz J Profile advertisements
US20080052147A1 (en) * 2006-07-18 2008-02-28 Eran Reshef System and method for influencing public opinion
US8239253B2 (en) * 2006-07-26 2012-08-07 Wu Louis L Election-based electronic compilations
US7966647B1 (en) 2006-08-16 2011-06-21 Resource Consortium Limited Sending personal information to a personal information aggregator
US8930204B1 (en) 2006-08-16 2015-01-06 Resource Consortium Limited Determining lifestyle recommendations using aggregated personal information
US8140376B2 (en) * 2006-09-12 2012-03-20 Strongmail Systems, Inc. System and method for optimization of viral marketing efforts
US7895127B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2011-02-22 Weiser Anatoly S Rating-based sorting and displaying of reviews
US8036979B1 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-10-11 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data
US8442972B2 (en) 2006-10-11 2013-05-14 Collarity, Inc. Negative associations for search results ranking and refinement
KR101622742B1 (en) * 2006-10-18 2016-06-01 구글 인코포레이티드 Generic online ranking system and method suitable for syndication
US20080103879A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Google Inc. User-specified online advertising
US8594702B2 (en) 2006-11-06 2013-11-26 Yahoo! Inc. Context server for associating information based on context
US8402356B2 (en) 2006-11-22 2013-03-19 Yahoo! Inc. Methods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media
US9110903B2 (en) 2006-11-22 2015-08-18 Yahoo! Inc. Method, system and apparatus for using user profile electronic device data in media delivery
US20080235338A1 (en) * 2006-12-14 2008-09-25 Robert Cary Maleeny Apparatus, systems, and methods to facilitate the interaction between parties
US8769099B2 (en) 2006-12-28 2014-07-01 Yahoo! Inc. Methods and systems for pre-caching information on a mobile computing device
US8438062B2 (en) * 2006-12-29 2013-05-07 Google Inc. Network node ad targeting
US20080030496A1 (en) 2007-01-03 2008-02-07 Social Concepts, Inc. On-line interaction system
US20080177819A1 (en) * 2007-01-22 2008-07-24 Eran Reshef System and method for contextual call-for-actions
US8166407B2 (en) * 2007-01-25 2012-04-24 Social Concepts, Inc. Apparatus for increasing social interaction over an electronic network
US20080215416A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-09-04 Collarity, Inc. Searchable interactive internet advertisements
US20080189169A1 (en) * 2007-02-01 2008-08-07 Enliven Marketing Technologies Corporation System and method for implementing advertising in an online social network
US20080228537A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-09-18 Andrew Monfried Systems and methods for targeting advertisements to users of social-networking and other web 2.0 websites and applications
US8235811B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2012-08-07 Wms Gaming, Inc. Using player information in wagering game environments
US7730017B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2010-06-01 Google Inc. Open profile content identification
US8321462B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2012-11-27 Google Inc. Custodian based content identification
US20080243607A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Google Inc. Related entity content identification
US20080249863A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Scott Redmond Managing a multi-function social network
US8356035B1 (en) 2007-04-10 2013-01-15 Google Inc. Association of terms with images using image similarity
US8601386B2 (en) * 2007-04-20 2013-12-03 Ingenio Llc Methods and systems to facilitate real time communications in virtual reality
US8055664B2 (en) 2007-05-01 2011-11-08 Google Inc. Inferring user interests
US7904461B2 (en) * 2007-05-01 2011-03-08 Google Inc. Advertiser and user association
US20090048922A1 (en) * 2007-05-08 2009-02-19 Morgenstern Jared S Systems and methods for classified advertising in an authenticated web-based social network
US20110040586A1 (en) * 2007-05-09 2011-02-17 Alan Murray Methods and systems for providing social networking-based advertisements
US20080294747A1 (en) * 2007-05-22 2008-11-27 Fatdoor, Inc. Property billboarding and financial revenue distribution to property owner in a geo-spatial environment
US20080294624A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Ontogenix, Inc. Recommendation systems and methods using interest correlation
US7734641B2 (en) 2007-05-25 2010-06-08 Peerset, Inc. Recommendation systems and methods using interest correlation
US20080304638A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Branded Marketing Llc System and method for delivering targeted promotional announcements over a telecommunications network based on financial instrument consumer data
US7870026B2 (en) * 2007-06-08 2011-01-11 Yahoo! Inc. Selecting and displaying advertisement in a personal media space
US7949560B2 (en) * 2007-06-13 2011-05-24 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated System and method for providing print advertisements
US20080319778A1 (en) * 2007-06-22 2008-12-25 Fatdoor, Inc. Neighborhood bartering in a geo-spatial network
US20080320139A1 (en) * 2007-06-25 2008-12-25 Yahoo! Inc. Social mobilized content sharing
US8209760B1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2012-06-26 Symantec Corporation Quantifying a property of a focus computing resource based on proximity to other computing resources
US8849909B2 (en) * 2007-07-06 2014-09-30 Yahoo! Inc. Real-time asynchronous event aggregation systems
US9947016B2 (en) * 2007-07-18 2018-04-17 Excalibur Ip, Llc Techniques for improving user engagement with advertisements
US20110029613A1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2011-02-03 John Norman Hedditch Evaluation of an attribute of an information object
WO2009020570A1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2009-02-12 Rovrr, Inc. System for electronic commerce
US20110041168A1 (en) * 2007-08-14 2011-02-17 Alan Murray Systems and methods for targeting online advertisements using data derived from social networks
CA2695794C (en) * 2007-08-20 2016-07-05 Facebook, Inc. Targeting advertisements in a social network
US7945482B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2011-05-17 Ebay Inc. Viewing shopping information on a network-based social platform
US8348716B2 (en) * 2007-09-19 2013-01-08 Ganz Pet of the month with music player
US20090063995A1 (en) * 2007-08-27 2009-03-05 Samuel Pierce Baron Real Time Online Interaction Platform
US8788278B2 (en) * 2007-08-28 2014-07-22 Moneygram International, Inc. Consumer database loyalty program for a money transfer system
US8631015B2 (en) * 2007-09-06 2014-01-14 Linkedin Corporation Detecting associates
US8600779B2 (en) * 2007-10-09 2013-12-03 Microsoft Corporation Advertising with an influential participant in a virtual world
US8606634B2 (en) * 2007-10-09 2013-12-10 Microsoft Corporation Providing advertising in a virtual world
WO2009050739A2 (en) * 2007-10-19 2009-04-23 Amsoft Systems Private Limited Method and system for facilitating communication between identities over a social network
US8751292B2 (en) * 2007-10-19 2014-06-10 Intuit Inc. Method and system for providing sellers access to selected consumers
US20090112707A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2009-04-30 Benjamin Weiss Method and system for using a point-of sale system to correlate transactions to a coupon database
CN101159967B (en) * 2007-10-29 2011-08-31 中国移动通信集团公司 Method and device for using drive test data for propagation model revision
US7853622B1 (en) 2007-11-01 2010-12-14 Google Inc. Video-related recommendations using link structure
US8041082B1 (en) 2007-11-02 2011-10-18 Google Inc. Inferring the gender of a face in an image
US20090182589A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-07-16 Kendall Timothy A Communicating Information in a Social Networking Website About Activities from Another Domain
US20090177588A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-07-09 Archetype Media Inc. System and method of determining pricing and sponsorship optimization for brand promoters and social publishers
US8799068B2 (en) * 2007-11-05 2014-08-05 Facebook, Inc. Social advertisements and other informational messages on a social networking website, and advertising model for same
US9123079B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2015-09-01 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored stories unit creation from organic activity stream
US8924465B1 (en) 2007-11-06 2014-12-30 Google Inc. Content sharing based on social graphing
US9367823B1 (en) 2007-11-09 2016-06-14 Skyword, Inc. Computer method and system for ranking users in a network community of users
US8171388B2 (en) * 2007-11-15 2012-05-01 Yahoo! Inc. Trust based moderation
US20090132357A1 (en) * 2007-11-19 2009-05-21 Ganz, An Ontario Partnership Consisting Of S.H. Ganz Holdings Inc. And 816877 Ontario Limited Transfer of rewards from a central website to other websites
US8612302B2 (en) 2007-11-19 2013-12-17 Ganz Credit swap in a virtual world
US8626819B2 (en) 2007-11-19 2014-01-07 Ganz Transfer of items between social networking websites
US8088002B2 (en) * 2007-11-19 2012-01-03 Ganz Transfer of rewards between websites
US20090132361A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2009-05-21 Microsoft Corporation Consumable advertising in a virtual world
US20090144139A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Dewey Gaedcke System and method of facilitating commercial transactions using content added to web sites
US8069142B2 (en) * 2007-12-06 2011-11-29 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for synchronizing data on a network
US8671154B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2014-03-11 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for contextual addressing of communications on a network
US8307029B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2012-11-06 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for conditional delivery of messages
US8127986B1 (en) 2007-12-14 2012-03-06 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Card registry systems and methods
US9990674B1 (en) 2007-12-14 2018-06-05 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Card registry systems and methods
US8166168B2 (en) 2007-12-17 2012-04-24 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for disambiguating non-unique identifiers using information obtained from disparate communication channels
US8270937B2 (en) * 2007-12-17 2012-09-18 Kota Enterprises, Llc Low-threat response service for mobile device users
CA2616234A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-21 Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee System and method for interaction between users of an online community
US8276079B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2012-09-25 Jonathan Davar Supplementing user web-browsing
US8024431B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2011-09-20 Domingo Enterprises, Llc System and method for identifying transient friends
US8010601B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2011-08-30 Waldeck Technology, Llc Contiguous location-based user networks
US8527334B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2013-09-03 Microsoft Corporation Advertising revenue sharing
US8843406B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2014-09-23 Yahoo! Inc. Using product and social network data to improve online advertising
US9706345B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2017-07-11 Excalibur Ip, Llc Interest mapping system
US9626685B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2017-04-18 Excalibur Ip, Llc Systems and methods of mapping attention
US8762285B2 (en) 2008-01-06 2014-06-24 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for message clustering
US9953339B2 (en) * 2008-01-08 2018-04-24 Iheartmedia Management Services, Inc. Automated advertisement system
US20090177695A1 (en) * 2008-01-08 2009-07-09 Microsoft Corporation Integration of social networking and merchandising
US20090180599A1 (en) * 2008-01-15 2009-07-16 Branded Marketing Llc System and Method for Delivering Targeted Promotional Announcements Over a Communications Network
US20090182618A1 (en) * 2008-01-16 2009-07-16 Yahoo! Inc. System and Method for Word-of-Mouth Advertising
US20090187462A1 (en) * 2008-01-18 2009-07-23 Lisa Cohen Gevelber Method and system for providing relevant coupons to consumers based on financial transaction history and network search activity
US20090192929A1 (en) * 2008-01-24 2009-07-30 Jonathan William Hoeflinger Systems and Methods for Distributing Electronic Media
US7953654B2 (en) * 2008-01-29 2011-05-31 Transaction Wireless, Inc. Integration of gift card services for mobile devices and social networking services
US8719077B2 (en) * 2008-01-29 2014-05-06 Microsoft Corporation Real world and virtual world cross-promotion
US20090192871A1 (en) * 2008-01-29 2009-07-30 Linksmanager Llc Business Social Network Advertising
US20090192865A1 (en) * 2008-01-30 2009-07-30 Internet Consumer Exchange Group profiling with electronic offers
US8364522B1 (en) 2008-01-30 2013-01-29 Intuit Inc. Method and system for providing a small business coupon distribution system
US20090197681A1 (en) * 2008-01-31 2009-08-06 Microsoft Corporation System and method for targeted recommendations using social gaming networks
US20090198711A1 (en) * 2008-02-04 2009-08-06 Google Inc. User-targeted advertising
US8768922B2 (en) * 2008-02-08 2014-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Ad retrieval for user search on social network sites
CA2653820A1 (en) * 2008-02-11 2009-08-11 Ganz Friends list management
WO2009101922A1 (en) * 2008-02-12 2009-08-20 Nec Corporation Information distribution apparatus, terminal, information distribution system, method and program
US20090210301A1 (en) * 2008-02-14 2009-08-20 Microsoft Corporation Generating customized content based on context data
US8819564B1 (en) * 2008-02-22 2014-08-26 Google Inc. Distributed discussion collaboration
US8499247B2 (en) 2008-02-26 2013-07-30 Livingsocial, Inc. Ranking interactions between users on the internet
US20090222315A1 (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-03 Microsoft Corporation Selection of targeted advertisements
US8229819B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2012-07-24 Wildfire Interactive, Inc. Providing online promotions through social media networks
US8560390B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2013-10-15 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for social network marketing with brand referral
US8554623B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2013-10-08 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for social network marketing with consumer referral
US8538811B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2013-09-17 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for social network marketing with advocate referral
US20090228296A1 (en) * 2008-03-04 2009-09-10 Collarity, Inc. Optimization of social distribution networks
US20090282002A1 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-11-12 Travis Reeder Methods and systems for integrating data from social networks
CA2623188C (en) * 2008-03-20 2011-02-15 Ganz, An Ontario Partnership Consisting Of 2121200 Ontario Inc. And 2121812 Ontario Inc. Social networking in a non-personalized environment
US8589486B2 (en) 2008-03-28 2013-11-19 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for addressing communications
US8745133B2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2014-06-03 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for optimizing the storage of data
US8271506B2 (en) 2008-03-31 2012-09-18 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for modeling relationships between entities
US8688553B1 (en) 2008-03-31 2014-04-01 Intuit Inc. Method and system for using consumer financial data in product market analysis
WO2009143501A2 (en) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-26 The Mechanical Zoo, Inc. Online word-of-mouth maketing of a web service using personalized invitation via a status messaging service
US20090307057A1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-12-10 Albert Azout Associative memory operators, methods and computer program products for using a social network for predictive marketing analysis
US8627209B2 (en) * 2008-06-10 2014-01-07 Ganz Social networking in a non-personalized environment
US20090307073A1 (en) * 2008-06-10 2009-12-10 Microsoft Corporation Social marketing
US8117067B2 (en) * 2008-06-13 2012-02-14 Google Inc. Achieving advertising campaign goals
US20090319359A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2009-12-24 Vyrl Mkt, Inc. Social behavioral targeting based on influence in a social network
US20110302008A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2011-12-08 Soza Harry R Assessing engagement and influence using consumer-specific promotions in social networks
US20110131095A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2011-06-02 Soza Harry R Social network-driven cooperative characterization with non-social network sites
US20090319436A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2009-12-24 Delip Andra Method and system of opinion analysis and recommendations in social platform applications
US20110131145A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2011-06-02 Soza Harry R Measuring engagement activities initiated by electronic word-of mouth referrals in social networks
US8312033B1 (en) 2008-06-26 2012-11-13 Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier
US8438178B2 (en) * 2008-06-26 2013-05-07 Collarity Inc. Interactions among online digital identities
US8706406B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2014-04-22 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for determination and display of personalized distance
US8813107B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2014-08-19 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for location based media delivery
US8452855B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2013-05-28 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for presentation of media related to a context
US7961986B1 (en) 2008-06-30 2011-06-14 Google Inc. Ranking of images and image labels
US20100241507A1 (en) * 2008-07-02 2010-09-23 Michael Joseph Quinn System and method for searching, advertising, producing and displaying geographic territory-specific content in inter-operable co-located user-interface components
US20100010822A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Social product advertisements
US20100010866A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Advertising across social network communication pathways
US20100017261A1 (en) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-21 Kota Enterprises, Llc Expert system and service for location-based content influence for narrowcast
US8583668B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2013-11-12 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for context enhanced mapping
US10230803B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2019-03-12 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for improved mapping and routing
US8504073B2 (en) 2008-08-12 2013-08-06 Teaneck Enterprises, Llc Customized content delivery through the use of arbitrary geographic shapes
US9256904B1 (en) 2008-08-14 2016-02-09 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze
US8386506B2 (en) 2008-08-21 2013-02-26 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for context enhanced messaging
GB0815440D0 (en) * 2008-08-26 2008-10-01 Allen Matthew E An internet-based location intelligence system
US8281027B2 (en) 2008-09-19 2012-10-02 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for distributing media related to a location
WO2010151379A1 (en) * 2009-05-07 2010-12-29 Chacha Search, Inc. Method and system for personally targeted search messages
US8108778B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2012-01-31 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for context enhanced mapping within a user interface
US20100082427A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Yahoo! Inc. System and Method for Context Enhanced Ad Creation
US9600484B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2017-03-21 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for reporting and analysis of media consumption data
US20100088182A1 (en) * 2008-10-03 2010-04-08 Demand Media, Inc. Systems and Methods to Facilitate Social Media
US20100088373A1 (en) * 2008-10-06 2010-04-08 Jeremy Pinkham Method of Tracking & Targeting Internet Payloads based on Time Spent Actively Viewing
US20100088130A1 (en) * 2008-10-07 2010-04-08 Yahoo! Inc. Discovering Leaders in a Social Network
US20100114691A1 (en) * 2008-11-05 2010-05-06 Oracle International Corporation Managing a marketing template used in an e-mail marketing campaign
US20100125490A1 (en) * 2008-11-14 2010-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Social network referral coupons
US8060492B2 (en) * 2008-11-18 2011-11-15 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for generation of URL based context queries
US8024317B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2011-09-20 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for deriving income from URL based context queries
US8032508B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2011-10-04 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for URL based query for retrieving data related to a context
US9805123B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2017-10-31 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for data privacy in URL based context queries
EP2359276A4 (en) * 2008-12-01 2013-01-23 Topsy Labs Inc Ranking and selecting enitities based on calculated reputation or influence scores
WO2010065109A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-10 Topsy Labs, Inc. Advertising based on influence
JP5604441B2 (en) * 2008-12-01 2014-10-08 トプシー ラブズ インコーポレイテッド Impact estimation
US20100153185A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-17 Topsy Labs, Inc. Mediating and pricing transactions based on calculated reputation or influence scores
US9224172B2 (en) * 2008-12-02 2015-12-29 Yahoo! Inc. Customizable content for distribution in social networks
US8631148B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2014-01-14 Lemi Technology, Llc Method of providing proximity-based quality for multimedia content
US8055675B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2011-11-08 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for context based query augmentation
US7921223B2 (en) 2008-12-08 2011-04-05 Lemi Technology, Llc Protected distribution and location based aggregation service
US20100153215A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced search result relevance using relationship information
US8166016B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2012-04-24 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for automated service recommendations
US8255807B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2012-08-28 Ganz Item customization and website customization
GB0823452D0 (en) * 2008-12-24 2009-01-28 Vodafone Plc Aggregated communications filter
US20100185509A1 (en) * 2009-01-21 2010-07-22 Yahoo! Inc. Interest-based ranking system for targeted marketing
US20100205057A1 (en) * 2009-02-06 2010-08-12 Rodney Hook Privacy-sensitive methods, systems, and media for targeting online advertisements using brand affinity modeling
US8489458B2 (en) * 2009-02-24 2013-07-16 Google Inc. Rebroadcasting of advertisements in a social network
US8326684B1 (en) * 2009-03-16 2012-12-04 Eyal Halahmi System and method for selective publication of sponsored comments
US20100241689A1 (en) * 2009-03-19 2010-09-23 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for associating advertising with computer enabled maps
US8150967B2 (en) 2009-03-24 2012-04-03 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for verified presence tracking
US20120047087A1 (en) 2009-03-25 2012-02-23 Waldeck Technology Llc Smart encounters
US20100250372A1 (en) * 2009-03-27 2010-09-30 Matthew Anthony Smith Method of electronic gifting and yield management
US20100257023A1 (en) * 2009-04-07 2010-10-07 Facebook, Inc. Leveraging Information in a Social Network for Inferential Targeting of Advertisements
WO2010120925A2 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri Inc. Search and search optimization using a pattern of a location identifier
US8200617B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2012-06-12 Evri, Inc. Automatic mapping of a location identifier pattern of an object to a semantic type using object metadata
US20100268574A1 (en) * 2009-04-17 2010-10-21 Microsoft Corporation Tracking user profile influence in a digital media system
US20100268582A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2010-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Affiliate system on social networking
US20100280913A1 (en) * 2009-05-01 2010-11-04 Yahoo! Inc. Gift credit matching engine
US8639920B2 (en) 2009-05-11 2014-01-28 Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data
US20100312696A1 (en) * 2009-06-03 2010-12-09 Parijat Sinha Virtual shared account
US20110153425A1 (en) * 2009-06-21 2011-06-23 James Mercs Knowledge based search engine
US20110153502A1 (en) * 2009-06-24 2011-06-23 James Jean-Claude Systems, methods, and apparatus for identifying influential individuals
US20100332312A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Theresa Klinger System and method for analyzing endorsement networks
US20110010224A1 (en) * 2009-07-13 2011-01-13 Naveen Gupta System and method for user-targeted listings
US10223701B2 (en) 2009-08-06 2019-03-05 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for verified monetization of commercial campaigns
US8914342B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2014-12-16 Yahoo! Inc. Personal data platform
US8364611B2 (en) 2009-08-13 2013-01-29 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for precaching information on a mobile device
US10339541B2 (en) 2009-08-19 2019-07-02 Oracle International Corporation Systems and methods for creating and inserting application media content into social media system displays
US9633399B2 (en) * 2009-08-19 2017-04-25 Oracle International Corporation Method and system for implementing a cloud-based social media marketing method and system
US20140040043A1 (en) * 2009-08-26 2014-02-06 Consumeron, Llc System and Method for Remote Acquisition and Delivery of Goods
US20110078030A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2011-03-31 Ganz Website with activities triggered by clickable ads
US8306922B1 (en) 2009-10-01 2012-11-06 Google Inc. Detecting content on a social network using links
US8311950B1 (en) 2009-10-01 2012-11-13 Google Inc. Detecting content on a social network using browsing patterns
US20110106597A1 (en) * 2009-10-28 2011-05-05 Pushkart, Llc Methods And Systems For Offering Discounts
US20110125793A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Avaya Inc. Method for determining response channel for a contact center from historic social media postings
US20110125826A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Avaya Inc. Stalking social media users to maximize the likelihood of immediate engagement
US20110125697A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Avaya Inc. Social media contact center dialog system
US8543452B2 (en) * 2009-12-15 2013-09-24 EarDish Corporation Monetary distribution of behavioral demographics and fan-supported distribution of commercial content
US20110153414A1 (en) * 2009-12-23 2011-06-23 Jon Elvekrog Method and system for dynamic advertising based on user actions
US8671029B2 (en) * 2010-01-11 2014-03-11 Ebay Inc. Method, medium, and system for managing recommendations in an online marketplace
US8875038B2 (en) 2010-01-19 2014-10-28 Collarity, Inc. Anchoring for content synchronization
US20110184792A1 (en) * 2010-01-28 2011-07-28 Microsoft Corporation Social network rewards
WO2011097411A2 (en) * 2010-02-03 2011-08-11 Glomantra Inc. Method and system for need fulfillment
CA2788802A1 (en) * 2010-02-03 2011-08-11 Glomantra Inc. Method and system for providing actionable relevant recommendations
US20110208572A1 (en) * 2010-02-22 2011-08-25 ASC Information Technology, Inc. Systems and methods for providing a refferal reward incentive for an item via a networking website
US20110213646A1 (en) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 Junaid Ali Web-based review system to enable sales referrals and commissions in distributed environments
US8275771B1 (en) 2010-02-26 2012-09-25 Google Inc. Non-text content item search
CA2724144A1 (en) * 2010-03-07 2011-09-07 Hamid Hatami-Hanza Interactive and social knowledge discovery sessions
US8392431B1 (en) * 2010-04-07 2013-03-05 Amdocs Software Systems Limited System, method, and computer program for determining a level of importance of an entity
US9152969B2 (en) 2010-04-07 2015-10-06 Rovi Technologies Corporation Recommendation ranking system with distrust
US8751305B2 (en) * 2010-05-24 2014-06-10 140 Proof, Inc. Targeting users based on persona data
US8874727B2 (en) 2010-05-31 2014-10-28 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to rank users in an online social network
US9338121B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2016-05-10 Exacttarget, Inc. System and method for managing a messaging campaign within an enterprise
US20110307340A1 (en) * 2010-06-09 2011-12-15 Akram Benmbarek Systems and methods for sharing user or member experience on brands
US9413557B2 (en) 2010-06-18 2016-08-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Pricing in social advertising
US8230062B2 (en) * 2010-06-21 2012-07-24 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Referred internet traffic analysis system and method
US20110153423A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2011-06-23 Jon Elvekrog Method and system for creating user based summaries for content distribution
US8595053B1 (en) * 2010-06-25 2013-11-26 Mlb Advanced Media, L.P. Campaigning systems and methods
JP4944287B2 (en) * 2010-06-29 2012-05-30 楽天株式会社 Information providing apparatus, compensation payment processing method, compensation payment processing program, and recording medium on which compensation payment processing program is recorded
US20120010939A1 (en) * 2010-07-07 2012-01-12 Yahoo! Inc. Social network based online advertising
US20120016817A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2012-01-19 Smith S Alex Predicting Life Changes of Members of a Social Networking System
US20120036079A1 (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Building social networks based on commerce
US20120041850A1 (en) * 2010-08-10 2012-02-16 International Business Machines, Inc. Incentivizing content-receivers in social networks
US9152727B1 (en) 2010-08-23 2015-10-06 Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for processing consumer information for targeted marketing applications
US8478697B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2013-07-02 Yahoo! Inc. Determining whether to provide an advertisement to a user of a social network
US9208239B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2015-12-08 Eloy Technology, Llc Method and system for aggregating music in the cloud
US20120089446A1 (en) * 2010-10-07 2012-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Publishing Commercial Information in a Social Network
US9043220B2 (en) * 2010-10-19 2015-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Defining marketing strategies through derived E-commerce patterns
US20130311219A1 (en) * 2010-10-25 2013-11-21 Yechezkel Zvi Green Crowd-source based system and method of supervising and dispatching on-line content production for advocacy and search engine optimization
US8527344B2 (en) * 2010-11-15 2013-09-03 Facebook, Inc. Crowdsourced advertisements sponsored by advertisers in a social networking environment
US9058814B2 (en) * 2010-11-15 2015-06-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Mobile devices, methods, and computer program products for enhancing social interactions with relevant social networking information
US20120130860A1 (en) * 2010-11-19 2012-05-24 Microsoft Corporation Reputation scoring for online storefronts
US9147042B1 (en) 2010-11-22 2015-09-29 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for data verification
US20130117084A1 (en) * 2010-11-29 2013-05-09 Todd A. Rooke Engagement reward and redemption system
US9990652B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2018-06-05 Facebook, Inc. Targeting social advertising to friends of users who have interacted with an object associated with the advertising
US20180293646A1 (en) * 2010-12-21 2018-10-11 Google Inc. Inspiration Feedback by an Activity Assistant
US20120166284A1 (en) * 2010-12-22 2012-06-28 Erick Tseng Pricing Relevant Notifications Provided to a User Based on Location and Social Information
KR101089944B1 (en) * 2010-12-23 2011-12-05 씨제이이앤엠 주식회사 System and method for noticing and issuing coupons using social network service data
US20120313761A1 (en) * 2011-01-06 2012-12-13 John Rolin Power Management for an Active RFID Tag in Credit Card Form Factor
US20130346170A1 (en) * 2011-01-10 2013-12-26 Bozuko, Inc. Customized Customer Loyalty Rewards Program Enhanced Rewards Distribution System and Method
US20120197723A1 (en) * 2011-01-28 2012-08-02 Yahoo! Inc. User-customizable social grouping and advertisement targeting techniques
US20120203831A1 (en) 2011-02-03 2012-08-09 Kent Schoen Sponsored Stories Unit Creation from Organic Activity Stream
US20120203572A1 (en) * 2011-02-07 2012-08-09 Scott Christensen Merchantsellect point-of-entry kiosk loyalty system & prepaid card deposit and loyalty kiosk device
US20120203619A1 (en) * 2011-02-09 2012-08-09 Lutnick Howard W Multi-system distributed processing of group goals
US20120278164A1 (en) 2011-02-23 2012-11-01 Nova Spivack Systems and methods for recommending advertisement placement based on in network and cross network online activity analysis
US9235863B2 (en) * 2011-04-15 2016-01-12 Facebook, Inc. Display showing intersection between users of a social networking system
US9519682B1 (en) 2011-05-26 2016-12-13 Yahoo! Inc. User trustworthiness
US9083562B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2015-07-14 Adobe Systems Incorporated Predictive analysis of network analytics
US9665854B1 (en) 2011-06-16 2017-05-30 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Authentication alerts
US9483606B1 (en) 2011-07-08 2016-11-01 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Lifescore
US20130030865A1 (en) * 2011-07-25 2013-01-31 Nova-Ventus Consulting Sl Method of constructing a loyalty graph
US20130030909A1 (en) * 2011-07-26 2013-01-31 Hearsay Labs, Inc. Customizable social campaigns
US9106691B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-08-11 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and methods of identity protection and management
US20130073378A1 (en) * 2011-09-19 2013-03-21 Microsoft Corporation Social media campaign metrics
CA2885689A1 (en) * 2011-09-21 2013-03-28 Jingit Holdings, Llc Offer management and settlement in a payment network
US20130085844A1 (en) * 2011-10-04 2013-04-04 Microsoft Corporation Social ranking for online commerce sellers
US20130085838A1 (en) * 2011-10-04 2013-04-04 Microsoft Corporation Incentive optimization for social media marketing campaigns
CA2789701A1 (en) * 2011-10-11 2013-04-11 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Content quality and user engagement in social platforms
US8738516B1 (en) 2011-10-13 2014-05-27 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Debt services candidate locator
US8554613B2 (en) * 2011-10-21 2013-10-08 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Providing coupons based on user selected preference options
US9189797B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2015-11-17 Apple Inc. Systems and methods for sentiment detection, measurement, and normalization over social networks
US8666836B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2014-03-04 Facebook, Inc. Targeting items to a user of a social networking system based on a predicted event for the user
MX2014007025A (en) * 2011-12-21 2014-09-15 Engagement Labs Inc System and method for measuring and improving the efficiency of social media campaigns.
US9996852B2 (en) * 2011-12-21 2018-06-12 Engagement Labs Inc./Laboratoires Engagement Inc. System and method for measuring and improving the efficiency of social media campaigns
US10402795B2 (en) 2012-01-05 2019-09-03 Moneygram International, Inc. Prefunding for money transfer send transactions
US10255616B2 (en) * 2012-02-16 2019-04-09 Facebook, Inc. Selecting whisper codes to present with offers
US8832092B2 (en) 2012-02-17 2014-09-09 Bottlenose, Inc. Natural language processing optimized for micro content
US8721456B2 (en) 2012-02-17 2014-05-13 Ganz Incentivizing playing between websites
US8756168B1 (en) 2012-02-22 2014-06-17 Google Inc. Endorsing a product purchased offline
US8494973B1 (en) 2012-03-05 2013-07-23 Reputation.Com, Inc. Targeting review placement
US20120323647A1 (en) * 2012-04-26 2012-12-20 Scott Klooster Analyzing consumer behavior involving use of social networking benefits associated with content
US20130290084A1 (en) * 2012-04-28 2013-10-31 Shmuel Ur Social network advertising
US9853959B1 (en) 2012-05-07 2017-12-26 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Storage and maintenance of personal data
US9881258B1 (en) * 2012-05-31 2018-01-30 Google Llc Generating notifications based on formation of memberships
US9413710B1 (en) * 2012-06-23 2016-08-09 Microstrategy Incorporated Targeted content delivery
US8918312B1 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-12-23 Reputation.Com, Inc. Assigning sentiment to themes
US9020835B2 (en) * 2012-07-13 2015-04-28 Facebook, Inc. Search-powered connection targeting
US9009126B2 (en) 2012-07-31 2015-04-14 Bottlenose, Inc. Discovering and ranking trending links about topics
US20140074551A1 (en) 2012-09-09 2014-03-13 Oracle International Corporation Method and system for implementing a social media marketing and engagement application
US20140074620A1 (en) * 2012-09-12 2014-03-13 Andrew G. Bosworth Advertisement selection based on user selected affiliation with brands in a social networking system
US8595317B1 (en) 2012-09-14 2013-11-26 Geofeedr, Inc. System and method for generating, accessing, and updating geofeeds
US20140095407A1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2014-04-03 Danes Media, Inc. Integrated method and system for real time bi-directional communications of issues, concerns, problems, criticisms, complaints, feedback, or compliments and managing, tracking, responding and automating responses to same
US20140114737A1 (en) * 2012-10-18 2014-04-24 Raul Augusto Triveno Espejo Business to network reward system
US20140114763A1 (en) * 2012-10-18 2014-04-24 Google Inc. Facilitating following a content provider
US9633363B2 (en) 2012-11-08 2017-04-25 Thnx, Llc System and method of incentivized advertising
US9654541B1 (en) 2012-11-12 2017-05-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Aggregating user web browsing data
US8657688B1 (en) 2012-11-26 2014-02-25 Moneygram International, Inc. Promotion generation engine for a money transfer system
US9930078B2 (en) * 2012-11-28 2018-03-27 Facebook, Inc. Third-party communications to social networking system users using user descriptors
US9916621B1 (en) 2012-11-30 2018-03-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Presentation of credit score factors
US20140164087A1 (en) * 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems and methods for social media influence based rewards
US10255598B1 (en) 2012-12-06 2019-04-09 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit card account data extraction
US20140164082A1 (en) * 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems and methods for social media referrals based rewards
US8639767B1 (en) 2012-12-07 2014-01-28 Geofeedr, Inc. System and method for generating and managing geofeed-based alerts
US8655983B1 (en) 2012-12-07 2014-02-18 Geofeedr, Inc. System and method for location monitoring based on organized geofeeds
US20140164137A1 (en) * 2012-12-07 2014-06-12 Facebook, Inc. Pricing system for on-line advertisements
US8909646B1 (en) 2012-12-31 2014-12-09 Google Inc. Pre-processing of social network structures for fast discovery of cohesive groups
US20140214510A1 (en) * 2013-01-29 2014-07-31 Sriram Karri Social rewards
US8762302B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2014-06-24 Bottlenose, Inc. System and method for revealing correlations between data streams
US9307353B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2016-04-05 Geofeedia, Inc. System and method for differentially processing a location input for content providers that use different location input formats
US8612533B1 (en) 2013-03-07 2013-12-17 Geofeedr, Inc. System and method for creating and managing geofeeds
US8850531B1 (en) * 2013-03-07 2014-09-30 Geofeedia, Inc. System and method for targeted messaging, workflow management, and digital rights management for geofeeds
US20140280339A1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2014-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Integrating offers
US9406085B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-08-02 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting
US9870589B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-01-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit utilization tracking and reporting
US10102570B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-10-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Account vulnerability alerts
US9633322B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-04-25 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication
US9317600B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-04-19 Geofeedia, Inc. View of a physical space augmented with social media content originating from a geo-location of the physical space
US20140283095A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Philip John MacGregor Collaborative publishing within a social network
US20140280124A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Andrew Tikofsky Social Graph Sybils
US9659446B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-05-23 Zynga Inc. Real money gambling payouts that depend on online social activity
US8849935B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-30 Geofeedia, Inc. Systems and method for generating three-dimensional geofeeds, orientation-based geofeeds, and geofeeds based on ambient conditions based on content provided by social media content providers
US20140316872A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-10-23 Monster, Inc. Systems and methods for managing endorsements
US8862589B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-10-14 Geofeedia, Inc. System and method for predicting a geographic origin of content and accuracy of geotags related to content obtained from social media and other content providers
US20140304093A1 (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-10-09 Xuejiang Cheng Method and system to promote sales or services with social sales point
US10019531B2 (en) * 2013-05-19 2018-07-10 Carmel Kent System and method for displaying, connecting and analyzing data in an online collaborative webpage
US9721147B1 (en) 2013-05-23 2017-08-01 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Digital identity
US20150180818A1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2015-06-25 Google Inc. Interface for Product Reviews Identified in Online Reviewer Generated Content
US20150006295A1 (en) * 2013-06-28 2015-01-01 Linkedln Corporation Targeting users based on previous advertising campaigns
US20150006286A1 (en) * 2013-06-28 2015-01-01 Linkedin Corporation Targeting users based on categorical content interactions
US10373431B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2019-08-06 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for advertising distribution through mobile social gaming
US9814985B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2017-11-14 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for advertising distribution through mobile social gaming
US9314697B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2016-04-19 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for advertising distribution through mobile social gaming
US20150039424A1 (en) * 2013-07-30 2015-02-05 Yahoo! Inc System and method for social display advertisements
US10192204B2 (en) 2013-08-01 2019-01-29 Moneygram International, Inc. System and method for staging money transfers between users having profiles
US10325314B1 (en) 2013-11-15 2019-06-18 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Payment reporting systems
US20150081417A1 (en) * 2013-09-19 2015-03-19 Apparel Media Group, Inc. System and method for collaborative marketing with online brand engagement advertising
US9659306B1 (en) 2013-09-20 2017-05-23 Intuit Inc. Method and system for linking social media systems and financial management systems to provide social group-based marketing programs
US8831969B1 (en) * 2013-10-02 2014-09-09 Linkedin Corporation System and method for determining users working for the same employers in a social network
US10102536B1 (en) 2013-11-15 2018-10-16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Micro-geographic aggregation system
US9477737B1 (en) 2013-11-20 2016-10-25 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules
US20150161624A1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-06-11 Martin Charles Heath Systems and methods for capturing, managing, and triggering user journeys associated with trackable digital objects
US20150161640A1 (en) * 2013-12-08 2015-06-11 Robert Richard Walling, III System, method, and computer-readable medium for predicting trends
USD759690S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD759689S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD760256S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-28 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
US9892457B1 (en) 2014-04-16 2018-02-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Providing credit data in search results
US10373240B1 (en) 2014-04-25 2019-08-06 Csidentity Corporation Systems, methods and computer-program products for eligibility verification
US9576030B1 (en) 2014-05-07 2017-02-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Keeping up with the joneses
US20150332334A1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Microsoft Corporation Personalized group coupons and offers with user experience
WO2015191741A1 (en) * 2014-06-10 2015-12-17 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Office Of The General Counsel Systems and methods for conducting relationship dependent online transactions
CN104320326B (en) * 2014-10-16 2017-06-20 温州电力设计有限公司 Landing system is implemented in a kind of culture based on micro- propagation
US10445152B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-10-15 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for dynamic report generation based on automatic modeling of complex data structures
US10319047B2 (en) 2015-06-29 2019-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation Identification of life events within social media conversations
EP3326371A4 (en) 2015-07-24 2019-05-22 VideoAmp, Inc. Cross-screen optimization of advertising placement
EP3326135A4 (en) 2015-07-24 2019-03-06 Videoamp, Inc. Targeting tv advertising slots based on consumer online behavior
US9980011B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2018-05-22 Videoamp, Inc. Sequential delivery of advertising content across media devices
US10136174B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2018-11-20 Videoamp, Inc. Programmatic TV advertising placement using cross-screen consumer data
US9485318B1 (en) 2015-07-29 2016-11-01 Geofeedia, Inc. System and method for identifying influential social media and providing location-based alerts
US9767309B1 (en) 2015-11-23 2017-09-19 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Access control system for implementing access restrictions of regulated database records while identifying and providing indicators of regulated database records matching validation criteria
US10108714B2 (en) 2015-12-22 2018-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Segmenting social media users by means of life event detection and entity matching
KR101888901B1 (en) * 2017-07-25 2018-09-20 주식회사 아이온커뮤니케이션즈 Item marketing server and method for marketing item thereby

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130110805A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2013-05-02 Google Inc. Methods and Systems for Endorsing Local Search Results
US20130262221A1 (en) * 2004-12-27 2013-10-03 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for providing endorsed electronic offers between communication devices

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5537314A (en) * 1994-04-18 1996-07-16 First Marketrust Intl. Referral recognition system for an incentive award program
US6151585A (en) * 1998-04-24 2000-11-21 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for determining or inferring influential rumormongers from resource usage data
US6421648B1 (en) * 1999-04-14 2002-07-16 Louis Gagnon Data processing system for the management of a differential continuous compensation plan
US6567786B1 (en) * 1999-09-16 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for increasing the effectiveness of customer contact strategies
US7664669B1 (en) * 1999-11-19 2010-02-16 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community
US7197470B1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2007-03-27 Buzzmetrics, Ltd. System and method for collection analysis of electronic discussion methods
AU2002355530A1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2003-02-24 John Allen Ananian Personalized interactive digital catalog profiling
US8306874B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2012-11-06 Buy.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for word of mouth selling via a communications network
US7974868B2 (en) 2004-03-10 2011-07-05 Tagged, Inc. Enhancing virally-marketed facilities
US20060085253A1 (en) 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Matthew Mengerink Method and system to utilize a user network within a network-based commerce platform

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130110805A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2013-05-02 Google Inc. Methods and Systems for Endorsing Local Search Results
US20130262221A1 (en) * 2004-12-27 2013-10-03 Blue Calypso, Llc System and method for providing endorsed electronic offers between communication devices

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10366421B1 (en) * 2011-08-09 2019-07-30 Google Llc Content offers based on social influences
US20140019225A1 (en) * 2012-07-10 2014-01-16 International Business Machines Corporation Multi-channel, self-learning, social influence-based incentive generation
US20140279036A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Yahoo! Inc. Ad targeting system
US20150066624A1 (en) * 2013-08-27 2015-03-05 Jon Anthony ASTORE Method and system for providing a social media ecosystem cooperative marketplace
US9824404B2 (en) * 2013-08-27 2017-11-21 Unittus, Inc. Method and system for providing a social media ecosystem cooperative marketplace
US20160381158A1 (en) * 2015-06-29 2016-12-29 Google Inc. Automatic Invitation Delivery System
CN107409150A (en) * 2015-06-29 2017-11-28 谷歌公司 It is automatic to invite transmission system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20150106178A1 (en) 2015-04-16
US20070121843A1 (en) 2007-05-31
US8560385B2 (en) 2013-10-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Krishnamurthy A comprehensive analysis of permission marketing
US8140376B2 (en) System and method for optimization of viral marketing efforts
US8799068B2 (en) Social advertisements and other informational messages on a social networking website, and advertising model for same
US8504423B2 (en) Social network appreciation platform
US8799208B2 (en) Method and system for evaluating, reporting, and improving on-line promotion effectiveness
Foss et al. Successful customer relationship marketing: new thinking, new strategies, new tools for getting closer to your customers
US8762206B2 (en) Method and system for word of mouth advertising via a communications network
US8554635B2 (en) Social marketplace digital worth score
US8756102B2 (en) Method, system, and computer program for attracting local and regional businesses to an automated cause marketing environment
Trusov et al. Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site
Kannan Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda
US9524355B2 (en) Methods for delivering task-related digital content based on task-oriented user activity
JP6170463B2 (en) Targeting ads on social networks
TWI398820B (en) Modification of content representation by a brand engine in a social network
US9787760B2 (en) Platform for building virtual entities using equity systems
US20080189189A1 (en) System and method for collectively giving gifts in a social network environment
US20080126476A1 (en) Method and System for the Creating, Managing, and Delivery of Enhanced Feed Formatted Content
US20050004837A1 (en) System and method for compounded marketing
US20060106670A1 (en) System and method for interactively and progressively determining customer satisfaction within a networked community
US8930282B2 (en) Content generation revenue sharing
US20080249813A1 (en) System and Method for Providing Consumer Rewards
US8751327B2 (en) Facilitating content generation via messaging system interactions
JP5318782B2 (en) Determining and communicating excess advertiser demand to users, such as publishers participating in or expected to participate in the ad network
US8744908B2 (en) System and method for management and optimization of off-line advertising campaigns with a consumer call to action
Grueskin et al. The story so far: What we know about the business of digital journalism

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BEES & POLLEN LTD., ISRAEL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ATAZKY, RON;BARONE, EHUD;REEL/FRAME:030783/0225

Effective date: 20080214

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION