US20120165967A1  Methods and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics  Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics Download PDFInfo
 Publication number
 US20120165967A1 US20120165967A1 US13/194,436 US201113194436A US2012165967A1 US 20120165967 A1 US20120165967 A1 US 20120165967A1 US 201113194436 A US201113194436 A US 201113194436A US 2012165967 A1 US2012165967 A1 US 2012165967A1
 Authority
 US
 United States
 Prior art keywords
 object
 material property
 manufacturing
 field
 finite element
 Prior art date
 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications

 G—PHYSICS
 G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
 G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
 G05B19/00—Programmecontrol systems
 G05B19/02—Programmecontrol systems electric
 G05B19/42—Recording and playback systems, i.e. in which the programme is recorded from a cycle of operations, e.g. the cycle of operations being manually controlled, after which this record is played back on the same machine
 G05B19/4202—Recording and playback systems, i.e. in which the programme is recorded from a cycle of operations, e.g. the cycle of operations being manually controlled, after which this record is played back on the same machine preparation of the programme medium using a drawing, a model
 G05B19/4207—Recording and playback systems, i.e. in which the programme is recorded from a cycle of operations, e.g. the cycle of operations being manually controlled, after which this record is played back on the same machine preparation of the programme medium using a drawing, a model in which a model is traced or scanned and corresponding data recorded

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
 A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finiteelement analysis or CADCAM techniques

 G—PHYSICS
 G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
 G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
 G05B19/00—Programmecontrol systems
 G05B19/02—Programmecontrol systems electric
 G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or coordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
 G05B19/4097—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or coordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by using design data to control NC machines, e.g. CAD/CAM

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
 G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
 G06F17/50—Computeraided design
 G06F17/5009—Computeraided design using simulation
 G06F17/5018—Computeraided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2/32—Joints for the hip
 A61F2/36—Femoral heads ; Femoral endoprostheses

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2002/30001—Additional features of subjectmatter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
 A61F2002/30003—Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
 A61F2002/30004—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2002/30014—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in elasticity, stiffness or compressibility

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2002/30001—Additional features of subjectmatter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
 A61F2002/30003—Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
 A61F2002/30004—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2002/30046—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in thermal conductivity

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2002/30001—Additional features of subjectmatter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
 A61F2002/30003—Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
 A61F2002/30004—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2002/30052—The prosthesis made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in electric properties

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
 A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finiteelement analysis or CADCAM techniques
 A61F2002/30952—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finiteelement analysis or CADCAM techniques using CADCAM techniques or NCtechniques

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
 A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finiteelement analysis or CADCAM techniques
 A61F2002/30955—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finiteelement analysis or CADCAM techniques using finiteelement analysis

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
 A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
 A61F2/30—Joints
 A61F2/32—Joints for the hip
 A61F2/36—Femoral heads ; Femoral endoprostheses
 A61F2/3609—Femoral heads or necks; Connections of endoprosthetic heads or necks to endoprosthetic femoral shafts
 A61F2002/3611—Heads or epiphyseal parts of femur

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2250/00—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
 A61F2250/0014—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2250/0018—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in elasticity, stiffness or compressibility

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2250/00—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
 A61F2250/0014—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2250/0043—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in electric properties, e.g. in electrical conductivity, in galvanic properties

 A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
 A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRSTAID KITS
 A61F2250/00—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
 A61F2250/0014—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
 A61F2250/0047—Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00  A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in thermal conductivity

 G—PHYSICS
 G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
 G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
 G05B2219/00—Programcontrol systems
 G05B2219/30—Nc systems
 G05B2219/35—Nc in input of data, input till input file format
 G05B2219/35017—Finite elements analysis, finite elements method FEM

 G—PHYSICS
 G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
 G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
 G05B2219/00—Programcontrol systems
 G05B2219/30—Nc systems
 G05B2219/45—Nc applications
 G05B2219/45168—Bone prosthesis

 G—PHYSICS
 G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
 G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
 G05B2219/00—Programcontrol systems
 G05B2219/30—Nc systems
 G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
 G05B2219/49008—Making 3D object with model in computer memory

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
 G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
 G06F2217/16—Numerical modeling

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
 G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
 G06F2217/44—Composites

 Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSSSECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSSREFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
 Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
 Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
 Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
 Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
 Y02P90/26—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] characterised by modelling or simulation of the manufacturing system
 Y02P90/265—Product design therefor
Abstract
A method for manufacturing an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto is provided. The method includes the step of designing a geometric model of the object. A computerized mathematical model of the object is generated by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A material property matrix [k] is then calculated based on the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. Material property coefficients are then extracted from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model and the extracted material property coefficients are compared to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials. Manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched material property coefficients are then determined. The object is then manufactured in accordance with the determined manufacturing parameters.
Description
 1. Technical Field
 The present invention generally relates to articles of manufacture and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having response characteristics which are optimized for a desired application or use.
 2. Description of Related Art
 An object composed of one or more materials, which is engineered and manufactured for an intended application, must be able to withstand the stresses exerted on the object during use in the application. For example, a bridge, carrying a pathway or roadway over a depression or obstacle such as a body of water, must be designed to withstand the stresses created by traffic (either pedestrian or vehicle or both), temperature variations, wind, shifts in the surface of the earth which may be caused by earthquakes or other geological movements, etc. Similarly, aircraft components must have sufficient strength to withstand bending, sheer, torsion, and other forces placed on it. Accordingly, in a conventional engineering process, a stress analysis is performed. The stress analysis requires a determination of the forces (or “stressfield”) which will be applied, to the object during use in the application. These stresses include, for example, thermal, mechanical, and electromagnetic forces. Knowing the stressfield enables a determination of whether a trial design and the selected material(s) are appropriate to withstand the stresses created during use of the object for its intended application. If a specific combination of design and material(s) is not suitable for an intended application, the object may be redesigned and/or new material(s) may be selected.
 The abovedescribed conventional engineering process will be discussed in greater detail with respect to
FIG. 1 . The initial design geometry of the object and the material(s) of which the object is to be composed are defined at step 11. Geometry includes dimensions, tolerances, surface finish, definitions of surfaces and edges, and, in some cases, the fit between two mating parts. The initial design geometry may be created using computeraideddesign (CAD) techniques known in the art. Each force which will be applied to the object during intended use, and the points and direction of application of the respective forces, are identified at step 12.  Stress analysis is performed at step 13. One technique for carrying out such a stress analysis is to create a finiteelement model of the object and utilize the finite element method to determine the suitability of the object for the intended application. The finite element method is a numerical analysis technique for obtaining approximate solutions to a wide variety of engineering problems in which a complex part or object is subdivided into the analyses of small simple subdivisions of the part or object. This method has been widely discussed and reference will be made in what follows to a discussion from Huebner et al, The Finite Element Method for Engineers, Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1995). In a continuum problem, a field variable such as pressure, temperature, displacement, or stress has infinitely many values because it is a function of each point in the body. The finite element method reduces the problem to one of a finite number of unknowns by dividing the solution region into elements and by expressing the unknown field variable in terms of assumed approximating functions within each element. The approximating functions are defined in terms of the values of the field variables at specified points called nodes. Nodes usually lie on the element boundaries where adjacent elements are connected. For the finite element representation of a problem, the nodal values of the field variable become the unknowns. Once these unknowns are found, the approximating functions define the field variable throughout the assembled elements. An important feature of the finite element method is the ability to formulate solutions for individual elements before putting them together to represent the entire problem. This means that the characteristics of each individual element may be found and then the elements may be assembled to find the characteristics of the whole structure. The finite element method may be summarized by the following steps.
 First, the continuum is discretized into elements. A variety of element shapes may be used and different element shapes may be employed in the same solution region. The number and type of elements in a given problem are generally matters of engineering judgment. For example, threedimensional elements work best if they are either tetrahedral or hexahedral in shape. In addition, the most accurate elements have a unity aspect ratio. The next step is to assign nodes to each element and then choose the interpolation function to represent the variation of the field variable over the element. Once the finite element model has been established, the matrix equations expressing the properties of the individual elements may be determined. Several different approaches including a direct approach, a variational approach, or a weighted residual approach may be used. The element properties are then assembled to obtain the system equations. That is, the matrix equations expressing the behavior of the elements are combined to form the matrix equations expressing the behavior of the entire system. At this point, the system equations are modified to account for any boundary conditions of the problem. That is, known nodal values of the dependent variables or nodal loads are imposed. The resulting system of equations may then be solved to obtain the unknown nodal values of the problem. The solution of equations may be used to calculate other important parameters. For example, in a structural problem, the nodal unknowns are displacement components. From these displacements, the element strains and stresses may be calculated.
 An example of the finite element method from the Huebner text will be discussed as an aid in understanding the terminology to be used in this specification.
FIG. 2 illustrates a linear spring system. For a typical spring element, the relations expressing its stiffness are 
$\left[\begin{array}{cc}{k}_{11}& {k}_{12}\\ {k}_{21}& {k}_{22}\end{array}\right]\ue89e\left\{\begin{array}{c}{\delta}_{1}\\ {\delta}_{2}\end{array}\right\}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}{F}_{1}\\ {F}_{2}\end{array}\right\}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{where}$ ${k}_{11}={k}_{12}={k}_{21}={k}_{22}=k.$  Under a given loading condition, each element as well as the system of elements, must be in equilibrium. If this equilibrium condition is imposed at a particular node i,

ΣF _{i} ^{(e)} =F _{i} ^{(1)} +F _{i} ^{(2)} +F _{i} ^{(3)} + . . . =R _{i} (1)  which states that the sum of all the nodal forces in one direction at node i equals the resultant external load applied at node i. In accordance with conventional tensor notation, each coefficient in a stiffness matrix is assigned a double subscript, e.g., ij; the number i is the subscript designating the force F_{i }produced by a unit value of the displacement whose subscript is j. The force F_{i }is that which exists when δ_{j}=1 and all the other displacements are fixed. A displacement and a resultant force in the direction of the displacement carry the same subscript. Thus, evaluating equation (1) at each node in the linear spring system of
FIG. 2 , it can be shown that
at node 1, 
k _{11} ^{(1)}δ_{1} +k _{12} ^{(1)}δ_{2} =R _{1 }  at node 2,

k _{21} ^{(1)}δ_{1}+(k _{22} ^{(1)} k _{22} ^{(2)} k _{22} ^{(3)})δ_{2}(k _{23} ^{(2)} +k _{23} ^{(3)})δ_{3}=0  at node 3,

(k _{32} ^{(2)} +k _{32} ^{(3)})δ_{2}+(k _{33} ^{(2)} +k _{33} ^{(3)} +k _{33} ^{(4)})δ_{3} +k _{34} ^{(4)})δ_{3} +k _{34} ^{(4)}δ_{4}=0  at node 4

k _{43} ^{(4)}δ_{3} +k _{44} ^{(4)}δ_{4} =F  Using matrix notation, these system equilibrium equations can be written as

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{or}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\left[\begin{array}{cccc}{k}_{11}^{\left(1\right)}& {k}_{12}^{\left(1\right)}& 0& 0\\ {k}_{21}^{\left(1\right)}& \left({k}_{22}^{\left(1\right)}+{k}_{22}^{\left(2\right)}+{k}_{22}^{\left(3\right)}\right)& \left({k}_{23}^{\left(2\right)}+{k}_{23}^{\left(3\right)}\right)& 0\\ 0& \left({k}_{32}^{\left(2\right)}+{k}_{32}^{\left(3\right)}\right)& \left({k}_{33}^{\left(2\right)}+{k}_{33}^{\left(3\right)}+{k}_{33}^{\left(4\right)}\right)& {k}_{34}^{\left(4\right)}\\ 0& 0& {k}_{43}^{\left(4\right)}& {k}_{44}^{\left(4\right)}\end{array}\right]\ue89e\left\{\begin{array}{c}{\delta}_{1}\\ {\delta}_{2}\\ {\delta}_{3}\\ {\delta}_{4}\end{array}\right\}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}{R}_{1}\\ 0\\ 0\\ F\end{array}\right\}\ue89e\text{}\left[k\right]\ue89e\left\{\delta \right\}=\left\{F\right\}.& \left(2\right)\end{array}$  These equations are the assembled forcedisplacement characteristics for the complete system and [k] is the assembled stiffness matrix. These equations cannot be solved for the nodal displacements until they have been modified to account for the boundary conditions.
 It can be seen that the stiffness matrix [k] is the sum of the following matrices, each matrix representing the contribution from a corresponding one of the elements:

${\left[\stackrel{\_}{K}\right]}^{\left(1\right)}={\left[\begin{array}{cccc}{k}_{11}^{\left(1\right)}& {k}_{12}^{\left(1\right)}& 0& 0\\ {k}_{21}^{\left(1\right)}& {k}_{22}^{\left(1\right)}& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0\end{array}\right]\ue89e\text{}\left[\stackrel{\_}{K}\right]}^{\left(2\right)}={\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& {k}_{22}^{\left(2\right)}& {k}_{23}^{\left(2\right)}& 0\\ 0& {k}_{32}^{\left(2\right)}& {k}_{33}^{\left(2\right)}& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0\end{array}\right]\ue89e\text{}\left[\stackrel{\_}{K}\right]}^{\left(3\right)}={\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& {k}_{22}^{\left(3\right)}& {k}_{23}^{\left(3\right)}& 0\\ 0& {k}_{32}^{\left(3\right)}& {k}_{33}^{\left(3\right)}& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0\end{array}\right]\ue89e\text{}\left[\stackrel{\_}{K}\right]}^{\left(4\right)}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& {k}_{33}^{\left(4\right)}& {k}_{34}^{\left(4\right)}\\ 0& 0& {k}_{43}^{\left(4\right)}& {k}_{44}^{\left(4\right)}\end{array}\right]$  Thus, it can be seen that the assembled or global stiffness matrix can be obtained simply by adding the contribution of each element. Similarly, using boolean locating functions or other locating functions, the contribution of each element may be determined from the assembled or global stiffness matrix.
 Thus, to perform stress analysis, the material(s) of which the object is composed as determined by the initial design, the forces which are applied to the object as identified at step 12, and any constraints or boundary conditions are input into the finite element model. Since the forces {f} and the material property matrix [k] are known, the finite element method is used to determine the corresponding displacements {δ} using equation (2). For example, assume the forces determined at step 12 are loads applied to the object. Then, since the material property matrix is determined by the initial choice of material(s), the displacement resulting from application of the loads may be determined. As noted above, these displacements may then be used to calculate the stresses and strains. The calculations for solving the matrix equations generated by the finite element method are generally performed using a suitable finite element software package.
 Postprocessing, indicated at step 14, is carried out to determine if the design will perform satisfactorily. Such postprocessing may include, for example, a comparison of the stresses in the material to the maximum allowable stresses dictated by the material used. If the stresses are too high, the process returns to step 11 where the part may be made stronger by adding material, the material may be changed to one with higher allowable stress, or a new design geometry may be utilized. If the postprocessing at step 14 indicates the results are acceptable, the process proceeds to step 15 where the object is manufactured in accordance with the design geometry and the choice of material(s) determined at step 11.
 A known problem with the conventional manufacturing technique described above is that it uses known materials and preset manufacturing parameters, thereby creating a structure with fixed intrinsic (constitutive) properties. This results in over designing and inefficiency of the structure. While manufacturing processes exist that enable the adjustment of manufacturing parameters, no method exists of precisely determining what the manufacturing parameters should be or the sequence in which they should be implemented so as to optimize the constitutive properties of a particular object design. In essence, no method exists for determining an optimized constitutive matrix for a particular object or for manufacturing the object in accordance with this optimized constitutive matrix.
 In accordance with the present invention, a method for manufacturing an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto includes the step of designing a geometric model of the object. A computerized mathematical model of the object is generated by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A material property matrix [c] is then calculated based on the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. Material property coefficients are then extracted from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model and the extracted material property coefficients are compared to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials. Manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched material property coefficients are then determined. The object is then manufactured in accordance with the determined manufacturing parameters.
 In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for determining manufacturing parameters for manufacturing an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto includes the step of designing a geometric model of the object. A computerized mathematical model of the object is generated by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A material property matrix [k] is calculated based on the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. Material property coefficients are extracted from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model and the extracted material property coefficients are compared to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials. Manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched material property coefficients are then determined.
 In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for determining the material properties of an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto includes the step of designing a geometric model of the object. A computerized mathematical model of the object is generated by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A material property matrix [k] is calculated based the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. Material property coefficients are extracted from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model and the extracted material property coefficients are compared to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials.
 In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a machine for determining the manufacturing parameters of an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto includes a designing element for designing a geometric model of the object. A generating element generates a computerized mathematical model of the object by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and the potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A calculating element calculates a material property matrix [k] based the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. An extracting element extracts material property coefficients from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model. A comparing element compares the extracted material property coefficients to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials and a determining means determines manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched material property coefficients.
 In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a machine for determining the material properties of an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto includes a designing element for designing a geometric model of the object. A generating element generates a computerized mathematical model of the object by discretizing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of the elements, wherein values of the field {f} and the potential {x} are specified at the nodes. A calculating element calculates a material property matrix [k] based the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. An extracting element extracts material property coefficients from the material property matrix [k] for each finite element in the computerized mathematical model. A comparing element compares the extracted material property coefficients to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials.
 These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood from a reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates the prior art methodology for manufacturing an object. 
FIG. 2 illustrates a simple mechanical spring system for defining terminology used in this application. 
FIG. 3 illustrates the methodology for manufacturing an object in accordance with the present invention. 
FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrates forces applied to the femoral head of a hip during a oneleg stance and rising from a chair, respectively. 
FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate a force applied to an in vivo hip and the resultant stresses, respectively. 
FIG. 6 illustrates a finite element model of a prosthetic hip. 
FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate material properties data bases. 
FIG. 8 illustrates functional modules which may be used to implement the present invention. 
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an environment which may be used to implement one or more of the functional modules ofFIG. 8 . 
FIG. 10 is a schematic of a control computer for controlling a manufacturing machine. 
FIG. 3 will be used to describe a methodology for manufacturing an object or part in accordance with the present invention. As will become apparent from the description below, object or part (hereinafter “object”) as used herein refers to any object which may be manufactured by a process or technique in which manufacturing parameters may be controlled to vary constitutive or material properties within the object. The methodology for manufacturing an object in accordance with the instant invention is based on solutions of the equation 
{f}=[k]{x}  where {f} represents a field which will be applied to the object in its intended use, {x} represents a potential corresponding to the applied field, and [k] represents the material properties of the object.
 The methodology of the instant invention may be utilized with any manufacturing technique in which the manufacturing parameters may be varied. For example, a braiding process using a braider may be used to manufacture fiber composite objects. Fiber composite materials are finding increasing use as the construction material for components such as body panels of automobiles, aircraft, prosthetic implants, golf club shafts, tennis rackets, bicycle frames, and fishing poles. These composite materials offer high strength equal to, or exceeding, that of metallic materials, for example, while at the same time are lighter in weight and have other improved functional properties. Parameters such as the speed of the braider bed and/or mandrel, the thickness of the fibers, and the tension applied to the fibers are controlled to vary the stiffness properties of the fiber composite material. An example of a braider bed designed for controlled braiding of composite materials is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,127 to Skelton. Threedimension woven fabrics are also discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,262 to Suto.
 Composite materials may also be constructed by laminating structural fibers in appropriate matrices compatible with these fibers as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,800 to Carver et al. Fiberglass is a widely used composite system which incorporates glass fibers within an epoxy resin matrix. For formation of aircraft components, more exotic composite systems having improved properties are desirable. Currently available for use are exotic inorganic materials such as carbon fibers, boron fibers, improved glass fibers, aluminum oxide fibers, inorganic whiskers of different materials and certain organic fibers such as aramides and extended chain polyethylenes. These fibers or whiskers are incorporated as threads, fabrics, mats, or the like in appropriate resins, as for instance thermosetting epoxies, polyesters, polyethers, polyimides, and bismaleimides or thermoplastic polyamideimines, polyether sulfones, polyether ketones, polyphenylene sulfides and other similar polymeric materials. Composite objects may be formed utilizing molding techniques—using either external molds which are of a complementary shape to an object or an internal mandrel type mold on which the composite object is built. A mold utilized for the formation and curing of a composite object is called a bonding tool and the curing is carried out under precisely controlled temperatures and pressures.
 A contouring process using a contouring system on a lathe or a milling machine may be used to manufacture metal objects. Contouring refers to the continuous removal of material in an application such as turbineblade machining. Parameters such as the part surface, the drive surface, and the check surface may be controlled to vary the milling tool path and thus the contouring. Part surface refers to the surface on which the end of the milling tool is riding; drive surface refers to the surface against which the edge of the milling tool rides; and check surface refers to a surface at which the current milling tool motion is to stop. Details of a contouring system are shown in Bedworth et al., ComputerIntegrated Design and Manufacturing, McGrawHill Inc. (1991).
 Of course, the instant invention is not limited to objects formed using braiding, molding, or contouring and the above discussions are merely examples of manufacturing techniques which may be utilized in the inventive methodology. Other processes and techniques include by way of example, but not by way of limitation, polymer manufacturing processes, crystallization techniques, ceramic manufacturing techniques, and the like.
 At step 21, the field(s) {f} which will be applied to the object in its intended use, as well as the desired potential(s) or response(s) {x} to these field(s), are defined. For example, an object may be applied with a mechanical force field, an electric current field, a magnetic field, a thermal flux field, and/or a fluid velocity field. Other fields {f} may be derived using these primary fields. For example, an acoustic field may be derived by combining the mechanical force field and the fluid velocity field. A magnetohydrodynamics field may be derived by combining the fluid velocity field and the magnetic field. Each of the aboveidentified fields has a corresponding potential. These potentials are displacement, corresponding to the mechanical force field; voltage, corresponding to the electric field; magnetic vector potential, corresponding to the magnetic field; temperature, corresponding to the thermal flux field; and fluid potential, corresponding to the fluid velocity field.
 As noted, the fields defined at step 21 represent one or more fields which will be applied to the object in its intended use. For example, in the case of a prosthetic hip, the field may be the mechanical forces which will be applied to the prosthetic hip after implant in the human body. For example, the arrows in
FIGS. 4A and 4B represent the forces (direction and magnitude) applied to the femoral head during a oneleg stance (during walking, for example) and rising from a chair, respectively. The force distributions and orientations are based on in vivo studies reported at, for example, Hodge et al., “Contact Pressures in the Human Hip Joint Measured In Vivo,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 28792883 (1986). The resultant force of each of these forces was approximately 2000 Newtons (N), with an orientation change from oneleg stance to midrise loading. As another example, in the case of a heat conduction element, the field may be the thermal flux which will be applied to the object in its intended use. Of course, an object may be applied with more than one field and each of these fields may be defined at step 21. For example, an electrical conductor may be applied with an electric field, a magnetic field, and a mechanical force field in its intended use.  The potential(s) {x} defined at step 21 define the manner in which the manufacturer desires the object to respond when the defined field or fields {f} are applied thereto. In the case of the prosthetic hip, the defined potentials are the desired displacements (which correlate mathematically to the stresses) in the prosthetic hip when the prosthetic hip is subjected to the mechanical forces shown in
FIGS. 4A and 4B during walking and rising from a chair. If the manufacturer desires the prosthetic hip to respond to forces in the same manner as an in vivo hip, the “desired displacements” in the prosthetic hip may, for example, correspond to the displacements generated in an in vivo hip during walking and rising from a chair.FIG. 5A illustrates an in vivo hip applied with a force of 2000 N as indicated andFIG. 5B is a table setting forth measures of the displacements generated at the points labeled A, B, C, D, E, and F inFIG. 5A in response to this applied force. Thus, a manufacturer desiring to manufacture a prosthetic hip which responds to the force indicated inFIG. 5A in the same manner as an in vivo hip would define the force {f} to be the force indicated inFIG. 5A and would define the displacements {x} to be the displacements set forth in the table ofFIG. 5B . Similarly, in the case of the heat conduction element which is applied with a thermal flux field, the defined responses correspond to desired temperatures at various portions of the heat conduction element when the defined thermal flux field is applied. In the case of an electrical conductor which is applied with an electric field, a magnetic field, and a mechanical force field, the defined responses correspond to desired displacements at various portions of the conductor when the defined mechanical force field is applied, to desired magnetic vector potentials at various portions of the conductor when the defined magnetic field is applied, and to desired voltages at various portions of the conductor when the defined electric field is applied, respectively.  At step 22, computer aided design is used to geometrically model the object to be manufactured. Geometric modeling is a technique of using computational geometry to define geometric objects. The purposes of geometric modeling are object representation, which mandates a complete definition of the object for manufacturing and other applications such as finite element analysis; design, which allows the user to input and manipulate a geometric specification of the object; and rendering, which uses the geometry to paint a realistic picture of the object on a computer graphics output device. The initial geometric model of the object or part may, for example, be based on the experience of the design engineer or be dictated by the intended use of the object or part. For example, the initial geometric model of a prosthetic hip is based on an in vivo hip. Of course, this initial geometric model may be subsequently modified for adaptation to an individual of a particular height and/or weight. The initial design geometry of a golf club shaft is again known, i.e., a cylinder of predetermined length and diameter. Again, this initial design geometry may be modified to provide a shaft for a golfer of a particular height or to provide a shaft having a diameter which varies, e.g., a narrower diameter near the club head. Suitable CAD software packages for carrying out this geometric modeling include IDEAS (available from SDRC, Inc. of Milford, Ohio), CATIA (available from IBM of Armonk, N.Y.), and ANVIL5000 (available from Manufacturing Consulting Services). These software packages may be run, for example, on UNIXbased work stations such as those available from Sun Microsystems or Silicon Graphics. Of course, the choice of computer will be determined by the computational power required and the invention is not limited in this respect. The use of such computer aided design software packages permits a geometric model of an object or part to be defined by a user and modified quickly and results in generation of geometry data which can be converted to formats useful in a computer aided manufacturing step and/or to formats useful a finite element method step, which steps are discussed in greater detail below. It is noted that the initial geometric model can be image data generated by scanning an object having the desired geometry. For example, the initial geometric model in the case of a prosthetic hip can be generated by Xraying a cadaveric hip using, for example, a Siemens Somatom DR3 or a GE 9800 CT scanner. This image data may be converted to a format usable by the CAD software package or may be directly converted to a format usable by a finite element software package (for example, a PDAPATRAN (available from PDA Engineering) format) to be described below.
 At step 23, a finite element model of the object is generated using the finite element method. The finite element method is based on the theory that an irregularly shaped object can be divided into smaller regular finite elements. Each element can then be treated separately and the aggregate effect is the sum of the effects of all of the finite elements in the object. The finite element model is created by a user using an appropriate software package which operates on the geometric model developed in step 22. Thus, the finite element software package generally accesses a data file which contains the geometry of the object developed in step 21. S_{ome }integrated software packages, such as IDEAS from SDRC, Inc., link modules for geometric modeling and finite element analysis so that the user does not have to redefine the geometry specifically for finite element analysis. Other suitable software packages for generating the finite element model include MSC/NASTRAN (available from MacNealSchwendler Corporation), ABAQUS (available from MacNealSchwendler Corporation), and ANSYS (available from Swanson Manufacturing).
 Thus, the finite element model is generated by dividing the geometric model of the object into a plurality of elements and then defining nodes at the boundaries of the elements. An exemplary finite element model for a prosthetic hip is shown in
FIG. 6 . A variety of element shapes may be used in the finite element model of the object. The number and types of elements selected are generally based on the type of field and the geometry of the object. The various finite element software packages identified above generally include libraries of elements and element clusters to enable modeling of areas having particular geometries with a userspecified degree of accuracy. Thus, an element having a element size of a predetermined value or an element cluster of variable elements having a cluster size of the predetermined value may be utilized. If element clusters are utilized, the cluster may be repeated throughout the finite element model. A cluster may include elements which have different shapes. For example, if the object to be manufactured will be subject to shear forces, elements having shapes which are best suited for modeling shear forces may be utilized and oriented as appropriate. When these elements are grouped together, they may define a cluster which may be repeated, for example, in areas having similar geometries and/or which are applied with similar forces. In addition, different size elements may be used to model object portions of critical tolerance. Socalled superelements may be used where tolerance is not critical. Since the methodology of the invention is typically an iterative process as will be discussed below, if, for example, it is determined in a first iteration that there are one or more portions of the object where the nodal values do not change much, for computational purposes, a second later iteration may generate a finite element model of the object which includes one or more superelements in these areas in order to simplify subsequent calculations.  The finite element model is completed by specifying the values and/or directions of the abovedescribed fields {f} and potentials {x} at the nodes of the discretized object. In addition, any appropriate boundary conditions are imposed.
 At step 24, the finite element software package is programmed to solve for the material property matrix [k] using the relationship {f}=[k] {x}. That is,

[k]{x}={f} 
[k]{x}{x} ^{−1} ={x} ^{−1} {f} 
[k]={x} ^{−1} {f}  Since the field {f} and the potential {x} have been defined at step 21, the material property matrix [k] may be calculated. When {f} is the mechanical force field and {x} is the displacement, [k] is the stiffness matrix. When {f} is the thermal flux field and {x} is the temperature, [k] is the thermal conductivity. When {f} is the magnetic field and {x} is the magnetic vector potential, [k] is the magnetic reluctivity. When {f} is an electric current field and {x} is the voltage, [k] is electrical conductivity. The calculation of the matrix [k] at step 24 when the fields and potentials have been defined as described at steps 21 determines the optimum or nearoptimum material property matrix for permitting a manufacturer to manufacture an object having desired responses for a specific application, i.e., for a specific application of forces.
 At step 25, the finite element software package is used to extract the material property coefficients for each of the elements in the finite element model from the material property matrix [k]. Specifically, the material property matrix [k] which is calculated at step 24 is the global or assembled material property matrix [k]. As previously discussed, the material property coefficients for a particular element of the finite element model may be extracted from such a global or assembled matrix using a boolean locating function or some other locating function. For example, with reference to
FIG. 6 , the material property coefficients for element 601 are extracted, followed by the material property coefficients for element 602, etc. This procedure is repeated for each element in the model in order to generate a data sequence representing the material properties of the prosthetic hip at small volume increments.  At step 26, the extracted material property coefficients are compared with known material property coefficients in a material property data base or data bases.
FIG. 7A illustrates one organization of a material property data base 700. Material property data base 700 characterizes a plurality of materials M11, M12, . . . , M1n by the values of stiffness properties such as Young's modulus (E) and Poisson's ratio (σ). For example, material M11 may be aluminum having a Young's modulus of 7.2×10^{10 }Pa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.32. Material M12 may be aluminum having a Young's modulus of 6.9×10^{10 }Pa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.35. Material M1n may be cast iron having a Young's modulus of 8.8×10^{10 }Pa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.30. Of course, the invention is not limited to these specific materials. Respectively associated with each of these materials M11, M12, . . . , M1n are a manufacturing process and the specific parameters of that process (such as temperature, pressure, etc.) which will produce the material with the corresponding stiffness properties. Similarly, as shown with reference toFIG. 7B , a material property data base 701 may characterize a plurality of materials M21, M22, . . . , M2n by the values of electrical conductivity (σ′). Again, respectively associated with each of these materials M21, . . . , M2n are a manufacturing process and the specific parameters of that process which will produce the material with the corresponding electrical conductivity. Similar material data bases may be used to characterize materials by their thermal conductivity or magnetic reluctivity and to identify the manufacturing method and manufacturing parameters associated with each material.  Thus, the material property data bases are archives of material property coefficients with their corresponding manufacturing process and manufacturingprocess control parameters. Such data bases are created and maintained by industrial manufacturers, government agencies, and research institutes. For example, when a material such as a metal, a plastic, or a composite is created using a particular manufacturing process, its properties may be determined through standard testing methods such as ASTM testing methods. When these properties have been determined, the set of manufacturing parameters such as temperature, pressure, etc. which was used to create the material having these properties is correlated to the material in order that the material may be reproduced in the future.
 The comparison at step 26 between the extracted material property coefficients and the material properties data base is used to determine which material in the data base has material properties which match or most closely match the properties corresponding to the extracted material property coefficients. Thus, referring to
FIG. 6 , the comparison will result in the identification of a first set of manufacturing parameters which will produce the portion of the prosthetic hip corresponding to element 601 with the desired stiffness properties; the identification of a second set of manufacturing parameters which will produce the portion of the prosthetic hip corresponding to element 602; etc. The abovedescribed comparisons may be carried out, for example, using a knowledge base having a fact base for storing the extracted material property coefficient data for each of the elements (e.g., elements 601, 602, etc. ofFIG. 6 ) and the material property data from the material data base, and a rule base containing rules for comparing and matching the extracted material property data for each of the elements and the material property data from the material data base. The level of matching (e.g., a perfect match, a close match) is application specific and is related, inter alia, to how much tolerance is permitted. If the object to be manufactured is a critical component, a very close or perfect match is desirable. If the object to be manufactured is a noncritical component, the matching criteria may be relaxed. Other criteria such as cost and the available manufacturing equipment may also determine the level of matching. Thus, by performing step 26, the sets of manufacturingprocess control parameters for each and every portion of object are determined.  At step 27, the determined sets of manufacturingprocess control parameters are ordered or sequenced to define the manufacturingprocess controls which are necessary to manufacture the object. The manufacturing control parameters may be used to implement numerical control of the manufacturing equipment used to manufacture the object. Numerical control refers to the use of coded numerical information in the automatic control of manufacturing equipment. For machine tools, this might refer to the motion of the cutting tool or the movement of the part being formed against a rotating tool. The process of laying composite material to form lightweight alternatives to machined metal parts may also be implemented using numerical control. The necessary geometry and motion statements for manufacturing the object may then be programmed using a general purpose numerical control language to develop manufacturing control data. One such language is APTAC Numerical Control Processor Program (available from IBM Corporation, Armonk, N.Y.). The APTAC processor is a computer application program that accepts as input useroriented language statements that describe the numerical control operations to be performed. A postprocessor may further process the manufacturing control data to tailor the information to a specific manufacturing process. At step 28, the postprocessed data is supplied to a computerized manufacturing device which uses the supplied data to control the manufacturing of the object. The data supplied to the computerized manufacturing device controls the manufacturing device to synthesize the object, which object has the desired specifically calculated material properties. For example, assume the manufacturing is carried out using a braider for manufacturing a composite material. During the weaving of the composite, by allowing the computer to control the speed of various machine parts, the tightness of the weave is controlled. The tighter the weave, the higher the stiffness (low flexibility). For example, in the case of the prosthetic hip, regions of both high and low stiffness are required. Using the geometric model and the extracted material property coefficients, the manufacturing process and specifically, the tightness of the weave, can be controlled to provide a region of high stiffness (e.g., the region defined by element 601 in
FIG. 6 ) and a region of low stiffness (e.g., the region defined by element 603 inFIG. 6 ). By appropriately controlling the manufacturing process in accordance the inventive methodology, a prosthetic hip may be produced which responds to applied loads in a manner which is substantially identical to manner in which the human hip would respond to the same applied load. Such a prosthesis can be developed with specific response characteristics for a particular individual.  The abovedescribed methodology is typically carried out as an iterative process. For example, the results of an initial iteration may generally indicate that a fiber composite manufactured using a braider provides the best match to the extracted material property coefficients in the intended application. Thus, in a second subsequent iteration, the finite element model may be modified to take into account the smallest incremental volume that can be controllably braided using a computercontrolled braider. Preferably, each of the elements in the finite element model corresponds to no less than the smallest incremental volume that can be controllably manufactured using the manufacturing technique by which the object is to be manufactured. For example, for a braiding process using a braider, the smallest volume that can be controllably braided is approximately one cubic millimeter. In other words, it is possible to controllably vary a braid pattern to produce an object having material or constitutive properties which vary on the order of a cubic millimeter. This smallest incremental volume will of course vary in accordance with the manufacturing process or technique selected and may, in addition, be dependent on available manufacturing equipment. Thus, although the smallest incremental volume that can be braided by a stateoftheart braider is one cubic millimeter, it is not necessarily true that all braiders will be capable of such operation. Accordingly, in such cases, the smallest incremental volume is determined by the capabilities of an available braider. It will be appreciated that as manufacturing techniques improve and smaller incremental volumes can be controllably manufactured, the methodology of the instant invention may be utilized with resized or different shaped elements.
 The mathematics of the inventive method are valid for other types of manufacturing processes other than composites such as the manufacturing of metals, plastics, and ceramics. The inventive method is also valid for manufacturing objects based on their desired responses to heat and electric currents. In short, the inventive method can be used for any computer controlled manufacturing process, where precision volumetrically controlled manufacturing is desired.
 The method of the present invention is particularly useful when increased efficiency of an object is desired. In traditional manufacturing, the emphasis is on precision manufacturing of an object's geometry, without much, if any, control over the internal structural makeup of this geometry. In accordance with inventive methodology, the material matrix is the unknown and an iterative process may be carried out to optimize the material property matrix while keeping the geometry fixed.
 Thus, in accordance with the present invention, the input parameters of any process may be precisely varied to create an object with a precisely defined material property matrix. As manufacturing continues to improve, the abovedescribed methodology is applicable even though the smallest incremental volume that can be controllably manufactured may continue to decrease in size.

FIG. 8 illustrates various functional modules which may be used to implement the methodology of the instant invention. A computeraideddesign (CAD) module 801 is a threedimensional graphics software program for generating an geometrical model definition. Such a geometrical model definition includes coordinate points precisely locating the object design in a threedimensional coordinate system. This may be provided by a graphics software package using, for example, X, Y, and Z coordinate points and appropriate locating vectors where necessary. The threedimensional graphics software package utilizes appropriate data structures for defining particular points in the data base of the graphics program. By utilizing algorithms in the graphics program, other points in the object can be defined and generated. The graphics program preferably utilizes appropriate vector and matrix routines whereby an object can be rotated or otherwise moved in computer memory and can be dimensioned whereby the coordinates for any one point are known with respect to other points. As noted above, suitable CAD software packages include IDEAS (available from SDRC, Inc. of Milford, Ohio), CATIA (available from IBM), and ANVIL5000 (available from Manufacturing Consulting Services).  A finite element module 802 is used to generate the finite element model of the object from data stored in the graphics program data base. Finite element module 802 is a software package for dividing the object designed using computeraideddesign module 801 into a plurality of elements and expressing one or more unknown field variables in terms of assumed approximating functions within each element. Finite element module 802 is programmed to calculate the optimum material properties for each element as discussed above. Suitable software packages for finite element module 802 include MSC/NASTRAN (available from MacNealSchwendler Corporation), ABAQUS (available from MacNealSchwendler Corporation), and ANSYS (available from Swanson Manufacturing).
 A materials data base module 803 is an archive or archives of material property coefficients with their corresponding manufacturing process and manufacturingprocess control parameters. The archives thus correlate the properties of materials to the manufacturing process and manufacturing process parameters used to create the materials.
 A comparison module 804 compares the material properties determined using finite element module 802 to the material data in material data base module 803 in order to determine (1) which material has material properties which match or most closely match the material properties determined using finite element module 802 and (2) the manufacturing process and manufacturing process parameters associated with this matched material. Comparison module 804 may be implemented, for example, by a knowledge base having a fact base for storing material property data from finite element module 802 and material property data from material data base module 803 and a rule base containing rules for comparing and matching the material property data from finite element module 802 and the material property data from material data base module 803.
 A manufacturing module 805 translates and sequences the manufacturing parameters derived from comparison module 804 to provide manufacturing instructions to a manufacturing machine for manufacturing an object in having the geometry defined using computeraideddesign module 801. The manufacturing of the object may be carried out by a machine suitable for the particular material. For example, metals may be manufactured by reproducing surface geometry (surface points in space), composites may be manufactured by controlling weave configuration and fiber choice, and polymers may be manufactured by chemical choice, temperature, and pressure. Computer assistance in manufacturing allows machines to be quickly adjusted to vary the manufacturing process from one object to the next or within various regions of a single object.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of the configuration of an environment 900 which may be used to implement the various functional modules described above. Examples of this environment include (but are not limited to) IBMPC compatible personal computers and UNIXbased workstations such as those available from Sun Microsystems or Silicon Graphics. It should be understood that the environment of the instant invention is not limited to any type or brand of computer, and thus contemplates microcomputers to supercomputers. In addition, whileFIG. 9 illustrates the details of a single environment, the modules ofFIG. 8 may be implemented on more than one environment. For example, a first environment may be used to implement CAD module 801 while a second different environment may be used to implement finite element module 802. Information may be exchanged between environments using floppy disks or using standard communication packages. Alternatively, a single environment may be used to implement both CAD module 801 and finite element module 802. Environment 900 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 901 such as a RISCbased or an IBM PCcompatible CPU which is plugged into bus 903. One or more of the modules ofFIG. 8 are loaded in memory 905 during operation. Input is received via an I/O device 907, after which the input passes through a buffer 909 and then to memory 905 via bus 903. It should be understood that the I/O device can be any standard input device, such as a disk, tape, keyboard, mouse, touch screen, or any compatible or equivalent means for manually or automatically entering information or commands. In order for a user to observe the results as information is entered into the present invention and as progress is made, a preferred embodiment also contemplates the use of a visual display device 911 as an example of an output devices. Other output devices could include printers, magnetic or optical disks, tape, etc. A ROM 913 may store programs for the overall control of environment 900. 
FIG. 10 is a control computer schematic for a generalized control computer using a control computer 950. The control computer is downloaded with the manufacturing instructions generated by manufacturing module 805 ofFIG. 8 . Information such as braider bed speed, fiber tension, temperature, pressure, etc. is obtained from sensors 952 of a manufacturing machine in digital format (on/off, open/closed) or analog format (voltage). Analog inputs are converted to a digital representation by analogtodigital converter 953 of control computer 950. Control computer 950 includes a processor 960 for analyzing the information from sensors 952 and generating signals which are supplied to actuators 954 for adjusting the settings of the manufacturing machine in accordance with the downloaded manufacturing instructions. In addition to analog and digital outputs, pulse outputs may be provided to drive stepping motors, frequently used with machine tools and other equipment. Of course, the specifics of control computer 950 will depend on the manufacturing machine which is utilized. Details of control computers useful in specific manufacturing processes may be found, for example, in the aboveidentified Bedworth text.  The following examples are provided to illustrate applications of the methodology of the instant invention.
 The manufacturing of a composite fiber golf club shaft in accordance with the present invention will be described. In the case of the golf club shaft, the governing equation is

{f}=[k]{x}  A finite element model of the golf club shaft is created. Golf club manufacturers maintain data bases which specify the forces {f} a shaft is subjected to (torsion, compression, tension, etc.) for different club head speeds. These forces are used to define the forces at the nodes of the finite element model.
 A golfer generally desires a golf club shaft to respond in a particular way to these various forces. For example, a golf professional generally wants the shafts for a pitching wedge, nineiron, and eightiron to have a flex point (i.e., a point of relatively low stiffness) near the club head; the shafts for a seveniron, a sixiron, and a fiveiron to have a flex point near midshaft; the shafts for a fouriron, a threeiron, and a twoiron to have a flex point just above midshaft; and the shaft for a driver to have a flex point just below the grip. In each of these four cases, the shaft thus has a unique set of desired deflections {x}. These desired deflections {x} thus define the displacements at the nodes of the finite element model. Accordingly, four different finite element analyses are carried out.
 Since the forces and the displacements of the finite element model have been defined, the global stiffness matrices for each of the four cases may be calculated. Using boolean locating functions, the stiffness coefficients for the individual elements are determined. These determined stiffness coefficients are matched with stiffness coefficients from industrial databases. The manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched coefficients are appropriately translated and sequenced to generate manufacturing instructions. These manufacturing instructions are then supplied to a composite weaving machine and the braider bed speed and the fiber tension are appropriately controlled to produce the golf shafts. For example, if it is determined that a carbon fiber provides the best match to the determined stiffness coefficients, a carbon fiber is placed on an appropriate weaving machine. As the weaving is performed, the speed of the braider bed and the tension on the fibers is varied in accordance with the generated manufacturing instructions so that certain portions of the golf club shaft will have a tight weave and other portions will have a looser weave. Portions of the shaft having the tighter weave will be stiffer than portions with the loose weave.
 The manufacturing of a carbon fiber filled composite hip replacement in accordance with the present invention will be described. In the case of a composite hip replacement, the governing equation is once again

{f}={x}  First, a finite element model of the normal bone geometry (both cortical and cancellous layers) is created. The stiffness properties of each layer are then defined. These stiffness properties are a function of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio. These stiffness properties are used to define the stiffness at the nodes of the finite element model. Next, the loads of walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, etc. are defined. These loads are used to define the forces at the nodes of the finite element model. These stiffness properties and loads are known quantities which have been published in numerous journals, e.g., Hodge et al., Contact Pressures in the Human Hip Joint Measured In Vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83 28792883 (1986); Fung, Biomechanics, Mechanical Properties of Human Tissue, SpringerVerlag, NY (1981).
 Since the forces {f} and the stiffness [k] of the finite element model have been defined, the displacements {x} (which are mathematically related to the stress) may be determined. Using boolean locating functions, the resulting matrix data is analyzed to determine the stress at the elements of the finite element model.
 Since the stress {x} at the elements of the finite element model has been determined, it may now be treated as a known quantity and represents the ideal stress distribution that it is desired to achieve in the composite hip replacement. Thus, the material stiffness matrix [k] may now be treated as an unknown.
 A finite element model is again created, but now includes another layer, namely, the artificial hip embedded in the cancellous bone area. For example, as discussed in St. Ville et al., The Anatomy of Midthigh Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty”, a finite element analysis may be performed using the fine mesh model of
FIG. 6 which includes 5207 nodes and 5040 isoparametric solid elements. Both hexahedronal and pentahedronal elements are used in the mesh ofFIG. 6 to ensure accurate shape adherence. The previously calculated displacement data {x} defines the displacement at each node of the finite element model.  The loads it is desired to subject the composite hip replacement to are defined. Thus, loads such as walking, one leg stance, etc. are used. The choice of loads depends on the nature of the composite hip replacement being designed. These loads are generally known quantities as noted above, for example, with respect to Hodge et al., “Contact Pressures in the Human Hip Joint Measured In Vivo,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 28792883 (1986). These loads define the forces {f} at the nodes of the finite element model.
 Since the displacement {x} and forces {f} at the nodes of the finite element model have been defined, the global stiffness matrix [k] may be calculated. Using boolean locating functions or other types of locating functions, the stiffness coefficients at each of the nodes are determined. Iterative optimization techniques may be used to calculate the ideal stiffness properties at the elements of the finite element model.
 These determined stiffness coefficients are matched with stiffness coefficients from a material property data base. The manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched coefficients are appropriately translated and sequenced to generate manufacturing instructions. These manufacturing instructions are then supplied to a composite weaving machine and the braider speed and the fiber tension are appropriately controlled to produce the composite hip replacement.
 Of course, it should be understood that the present invention contemplates other configurations of modules, and it is not limited to the specific implementation noted above.
 Any application, patent, technical document, textbook, or other publication cited herein should be construed to be incorporated by reference as to any subject matter deemed essential to the present disclosure.
 While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the abovedescribed exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (2)
1. A method for manufacturing an object having a potential {x} which is generated in response to a field {f} applied thereto, the method comprising the steps of:
designing a geometric model of said object;
generating a computerized mathematical model of said object by discretizing said geometric model of said object into a plurality of finite elements and defining nodes at boundaries of said elements, wherein values of the field {f} and potential {x} are specified at said nodes;
calculating a material property matrix [k] based on the relationship {f}=[k] {x};
extracting material property coefficients from said material property matrix [k] for each finite element in said computerized mathematical model;
comparing the extracted material property coefficients to material property coefficients for known materials to match the extracted material property coefficients to the material property coefficients for known materials;
determining manufacturing parameters corresponding to the matched material property coefficients; and
manufacturing the object in accordance with the determined manufacturing parameters.
212. (canceled)
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US08/388,580 US5594651A (en)  19950214  19950214  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US08/778,270 US5796617A (en)  19950214  19970102  Method and apparatus for manufacturing a prosthesis having optimized response characteristics 
US08/994,022 US6263252B1 (en)  19950214  19971218  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US09/865,603 US6560500B2 (en)  19950214  20010529  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US10/401,540 US7542817B2 (en)  19950214  20030331  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US11/581,363 US7991496B2 (en)  19950214  20061017  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US13/194,436 US20120165967A1 (en)  19950214  20110729  Methods and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US13/194,436 US20120165967A1 (en)  19950214  20110729  Methods and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date  

US11/581,363 Continuation US7991496B2 (en)  19950214  20061017  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
Publications (1)
Publication Number  Publication Date 

US20120165967A1 true US20120165967A1 (en)  20120628 
Family
ID=23534690
Family Applications (7)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US08/388,580 Expired  Lifetime US5594651A (en)  19950214  19950214  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US08/778,270 Expired  Lifetime US5796617A (en)  19950214  19970102  Method and apparatus for manufacturing a prosthesis having optimized response characteristics 
US08/994,022 Expired  Lifetime US6263252B1 (en)  19950214  19971218  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US09/865,603 Expired  Fee Related US6560500B2 (en)  19950214  20010529  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US10/401,540 Expired  Fee Related US7542817B2 (en)  19950214  20030331  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US11/581,363 Expired  Fee Related US7991496B2 (en)  19950214  20061017  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US13/194,436 Abandoned US20120165967A1 (en)  19950214  20110729  Methods and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
Family Applications Before (6)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US08/388,580 Expired  Lifetime US5594651A (en)  19950214  19950214  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US08/778,270 Expired  Lifetime US5796617A (en)  19950214  19970102  Method and apparatus for manufacturing a prosthesis having optimized response characteristics 
US08/994,022 Expired  Lifetime US6263252B1 (en)  19950214  19971218  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US09/865,603 Expired  Fee Related US6560500B2 (en)  19950214  20010529  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US10/401,540 Expired  Fee Related US7542817B2 (en)  19950214  20030331  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
US11/581,363 Expired  Fee Related US7991496B2 (en)  19950214  20061017  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
Country Status (16)
Country  Link 

US (7)  US5594651A (en) 
EP (1)  EP0811199B1 (en) 
JP (2)  JP3307948B2 (en) 
CN (2)  CN1154950C (en) 
AT (1)  AT381064T (en) 
AU (1)  AU713959B2 (en) 
CA (2)  CA2213496C (en) 
DE (2)  DE69637362T2 (en) 
DK (1)  DK0811199T3 (en) 
ES (1)  ES2300104T3 (en) 
HK (1)  HK1069227A1 (en) 
MX (1)  MX9706230A (en) 
NZ (2)  NZ335925A (en) 
PT (1)  PT811199E (en) 
RU (1)  RU2343527C2 (en) 
WO (1)  WO1996025716A1 (en) 
Families Citing this family (92)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US5594651A (en) *  19950214  19970114  St. Ville; James A.  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
GB2309800B (en) *  19960203  19990728  Kodak Ltd  A method of controlling the effect of raw materials on manufacturability 
US5923335A (en) *  19960207  19990713  Multigen, Inc.  Computer generated objects having magnets and targets 
DE19612016A1 (en) *  19960315  19970918  Daimler Benz Ag  A method for computeraided modeling geometry 
DE69734675T2 (en) *  19960829  20060614  Corning Inc  A method for determination of laserinduced compaction in fused quartz 
US5754447A (en) *  19961030  19980519  Sandia National Laboratories  Process for predicting structural performance of mechanical systems 
US6101450A (en) *  19970603  20000808  The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York  Stress analysis using a defectfree fournode finite element technique 
CH694217A5 (en) *  19970908  20040930  Metoxit Ag  Prosthesis made of ceramic materials. 
JP3548674B2 (en) *  19970929  20040728  トヨタ自動車株式会社  Parts binding data generating method and apparatus and component coupling data storing storage medium 
US6434441B1 (en)  19980430  20020813  General Electric Company  Designing and making an article of manufacture 
GB9901887D0 (en) *  19990129  19990317  Lightwork Design Ltd  Machining simulation method and apparatus 
DE69927479T2 (en) *  19990505  20060622  General Electric Co.  Design and production of articles 
EP2381378A2 (en) *  19990823  20111026  James A. St. Ville  Manufacturing system and method 
KR100781748B1 (en) *  19990823  20071204  빌레 제임스 에이 세인트  Manufacturing System and Method 
DE69901959T2 (en) *  19990903  20030227  Autodesk Inc  Userdefinable parameters for the finite element analysis calculation in a CAD program, 
US7082338B1 (en)  19991020  20060725  Caterpillar Inc.  Method for providing a process model for a material in a manufacturing process 
US6789051B1 (en) *  19991027  20040907  Caterpillar Inc  Method and apparatus for providing a simulation of a welding process using integrated models 
US6640149B1 (en) *  20000321  20031028  Alcan International Limited  System and method of developing a can bottom profile and a can with a domed bottom structure 
US6772026B2 (en)  20000405  20040803  Therics, Inc.  System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices 
AU4993501A (en) *  20000405  20011023  Therics Inc  System and method for rapidly customizing a design and remotely manufacturing biomedical devices using a computer system 
GB0112559D0 (en) *  20000914  20010711  Bae Systems Plc  A method and control system for generating machine tool control data 
US7840393B1 (en)  20001004  20101123  Trivascular, Inc.  Virtual prototyping and testing for medical device development 
US7353153B2 (en) *  20011017  20080401  MariaGrazia Ascenzi  Method and system for modeling bone structure 
MXPA01012613A (en) *  20001207  20030820  Visteon Global Tech Inc  Method for calibrating a mathematical model. 
AU2002306453A1 (en) *  20010206  20021003  California Institute Of Technology  Method and apparatus for a head injury simulation system 
FR2820534B1 (en) *  20010208  20030627  Inst Nat Rech Inf Automat  The device materials of deformations simulation, including soft body tissues 
US6839606B2 (en) *  20010314  20050104  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling for fixtures and tooling 
US7110849B2 (en) *  20010314  20060919  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontallystructured CAD/CAM modeling for virtual fixture and tooling processes 
US7308386B2 (en) *  20010314  20071211  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Enhancement to horizontallystructured CAD/CAM modeling 
US20020133265A1 (en) *  20010314  20020919  Landers Diane M.  Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling for concurrent product and process design 
US20020133266A1 (en) *  20010314  20020919  Landers Diane M.  Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling for alternate operations, large parts and charted parts 
US7099804B2 (en) *  20010314  20060829  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Automated horizontally structured manufacturing process design modeling 
EP1406187A4 (en) *  20010711  20070502  Riken  Method for storing entity data in which shape and physical quantity are integrated and storing program 
WO2003016031A1 (en) *  20010816  20030227  Riken  Rapid prototyping method and device using vcad data 
US6847923B2 (en) *  20010829  20050125  Textron Inc.  Design software: selfpiercing rivet analysis (F.E.A.) 
ITRM20010628A1 (en) *  20011023  20030423  Univ Roma  hip replacement and its design method. 
CN1311390C (en) *  20011204  20070418  独立行政法人理化学研究所  Method for converting 3dimensional shape data into cell inner data and conversion program 
DE10161496A1 (en) *  20011214  20030626  Stockhausen Chem Fab Gmbh  Compacted superabsorber for use, e.g. in hygiene articles, obtained by compaction under pressure of a composition containing synthetic superabsorber particles with a high fines content 
US7280948B2 (en)  20020131  20071009  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  System and method for integrating geometric models 
US6856842B2 (en)  20020205  20050215  General Electric Company  Method and system for creating a tooling master model for manufacturing parts 
US7219043B2 (en) *  20020205  20070515  General Electric Company  Method and system for reverse and reengineering parts 
CN100423009C (en) *  20020228  20081001  独立行政法人理化学研究所  Method and program for converting boundary data into incell shape 
US20050131415A1 (en) *  20020424  20050616  Hearn Trevor C.  Adaptive apparatus for driving a threaded device into material such as a biological tissue 
US7024272B2 (en) *  20020426  20060404  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Virtual design, inspect and grind optimization process 
US7421363B2 (en) *  20020426  20080902  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Method for virtual inspection of virtually machined parts 
US20030204286A1 (en) *  20020426  20031030  Thomas Steven M.  Method for modeling complex, three dimensional tool paths through a workpiece 
US7222057B2 (en) *  20020531  20070522  Ugs Corp.  Topology modeler 
US7027048B2 (en) *  20020531  20060411  Ugs Corp.  Computerized deformation analyzer 
US20040064295A1 (en) *  20020926  20040401  Jiping Zhang  Methods for modularparametricfiniteelement modeling 
US6931294B2 (en) *  20021008  20050816  The Boeing Company  Method for generating threedimensional CAD models of complex products or systems 
FR2847693B1 (en) *  20021122  20050225  Bosch Gmbh Robert  Process for designing a form assisted by computer and method of building a well designed piece 
US6907313B2 (en)  20030117  20050614  Dp Technology Corp.  Method and system for computer aided manufacturing 
US7079908B2 (en) *  20030131  20060718  Delphi Technologies,Inc.  Horizontallystructured modeling for analysis 
US6950719B2 (en) *  20030131  20050927  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling: across file feature operability 
US20040153296A1 (en) *  20030131  20040805  Landers Diane M.  Horizontally structured CAD/CAM coordinate system 
US6985793B2 (en) *  20030131  20060110  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontally structured CAD/CAM coordinate system for manufacturing design 
US7245984B2 (en) *  20030131  20070717  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling: exterior linked representational embodiment 
DE10326282B4 (en) *  20030611  20060119  Siemens Ag  Access control system with suppression of interference modulation 
DE10326228A1 (en) *  20030611  20041230  Daimlerchrysler Ag  A method of detecting faces connectable 
JP4381743B2 (en) *  20030716  20091209  独立行政法人理化学研究所  Method and a program for generating volume data from boundary representation data 
JP3901717B2 (en) *  20031009  20070404  株式会社ビー・アイ・テック  Cementless type artificial joint stem using the composite material 
US7472044B2 (en) *  20040322  20081230  Delphi Technologies, Inc.  Horizontally structured CAD/CAM modelingvertical to horizontal conversion 
US20080234833A1 (en) *  20040323  20080925  B.I. Tec Ltd  Method of Designing and Manufacturing Artificial Joint Stem with Use of Composite Material 
FR2871286B1 (en) *  20040603  20060804  Eurocopter France  Method for organization of the adjustment parameters of the braiding of a shielding sheath on a bundle of electric conductors and beam thus obtained 
US7340371B2 (en) *  20040811  20080304  Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.  System, method, and computer program product for performing transformation of rotations to translations during finite element stiffness formulation 
DE102004039882A1 (en) *  20040817  20060223  Adam Opel Ag  A process for the manufacture of automobile mounted parts 
FR2883073B1 (en) *  20050309  20090710  Commissariat Energie Atomique  Method and device for acquiring a geometric shape. 
JP4783100B2 (en) *  20050912  20110928  独立行政法人理化学研究所  Conversion method and the conversion program to a cell in the shape data of boundary data 
EP1931507A4 (en) *  20051004  20091118  Aztec Ip Company L L C  Parametrized material and performance properties based on virtual testing 
KR100750379B1 (en)  20060131  20070817  한국화학연구원  Method for optimizing material property 
US7403833B2 (en) *  20060403  20080722  Stratasys, Inc.  Method for optimizing spatial orientations of computeraided design models 
CA2664425A1 (en) *  20060920  20080327  Smith & Nephew, Inc.  Variable stiffness stem for prosthetic implants 
US20080088578A1 (en) *  20061016  20080417  Immersion Corporation  Flexible object simulator 
DE102007007684A1 (en) *  20070216  20080828  Audi Ag  Method for manufacturing mechanically processed cast workpiece with exact geometrical structure, involves setting of target parameters to determine accurate geometrical structure of workpiece 
JP5442456B2 (en)  20070227  20140312  エクソンモービル アップストリーム リサーチ カンパニー  Corrosionresistant alloy weld carbon steel structure and the pipeline to accommodate higher plastic strains in the axial direction 
JP4645606B2 (en) *  20070308  20110309  日産自動車株式会社  Lithium ion secondary battery 
US8301286B2 (en) *  20070420  20121030  Edison Welding Institute, Inc.  Remote highperformance computing material joining and material forming modeling system and method 
EP2664443A1 (en) *  20070725  20131120  Stratasys Ltd.  Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials 
US20090084486A1 (en) *  20070927  20090402  The Boeing Company  Optimized ordering of doubler plies in composite structures 
US20100256791A1 (en) *  20090406  20101007  Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.  Method and apparatus for the threedimensional shape magnetic forming of a motor core 
WO2010132794A2 (en) *  20090515  20101118  University Of Delaware  Method and apparatus for measuring microrelief of an object 
US8498728B2 (en)  20091019  20130730  Edison Welding Institute, Inc.  Remote highperformance modeling system for material joining and material forming 
US8706282B2 (en) *  20100112  20140422  Ford Global Technologies, Llc  Weldability prediction and recommendation systems and methods 
US8645086B1 (en) *  20100918  20140204  The Boeing Company  Stress function calibration method 
US20120209561A1 (en) *  20110210  20120816  University Of Delaware  Methods and systems for identifying a point of interest on the periphery of an object 
DE102011056677A1 (en) *  20111220  20130620  Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt e.V.  Optimization method for determining optimized component shape of fiber composite component, involves calculating load behavior of component shape depending on predetermined boundary conditions in predefined installation space 
RU2525767C2 (en) *  20121109  20140820  Григорий Иванович Карпенко  Method of manufacturing racket for table tennis basing on 3d image, with tactile control system 
WO2014176456A1 (en) *  20130425  20141030  Brigham Young University  Method and apparatus for concurrent multiuser toolpath creation 
US20140330525A1 (en) *  20130503  20141106  The Boeing Company  System and Method for Predicting Distortion of a Workpiece Resulting from a Peening Machine Process 
JP2014218004A (en) *  20130508  20141120  須知 晃一  Production method of carbon fiber, metal fiber, machine, resin cured, and compound integral construction and construction materials 
CN105069201B (en) *  20150722  20180320  太原重工轨道交通设备有限公司  A selfdefined method of solving and visual display function of stress 
GB201520361D0 (en) *  20151118  20151230  Romax Technology Ltd  Driveline modeller 
Family Cites Families (55)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US4231507A (en) *  19790109  19801104  The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy  Hightemperature, highpressure bonding of nested tubular metallic components 
JPS6212322B2 (en)  19810702  19870318  Mitsubishi Mining & Cement Co  
JPS60111747A (en)  19831121  19850618  Harima Refract Co Ltd  Nozzle for casting molten steel and its production 
US4889526A (en)  19840827  19891226  Magtech Laboratories, Inc.  Noninvasive method and apparatus for modulating brain signals through an external magnetic or electric field to reduce pain 
US5098621A (en)  19850107  19920324  Twin Rivers Engineering  Method of forming a foam substrate and micropackaged active ingredient particle composite 
US5006291A (en) *  19850424  19910409  Plas/Steel Products, Inc.  Method for making fiber reinforced plastic tubing 
FR2582956B1 (en)  19850610  19870731  Lorraine Carbone  membrane support for mineral separation techniques and processes for manufacturing such support 
JPH07120276B2 (en)  19860310  19951220  日立超エル・エス・アイ・エンジニアリング株式会社  Simulation program generating method 
US4936862A (en) *  19860530  19900626  Walker Peter S  Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis 
US4858146A (en) *  19860813  19890815  The Babcock & Wilcox Company  Automated design of structures using a finite element database 
JP2648711B2 (en) *  19861107  19970903  株式会社 ペトカ  Preparation of the pitchbased carbon fiber threedimensional textile 
GB8701111D0 (en) *  19870119  19870218  Albany Int Corp  Braiders 
US5023800A (en) *  19880414  19910611  Northrop Corporation  Assembly data model system 
US5257374A (en)  19871118  19931026  International Business Machines Corporation  Bus flow control mechanism 
GB8814633D0 (en)  19871118  19880727  Ibm  Bus flow control mechanism 
JPH01309352A (en)  19880608  19891213  Hitachi Ltd  Optimum design support apparatus of lsi aluminum wiring part film structure 
FR2652180B1 (en)  19890920  19911227  Mallet Jean Laurent  A method of modeling a surface and device for its implementation óoeuvre. 
US5101366A (en) *  19891218  19920331  General Electric Company  Method for controlling the manufacture of zirconium tubes 
JP2995482B2 (en)  19891227  19991227  株式会社日立製作所  Production control apparatus 
DE69327661D1 (en)  19921109  20000224  Ormco Corp  Method and apparatus for the manufacture of individual devices angepasstenorthodontischen 
DK0532582T3 (en) *  19900601  19960129  Du Pont  Composite orthopedic implant with variable modulus of elasticity 
US5487012A (en) *  19901221  19960123  Topholm & Westermann Aps  Method of preparing an otoplasty or adaptive earpiece individually matched to the shape of an auditory canal 
JPH04223849A (en)  19901221  19920813  Yamatake Honeywell Co Ltd  Multikind and small quantity production system 
DE69220263T2 (en) *  19910315  19971127  Spatial Technology Inc  Method and apparatus for mechanical machining of the workpiece by means of a solid model algorithm 
JP3142595B2 (en)  19910330  20010307  マツダ株式会社  Control system design support and failure diagnosis method of production facilities 
RU2024058C1 (en)  19910408  19941130  Таганрогский радиотехнический институт им.В.Д.Калмыкова  Device for estimating linear arrangement of elements 
RU2006933C1 (en)  19910520  19940130  Бурба Александр Алексеевич  Device for solving tasks of nonlinear stochastic programming 
JP2828526B2 (en)  19910620  19981125  三菱電機株式会社  Control information automatic generation system of the production line 
US5366816A (en)  19910620  19941122  Titan Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha  Potassium hexatitanate whiskers having a tunnel structure 
US5377116A (en) *  19910701  19941227  Valenite Inc.  Method and system for designing a cutting tool 
JP2775538B2 (en)  19911114  19980716  住友重機械工業株式会社  Forming simulation method and apparatus 
JPH05242071A (en) *  19911120  19930921  Mitsubishi Electric Corp  Control or decision/estimation of object system and its device 
US5634214A (en)  19920401  19970603  St. Ville; James A.  Golf glove and golf gripping method 
US5692764A (en) *  19930813  19971202  Klein Bicycle Corporation  Bicycle front forks and methods of making same 
US5552995A (en)  19931124  19960903  The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology  Concurrent engineering design tool and method 
US5581489A (en) *  19940105  19961203  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Model generator for constructing and method of generating a model of an object for finite element analysis 
US5942496A (en)  19940218  19990824  The Regent Of The University Of Michigan  Methods and compositions for multiple gene transfer into bone cells 
AU2286995A (en)  19940408  19951030  Alza Corporation  Electrotransport system with ion exchange competitive ion capture 
US5532040A (en)  19940415  19960702  Wu; KuangMing  Multimaterial fully isotropic laminates and multimaterial quasihomogeneous anisotropic laminates 
US5443636B1 (en) *  19940729  19990713  Fritz Ind Inc  Composition for and method of pumping concrete 
US5594651A (en) *  19950214  19970114  St. Ville; James A.  Method and apparatus for manufacturing objects having optimized response characteristics 
IT1282207B1 (en)  19951120  19980316  Fidia Advanced Biopolymers Srl  culture systems of human bone marrow stem cells into threedimensional matrix consisting of hyaluronic acid esters 
FR2760398B1 (en)  19970306  19990416  Snecma  Method for producing hollow parts of composite material in precision 
US6197624B1 (en)  19970829  20010306  Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.  Method of adjusting the threshold voltage in an SOI CMOS 
US6296667B1 (en)  19971001  20011002  PhillipsOrigen Ceramic Technology, Llc  Bone substitutes 
US5990266A (en)  19971204  19991123  University Of Nebraska  Degradable polyesters, a mixed culture of microorganisms for degrading these polyesters, and methods for making these substances 
US6087571A (en)  19980219  20000711  Legere Reeds Ltd.  Oriented polymer reeds for musical instruments 
WO2000006243A2 (en)  19980728  20000210  Innerdyne, Inc.  Absorbable brachytherapy and chemotherapy delivery devices and methods 
US6372558B1 (en)  19980818  20020416  Sony Corporation  Electrooptic device, driving substrate for electrooptic device, and method of manufacturing the device and substrate 
US6126659A (en)  19980930  20001003  Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.  Impaction instruments 
US6187024B1 (en)  19981110  20010213  Target Therapeutics, Inc.  Bioactive coating for vasoocclusive devices 
US6444370B2 (en)  19981120  20020903  Valence Technology, Inc.  Electrolytes having improved low temperature performance 
US6348042B1 (en)  19990202  20020219  W. Lee Warren, Jr.  Bioactive shunt 
US6456289B1 (en)  19990423  20020924  Georgia Tech Research Corporation  Animation system and method for a animating object fracture 
EP2381378A2 (en) *  19990823  20111026  James A. St. Ville  Manufacturing system and method 

1995
 19950214 US US08/388,580 patent/US5594651A/en not_active Expired  Lifetime

1996
 19960214 DE DE69637362T patent/DE69637362T2/en not_active Expired  Lifetime
 19960214 WO PCT/US1996/002007 patent/WO1996025716A1/en active IP Right Grant
 19960214 NZ NZ335925A patent/NZ335925A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
 19960214 CA CA002213496A patent/CA2213496C/en not_active Expired  Fee Related
 19960214 EP EP96906442A patent/EP0811199B1/en not_active Expired  Lifetime
 19960214 AU AU49819/96A patent/AU713959B2/en not_active Ceased
 19960214 DE DE69637362A patent/DE69637362D1/en not_active Expired  Lifetime
 19960214 CN CNB961930470A patent/CN1154950C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
 19960214 PT PT96906442T patent/PT811199E/en unknown
 19960214 AT AT96906442T patent/AT381064T/en unknown
 19960214 CA CA002614861A patent/CA2614861A1/en not_active Abandoned
 19960214 ES ES96906442T patent/ES2300104T3/en not_active Expired  Lifetime
 19960214 CN CN 200310119687 patent/CN100334590C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
 19960214 NZ NZ303490A patent/NZ303490A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
 19960214 JP JP52511896A patent/JP3307948B2/en not_active Expired  Fee Related
 19960214 DK DK96906442T patent/DK0811199T3/en active

1997
 19970102 US US08/778,270 patent/US5796617A/en not_active Expired  Lifetime
 19970814 MX MX9706230A patent/MX9706230A/en unknown
 19971218 US US08/994,022 patent/US6263252B1/en not_active Expired  Lifetime

2001
 20010529 US US09/865,603 patent/US6560500B2/en not_active Expired  Fee Related

2002
 20020313 JP JP2002115490A patent/JP4090263B2/en active Active

2003
 20030304 RU RU2003106139/09A patent/RU2343527C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
 20030331 US US10/401,540 patent/US7542817B2/en not_active Expired  Fee Related

2005
 20050224 HK HK05101584A patent/HK1069227A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation

2006
 20061017 US US11/581,363 patent/US7991496B2/en not_active Expired  Fee Related

2011
 20110729 US US13/194,436 patent/US20120165967A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication  Publication Date  Title 

AbdelMalek et al.  Swept volumes: fundation, perspectives, and applications  
Carter et al.  Automated 3‐D crack growth simulation  
Gorbet et al.  Preisach model identification of a twowire SMA actuator  
Frecker et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multicriteria optimization  
Choi et al.  Modelling and optimisation of rapid prototyping  
Olhoff et al.  On CADintegrated structural topology and design optimization  
Li et al.  A comparison of different methods in predicting static pressure distribution in articulating joints  
Yao et al.  3‐D shape optimal design and automatic finite element regridding  
Amaitik et al.  An intelligent process planning system for prismatic parts using STEP features  
Yip et al.  Automated modeling of three‐dimensional structural components using irregular lattices  
Smith et al.  CyberCut: A World Wide Web based designtofabrication tool  
Jung et al.  Upper body reach posture prediction for ergonomic evaluation models  
Fernandes et al.  A model of bone adaptation using a global optimisation criterion based on the trajectorial theory of Wolff  
Olovsson et al.  An ALE formulation for the solution of twodimensional metal cutting problems  
Advani et al.  A numerical simulation of short fiber orientation in compression molding  
Oomens et al.  Finite element modelling of contracting skeletal muscle  
Yang et al.  Fractal scanning path generation and control system for selective laser sintering (SLS)  
Thingvold et al.  Physical modeling with Bspline surfaces for interactive design and animation  
Shin et al.  Constructive representation of heterogeneous objects  
Rosen  Computeraided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures  
Dutta et al.  Layered manufacturing: current status and future trends  
Tang et al.  Integration of topology and shape optimization for design of structural components  
Samanta et al.  Featurebased design and material blending for freeform heterogeneous object modeling  
Querin  Evolutionary structural optimisation: stress based formulation and implementation  
Azariadis et al.  Design of plane developments of doubly curved surfaces 