US20130218416A1 - Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle - Google Patents

Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130218416A1
US20130218416A1 US13/848,433 US201313848433A US2013218416A1 US 20130218416 A1 US20130218416 A1 US 20130218416A1 US 201313848433 A US201313848433 A US 201313848433A US 2013218416 A1 US2013218416 A1 US 2013218416A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
collision avoidance
collision
avoidance route
obstacle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/848,433
Inventor
Ryota Shirato
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to JP2007126568 priority Critical
Priority to JP2007-126568 priority
Priority to JP2008023763A priority patent/JP5309582B2/en
Priority to JP2008-023763 priority
Priority to US12/081,557 priority patent/US8423277B2/en
Application filed by Nissan Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority to US13/848,433 priority patent/US20130218416A1/en
Publication of US20130218416A1 publication Critical patent/US20130218416A1/en
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T7/00Brake-action initiating means
    • B60T7/12Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger
    • B60T7/22Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger initiated by contact of vehicle, e.g. bumper, with an external object, e.g. another vehicle, or by means of contactless obstacle detectors mounted on the vehicle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W10/00Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function
    • B60W10/18Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of braking systems
    • B60W10/184Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of braking systems with wheel brakes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W10/00Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function
    • B60W10/20Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of steering systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units, or advanced driver assistance systems for ensuring comfort, stability and safety or drive control systems for propelling or retarding the vehicle
    • B60W30/08Active safety systems predicting or avoiding probable or impending collision or attempting to minimise its consequences
    • B60W30/09Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B62LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
    • B62DMOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
    • B62D15/00Steering not otherwise provided for
    • B62D15/02Steering position indicators ; Steering position determination; Steering aids
    • B62D15/025Active steering aids, e.g. helping the driver by actively influencing the steering system after environment evaluation
    • B62D15/0265Automatic obstacle avoidance by steering
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2420/00Indexing codes relating to the type of sensors based on the principle of their operation
    • B60W2420/52Radar, Lidar
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2510/00Input parameters relating to a particular sub-units
    • B60W2510/20Steering systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2520/00Input parameters relating to overall vehicle dynamics
    • B60W2520/10Longitudinal speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2520/00Input parameters relating to overall vehicle dynamics
    • B60W2520/12Lateral speed
    • B60W2520/125Lateral acceleration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2520/00Input parameters relating to overall vehicle dynamics
    • B60W2520/14Yaw
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2540/00Input parameters relating to occupants
    • B60W2540/12Brake pedal position
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2540/00Input parameters relating to occupants
    • B60W2540/18Steering angle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2710/00Output or target parameters relating to a particular sub-units
    • B60W2710/20Steering systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2710/00Output or target parameters relating to a particular sub-units
    • B60W2710/20Steering systems
    • B60W2710/207Steering angle of wheels

Abstract

A vehicle running control method includes detecting an obstacle in front of a vehicle; detecting a dynamic state of the vehicle; detecting an operation of the vehicle, the step of detecting including detecting at least a first steering operation amount of a driver; generating a collision avoidance route; calculating a second steering operation amount, the second steering operation amount being a steering operation amount necessary to be added to the first steering operation amount for following the generated collision avoidance route; and performing running control of the vehicle based on the generated collision avoidance route. When the vehicle is in a state of avoiding a collision, if the first steering operation amount is insufficient for following the generated collision avoidance route, the running control of the vehicle is implemented such that the second steering operation amount is used to compensate for the insufficiency of the first steering operation amount.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/081,557, filed Apr. 17, 2008, which is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-126568, filed May 11, 2007, and Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-023763, filed Feb. 4, 2008; the entire contents of all applications are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a vehicle running control method and a vehicle running control apparatus for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • Conventionally, as disclosed in Japanese Patent No. 3197307, a vehicle running control apparatus has been known, which selects and executes collision avoidance control from collision avoidance control by steering control, collision avoidance control by speed control, and collision avoidance control by using both controls, according to a running condition of a vehicle and a driver's operating condition. According to such a running control apparatus, it can be avoided that the vehicle collides with an obstacle by the collision avoidance control according to the running condition of the vehicle and the driver's operating condition.
  • The running control apparatus disclosed in Japanese Patent No. 3197307 has a configuration in which control is interposed in vehicle operation, which is not performed by the driver, such that when the driver does not perform a steering operation, collision avoidance control is performed by steering control; when the driver does not perform a braking operation, collision avoidance control is performed by speed control; and when the driver does not perform the steering operation and the braking operation, collision avoidance control is performed by the steering control and the speed control. Therefore, according to the running control apparatus disclosed in Japanese Patent No. 3197307, when the collision avoidance control is different from the driver's operation intention, the vehicle operation to be performed by the driver is disturbed by the collision avoidance control, and hence, the driver may feel discomfort with respect to the collision avoidance control.
  • The present invention has been achieved in order to solve the above problems. It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle running control method and a vehicle running control apparatus that can prevent the driver from feeling discomfort with respect to the collision avoidance control by performing the collision avoidance control without disturbing the driver's vehicle operation as much as possible.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In the vehicle running control method and the vehicle running control apparatus according to the present invention, a plurality of collision avoidance routes for avoiding that the own vehicle collides with an obstacle is generated based on an operating state of the own vehicle, and a collision avoidance route corresponding to the driver's vehicle operation is selected from the generated collision avoidance routes, thereby to perform running control based on the selected collision avoidance route.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Exemplary embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope, the exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a vehicle running control apparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the vehicle running control apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a flow of a running control process according to the first embodiment;
  • FIG. 4 shows one example of a collision avoidance route generated in the running control process shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a flow of a modified example of the running control process shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a vehicle running control apparatus according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram of the vehicle running control apparatus shown in FIG. 6;
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a flow of a running control process according to the second embodiment; and
  • FIG. 9 shows one example of a collision avoidance route generated in the running control process shown in FIG. 8.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • A vehicle running control apparatus and operations thereof according to first and second embodiments of the present invention will be explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • First Embodiment
  • A configuration and an operation of the vehicle running control apparatus (hereinafter, “control apparatus”) as the first embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to FIGS. 1 to 4.
  • [Configuration of Control Apparatus]
  • The control apparatus according to the first embodiment is mounted on a vehicle 1, as shown in FIG. 1, and includes a radar 2, an imaging device 3, an image processing device 4, a yaw rate sensor 5, a lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, a wheel speed sensor 7, a steering angle sensor 8, a brake pedal sensor 9, a brake actuator 10, a steering actuator 11, and a vehicle controller 12 as main components.
  • The radar 2 irradiates laser beams forward of the vehicle, receives reflected light from an object irradiated with the laser beams by a received ray system, and detects time difference between a point in time when the laser beams has been emitted and a point in time when the reflected light has been received, thereby to measure the presence of an obstacle, a distance between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle, and a position of the obstacle. The radar 2 inputs a measurement result to the vehicle controller 12.
  • The imaging device 3 picks up an image in front of the vehicle 1 and outputs the image to the image processing device 4. The image processing device 4 processes the image captured by the imaging device 3 to detect running environment information of the vehicle 1 such as peripheral vehicles and road environment, and inputs a detection result to the vehicle controller 12. The radar 2, the imaging device 3, and the image processing device 4 function as an obstacle detector 21 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2.
  • The yaw rate sensor 5 detects a yaw rate occurring in the vehicle 1 and inputs a detection value to the vehicle controller 12. The lateral G/vertical G sensor 6 detects a lateral acceleration G (lateral G) and a vertical acceleration (vertical G) occurring in the vehicle 1 and inputs respective detection values to the vehicle controller 12. The wheel speed sensor 7 detects a rotation speed (wheel speed) of respective wheels of the vehicle 1, and inputs detection values thereof to the vehicle controller 12. The yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, and the wheel speed sensor 7 function as a vehicle dynamic state detector 22 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2.
  • The steering angle sensor 8 detects a steering angle of a steering of the vehicle 1 and inputs a detection value to the vehicle controller 12. The brake pedal sensor 9 detects a depressed amount of a brake pedal of the vehicle 1 and inputs a detection value to the vehicle controller 12. The steering angle sensor 8 and the brake pedal sensor 9 function as a driver's operation amount detector 23 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2.
  • The brake actuator 10 controls a damping fluid pressure supplied to a wheel cylinder of the vehicle 1 to perform a braking operation of the vehicle 1 by generating a braking force in the vehicle 1. The steering actuator 11 controls the steering angle of the steering of the vehicle 1 to perform a steering operation of the vehicle 1 by generating a lateral force in the vehicle 1. The brake actuator 10 and the steering actuator 11 function as a vehicle dynamics control unit 24 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2.
  • The vehicle controller 12 includes a microcomputer, and controls the operation of the brake actuator 10 and the steering actuator 11 based on the information input from the radar 2, the image processing device 4, the yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, the wheel speed sensor 7, the steering angle sensor 8, and the brake pedal sensor 9. The vehicle controller 12 functions as an avoidance route selecting unit 26 and an avoidance-route selecting/correcting unit 27 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2, by executing a control program by a CPU included therein.
  • [Running Control Process]
  • In the control apparatus having such a configuration, the vehicle controller 12 executes the running control process described below to avoid that the vehicle 1 collides with the obstacle. An operation of the vehicle controller 12 at the time of executing the running control process is explained with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG. 3.
  • The flow of FIG. 3 starts at a timing where an ignition switch of the vehicle 1 is changed from OFF to ON, and the running control process proceeds to step S1.
  • In the process at step S1, the vehicle controller 12 detects an area in which the vehicle 1 can run (hereinafter, “runway”) and an object present in the runway by using the input information from the radar 2 and the image processing device 34. The detection method of the runway has been already known at the time of filing the present invention, and therefore detailed explanations thereof will be omitted. For example, please refer to Japanese Patent No. 3521860, for the details of the detection method of the runway. Consequently, the process at step S1 is complete and the running control process proceeds to step S2.
  • In the process at step S2, the vehicle controller 12 uses the processing result at step S1 to determine whether an object having possibility to collide with the vehicle 1 (hereinafter, “obstacle”) is present in the runway. Because the detection method of the obstacle has been already known at the time of filing the present invention, detailed explanations thereof will be omitted. For example, please refer to Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2000-207693, for the details of the detection method of the obstacle. As a result of determination, when it is determined that the obstacle is not present in the runway, the vehicle controller 12 returns the running control process to the process at step S1. On the other hand, when it is determined that the obstacle is present in the runway, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S3.
  • In the process at step S3, the vehicle controller 12 uses information of the distance between the obstacle and the vehicle 1 and a relative velocity between the obstacle and the vehicle 1 to calculate the time until the vehicle 1 collides with the obstacle confirmed by the process at step S2 as collision estimated time TTTC. The distance between the obstacle and the vehicle 1 can be calculated by the input information from the radar 2, and the relative velocity between the obstacle and the vehicle 1 can be calculated by, for example, differentiating the calculated distance. Accordingly, the process at step S3 is complete and the running control process proceeds to step S4.
  • In the process at step S4, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the collision estimated time TTTC calculated by the process at step S3 is within preset time T1. As a result of the determination, when the collision estimated time TTTC is not within the predetermined time T1, the vehicle controller 12 returns the running control process to the process at step S1. On the other hand, when the collision estimated time TTTC is within the predetermined time T1, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S5.
  • Generally, when the collision estimated time TTTC is not within the predetermined time T1, in other words, when the time until the vehicle 1 collides with the obstacle is comparatively long, the risk of collision with the obstacle can be reduced due to the vehicle operation by the driver, and it is high likely that execution of the collision avoidance control will not be needed. Therefore, according to the determination process at step S4, it is prevented that the process described later is executed although the collision avoidance control need not be executed, thereby enabling to reduce a processing load of the vehicle controller 12.
  • In the process at step S5, the vehicle controller 12 uses the information of the runway detected by the process at step S1 and the input information from the yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, and the wheel speed sensor 7, to generate (calculate) a plurality of running routes of the vehicle 1 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle as the collision avoidance route, taking the runway and the motion state of the vehicle 1 into consideration.
  • In the first embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, the vehicle controller 12 generates collision avoidance routes R1, R2, and R3 appropriate for respective conditions when the driver depresses the brake pedal of the vehicle 1 to start the braking operation, when the driver starts the steering operation to the right, and when the driver starts the steering operation to the left. At this time, the vehicle controller 12 does not generate a collision avoidance route deviated from the runway range or a collision avoidance route that cannot avoid a collision with the obstacle by the driver's operation of the vehicle 1.
  • Specifically, when collision avoidance route R1 appropriate for when the driver starts the braking operation is to be generated, the vehicle controller 12 takes into consideration the input information from the yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, and the wheel speed sensor 7 and tire characteristics of the vehicle 1 at beginning, to set a deceleration of the vehicle 1 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle, and determines whether the vehicle 1 can avoid the collision with the obstacle by the set deceleration.
  • When having determining that the vehicle 1 can avoid the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 calculates a collision avoidance route by the vehicle control only by the deceleration within the runway range. On the contrary, when having determining that the vehicle 1 cannot avoid the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 calculates a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by generating a minimum lateral force required within the runway range. However, an upper limit is set to the lateral force, taking the tire characteristics of the vehicle 1 into consideration, and when the lateral force exceeding the upper limit is required, the vehicle controller 12 does not calculate the collision avoidance route.
  • Likewise, when collision avoidance routes R2 and R3 appropriate when the driver starts the steering operation (steering operation to the right and steering operation to the left) are to be generated, the vehicle controller 12 takes into consideration the input information from the yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, and the wheel speed sensor 7 and the tire characteristics of the vehicle 1 at beginning, to set a lateral acceleration of the vehicle 1 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle, and determines whether the vehicle 1 can avoid the collision with the obstacle by the set lateral acceleration.
  • When having determined that the vehicle 1 can avoid the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 calculates the collision avoidance route by the vehicle control only by the lateral acceleration within the runway range. On the contrary, when having determined that the vehicle 1 cannot avoid the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 calculates a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by generating a minimum braking force required within the runway range. However, an upper limit is set to the braking force by taking the tire characteristics of the vehicle 1 into consideration, and when the braking force exceeding the upper limit is required, the vehicle controller 12 does not calculate the collision avoidance route. Further, even when the collision avoidance route by the vehicle control only by the lateral acceleration has been calculated, the vehicle controller 12 can also calculate the collision avoidance route, taking into consideration also the braking force without exceeding the upper limit, since it is generally safer to pass by the obstacle by decelerating the vehicle speed as much as possible when the vehicle runs near the obstacle. Accordingly, the process at step S5 is complete and the running control process proceeds to step S6.
  • In the process at step S6, the vehicle controller 12 refers to the input information from the steering angle sensor 8 and the brake pedal sensor 9 to determine whether at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation by the driver has been detected. As a result of determination, when any of the steering operation and the braking operation has not been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S8. On the other hand, when at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S7. Any detection method of the steering operation can be used, so long as, for example, it can detect to which direction, left or right, the steering is performed from the steering angle at the time of calculating the collision avoidance route at step S5. Further, a method for determining not only the steering direction but also whether there is a change in the steering angle from the steering angle at the time of calculating the collision avoidance route larger than a predetermined threshold can be used. Furthermore, it can be a method for determining whether steering angle velocity or steering angle acceleration is higher than a predetermined threshold, instead of making determination on the steering angle change.
  • In the process at step S7, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route appropriate for the operation content of the driver detected by the process at step S6 from the plurality of collision avoidance routes generated by the process at step S5. Specifically, when the braking operation has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 selects collision avoidance route R1 appropriate for when the driver has started the braking operation; when the steering operation to the right has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 selects collision avoidance route R2 appropriate for when the driver has started steering to the right; and when the steering operation to the left has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 selects collision avoidance route R3 appropriate for when the driver has started steering to the left. In this process, the vehicle controller 12 basically selects the collision avoidance route appropriate for the operation content of the driver. However, according to the timing where the driver's operation has been detected, the content of the collision avoidance control is changed as shown in Table 1 below.
  • TABLE 1 RUNNING ROUTE OF VEHICLE RUNNING ROUTE OF VEHICLE OVERLAPS ON COLLISION DOSE NOT OVERLAP ON AVOIDANCE ROUTE COLLISION AVOIDANCE ROUTE DRIVER STARTED OPERATION START CONTROL AFTER DO NOT START COLLISION BEFORE CONTROL START POINT RUNNING ROUTE OVERLAPS ON AVOIDANCE CONTROL COLLISION AVOIDANCE ROUTE DRIVER STARTED OPERATION START CONTROL AFTER SELECT ANOTHER COLLISION AFTER CONTROL START POINT RUNNING ROUTE OVERLAPS ON AVOIDANCE ROUTE COLLISION AVOIDANCE ROUTE NO DRIVER'S OPERATION SELECT COLLISION AVOIDANCE ROUTE ON WHICH CONTROL START POINT IS CLOSEST TO OBSTACLE
  • To specifically explain the above process with reference to Table 1 and FIG. 4, for example, when the driver performs the steering operation to the left, the vehicle controller 12 selects collision avoidance route R3 appropriate for when the driver has started the steering operation. However, in a case that the control start point P3 on the collision avoidance route R3 is positioned on the obstacle side than the point where the driver has started the steering operation or at the same point, if the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation does not overlap on the collision avoidance route R3, the vehicle controller 12 completes the vehicle control process. Further, in a case that the control start point P3 on the collision avoidance route R3 is positioned closer to the obstacle than the point where the driver has started the steering operation or at the same point, if the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route R3, the vehicle controller 12 executes the collision avoidance control from the point where the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route R3.
  • On the other hand, in a case that the control start point P3 on the collision avoidance route R3 is positioned farther from the obstacle than the point where the driver has started the steering operation, if the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation does not overlap on the collision avoidance route R3, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route, on which the control start point is closest to the point where the driver has started the steering operation. Further, in the case that the control start point P3 on the collision avoidance route R3 is positioned farther from the obstacle than the point where the driver has started the steering operation, if the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route R3, the vehicle controller 12 executes the collision avoidance control from the point where the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's steering operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route R3. Consequently, the process at step S7 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S10.
  • The selection method of the collision avoidance route can be selected simply from only the steering operation direction. Further, when the control start point P3 on the collision avoidance route R3 is positioned farther from the obstacle than the point where the driver has started the steering operation, and when the running route of the vehicle 1 overlaps on the collision avoidance route R3, the collision avoidance control can be executed so as to follow the collision avoidance route R3. In this case, an operation amount of the driver insufficient for the collision avoidance route R3 is compensated by the collision avoidance control.
  • In the process at step S8, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the collision estimated time TTTC calculated by the process at step S3 is longer than collision estimated time T2 when the vehicle has reached a control start point on the collision avoidance route, which is closest to the obstacle. As a result of determination, if the collision estimated time TTTC is longer than the collision estimated time T2, the vehicle controller 12 returns the vehicle control process to step S6. On the other hand, if the collision estimated time TTTC is not longer than the collision estimated time T2, the vehicle controller 12 advances the vehicle control process to step S9.
  • In the process at step S9, the vehicle controller 12 determines that the point where the driver has started the operation is closer to the obstacle than the control start point on any collision avoidance route, and the driver has not started any operation even when the vehicle has reached the control start point on any collision avoidance route, and selects the collision avoidance route, on which the control start point is closest to the obstacle. Accordingly, the process at step S9 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S10.
  • In the process at step S10, the vehicle controller 12 controls the brake actuator 10 and the steering actuator 11 so that the vehicle 1 runs along the collision avoidance route selected in the process at step S7 or S9. Accordingly, the process at step S10 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S11.
  • In the process at step S11, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the possibility of the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle has disappeared due to the vehicle control or the driver's vehicle operation. As a result of determination, if there is still the possibility of collision, the vehicle controller 12 maintains the current control state, and returns the vehicle control process to step S1 at the timing where there is no possibility of collision, to execute the vehicle control process with respect to other obstacles.
  • In the process at step S1, an object present on the runway is detected. However, for example, an object present within a predetermined region in front of the own vehicle can be detected, regardless of being on the runway or not.
  • At step S7, it is determined whether the estimated route of the vehicle overlaps on the selected collision avoidance route. However, the steering actuator 11 (and the brake actuator 10) can be simply controlled to follow the selected collision avoidance route, with the above determination being omitted.
  • Further, at step S5, only collision avoidance routes R2 and R3 can be generated without generating collision avoidance route R1. At this time, when the driver has started the braking operation, a collision avoidance route on which the control start point is closest to the braking operation start point can be selected. Accordingly, the calculation process load of the vehicle controller 12 can be further reduced.
  • The conventional collision avoidance control technique has a configuration in which the control is interposed in the vehicle operation, which is not performed by the driver. Therefore, when the collision avoidance control is different from the driver's operation intention, the vehicle operation to be performed by the driver by the collision avoidance control, in other words, the vehicle operation intended by the driver may be disturbed, and the driver may feel discomfort with respect to the collision avoidance control. On the other hand, in the vehicle control process according to the first embodiment, as described above, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route corresponding to steering of the vehicle 1 or depression of the brake pedal by the driver, and controls the vehicle 1 so as to run based on the selected collision avoidance route. Accordingly, it can be prevented that the driver feels discomfort with respect to the collision avoidance control.
  • Further, in the conventional collision avoidance control technique, the configuration is such that the control is not interposed in the vehicle operation, which is being performed by the driver. Therefore, when the vehicle operation being performed by the driver is not appropriate for avoiding a collision with the obstacle, there is a possibility that the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle cannot be avoided. On the other hand, in the vehicle control process according to the first embodiment, as described above, when the collision with the obstacle can be avoided by the vehicle operation of the driver, the vehicle controller 12 does not execute the collision avoidance control and leaves the control to the driver's vehicle operation. When the operation amount of the driver is insufficient for avoiding the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 executes the collision avoidance control so as to increase the operation amount supplementarily. Accordingly, if the vehicle operation being performed by the driver is not appropriate for avoiding the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle, collision of the vehicle 1 with the obstacle can be avoided.
  • In the vehicle control process according to the first embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, the vehicle controller 12 generates at least three types of collision avoidance routes, that is, collision avoidance route R1 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the braking operation, collision avoidance route R2 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the steering operation to the right, and collision avoidance route R3 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the steering operation to the left. Therefore, a collision avoidance route appropriate for the driver's vehicle operation for avoiding the collision with the obstacle can be generated.
  • Further, in the vehicle control process according to the first embodiment, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route R1 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the braking operation, when the braking operation by the driver is detected. When the steering operation to the right by the driver is detected, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route R2 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the steering operation to the right; and when the steering operation to the left by the driver is detected, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route R3 for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the steering operation to the left. When a collision avoidance route corresponding to the driver's vehicle operation has not been generated, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route, on which a point for starting the collision avoidance control is closest to the obstacle as seen from a point where the driver's vehicle operation has been detected. Accordingly, the collision avoidance control can be executed while minimizing discomfort of the driver.
  • Further, in the vehicle control process according to the first embodiment, when a plurality of collision-avoidance-control start points on the collision avoidance routes are positioned on the obstacle side than the point where the driver's vehicle operation has been detected or at the same point, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on any one of the collision avoidance routes. When the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on any one of the collision avoidance routes, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route overlapping on the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation, and executes the collision avoidance control at a timing when the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route. When the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation does not overlap on any of the collision avoidance routes, the vehicle controller 12 does not execute the collision avoidance control.
  • On the other hand, when the collision-avoidance-control start point on the collision avoidance routes are positioned farther from the obstacle side than the point where the driver's vehicle operation has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on any one of the collision avoidance routes. When the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on any one of the collision avoidance routes, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route overlapping on the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation, and executes the collision avoidance control at the timing when the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route. When the running route of the vehicle 1 according to the driver's vehicle operation does not overlap on any one of the collision avoidance routes, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route on which the collision-avoidance-control start point is farthest from the vehicle 1.
  • According to such a process, when the collision with the obstacle can be avoided by the driver's vehicle operation, the vehicle controller 12 does not execute the collision avoidance control and leaves the control to the driver's vehicle operation. When the operation amount of the driver is insufficient for avoiding the collision with the obstacle, the vehicle controller 12 can execute the collision avoidance control naturally, without disturbing the driver's vehicle operation.
  • [Modification]
  • A modification of the running control process according to the first embodiment is explained with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG. 5. The flow of FIG. 5 starts at a timing where the ignition switch of the vehicle 1 is changed from OFF to ON, and the running control process proceeds to step S21. Because the process from steps S21 to S24 is the same as that from steps S1 to S4 in the flowchart shown in FIG. 3, explanations thereof will be omitted, and only processes from step S25 are explained.
  • In the process at step S25, the vehicle controller 12 refers to the input information from the steering angle sensor 8 and the brake pedal sensor 9 to determine whether at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation by the driver has been detected. As a result of determination, when both the steering operation and the braking operation have not been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S26. On the other hands, when at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control to step S28.
  • In the process at step S26, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the collision estimated time TTTC calculated by the process at step S23 is longer than the collision estimated time T2 when the vehicle has reached the control starting point on the collision avoidance route, which is closest to the obstacle. As a result of determination, if the collision estimated time TTTC is longer than the collision estimated time T2, the vehicle controller 12 returns the vehicle control process to step S25. On the other hand, if the collision estimated time TTTC is not longer than the collision estimated time T2, the vehicle controller 12 advances the vehicle control process to step S27.
  • In the process at step S27, the vehicle controller 12 automatically generates a path most appropriate for avoiding the obstacle. The path is set according to a route drawn along the traveling direction of the obstacle, for example, by setting the minimum relative distance from the obstacle to 1 meter. Consequently, the process at step S27 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S31.
  • In the process at step S28, the vehicle controller 12 uses the information of the runway detected by the process at step S21 and the input information from the yaw rate sensor 5, the lateral G/vertical G sensor 6, and the wheel speed sensor 7, to generate a plurality of running routes of the vehicle 1 for avoiding the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle appropriate for the driver's vehicle operation detected by the process at step S25, as the collision avoidance route. Specifically, when the steering operation to the right by the driver has been detected in the process at step S25, the vehicle controller 12 generates a collision avoidance route appropriate for when the driver has performed the steering operation to the right, and a collision avoidance route appropriate for when the driver has performed the steering operation to the left and the braking operation. In this case, the vehicle controller 12 can generate a plurality of collision avoidance routes corresponding to the steering angle speed. Consequently, the process at step S28 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S29.
  • In the process at step S29, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the collision estimated time TTTC calculated by the process at step S23 is within predetermined time T3. The vehicle controller 12 advances the vehicle control process to step S30 at a timing where the collision estimated time TTTC becomes within the predetermined time T3.
  • In the process at step S30, the vehicle controller 12 selects a collision avoidance route corresponding to the vehicle operation performed by the driver since generation of the collision avoidance routes until the collision estimated time TTTC becomes equal to or less than a predetermined value T3, from the collision avoidance routes generated by the process at step S28. Specifically, when the vehicle operation performed by the driver since generation of the collision avoidance routes until the collision estimated time TTTC becomes equal to or less than the predetermined value T3 is only the steering operation to the right, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route appropriate for when the driver has performed the steering operation to the right. When the collision avoidance routes are generated according to the steering angle speed, the vehicle controller 12 calculates the steering angle speed for the period since generation of the collision avoidance routes until the collision estimated time becomes equal to or less than the predetermined value T3, to select a collision avoidance route with the steering angle speed closest to the calculated steering angle speed. Consequently, the process at step S30 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S31.
  • In the process at step S31, the vehicle controller 12 controls the brake actuator 10 and the steering actuator 11 so that the vehicle 1 runs along the collision avoidance route selected by the process at steps S27 and S30. Consequently, the process at step S31 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S32.
  • In the process at step S32, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the possibility of the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle has disappeared due to the vehicle control or the driver's vehicle operation. As a result of determination, if there is still the possibility of collision, the vehicle controller 12 maintains the current control state, and returns the vehicle control process to step S21 at the timing where there is no possibility of collision, to execute the vehicle control process with respect to other obstacles.
  • As is obvious from the above explanations, according to the modification, after the collision avoidance routes have been generated, when the collision estimated time becomes equal to or less than the predetermined value T3 (step S29), the avoidance route corresponding to the operation performed by the driver in the period since generation of the routes until T2 is selected (step S30). Therefore, in addition to the effect of the first embodiment, for example, when the driver's operation is only steering to the right, the route only by the steering operation to the right is selected, thereby enabling to quickly select the route following the steering operation of the driver.
  • Selection of the collision avoidance routes can be performed from those other than the collision avoidance routes based on the vehicle operation performed by the driver in the period since generation of the collision avoidance routes until the collision estimated time becomes equal to or less than the predetermined value T3. For example, during a predetermined period after the operation by the driver has started, the operation state can be detected to select the collision avoidance route based on the operation state.
  • Second Embodiment
  • Operations of a control apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention will be explained with reference to FIGS. 6 to 9.
  • [Configuration of Control Apparatus]
  • The control apparatus according to the second embodiment additionally includes, as shown in FIG. 6, an alarm device 13 in the control apparatus of the first embodiment, and the alarm device 13 generates an alarm informing the driver of a danger of collision with the obstacle under control of the vehicle controller 12. In the control apparatus, the vehicle controller 12 functions as an avoidance route generating unit 25, the avoidance-route selecting/correcting unit 27, and a collision-alarm-generation determining unit 28, and the alarm device 13 functions as a collision alarm generating unit 29 according to the present invention shown in FIG. 7.
  • [Vehicle Control Process]
  • In the control apparatus having such a configuration, the vehicle controller 12 executes the running control process described below to avoid collision of the vehicle 1 with the obstacle. An operation of the vehicle controller 12 at the time of executing the running control process is explained with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG. 8. The process from steps S41 to S45 is the same as that from steps S1 to S5 in the flowchart shown in FIG. 3, and therefore explanations thereof will be omitted and only processes from step S46 onward are explained.
  • In the process at step S46, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether it is a timing to generate the alarm informing the driver of a danger of collision with the obstacle. When determining that it is the timing for generating the alarm, the vehicle controller 12 controls the alarm device 13 to generate the alarm. In the second embodiment, the determination process whether it is the timing for generating the alarm is performed according to whether the vehicle 1 has reached a point where the vehicle 1 has advanced toward the obstacle from the control start point farthest from the obstacle, among the control start points on the collision avoidance routes generated by the process at step S45, by a brake reaction distance of the vehicle 1 for a period since the driver has heard the alarm until the driver reacts thereto. When the vehicle has reached the point, the alarm is generated. Consequently, the process at step S46 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S47.
  • In the process at step S47, the vehicle controller 12 refers to the input information from the steering angle sensor 8 and the brake pedal sensor 9 to determine whether at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation by the driver has been detected. As a result of determination, when both the steering operation and the braking operation have not been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step S48. Because the process at steps S48 and S49 is the same as that at steps S8 and S9 in the flowchart shown in FIG. 3, explanations thereof will be omitted. On the other hand, when at least one of the steering operation and the braking operation has been detected, the vehicle controller 12 advances the running control process to step 50.
  • In the process at step S50, the vehicle controller 12 selects the collision avoidance route appropriate for the operation content of the driver detected by the process at step S47, from the plurality of collision avoidance routes generated by the process at step S45. Because the process at step S50 is the same as that at step S7 in the flowchart shown in FIG. 3, explanations thereof will be omitted. Consequently, the process at step S50 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S51.
  • In the process at step S51, the vehicle controller 12 corrects the collision avoidance route selected at step S50 according to the timing at which the driver has performed the operation. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 9, when the driver has started the vehicle operation before the vehicle 1 reaches a control start point PB on the selected collision avoidance route R, the vehicle controller 12 starts the collision avoidance control from a point PA at which the driver has started the operation, so that a running route RA of the vehicle 1 due to the driver's vehicle operation overlaps on the collision avoidance route R. Accordingly, the process at step S51 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S52.
  • In the process at step S52, the vehicle controller 12 controls the brake actuator 10 and the steering actuator 11 so that the vehicle 1 runs along the collision avoidance route selected by the process at step S49 or the collision avoidance route corrected by the process at step S51. Consequently, the process at step S52 is complete, and the vehicle control process proceeds to step S53.
  • In the process at step S53, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the possibility of the collision between the vehicle 1 and the obstacle has disappeared due to the vehicle control or the driver's vehicle operation. As a result of determination, if there is still the possibility of collision, the vehicle controller 12 maintains the current control state, and returns the vehicle control process to step S41 at the timing at which there is no possibility of collision, to execute the vehicle control process with respect to other obstacles.
  • As is obvious from the above explanations, according to the vehicle control process according to the second embodiment, when the driver's vehicle operation has been detected before the vehicle 1 reaches the collision-avoidance-control start point on the selected collision avoidance route, the vehicle controller 12 corrects the selected collision avoidance route so that the collision avoidance control is started from the point at which the driver's vehicle operation has been detected. Accordingly, even if the driver starts the collision avoidance operation voluntarily, the collision avoidance control can be added without giving discomfort to the driver.
  • Further, in the vehicle control process according to the second embodiment, the vehicle controller 12 determines whether the vehicle 1 has reached a point where the vehicle 1 has advanced toward the obstacle by the brake reaction distance of the vehicle 1 for the period since the driver has heard the alarm until the driver reacts thereto, from the collision-avoidance-control start point farthest from the obstacle, among the collision-avoidance-control start points on the collision avoidance routes. When the vehicle has reached the point, the vehicle controller 12 generates the alarm by controlling the alarm device 13, thereby enabling to give the driver collision alarm at an appropriate timing.
  • Description has been made of the embodiments to which the invention created by the inventors of the present invention is applied. However, the present invention is not limited to the descriptions and the drawings, which form a part of the disclosure of the present invention according to these embodiments. Specifically, all of other embodiments, examples, operational techniques and the like, which are made by those skilled in the art based on these embodiments, are naturally incorporated in the scope of the present invention. The above is additionally described at the end of this specification.
  • The entire content of Japanese Patent Application No. TOKUGAN 2007-126568 with a filing date of May 11, 2007, and Japanese Patent Application No. TOKUGAN 2008-23763 with a filing date of Feb. 4, 2008, is hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims (19)

1.-20. (canceled)
21. A vehicle running control method comprising:
detecting an obstacle in front of a vehicle;
detecting a dynamic state of the vehicle;
detecting an operation of the vehicle, the step of detecting an operation of the vehicle including detecting at least a first steering operation amount of a driver;
generating a collision avoidance route for avoiding a collision of the vehicle with the obstacle based on the detected obstacle and the dynamic state of the vehicle;
calculating a second steering operation amount, the second steering operation amount being a steering operation amount necessary to be added to the first steering operation amount for following the generated collision avoidance route; and
performing running control of the vehicle based on the generated collision avoidance route,
wherein, when the vehicle is in a state of avoiding a collision, if the first steering operation amount is insufficient for following the generated collision avoidance route, the running control of the vehicle is implemented such that the second steering operation amount is used to compensate for the insufficiency of the first steering operation amount.
22. The vehicle running control method according to claim 21, wherein:
a plurality of collision avoidance routes are generated for avoiding a collision of the vehicle with the obstacle based on the detected obstacle and the dynamic state of the vehicle, and
the method further comprises:
selecting a collision avoidance route corresponding to the detected operation of the vehicle, from the plurality of collision avoidance routes,
wherein, in the process of selecting, when the first steering operation is a steering operation to the right, a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the right is selected, and
wherein, in the process of selecting, when the first steering operation is a steering operation to the left, a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the left is selected.
23. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, wherein:
when the first steering operation amount is insufficient for following the selected collision avoidance route, the running control of the vehicle is performed so that the selected collision avoidance route is achieved, and
when the first steering operation amount exceeds the selected collision avoidance route, the running control is suppressed.
24. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, wherein:
the plurality of collision avoidance routes include at least three types of collision avoidance routes, the at least three types of collision avoidance routes including:
the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the right,
the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the left, and
a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a braking operation, and
in the selecting step, when the braking operation by the driver has been detected, the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the braking operation is selected.
25. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, wherein, in the process of selecting the collision avoidance route, when it is determined that there is no collision avoidance route corresponding to the operation of the vehicle by the driver, a collision avoidance route on which a point for starting a collision avoidance control is closest to an operation starting point is selected.
26. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, wherein:
in the step of selecting the collision avoidance route, it is determined whether a running route of the vehicle by the driver's operation overlaps on the selected collision avoidance route, and
in the step of performing running control of the vehicle, a running control mode is changed based on a result of the determination.
27. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, wherein:
in the process of selecting the collision avoidance route, it is determined whether an operation start point by the driver is closer to the obstacle than a control start point on the selected collision avoidance route, and
in the process of performing running control of the vehicle, a running control mode is changed based on a result of the determination.
28. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, further comprising correcting the selected collision avoidance route so that when the operation of the vehicle by the driver has been detected before the vehicle reaches a collision-avoidance-control start point on the selected collision avoidance route, the collision avoidance control is started from a point where the operation of the vehicle by the driver has been detected.
29. The vehicle running control method according to claim 22, further comprising:
determining whether the vehicle has reached a point where the vehicle has advanced toward the obstacle by a predetermined distance from the collision-avoidance-control start point farthest from the obstacle, among collision-avoidance-control start points on the collision avoidance routes, and
generating an alarm when the vehicle has reached the point where the vehicle has advanced toward the obstacle by the predetermined distance.
30. A vehicle running control apparatus comprising:
an obstacle detector configured to detect an obstacle in front of a vehicle;
a vehicle dynamic state detector configured to detect a dynamic state of the vehicle;
an operation detector configured to detect an operation of the vehicle, the detection of the operation of the vehicle including at least a detection of a first steering operation amount of a driver;
an avoidance route generating unit configured to generate a collision avoidance route for avoiding a collision of the vehicle with the obstacle based on the detected obstacle and the dynamic state of the vehicle detected by the vehicle dynamic state detector;
a calculating unit configured to calculate a second steering operation amount, the second steering operation amount being a steering operation amount necessary to be added to the first steering operation amount for following the generated collision avoidance route;
a vehicle dynamics control unit configured to perform running control of the vehicle based on the collision avoidance route generated by the avoidance route generating unit,
wherein, when the vehicle is in a state of avoiding a collision, if the first steering operation amount is insufficient for following the generated collision avoidance route, the running control of the vehicle is implemented such that the second steering operation amount is used to compensate for the insufficiency of the first steering operation amount.
31. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 30, wherein:
a plurality of collision avoidance routes are generated for avoiding a collision of the vehicle with the obstacle based on the detected obstacle and the dynamic state of the vehicle, and
the apparatus further comprises:
an avoidance route selecting unit configured to select a collision avoidance route corresponding to the detected operation of the vehicle, from the plurality of collision avoidance routes,
wherein, the avoidance route selecting unit is configured such that, when the first steering operation is a steering operation to the right, the avoidance route selecting unit selects a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the right, and
wherein, the avoidance route selecting unit is configured such that, when the first steering operation is a steering operation to the left, the avoidance route selecting unit selects a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the left.
32. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31, wherein:
when the first steering operation is insufficient for following the selected collision avoidance route, the vehicle dynamics control unit performs running control of the vehicle so that the selected collision avoidance route is achieved, and
when the first steering operation amount exceeds the selected collision avoidance route, the running control is suppressed.
33. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31, wherein:
the plurality of collision avoidance routes include at least three types of collision avoidance routes, the at least three types of collision avoidance routes including:
the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the right,
the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a steering operation to the left, and
a collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by a braking operation, and
the avoidance route selecting unit is configured such that, when the braking operation by the driver has been detected, the avoidance route selecting unit selects the collision avoidance route for avoiding the collision with the obstacle by the braking operation.
34. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the avoidance route selecting unit is configured such that, when it is determined that there is no collision avoidance route corresponding to the operation of the vehicle by the driver, the avoidance route selecting unit selects a collision avoidance route on which a point for starting a collision avoidance control is closest to an operation starting point.
35. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31,
the avoidance route selecting unit is configured to determine whether a running route of the vehicle by the driver's operation overlaps on the selected collision avoidance route, and
the vehicle dynamics control unit is configured to change a running control mode based on the determination by the avoidance route selecting unit.
36. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31,
the avoidance route selecting unit is configured to determine whether an operation start point by the driver is closer to the obstacle than a control start point on the selected collision avoidance route, and
the vehicle dynamics control unit is configured to change a running control mode based on the determination by the avoidance route selecting unit.
37. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31, further comprising a correcting unit configured to correct the selected collision avoidance route so that when the operation of the vehicle by the driver has been detected before the vehicle reaches a collision-avoidance-control start point on the selected collision avoidance route, the collision avoidance control is started from a point where the operation of the vehicle by the driver has been detected.
38. The vehicle running control apparatus according to claim 31, further comprising:
an alarm unit configured to
determine whether the vehicle has reached a point where the vehicle has advanced toward the obstacle by a predetermined distance from the collision-avoidance-control start point farthest from the obstacle, among collision-avoidance-control start points on the collision avoidance routes, and
generate an alarm when the vehicle has reached the point where the vehicle has advanced toward the obstacle by the predetermined distance.
US13/848,433 2007-05-11 2013-03-21 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle Abandoned US20130218416A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007126568 2007-05-11
JP2007-126568 2007-05-11
JP2008023763A JP5309582B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-02-04 Vehicle traveling control method and traveling control device
JP2008-023763 2008-02-04
US12/081,557 US8423277B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-04-17 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle
US13/848,433 US20130218416A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-03-21 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/848,433 US20130218416A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-03-21 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/081,557 Continuation US8423277B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-04-17 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130218416A1 true US20130218416A1 (en) 2013-08-22

Family

ID=39646353

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/081,557 Active 2031-03-06 US8423277B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-04-17 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle
US13/848,433 Abandoned US20130218416A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-03-21 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/081,557 Active 2031-03-06 US8423277B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-04-17 Vehicle running control method for avoiding that a vehicle collides with an obstacle

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US8423277B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2551162A1 (en)
JP (1) JP5309582B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120130629A1 (en) * 2010-11-18 2012-05-24 Kim Eun-Sook Method for avoiding side collision of vehicles
WO2016124368A1 (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-08-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a vehicle, computer program, machine-readable storage medium and electronic control unit
US20170158192A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2017-06-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for operating a vehicle

Families Citing this family (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8515659B2 (en) 2007-03-29 2013-08-20 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Collision possibility acquiring device, and collision possibility acquiring method
JP5309582B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-10-09 日産自動車株式会社 Vehicle traveling control method and traveling control device
JP4450023B2 (en) 2007-07-12 2010-04-14 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Own vehicle risk acquisition device
DE102008003666A1 (en) 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for controlling a driver assistance system and driver assistance system
US8473156B2 (en) * 2008-10-17 2013-06-25 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Driving dynamics control system for vehicles
EP2208654B1 (en) * 2009-01-15 2013-06-19 Volvo Car Corporation Method and system for avoiding host vehicle collisions with a target
JP2010179761A (en) * 2009-02-05 2010-08-19 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Device and method for supporting driving operation
JP4748232B2 (en) * 2009-02-27 2011-08-17 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Driving assistance device
JP5556029B2 (en) * 2009-03-05 2014-07-23 日産自動車株式会社 Driving operation support device and driving operation support method
JP5321153B2 (en) * 2009-03-05 2013-10-23 日産自動車株式会社 Driving operation support device and driving operation support method
US9108600B2 (en) 2009-05-07 2015-08-18 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method and device for performing closed-loop or open-loop control of the driving stability of a vehicle
JP5532684B2 (en) * 2009-06-01 2014-06-25 日産自動車株式会社 Vehicle travel control device and vehicle travel control method
JP5531455B2 (en) * 2009-06-03 2014-06-25 日産自動車株式会社 Vehicle travel control device and vehicle travel control method
JP4957752B2 (en) * 2009-06-12 2012-06-20 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Course evaluation device
DE102010038846A1 (en) 2009-08-05 2011-02-10 Advics Co., Ltd, Kariya-city Motion control device for a vehicle
JP5463971B2 (en) * 2010-03-10 2014-04-09 日産自動車株式会社 Mobile body travel route generation device
JP5565136B2 (en) * 2010-06-25 2014-08-06 日産自動車株式会社 Driving operation support device and driving operation support method
EP2681092A1 (en) 2011-03-01 2014-01-08 Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG Safety device for motor vehicle and method for operating a motor vehicle
US9081387B2 (en) 2011-03-01 2015-07-14 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method and device for the prediction and adaptation of movement trajectories of motor vehicles
WO2012119595A1 (en) * 2011-03-04 2012-09-13 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Limiting the activation of an evasive steering support
DE102012203673A1 (en) 2011-03-09 2012-10-04 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Safety device for a motor vehicle and method for operating a motor vehicle
KR101786542B1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2017-11-16 현대모비스 주식회사 Collision avoidance method for vehicles
DE102011106520A1 (en) * 2011-06-15 2011-12-15 Daimler Ag A method for preventing a collision of a vehicle and driver assistance system for a vehicle
KR101811435B1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2018-01-26 현대모비스 주식회사 Collision Avoidance Apparatus Setting Control Reference Value And Method Thereof
KR101616653B1 (en) * 2011-09-26 2016-04-28 도요타 지도샤(주) Vehicle driving assistance system
RU2570982C2 (en) * 2011-09-26 2015-12-20 Тойота Дзидося Кабусики Кайся Auxiliary vehicle control system
CN102490780B (en) * 2011-12-20 2014-11-05 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Electric power steering system, steering control method and automobile
DE102012202916A1 (en) * 2012-02-27 2013-08-29 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for operating a vehicle
US8781721B2 (en) * 2012-06-06 2014-07-15 Google Inc. Obstacle evaluation technique
EP2878507B1 (en) 2012-07-24 2017-08-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Drive assist device
JP5991377B2 (en) * 2012-07-24 2016-09-14 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Driving assistance device
CN102785660A (en) * 2012-08-17 2012-11-21 毛振刚 Vehicle collision-proof early warning device
KR101389963B1 (en) * 2012-09-12 2014-04-30 한양대학교 산학협력단 Control system and method for breaking vehicle considering response-preformance of brake
JP5527382B2 (en) * 2012-10-12 2014-06-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Driving support system and control device
BR112015009456A2 (en) * 2012-10-26 2017-07-04 Toyota Motor Co Ltd steering support device and steering support method
JP6137194B2 (en) * 2012-11-29 2017-05-31 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Driving support device and driving support method
US9569968B2 (en) 2012-12-20 2017-02-14 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method and device for the automated braking and steering of a vehicle
KR20140126975A (en) 2013-04-24 2014-11-03 주식회사 만도 Apparatus and method for preventing collision of vehicle
US8868328B1 (en) * 2013-06-04 2014-10-21 The Boeing Company System and method for routing decisions in a separation management system
DE102013016422A1 (en) * 2013-10-02 2015-04-02 Audi Ag Method for operating a safety system of a motor vehicle and motor vehicle
WO2016024317A1 (en) * 2014-08-11 2016-02-18 日産自動車株式会社 Travel control device and travel control method
WO2016024315A1 (en) * 2014-08-11 2016-02-18 日産自動車株式会社 Travel control device and method for vehicle
CN104149688A (en) * 2014-08-12 2014-11-19 桂林电子科技大学 Vehicle speed reminding device and method
DE102016210848A1 (en) 2015-07-06 2017-01-12 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for avoiding a collision of a vehicle with an object, and driving assistance system
DE102015213705A1 (en) * 2015-07-21 2017-01-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and assistance system for controlling a technical system
CN105151044B (en) * 2015-08-24 2019-01-01 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Vehicle assistant drive method and device
CN105740802A (en) * 2016-01-28 2016-07-06 北京中科慧眼科技有限公司 Disparity map-based obstacle detection method and device as well as automobile driving assistance system
CN106741136A (en) * 2016-12-15 2017-05-31 上海拓为汽车技术有限公司 Electric boosting steering system with active steering function
CN106740837A (en) * 2017-03-08 2017-05-31 武汉理工大学 A kind of automatic Pilot lorry control system based on Freeway Conditions
JP2019093764A (en) * 2017-11-17 2019-06-20 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Vehicle control device

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3197307B2 (en) * 1991-10-14 2001-08-13 マツダ株式会社 Travel control device for mobile vehicles
JP3319984B2 (en) * 1997-07-09 2002-09-03 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle collision avoidance device
JP2000207693A (en) 1999-01-08 2000-07-28 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Obstacle detector on vehicle
JP2000357299A (en) * 1999-06-16 2000-12-26 Honda Motor Co Ltd Safety device for vehicle running
DE10036276A1 (en) * 2000-07-26 2002-02-07 Daimler Chrysler Ag Automatic braking and steering system for a vehicle
JP3521860B2 (en) 2000-10-02 2004-04-26 日産自動車株式会社 Vehicle travel path recognition device
US7016783B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2006-03-21 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Collision avoidance with active steering and braking
JP4290455B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2009-07-08 日産自動車株式会社 Brake control device for vehicle
DE102004008894A1 (en) * 2004-02-24 2005-09-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Safety system for a means of transportation and related method
JP4942642B2 (en) 2004-03-01 2012-05-30 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト Method and configuration for controlling safety measures in a vehicle
JP4042979B2 (en) * 2004-05-14 2008-02-06 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle operation support device
JP4760715B2 (en) * 2004-12-28 2011-08-31 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Vehicle motion control device
JP4531621B2 (en) * 2005-04-25 2010-08-25 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle travel safety device
EP1717778B1 (en) 2005-04-29 2007-07-11 Ford Global Technologies, LLC Method and system for forward collision avoidance in an automotive vehicle
DE102005023832A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method and system for avoiding a collision of a motor vehicle with an object
US7734418B2 (en) * 2005-06-28 2010-06-08 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicle operation assisting system
JP4534956B2 (en) 2005-11-04 2010-09-01 ユニマテック株式会社 Fluorine-containing elastomer composition
EP1990786A4 (en) * 2006-02-28 2017-08-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Object course prediction method, device, program, and automatic driving system
JP2008023763A (en) 2006-07-19 2008-02-07 Ricoh Co Ltd Image forming apparatus
JP5309582B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-10-09 日産自動車株式会社 Vehicle traveling control method and traveling control device

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120130629A1 (en) * 2010-11-18 2012-05-24 Kim Eun-Sook Method for avoiding side collision of vehicles
US8751142B2 (en) * 2010-11-18 2014-06-10 Eun-sook KIM Method for avoiding side collision of vehicles
US20170158192A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2017-06-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for operating a vehicle
US10220846B2 (en) * 2014-06-24 2019-03-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for operating a vehicle
WO2016124368A1 (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-08-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a vehicle, computer program, machine-readable storage medium and electronic control unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008308152A (en) 2008-12-25
EP2551162A1 (en) 2013-01-30
US20080281521A1 (en) 2008-11-13
EP1990250B1 (en) 2013-04-03
EP1990250A3 (en) 2009-12-30
US8423277B2 (en) 2013-04-16
JP5309582B2 (en) 2013-10-09
EP1990250A2 (en) 2008-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6333655B2 (en) Method and apparatus for assisting in driving a vehicle
US9308914B1 (en) Advanced driver assistance system for vehicle
JP5652364B2 (en) Vehicle behavior control device
US9037348B2 (en) Lane-keeping assistance method for a motor vehicle
US8260538B2 (en) Vehicle-use collision mitigation apparatus
US9108600B2 (en) Method and device for performing closed-loop or open-loop control of the driving stability of a vehicle
DE10029710B4 (en) Vehicle travel safety device
JP4759547B2 (en) Driving support device
EP1010596B1 (en) Safety system for a motor vehicle
JP5127917B2 (en) Vehicle control device
EP3135550B1 (en) Collision avoidance support device
EP2051886B1 (en) Braking control system and braking control method
JP4386082B2 (en) Vehicle travel support device
JP4011711B2 (en) Vehicle travel safety device
JP4020089B2 (en) Vehicle drive operation assistance device and vehicle with vehicle drive operation assistance device
US8150583B2 (en) Method and apparatus for avoiding or mitigating vehicle collisions
JP4290455B2 (en) Brake control device for vehicle
CN1239341C (en) Automatic braking system for wheel motor vehicle
US5757949A (en) Warning system for vehicle
JP4924590B2 (en) Vehicle notification device
US7844384B2 (en) Vehicular traveling control apparatus and method
DE602004012196T2 (en) Driver assistance system for a motor vehicle
US9415774B2 (en) Vehicle control apparatus including an obstacle detection device
US8638204B2 (en) Driver assistance system
JP4279112B2 (en) Deceleration control device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION